Request for Scientific Views on the Draft Recommended Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium-2015, 75097-75099 [2015-30493]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice of Commission Staff
Attendance
The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission’s staff may
attend the following meetings related to
the transmission planning activities of
the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM):
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
PJM Planning Committee
December 3, 2015, 9:30 a.m.–12:00 p.m.
(EST)
PJM Transmission Expansion Advisory
Committee
December 3, 2015, 11:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m.
(EST)
The above-referenced meetings will
be held at: PJM Conference and Training
Center, PJM Interconnection, 2750
Monroe Boulevard, Audubon, PA
19403.
The above-referenced meetings are
open to stakeholders.
Further information may be found at
www.pjm.com.
The discussions at the meetings
described above may address matters at
issue in the following proceedings:
Docket No. ER14–972, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER14–1485, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER13–1957, et al., ISO New
England, Inc., et. al.
Docket Nos. ER13–1944, et al., PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.
Docket No. ER15–1344, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15–1387, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. and Potomac
Electric Power Company
Docket No. ER15–2648, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15–2562, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER15–2563, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15–18, Consolidated
Edison Company of New York, Inc. v.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15–41, Essential Power
Rock Springs, LLC, et. al. v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13–1927, et al., PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.
Docket No. ER15–2114, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C. and
Transource West Virginia, LLC
Docket No. EL15–79, TransSource, LLC
v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL15–95, Delaware Public
Service Commission, et. al., v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., et. al.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:35 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
Docket No. EL15–67, Linden VFT, LLC
v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL05–121, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
For more information, contact the
following:
Jonathan Fernandez, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, (202) 502–
6604, Jonathan.Fernandez@ferc.gov.
Alina Halay, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, (202) 502–6474,
Alina.Halay@ferc.gov.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–30400 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2015–0753; FRL–9939–57–
OW]
Request for Scientific Views on the
Draft Recommended Aquatic Life
Ambient Water Quality Criteria for
Cadmium—2015
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is announcing its draft
recommended aquatic life water quality
criteria for cadmium for public
comment. EPA is updating its national
recommended ambient water quality
criteria for cadmium in order to reflect
the latest scientific information, and
current EPA policies and methods.
Following closure of this public
comment period, EPA will consider
scientific views from the public on this
draft document as well as any new data
or information received. EPA will then
publish a Federal Register notice
announcing the availability of the final
cadmium criteria. Once finalized, EPA’s
water quality criteria for cadmium will
provide recommendations to states and
tribes authorized to establish water
quality standards under the Clean Water
Act. In adopting water quality
standards, states set exposure
protections for aquatic life; chronic
exposure to cadmium negatively
impacts growth, development, behavior,
reproduction, and immune and
endocrine systems in aquatic life.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75097
OW–2015–0753, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.
epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Elias, Health and Ecological
Criteria Division, Office of Water (Mail
Code 4304T), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number: (202) 566–0120; email address:
elias.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How can I get copies of this
document and other related
information?
1. Docket: All documents in the
docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA–HQ–OW–
2015–0753 Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the EPA–HQ–OW–2015–
0753 Docket is (202) 566–2426. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit EPA Docket Center
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
75098
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
II. What are EPA’s recommended water
quality criteria?
EPA’s recommended water quality
criteria are scientifically derived
numeric values that protect aquatic life
or human health from the deleterious
effects of pollutants in ambient water.
Section 304(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) directs EPA to develop and
publish and, from time to time, revise
criteria for protection of aquatic life and
human health that accurately reflect the
latest scientific knowledge. Water
quality criteria developed under section
304(a) are based solely on data and the
latest scientific knowledge on the
relationship between pollutant
concentrations and environmental and
human health effects. Section 304(a)
criteria do not reflect consideration of
economic impacts or the technological
feasibility of meeting pollutant
concentrations in ambient water.
EPA’s recommended section 304(a)
criteria provide technical information to
states and authorized tribes in adopting
water quality standards (WQS) that
ultimately provide a basis for assessing
water body health and controlling
discharges or releases of pollutants.
Under the CWA and its implementing
regulations, states and authorized tribes
are to adopt water quality criteria to
protect designated uses (e.g., public
water supply, aquatic life, recreational
use, or industrial use). EPA’s
recommended water quality criteria do
not substitute for the CWA or
regulations, nor are they regulations
themselves. EPA’s recommended
criteria do not impose legally binding
requirements. States and authorized
tribes have the discretion to adopt,
where appropriate, other scientifically
defensible water quality criteria that
differ from these recommendations.
III. What is cadmium and why is EPA
concerned about it?
Cadmium is a relatively rare,
naturally occurring metal found in
mineral deposits and distributed
ubiquitously at low concentrations in
the environment. Cadmium’s primary
industrial uses are for the
manufacturing of batteries, pigments,
plastic stabilizers, metal coatings, alloys
and electronics. Recently, cadmium has
been used in manufacturing
nanoparticles (quantum dots) for use in
solar cells and color displays. Cadmium
is a non-essential metal with no
biological function in aquatic life.
Chronic exposure leads to adverse
effects on growth, reproduction,
immune and endocrine systems,
development and behavior in aquatic
organisms.
IV. Information on the Draft Aquatic
Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for
Cadmium
EPA prepared an update of the
chronic aquatic life criteria document
for cadmium based on the latest
scientific information and current EPA
policies and methods, including EPA’s
Guidelines for Deriving Numerical
National Water Quality Criteria for the
Protection of Aquatic Organisms and
Their Uses (1985) (EPA/R–85–100) and
Guidelines for Ecological Risk
Assessment (1998) (EPA/630/R–95/
002F). The draft 2015 updated criteria
include new data for 70 species and 49
genera not previously represented. The
draft freshwater acute criterion was
derived to be protective of endangered
species and further lowered to protect
the commercially and recreationally
important rainbow trout, consistent
with procedures described in EPA’s
current aquatic life criteria guidelines;
the freshwater acute value is
approximately the same as the 2001
acute criterion for dissolved cadmium.
The draft freshwater chronic criterion is
slightly higher (i.e., less stringent)
compared to the 2001 criterion for
dissolved cadmium; this increase is
primarily due to the inclusion of new
data.
The draft estuarine/marine acute
criterion for dissolved cadmium is
slightly more stringent than the 2001
recommended criterion, which is
primarily due to the addition of data.
Draft changes in suggested values
between 2001 and 2015 can be found in
Table 1 below.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF 2001 AND 2015 DRAFT AQUATIC LIFE AWQC FOR CADMIUM
2015 AWQC Update
2001 AWQC
Acute
(1-hour, dissolved Cd)c
Freshwater (Total Hardness =
100 mg/L as CaCO3) a.
Estuarine/marine ....................
Chronic
(4-day, dissolved Cd)
Acute
(1-day, dissolved Cd)
Chronic
(4-day, dissolved Cd)
2.1 μg/L b ..........................
0.73 μg/L ..........................
2.0 μg/L b ..........................
0.25 μg/L.
35 μg/L .............................
8.3 μg/L ............................
40 μg/L .............................
8.8 μg/L.
a Freshwater
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
acute and chronic criteria are hardness-dependent and were normalized to a hardness of 100 mg/L as CaCO3 to allow the presentation of representative criteria values.
b Lowered to protect the commercially and recreationally important species (rainbow trout), as per the 1985 Guidelines, Stephen et al. (1985).
c The duration of the 2015 acute criteria was changed to 1-hour to reflect the 1985 Guidelines-based recommended acute duration.
EPA will consider the public
comments, revise the document as
necessary, and issue a final updated
cadmium criteria document. This draft
criteria document does not represent
and should not be construed to
represent any final EPA policy,
viewpoint, or determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:35 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
V. What is the relationship between the
draft chronic water quality criterion
and your state or tribal water quality
standards?
As part of the WQS triennial review
process defined in section 303(c)(1) of
the CWA, the states and authorized
tribes are responsible for maintaining
and revising WQS. Standards consist of
designated uses, water quality criteria to
protect those uses, a policy for
antidegradation, and may include
general policies for application and
implementation. Section 303(c)(1)
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requires states and authorized tribes to
review and modify, if appropriate, their
WQS at least once every three years.
States and authorized tribes must
adopt water quality criteria that protect
designated uses. Protective criteria are
based on a sound scientific rationale
and contain sufficient parameters or
constituents to protect the designated
uses. Criteria may be expressed in either
narrative or numeric form. States and
authorized tribes have four options
when adopting water quality criteria for
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
which EPA has published section 304(a)
criteria. They can:
(1) Establish numerical values based
on recommended section 304(a) criteria;
(2) Adopt section 304(a) criteria
modified to reflect site-specific
conditions;
(3) Adopt criteria derived using other
scientifically defensible methods; or
(4) Establish narrative criteria where
numeric criteria cannot be established
or to supplement numerical criteria (40
CFR 131.11(b)).
EPA’s regulation at 40 CFR 131.20(a)
states that if a state does not adopt new
or revised criteria parameters for which
EPA has published new or updated
recommendations, then the state shall
provide an explanation when it submits
the results of its triennial review to the
Regional Administrator consistent with
CWA section 303(c)(1). The
recommendations in the draft cadmium
criteria document may change based on
scientific views shared in response to
this notice. Upon finalization, the
updated cadmium criteria would
supersede EPA’s previous 304(a) criteria
for cadmium. Consistent with 40 CFR
131.21, new or revised water quality
criteria adopted into law or regulation
by states and authorized tribes on or
after May 30, 2 000 are applicable water
quality standards for CWA purposes
only after EPA approval.
VI. Solicitation of Scientific Views
EPA is soliciting additional scientific
views, data, and information regarding
the science and technical approach used
by the Agency in the derivation of this
draft criteria for cadmium. The Agency
is also interested in obtaining
information regarding new toxicity tests
on Hyalella azteca (amphipod); latent
acute effects of cadmium following
short exposures; and new estuarine
marine chronic toxicity tests.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VII. Additional Information
EPA conducted a contractor-led and
independent external peer review of the
draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water
Quality Criteria for Cadmium document
in October 2015. EPA will make the
external peer review comments and
Agency responses to these comments
available in the docket with the revised
draft cadmium criteria document at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Joel Beauvais,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office
of Water.
[FR Doc. 2015–30493 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:35 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2015–0667; FRL–9939–56–
OW]
Extension of Public Comment Period
for the National Wetland Condition
Assessment 2011 Draft Report
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is extending the comment
period for the draft report on the
National Wetland Condition Assessment
(NWCA 2011). In response to
stakeholder requests, the comment
period will be extended for an
additional 30 days, from December 7,
2015 until January 6, 2016.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2015–0667, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.
epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregg Serenbetz, Wetlands Division,
Office of Water (4502T), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: 202–566–1253;
email address: serenbetz.gregg@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 5, 2015, EPA announced the
availability of the draft report, National
Wetland Condition Assessment 2011: A
Collaborative Survey of the Nation’s
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75099
Wetlands, and opened a 30-day public
review and comment period to seek
comment on the information contained
in the draft report, the reasonableness of
the conclusions, and the clarity with
which the information is presented.
The original deadline to submit
comments on the draft report was
December 7, 2015. This action extends
the comment period for 30 days. Written
comments must now be received by
January 6, 2016. The draft report and
other supporting materials may also be
viewed and downloaded from EPA’s
Web site at https://www2.epa.gov/
national-aquatic-resource-surveys/
national-wetland-condition-assessment.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Benita Best-Wong,
Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and
Watersheds.
[FR Doc. 2015–30505 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9939–40–OAR]
Stratospheric Protection Division;
Teleconference on the Clean Air Act
Section 608 Technician Certification
Program Test Bank
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Section 608
Technician Certification Program Test
Bank teleconference.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the Stratospheric Protection Division
will hold a public teleconference on
December 9, 2015 on the Section 608
Technician Certification Test Bank. The
teleconference will be an opportunity
for stakeholders and members of the
public to provide feedback on updating
Test Bank questions. For further
information regarding the
teleconference, please contact Robert
Burchard at the number and email
below.
DATES: The Stratospheric Protection
Division will hold a public
teleconference on December 9, 2015
from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: Under the authority of
Section 608 of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
of 1990, as amended, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) established a
technician certification program for
persons (‘‘technicians’’) who perform
maintenance, service, repair, or disposal
activities on appliances (with some
enumerated exceptions) that could be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75097-75099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30493]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0753; FRL-9939-57-OW]
Request for Scientific Views on the Draft Recommended Aquatic
Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium--2015
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing its
draft recommended aquatic life water quality criteria for cadmium for
public comment. EPA is updating its national recommended ambient water
quality criteria for cadmium in order to reflect the latest scientific
information, and current EPA policies and methods. Following closure of
this public comment period, EPA will consider scientific views from the
public on this draft document as well as any new data or information
received. EPA will then publish a Federal Register notice announcing
the availability of the final cadmium criteria. Once finalized, EPA's
water quality criteria for cadmium will provide recommendations to
states and tribes authorized to establish water quality standards under
the Clean Water Act. In adopting water quality standards, states set
exposure protections for aquatic life; chronic exposure to cadmium
negatively impacts growth, development, behavior, reproduction, and
immune and endocrine systems in aquatic life.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2015-0753, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. EPA
may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Elias, Health and Ecological
Criteria Division, Office of Water (Mail Code 4304T), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202) 566-0120; email address: elias.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?
1. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0753
Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone
number for the EPA-HQ-OW-2015-0753 Docket is (202) 566-2426. For
additional information about EPA's public docket, visit EPA Docket
Center
[[Page 75098]]
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
II. What are EPA's recommended water quality criteria?
EPA's recommended water quality criteria are scientifically derived
numeric values that protect aquatic life or human health from the
deleterious effects of pollutants in ambient water. Section 304(a)(1)
of the Clean Water Act (CWA) directs EPA to develop and publish and,
from time to time, revise criteria for protection of aquatic life and
human health that accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge.
Water quality criteria developed under section 304(a) are based solely
on data and the latest scientific knowledge on the relationship between
pollutant concentrations and environmental and human health effects.
Section 304(a) criteria do not reflect consideration of economic
impacts or the technological feasibility of meeting pollutant
concentrations in ambient water.
EPA's recommended section 304(a) criteria provide technical
information to states and authorized tribes in adopting water quality
standards (WQS) that ultimately provide a basis for assessing water
body health and controlling discharges or releases of pollutants. Under
the CWA and its implementing regulations, states and authorized tribes
are to adopt water quality criteria to protect designated uses (e.g.,
public water supply, aquatic life, recreational use, or industrial
use). EPA's recommended water quality criteria do not substitute for
the CWA or regulations, nor are they regulations themselves. EPA's
recommended criteria do not impose legally binding requirements. States
and authorized tribes have the discretion to adopt, where appropriate,
other scientifically defensible water quality criteria that differ from
these recommendations.
III. What is cadmium and why is EPA concerned about it?
Cadmium is a relatively rare, naturally occurring metal found in
mineral deposits and distributed ubiquitously at low concentrations in
the environment. Cadmium's primary industrial uses are for the
manufacturing of batteries, pigments, plastic stabilizers, metal
coatings, alloys and electronics. Recently, cadmium has been used in
manufacturing nanoparticles (quantum dots) for use in solar cells and
color displays. Cadmium is a non-essential metal with no biological
function in aquatic life. Chronic exposure leads to adverse effects on
growth, reproduction, immune and endocrine systems, development and
behavior in aquatic organisms.
IV. Information on the Draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality
Criteria for Cadmium
EPA prepared an update of the chronic aquatic life criteria
document for cadmium based on the latest scientific information and
current EPA policies and methods, including EPA's Guidelines for
Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection
of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses (1985) (EPA/R-85-100) and
Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment (1998) (EPA/630/R-95/002F).
The draft 2015 updated criteria include new data for 70 species and 49
genera not previously represented. The draft freshwater acute criterion
was derived to be protective of endangered species and further lowered
to protect the commercially and recreationally important rainbow trout,
consistent with procedures described in EPA's current aquatic life
criteria guidelines; the freshwater acute value is approximately the
same as the 2001 acute criterion for dissolved cadmium. The draft
freshwater chronic criterion is slightly higher (i.e., less stringent)
compared to the 2001 criterion for dissolved cadmium; this increase is
primarily due to the inclusion of new data.
The draft estuarine/marine acute criterion for dissolved cadmium is
slightly more stringent than the 2001 recommended criterion, which is
primarily due to the addition of data. Draft changes in suggested
values between 2001 and 2015 can be found in Table 1 below.
Table 1--Summary of 2001 and 2015 Draft Aquatic Life AWQC for Cadmium
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 AWQC Update 2001 AWQC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute (1-hour, Chronic (4-day, Acute (1-day, Chronic (4-day,
dissolved Cd)\c\ dissolved Cd) dissolved Cd) dissolved Cd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freshwater (Total Hardness = 100 2.1 [micro]g/L \b\ 0.73 [micro]g/L... 2.0 [micro]g/L \b\ 0.25 [micro]g/L.
mg/L as CaCO3) \a\.
Estuarine/marine................ 35 [micro]g/L..... 8.3 [micro]g/L.... 40 [micro]g/L..... 8.8 [micro]g/L.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Freshwater acute and chronic criteria are hardness-dependent and were normalized to a hardness of 100 mg/L
as CaCO3 to allow the presentation of representative criteria values.
\b\ Lowered to protect the commercially and recreationally important species (rainbow trout), as per the 1985
Guidelines, Stephen et al. (1985).
\c\ The duration of the 2015 acute criteria was changed to 1-hour to reflect the 1985 Guidelines-based
recommended acute duration.
EPA will consider the public comments, revise the document as
necessary, and issue a final updated cadmium criteria document. This
draft criteria document does not represent and should not be construed
to represent any final EPA policy, viewpoint, or determination.
V. What is the relationship between the draft chronic water quality
criterion and your state or tribal water quality standards?
As part of the WQS triennial review process defined in section
303(c)(1) of the CWA, the states and authorized tribes are responsible
for maintaining and revising WQS. Standards consist of designated uses,
water quality criteria to protect those uses, a policy for
antidegradation, and may include general policies for application and
implementation. Section 303(c)(1) requires states and authorized tribes
to review and modify, if appropriate, their WQS at least once every
three years.
States and authorized tribes must adopt water quality criteria that
protect designated uses. Protective criteria are based on a sound
scientific rationale and contain sufficient parameters or constituents
to protect the designated uses. Criteria may be expressed in either
narrative or numeric form. States and authorized tribes have four
options when adopting water quality criteria for
[[Page 75099]]
which EPA has published section 304(a) criteria. They can:
(1) Establish numerical values based on recommended section 304(a)
criteria;
(2) Adopt section 304(a) criteria modified to reflect site-specific
conditions;
(3) Adopt criteria derived using other scientifically defensible
methods; or
(4) Establish narrative criteria where numeric criteria cannot be
established or to supplement numerical criteria (40 CFR 131.11(b)).
EPA's regulation at 40 CFR 131.20(a) states that if a state does
not adopt new or revised criteria parameters for which EPA has
published new or updated recommendations, then the state shall provide
an explanation when it submits the results of its triennial review to
the Regional Administrator consistent with CWA section 303(c)(1). The
recommendations in the draft cadmium criteria document may change based
on scientific views shared in response to this notice. Upon
finalization, the updated cadmium criteria would supersede EPA's
previous 304(a) criteria for cadmium. Consistent with 40 CFR 131.21,
new or revised water quality criteria adopted into law or regulation by
states and authorized tribes on or after May 30, 2 000 are applicable
water quality standards for CWA purposes only after EPA approval.
VI. Solicitation of Scientific Views
EPA is soliciting additional scientific views, data, and
information regarding the science and technical approach used by the
Agency in the derivation of this draft criteria for cadmium. The Agency
is also interested in obtaining information regarding new toxicity
tests on Hyalella azteca (amphipod); latent acute effects of cadmium
following short exposures; and new estuarine marine chronic toxicity
tests.
VII. Additional Information
EPA conducted a contractor-led and independent external peer review
of the draft Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Cadmium
document in October 2015. EPA will make the external peer review
comments and Agency responses to these comments available in the docket
with the revised draft cadmium criteria document at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Joel Beauvais,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2015-30493 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P