Equal Access in Accordance With an Individual's Gender Identity in Community Planning and Development Programs, 72642-72649 [2015-29342]
Download as PDF
72642
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for FTA. Otherwise, requests for
deviations from the procedures in this
regulation because of emergency
circumstances (40 CFR 1506.11) shall be
referred to the Administration’s
headquarters for evaluation and
decision after consultation with CEQ.
■ 18. Revise § 771.133 to read as
follows:
§ 771.133 Compliance with other
requirements.
(a) The combined final EIS/ROD, final
EIS or FONSI should document
compliance with requirements of all
applicable environmental laws,
Executive orders, and other related
requirements. If full compliance is not
possible by the time the combined final
EIS/ROD, final EIS or FONSI is
prepared, the combined final EIS/ROD,
final EIS or FONSI should reflect
consultation with the appropriate
agencies and provide reasonable
assurance that the requirements will be
met. Approval of the environmental
document constitutes adoption of any
Administration findings and
determinations that are contained
therein. The FHWA’s approval of an
environmental document constitutes its
finding of compliance with the report
requirements of 23 U.S.C. 128.
(b) In consultation with the
Administration and subject to
Administration approval, an applicant
may develop a programmatic approach
for compliance with the requirements of
any law, regulation, or Executive order
applicable to the project development
process.
§ 771.139
[Amended]
19. Revise § 771.139 by replacing
‘‘180’’ with ‘‘150’’ in the second and
third sentences.
■
PART 774—PARKS, RECREATION
AREAS, WILDLIFE AND WATERFOWL
REFUGES, AND HISTORIC SITES
(SECTION 4(f))
20. Revise the authority citation for
part 774 to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 103(c), 109(h), 138,
325, 326, 327 and 204(h)(2); 49 U.S.C. 303;
Section 6009 of the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act:
A Legacy for Users (Pub. L. 109–59, Aug. 10,
2005, 119 Stat. 1144); 49 CFR 1.81 and 1.91.
21. Revise § 774.11(i) to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 774.11
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) When a property is formally
reserved for a future transportation
facility before or at the same time a
park, recreation area, or wildlife and
waterfowl refuge is established, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
§ 774.13
Exceptions.
*
■
■
concurrent or joint planning or
development of the transportation
facility and the Section 4(f) resource
occurs, then any resulting impacts of the
transportation facility will not be
considered a use as defined in § 774.17.
(1) Formal reservation of a property
for a future transportation use can be
demonstrated by a government
document created prior to or
contemporaneously with the
establishment of the park, recreation
area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge.
Examples of an adequate document to
formally reserve a future transportation
use include:
(i) A government map that depicts a
transportation facility on the property;
(ii) A land use or zoning plan
depicting a transportation facility on the
property; or
(iii) A fully executed real estate
instrument that references a future
transportation facility on the property.
(2) Concurrent or joint planning or
development can be demonstrated by a
government document created after,
contemporaneously with, or prior to the
establishment of the Section 4(f)
property. Examples of an adequate
document to demonstrate concurrent or
joint planning or development include:
(i) A government document that
describes or depicts the designation or
donation of the property for both the
potential transportation facility and the
Section 4(f) property; or
(ii) A government agency map,
memorandum, planning document,
report, or correspondence that describes
or depicts action taken with respect to
the property by two or more
governmental agencies with jurisdiction
for the potential transportation facility
and the Section 4(f) property, in
consultation with each other.
■ 22. Amend § 774.13 by revising
paragraphs (e) and (g) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(e) Projects for the Federal lands
transportation facilities described in 23
U.S.C. 101(a)(8).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Transportation enhancement
activities, transportation alternatives
projects, and mitigation activities,
where:
(1) The use of the Section 4(f)
property is solely for the purpose of
preserving or enhancing an activity,
feature, or attribute that qualifies the
property for Section 4(f) protection; and
(2) The official(s) with jurisdiction
over the Section 4(f) resource agrees in
writing to paragraph (g)(1) of this
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
TITLE 49—Transportation
PART 622—ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
AND RELATED PROCEDURES
23. Amend authority citation for part
622 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 49
U.S.C. 303 and 5323(q); 23 U.S.C. 139 and
326; Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, Sections
6002 and 6010; 40 CFR parts 1500–1508; 49
CFR 1.81; and Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405,
Sections 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, and 1319.
[FR Doc. 2015–29413 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR–5863–P–01]
RIN 2506–AC40
Equal Access in Accordance With an
Individual’s Gender Identity in
Community Planning and Development
Programs
Office of the Secretary, HUD.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As the Nation’s housing
agency, HUD administers programs
designed to meet the goal of ensuring
decent housing and a suitable living
environment for all. In furtherance of
this goal, in February 2012, HUD
promulgated a final rule entitled ‘‘Equal
Access to Housing in HUD Programs
Regardless of Sexual Orientation or
Gender Identity’’ (Equal Access Rule),
which requires that HUD-assisted and
HUD-insured housing be made available
without regard to actual or perceived
sexual orientation, gender identity, or
marital status, and which generally
prohibits inquiries into sexual
orientation or gender identity for the
purpose of determining eligibility for
such housing or otherwise making such
housing available. HUD’s Equal Access
Rule provides a limited exception for
inquiries about the sex of an individual
to determine eligibility for housing
provided or to be provided to the
individual when the housing is a
temporary, emergency shelter that
involves the sharing of sleeping areas or
bathrooms, or for inquiries made for the
purpose of determining the number of
bedrooms to which a household may be
entitled. At that time, HUD decided not
to set national policy regarding how
transgender persons would be
accommodated in temporary, emergency
shelters that involve shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities, but
instead decided to monitor and review
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
its programs to determine if transgender
individuals had greater access to
temporary, emergency shelters as a
result of the rule or if additional
guidance or a national policy was
warranted. HUD also committed to
review the prohibition on inquiries
contained in the Equal Access Rule.
HUD has now monitored and reviewed
its programs and, based on that review,
is proposing this rule to require
recipients and subrecipients of
assistance from HUD’s Office of
Community Planning and Development
(CPD), as well as owners, operators, and
managers of shelters, buildings, and
other facilities and providers of services
covered by CPD’s programs, to provide
transgender persons and other persons
who do not identify with the sex they
were assigned at birth with access to
programs, benefits, services, and
accommodations in accordance with
their gender identity. This proposed
rule would also amend the definition of
‘‘gender identity’’ included in HUD’s
Equal Access Rule so the definition
more clearly reflects the difference
between actual and perceived gender
identity. Finally, HUD has completed its
review of the inquiries provision, and
the proposed rule would eliminate the
Equal Access Rule’s current prohibition
on inquiries related to sexual
orientation or gender identity, while
maintaining the prohibition against
discrimination on those bases.
DATES: Comment Date: January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room
10276, Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Communications must refer to the above
docket number and title. There are two
methods for submitting public
comments. All submissions must refer
to the above docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail.
Comments may be submitted by mail to
the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
2. Electronic Submission of
Comments. Interested persons may
submit comments electronically through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic
submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare
and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
make them immediately available to the
public. Comments submitted
electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be
viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public
comments, comments must be submitted
through one of the two methods specified
above. Again, all submissions must refer to
the docket number and title of the rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile
(fax) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public
Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications
submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between
8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at the
above address. Due to security measures
at the HUD Headquarters building, an
advance appointment to review the
public comments must be scheduled by
calling the Regulations Division at 202–
708–3055 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing and individuals with
speech impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service, toll free, at 800–877–
8339. Copies of all comments submitted
are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norm Suchar, Director, Office of Special
Needs Assistance Programs, Office of
Community Planning and Development,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20410–7000; telephone
number 202–708–4300 (this is not a tollfree number). Persons who are deaf or
hard of hearing and persons with speech
impairments can access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339 (this is
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In order to address evidence of
arbitrary exclusion of lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender individuals
(LGBT) and their families from housing
opportunities, HUD published its Equal
Access Rule in the Federal Register on
February 3, 2012, at 77 FR 5662. The
Equal Access Rule, codified primarily at
24 CFR 5.100 and 5.105(a)(2) and in
applicable program regulations, defines
the terms sexual orientation and gender
identity, at 24 CFR 5.100, and requires,
at 24 CFR 5.105(a)(2), that housing
assisted or insured by HUD be made
available to individuals and families
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72643
without regard to an individual’s actual
or perceived sexual orientation, gender
identity, or marital status. Certain other
rules governing HUD housing programs
were revised to clarify that all otherwise
eligible families, regardless of sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital
status of any member, have the
opportunity to participate in HUD
programs. The 2012 rule also revised 24
CFR 203.33(b) by adding sexual
orientation and gender identity, in
addition to marital status, to the
characteristics that an FHA-certified
lender may not take into consideration
in determining the adequacy of a
mortgagor’s income.
Further, § 5.105(a)(2)(ii) prohibits
owners and administrators of HUDassisted or HUD-insured housing,
approved lenders in a Federal Housing
Administration (FHA) mortgage
insurance program, and any other
recipients or subrecipients of HUD
funds from inquiring about sexual
orientation or gender identity to
determine eligibility for HUD-assisted or
HUD-insured housing or otherwise
make such housing available. The
prohibition on inquiries regarding
sexual orientation or gender identity
does not prohibit individuals from
voluntarily self-identifying sexual
orientation or gender identity. Further,
the rule provides a limited exception for
inquiries about the sex of an individual
to determine eligibility for housing
provided or to be provided in
temporary, emergency shelters with
shared sleeping areas or bathrooms, or
to determine the number of bedrooms to
which a household may be entitled.
In response to public comments
recommending that HUD-assisted
programs accommodate individuals in
accordance with their gender identity,
HUD stated in the preamble to the Equal
Access Rule that it was not adopting a
national policy on the placement of
transgender persons in temporary,
emergency shelters with shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities at
that time, but would instead monitor its
programs to determine whether
additional guidance or a national policy
was needed to ensure equal access. In
response to comments on the
permissibility of inquiries about an
individual’s sex, HUD stated in the
preamble to the Equal Access Rule that
HUD would monitor its programs and
review the prohibition on inquiries to
determine whether additional guidance
was necessary to provide transgender
individuals with equal access to shelters
and other housing. The Fair Housing
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
72644
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Act 1 prohibits discrimination in the
sale, rental, making unavailable, or
financing of dwellings and in other
housing-related activities on the basis of
race, color, religion, sex, disability,
familial status, and national origin, and
thus prohibits making housing
unavailable to a person because of that
person’s sex. However, temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities that are not covered by the
Fair Housing Act 2 because they provide
short-term, temporary accommodations
may provide sex-segregated
accommodations, when the buildings
and facilities have physical limitations
or configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities.3
Since the publication of the Equal
Access Rule, HUD has conducted
further review on the issue of
transgender individuals’ access to
temporary, emergency shelters and
other facilities with physical limitations
or configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or bathing facilities,
both in terms of individual cases and
evidence from broader research. In this
regard, HUD and the U.S. Interagency
Council on Homelessness conducted a
listening session on LGBT issues at the
National Alliance to End
Homelessness’s 2012 National
Conference on Ending Homelessness,
where homeless service providers
reported that, if given the choice
between a shelter designated for their
assigned birth sex or sleeping on the
streets, many transgender shelterseekers would choose the streets.4 One
participant reported that, in her
community, transgender women are
excluded from the women’s shelter, and
conditions for them are so dangerous at
the men’s shelter that the shelter forces
them to try to disguise their gender
identity. HUD has also investigated
several cases in which transgender
persons have not been provided equal
1 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. The Fair Housing Act
contains no exemptions that permit covered
housing to be sex-segregated. See 42 U.S.C. 3603(b)
(limited exemptions for sales of certain singlefamily homes and for rooms or units in certain
owner-occupied dwellings), sec. 3607 (exemptions
for private clubs and religious organizations).
2 An emergency shelter and other building and
facility that would not qualify as dwellings under
the Fair Housing Act are not subject to the Act’s
prohibition against sex discrimination and thus
may be permitted by statute to be sex-segregated.
3 For purposes of this proposed rule, shared
sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities are
those that do not accommodate privacy. For
example, a single user bathing facility with a lock
on the door accommodates privacy, so it is not a
‘‘shared bathing facility’’ for purposes of the Equal
Access Rule or this proposed rule.
4 See https://usich.gov/blog/hud_usich_hears_
from_you_understanding_the_needs_of_the_lgbt_
homeless_popul.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
access to housing as required by the
Equal Access Rule or have faced
discrimination under the Fair Housing
Act because of nonconformance with
gender stereotypes.
National research indicates that these
denials of access are a common
occurrence. According to one major
national survey on the experiences of
transgender persons, nearly half (47
percent) of all transgender respondents
who accessed shelters left those shelters
because of the treatment they received
there—choosing the street over the
abuse and indignity they experienced in
the shelters.5 This survey further
reported that 25 percent of transgender
individuals who stayed in shelters were
physically assaulted, and 22 percent
were sexually assaulted, by another
resident or shelter staff.6
The experiences of homeless
transgender youth, specifically, have
also been documented, with similar
findings of lack of access to housing and
services. While research suggests that
transgender youth represent less than
one percent of the youth in the United
States,7 a disproportionately high 6.8
percent of youth living on the streets
identify as transgender.8 In addition, a
report detailing case studies of runaway
and homeless youth found that
transgender youth were particularly at
risk of emotional distress resulting from
discrimination or harassment because of
gender identity and supported
establishing clear nondiscrimination
and antiharassment policies relating to
gender identity. With respect to
facilities with shared sleeping or
bathing areas, the policies
recommended include addressing the
needs of transgender persons and other
persons who do not identify with the
sex assigned to the individual at birth.9
A recent report on experiences of
homeless LGBT youth also calls for the
creation of safe and supportive
protocols for housing and placement
specific to transgender individuals and
5 Jamie M. Grant Et Al, Injustice at Every Turn:
A Report of the National Transgender
Discrimination Survey, National Center for
Transgender Equality, 118 (2011).
6 See Jamie M. Grant Et Al, Injustice at Every
Turn: A Report of the National Transgender
Discrimination Survey, National Center for
Transgender Equality, footnote 5 at 117–18 (2011).
7 Hannah Hussey, Beyond 4 walls and a Roof:
Addressing Homelessness Among Transgender
Youth, Center for American Progress, 4 (2015).
8 Administration for Children and Families, Street
Outreach Program: Data Collection Project
Executive Summary (U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 2014).
9 Andrew Burwick Et Al, Identifying and Serving
LGBTQ Youth: Case Studies of Runaway and
Homeless Youth Program Grantees, Mathematica
Policy Research and the Williams Institute, 19
(2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
individuals who do not conform with
gender stereotypes.10
HUD has also reviewed steps that
other Federal agencies have taken since
the Equal Access Rule was promulgated
in February 2012 to provide equal
access for transgender persons and other
persons who do not conform with
gender stereotypes.
U.S. Department of Justice Guidance.
On April 9, 2014, the Office for Civil
Rights, Office of Justice Programs, at the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
published guidance entitled
‘‘Frequently Asked Questions:
Nondiscrimination Grant Condition in
the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013’’ 11 (VAWA
2013 FAQ). VAWA 2013 authorizes
certain grants administered by DOJ,
including grants to provide housing
assistance for survivors of domestic
violence. VAWA 2013 also imposes a
new grant condition that prohibits
discrimination by recipients of such
grants on the basis of sexual orientation
and gender identity. The VAWA 2013
FAQ, which is not applicable to HUDassisted housing,12 addresses how a
recipient of DOJ funds can operate a
single-sex facility funded through
VAWA and not discriminate on the
basis of gender identity. The DOJ
guidance states:
A recipient that operates a sex-segregated
or sex-specific program should assign a
beneficiary 13 to the group or service which
corresponds to the gender with which the
beneficiary identifies, with the following
considerations. In deciding how to house a
victim, a recipient that provides sexsegregated housing may consider on a caseby-case basis whether a particular housing
assignment would ensure the victim’s health
and safety. A victim’s own views with
respect to personal safety deserve serious
consideration. The recipient should ensure
that its services do not isolate or segregate
victims based upon actual or perceived
gender identity. A recipient may not make a
determination about services for one
beneficiary based on the complaints of
another beneficiary when those complaints
are based on gender identity.
For the purpose of assigning a beneficiary
to sex-segregated or sex-specific services, best
practices dictate that the recipient should ask
a transgender beneficiary which group or
service the beneficiary wishes to join. The
10 Meredith Dank Et Al, Surviving the streets of
New York: Experiences of LGBTQ youth, YMSM,
and YWSW Engaged in Survival Sex. Urban
Institute, 70 (2015).
11 The guidance can be found at https://
www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ovw/legacy/
2014/06/20/faqs-ngc-vawa.pdf.
12 Unlike HUD program statutes, which do not
authorize single-sex housing, VAWA 2013
specifically authorizes funding for single-sex
shelters in certain narrowly defined circumstances.
13 The beneficiary is the individual seeking
services from the recipient or service provider.
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
recipient may not, however, ask questions
about the beneficiary’s anatomy or medical
history or make burdensome demands for
identity documents.14
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
U.S. Department of Education
Guidance. Similarly, on December 1,
2014, the U.S. Department of
Education’s Office for Civil Rights
issued guidance providing that ‘‘under
Title IX [of the Education Amendments
of 1972, which prohibits discrimination
based on sex], a recipient generally must
treat transgender students consistent
with their gender identity in all aspects
of the planning, implementation,
enrollment, operation, and evaluation of
single-sex classes.’’ 15
Given HUD’s mission to provide equal
housing opportunities for all, and the
significant violence, harassment, and
discrimination faced by transgender
individuals and other persons who do
not identify with the sex they were
assigned at birth in attempting to access
programs, benefits, services, and
accommodations, HUD has a
responsibility to provide leadership in
establishing a policy for HUD’s
community development programs that
addresses these serious concerns. After
considering the feedback from HUD
recipients and subrecipients, the
experiences of the beneficiaries of
HUD’s community development
programs who have been denied access
because of their gender identity,
research on transgender discrimination
in shelter settings, and the actions taken
by other Federal agencies to address
access to programs, benefits, services,
14 See Department of Justice, Frequently Asked
Questions: Nondiscrimination Grant Conditions in
the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act
of 2013 (Apr. 9, 2013), FAQ 14, available at
https://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/docs/faqs-ngc-vawa.pdf.
15 The guidance can be found at https://
www.ed.gov/ocr/docs/faqs-title-ix-single-sex201412.pdf. In this guidance the Department of
Education considers discrimination based on
gender identity as a form of sex discrimination. The
guidance states, in relevant part: ‘‘All students,
including transgender students and students who
do not conform to sex stereotypes, are protected
from sex-based discrimination under Title IX.
Under Title IX, a recipient generally must treat
transgender students consistent with their gender
identity in all aspects of the planning,
implementation, enrollment, operation, and
evaluation of single-sex classes.’’ See also the
Department of Education’s guidance, ‘‘Questions
and Answers on Title IX and Sexual Violence,’’
which makes clear that sexual violence against
transgender students is a form of sex discrimination
prohibited by Title IX. The guidance can be found
at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/
qa-201404-title-ix.pdf. In addition to this guidance,
the Department of Labor, Office of Job Corps, issued
guidance ensuring equal access and opportunity for
transgender applicants and students in the Job
Corps Program; see ‘‘Ensuring Equal Access for
Transgender Applicants and Students to the Job
Corps Program’’ issued May 1, 2015, available at
https://supportservices.jobcorps.gov/health/Pages/
PINotices.aspx.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
and accommodations in accordance
with an individual’s gender identity,
CPD released Notice CPD–015–02,
‘‘Appropriate Placement for
Transgender Persons in Single-Sex
Emergency Shelters and Other
Facilities,’’ applicable to the Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS,
Emergency Solutions Grants, and
Continuum of Care programs, on
February 20, 2015.16 This guidance
states:
HUD assumes that a recipient or
subrecipient (‘‘provider’’) that makes
decisions about eligibility for or placement
into single-sex emergency shelters or other
facilities will place a potential client (or
current client seeking a new assignment) in
a shelter or facility that corresponds to the
gender with which the person identifies,
taking health and safety concerns into
consideration. A client’s or potential client’s
own views with respect to personal health
and safety should be given serious
consideration in making the placement. For
instance, if the potential client requests to be
placed based on his or her sex assigned at
birth, HUD assumes that the provider will
place the individual in accordance with that
request, consistent with health, safety, and
privacy concerns. HUD assumes that a
provider will not make an assignment or reassignment based on complaints of another
person when the sole stated basis of the
complaint is a client or potential client’s nonconformance with gender stereotypes.17
CPD’s guidance also outlines best
practices for appropriate and
inappropriate inquiries related to sex,
and states that where a provider is
uncertain of the client’s sex or gender
identity, the provider informs the client
or potential client that the agency
provides shelter based on the
individual’s gender identity. The
guidance further states that there
generally is no legitimate reason for the
provider to request documentation of a
person’s sex in order to determine
appropriate placement, nor should the
provider have any basis to deny access
to a single-sex emergency shelter or
facility solely because the provider
possesses identity documents indicating
a sex different than the client’s or
potential client’s gender identity.
Further, the provider may not ask
questions or otherwise seek information
or documentation concerning the
person’s anatomy or medical history,
nor consider a client ineligible for an
emergency shelter or other facility
because the client’s appearance or
16 See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/
documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-AppropriatePlacement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-SexEmergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
17 See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/
documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-AppropriatePlacement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-SexEmergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72645
behavior does not conform with gender
stereotypes. In addition, the guidance
provides examples of steps that
providers may take to address safety or
privacy concerns, and says that
providers should train staff on adhering
to this guidance.18
II. This Proposed Rule
To adopt requirements consistent
with the guidance recently published by
HUD, HUD is proposing to add in 24
CFR part 5 a new section that would
require recipients and subrecipients of
assistance under the HOME Investment
Partnerships program, Community
Development Block Grant program,
Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS program, Emergency Solutions
Grants program, and the Continuum of
Care program, as well as owners,
operators, and managers of shelters and
other buildings and facilities and
providers of services funded in whole or
in part by any of these programs, to
provide equal access to programs,
benefits, services, and accommodations
in accordance with an individual’s
gender identity. If the proposed rule
becomes a final rule, the final rule
would be effective upon receipt of
assistance after the effective date of the
final rule. Nothing in this proposed rule
is meant to prevent necessary and
appropriate steps to address any
fraudulent attempts to access services or
legitimate safety concerns that may arise
in any shelter, building, or facility
covered by this rule.
Prior to discussing the requirements
that would be established in this
section, it is important to clarify which
individuals would be covered by the
protections of this new section. While
some individuals refer to themselves as
transgender, other persons who do not
identify with the sex they were assigned
at birth may use other terms to describe
themselves. For this reason, the
proposed rule seeks to ensure that all
individuals, regardless of the terms they
use to describe themselves, are afforded
equal access to programs, benefits,
services, and accommodations in
accordance with their gender identity.
The following requirements would be
established by this proposed rule:
§ 5.100—Revised definition of gender
identity.
HUD is proposing to amend the
definition of gender identity in § 5.100,
which currently provides that ‘‘Gender
identity means actual or perceived
gender-related characteristics.’’ This
18 See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/
documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-AppropriatePlacement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-SexEmergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
72646
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
definition of gender identity, which was
adopted by HUD in its 2012 Equal
Access Rule for purposes of ensuring
equal access in HUD-assisted and HUDinsured housing, is the same definition
that was used in the Matthew Shepard
and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes
Prevention Act of 2009, 18 U.S.C. 249.
While this definition is effective for
purposes of prosecuting hate crimes,
HUD has concluded that it would be
more effective for purposes of ensuring
equal access to HUD programs to
separate the definitions of actual and
perceived gender identity. The
Department is therefore proposing to
amend the definition of gender identity
to read as follows: ‘‘Gender identity
means the gender with which a person
identifies, regardless of the sex assigned
to that person at birth. Perceived gender
identity means the gender with which a
person is perceived to identify based on
that person’s appearance, behavior,
expression, other gender-related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the
individual at birth.’’ Perceived gender
identity may differ from the identity
with which a person identifies.
§ 5.106—Providing access in
accordance with an individual’s gender
identity in community planning and
development programs.
HUD proposes to add a new § 5.106,
which would contain equal access
provisions specifically tailored to HUD’s
community development programs.
This proposed new provision would be
placed after the more general equal
access provisions applicable to all HUD
housing programs, added in 2012 to
§ 5.105.
Section 5.106(a) would identify the
programs covered by the new § 5.106.
Section 5.106 would apply to recipients
and subrecipients of assistance under
the HOME Investment Partnerships
program (24 CFR part 92), Community
Development Block Grant program (24
CFR part 570), Housing Opportunities
for Persons with AIDS program (24 CFR
part 574), Emergency Solutions Grants
program (24 CFR part 576), or
Continuum of Care program (24 CFR
part 578), as well as to owners,
operators, and managers of shelters and
other buildings and facilities and
providers of services funded in whole or
in part by any of these programs.
Section 5.106(b) is the operative
provision in § 5.106. Under this
subsection, a recipient, subrecipient, or
provider would be required to establish,
amend, or maintain program
admissions, occupancy, and operating
policies and procedures, including
policies and procedures to protect
individuals’ privacy and security, so
that equal access is provided to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
individuals based on their gender
identity. This requirement includes
tenant selection and admission
preferences. The provision also requires
that services, benefits, and
accommodations be provided in a
manner that affords equal access to the
individual’s family.19
Section 5.106(c) addresses temporary,
emergency shelters and other buildings
and facilities with physical limitations
or configurations that require shared
sleeping quarters or shared bathing
facilities. This section requires that the
placement and accommodation of
individuals in such facilities that are
permitted to be single-sex because they
are not covered by the Fair Housing Act
must be made in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity.
The only exception to the requirement
to accommodate and serve a person in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity is that the recipient,
subrecipient, owner, operator, manager,
or provider may consider, on a case-bycase basis, whether a particular housing
assignment would ensure health and
safety. It is prohibited for such a
determination to be based solely on a
person’s actual or perceived gender
identity or on complaints of other
shelter residents when those complaints
are based on actual or perceived gender
identity. It is likewise prohibited to
deny appropriate placement based on a
perceived threat to health or safety that
can be mitigated some other less
burdensome way (e.g., providing the
transgender shelter seeker the option to
use single-use bathing facilities).
Section 5.106(d) requires that when
such a determination is made, the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator,
manager, or provider is required to
provide either (1) equivalent alternative
accommodation, benefits, and services
or (2) a referral to a comparable
alternative program that meets the needs
of the individual. HUD expects the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator,
manager, or provider to refer the
individual to a comparable alternative
program that can more appropriately
mitigate or eliminate the safety risk and
that has available accommodations, or
offer the individual equivalent
alternative accommodation (e.g., a hotel
or motel voucher), benefits, and
services. HUD anticipates that the use of
this limited exception for the provision
of equivalent alternative
19 As noted above, the Fair Housing Act prohibits
familial status discrimination. Accordingly, housing
providers covered by the Fair Housing Act may not
discriminate based on familial status unless the
housing meets statutory and regulatory
requirements for housing for older persons. 42
U.S.C. 3607(b); 24 CFR part 100, subpart E.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
accommodations, benefits, and services
or referral to a comparable alternative
program would be rare, since it would
not apply unless the facts and
circumstances demonstrated a
nondiscriminatory risk to health or
safety that could not be eliminated or
appropriately mitigated by policy
adjustments and physical modifications
to buildings and facilities.
Section 5.106(e) requires that records
of case-by-case determinations must be
kept by the recipient, subrecipient,
owner, operator, manager, or provider,
including when the determination is
made that an individual cannot safely
be served in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity. Where an
alternative placement is made,
recipients, subrecipients, owners,
operators, managers, or providers must
thoroughly document the reasons for
that placement, in accordance with the
recordkeeping requirements established
in this subsection. Further, the
recordkeeping section proposes that
when a referral is made, the recipient,
subrecipient, owner, operator, manager,
or provider documents the facts and
circumstances regarding the referral and
whether the individual and the
individual’s family, in instances where
the individual presents with a family,
has been admitted and accommodated.
§ 5.105(a)(2)(ii)—Removal of
prohibited inquiries.
In the preamble to HUD’s 2012 Equal
Access Rule, HUD stated that it would
review the prohibition of inquiries in
§ 5.105(a)(2)(ii) following monitoring of
the application of this provision in HUD
programs. As discussed earlier in this
preamble, CPD released Notice CPD–
015–02 ‘‘Appropriate Placement for
Transgender Persons in Single-Sex
Emergency Shelters and Other
Facilities,’’ applicable to the Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS,
Emergency Solutions Grants, and
Continuum of Care programs, on
February 20, 2015,20 which provided
that HUD expected recipients,
subrecipients, and providers to
accommodate individuals in accordance
with the individual’s gender identity.
The guidance states that where a
provider is uncertain of the client’s sex
or gender identity and that information
matters for the determination of
placement, the provider informs the
client or potential client that the agency
provides shelter based on the
individual’s gender identity. HUD now
believes, however, that the prohibition
20 See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/
documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-AppropriatePlacement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-SexEmergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of inquiries at § 5.105(a)(2)(ii) may
hinder a provider from making an
appropriate placement decision for fear
of violating the rule. For this reason,
HUD is proposing to remove the
prohibition of inquiries.
HUD’s intent in proposing removal of
§ 5.105(a)(2)(ii) is not to now permit
recipients or subrecipients to ask
questions in order to seek information
that could be used for discriminatory
purposes. Rather, HUD is proposing
removal because § 5.105(a)(2)(ii) has
raised several legitimate questions about
implementation. Removal of
§ 5.105(a)(2)(ii) would allow shelters
and other facilities with physical
limitations or configurations that
require shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities to ask the
individual’s gender identity, and it
would permit inquiries of the
individual’s gender identity and sexual
orientation to determine the number of
bedrooms to which a household is
entitled. Removal of § 5.105(a)(2)(ii) also
reaffirms that HUD permits mechanisms
for voluntary and anonymous reporting
of sexual orientation or gender identity
for compliance with data collection
requirements of State and local
governments or Federal assistance
programs.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Order
12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects; distributive impacts; and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Under Executive
Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review), a determination must be made
whether a regulatory action is
significant and, therefore, subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in accordance with the
requirements of the order.
This proposed rule is consistent with
Administration policy, as has been
noted in the preamble by citing to
policy already implemented by the U.S
Department of Education, the U.S.
Department of Justice, the U.S.
Department of Labor, and the CPD
guidance already implemented by HUD.
This proposed rule clarifies how
facilities funded by CPD that have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities comply with the
requirement that equal access be
provided to programs, buildings,
facilities, services, benefits, and
accommodations in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity. This
clarification should provide benefits to
clients accessing CPD-funded,
temporary, emergency shelters and
other buildings and facilities by
assuring all clients receive equal access,
and will benefit the CPD-funded
facilities by making compliance with
HUD’s equal access requirements easier.
In this proposed rule, HUD recognizes
a limited exception to accommodating
individuals in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity when a
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator,
manager, or provider identifies a
legitimate safety risk that cannot be
eliminated or appropriately mitigated
and makes a written case-by-case
analysis. The written case-by-case
analysis only applies when the benefits,
services, and accommodations are not
being provided to an individual in
accordance with the individual’s gender
identity. The written case-by-case
analysis benefits the client accessing the
services and the recipient, subrecipient,
owner, operator, manager, or provider
by keeping a record of when a legitimate
safety risk is identified. The recipient,
subrecipient, owner, operator, manager,
or provider must also undertake
reasonable efforts to ensure that
equivalent alternative accommodations
are provided or refer the individual to
a comparable alternative program that
will meet the individual’s needs. This
proposed rule also seeks to amend the
definition of gender identity in § 5.100
to clarify the difference between actual
and perceived gender identity, which
would be necessary if proposed § 5.106
is adopted. This proposed rule also
would eliminate the prohibition on
inquiries relating to sexual orientation
or gender identity in § 5.105(a)(2)(ii).
Both of these proposed changes would
make it easier for recipients,
subrecipients, owners, operators,
managers, and providers of programs,
buildings, and facilities funded by CPD
programs to comply with the
requirements of existing § 5.105(a)(2)(i)
and proposed § 5.106. An estimate of
the cost of recording and retaining that
written case-by-case analysis, in the
limited situations in which it may
apply, is discussed in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of this proposed
rule.
The docket file is available for public
inspection in the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72647
451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500. Due to
security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, please schedule
an appointment to review the docket file
by calling the Regulations Division at
202–402–3055 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing and individuals with
speech impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Relay Service at 800–877–8339 (this is
a toll-free number).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Approximately
4,000 providers participating in the CPD
programs covered by this rule are small
organizations, but the number of entities
that would address the accommodation
needs addressed by this rule is much
lower. The benefit of this proposed rule
is to ensure equal access to CPD
programs, facilities, services, benefits,
and accommodations. The rule does
require organizations to make a written
case-by-case analysis and referral in
limited situations. Although HUD does
not have any way to determine the
number of written case-by-case analyses
or referrals that will occur in any one
year, HUD does not believe that costs
will be significant for small service
providers and estimates it will take a
provider 15 minutes per case-by-case
analysis and referral. HUD invites
interested parties to provide data with
which HUD can formulate better
estimates of the compliance costs
associated with the written notice and
referral requirements of this proposed
rule. Accordingly, for the foregoing
reasons, the undersigned certifies that
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Notwithstanding HUD’s determination
that this proposed rule would not have
a significant effect on a substantial
number of small entities, HUD
specifically invites comments regarding
any less burdensome alternatives to this
rule that will meet HUD’s objectives and
the principles in Executive Order 13559,
as described in this preamble.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule requires CPD
programs to include a written case-bycase analysis and make referrals. This
rule also requires the retention of
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
72648
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
records to show that the case-by-case
analysis was followed and referral
requirements in this rulemaking have
been met. HUD estimates that a case-bycase analysis and referral will be
required infrequently given that the
case-by-case analysis is only necessary
when the provider is not providing
accommodations to an individual in
accordance with the gender with which
an individual identifies because there is
a legitimate safety risk that cannot be
eliminated or appropriately mitigated.
HUD estimates that only 0.05 percent of
facilities that are covered by this
proposed regulation will need to make
a written case-by-case analysis and
referral, and estimates it will take an
individual 15 minutes to complete the
case-by-case analysis and referral. This
estimate includes the time required to
write down the basis for the analysis,
identify service providers that provide
similar services, and make the referral.
The information collection
requirements for the CPD’s HOME
Investment Partnerships program,
Community Development Block Grant
program (State and entitlement),
Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS program, Emergency Solutions
Grants program, or Continuum of Care
program impacted by this rule have
been approved by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned OMB
control numbers 2506–0171, 2506–0085,
2506–0077, 2506–0133, 2506–0089, and
2506–0199. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information, unless the
collection displays a currently valid
OMB control number. The existing
forms will be changed to include the
new recordkeeping requirement added
by this proposed rule.
In accordance with 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting
comments from members of the public
and affected agencies concerning this
collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility.
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information.
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond; including through the
use of appropriate automated collection
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., by permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in
this rule. Comments must refer to the
proposed rule by name and docket
number (FR–5583–P–01) and must be
sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, Fax number: 202–395–6947;
and Reports Liaison Officer, Office of
Housing, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW.,
Room 9128, Washington, DC 20410.
Interested persons may submit
comments regarding the information
collection requirements electronically
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. HUD
strongly encourages commenters to
submit comments electronically.
Electronic submission of comments
allows the commenter maximum time to
prepare and submit a comment, ensures
timely receipt by HUD, and enables
HUD to make them immediately
available to the public. Comments
submitted electronically through the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site can
be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public.
Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule sets forth
nondiscrimination standards.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3),
this rule is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either: (i)
Imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments
and is not required by statute or (ii)
preempts State law, unless the agency
meets the consultation and funding
requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order. This proposed rule
would not have federalism implications
and would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for Federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, and on
the private sector. This proposed rule
does not impose any Federal mandates
on any State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector,
within the meaning of the UMRA.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Claims, Drug abuse,
Drug traffic control, Grant programs—
housing and community development,
Grant programs—Indians, Individuals
with disabilities, Loan programs—
housing and community development,
Low and moderate income housing,
Mortgage insurance, Pets, Public
housing, Rent subsidies, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PART 5—GENERAL HUD PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR
part 5 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d,
1437f, 1437n, 3535(d), Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109–
115, 119 Stat. 2936, and Sec. 607, Pub. L.
109–162, 119 Stat. 3051.
2. In § 5.100, revise the definition for
‘‘Gender identity’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 5.100
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Gender identity means the gender
with which a person identifies,
regardless of the sex assigned to that
person at birth. Perceived gender
identity means the gender with which a
person is perceived to identify based on
that person’s appearance, behavior,
expression, other gender related
characteristics, or sex assigned to the
individual at birth.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 5.105
[Amended]
3. In § 5.105, remove paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) and redesignate paragraph
(a)(2)(i) as paragraph (a)(2).
■ 4. Add § 5.106 to read as follows:
■
§ 5.106 Providing access in accordance
with the individual’s gender identity in
community planning and development
programs.
(a) Applicability. This section applies
to recipients and subrecipients of
assistance under the HOME Investment
Partnerships program (24 CFR part 92),
Community Development Block Grant
program (24 CFR part 570), Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
program (24 CFR part 574), Emergency
Solutions Grants program (24 CFR part
576), or Continuum of Care program (24
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
CFR part 578), as well as to owners,
operators, and managers of shelters and
other buildings and facilities and
providers of services funded in whole or
in part by any of these programs.
(b) Equal access in accordance with
gender identity. The admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and
procedures of recipients, subrecipients,
owners, operators, managers, and
providers identified in paragraph (a) of
this section, including policies and
procedures to protect privacy and
security, shall be established or
amended, as necessary, and
administered so:
(1) Equal access to programs, shelters,
other buildings and facilities, benefits,
services, and accommodations is
provided to individuals in accordance
with the individual’s gender identity,
and in a manner that affords equal
access to the individual’s family; and
(2) Individuals are placed, served, and
accommodated in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity.
(c) Placement and accommodation in
facilities with shared sleeping quarters
or shared bathing facilities. Placement
and accommodation of individuals in
shelters and other buildings and
facilities with physical limitations or
configurations that require and are
permitted to have shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities
shall be made in accordance with the
individual’s gender identity. Under
narrow circumstances, a written caseby-case determination can be made as to
whether an alternative accommodation
is necessary to ensure health and safety.
It shall be prohibited for such a
determination to be based solely on a
person’s actual or perceived gender
identity, the complaints of other clients,
beneficiaries, or employees when those
complaints are based on actual or
perceived gender identity, or on an
actual or perceived threat to health or
safety that can be mitigated in some
other way that is less burdensome. In
order to avoid unwarranted denials of
placement in accordance with an
individual’s gender identity, decisions
to provide accommodations based on
concern for the health and safety of the
individual seeking accommodations
should be based on the individual’s own
request to be otherwise accommodated.
(d) Referrals. In any instance in which
a case-by-case determination is made
under paragraph (c) of this section, the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator,
manager, or provider shall ensure that
an opportunity to access equivalent
alternative accommodations, benefits,
and services is provided or shall refer
the individual to a comparable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
alternative program with availability
that will meet the individual’s needs.
(e) Documentation and record
retention. Providers shall document and
maintain records of compliance with the
requirements in paragraphs (b), (c), and
(d) of this section for a period of 5 years,
including but not limited to:
(1) The specific facts, circumstances,
and reasoning relied upon in any caseby-case determination that results in an
alternative admission, accommodation,
benefit, or service to an individual or
their family;
(2) The facts and circumstances
regarding the opportunities to access
alternative accommodations that are
provided to an individual and their
families by the recipient, subrecipient,
owner, operator, manager, or provider;
and
(3) The facts, circumstances, and
outcomes regarding each referral of an
individual and their family to a
comparable alternative program,
including information regarding the
benefits, services, and accommodations
received.
Dated: October 23, 2015.
´
Julian Castro,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–29342 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–134219–08]
RIN 1545–BI82
Relief From Joint and Several Liability
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations relating to relief
from joint and several liability under
section 6015 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). The regulations reflect
changes in the law made by the Tax
Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 as
well as changes in the law arising from
litigation. The regulations provide
guidance to married individuals who
filed joint returns and later seek relief
from joint and several liability.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by February 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134219–08), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72649
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–134219–
08), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC; or sent electronically
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–134219–
08).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Nancy Rose at (202) 317–6844;
concerning submissions of comments
contact Oluwafunmilayo Taylor, (202)
317–6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) for relief
from joint and several liability under
section 6015 of the Code and relief from
the operation of state community
property law under section 66.
Section 6013(a) permits a husband
and wife to file a joint income tax
return. Section 6013(d)(3) provides that
spouses filing a joint income tax return
are jointly and severally liable for
liabilities for tax arising from that
return. The term ‘‘tax’’ includes
additions to tax, additional amounts,
penalties, and interest. See sections
6665(a)(2) and 6601(e)(1). Joint and
several liability allows the IRS to collect
the entire liability from either spouse
who signed the joint return, without
regard to whom the items of income,
deduction, credit, or basis that gave rise
to the liability are attributable. Prior to
1998, section 6013(e) provided limited
relief from joint and several liability. In
1998, Congress enacted the Internal
Revenue Service Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998, Public Law 105–
206, 112 Stat. 685 (1998), which
repealed section 6013(e) and replaced it
with section 6015. Section 6015 applies
to liabilities arising after July 22, 1998,
and liabilities that arose on or before
July 22, 1998, but remained unpaid as
of that date.
Section 6015 provides three avenues
for relief from joint and several
liability—sections 6015(b), (c) and (f).
To be eligible for relief from joint and
several liability, a spouse must request
relief. Under section 6015(b), a
requesting spouse may be entitled to
relief from joint and several liability for
an understatement of tax attributable to
erroneous items of the nonrequesting
spouse. Section 6015(c) permits a
taxpayer who is divorced, separated,
widowed, or who had been living apart
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 224 (Friday, November 20, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72642-72649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29342]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. FR-5863-P-01]
RIN 2506-AC40
Equal Access in Accordance With an Individual's Gender Identity
in Community Planning and Development Programs
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HUD.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As the Nation's housing agency, HUD administers programs
designed to meet the goal of ensuring decent housing and a suitable
living environment for all. In furtherance of this goal, in February
2012, HUD promulgated a final rule entitled ``Equal Access to Housing
in HUD Programs Regardless of Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity''
(Equal Access Rule), which requires that HUD-assisted and HUD-insured
housing be made available without regard to actual or perceived sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital status, and which generally
prohibits inquiries into sexual orientation or gender identity for the
purpose of determining eligibility for such housing or otherwise making
such housing available. HUD's Equal Access Rule provides a limited
exception for inquiries about the sex of an individual to determine
eligibility for housing provided or to be provided to the individual
when the housing is a temporary, emergency shelter that involves the
sharing of sleeping areas or bathrooms, or for inquiries made for the
purpose of determining the number of bedrooms to which a household may
be entitled. At that time, HUD decided not to set national policy
regarding how transgender persons would be accommodated in temporary,
emergency shelters that involve shared sleeping quarters or shared
bathing facilities, but instead decided to monitor and review
[[Page 72643]]
its programs to determine if transgender individuals had greater access
to temporary, emergency shelters as a result of the rule or if
additional guidance or a national policy was warranted. HUD also
committed to review the prohibition on inquiries contained in the Equal
Access Rule. HUD has now monitored and reviewed its programs and, based
on that review, is proposing this rule to require recipients and
subrecipients of assistance from HUD's Office of Community Planning and
Development (CPD), as well as owners, operators, and managers of
shelters, buildings, and other facilities and providers of services
covered by CPD's programs, to provide transgender persons and other
persons who do not identify with the sex they were assigned at birth
with access to programs, benefits, services, and accommodations in
accordance with their gender identity. This proposed rule would also
amend the definition of ``gender identity'' included in HUD's Equal
Access Rule so the definition more clearly reflects the difference
between actual and perceived gender identity. Finally, HUD has
completed its review of the inquiries provision, and the proposed rule
would eliminate the Equal Access Rule's current prohibition on
inquiries related to sexual orientation or gender identity, while
maintaining the prohibition against discrimination on those bases.
DATES: Comment Date: January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposed rule to the Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Communications must refer
to the above docket number and title. There are two methods for
submitting public comments. All submissions must refer to the above
docket number and title.
1. Submission of Comments by Mail. Comments may be submitted by
mail to the Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410-0500.
2. Electronic Submission of Comments. Interested persons may submit
comments electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically. Electronic submission of comments allows the
commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a comment, ensures timely
receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them immediately available to
the public. Comments submitted electronically through the
www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other commenters and
interested members of the public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to submit comments electronically.
Note: To receive consideration as public comments, comments
must be submitted through one of the two methods specified above.
Again, all submissions must refer to the docket number and title of
the rule.
No Facsimile Comments. Facsimile (fax) comments are not acceptable.
Public Inspection of Public Comments. All properly submitted
comments and communications submitted to HUD will be available for
public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., weekdays, at
the above address. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, an advance appointment to review the public comments must be
scheduled by calling the Regulations Division at 202-708-3055 (this is
not a toll-free number). Individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
and individuals with speech impairments may access this number via TTY
by calling the Federal Relay Service, toll free, at 800-877-8339.
Copies of all comments submitted are available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norm Suchar, Director, Office of
Special Needs Assistance Programs, Office of Community Planning and
Development, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20410-7000; telephone number 202-708-4300
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons who are deaf or hard of
hearing and persons with speech impairments can access this number
through TTY by calling the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339 (this
is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In order to address evidence of arbitrary exclusion of lesbian,
gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals (LGBT) and their families
from housing opportunities, HUD published its Equal Access Rule in the
Federal Register on February 3, 2012, at 77 FR 5662. The Equal Access
Rule, codified primarily at 24 CFR 5.100 and 5.105(a)(2) and in
applicable program regulations, defines the terms sexual orientation
and gender identity, at 24 CFR 5.100, and requires, at 24 CFR
5.105(a)(2), that housing assisted or insured by HUD be made available
to individuals and families without regard to an individual's actual or
perceived sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status.
Certain other rules governing HUD housing programs were revised to
clarify that all otherwise eligible families, regardless of sexual
orientation, gender identity, or marital status of any member, have the
opportunity to participate in HUD programs. The 2012 rule also revised
24 CFR 203.33(b) by adding sexual orientation and gender identity, in
addition to marital status, to the characteristics that an FHA-
certified lender may not take into consideration in determining the
adequacy of a mortgagor's income.
Further, Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) prohibits owners and administrators
of HUD-assisted or HUD-insured housing, approved lenders in a Federal
Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance program, and any other
recipients or subrecipients of HUD funds from inquiring about sexual
orientation or gender identity to determine eligibility for HUD-
assisted or HUD-insured housing or otherwise make such housing
available. The prohibition on inquiries regarding sexual orientation or
gender identity does not prohibit individuals from voluntarily self-
identifying sexual orientation or gender identity. Further, the rule
provides a limited exception for inquiries about the sex of an
individual to determine eligibility for housing provided or to be
provided in temporary, emergency shelters with shared sleeping areas or
bathrooms, or to determine the number of bedrooms to which a household
may be entitled.
In response to public comments recommending that HUD-assisted
programs accommodate individuals in accordance with their gender
identity, HUD stated in the preamble to the Equal Access Rule that it
was not adopting a national policy on the placement of transgender
persons in temporary, emergency shelters with shared sleeping quarters
or shared bathing facilities at that time, but would instead monitor
its programs to determine whether additional guidance or a national
policy was needed to ensure equal access. In response to comments on
the permissibility of inquiries about an individual's sex, HUD stated
in the preamble to the Equal Access Rule that HUD would monitor its
programs and review the prohibition on inquiries to determine whether
additional guidance was necessary to provide transgender individuals
with equal access to shelters and other housing. The Fair Housing
[[Page 72644]]
Act \1\ prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, making
unavailable, or financing of dwellings and in other housing-related
activities on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, disability,
familial status, and national origin, and thus prohibits making housing
unavailable to a person because of that person's sex. However,
temporary, emergency shelters and other buildings and facilities that
are not covered by the Fair Housing Act \2\ because they provide short-
term, temporary accommodations may provide sex-segregated
accommodations, when the buildings and facilities have physical
limitations or configurations that require shared sleeping quarters or
shared bathing facilities.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq. The Fair Housing Act contains no
exemptions that permit covered housing to be sex-segregated. See 42
U.S.C. 3603(b) (limited exemptions for sales of certain single-
family homes and for rooms or units in certain owner-occupied
dwellings), sec. 3607 (exemptions for private clubs and religious
organizations).
\2\ An emergency shelter and other building and facility that
would not qualify as dwellings under the Fair Housing Act are not
subject to the Act's prohibition against sex discrimination and thus
may be permitted by statute to be sex-segregated.
\3\ For purposes of this proposed rule, shared sleeping quarters
or shared bathing facilities are those that do not accommodate
privacy. For example, a single user bathing facility with a lock on
the door accommodates privacy, so it is not a ``shared bathing
facility'' for purposes of the Equal Access Rule or this proposed
rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the publication of the Equal Access Rule, HUD has conducted
further review on the issue of transgender individuals' access to
temporary, emergency shelters and other facilities with physical
limitations or configurations that require shared sleeping quarters or
bathing facilities, both in terms of individual cases and evidence from
broader research. In this regard, HUD and the U.S. Interagency Council
on Homelessness conducted a listening session on LGBT issues at the
National Alliance to End Homelessness's 2012 National Conference on
Ending Homelessness, where homeless service providers reported that, if
given the choice between a shelter designated for their assigned birth
sex or sleeping on the streets, many transgender shelter-seekers would
choose the streets.\4\ One participant reported that, in her community,
transgender women are excluded from the women's shelter, and conditions
for them are so dangerous at the men's shelter that the shelter forces
them to try to disguise their gender identity. HUD has also
investigated several cases in which transgender persons have not been
provided equal access to housing as required by the Equal Access Rule
or have faced discrimination under the Fair Housing Act because of
nonconformance with gender stereotypes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://usich.gov/blog/hud_usich_hears_from_you_understanding_the_needs_of_the_lgbt_homeless_popul.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
National research indicates that these denials of access are a
common occurrence. According to one major national survey on the
experiences of transgender persons, nearly half (47 percent) of all
transgender respondents who accessed shelters left those shelters
because of the treatment they received there--choosing the street over
the abuse and indignity they experienced in the shelters.\5\ This
survey further reported that 25 percent of transgender individuals who
stayed in shelters were physically assaulted, and 22 percent were
sexually assaulted, by another resident or shelter staff.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Jamie M. Grant Et Al, Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of
the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, National Center for
Transgender Equality, 118 (2011).
\6\ See Jamie M. Grant Et Al, Injustice at Every Turn: A Report
of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, National Center
for Transgender Equality, footnote 5 at 117-18 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The experiences of homeless transgender youth, specifically, have
also been documented, with similar findings of lack of access to
housing and services. While research suggests that transgender youth
represent less than one percent of the youth in the United States,\7\ a
disproportionately high 6.8 percent of youth living on the streets
identify as transgender.\8\ In addition, a report detailing case
studies of runaway and homeless youth found that transgender youth were
particularly at risk of emotional distress resulting from
discrimination or harassment because of gender identity and supported
establishing clear nondiscrimination and antiharassment policies
relating to gender identity. With respect to facilities with shared
sleeping or bathing areas, the policies recommended include addressing
the needs of transgender persons and other persons who do not identify
with the sex assigned to the individual at birth.\9\ A recent report on
experiences of homeless LGBT youth also calls for the creation of safe
and supportive protocols for housing and placement specific to
transgender individuals and individuals who do not conform with gender
stereotypes.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Hannah Hussey, Beyond 4 walls and a Roof: Addressing
Homelessness Among Transgender Youth, Center for American Progress,
4 (2015).
\8\ Administration for Children and Families, Street Outreach
Program: Data Collection Project Executive Summary (U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, 2014).
\9\ Andrew Burwick Et Al, Identifying and Serving LGBTQ Youth:
Case Studies of Runaway and Homeless Youth Program Grantees,
Mathematica Policy Research and the Williams Institute, 19 (2014).
\10\ Meredith Dank Et Al, Surviving the streets of New York:
Experiences of LGBTQ youth, YMSM, and YWSW Engaged in Survival Sex.
Urban Institute, 70 (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD has also reviewed steps that other Federal agencies have taken
since the Equal Access Rule was promulgated in February 2012 to provide
equal access for transgender persons and other persons who do not
conform with gender stereotypes.
U.S. Department of Justice Guidance. On April 9, 2014, the Office
for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, at the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) published guidance entitled ``Frequently Asked Questions:
Nondiscrimination Grant Condition in the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013'' \11\ (VAWA 2013 FAQ). VAWA 2013
authorizes certain grants administered by DOJ, including grants to
provide housing assistance for survivors of domestic violence. VAWA
2013 also imposes a new grant condition that prohibits discrimination
by recipients of such grants on the basis of sexual orientation and
gender identity. The VAWA 2013 FAQ, which is not applicable to HUD-
assisted housing,\12\ addresses how a recipient of DOJ funds can
operate a single-sex facility funded through VAWA and not discriminate
on the basis of gender identity. The DOJ guidance states:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The guidance can be found at https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ovw/legacy/2014/06/20/faqs-ngc-vawa.pdf.
\12\ Unlike HUD program statutes, which do not authorize single-
sex housing, VAWA 2013 specifically authorizes funding for single-
sex shelters in certain narrowly defined circumstances.
A recipient that operates a sex-segregated or sex-specific
program should assign a beneficiary \13\ to the group or service
which corresponds to the gender with which the beneficiary
identifies, with the following considerations. In deciding how to
house a victim, a recipient that provides sex-segregated housing may
consider on a case-by-case basis whether a particular housing
assignment would ensure the victim's health and safety. A victim's
own views with respect to personal safety deserve serious
consideration. The recipient should ensure that its services do not
isolate or segregate victims based upon actual or perceived gender
identity. A recipient may not make a determination about services
for one beneficiary based on the complaints of another beneficiary
when those complaints are based on gender identity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The beneficiary is the individual seeking services from the
recipient or service provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the purpose of assigning a beneficiary to sex-segregated or
sex-specific services, best practices dictate that the recipient
should ask a transgender beneficiary which group or service the
beneficiary wishes to join. The
[[Page 72645]]
recipient may not, however, ask questions about the beneficiary's
anatomy or medical history or make burdensome demands for identity
documents.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Department of Justice, Frequently Asked Questions:
Nondiscrimination Grant Conditions in the Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Apr. 9, 2013), FAQ 14, available at
https://www.ovw.usdoj.gov/docs/faqs-ngc-vawa.pdf.
U.S. Department of Education Guidance. Similarly, on December 1,
2014, the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights issued
guidance providing that ``under Title IX [of the Education Amendments
of 1972, which prohibits discrimination based on sex], a recipient
generally must treat transgender students consistent with their gender
identity in all aspects of the planning, implementation, enrollment,
operation, and evaluation of single-sex classes.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The guidance can be found at https://www.ed.gov/ocr/docs/faqs-title-ix-single-sex-201412.pdf. In this guidance the Department
of Education considers discrimination based on gender identity as a
form of sex discrimination. The guidance states, in relevant part:
``All students, including transgender students and students who do
not conform to sex stereotypes, are protected from sex-based
discrimination under Title IX. Under Title IX, a recipient generally
must treat transgender students consistent with their gender
identity in all aspects of the planning, implementation, enrollment,
operation, and evaluation of single-sex classes.'' See also the
Department of Education's guidance, ``Questions and Answers on Title
IX and Sexual Violence,'' which makes clear that sexual violence
against transgender students is a form of sex discrimination
prohibited by Title IX. The guidance can be found at https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/qa-201404-title-ix.pdf. In
addition to this guidance, the Department of Labor, Office of Job
Corps, issued guidance ensuring equal access and opportunity for
transgender applicants and students in the Job Corps Program; see
``Ensuring Equal Access for Transgender Applicants and Students to
the Job Corps Program'' issued May 1, 2015, available at https://supportservices.jobcorps.gov/health/Pages/PINotices.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given HUD's mission to provide equal housing opportunities for all,
and the significant violence, harassment, and discrimination faced by
transgender individuals and other persons who do not identify with the
sex they were assigned at birth in attempting to access programs,
benefits, services, and accommodations, HUD has a responsibility to
provide leadership in establishing a policy for HUD's community
development programs that addresses these serious concerns. After
considering the feedback from HUD recipients and subrecipients, the
experiences of the beneficiaries of HUD's community development
programs who have been denied access because of their gender identity,
research on transgender discrimination in shelter settings, and the
actions taken by other Federal agencies to address access to programs,
benefits, services, and accommodations in accordance with an
individual's gender identity, CPD released Notice CPD-015-02,
``Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-Sex Emergency
Shelters and Other Facilities,'' applicable to the Housing
Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, Emergency Solutions Grants, and
Continuum of Care programs, on February 20, 2015.\16\ This guidance
states:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
HUD assumes that a recipient or subrecipient (``provider'') that
makes decisions about eligibility for or placement into single-sex
emergency shelters or other facilities will place a potential client
(or current client seeking a new assignment) in a shelter or
facility that corresponds to the gender with which the person
identifies, taking health and safety concerns into consideration. A
client's or potential client's own views with respect to personal
health and safety should be given serious consideration in making
the placement. For instance, if the potential client requests to be
placed based on his or her sex assigned at birth, HUD assumes that
the provider will place the individual in accordance with that
request, consistent with health, safety, and privacy concerns. HUD
assumes that a provider will not make an assignment or re-assignment
based on complaints of another person when the sole stated basis of
the complaint is a client or potential client's non-conformance with
gender stereotypes.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
CPD's guidance also outlines best practices for appropriate and
inappropriate inquiries related to sex, and states that where a
provider is uncertain of the client's sex or gender identity, the
provider informs the client or potential client that the agency
provides shelter based on the individual's gender identity. The
guidance further states that there generally is no legitimate reason
for the provider to request documentation of a person's sex in order to
determine appropriate placement, nor should the provider have any basis
to deny access to a single-sex emergency shelter or facility solely
because the provider possesses identity documents indicating a sex
different than the client's or potential client's gender identity.
Further, the provider may not ask questions or otherwise seek
information or documentation concerning the person's anatomy or medical
history, nor consider a client ineligible for an emergency shelter or
other facility because the client's appearance or behavior does not
conform with gender stereotypes. In addition, the guidance provides
examples of steps that providers may take to address safety or privacy
concerns, and says that providers should train staff on adhering to
this guidance.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. This Proposed Rule
To adopt requirements consistent with the guidance recently
published by HUD, HUD is proposing to add in 24 CFR part 5 a new
section that would require recipients and subrecipients of assistance
under the HOME Investment Partnerships program, Community Development
Block Grant program, Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
program, Emergency Solutions Grants program, and the Continuum of Care
program, as well as owners, operators, and managers of shelters and
other buildings and facilities and providers of services funded in
whole or in part by any of these programs, to provide equal access to
programs, benefits, services, and accommodations in accordance with an
individual's gender identity. If the proposed rule becomes a final
rule, the final rule would be effective upon receipt of assistance
after the effective date of the final rule. Nothing in this proposed
rule is meant to prevent necessary and appropriate steps to address any
fraudulent attempts to access services or legitimate safety concerns
that may arise in any shelter, building, or facility covered by this
rule.
Prior to discussing the requirements that would be established in
this section, it is important to clarify which individuals would be
covered by the protections of this new section. While some individuals
refer to themselves as transgender, other persons who do not identify
with the sex they were assigned at birth may use other terms to
describe themselves. For this reason, the proposed rule seeks to ensure
that all individuals, regardless of the terms they use to describe
themselves, are afforded equal access to programs, benefits, services,
and accommodations in accordance with their gender identity.
The following requirements would be established by this proposed
rule:
Sec. 5.100--Revised definition of gender identity.
HUD is proposing to amend the definition of gender identity in
Sec. 5.100, which currently provides that ``Gender identity means
actual or perceived gender-related characteristics.'' This
[[Page 72646]]
definition of gender identity, which was adopted by HUD in its 2012
Equal Access Rule for purposes of ensuring equal access in HUD-assisted
and HUD-insured housing, is the same definition that was used in the
Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes Prevention Act of
2009, 18 U.S.C. 249. While this definition is effective for purposes of
prosecuting hate crimes, HUD has concluded that it would be more
effective for purposes of ensuring equal access to HUD programs to
separate the definitions of actual and perceived gender identity. The
Department is therefore proposing to amend the definition of gender
identity to read as follows: ``Gender identity means the gender with
which a person identifies, regardless of the sex assigned to that
person at birth. Perceived gender identity means the gender with which
a person is perceived to identify based on that person's appearance,
behavior, expression, other gender-related characteristics, or sex
assigned to the individual at birth.'' Perceived gender identity may
differ from the identity with which a person identifies.
Sec. 5.106--Providing access in accordance with an individual's
gender identity in community planning and development programs.
HUD proposes to add a new Sec. 5.106, which would contain equal
access provisions specifically tailored to HUD's community development
programs. This proposed new provision would be placed after the more
general equal access provisions applicable to all HUD housing programs,
added in 2012 to Sec. 5.105.
Section 5.106(a) would identify the programs covered by the new
Sec. 5.106. Section 5.106 would apply to recipients and subrecipients
of assistance under the HOME Investment Partnerships program (24 CFR
part 92), Community Development Block Grant program (24 CFR part 570),
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program (24 CFR part 574),
Emergency Solutions Grants program (24 CFR part 576), or Continuum of
Care program (24 CFR part 578), as well as to owners, operators, and
managers of shelters and other buildings and facilities and providers
of services funded in whole or in part by any of these programs.
Section 5.106(b) is the operative provision in Sec. 5.106. Under
this subsection, a recipient, subrecipient, or provider would be
required to establish, amend, or maintain program admissions,
occupancy, and operating policies and procedures, including policies
and procedures to protect individuals' privacy and security, so that
equal access is provided to individuals based on their gender identity.
This requirement includes tenant selection and admission preferences.
The provision also requires that services, benefits, and accommodations
be provided in a manner that affords equal access to the individual's
family.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ As noted above, the Fair Housing Act prohibits familial
status discrimination. Accordingly, housing providers covered by the
Fair Housing Act may not discriminate based on familial status
unless the housing meets statutory and regulatory requirements for
housing for older persons. 42 U.S.C. 3607(b); 24 CFR part 100,
subpart E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 5.106(c) addresses temporary, emergency shelters and other
buildings and facilities with physical limitations or configurations
that require shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities.
This section requires that the placement and accommodation of
individuals in such facilities that are permitted to be single-sex
because they are not covered by the Fair Housing Act must be made in
accordance with the individual's gender identity.
The only exception to the requirement to accommodate and serve a
person in accordance with the individual's gender identity is that the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider may
consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether a particular housing
assignment would ensure health and safety. It is prohibited for such a
determination to be based solely on a person's actual or perceived
gender identity or on complaints of other shelter residents when those
complaints are based on actual or perceived gender identity. It is
likewise prohibited to deny appropriate placement based on a perceived
threat to health or safety that can be mitigated some other less
burdensome way (e.g., providing the transgender shelter seeker the
option to use single-use bathing facilities).
Section 5.106(d) requires that when such a determination is made,
the recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider is
required to provide either (1) equivalent alternative accommodation,
benefits, and services or (2) a referral to a comparable alternative
program that meets the needs of the individual. HUD expects the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider to refer
the individual to a comparable alternative program that can more
appropriately mitigate or eliminate the safety risk and that has
available accommodations, or offer the individual equivalent
alternative accommodation (e.g., a hotel or motel voucher), benefits,
and services. HUD anticipates that the use of this limited exception
for the provision of equivalent alternative accommodations, benefits,
and services or referral to a comparable alternative program would be
rare, since it would not apply unless the facts and circumstances
demonstrated a nondiscriminatory risk to health or safety that could
not be eliminated or appropriately mitigated by policy adjustments and
physical modifications to buildings and facilities.
Section 5.106(e) requires that records of case-by-case
determinations must be kept by the recipient, subrecipient, owner,
operator, manager, or provider, including when the determination is
made that an individual cannot safely be served in accordance with the
individual's gender identity. Where an alternative placement is made,
recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, or providers
must thoroughly document the reasons for that placement, in accordance
with the recordkeeping requirements established in this subsection.
Further, the recordkeeping section proposes that when a referral is
made, the recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or
provider documents the facts and circumstances regarding the referral
and whether the individual and the individual's family, in instances
where the individual presents with a family, has been admitted and
accommodated.
Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii)--Removal of prohibited inquiries.
In the preamble to HUD's 2012 Equal Access Rule, HUD stated that it
would review the prohibition of inquiries in Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii)
following monitoring of the application of this provision in HUD
programs. As discussed earlier in this preamble, CPD released Notice
CPD-015-02 ``Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-
Sex Emergency Shelters and Other Facilities,'' applicable to the
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, Emergency Solutions
Grants, and Continuum of Care programs, on February 20, 2015,\20\ which
provided that HUD expected recipients, subrecipients, and providers to
accommodate individuals in accordance with the individual's gender
identity. The guidance states that where a provider is uncertain of the
client's sex or gender identity and that information matters for the
determination of placement, the provider informs the client or
potential client that the agency provides shelter based on the
individual's gender identity. HUD now believes, however, that the
prohibition
[[Page 72647]]
of inquiries at Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) may hinder a provider from making
an appropriate placement decision for fear of violating the rule. For
this reason, HUD is proposing to remove the prohibition of inquiries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/Notice-CPD-15-02-Appropriate-Placement-for-Transgender-Persons-in-Single-Sex-Emergency-Shelters-and-Other-Facilities.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD's intent in proposing removal of Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) is not
to now permit recipients or subrecipients to ask questions in order to
seek information that could be used for discriminatory purposes.
Rather, HUD is proposing removal because Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) has
raised several legitimate questions about implementation. Removal of
Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) would allow shelters and other facilities with
physical limitations or configurations that require shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities to ask the individual's gender
identity, and it would permit inquiries of the individual's gender
identity and sexual orientation to determine the number of bedrooms to
which a household is entitled. Removal of Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(ii) also
reaffirms that HUD permits mechanisms for voluntary and anonymous
reporting of sexual orientation or gender identity for compliance with
data collection requirements of State and local governments or Federal
assistance programs.
III. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, and safety effects; distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. Under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review), a determination must be made whether a regulatory action is
significant and, therefore, subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the
order.
This proposed rule is consistent with Administration policy, as has
been noted in the preamble by citing to policy already implemented by
the U.S Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Justice, the
U.S. Department of Labor, and the CPD guidance already implemented by
HUD. This proposed rule clarifies how facilities funded by CPD that
have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities comply with
the requirement that equal access be provided to programs, buildings,
facilities, services, benefits, and accommodations in accordance with
the individual's gender identity. This clarification should provide
benefits to clients accessing CPD-funded, temporary, emergency shelters
and other buildings and facilities by assuring all clients receive
equal access, and will benefit the CPD-funded facilities by making
compliance with HUD's equal access requirements easier.
In this proposed rule, HUD recognizes a limited exception to
accommodating individuals in accordance with the individual's gender
identity when a recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or
provider identifies a legitimate safety risk that cannot be eliminated
or appropriately mitigated and makes a written case-by-case analysis.
The written case-by-case analysis only applies when the benefits,
services, and accommodations are not being provided to an individual in
accordance with the individual's gender identity. The written case-by-
case analysis benefits the client accessing the services and the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider by
keeping a record of when a legitimate safety risk is identified. The
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider must
also undertake reasonable efforts to ensure that equivalent alternative
accommodations are provided or refer the individual to a comparable
alternative program that will meet the individual's needs. This
proposed rule also seeks to amend the definition of gender identity in
Sec. 5.100 to clarify the difference between actual and perceived
gender identity, which would be necessary if proposed Sec. 5.106 is
adopted. This proposed rule also would eliminate the prohibition on
inquiries relating to sexual orientation or gender identity in Sec.
5.105(a)(2)(ii). Both of these proposed changes would make it easier
for recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, and
providers of programs, buildings, and facilities funded by CPD programs
to comply with the requirements of existing Sec. 5.105(a)(2)(i) and
proposed Sec. 5.106. An estimate of the cost of recording and
retaining that written case-by-case analysis, in the limited situations
in which it may apply, is discussed in the Paperwork Reduction Act
section of this proposed rule.
The docket file is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC
20410-0500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters building,
please schedule an appointment to review the docket file by calling the
Regulations Division at 202-402-3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing and individuals with speech
impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the Federal Relay
Service at 800-877-8339 (this is a toll-free number).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Approximately 4,000 providers participating in the CPD programs covered
by this rule are small organizations, but the number of entities that
would address the accommodation needs addressed by this rule is much
lower. The benefit of this proposed rule is to ensure equal access to
CPD programs, facilities, services, benefits, and accommodations. The
rule does require organizations to make a written case-by-case analysis
and referral in limited situations. Although HUD does not have any way
to determine the number of written case-by-case analyses or referrals
that will occur in any one year, HUD does not believe that costs will
be significant for small service providers and estimates it will take a
provider 15 minutes per case-by-case analysis and referral. HUD invites
interested parties to provide data with which HUD can formulate better
estimates of the compliance costs associated with the written notice
and referral requirements of this proposed rule. Accordingly, for the
foregoing reasons, the undersigned certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Notwithstanding HUD's determination that this proposed rule
would not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small
entities, HUD specifically invites comments regarding any less
burdensome alternatives to this rule that will meet HUD's objectives
and the principles in Executive Order 13559, as described in this
preamble.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule requires CPD programs to include a written case-
by-case analysis and make referrals. This rule also requires the
retention of
[[Page 72648]]
records to show that the case-by-case analysis was followed and
referral requirements in this rulemaking have been met. HUD estimates
that a case-by-case analysis and referral will be required infrequently
given that the case-by-case analysis is only necessary when the
provider is not providing accommodations to an individual in accordance
with the gender with which an individual identifies because there is a
legitimate safety risk that cannot be eliminated or appropriately
mitigated. HUD estimates that only 0.05 percent of facilities that are
covered by this proposed regulation will need to make a written case-
by-case analysis and referral, and estimates it will take an individual
15 minutes to complete the case-by-case analysis and referral. This
estimate includes the time required to write down the basis for the
analysis, identify service providers that provide similar services, and
make the referral.
The information collection requirements for the CPD's HOME
Investment Partnerships program, Community Development Block Grant
program (State and entitlement), Housing Opportunities for Persons with
AIDS program, Emergency Solutions Grants program, or Continuum of Care
program impacted by this rule have been approved by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and assigned OMB
control numbers 2506-0171, 2506-0085, 2506-0077, 2506-0133, 2506-0089,
and 2506-0199. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless the collection displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The existing forms will be
changed to include the new recordkeeping requirement added by this
proposed rule.
In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), HUD is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected agencies concerning this
collection of information to:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information.
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology (e.g.,
by permitting electronic submission of responses).
Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding the
information collection requirements in this rule. Comments must refer
to the proposed rule by name and docket number (FR-5583-P-01) and must
be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, Fax number: 202-395-
6947; and Reports Liaison Officer, Office of Housing, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW., Room 9128,
Washington, DC 20410.
Interested persons may submit comments regarding the information
collection requirements electronically through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly encourages
commenters to submit comments electronically. Electronic submission of
comments allows the commenter maximum time to prepare and submit a
comment, ensures timely receipt by HUD, and enables HUD to make them
immediately available to the public. Comments submitted electronically
through the https://www.regulations.gov Web site can be viewed by other
commenters and interested members of the public. Commenters should
follow the instructions provided on that site to submit comments
electronically.
Environmental Impact
This proposed rule sets forth nondiscrimination standards.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3), this rule is categorically
excluded from environmental review under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either: (i) Imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and
local governments and is not required by statute or (ii) preempts State
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This proposed rule would not have
federalism implications and would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and
tribal governments, and on the private sector. This proposed rule does
not impose any Federal mandates on any State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector, within the meaning of the UMRA.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 5
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Claims, Drug abuse,
Drug traffic control, Grant programs--housing and community
development, Grant programs--Indians, Individuals with disabilities,
Loan programs--housing and community development, Low and moderate
income housing, Mortgage insurance, Pets, Public housing, Rent
subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
PART 5--GENERAL HUD PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS; WAIVERS
0
1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 5 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437a, 1437c, 1437d, 1437f, 1437n,
3535(d), Sec. 327, Pub. L. 109-115, 119 Stat. 2936, and Sec. 607,
Pub. L. 109-162, 119 Stat. 3051.
0
2. In Sec. 5.100, revise the definition for ``Gender identity'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 5.100 Definitions.
* * * * *
Gender identity means the gender with which a person identifies,
regardless of the sex assigned to that person at birth. Perceived
gender identity means the gender with which a person is perceived to
identify based on that person's appearance, behavior, expression, other
gender related characteristics, or sex assigned to the individual at
birth.
* * * * *
Sec. 5.105 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 5.105, remove paragraph (a)(2)(ii) and redesignate
paragraph (a)(2)(i) as paragraph (a)(2).
0
4. Add Sec. 5.106 to read as follows:
Sec. 5.106 Providing access in accordance with the individual's
gender identity in community planning and development programs.
(a) Applicability. This section applies to recipients and
subrecipients of assistance under the HOME Investment Partnerships
program (24 CFR part 92), Community Development Block Grant program (24
CFR part 570), Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program (24
CFR part 574), Emergency Solutions Grants program (24 CFR part 576), or
Continuum of Care program (24
[[Page 72649]]
CFR part 578), as well as to owners, operators, and managers of
shelters and other buildings and facilities and providers of services
funded in whole or in part by any of these programs.
(b) Equal access in accordance with gender identity. The
admissions, occupancy, and operating policies and procedures of
recipients, subrecipients, owners, operators, managers, and providers
identified in paragraph (a) of this section, including policies and
procedures to protect privacy and security, shall be established or
amended, as necessary, and administered so:
(1) Equal access to programs, shelters, other buildings and
facilities, benefits, services, and accommodations is provided to
individuals in accordance with the individual's gender identity, and in
a manner that affords equal access to the individual's family; and
(2) Individuals are placed, served, and accommodated in accordance
with the individual's gender identity.
(c) Placement and accommodation in facilities with shared sleeping
quarters or shared bathing facilities. Placement and accommodation of
individuals in shelters and other buildings and facilities with
physical limitations or configurations that require and are permitted
to have shared sleeping quarters or shared bathing facilities shall be
made in accordance with the individual's gender identity. Under narrow
circumstances, a written case-by-case determination can be made as to
whether an alternative accommodation is necessary to ensure health and
safety. It shall be prohibited for such a determination to be based
solely on a person's actual or perceived gender identity, the
complaints of other clients, beneficiaries, or employees when those
complaints are based on actual or perceived gender identity, or on an
actual or perceived threat to health or safety that can be mitigated in
some other way that is less burdensome. In order to avoid unwarranted
denials of placement in accordance with an individual's gender
identity, decisions to provide accommodations based on concern for the
health and safety of the individual seeking accommodations should be
based on the individual's own request to be otherwise accommodated.
(d) Referrals. In any instance in which a case-by-case
determination is made under paragraph (c) of this section, the
recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator, manager, or provider shall
ensure that an opportunity to access equivalent alternative
accommodations, benefits, and services is provided or shall refer the
individual to a comparable alternative program with availability that
will meet the individual's needs.
(e) Documentation and record retention. Providers shall document
and maintain records of compliance with the requirements in paragraphs
(b), (c), and (d) of this section for a period of 5 years, including
but not limited to:
(1) The specific facts, circumstances, and reasoning relied upon in
any case-by-case determination that results in an alternative
admission, accommodation, benefit, or service to an individual or their
family;
(2) The facts and circumstances regarding the opportunities to
access alternative accommodations that are provided to an individual
and their families by the recipient, subrecipient, owner, operator,
manager, or provider; and
(3) The facts, circumstances, and outcomes regarding each referral
of an individual and their family to a comparable alternative program,
including information regarding the benefits, services, and
accommodations received.
Dated: October 23, 2015.
Juli[aacute]n Castro,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-29342 Filed 11-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P