Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Feather River Air Quality Management District and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, 76258-76259 [2015-30808]
Download as PDF
76258
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: SCAQMD Rule 1151,‘‘Motor
Vehicle and Mobile Equipment NonAssembly Line Coating Operations,’’
and YSAQMD Rule 2.26, ‘‘Motor
Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating
Operations’’. In the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving these local
rules in a direct final action without
prior proposal because we believe these
SIP revisions are not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on a
particular rule, we may adopt as final
the rule that is not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015–30825 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0689; FRL–9936–81–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Placer County Air
Pollution Control District (PCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). This
revision describes actions that PCAPCD
will take to prevent air pollution
concentrations from reaching
dangerously high levels.
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by January 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0689, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. If you need to
include CBI as part of your comment,
please visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets/comments.html for instructions.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. For additional
submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. While all
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
documents in the docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120 graham.vanessa@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. In the Rules
and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving the Placer
County Ozone Emergency Episode Plan
in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe this SIP
revision is not controversial. If we
receive adverse comments, however, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in a subsequent action based
on this proposed rule.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: October 26, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015–30829 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0619; FRL–9936–66–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District,
Feather River Air Quality Management
District and Santa Barbara County Air
Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Antelope Valley Air
Quality Management District
(AVAQMD), Feather River Air Quality
Management District (FRAQMD), and
Santa Barbara County Air Pollution
Control District (SBCAPCD) portions of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from architectural coatings.
We are proposing to approve local rules
to regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
Simultaneously, the EPA is proposing to
delete two related local rules from the
SIP from Sutter County Air Pollution
Control District (SCAPCD) and Yuba
County Air Pollution Control District
(YCAPCD).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by January 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0619, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. If you need to
include CBI as part of your comment,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:16 Dec 07, 2015
Jkt 238001
please visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets/comments.html for instructions.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. For additional
submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. While all
documents in the docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This
proposal addresses the following local
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
76259
rules: AVAQMD Rule 1113
‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’ FRAQMD
Rule 3.15 ‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’
SBCAPCD Rule 323.1 ‘‘Architectural
Coatings,’’ SCAPCD Rule 3.15
‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’ and YCAPCD
Rule 3.15 ‘‘Architectural Coatings.’’ In
the Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving and
deleting these local rules in a direct
final action without prior proposal
because we believe these SIP revisions
are not controversial. If we receive
adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
if we receive adverse comment on a
provision of a particular rule, we may
adopt as final those provisions of the
rules that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: October 23, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015–30808 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\08DEP1.SGM
08DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 235 (Tuesday, December 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76258-76259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30808]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0619; FRL-9936-66-Region 9]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District, Feather River Air Quality
Management District and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management
District (AVAQMD), Feather River Air Quality Management District
(FRAQMD), and Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District
(SBCAPCD) portions of
[[Page 76259]]
the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from architectural coatings.
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). Simultaneously, the
EPA is proposing to delete two related local rules from the SIP from
Sutter County Air Pollution Control District (SCAPCD) and Yuba County
Air Pollution Control District (YCAPCD).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by January 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number [EPA-R09-OAR-
2015-0619, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. If you need to include CBI as part
of your comment, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html
for instructions. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA. This proposal addresses the following local
rules: AVAQMD Rule 1113 ``Architectural Coatings,'' FRAQMD Rule 3.15
``Architectural Coatings,'' SBCAPCD Rule 323.1 ``Architectural
Coatings,'' SCAPCD Rule 3.15 ``Architectural Coatings,'' and YCAPCD
Rule 3.15 ``Architectural Coatings.'' In the Rules and Regulations
section of this Federal Register, we are approving and deleting these
local rules in a direct final action without prior proposal because we
believe these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive
adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment
on a provision of a particular rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rules that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.
Dated: October 23, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015-30808 Filed 12-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P