Agency Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Joint Standards for Assessing the Diversity Policies and Practices of Entities Regulated by the Agencies, 76585-76587 [2015-30932]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Notices
information. NCUA received no
comments.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
NCUA requests that you send your
comments on this collection for part
708a to the location listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Your comments
should address: (a) The necessity of the
information collection for the proper
performance of NCUA, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways we could
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways we could minimize the burden
of the information collection on
respondents, such as through the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
It is NCUA’s policy to make all
comments available to the public for
review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Data
Title: Bank Conversions and Mergers,
12 CFR part 708a.
OMB Number: 3133–0182.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Reinstatement, with
change.
Description: Part 708a requires an
insured credit union that proposes to
convert to an MSB or to merge into a
bank to provide notice and disclosure of
the proposal to members and NCUA and
to conduct a membership vote.
Submission of this information is
designed to ensure NCUA has sufficient
information to administer the member
vote in an MSB conversion and to
approve or disapprove a proposed
merger into a bank. The information
collection allows NCUA to ensure
compliance with statutory and
regulatory requirements for conversions
and mergers. It also ensures that
members of credit unions have
sufficient and accurate information to
exercise an informed vote concerning a
proposed conversion or merger.
Respondents: Federally insured credit
unions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2.
Estimated Number of Responses: 2.
Frequency of Response: One-time; on
occasion.
Estimated Time per Response: Ranges
from 300 to 410 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
710 hours.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$28,400.00.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on November 18, 2015.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–30933 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection;
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Joint Standards for
Assessing the Diversity Policies and
Practices of Entities Regulated by the
Agencies
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Notice, request for comment,
and notice of information collection to
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA).
AGENCY:
The NCUA has submitted to
OMB a request for approval under the
PRA of the collection of information
discussed below. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is
not required to respond to, an
information collection unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the information collection to Tracy
Crews, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3428; by fax to
703–837–2861; or by email to
OCIOPRA@ncua.gov.
Additionally, commenters may send a
copy of their comments to the OMB
desk officer for the Agencies by mail to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and
Budget, New Executive Office Building
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503: by fax to (202)
395–6974; or by email to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information about the
information collection discussed in this
notice, please contact Tracy Crews,
National Credit Union Administration,
1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428; by fax to 703–837–2861; or
by email to OCIOPRA@ncua.gov. In
addition, background documentation for
this information collection may be
viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00143
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76585
Section
342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) required each
Agency, including NCUA, to establish
an Office of Minority and Women
Inclusion (OMWI) to be responsible for
all matters of the Agency relating to
diversity in management, employment,
and business activities. The Dodd-Frank
Act also instructed the OMWI Directors
to develop standards for assessing the
diversity policies and practices of
entities regulated by their Agencies. The
Agencies worked together to develop
joint standards and, on June 10, 2015,
they published a Federal Register notice
(80 FR 33016) entitled ‘‘Final
Interagency Policy Statement
Establishing Joint Standards for
Assessing the Diversity Policies and
Practices of Entities Regulated by the
Agencies’’ (Policy Statement). The
NCUA joined the Agencies in issuing
the Policy Statement. The NCUA is
issuing a separate Federal Register
notice for PRA clearance using this
notice. The Policy Statement contains a
collection of information within the
meaning of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Overview of the Collection of
Information
1. Description of the Collection of
Information and Proposed Use
The title for this proposed collection
of information is:
• Joint Standards for Assessing
Diversity Policies and Practices
The Policy Statement includes Joint
Standards that cover ‘‘Practices to
Promote Transparency of Organizational
Diversity and Inclusion.’’ These
standards contemplate that a regulated
entity is transparent about its diversity
and inclusion activities by making
certain information available to the
public annually on its Web site or in
other appropriate communications, in a
manner reflective of the entity’s size and
other characteristics. The information
noted in these standards is the entity’s
diversity and inclusion strategic plan;
its policy on its commitment to
diversity and inclusion; progress toward
achieving diversity and inclusion in its
workforce and procurement activities
(which may include the entity’s current
workforce and supplier demographic
profiles); and employment and
procurement opportunities available at
the entity that promote diversity.
In addition, the Policy Statement
includes standards that address
‘‘Entities’ Self-Assessment.’’ These
standards envision that the regulated
entity conducts a voluntary self-
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
76586
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Notices
assessment of its diversity policies and
practices at least annually, provides
information pertaining to this selfassessment to its primary federal
financial regulator, and publishes
information pertaining to its efforts with
respect to the Joint Standards. The
information provided to the Agencies
will be used to monitor progress and
trends among regulated entities with
regard to diversity and inclusion in
employment and contracting activities,
as well as to identify and publicize
leading diversity policies and practices.
NCUA designed a proposed, draft
‘‘Voluntary, Sample Credit Union SelfAssessment Checklist,’’ which federally
insured credit unions would be able to
use to as tool to perform their
assessment and to submit this
information to NCUA.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Description of Likely Respondents
and Estimate of Annual Burden
The collections of information
contemplated by the Joint Standards
will impose no new recordkeeping
burdens as regulated entities will only
publish or provide information
pertaining to diversity policies and
practices that they maintain during the
normal course of business. The NCUA
estimates that, on average, it will take a
federally insured credit union
approximately 12 burden hours
annually to assess diversity and
inclusion practices and publish
information pertaining to its diversity
policies and practices on its Web site or
in other appropriate communications
and to retrieve and submit information
pertaining to its self-assessment to
NCUA.
NCUA estimates the total burden for
federally insured credit unions as
follows:
Information Collection: Joint
Standards for Assessing Diversity
Policies and Practices.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
367.
Frequency of Collection: Annual.
Average Response Time per
Respondent: 12 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 4,404.
Obligation to respond: Voluntary.
B. Solicitation of Public Comments
The Policy Statement included a 60day notice requesting public comments
on the collection of information. 80 FR
33016, 33021 (June 10, 2015). In
addition, NCUA designed a draft
proposed ‘‘Voluntary, Sample Credit
Union Self-Assessment Checklist,’’
which federally insured credit unions
would be able to use to perform their
assessment and to submit information to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
NCUA. NCUA released the draft
checklist with the Joint Standards, and
the NCUA Letter to Credit Unions, No.
15–CU–05.
During the comment period, the
Agencies collectively received four
comment letters: Two from industry
trade associations, one from an
advocacy organization, and one from an
individual. Separately, the NCUA
received a comment letter from an
industry trade association. The Agencies
considered this comment and have
included it in the discussion of
comments below. The comments
addressed the collection of information
under the ‘‘Entities Self-Assessment’’
Joint Standards. (As noted above, these
Joint Standards envision that a regulated
entity provides self-assessment
information to the OMWI Director of the
entity’s primary federal financial
regulator.) The commenters also
commented on aspects of the Policy
Statement unrelated to the collection of
information; these views are not
relevant to this notice or the paperwork
burden analysis and, accordingly, they
are not addressed below.
After reviewing and considering the
comments related to the collection of
information, the Agencies have decided
not to make any changes to the
collection of information described in
the 60-day notice.
1. Practical Utility of Information
Collection
Two commenters addressed whether
the collection of information pertaining
to self-assessments will have practical
utility. One commenter asserted that it
is premature to gauge how useful
information will be without knowing
precisely what information the Agencies
will request. The other commenter
maintained that the information
collection request in the Policy
Statement will yield large variations in
the information submitted and
predicted that the information received
will have little practical utility. This
commenter argued that the Agencies
should standardize the information they
request so they are able to assess
accurately the state of diversity and
inclusion across the industry. The
commenter’s view is that
standardization of the data request
would enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the collected information.
Although the Agencies have not
specified the content or format for the
information collection described in the
Policy Statement, they anticipate that
the information submitted to them will
be similar in content, if not in form.
They contemplate that regulated entities
will organize their information
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection around the categories in the
Joint Standards. The Agencies also
expect that the information they receive
will help achieve the purpose of the
collection, which is to allow the
Agencies to identify trends in the
financial services industry regarding
diversity and inclusion in employment
and contracting and to identify leading
diversity policies and practices.
2. Specific Collection Instrument
As mentioned above, NCUA
developed a draft, proposed voluntary
checklist as an option for a collection
tool for federally insured credit unions.
Three commenters requested that the
Agencies be more specific about the
information collection. One commenter
asked the Agencies to send questions
that ‘‘comport with how its member
firms operate’’ and that the information
collection request allow entities to
submit qualitative information to add
context to quantitative submissions.
Another commenter asked the Agencies
to provide a ‘‘robust’’ example or
template of the information the entities
should submit. This commenter also
recommended that the Agencies provide
a non-exhaustive list of materials that
respondents can use to compare against
what they are planning to submit. The
third commenter recommended that the
Agencies develop a standardized
collection instrument. This commenter
noted that it had recommended
standardized survey questions when it
commented on the proposed Policy
Statement. The commenter urged the
Agencies to adopt a thorough framework
for collecting specific and consistent
data.
The Agencies appreciate the
collection instrument recommendations
and the offers to assist in developing an
instrument. At this time, however, the
Agencies have not developed a joint
information collection instrument. The
Agencies believe that the Policy
Statement encourages regulated entities
to provide information regarding their
self-assessments in a manner reflective
of the Joint Standards and that any such
information received will be useful.
3. Assurance of Confidentiality
The Joint Standards addressing SelfAssessments provide that the entities
submitting information may designate
such information as confidential
commercial information, where
appropriate. Three commenters
expressed concerns about whether the
information submitted would remain
confidential. One commenter indicated
that its members are concerned that
information submitted to their primary
federal financial regulator might be
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Notices
provided, without context, to other
regulators or to the U.S. Congress,
leading to confusion or to the disclosure
of competitive information. This
commenter asked the Agencies to
provide a clearer confidentiality policy
and clarify that submissions will remain
confidential unless the submitting entity
expressly waives confidentiality.
Similarly, another commenter stated
that its members are concerned that
third parties may have access to the
information submitted and could use
this information to the submitter’s
disadvantage. This commenter
requested additional clarification
regarding how the Agencies will use
and protect submitted information, as
well as a written statement providing
assurance that the Agencies will not
share the information with third parties.
The remaining commenter expressed
concern that designating information as
confidential will not guarantee
protection from disclosure. The
commenter observed that, if the public
requests information under the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), the regulated
entity will be notified of the request and
provided an opportunity to argue
against disclosure. In the event that the
regulated entity’s argument does not
prevail, the voluntarily submitted
information could be released to the
public.
Two of these commenters
recommended that regulated entities be
allowed to submit information
anonymously. One commenter said its
members might support the use of a
third-party vendor that could capture
and potentially anonymize submissions
as a way to minimize information
collection burden. The other commenter
asserted that giving respondents the
option to submit information
anonymously would enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information, minimize burden, and
address confidentiality concerns. This
commenter also recommended that the
Agencies allow submitters to classify
themselves into general categories, such
as by approximate asset size, number of
employees, and geographic location.
The Agencies understand that
regulated entities want assurances that
the Agencies will treat the submitted
information as confidential and will not
disclose the information unless the
submitter expressly waives
confidentiality. To the extent that a
submission includes confidential
information, the Agencies will keep
such information confidential to the
extent allowed by law. The Agencies
advise regulated entities submitting
private information to follow their
primary federal financial regulator’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:21 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
FOIA regulations with respect to
designating information as confidential
or seeking confidential treatment.
Finally, with respect to anonymity,
the Agencies are concerned that
anonymous submissions would be less
useful than submissions in which the
submitting entity is identified. As
indicated in the Policy Statement, the
OMWI Directors plan to reach out to
regulated entities to discuss diversity
and inclusion practices and methods of
assessment, and these contacts will be
more informative for both the Agencies
and the entities if the Agencies know
which submission came from which
entity. However, the Agencies will
reassess this matter over time.
4. Accuracy of Burden Estimate
The Agencies estimated that,
annually, it would take an entity 12
burden hours, on average, to publish
information pertaining to its diversity
policies and practices on its Web site
and to retrieve and submit selfassessment information to its primary
federal financial regulator. One
commenter stated that the Agencies
grossly underestimated the time it
would take to collect, categorize, and
submit this information. The commenter
asserted that retrieving diversity data is
a time-consuming and labor-intensive
task, particularly for entities with
hundreds or thousands of employees
located throughout U.S. and the world.
In addition, the commenter maintained
that an entity’s submission would have
to undergo a time-consuming review by
legal counsel and others to assure
accuracy and clarity before the entity
could submit the information.
The Agencies note that the
commenter did not provide an
alternative estimate or formula for
calculating this burden and that 12
hours is an estimated average. In the
absence of more specific information,
the Agencies do not have a basis for
changing their burden estimate at this
time. If, however, future feedback
indicates that the current estimate needs
further refinement, the Agencies will
consider adjusting their estimates
accordingly.
5. Estimate of Start-Up Costs
One commenter asserted that it would
take substantial IT, legal, and
operational resources to put diversity
data into a format appropriate for
submission to a regulator. The
commenter said that it could not
provide an exact estimate of capital or
start-up costs for submitting this
information until an actual information
request was available. In response, the
Agencies note that there are no start-up
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76587
costs associated with the collection of
information contained in the Joint
Standards. Furthermore, any costs
incurred by a regulated entity, aside
from the 12 burden hours discussed
above to publish information pertaining
to its diversity policies and practices on
its Web site and to retrieve and submit
self-assessment information to its
primary federal financial regulator, will
be incurred in the normal course of its
business activities.
Written comments continue to be
invited on:
(a) The necessity of the collection of
information for the proper performance
of the Agencies’ functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agencies’
estimate of the information collection
burden, including the validity of the
methods and the assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information
proposed to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the information
collection burden on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up
costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information.
The Agencies encourage interested
parties to submit comments in response
to these questions. Comments submitted
in response to this notice will be shared
among the Agencies. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
By National Credit Union Administration.
Dated: November 18, 2015.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015–30932 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the
Humanities
Meetings of Humanities Panel
National Endowment for the
Humanities.
ACTION: Notice of Meetings.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Humanities will hold three meetings
of the Humanities Panel, a federal
advisory committee, during January,
2016. The purpose of the meetings is for
panel review, discussion, evaluation,
and recommendation of applications for
financial assistance under the National
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 236 (Wednesday, December 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76585-76587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30932]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection; Submission for OMB Review; Comment
Request; Joint Standards for Assessing the Diversity Policies and
Practices of Entities Regulated by the Agencies
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Notice, request for comment, and notice of information
collection to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NCUA has submitted to OMB a request for approval under the
PRA of the collection of information discussed below. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, an
information collection unless it displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the information collection to Tracy Crews, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428; by fax to
703-837-2861; or by email to OCIOPRA@ncua.gov.
Additionally, commenters may send a copy of their comments to the
OMB desk officer for the Agencies by mail to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington,
DC 20503: by fax to (202) 395-6974; or by email to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information about the
information collection discussed in this notice, please contact Tracy
Crews, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314-3428; by fax to 703-837-2861; or by email to
OCIOPRA@ncua.gov. In addition, background documentation for this
information collection may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) required
each Agency, including NCUA, to establish an Office of Minority and
Women Inclusion (OMWI) to be responsible for all matters of the Agency
relating to diversity in management, employment, and business
activities. The Dodd-Frank Act also instructed the OMWI Directors to
develop standards for assessing the diversity policies and practices of
entities regulated by their Agencies. The Agencies worked together to
develop joint standards and, on June 10, 2015, they published a Federal
Register notice (80 FR 33016) entitled ``Final Interagency Policy
Statement Establishing Joint Standards for Assessing the Diversity
Policies and Practices of Entities Regulated by the Agencies'' (Policy
Statement). The NCUA joined the Agencies in issuing the Policy
Statement. The NCUA is issuing a separate Federal Register notice for
PRA clearance using this notice. The Policy Statement contains a
collection of information within the meaning of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
A. Overview of the Collection of Information
1. Description of the Collection of Information and Proposed Use
The title for this proposed collection of information is:
Joint Standards for Assessing Diversity Policies and Practices
The Policy Statement includes Joint Standards that cover
``Practices to Promote Transparency of Organizational Diversity and
Inclusion.'' These standards contemplate that a regulated entity is
transparent about its diversity and inclusion activities by making
certain information available to the public annually on its Web site or
in other appropriate communications, in a manner reflective of the
entity's size and other characteristics. The information noted in these
standards is the entity's diversity and inclusion strategic plan; its
policy on its commitment to diversity and inclusion; progress toward
achieving diversity and inclusion in its workforce and procurement
activities (which may include the entity's current workforce and
supplier demographic profiles); and employment and procurement
opportunities available at the entity that promote diversity.
In addition, the Policy Statement includes standards that address
``Entities' Self-Assessment.'' These standards envision that the
regulated entity conducts a voluntary self-
[[Page 76586]]
assessment of its diversity policies and practices at least annually,
provides information pertaining to this self-assessment to its primary
federal financial regulator, and publishes information pertaining to
its efforts with respect to the Joint Standards. The information
provided to the Agencies will be used to monitor progress and trends
among regulated entities with regard to diversity and inclusion in
employment and contracting activities, as well as to identify and
publicize leading diversity policies and practices. NCUA designed a
proposed, draft ``Voluntary, Sample Credit Union Self-Assessment
Checklist,'' which federally insured credit unions would be able to use
to as tool to perform their assessment and to submit this information
to NCUA.
2. Description of Likely Respondents and Estimate of Annual Burden
The collections of information contemplated by the Joint Standards
will impose no new recordkeeping burdens as regulated entities will
only publish or provide information pertaining to diversity policies
and practices that they maintain during the normal course of business.
The NCUA estimates that, on average, it will take a federally insured
credit union approximately 12 burden hours annually to assess diversity
and inclusion practices and publish information pertaining to its
diversity policies and practices on its Web site or in other
appropriate communications and to retrieve and submit information
pertaining to its self-assessment to NCUA.
NCUA estimates the total burden for federally insured credit unions
as follows:
Information Collection: Joint Standards for Assessing Diversity
Policies and Practices.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 367.
Frequency of Collection: Annual.
Average Response Time per Respondent: 12 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,404.
Obligation to respond: Voluntary.
B. Solicitation of Public Comments
The Policy Statement included a 60-day notice requesting public
comments on the collection of information. 80 FR 33016, 33021 (June 10,
2015). In addition, NCUA designed a draft proposed ``Voluntary, Sample
Credit Union Self-Assessment Checklist,'' which federally insured
credit unions would be able to use to perform their assessment and to
submit information to NCUA. NCUA released the draft checklist with the
Joint Standards, and the NCUA Letter to Credit Unions, No. 15-CU-05.
During the comment period, the Agencies collectively received four
comment letters: Two from industry trade associations, one from an
advocacy organization, and one from an individual. Separately, the NCUA
received a comment letter from an industry trade association. The
Agencies considered this comment and have included it in the discussion
of comments below. The comments addressed the collection of information
under the ``Entities Self-Assessment'' Joint Standards. (As noted
above, these Joint Standards envision that a regulated entity provides
self-assessment information to the OMWI Director of the entity's
primary federal financial regulator.) The commenters also commented on
aspects of the Policy Statement unrelated to the collection of
information; these views are not relevant to this notice or the
paperwork burden analysis and, accordingly, they are not addressed
below.
After reviewing and considering the comments related to the
collection of information, the Agencies have decided not to make any
changes to the collection of information described in the 60-day
notice.
1. Practical Utility of Information Collection
Two commenters addressed whether the collection of information
pertaining to self-assessments will have practical utility. One
commenter asserted that it is premature to gauge how useful information
will be without knowing precisely what information the Agencies will
request. The other commenter maintained that the information collection
request in the Policy Statement will yield large variations in the
information submitted and predicted that the information received will
have little practical utility. This commenter argued that the Agencies
should standardize the information they request so they are able to
assess accurately the state of diversity and inclusion across the
industry. The commenter's view is that standardization of the data
request would enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
collected information.
Although the Agencies have not specified the content or format for
the information collection described in the Policy Statement, they
anticipate that the information submitted to them will be similar in
content, if not in form. They contemplate that regulated entities will
organize their information collection around the categories in the
Joint Standards. The Agencies also expect that the information they
receive will help achieve the purpose of the collection, which is to
allow the Agencies to identify trends in the financial services
industry regarding diversity and inclusion in employment and
contracting and to identify leading diversity policies and practices.
2. Specific Collection Instrument
As mentioned above, NCUA developed a draft, proposed voluntary
checklist as an option for a collection tool for federally insured
credit unions.
Three commenters requested that the Agencies be more specific about
the information collection. One commenter asked the Agencies to send
questions that ``comport with how its member firms operate'' and that
the information collection request allow entities to submit qualitative
information to add context to quantitative submissions. Another
commenter asked the Agencies to provide a ``robust'' example or
template of the information the entities should submit. This commenter
also recommended that the Agencies provide a non-exhaustive list of
materials that respondents can use to compare against what they are
planning to submit. The third commenter recommended that the Agencies
develop a standardized collection instrument. This commenter noted that
it had recommended standardized survey questions when it commented on
the proposed Policy Statement. The commenter urged the Agencies to
adopt a thorough framework for collecting specific and consistent data.
The Agencies appreciate the collection instrument recommendations
and the offers to assist in developing an instrument. At this time,
however, the Agencies have not developed a joint information collection
instrument. The Agencies believe that the Policy Statement encourages
regulated entities to provide information regarding their self-
assessments in a manner reflective of the Joint Standards and that any
such information received will be useful.
3. Assurance of Confidentiality
The Joint Standards addressing Self-Assessments provide that the
entities submitting information may designate such information as
confidential commercial information, where appropriate. Three
commenters expressed concerns about whether the information submitted
would remain confidential. One commenter indicated that its members are
concerned that information submitted to their primary federal financial
regulator might be
[[Page 76587]]
provided, without context, to other regulators or to the U.S. Congress,
leading to confusion or to the disclosure of competitive information.
This commenter asked the Agencies to provide a clearer confidentiality
policy and clarify that submissions will remain confidential unless the
submitting entity expressly waives confidentiality. Similarly, another
commenter stated that its members are concerned that third parties may
have access to the information submitted and could use this information
to the submitter's disadvantage. This commenter requested additional
clarification regarding how the Agencies will use and protect submitted
information, as well as a written statement providing assurance that
the Agencies will not share the information with third parties.
The remaining commenter expressed concern that designating
information as confidential will not guarantee protection from
disclosure. The commenter observed that, if the public requests
information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the regulated
entity will be notified of the request and provided an opportunity to
argue against disclosure. In the event that the regulated entity's
argument does not prevail, the voluntarily submitted information could
be released to the public.
Two of these commenters recommended that regulated entities be
allowed to submit information anonymously. One commenter said its
members might support the use of a third-party vendor that could
capture and potentially anonymize submissions as a way to minimize
information collection burden. The other commenter asserted that giving
respondents the option to submit information anonymously would enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information, minimize burden,
and address confidentiality concerns. This commenter also recommended
that the Agencies allow submitters to classify themselves into general
categories, such as by approximate asset size, number of employees, and
geographic location.
The Agencies understand that regulated entities want assurances
that the Agencies will treat the submitted information as confidential
and will not disclose the information unless the submitter expressly
waives confidentiality. To the extent that a submission includes
confidential information, the Agencies will keep such information
confidential to the extent allowed by law. The Agencies advise
regulated entities submitting private information to follow their
primary federal financial regulator's FOIA regulations with respect to
designating information as confidential or seeking confidential
treatment.
Finally, with respect to anonymity, the Agencies are concerned that
anonymous submissions would be less useful than submissions in which
the submitting entity is identified. As indicated in the Policy
Statement, the OMWI Directors plan to reach out to regulated entities
to discuss diversity and inclusion practices and methods of assessment,
and these contacts will be more informative for both the Agencies and
the entities if the Agencies know which submission came from which
entity. However, the Agencies will reassess this matter over time.
4. Accuracy of Burden Estimate
The Agencies estimated that, annually, it would take an entity 12
burden hours, on average, to publish information pertaining to its
diversity policies and practices on its Web site and to retrieve and
submit self-assessment information to its primary federal financial
regulator. One commenter stated that the Agencies grossly
underestimated the time it would take to collect, categorize, and
submit this information. The commenter asserted that retrieving
diversity data is a time-consuming and labor-intensive task,
particularly for entities with hundreds or thousands of employees
located throughout U.S. and the world. In addition, the commenter
maintained that an entity's submission would have to undergo a time-
consuming review by legal counsel and others to assure accuracy and
clarity before the entity could submit the information.
The Agencies note that the commenter did not provide an alternative
estimate or formula for calculating this burden and that 12 hours is an
estimated average. In the absence of more specific information, the
Agencies do not have a basis for changing their burden estimate at this
time. If, however, future feedback indicates that the current estimate
needs further refinement, the Agencies will consider adjusting their
estimates accordingly.
5. Estimate of Start-Up Costs
One commenter asserted that it would take substantial IT, legal,
and operational resources to put diversity data into a format
appropriate for submission to a regulator. The commenter said that it
could not provide an exact estimate of capital or start-up costs for
submitting this information until an actual information request was
available. In response, the Agencies note that there are no start-up
costs associated with the collection of information contained in the
Joint Standards. Furthermore, any costs incurred by a regulated entity,
aside from the 12 burden hours discussed above to publish information
pertaining to its diversity policies and practices on its Web site and
to retrieve and submit self-assessment information to its primary
federal financial regulator, will be incurred in the normal course of
its business activities.
Written comments continue to be invited on:
(a) The necessity of the collection of information for the proper
performance of the Agencies' functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) The accuracy of the Agencies' estimate of the information
collection burden, including the validity of the methods and the
assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information proposed to be collected;
(d) Ways to minimize the information collection burden on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
(e) Estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
The Agencies encourage interested parties to submit comments in
response to these questions. Comments submitted in response to this
notice will be shared among the Agencies. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
By National Credit Union Administration.
Dated: November 18, 2015.
Gerard Poliquin,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-30932 Filed 12-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P