Periodic Reporting, 74741-74742 [2015-30319]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
A webinar will be held for
interested members of the general
public on Tuesday, December 15, 2015,
from 1:00–2:30 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time/10:00–11:30 a.m. Pacific Standard
Time.
ADDRESSES: The webinar will be held
via Adobe Connect web conferencing
software. To access the presentation,
enter the following URL into any Flashenabled web browser: https://
usfs.adobeconnect.com/orms/. Audioonly access is available toll-free by
calling (888) 844–9904 and entering the
following access code: 4909819.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Earnest Rawles, Acting Assistant
Director, Office of Regulatory and
Management Services—Directives and
Regulations Branch (202) 205–2601,
WO_Directives@fs.fed.us. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339 between 8:00 a.m. and
8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of this RFI is to inform the
public, gather feedback on potential
future strategies for notifying the public,
and obtaining comments prior to
making any amendments to the Forest
Service Directive System. Information
obtained in response to this RFI may be
used by the Forest Service for program
planning and development, or for other
purposes. Note that information shared
by the Forest Service in conjunction
with this RFI may or may not be used
to inform or issue further policy.
Background: The Forest Service is
bound by the Forest and Rangeland
Renewable Resources Planning Act of
1974, as modified by the National Forest
Management Act of 1976, ‘‘to give the
Federal, State, and local governments
and the public adequate notice and an
opportunity to comment upon the
formulation of standards, criteria, and
guidelines applicable to Forest Service
programs’’ (16 U.S.C. 1612(a)). Many of
these standards, criteria, and guidelines
are contained in the Forest Service
Directive System, which is used to
implement existing laws and
regulations. The Forest Service Directive
System contains the Agency’s policies,
practices, and procedures and serves as
the primary basis for the internal
management and control of programs
and administrative direction to Agency
employees. The Forest Service Manual
contains legal authorities, objectives,
policies, responsibilities, and guidance
needed on a continuing basis by Agency
line officers and primary staff to plan
and execute programs and activities.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 Nov 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
The Forest Service Handbook is the
principal source of specialized guidance
and instruction for carrying out the
policies, objectives, and responsibilities
contained in the Forest Service Manual.
The directives for all Agency programs
are available on the Agency Web site
(www.fs.fed.us).
Currently, the Forest Service uses the
process set forth in the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) to
notify the public of, and obtain
comments on, changes to the Forest
Service Directive System. This entails
publication of notice in the Federal
Register and solicitation of comments
through Regulations.gov. This process
was established and is primarily used to
facilitate public participation in the
promulgation of rules in the CFR. The
Forest Service will continue to
exclusively use the APA process to
involve the public in rulemaking. The
Agency is seeking to expand options for
involving interested parties in the
formulation of directives to be more
responsive and accessible to the public.
Dated: November 23, 2015.
Lenise Lago,
Deputy Chief of Business Operations, U. S.
Forest Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–30347 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2016–3; Order No. 2836]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent filing requesting that the
Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating
to periodic reports (Proposal Twelve).
This notice informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: December 4,
2015. Reply Comments are due:
December 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74741
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposals
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 20, 2015, the Postal
Service filed a petition pursuant to 39
CFR 3050.11 requesting that the
Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating
to the Postal Service’s periodic reports.1
Proposal Twelve is attached to the
Petition and identifies the proposed
analytical method change that relates to
the treatment of costs for vehicles used
on city carrier letter routes within
various cost components of the Cost and
Revenue Analysis (CRA) report. Id. The
Postal Service concurrently filed two
library references, along with an
application for non-public treatment for
one.2
II. Summary of Proposal
The Postal Service requests this
rulemaking to re-align certain
calculations within the CRA report to be
consistent with the methodology
approved by the Commission in
Proposal Thirteen.3 Petition at 1.
Acknowledging that the Postal Service
will soon submit the FY 2015 Annual
Compliance Report, the Postal Service
emphasizes that immediate
consideration of Proposal Twelve is
necessary to avoid a mismatch between
the current methodology for the
treatment of ancillary vehicle cost
matters and the framework approved in
Proposal Thirteen. Id. at 1–2. Under
Proposal Twelve, the Postal Service
proposes two methodological changes:
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Twelve),
November 20, 2015, at 1 (Petition).
2 Notice of Filing of USPS–RM2016–3/1, USPS–
RM2016–3/NP1, and Application for Nonpublic
Treatment, November 20, 2015 (Notice). Library
Reference USPS–RM2016–3/1 contains workbooks
displaying the calculation and cost impacts of
implementing the proposed methodology. Library
Reference USPS–RM2016–3/NP1 contains
supporting non-public material. The Notice
incorporates by reference the Application for NonPublic Treatment of Materials contained in
Attachment Two to the December 29, 2014, United
States Postal Service Fiscal Year 2014 Annual
Compliance Report. Notice at 1. See 39 CFR part
3007 for information on access to non-public
material.
3 Docket No. RM2015–7, Order No. 2792, Order
Approving Analytical Principles Used in Periodic
Reporting (Proposal Thirteen), October 29, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
74742
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 229 / Monday, November 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Attribution of city carrier letter route
vehicle costs and calculation of office
and street proportions that are used in
the calculation of costs relating to city
carrier labor. Petition, Proposal Twelve
at 1.
A. Attributing City Carrier Letter Route
Vehicle Costs
The Postal Service proposes to change
the methodology for attributing costs
relating to vehicles used on city carrier
letter routes, including Motor Vehicle
Service (MVS) Labor in Cost Segment
12.1, MVS Supplies and Materials in
Cost Segment 12.2, and Vehicle
Depreciation in Cost Segment 20. Id.
Current methodology: The Postal
Service explains that currently city
carrier letter route vehicle costs are
divided into two pools: Delivery
Activities and Network Travel for
motorized letter routes. Id. at 2. The
Postal Service reports that ‘‘[i]n FY
2014, these respective proportions were
approximately 42 and 58 percent.’’ Id.
The Postal Service states that the
current methodology multiplies each
cost pool by the appropriate variability
to determine attributable costs and that
these ‘‘attributable costs are assigned to
products in the same proportions as
Cost Segment 7 letter route Delivery
Activities costs.’’ Id.
Proposed Methodology: Building
upon the new methodology approved by
the Commission in Proposal Thirteen
for the treatment of labor costs on city
delivery letter routes, the Postal Service
proposes to ‘‘calculate the attributable
vehicle costs by multiplying the letter
route vehicle costs by the new overall
letter route street variability’’ and to
assign the attributable costs to products
using the proportions based on all letter
route street costs. Id. The Postal Service
represents that Proposal Twelve would
also change the component structure of
the CRA for Cost Segments 12 and 20.
Id. at 4. Specifically, in Cost Segment
12, the Network Travel components 86
and 95 would be removed and
components 83 and 92, currently named
Delivery Activities, would be renamed
City Delivery Letter Routes. Id. In Cost
Segment 20, components 222 and 225
for Delivery Activities and Network
Travel would be removed. Id.
Component 223 would be established as
City Delivery Special Purpose Routes
(SPR) to assign SPR vehicle depreciation
costs. Id. Finally, component 221 would
be reactivated and named City Delivery
Letter Routes. Id.
Rationale: The Postal Service
represents that Proposal Twelve would
align the calculation of vehicle use costs
with the new street time methodology.
Id. at 5. The Postal Service claims that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 Nov 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
this treatment of city carrier vehicle
costs is consistent with the longstanding practice of linking the
treatment with the direct labor that uses
these vehicles. Id. The Postal Service
asserts that the ‘‘proposed methodology
for vehicle use cost[s] recognizes that
letter route carriers use their vehicles
throughout their time on the street,
while delivering mail, traversing the
route, and while traveling to and from
the route.’’ Id.
Impact: The Postal Service anticipates
that under Proposal Twelve higher
proportions of MVS Labor, MVS
Supplies, and Vehicle Depreciation
costs for city carriers will be attributed
to products. Id. The Postal Service states
that currently ‘‘Network Travel is not
attributed and letter route Delivery
Activities costs has a variability of 43
percent, which results in a combined
variability of 18 percent.’’ Id. Under
Proposal Twelve, the Postal Service
represents that ‘‘the city carrier letter
route costs for MVS Labor, MVS
Supplies, and Vehicle Depreciation
costs are attributed in the same
proportion as all letter route street
activities in Cost Segment 7, which
results in an attribution level of 36
percent.’’ Id. at 5–6. For FY 2014, the
Postal Service projects that Proposal
Twelve would increase attributable
costs by $185 million. Id. at 6. The
Postal Service illustrates the cost impact
by product for Proposal Twelve in Table
1. Id. at 7.
B. Calculating Office and Street
Proportions
The Postal Service proposes a minor
change to the methodology for
calculating office and street proportions
that are used in the calculation of costs
relating to city carrier labor for Vehicle
Hire in Cost Segment 12.3 and Carfare
and Driveout in Cost Segment 13.2. Id.
at 1.
Current methodology: The Postal
Service explains that it currently
‘‘develops office and street proportions
for foot and motorized routes using [InOffice Cost System] IOCS office costs by
route type and street costs by delivery
mode.’’ Id. at 2.
Proposed Methodology: Building
upon the new methodology approved by
the Commission in Proposal Thirteen,
the Postal Service proposes to develop
office and street proportions for foot and
motorized routes using Delivery
Operations Information System
workhours. Id. The Postal Service
would also use city carrier costs for
Delivery Activities and Network Travel
to further divide the street proportions
among these components. Id. at 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Rationale: The Postal Service claims
that ‘‘Proposal Twelve would also align
the calculation of office and street
proportions with the new street time
methodology.’’ Id. at 5.
Impact: The Postal Service illustrates
the change in office and street
proportions for Proposal Twelve in
Table 2. Id. at 8.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2016–3 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition.
Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.prc.gov. Interested persons may
submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal Twelve no later than December
4, 2015. Reply comments are due no
later than December 9, 2015. Pursuant to
39 U.S.C. 505, Jennaca D. Upperman is
designated as officer of the Commission
(Public Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2016–3 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Twelve), filed
November 20, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than
December 4, 2015. Reply comments are
due no later than December 9, 2015.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Jennaca D.
Upperman to serve as officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–30319 Filed 11–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 0, 1, 2 and 15
[ET Docket No. 13–44; Report No. 3030]
Petitions for Reconsideration of Action
in Rulemaking Proceeding
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30NOP1.SGM
30NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 229 (Monday, November 30, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74741-74742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-30319]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2016-3; Order No. 2836]
Periodic Reporting
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent filing requesting that the
Commission initiate an informal rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports (Proposal
Twelve). This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public
comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: December 4, 2015. Reply Comments are due:
December 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Summary of Proposals
III. Initial Commission Action
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On November 20, 2015, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant
to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles
relating to the Postal Service's periodic reports.\1\ Proposal Twelve
is attached to the Petition and identifies the proposed analytical
method change that relates to the treatment of costs for vehicles used
on city carrier letter routes within various cost components of the
Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) report. Id. The Postal Service
concurrently filed two library references, along with an application
for non-public treatment for one.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in
Analytical Principles (Proposal Twelve), November 20, 2015, at 1
(Petition).
\2\ Notice of Filing of USPS-RM2016-3/1, USPS-RM2016-3/NP1, and
Application for Nonpublic Treatment, November 20, 2015 (Notice).
Library Reference USPS-RM2016-3/1 contains workbooks displaying the
calculation and cost impacts of implementing the proposed
methodology. Library Reference USPS-RM2016-3/NP1 contains supporting
non-public material. The Notice incorporates by reference the
Application for Non-Public Treatment of Materials contained in
Attachment Two to the December 29, 2014, United States Postal
Service Fiscal Year 2014 Annual Compliance Report. Notice at 1. See
39 CFR part 3007 for information on access to non-public material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of Proposal
The Postal Service requests this rulemaking to re-align certain
calculations within the CRA report to be consistent with the
methodology approved by the Commission in Proposal Thirteen.\3\
Petition at 1. Acknowledging that the Postal Service will soon submit
the FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report, the Postal Service emphasizes
that immediate consideration of Proposal Twelve is necessary to avoid a
mismatch between the current methodology for the treatment of ancillary
vehicle cost matters and the framework approved in Proposal Thirteen.
Id. at 1-2. Under Proposal Twelve, the Postal Service proposes two
methodological changes:
[[Page 74742]]
Attribution of city carrier letter route vehicle costs and calculation
of office and street proportions that are used in the calculation of
costs relating to city carrier labor. Petition, Proposal Twelve at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Docket No. RM2015-7, Order No. 2792, Order Approving
Analytical Principles Used in Periodic Reporting (Proposal
Thirteen), October 29, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Attributing City Carrier Letter Route Vehicle Costs
The Postal Service proposes to change the methodology for
attributing costs relating to vehicles used on city carrier letter
routes, including Motor Vehicle Service (MVS) Labor in Cost Segment
12.1, MVS Supplies and Materials in Cost Segment 12.2, and Vehicle
Depreciation in Cost Segment 20. Id.
Current methodology: The Postal Service explains that currently
city carrier letter route vehicle costs are divided into two pools:
Delivery Activities and Network Travel for motorized letter routes. Id.
at 2. The Postal Service reports that ``[i]n FY 2014, these respective
proportions were approximately 42 and 58 percent.'' Id. The Postal
Service states that the current methodology multiplies each cost pool
by the appropriate variability to determine attributable costs and that
these ``attributable costs are assigned to products in the same
proportions as Cost Segment 7 letter route Delivery Activities costs.''
Id.
Proposed Methodology: Building upon the new methodology approved by
the Commission in Proposal Thirteen for the treatment of labor costs on
city delivery letter routes, the Postal Service proposes to ``calculate
the attributable vehicle costs by multiplying the letter route vehicle
costs by the new overall letter route street variability'' and to
assign the attributable costs to products using the proportions based
on all letter route street costs. Id. The Postal Service represents
that Proposal Twelve would also change the component structure of the
CRA for Cost Segments 12 and 20. Id. at 4. Specifically, in Cost
Segment 12, the Network Travel components 86 and 95 would be removed
and components 83 and 92, currently named Delivery Activities, would be
renamed City Delivery Letter Routes. Id. In Cost Segment 20, components
222 and 225 for Delivery Activities and Network Travel would be
removed. Id. Component 223 would be established as City Delivery
Special Purpose Routes (SPR) to assign SPR vehicle depreciation costs.
Id. Finally, component 221 would be reactivated and named City Delivery
Letter Routes. Id.
Rationale: The Postal Service represents that Proposal Twelve would
align the calculation of vehicle use costs with the new street time
methodology. Id. at 5. The Postal Service claims that this treatment of
city carrier vehicle costs is consistent with the long-standing
practice of linking the treatment with the direct labor that uses these
vehicles. Id. The Postal Service asserts that the ``proposed
methodology for vehicle use cost[s] recognizes that letter route
carriers use their vehicles throughout their time on the street, while
delivering mail, traversing the route, and while traveling to and from
the route.'' Id.
Impact: The Postal Service anticipates that under Proposal Twelve
higher proportions of MVS Labor, MVS Supplies, and Vehicle Depreciation
costs for city carriers will be attributed to products. Id. The Postal
Service states that currently ``Network Travel is not attributed and
letter route Delivery Activities costs has a variability of 43 percent,
which results in a combined variability of 18 percent.'' Id. Under
Proposal Twelve, the Postal Service represents that ``the city carrier
letter route costs for MVS Labor, MVS Supplies, and Vehicle
Depreciation costs are attributed in the same proportion as all letter
route street activities in Cost Segment 7, which results in an
attribution level of 36 percent.'' Id. at 5-6. For FY 2014, the Postal
Service projects that Proposal Twelve would increase attributable costs
by $185 million. Id. at 6. The Postal Service illustrates the cost
impact by product for Proposal Twelve in Table 1. Id. at 7.
B. Calculating Office and Street Proportions
The Postal Service proposes a minor change to the methodology for
calculating office and street proportions that are used in the
calculation of costs relating to city carrier labor for Vehicle Hire in
Cost Segment 12.3 and Carfare and Driveout in Cost Segment 13.2. Id. at
1.
Current methodology: The Postal Service explains that it currently
``develops office and street proportions for foot and motorized routes
using [In-Office Cost System] IOCS office costs by route type and
street costs by delivery mode.'' Id. at 2.
Proposed Methodology: Building upon the new methodology approved by
the Commission in Proposal Thirteen, the Postal Service proposes to
develop office and street proportions for foot and motorized routes
using Delivery Operations Information System workhours. Id. The Postal
Service would also use city carrier costs for Delivery Activities and
Network Travel to further divide the street proportions among these
components. Id. at 4.
Rationale: The Postal Service claims that ``Proposal Twelve would
also align the calculation of office and street proportions with the
new street time methodology.'' Id. at 5.
Impact: The Postal Service illustrates the change in office and
street proportions for Proposal Twelve in Table 2. Id. at 8.
III. Initial Commission Action
The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2016-3 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. Additional information concerning the
Petition may be accessed via the Commission's Web site at https://www.prc.gov. Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and
Proposal Twelve no later than December 4, 2015. Reply comments are due
no later than December 9, 2015. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Jennaca D.
Upperman is designated as officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2016-3 for consideration
of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal
Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes
in Analytical Principles (Proposal Twelve), filed November 20, 2015.
2. Comments are due no later than December 4, 2015. Reply comments
are due no later than December 9, 2015.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Jennaca D.
Upperman to serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative)
to represent the interests of the general public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-30319 Filed 11-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P