Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2016 Atlantic Shark Commercial Fishing Season, 74999-75008 [2015-30032]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
immediate action to be effective on the
fishing grounds. NMFS could not
effectively react to this data if, in
implementing the retention limit, it
allowed a public comment period,
which, as it relates to quota transfers,
would preclude fishermen from
harvesting BFT that are legally available
consistent with all of the regulatory
criteria.
Delays in adjusting the retention limit
may result in the available quota being
met or exceeded and NMFS needing to
close the fishery earlier than otherwise
would be necessary under a lower limit.
This could adversely affect those
General and HMS Charter/Headboat
category vessels that would otherwise
have an opportunity to harvest BFT
under retention limits set in response to
the most recent data available. Limited
opportunities to harvest the respective
quotas may have negative social and
economic impacts for U.S. fishermen
that depend upon catching the available
quota within the designated time
periods. Adjustment of the retention
limit needs to be effective as soon as
possible, to extend fishing opportunities
for fishermen in geographic areas with
access to the fishery only during this
time period. Therefore, the AA finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to
waive prior notice and the opportunity
for public comment. For these reasons,
there is good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(d) to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness.
This action is being taken under
§§ 635.23(a)(4) and 635.27(a)(9), and is
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 1801
et seq.
Dated: November 25, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30464 Filed 11–25–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Docket No. 150413357–5999–02]
RIN 0648–XD898
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
2016 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Season
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; fishing season
notification.
This final rule establishes an
opening date of January 1, 2016, for all
Atlantic shark fisheries, including the
fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. This
final rule also establishes the quotas for
the 2016 fishing season based on overand/or underharvests experienced
during 2015 and previous fishing
seasons. The large coastal shark (LCS)
retention limit for directed shark limited
access permit holders will start at 45
LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip
in the Gulf of Mexico region and at 36
LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip
in the Atlantic region. These retention
limits for directed shark limited access
permit holders may decrease or increase
during the year to provide, to the extent
practicable, fishing opportunities for
commercial shark fishermen in all
regions and areas. NMFS anticipates
that the retention limit in the Atlantic
region will likely increase to the default
limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per trip around July 15, 2016,
subject to NMFS’ evaluation of the
inseason trip limit adjustment criteria.
These actions could affect fishing
opportunities for commercial shark
fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic
Ocean, including the Gulf of Mexico
and Caribbean Sea.
DATES: This rule is effective on January
1, 2016. The 2016 Atlantic commercial
shark fishing season opening dates and
quotas are provided in Table 1 under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Highly Migratory Species
Management Division, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
´
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Guy
DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-Geisz at 301–
427–8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark
fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006
Consolidated Highly Migratory Species
(HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
and its amendments are implemented
by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For
the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries,
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments established, among
other things, commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species
and management groups, accounting
measures for under- and overharvests
for the shark fisheries, and adaptive
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74999
management measures such as flexible
opening dates for the fishing season and
inseason adjustments to shark trip
limits, which provide management
flexibility in furtherance of equitable
fishing opportunities, to the extent
practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
On August 18, 2015 (80 FR 49974),
NMFS published a rule proposing the
2016 opening dates for the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries and quotas,
based on shark landings information
reported as of July 15, 2015. The August
2015 proposed rule contains details that
are not repeated here. The comment
period on the proposed rule ended on
September 17, 2015.
During the comment period, NMFS
received several written and oral
comments on the proposed rule. Those
comments, along with the Agency’s
responses, are summarized below. As
further detailed in the Response to
Comments section, after considering all
the comments, NMFS is opening the
fishing seasons for all shark
management groups on January 1, 2016,
as proposed in the August 18, 2015,
proposed rule. For directed shark
limited access permit holders, the Gulf
of Mexico blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
hammerhead management groups will
start the fishing season with a retention
limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. The
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups in the Atlantic
region will start the fishing season with
a retention limit of 36 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit
holders, which is a change from the
proposed rule. Also, some of the quotas
have changed since the proposed rule,
based on updated landings information
as of October 16, 2015. The retention
limit for incidental shark limited access
permit holders has not changed and
remains at 3 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per trip and a combined total of
16 small coastal sharks (SCS) and
pelagic sharks, combined, per trip,
consistent with § 635.24(a)(3) and (4).
This final rule serves as notification of
the 2016 opening dates of the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries and 2016
quotas, based on shark landings updated
as of October 16, 2015, pursuant to the
‘‘opening commercial fishing season’’
criteria at § 635.27(b)(3)(i) through (vii).
This action does not change the annual
base commercial quotas established
under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
and its amendments for any shark
management group. Any such changes
would be performed through a separate
action. Rather, this action adjusts the
annual base commercial quotas for 2016
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
75000
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
based on over- and/or underharvests
that occurred in 2015 and previous
fishing seasons, consistent with existing
regulations.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Response to Comments
NMFS received 6 written comments
on the proposed rule from fishermen,
dealers, and other interested parties.
All written comments can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov/ by
searching for RIN 0648–XD898. NMFS
received approximately 5 oral
comments which were received through
phone conversations. All of the oral
comments are incorporated with the
written comments below.
A. LCS Management Group Comments
Comment 1: NMFS received several
comments regarding the proposed
opening date for the aggregated LCS and
hammerhead management groups in the
Atlantic region. The North Carolina
Division of Marine Fisheries (NCDMR)
and other commenters from the
southern and northern part of the region
supported the proposed opening date of
January 1 for the aggregated LCS and
hammerhead management groups,
retention limit, and inseason retention
limit adjustments for LCS fisheries as
long as the majority of the quota is
available later in the year. The
comments from some of the fishermen
supporting the January 1 opening date
noted they preferred the opportunity to
land some LCS that were caught while
targeting SCS and other non-shark
species rather than discard them if the
season is closed in January. NMFS also
received a few comments regarding the
timing for the inseason retention limit
adjustment. One commenter supported
the January 1 opening date with
reducing the retention limit on March 1
to incidental levels (3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip)
before increasing the retention limit on
August 1 to 55 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. Another
commenter supported the January 1
opening date until 50 percent of the
quota is reached before reducing the
retention limit to incidental levels and
then increasing the retention limit on
July 1 to 55 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. NMFS also
received comments opposing the
proposed opening date of January 1 with
inseason retention limit adjustments.
The Commonwealth of Virginia Marine
Resources Commission requested a June
or July opening date for the LCS
fisheries to allow their state-water
fishermen an opportunity to fish for
sharks under the proposed retention
limit, while other commenters suggested
a July 1 LCS fishery opening date at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
proposed retention limit with no
inseason retention limit adjustments.
The comments from some of the
fishermen in the southern part of the
region noted they preferred the
opportunity to fish for sharks in October
through December because they
participate in other, non-shark fisheries
at the beginning of the year and in the
shark fisheries later in the year, when
there are no other fisheries open in
Florida. Also, these commenters are
concerned that having the LCS fisheries
in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico
regions open at the same time will flood
the market with shark products, causing
a dramatic drop in potential revenue.
Response: NMFS evaluates the
‘‘opening commercial fishing season’’
criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3)) when choosing
an opening date. These criteria include:
(1) The available annual quotas for the
current fishing season for the different
species/management groups based on
any over- and/or underharvests
experienced during the previous
commercial shark fishing seasons; (2)
estimated season length based on
available quota(s) and average weekly
catch rates of different species and/or
management group from the previous
years; (3) length of the season for the
different species and/or management
group in the previous years and whether
fishermen were able to participate in the
fishery in those years; (4) variations in
seasonal distribution, abundance, or
migratory patterns of the different
species/management groups based on
scientific and fishery information; (5)
effects of catch rates in one part of a
region precluding vessels in another
part of that region from having a
reasonable opportunity to harvest a
portion of the different species and/or
management quotas; (6) effects of the
adjustment on accomplishing the
objectives of the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments; and/or
(7) effects of a delayed opening with
regard to fishing opportunities in other
fisheries.
After evaluating these criteria, as
described in the proposed rule, and
reviewing the public comments, NMFS
has decided to open the fisheries in the
Atlantic region with a lower retention
limit than proposed. Specifically, on
January 1, 2016, the LCS fisheries in the
Atlantic region will open with a
retention limit of 36 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit
holders. NMFS has determined that a
lower retention limit at the start of the
season will allow NMFS to more easily
and closely monitor the quota and catch
rates in the beginning of the year to help
ensure equitable fishing opportunities
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
later in the year. NMFS chose 36 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip because that was the commercial
retention limit for the fishery from 2013
through August 2015, and thus is
familiar to both NMFS and the
participants in the fishery.
The proposed rule stated that, if it
appears that the quota is being
harvested too quickly to allow
fishermen throughout the entire region
an opportunity to fish, NMFS will
reduce the commercial retention limit
after a portion of the quota is harvested
(e.g., 30 percent) and then raise the
commercial retention limit at a later
date (e.g., July 1 or 15) to allow greater
fishing opportunities later in the year.
Reducing the retention limit when 50
percent of the quota has been harvested,
as suggested by a commenter, would
likely not allow for fishing
opportunities later in the year when the
majority of the fishing occurs. Under
§ 635.28(b), NMFS closes any shark
management group that has reached, or
is projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota. After considering
public comment, NMFS believes that it
is more appropriate to consider a
retention limit reduction, when
approximately 20 percent of the quota
has been harvested (which is expected
to occur in March or April, based on
landings data from prior years). Any
such action will depend on
consideration of the factors under
§ 635.24(a)(8). If catch rates and
landings are similar to past years, NMFS
anticipates that it could reduce the
retention limit to 3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks, which is consistent with
the retention limit for incidental limited
access permit holders, when the 20
percent is reached. However, if the
quota is being landed quickly at the
beginning of the year, or if, after
reducing the retention limit, the
reduction to 3 LCS other than sandbar
sharks does not slow the rate of harvest
enough to allow for a fishery later in the
year, NMFS could reduce the retention
limit to 0. Alternatively, if the quota is
being landed slowly, NMFS could
choose not to reduce the retention limit,
or not to reduce it all the way down
to 3.
After considering public comment,
NMFS anticipates that it will increase
the commercial retention limit around
July 15, 2016, as this was the date used
for prior season opening dates. The
retention limit will be the default level
of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip for directed shark limited
access permit holders, or another
amount, as deemed appropriate after
considering the inseason trip limit
adjustment criteria (§ 635.24(a)(8)).
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
NMFS believes that utilizing the
inseason retention limit adjustment
during the fishing season will promote
equitable fishing opportunities in the
Atlantic region, while still allowing the
majority of quota to be harvested later
in the year. The January 1 opening date
should allow fishermen in the southern
and northern portions of the Atlantic
region the opportunity to fish at the
beginning of the year, while providing
all fishermen in the Atlantic region
fishing opportunities later in the year,
when the majority of fishing occurs, as
the majority of the quota will still be
available.
Regarding the comments from
constituents suggesting when to adjust
the retention limit, NMFS intends to
reduce the retention limit to 3 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip
if the quota is being caught too quickly
(e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the
quota is harvested at the beginning of
the year), and then anticipates that it
will increase the retention limit to the
default level of 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit
holders, or another amount, as deemed
appropriate after considering the
inseason trip limit adjustment criteria,
around July 15, 2016. If NMFS were to
reduce the retention limit when
approximately 20 percent of the quota is
harvested, based on past landings data,
the aggregated LCS quota will likely
reach 20 percent around March, which
is similar to the time suggested by a
commenter. Regarding an increase on
August 1, NMFS will determine any
potential increase in the retention limit
at a later time, but notes that an increase
around July 15 would be closer to recent
opening dates of the fishery than August
1 and could better promote equitable
fishing opportunities. Regarding the
comment to wait until 50 percent of the
quota was harvested before reducing the
retention limit and then increasing the
retention limit on July 1, when the
Atlantic LCS fisheries last opened in
January, the quota reached 50 percent in
July. Thus, under that scenario, it is
unlikely that any adjustment would be
needed until much later in the season
(e.g., August). In addition, under
§ 635.28(b), NMFS closes any shark
management group that has reached, or
is projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota. Thus, waiting until 50
percent of the quota has been harvested
before reducing the retention limit
would likely prevent the majority of the
quota from being available later in the
year, which is what most of the public
comments requested.
Regarding the comments from the
Commonwealth of Virginia Marine
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
Resources Commission and other
commenters requesting an opening date
in June or July in order to allow statewater fishermen the opportunity to fish
and regarding the comments from
constituents who prefer a later start date
in order to fish for sharks at the end of
the year, NMFS agrees that the fishery
should remain open later in the year
and anticipates having the majority of
the quota available after July 15, 2016.
Based on past landings data, having the
majority of the quota available after July
15 would allow Virginia state-water
fishermen the opportunity to fish for
sharks and potentially allow the fishery
to be open in October through
December. Regarding the comments that
having the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico regions open at the
same time will impact the market
prices, NMFS has no control over the
market prices and this is not one of the
criteria NMFS evaluates when choosing
an opening date. However, in the past,
the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic and
Gulf of Mexico regions have been open
at the same time, and during those
times, NMFS has not noticed any
dramatic impacts on the ex-vessel prices
in either region. For example, in 2013,
when both regional LCS fisheries were
open in January, the ex-vessel price for
Atlantic aggregated LCS stayed
consistent throughout the year and was
much higher than the Gulf of Mexico
aggregated LCS ex-vessel prices.
Comment 2: NMFS received
comments regarding the proposed subregional opening dates and commercial
retention limit for the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
hammerhead management groups. One
commenter supported the proposed
January 1 opening date for both Gulf of
Mexico sub-regions and the proposed
retention limit, suggesting that NMFS
use this season as an experiment to see
how the fishery operates under the new
management measures from
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP (Amendment 6). Another
commenter suggested staggering the
Gulf of Mexico sub-regional opening
dates and increasing the retention limit.
Specifically, the commenter suggested
that both sub-regions open at 55 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip, with the western Gulf of Mexico
sub-region opening on January 1 and the
eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region
opening on March 1.
Response: After considering public
comment and the ‘‘opening commercial
fishing season’’ criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3))
described in the proposed rule, NMFS
has determined that opening the Gulf of
Mexico blacktip, aggregated LCS, and
hammerhead shark management groups
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75001
on January 1 at 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit
holders, as proposed, will promote
equitable fishing opportunities for
constituents in each sub-region. In
reaching this determination, NMFS
considered, in particular, the length of
the season for the different species and/
or management groups in 2015 and
whether fishermen were able to
participate in the fishery
(§ 635.27(b)(3)(iii)), and found that with
a January 1 opening date in 2015, the
length of the fishing season provided all
fishermen with equitable fishing
opportunities to participate in the
fishery in 2015.
Regarding the comment relating to the
different sub-regional opening dates, at
this time, NMFS prefers to open both
sub-regions at the same time to evaluate
how the changes in the regulations,
such as the increase in the retention
limit, affect the fishery before making
other changes to the commercial shark
fishing season. NMFS may consider
staggered opening dates for the subregions in future years if such an
approach is needed to promote
equitable fishing opportunities
throughout the region.
B. Atlantic SCS Management Group
Comments
Comment 3: NMFS received
comments regarding the proposed
opening date for the non-blacknose SCS
and blacknose shark management
groups in the Atlantic region. Most
commenters, including NCDMR,
supported the proposed January 1
opening date, while only a few
commenters requested that the SCS
fisheries not open until August to
ensure that the southern part of the
fishery would not be closed because of
the blacknose shark quota linkage.
Response: Taking into consideration
the ‘‘opening commercial fishing
season’’ criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3)), as
described in the proposed rule, and the
general public support of the proposed
opening date, NMFS has determined
that keeping the proposed opening date
of January 1 for the non-blacknose SCS
and blacknose shark management
groups in the Atlantic region will
provide commercial shark fishermen
year-round access to the increased nonblacknose SCS quota. In reaching this
determination, NMFS considered, in
particular, the current length of the 2015
season for the different species and/or
management groups and whether
fishermen were able to participate in the
fishery in 2015 (§ 635.27(b)(3)(iii)), and
found that with a January 1 opening
date in 2015, the length of the fishing
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75002
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
season provided all fishermen with
equitable fishing opportunities to
participate in the fishery in 2015. NMFS
still encourages fishermen south of 34
degrees to avoid blacknose sharks to
keep the non-blacknose SCS fishery
open year-round in that area. NMFS
linked these quotas due to concerns
regarding the incidental harvest of
blacknose sharks, which are overfished,
while fishermen were targeting nonblacknose SCS. During the Amendment
3 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
rulemaking process (75 FR 30484; June
1, 2010), fishermen indicated that they
could avoid catching blacknose sharks
when fishing for non-blacknose sharks.
Fishermen successfully avoided
blacknose sharks for several years.
However, in the past few years, a small
number of individuals began targeting
blacknose sharks, resulting in early
closures.
Comment 4: NMFS received
comments to adjust the commercial
retention limit for SCS, implement a
commercial retention limit for Atlantic
blacknose sharks, and establish a
bycatch allowance for non-blacknose
SCS (approximately 200 lb dw) once the
blacknose quota is reached to reduce
dead discards of SCS.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rulemaking because
there is currently no commercial
retention limit for blacknose sharks, and
the purpose of this rulemaking is to
adjust quotas based on over- and
underharvests from the previous years
and set opening dates for the 2016 shark
seasons. The commenter thought that
because NMFS was proposing to adjust
the commercial retention limit for the
LCS fisheries that NMFS could do the
same for SCS fisheries. However, at this
time, the only retention limit for SCS is
for incidental shark permit holders, who
can retain up to 16 SCS or pelagic
sharks per vessel per trip.
NMFS considered a commercial
retention limit for blacknose shark in
Amendment 5a to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (see Section
2.3, Alternatives Considered But Not
Further Analyzed, of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
Amendment 5a) and received similar
comments during the public comment
period for Amendment 6. In those
actions, NMFS preferred to address
blacknose shark landings and discards
by linking the blacknose shark and nonblacknose SCS quotas, which should
provide a greater and more effective
incentive for reducing landings of
blacknose sharks than a retention limit,
thus more effectively managing the
blacknose fishery in a manner that
maximizes resource sustainability,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
while minimizing, to the greatest extent
possible, socioeconomic impacts. After
the blacknose shark quota was reached
much earlier this year (June 7) than in
previous seasons (July 28, 2014, and
September 30, 2013), NMFS examined
the blacknose shark landings from the
HMS electronic dealer data from 2015
on a per trip basis. These data indicate
that the majority of the trips (60 percent
of the total number of trips) landed less
than 200 lb dw of blacknose sharks per
trip; however, there were multiple trips
(11 percent of the total number of trips)
that landed more than 700 lb dw of
blacknose sharks per trip, with some as
high as 3,170 lb dw, which is
approximately 8 percent of the entire
quota. Because the blacknose shark
linkage has caused the SCS fishery
south of 34 degrees to close sooner than
in previous seasons and given that the
commercial quota continues to be
overharvested, NMFS is re-considering
the appropriateness of a commercial
blacknose retention limit and may
pursue this issue in a separate action.
C. General Comments
Comment 5: NMFS received
comments to stop all shark fishing.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rulemaking because the
purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust
quotas for the 2016 shark seasons based
on over- and underharvests from the
previous years and set opening dates for
the 2016 shark seasons. Management of
the Atlantic shark fisheries is based on
the best available science to achieve
optimum yield while also rebuilding
overfished shark stocks and preventing
overfishing. The final rule does not
reanalyze the overall management
measures for sharks, which were
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP and its amendments. NMFS is
considering further shark management
measures, including those to rebuild
shark stocks or prevent overfishing, in
other upcoming rulemakings, such as
Amendments 5b to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP.
Comment 6: NMFS received
comments from the NCDMR that
requested NMFS to perform a
benchmark stock assessment on Atlantic
blacktip and sandbar sharks as soon as
possible.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rulemaking because the
purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust
quotas based on over- and
underharvests from the previous years
and set opening dates for the 2016 shark
seasons. Most of the domestic shark
stock assessments follow the SEDAR
process. This process is also used by the
South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils and is designed to provide
transparency throughout the stock
assessment. With regard to the timing of
upcoming shark stock assessments,
NMFS aims to conduct a number of
shark stock assessments every year and
to regularly reassess these stocks. The
number of species that can be assessed
each year depends on whether
assessments are establishing baselines
or are only updates to previous
assessments. Assessments also depend
on ensuring there are data available for
a particular species. Tentatively, in
addition to the shark assessments being
conducted by the International
Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), NMFS intends
to conduct a dusky shark update
assessment in 2016 and a Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark update
assessment in 2017. NMFS is currently
considering options that would allow
for both Atlantic blacktip and sandbar
sharks to be assessed in 2018.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS made four changes to the
proposed rule, as described below.
1. NMFS changed the final eastern
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota
from the 28.9 mt dw (63,835 lb dw) in
the proposed rule to 28.9 mt dw (63,819
lb dw), a difference of 16 lb dw, based
on updated landings through October
16, 2015. In the 2016 shark season
proposed rule (80 FR 49974; August 18,
2015), which was based on data
available through July 17, 2015, the
2016 adjusted annual quota for eastern
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark was
proposed to be 28.9 mt dw (63,835 lb
dw), based on an underharvest of 0.1 mt
dw (308 lb dw) from 2014 and an
underharvest of 3.7 mt dw from 2015
(8,088 lb dw). NMFS explained in the
proposed rule that it would adjust the
proposed quotas based on dealer reports
as of mid-October or mid-November
2015. Based on updated landings data
through October 16, 2015, the overall
2015 Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group underharvest was
37.4 mt dw (82,373 lb dw). Consistent
with Amendment 6 and the August
2015 proposed rule, NMFS will account
for underharvest based on the subregional quota percentage split. Thus,
the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip
shark quota is increased by 9.8 percent
of the 2015 underharvest or 3.7 mt dw
(8,072 lb dw). Therefore, the 2016
adjusted annual quota for eastern Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark is 28.9 mt dw
(63,819 lb dw) (25.1 mt dw annual base
quota + 0.1 mt dw from 2014
underharvest + 3.7 mt dw from the 2015
underharvest = 28.9 mt dw). Landings
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
information beyond October 16, 2015,
was not available while NMFS was
writing this rule. This final rule used
the most recent available information to
allow NMFS to properly analyze the
fishery and open the fishery as proposed
on January 1, 2016. Any landings
between October 16 and December 31,
2015, will be accounted for in the 2017
shark fisheries quotas, as appropriate.
2. NMFS changed the final western
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota
from the 266.6 mt dw (587,538 lb dw)
in the proposed rule to 266.5 mt dw
(587,396 lb dw), a difference of 142 lb
dw, based on updated landings through
October 16, 2015. In the proposed rule,
which was based on data available
through July 17, 2015, the 2016 adjusted
annual quota for western Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark was proposed to be 266.6
mt dw (587,538 lb dw), based on an
underharvest of 1.3 mt dw (2,834 lb dw)
from 2014 and an underharvest of 33.7
mt dw (74,443 lb dw) from 2015. Based
on updated landings data through
October 16, 2015, the overall 2015 Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark management
group was underharvested by 37.4 mt
dw (82,373 lb dw). Consistent with
Amendment 6 and the August 2015
proposed rule, NMFS will account for
underharvest based on the sub-regional
quota percentage split. Thus, the
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota is increased by 90.2 percent of the
2015 underharvest, or 33.7 mt dw
(74,301 lb dw). Therefore, the 2016
adjusted annual quota for eastern Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark is 266.5 mt dw
(587,396 lb dw) (231.5 mt dw annual
base quota + 1.3 mt dw from 2014
underharvest + 33.7 mt dw from the
2015 underharvest = 266.5 mt dw 2016
adjusted annual quota). As described
above, landings information beyond
October 16, 2015, was not available
while NMFS was writing this rule. This
final rule used the most recent available
information to allow NMFS to properly
analyze the fishery and open the fishery
on January 1, 2016. Any landings
between October 16 and December 31,
2015, will be accounted for in the 2017
shark fisheries quotas, as appropriate.
3. NMFS changed the final Atlantic
blacknose shark quota from the 15.7 mt
dw (34,700 lb dw) in the proposed rule
to 15.7 mt dw (34,653 lb dw), a
difference of 47 lb, based on updated
landings through October 16, 2015. In
the proposed rule, the quota for the
Atlantic blacknose shark management
group was proposed to be 15.7 mt dw
(34,700 lb dw), due to an adjustment of
0.5 mt dw (1,111 lb dw) for a 2012
overharvest that was spread over five
years and an adjustment of 1.0 mt dw
(2,110 lb dw) for a 2015 overharvest that
was spread over three years. However,
based on the updated landings data,
NMFS found that the 2015 quota was
overharvested by 3.0 mt dw (6,471 lb
dw) and not the 6,328 lb dw originally
considered. Consistent with the
proposed rule, NMFS will spread this
overharvest amount over 3 years at 1.0
mt dw (2,157 lb dw) each year from
2016–2018. Thus, NMFS will reduce the
2016 base annual quota by 1.5 mt dw
(3,268 lb dw), based on the 2012
overharvest amount and the most recent
estimates of the 2015 landings.
Therefore, the 2016 adjusted annual
quota for Atlantic blacknose shark is
15.7 mt dw (34,653 lb dw) (17.2 mt dw
annual base quota ¥ 0.5 mt dw 2012
overharvest ¥ 1.0 mt dw 2015
overharvest = 15.7 mt dw 2016 adjusted
annual quota). As described above,
75003
landings information beyond October
16, 2015, was not available while NMFS
was writing this rule. This final rule
used the most recent available
information to allow NMFS to properly
analyze the fishery and open the fishery
on January 1, 2016. Any landings
between October 16 and December 31,
2015, will be accounted for in the 2017
shark fisheries quotas, as appropriate.
4. NMFS changed the retention limit
for directed shark limited access permit
holders at the start of the commercial
shark fishing season for the aggregated
LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups in the Atlantic
region from 45 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip to 36 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip. As explained above, NMFS
changed the retention limit after
considering the ‘‘opening commercial
fishing season’’ criteria (§ 635.27(b)(3)),
public comment, and the 2015 landings
data in order to promote equitable
fishing opportunities throughout the
Atlantic region.
2016 Annual Quotas
This final rule adjusts the 2016
commercial quotas due to over- and/or
underharvests in 2015 and previous
fishing seasons, based on landings data
through October 16, 2015. The 2016
annual quotas by species and species
group are summarized in Table 1. All
dealer reports that are received by
NMFS after October 16, 2015, will be
used to adjust the 2017 quotas, if
necessary. A description of the quota
calculations is provided in the proposed
rule and is not repeated here. Any
changes are described in the ‘‘Changes
from the Proposed Rule’’ section.
TABLE 1—2016 ANNUAL QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK FISHERIES
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw]
Eastern Gulf of
Mexico.
Management
group
2015
annual quota
(A)
Preliminary
2015
landings 1
(B)
Blacktip Sharks ...
Region or
sub-region
25.1 mt dw
(55,439 lb dw).
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw).
Hammerhead
Sharks.
Blacktip Sharks ...
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw).
231.5 mt dw
(510,261 lb dw).
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb dw).
Hammerhead
Sharks.
11.9 mt dw
(23,301 lb dw).
21.5 mt dw
(47,366 lb dw) 2.
84.5 mt dw
(186,223 lb
dw) 2.
7.3 mt dw (16,198
lb dw) 2.
197.7 mt dw
(435,961 lb
dw) 2.
69.6 mt dw
(153,380 lb
dw) 2.
6.5 mt dw (14,360
lb dw) 2.
PO 00000
Fmt 4700
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Western Gulf of
Mexico.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
Frm 00039
Sfmt 4700
Adjustments
(C)
2016
Base annual
quota
(D)
2016
Final annual
quota
(D+C)
3.8 mt dw (8,380
lb dw) 3.
.............................
25.1 mt dw
(55,439 lb dw).
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw).
28.9 mt dw
(63,819 lb dw)
85.5 mt dw
(188,593 lb dw)
.............................
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw).
231.5 mt dw
(510,261 lb dw).
13.4 mt dw
(29,421 lb dw)
266.5 mt dw
(587,396 lb dw)
.............................
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb dw).
72.0 mt dw
(158,724 lb dw)
.............................
11.9 mt dw
(23,301 lb dw).
11.9 mt dw
(23,301 lb dw)
35.0 mt dw
(77,135 lb dw) 3.
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
75004
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—2016 ANNUAL QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SHARK FISHERIES—Continued
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw]
Region or
sub-region
Management
group
2015
annual quota
(A)
Preliminary
2015
landings 1
(B)
Gulf of Mexico ........
Non-Blacknose
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead
Sharks.
Non-Blacknose
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks
(South of 34° N.
lat. only).
Non-Sandbar LCS
Research.
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks .........
45.5 mt dw
(100,317 lb dw).
69.9 mt dw
(154,077 lb dw).
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb dw).
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw).
176.1 mt dw
(388,222 lb dw).
90.1 mt dw
(198,651 lb dw).
8.5 mt dw (18,703
lb dw).
106.2 mt dw
(234,170 lb dw).
17.5 mt dw
(38,638 lb dw).
20.5 mt dw
(45,109 lb dw).
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb dw).
116.6 mt dw
(257,056 lb dw).
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw).
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
18.1 mt dw
(39,830 lb dw).
63.6 mt dw
(140,258 lb dw).
0.5 mt dw (1,114
lb dw).
0 mt dw (0 lb dw)
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw).
71.3 mt dw
(157,099 lb dw).
Atlantic ...................
No regional quotas
Porbeagle Sharks
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
Adjustments
(C)
¥5.3 mt dw
(¥11,612 lb
dw) 4.
.............................
.............................
.............................
¥1.5 mt dw
(¥3,268 lb
dw) 5.
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
2016
Base annual
quota
(D)
2016
Final annual
quota
(D+C)
112.6 mt dw
(248,215 lb dw).
107.3 mt dw
(236,603 lb dw)
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb dw).
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw).
264.1 mt dw
(582,333 lb dw).
168.9 mt dw
(372,552 lb dw)
27.1 mt dw
(59,736 lb dw)
264.1 mt dw
(582,333 lb dw)
17.2 mt dw
(37,921 lb dw).
15.7 mt dw
(34,653 lb dw)
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb dw).
90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb dw).
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw).
1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw).
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw).
50.0 mt dw
(110,230 lb dw)
90.7 mt dw
(199,943 lb dw)
273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw)
1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw)
488.0 mt dw
(1,075,856 lb
dw)
1 Landings
are from January 1, 2015, through October 16, 2015, and are subject to change.
blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management group preliminary 2015 landings were split based on the sub-regional
quota percentage splits established in Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
3 This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2014 and 2015. In the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas (79 FR 71331; December 2,
2014), the 2014 Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota was underharvested by 72.0 mt dw (158,602 lb dw). After the final rule establishing the 2015
quotas published, late dealer reports indicated the quota was underharvested by an additional 1.4 mt dw (3,142 lb dw), for a total underharvest
of 73.4 mt dw (161,744 lb dw). In 2015, the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota was underharvested by 37.4 mt (82,373 lb dw). Therefore, this
final rule increases the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 38.8 mt dw (37.4 mt dw underharvest in 2015 + 1.4 mt dw underharvest from
2014). Recently, NMFS implemented Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP which, among other things, established sub-regional
quotas for the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group. NMFS will account for underharvest based on the sub-regional quota percentage split. Thus, the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota is increased by 3.8 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest, while the western
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota is increased by 35.0 mt dw, or 90.2 percent of the underharvest.
4 This adjustment accounts for overharvests from 2014. In the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas (79 FR 71331; December 2, 2014), the
2014 Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS quota was not overharvested. After the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas published, late dealer reports indicated the quota was overharvested by 5.3 mt dw (11,612 lb dw) due to landings by state-water fishermen fishing in state-waters after
the federal closure. NMFS will decrease the 2016 base annual quota based on the overharvest estimate of 5.3 mt from 2014. Based on the original 2015 annual commercial quota, the 2015 annual quota was overharvested by 7.8 mt dw (17,184 lb dw) as of October 16, 2015. In Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP, NMFS increased the commercial Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS quota to 112.6 mt dw (248,215
lb dw) and re-opened the fishery. Based on the revised annual commercial quota, reported landings have not exceeded the revised 2015 base
quota to date.
5 This adjustment accounts for overharvest in 2012 and 2015. After the final rule establishing the 2012 quotas published, late dealer reports indicated the blacknose shark quota was overharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,742 lb dw). In the final rule establishing the 2014 quotas, NMFS implemented a 5-year adjustment of the overharvest amount by the percentage of landings in 2012. Thus, NMFS will reduce the Atlantic blacknose
sharks by 0.5 mt dw (1,111 lb dw) each year for 5 years from 2014–2018. In 2015, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was overharvested by 3.0
(6,471 lb dw). NMFS is implementing an additional 3-year adjustment of the overharvest amount in 2015. NMFS will reduce the quota by 1.0 mt
dw (2,157 lb dw) each year from 2016–2018. Therefore, this final rule decreases the Atlantic blacknose shark quota by 1.5 mt dw (1.0 mt dw
overharvest in 2015 + 0.5 mt dw overharvest from 2012).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2 The
Fishing Season Notification for the 2016
Atlantic Commercial Shark Fishing
Seasons
Based on the seven ‘‘opening
commercial fishing season’’ criteria
listed in § 635.27(b)(3), NMFS is
opening all the 2016 Atlantic
commercial shark fishing seasons on
January 1, 2016 (Table 2).
Regarding the LCS retention limit, as
shown in Table 2, for directed shark
limited access permit holders, the Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark, aggregated
LCS, and hammerhead shark
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
management groups will start the
commercial fishing season at 45 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip, and the Atlantic aggregated LCS
and hammerhead shark management
groups will start the commercial fishing
season at 36 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip. In the
Atlantic region, as described above,
NMFS will closely monitor the quota at
the beginning of the year. If it appears
that the quota is being harvested too
quickly to allow fishermen throughout
the entire region an opportunity to fish
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the
quota is caught at the beginning of the
year), NMFS will reduce the commercial
retention limit, then raise it later in the
season. Based on prior years’ fishing
activity, to allow greater fishing
opportunities later in the year, NMFS
anticipates raising the commercial
retention limit to the default limit of 45
LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around July 15, 2016.
However, any retention limit reductions
and increases will be based on
consideration of the trip limit
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
adjustment criteria at 50 CFR
635.24(a)(8).
All of the shark management groups
will remain open until December 31,
2016, or until NMFS determines that the
fishing season landings for any shark
management group has reached, or is
projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota; however, consistent
with § 635.28(b)(5), NMFS may close the
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group before landings
reach, or are expected to reach, 80
percent of the quota. Additionally,
NMFS has established non-linked and
linked quotas; linked quotas are
explicitly designed to concurrently
close multiple shark management
groups that are caught together to
prevent incidental catch mortality from
exceeding the total allowable catch. The
linked and non-linked quotas are shown
in Table 2. NMFS will file for
publication with the Office of the
Federal Register a notice of closure for
that shark species, shark management
75005
group including any linked quotas, and/
or region that will be effective no fewer
than 5 days from date of filing. From the
effective date and time of the closure
until NMFS announces, via the
publication of a notice in the Federal
Register, that additional quota is
available and the season is reopened,
the fisheries for the shark species or
management group are closed, even
across fishing years.
TABLE 2—QUOTA LINKAGES, SEASON OPENING DATES, AND COMMERCIAL RETENTION LIMIT BY REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region or sub-region
Management group
Quota
linkages
Season opening
dates
Commercial retention limits for directed shark limited
access permit holders
(inseason adjustments are available)
Eastern Gulf of Mexico ..
Blacktip Sharks .............
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Blacktip Sharks .............
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Aggregated Large
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Not Linked .....
Linked
January 1, 2016
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
Not Linked .....
Linked
January 1, 2016
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip.
Not Linked .....
January 1, 2016
N/A
Linked ............
January 1, 2016
Non-Blacknose Small
Coastal Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks
(South of 34° N. lat.
only)
Non-Sandbar LCS Research.
Sandbar Shark Research
Blue Sharks ..................
Porbeagle Sharks
Pelagic Sharks Other
Than Porbeagle or
Blue
Linked (South
of 34° N.
lat. only).
January 1, 2016
36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip
[If quota is landed quickly (e.g., if approximately 20
percent of quota is caught at the beginning of the
year), NMFS anticipates an inseason reduction
(e.g., to 3 or fewer LCS other than sandbar sharks
per vessel per trip), then an inseason increase to
45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip around July 15, 2016].
N/A
Linked ............
January 1, 2016
N/A
Not Linked .....
January 1, 2016
N/A
Western Gulf of Mexico
Gulf of Mexico ................
Atlantic ...........................
No regional quotas ........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that the final rule is
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
In compliance with section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), NMFS
prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) for this final rule,
which analyzed the adjustments to the
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, Gulf of
Mexico aggregated LCS, and blacknose
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
shark management group quotas based
on over- and/or underharvests from the
previous fishing season(s). The FRFA
analyzes the anticipated economic
impacts of the final actions and any
significant economic impacts on small
entities. The FRFA is below.
Section 604(a)(1) of the RFA requires
an explanation of the purpose of the
rulemaking. The purpose of this final
rulemaking is, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, to establish the 2016
Atlantic commercial shark fishing
quotas and fishing seasons. Without this
rule, the Atlantic commercial shark
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
fisheries would close on December 31,
2015, and would not open until another
action was taken. This final rule will be
implemented according to the
regulations implementing the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few,
if any, economic impacts to fishermen
other than those already analyzed in the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. While there may be some
direct negative economic impacts
associated with the opening dates for
fishermen in certain areas, there could
also be positive effects for other
fishermen in the region. The opening
dates were chosen to allow for an
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
75006
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
equitable distribution of the available
quotas among all fishermen across
regions and states, to the extent
practicable.
Section 604(a)(2) of the RFA requires
NMFS to summarize significant issues
raised by the public in response to the
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA), provide a summary of NMFS’
assessment of such issues, and provide
a statement of any changes made as a
result of the comments. The IRFA was
done as part of the proposed rule for the
2016 Atlantic Commercial Shark Season
Specifications. NMFS did not receive
any comments specific to the IRFA.
However, NMFS received comments
related to the overall economic impacts
of the proposed rule, and those
comments and NMFS’ assessment of
and response to them are summarized
above (see Comments 1 and 3 above). As
described in the responses to those
comments relating to the season
opening dates, consistent with
§ 635.27(b)(3), the opening date for the
all of the commercial shark fisheries
will be implemented as proposed
(January 1, 2016).
Section 604(a)(4) of the RFA requires
NMFS to provide an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule would apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
fish harvesters. The SBA size standards
are $20.5 million for finfish fishing, $5.5
million for shellfish fishing, and $7.5
million for other marine fishing, for-hire
businesses, and marinas (79 FR 33647;
June 12, 2014). NMFS considers all
HMS permit holders to be small entities
because they had average annual
receipts of less than $20.5 million for
finfish-harvesting. The commercial
shark fisheries are comprised of
fishermen who hold shark directed or
incidental limited access permits and
the related shark dealers, all of which
NMFS considers to be small entities
according to the size standards set by
the SBA. This final rule applies to the
approximately 210 directed commercial
shark permit holders (124 in the
Atlantic and 86 in the Gulf of Mexico
regions), 253 incidental commercial
shark permit holders (153 in the
Atlantic and 100 in the Gulf of Mexico
regions), and 100 commercial shark
dealers (71 in the Atlantic and 29 in the
Gulf of Mexico regions) as of October
2015.
Section 604(a)(5) of the RFA requires
NMFS to describe the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the final
rule, including an estimate of the classes
of small entities which would be subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
to the requirements of the report or
record. None of the actions in this final
rule would result in additional
reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance
requirements beyond those already
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS
FMP and its amendments.
Section 604(a)(6) of the RFA requires
NMFS to describe the steps taken to
minimize the economic impact on small
entities, consistent with the stated
objectives of applicable statutes.
Additionally, the RFA (5 U.S.C.
603(c)(1)–(4)) lists four general
categories of ‘‘significant’’ alternatives
that would assist an agency in the
development of significant alternatives
that would accomplish the stated
objectives of applicable statutes and
minimize any significant economic
impact of the rule on small entities.
These categories of alternatives are: (1)
Establishment of differing compliance
or reporting requirements or timetables
that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2)
clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design
standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
In order to meet the objectives of this
rule, consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act, NMFS cannot exempt
small entities or change the reporting
requirements only for small entities
because all the entities affected are
small entities. Thus, there are no
alternatives discussed that fall under the
first, second, and fourth categories
described above. NMFS does not know
of any performance or design standards
that would satisfy the aforementioned
objectives of this rulemaking while,
concurrently, complying with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there
are no alternatives considered under the
third category.
This rulemaking does not establish
management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements
previously adopted and analyzed
measures as adjustments, as specified in
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments and the Environmental
Assessment (EA) for the 2011 shark
quota specifications rule (75 FR 76302;
December 8, 2010). Thus, in this
rulemaking, NMFS adjusted the base
quotas established and analyzed in the
2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments by subtracting the
underharvest or adding the overharvest,
as specified and allowable in existing
regulations. Under current regulations
(§ 635.27(b)(2)), all shark fisheries close
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on December 31 of each year, or when
NMFS determines that the fishing
season landings for any shark
management group has reached, or is
projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota, and do not open until
NMFS takes action, such as this
rulemaking to re-open the fisheries.
Thus, not implementing these
management measures would negatively
affect shark fishermen and related small
entities, such as dealers, and also would
not provide management flexibility in
furtherance of equitable fishing
opportunities, to the extent practicable,
for commercial shark fishermen in all
regions and areas.
Based on the 2014 ex-vessel price,
fully harvesting the unadjusted 2016
Atlantic shark commercial baseline
quotas could result in total fleet
revenues of $4,583,514 (see Table 3).
For the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group, NMFS has
increased the baseline sub-regional
quotas due to the underharvests in 2015.
The increase for the eastern Gulf of
Mexico blacktip shark management
group could result in a $8,397 gain in
total revenues for fishermen in that subregion, while the increase for the
western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group could result in a
$77,289 gain in total revenues for
fishermen in that sub-region. For the
Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS
management group, NMFS has reduced
the baseline quota due to the
overharvest in 2014. This will cause a
potential loss in revenue of $7,571 for
the fleet in the Gulf of Mexico region.
For the Atlantic blacknose shark
management group, NMFS will
continue to reduce the baseline quota
through 2018 to account for overharvest
in 2012 and will reduce the baseline
quota for the next 3 years to account for
overharvest in 2015. These reductions
will cause a potential loss in revenue of
$3,203 for the fleet in the Atlantic
region.
All of these changes in gross revenues
are similar to the changes in gross
revenues analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. The FRFAs for those
amendments concluded that the
economic impacts on these small
entities are expected to be minimal. In
the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and
its amendments and the EA for the 2011
shark quota specifications rule, NMFS
stated it would be conducting annual
rulemakings and considering the
potential economic impacts of adjusting
the quotas for under- and overharvests
at that time.
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
75007
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—AVERAGE EX-VESSEL PRICES PER LB DW FOR EACH SHARK MANAGEMENT GROUP, 2014
Average exvessel meat
price
Region
Species
Gulf of Mexico ..................................
Blacktip Shark ...........................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ........................................................................................
Hammerhead Shark ..................................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ..................................................................................
Blacknose Shark .......................................................................................
Aggregated LCS ........................................................................................
Hammerhead Shark ..................................................................................
Non-Blacknose SCS ..................................................................................
Blacknose Shark .......................................................................................
Shark Research Fishery (Aggregated LCS) .............................................
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar only) ...................................................
Blue shark .................................................................................................
Porbeagle shark ........................................................................................
Other Pelagic sharks .................................................................................
Atlantic .............................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
No Region ........................................
For this final rule, NMFS reviewed
the ‘‘opening commercial fishing
season’’ criteria at § 635.27(b)(3)(i)
through (vii) to determine when
opening each fishery will provide
equitable opportunities for fishermen
while also considering the ecological
needs of the different species. Overand/or underharvests of 2015 and
previous fishing season quotas were
examined for the different species/
complexes to determine the effects of
the 2016 final quotas on fishermen
across regional fishing areas. The
potential season lengths and previous
catch rates were examined to ensure
that equitable fishing opportunities
would be provided to fishermen. Lastly,
NMFS examined the seasonal variation
of the different species/complexes and
the effects on fishing opportunities. In
addition to these criteria, NMFS also
considered other relevant factors, such
as recent landings data and public
comments, before arriving at the final
opening dates for the 2016 Atlantic
shark management groups. For the 2016
fishing season, NMFS is opening all of
the shark management groups on
January 1, 2016. The direct and indirect
economic impacts will be neutral on a
short- and long-term basis for the Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark, Gulf of
Mexico aggregated LCS, Gulf of Mexico
hammerhead shark, Gulf of Mexico nonblacknose shark SCS, Atlantic nonblacknose shark SCS, Atlantic blacknose
shark, sandbar shark, blue shark,
porbeagle shark, and pelagic shark
(other than porbeagle or blue sharks)
management groups, because NMFS did
not change the opening dates of these
fisheries from the status quo.
Opening the aggregated LCS and
hammerhead shark management groups
in the Atlantic region on January 1 will
result in short-term, direct, moderate,
beneficial economic impacts, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
fishermen and dealers in the southern
portion of the Atlantic region will be
able to fish for and sell aggregated LCS
and hammerhead sharks starting in
January. These fishermen will be able to
fish earlier in the 2016 fishing season
compared to the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014,
and 2015 fishing seasons, which did not
start until June or July. Based on public
comment, some Atlantic fishermen in
the southern and northern part of the
region prefer a January 1 opening for the
fishery as long as the majority of the
quota is available later in the year. With
the implementation of the HMS
electronic reporting system in 2013,
NMFS now monitors the quota on a
more real-time basis compared to the
paper reporting system that was in place
before 2013. This ability, along with the
inseason retention limit adjustment
criteria in § 635.24(a)(8), should allow
NMFS the flexibility to further provide
equitable fishing opportunities for
fishermen across all regions, to the
extent practicable. Depending on how
quickly the quota is being harvested,
NMFS will reduce the retention limits
to ensure that fishermen farther north
have sufficient quota for a fishery later
in the 2016 fishing season. The direct
impacts to shark fishermen in the
Atlantic region of reducing the trip limit
depend on the needed reduction in the
trip limit and the timing of such a
reduction. Therefore, such a reduction
in the trip limit for directed shark
limited access permit holders is only
anticipated to have minor adverse direct
economic impacts to fishermen in the
short-term; long-term impacts are not
anticipated as these reductions would
not be permanent.
In the northern portion of the Atlantic
region, a January 1 opening for the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups, with inseason trip
limit adjustments to ensure quota is
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$0.50
0.54
0.48
0.36
0.86
0.75
0.57
0.74
0.78
0.58
0.69
0.67
1.41
1.41
Average exvessel fin price
$9.53
10.04
10.21
5.84
5.84
4.19
2.33
4.00
4.00
7.68
10.12
2.34
2.34
2.34
available later in the season, will have
direct, minor, beneficial economic
impacts in the short-term for fishermen
as they will potentially have access to
the aggregated LCS and hammerhead
shark quotas earlier than in past
seasons. Fishermen in this area have
stated that, depending on the weather,
some aggregated LCS species might be
available to retain in January. Thus,
fishermen will be able to target or retain
aggregated LCS while targeting nonblacknose SCS. There will be indirect,
minor, beneficial economic impacts in
the short- and long-term for shark
dealers and other entities that deal with
shark products in this region as they
will also have access to aggregated LCS
products earlier than in past seasons.
Thus, opening the aggregated LCS and
hammerhead shark management groups
in January and using inseason trip limit
adjustments to ensure the fishery is
open later in the year in 2016 will cause
beneficial cumulative economic
impacts, because it allows for a more
equitable distribution of the quotas
among constituents in this region,
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments.
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a FRFA, the agency
shall publish one or more guides to
assist small entities in complying with
the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. As part of this
rulemaking process, NMFS has prepared
a brochure summarizing fishery
information and regulations for Atlantic
shark fisheries for 2016. This brochure
also serves as the small entity
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
75008
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 230 / Tuesday, December 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
compliance guide. Copies of the
compliance guide are available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
Dated: November 20, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30032 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 140117052–4402–02]
RIN 0648–XE321
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery;
Quota Transfer
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; quota transfer.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces that the
State of North Carolina is transferring a
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:38 Nov 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
portion of its 2015 commercial Atlantic
bluefish quota to the State of New York.
These quota adjustments are necessary
to comply with the Bluefish Fishery
Management Plan quota transfer
provision. This announcement is
intended to inform the public of the
revised commercial quota for each state
involved.
DATES: Effective November 30, 2015,
through December 31, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reid
Lichwell, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9112.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations governing the bluefish
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648.
The regulations require annual
specification of a commercial quota that
is apportioned among the coastal states
from Florida through Maine. The
process to set the annual commercial
quota and the percent allocated to each
state are described in § 648.162.
The final rule implementing
Amendment 1 to the Bluefish Fishery
Management Plan, which was published
in the Federal Register on July 26, 2000
(65 FR 45844), provided a mechanism
for bluefish quota to be transferred from
one state to another. Two or more states,
under mutual agreement and with the
concurrence of the Administrator,
Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS
(Regional Administrator), can transfer or
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
combine bluefish commercial quota
under § 648.162(e). The Regional
Administrator is required to consider
the criteria in § 648.162(e)(1) in the
evaluation of requests for quota transfers
or combinations.
North Carolina has agreed to transfer
250,000 lb (113,398 kg) of its 2015
commercial quota to New York. This
transfer was prompted by state officials
in New York to address an overage of its
commercial bluefish quota and to
provide sufficient quota to allow the
fishery to remain open. The Regional
Administrator has determined that the
criteria set forth in § 648.162(e)(1) have
been met. The revised bluefish quotas
for calendar year 2015 are: North
Carolina, 1,139,371 lb (512,727 kg); and
New York, 1,094,304 lb (496,367 kg).
Classification
This action is taken under 50 CFR
part 648 and is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 25, 2015.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30447 Filed 11–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 230 (Tuesday, December 1, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74999-75008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30032]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 150413357-5999-02]
RIN 0648-XD898
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; 2016 Atlantic Shark Commercial
Fishing Season
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; fishing season notification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule establishes an opening date of January 1,
2016, for all Atlantic shark fisheries, including the fisheries in the
Gulf of Mexico. This final rule also establishes the quotas for the
2016 fishing season based on over- and/or underharvests experienced
during 2015 and previous fishing seasons. The large coastal shark (LCS)
retention limit for directed shark limited access permit holders will
start at 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip in the Gulf of
Mexico region and at 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip in the
Atlantic region. These retention limits for directed shark limited
access permit holders may decrease or increase during the year to
provide, to the extent practicable, fishing opportunities for
commercial shark fishermen in all regions and areas. NMFS anticipates
that the retention limit in the Atlantic region will likely increase to
the default limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per trip around
July 15, 2016, subject to NMFS' evaluation of the inseason trip limit
adjustment criteria. These actions could affect fishing opportunities
for commercial shark fishermen in the northwestern Atlantic Ocean,
including the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea.
DATES: This rule is effective on January 1, 2016. The 2016 Atlantic
commercial shark fishing season opening dates and quotas are provided
in Table 1 under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: Highly Migratory Species Management Division, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gu[yacute] DuBeck or Karyl Brewster-
Geisz at 301-427-8503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic commercial shark fisheries are managed under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2006 Consolidated Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its amendments are
implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part 635. For the Atlantic
commercial shark fisheries, the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments established, among other things, commercial shark retention
limits, commercial quotas for species and management groups, accounting
measures for under- and overharvests for the shark fisheries, and
adaptive management measures such as flexible opening dates for the
fishing season and inseason adjustments to shark trip limits, which
provide management flexibility in furtherance of equitable fishing
opportunities, to the extent practicable, for commercial shark
fishermen in all regions and areas.
On August 18, 2015 (80 FR 49974), NMFS published a rule proposing
the 2016 opening dates for the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries and
quotas, based on shark landings information reported as of July 15,
2015. The August 2015 proposed rule contains details that are not
repeated here. The comment period on the proposed rule ended on
September 17, 2015.
During the comment period, NMFS received several written and oral
comments on the proposed rule. Those comments, along with the Agency's
responses, are summarized below. As further detailed in the Response to
Comments section, after considering all the comments, NMFS is opening
the fishing seasons for all shark management groups on January 1, 2016,
as proposed in the August 18, 2015, proposed rule. For directed shark
limited access permit holders, the Gulf of Mexico blacktip, aggregated
LCS, and hammerhead management groups will start the fishing season
with a retention limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip. The aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in
the Atlantic region will start the fishing season with a retention
limit of 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit holders, which is a change from
the proposed rule. Also, some of the quotas have changed since the
proposed rule, based on updated landings information as of October 16,
2015. The retention limit for incidental shark limited access permit
holders has not changed and remains at 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks
per trip and a combined total of 16 small coastal sharks (SCS) and
pelagic sharks, combined, per trip, consistent with Sec. 635.24(a)(3)
and (4).
This final rule serves as notification of the 2016 opening dates of
the Atlantic commercial shark fisheries and 2016 quotas, based on shark
landings updated as of October 16, 2015, pursuant to the ``opening
commercial fishing season'' criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i) through
(vii). This action does not change the annual base commercial quotas
established under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments for
any shark management group. Any such changes would be performed through
a separate action. Rather, this action adjusts the annual base
commercial quotas for 2016
[[Page 75000]]
based on over- and/or underharvests that occurred in 2015 and previous
fishing seasons, consistent with existing regulations.
Response to Comments
NMFS received 6 written comments on the proposed rule from
fishermen, dealers, and other interested parties. All written comments
can be found at https://www.regulations.gov/ by searching for RIN 0648-
XD898. NMFS received approximately 5 oral comments which were received
through phone conversations. All of the oral comments are incorporated
with the written comments below.
A. LCS Management Group Comments
Comment 1: NMFS received several comments regarding the proposed
opening date for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead management groups in
the Atlantic region. The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries
(NCDMR) and other commenters from the southern and northern part of the
region supported the proposed opening date of January 1 for the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead management groups, retention limit, and
inseason retention limit adjustments for LCS fisheries as long as the
majority of the quota is available later in the year. The comments from
some of the fishermen supporting the January 1 opening date noted they
preferred the opportunity to land some LCS that were caught while
targeting SCS and other non-shark species rather than discard them if
the season is closed in January. NMFS also received a few comments
regarding the timing for the inseason retention limit adjustment. One
commenter supported the January 1 opening date with reducing the
retention limit on March 1 to incidental levels (3 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip) before increasing the retention
limit on August 1 to 55 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip. Another commenter supported the January 1 opening date until 50
percent of the quota is reached before reducing the retention limit to
incidental levels and then increasing the retention limit on July 1 to
55 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. NMFS also
received comments opposing the proposed opening date of January 1 with
inseason retention limit adjustments. The Commonwealth of Virginia
Marine Resources Commission requested a June or July opening date for
the LCS fisheries to allow their state-water fishermen an opportunity
to fish for sharks under the proposed retention limit, while other
commenters suggested a July 1 LCS fishery opening date at the proposed
retention limit with no inseason retention limit adjustments. The
comments from some of the fishermen in the southern part of the region
noted they preferred the opportunity to fish for sharks in October
through December because they participate in other, non-shark fisheries
at the beginning of the year and in the shark fisheries later in the
year, when there are no other fisheries open in Florida. Also, these
commenters are concerned that having the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic
and Gulf of Mexico regions open at the same time will flood the market
with shark products, causing a dramatic drop in potential revenue.
Response: NMFS evaluates the ``opening commercial fishing season''
criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)) when choosing an opening date. These
criteria include: (1) The available annual quotas for the current
fishing season for the different species/management groups based on any
over- and/or underharvests experienced during the previous commercial
shark fishing seasons; (2) estimated season length based on available
quota(s) and average weekly catch rates of different species and/or
management group from the previous years; (3) length of the season for
the different species and/or management group in the previous years and
whether fishermen were able to participate in the fishery in those
years; (4) variations in seasonal distribution, abundance, or migratory
patterns of the different species/management groups based on scientific
and fishery information; (5) effects of catch rates in one part of a
region precluding vessels in another part of that region from having a
reasonable opportunity to harvest a portion of the different species
and/or management quotas; (6) effects of the adjustment on
accomplishing the objectives of the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments; and/or (7) effects of a delayed opening with regard to
fishing opportunities in other fisheries.
After evaluating these criteria, as described in the proposed rule,
and reviewing the public comments, NMFS has decided to open the
fisheries in the Atlantic region with a lower retention limit than
proposed. Specifically, on January 1, 2016, the LCS fisheries in the
Atlantic region will open with a retention limit of 36 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed shark limited access
permit holders. NMFS has determined that a lower retention limit at the
start of the season will allow NMFS to more easily and closely monitor
the quota and catch rates in the beginning of the year to help ensure
equitable fishing opportunities later in the year. NMFS chose 36 LCS
other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip because that was the
commercial retention limit for the fishery from 2013 through August
2015, and thus is familiar to both NMFS and the participants in the
fishery.
The proposed rule stated that, if it appears that the quota is
being harvested too quickly to allow fishermen throughout the entire
region an opportunity to fish, NMFS will reduce the commercial
retention limit after a portion of the quota is harvested (e.g., 30
percent) and then raise the commercial retention limit at a later date
(e.g., July 1 or 15) to allow greater fishing opportunities later in
the year. Reducing the retention limit when 50 percent of the quota has
been harvested, as suggested by a commenter, would likely not allow for
fishing opportunities later in the year when the majority of the
fishing occurs. Under Sec. 635.28(b), NMFS closes any shark management
group that has reached, or is projected to reach, 80 percent of the
available quota. After considering public comment, NMFS believes that
it is more appropriate to consider a retention limit reduction, when
approximately 20 percent of the quota has been harvested (which is
expected to occur in March or April, based on landings data from prior
years). Any such action will depend on consideration of the factors
under Sec. 635.24(a)(8). If catch rates and landings are similar to
past years, NMFS anticipates that it could reduce the retention limit
to 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks, which is consistent with the
retention limit for incidental limited access permit holders, when the
20 percent is reached. However, if the quota is being landed quickly at
the beginning of the year, or if, after reducing the retention limit,
the reduction to 3 LCS other than sandbar sharks does not slow the rate
of harvest enough to allow for a fishery later in the year, NMFS could
reduce the retention limit to 0. Alternatively, if the quota is being
landed slowly, NMFS could choose not to reduce the retention limit, or
not to reduce it all the way down to 3.
After considering public comment, NMFS anticipates that it will
increase the commercial retention limit around July 15, 2016, as this
was the date used for prior season opening dates. The retention limit
will be the default level of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip for directed shark limited access permit holders, or
another amount, as deemed appropriate after considering the inseason
trip limit adjustment criteria (Sec. 635.24(a)(8)).
[[Page 75001]]
NMFS believes that utilizing the inseason retention limit adjustment
during the fishing season will promote equitable fishing opportunities
in the Atlantic region, while still allowing the majority of quota to
be harvested later in the year. The January 1 opening date should allow
fishermen in the southern and northern portions of the Atlantic region
the opportunity to fish at the beginning of the year, while providing
all fishermen in the Atlantic region fishing opportunities later in the
year, when the majority of fishing occurs, as the majority of the quota
will still be available.
Regarding the comments from constituents suggesting when to adjust
the retention limit, NMFS intends to reduce the retention limit to 3
LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip if the quota is being
caught too quickly (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the quota is
harvested at the beginning of the year), and then anticipates that it
will increase the retention limit to the default level of 45 LCS other
than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for directed shark limited
access permit holders, or another amount, as deemed appropriate after
considering the inseason trip limit adjustment criteria, around July
15, 2016. If NMFS were to reduce the retention limit when approximately
20 percent of the quota is harvested, based on past landings data, the
aggregated LCS quota will likely reach 20 percent around March, which
is similar to the time suggested by a commenter. Regarding an increase
on August 1, NMFS will determine any potential increase in the
retention limit at a later time, but notes that an increase around July
15 would be closer to recent opening dates of the fishery than August 1
and could better promote equitable fishing opportunities. Regarding the
comment to wait until 50 percent of the quota was harvested before
reducing the retention limit and then increasing the retention limit on
July 1, when the Atlantic LCS fisheries last opened in January, the
quota reached 50 percent in July. Thus, under that scenario, it is
unlikely that any adjustment would be needed until much later in the
season (e.g., August). In addition, under Sec. 635.28(b), NMFS closes
any shark management group that has reached, or is projected to reach,
80 percent of the available quota. Thus, waiting until 50 percent of
the quota has been harvested before reducing the retention limit would
likely prevent the majority of the quota from being available later in
the year, which is what most of the public comments requested.
Regarding the comments from the Commonwealth of Virginia Marine
Resources Commission and other commenters requesting an opening date in
June or July in order to allow state-water fishermen the opportunity to
fish and regarding the comments from constituents who prefer a later
start date in order to fish for sharks at the end of the year, NMFS
agrees that the fishery should remain open later in the year and
anticipates having the majority of the quota available after July 15,
2016. Based on past landings data, having the majority of the quota
available after July 15 would allow Virginia state-water fishermen the
opportunity to fish for sharks and potentially allow the fishery to be
open in October through December. Regarding the comments that having
the LCS fisheries in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions open at
the same time will impact the market prices, NMFS has no control over
the market prices and this is not one of the criteria NMFS evaluates
when choosing an opening date. However, in the past, the LCS fisheries
in the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico regions have been open at the same
time, and during those times, NMFS has not noticed any dramatic impacts
on the ex-vessel prices in either region. For example, in 2013, when
both regional LCS fisheries were open in January, the ex-vessel price
for Atlantic aggregated LCS stayed consistent throughout the year and
was much higher than the Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS ex-vessel
prices.
Comment 2: NMFS received comments regarding the proposed sub-
regional opening dates and commercial retention limit for the Gulf of
Mexico blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead management groups. One
commenter supported the proposed January 1 opening date for both Gulf
of Mexico sub-regions and the proposed retention limit, suggesting that
NMFS use this season as an experiment to see how the fishery operates
under the new management measures from Amendment 6 to the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP (Amendment 6). Another commenter suggested
staggering the Gulf of Mexico sub-regional opening dates and increasing
the retention limit. Specifically, the commenter suggested that both
sub-regions open at 55 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per
trip, with the western Gulf of Mexico sub-region opening on January 1
and the eastern Gulf of Mexico sub-region opening on March 1.
Response: After considering public comment and the ``opening
commercial fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)) described in
the proposed rule, NMFS has determined that opening the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups on
January 1 at 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip for
directed shark limited access permit holders, as proposed, will promote
equitable fishing opportunities for constituents in each sub-region. In
reaching this determination, NMFS considered, in particular, the length
of the season for the different species and/or management groups in
2015 and whether fishermen were able to participate in the fishery
(Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(iii)), and found that with a January 1 opening date
in 2015, the length of the fishing season provided all fishermen with
equitable fishing opportunities to participate in the fishery in 2015.
Regarding the comment relating to the different sub-regional
opening dates, at this time, NMFS prefers to open both sub-regions at
the same time to evaluate how the changes in the regulations, such as
the increase in the retention limit, affect the fishery before making
other changes to the commercial shark fishing season. NMFS may consider
staggered opening dates for the sub-regions in future years if such an
approach is needed to promote equitable fishing opportunities
throughout the region.
B. Atlantic SCS Management Group Comments
Comment 3: NMFS received comments regarding the proposed opening
date for the non-blacknose SCS and blacknose shark management groups in
the Atlantic region. Most commenters, including NCDMR, supported the
proposed January 1 opening date, while only a few commenters requested
that the SCS fisheries not open until August to ensure that the
southern part of the fishery would not be closed because of the
blacknose shark quota linkage.
Response: Taking into consideration the ``opening commercial
fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)), as described in the
proposed rule, and the general public support of the proposed opening
date, NMFS has determined that keeping the proposed opening date of
January 1 for the non-blacknose SCS and blacknose shark management
groups in the Atlantic region will provide commercial shark fishermen
year-round access to the increased non-blacknose SCS quota. In reaching
this determination, NMFS considered, in particular, the current length
of the 2015 season for the different species and/or management groups
and whether fishermen were able to participate in the fishery in 2015
(Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(iii)), and found that with a January 1 opening date
in 2015, the length of the fishing
[[Page 75002]]
season provided all fishermen with equitable fishing opportunities to
participate in the fishery in 2015. NMFS still encourages fishermen
south of 34 degrees to avoid blacknose sharks to keep the non-blacknose
SCS fishery open year-round in that area. NMFS linked these quotas due
to concerns regarding the incidental harvest of blacknose sharks, which
are overfished, while fishermen were targeting non-blacknose SCS.
During the Amendment 3 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP rulemaking
process (75 FR 30484; June 1, 2010), fishermen indicated that they
could avoid catching blacknose sharks when fishing for non-blacknose
sharks. Fishermen successfully avoided blacknose sharks for several
years. However, in the past few years, a small number of individuals
began targeting blacknose sharks, resulting in early closures.
Comment 4: NMFS received comments to adjust the commercial
retention limit for SCS, implement a commercial retention limit for
Atlantic blacknose sharks, and establish a bycatch allowance for non-
blacknose SCS (approximately 200 lb dw) once the blacknose quota is
reached to reduce dead discards of SCS.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking
because there is currently no commercial retention limit for blacknose
sharks, and the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas based on
over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates
for the 2016 shark seasons. The commenter thought that because NMFS was
proposing to adjust the commercial retention limit for the LCS
fisheries that NMFS could do the same for SCS fisheries. However, at
this time, the only retention limit for SCS is for incidental shark
permit holders, who can retain up to 16 SCS or pelagic sharks per
vessel per trip.
NMFS considered a commercial retention limit for blacknose shark in
Amendment 5a to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP (see Section 2.3,
Alternatives Considered But Not Further Analyzed, of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for Amendment 5a) and received similar
comments during the public comment period for Amendment 6. In those
actions, NMFS preferred to address blacknose shark landings and
discards by linking the blacknose shark and non-blacknose SCS quotas,
which should provide a greater and more effective incentive for
reducing landings of blacknose sharks than a retention limit, thus more
effectively managing the blacknose fishery in a manner that maximizes
resource sustainability, while minimizing, to the greatest extent
possible, socioeconomic impacts. After the blacknose shark quota was
reached much earlier this year (June 7) than in previous seasons (July
28, 2014, and September 30, 2013), NMFS examined the blacknose shark
landings from the HMS electronic dealer data from 2015 on a per trip
basis. These data indicate that the majority of the trips (60 percent
of the total number of trips) landed less than 200 lb dw of blacknose
sharks per trip; however, there were multiple trips (11 percent of the
total number of trips) that landed more than 700 lb dw of blacknose
sharks per trip, with some as high as 3,170 lb dw, which is
approximately 8 percent of the entire quota. Because the blacknose
shark linkage has caused the SCS fishery south of 34 degrees to close
sooner than in previous seasons and given that the commercial quota
continues to be overharvested, NMFS is re-considering the
appropriateness of a commercial blacknose retention limit and may
pursue this issue in a separate action.
C. General Comments
Comment 5: NMFS received comments to stop all shark fishing.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking
because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas for the 2016
shark seasons based on over- and underharvests from the previous years
and set opening dates for the 2016 shark seasons. Management of the
Atlantic shark fisheries is based on the best available science to
achieve optimum yield while also rebuilding overfished shark stocks and
preventing overfishing. The final rule does not reanalyze the overall
management measures for sharks, which were analyzed in the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments. NMFS is considering further
shark management measures, including those to rebuild shark stocks or
prevent overfishing, in other upcoming rulemakings, such as Amendments
5b to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
Comment 6: NMFS received comments from the NCDMR that requested
NMFS to perform a benchmark stock assessment on Atlantic blacktip and
sandbar sharks as soon as possible.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking
because the purpose of this rulemaking is to adjust quotas based on
over- and underharvests from the previous years and set opening dates
for the 2016 shark seasons. Most of the domestic shark stock
assessments follow the SEDAR process. This process is also used by the
South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Fishery Management
Councils and is designed to provide transparency throughout the stock
assessment. With regard to the timing of upcoming shark stock
assessments, NMFS aims to conduct a number of shark stock assessments
every year and to regularly reassess these stocks. The number of
species that can be assessed each year depends on whether assessments
are establishing baselines or are only updates to previous assessments.
Assessments also depend on ensuring there are data available for a
particular species. Tentatively, in addition to the shark assessments
being conducted by the International Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), NMFS intends to conduct a dusky shark update
assessment in 2016 and a Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark update
assessment in 2017. NMFS is currently considering options that would
allow for both Atlantic blacktip and sandbar sharks to be assessed in
2018.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS made four changes to the proposed rule, as described below.
1. NMFS changed the final eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota from the 28.9 mt dw (63,835 lb dw) in the proposed rule to 28.9
mt dw (63,819 lb dw), a difference of 16 lb dw, based on updated
landings through October 16, 2015. In the 2016 shark season proposed
rule (80 FR 49974; August 18, 2015), which was based on data available
through July 17, 2015, the 2016 adjusted annual quota for eastern Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark was proposed to be 28.9 mt dw (63,835 lb dw),
based on an underharvest of 0.1 mt dw (308 lb dw) from 2014 and an
underharvest of 3.7 mt dw from 2015 (8,088 lb dw). NMFS explained in
the proposed rule that it would adjust the proposed quotas based on
dealer reports as of mid-October or mid-November 2015. Based on updated
landings data through October 16, 2015, the overall 2015 Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark management group underharvest was 37.4 mt dw (82,373 lb
dw). Consistent with Amendment 6 and the August 2015 proposed rule,
NMFS will account for underharvest based on the sub-regional quota
percentage split. Thus, the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota
is increased by 9.8 percent of the 2015 underharvest or 3.7 mt dw
(8,072 lb dw). Therefore, the 2016 adjusted annual quota for eastern
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark is 28.9 mt dw (63,819 lb dw) (25.1 mt dw
annual base quota + 0.1 mt dw from 2014 underharvest + 3.7 mt dw from
the 2015 underharvest = 28.9 mt dw). Landings
[[Page 75003]]
information beyond October 16, 2015, was not available while NMFS was
writing this rule. This final rule used the most recent available
information to allow NMFS to properly analyze the fishery and open the
fishery as proposed on January 1, 2016. Any landings between October 16
and December 31, 2015, will be accounted for in the 2017 shark
fisheries quotas, as appropriate.
2. NMFS changed the final western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota from the 266.6 mt dw (587,538 lb dw) in the proposed rule to
266.5 mt dw (587,396 lb dw), a difference of 142 lb dw, based on
updated landings through October 16, 2015. In the proposed rule, which
was based on data available through July 17, 2015, the 2016 adjusted
annual quota for western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark was proposed to
be 266.6 mt dw (587,538 lb dw), based on an underharvest of 1.3 mt dw
(2,834 lb dw) from 2014 and an underharvest of 33.7 mt dw (74,443 lb
dw) from 2015. Based on updated landings data through October 16, 2015,
the overall 2015 Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group was
underharvested by 37.4 mt dw (82,373 lb dw). Consistent with Amendment
6 and the August 2015 proposed rule, NMFS will account for underharvest
based on the sub-regional quota percentage split. Thus, the western
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota is increased by 90.2 percent of the
2015 underharvest, or 33.7 mt dw (74,301 lb dw). Therefore, the 2016
adjusted annual quota for eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark is
266.5 mt dw (587,396 lb dw) (231.5 mt dw annual base quota + 1.3 mt dw
from 2014 underharvest + 33.7 mt dw from the 2015 underharvest = 266.5
mt dw 2016 adjusted annual quota). As described above, landings
information beyond October 16, 2015, was not available while NMFS was
writing this rule. This final rule used the most recent available
information to allow NMFS to properly analyze the fishery and open the
fishery on January 1, 2016. Any landings between October 16 and
December 31, 2015, will be accounted for in the 2017 shark fisheries
quotas, as appropriate.
3. NMFS changed the final Atlantic blacknose shark quota from the
15.7 mt dw (34,700 lb dw) in the proposed rule to 15.7 mt dw (34,653 lb
dw), a difference of 47 lb, based on updated landings through October
16, 2015. In the proposed rule, the quota for the Atlantic blacknose
shark management group was proposed to be 15.7 mt dw (34,700 lb dw),
due to an adjustment of 0.5 mt dw (1,111 lb dw) for a 2012 overharvest
that was spread over five years and an adjustment of 1.0 mt dw (2,110
lb dw) for a 2015 overharvest that was spread over three years.
However, based on the updated landings data, NMFS found that the 2015
quota was overharvested by 3.0 mt dw (6,471 lb dw) and not the 6,328 lb
dw originally considered. Consistent with the proposed rule, NMFS will
spread this overharvest amount over 3 years at 1.0 mt dw (2,157 lb dw)
each year from 2016-2018. Thus, NMFS will reduce the 2016 base annual
quota by 1.5 mt dw (3,268 lb dw), based on the 2012 overharvest amount
and the most recent estimates of the 2015 landings. Therefore, the 2016
adjusted annual quota for Atlantic blacknose shark is 15.7 mt dw
(34,653 lb dw) (17.2 mt dw annual base quota - 0.5 mt dw 2012
overharvest - 1.0 mt dw 2015 overharvest = 15.7 mt dw 2016 adjusted
annual quota). As described above, landings information beyond October
16, 2015, was not available while NMFS was writing this rule. This
final rule used the most recent available information to allow NMFS to
properly analyze the fishery and open the fishery on January 1, 2016.
Any landings between October 16 and December 31, 2015, will be
accounted for in the 2017 shark fisheries quotas, as appropriate.
4. NMFS changed the retention limit for directed shark limited
access permit holders at the start of the commercial shark fishing
season for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups in
the Atlantic region from 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel
per trip to 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. As
explained above, NMFS changed the retention limit after considering the
``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria (Sec. 635.27(b)(3)),
public comment, and the 2015 landings data in order to promote
equitable fishing opportunities throughout the Atlantic region.
2016 Annual Quotas
This final rule adjusts the 2016 commercial quotas due to over-
and/or underharvests in 2015 and previous fishing seasons, based on
landings data through October 16, 2015. The 2016 annual quotas by
species and species group are summarized in Table 1. All dealer reports
that are received by NMFS after October 16, 2015, will be used to
adjust the 2017 quotas, if necessary. A description of the quota
calculations is provided in the proposed rule and is not repeated here.
Any changes are described in the ``Changes from the Proposed Rule''
section.
Table 1--2016 Annual Quotas for the Atlantic Shark Fisheries
[All quotas and landings are dressed weight (dw), in metric tons (mt), unless specified otherwise. 1 mt dw = 2,204.6 lb dw]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 annual quota Preliminary 2015 2016 Base annual 2016 Final annual
Region or sub-region Management group (A) landings \1\ (B) Adjustments (C) quota (D) quota (D+C)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Gulf of Mexico.......... Blacktip Sharks... 25.1 mt dw (55,439 21.5 mt dw (47,366 3.8 mt dw (8,380 25.1 mt dw (55,439 28.9 mt dw (63,819
lb dw). lb dw) \2\. lb dw) \3\. lb dw). lb dw)
Aggregated Large 85.5 mt dw 84.5 mt dw .................. 85.5 mt dw 85.5 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (188,593 lb dw). (186,223 lb dw) (188,593 lb dw). (188,593 lb dw)
\2\.
Hammerhead Sharks. 13.4 mt dw (29,421 7.3 mt dw (16,198 .................. 13.4 mt dw (29,421 13.4 mt dw (29,421
lb dw). lb dw) \2\. lb dw). lb dw)
Western Gulf of Mexico.......... Blacktip Sharks... 231.5 mt dw 197.7 mt dw 35.0 mt dw (77,135 231.5 mt dw 266.5 mt dw
(510,261 lb dw). (435,961 lb dw) lb dw) \3\. (510,261 lb dw). (587,396 lb dw)
\2\.
Aggregated Large 72.0 mt dw 69.6 mt dw .................. 72.0 mt dw 72.0 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (158,724 lb dw). (153,380 lb dw) (158,724 lb dw). (158,724 lb dw)
\2\.
Hammerhead Sharks. 11.9 mt dw (23,301 6.5 mt dw (14,360 .................. 11.9 mt dw (23,301 11.9 mt dw (23,301
lb dw). lb dw) \2\. lb dw). lb dw)
[[Page 75004]]
Gulf of Mexico.................. Non-Blacknose 45.5 mt dw 69.9 mt dw -5.3 mt dw (- 112.6 mt dw 107.3 mt dw
Small Coastal (100,317 lb dw). (154,077 lb dw). 11,612 lb dw) \4\. (248,215 lb dw). (236,603 lb dw)
Sharks.
Atlantic........................ Aggregated Large 168.9 mt dw 90.1 mt dw .................. 168.9 mt dw 168.9 mt dw
Coastal Sharks. (372,552 lb dw). (198,651 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw). (372,552 lb dw)
Hammerhead Sharks. 27.1 mt dw (59,736 8.5 mt dw (18,703 .................. 27.1 mt dw (59,736 27.1 mt dw (59,736
lb dw). lb dw). lb dw). lb dw)
Non-Blacknose 176.1 mt dw 106.2 mt dw .................. 264.1 mt dw 264.1 mt dw
Small Coastal (388,222 lb dw). (234,170 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw). (582,333 lb dw)
Sharks.
Blacknose Sharks 17.5 mt dw (38,638 20.5 mt dw (45,109 -1.5 mt dw (-3,268 17.2 mt dw (37,921 15.7 mt dw (34,653
(South of 34[deg] lb dw). lb dw). lb dw) \5\. lb dw). lb dw)
N. lat. only).
No regional quotas.............. Non-Sandbar LCS 50.0 mt dw 18.1 mt dw (39,830 .................. 50.0 mt dw 50.0 mt dw
Research. (110,230 lb dw). lb dw). (110,230 lb dw). (110,230 lb dw)
Sandbar Shark 116.6 mt dw 63.6 mt dw .................. 90.7 mt dw 90.7 mt dw
Research. (257,056 lb dw). (140,258 lb dw). (199,943 lb dw). (199,943 lb dw)
Blue Sharks....... 273.0 mt dw 0.5 mt dw (1,114 .................. 273.0 mt dw 273.0 mt dw
(601,856 lb dw). lb dw). (601,856 lb dw). (601,856 lb dw)
Porbeagle Sharks.. 0 mt dw (0 lb dw). 0 mt dw (0 lb dw). .................. 1.7 mt dw (3,748 1.7 mt dw (3,748
lb dw). lb dw)
Pelagic Sharks 488.0 mt dw 71.3 mt dw .................. 488.0 mt dw 488.0 mt dw
Other Than (1,075,856 lb dw). (157,099 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb dw). (1,075,856 lb dw)
Porbeagle or Blue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Landings are from January 1, 2015, through October 16, 2015, and are subject to change.
\2\ The blacktip, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management group preliminary 2015 landings were split based on the sub-regional quota percentage
splits established in Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
\3\ This adjustment accounts for underharvest in 2014 and 2015. In the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas (79 FR 71331; December 2, 2014), the 2014
Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota was underharvested by 72.0 mt dw (158,602 lb dw). After the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas published,
late dealer reports indicated the quota was underharvested by an additional 1.4 mt dw (3,142 lb dw), for a total underharvest of 73.4 mt dw (161,744
lb dw). In 2015, the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota was underharvested by 37.4 mt (82,373 lb dw). Therefore, this final rule increases the Gulf
of Mexico blacktip shark quota by 38.8 mt dw (37.4 mt dw underharvest in 2015 + 1.4 mt dw underharvest from 2014). Recently, NMFS implemented
Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP which, among other things, established sub-regional quotas for the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group. NMFS will account for underharvest based on the sub-regional quota percentage split. Thus, the eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
quota is increased by 3.8 mt dw, or 9.8 percent of the underharvest, while the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark quota is increased by 35.0 mt dw,
or 90.2 percent of the underharvest.
\4\ This adjustment accounts for overharvests from 2014. In the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas (79 FR 71331; December 2, 2014), the 2014 Gulf
of Mexico non-blacknose SCS quota was not overharvested. After the final rule establishing the 2015 quotas published, late dealer reports indicated
the quota was overharvested by 5.3 mt dw (11,612 lb dw) due to landings by state-water fishermen fishing in state-waters after the federal closure.
NMFS will decrease the 2016 base annual quota based on the overharvest estimate of 5.3 mt from 2014. Based on the original 2015 annual commercial
quota, the 2015 annual quota was overharvested by 7.8 mt dw (17,184 lb dw) as of October 16, 2015. In Amendment 6 to the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP,
NMFS increased the commercial Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS quota to 112.6 mt dw (248,215 lb dw) and re-opened the fishery. Based on the revised
annual commercial quota, reported landings have not exceeded the revised 2015 base quota to date.
\5\ This adjustment accounts for overharvest in 2012 and 2015. After the final rule establishing the 2012 quotas published, late dealer reports
indicated the blacknose shark quota was overharvested by 3.5 mt dw (7,742 lb dw). In the final rule establishing the 2014 quotas, NMFS implemented a 5-
year adjustment of the overharvest amount by the percentage of landings in 2012. Thus, NMFS will reduce the Atlantic blacknose sharks by 0.5 mt dw
(1,111 lb dw) each year for 5 years from 2014-2018. In 2015, the Atlantic blacknose shark quota was overharvested by 3.0 (6,471 lb dw). NMFS is
implementing an additional 3-year adjustment of the overharvest amount in 2015. NMFS will reduce the quota by 1.0 mt dw (2,157 lb dw) each year from
2016-2018. Therefore, this final rule decreases the Atlantic blacknose shark quota by 1.5 mt dw (1.0 mt dw overharvest in 2015 + 0.5 mt dw overharvest
from 2012).
Fishing Season Notification for the 2016 Atlantic Commercial Shark
Fishing Seasons
Based on the seven ``opening commercial fishing season'' criteria
listed in Sec. 635.27(b)(3), NMFS is opening all the 2016 Atlantic
commercial shark fishing seasons on January 1, 2016 (Table 2).
Regarding the LCS retention limit, as shown in Table 2, for
directed shark limited access permit holders, the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark, aggregated LCS, and hammerhead shark management groups
will start the commercial fishing season at 45 LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per trip, and the Atlantic aggregated LCS and
hammerhead shark management groups will start the commercial fishing
season at 36 LCS other than sandbar sharks per vessel per trip. In the
Atlantic region, as described above, NMFS will closely monitor the
quota at the beginning of the year. If it appears that the quota is
being harvested too quickly to allow fishermen throughout the entire
region an opportunity to fish (e.g., if approximately 20 percent of the
quota is caught at the beginning of the year), NMFS will reduce the
commercial retention limit, then raise it later in the season. Based on
prior years' fishing activity, to allow greater fishing opportunities
later in the year, NMFS anticipates raising the commercial retention
limit to the default limit of 45 LCS other than sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around July 15, 2016. However, any retention limit
reductions and increases will be based on consideration of the trip
limit
[[Page 75005]]
adjustment criteria at 50 CFR 635.24(a)(8).
All of the shark management groups will remain open until December
31, 2016, or until NMFS determines that the fishing season landings for
any shark management group has reached, or is projected to reach, 80
percent of the available quota; however, consistent with Sec.
635.28(b)(5), NMFS may close the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark
management group before landings reach, or are expected to reach, 80
percent of the quota. Additionally, NMFS has established non-linked and
linked quotas; linked quotas are explicitly designed to concurrently
close multiple shark management groups that are caught together to
prevent incidental catch mortality from exceeding the total allowable
catch. The linked and non-linked quotas are shown in Table 2. NMFS will
file for publication with the Office of the Federal Register a notice
of closure for that shark species, shark management group including any
linked quotas, and/or region that will be effective no fewer than 5
days from date of filing. From the effective date and time of the
closure until NMFS announces, via the publication of a notice in the
Federal Register, that additional quota is available and the season is
reopened, the fisheries for the shark species or management group are
closed, even across fishing years.
Table 2--Quota Linkages, Season Opening Dates, and Commercial Retention Limit by Regional or Sub-Regional Shark
Management Group
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial retention
limits for directed
Season opening shark limited access
Region or sub-region Management group Quota linkages dates permit holders
(inseason adjustments
are available)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Gulf of Mexico........ Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2016.. 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
Aggregated Large Linked
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Western Gulf of Mexico........ Blacktip Sharks.. Not Linked....... January 1, 2016.. 45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip.
Aggregated Large Linked
Coastal Sharks.
Hammerhead Sharks
Gulf of Mexico................ Non-Blacknose Not Linked....... January 1, 2016.. N/A
Small Coastal
Sharks.
Atlantic...................... Aggregated Large Linked........... January 1, 2016.. 36 LCS other than
Coastal Sharks. sandbar sharks per
Hammerhead Sharks vessel per trip
[If quota is landed
quickly (e.g., if
approximately 20
percent of quota is
caught at the
beginning of the
year), NMFS
anticipates an
inseason reduction
(e.g., to 3 or fewer
LCS other than sandbar
sharks per vessel per
trip), then an
inseason increase to
45 LCS other than
sandbar sharks per
vessel per trip around
July 15, 2016].
Non-Blacknose Linked (South of January 1, 2016.. N/A
Small Coastal 34[deg] N. lat.
Sharks. only).
Blacknose Sharks
(South of
34[deg] N. lat.
only).
No regional quotas............ Non-Sandbar LCS Linked........... January 1, 2016.. N/A
Research.
Sandbar Shark
Research.
Blue Sharks...... Not Linked....... January 1, 2016.. N/A
Porbeagle Sharks.
Pelagic Sharks
Other Than
Porbeagle or
Blue.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the final rule
is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866.
In compliance with section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), NMFS prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) for
this final rule, which analyzed the adjustments to the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark, Gulf of Mexico aggregated LCS, and blacknose shark
management group quotas based on over- and/or underharvests from the
previous fishing season(s). The FRFA analyzes the anticipated economic
impacts of the final actions and any significant economic impacts on
small entities. The FRFA is below.
Section 604(a)(1) of the RFA requires an explanation of the purpose
of the rulemaking. The purpose of this final rulemaking is, consistent
with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, to establish the 2016 Atlantic commercial shark fishing
quotas and fishing seasons. Without this rule, the Atlantic commercial
shark fisheries would close on December 31, 2015, and would not open
until another action was taken. This final rule will be implemented
according to the regulations implementing the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
and its amendments. Thus, NMFS expects few, if any, economic impacts to
fishermen other than those already analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated
HMS FMP and its amendments. While there may be some direct negative
economic impacts associated with the opening dates for fishermen in
certain areas, there could also be positive effects for other fishermen
in the region. The opening dates were chosen to allow for an
[[Page 75006]]
equitable distribution of the available quotas among all fishermen
across regions and states, to the extent practicable.
Section 604(a)(2) of the RFA requires NMFS to summarize significant
issues raised by the public in response to the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), provide a summary of NMFS' assessment of
such issues, and provide a statement of any changes made as a result of
the comments. The IRFA was done as part of the proposed rule for the
2016 Atlantic Commercial Shark Season Specifications. NMFS did not
receive any comments specific to the IRFA. However, NMFS received
comments related to the overall economic impacts of the proposed rule,
and those comments and NMFS' assessment of and response to them are
summarized above (see Comments 1 and 3 above). As described in the
responses to those comments relating to the season opening dates,
consistent with Sec. 635.27(b)(3), the opening date for the all of the
commercial shark fisheries will be implemented as proposed (January 1,
2016).
Section 604(a)(4) of the RFA requires NMFS to provide an estimate
of the number of small entities to which the rule would apply. The
Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria for
all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish
harvesters. The SBA size standards are $20.5 million for finfish
fishing, $5.5 million for shellfish fishing, and $7.5 million for other
marine fishing, for-hire businesses, and marinas (79 FR 33647; June 12,
2014). NMFS considers all HMS permit holders to be small entities
because they had average annual receipts of less than $20.5 million for
finfish-harvesting. The commercial shark fisheries are comprised of
fishermen who hold shark directed or incidental limited access permits
and the related shark dealers, all of which NMFS considers to be small
entities according to the size standards set by the SBA. This final
rule applies to the approximately 210 directed commercial shark permit
holders (124 in the Atlantic and 86 in the Gulf of Mexico regions), 253
incidental commercial shark permit holders (153 in the Atlantic and 100
in the Gulf of Mexico regions), and 100 commercial shark dealers (71 in
the Atlantic and 29 in the Gulf of Mexico regions) as of October 2015.
Section 604(a)(5) of the RFA requires NMFS to describe the
projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements
of the final rule, including an estimate of the classes of small
entities which would be subject to the requirements of the report or
record. None of the actions in this final rule would result in
additional reporting, recordkeeping, or compliance requirements beyond
those already analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments.
Section 604(a)(6) of the RFA requires NMFS to describe the steps
taken to minimize the economic impact on small entities, consistent
with the stated objectives of applicable statutes. Additionally, the
RFA (5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4)) lists four general categories of
``significant'' alternatives that would assist an agency in the
development of significant alternatives that would accomplish the
stated objectives of applicable statutes and minimize any significant
economic impact of the rule on small entities. These categories of
alternatives are: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or
reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2) clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities.
In order to meet the objectives of this rule, consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS cannot exempt small entities or change the
reporting requirements only for small entities because all the entities
affected are small entities. Thus, there are no alternatives discussed
that fall under the first, second, and fourth categories described
above. NMFS does not know of any performance or design standards that
would satisfy the aforementioned objectives of this rulemaking while,
concurrently, complying with the Magnuson-Stevens Act; therefore, there
are no alternatives considered under the third category.
This rulemaking does not establish management measures to be
implemented, but rather implements previously adopted and analyzed
measures as adjustments, as specified in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP
and its amendments and the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the 2011
shark quota specifications rule (75 FR 76302; December 8, 2010). Thus,
in this rulemaking, NMFS adjusted the base quotas established and
analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments by
subtracting the underharvest or adding the overharvest, as specified
and allowable in existing regulations. Under current regulations (Sec.
635.27(b)(2)), all shark fisheries close on December 31 of each year,
or when NMFS determines that the fishing season landings for any shark
management group has reached, or is projected to reach, 80 percent of
the available quota, and do not open until NMFS takes action, such as
this rulemaking to re-open the fisheries. Thus, not implementing these
management measures would negatively affect shark fishermen and related
small entities, such as dealers, and also would not provide management
flexibility in furtherance of equitable fishing opportunities, to the
extent practicable, for commercial shark fishermen in all regions and
areas.
Based on the 2014 ex-vessel price, fully harvesting the unadjusted
2016 Atlantic shark commercial baseline quotas could result in total
fleet revenues of $4,583,514 (see Table 3). For the Gulf of Mexico
blacktip shark management group, NMFS has increased the baseline sub-
regional quotas due to the underharvests in 2015. The increase for the
eastern Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management group could result in
a $8,397 gain in total revenues for fishermen in that sub-region, while
the increase for the western Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark management
group could result in a $77,289 gain in total revenues for fishermen in
that sub-region. For the Gulf of Mexico non-blacknose SCS management
group, NMFS has reduced the baseline quota due to the overharvest in
2014. This will cause a potential loss in revenue of $7,571 for the
fleet in the Gulf of Mexico region. For the Atlantic blacknose shark
management group, NMFS will continue to reduce the baseline quota
through 2018 to account for overharvest in 2012 and will reduce the
baseline quota for the next 3 years to account for overharvest in 2015.
These reductions will cause a potential loss in revenue of $3,203 for
the fleet in the Atlantic region.
All of these changes in gross revenues are similar to the changes
in gross revenues analyzed in the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments. The FRFAs for those amendments concluded that the economic
impacts on these small entities are expected to be minimal. In the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments and the EA for the 2011 shark
quota specifications rule, NMFS stated it would be conducting annual
rulemakings and considering the potential economic impacts of adjusting
the quotas for under- and overharvests at that time.
[[Page 75007]]
Table 3--Average Ex-Vessel Prices per lb dw for Each Shark Management Group, 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average ex- Average ex-
Region Species vessel meat vessel fin
price price
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gulf of Mexico................................ Blacktip Shark.................. $0.50 $9.53
Aggregated LCS.................. 0.54 10.04
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.48 10.21
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.36 5.84
Blacknose Shark................. 0.86 5.84
Atlantic...................................... Aggregated LCS.................. 0.75 4.19
Hammerhead Shark................ 0.57 2.33
Non-Blacknose SCS............... 0.74 4.00
Blacknose Shark................. 0.78 4.00
No Region..................................... Shark Research Fishery 0.58 7.68
(Aggregated LCS).
Shark Research Fishery (Sandbar 0.69 10.12
only).
Blue shark...................... 0.67 2.34
Porbeagle shark................. 1.41 2.34
Other Pelagic sharks............ 1.41 2.34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this final rule, NMFS reviewed the ``opening commercial fishing
season'' criteria at Sec. 635.27(b)(3)(i) through (vii) to determine
when opening each fishery will provide equitable opportunities for
fishermen while also considering the ecological needs of the different
species. Over- and/or underharvests of 2015 and previous fishing season
quotas were examined for the different species/complexes to determine
the effects of the 2016 final quotas on fishermen across regional
fishing areas. The potential season lengths and previous catch rates
were examined to ensure that equitable fishing opportunities would be
provided to fishermen. Lastly, NMFS examined the seasonal variation of
the different species/complexes and the effects on fishing
opportunities. In addition to these criteria, NMFS also considered
other relevant factors, such as recent landings data and public
comments, before arriving at the final opening dates for the 2016
Atlantic shark management groups. For the 2016 fishing season, NMFS is
opening all of the shark management groups on January 1, 2016. The
direct and indirect economic impacts will be neutral on a short- and
long-term basis for the Gulf of Mexico blacktip shark, Gulf of Mexico
aggregated LCS, Gulf of Mexico hammerhead shark, Gulf of Mexico non-
blacknose shark SCS, Atlantic non-blacknose shark SCS, Atlantic
blacknose shark, sandbar shark, blue shark, porbeagle shark, and
pelagic shark (other than porbeagle or blue sharks) management groups,
because NMFS did not change the opening dates of these fisheries from
the status quo.
Opening the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups
in the Atlantic region on January 1 will result in short-term, direct,
moderate, beneficial economic impacts, as fishermen and dealers in the
southern portion of the Atlantic region will be able to fish for and
sell aggregated LCS and hammerhead sharks starting in January. These
fishermen will be able to fish earlier in the 2016 fishing season
compared to the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2014, and 2015 fishing seasons, which
did not start until June or July. Based on public comment, some
Atlantic fishermen in the southern and northern part of the region
prefer a January 1 opening for the fishery as long as the majority of
the quota is available later in the year. With the implementation of
the HMS electronic reporting system in 2013, NMFS now monitors the
quota on a more real-time basis compared to the paper reporting system
that was in place before 2013. This ability, along with the inseason
retention limit adjustment criteria in Sec. 635.24(a)(8), should allow
NMFS the flexibility to further provide equitable fishing opportunities
for fishermen across all regions, to the extent practicable. Depending
on how quickly the quota is being harvested, NMFS will reduce the
retention limits to ensure that fishermen farther north have sufficient
quota for a fishery later in the 2016 fishing season. The direct
impacts to shark fishermen in the Atlantic region of reducing the trip
limit depend on the needed reduction in the trip limit and the timing
of such a reduction. Therefore, such a reduction in the trip limit for
directed shark limited access permit holders is only anticipated to
have minor adverse direct economic impacts to fishermen in the short-
term; long-term impacts are not anticipated as these reductions would
not be permanent.
In the northern portion of the Atlantic region, a January 1 opening
for the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark management groups, with
inseason trip limit adjustments to ensure quota is available later in
the season, will have direct, minor, beneficial economic impacts in the
short-term for fishermen as they will potentially have access to the
aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark quotas earlier than in past
seasons. Fishermen in this area have stated that, depending on the
weather, some aggregated LCS species might be available to retain in
January. Thus, fishermen will be able to target or retain aggregated
LCS while targeting non-blacknose SCS. There will be indirect, minor,
beneficial economic impacts in the short- and long-term for shark
dealers and other entities that deal with shark products in this region
as they will also have access to aggregated LCS products earlier than
in past seasons. Thus, opening the aggregated LCS and hammerhead shark
management groups in January and using inseason trip limit adjustments
to ensure the fishery is open later in the year in 2016 will cause
beneficial cumulative economic impacts, because it allows for a more
equitable distribution of the quotas among constituents in this region,
consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its amendments.
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a FRFA, the agency shall publish
one or more guides to assist small entities in complying with the rule,
and shall designate such publications as ``small entity compliance
guides.'' The agency shall explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule or group of rules. As part of
this rulemaking process, NMFS has prepared a brochure summarizing
fishery information and regulations for Atlantic shark fisheries for
2016. This brochure also serves as the small entity
[[Page 75008]]
compliance guide. Copies of the compliance guide are available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 20, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-30032 Filed 11-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P