Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Regional Haze Glatfelter BART SIP Revision, 76403-76405 [2015-30917]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No. FAA–2015–
4076; Directorate Identifier 2015–NE–
30–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February 8,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc RB211–
22B–02, RB211–22B (MOD 72–8700), RB211–
524B–02, RB211–524B–B–02, RB211–524B2–
19, RB211–524B2–B–19, RB211–524B3–02,
RB211–524B4–02, RB211–524B4–D–02,
RB211–524C2–19, RB211–524C2–B–19,
RB211–524D4–19, RB211–524D4–B–19,
RB211–524D4X–19, RB211–524D4X–B–19,
RB211–524D4–39, RB211–524D4–B–39,
RB211–524G2–19, RB211–524G3–19,
RB211–524–G2–T–19, RB211–524G3–T–19,
RB211–524H–36, RB211–524H2–19, RB211–
524H–T–36, and RB211–524H2–T–19
turbofan engines, all serial numbers, with
low-pressure turbine (LPT) support roller
bearing, part number (P/N) LK30313 or P/N
UL29651, installed.
(d) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a
breach of the turbine casing and release of
engine debris through a hole in the engine
nacelle. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the LPT support roller bearing, loss
of radial position following LPT blade
failure, uncontained part release, damage to
the engine, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Actions and Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done. At the next shop visit or within 24
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, remove from service
LPT support roller bearing, P/N LK30313 or
P/N UL29651, and replace with a part
eligible for installation.
(f) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install an LPT support roller bearing, P/N
LK30313 or P/N UL29651, onto any engine.
(g) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, a ‘‘shop visit’’
is defined as induction of an engine into the
shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine
flanges, except that the separation of engine
flanges solely for the purposes of
transportation without subsequent engine
maintenance does not constitute an engine
shop visit.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7772; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency AD 2015–0187, dated
September 9, 2015, for more information.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76403
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA–2015–4076.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
December 2, 2015.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30947 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0362; FRL–9939–76–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Regional
Haze Glatfelter BART SIP Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to extend the
compliance date for the Best Available
Retrofit Technology (BART) emission
limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2) at the
P.H. Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter)
facility submitted as part of its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision on
April 14, 2014. Specifically, EPA is
proposing to extend the compliance
date for the SO2 emission limits
applicable to Boilers No. 7 and No. 8 at
Glatfelter by 25 months, from December
31, 2014, to January 31, 2017. We have
reviewed this SIP revision and
concluded that it meets the
requirements of the Clean Air Act and
the regional haze rule and because
BART requirements continue to be met.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2014–0362, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408–2279.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano,
Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
76404
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
during the Regional Office normal hours
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014–
0362. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Gilberto
Alvarez, Environmental Scientist, at
(312) 886–6143 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:11 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–6143,
alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this proposed
action?
II. What is EPA’s analysis of Ohio’s April 14,
2014, SIP revision?
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this
proposed action?
On July 2, 2012, EPA approved Ohio’s
Regional Haze SIP (77 FR 39177). Ohio’s
Regional Haze SIP included the
applicability of BART to the State’s only
non-utility BART source, Glatfelter, in
Chillicothe, Ohio. The BART
requirement specified that two of the
coal fired boilers at this facility, No. 7
and No. 8, install control technology to
limit the amount of SO2 emissions from
the boilers. The compliance date for
BART emission reductions was
scheduled to be December 31, 2014. The
compliance date was aligned with
Glatfelter’s expected compliance date
for the Industrial Boiler Maximum
Achievable Control Technology (MACT)
requirements finalized by EPA in May,
2011 (76 FR 28862).
On February 6, 2014, Ohio EPA
received a request from Glatfelter to
extend the original compliance date to
January 31, 2017. The extension request
is based on the litigation, revision and
new compliance date associated with
the Industrial Boiler MACT. Under EPA
regulations (40 CFR 51.308(e)(1)(iv)),
BART is to be implemented ‘‘as
expeditiously as practicable, but in no
event later than 5 years after approval of
the implementation plan revision.’’ The
required compliance date is July 2,
2017.
This rulemaking addresses an April
14, 2014, submission supplemented on
July 27, 2015, from the Ohio EPA to
extend the compliance date from
December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017.
One of the requests within the April 14,
2014, SIP revision includes ‘‘the
requirement that P.H. Glatfelter submit
an application for modification of the
federally enforceable permit (that will
include a compliance date outlining, at
a minimum, the specific, selected
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
control technologies and methods of
compliance) from December 31, 2013, to
requiring the submittal provide for
sufficient time for Ohio EPA to include
these requirements, along with any
appropriate monitoring, record keeping
and reporting requirements, in the
federally enforceable permit by no later
than January 31, 2017.’’
Ohio EPA supplemented their original
submittal on July 27, 2015, with a
revised federally enforceable permit for
Glatfelter that included the new
compliance date. Ohio EPA made the
federally enforceable permit available
for public comment on June 6, 2015,
and comments were accepted through
July 7, 2015. The Ohio EPA consulted
the Federal Land Managers and
included them in the public comment
process. Two comments were received
and those comments, along with Ohio
EPA’s responses were included in the
July 27, 2015, submittal.
II. What is EPA’s analysis of Ohio’s
April 14, 2014, SIP revision?
The CAA and the Regional Haze Rule
require BART controls to be installed as
expeditiously as practicable, but in no
event later than five years after approval
of the Regional Haze implementation
plan revision. As discussed in greater
detail in section I of this proposed
rulemaking, our proposed extension of
the compliance date by 25 months, from
December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017,
is consistent with the CAA and the
Regional Haze Rule. The extension is
justified by an expeditious schedule for
the installation of multiple control
technologies to meet the Boiler MACT.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve a
revision to the Ohio SIP submitted by
the State of Ohio on April 14, 2014,
supplemented on July 27, 2015, related
to BART requirements for Glatfelter.
Specifically, EPA is proposing to extend
the compliance date for the SO2
emission limits applicable to Boilers No.
7 and No. 8 at Glatfelter by 25 months
from December 31, 2014, to January 31,
2017.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Permit Number 0671010028—Final
Division of Air Pollution Control Permit
to Install for P.H. Glatfelter Company—
Chillecothe facility, effective July 20,
2015. EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 236 / Wednesday, December 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Dec 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 23, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015–30917 Filed 12–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 150818742–5742–01]
RIN 0648–XE130
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Gulf of Alaska; 2016
and 2017 Harvest Specifications for
Groundfish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes 2016 and
2017 harvest specifications,
apportionments, and Pacific halibut
prohibited species catch limits for the
groundfish fishery of the Gulf of Alaska
(GOA). This action is necessary to
establish harvest limits for groundfish
during the 2016 and 2017 fishing years
and to accomplish the goals and
objectives of the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska. The intended effect of this
action is to conserve and manage the
groundfish resources in the GOA in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
January 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0110, by any one of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
76405
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150110, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the Alaska
Groundfish Harvest Specifications Final
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
EIS), Record of Decision (ROD) for the
Final EIS, Supplementary Information
Report (SIR) to the Final EIS, and the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) prepared for this action may be
obtained from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the Alaska
Region Web site at https://alaska
fisheries.noaa.gov. The final 2014 Stock
Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
(SAFE) report for the groundfish
resources of the GOA, dated November
2014, is available from the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
at 605 West 4th Avenue, Suite 306,
Anchorage, AK 99501, phone 907–271–
2809, or from the Council’s Web site at
https://www.npfmc.org. The draft 2015
SAFE report for the GOA will be
available from the same source.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Obren Davis, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the GOA groundfish fisheries
in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of
the GOA under the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP). The Council prepared the
FMP under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1801, et seq. Regulations governing U.S.
fisheries and implementing the FMP
appear at 50 CFR parts 600, 679, and
680.
E:\FR\FM\09DEP1.SGM
09DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 236 (Wednesday, December 9, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76403-76405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30917]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0362; FRL-9939-76-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Regional Haze Glatfelter BART SIP
Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
extend the compliance date for the Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) emission limits for sulfur dioxide (SO2) at the P.H.
Glatfelter Company (Glatfelter) facility submitted as part of its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision on April 14, 2014. Specifically, EPA
is proposing to extend the compliance date for the SO2
emission limits applicable to Boilers No. 7 and No. 8 at Glatfelter by
25 months, from December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017. We have
reviewed this SIP revision and concluded that it meets the requirements
of the Clean Air Act and the regional haze rule and because BART
requirements continue to be met.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2014-0362, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: aburano.douglas@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 408-2279.
4. Mail: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Douglas Aburano, Chief, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
[[Page 76404]]
during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2014-0362. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, at (312) 886-6143 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6143,
alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for this proposed action?
II. What is EPA's analysis of Ohio's April 14, 2014, SIP revision?
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for this proposed action?
On July 2, 2012, EPA approved Ohio's Regional Haze SIP (77 FR
39177). Ohio's Regional Haze SIP included the applicability of BART to
the State's only non-utility BART source, Glatfelter, in Chillicothe,
Ohio. The BART requirement specified that two of the coal fired boilers
at this facility, No. 7 and No. 8, install control technology to limit
the amount of SO2 emissions from the boilers. The compliance
date for BART emission reductions was scheduled to be December 31,
2014. The compliance date was aligned with Glatfelter's expected
compliance date for the Industrial Boiler Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) requirements finalized by EPA in May, 2011 (76 FR
28862).
On February 6, 2014, Ohio EPA received a request from Glatfelter to
extend the original compliance date to January 31, 2017. The extension
request is based on the litigation, revision and new compliance date
associated with the Industrial Boiler MACT. Under EPA regulations (40
CFR 51.308(e)(1)(iv)), BART is to be implemented ``as expeditiously as
practicable, but in no event later than 5 years after approval of the
implementation plan revision.'' The required compliance date is July 2,
2017.
This rulemaking addresses an April 14, 2014, submission
supplemented on July 27, 2015, from the Ohio EPA to extend the
compliance date from December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017. One of the
requests within the April 14, 2014, SIP revision includes ``the
requirement that P.H. Glatfelter submit an application for modification
of the federally enforceable permit (that will include a compliance
date outlining, at a minimum, the specific, selected control
technologies and methods of compliance) from December 31, 2013, to
requiring the submittal provide for sufficient time for Ohio EPA to
include these requirements, along with any appropriate monitoring,
record keeping and reporting requirements, in the federally enforceable
permit by no later than January 31, 2017.''
Ohio EPA supplemented their original submittal on July 27, 2015,
with a revised federally enforceable permit for Glatfelter that
included the new compliance date. Ohio EPA made the federally
enforceable permit available for public comment on June 6, 2015, and
comments were accepted through July 7, 2015. The Ohio EPA consulted the
Federal Land Managers and included them in the public comment process.
Two comments were received and those comments, along with Ohio EPA's
responses were included in the July 27, 2015, submittal.
II. What is EPA's analysis of Ohio's April 14, 2014, SIP revision?
The CAA and the Regional Haze Rule require BART controls to be
installed as expeditiously as practicable, but in no event later than
five years after approval of the Regional Haze implementation plan
revision. As discussed in greater detail in section I of this proposed
rulemaking, our proposed extension of the compliance date by 25 months,
from December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017, is consistent with the CAA
and the Regional Haze Rule. The extension is justified by an
expeditious schedule for the installation of multiple control
technologies to meet the Boiler MACT.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Ohio SIP submitted by
the State of Ohio on April 14, 2014, supplemented on July 27, 2015,
related to BART requirements for Glatfelter. Specifically, EPA is
proposing to extend the compliance date for the SO2 emission
limits applicable to Boilers No. 7 and No. 8 at Glatfelter by 25 months
from December 31, 2014, to January 31, 2017.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Permit Number 0671010028--Final Division of Air Pollution
Control Permit to Install for P.H. Glatfelter Company--Chillecothe
facility, effective July 20, 2015. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally
[[Page 76405]]
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: November 23, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015-30917 Filed 12-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P