Cotton Research and Promotion Program: Determination of Whether To Conduct a Referendum Regarding the 1990 Amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Act, 76654-76655 [2015-31133]
Download as PDF
76654
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 237
Thursday, December 10, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. AMS–CN–15–0061]
Cotton Research and Promotion
Program: Determination of Whether To
Conduct a Referendum Regarding the
1990 Amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
(USDA) determination not to conduct a
continuance referendum regarding the
1991 amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Order (Order)
provided for in the Cotton Research and
Promotion Act (Act) amendments of
1990. This determination is based on
the results of a sign-up period
conducted August 3 through August 14,
2015, during which eligible cotton
producers and importers were provided
an opportunity to request a continuance
referendum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shethir M. Riva, Chief, Research and
Promotion Staff, Cotton and Tobacco
Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, 100 Riverside Parkway,
Suite 101, Fredericksburg, Virginia
22406, telephone (540) 361–2726,
facsimile (540) 361–1199, or email at
Shethir.Riva@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the
period of August 3 through August 14,
2015, pursuant to Section 8(c)(1) of the
Act, USDA provided an opportunity for
eligible cotton producers and importers
to request a continuance referendum
regarding the 1991 amendments to the
Order provided for in the Act. Sign-up
period results showed that USDA
received 46 valid requests from eligible
producers and importers. The following
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Dec 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
table depicts the number of requests for
a continuance referendum.
Farm service agency
state office
Total sign-up
requests
Alabama ..........................
Arizona ............................
Arkansas .........................
California .........................
Florida .............................
Georgia ...........................
Illinois ..............................
Kansas ............................
Kentucky .........................
Louisiana ........................
Mississippi ......................
Missouri ..........................
Nevada ...........................
New Mexico ....................
North Carolina ................
Oklahoma .......................
South Carolina ................
Tennessee ......................
Texas ..............................
Virginia ............................
0
0
16
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
8
7
0
0
9
0
Total .........................
46
Section 8(c)(2) of the Act, provides
that following a sign-up period, USDA
shall conduct a referendum upon the
request of 10 percent or more of the
number of cotton producers and
importers voting in the most recent
referendum (1991). This would require
10 percent or 4,622 (46,220 × .10 =
4,622) of the 46,220 valid ballots cast by
cotton producers and importers in the
July 1991 referendum. It is further
provided that, in counting such request
not more than 20 percent or 924 may be
from producers from any one state or
importers of cotton.
USDA finds that the results of the
sign-up period did not meet the criteria
requiring a continuance referendum by
the Act. USDA bases this determination
on the fact that the 46 requests received
during the sign-up period is less than
the 4,622 required.
The 1991 amendments to the Order (7
CFR 1205 et seq.) were implemented
following the July 1991 referendum. The
1990 amendments were provided for in
the Act (7 U.S.C. 2101–2118). These
amendments provided for: (1) Importer
representation on the Cotton Board by
an appropriate number of persons, to be
determined by USDA, who import
cotton or cotton products into the U.S.
and whom USDA selects from
nominations submitted by importer
organization certified by USDA; (2)
assessments levied on imported cotton
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and cotton products at a rate determined
in the same manner as for U.S. cotton;
(3) increasing the amount USDA can be
reimbursed for the conduct of a
referendum from $200,000 to $300,000;
(4) reimbursing government agencies
that assist in administering the
collection of assessments on imported
cotton and cotton products; and (5)
terminating the right of producers to
demand a refund of assessments.
On July 9, 1991, (56 FR 31289) AMS
issued a proposal to amend the Order to
determine if a majority, 50 percent or
more, of producers and importers
favored implementation of the proposed
amendments to the Order. USDA
conducted a referendum (July 1991)
among persons who had been cotton
producers or cotton importers during a
representative period. Results of the July
1991 referendum showed that of the
46,220 valid ballots received; 27,879 or
60 percent of the persons voting favored
the amendments to the Order and
18,341 or 40 percent opposed the
amendments.
Following the July 1991 referendum,
AMS implemented the amendments. In
addition to the previously discussed
amendments to the Act and Order,
USDA is required by Section 8(c)(1) to:
(1) Conduct a review once every 5 years
after the anniversary date of the
referendum implementing the 1990 Act
amendments to determine whether a
referendum is necessary and (2) make
public the results of such a review
within 60 days after each fifth
anniversary date of the 1991
implementing referendum. Should the
review indicate that a referendum is
needed USDA is directed to conduct the
referendum within 12 months after a
public announcement of review results.
Should the review indicate that a
referendum is not warranted, Section
8(c)(2) includes provisions for
producers and importers to request a
continuance referendum through a signup period.
In 2011–2012, the Department
prepared a 5-year report that described
the impact of the Cotton Research and
Promotion Program on the cotton
industry. The review report is available
upon written request to the Chief of the
Cotton Research and Promotion Staff at
the address provided above. Comments
were solicited from all interested
parties, including persons who pay the
assessments as well as from
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 / Notices
organizations representing cotton
producers and importers (76 FR 31573).
Five comments, including comments
from four certified producer
organizations that nominate producers
to the Cotton Board, claimed strong
support for the continuance of the
program, noting that the administration
of the Act has been proper, carries out
the intent and purpose in a timely and
superior manner, and requires no
changes or adjustment.
USDA reviewed the Cotton Research
and Promotion Program major program
activities and accomplishments,
including third-party evaluations of
advertising and marketing activities and
other functional areas; the results of
producer and importer awareness and
satisfaction surveys; and data from the
Foreign Agricultural Service. USDA also
reviewed the results of the Cotton
Board’s 2011 independent program
evaluation, which assessed the
effectiveness of the Cotton Research and
Promotion Program; the strength of
cotton’s competitive position; the ability
to maintain and expand domestic and
foreign markets; increases in the number
of uses for cotton; and estimates of a
return on investment for stakeholders
and qualitative benefits and returns
associated with the Cotton Research and
Promotion Program. The review report
concluded that the 1990 amendments to
the Act were successfully implemented
and are operating as intended. The
report also noted that there is a general
consensus within the cotton industry
that the Cotton Research and Promotion
Program and the 1990 amendments to
the Act are operating as intended.
Written comments, economic data, and
results from independent evaluations
support this conclusion.
USDA found no compelling reason to
conduct a referendum regarding the
1990 Act amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Order although
some program participants support a
referendum. In 2013, USDA announced
its view not to conduct a referendum
regarding the 1991 amendments to the
Order (78 FR 32228). Therefore, USDA
allowed all eligible persons to request
the conduct of a continuance
referendum on the 1990 amendments
through a sign-up period. The results of
this sign-up period did not meet the
criteria as established by the Act for a
continuance referendum and, therefore,
referenda were not conducted.
With this announcement of the results
of the sign-up period, USDA has
completed all requirements set forth in
Section 8(c) (1) and (2) of the Act
regarding the review of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program to
determine if a continuance referendum
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:33 Dec 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
is warranted. A referendum will not be
conducted, and no further actions are
planned in connection with this review.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118.
Dated: December 7, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–31133 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Shoshone Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Shoshone Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet
via conference call. The committee is
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with Title II of
the Act. Additional RAC information,
including the meeting agenda and the
meeting summary/minutes can be found
at the following Web site: https://
cloudapps-usda-gov.force.com/FSSRS/
RAC_Page?id=001t0000002JcvXAAS.
DATES: The meeting will be held
Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 10:00
a.m.
All RAC meetings are subject to
cancellation. For status of meeting prior
to attendance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
via conference call. Members of the
public wishing to call in should contact
Shoshone RAC Coordinator, Olga
Troxel, for call-in information.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at Shoshone
National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 808
Meadow Lane, Cody, Wyoming. Please
call ahead (307–527–6241) to facilitate
entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olga
Troxel by phone at 307–578–5164 or via
email at otroxel@fs.fed.us.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76655
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is:
1. To update the Shoshone Resource
Advisory Committee on the status
of existing Title II projects, and
2. Strategize on advertising for project
proposals for the current year
The meeting is open to the public.
The agenda will include time for people
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should request in writing
by December 30, 2015 to be scheduled
on the agenda. Anyone who would like
to bring related matters to the attention
of the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time for oral
comments must be sent to Olga Troxel,
RAC Coordinator, 808 Meadow Lane,
Cody, WY; or by email to otroxel@
fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to 307–578–
5112.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices
or other reasonable accommodation for
access to the facility or proceedings by
contacting the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
Dated: December 3, 2015.
Joe G. Alexander,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2015–30975 Filed 12–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Notice of Public Meeting of the Indiana
Advisory Committee to the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights To Hear
Testimony Regarding Civil Rights
Concerns Relating to School
Disciplinary Policies and Their
Potential Impact on Disparities in
Juvenile Incarceration in Indiana
U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights.
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 237 (Thursday, December 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76654-76655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31133]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 237 / Thursday, December 10, 2015 /
Notices
[[Page 76654]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Docket No. AMS-CN-15-0061]
Cotton Research and Promotion Program: Determination of Whether
To Conduct a Referendum Regarding the 1990 Amendments to the Cotton
Research and Promotion Act
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
(USDA) determination not to conduct a continuance referendum regarding
the 1991 amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Order (Order)
provided for in the Cotton Research and Promotion Act (Act) amendments
of 1990. This determination is based on the results of a sign-up period
conducted August 3 through August 14, 2015, during which eligible
cotton producers and importers were provided an opportunity to request
a continuance referendum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shethir M. Riva, Chief, Research and
Promotion Staff, Cotton and Tobacco Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, USDA, 100 Riverside Parkway, Suite 101, Fredericksburg,
Virginia 22406, telephone (540) 361-2726, facsimile (540) 361-1199, or
email at Shethir.Riva@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During the period of August 3 through August
14, 2015, pursuant to Section 8(c)(1) of the Act, USDA provided an
opportunity for eligible cotton producers and importers to request a
continuance referendum regarding the 1991 amendments to the Order
provided for in the Act. Sign-up period results showed that USDA
received 46 valid requests from eligible producers and importers. The
following table depicts the number of requests for a continuance
referendum.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total sign-up
Farm service agency state office requests
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama.............................................. 0
Arizona.............................................. 0
Arkansas............................................. 16
California........................................... 0
Florida.............................................. 1
Georgia.............................................. 0
Illinois............................................. 0
Kansas............................................... 3
Kentucky............................................. 0
Louisiana............................................ 0
Mississippi.......................................... 1
Missouri............................................. 1
Nevada............................................... 0
New Mexico........................................... 0
North Carolina....................................... 8
Oklahoma............................................. 7
South Carolina....................................... 0
Tennessee............................................ 0
Texas................................................ 9
Virginia............................................. 0
------------------
Total............................................ 46
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 8(c)(2) of the Act, provides that following a sign-up
period, USDA shall conduct a referendum upon the request of 10 percent
or more of the number of cotton producers and importers voting in the
most recent referendum (1991). This would require 10 percent or 4,622
(46,220 x .10 = 4,622) of the 46,220 valid ballots cast by cotton
producers and importers in the July 1991 referendum. It is further
provided that, in counting such request not more than 20 percent or 924
may be from producers from any one state or importers of cotton.
USDA finds that the results of the sign-up period did not meet the
criteria requiring a continuance referendum by the Act. USDA bases this
determination on the fact that the 46 requests received during the
sign-up period is less than the 4,622 required.
The 1991 amendments to the Order (7 CFR 1205 et seq.) were
implemented following the July 1991 referendum. The 1990 amendments
were provided for in the Act (7 U.S.C. 2101-2118). These amendments
provided for: (1) Importer representation on the Cotton Board by an
appropriate number of persons, to be determined by USDA, who import
cotton or cotton products into the U.S. and whom USDA selects from
nominations submitted by importer organization certified by USDA; (2)
assessments levied on imported cotton and cotton products at a rate
determined in the same manner as for U.S. cotton; (3) increasing the
amount USDA can be reimbursed for the conduct of a referendum from
$200,000 to $300,000; (4) reimbursing government agencies that assist
in administering the collection of assessments on imported cotton and
cotton products; and (5) terminating the right of producers to demand a
refund of assessments.
On July 9, 1991, (56 FR 31289) AMS issued a proposal to amend the
Order to determine if a majority, 50 percent or more, of producers and
importers favored implementation of the proposed amendments to the
Order. USDA conducted a referendum (July 1991) among persons who had
been cotton producers or cotton importers during a representative
period. Results of the July 1991 referendum showed that of the 46,220
valid ballots received; 27,879 or 60 percent of the persons voting
favored the amendments to the Order and 18,341 or 40 percent opposed
the amendments.
Following the July 1991 referendum, AMS implemented the amendments.
In addition to the previously discussed amendments to the Act and
Order, USDA is required by Section 8(c)(1) to: (1) Conduct a review
once every 5 years after the anniversary date of the referendum
implementing the 1990 Act amendments to determine whether a referendum
is necessary and (2) make public the results of such a review within 60
days after each fifth anniversary date of the 1991 implementing
referendum. Should the review indicate that a referendum is needed USDA
is directed to conduct the referendum within 12 months after a public
announcement of review results. Should the review indicate that a
referendum is not warranted, Section 8(c)(2) includes provisions for
producers and importers to request a continuance referendum through a
sign-up period.
In 2011-2012, the Department prepared a 5-year report that
described the impact of the Cotton Research and Promotion Program on
the cotton industry. The review report is available upon written
request to the Chief of the Cotton Research and Promotion Staff at the
address provided above. Comments were solicited from all interested
parties, including persons who pay the assessments as well as from
[[Page 76655]]
organizations representing cotton producers and importers (76 FR
31573). Five comments, including comments from four certified producer
organizations that nominate producers to the Cotton Board, claimed
strong support for the continuance of the program, noting that the
administration of the Act has been proper, carries out the intent and
purpose in a timely and superior manner, and requires no changes or
adjustment.
USDA reviewed the Cotton Research and Promotion Program major
program activities and accomplishments, including third-party
evaluations of advertising and marketing activities and other
functional areas; the results of producer and importer awareness and
satisfaction surveys; and data from the Foreign Agricultural Service.
USDA also reviewed the results of the Cotton Board's 2011 independent
program evaluation, which assessed the effectiveness of the Cotton
Research and Promotion Program; the strength of cotton's competitive
position; the ability to maintain and expand domestic and foreign
markets; increases in the number of uses for cotton; and estimates of a
return on investment for stakeholders and qualitative benefits and
returns associated with the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. The
review report concluded that the 1990 amendments to the Act were
successfully implemented and are operating as intended. The report also
noted that there is a general consensus within the cotton industry that
the Cotton Research and Promotion Program and the 1990 amendments to
the Act are operating as intended. Written comments, economic data, and
results from independent evaluations support this conclusion.
USDA found no compelling reason to conduct a referendum regarding
the 1990 Act amendments to the Cotton Research and Promotion Order
although some program participants support a referendum. In 2013, USDA
announced its view not to conduct a referendum regarding the 1991
amendments to the Order (78 FR 32228). Therefore, USDA allowed all
eligible persons to request the conduct of a continuance referendum on
the 1990 amendments through a sign-up period. The results of this sign-
up period did not meet the criteria as established by the Act for a
continuance referendum and, therefore, referenda were not conducted.
With this announcement of the results of the sign-up period, USDA
has completed all requirements set forth in Section 8(c) (1) and (2) of
the Act regarding the review of the Cotton Research and Promotion
Program to determine if a continuance referendum is warranted. A
referendum will not be conducted, and no further actions are planned in
connection with this review.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101-2118.
Dated: December 7, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-31133 Filed 12-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P