Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Multi-Year Specifications for Monitored and Prohibited Harvest Species Stock Categories, 72676-72679 [2015-29684]
Download as PDF
72676
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to clarify the contract term for contracts
awarded under the statutory authority of
10 U.S.C. 2913. Section 2913 requires
DoD to develop a simplified method of
contracting for shared energy savings
contract services that will accelerate the
use of such contracts. DoD is authorized
by section 2913 to contract with utility
service providers to implement energy
conservation measures on military
bases. Section 2913 does not indicate a
term limit for contracts executed under
this authority.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The proposed rule revises DFARS
241.103 by adding paragraph (2) to state
that contracting officers may enter into
a shared energy savings contract under
10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not-toexceed 25 years. Experience has
indicated that a period of less than 25
years is frequently insufficient to
amortize the capital cost. Twenty-five
years allows a greater volume and
variety of energy conservation measures,
and is consistent with non-DoD agency
practice for similar contracts.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because the rule only seeks to
clarify the contract term for contracts
awarded under the statutory authority of
10 U.S.C. 2913. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis has been
performed and is summarized as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
DoD is proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to clarify the
contract term for contracts awarded
under the statutory authority of 10
U.S.C. 2913. Section 2913 requires DoD
to develop a simplified method of
contracting for shared energy savings
contract services that will accelerate the
use of such contracts. DoD is authorized
by section 2913 to contract with utility
service providers to implement energy
conservation measures on military
bases. Section 2913 does not indicate a
term limit for contracts executed under
this authority, and this has created
ambiguity and inconsistency throughout
DoD on the term limit that is imposed
on contracts awarded under the
authority. Additionally, the ambiguity
has resulted in a hesitation to enter
shared energy savings contracts,
contrary to the intent of section 2913.
The proposed rule is not anticipated
to have a significant economic impact
on small business entities. The number
of contract awards made under the
authority of 10 U.S.C. 2913 is not
currently tracked by DoD’s business
systems. However, it is estimated that
approximately 25 shared energy savings
projects are initiated across DoD each
year, with approximately 17 being
awarded annually. It is believed that
most awards are made to large utility
providers, with generally 25% or more
of the renovation and operations &
maintenance work executed under the
awards being subcontracted to local
small business by the utility provider.
This rule does not impose new
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements. This rule only serves to
clarify the maximum contract term that
may be authorized for these awards.
Any burden caused by this rule is
expected to be minimal and will not be
any greater on small entities than it is
on large businesses.
The rule does not impose any
additional reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements. The
rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
There are no known significant
alternatives to this rule.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2015–D018), in
correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 241
Government procurement.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 241 is
proposed to be amended to read as
follows:
PART 241—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 241
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Amend section 241.103 by
redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as
paragraphs (3) and (4) and adding a new
paragraph (2) to read as follows:
■
241.103
Statutory and delegated authority.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) The contracting officer may enter
into a shared energy savings contract
under 10 U.S.C. 2913 for a period not
to exceed 25 years.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–29553 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 130808697–5999–01]
RIN 0648–XC808
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Multi-Year Specifications for Monitored
and Prohibited Harvest Species Stock
Categories
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
annual catch limits (ACL) and, where
necessary, other annual reference points
(overfishing limits (OFL) and acceptable
biological catches (ABC)) for certain
stocks in the monitored and prohibited
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
harvest species categories under the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The proposed
ACLs are: Jack mackerel, 31,000 metric
tons (mt); northern subpopulation of
northern anchovy, 9,750 mt; central
subpopulation of northern anchovy,
25,000 mt; and krill, zero. Additionally,
an OFL of 39,000 mt, an ABC of 9,750
mt and an annual catch target (ACT) of
1,500 mt is being proposed for the
northern subpopulation of northern
anchovy. This rule is intended to
conserve and manage these stocks off
the U.S. West Coast. If the ACL for any
one of these stocks is reached, then
fishing for that stock will be closed until
it reopens at the start of the next fishing
season.
DATES: Comments must be received by
December 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2013–0145, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130145, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
William W. Stelle, Jr., Regional
Administrator, West Coast Region,
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,
Seattle, WA 98115–0070; Attn: Joshua
Lindsay.
• Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
The CPS
fishery in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) off the West Coast is
managed under the CPS FMP, which
was developed by the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. The
six species managed under the CPS FMP
are Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel,
jack mackerel, northern anchovy
(northern and central subpopulations),
market squid and krill. The CPS FMP is
implemented by regulations at 50 CFR
part 660, subpart I.
Management unit stocks in the CPS
FMP are classified under three
management categories: Actively
managed; monitored; and prohibited
harvest species. Active stocks are
characterized by periodic stock
assessments, and/or periodic or annual
adjustments of target harvest levels.
Management of monitored stocks, in
contrast, generally involves tracking
landings against the relevant ACL
(previously the ABCs) and qualitative
comparison to available abundance
data, but without regular stock
assessments or annual adjustments to
target harvest levels. Species in both
categories may be subject to
management measures such as catch
allocation, gear regulations, closed
areas, closed seasons, or other forms of
‘‘active’’ management. For example, trip
limits and a limited entry permit
program are already in place for all CPS
finfish. The monitored category
includes jack mackerel, two subpopulations of northern anchovy stock
and market squid. Krill is the only stock
in the prohibited harvest category. The
monitored stocks have not been
managed to a hard quota like the active
category stocks by NMFS (although the
state of California manages market squid
with an annual limit). Instead, landings
have been monitored against harvest
reference levels to determine if
overfishing is occurring and to gauge the
need for more active management such
as requiring periodic stock assessments
and regular adjustments to a quota.
Catches of the three finfish stocks in the
monitored category—northern anchovy
(northern and central subpopulations)
and jack mackerel— have remained well
below their respective ABC (now
proposed ACL levels for jack mackerel
and the central anchovy population)
since implementation of the CPS FMP
in 2000, with average catches over the
last 10 years of approximately 7,300 mt,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72677
270 mt and 660 mt for the central and
northern subpopulations of northern
anchovy and jack mackerel,
respectively.
In September 2011, NMFS approved
Amendment 13 to the CPS FMP, which
modified the framework process used to
set and adjust fishery specifications and
for setting ACLs and accountability
measures (AMs); Amendment 13 was
intended to ensure the FMP conforms
with the 2007 amendments to the MSA
and NMFS’ revised MSA National
Standard 1 guidelines at 50 CFR part
600. Specifically, Amendment 13
maintained the existing reference points
and the primary harvest control rules for
the monitored stocks (jack mackerel,
northern anchovy and market squid),
including the large buffer built into the
ABC control rule for the finfish stocks,
as well as the overfishing criteria for
market squid, but modified these
reference points and control rules to
align with the revised advisory
guidelines and to comply with the new
statutory requirement to establish a
process for setting ACLs and AMs. This
included a default management
framework under which the OFL for
each monitored stock was set equal to
the maximum sustainable yield (MSY)
value and ABC was reduced from the
OFL by 75 percent as an uncertainty
buffer (based on the existing ABC
control rule where ABC equals 25
percent of OFL/MSY). This default
framework is used unless there is
determined to be a more appropriate
OFL, as is the case for the northern
subpopulation of northern anchovy, or
stock specific ABC control rule like the
proxy for the Fishing rate that is
expected to result in maximum
sustainable yield (FMSY proxy) for
market squid of Egg Escapement ≥ 30
percent. ACLs are then set equal to the
ABC or could be set lower than the
ABC, along with annual catch targets
(ACTs), if deemed necessary. These
control rules and harvest policies for
monitored CPS stocks are simpler and
more precautionary than those used for
actively managed stocks in recognition
of the low fishing effort and low
landings for these stocks, as well as the
lack of current estimates of stock
biomass.
Through this action, NMFS proposes
to implement the ACLs shown in Table
1 below for jack mackerel, the two
subpopulations of northern anchovy,
and krill, as well an OFL, ABC and ACT
for the northern subpopulation of
northern anchovy.
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
72678
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—PROPOSED ACLS FOR MONITORED CPS FINFISH, INCLUDING PROPOSED OFL, ABC, AND ACT FOR THE
NORTHERN SUBPOPULATION OF NORTHERN ANCHOVY
OFL
ABC
ACL
Jack mackerel ........................
Northern anchovy, (northern
subpopulation).
Northern anchovy, (central
subpopulation).
Market squid ..........................
126,000 mt .............................
39,000 mt ...............................
31,000 mt ...............................
9,750 mt .................................
31,000 mt
9,750 mt .................................
100,000 mt .............................
25,000 mt ...............................
25,000 mt
FMSY proxy resulting in Egg
Escapement ≥ 30%.
FMSY proxy resulting in Egg
Escapement ≥ 30%.
Krill .........................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Stock
Undefined ...............................
Undefined ...............................
ACL not required (Less than
1-year lifecycle and no
overfishing).
0
The OFLs and ABCs listed in Table 1
for jack mackerel, the central
subpopulation of northern anchovy,
market squid and krill are included for
information purposes only. The OFL
and ABC specifications for those stocks
are set in the FMP; NMFS does not
propose to establish or revise them by
this proposed rule.
These proposed catch levels and
reference points were recommended to
NMFS by the Pacific Council and were
based on recommendations from its
advisory bodies according to the
framework in the FMP established
through Amendment 13, including OFL
and ABC recommendations from its
Science and Statistical Committee
(SSC). The proposed ACLs for these
monitored stocks would be in place for
the calendar year fishing season
(January 1–December 31), and would
remain in place for each subsequent
calendar year until new scientific
information becomes available to
warrant changing them, or if landings
increase and consistently reach the
ABC/ACL level and it necessitates a
change to active management under the
FMP. These management benchmarks
provide a means to monitor these stocks
on an annual basis. Each year, the total
harvest of each stock will be assessed
against the ACL until such time as the
Pacific Council chooses to reassess the
management of these stocks, new
scientific information regarding these
stocks becomes available, or harvest
approaches or exceeds the ACL. These
benchmarks implicitly include a
postseason AM; harvest levels are
monitored annually to assess whether a
stock should become actively managed.
Per the framework that was
established through Amendment 13, the
OFLs for the central subpopulation of
northern anchovy and jack mackerel are
set based on MSY values that were
established through Amendment 8 to
the FMP. In 2015, Amendment 14 to the
CPS FMP established an FMSY of 0.3 as
the MSY reference point for the
northern subpopulation of northern
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
anchovy in the CPS FMP. However,
because the framework in the FMP for
setting ABCs is based on applying a
percentage to numerical MSY/OFLs, it
was necessary to determine a numerical
OFL value through the specifications
process. Because the northern
subpopulation of the northern anchovy
is currently lightly fished and effort has
been inconsistent over time, it was
determined that using a catch time
series as a way of setting the OFL was
not appropriate as it likely was an
unreliable indicator of stock status.
Therefore, the best available scientific
information on the population and
biology of northern subpopulation
northern anchovy was compiled to
develop an OFL. The available
information included two separate
estimates of biomass; the average of
these two estimates was approximately
130,000 mt. After reviewing this
information, the SSC recommended that
the OFL be set by multiplying the
average of these two biomass estimates
(130,000 mt), by an FMSY 0.3, which is
also the FMSY value for Pacific mackerel.
This is appropriate because,
biologically, anchovy populations are
likely to be as or more productive than
Pacific mackerel. This calculation
results in an OFL of 39,000 mt and with
the established uncertainty buffer of 75
percent, an ABC of 9,750 mt. Although
the proposed ACL for this stock is equal
to the ABC, to further account for
uncertainty surrounding the reference
points for this stock, anchovy’s role as
forage, and because annual catch levels
have been sustainably below the ACL,
the Pacific Council recommended, and
NMFS is proposing, an ACT of 1,500 mt.
Market squid, because of its short lifecycle, falls under the statutory
exception from the requirement to set
ACLs and AMs. Section 303(a)(15) of
the MSA states that the requirement for
ACLs ‘‘shall not apply to a fishery for
species that has a life cycle of
approximately 1 year unless the
Secretary has determined the fishery is
subject to overfishing of that species.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACT
1,500 mt.
Market squid have a lifecycle of less
than 1 year and have not been
determined to be subject to overfishing;
therefore, an ACL is not required and is
not being proposed for market squid.
NMFS is not proposing to establish or
change specifications for krill by this
rulemaking. Krill are a prohibited
harvest species. The targeting,
harvesting and transshipment of krill
are all explicitly prohibited; therefore,
the ACL for krill is zero. Because the
harvest level is zero, setting an OFL or
ABC for krill would serve no function
and is not being proposed in this rule.
If the proposed ACL and/or ACT
levels are reached, or are expected to be
reached, for one of these fisheries, the
directed fishery would be closed until
the beginning of the next fishing season.
The NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator would publish a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the
date of any such closure. Additionally,
nearing or exceeding one of these ACLs
or the ACT would trigger a review of
whether the fishery should be moved
into the actively managed category of
the FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the CPS FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, for the following reasons:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The primary action being
implemented through this rule as it
relates to potential economic impacts on
small entities is the establishment of
multi-year ACLs for the two sub-stocks
of northern anchovy and for jack
mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific
coast. The CPS FMP and its
implementing regulations require NMFS
to set ACLs for these fisheries based on
the harvest control rules in the FMP.
On June 12, 2014, the SBA issued an
interim final rule revising the small
business size standards for several
industries effective July 14, 2014 (79 FR
33647). The rule increased the size
standard for Finfish Fishing from $19.0
to 20.5 million, Shellfish Fishing from
$5.0 to 5.5 million, and Other Marine
Fishing from $7.0 to 7.5 million. 79 FR
33650, 33656 (June 12, 2014). NMFS
conducted its analysis for this action in
light of the new size standards.
The entities that would be affected by
the proposed action are the vessels that
harvest jack mackerel and northern
anchovy as part of the West Coast CPS
purse seine fleet. Jack mackerel and
northern anchovy are components of the
CPS purse seine fishery off the U.S.
West Coast, which generally fishes a
complex of species, including Pacific
sardine, Pacific mackerel and market
squid. Currently there are 58 vessels
permitted in the Federal CPS limited
entry fishery off California. Annually 28
to 45 (average 39) of these CPS vessels
landed anchovy and jack mackerel over
the last five years. Approximately 26
baitfish licenses are issued annually in
the state of Washington to harvest
northern anchovy. Since 2009, the state
of Oregon has not required a permit to
harvest anchovy in Oregon waters. Jack
mackerel is currently not fished in
Oregon and Washington.
The average annual per vessel
revenue in 2013 for the West Coast CPS
finfish small purse seine fleet, as well as
the few vessels that target anchovy off
of Oregon and Washington, was below
$20.5 million; therefore, all of these
vessels are considered small businesses
under the SBA size standards. Because
each affected vessel is a small business,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
this proposed rule has an equal effect on
all of these small entities, and therefore
will impact a substantial number of
these small entities in the same manner.
The corresponding annual revenues
from these species averaged to about
$60,000 and $653,000, for jack mackerel
and anchovy respectively.
To evaluate whether this proposed
rule could potentially reduce the
profitability of the affected vessels,
NMFS compared current and average
recent historical landings to the
proposed ACLs. The proposed multiyear ACL (maximum fishing level for
each year) for the northern anchovy
central subpopulation is 25,000 mt and
the proposed northern subpopulation
ACL is 9,750 mt. In 2014, 10,511 mt of
the northern anchovy central
subpopulation and 112 mt of northern
anchovy northern subpopulation were
landed. The annual average harvest
from 2004 to 2014 for the central and
northern subpopulations of northern
anchovy is 7,300 mt and 270 mt,
respectively. The proposed jack
mackerel ACL is 31,000 mt. In 2014,
approximately 1,800 mt of jack mackerel
were landed and average annual
landings of jack mackerel over the last
ten years is 549 mt. Prior landings of
these stocks have been well below the
proposed ACLs. Therefore, although the
establishment of ACLs for these stocks
is considered a new management
measure for these fisheries, based on
current and historical landings of these
stocks, this proposed action will not
result in changes in current fishery
operations. As a result, it is unlikely
that the ACLs proposed in this rule will
limit the profitability of the fleets
catching these stocks and thus would
not impose a significant economic
impact.
The economic impact to the fleet from
the proposed action cannot be viewed in
isolation. CPS finfish vessels typically
harvest a number of other species,
including Pacific sardine, Pacific
mackerel, squid, and tuna, making these
fisheries only components of a multispecies CPS fishery. Vessels rely on
multiple species for profitability
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
72679
because each CPS stock is highly
associated with different ocean
conditions and different time periods,
and so are harvested at various times
throughout the year. Because each
species responds to ocean conditions in
its own way, not all CPS stocks are
likely to be abundant at the same time;
therefore as abundance levels and
markets fluctuate, the CPS fishery as a
whole relies on a group of species for
annual revenues. Accordingly, even if
the revenue derived from the specific e
fisheries addressed in this proposed rule
decline, such a decline will have only
a small impact, if at all, on the profits
of CPS fishery vessels.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act and the SBA’s June 20, 2013 and
June 12, 2014 final rules (78 FR 37398
and 79 FR 33647, respectively), this
certification was developed for this
action using the SBA’s revised size
standards. All entities subject to this
action are small entities as defined by
both the former, lower size standards
and the revised size standards. Because
each affected vessel is a small business,
this proposed action is considered to
equally affect all of these small entities
in the same manner. Based on the
disproportionality and profitability
analysis above, the proposed action, if
adopted, will not have adverse or
disproportional economic impact on
these small business entities. As a
result, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required, and none has
been prepared.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping,
or other compliance requirements
required by this proposed rule.
Additionally, no other Federal rules
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
proposed rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 17, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–29684 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 224 (Friday, November 20, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72676-72679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29684]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 130808697-5999-01]
RIN 0648-XC808
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Multi-Year Specifications for Monitored and Prohibited
Harvest Species Stock Categories
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to implement annual catch limits (ACL) and,
where necessary, other annual reference points (overfishing limits
(OFL) and acceptable biological catches (ABC)) for certain stocks in
the monitored and prohibited
[[Page 72677]]
harvest species categories under the Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS)
Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The proposed ACLs are: Jack mackerel,
31,000 metric tons (mt); northern subpopulation of northern anchovy,
9,750 mt; central subpopulation of northern anchovy, 25,000 mt; and
krill, zero. Additionally, an OFL of 39,000 mt, an ABC of 9,750 mt and
an annual catch target (ACT) of 1,500 mt is being proposed for the
northern subpopulation of northern anchovy. This rule is intended to
conserve and manage these stocks off the U.S. West Coast. If the ACL
for any one of these stocks is reached, then fishing for that stock
will be closed until it reopens at the start of the next fishing
season.
DATES: Comments must be received by December 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2013-0145, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0145, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to William W. Stelle, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way
NE., Seattle, WA 98115-0070; Attn: Joshua Lindsay.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the
above methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the
sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CPS fishery in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off the West Coast is managed under the CPS FMP,
which was developed by the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Pacific
Council) pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. The six species managed
under the CPS FMP are Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel, jack mackerel,
northern anchovy (northern and central subpopulations), market squid
and krill. The CPS FMP is implemented by regulations at 50 CFR part
660, subpart I.
Management unit stocks in the CPS FMP are classified under three
management categories: Actively managed; monitored; and prohibited
harvest species. Active stocks are characterized by periodic stock
assessments, and/or periodic or annual adjustments of target harvest
levels. Management of monitored stocks, in contrast, generally involves
tracking landings against the relevant ACL (previously the ABCs) and
qualitative comparison to available abundance data, but without regular
stock assessments or annual adjustments to target harvest levels.
Species in both categories may be subject to management measures such
as catch allocation, gear regulations, closed areas, closed seasons, or
other forms of ``active'' management. For example, trip limits and a
limited entry permit program are already in place for all CPS finfish.
The monitored category includes jack mackerel, two sub-populations of
northern anchovy stock and market squid. Krill is the only stock in the
prohibited harvest category. The monitored stocks have not been managed
to a hard quota like the active category stocks by NMFS (although the
state of California manages market squid with an annual limit).
Instead, landings have been monitored against harvest reference levels
to determine if overfishing is occurring and to gauge the need for more
active management such as requiring periodic stock assessments and
regular adjustments to a quota. Catches of the three finfish stocks in
the monitored category--northern anchovy (northern and central
subpopulations) and jack mackerel-- have remained well below their
respective ABC (now proposed ACL levels for jack mackerel and the
central anchovy population) since implementation of the CPS FMP in
2000, with average catches over the last 10 years of approximately
7,300 mt, 270 mt and 660 mt for the central and northern subpopulations
of northern anchovy and jack mackerel, respectively.
In September 2011, NMFS approved Amendment 13 to the CPS FMP, which
modified the framework process used to set and adjust fishery
specifications and for setting ACLs and accountability measures (AMs);
Amendment 13 was intended to ensure the FMP conforms with the 2007
amendments to the MSA and NMFS' revised MSA National Standard 1
guidelines at 50 CFR part 600. Specifically, Amendment 13 maintained
the existing reference points and the primary harvest control rules for
the monitored stocks (jack mackerel, northern anchovy and market
squid), including the large buffer built into the ABC control rule for
the finfish stocks, as well as the overfishing criteria for market
squid, but modified these reference points and control rules to align
with the revised advisory guidelines and to comply with the new
statutory requirement to establish a process for setting ACLs and AMs.
This included a default management framework under which the OFL for
each monitored stock was set equal to the maximum sustainable yield
(MSY) value and ABC was reduced from the OFL by 75 percent as an
uncertainty buffer (based on the existing ABC control rule where ABC
equals 25 percent of OFL/MSY). This default framework is used unless
there is determined to be a more appropriate OFL, as is the case for
the northern subpopulation of northern anchovy, or stock specific ABC
control rule like the proxy for the Fishing rate that is expected to
result in maximum sustainable yield (FMSY proxy) for market
squid of Egg Escapement >= 30 percent. ACLs are then set equal to the
ABC or could be set lower than the ABC, along with annual catch targets
(ACTs), if deemed necessary. These control rules and harvest policies
for monitored CPS stocks are simpler and more precautionary than those
used for actively managed stocks in recognition of the low fishing
effort and low landings for these stocks, as well as the lack of
current estimates of stock biomass.
Through this action, NMFS proposes to implement the ACLs shown in
Table 1 below for jack mackerel, the two subpopulations of northern
anchovy, and krill, as well an OFL, ABC and ACT for the northern
subpopulation of northern anchovy.
[[Page 72678]]
Table 1--Proposed ACLs for Monitored CPS Finfish, Including Proposed OFL, ABC, and ACT for the Northern
Subpopulation of Northern Anchovy
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock OFL ABC ACL ACT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack mackerel................ 126,000 mt.......... 31,000 mt........... 31,000 mt ...............
Northern anchovy, (northern 39,000 mt........... 9,750 mt............ 9,750 mt............ 1,500 mt.
subpopulation).
Northern anchovy, (central 100,000 mt.......... 25,000 mt........... 25,000 mt ...............
subpopulation).
Market squid................. FMSY proxy resulting FMSY proxy resulting ACL not required ...............
in Egg Escapement in Egg Escapement (Less than 1-year
>= 30%. >= 30%. lifecycle and no
overfishing).
Krill........................ Undefined........... Undefined........... 0 ...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OFLs and ABCs listed in Table 1 for jack mackerel, the central
subpopulation of northern anchovy, market squid and krill are included
for information purposes only. The OFL and ABC specifications for those
stocks are set in the FMP; NMFS does not propose to establish or revise
them by this proposed rule.
These proposed catch levels and reference points were recommended
to NMFS by the Pacific Council and were based on recommendations from
its advisory bodies according to the framework in the FMP established
through Amendment 13, including OFL and ABC recommendations from its
Science and Statistical Committee (SSC). The proposed ACLs for these
monitored stocks would be in place for the calendar year fishing season
(January 1-December 31), and would remain in place for each subsequent
calendar year until new scientific information becomes available to
warrant changing them, or if landings increase and consistently reach
the ABC/ACL level and it necessitates a change to active management
under the FMP. These management benchmarks provide a means to monitor
these stocks on an annual basis. Each year, the total harvest of each
stock will be assessed against the ACL until such time as the Pacific
Council chooses to reassess the management of these stocks, new
scientific information regarding these stocks becomes available, or
harvest approaches or exceeds the ACL. These benchmarks implicitly
include a postseason AM; harvest levels are monitored annually to
assess whether a stock should become actively managed.
Per the framework that was established through Amendment 13, the
OFLs for the central subpopulation of northern anchovy and jack
mackerel are set based on MSY values that were established through
Amendment 8 to the FMP. In 2015, Amendment 14 to the CPS FMP
established an FMSY of 0.3 as the MSY reference point for
the northern subpopulation of northern anchovy in the CPS FMP. However,
because the framework in the FMP for setting ABCs is based on applying
a percentage to numerical MSY/OFLs, it was necessary to determine a
numerical OFL value through the specifications process. Because the
northern subpopulation of the northern anchovy is currently lightly
fished and effort has been inconsistent over time, it was determined
that using a catch time series as a way of setting the OFL was not
appropriate as it likely was an unreliable indicator of stock status.
Therefore, the best available scientific information on the population
and biology of northern subpopulation northern anchovy was compiled to
develop an OFL. The available information included two separate
estimates of biomass; the average of these two estimates was
approximately 130,000 mt. After reviewing this information, the SSC
recommended that the OFL be set by multiplying the average of these two
biomass estimates (130,000 mt), by an FMSY 0.3, which is
also the FMSY value for Pacific mackerel. This is
appropriate because, biologically, anchovy populations are likely to be
as or more productive than Pacific mackerel. This calculation results
in an OFL of 39,000 mt and with the established uncertainty buffer of
75 percent, an ABC of 9,750 mt. Although the proposed ACL for this
stock is equal to the ABC, to further account for uncertainty
surrounding the reference points for this stock, anchovy's role as
forage, and because annual catch levels have been sustainably below the
ACL, the Pacific Council recommended, and NMFS is proposing, an ACT of
1,500 mt.
Market squid, because of its short life-cycle, falls under the
statutory exception from the requirement to set ACLs and AMs. Section
303(a)(15) of the MSA states that the requirement for ACLs ``shall not
apply to a fishery for species that has a life cycle of approximately 1
year unless the Secretary has determined the fishery is subject to
overfishing of that species.'' Market squid have a lifecycle of less
than 1 year and have not been determined to be subject to overfishing;
therefore, an ACL is not required and is not being proposed for market
squid.
NMFS is not proposing to establish or change specifications for
krill by this rulemaking. Krill are a prohibited harvest species. The
targeting, harvesting and transshipment of krill are all explicitly
prohibited; therefore, the ACL for krill is zero. Because the harvest
level is zero, setting an OFL or ABC for krill would serve no function
and is not being proposed in this rule.
If the proposed ACL and/or ACT levels are reached, or are expected
to be reached, for one of these fisheries, the directed fishery would
be closed until the beginning of the next fishing season. The NMFS West
Coast Regional Administrator would publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing the date of any such closure. Additionally, nearing
or exceeding one of these ACLs or the ACT would trigger a review of
whether the fishery should be moved into the actively managed category
of the FMP.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the CPS FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, for the following reasons:
[[Page 72679]]
The primary action being implemented through this rule as it
relates to potential economic impacts on small entities is the
establishment of multi-year ACLs for the two sub-stocks of northern
anchovy and for jack mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast.
The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to set ACLs
for these fisheries based on the harvest control rules in the FMP.
On June 12, 2014, the SBA issued an interim final rule revising the
small business size standards for several industries effective July 14,
2014 (79 FR 33647). The rule increased the size standard for Finfish
Fishing from $19.0 to 20.5 million, Shellfish Fishing from $5.0 to 5.5
million, and Other Marine Fishing from $7.0 to 7.5 million. 79 FR
33650, 33656 (June 12, 2014). NMFS conducted its analysis for this
action in light of the new size standards.
The entities that would be affected by the proposed action are the
vessels that harvest jack mackerel and northern anchovy as part of the
West Coast CPS purse seine fleet. Jack mackerel and northern anchovy
are components of the CPS purse seine fishery off the U.S. West Coast,
which generally fishes a complex of species, including Pacific sardine,
Pacific mackerel and market squid. Currently there are 58 vessels
permitted in the Federal CPS limited entry fishery off California.
Annually 28 to 45 (average 39) of these CPS vessels landed anchovy and
jack mackerel over the last five years. Approximately 26 baitfish
licenses are issued annually in the state of Washington to harvest
northern anchovy. Since 2009, the state of Oregon has not required a
permit to harvest anchovy in Oregon waters. Jack mackerel is currently
not fished in Oregon and Washington.
The average annual per vessel revenue in 2013 for the West Coast
CPS finfish small purse seine fleet, as well as the few vessels that
target anchovy off of Oregon and Washington, was below $20.5 million;
therefore, all of these vessels are considered small businesses under
the SBA size standards. Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed rule has an equal effect on all of these small
entities, and therefore will impact a substantial number of these small
entities in the same manner. The corresponding annual revenues from
these species averaged to about $60,000 and $653,000, for jack mackerel
and anchovy respectively.
To evaluate whether this proposed rule could potentially reduce the
profitability of the affected vessels, NMFS compared current and
average recent historical landings to the proposed ACLs. The proposed
multi-year ACL (maximum fishing level for each year) for the northern
anchovy central subpopulation is 25,000 mt and the proposed northern
subpopulation ACL is 9,750 mt. In 2014, 10,511 mt of the northern
anchovy central subpopulation and 112 mt of northern anchovy northern
subpopulation were landed. The annual average harvest from 2004 to 2014
for the central and northern subpopulations of northern anchovy is
7,300 mt and 270 mt, respectively. The proposed jack mackerel ACL is
31,000 mt. In 2014, approximately 1,800 mt of jack mackerel were landed
and average annual landings of jack mackerel over the last ten years is
549 mt. Prior landings of these stocks have been well below the
proposed ACLs. Therefore, although the establishment of ACLs for these
stocks is considered a new management measure for these fisheries,
based on current and historical landings of these stocks, this proposed
action will not result in changes in current fishery operations. As a
result, it is unlikely that the ACLs proposed in this rule will limit
the profitability of the fleets catching these stocks and thus would
not impose a significant economic impact.
The economic impact to the fleet from the proposed action cannot be
viewed in isolation. CPS finfish vessels typically harvest a number of
other species, including Pacific sardine, Pacific mackerel, squid, and
tuna, making these fisheries only components of a multi-species CPS
fishery. Vessels rely on multiple species for profitability because
each CPS stock is highly associated with different ocean conditions and
different time periods, and so are harvested at various times
throughout the year. Because each species responds to ocean conditions
in its own way, not all CPS stocks are likely to be abundant at the
same time; therefore as abundance levels and markets fluctuate, the CPS
fishery as a whole relies on a group of species for annual revenues.
Accordingly, even if the revenue derived from the specific e fisheries
addressed in this proposed rule decline, such a decline will have only
a small impact, if at all, on the profits of CPS fishery vessels.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the SBA's June 20,
2013 and June 12, 2014 final rules (78 FR 37398 and 79 FR 33647,
respectively), this certification was developed for this action using
the SBA's revised size standards. All entities subject to this action
are small entities as defined by both the former, lower size standards
and the revised size standards. Because each affected vessel is a small
business, this proposed action is considered to equally affect all of
these small entities in the same manner. Based on the
disproportionality and profitability analysis above, the proposed
action, if adopted, will not have adverse or disproportional economic
impact on these small business entities. As a result, an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required, and none has been
prepared.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements required by this proposed rule. Additionally, no other
Federal rules duplicate, overlap or conflict with this proposed rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 17, 2015.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-29684 Filed 11-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P