Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Follow Up to an Assessment of the Roles and Effectiveness of Community-Based Organizations in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, 75044-75045 [2015-30442]
Download as PDF
75044
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michele Esch, Executive Director,
National Agricultural Research,
Extension, Education, and Economics
Advisory Board; telephone: (202) 720–
8408; fax: (202) 720–6199; or email:
Michele.esch@ars.usda.gov.
The
Specialty Crop Committee was
established in accordance with the
Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of
2004 under Title III, Section 303 of
Public Law 108–465. This Committee is
a permanent subcommittee of the
National Agricultural Research
Extension, Education, and Economics
Advisory Board (the Board). The
Committee’s charge is to study the scope
and effectiveness of research, extension,
and economics programs affecting the
specialty crop industry. The
congressional legislation defines
‘‘specialty crops’’ as fruits, vegetables,
tree nuts, dried fruits and nursery crops
(including floriculture).
In order to carry out its
responsibilities effectively, the
Committee is holding a stakeholder
listening session. The listening session
will elicit stakeholder input from
industry and state representatives,
national organizations and institutions,
local producers, and other groups
interested in the issues with which the
Specialty Crop Committee is charged.
This session will be an opportunity to
share ideas on the specialty crop
industry with members of USDA’s
Specialty Crop Committee, including:
measures designed to improve the
efficiency, productivity, and
profitability of specialty crop
production in the United States;
measures designed to improve
competitiveness through research,
extension, and economics programs
affecting the specialty crop industry;
and programs that would: enhance
quality and shelf-life, development of
new crop protection tools, preventing
foreign invasive pests and diseases,
developing new and improved
marketing tools, and enhancing food
safety, improvement of mechanization
of production practices, and enhancing
irrigation techniques. Input received
will help formulate recommendations
from the Specialty Crop Committee to
USDA.
Written comments by attendees and
other interested stakeholders will be
welcomed as additional public input by
December 21, 2015. All verbal and
written statements will become part of
the official public record of the REE
Advisory Board Office.
Done at Washington, DC, this 24th day of
November 2015.
Catherine E. Woteki,
Under Secretary, Research, Education, and
Economics, Chief Scientist, USDA.
[FR Doc. 2015–30450 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:35 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Follow Up to an
Assessment of the Roles and
Effectiveness of Community-Based
Organizations in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on
this proposed information collection.
This is a revision of an existing
collection for the Food and Nutrition
Service to describe the roles of
community-based organizations (CBOs)
in the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP), and to
assess if, and how, the use of CBOs to
conduct SNAP applicant interviews has
impacted SNAP program outcomes such
as timeliness, payment error rates,
access, and client satisfaction across five
(5) States.
DATES: Written comments on this notice
must be received on or before February
1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s burden
estimate for the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
and (d) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to
be collected.
Comments may be sent to: Rosemarie
Downer, Food and Nutrition Service/
U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Rosemarie Downer at 703–305–2576
or via email to rosemarie.downer@
fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be
accepted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will also
become a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Rosemarie Downer
at 703–305–2129. Information requests
submitted through email should refer to
the title of this proposal.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Follow Up to an Assessment of
the Roles and Effectiveness of
Community-Based Organizations in the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program.
OMB Number: 0584–0578.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Expiration Date: May 31, 2016.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approval information
collection.
Abstract: To provide more timely and
efficient services to the growing number
of applicants to SNAP, State and local
SNAP offices are partnering with CBOs
that have the capacity to provide
application assistance and conduct
applicant interviews for SNAP across
five (5) States. FNS has approved these
partnerships as part of a demonstration
of ‘‘Community Partner Interviewer
Projects.’’ In 2015, FNS released a report
that assessed whether the use of CBOs
to conduct SNAP applicant interviews
had an impact on SNAP program
performance. Specific program
outcomes included efficiency, payment
accuracy and client satisfaction. FNS
has extended the demonstration
projects, and to further assess the
impact of these SNAP–CBO
partnerships on SNAP program
outcomes, FNS is seeking to collect
additional data from the five States that
are participating in the demonstration.
The information collection plan for
this follow-up includes a satisfaction
survey to be completed by SNAP
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
01DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Notices
participants who were interviewed by
CBO staff at the time of application or
recertification for SNAP, and program
administration data (error rates,
timeliness, payment accuracy, and
eligibility determination) from the five
participating States. FNS’ data
collection strategy aims to maximize
both efficiency and data quality. The
participant satisfaction survey will take
no more than five minutes. FNS will use
the information collected to evaluate
whether the 10 Community Partner
Interviewer projects have helped to
improve SNAP access and performance.
Affected Public: 3,452 Individuals and
Households (3,384 Respondent & 68
Non-Respondent type SNAP
participants).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,384.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Response:
3,384.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.08
hours (4.8 minutes).
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 272.08 burden hours.
Affected Public: State Agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5
States.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 2.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
10.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 10 burden hours.
Affected Public: Business-for-not-forProfit (Respondent type: CommunityBased Organizations (CBOs).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 338.40.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
3,384.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.08.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 270.40.
FNS is requesting 552.48 burden
hours.
There is no recordkeeping
requirements involved in this data
collection.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Yvette S. Jackson,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30442 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:35 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
and Ashley National Forest; Utah; High
Uintas Wilderness Domestic Sheep
Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In 2007, the Wasatch-Cache
National Forest, now the UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest
(UWCNF), along with other forests in
the Nation issued a number of decisions
reissuing term grazing permits on range
allotments using a provisional
categorical exclusion (CE) authorized by
Congress. In 2010, the United States
Forest Service was sued for authorizing
grazing on allotments using this CE
authority. In December 2013, the
Intermountain Region and the United
States District Court for the District
Court of Idaho agreed to the Range CE
settlement agreement. This agreement
stipulated that the UWCNF would issue
a scoping notice by May 2014 on five
domestic sheep allotments.
These were Gilbert Peak, Hessie LakeHenry’s Fork, Red Castle, East Fork
Blacks Fork, and the Middle Fork Blacks
Fork allotments. In reviewing the
management of these domestic sheep
allotments it became apparent that the
effects of grazing had to be considered
for both the north and south slope of the
Uinta Mountains because sheep trailed
from the north slope of the Uinta
Mountains to the south slope for the
summer grazing season. Therefore, the
analysis was then extended to include
the Painter Basin, Tungsten, Oweep,
Ottoson Basin, and Fall Creek sheep
allotments on the Ashley National
Forest, which are some of the domestic
sheep allotments on the south slope of
the Uinta Mountains.
Since 2007, various species of
terrestrial and aquatic animals as well as
plants have been added to or removed
from the Regional Forester’s Sensitive
Species (RFSS) list. The RFSS will be
analyzed as part of the EIS.
In May of 2014, scoping was initiated
for this project; at that time, it was
anticipated that the project would be
completed as an Environmental
Assessment. Since then, it has become
apparent that there is a potential for
significant impacts and that an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed. This project will evaluate the
effects of continued domestic sheep
grazing on these 10 allotments. These 10
sheep allotments located on the north
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75045
and south slopes of the Uinta Mountains
and are located in the Ashley or UintaWasatch-Cache NFs.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
December 31, 2015. The draft
environmental impact statement is
expected around November, 2016 and
the final environmental impact
statement is expected around October,
2017.
Send written comments to
David Whittekiend, Uinta-WasatchCache National Forest Supervisor at 857
West South Jordan Parkway, South
Jordan, UT 84095. Comments may also
be sent via email to comments-intermtnashley@fs.fed.us or comments-intermtnuwc@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to 801–
253–8118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Cowley, Interdisciplinary Team Leader,
at the Uinta-Wasatch Cache Supervisor’s
Office (telephone: 801–999–2177; email:
pcowley@fs.fed.us).
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Purpose and Need for Action
In response to the requirements of the
2013 settlement, the UWC is required to
reassess the effects of domestic sheep
grazing on the Gilbert Peak, Hessie
Lake-Henry’s Fork, Red Castle, East Fork
Blacks Fork, and the Middle Fork Blacks
Fork allotments. As such there is a need
to respond to the requirements of the
2013 settlement. Since the Ashley NF
neighbors those allotments to the south
(Painter Basin, Tungsten, Oweep,
Ottoson Basin, and Fall Creek), and
domestic sheep utilize both the north
and south slopes of the High Uintas, it
was determined that an analysis of all
10 allotments was needed.
With the addition of new species to
the RFSS,1 the Forest Service must
design and manage projects when they
are initiated and implemented to
account for impacts to those species.2
1 RFSS are ‘‘those plant and animal species
identified by a regional forester for which
population viability is a concern . . .’’ (FSM
2670.5).
2 Forest Service Manual 2670.32 required that the
Forests ‘‘Avoid or minimize impacts to species
whose viability has been identified as a concern.’’
The Forests are also required to ‘‘Analyze, if
impacts cannot be avoided, the significance of
potential adverse effects on the population or its
habitat within the area of concern and on the
species as a whole. (The line officer, with project
approval authority, makes the decision to allow or
E:\FR\FM\01DEN1.SGM
Continued
01DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75044-75045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30442]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Follow Up to an Assessment of the Roles and
Effectiveness of Community-Based Organizations in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on this proposed information collection. This is a revision of an
existing collection for the Food and Nutrition Service to describe the
roles of community-based organizations (CBOs) in the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and to assess if, and how, the use
of CBOs to conduct SNAP applicant interviews has impacted SNAP program
outcomes such as timeliness, payment error rates, access, and client
satisfaction across five (5) States.
DATES: Written comments on this notice must be received on or before
February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's burden estimate for the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond,
including use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, and (d) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of
the information to be collected.
Comments may be sent to: Rosemarie Downer, Food and Nutrition
Service/U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room
1014, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to
the attention of Rosemarie Downer at 703-305-2576 or via email to
rosemarie.downer@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101 Park Center
Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Rosemarie
Downer at 703-305-2129. Information requests submitted through email
should refer to the title of this proposal.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Follow Up to an Assessment of the Roles and Effectiveness of
Community-Based Organizations in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program.
OMB Number: 0584-0578.
Form Number: Not Applicable.
Expiration Date: May 31, 2016.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approval information
collection.
Abstract: To provide more timely and efficient services to the
growing number of applicants to SNAP, State and local SNAP offices are
partnering with CBOs that have the capacity to provide application
assistance and conduct applicant interviews for SNAP across five (5)
States. FNS has approved these partnerships as part of a demonstration
of ``Community Partner Interviewer Projects.'' In 2015, FNS released a
report that assessed whether the use of CBOs to conduct SNAP applicant
interviews had an impact on SNAP program performance. Specific program
outcomes included efficiency, payment accuracy and client satisfaction.
FNS has extended the demonstration projects, and to further assess the
impact of these SNAP-CBO partnerships on SNAP program outcomes, FNS is
seeking to collect additional data from the five States that are
participating in the demonstration.
The information collection plan for this follow-up includes a
satisfaction survey to be completed by SNAP
[[Page 75045]]
participants who were interviewed by CBO staff at the time of
application or recertification for SNAP, and program administration
data (error rates, timeliness, payment accuracy, and eligibility
determination) from the five participating States. FNS' data collection
strategy aims to maximize both efficiency and data quality. The
participant satisfaction survey will take no more than five minutes.
FNS will use the information collected to evaluate whether the 10
Community Partner Interviewer projects have helped to improve SNAP
access and performance.
Affected Public: 3,452 Individuals and Households (3,384 Respondent
& 68 Non-Respondent type SNAP participants).
Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,384.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Response: 3,384.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.08 hours (4.8 minutes).
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 272.08 burden hours.
Affected Public: State Agencies.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5 States.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 2.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 10.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 10 burden hours.
Affected Public: Business-for-not-for-Profit (Respondent type:
Community-Based Organizations (CBOs).
Estimated Number of Respondents: 10.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 338.40.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 3,384.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.08.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 270.40.
FNS is requesting 552.48 burden hours.
There is no recordkeeping requirements involved in this data
collection.
Dated: November 24, 2015.
Yvette S. Jackson,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-30442 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P