Medicare Program; Request for Information To Aid in the Design and Development of a Survey Regarding Patient and Family Member Experiences With Care Received in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities, 72725-72727 [2015-29623]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
++ CAHPS® trademark status.
++ NQF endorsement status.
++ Survey administration
instructions.
++ Data analysis instructions.
++ Guidelines for reporting survey
data.
If you wish to provide comment on
this information collection, please
submit your comments as specified in
the ADDRESSES section of this request for
information.
Comments must be received on/by
January 19, 2016.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This RFI does not impose any
information collection requirements. We
believe it is a solicitation of comments
from the general public. As stated in the
implementing regulations of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
at 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4), it is exempt from
the requirements of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) .
The data collected via this RFI will be
used to develop the LTCH PEC Survey.
While surveys are generally subject to
the requirements of the PRA, we believe
the LTCH PEC Survey is exempt.
Section I of this RFI explains that we
plan to collect this information in
support of the NQS and, under sections
1886(m)(5) and 1890A(e) of the the Act
and develop the LTCH PEC Survey into
a quality measure that we may consider
proposing for adoption in the LTCH
Quality Reporting Program (QRP). In
accordance with section 102 of the
Medicare Access and CHIP
Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA)
(Pub. L. 114–110), the PRA shall not
apply to the collection of information
for the development of quality
measures.
Also, as stated earlier in section I. of
this RFI, we will develop the CMS
LTCH PEC Survey in accordance with
CAHPS® Survey Design Principles and
are developing this survey and plans to
submit the resulting instrument to
AHRQ for recognition as a CAHPS®
survey. Upon receiving recognition as a
CAHPS® survey and prior to
implementation, CMS will submit the
CAHPS recognized LTCH PEC Survey
through the OMB approval process. At
that time, the public will have the
opportunity to review, comment, or
review and comment on the proposed
information collection request prior to
its submission to OMB for review and
approval.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Dated: November 6, 2015.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–29622 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–3328–NC]
Medicare Program; Request for
Information To Aid in the Design and
Development of a Survey Regarding
Patient and Family Member
Experiences With Care Received in
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
This request for information
will aid in the design and development
of a survey regarding patient and family
member experiences with the care
received in inpatient rehabilitation
facilities (IRFs).
Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file
code CMS–3328–NC. Because of staff
and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–3328–NC, P.O. Box 8016,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8016.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72725
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–3328–NC,
Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments only to the
following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–7195 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith Harvilchuck, Ph.D., 410–786–
3527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All
comments received before the close of
the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
72726
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Notices
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
In accordance with section 399HH of
the Public Health Service Act (PHSA),
as added by section 3011 of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111–148, enacted on Mar. 23,
2010), the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) developed the
National Quality Strategy (NQS), which
is led by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ), to create
national aims and priorities to guide
local, state, and national efforts to
improve the quality of health care
(https://www.ahrq.gov/workingfor
quality/). The NQS established three
aims supported by six priorities.
The three aims are as follows:
• Better Care: Improve the overall
quality, by making health care more
patient-centered, reliable, accessible,
and safe.
• Healthy People/Healthy
Communities: Improve the health of the
U.S. population by supporting proven
interventions to address behavioral,
social, and environmental determinants
of health in addition to delivering
higher-quality care.
• Affordable Care: Reduce the cost of
quality health care for individuals,
families, employers, and government.
The six priorities are: (1) Making care
safer by reducing harm caused by the
delivery of care; (2) ensuring that each
person and family are engaged as
partners in their care; (3) promoting
effective communication and
coordination of care; (4) promoting the
most effective prevention and treatment
practices for the leading causes of
mortality, starting with cardiovascular
disease; (5) working with communities
to promote wide use of best practices to
enable healthy living; and (6) making
quality care more affordable for
individuals, families, employers, and
governments by developing new health
care delivery models.
To support the collection of data that
can be used to pursue these aims and
progress on these priorities in the IRF
setting, we are developing a survey
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘IRF
Patient and Family Member Experience
of Care (PEC) Survey,’’ which supports
the NQS goal of Better Care and the
priorities of:
• Ensuring that each person and
family are engaged as partners in their
care (priority #2); and
• Promoting effective communication
and coordination of care (priority #3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
Under authority of sections 1886(j)(7)
and 1890A(e) of the Social Security Act
(the Act), we plan to collect this
information in support of the NQS aims.
When this survey is fully developed, we
will consider proposing it for adoption
as a quality measure under the IRF
Quality Reporting Program (QRP) (for
details on CMS’ measure development
process, please see the Blueprint at
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/QualityInitiatives-Patient-AssessmentInstruments/MMS/Measures
ManagementSystemBlueprint.html). We
intend to develop the IRF PEC Survey
in accordance with Consumer
Assessment of Healthcare Providers and
Systems (CAHPS®) Survey Design
Principles and submit the resulting
instrument to AHRQ for recognition as
a CAHPS® survey. CAHPS® Survey
Design Principles and implementation
instructions can be found at https://
www.cahps.ahrq.gov/about-cahps/
principles/.
We have previously implemented a
number of nationwide patient
experience CAHPS® surveys in both
inpatient and outpatient settings and for
different services. Specifically, we
implemented CAHPS® surveys for
Medicare health and drug plans,
inpatient hospitals, home health
agencies, in-center dialysis facilities,
hospices, and Accountable Care
Organizations, and recently developed a
CAHPS® survey for outpatient and
ambulatory surgery centers; and we
have begun development of a Long
Term Care Hospital Patient Experience
of Care Survey. The planned IRF PEC
Survey differs from other CMS PEC
surveys because the target population
for the IRF PEC Survey consists of
patients who have significant
rehabilitation needs, some of which are
complex. Although the vast majority of
IRFs exist as part of acute care hospitals,
IRF patients are specifically excluded
from the survey population of the
Hospital CAHPS® surveys for purposes
of CMS’ Hospital Inpatient Quality
Reporting Program.
IRFs are hospitals or units of acute
care (or critical access) hospitals that
provide intensive rehabilitation services
to patients typically following an injury,
illness, or surgery.1 Patient who are
admitted require intensive rehabilitation
therapy services, as documented by
physician assessment, which are
uniquely provided in IRFs. Although
the intensity of these services can be
reflected in various ways, the generallyaccepted standard by which it is
typically demonstrated in IRFs is by the
1 https://www.medpac.gov/documents/reports/
mar14_ch10.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provision of intensive therapies at least
3 hours a day for 5 days a week.2 This
resource-intensive inpatient hospital
environment is for patients who, due to
the complexity of their nursing, medical
management, and rehabilitation needs,
require an inpatient stay and an
interdisciplinary team approach to the
delivery of rehabilitation care.
We believe that the following aspects
of IRF care that would have to be taken
into consideration in developing the
survey, but we invite comment on these
considerations as well as any potential
omissions from this list:
• Complexity of rehabilitation needs
and long-term options.
• Interdisciplinary team approach to
care delivery.
• Coordination and collaboration on
patient and medical goals of care when
many patients have goals of returning to
their home- or community-based setting.
• Patient and family education on the
types and limitations of rehabilitative
services and long-term levels of care and
supports following IRF discharge.
• Addressing psycho-social needs
related to the oftentimes unexpected
setback that resulted in the IRF stay.
Given the unique environment and
patient population of the IRF setting, we
are exploring the level of adequacy of
existing patient experience of care
instruments designed for other settings
for capturing IRF care experiences.
Therefore, we are in the process of
reviewing potential topic areas (as
discussed in section II. of this RFI), as
well as publicly available instruments
and measures, for the purpose of
developing an IRF PEC Survey that will
enable objective comparisons of IRF
experiences across the country. A
rigorous, well-designed IRF PEC Survey
will allow us to understand patient
experiences throughout their IRF care,
as reported by the patients themselves,
if possible, or by family members.
Should we ultimately adopt the IRF PEC
Survey as a quality measure in the IRF
QRP, the public reporting of data from
the measure could help consumers
make more informed decisions about
different IRF providers, as well as drive
improvements in the quality of IRF care.
II. Solicitation of Information
We are soliciting the submission of
suggested topic areas such as
communication with providers,
rehabilitation, functional status, pain
management/control or non-pain
symptom management (including
2 https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/
Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/
downloads/Inpatient_Rehab_Fact_Sheet_
ICN905643.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Notices
offering of alternative non-opioid pain
management, discussion of safe storage
and proper disposal of opioids,
screening for overdose risk, and review
the history of substance use), discharge
planning, family training, rehabilitation
services, medical and nursing care,
interdisciplinary team goal setting and
care planning. We are also soliciting
information on publicly available
instruments for capturing patients’ and
family members’ experiences with IRF
care in a variety of formats (for example,
standardized, computer readable format)
that can be collected by providers or
CAHPS® survey vendors. We are
interested in suggested topic areas and
publicly available instruments that can
measure the quality of care from the
patients’ and/or family members’
perspective in IRFs within acute-care
hospitals, critical access hospitals, and
free-standing facilities; instruments that
can be used to track changes over time;
and items that are developed for and/or
can be modified to address low case
volume. Existing instruments are
preferred if they have been tested, have
been found to have a high degree of
reliability and validity, and for which
there is evidence of wide use in one or
more patient care settings, including
those in rural and frontier communities.
Instruments capable of risk adjustment,
and/or instruments that minimize
duplication of efforts and/or that utilize
common quality measures, where
available, are preferred. Whenever
possible, preference will be given to
quality measures identified by the
Secretary under section 1139A or 1139B
of the Act, or endorsed under section
1890 of the Act.
The following information would be
especially helpful in any comments
responding to this request for
information:
• A brief cover letter summarizing the
information requested for submitted
instruments and topic areas,
respectively, and how the submitted
materials could be used to help fulfil the
intent of the survey.
• (Optional) Information about the
person submitting the materials for the
purpose of follow-up questions about
the submission, which includes the
following:
++ Name.
++ Title.
++ Organization.
++ Mailing address.
++ Telephone number.
++ Email address.
• When submitting topic areas, we
encourage including, to the extent
available, the following information:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
++ Detailed descriptions of the
suggested topic area(s) and specific
purpose(s).
++ Relevant peer-reviewed journal
articles or full citations.
• When submitting publicly available
instruments or survey questions, we
encourage including to the extent
available the following information:
++ Name of the instrument.
++ Indication that the instrument is
publicly available.
++ Copies of the full instrument in all
available languages.
++ Topic areas included in the
instrument.
++ Measures that can be derived from
data collected using the instrument.
++ Instrument reliability (internal
consistency, test-retest, etc.) and
validity (content, construct, criterion
related).
++ Results of cognitive testing (oneon-one testing with a small number of
respondents to ensure that they
understand the questionnaire.)
++ Results of field testing.
++ Current use of the instrument
(who is using it, what it is being used
for, what population it is being used
with, how instrument findings are
reported, and by whom the findings are
used).
++ Relevant peer-reviewed journal
articles or full citations.
++ CAHPS® trademark status.
++ NQF endorsement status.
++ Survey administration
instructions.
++ Data analysis instructions.
++ Guidelines for reporting survey
data.
If you wish to provide comments on
this information collection, please
submit your comments as specified in
the ADDRESSES section of this request for
information.
Comments must be received on/by
January 19, 2016.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This RFI does not impose any
information collection requirements. We
believe it is a solicitation of comments
from the general public. As stated in the
implementing regulations of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
at 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4), it is exempt from
the requirements of the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
The data collected via this RFI will be
used to develop the IRF PEC Survey.
While surveys are generally subject to
the requirements of the PRA, we believe
the IRF PEC Survey is exempt. Section
I. of this RFI explains that we plan to
collect this information in support of
the NQS and, under sections 1886(j)(7)
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72727
and 1890A(e) of the Act and develop the
IRF PEC Survey into a quality measure
that we may consider proposing for
adoption in the IRF Quality Reporting
Program (QRP). In accordance with
section 102 of the Medicare Access and
CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015
(MACRA) (Pub. L. 114–110), the PRA
shall not apply to the collection of
information for the development of
quality measures.
Also, as stated earlier in section I. of
this RFI, we will develop the CMS IRF
PEC Survey in accordance with
CAHPS® Survey Design Principles and
are developing this survey and plans to
submit the resulting instrument to
AHRQ for recognition as a CAHPS®
survey. Upon receiving recognition as a
CAHPS® survey and prior to
implementation, CMS will submit the
CAHPS recognized IRF PEC Survey
through the OMB approval process. At
that time, the public will have the
opportunity to review, comment, or
review and comment on the proposed
information collection request prior to
its submission to OMB for review and
approval.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Dated: November 6, 2015.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–29623 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0145]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Improving Food
Safety and Defense Capacity of the
State and Local Level: Review of State
and Local Capacities
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
Notice.
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 224 (Friday, November 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72725-72727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29623]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-3328-NC]
Medicare Program; Request for Information To Aid in the Design
and Development of a Survey Regarding Patient and Family Member
Experiences With Care Received in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This request for information will aid in the design and
development of a survey regarding patient and family member experiences
with the care received in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs).
Comment Date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, refer to file code CMS-3328-NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile
(FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3328-NC, P.O. Box 8016,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8016.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3328-NC, Mail
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments only to the following addresses:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC-- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD--Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
call telephone number (410) 786-7195 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as
appropriate for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received
after the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Harvilchuck, Ph.D., 410-786-
3527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments: All comments received before the
close of the comment period are available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or confidential business
information that is included in a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web site to
view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
[[Page 72726]]
through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments, phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
In accordance with section 399HH of the Public Health Service Act
(PHSA), as added by section 3011 of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148, enacted on Mar. 23, 2010), the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) developed the National
Quality Strategy (NQS), which is led by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ), to create national aims and priorities to
guide local, state, and national efforts to improve the quality of
health care (https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/). The NQS
established three aims supported by six priorities.
The three aims are as follows:
Better Care: Improve the overall quality, by making health
care more patient-centered, reliable, accessible, and safe.
Healthy People/Healthy Communities: Improve the health of
the U.S. population by supporting proven interventions to address
behavioral, social, and environmental determinants of health in
addition to delivering higher-quality care.
Affordable Care: Reduce the cost of quality health care
for individuals, families, employers, and government.
The six priorities are: (1) Making care safer by reducing harm
caused by the delivery of care; (2) ensuring that each person and
family are engaged as partners in their care; (3) promoting effective
communication and coordination of care; (4) promoting the most
effective prevention and treatment practices for the leading causes of
mortality, starting with cardiovascular disease; (5) working with
communities to promote wide use of best practices to enable healthy
living; and (6) making quality care more affordable for individuals,
families, employers, and governments by developing new health care
delivery models.
To support the collection of data that can be used to pursue these
aims and progress on these priorities in the IRF setting, we are
developing a survey hereinafter referred to as the ``IRF Patient and
Family Member Experience of Care (PEC) Survey,'' which supports the NQS
goal of Better Care and the priorities of:
Ensuring that each person and family are engaged as
partners in their care (priority #2); and
Promoting effective communication and coordination of care
(priority #3).
Under authority of sections 1886(j)(7) and 1890A(e) of the Social
Security Act (the Act), we plan to collect this information in support
of the NQS aims. When this survey is fully developed, we will consider
proposing it for adoption as a quality measure under the IRF Quality
Reporting Program (QRP) (for details on CMS' measure development
process, please see the Blueprint at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/MeasuresManagementSystemBlueprint.html). We intend to develop the IRF
PEC Survey in accordance with Consumer Assessment of Healthcare
Providers and Systems (CAHPS[supreg]) Survey Design Principles and
submit the resulting instrument to AHRQ for recognition as a
CAHPS[supreg] survey. CAHPS[supreg] Survey Design Principles and
implementation instructions can be found at https://www.cahps.ahrq.gov/about-cahps/principles/.
We have previously implemented a number of nationwide patient
experience CAHPS[supreg] surveys in both inpatient and outpatient
settings and for different services. Specifically, we implemented
CAHPS[supreg] surveys for Medicare health and drug plans, inpatient
hospitals, home health agencies, in-center dialysis facilities,
hospices, and Accountable Care Organizations, and recently developed a
CAHPS[supreg] survey for outpatient and ambulatory surgery centers; and
we have begun development of a Long Term Care Hospital Patient
Experience of Care Survey. The planned IRF PEC Survey differs from
other CMS PEC surveys because the target population for the IRF PEC
Survey consists of patients who have significant rehabilitation needs,
some of which are complex. Although the vast majority of IRFs exist as
part of acute care hospitals, IRF patients are specifically excluded
from the survey population of the Hospital CAHPS[supreg] surveys for
purposes of CMS' Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program.
IRFs are hospitals or units of acute care (or critical access)
hospitals that provide intensive rehabilitation services to patients
typically following an injury, illness, or surgery.\1\ Patient who are
admitted require intensive rehabilitation therapy services, as
documented by physician assessment, which are uniquely provided in
IRFs. Although the intensity of these services can be reflected in
various ways, the generally-accepted standard by which it is typically
demonstrated in IRFs is by the provision of intensive therapies at
least 3 hours a day for 5 days a week.\2\ This resource-intensive
inpatient hospital environment is for patients who, due to the
complexity of their nursing, medical management, and rehabilitation
needs, require an inpatient stay and an interdisciplinary team approach
to the delivery of rehabilitation care.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.medpac.gov/documents/reports/mar14_ch10.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
\2\ https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/Inpatient_Rehab_Fact_Sheet_ICN905643.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe that the following aspects of IRF care that would have
to be taken into consideration in developing the survey, but we invite
comment on these considerations as well as any potential omissions from
this list:
Complexity of rehabilitation needs and long-term options.
Interdisciplinary team approach to care delivery.
Coordination and collaboration on patient and medical
goals of care when many patients have goals of returning to their home-
or community-based setting.
Patient and family education on the types and limitations
of rehabilitative services and long-term levels of care and supports
following IRF discharge.
Addressing psycho-social needs related to the oftentimes
unexpected setback that resulted in the IRF stay.
Given the unique environment and patient population of the IRF
setting, we are exploring the level of adequacy of existing patient
experience of care instruments designed for other settings for
capturing IRF care experiences. Therefore, we are in the process of
reviewing potential topic areas (as discussed in section II. of this
RFI), as well as publicly available instruments and measures, for the
purpose of developing an IRF PEC Survey that will enable objective
comparisons of IRF experiences across the country. A rigorous, well-
designed IRF PEC Survey will allow us to understand patient experiences
throughout their IRF care, as reported by the patients themselves, if
possible, or by family members. Should we ultimately adopt the IRF PEC
Survey as a quality measure in the IRF QRP, the public reporting of
data from the measure could help consumers make more informed decisions
about different IRF providers, as well as drive improvements in the
quality of IRF care.
II. Solicitation of Information
We are soliciting the submission of suggested topic areas such as
communication with providers, rehabilitation, functional status, pain
management/control or non-pain symptom management (including
[[Page 72727]]
offering of alternative non-opioid pain management, discussion of safe
storage and proper disposal of opioids, screening for overdose risk,
and review the history of substance use), discharge planning, family
training, rehabilitation services, medical and nursing care,
interdisciplinary team goal setting and care planning. We are also
soliciting information on publicly available instruments for capturing
patients' and family members' experiences with IRF care in a variety of
formats (for example, standardized, computer readable format) that can
be collected by providers or CAHPS[supreg] survey vendors. We are
interested in suggested topic areas and publicly available instruments
that can measure the quality of care from the patients' and/or family
members' perspective in IRFs within acute-care hospitals, critical
access hospitals, and free-standing facilities; instruments that can be
used to track changes over time; and items that are developed for and/
or can be modified to address low case volume. Existing instruments are
preferred if they have been tested, have been found to have a high
degree of reliability and validity, and for which there is evidence of
wide use in one or more patient care settings, including those in rural
and frontier communities. Instruments capable of risk adjustment, and/
or instruments that minimize duplication of efforts and/or that utilize
common quality measures, where available, are preferred. Whenever
possible, preference will be given to quality measures identified by
the Secretary under section 1139A or 1139B of the Act, or endorsed
under section 1890 of the Act.
The following information would be especially helpful in any
comments responding to this request for information:
A brief cover letter summarizing the information requested
for submitted instruments and topic areas, respectively, and how the
submitted materials could be used to help fulfil the intent of the
survey.
(Optional) Information about the person submitting the
materials for the purpose of follow-up questions about the submission,
which includes the following:
++ Name.
++ Title.
++ Organization.
++ Mailing address.
++ Telephone number.
++ Email address.
When submitting topic areas, we encourage including, to
the extent available, the following information:
++ Detailed descriptions of the suggested topic area(s) and
specific purpose(s).
++ Relevant peer-reviewed journal articles or full citations.
When submitting publicly available instruments or survey
questions, we encourage including to the extent available the following
information:
++ Name of the instrument.
++ Indication that the instrument is publicly available.
++ Copies of the full instrument in all available languages.
++ Topic areas included in the instrument.
++ Measures that can be derived from data collected using the
instrument.
++ Instrument reliability (internal consistency, test-retest, etc.)
and validity (content, construct, criterion related).
++ Results of cognitive testing (one-on-one testing with a small
number of respondents to ensure that they understand the
questionnaire.)
++ Results of field testing.
++ Current use of the instrument (who is using it, what it is being
used for, what population it is being used with, how instrument
findings are reported, and by whom the findings are used).
++ Relevant peer-reviewed journal articles or full citations.
++ CAHPS[supreg] trademark status.
++ NQF endorsement status.
++ Survey administration instructions.
++ Data analysis instructions.
++ Guidelines for reporting survey data.
If you wish to provide comments on this information collection,
please submit your comments as specified in the ADDRESSES section of
this request for information.
Comments must be received on/by January 19, 2016.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This RFI does not impose any information collection requirements.
We believe it is a solicitation of comments from the general public. As
stated in the implementing regulations of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) at 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4), it is exempt from the requirements
of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The data collected via this RFI will be used to develop the IRF PEC
Survey. While surveys are generally subject to the requirements of the
PRA, we believe the IRF PEC Survey is exempt. Section I. of this RFI
explains that we plan to collect this information in support of the NQS
and, under sections 1886(j)(7) and 1890A(e) of the Act and develop the
IRF PEC Survey into a quality measure that we may consider proposing
for adoption in the IRF Quality Reporting Program (QRP). In accordance
with section 102 of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of
2015 (MACRA) (Pub. L. 114-110), the PRA shall not apply to the
collection of information for the development of quality measures.
Also, as stated earlier in section I. of this RFI, we will develop
the CMS IRF PEC Survey in accordance with CAHPS[supreg] Survey Design
Principles and are developing this survey and plans to submit the
resulting instrument to AHRQ for recognition as a CAHPS[supreg] survey.
Upon receiving recognition as a CAHPS[supreg] survey and prior to
implementation, CMS will submit the CAHPS recognized IRF PEC Survey
through the OMB approval process. At that time, the public will have
the opportunity to review, comment, or review and comment on the
proposed information collection request prior to its submission to OMB
for review and approval.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
Dated: November 6, 2015.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-29623 Filed 11-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P