Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing: Defining “Chronically Homeless”, 75791-75806 [2015-30473]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
75791
(i) Revision to AFM—In-flight Warning
Within 15 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the Limitations section of the
AFM to include the statement found in figure
2 to paragraph (i) of this AD. This may be
done by inserting a copy of this AD into the
AFM. When a statement identical to that in
figure 2 to paragraph (i) of this AD has been
included in the general revisions of the AFM,
the general revisions may be inserted into the
AFM, and the copy of this AD may be
removed from the AFM.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Gulfstream
G650 Alert Customer Bulletin 4, dated
November 6, 2015; or Gulfstream G650ER
Alert Customer Bulletin 4, dated November
6, 2015; which are not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 25, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m) of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (l)(3)(i) and (l)(3)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
For more information about this AD,
Gideon Jose, Aerospace Engineer, Systems
and Equipment Branch, ACE–119A, FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337; phone: 404–474–5569; fax: 404–474–
5606; email: Gideon.Jose@faa.gov.
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Gulfstream G650 Alert Customer
Bulletin 4A, dated November 13, 2015.
(ii) Gulfstream G650ER Alert Customer
Bulletin 4A, dated November 13, 2015.
(3) For Gulfstream service information
identified in this AD, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, Technical
Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206, Savannah,
GA 31402–2206; telephone 800–810–4853;
fax 912–965–3520; email pubs@
gulfstream.com; Internet https://
www.gulfstream.com/product_support/
technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2015–30629 Filed 12–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 91 and 578
[Docket No. FR–5809–F–01]
RIN 2506–AC37
Homeless Emergency Assistance and
Rapid Transition to Housing: Defining
‘‘Chronically Homeless’’
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule establishes the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
that will be used in HUD’s Continuum
of Care Program, and in the
Consolidated Submissions for
Community Planning and Development
Programs. This definition has been the
subject of significant public comment
which has guided HUD in establishing
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
that will be used in its homeless
assistance programs. The final rule also
establishes the necessary recordkeeping
requirements that correspond to the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ for
the Continuum of Care Program.
Historically, other programs within
HUD, as well as other agencies such as
the United States Interagency Council
on Homelessness and the Department of
Veteran Affairs, have adopted HUD’s
definition of chronically homeless and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
ER04DE15.001
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(k) No Reporting Requirement
Although Gulfstream G650 Alert Customer
Bulletin 4A, dated November 13, 2015; and
Gulfstream G650ER Alert Customer Bulletin
4A, dated November 13, 2015; specify to
submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not require that
action.
(m) Related Information
75792
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
may also choose to adopt the definition
of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ included in
this final rule, however, it is not
required.
Effective Date: January 4, 2016.
Compliance Dates: Continuum of Care
recipients must comply with the
regulations promulgated by this rule as
of January 15, 2016. The Continuum of
Care Program grant agreement provides
that upon publication of a final rule for
the Continuum of Care Program, that
follows the July 31, 2012, interim rule,
the final rule, not the prior interim rule,
will govern the grant agreement.
Continuum of Care Program recipients,
therefore, must comply with the
regulations promulgated by this rule for
all program participants admitted after
January 15, 2016. The regulations
promulgated by this rule do not apply
retroactively to program participants
admitted to a Continuum of Care
Program project prior to January 15,
2016.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norm Suchar, Director, Office of Special
Needs Assistance Programs, Office of
Community Planning and Development,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20410–7000; telephone
number 202–708–4300 (this is not a tollfree number). Hearing- and speechimpaired persons can access this
number through TTY by calling the
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339
(this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Purpose and Legal Authority
The purpose of this rule is to establish
a final definition of the term
‘‘chronically homeless’’ that will be
used in HUD’s Continuum of Care
Program (24 CFR part 578) and the
Consolidated Submissions for
Community Planning and Development
Programs (24 CFR part 91). ‘‘Chronically
homeless’’ is defined in section 401(2)
of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11360
(McKinney-Vento Act or Act), as an
individual or family that is homeless
and resides in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter, and has been
homeless and residing in such a place
for at least 1 year or on at least four
separate occasions in the last 3 years.
The statutory definition also requires
that the individual or family has a head
of household with a diagnosable
substance use disorder, serious mental
illness, developmental disability, posttraumatic stress disorder, cognitive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
impairments resulting from a brain
injury, or chronic physical illness or
disability.
Following the statutory definition,
HUD first proposed a regulatory
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ in
a December 5, 2011, interim rule that
established regulations for the
Emergency Solutions Grants program
and made conforming amendments to
HUD’s Consolidated Plan regulations
(76 FR 75954). In response to concerns
raised in public comments, HUD
amended the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ in the Continuum of Care
Program interim rule, published July 31,
2012 (77 FR 45422), and sought further
public comment on the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ At a convening
held on May 30, 2012, HUD also
solicited feedback from nationally
recognized experts on a workable
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless,’’ as
described in the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program proposed rule,
published March 27, 2013 (78 FR
18726). This final rule results from
HUD’s consideration of the public
comments on the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ and feedback
from the convening of nationally
recognized experts.
Summary of Major Provisions
This rule provides a definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ in 24 CFR 91.5,
which applies to Consolidated
Submissions for Community Planning
and Development Programs, and in 24
CFR 578.3, which applies to the
Continuum of Care Program. In
addition, this rule amends 24 CFR
578.103, which stipulates recordkeeping
requirements for the Continuum of Care
Program, to include requirements that
recipients and subrecipients of
Continuum of Care funds must follow in
order to demonstrate that an individual
or family has met the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’
A ‘‘chronically homeless’’ individual
is defined to mean a homeless
individual with a disability who lives
either in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter, or in an institutional
care facility if the individual has been
living in the facility for fewer than 90
days and had been living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter
immediately before entering the
institutional care facility. In order to
meet the ‘‘chronically homeless’’
definition, the individual also must
have been living as described above
continuously for at least 12 months, or
on at least four separate occasions in the
last 3 years, where the combined
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
occasions total a length of time of at
least 12 months. Each period separating
the occasions must include at least 7
nights of living in a situation other than
a place not meant for human habitation,
in an emergency shelter, or in a safe
haven.
Chronically homeless families are
families with adult heads of household
who meet the definition of a chronically
homeless individual. If there is no adult
in the family, the family would still be
considered chronically homeless if a
minor head of household meets all the
criteria of a chronically homeless
individual. A chronically homeless
family includes those whose
composition has fluctuated while the
head of household has been homeless.
Recipients and subrecipients of
Continuum of Care Program funds are
required to maintain and follow written
intake procedures to ensure compliance
with the ‘‘chronically homeless’’
definition. The procedures must
establish the order of priority for
obtaining evidence as third-party
documentation first, intake worker
observations second, and certification
from the individual seeking assistance
third.
Benefits and Costs
This final rule establishes a regulatory
definition for the term ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ that meets the statutory
definition of the term established in the
McKinney-Vento Act and focuses on
persons with the longest histories of
homelessness, who often also have the
highest need. This will ensure that
funds are targeted to providing
permanent supportive housing solutions
for these individuals and families.
This final definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ provides greater clarity than
the statutory definition and HUD’s
previous proposed definitions so that
recipients and subrecipients can benefit
from understanding which homeless
individuals and families can be
considered ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
This final definition will ensure that
communities are consistently using the
same criteria when considering whether
a person is chronically homeless, and
that HUD receives consistent and
accurate information nationwide.
Communities previously used various
standards for the length of time to
define an ‘‘episode’’ for a person to be
considered chronically homeless, which
made it difficult for HUD to compare
data nationally and failed to ensure
resources were going to those with the
longest histories of homelessness.
Although recordkeeping necessarily
entails costs, and this rule establishes
certain recordkeeping requirements for
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the Continuum of Care Program,
recipients of Continuum of Care
Program-funded permanent supportive
housing projects that serve the
chronically homeless have always been
required to document the chronically
homeless status of program participants.
Failure to maintain appropriate
documentation of a household’s
eligibility is the monitoring finding that
most often requires recipients of HUD
funds to repay grant funds. This rule
establishes recordkeeping requirements
to assist Continuum of Care Program
recipients in appropriately and
consistently documenting chronically
homeless status, which will help to
ensure that recipients are not required
to repay grant funds due to
inappropriately documenting eligibility
for these projects.
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Background—HEARTH Act
The Homeless Emergency Assistance
and Rapid Transition to Housing Act of
2009 (HEARTH Act), which was enacted
on May 20, 2009, amended the
McKinney-Vento Act and consolidates
three separate homeless assistance
programs administered by HUD under
the McKinney-Vento Act into a single
grant program, the Continuum of Care
Program; revises the Emergency Shelter
Grants Program and renames the
program the Emergency Solutions
Grants program; and creates the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program to
replace the Rural Homelessness Grant
program. Commencing in 2010 with the
publication of the proposed rule on the
definition of ‘‘homeless,’’ HUD initiated
the rulemaking process to establish the
regulations for these new and revised
programs. In this rule, HUD provides
the final definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ that will apply to its
homeless assistance programs, and
makes this definition applicable,
through amendments, to the regulations
at 24 CFR part 91(Consolidated
Submissions for Community Planning
and Development Programs) and 24 CFR
part 578 (Continuum of Care Program).
III. Prior Proposed Rules
On December 5, 2011, at 76 FR 75954,
HUD published an interim rule which
established the regulations for the
Emergency Solutions Grants program
and made conforming amendments to
HUD’s Consolidated Plan regulations at
24 CFR part 91, which included a
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
HUD received 28 public comments on
this definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’ The majority of the
commenters raised concerns over HUD’s
clarification that ‘‘an occasion’’ must
equal at least 15 days of living or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, in a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter. In response to these
concerns, HUD included a definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ that omitted
this clarification in the Continuum of
Care Program interim rule, published
July 31, 2012, in the Federal Register
(77 FR 45422) and HUD sought further
comment on the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ At a convening
held on May 30, 2012, HUD also
solicited feedback from nationally
recognized experts on a workable
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
which was described in the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule. After considering the 28
public comments submitted in response
to the conforming amendments to the
Consolidated Plan published with the
Emergency Solutions Grants interim
rule, the 42 comments submitted in
response to the Continuum of Care
Program interim rule, and the feedback
solicited at the convening of nationally
recognized experts, HUD determined to
propose for public comment a revised
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
On March 27, 2013, HUD published a
proposed rule at 78 FR 18726 that
would establish the regulations for the
Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program. In addition to proposing the
regulations that would govern this
program, the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program proposed rule
submitted for public comment a further
revised definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’ The public comment period
for the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ closed on May 28, 2013, and
these public comments and HUD’s
responses to these comments are
addressed later in this preamble.
IV. Overview of the Final Rule—Key
Clarifications
In the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program proposed rule, HUD
defined a chronically homeless person
as follows:
1. An individual who:
• Is homeless and lives in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter; and
• Has been homeless and living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter continuously for at
least 1 year or on at least four separate
occasions in the last 3 years, where the
cumulative total of the four occasions is
at least one year. Stays in institutions of
90 days or less will not constitute as a
break in homelessness, but rather such
stays are included in the cumulative
total; and
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75793
• Can be diagnosed with one or more
of the following conditions: Substance
use disorder, serious mental illness,
developmental disability (as defined in
section 102 of the Developmental
Disabilities Assistance Bill of Rights Act
of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002)), posttraumatic stress disorder, cognitive
impairments resulting from brain injury,
or chronic physical illness or disability;
2. An individual who has been
residing in an institutional care facility,
including a jail, substance abuse or
mental health treatment facility,
hospital, or other similar facility for
fewer than 90 days and met all of the
criteria in paragraph (1), before entering
that facility; or
3. A family with an adult head of
household (or if there is no adult in the
family, a minor head of household) who
meets all of the criteria in paragraph (1),
including a family whose composition
has fluctuated while the head of
household has been homeless.
After reviewing the public comments,
which are discussed in Section IV of
this preamble, and upon HUD’s further
consideration of concerns related to the
proposed definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless,’’ the following highlights the
changes that are made by this final rule.
The cumulative total of the length of
homelessness spent living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter must
be at least 12 months. The final rule
provides that a person must have been
homeless and living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter for a
period of at least 12 months as opposed
to ‘‘one year.’’ This includes a provision
that where a person has experienced at
least four occasions of homelessness
living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter over a period of 3
years, the cumulative total of the
occasions must total at least 12 months
as opposed to ‘‘one year.’’ While the
requirement is essentially the same as
that which was included in the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule, the change clarifies
HUD’s intent for less burdensome
recordkeeping requirements, as
discussed in Section IV of this
preamble.
Establishing a break in homelessness.
The final rule provides that a break in
homelessness spent living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter is
considered to be any period of 7 or more
consecutive nights where an individual
or family is not living or residing in
such a place. Stays in an institutional
care facility (e.g., a jail, substance abuse
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
75794
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
or mental health treatment facility,
hospital, or other similar facility) for
fewer than 90 days and where the
individual or family had been living in
a place not meant for human habitation,
a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
immediately before entering the
institutional care facility will not
constitute as a break.
Establish clear recordkeeping
requirements. The final rule provides
recordkeeping requirements at 24 CFR
part 578 to help recipients and
subrecipients of Continuum of Care
Program funds understand the evidence
that must be kept in the program
participant file in order to demonstrate
that an individual or family met the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ at
the point of entry into a program, when
required. In general, the recordkeeping
requirements establish HUD’s preferred
order of documentation; provide clarity
about how the length of time of
homelessness spent living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter must
be documented; and provide
documentation standards for
documenting disability.
Technical and additional clarifying
changes. In addition to the changes
highlighted above, this final rule also
includes technical and minor clarifying
changes to certain proposed regulatory
provisions. Several of these changes are
in response to requests by commenters
for clarification, and are further
discussed in Section IV of this
preamble. HUD’s response to public
comments identifies where the final rule
makes these changes.
V. Discussion of the Public Comments
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. The Comments, Generally
The public comment period on the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
portion of the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program proposed rule
closed on May 28, 2013, and HUD
received 177 public comments related to
this definition. HUD also received 23
comments for the Rural Housing
Stability Assistance Program proposed
rule unrelated to the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ and will
respond to those comments in the final
rule for the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program. Regarding the
public comments on the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless,’’ HUD received
comments from a variety of sources:
Advocacy groups, service providers,
case managers, State and local
government agencies, nonprofit
organizations, private companies, and
private citizens.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
General concerns most frequently
expressed by commenters about the
proposed definition were: (1) The length
of time an individual or family must be
homeless and living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter based
on the proposed definition was too long
and would require households to
experience longer periods of
homelessness in order to qualify as
chronically homeless, and (2)
documenting chronically homeless
status based on the proposed definition
would be too burdensome.
Regarding the first concern, it is not
HUD’s intent to make an individual or
family experience a longer period of
homelessness. Rather, HUD’s primary
intent is to align the period of time of
those experiencing occasional
homelessness with that of those who are
experiencing continuous homelessness.
This will also ensure that individuals
and families who already meet these
criteria are prioritized for assistance,
that recipients and subrecipients can
demonstrate to HUD that they are
complying with the requirements
established by HUD, and that HUD is
able to make its required reports to
Congress. Where there are no persons
within a Continuum of Care that meet
the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless,’’ permanent supportive
housing beds that are required through
their grant agreement to serve this
population may serve other vulnerable
and eligible households. HUD will
provide guidance to assist communities
on which populations to prioritize when
there are no persons that meet the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
established in this rule.
Regarding the second concern, it is
critical to note that recipients of
Continuum of Care Program-funded
permanent supportive housing projects
with one or more beds that are required
through a grant agreement to serve
individuals and families experiencing
chronic homelessness have always been
required to document the chronically
homeless status of program participants
that will occupy those beds, at the point
of program entry. Failure to maintain
appropriate documentation of a
household’s eligibility is the monitoring
finding that most often requires
recipients of HUD funds to repay grant
funds. HUD recognizes that not
including recordkeeping requirements
for documenting chronically homeless
status in the regulatory text of the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule resulted in some
confusion about HUD’s expectations
and resulted in a number of commenters
raising concerns that recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements would be overly
burdensome for those recipients.
Therefore, this final rule includes, in the
regulatory text, recordkeeping
requirements to assist Continuum of
Care Program recipients in
appropriately documenting chronically
homeless status that take into
consideration that documenting the
length of time homeless will be
challenging. In addition, HUD notes that
the revised Homeless Management
Information System Data Standards
published in May 2014 include data
elements that are aligned with this
definition in order to more easily allow
for chronically homeless persons to be
identified through the Continuum of
Care’s Homeless Management
Information System.
B. The Definition of ‘‘Chronically
Homeless’’ in 24 CFR Parts 91 and 578
The Comments Generally
Comment: Concern that the expert
panel was mainly composed of
researchers and not practitioners.
Several commenters expressed
disappointment that the expert panel
hosted by HUD to develop the proposed
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
was composed mostly of researchers
and not practitioners or technicians.
These commenters recommended that
HUD invite stakeholders responsible for
service delivery to such discussions
prior to final rulemaking.
HUD Response: Although several of
the experts that participated in the
convening were researchers, HUD also
included several practitioners. As stated
in the summary of the convening,
posted at www.hudexchange.info/rhsp,
the group of experts included
researchers, advocates, homeless
services providers, and homelessness
technical assistance providers, as well
as Federal representatives from HUD,
the United States Interagency Council
on Homelessness, and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services. In addition, by publishing the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
one more time as a proposed definition,
HUD provided a third opportunity for
stakeholders responsible for service
delivery and reporting to submit their
comments on the proposed definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’
Comment: Definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ should have been issued
separately from the Rural Housing
Stability Assistance Program proposed
rule. A few commenters stated that in
order to solicit the most comments on
the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless,’’ requesting comments on the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
should have been a separate notice from
the Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program proposed rule since the
definition will apply to all programs
authorized by the statute.
HUD Response: HUD’s proposed rule
on the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program offered an
opportunity to further solicit public
comment on HUD’s definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ HUD first
introduced the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ as part of its
‘‘Emergency Solutions Grants program
and Consolidated Plan Conforming
Amendments interim rule,’’ not as a
stand-alone rule on defining chronically
homeless. Although HUD did not solicit
public comment on specific aspects of
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
in its Continuum of Care Program rule,
HUD did address the definition in that
rule, and informed interested parties of
its intent to solicit further public
comment. As the commenters note, the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
applies to all of HUD’s homeless
assistance programs. Soliciting
comments on HUD’s proposed
definition in connection with
solicitation of comments on the
Emergency Solutions Grants program
interim rule or on the Rural Housing
Stability Assistance Program rule did
not diminish the importance of this
definition, but rather underscored the
significant role that this definition will
have in each of these programs, and
underscores the value that HUD placed
on receiving public comment on this
definition. Although HUD did not issue
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
as a stand-alone proposed rule, it is
HUD’s intent to issue a final rule solely
on the definition.
Comment: HUD needs to account for
estimated hours and costs to service
providers trying to meet requirements of
the definition. A few commenters
requested that HUD account for the total
estimated hours and financial costs it
would take service providers to
complete the requirements of this rule.
HUD Response: This final rule
establishes the final definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ by
incorporating the definition into 24 CFR
parts 91 and 578. HUD requires
Continuum of Care Program recipients
of permanent supportive housing that
are required to serve persons
experiencing chronic homelessness to
determine and document that any
individual or family assisted meets the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ as
defined in this final rule. Each recipient
must obtain documentation of homeless
status, disability, and the specific period
of time the individual or head of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
household was living in an emergency
shelter, safe haven, or place not meant
for human habitation. The burden for
collecting the required homeless status
and disability information was
considered in the burden estimates for
the Continuum of Care Program interim
rule (77 FR 45421). The public had the
opportunity to provide comments on
those estimates during the public
comment period. In some instances, the
documentation obtained under the
existing burden of the Continuum of
Care Program interim rule will already
meet the standards for documenting the
length of time an individual or head of
household resided in a place not meant
for human habitation, an emergency
shelter, or a safe haven as required in
this rule. In other instances, recipients
and subrecipients may need to spend
more time acquiring the documents
necessary to show that an individual
meets the timeframe necessary residing
in a place not meant for human
habitation, an emergency shelter, or a
safe haven to qualify as ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’ See Section VI, Information
Collection Requirements, for more
information about HUD’s change to its
existing recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.
Comments Related to Data Collection
and Reporting
Comment: Problems in reporting such
information in Homeless Management
Information Systems. Several
commenters expressed concerns about
how to document and report chronically
homeless status in their Homeless
Management Information System. One
commenter pointed to the variations
across the country around how chronic
homelessness is reported in the
Homeless Management Information
System and noted that Continuums of
Care would not be able to uniformly and
accurately document homelessness
spent living in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter over a 3-year period
in their Homeless Management
Information Systems. Other commenters
stated that many Homeless Management
Information Systems are closed and do
not share information with other
Continuums of Care, which could create
a problem in documenting chronically
homeless status for homeless persons
moving between Continuums of Care.
Another commenter expressed concern
that data entry personnel and case
managers do not have the expertise to
determine whether a person meets the
criteria to be classified as chronically
homeless, and concern about the time
service providers would spend on data
entry rather than on providing services.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75795
Further, the commenter requested that
HUD improve the Homeless
Management Information System and
the data entry process and establish data
elements to capture a person’s
chronically homeless status.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges
that Homeless Management Information
Systems across the country do not
always collect data on chronically
homeless status uniformly. HUD
believes that the promulgation of its
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
will assist communities in collecting
consistent data. HUD also included
specific data elements in the 2014
Homeless Management Information
System Data Standards to allow for
uniform data collection on chronically
homeless status. These data standards
take into account that not all chronically
homeless persons have a service
interaction with the Continuum of
Care’s Homeless Management
Information System and allow for
history of homelessness to be
documented based on the information
provided by the program participant. It
should also be noted that it is not HUD’s
expectation that the person entering
data into the Homeless Management
Information System also be responsible
for determining program eligibility.
Comment: Proposed definition
impedes ability to compare data. Many
commenters expressed concerns that the
new definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ would impede their ability to
compare current and future data with
data from previous years. A few
commenters stated that the new
definition would hinder efforts to
measure ‘‘real’’ progress in reducing the
chronically homeless population, as
data would not be comparable.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges
that the change in the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ may mean that
the number of persons experiencing
chronic homelessness within a
community may change as a result of
the new definition. However, this more
detailed definition is necessary in order
to ensure that communities are
consistently using the same criteria
when considering whether a person is
chronically homeless. A uniformly
applied definition also serves to ensure
that HUD has more consistent and
accurate information. Previously,
communities used various standards for
the length of time to define an
‘‘episode’’ for a person to be considered
chronically homeless, which made it
difficult for HUD to compare data
nationally. The definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ in the final rule
will ensure consistency in the data
nationwide. HUD notes that this will
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
75796
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
only affect the number of persons
considered to be chronically homeless
and not the Continuum of Care’s total
homeless count.
Comments Related to Community
Strategies To Serve the Chronically
Homeless, Including Eligibility for
Housing Resources
Comment: A narrow definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ will result in an
increase in vacancies in units
designated for the chronically homeless
and individuals and families spending a
longer time in a place not meant for
human habitation. Several commenters
expressed concerns that the more
narrow definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ included in the proposed
rule would result in an increase in
vacant units otherwise dedicated to the
chronically homeless. Several
commenters suggested that they would
have difficulty locating individuals or
families who meet the criteria of the
proposed definition.
One commenter expressed concern
that the proposed definition would
affect local and State governments, in
addition to homeless individuals,
stating that the new definition would
result in more people being on the street
for longer periods of time resulting in
the following: an increased demand for
emergency shelters, a burden on local
police services since more individuals
would be in unstable situations, and a
decrease in property values. The
commenter suggested that HUD phase in
the new definition over a few years by
incrementally increasing the cumulative
episode threshold in order to provide
localities time to plan their budgets and
give homeless individuals time to adjust
their expectations.
Another commenter requested
guidance on what providers with
dedicated permanent supportive
housing beds should do if they are
unable to locate persons that meet this
definition.
Several commenters recommended
that HUD establish a ‘‘tiering system’’
where communities that are unable to
identify people who meet requirements
for ‘‘chronically homeless’’ may target
permanent supportive housing for other
vulnerable homeless persons. Similarly,
other commenters recommended that
HUD consider a prioritization policy for
homeless individuals eligible for
permanent supportive housing and
remove the requirement that 100
percent of new permanent supportive
housing units be designated for the
chronically homeless.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
is not inclusive of all vulnerable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
homeless populations; however, HUD
has intentionally focused the definition
of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ on those
persons with the longest histories of
homelessness and with the highest need
and believes that this is a reasonable
implementation of the statutory
requirements established in section 401
of the McKinney-Vento Act. The
definition is not intended to require
individuals and families to have longer
periods of homelessness before being
served; rather, the definition allows for
persons who already meet such criteria
to be prioritized for Continuum of Care
Program-funded permanent supportive
housing dedicated to persons
experiencing chronic homelessness.
In addition, HUD published
guidance 1 to clarify that, to the extent
that there are no persons who meet the
criteria of chronic homelessness
included in this rule, Continuum of
Care Program-funded dedicated
permanent supportive housing
providers are not required to keep a unit
vacant. Instead, the recipient may house
non-chronically homeless individuals or
families who are eligible for permanent
supportive housing generally and are
encouraged to prioritize those homeless
individuals or families who are the most
vulnerable or at risk of becoming
chronically homeless.
Comment: Definition does not target
those with longest histories and most
severe cases of homelessness. One
commenter stated that the proposed
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
does not target those with the longest
histories and most severe cases of
homelessness, such as those with
histories of homelessness that have four
or more episodes in more than the past
3 years.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that
there are individuals and families with
long histories of homelessness that may
not meet the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ included in the final rule.
For example, individuals and families
who have been homeless and living in
a place not meant for human habitation,
a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
for 12 months or longer in the past 3
years but where there were fewer than
four distinct occasions and the current
occasion lasted less than 12 months
would not be considered chronically
homeless. However, because the
1 Notice CPD–14–012: Prioritizing Persons
Experiencing Chronic Homelessness in Permanent
Supportive Housing and Recordkeeping
Requirements for Documenting Chronic Homeless
Status. Available at: https://
www.hudexchange.info/resource/3897/notice-cpd14-012-prioritizing-persons-experiencing-chronichomelessness-in-psh-and-recordkeepingrequirements/.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
statutory definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ requires at least four
occasions over a 3-year time frame, the
number of occasions necessary to be
considered chronically homeless cannot
be changed. Individuals or families who
have longer histories of homelessness
spent living a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter and who have
experienced at least four occasions in
the last 3 years are considered
chronically homeless so long as the
adult head of household (or minor head
of household where no adult is present)
has a disability as required by the
definition. However, an individual or
family who has a history of
homelessness spent living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter where
the period of homelessness has not
totaled 12 months either continuously
or over a period of at least four
occasions in the past 3 years would not
be considered chronically homeless. For
this reason, HUD has provided
flexibility around what constitutes an
occasion of homelessness and how to
document the period of homelessness
while still maintaining a uniform
standard to ensure consistency across
the country. HUD encourages recipients
of Continuum of Care Program-funded
permanent supportive housing not
dedicated to the chronically homeless to
prioritize persons that are most at risk
of becoming chronically homeless and
who are the most vulnerable.
Comment: Periods of homelessness do
not automatically correlate to need. A
commenter stated that those who have
been homeless for shorter, sporadic
periods of time that do not cumulatively
total 365 days might be more physically
and mentally prepared to use permanent
supportive housing than those who have
had longer episodes of homelessness.
Similarly, one commenter stated that a
longer length of time spent homeless
does not necessarily indicate a higher
level of need, and those who have been
homeless for shorter periods might
make better use of housing services.
HUD Response: HUD has determined
that the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ in section 401 of the
McKinney-Vento Act should define
those persons as chronically homeless
that have had the longest histories of
homelessness and highest need. The
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ set
forth in 24 CFR parts 91 and 578
intentionally narrows the statutory
definition to further ensure that limited
resources targeted to this population are
used to serve persons with the longest
histories of homelessness and highest
need. HUD acknowledges that there are
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
other factors that might also correlate to
need, however, length of time residing
in emergency shelters, safe havens, and
places not meant for human habitation
is one factor of need, and when
combined with the statutory
requirement that the head of household
have a disabling condition, HUD has
determined that it effectively defines
those persons with the highest needs as
chronically homeless. Therefore, the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
included in this final rule maintains the
requirement that was included in the
Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program proposed rule, that the four or
more separate occasions of
homelessness living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter must
total 12 months or include additional
criteria related to vulnerability. HUD
also recognizes that persons meeting the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
included in the final rule may require a
higher level of support in order to
obtain and maintain housing. Not all
permanent supportive housing is
limited to serving persons that meet the
definition of chronically homeless. HUD
has encouraged Continuums of Care and
recipients of Continuum of Care
Program-funded permanent supportive
housing to take other factors, such as
vulnerability, into account when
prioritizing households for permanent
supportive housing.
Comment: Require jurisdictions to
produce a plan to specifically address
dealing with chronic homelessness. A
commenter stated that every region in
the country should be required to have
a plan that deals directly with the
chronically homeless to show proof that
they have worked on the issue through
a statement with a local provider.
HUD Response: Each Continuum of
Care submits its plan for addressing
chronic homelessness through the
Continuum of Care Application
submitted under each Notice of Funding
Availability for the Continuum of Care
Program. This requirement will
continue to be addressed through the
Continuum of Care Program
Competition; therefore, no additional
requirements have been added to the
final rule. In addition, each
Consolidated Plan jurisdiction is
required to develop a homeless strategy
and this strategy must address the needs
of, and resources available to,
chronically homeless persons. This
requirement will continue to be
addressed through the Consolidated
Plan requirements at 24 CFR part 91.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
Comments Related to the Definition
Comment: Adhere to the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ included in the
conforming amendments to the
Consolidated Plan published with the
Emergency Solutions Grants program
interim rule. Several commenters stated
that they preferred the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ that was
included in the conforming
amendments to the Consolidated Plan
published with the Emergency
Solutions Grants program interim rule,
which defined a homeless occasion as a
period of at least 15 days.
HUD Response: The majority of
public comments received on the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
that was included in the conforming
amendments to the Consolidated Plan
published with the Emergency
Solutions Grants program interim rule
related to the requirement that to be
considered an ‘‘occasion’’ a period of
homelessness had to be a period of at
least 15 days. Several commenters
stated that the period of 15 days to
define an ‘‘occasion’’ was arbitrary and
was not the ideal definition. Upon
review of these comments, HUD
concluded that the 15-day standard did
not effectively target persons with the
longest histories of homelessness and
highest level of need. The definition in
the conforming amendments to the
Consolidated Plan published with the
Emergency Solutions Grants interim
rule would have allowed for an
individual or family experiencing
occasions of homelessness to be
considered chronically homeless within
a period of as few as 65 days, while
persons experiencing homelessness
without a break would have to be
homeless and residing in a place not
meant for human habitation, in a safe
haven, or an emergency shelter for at
least 1 year. Consistent with research,2
HUD has determined that requiring 1
year (12 months) of homelessness living
in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter will ensure that the
definition focuses on those persons with
the longest histories of such
homelessness and highest needs. The
definition included in this final rule
allows for limited resources to be
effectively targeted and does not adopt
the definition originally published in 24
CFR part 91.
Comment: Use ‘‘vulnerability index’’
to measure chronic homelessness.
Several commenters proposed
2 Thomas Byrne and Dennis P. Culhane. ‘‘Testing
Alternative Definitions of Chronic Homelessness’’
Psychiatric Services 66.5 (2015). Available at:
https://works.bepress.com/dennis_culhane/146.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75797
alternative definitions for targeting the
homeless population most in need of
permanent supportive housing. Several
commenters recommended that HUD
replace the proposed definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ with ‘‘homeless
persons determined to be vulnerable
through the application of a
standardized vulnerability index tool’’
that would be developed with
stakeholders. These commenters also
stated that homeless persons could be
assigned spots on a community’s
‘‘vulnerability list’’ so those most in
need of services could be identified.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that it is
important to consider a person’s
vulnerability or the severity of a
person’s needs when determining
housing placement; however, the
statutory definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ does not permit HUD to
adopt the definition proposed by the
commenters. HUD recognizes that
individuals and families should be
prioritized for permanent supportive
housing under the Continuum of Care
Program based on the severity of their
needs. To this point, HUD has provided
guidance to recipients of all Continuum
of Care Program-funded permanent
supportive housing encouraging
Continuums of Care and permanent
supportive housing providers to take
other factors, such as vulnerability, into
account when prioritizing households
for permanent supportive housing.
Comment: Allow communities to
define ‘‘chronically homeless’’ locally.
A commenter suggested that
establishing a global definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ has limitations
and that communities should be
encouraged to set their own
‘‘prioritization benchmarks’’ based on
local conditions.
Another commenter recommended
that the term ‘‘chronic’’ is a medical
term, and is not an appropriate term to
measure severity of homelessness, and
suggested that HUD allow local
Continuums of Care to submit their own
definitions based on people with serious
health conditions who have experienced
multiple and/or long episodes of
homelessness.
Finally, another commenter suggested
that HUD provide rural communities the
flexibility to determine what is meant
by ‘‘not meant for human habitation’’
since many of these communities do not
have condemnation procedures like
those often used by urban areas.
HUD Response: The definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ in section 401
of the McKinney-Vento Act provides the
basis for the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ set forth in 24 CFR parts 91
and 578. Although the Act does allow
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75798
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
HUD the discretion to allow
communities to define certain terms
such as ‘‘not meant for human
habitation’’ locally, HUD has
determined that all Continuums of Care
must use the same standard when
determining whether or not an
individual or family is chronically
homeless. Using a universal standard
will also allow HUD to track progress,
nationally, on the goal of ending chronic
homelessness.
Comment: Include individuals and
families who meet the McKinney-Vento
Homeless Assistance Education Act in
the definition of chronically homeless.
A commenter stated that individuals or
families who meet the McKinney-Vento
Homeless Education Act definition of
‘‘homeless’’ should also be considered
chronically homeless.
HUD Response: The definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ included in this
final rule reflects the statutory
definition in section 401 of the Act. The
statutory definition provides specific
minimum criteria that an individual or
family must meet in order to be defined
as chronically homeless. Although HUD
has the discretion to make the definition
of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ more narrow
in the final rule, the definition must
include the minimum statutory
requirements. Further, it is HUD’s
intention to ensure that the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ targets those
persons with the longest histories of
homelessness who have been living in
a place not meant for human habitation,
a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter.
Therefore, HUD has chosen to not
change the final rule to include all
individuals and families who meet the
definition in section 725(2) of the
McKinney-Vento Act. HUD recognizes
that there are vulnerable populations
who are not included in this definition
of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’ The
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ is
not intended to include all vulnerable
populations.
Comment: HUD should consider
persons chronically at risk of
homelessness the same as chronically
homeless. A commenter suggested that
HUD should treat ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ and ‘‘chronically at risk of
homelessness’’ as the same so that those
who have not been able to maintain
permanent supportive housing because
of a loss of income due to a disability
and inability to attain a permanent
voucher are not penalized.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that
there are vulnerable populations who
are not included in this definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’; however,
defining chronically homeless more
narrowly will allow limited resources to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
be prioritized for persons with the
longest histories of homelessness and
who are most likely to have the most
severe service needs, which is
consistent with the requirements
established in section 401 of the
McKinney-Vento Act. The statute does
not support defining persons who are
‘‘at risk of homelessness’’ (on a
recurring basis or otherwise) as
chronically homeless as these persons
do not meet the definition of homeless
or chronically homeless as set forth in
the Act. HUD reminds stakeholders that
individuals and families who meet the
definition of at risk of homelessness
might be eligible for homelessness
prevention assistance under either the
Continuum of Care Program, if the
Continuum of Care is a High Performing
Community, or the Emergency Solutions
Grants program.
Comment: Provide for different
definitional criteria for ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ for youth and families with
children. Several commenters suggested
that the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ should have different
definitional criteria for families with
children and youth than for adult
individuals. One commenter suggested
that there should be different
cumulative time frames for individuals,
families, and youth. Specifically, the
commenter proposed, ‘‘that the
definition be changed so that a
chronically homeless individual is
defined as one who is homeless for at
least 1 year or for a cumulative total of
180 days in the previous 3 years over
multiple occasions, a chronically
homeless family is defined as one that
is currently homeless and has moved
multiple times in the previous 12
months, where an adult and/or child
family member is involved with more
than one public service system, and a
category is added for chronically
homeless youth, who would be
currently homeless individuals under
the age of 25 who have moved multiple
times in the previous 6 months, and this
pattern of housing instability can be
expected to continue.’’
HUD Response: The single statutory
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ is
inclusive of individuals, families with
children, and unaccompanied youth
and sets a minimum threshold that must
be met for any person, regardless of age
or household composition. HUD strived
to reasonably implement the statutory
definition by clarifying in the regulation
that, for family households, only the
head of household must meet the
criteria for individuals who are defined
as chronically homeless. The definition
in the regulation also allows for changes
to family composition over time.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Beyond this clarification, creating a
broader or less restrictive threshold for
unaccompanied youth or families with
children would undermine one of the
goals of the ‘‘chronically homeless’’
definition, which is to help ensure that
resources are focused on individuals
and families with the longest
experiences of homelessness spent
living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter. In addition, a
person’s status as part of a family may
change and a youth may become an
adult during his or her time living in an
emergency shelter, safe haven, or place
not meant for human habitation.
Therefore, a single definition helps
ensure that an individual’s status does
not change depending on whether he or
she is part of a family at the time of
intake or turns 25. Therefore, in the
final rule, HUD has maintained that the
standard for qualifying as chronically
homeless is the same for all individuals,
families with children, and
unaccompanied youth. Families with
children and unaccompanied youth,
like single adults, who do not meet the
criteria of chronically homeless might
still meet the definition of ‘‘homeless’’
and if they do they are eligible for
assistance under the Continuum of Care
Program and Emergency Solutions
Grants program.
Comment: Define family in the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
Several commenters sought clarification
on how HUD defines ‘‘family’’ for the
purposes of defining ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’ One commenter asked that
HUD define the term ‘‘family’’ in a
manner consistent with how it is
defined in the Equal Access to Housing
in HUD Program Regardless of Sexual
Orientation or Gender Identity final
rule. Another commenter expressed
confusion over whether a chronically
homeless family must have a child
under the age of 18. Another commenter
stated that the term family is ‘‘misused
to identify a demographic of a
household and that the term
‘‘household’’ should be defined
consistently with the proposed data
standards.’’
HUD Response: The proposed
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
did not define the term ‘‘family.’’ The
Equal Access to Housing in HUD
Programs Regardless of Sexual
Orientation or Gender Identity final rule
provides the following definition of
‘‘family’’ in 24 CFR 5.403 which applies
to programs authorized under the Act.
The definition ‘‘Family’’ includes, but is
not limited to, the following, regardless
of actual or perceived sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
status: (1) A single person, who may be
an elderly person, displaced person,
disabled person, near-elderly person, or
any other single person; or, (2) A group
of persons residing together, and such
group includes, but is not limited to, a
family with or without children, an
elderly family, a near-elderly family, a
disabled family, a displaced family, and
remaining members of a tenant family.
This definition of ‘‘family’’ applies in
both the Emergency Solutions Grants
and Continuum of Care Program rules.
The McKinney-Vento Act distinguishes
individuals from families. Therefore,
paragraph (1) of the definition of
‘‘family’’ under the Equal Access Rule is
considered an individual for the
purposes of the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ included in this
final rule. This means that a chronically
homeless family is any group of persons
presenting for assistance together, where
the head of household meets all of the
criteria established in this final rule,
regardless of marital status, actual or
perceived sexual orientation, or gender
identity, with or without children and
irrespective of age or relationship. A
child who is temporarily away from the
home because of placement in foster
care is considered a member of the
family.
Comment: Clarify that any family
member who meets the criteria of
chronically homeless can qualify the
family as chronically homeless. A few
commenters requested that any member
of the family could make the entire
family meet the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ A commenter
recommended that HUD consider
revising the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ specifically to allow for a
minor child in a family to qualify the
family household as chronically
homeless. Another commenter
recommended only that the children,
instead of the adult head of household,
be able to have one of the listed
disabling conditions and qualify the
family as chronically homeless because
the barriers a disability presents to an
individual are similar to the barriers
faced by a parent of a child with a
disability. Similarly, one commenter
proposed adding language to clarify that
the members of a family household all
qualify as chronically homeless based
on the head of household regardless of
changes within the household
composition.
HUD Response: The statutory
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
dictates that the adult head of
household (or minor head of household
if there is no adult in the family) must
meet the criteria set forth in the
definition. Therefore, the final rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
cannot be revised from the proposed
rule to allow for any household member
besides the head of household to qualify
the family as chronically homeless; this
includes experiencing the occasion(s) of
homelessness and being diagnosed with
the disabling condition.
However, because it is the adult head
of household who qualifies a family as
chronically homeless, the whole family
is considered chronically homeless even
if the household composition changed
during the course of the head of
household’s homelessness. Language
stating this was included in the
proposed definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ and remains in the final
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
For example, if an adult head of
household has a qualifying disability
and has been homeless continuously for
12 months and has been accompanied
by another family member for only part
of that time frame, the whole household
meets the definition of a chronically
homeless family.
Comment: Eliminate the requirement
that to be chronically homeless an
individual or family must experience
four separate occasions of homelessness.
Several commenters requested that HUD
eliminate the requirement for four
separate occasions of homelessness in
favor of considering anyone that has
been homeless for a cumulative total of
365 days over the past 3 years to be
considered chronically homeless. One
commenter stated that occasions are
‘‘too sloppy to define’’ and the concept
is of little value.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that
the requirement for four or more
separate occasions of homelessness over
a 3-year period will not include
individuals or families who have
experienced only two occasions of
homelessness over a 3-year period
where the cumulative total is 12 months
or greater. However, the requirement of
four or more occasions is statutory and
included in the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ in the
McKinney-Vento Act and, therefore,
cannot be changed without a change to
the statute. For this reason, HUD has
provided maximum flexibility within
the statutory framework about what
constitutes a break between occasions
and how to document the period of
homelessness. In addition, HUD notes,
for those stakeholders who submitted
this comment because of concerns about
these individuals and families not being
eligible for needed resources, that the
Continuum of Care and Emergency
Solutions Grants programs fund a
variety of housing and services for
individuals and families who are
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75799
homeless, but do not meet the criteria of
chronically homeless.
Comment: Include a cumulative time
frame for the four or more occasions but
make that time frame less than 1 year.
Many commenters disagreed with the
proposed rule’s cumulative length of
time the four or more occasions must
total in order for an individual or family
to be considered chronically homeless.
A few commenters proposed reducing
the requirement from 1 year to 120 days.
Several commenters suggested that the
time frame should be reduced from 1
year to 6 months or 180 days. One
commenter proposed that this 6-month
time frame should apply to both
occasional and consecutive periods of
homelessness.
HUD Response: The statutory
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
requires individuals and families who
meet the definition through a
continuous occasion to have been
homeless and living or residing in a
place not meant for human habitation,
safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
for at least 1 year. The statute set a
different standard for persons who
experience frequent occasions of
homelessness, requiring at least four
occasions over 3 years. The statute was
silent on what qualified as an occasion
of homelessness. HUD has determined
that requiring four or more occasions to
total at least 12 months would set a
threshold of need comparable to the
requirement for a continuous episode.
This will help ensure that resources that
are dedicated to serving chronically
homeless persons are targeted to
individuals and families with the
longest experiences of homelessness
regardless of whether they meet the
threshold for chronic homelessness
through a continuous occasion or
through multiple occasions.
Comment: For the cumulative time
frame for four or more occasions, count
the time in months as opposed to days.
One commenter proposed that the
definition be revised to count homeless
occasions in terms of months and not
days. Another commenter
recommended that the actual number of
days homeless need not be counted and
a single encounter with a service
provider on a single day in one month
could count for homeless status for the
entire month.
HUD Response: The definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ included in the
proposed rule did not specify how the
time frame should be counted and
instead just stated that the cumulative
total of occasions must total at least 1
year. HUD agrees with the comment that
changing 1 year to 12 months helps
provide clarification about how to count
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75800
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
an individual or family’s time spent in
places not meant for human habitation,
in a safe haven or in an emergency
shelter. Furthermore, since HUD did not
include recordkeeping requirements in
the proposed rule, it was not clear that
HUD does not intend to make homeless
service providers document every day of
homelessness spent living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter to
equal 365 days, for either continuous or
occasional homelessness. HUD agrees
that counting in months instead of days
is a more reasonable requirement for
documentation purposes. In addition,
HUD agrees with the comment that a
single encounter with a homeless
service provider on a single day within
1 month would be sufficient to count
the individual or family as homeless for
the entire month. HUD understands that
there is not an Homeless Management
Information System record for every
interaction or for every day in which a
person is homeless and did not want to
create a recordkeeping requirement that
was overly burdensome. This
requirement has been clarified in the
recordkeeping requirements; however,
HUD has also added language stating
that this does not apply if the provider
has evidence of a break, defined as 7 or
more consecutive nights not living in a
safe haven or in an emergency shelter,
or living in a place meant for human
habitation, during that month. Again,
this will help ensure that resources
dedicated to persons experiencing
chronic homelessness are targeted to
individuals and families with the
longest experiences of homelessness.
When considering how to determine a
break, HUD understands that people
often find themselves with a place to
stay for a couple of nights (hotel, with
a friend, etc.), however, their primary
nighttime residence is still a place not
meant for human habitation, an
emergency shelter, or a safe haven. HUD
determined that up to 7 nights is a
reasonable period of time for an
individual or family to stay for a few
nights in a place other than an
emergency shelter, a safe haven, or in a
place that is meant for human habitation
without considering it a break in their
total length of time homeless for
purposes of determining chronically
homeless status.
Rule clarification. To clarify that, for
documentation purposes, the
cumulative length of time of occasions
must total 12 months instead of 365
days, the language in paragraph (1)(ii) of
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
has been revised to provide that the
homeless individual with a disability
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
has been homeless and living as
described continuously for at least 12
months or on at least 4 separate
occasions in the last 3 years, as long as
the combined occasions equal at least 12
months and each break in homelessness
separating the occasions included at
least 7 consecutive nights of not living
in a place not meant for human
habitation. The definition further
provides that stays in institutional care
facilities for fewer than 90 days will
generally not constitute as a break in
homelessness, but rather such stays are
included in the 12-month total.
In addition, to clarify the
recordkeeping requirements related to
paragraph (1)(ii), § 578.103(a)(4) has
been revised to include language on
how documenting a single encounter
within 1 month is sufficient
documentation to count the individual
or family as homeless for the entire
month.
Comment: Give discretion to
Continuums of Care to determine the
length of the occasions of homelessness.
Several commenters suggested that
Continuums of Care should be provided
with the flexibility to determine when
an individual or family is chronically
homeless and whether they have been
homeless at least four times over the
past 3 years.
HUD Response: In order to ensure that
Continuums of Care nationwide are
defining chronically homeless
consistently for counting, eligibility,
and reporting purposes, it is necessary
to have one uniform definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ that applies
nationwide. A uniform definition will
allow for data from each community to
be compared nationally, and that
persons with the longest histories of
homelessness who have been living in
a place not meant for human habitation,
a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
and with the most severe service needs
are prioritized for assistance in
permanent supportive housing. As more
communities meet the Administration’s
goal of ending chronic homelessness,
HUD will use the annual Continuum of
Care Program Competition Notice of
Funding Availability to reflect changes
in priorities. However, the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ will not change,
as it is meant to encompass those
homeless persons with the longest
histories of living in places not meant
for human habitation, in a safe haven,
or in emergency shelters and who have
the most severe service needs, and to
the extent that there are persons that
meet this criteria within a Continuum of
Care they should always be counted and
be prioritized for assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comment: Need guidance on what
constitutes as a break in homelessness.
Many commenters requested guidance
on what constitutes as a break in
homelessness in order to distinguish
between occasions. One commenter
requested guidance on how to document
such breaks in Homeless Management
Information System. Another
commenter suggested that temporary
housing situations of less than 1 week
not constitute as a break. Several
commenters suggested that periods of
‘‘couch surfing’’ should not constitute as
a break in homelessness.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that in
order to accurately document occasions
of homelessness, it is necessary to
understand and document the housing
situation that ended the occasion;
therefore, HUD has clarified in the
recordkeeping requirements that a break
in homelessness is any period of 7 or
more consecutive nights where the
individual or family is not residing in a
safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
or is residing in a place meant for
human habitation. In addition, the final
rule allows for stays in an institutional
care facility where the individual has
been residing for fewer than 90 days to
not constitute as a break in
homelessness either. HUD provided this
clarification because of a comment
provided through the comment process
on the Continuum of Care Program
interim rule recognizing that many
hard-to-serve chronically homeless
individuals and families have an
opportunity to spend 1 or 2 nights on
someone’s couch, in a motel using all or
most of the beneficiary’s monthly Social
Security Income or Social Security
Disability Income check, in another
location that allows them to briefly not
sleep in a place not meant for human
habitation, in an emergency shelter, or
in a safe haven. HUD does not consider
these periods of less than 7 nights a
break in homelessness. Instead, these
days would be counted towards a single
occasion of homelessness living in a
place not meant for human habitation,
a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter.
Only periods of 7 or more consecutive
nights where the individual or family is
not living in a place not meant for
human habitation, in a safe haven, or in
an emergency shelter would qualify as
a break. Intake workers must follow the
general recordkeeping standards of
third-party evidence first, intake worker
observation second, and selfcertification of the head of household
third, when documenting the break in
homelessness.
Rule Clarification: Section 578.3 of
the final rule includes language in
paragraph (1)(ii) of the definition of
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘chronically homeless’’ that clarifies
that a break is considered to be 7 or
more consecutive nights where the
individual or family is not living in a
place not meant for human habitation,
in a safe haven or in an emergency
shelter.
Comment: Stays in living situations
other than the streets, emergency
shelters, or safe havens should be
included in places an individual or
family can reside and still meet the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’
Several commenters suggested that HUD
consider expanding the definition to
allow for individuals and families in
certain living situations to be
considered chronically homeless.
Numerous commenters suggested that
individuals and families who have been
living in ‘‘doubled up’’ situations
should qualify as being chronically
homeless. One commenter stated that
periods spent ‘‘doubled up’’ should be
counted if the individual or family
moves two or more times within 60
days. Another commenter suggested that
in addition to periods of living in
‘‘doubled up’’ situations, the definition
should also include those living in
unsuitable housing for long periods of
time, such as old mobile homes or
cabins without electricity and sewage.
Another commenter suggested that the
definition include ‘‘a person or family
who does not have a permanent
residence AND has moved two or more
times in the past 60 days.’’
Several commenters asked HUD to
consider stays in transitional housing
towards a person’s homeless history
when determining an individual or
family’s chronically homeless status.
The commenters had various
suggestions about how such stays could
be incorporated. One commenter
suggested that stays of 90 days or less
in transitional housing should not
constitute as a break. Similarly, another
commenter asked HUD to consider
including transitional housing programs
in the definition of ‘‘institutional care
facility,’’ which would allow stays in
transitional housing for 90 days or less
to not constitute as a break in
homelessness. Another commenter
proposed that the definition be
expanded so that persons who have
been living in transitional housing, for
any period of time, may also be
considered chronically homeless.
Finally, one commenter was concerned
that excluding time in transitional
housing would disadvantage homeless
veterans who would otherwise be
eligible for the HUD-Veterans Affairs
Supportive Housing (HUD–VASH)
program because many of those veterans
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
are initially housed in transitional
housing.
HUD Response: HUD has interpreted
the criteria in paragraphs (1) and (2) of
the statutory definition by clarifying
that short-term stays in institutional
care facilities do not count as breaks in
homelessness. HUD believes this
clarification is supported by the
widespread and longstanding
recognition that persons experiencing
chronic homelessness frequently cycle
between short-term stays in institutional
care facilities and emergency shelters,
safe havens, and places not meant for
human habitation. HUD also believes
this widespread and longstanding
recognition is implicit in paragraph (2)
of the statutory definition, which allows
certain individuals to qualify as
chronically homeless even if they
currently live in an institutional care
facility, as opposed to an emergency
shelter, safe haven, or place not meant
for human habitation. There is nothing
in the statutory definition to suggest that
certain people should qualify as
chronically homeless even if they are
currently living in transitional housing
or in ‘‘doubled up’’ locations as opposed
to emergency shelters, safe havens, or
places not meant for human habitation.
Therefore, HUD has decided not to
expand the qualifying residences
beyond the places explicitly mentioned
in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the statute.
Regarding HUD–VASH, specifically,
the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) determines chronic homeless
status at the initial intake to VA
homeless services. Therefore, veterans
who qualify as chronically homeless at
initial intake will maintain that status
throughout the episode of care, even if
they are served in a VA program that is
characterized as transitional housing
immediately prior to entry into HUD–
VASH.
Comment: Clarification of how the
word ‘‘continuously’’ is defined in the
phrase ‘‘continuously homeless for at
least one year.’’ A commenter asked
how HUD is defining the word
‘‘continuously’’ in the phrase
‘‘continuously homeless for at least one
year’’ in the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’
HUD Response: HUD has clarified
that a break in homelessness is defined
as 7 or more consecutive nights in a
place that does not qualify as a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or an emergency shelter and,
therefore, does not consider it to be
necessary to define the word
‘‘continuously.’’
Comment: Clarification is needed on
‘‘conditions’’ versus ‘‘disability.’’
Several commenters wrote about
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75801
paragraph (1)(iii) in the proposed rule’s
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless,’’
which provides that a chronically
homeless person is a person who can be
diagnosed with one of the following
conditions: ‘‘substance use disorder,
serious mental illness, developmental
disability (as defined in section 102 of
the Developmental Disabilities
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of
2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002)), post-traumatic
stress disorder, cognitive impairments
resulting from brain injury, or chronic
physical illness or disability.’’
Commenters asked for clarification on
what constitutes a ‘‘condition.’’ Other
commenters asked about the specific list
of ‘‘conditions’’ included in the
definition. One commenter asked why
the term ‘‘serious mental illness’’ is
used instead of ‘‘severe and persistent
mental illness,’’ while another
commenter asked why ‘‘post-traumatic
stress disorder’’ was included here but
not in the definition of ‘‘disability’’
included in the McKinney-Vento Act.
Other commenters referenced the
Homeless Management Information
System Data Standards and
recommended that they be consistent.
Another commenter suggested that
the language be revised to say that a
chronically homeless person is a person
who has been diagnosed with a
condition as opposed to saying can be
diagnosed, so that it is more definitive.
Finally, one commenter said that the
requirement to have a disability
determination for each of the identified
disabilities will cause an underreporting
of disabilities, which will result in an
underreporting of chronic
homelessness.
HUD Response: The language
included in the proposed definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ regarding the
types of conditions a person must have
in order to qualify as chronically
homeless comes from the statute. HUD
analyzed the list of conditions included
in the statute in comparison with those
included under the definition of
‘‘homeless individual with a disability’’
under the Act and determined that each
of the ‘‘conditions’’ included under the
statutory definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ are also included under the
definition of ‘‘homeless individual with
a disability.’’ Because an individual
with one or more of the ‘‘conditions’’
included under the statutory definition
of ‘‘chronically homeless’’ would
qualify as a ‘‘homeless individual with
a disability’’ under the Act, and because
HUD wants to clarify that chronically
homeless individuals and families are
eligible for permanent supportive
housing, which under the Continuum of
Care Program interim rule means
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75802
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘permanent housing in which
supportive services are provided to
assist homeless persons with a disability
to live independently,’’ HUD has
replaced the list of ‘‘conditions’’ found
in the proposed rule with the
requirement that an individual must
meet the definition of ‘‘homeless
individual with a disability’’ in the Act.
In addition, HUD has added to the
Continuum of Care Program interim rule
recordkeeping requirements for
documenting the disability, and has
created standards for collecting
information on disability in the
Homeless Management Information
System Data Standards that are
consistent with this definition.
Regarding the comment related to the
phrase ‘‘can be diagnosed’’ found in the
proposed rule, HUD decided to replace
the list of ‘‘conditions’’ found in the
proposed rule with the requirement that
an individual must meet the definition
of ‘‘homeless individual with a
disability’’ in the Act. Therefore, the
phrase ‘‘can be diagnosed’’ is not found
in the final rule. It should be noted,
however, that for the purposes of
recordkeeping, the final rule permits
evidence of a disability to be
documented using an intake staffrecorded observation of disability that,
no later than 45 days of the application
for assistance, is confirmed and
accompanied by evidence in 24 CFR
578.103(a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2), (3), or (5).
Finally, regarding the last comment,
there is no such ‘‘requirement to have a
disability determination for each of the
identified disabilities.’’ An adult head of
household is only required to meet the
definition of ‘‘homeless individual with
a disability’’ as defined in section 401(9)
of the McKinney-Vento Act in order to
meet the definition of ‘‘chronically
homeless’’ and the recipient is only
required to keep on file evidence of the
qualifying disabling condition as HUD
has clarified in the recordkeeping
requirements.
Rule Clarification: To provide for a
more uniform definition, this final rule
revised the language in paragraph (3) of
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
to state that to be considered chronically
homeless a family must have an adult
head of household (or a minor head of
household if no adult is present in the
household) who meets the criteria of
‘‘homeless individual with a disability’’
as defined in section 401(9) of the
McKinney-Vento Act.
Comment: The definition of
‘‘chronically homeless’’ should include
an income variable. A commenter
recommended that HUD add an income
variable as an indicator of chronic
homelessness.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
HUD Response: HUD disagrees with
this recommendation. The statute does
not include an income variable for
either the definition of ‘‘homeless’’ or
‘‘chronically homeless’’ and HUD does
not seek to expand either definition to
include this component.
Comment: Provide guidance on what
is meant by ‘‘institution.’’ One
commenter stated that HUD should
provide clear guidance on what
constitutes an ‘‘institution.’’ Other
commenters suggested that HUD
include foster care in the definition of
an institution and clarify that temporary
placement in child welfare systems and
foster care should constitute as a break
in homelessness.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges
that clarification of institutional care
facility is necessary, however, rather
than establishing a fixed set of
institutional care facilities in the final
rule, HUD intends to issue guidance on
the meaning of ‘‘institutional care
facility.’’
Comment: Consistently refer to stays
in institutions that do not constitute as
a break in homelessness for purposes of
defining ‘‘chronically homeless’’ as
either ‘‘90 days or less’’ or ‘‘fewer than
90 days.’’ One commenter stated that
HUD should be consistent when
referencing institutional stays because
‘‘90 days or less’’ in paragraph (1)(ii) of
the definition is not the same as ‘‘fewer
than 90 days’’ in paragraph (2) of this
definition.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that the
language around stays in an institution
included in the proposed definition was
inconsistent. The definition in this rule
has been revised to clarify that an
individual can be considered
chronically homeless if they are residing
in or have a history of residing in an
institution for fewer than 90 days,
where the individual or family resided
in a place not meant for human
habitation, in a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter immediately prior to
entering the institution.
Rule clarification: HUD has revised
the definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
to state that a homeless individual with
a disability may be considered to be
chronically homeless if they live in an
institutional care facility, as long as the
individual has been living there for
fewer than 90 days and had been living
in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter prior to entering the
institutional care facility.
Comment: Define residence in
institutional care facility as present and
not past residence. A commenter
suggested that HUD change the wording
in paragraph (2) of the definition from
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘An individual who has been residing
in an institutional care facility. . ..’’ to
‘‘An individual who is residing in an
institutional care facility. . .’’
HUD Response: HUD disagrees that
this rewording is necessary. The phrase
‘‘has been residing in an institutional
care facility’’ encompasses both the
recent past and the current living
situation of the individual and describes
persons who are currently living or
residing in an institutional care facility
and whose total current stay in that
facility will be fewer than 90 days.
Comment: Difficulty in documenting
periods of homelessness. Many
commenters expressed concern that it
would be difficult to document or verify
the time period of homelessness
required in the proposed definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ Some
commenters stated that it would be
difficult to verify where homeless
individuals or families have slept if the
individual or family had not had regular
interaction with a homeless service
provider. Other commenters stated that
chronically homeless individuals and
families would not be able to remember
or provide documentation for the exact
period of time during which they had
been homeless. Several commenters
suggested that self-certification by the
head of household of homeless status
should be sufficient for documenting
homeless status and history. Many
commenters expressed concern that the
requirement to track and verify
cumulative lengths of homelessness
would place an undue burden on
homeless service providers, particularly
in rural areas where there are fewer
institutions or shelters. Commenters
also requested that the final rule include
specific guidance on how to document
homeless status and history, particularly
for persons that have been unsheltered.
Finally, several commenters expressed
concern that the definition would make
counting chronically homeless persons
in the Point-in-Time counts more
difficult because enumerators will not
have sufficient time to determine
lengths of homelessness.
HUD Response: After reviewing the
public comments, HUD acknowledges
the lack of recordkeeping requirements
for chronically homeless status in the
proposed rule caused confusion and
concern and HUD agrees it must provide
specific guidance on documentation
requirements for projects that are
required to serve the chronically
homeless. For this reason, the final rule
includes a section on recordkeeping
requirements. When creating the
recordkeeping requirements, HUD
acknowledged many of the potential
difficulties expressed by the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
commenters might occur if the burdenof-proof is too high. Therefore, the
language in the recordkeeping section
will allow for the period of
homelessness to be documented by a
self-certification by the head of
household seeking assistance on a
limited basis. In rare instances where
persons have been unsheltered and out
of contact for long periods of time, the
recordkeeping requirements provide
that up to the full period of
homelessness could be documented by
a self-certification by the individual or
head of household seeking assistance,
however, this accommodation is limited
to no more than 25 percent of all
chronically homeless individuals and
families assisted. HUD determined that
25 percent was a reasonable limit for
this accommodation as it is consistent
with a previous policy used by HUD
that limited the percentage of program
participants in transitional housing
funded through the Supportive Housing
Program who could be assisted for
longer than 2 years. Further, the
recordkeeping section clarifies that
homeless service providers are not
required to verify every day of
homelessness in a given month but
instead, that a single encounter with a
homeless service provider in a given
month would be sufficient third-party
evidence that the individual or family
has been homeless for the entire month,
unless there is evidence that the
individual or family had a break of at
least 7 consecutive nights in their
homeless occasion during that month
(e.g., was housed with a friend or family
member). HUD does not expect
Continuums of Care to document a
person’s chronically homeless status
when conducting the annual Point-inTime count. HUD will provide
clarification and guidance regarding
how to enumerate persons experiencing
chronic homelessness through notices
and other guidance in advance of the
Point-in-Time count.
Rule clarification. To clarify the
records HUD expects Continuum of Care
Program recipients and subrecipients to
maintain when they are required to
serve chronically homeless individuals
and families, HUD has revised
§ 578.103(a)(4) to incorporate
recordkeeping requirements for the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless.’’ In
addition, as a result of incorporating a
new paragraph (4) in § 578.103(a), the
remainder of § 578.103(a) has been
reordered and HUD has amended
§ 578.87(b)(4) to update the reference
from § 578.103(a)(13) to
§ 578.103(a)(14).
Comment: If there is no penalty for
lying there will be fraud. A commenter
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
expressed concern that if there is no
penalty for lying by the program
participants about the length of time
homeless, there is likely to be fraud.
HUD Response: In general, HUD
expects that all homeless service
providers will exercise due diligence
when documenting periods of
homelessness. The final rule includes
recordkeeping requirements that will
require third-party documentation
where it is available, but allows for selfcertification by the head of household
seeking assistance in certain instances.
Rule clarification: To clarify that HUD
expects Continuum of Care Program
recipients and subrecipients
documenting chronic homeless status to
obtain third-party documentation
whenever possible, HUD has established
§ 578.103(a)(4) to incorporate
recordkeeping requirements for the
definition of ‘‘chronically homeless’’
and to provide that the order of priority
for documenting chronically homeless
status is third-party documentation first,
intake worker observations second, and
certification from the person seeking
assistance third. In addition, HUD has
clarified that, except for in limited
circumstances, at least 9 months of the
homeless occasion(s) must be
documented with third-party
documentation.
VI. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This final rule establishes a regulatory
definition for the term ‘‘chronically
homeless.’’ This rule focuses on persons
with the longest histories of
homelessness to ensure that funds are
targeted to providing permanent
supportive housing solutions for these
individuals and families who are
chronically homeless, consistent with
the statutory definition of the term
established in the McKinney-Vento Act.
This definition will also ensure that
communities are using the same criteria
in determining whether a person is
chronically homeless, and that HUD
receives consistent and accurate
information nationwide.
This new definition will use existing
recordkeeping requirements for the
Continuum of Care Program to
document the homeless status of
program participants, but adds that such
documentation covers a program
participant’s homelessness status over a
specific time period—at least 1 year or
on at least 4 separate occasions in the
last 3 years—to document the
chronically homeless status of program
participants. While in some instances
additional program participant records
will need to be obtained to identify an
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75803
individual’s ‘‘chronically homeless’’
status, the additional burden of
obtaining these records will ensure that
communities are appropriately targeting
HUD funds to those with the greatest
need.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review.’’ This rule was
determined to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ as defined in section
3(f) of the order (although not an
economically significant regulatory
action under the order). The docket file
is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Office of the
General Counsel, 451 7th Street SW.,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–
0500. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, please
schedule an appointment to review the
docket file by calling the Regulations
Division at 202–402–3055 (this is not a
toll-free number). Individuals with
speech or hearing impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339 (this is a toll-free number).
Information Collection Requirements
The information collection
requirements contained in this final rule
have been submitted to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned OMB
control number 2506–0112. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Environmental Impact
This rule does not direct, provide for
assistance or loan and mortgage
insurance for, or otherwise govern or
regulate, real property acquisition,
disposition, leasing, rehabilitation,
alteration, demolition, or new
construction, or establish, revise, or
provide for standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this rule is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, local, and
tribal governments and on the private
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
75804
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
sector. This rule does not impose a
Federal mandate on any State, local, or
tribal government, or on the private
sector, within the meaning of UMRA.
PART 91—CONSOLIDATED
SUBMISSIONS FOR COMMUNITY
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
■
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an
agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule
solely addresses the definition of
‘‘chronically homeless.’’ The purpose of
this rule is to determine the universe of
individuals and families who qualify as
‘‘chronically homeless’’ under the
McKinney-Vento Act. Given the narrow
scope of this rule, HUD has determined
that it would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments and is not
required by statute or the rule preempts
State law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
final rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments nor
preempt State law within the meaning
of the Executive order.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 91
Aged, Grant programs—housing and
community development, Homeless,
Individuals with disabilities, Low- and
moderate-income housing, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
24 CFR Part 578
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11371 et seq., 42
U.S.C. 3535(d).
Community development,
Community facilities, Grant programs—
housing and community development,
Grant program—social programs,
Homeless, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, parts 91 and 578 of title
24 of the Code of Federal Regulations
are amended as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 91 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 3601–3619,
5301–5315, 11331–11388, 12701–12711,
12741–12756, and 12901–12912.
2. In § 91.5, the definition of
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 91.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Chronically homeless means:
(1) A ‘‘homeless individual with a
disability,’’ as defined in section 401(9)
of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360(9)),
who:
(i) Lives in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter; and
(ii) Has been homeless and living as
described in paragraph (1)(i) of this
definition continuously for at least 12
months or on at least 4 separate
occasions in the last 3 years, as long as
the combined occasions equal at least 12
months and each break in homelessness
separating the occasions included at
least 7 consecutive nights of not living
as described in paragraph (1)(i). Stays in
institutional care facilities for fewer
than 90 days will not constitute as a
break in homelessness, but rather such
stays are included in the 12-month total,
as long as the individual was living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter immediately before
entering the institutional care facility;
(2) An individual who has been
residing in an institutional care facility,
including a jail, substance abuse or
mental health treatment facility,
hospital, or other similar facility, for
fewer than 90 days and met all of the
criteria in paragraph (1) of this
definition, before entering that facility;
or
(3) A family with an adult head of
household (or if there is no adult in the
family, a minor head of household) who
meets all of the criteria in paragraph (1)
or (2) of this definition, including a
family whose composition has
fluctuated while the head of household
has been homeless.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 578—CONTINUUM OF CARE
PROGRAM
3. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 578 continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. In § 578.3, the definition of
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 578.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Chronically homeless means:
(1) A ‘‘homeless individual with a
disability,’’ as defined in section 401(9)
of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360(9)),
who:
(i) Lives in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter; and
(ii) Has been homeless and living as
described in paragraph (1)(i) of this
definition continuously for at least 12
months or on at least 4 separate
occasions in the last 3 years, as long as
the combined occasions equal at least 12
months and each break in homelessness
separating the occasions included at
least 7 consecutive nights of not living
as described in paragraph (1)(i). Stays in
institutional care facilities for fewer
than 90 days will not constitute as a
break in homelessness, but rather such
stays are included in the 12-month total,
as long as the individual was living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter immediately before
entering the institutional care facility;
(2) An individual who has been
residing in an institutional care facility,
including a jail, substance abuse or
mental health treatment facility,
hospital, or other similar facility, for
fewer than 90 days and met all of the
criteria in paragraph (1) of this
definition, before entering that facility;
or
(3) A family with an adult head of
household (or if there is no adult in the
family, a minor head of household) who
meets all of the criteria in paragraph (1)
or (2) of this definition, including a
family whose composition has
fluctuated while the head of household
has been homeless.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 578.87
[Amended]
5. In § 578.87, paragraph (b)(4) is
amended by removing the reference
‘‘§ 578.103(a)(13)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘§ 578.103(a)(14)’’.
■ 6. In § 578.103, redesignate
paragraphs (a)(4) through (17) as
paragraphs (a)(5) through (18) and add
paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 578.103
Recordkeeping requirements.
(a) * * *
(4) Chronically homeless status. The
recipient must maintain and follow
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
written intake procedures to ensure
compliance with the chronically
homeless definition in § 578.3. The
procedures must require documentation
at intake of the evidence relied upon to
establish and verify chronically
homeless status. The procedures must
establish the order of priority for
obtaining evidence as third-party
documentation first, intake worker
observations second, and certification
from the person seeking assistance
third. Records contained in an HMIS, or
comparable database used by victim
service or legal service providers, are
acceptable evidence of third-party
documentation and intake worker
observations if the HMIS, or comparable
database, retains an auditable history of
all entries, including the person who
entered the data, the date of entry, and
the change made, and if the HMIS
prevents overrides or changes of the
dates on which entries are made.
(i) For paragraph (1) of the
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ definition in
§ 578.3, evidence that the individual is
a ‘‘homeless individual with a
disability’’ as defined in section 401(9)
of the McKinney-Vento Homeless
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360(9))
must include:
(A) Evidence of homeless status as set
forth in paragraph (a)(3) of this section;
and
(B) Evidence of a disability. In
addition to the documentation required
under paragraph (a)(4)(i)(A) of this
section, the procedures must require
documentation at intake of the evidence
relied upon to establish and verify the
disability of the person applying for
homeless assistance. The recipient must
keep these records for 5 years after the
end of the grant term. Acceptable
evidence of the disability includes:
(1) Written verification of the
disability from a professional licensed
by the state to diagnose and treat the
disability and his or her certification
that the disability is expected to be longcontinuing or of indefinite duration and
substantially impedes the individual’s
ability to live independently;
(2) Written verification from the
Social Security Administration;
(3) The receipt of a disability check
(e.g., Social Security Disability
Insurance check or Veteran Disability
Compensation);
(4) Intake staff-recorded observation
of disability that, no later than 45 days
from the application for assistance, is
confirmed and accompanied by
evidence in paragraph (a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2),
(3), or (5) of this section; or
(5) Other documentation approved by
HUD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
(ii) For paragraph (1)(i) of the
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ definition in
§ 578.3, evidence that the individual
lives in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter, which includes:
(A) An HMIS record or record from a
comparable database;
(B) A written observation by an
outreach worker of the conditions where
the individual was living;
(C) A written referral by another
housing or service provider; or
(D) Where evidence in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (C) of this section
cannot be obtained, a certification by
the individual seeking assistance, which
must be accompanied by the intake
worker’s documentation of the living
situation of the individual or family
seeking assistance and the steps taken to
obtain evidence in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (C).
(iii) For paragraph (1)(ii) of the
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ definition in
§ 578.3, evidence must include a
combination of the evidence described
in paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D) of
this section, subject to the following
conditions:
(A) Third-party documentation of a
single encounter with a homeless
service provider on a single day within
1 month is sufficient to consider an
individual as homeless and living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter for the entire
calendar month (e.g., an encounter on
May 5, 2015, counts for May 1—May 31,
2015), unless there is evidence that
there have been at least 7 consecutive
nights not living or residing in a place
not meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or an emergency shelter during
that month (e.g., evidence in HMIS of a
stay in transitional housing);
(B) Each break in homelessness of at
least 7 consecutive nights not living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter between separate
occasions must be documented with the
evidence described in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D) of this section;
(C) Evidence of stays in institutional
care facilities fewer than 90 days
included in the total of at least 12
months of living or residing in a place
not meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or an emergency shelter must
include the evidence in paragraphs
(a)(4)(iv)(A) through (B) of this section
and evidence described in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D) of this section
that the individual was living or
residing in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter immediately prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75805
entering the institutional care facility;
and
(D) For at least 75 percent of the
chronically homeless individuals and
families assisted by a recipient in a
project during an operating year, no
more than 3 months of living or residing
in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter may be documented
using the evidence in paragraph
(a)(4)(ii)(D) of this section for each
assisted chronically homeless
individual or family. This limitation
does not apply to documentation of
breaks in homelessness between
separate occasions, which may be
documented entirely based on a selfreport by the individual seeking
assistance.
(iv) If an individual qualifies as
chronically homeless under paragraph
(2) of the ‘‘Chronically homeless’’
definition in § 578.3 because he or she
has been residing in an institutional
care facility for fewer than 90 days and
met all of the criteria in paragraph (1)
of the definition, before entering that
facility, evidence must include the
following:
(A) Discharge paperwork or a written
or oral referral from a social worker,
case manager, or other appropriate
official of the institutional care facility
stating the beginning and end dates of
the time residing in the institutional
care facility. All oral statements must be
recorded by the intake worker; or
(B) Where the evidence in paragraph
(a)(4)(iv)(A) of this section is not
obtainable, a written record of the intake
worker’s due diligence in attempting to
obtain the evidence described in
paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(A) and a
certification by the individual seeking
assistance that states that he or she is
exiting or has just exited an institutional
care facility where he or she resided for
fewer than 90 days; and
(C) Evidence as set forth in paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) through (iii) of this section that
the individual met the criteria in
paragraph (1) of the definition for
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ in § 578.3,
immediately prior to entry into the
institutional care facility.
(v) If a family qualifies as chronically
homeless under paragraph (3) of the
‘‘Chronically homeless’’ definition in
§ 578.3, evidence must include the
evidence as set forth in paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) through (iv) of this section that
the adult head of household (or if there
is no adult in the family, a minor head
of household) met all of the criteria in
paragraph (1) or (2) of the definition.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
75806
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 233 / Friday, December 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 13, 2015.
Harriet Tregoning,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
Dated: Approved on November 24, 2015.
Nani A. Coloretti,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–30473 Filed 12–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Safety and Environmental
Enforcement
30 CFR Part 250
[Docket ID: BSEE–2015–0012; 15XE1700DX
EEEE500000 EX1SF0000.DAQ000]
RIN 1014–AA24
Oil and Gas and Sulphur Operations in
the Outer Continental Shelf—
Decommissioning Costs
Bureau of Safety and
Environmental Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule amends the
regulations to require lessees and
owners of operating rights to submit
summaries of actual decommissioning
expenditures incurred after completion
of certain decommissioning activities
for oil and gas and sulphur operations
on the Outer Continental Shelf. This
information will help BSEE to better
estimate future decommissioning costs
related to OCS leases, rights-of-way, and
rights of use and easement.
DATES: This final rule becomes effective
on January 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lakeisha Harrison, Chief, Regulations
and Standards Branch,
Lakeisha.Harrison@bsee.gov, (703) 787–
1552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
I. Background
II. What This Final Rule Covers
III. Differences Between Proposed Rule and
Final Rule
IV. Comments and Responses
V. Procedural Matters
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Summary
This final rule requires lessees and
owners of operating rights (collectively,
‘‘lessees’’) to submit to the Bureau of
Safety and Environmental Enforcement
(BSEE) summaries of actual
expenditures for decommissioning of
wells, platforms and other facilities on
the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:14 Dec 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
are required under BSEE’s existing
regulations. This information will help
BSEE to better estimate future
decommissioning costs related to OCS
leases, rights-of-way, and rights of use
and easement. The Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management (BOEM) may then
use BSEE’s future decommissioning cost
estimates to set necessary financial
assurance levels to minimize or
eliminate the possibility that the
government will incur decommissioning
liability.
In a proposed rule published on May
27, 2009, the Minerals Management
Service (BSEE’s predecessor agency)
proposed to require lessees to submit
information (including supporting
documentation) regarding expenditures
actually incurred for certain mandatory
decommissioning activities within 30
days of completion of each activity.
Based on BSEE’s review of public
comments on the proposed rule, the
final rule generally requires only
certified summaries of the actual
expenditures (without other supporting
documentation) for those
decommissioning activities and extends
the time period for submission of such
reports to 120 days after completion of
each such activity. BSEE may, however,
require additional supporting
information for specific
decommissioning costs on a case-bycase basis.
gas resources through vigorous
regulatory oversight and enforcement.
This final rule completes the
rulemaking for one of the issues covered
by the proposed rule that is now under
BSEE’s authority. Specifically, this final
rule addresses the proposed
requirement that lessees submit
information regarding actual
expenditures incurred for certain
decommissioning activities required
under the existing regulations.
The other issues covered by the
proposed rule now under BSEE’s
authority include proposed
consolidation of mechanisms for
maintaining and extending leases past
their primary terms and a proposed
requirement for submittal of pipelinerelated reports after approval of an
assignment or change of designated
operator (see 74 FR 25177–25178). BSEE
may issue a final rule in the future
regarding the proposed consolidation of
mechanisms for extending and
maintaining leases beyond their primary
terms. Similarly, BSEE will decide at a
later date whether to finalize the
proposed pipeline report requirement or
to address that issue again, potentially
in a broader rulemaking under 30 CFR
part 250, Subpart J—Pipelines and
Pipeline Rights-of-Way. Therefore, these
two issues are not included in this final
rule. In addition, this final rule does not
include sections of the proposed rule
that now fall under BOEM’s authority.
I. Background
II. What This Final Rule Covers
This final rule revises portions of
BSEE’s regulations at 30 CFR part 250,
Subpart Q—Decommissioning
Activities. Specifically, the final rule
requires lessees to submit certified
summaries of actual decommissioning
expenditures incurred for certain
decommissioning activities that are
required under Subpart Q (i.e., plugging
and abandonment of wells, removal of
platforms and other facilities, and site
clearance) 2 within 120 days of
completion of each such activity. This
information will help BSEE better
estimate future decommissioning costs
related to OCS leases, rights-of-way, and
rights of use and easement. BSEE’s
decommissioning cost estimates may
then be used by BOEM to set financial
assurance levels necessary to minimize
On May 27, 2009, the former Minerals
Management Service (MMS) published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the
Federal Register (Leasing of Sulphur or
Oil and Gas and Bonding Requirements
in the Outer Continental Shelf) in order
to update and streamline the existing
OCS leasing regulations under the Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)
and to clarify implementation of the
Federal Oil and Gas Royalty
Simplification and Fairness Act of 1996
(see 74 FR 25177). In 2010 and 2011, the
Secretary of the Interior (Secretary)
reorganized MMS into three bureaus:
BSEE, BOEM, and the Office of Natural
Resources Revenue. The Secretary then
delegated to BSEE certain
responsibilities under OCSLA that were
formerly held by MMS, including
responsibilities for overseeing
decommissioning.1 BSEE’s primary
purpose as an agency is to promote
safety, protect the environment, and
ensure responsible development and
conservation of offshore oil and natural
1 For convenience, hereafter we use the term
‘‘BSEE’’ rather than ‘‘MMS’’ in this document,
where appropriate, when referring to past actions of
MMS.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2 For example, §§ 250.1710 and 250.1711 require
wells to be plugged within a year after termination
of a lease or when ordered by BSEE, respectively.
Section 250.1725 requires platforms and other
facilities to be removed within a year of termination
of a lease unless the lessee has received approval
to maintain the facility to conduct other activities.
Section 250.1740 requires verification that a site has
been cleared of obstructions within 60 days after a
well has been plugged or a platform or other facility
has been removed.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 233 (Friday, December 4, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75791-75806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30473]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 91 and 578
[Docket No. FR-5809-F-01]
RIN 2506-AC37
Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing:
Defining ``Chronically Homeless''
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule establishes the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' that will be used in HUD's Continuum of Care Program, and in
the Consolidated Submissions for Community Planning and Development
Programs. This definition has been the subject of significant public
comment which has guided HUD in establishing the definition of
``chronically homeless'' that will be used in its homeless assistance
programs. The final rule also establishes the necessary recordkeeping
requirements that correspond to the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' for the Continuum of Care Program. Historically, other
programs within HUD, as well as other agencies such as the United
States Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Department of
Veteran Affairs, have adopted HUD's definition of chronically homeless
and
[[Page 75792]]
may also choose to adopt the definition of ``chronically homeless''
included in this final rule, however, it is not required.
DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2016.
Compliance Dates: Continuum of Care recipients must comply with the
regulations promulgated by this rule as of January 15, 2016. The
Continuum of Care Program grant agreement provides that upon
publication of a final rule for the Continuum of Care Program, that
follows the July 31, 2012, interim rule, the final rule, not the prior
interim rule, will govern the grant agreement. Continuum of Care
Program recipients, therefore, must comply with the regulations
promulgated by this rule for all program participants admitted after
January 15, 2016. The regulations promulgated by this rule do not apply
retroactively to program participants admitted to a Continuum of Care
Program project prior to January 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norm Suchar, Director, Office of
Special Needs Assistance Programs, Office of Community Planning and
Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410-7000; telephone number 202-708-4300
(this is not a toll-free number). Hearing- and speech-impaired persons
can access this number through TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service
at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
Purpose and Legal Authority
The purpose of this rule is to establish a final definition of the
term ``chronically homeless'' that will be used in HUD's Continuum of
Care Program (24 CFR part 578) and the Consolidated Submissions for
Community Planning and Development Programs (24 CFR part 91).
``Chronically homeless'' is defined in section 401(2) of the McKinney-
Vento Homeless Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 11360 (McKinney-Vento Act or
Act), as an individual or family that is homeless and resides in a
place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency
shelter, and has been homeless and residing in such a place for at
least 1 year or on at least four separate occasions in the last 3
years. The statutory definition also requires that the individual or
family has a head of household with a diagnosable substance use
disorder, serious mental illness, developmental disability, post-
traumatic stress disorder, cognitive impairments resulting from a brain
injury, or chronic physical illness or disability.
Following the statutory definition, HUD first proposed a regulatory
definition of ``chronically homeless'' in a December 5, 2011, interim
rule that established regulations for the Emergency Solutions Grants
program and made conforming amendments to HUD's Consolidated Plan
regulations (76 FR 75954). In response to concerns raised in public
comments, HUD amended the definition of ``chronically homeless'' in the
Continuum of Care Program interim rule, published July 31, 2012 (77 FR
45422), and sought further public comment on the definition of
``chronically homeless.'' At a convening held on May 30, 2012, HUD also
solicited feedback from nationally recognized experts on a workable
definition of ``chronically homeless,'' as described in the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program proposed rule, published March 27,
2013 (78 FR 18726). This final rule results from HUD's consideration of
the public comments on the definition of ``chronically homeless'' and
feedback from the convening of nationally recognized experts.
Summary of Major Provisions
This rule provides a definition of ``chronically homeless'' in 24
CFR 91.5, which applies to Consolidated Submissions for Community
Planning and Development Programs, and in 24 CFR 578.3, which applies
to the Continuum of Care Program. In addition, this rule amends 24 CFR
578.103, which stipulates recordkeeping requirements for the Continuum
of Care Program, to include requirements that recipients and
subrecipients of Continuum of Care funds must follow in order to
demonstrate that an individual or family has met the definition of
``chronically homeless.''
A ``chronically homeless'' individual is defined to mean a homeless
individual with a disability who lives either in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter, or in an
institutional care facility if the individual has been living in the
facility for fewer than 90 days and had been living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
immediately before entering the institutional care facility. In order
to meet the ``chronically homeless'' definition, the individual also
must have been living as described above continuously for at least 12
months, or on at least four separate occasions in the last 3 years,
where the combined occasions total a length of time of at least 12
months. Each period separating the occasions must include at least 7
nights of living in a situation other than a place not meant for human
habitation, in an emergency shelter, or in a safe haven.
Chronically homeless families are families with adult heads of
household who meet the definition of a chronically homeless individual.
If there is no adult in the family, the family would still be
considered chronically homeless if a minor head of household meets all
the criteria of a chronically homeless individual. A chronically
homeless family includes those whose composition has fluctuated while
the head of household has been homeless.
Recipients and subrecipients of Continuum of Care Program funds are
required to maintain and follow written intake procedures to ensure
compliance with the ``chronically homeless'' definition. The procedures
must establish the order of priority for obtaining evidence as third-
party documentation first, intake worker observations second, and
certification from the individual seeking assistance third.
Benefits and Costs
This final rule establishes a regulatory definition for the term
``chronically homeless'' that meets the statutory definition of the
term established in the McKinney-Vento Act and focuses on persons with
the longest histories of homelessness, who often also have the highest
need. This will ensure that funds are targeted to providing permanent
supportive housing solutions for these individuals and families.
This final definition of ``chronically homeless'' provides greater
clarity than the statutory definition and HUD's previous proposed
definitions so that recipients and subrecipients can benefit from
understanding which homeless individuals and families can be considered
``chronically homeless.'' This final definition will ensure that
communities are consistently using the same criteria when considering
whether a person is chronically homeless, and that HUD receives
consistent and accurate information nationwide. Communities previously
used various standards for the length of time to define an ``episode''
for a person to be considered chronically homeless, which made it
difficult for HUD to compare data nationally and failed to ensure
resources were going to those with the longest histories of
homelessness.
Although recordkeeping necessarily entails costs, and this rule
establishes certain recordkeeping requirements for
[[Page 75793]]
the Continuum of Care Program, recipients of Continuum of Care Program-
funded permanent supportive housing projects that serve the chronically
homeless have always been required to document the chronically homeless
status of program participants. Failure to maintain appropriate
documentation of a household's eligibility is the monitoring finding
that most often requires recipients of HUD funds to repay grant funds.
This rule establishes recordkeeping requirements to assist Continuum of
Care Program recipients in appropriately and consistently documenting
chronically homeless status, which will help to ensure that recipients
are not required to repay grant funds due to inappropriately
documenting eligibility for these projects.
II. Background--HEARTH Act
The Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing
Act of 2009 (HEARTH Act), which was enacted on May 20, 2009, amended
the McKinney-Vento Act and consolidates three separate homeless
assistance programs administered by HUD under the McKinney-Vento Act
into a single grant program, the Continuum of Care Program; revises the
Emergency Shelter Grants Program and renames the program the Emergency
Solutions Grants program; and creates the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program to replace the Rural Homelessness Grant program.
Commencing in 2010 with the publication of the proposed rule on the
definition of ``homeless,'' HUD initiated the rulemaking process to
establish the regulations for these new and revised programs. In this
rule, HUD provides the final definition of ``chronically homeless''
that will apply to its homeless assistance programs, and makes this
definition applicable, through amendments, to the regulations at 24 CFR
part 91(Consolidated Submissions for Community Planning and Development
Programs) and 24 CFR part 578 (Continuum of Care Program).
III. Prior Proposed Rules
On December 5, 2011, at 76 FR 75954, HUD published an interim rule
which established the regulations for the Emergency Solutions Grants
program and made conforming amendments to HUD's Consolidated Plan
regulations at 24 CFR part 91, which included a definition of
``chronically homeless.'' HUD received 28 public comments on this
definition of ``chronically homeless.'' The majority of the commenters
raised concerns over HUD's clarification that ``an occasion'' must
equal at least 15 days of living or residing in a place not meant for
human habitation, in a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter. In
response to these concerns, HUD included a definition of ``chronically
homeless'' that omitted this clarification in the Continuum of Care
Program interim rule, published July 31, 2012, in the Federal Register
(77 FR 45422) and HUD sought further comment on the definition of
``chronically homeless.'' At a convening held on May 30, 2012, HUD also
solicited feedback from nationally recognized experts on a workable
definition of ``chronically homeless'' which was described in the Rural
Housing Stability Assistance Program proposed rule. After considering
the 28 public comments submitted in response to the conforming
amendments to the Consolidated Plan published with the Emergency
Solutions Grants interim rule, the 42 comments submitted in response to
the Continuum of Care Program interim rule, and the feedback solicited
at the convening of nationally recognized experts, HUD determined to
propose for public comment a revised definition of ``chronically
homeless.''
On March 27, 2013, HUD published a proposed rule at 78 FR 18726
that would establish the regulations for the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program. In addition to proposing the regulations that would
govern this program, the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule submitted for public comment a further revised definition
of ``chronically homeless.'' The public comment period for the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' closed on May 28, 2013, and
these public comments and HUD's responses to these comments are
addressed later in this preamble.
IV. Overview of the Final Rule--Key Clarifications
In the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program proposed rule,
HUD defined a chronically homeless person as follows:
1. An individual who:
Is homeless and lives in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter; and
Has been homeless and living or residing in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter
continuously for at least 1 year or on at least four separate occasions
in the last 3 years, where the cumulative total of the four occasions
is at least one year. Stays in institutions of 90 days or less will not
constitute as a break in homelessness, but rather such stays are
included in the cumulative total; and
Can be diagnosed with one or more of the following
conditions: Substance use disorder, serious mental illness,
developmental disability (as defined in section 102 of the
Developmental Disabilities Assistance Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (42
U.S.C. 15002)), post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive impairments
resulting from brain injury, or chronic physical illness or disability;
2. An individual who has been residing in an institutional care
facility, including a jail, substance abuse or mental health treatment
facility, hospital, or other similar facility for fewer than 90 days
and met all of the criteria in paragraph (1), before entering that
facility; or
3. A family with an adult head of household (or if there is no
adult in the family, a minor head of household) who meets all of the
criteria in paragraph (1), including a family whose composition has
fluctuated while the head of household has been homeless.
After reviewing the public comments, which are discussed in Section
IV of this preamble, and upon HUD's further consideration of concerns
related to the proposed definition of ``chronically homeless,'' the
following highlights the changes that are made by this final rule.
The cumulative total of the length of homelessness spent living in
a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter must be at least 12 months. The final rule provides
that a person must have been homeless and living in a place not meant
for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter for a
period of at least 12 months as opposed to ``one year.'' This includes
a provision that where a person has experienced at least four occasions
of homelessness living in a place not meant for human habitation, a
safe haven, or in an emergency shelter over a period of 3 years, the
cumulative total of the occasions must total at least 12 months as
opposed to ``one year.'' While the requirement is essentially the same
as that which was included in the Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program proposed rule, the change clarifies HUD's intent for less
burdensome recordkeeping requirements, as discussed in Section IV of
this preamble.
Establishing a break in homelessness. The final rule provides that
a break in homelessness spent living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter is considered to
be any period of 7 or more consecutive nights where an individual or
family is not living or residing in such a place. Stays in an
institutional care facility (e.g., a jail, substance abuse
[[Page 75794]]
or mental health treatment facility, hospital, or other similar
facility) for fewer than 90 days and where the individual or family had
been living in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or
in an emergency shelter immediately before entering the institutional
care facility will not constitute as a break.
Establish clear recordkeeping requirements. The final rule provides
recordkeeping requirements at 24 CFR part 578 to help recipients and
subrecipients of Continuum of Care Program funds understand the
evidence that must be kept in the program participant file in order to
demonstrate that an individual or family met the definition of
``chronically homeless'' at the point of entry into a program, when
required. In general, the recordkeeping requirements establish HUD's
preferred order of documentation; provide clarity about how the length
of time of homelessness spent living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter must be
documented; and provide documentation standards for documenting
disability.
Technical and additional clarifying changes. In addition to the
changes highlighted above, this final rule also includes technical and
minor clarifying changes to certain proposed regulatory provisions.
Several of these changes are in response to requests by commenters for
clarification, and are further discussed in Section IV of this
preamble. HUD's response to public comments identifies where the final
rule makes these changes.
V. Discussion of the Public Comments
A. The Comments, Generally
The public comment period on the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' portion of the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule closed on May 28, 2013, and HUD received 177 public
comments related to this definition. HUD also received 23 comments for
the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program proposed rule unrelated
to the definition of ``chronically homeless'' and will respond to those
comments in the final rule for the Rural Housing Stability Assistance
Program. Regarding the public comments on the definition of
``chronically homeless,'' HUD received comments from a variety of
sources: Advocacy groups, service providers, case managers, State and
local government agencies, nonprofit organizations, private companies,
and private citizens.
General concerns most frequently expressed by commenters about the
proposed definition were: (1) The length of time an individual or
family must be homeless and living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter based on the
proposed definition was too long and would require households to
experience longer periods of homelessness in order to qualify as
chronically homeless, and (2) documenting chronically homeless status
based on the proposed definition would be too burdensome.
Regarding the first concern, it is not HUD's intent to make an
individual or family experience a longer period of homelessness.
Rather, HUD's primary intent is to align the period of time of those
experiencing occasional homelessness with that of those who are
experiencing continuous homelessness. This will also ensure that
individuals and families who already meet these criteria are
prioritized for assistance, that recipients and subrecipients can
demonstrate to HUD that they are complying with the requirements
established by HUD, and that HUD is able to make its required reports
to Congress. Where there are no persons within a Continuum of Care that
meet the definition of ``chronically homeless,'' permanent supportive
housing beds that are required through their grant agreement to serve
this population may serve other vulnerable and eligible households. HUD
will provide guidance to assist communities on which populations to
prioritize when there are no persons that meet the definition of
``chronically homeless'' established in this rule.
Regarding the second concern, it is critical to note that
recipients of Continuum of Care Program-funded permanent supportive
housing projects with one or more beds that are required through a
grant agreement to serve individuals and families experiencing chronic
homelessness have always been required to document the chronically
homeless status of program participants that will occupy those beds, at
the point of program entry. Failure to maintain appropriate
documentation of a household's eligibility is the monitoring finding
that most often requires recipients of HUD funds to repay grant funds.
HUD recognizes that not including recordkeeping requirements for
documenting chronically homeless status in the regulatory text of the
Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program proposed rule resulted in
some confusion about HUD's expectations and resulted in a number of
commenters raising concerns that recordkeeping requirements would be
overly burdensome for those recipients. Therefore, this final rule
includes, in the regulatory text, recordkeeping requirements to assist
Continuum of Care Program recipients in appropriately documenting
chronically homeless status that take into consideration that
documenting the length of time homeless will be challenging. In
addition, HUD notes that the revised Homeless Management Information
System Data Standards published in May 2014 include data elements that
are aligned with this definition in order to more easily allow for
chronically homeless persons to be identified through the Continuum of
Care's Homeless Management Information System.
B. The Definition of ``Chronically Homeless'' in 24 CFR Parts 91 and
578
The Comments Generally
Comment: Concern that the expert panel was mainly composed of
researchers and not practitioners. Several commenters expressed
disappointment that the expert panel hosted by HUD to develop the
proposed definition of ``chronically homeless'' was composed mostly of
researchers and not practitioners or technicians. These commenters
recommended that HUD invite stakeholders responsible for service
delivery to such discussions prior to final rulemaking.
HUD Response: Although several of the experts that participated in
the convening were researchers, HUD also included several
practitioners. As stated in the summary of the convening, posted at
www.hudexchange.info/rhsp, the group of experts included researchers,
advocates, homeless services providers, and homelessness technical
assistance providers, as well as Federal representatives from HUD, the
United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, and the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. In addition, by publishing the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' one more time as a proposed
definition, HUD provided a third opportunity for stakeholders
responsible for service delivery and reporting to submit their comments
on the proposed definition of ``chronically homeless.''
Comment: Definition of ``chronically homeless'' should have been
issued separately from the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program
proposed rule. A few commenters stated that in order to solicit the
most comments on the definition of ``chronically homeless,'' requesting
comments on the definition of ``chronically homeless''
[[Page 75795]]
should have been a separate notice from the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program proposed rule since the definition will apply to all
programs authorized by the statute.
HUD Response: HUD's proposed rule on the Rural Housing Stability
Assistance Program offered an opportunity to further solicit public
comment on HUD's definition of ``chronically homeless.'' HUD first
introduced the definition of ``chronically homeless'' as part of its
``Emergency Solutions Grants program and Consolidated Plan Conforming
Amendments interim rule,'' not as a stand-alone rule on defining
chronically homeless. Although HUD did not solicit public comment on
specific aspects of the definition of ``chronically homeless'' in its
Continuum of Care Program rule, HUD did address the definition in that
rule, and informed interested parties of its intent to solicit further
public comment. As the commenters note, the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' applies to all of HUD's homeless assistance programs.
Soliciting comments on HUD's proposed definition in connection with
solicitation of comments on the Emergency Solutions Grants program
interim rule or on the Rural Housing Stability Assistance Program rule
did not diminish the importance of this definition, but rather
underscored the significant role that this definition will have in each
of these programs, and underscores the value that HUD placed on
receiving public comment on this definition. Although HUD did not issue
the definition of ``chronically homeless'' as a stand-alone proposed
rule, it is HUD's intent to issue a final rule solely on the
definition.
Comment: HUD needs to account for estimated hours and costs to
service providers trying to meet requirements of the definition. A few
commenters requested that HUD account for the total estimated hours and
financial costs it would take service providers to complete the
requirements of this rule.
HUD Response: This final rule establishes the final definition of
``chronically homeless'' by incorporating the definition into 24 CFR
parts 91 and 578. HUD requires Continuum of Care Program recipients of
permanent supportive housing that are required to serve persons
experiencing chronic homelessness to determine and document that any
individual or family assisted meets the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' as defined in this final rule. Each recipient must obtain
documentation of homeless status, disability, and the specific period
of time the individual or head of household was living in an emergency
shelter, safe haven, or place not meant for human habitation. The
burden for collecting the required homeless status and disability
information was considered in the burden estimates for the Continuum of
Care Program interim rule (77 FR 45421). The public had the opportunity
to provide comments on those estimates during the public comment
period. In some instances, the documentation obtained under the
existing burden of the Continuum of Care Program interim rule will
already meet the standards for documenting the length of time an
individual or head of household resided in a place not meant for human
habitation, an emergency shelter, or a safe haven as required in this
rule. In other instances, recipients and subrecipients may need to
spend more time acquiring the documents necessary to show that an
individual meets the timeframe necessary residing in a place not meant
for human habitation, an emergency shelter, or a safe haven to qualify
as ``chronically homeless.'' See Section VI, Information Collection
Requirements, for more information about HUD's change to its existing
recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Comments Related to Data Collection and Reporting
Comment: Problems in reporting such information in Homeless
Management Information Systems. Several commenters expressed concerns
about how to document and report chronically homeless status in their
Homeless Management Information System. One commenter pointed to the
variations across the country around how chronic homelessness is
reported in the Homeless Management Information System and noted that
Continuums of Care would not be able to uniformly and accurately
document homelessness spent living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter over a 3-year
period in their Homeless Management Information Systems. Other
commenters stated that many Homeless Management Information Systems are
closed and do not share information with other Continuums of Care,
which could create a problem in documenting chronically homeless status
for homeless persons moving between Continuums of Care. Another
commenter expressed concern that data entry personnel and case managers
do not have the expertise to determine whether a person meets the
criteria to be classified as chronically homeless, and concern about
the time service providers would spend on data entry rather than on
providing services. Further, the commenter requested that HUD improve
the Homeless Management Information System and the data entry process
and establish data elements to capture a person's chronically homeless
status.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges that Homeless Management Information
Systems across the country do not always collect data on chronically
homeless status uniformly. HUD believes that the promulgation of its
definition of ``chronically homeless'' will assist communities in
collecting consistent data. HUD also included specific data elements in
the 2014 Homeless Management Information System Data Standards to allow
for uniform data collection on chronically homeless status. These data
standards take into account that not all chronically homeless persons
have a service interaction with the Continuum of Care's Homeless
Management Information System and allow for history of homelessness to
be documented based on the information provided by the program
participant. It should also be noted that it is not HUD's expectation
that the person entering data into the Homeless Management Information
System also be responsible for determining program eligibility.
Comment: Proposed definition impedes ability to compare data. Many
commenters expressed concerns that the new definition of ``chronically
homeless'' would impede their ability to compare current and future
data with data from previous years. A few commenters stated that the
new definition would hinder efforts to measure ``real'' progress in
reducing the chronically homeless population, as data would not be
comparable.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges that the change in the definition of
``chronically homeless'' may mean that the number of persons
experiencing chronic homelessness within a community may change as a
result of the new definition. However, this more detailed definition is
necessary in order to ensure that communities are consistently using
the same criteria when considering whether a person is chronically
homeless. A uniformly applied definition also serves to ensure that HUD
has more consistent and accurate information. Previously, communities
used various standards for the length of time to define an ``episode''
for a person to be considered chronically homeless, which made it
difficult for HUD to compare data nationally. The definition of
``chronically homeless'' in the final rule will ensure consistency in
the data nationwide. HUD notes that this will
[[Page 75796]]
only affect the number of persons considered to be chronically homeless
and not the Continuum of Care's total homeless count.
Comments Related to Community Strategies To Serve the Chronically
Homeless, Including Eligibility for Housing Resources
Comment: A narrow definition of ``chronically homeless'' will
result in an increase in vacancies in units designated for the
chronically homeless and individuals and families spending a longer
time in a place not meant for human habitation. Several commenters
expressed concerns that the more narrow definition of ``chronically
homeless'' included in the proposed rule would result in an increase in
vacant units otherwise dedicated to the chronically homeless. Several
commenters suggested that they would have difficulty locating
individuals or families who meet the criteria of the proposed
definition.
One commenter expressed concern that the proposed definition would
affect local and State governments, in addition to homeless
individuals, stating that the new definition would result in more
people being on the street for longer periods of time resulting in the
following: an increased demand for emergency shelters, a burden on
local police services since more individuals would be in unstable
situations, and a decrease in property values. The commenter suggested
that HUD phase in the new definition over a few years by incrementally
increasing the cumulative episode threshold in order to provide
localities time to plan their budgets and give homeless individuals
time to adjust their expectations.
Another commenter requested guidance on what providers with
dedicated permanent supportive housing beds should do if they are
unable to locate persons that meet this definition.
Several commenters recommended that HUD establish a ``tiering
system'' where communities that are unable to identify people who meet
requirements for ``chronically homeless'' may target permanent
supportive housing for other vulnerable homeless persons. Similarly,
other commenters recommended that HUD consider a prioritization policy
for homeless individuals eligible for permanent supportive housing and
remove the requirement that 100 percent of new permanent supportive
housing units be designated for the chronically homeless.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' is not inclusive of all vulnerable homeless populations;
however, HUD has intentionally focused the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' on those persons with the longest histories of homelessness
and with the highest need and believes that this is a reasonable
implementation of the statutory requirements established in section 401
of the McKinney-Vento Act. The definition is not intended to require
individuals and families to have longer periods of homelessness before
being served; rather, the definition allows for persons who already
meet such criteria to be prioritized for Continuum of Care Program-
funded permanent supportive housing dedicated to persons experiencing
chronic homelessness.
In addition, HUD published guidance \1\ to clarify that, to the
extent that there are no persons who meet the criteria of chronic
homelessness included in this rule, Continuum of Care Program-funded
dedicated permanent supportive housing providers are not required to
keep a unit vacant. Instead, the recipient may house non-chronically
homeless individuals or families who are eligible for permanent
supportive housing generally and are encouraged to prioritize those
homeless individuals or families who are the most vulnerable or at risk
of becoming chronically homeless.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Notice CPD-14-012: Prioritizing Persons Experiencing Chronic
Homelessness in Permanent Supportive Housing and Recordkeeping
Requirements for Documenting Chronic Homeless Status. Available at:
https://www.hudexchange.info/resource/3897/notice-cpd-14-012-prioritizing-persons-experiencing-chronic-homelessness-in-psh-and-recordkeeping-requirements/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Definition does not target those with longest histories
and most severe cases of homelessness. One commenter stated that the
proposed definition of ``chronically homeless'' does not target those
with the longest histories and most severe cases of homelessness, such
as those with histories of homelessness that have four or more episodes
in more than the past 3 years.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that there are individuals and
families with long histories of homelessness that may not meet the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' included in the final rule. For
example, individuals and families who have been homeless and living in
a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter for 12 months or longer in the past 3 years but where
there were fewer than four distinct occasions and the current occasion
lasted less than 12 months would not be considered chronically
homeless. However, because the statutory definition of ``chronically
homeless'' requires at least four occasions over a 3-year time frame,
the number of occasions necessary to be considered chronically homeless
cannot be changed. Individuals or families who have longer histories of
homelessness spent living a place not meant for human habitation, a
safe haven, or in an emergency shelter and who have experienced at
least four occasions in the last 3 years are considered chronically
homeless so long as the adult head of household (or minor head of
household where no adult is present) has a disability as required by
the definition. However, an individual or family who has a history of
homelessness spent living in a place not meant for human habitation, a
safe haven, or in an emergency shelter where the period of homelessness
has not totaled 12 months either continuously or over a period of at
least four occasions in the past 3 years would not be considered
chronically homeless. For this reason, HUD has provided flexibility
around what constitutes an occasion of homelessness and how to document
the period of homelessness while still maintaining a uniform standard
to ensure consistency across the country. HUD encourages recipients of
Continuum of Care Program-funded permanent supportive housing not
dedicated to the chronically homeless to prioritize persons that are
most at risk of becoming chronically homeless and who are the most
vulnerable.
Comment: Periods of homelessness do not automatically correlate to
need. A commenter stated that those who have been homeless for shorter,
sporadic periods of time that do not cumulatively total 365 days might
be more physically and mentally prepared to use permanent supportive
housing than those who have had longer episodes of homelessness.
Similarly, one commenter stated that a longer length of time spent
homeless does not necessarily indicate a higher level of need, and
those who have been homeless for shorter periods might make better use
of housing services.
HUD Response: HUD has determined that the definition of
``chronically homeless'' in section 401 of the McKinney-Vento Act
should define those persons as chronically homeless that have had the
longest histories of homelessness and highest need. The definition of
``chronically homeless'' set forth in 24 CFR parts 91 and 578
intentionally narrows the statutory definition to further ensure that
limited resources targeted to this population are used to serve persons
with the longest histories of homelessness and highest need. HUD
acknowledges that there are
[[Page 75797]]
other factors that might also correlate to need, however, length of
time residing in emergency shelters, safe havens, and places not meant
for human habitation is one factor of need, and when combined with the
statutory requirement that the head of household have a disabling
condition, HUD has determined that it effectively defines those persons
with the highest needs as chronically homeless. Therefore, the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' included in this final rule
maintains the requirement that was included in the Rural Housing
Stability Assistance Program proposed rule, that the four or more
separate occasions of homelessness living in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter must total
12 months or include additional criteria related to vulnerability. HUD
also recognizes that persons meeting the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' included in the final rule may require a higher level of
support in order to obtain and maintain housing. Not all permanent
supportive housing is limited to serving persons that meet the
definition of chronically homeless. HUD has encouraged Continuums of
Care and recipients of Continuum of Care Program-funded permanent
supportive housing to take other factors, such as vulnerability, into
account when prioritizing households for permanent supportive housing.
Comment: Require jurisdictions to produce a plan to specifically
address dealing with chronic homelessness. A commenter stated that
every region in the country should be required to have a plan that
deals directly with the chronically homeless to show proof that they
have worked on the issue through a statement with a local provider.
HUD Response: Each Continuum of Care submits its plan for
addressing chronic homelessness through the Continuum of Care
Application submitted under each Notice of Funding Availability for the
Continuum of Care Program. This requirement will continue to be
addressed through the Continuum of Care Program Competition; therefore,
no additional requirements have been added to the final rule. In
addition, each Consolidated Plan jurisdiction is required to develop a
homeless strategy and this strategy must address the needs of, and
resources available to, chronically homeless persons. This requirement
will continue to be addressed through the Consolidated Plan
requirements at 24 CFR part 91.
Comments Related to the Definition
Comment: Adhere to the definition of ``chronically homeless''
included in the conforming amendments to the Consolidated Plan
published with the Emergency Solutions Grants program interim rule.
Several commenters stated that they preferred the definition of
``chronically homeless'' that was included in the conforming amendments
to the Consolidated Plan published with the Emergency Solutions Grants
program interim rule, which defined a homeless occasion as a period of
at least 15 days.
HUD Response: The majority of public comments received on the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' that was included in the
conforming amendments to the Consolidated Plan published with the
Emergency Solutions Grants program interim rule related to the
requirement that to be considered an ``occasion'' a period of
homelessness had to be a period of at least 15 days. Several commenters
stated that the period of 15 days to define an ``occasion'' was
arbitrary and was not the ideal definition. Upon review of these
comments, HUD concluded that the 15-day standard did not effectively
target persons with the longest histories of homelessness and highest
level of need. The definition in the conforming amendments to the
Consolidated Plan published with the Emergency Solutions Grants interim
rule would have allowed for an individual or family experiencing
occasions of homelessness to be considered chronically homeless within
a period of as few as 65 days, while persons experiencing homelessness
without a break would have to be homeless and residing in a place not
meant for human habitation, in a safe haven, or an emergency shelter
for at least 1 year. Consistent with research,\2\ HUD has determined
that requiring 1 year (12 months) of homelessness living in a place not
meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter will
ensure that the definition focuses on those persons with the longest
histories of such homelessness and highest needs. The definition
included in this final rule allows for limited resources to be
effectively targeted and does not adopt the definition originally
published in 24 CFR part 91.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Thomas Byrne and Dennis P. Culhane. ``Testing Alternative
Definitions of Chronic Homelessness'' Psychiatric Services 66.5
(2015). Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dennis_culhane/146.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: Use ``vulnerability index'' to measure chronic
homelessness. Several commenters proposed alternative definitions for
targeting the homeless population most in need of permanent supportive
housing. Several commenters recommended that HUD replace the proposed
definition of ``chronically homeless'' with ``homeless persons
determined to be vulnerable through the application of a standardized
vulnerability index tool'' that would be developed with stakeholders.
These commenters also stated that homeless persons could be assigned
spots on a community's ``vulnerability list'' so those most in need of
services could be identified.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that it is important to consider a
person's vulnerability or the severity of a person's needs when
determining housing placement; however, the statutory definition of
``chronically homeless'' does not permit HUD to adopt the definition
proposed by the commenters. HUD recognizes that individuals and
families should be prioritized for permanent supportive housing under
the Continuum of Care Program based on the severity of their needs. To
this point, HUD has provided guidance to recipients of all Continuum of
Care Program-funded permanent supportive housing encouraging Continuums
of Care and permanent supportive housing providers to take other
factors, such as vulnerability, into account when prioritizing
households for permanent supportive housing.
Comment: Allow communities to define ``chronically homeless''
locally. A commenter suggested that establishing a global definition of
``chronically homeless'' has limitations and that communities should be
encouraged to set their own ``prioritization benchmarks'' based on
local conditions.
Another commenter recommended that the term ``chronic'' is a
medical term, and is not an appropriate term to measure severity of
homelessness, and suggested that HUD allow local Continuums of Care to
submit their own definitions based on people with serious health
conditions who have experienced multiple and/or long episodes of
homelessness.
Finally, another commenter suggested that HUD provide rural
communities the flexibility to determine what is meant by ``not meant
for human habitation'' since many of these communities do not have
condemnation procedures like those often used by urban areas.
HUD Response: The definition of ``chronically homeless'' in section
401 of the McKinney-Vento Act provides the basis for the definition of
``chronically homeless'' set forth in 24 CFR parts 91 and 578. Although
the Act does allow
[[Page 75798]]
HUD the discretion to allow communities to define certain terms such as
``not meant for human habitation'' locally, HUD has determined that all
Continuums of Care must use the same standard when determining whether
or not an individual or family is chronically homeless. Using a
universal standard will also allow HUD to track progress, nationally,
on the goal of ending chronic homelessness.
Comment: Include individuals and families who meet the McKinney-
Vento Homeless Assistance Education Act in the definition of
chronically homeless. A commenter stated that individuals or families
who meet the McKinney-Vento Homeless Education Act definition of
``homeless'' should also be considered chronically homeless.
HUD Response: The definition of ``chronically homeless'' included
in this final rule reflects the statutory definition in section 401 of
the Act. The statutory definition provides specific minimum criteria
that an individual or family must meet in order to be defined as
chronically homeless. Although HUD has the discretion to make the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' more narrow in the final rule,
the definition must include the minimum statutory requirements.
Further, it is HUD's intention to ensure that the definition of
``chronically homeless'' targets those persons with the longest
histories of homelessness who have been living in a place not meant for
human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter. Therefore,
HUD has chosen to not change the final rule to include all individuals
and families who meet the definition in section 725(2) of the McKinney-
Vento Act. HUD recognizes that there are vulnerable populations who are
not included in this definition of ``chronically homeless.'' The
definition of ``chronically homeless'' is not intended to include all
vulnerable populations.
Comment: HUD should consider persons chronically at risk of
homelessness the same as chronically homeless. A commenter suggested
that HUD should treat ``chronically homeless'' and ``chronically at
risk of homelessness'' as the same so that those who have not been able
to maintain permanent supportive housing because of a loss of income
due to a disability and inability to attain a permanent voucher are not
penalized.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that there are vulnerable populations
who are not included in this definition of ``chronically homeless'';
however, defining chronically homeless more narrowly will allow limited
resources to be prioritized for persons with the longest histories of
homelessness and who are most likely to have the most severe service
needs, which is consistent with the requirements established in section
401 of the McKinney-Vento Act. The statute does not support defining
persons who are ``at risk of homelessness'' (on a recurring basis or
otherwise) as chronically homeless as these persons do not meet the
definition of homeless or chronically homeless as set forth in the Act.
HUD reminds stakeholders that individuals and families who meet the
definition of at risk of homelessness might be eligible for
homelessness prevention assistance under either the Continuum of Care
Program, if the Continuum of Care is a High Performing Community, or
the Emergency Solutions Grants program.
Comment: Provide for different definitional criteria for
``chronically homeless'' for youth and families with children. Several
commenters suggested that the definition of ``chronically homeless''
should have different definitional criteria for families with children
and youth than for adult individuals. One commenter suggested that
there should be different cumulative time frames for individuals,
families, and youth. Specifically, the commenter proposed, ``that the
definition be changed so that a chronically homeless individual is
defined as one who is homeless for at least 1 year or for a cumulative
total of 180 days in the previous 3 years over multiple occasions, a
chronically homeless family is defined as one that is currently
homeless and has moved multiple times in the previous 12 months, where
an adult and/or child family member is involved with more than one
public service system, and a category is added for chronically homeless
youth, who would be currently homeless individuals under the age of 25
who have moved multiple times in the previous 6 months, and this
pattern of housing instability can be expected to continue.''
HUD Response: The single statutory definition of ``chronically
homeless'' is inclusive of individuals, families with children, and
unaccompanied youth and sets a minimum threshold that must be met for
any person, regardless of age or household composition. HUD strived to
reasonably implement the statutory definition by clarifying in the
regulation that, for family households, only the head of household must
meet the criteria for individuals who are defined as chronically
homeless. The definition in the regulation also allows for changes to
family composition over time. Beyond this clarification, creating a
broader or less restrictive threshold for unaccompanied youth or
families with children would undermine one of the goals of the
``chronically homeless'' definition, which is to help ensure that
resources are focused on individuals and families with the longest
experiences of homelessness spent living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter. In addition, a
person's status as part of a family may change and a youth may become
an adult during his or her time living in an emergency shelter, safe
haven, or place not meant for human habitation. Therefore, a single
definition helps ensure that an individual's status does not change
depending on whether he or she is part of a family at the time of
intake or turns 25. Therefore, in the final rule, HUD has maintained
that the standard for qualifying as chronically homeless is the same
for all individuals, families with children, and unaccompanied youth.
Families with children and unaccompanied youth, like single adults, who
do not meet the criteria of chronically homeless might still meet the
definition of ``homeless'' and if they do they are eligible for
assistance under the Continuum of Care Program and Emergency Solutions
Grants program.
Comment: Define family in the definition of ``chronically
homeless.'' Several commenters sought clarification on how HUD defines
``family'' for the purposes of defining ``chronically homeless.'' One
commenter asked that HUD define the term ``family'' in a manner
consistent with how it is defined in the Equal Access to Housing in HUD
Program Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity final rule.
Another commenter expressed confusion over whether a chronically
homeless family must have a child under the age of 18. Another
commenter stated that the term family is ``misused to identify a
demographic of a household and that the term ``household'' should be
defined consistently with the proposed data standards.''
HUD Response: The proposed definition of ``chronically homeless''
did not define the term ``family.'' The Equal Access to Housing in HUD
Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity final rule
provides the following definition of ``family'' in 24 CFR 5.403 which
applies to programs authorized under the Act. The definition ``Family''
includes, but is not limited to, the following, regardless of actual or
perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital
[[Page 75799]]
status: (1) A single person, who may be an elderly person, displaced
person, disabled person, near-elderly person, or any other single
person; or, (2) A group of persons residing together, and such group
includes, but is not limited to, a family with or without children, an
elderly family, a near-elderly family, a disabled family, a displaced
family, and remaining members of a tenant family.
This definition of ``family'' applies in both the Emergency
Solutions Grants and Continuum of Care Program rules. The McKinney-
Vento Act distinguishes individuals from families. Therefore, paragraph
(1) of the definition of ``family'' under the Equal Access Rule is
considered an individual for the purposes of the definition of
``chronically homeless'' included in this final rule. This means that a
chronically homeless family is any group of persons presenting for
assistance together, where the head of household meets all of the
criteria established in this final rule, regardless of marital status,
actual or perceived sexual orientation, or gender identity, with or
without children and irrespective of age or relationship. A child who
is temporarily away from the home because of placement in foster care
is considered a member of the family.
Comment: Clarify that any family member who meets the criteria of
chronically homeless can qualify the family as chronically homeless. A
few commenters requested that any member of the family could make the
entire family meet the definition of ``chronically homeless.'' A
commenter recommended that HUD consider revising the definition of
``chronically homeless'' specifically to allow for a minor child in a
family to qualify the family household as chronically homeless. Another
commenter recommended only that the children, instead of the adult head
of household, be able to have one of the listed disabling conditions
and qualify the family as chronically homeless because the barriers a
disability presents to an individual are similar to the barriers faced
by a parent of a child with a disability. Similarly, one commenter
proposed adding language to clarify that the members of a family
household all qualify as chronically homeless based on the head of
household regardless of changes within the household composition.
HUD Response: The statutory definition of ``chronically homeless''
dictates that the adult head of household (or minor head of household
if there is no adult in the family) must meet the criteria set forth in
the definition. Therefore, the final rule cannot be revised from the
proposed rule to allow for any household member besides the head of
household to qualify the family as chronically homeless; this includes
experiencing the occasion(s) of homelessness and being diagnosed with
the disabling condition.
However, because it is the adult head of household who qualifies a
family as chronically homeless, the whole family is considered
chronically homeless even if the household composition changed during
the course of the head of household's homelessness. Language stating
this was included in the proposed definition of ``chronically
homeless'' and remains in the final definition of ``chronically
homeless.'' For example, if an adult head of household has a qualifying
disability and has been homeless continuously for 12 months and has
been accompanied by another family member for only part of that time
frame, the whole household meets the definition of a chronically
homeless family.
Comment: Eliminate the requirement that to be chronically homeless
an individual or family must experience four separate occasions of
homelessness. Several commenters requested that HUD eliminate the
requirement for four separate occasions of homelessness in favor of
considering anyone that has been homeless for a cumulative total of 365
days over the past 3 years to be considered chronically homeless. One
commenter stated that occasions are ``too sloppy to define'' and the
concept is of little value.
HUD Response: HUD recognizes that the requirement for four or more
separate occasions of homelessness over a 3-year period will not
include individuals or families who have experienced only two occasions
of homelessness over a 3-year period where the cumulative total is 12
months or greater. However, the requirement of four or more occasions
is statutory and included in the definition of ``chronically homeless''
in the McKinney-Vento Act and, therefore, cannot be changed without a
change to the statute. For this reason, HUD has provided maximum
flexibility within the statutory framework about what constitutes a
break between occasions and how to document the period of homelessness.
In addition, HUD notes, for those stakeholders who submitted this
comment because of concerns about these individuals and families not
being eligible for needed resources, that the Continuum of Care and
Emergency Solutions Grants programs fund a variety of housing and
services for individuals and families who are homeless, but do not meet
the criteria of chronically homeless.
Comment: Include a cumulative time frame for the four or more
occasions but make that time frame less than 1 year. Many commenters
disagreed with the proposed rule's cumulative length of time the four
or more occasions must total in order for an individual or family to be
considered chronically homeless. A few commenters proposed reducing the
requirement from 1 year to 120 days. Several commenters suggested that
the time frame should be reduced from 1 year to 6 months or 180 days.
One commenter proposed that this 6-month time frame should apply to
both occasional and consecutive periods of homelessness.
HUD Response: The statutory definition of ``chronically homeless''
requires individuals and families who meet the definition through a
continuous occasion to have been homeless and living or residing in a
place not meant for human habitation, safe haven, or in an emergency
shelter for at least 1 year. The statute set a different standard for
persons who experience frequent occasions of homelessness, requiring at
least four occasions over 3 years. The statute was silent on what
qualified as an occasion of homelessness. HUD has determined that
requiring four or more occasions to total at least 12 months would set
a threshold of need comparable to the requirement for a continuous
episode. This will help ensure that resources that are dedicated to
serving chronically homeless persons are targeted to individuals and
families with the longest experiences of homelessness regardless of
whether they meet the threshold for chronic homelessness through a
continuous occasion or through multiple occasions.
Comment: For the cumulative time frame for four or more occasions,
count the time in months as opposed to days. One commenter proposed
that the definition be revised to count homeless occasions in terms of
months and not days. Another commenter recommended that the actual
number of days homeless need not be counted and a single encounter with
a service provider on a single day in one month could count for
homeless status for the entire month.
HUD Response: The definition of ``chronically homeless'' included
in the proposed rule did not specify how the time frame should be
counted and instead just stated that the cumulative total of occasions
must total at least 1 year. HUD agrees with the comment that changing 1
year to 12 months helps provide clarification about how to count
[[Page 75800]]
an individual or family's time spent in places not meant for human
habitation, in a safe haven or in an emergency shelter. Furthermore,
since HUD did not include recordkeeping requirements in the proposed
rule, it was not clear that HUD does not intend to make homeless
service providers document every day of homelessness spent living in a
place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency
shelter to equal 365 days, for either continuous or occasional
homelessness. HUD agrees that counting in months instead of days is a
more reasonable requirement for documentation purposes. In addition,
HUD agrees with the comment that a single encounter with a homeless
service provider on a single day within 1 month would be sufficient to
count the individual or family as homeless for the entire month. HUD
understands that there is not an Homeless Management Information System
record for every interaction or for every day in which a person is
homeless and did not want to create a recordkeeping requirement that
was overly burdensome. This requirement has been clarified in the
recordkeeping requirements; however, HUD has also added language
stating that this does not apply if the provider has evidence of a
break, defined as 7 or more consecutive nights not living in a safe
haven or in an emergency shelter, or living in a place meant for human
habitation, during that month. Again, this will help ensure that
resources dedicated to persons experiencing chronic homelessness are
targeted to individuals and families with the longest experiences of
homelessness. When considering how to determine a break, HUD
understands that people often find themselves with a place to stay for
a couple of nights (hotel, with a friend, etc.), however, their primary
nighttime residence is still a place not meant for human habitation, an
emergency shelter, or a safe haven. HUD determined that up to 7 nights
is a reasonable period of time for an individual or family to stay for
a few nights in a place other than an emergency shelter, a safe haven,
or in a place that is meant for human habitation without considering it
a break in their total length of time homeless for purposes of
determining chronically homeless status.
Rule clarification. To clarify that, for documentation purposes,
the cumulative length of time of occasions must total 12 months instead
of 365 days, the language in paragraph (1)(ii) of the definition of
``chronically homeless'' has been revised to provide that the homeless
individual with a disability has been homeless and living as described
continuously for at least 12 months or on at least 4 separate occasions
in the last 3 years, as long as the combined occasions equal at least
12 months and each break in homelessness separating the occasions
included at least 7 consecutive nights of not living in a place not
meant for human habitation. The definition further provides that stays
in institutional care facilities for fewer than 90 days will generally
not constitute as a break in homelessness, but rather such stays are
included in the 12-month total.
In addition, to clarify the recordkeeping requirements related to
paragraph (1)(ii), Sec. 578.103(a)(4) has been revised to include
language on how documenting a single encounter within 1 month is
sufficient documentation to count the individual or family as homeless
for the entire month.
Comment: Give discretion to Continuums of Care to determine the
length of the occasions of homelessness. Several commenters suggested
that Continuums of Care should be provided with the flexibility to
determine when an individual or family is chronically homeless and
whether they have been homeless at least four times over the past 3
years.
HUD Response: In order to ensure that Continuums of Care nationwide
are defining chronically homeless consistently for counting,
eligibility, and reporting purposes, it is necessary to have one
uniform definition of ``chronically homeless'' that applies nationwide.
A uniform definition will allow for data from each community to be
compared nationally, and that persons with the longest histories of
homelessness who have been living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter and with the most
severe service needs are prioritized for assistance in permanent
supportive housing. As more communities meet the Administration's goal
of ending chronic homelessness, HUD will use the annual Continuum of
Care Program Competition Notice of Funding Availability to reflect
changes in priorities. However, the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' will not change, as it is meant to encompass those homeless
persons with the longest histories of living in places not meant for
human habitation, in a safe haven, or in emergency shelters and who
have the most severe service needs, and to the extent that there are
persons that meet this criteria within a Continuum of Care they should
always be counted and be prioritized for assistance.
Comment: Need guidance on what constitutes as a break in
homelessness. Many commenters requested guidance on what constitutes as
a break in homelessness in order to distinguish between occasions. One
commenter requested guidance on how to document such breaks in Homeless
Management Information System. Another commenter suggested that
temporary housing situations of less than 1 week not constitute as a
break. Several commenters suggested that periods of ``couch surfing''
should not constitute as a break in homelessness.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that in order to accurately document
occasions of homelessness, it is necessary to understand and document
the housing situation that ended the occasion; therefore, HUD has
clarified in the recordkeeping requirements that a break in
homelessness is any period of 7 or more consecutive nights where the
individual or family is not residing in a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter or is residing in a place meant for human habitation.
In addition, the final rule allows for stays in an institutional care
facility where the individual has been residing for fewer than 90 days
to not constitute as a break in homelessness either. HUD provided this
clarification because of a comment provided through the comment process
on the Continuum of Care Program interim rule recognizing that many
hard-to-serve chronically homeless individuals and families have an
opportunity to spend 1 or 2 nights on someone's couch, in a motel using
all or most of the beneficiary's monthly Social Security Income or
Social Security Disability Income check, in another location that
allows them to briefly not sleep in a place not meant for human
habitation, in an emergency shelter, or in a safe haven. HUD does not
consider these periods of less than 7 nights a break in homelessness.
Instead, these days would be counted towards a single occasion of
homelessness living in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter. Only periods of 7 or more
consecutive nights where the individual or family is not living in a
place not meant for human habitation, in a safe haven, or in an
emergency shelter would qualify as a break. Intake workers must follow
the general recordkeeping standards of third-party evidence first,
intake worker observation second, and self-certification of the head of
household third, when documenting the break in homelessness.
Rule Clarification: Section 578.3 of the final rule includes
language in paragraph (1)(ii) of the definition of
[[Page 75801]]
``chronically homeless'' that clarifies that a break is considered to
be 7 or more consecutive nights where the individual or family is not
living in a place not meant for human habitation, in a safe haven or in
an emergency shelter.
Comment: Stays in living situations other than the streets,
emergency shelters, or safe havens should be included in places an
individual or family can reside and still meet the definition of
``chronically homeless.'' Several commenters suggested that HUD
consider expanding the definition to allow for individuals and families
in certain living situations to be considered chronically homeless.
Numerous commenters suggested that individuals and families who have
been living in ``doubled up'' situations should qualify as being
chronically homeless. One commenter stated that periods spent ``doubled
up'' should be counted if the individual or family moves two or more
times within 60 days. Another commenter suggested that in addition to
periods of living in ``doubled up'' situations, the definition should
also include those living in unsuitable housing for long periods of
time, such as old mobile homes or cabins without electricity and
sewage. Another commenter suggested that the definition include ``a
person or family who does not have a permanent residence AND has moved
two or more times in the past 60 days.''
Several commenters asked HUD to consider stays in transitional
housing towards a person's homeless history when determining an
individual or family's chronically homeless status. The commenters had
various suggestions about how such stays could be incorporated. One
commenter suggested that stays of 90 days or less in transitional
housing should not constitute as a break. Similarly, another commenter
asked HUD to consider including transitional housing programs in the
definition of ``institutional care facility,'' which would allow stays
in transitional housing for 90 days or less to not constitute as a
break in homelessness. Another commenter proposed that the definition
be expanded so that persons who have been living in transitional
housing, for any period of time, may also be considered chronically
homeless. Finally, one commenter was concerned that excluding time in
transitional housing would disadvantage homeless veterans who would
otherwise be eligible for the HUD-Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing
(HUD-VASH) program because many of those veterans are initially housed
in transitional housing.
HUD Response: HUD has interpreted the criteria in paragraphs (1)
and (2) of the statutory definition by clarifying that short-term stays
in institutional care facilities do not count as breaks in
homelessness. HUD believes this clarification is supported by the
widespread and longstanding recognition that persons experiencing
chronic homelessness frequently cycle between short-term stays in
institutional care facilities and emergency shelters, safe havens, and
places not meant for human habitation. HUD also believes this
widespread and longstanding recognition is implicit in paragraph (2) of
the statutory definition, which allows certain individuals to qualify
as chronically homeless even if they currently live in an institutional
care facility, as opposed to an emergency shelter, safe haven, or place
not meant for human habitation. There is nothing in the statutory
definition to suggest that certain people should qualify as chronically
homeless even if they are currently living in transitional housing or
in ``doubled up'' locations as opposed to emergency shelters, safe
havens, or places not meant for human habitation. Therefore, HUD has
decided not to expand the qualifying residences beyond the places
explicitly mentioned in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the statute.
Regarding HUD-VASH, specifically, the U.S. Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) determines chronic homeless status at the initial intake
to VA homeless services. Therefore, veterans who qualify as chronically
homeless at initial intake will maintain that status throughout the
episode of care, even if they are served in a VA program that is
characterized as transitional housing immediately prior to entry into
HUD-VASH.
Comment: Clarification of how the word ``continuously'' is defined
in the phrase ``continuously homeless for at least one year.'' A
commenter asked how HUD is defining the word ``continuously'' in the
phrase ``continuously homeless for at least one year'' in the
definition of ``chronically homeless.''
HUD Response: HUD has clarified that a break in homelessness is
defined as 7 or more consecutive nights in a place that does not
qualify as a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter and, therefore, does not consider it to be necessary
to define the word ``continuously.''
Comment: Clarification is needed on ``conditions'' versus
``disability.'' Several commenters wrote about paragraph (1)(iii) in
the proposed rule's definition of ``chronically homeless,'' which
provides that a chronically homeless person is a person who can be
diagnosed with one of the following conditions: ``substance use
disorder, serious mental illness, developmental disability (as defined
in section 102 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of
Rights Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002)), post-traumatic stress disorder,
cognitive impairments resulting from brain injury, or chronic physical
illness or disability.''
Commenters asked for clarification on what constitutes a
``condition.'' Other commenters asked about the specific list of
``conditions'' included in the definition. One commenter asked why the
term ``serious mental illness'' is used instead of ``severe and
persistent mental illness,'' while another commenter asked why ``post-
traumatic stress disorder'' was included here but not in the definition
of ``disability'' included in the McKinney-Vento Act. Other commenters
referenced the Homeless Management Information System Data Standards
and recommended that they be consistent.
Another commenter suggested that the language be revised to say
that a chronically homeless person is a person who has been diagnosed
with a condition as opposed to saying can be diagnosed, so that it is
more definitive.
Finally, one commenter said that the requirement to have a
disability determination for each of the identified disabilities will
cause an underreporting of disabilities, which will result in an
underreporting of chronic homelessness.
HUD Response: The language included in the proposed definition of
``chronically homeless'' regarding the types of conditions a person
must have in order to qualify as chronically homeless comes from the
statute. HUD analyzed the list of conditions included in the statute in
comparison with those included under the definition of ``homeless
individual with a disability'' under the Act and determined that each
of the ``conditions'' included under the statutory definition of
``chronically homeless'' are also included under the definition of
``homeless individual with a disability.'' Because an individual with
one or more of the ``conditions'' included under the statutory
definition of ``chronically homeless'' would qualify as a ``homeless
individual with a disability'' under the Act, and because HUD wants to
clarify that chronically homeless individuals and families are eligible
for permanent supportive housing, which under the Continuum of Care
Program interim rule means
[[Page 75802]]
``permanent housing in which supportive services are provided to assist
homeless persons with a disability to live independently,'' HUD has
replaced the list of ``conditions'' found in the proposed rule with the
requirement that an individual must meet the definition of ``homeless
individual with a disability'' in the Act. In addition, HUD has added
to the Continuum of Care Program interim rule recordkeeping
requirements for documenting the disability, and has created standards
for collecting information on disability in the Homeless Management
Information System Data Standards that are consistent with this
definition.
Regarding the comment related to the phrase ``can be diagnosed''
found in the proposed rule, HUD decided to replace the list of
``conditions'' found in the proposed rule with the requirement that an
individual must meet the definition of ``homeless individual with a
disability'' in the Act. Therefore, the phrase ``can be diagnosed'' is
not found in the final rule. It should be noted, however, that for the
purposes of recordkeeping, the final rule permits evidence of a
disability to be documented using an intake staff-recorded observation
of disability that, no later than 45 days of the application for
assistance, is confirmed and accompanied by evidence in 24 CFR
578.103(a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2), (3), or (5).
Finally, regarding the last comment, there is no such ``requirement
to have a disability determination for each of the identified
disabilities.'' An adult head of household is only required to meet the
definition of ``homeless individual with a disability'' as defined in
section 401(9) of the McKinney-Vento Act in order to meet the
definition of ``chronically homeless'' and the recipient is only
required to keep on file evidence of the qualifying disabling condition
as HUD has clarified in the recordkeeping requirements.
Rule Clarification: To provide for a more uniform definition, this
final rule revised the language in paragraph (3) of the definition of
``chronically homeless'' to state that to be considered chronically
homeless a family must have an adult head of household (or a minor head
of household if no adult is present in the household) who meets the
criteria of ``homeless individual with a disability'' as defined in
section 401(9) of the McKinney-Vento Act.
Comment: The definition of ``chronically homeless'' should include
an income variable. A commenter recommended that HUD add an income
variable as an indicator of chronic homelessness.
HUD Response: HUD disagrees with this recommendation. The statute
does not include an income variable for either the definition of
``homeless'' or ``chronically homeless'' and HUD does not seek to
expand either definition to include this component.
Comment: Provide guidance on what is meant by ``institution.'' One
commenter stated that HUD should provide clear guidance on what
constitutes an ``institution.'' Other commenters suggested that HUD
include foster care in the definition of an institution and clarify
that temporary placement in child welfare systems and foster care
should constitute as a break in homelessness.
HUD Response: HUD acknowledges that clarification of institutional
care facility is necessary, however, rather than establishing a fixed
set of institutional care facilities in the final rule, HUD intends to
issue guidance on the meaning of ``institutional care facility.''
Comment: Consistently refer to stays in institutions that do not
constitute as a break in homelessness for purposes of defining
``chronically homeless'' as either ``90 days or less'' or ``fewer than
90 days.'' One commenter stated that HUD should be consistent when
referencing institutional stays because ``90 days or less'' in
paragraph (1)(ii) of the definition is not the same as ``fewer than 90
days'' in paragraph (2) of this definition.
HUD Response: HUD agrees that the language around stays in an
institution included in the proposed definition was inconsistent. The
definition in this rule has been revised to clarify that an individual
can be considered chronically homeless if they are residing in or have
a history of residing in an institution for fewer than 90 days, where
the individual or family resided in a place not meant for human
habitation, in a safe haven, or in an emergency shelter immediately
prior to entering the institution.
Rule clarification: HUD has revised the definition of ``chronically
homeless'' to state that a homeless individual with a disability may be
considered to be chronically homeless if they live in an institutional
care facility, as long as the individual has been living there for
fewer than 90 days and had been living in a place not meant for human
habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter prior to entering the
institutional care facility.
Comment: Define residence in institutional care facility as present
and not past residence. A commenter suggested that HUD change the
wording in paragraph (2) of the definition from ``An individual who has
been residing in an institutional care facility. . ..'' to ``An
individual who is residing in an institutional care facility. . .''
HUD Response: HUD disagrees that this rewording is necessary. The
phrase ``has been residing in an institutional care facility''
encompasses both the recent past and the current living situation of
the individual and describes persons who are currently living or
residing in an institutional care facility and whose total current stay
in that facility will be fewer than 90 days.
Comment: Difficulty in documenting periods of homelessness. Many
commenters expressed concern that it would be difficult to document or
verify the time period of homelessness required in the proposed
definition of ``chronically homeless.'' Some commenters stated that it
would be difficult to verify where homeless individuals or families
have slept if the individual or family had not had regular interaction
with a homeless service provider. Other commenters stated that
chronically homeless individuals and families would not be able to
remember or provide documentation for the exact period of time during
which they had been homeless. Several commenters suggested that self-
certification by the head of household of homeless status should be
sufficient for documenting homeless status and history. Many commenters
expressed concern that the requirement to track and verify cumulative
lengths of homelessness would place an undue burden on homeless service
providers, particularly in rural areas where there are fewer
institutions or shelters. Commenters also requested that the final rule
include specific guidance on how to document homeless status and
history, particularly for persons that have been unsheltered. Finally,
several commenters expressed concern that the definition would make
counting chronically homeless persons in the Point-in-Time counts more
difficult because enumerators will not have sufficient time to
determine lengths of homelessness.
HUD Response: After reviewing the public comments, HUD acknowledges
the lack of recordkeeping requirements for chronically homeless status
in the proposed rule caused confusion and concern and HUD agrees it
must provide specific guidance on documentation requirements for
projects that are required to serve the chronically homeless. For this
reason, the final rule includes a section on recordkeeping
requirements. When creating the recordkeeping requirements, HUD
acknowledged many of the potential difficulties expressed by the
[[Page 75803]]
commenters might occur if the burden-of-proof is too high. Therefore,
the language in the recordkeeping section will allow for the period of
homelessness to be documented by a self-certification by the head of
household seeking assistance on a limited basis. In rare instances
where persons have been unsheltered and out of contact for long periods
of time, the recordkeeping requirements provide that up to the full
period of homelessness could be documented by a self-certification by
the individual or head of household seeking assistance, however, this
accommodation is limited to no more than 25 percent of all chronically
homeless individuals and families assisted. HUD determined that 25
percent was a reasonable limit for this accommodation as it is
consistent with a previous policy used by HUD that limited the
percentage of program participants in transitional housing funded
through the Supportive Housing Program who could be assisted for longer
than 2 years. Further, the recordkeeping section clarifies that
homeless service providers are not required to verify every day of
homelessness in a given month but instead, that a single encounter with
a homeless service provider in a given month would be sufficient third-
party evidence that the individual or family has been homeless for the
entire month, unless there is evidence that the individual or family
had a break of at least 7 consecutive nights in their homeless occasion
during that month (e.g., was housed with a friend or family member).
HUD does not expect Continuums of Care to document a person's
chronically homeless status when conducting the annual Point-in-Time
count. HUD will provide clarification and guidance regarding how to
enumerate persons experiencing chronic homelessness through notices and
other guidance in advance of the Point-in-Time count.
Rule clarification. To clarify the records HUD expects Continuum of
Care Program recipients and subrecipients to maintain when they are
required to serve chronically homeless individuals and families, HUD
has revised Sec. 578.103(a)(4) to incorporate recordkeeping
requirements for the definition of ``chronically homeless.'' In
addition, as a result of incorporating a new paragraph (4) in Sec.
578.103(a), the remainder of Sec. 578.103(a) has been reordered and
HUD has amended Sec. 578.87(b)(4) to update the reference from Sec.
578.103(a)(13) to Sec. 578.103(a)(14).
Comment: If there is no penalty for lying there will be fraud. A
commenter expressed concern that if there is no penalty for lying by
the program participants about the length of time homeless, there is
likely to be fraud.
HUD Response: In general, HUD expects that all homeless service
providers will exercise due diligence when documenting periods of
homelessness. The final rule includes recordkeeping requirements that
will require third-party documentation where it is available, but
allows for self-certification by the head of household seeking
assistance in certain instances.
Rule clarification: To clarify that HUD expects Continuum of Care
Program recipients and subrecipients documenting chronic homeless
status to obtain third-party documentation whenever possible, HUD has
established Sec. 578.103(a)(4) to incorporate recordkeeping
requirements for the definition of ``chronically homeless'' and to
provide that the order of priority for documenting chronically homeless
status is third-party documentation first, intake worker observations
second, and certification from the person seeking assistance third. In
addition, HUD has clarified that, except for in limited circumstances,
at least 9 months of the homeless occasion(s) must be documented with
third-party documentation.
VI. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
This final rule establishes a regulatory definition for the term
``chronically homeless.'' This rule focuses on persons with the longest
histories of homelessness to ensure that funds are targeted to
providing permanent supportive housing solutions for these individuals
and families who are chronically homeless, consistent with the
statutory definition of the term established in the McKinney-Vento Act.
This definition will also ensure that communities are using the same
criteria in determining whether a person is chronically homeless, and
that HUD receives consistent and accurate information nationwide.
This new definition will use existing recordkeeping requirements
for the Continuum of Care Program to document the homeless status of
program participants, but adds that such documentation covers a program
participant's homelessness status over a specific time period--at least
1 year or on at least 4 separate occasions in the last 3 years--to
document the chronically homeless status of program participants. While
in some instances additional program participant records will need to
be obtained to identify an individual's ``chronically homeless''
status, the additional burden of obtaining these records will ensure
that communities are appropriately targeting HUD funds to those with
the greatest need.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' This rule
was determined to be a ``significant regulatory action,'' as defined in
section 3(f) of the order (although not an economically significant
regulatory action under the order). The docket file is available for
public inspection in the Regulations Division, Office of the General
Counsel, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due
to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule
an appointment to review the docket file by calling the Regulations
Division at 202-402-3055 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals
with speech or hearing impairments may access this number via TTY by
calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free
number).
Information Collection Requirements
The information collection requirements contained in this final
rule have been submitted to OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and assigned OMB control number 2506-0112.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information, unless the collection displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
Environmental Impact
This rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and
mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern or regulate, real property
acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration,
demolition, or new construction, or establish, revise, or provide for
standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this rule
is categorically excluded from environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
(UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and on the private
[[Page 75804]]
sector. This rule does not impose a Federal mandate on any State,
local, or tribal government, or on the private sector, within the
meaning of UMRA.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule solely
addresses the definition of ``chronically homeless.'' The purpose of
this rule is to determine the universe of individuals and families who
qualify as ``chronically homeless'' under the McKinney-Vento Act. Given
the narrow scope of this rule, HUD has determined that it would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local
governments and is not required by statute or the rule preempts State
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This final rule does not have
federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local governments nor preempt State law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 91
Aged, Grant programs--housing and community development, Homeless,
Individuals with disabilities, Low- and moderate-income housing,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
24 CFR Part 578
Community development, Community facilities, Grant programs--
housing and community development, Grant program--social programs,
Homeless, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, parts 91
and 578 of title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as
follows:
PART 91--CONSOLIDATED SUBMISSIONS FOR COMMUNITY PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 91 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 3601-3619, 5301-5315, 11331-
11388, 12701-12711, 12741-12756, and 12901-12912.
0
2. In Sec. 91.5, the definition of ``Chronically homeless'' is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 91.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
Chronically homeless means:
(1) A ``homeless individual with a disability,'' as defined in
section 401(9) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
11360(9)), who:
(i) Lives in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven,
or in an emergency shelter; and
(ii) Has been homeless and living as described in paragraph (1)(i)
of this definition continuously for at least 12 months or on at least 4
separate occasions in the last 3 years, as long as the combined
occasions equal at least 12 months and each break in homelessness
separating the occasions included at least 7 consecutive nights of not
living as described in paragraph (1)(i). Stays in institutional care
facilities for fewer than 90 days will not constitute as a break in
homelessness, but rather such stays are included in the 12-month total,
as long as the individual was living or residing in a place not meant
for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter immediately
before entering the institutional care facility;
(2) An individual who has been residing in an institutional care
facility, including a jail, substance abuse or mental health treatment
facility, hospital, or other similar facility, for fewer than 90 days
and met all of the criteria in paragraph (1) of this definition, before
entering that facility; or
(3) A family with an adult head of household (or if there is no
adult in the family, a minor head of household) who meets all of the
criteria in paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition, including a family
whose composition has fluctuated while the head of household has been
homeless.
* * * * *
PART 578--CONTINUUM OF CARE PROGRAM
0
3. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 578 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11371 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
0
4. In Sec. 578.3, the definition of ``Chronically homeless'' is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 578.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Chronically homeless means:
(1) A ``homeless individual with a disability,'' as defined in
section 401(9) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
11360(9)), who:
(i) Lives in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven,
or in an emergency shelter; and
(ii) Has been homeless and living as described in paragraph (1)(i)
of this definition continuously for at least 12 months or on at least 4
separate occasions in the last 3 years, as long as the combined
occasions equal at least 12 months and each break in homelessness
separating the occasions included at least 7 consecutive nights of not
living as described in paragraph (1)(i). Stays in institutional care
facilities for fewer than 90 days will not constitute as a break in
homelessness, but rather such stays are included in the 12-month total,
as long as the individual was living or residing in a place not meant
for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter immediately
before entering the institutional care facility;
(2) An individual who has been residing in an institutional care
facility, including a jail, substance abuse or mental health treatment
facility, hospital, or other similar facility, for fewer than 90 days
and met all of the criteria in paragraph (1) of this definition, before
entering that facility; or
(3) A family with an adult head of household (or if there is no
adult in the family, a minor head of household) who meets all of the
criteria in paragraph (1) or (2) of this definition, including a family
whose composition has fluctuated while the head of household has been
homeless.
* * * * *
Sec. 578.87 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 578.87, paragraph (b)(4) is amended by removing the
reference ``Sec. 578.103(a)(13)'' and adding in its place ``Sec.
578.103(a)(14)''.
0
6. In Sec. 578.103, redesignate paragraphs (a)(4) through (17) as
paragraphs (a)(5) through (18) and add paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 578.103 Recordkeeping requirements.
(a) * * *
(4) Chronically homeless status. The recipient must maintain and
follow
[[Page 75805]]
written intake procedures to ensure compliance with the chronically
homeless definition in Sec. 578.3. The procedures must require
documentation at intake of the evidence relied upon to establish and
verify chronically homeless status. The procedures must establish the
order of priority for obtaining evidence as third-party documentation
first, intake worker observations second, and certification from the
person seeking assistance third. Records contained in an HMIS, or
comparable database used by victim service or legal service providers,
are acceptable evidence of third-party documentation and intake worker
observations if the HMIS, or comparable database, retains an auditable
history of all entries, including the person who entered the data, the
date of entry, and the change made, and if the HMIS prevents overrides
or changes of the dates on which entries are made.
(i) For paragraph (1) of the ``Chronically homeless'' definition in
Sec. 578.3, evidence that the individual is a ``homeless individual
with a disability'' as defined in section 401(9) of the McKinney-Vento
Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11360(9)) must include:
(A) Evidence of homeless status as set forth in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section; and
(B) Evidence of a disability. In addition to the documentation
required under paragraph (a)(4)(i)(A) of this section, the procedures
must require documentation at intake of the evidence relied upon to
establish and verify the disability of the person applying for homeless
assistance. The recipient must keep these records for 5 years after the
end of the grant term. Acceptable evidence of the disability includes:
(1) Written verification of the disability from a professional
licensed by the state to diagnose and treat the disability and his or
her certification that the disability is expected to be long-continuing
or of indefinite duration and substantially impedes the individual's
ability to live independently;
(2) Written verification from the Social Security Administration;
(3) The receipt of a disability check (e.g., Social Security
Disability Insurance check or Veteran Disability Compensation);
(4) Intake staff-recorded observation of disability that, no later
than 45 days from the application for assistance, is confirmed and
accompanied by evidence in paragraph (a)(4)(i)(B)(1), (2), (3), or (5)
of this section; or
(5) Other documentation approved by HUD.
(ii) For paragraph (1)(i) of the ``Chronically homeless''
definition in Sec. 578.3, evidence that the individual lives in a
place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency
shelter, which includes:
(A) An HMIS record or record from a comparable database;
(B) A written observation by an outreach worker of the conditions
where the individual was living;
(C) A written referral by another housing or service provider; or
(D) Where evidence in paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)(A) through (C) of this
section cannot be obtained, a certification by the individual seeking
assistance, which must be accompanied by the intake worker's
documentation of the living situation of the individual or family
seeking assistance and the steps taken to obtain evidence in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (C).
(iii) For paragraph (1)(ii) of the ``Chronically homeless''
definition in Sec. 578.3, evidence must include a combination of the
evidence described in paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D) of this
section, subject to the following conditions:
(A) Third-party documentation of a single encounter with a homeless
service provider on a single day within 1 month is sufficient to
consider an individual as homeless and living or residing in a place
not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter
for the entire calendar month (e.g., an encounter on May 5, 2015,
counts for May 1--May 31, 2015), unless there is evidence that there
have been at least 7 consecutive nights not living or residing in a
place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency
shelter during that month (e.g., evidence in HMIS of a stay in
transitional housing);
(B) Each break in homelessness of at least 7 consecutive nights not
living or residing in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or in an emergency shelter between separate occasions must be
documented with the evidence described in paragraphs (a)(4)(ii)(A)
through (D) of this section;
(C) Evidence of stays in institutional care facilities fewer than
90 days included in the total of at least 12 months of living or
residing in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe haven, or an
emergency shelter must include the evidence in paragraphs (a)(4)(iv)(A)
through (B) of this section and evidence described in paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D) of this section that the individual was
living or residing in a place not meant for human habitation, a safe
haven, or an emergency shelter immediately prior to entering the
institutional care facility; and
(D) For at least 75 percent of the chronically homeless individuals
and families assisted by a recipient in a project during an operating
year, no more than 3 months of living or residing in a place not meant
for human habitation, a safe haven, or an emergency shelter may be
documented using the evidence in paragraph (a)(4)(ii)(D) of this
section for each assisted chronically homeless individual or family.
This limitation does not apply to documentation of breaks in
homelessness between separate occasions, which may be documented
entirely based on a self-report by the individual seeking assistance.
(iv) If an individual qualifies as chronically homeless under
paragraph (2) of the ``Chronically homeless'' definition in Sec. 578.3
because he or she has been residing in an institutional care facility
for fewer than 90 days and met all of the criteria in paragraph (1) of
the definition, before entering that facility, evidence must include
the following:
(A) Discharge paperwork or a written or oral referral from a social
worker, case manager, or other appropriate official of the
institutional care facility stating the beginning and end dates of the
time residing in the institutional care facility. All oral statements
must be recorded by the intake worker; or
(B) Where the evidence in paragraph (a)(4)(iv)(A) of this section
is not obtainable, a written record of the intake worker's due
diligence in attempting to obtain the evidence described in paragraph
(a)(4)(iv)(A) and a certification by the individual seeking assistance
that states that he or she is exiting or has just exited an
institutional care facility where he or she resided for fewer than 90
days; and
(C) Evidence as set forth in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (iii) of
this section that the individual met the criteria in paragraph (1) of
the definition for ``Chronically homeless'' in Sec. 578.3, immediately
prior to entry into the institutional care facility.
(v) If a family qualifies as chronically homeless under paragraph
(3) of the ``Chronically homeless'' definition in Sec. 578.3, evidence
must include the evidence as set forth in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through
(iv) of this section that the adult head of household (or if there is
no adult in the family, a minor head of household) met all of the
criteria in paragraph (1) or (2) of the definition.
* * * * *
[[Page 75806]]
Dated: November 13, 2015.
Harriet Tregoning,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and
Development.
Dated: Approved on November 24, 2015.
Nani A. Coloretti,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-30473 Filed 12-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P