Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2015 U.S. Territorial Longline Bigeye Tuna Catch Limits for Guam, 75437 [2015-30544]
Download as PDF
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 231 / Wednesday, December 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
estimates that the 80 percent limit
specified for closure will be exceeded
by November 27, 2015. Accordingly,
NMFS is closing the commercial nonblacknose SCS management group in
the Gulf of Mexico region as of 11:30
p.m. local time December 5, 2015. The
only shark species or management
groups that remain open in the Gulf of
Mexico region are the research large
coastal sharks, sandbar sharks within
the shark research fishery, the blue
shark, and pelagic sharks other than
porbeagle or blue shark management
groups.
At § 635.27(b)(1), the boundary
between the Gulf of Mexico region and
the Atlantic region is defined as a line
beginning on the East Coast of Florida
at the mainland at 25°20.4′ N. latitude,
proceeding due east. Any water and
land to the south and west of that
boundary is considered, for the
purposes of monitoring and setting
quotas, to be within the Gulf of Mexico
region.
During the closure, retention of nonblacknose SCS in the Gulf of Mexico
region is prohibited for persons fishing
aboard vessels issued a commercial
shark limited access permit (LAP) under
§ 635.4. However, persons aboard a
commercially permitted vessel that is
also properly permitted to operate as a
charter vessel or headboat for HMS and
is engaged in a for-hire trip could fish
under the recreational retention limits
for sharks and ‘‘no sale’’ provisions
(§ 635.22(a) and (c)).
During this closure, a shark dealer
issued a permit pursuant to § 635.4 may
not purchase or receive non-blacknose
SCS in the Gulf of Mexico region from
a vessel issued a shark LAP, except that
a permitted shark dealer or processor
may possess non-blacknose SCS in the
Gulf of Mexico region that were
harvested, off-loaded, and sold, traded,
or bartered prior to the effective date of
the closure and were held in storage
consistent with § 635.28(b)(6). Similarly,
a shark dealer issued a permit pursuant
to § 635.4 may, in accordance with
relevant state regulations, purchase or
receive non-blacknose SCS in the Gulf
of Mexico region if the sharks were
harvested, off-loaded, and sold, traded,
or bartered from a vessel that fishes only
in state waters and that has not been
issued a shark LAP, HMS Angling
permit, or HMS Charter/Headboat
permit pursuant to § 635.4.
Classification
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:21 Dec 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
NOAA (AA), finds that providing prior
notice and public comment for this
action is impracticable and contrary to
the public interest because the fisheries
are currently underway and any delay
in this action would result in
overharvest of the Gulf of Mexico nonblacknose SCS quota and be
inconsistent with management
requirements and objectives. Similarly,
affording prior notice and opportunity
for public comment on this action is
contrary to the public interest because if
the quota is exceeded, the stock may be
negatively affected and fishermen
ultimately could experience reductions
in the available quota and a lack of
fishing opportunities in future seasons.
For these reasons, the AA also finds
good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This action is required under
§ 635.28(b)(2) and is exempt from
review under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 27, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30540 Filed 11–30–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
RIN 0648–XD998
Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2015
U.S. Territorial Longline Bigeye Tuna
Catch Limits for Guam
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of a valid
specified fishing agreement.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces a valid
specified fishing agreement that
allocates 1,000 mt of the 2015 Guam
bigeye tuna limit to U.S. longline fishing
vessels. The agreement supports the
long-term sustainability of fishery
resources of the U.S. Pacific Islands.
DATES: November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the environmental
assessment and finding of no significant
impact for this action, identified by
NOAA–NMFS–2015–0077, are available
from www.regulations.gov, or from
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
75437
Michael D. Tosatto, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg.
176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Copies of the fishery ecosystem plans
are available from the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu,
HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220, fax 808–
522–8226, or www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIRO Sustainable
Fisheries, 808–725–5176.
In a final
rule published on November 6, 2015,
NMFS specified a 2015 limit of 2,000
metric tons (mt) of longline-caught
bigeye tuna for Guam (80 FR 68778). Of
the 2,000 mt, NMFS allows the territory
to allocate up to 1,000 mt to U.S.
longline fishing vessels identified in a
specified fishing agreement that meets
established criteria.
On November 25, 2015, NMFS
received from the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council a
specified fishing agreement between the
Government of Guam and Quota
Management, Inc. (QMI). In the
transmittal memorandum, the Council’s
Executive Director noted that the
specified fishing agreement was
consistent with the criteria set forth in
50 CFR 665.819(c)(1). NMFS reviewed
the agreement and determined that it is
consistent with the Fishery Ecosystem
Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western
Pacific Region, the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, implementing regulations, and
other applicable laws.
In accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(d)
and 50 CFR 665.819(c)(9), vessels
identified in the agreement may retain
and land bigeye tuna in the western and
central Pacific Ocean under the Guam
limit.
NMFS began attributing bigeye tuna
caught by vessels identified in the
agreement to Guam starting on
November 25, 2015. If and when NMFS
determines the fishery will reach the
1,000 mt attribution limit, we will
restrict harvest of bigeye tuna caught by
vessels identified in the agreement.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 27, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30544 Filed 11–27–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02DER1.SGM
02DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 231 (Wednesday, December 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 75437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30544]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 665
RIN 0648-XD998
Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2015 U.S. Territorial Longline
Bigeye Tuna Catch Limits for Guam
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of a valid specified fishing agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces a valid specified fishing agreement that
allocates 1,000 mt of the 2015 Guam bigeye tuna limit to U.S. longline
fishing vessels. The agreement supports the long-term sustainability of
fishery resources of the U.S. Pacific Islands.
DATES: November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no
significant impact for this action, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2015-0077,
are available from www.regulations.gov, or from Michael D. Tosatto,
Regional Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands Region (PIR), 1845 Wasp
Blvd., Bldg. 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Copies of the fishery ecosystem plans are available from the
Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), 1164 Bishop St.,
Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808-522-8220, fax 808-522-8226, or
www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIRO Sustainable
Fisheries, 808-725-5176.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a final rule published on November 6,
2015, NMFS specified a 2015 limit of 2,000 metric tons (mt) of
longline-caught bigeye tuna for Guam (80 FR 68778). Of the 2,000 mt,
NMFS allows the territory to allocate up to 1,000 mt to U.S. longline
fishing vessels identified in a specified fishing agreement that meets
established criteria.
On November 25, 2015, NMFS received from the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council a specified fishing agreement between the
Government of Guam and Quota Management, Inc. (QMI). In the transmittal
memorandum, the Council's Executive Director noted that the specified
fishing agreement was consistent with the criteria set forth in 50 CFR
665.819(c)(1). NMFS reviewed the agreement and determined that it is
consistent with the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for Pelagic Fisheries of the
Western Pacific Region, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, implementing regulations, and other applicable laws.
In accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(d) and 50 CFR 665.819(c)(9),
vessels identified in the agreement may retain and land bigeye tuna in
the western and central Pacific Ocean under the Guam limit.
NMFS began attributing bigeye tuna caught by vessels identified in
the agreement to Guam starting on November 25, 2015. If and when NMFS
determines the fishery will reach the 1,000 mt attribution limit, we
will restrict harvest of bigeye tuna caught by vessels identified in
the agreement.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 27, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-30544 Filed 11-27-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P