Safety Zone; Witt-Penn Bridge Construction, Hackensack River; Jersey City, NJ, 76209-76211 [2015-30907]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 30 minutes during
steel erection that will prohibit entry
within 200 yards of the Shore (Belt)
Parkway Bridge over Mill Basin.
Enforcement times may last longer than
30 minutes during demolition of the old
Shore (Belt) Parkway Bridge. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination
will be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.161 to read as follows:
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with RULES
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2015–30906 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Coast Guard
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters from surface to
bottom of Mill Basin within 200 yards
of the Shore (Belt) Parkway Mill Basin
bridge, east of a line drawn from
40°36′24.29″ N., 073°54′02.59″ W. to
40°36′11.36″ N., 073°54′04.69″ W., and
west of a line drawn from 40°36′21.13″
N., 073°53′47.38″ W. to 40°36′11.59″ N.,
073°53′48.88″ W.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
14:14 Dec 07, 2015
Dated: November 24, 2015.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 165.161 Safety Zone; Shore (Belt)
Parkway Bridge Construction, Mill Basin,
Brooklyn, NY.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) New York, to act on his or
her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official
patrol vessel or may be on shore and
will communicate with vessels via
VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official patrol vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement periods. (1) This
safety zone is in effect permanently
starting January 7, 2016, but will only be
enforced when deemed necessary by the
COTP.
(2) The COTP will rely on the
methods described in § 165.7 to notify
the public of the enforcement of this
safety zone. Such notifications will
include the date and times of
enforcement, along with any predetermined conditions of entry.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23, as
well as the regulations in paragraphs
(d)(2) and (3) of this section, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all
persons and vessels must comply with
all orders and directions from the COTP
or a COTP’s designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2014–1008]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Witt-Penn Bridge
Construction, Hackensack River;
Jersey City, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Hackensack
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76209
River surrounding the Witt-Penn Bridge
between Jersey City and Kearny, NJ. In
response to a planned Witt-Penn Bridge
construction project, this rule allows the
Coast Guard to prohibit all vessel traffic
through the safety zone during bridge
replacement operations that could pose
an imminent hazard to persons and
vessels operating in the area. This rule
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life in the vicinity of the construction of
the Witt-Penn Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective January 7,
2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2014–
1008 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Coast Guard
Sector New York; telephone (718) 354–
4195, or email jeff.m.yunker@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NJ DOT New Jersey Department of
Transportation
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On April 7, 2011 the Coast Guard
issued a Bridge Permit approving the
location and construction of the WittPenn Bridge across the Hackensack
River, mile 3.1, between Kearny and
Jersey City, NJ. The Coast Guard
published a Solicitation of Comments
from NJ DOT in the First Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners #16
(April 23, 2014) through #20 (May 21,
2014). This solicitation requested
comments regarding impacts to
navigation from NJ DOT’s proposed
tentative channel closures/restrictions.
On June 26, 2015, we published an
NPRM titled Safety Zone; Witt-Penn
Bridge Construction, Hackensack River;
Jersey City, NJ in the Federal Register
(80 FR 36733). We invited comments on
our proposed regulatory action related
to the bridge construction project.
During the comment period that ended
August 25, 2015, we received one
comment.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under the authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231;
50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
76210
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
6.04–6, and 160.5 Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1. The COTP has determined that
potential hazards associated with bridge
construction will be a safety concern for
anyone within approximately 500 feet of
the Witt-Penn Bridge. The purpose of
this rule is to ensure the safety of
vessels and workers from hazards
associated with construction of the
replacement Witt-Penn Bridge and the
follow-on demolition of the current
Witt-Penn Bridge.
(one to 21 days), and waterway users
have already been notified of the
proposed closures through the Local
Notice to Mariners. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue advanced public
notifications to local mariners through
appropriate means, which may include
but are not limited to marine broadcasts
or Local Notice to Mariners which
would allow the public an opportunity
to plan for these closures.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received one
comment on our NPRM published June
26, 2015. We received one comment
regarding nurse infection control in a
rural area in the State of Missouri. This
is outside the purview of this
rulemaking. There are no changes in the
regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a safety zone on
January 7, 2016. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters within
approximately 500 feet of the Witt-Penn
Bridge (river mile 3.1) on the
Hackensack River between Jersey City
and Kearny, NJ. The duration of the
zone, one to 21 days, is intended to
ensure the safety of life and vessels
during bridge construction and
demolition operations. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with RULES
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
E.O.s related to rulemaking. Below we
summarize our analyses based on a
number of these statutes and E.O.s, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of
protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
it has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the safety zone will be
limited to the Hackensack River area,
closures will be of a limited duration
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
B. Impact on Small Entities
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting between one and 21 days
that will prohibit entry within
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
approximately 500 feet of the Witt-Penn
Bridge. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
an official patrol vessel or may be on
shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF–FM radio or loudhailer.
In addition, members of the Coast Guard
Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
(2) Official patrol vessels. Official
patrol vessels may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or
local law enforcement vessels assigned
or approved by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement periods. (1) This
safety zone is in effect permanently
starting January 7, 2016, but will only be
enforced when deemed necessary by the
COTP.
(2) The Coast Guard will rely on the
methods described in § 165.7 to notify
the public of the time and duration of
any closure of the safety zone.
Violations of this safety zone may be
reported to the COTP at 718–354–4353
or on VHF-Channel 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in § 165.23, as
well as paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this
section, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all
persons and vessels must comply with
all orders and directions from the COTP
or a COTP’s designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement,
upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator of the vessel
must proceed as directed.
Dated: November 6, 2015.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2015–30907 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
2. Add § 165.162 to read as follows:
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with RULES
§ 165.162 Safety Zone; Witt-Penn Bridge
Construction, Hackensack River, Jersey
City, NJ.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters from surface to
bottom of the Hackensack River bound
by the following approximate positions:
North of a line drawn from 40°44′27.4″
N., 074°05′09.8″ W. to 40°44′22.9″ N.,
074°04′53.1″ W. (NJ PATH Bridge at
mile 3.0), and south of a line drawn
from 40°44′33.2″ N., 074°04′51.0″ W. to
40°44′28.2″ N., 074°04′42.7″ W. (500 feet
north of the new Witt-Penn Bridge)
(NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative. A
‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) to act on his or her behalf.
A designated representative may be on
40 CFR Part 52
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:14 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
[EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0047; FRL–9932–60–
Region 8]
Air Plan Approval; ND; Update to
Materials Incorporated by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; administrative
change.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is updating the materials
that are incorporated by reference (IBR)
into the North Dakota State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
regulations affected by this update have
been previously submitted by the North
Dakota Department of Health and
approved by the EPA. In this action, the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76211
EPA is also notifying the public of
corrections to typographical errors and
minor formatting changes to the IBR
tables. This update affects the SIP
materials that are available for public
inspection at the EPA Regional Office.
DATES: This action is effective December
8, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification Number EPA–R08–OAR–
2013–0047. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information the disclosure of
which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
the hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region 8, Office of Partnership and
Regulatory Assistance, Air Program,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. The EPA requests that you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. An
electronic copy of the State’s SIP
compilation is also available at https://
www.epa.gov/region8/air/sip.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ayala, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6142,
ayala.kathy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The SIP is a living document which
a state revises as necessary to address its
unique air pollution problems.
Therefore, the EPA, from time to time,
must take action on SIP revisions
containing new and/or revised
regulations as being part of the SIP. On
May 22, 1997 (62 FR 27968), the EPA
revised the procedures for incorporating
by reference federally-approved SIPs, as
a result of consultation between the EPA
and the Office of the Federal Register
(OFR). The description of the revised
SIP document, IBR procedures and
‘‘Identification of Plan’’ format are
discussed in further detail in the May
22, 1997, Federal Register document.
On April 21, 2009 (74 FR 18141) the
EPA published an update to the IBR
material for North Dakota as of March 1,
2009. Today’s action is an update to the
March 1, 2009 document.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76209-76211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30907]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2014-1008]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Witt-Penn Bridge Construction, Hackensack River;
Jersey City, NJ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable
waters of the Hackensack River surrounding the Witt-Penn Bridge between
Jersey City and Kearny, NJ. In response to a planned Witt-Penn Bridge
construction project, this rule allows the Coast Guard to prohibit all
vessel traffic through the safety zone during bridge replacement
operations that could pose an imminent hazard to persons and vessels
operating in the area. This rule is necessary to provide for the safety
of life in the vicinity of the construction of the Witt-Penn Bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective January 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2014-1008 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Jeff Yunker, Coast Guard Sector New York; telephone
(718) 354-4195, or email jeff.m.yunker@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port New York
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NJ DOT New Jersey Department of Transportation
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On April 7, 2011 the Coast Guard issued a Bridge Permit approving
the location and construction of the Witt-Penn Bridge across the
Hackensack River, mile 3.1, between Kearny and Jersey City, NJ. The
Coast Guard published a Solicitation of Comments from NJ DOT in the
First Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners #16 (April 23,
2014) through #20 (May 21, 2014). This solicitation requested comments
regarding impacts to navigation from NJ DOT's proposed tentative
channel closures/restrictions.
On June 26, 2015, we published an NPRM titled Safety Zone; Witt-
Penn Bridge Construction, Hackensack River; Jersey City, NJ in the
Federal Register (80 FR 36733). We invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to the bridge construction project. During
the comment period that ended August 25, 2015, we received one comment.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
[[Page 76210]]
6.04-6, and 160.5 Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with
bridge construction will be a safety concern for anyone within
approximately 500 feet of the Witt-Penn Bridge. The purpose of this
rule is to ensure the safety of vessels and workers from hazards
associated with construction of the replacement Witt-Penn Bridge and
the follow-on demolition of the current Witt-Penn Bridge.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received one comment on our NPRM published June
26, 2015. We received one comment regarding nurse infection control in
a rural area in the State of Missouri. This is outside the purview of
this rulemaking. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
This rule establishes a safety zone on January 7, 2016. The safety
zone will cover all navigable waters within approximately 500 feet of
the Witt-Penn Bridge (river mile 3.1) on the Hackensack River between
Jersey City and Kearny, NJ. The duration of the zone, one to 21 days,
is intended to ensure the safety of life and vessels during bridge
construction and demolition operations. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
E.O.s related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a
number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First Amendment
rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the safety zone
will be limited to the Hackensack River area, closures will be of a
limited duration (one to 21 days), and waterway users have already been
notified of the proposed closures through the Local Notice to Mariners.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue advanced public notifications to
local mariners through appropriate means, which may include but are not
limited to marine broadcasts or Local Notice to Mariners which would
allow the public an opportunity to plan for these closures.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone lasting between one and 21 days that will
prohibit entry within
[[Page 76211]]
approximately 500 feet of the Witt-Penn Bridge. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.162 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.162 Safety Zone; Witt-Penn Bridge Construction, Hackensack
River, Jersey City, NJ.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters from
surface to bottom of the Hackensack River bound by the following
approximate positions: North of a line drawn from 40[deg]44'27.4'' N.,
074[deg]05'09.8'' W. to 40[deg]44'22.9'' N., 074[deg]04'53.1'' W. (NJ
PATH Bridge at mile 3.0), and south of a line drawn from
40[deg]44'33.2'' N., 074[deg]04'51.0'' W. to 40[deg]44'28.2'' N.,
074[deg]04'42.7'' W. (500 feet north of the new Witt-Penn Bridge) (NAD
83).
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Designated representative. A ``designated representative'' is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated by the Captain of the Port (COTP)
to act on his or her behalf. A designated representative may be on an
official patrol vessel or may be on shore and will communicate with
vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In addition, members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
(2) Official patrol vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
(c) Enforcement periods. (1) This safety zone is in effect
permanently starting January 7, 2016, but will only be enforced when
deemed necessary by the COTP.
(2) The Coast Guard will rely on the methods described in Sec.
165.7 to notify the public of the time and duration of any closure of
the safety zone. Violations of this safety zone may be reported to the
COTP at 718-354-4353 or on VHF-Channel 16.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in Sec.
165.23, as well as paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) of this section, apply.
(2) During periods of enforcement, all persons and vessels must
comply with all orders and directions from the COTP or a COTP's
designated representative.
(3) During periods of enforcement, upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the
operator of the vessel must proceed as directed.
Dated: November 6, 2015.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port New York.
[FR Doc. 2015-30907 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P