Amitraz, Carfentrazone-ethyl, Ethephon, Malathion, Mancozeb, et al.; Tolerance Actions, 72593-72599 [2015-28491]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
A list of potentially affected entities is
provided in the Federal Register of
October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59593) (FRL–
9933–30). If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. What direct final SNURs are being
withdrawn?
In the Federal Register of October 2,
2015, EPA issued direct final SNURs for
the chemical substances that are
identified in this document. These
direct final SNURs were issued under
the procedures in 40 CFR part 721,
subpart D. Because the Agency received
notices of intent to submit adverse
comments, in accordance with
§ 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA is withdrawing
the direct final SNURs issued for the
following chemical substances, which
were the subject of PMNs: Isocyanate
prepolymer (generic), (PMN No. P–15–
221); methylene diisocyanate polymer
with diols and triols (generic), (PMN
No. P–15–247); and polymer of
isophorone diisocyanate and amineterminated propoxylatedpolyol
(generic), (PMN No. P–15–278). EPA
intends to publish proposed SNURs for
the chemical substances identified in
this document.
For further information regarding
EPA’s direct final rulemaking
procedures for issuing SNURs, see 40
CFR part 721, subpart D, and the
Federal Register of July 27, 1989 (54 FR
31314).
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action withdraws regulatory
requirements that have not gone into
effect and which contain no new or
amended requirements. As such, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have any adverse impacts,
economic or otherwise. The statutory
and Executive Order review
requirements applicable to the direct
final rule were discussed in the Federal
Register of October 2, 2015. Those
review requirements do not apply to
this action because it is a withdrawal
and does not contain any new or
amended requirements.
IV. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
72593
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
List of Subjects
Amitraz, Carfentrazone-ethyl,
Ethephon, Malathion, Mancozeb, et al.;
Tolerance Actions
40 CFR Part 9
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 12, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 9—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136–
136y;15 U.S.C. 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2601–
2671; 21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 348; 31 U.S.C.
9701; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d,
1314, 1318, 1321, 1326, 1330, 1342, 1344,
1345 (d) and (e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR
21243, 3 CFR, 1971–1975 Comp. p. 973; 42
U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g, 300g–
1, 300g–2, 300j–2, 300j–3, 300j–4, 300j–9,
1857 et seq., 6901–6992k, 7401–7671q, 7542,
9601–9657, 11023, 11048.
§ 9.1
[Amended]
2. In the table in § 9.1, under the
undesignated center heading
‘‘Significant New Uses of Chemical
Substances,’’ remove §§ 721.10871,
721.10873, and 721.10874.
■
PART 721—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
§§ 721.10871
■
[Removed]
4. Remove §§ 721.10871.
§§ 721.10873 and 721.10874
[Removed]
5. Remove §§ 721.10873 and
721.10874.
■
[FR Doc. 2015–29596 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0194; FRL–9935–01]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is revoking certain
tolerances for the fungicides
spiroxamine and triflumizole, the
herbicides carfentrazone-ethyl and
quizalofop ethyl; the insecticides
amitraz, oxamyl, propetamphos, and
spinosad; the plant growth regulators
ethephon and mepiquat; and the
tolerance on rice straw for multiple
active ingredients. Also, EPA is
modifying certain tolerances for the
fungicides mancozeb, thiram, and
triflumizole. In addition, EPA is
establishing new tolerances for the
fungicide mancozeb. Also, in
accordance with current Agency
practice, EPA is making minor revisions
to the tolerance expressions for
mepiquat and thiram. In addition, EPA
is restoring the listings of tolerances on
bulb onion and pear for methomyl
residues to remedy inadvertent drafting
errors and cover existing registrations.
EPA is deferring a decision on the
malathion tolerances at this time.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
18, 2016, except for the amendments to
40 CFR 180.253 (the restorations of the
bulb onion and pear tolerances for
methomyl), which are effective
November 20, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 19, 2016, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0194, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
72594
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8037; email address:
nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 408(g),
21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2014–0194 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before January 19, 2016. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2014–0194, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
In the Federal Register of July 11,
2014 (79 FR 40043) (FRL–9910–45),
EPA issued a proposed rule, in followup to canceled uses, to revoke specific
tolerances for amitraz, carfentrazoneethyl, ethephon, mepiquat, oxamyl,
propetamphos, quizalofop ethyl,
spinosad, spiroxamine, and triflumizole.
Also, because rice straw is no longer
considered by the Agency to be a
significant feed item, EPA proposed to
revoke the tolerance on rice straw for
multiple active ingredients. In follow-up
to reregistration, EPA proposed to
modify tolerances for malathion and
mancozeb, and also establish tolerances
for mancozeb, and post-reregistration
follow-up to modify specific tolerances
for thiram and triflumizole. In addition,
the Agency proposed minor revisions to
the tolerance expressions for malathion,
mepiquat, and thiram. The proposal
provided a 60-day comment period.
Since the proposed rule, in the
Federal Register of March 27, 2015 (80
FR 16302) (FRL–9924–86), the Agency
published a final rule that removed the
expiration/revocation date for the
thiram tolerance in 40 CFR 180.132 on
banana at 0.80 parts per million (ppm)
for thiram residues. Also, in the Federal
Register of June 19, 2015 (80 FR 35249)
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(FRL–9928–82), the Agency published a
final rule that established a thiram
tolerance in 40 CFR 180.132 on avocado
at 15 ppm for thiram residues.
EPA is finalizing specific mancozeb
tolerance actions in order to implement
the tolerance recommendations made
during the reregistration and tolerance
reassessment processes (including
follow-up on canceled or additional
uses of pesticides). As part of these
processes, EPA is required to determine
whether each of the amended tolerances
meets the safety standard of FFDCA.
The safety finding determination of
‘‘reasonable certainty of no harm’’ is
discussed in detail in each
Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED)
and Report on FQPA Tolerance
Reassessment Progress and Interim Risk
Management Decision (TRED) for the
active ingredient. REDs and TREDs
recommend the implementation of
certain tolerance actions, including
modifications, to reflect current use
patterns, to meet safety findings and
change commodity names and
groupings in accordance with new EPA
policy. Printed copies of many REDs
and TREDs may be obtained from EPA’s
National Service Center for
Environmental Publications (EPA/
NSCEP), P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati,
OH 45242–2419; telephone number:
(800) 490–9198; fax number: (513) 489–
8695; Internet at https://www.epa.gov/
ncepihom and from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS),
5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA
22161; telephone number: (800) 553–
6847 or (703) 605–6000; Internet at
https://www.ntis.gov. Electronic copies of
REDs and TREDs are available on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
and https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
reregistration/status.htm.
In this final rule, EPA is revoking
certain tolerances and/or tolerance
exemptions because either they are no
longer needed or are associated with
food uses that are no longer registered
under the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
in the United States. Those instances
where registrations were canceled were
because the registrant failed to pay the
required maintenance fee and/or the
registrant voluntarily requested
cancellation of one or more registered
uses of the pesticide active ingredient.
The tolerances revoked by this final rule
are no longer necessary to cover
residues of the relevant pesticides in or
on domestically treated commodities or
commodities treated outside but
imported into the United States. It is
EPA’s general practice to issue a final
rule revoking those tolerances and
tolerance exemptions for residues of
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
pesticide active ingredients on crop uses
for which there are no active
registrations under FIFRA, unless any
person in comments on the proposal
indicates a need for the tolerance or
tolerance exemption to cover residues in
or on imported commodities or legally
treated domestic commodities.
EPA has historically been concerned
that retention of tolerances that are not
necessary to cover residues in or on
legally treated foods may encourage
misuse of pesticides within the United
States.
Generally, EPA will proceed with the
revocation of these tolerances on the
grounds discussed in Unit II.A. if one of
the following conditions applies:
1. Prior to EPA’s issuance of a FFDCA
section 408(f) order requesting
additional data or issuance of a FFDCA
section 408(d) or (e) order revoking the
tolerances on other grounds,
commenters retract the comment
identifying a need for the tolerance to be
retained.
2. EPA independently verifies that the
tolerance is no longer needed.
3. The tolerance is not supported by
data that demonstrate that the tolerance
meets the requirements under the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA).
This final rule does not revoke those
tolerances for which EPA received
comments stating a need for the
tolerance to be retained. Among the
comments received by EPA, are the
following:
1. General—i. Comment by private
citizen. An anonymous comment was
received which expressed concerns
about the toxicity of pesticides in
general.
Agency response. The commenter did
not take issue with the Agency’s specific
conclusions to revoke, modify, establish
tolerances, or revise tolerance
expressions. Also, the commenter did
not refer to any specific studies which
pertain to those conclusions. The
Agency has not changed its previous
determination that the tolerances in
question are safe and is therefore not
making any changes in response to these
comments.
2. Specific chemical comments—i.
Oxamyl-Comment by DuPont Crop
Protection. The commenter requested
that the soybean seed tolerance for
oxamyl be retained for possible future
actions. DuPont noted that since the
soybean use was deleted from oxamyl
labels in 2006 via EPA’s approval of its
request for voluntary cancellation,
growers have experienced an increasing
need for management of soybean cyst
nematode.
Agency response. The use of oxamyl
on soybean was officially canceled
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
under section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C.
136d(f)(1), under which a registrant of a
pesticide product may request that the
product registration be canceled or
amended to terminate one or more uses.
Because EPA canceled the soybean use
in response to DuPont’s request, and no
other oxamyl products include a use on
soybeans, there is currently no legal use
of oxamyl on soybeans. EPA will not
retain the tolerance based on the
possibility that someone may apply for
a new use on soybean in the future.
Tolerances are generally maintained for
current uses. Therefore, EPA is revoking
the tolerance for oxamyl in 40 CFR
180.303(a) on soybean, seed.
EPA is considering the public
comments received on malathion in
response to the proposed rule of July 11,
2014 and is thus deferring a decision on
the malathion tolerances at this time.
The Agency will respond to the
comments in a future notice to be
published in the Federal Register.
With the exception of malathion and
oxamyl, the Agency did not receive any
specific comments in the docket, during
the 60-day comment period, concerning
proposed tolerance actions associated
with pesticide active ingredients, as
described in the Federal Register of July
11, 2014. Therefore, the exceptions of
malathion, EPA is finalizing
amendments in the proposed rule of
July 11, 2014. Also, EPA is maintaining
both the establishment of the thiram
tolerance on avocado (now in newly
codified 40 CFR 180.132(a)(1) for thiram
residues), and the removal of the
expiration/revocation date on the thiram
tolerance on banana (now in newly
codified 40 CFR.180.132(a)(2) for carbon
disulfide residues). In addition, EPA is
finalizing the amendments in the
proposed rule of July 11, 2014 for
thiram tolerances on apple, banana,
peach, and strawberry (now in newly
codified 40 CFR 180.132(a)(2) for carbon
disulfide residues). For a detailed
discussion of the Agency’s rationale for
the finalized tolerance actions, refer to
the proposed rule of July 11, 2014.
In this final rule EPA is also making
corrections to two unrelated provisions.
In the Federal Register of May 9, 2012
(77 FR 27164) (FRL–9345–2), EPA
issued a proposed rule covering
multiple pesticide active ingredients,
including methomyl. In that rule, in
order to conform to current Agency
practice, EPA proposed to revise the
tolerance commodity terminology, in 40
CFR 180.253 for methomyl, for
vegetable, root (an outdated term) at
0.2(N) ppm to vegetable, root and tuber,
group 1 at 0.2 ppm. Also, EPA proposed
to make minor revisions to the tolerance
expressions for methomyl in 40 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72595
180.253(a) and (c). In follow-up, EPA
promulgated a final rule in the Federal
Register of September 26, 2012 (77 FR
59120) (FRL–9358–8) with an effective
date of March 25, 2013. However, the
outdated tolerance term ‘‘vegetable,
root’’ had covered the use on bulb
onions. Therefore, the terminology
revision by EPA inadvertently removed
a tolerance which covered methomyl
residues in or on bulb onions. Also,
while EPA revised the methomyl
tolerance expressions in 180.253(a) and
(c), EPA inadvertently removed the table
under paragraph (c), which contained
an entry for a regional tolerance on pear
at 4 ppm. Yet, active registrations for
use of methomyl on bulb onions and
pears existed at that time and now.
Consequently, in this final rule, EPA is
restoring coverage for methomyl
residues on the bulb onion commodity
as an individual tolerance in 40 CFR
180.253(a) for onion, dry bulb at 0.2
ppm and in 40 CFR 180.253(c) on pear
at 4 ppm.
EPA is issuing these tolerance actions
for methomyl in this final rule for this
purpose without notice and opportunity
to comment. Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act provides
that notice and comment is not
necessary ‘‘when the agency for good
cause finds (and incorporates the
finding and a brief statement of reasons
therefore in the rules issued) that notice
and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ EPA finds good
cause here because restoring the listings
of tolerance coverages on bulb onion
and pear for methomyl residues merely
corrects two inadvertent drafting errors.
As such, notice and comment is
unnecessary.
B. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA may issue a regulation
establishing, modifying, or revoking a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(e).
In this final rule, EPA is establishing,
modifying, and revoking tolerances to
implement the tolerance
recommendations made in the RED for
mancozeb during the reregistration and
tolerance reassessment processes, and as
follow-up on canceled uses of
pesticides.
C. When do these actions become
effective?
As stated in the DATES section, this
regulation is effective May 18, 2016,
except for the restorations of the bulb
onion and pear tolerances for methomyl,
which are effective November 20, 2015.
With the exception of methomyl, for
which EPA is restoring tolerances
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
72596
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
inadvertently removed, EPA is delaying
the effective date of these finalized
actions to allow a reasonable interval for
producers in exporting members of the
World Trade Organization’s Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement
to adapt to the requirements of a final
rule. EPA believes that existing stocks of
the canceled or amended pesticide
products labeled for the uses associated
with the revoked tolerances have been
completely exhausted and that treated
commodities have had sufficient time
for passage through the channels of
trade.
Any commodities listed in the
regulatory text of this document that are
treated with the pesticides subject to
this final rule, and that are in the
channels of trade following the
tolerance revocations, shall be subject to
FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established
by FQPA. Under this unit, any residues
of these pesticides in or on such food
shall not render the food adulterated so
long as it is shown to the satisfaction of
the Food and Drug Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result
of an application or use of the pesticide
at a time and in a manner that was
lawful under FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the
level that was authorized at the time of
the application or use to be present on
the food under a tolerance or exemption
from tolerance. Evidence to show that
food was lawfully treated may include
records that verify the dates that the
pesticide was applied to such food.
III. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for carfentrazone-ethyl, mepiquat,
propetamphos, quizalofop ethyl,
spiroxamine, triflumizole, ethephon in
or on cucumber, oxamyl in or on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
soybean seed, spinosad in or on
coriander leaves, or total
dithiocarbamates in or on barley bran,
barley flour, field corn grain, oat flour,
oat grain, rye bran, rye grain, wheat
bran, wheat flour, and wheat, shorts.
The Codex has established MRLs for
total dithiocarbamates determined as
carbon disulfide in or on various
commodities, including barley and
wheat, each at 1 milligrams/kilogram
(mg/kg). These MRLs are the same as the
tolerances finalized for mancozeb in the
United States.
The Codex has established MRLs for
total dithiocarbamates determined as
carbon disulfide in or on various
commodities, including papaya at 5 mg/
kg. This MRL will be covered by a
finalized U.S. tolerance at a higher level
than the MRL. The MRL is different
than the finalized U.S. tolerance for
mancozeb in the United States because
of differences in residue definition, use
patterns, and/or good agricultural
practices.
The Codex has established a MRL for
amitraz in or on various commodities,
including cotton seed at 0.5 mg/kg. This
MRL is covered by the current U.S.
tolerance at a higher level than the MRL,
but would no longer be covered due to
the revocation of the U.S. tolerance.
The Codex has established MRLs for
total dithiocarbamates determined as
carbon disulfide in or on various
commodities, including banana at 2 mg/
kg, peach at 7 mg/kg, and strawberry at
5 mg/kg. The MRLs for banana and
peach are the same as the U.S.
tolerances proposed for thiram in the
United States. The MRL for strawberry
will be covered by a finalized U.S.
tolerance at a higher level than the MRL.
The MRL for strawberry is different than
the tolerance finalized for thiram in the
United States because of differences in
use patterns, and/or good agricultural
practices.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
In this final rule, EPA establishes
tolerances under FFDCA section 408(e),
and also modifies and revokes specific
tolerances established under FFDCA
section 408. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions (i.e., establishment and
modification of a tolerance and
tolerance revocation for which
extraordinary circumstances do not
exist) from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 13211, entitled
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.). Nor does it require any
special considerations as required by
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any other
Agency action under Executive Order
13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency
previously assessed whether
establishment of tolerances, exemptions
from tolerances, raising of tolerance
levels, expansion of exemptions, or
revocations might significantly impact a
substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter,
these actions do not impose a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These analyses
for tolerance establishments and
modifications, and for tolerance
revocations were published in the
Federal Register on May 4, 1981 (46 FR
24950) and on December 17, 1997 (62
FR 66020) (FRL–5753–1), respectively,
and were provided to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. Taking into account
this analysis and available information
concerning the pesticides listed in this
rule, the Agency hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In a
memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA
determined that eight conditions must
all be satisfied in order for an import
tolerance or tolerance exemption
revocation to adversely affect a
significant number of small entity
importers, and that there is a negligible
joint probability of all eight conditions
holding simultaneously with respect to
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
any particular revocation. (This Agency
document is available in the docket of
the proposed rule). Furthermore, for the
pesticides named in this final rule, the
Agency knows of no extraordinary
circumstances that exist as to the
present revocations that would change
EPA’s previous analysis. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4).
For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have
any ‘‘tribal implications’’ as described
in Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
Parts
per million
Commodity
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
72597
Apple .....................................
Banana 1 ...............................
Peach ....................................
Strawberry ............................
5
2.0
7.0
13
1 There are no U.S. registrations as of September 23, 2009.
*
*
*
§ 180.142
*
*
[Amended]
3. In § 180.142, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
§ 180.169
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■
Dated: October 20, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
§ 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for
residues.
4. In § 180.169, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
■ 5. In § 180.176, revise the table in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(a) * * *
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
Commodity
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.132, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 180.132
Thiram; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. (1) A tolerances for
residues of the fungicide thiram
(tetramethyl thiuram disulfide),
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
the table in this paragraph. Compliance
with the tolerance level specified in this
paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only thiram.
Parts
per million
Commodity
Avocado 1 ..............................
1 No
15
U.S. registrations as of September 23,
2009.
(2) Tolerances are established for
residues of the fungicide thiram,
tetramethyl thiuram disulfide, including
its metabolites and degradates, in or on
the commodities in the table in this
paragraph. Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in this
paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only those thiram residues
convertible to and expressed in terms of
the degradate carbon disulfide, in or on
the commodity.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
Almond ..................................
Almond, hulls ........................
Apple .....................................
Asparagus .............................
Atemoya ................................
Banana .................................
Barley, bran ..........................
Barley, flour ..........................
Barley, grain .........................
Barley, hay ............................
Barley, pearled barley ..........
Barley, straw .........................
Beet, sugar, dried pulp .........
Beet, sugar, roots .................
Beet, sugar, tops ..................
Broccoli .................................
Cabbage ...............................
Canistel .................................
Cattle, kidney ........................
Cattle, liver ............................
Cherimoya ............................
Corn, field, forage .................
Corn, field, grain ...................
Corn, field, stover .................
Corn, pop, grain ....................
Corn, pop, stover ..................
Corn, sweet, forage ..............
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob
with husks removed ..........
Corn, sweet, stover ..............
Cotton, undelinted seed .......
Crabapple .............................
Cranberry ..............................
Custard apple .......................
Fennel ...................................
Flax, seed .............................
Ginseng ................................
Goat, kidney .........................
Goat, liver .............................
Grape ....................................
Hog, kidney ...........................
Hog, liver ..............................
Horse, kidney ........................
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Parts
per million
0.1
4
0.6
0.1
3.0
2
2
1.2
1
30
20
25
3.0
1.2
60
7
9
15.0
0.5
0.5
3.0
40
0.06
15
0.1
40
70
0.1
40
0.5
0.6
5
3.0
2.5
0.15
1.2
0.5
0.5
1.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
72598
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Parts
per million
Commodity
Horse, liver ...........................
Lettuce, head ........................
Lettuce, leaf ..........................
Mango ...................................
Oat, flour ...............................
Oat, grain ..............................
Oat, groats/rolled oats ..........
Oat, hay ................................
Oat, straw .............................
Onion, bulb ...........................
Papaya ..................................
Peanut ..................................
Peanut, hay ..........................
Pear ......................................
Pepper ..................................
Potato ...................................
Poultry, kidney ......................
Poultry, liver ..........................
Quince ..................................
Rice, grain ............................
Rye, bran ..............................
Rye, flour ..............................
Parts
per million
Commodity
0.5
3.5
18
15.0
1.2
1
20
30
25
1.5
9
0.1
65
0.6
12
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.06
2
1.2
Rye, grain .............................
Rye, straw .............................
Sapodilla ...............................
Sapote, mamey ....................
Sapote, white ........................
Sheep, kidney .......................
Sheep, liver ...........................
Sorghum, grain, forage .........
Sorghum, grain, grain ...........
Sorghum, grain, stover .........
Star apple .............................
Sugar apple ..........................
Tangerine 1 ...........................
Tomato ..................................
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9
Walnut ...................................
Wheat, bran ..........................
Wheat, flour ..........................
Wheat, germ .........................
Wheat, grain .........................
Wheat, hay ...........................
Wheat, middlings ..................
1
25
15.0
15.0
15.0
0.5
0.5
0.15
0.25
0.15
15.0
3.0
10
2.5
2.0
0.70
2
1.2
20
1
30
20
Wheat, shorts .......................
Wheat, straw .........................
*
*
*
§ 180.205
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
6. In § 180.205, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.253
[Amended]
7. In § 180.253, add alphabetically an
entry for ‘‘Onion, dry bulb’’ to the table
in paragraph (a), and add a table to
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.253 Methomyl; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
Parts
per million
*
Pear ......................................
*
§ 180.274
*
13. In § 180.301, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
*
4
[Amended]
§ 180.355
15. In § 180.355, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
[Amended]
9. In § 180.287, remove the entry for
‘‘Cotton, undelinted seed 1’’ and the
footnote from the table in paragraph (a).
[Amended]
10. In § 180.288, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
[Amended]
11. In § 180.293, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 180.300
[Amended]
12. In § 180.300, remove the entry for
‘‘Cucumber’’ from the table in paragraph
(a).
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Nov 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
[Amended]
■
■
§ 180.293
[Amended]
14. In § 180.303, remove the entry for
‘‘Soybean, seed’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
8. In § 180.274, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
§ 180.288
§ 180.303
■
*
■
§ 180.287
[Amended]
§ 180.361
0.2
*
§ 180.384 Mepiquat (N,Ndimethylpiperidinium); tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of the plant
growth regulator mepiquat, including its
metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities in the table in this
paragraph. Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in this
paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only mepiquat, N,Ndimethylpiperidinium, in or on the
commodity.
Parts
per million
Commodity
16. In § 180.361, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
[Amended]
17. In § 180.377, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(2).
■
§ 180.383
*
None.
*
[Amended]
■
§ 180.377
Expiration/
Revocation
date
*
*
■
Parts
per million
Commodity
*
*
§ 180.301
*
*
[Amended]
*
*
*
*
*
Onion, dry bulb ........................................................................................................................................................
*
2
25
1 There are no U.S. registrations for use of
mancozeb on tangerine.
Commodity
*
Parts
per million
Commodity
[Amended]
Cattle, meat byproducts .......
Cotton, gin byproducts .........
Cotton, undelinted seed .......
Goat, meat byproducts .........
Grape ....................................
Grape, raisin .........................
Hog, meat byproducts ..........
Horse, meat byproducts .......
Sheep, meat byproducts ......
*
18. In § 180.383, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
*
*
*
0.1
6.0
2.0
0.1
1.0
5.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
*
■
19. In § 180.384, revise paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 180.399
[Amended]
20. In § 180.399, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
■
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 224 / Friday, November 20, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 180.401
[Amended]
21. In § 180.401, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.417
§ 180.476 Triflumizole; tolerances for
residues.
Parts
per million
Commodity
■
§ 180.418
[Amended]
23. In § 180.418, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(2).
■
§ 180.425
[Amended]
24. In § 180.425, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.434
[Amended]
25. In § 180.434, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.438
[Amended]
26. In § 180.438, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1) and from the table in
paragraph (a)(2).
■
§ 180.439
[Amended]
27. In § 180.439, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.441
Berry, low growing, subgroup
13–07G, except cranberry
Brassica, head and stem,
subgroup 5A ......................
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B ...........................
Canistel .................................
Cherry, sweet .......................
Cherry, tart ............................
Cilantro, leaves .....................
Fruit, pome, group 11–10 .....
Fruit, small, vine climbing,
except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13–07F ....................
Hazelnut ................................
Hop, dried cones ..................
Leafy greens subgroup 4A,
except spinach ..................
Mango ...................................
Papaya ..................................
Pineapple ..............................
Sapodilla ...............................
Sapote, black ........................
Sapote, mamey ....................
Star apple .............................
Swiss chard ..........................
Tomato ..................................
Turnip, greens ......................
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9
28. In § 180.441, remove the entry for
‘‘Soybean, soapstock’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
§ 180.445
[Amended]
29. In § 180.445, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.447
[Amended]
30. In § 180.447, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(2).
■
§ 180.451
[Amended]
31. In § 180.451, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
[Amended]
32. In § 180.463, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
33. In § 180.473, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■ 34. In § 180.476, revise the table in
paragraph (a)(1) and revise the table in
paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
■
17:28 Nov 19, 2015
2.5
0.05
50
2.5
4.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
18
1.5
40
0.5
Parts
per million
Cattle, fat ..............................
Cattle, meat byproducts .......
Goat, fat ................................
Goat, meat byproducts .........
Horse, fat ..............................
Horse, meat byproducts .......
Sheep, fat .............................
Sheep, meat byproducts ......
*
*
§ 180.479
*
*
Jkt 238001
[Amended]
40. In § 180.517, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.541
■
[Removed]
41. Remove § 180.541.
§ 180.555
[Amended]
42. In § 180.555, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.570
[Amended]
43. In § 180.570, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
35
2.5 paragraph (a)(2).
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
■
§ 180.577
[Amended]
44. In § 180.577, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.602
[Amended]
45. In § 180.602, remove the entry for
‘‘Hop, dried cones’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
[Amended]
46. In § 180.605, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
§ 180.625
[Amended]
47. In § 180.625, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
■
[FR Doc. 2015–28491 Filed 11–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
[Amended]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
35. In § 180.479, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(2).
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
§ 180.484
48 CFR Parts 212, 225, and 252
[Amended]
36. In § 180.484, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
[Docket DARS–2015–0024]
§ 180.495
37. In § 180.495, remove the entry for
‘‘Coriander, leaves’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Photovoltaic
Devices From the United States
(DFARS Case 2015–D007)
§ 180.507
AGENCY:
[Amended]
■
[Amended]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
40
2.5
1.5
1.5
35
0.50
■
■
§ 180.473
8.0
■
■
§ 180.463
2.0
§ 180.605
Commodity
■
39. In § 180.515, remove the entries
for ‘‘Caneberry subgroup 13A,’’ ‘‘Cotton,
hulls,’’ ‘‘Cotton, meal,’’ ‘‘Cotton, refined
oil’’ and ‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a).
§ 180.517
(2) * * *
[Amended]
[Amended]
■
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
[Amended]
22. In § 180.417, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
§ 180.515
72599
[Amended]
38. In § 180.507, remove the entry for
‘‘Rice, straw’’ from the table in
paragraph (a)(1).
■
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 0750–AI41
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 224 (Friday, November 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72593-72599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28491]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0194; FRL-9935-01]
Amitraz, Carfentrazone-ethyl, Ethephon, Malathion, Mancozeb, et
al.; Tolerance Actions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is revoking certain tolerances for the fungicides
spiroxamine and triflumizole, the herbicides carfentrazone-ethyl and
quizalofop ethyl; the insecticides amitraz, oxamyl, propetamphos, and
spinosad; the plant growth regulators ethephon and mepiquat; and the
tolerance on rice straw for multiple active ingredients. Also, EPA is
modifying certain tolerances for the fungicides mancozeb, thiram, and
triflumizole. In addition, EPA is establishing new tolerances for the
fungicide mancozeb. Also, in accordance with current Agency practice,
EPA is making minor revisions to the tolerance expressions for mepiquat
and thiram. In addition, EPA is restoring the listings of tolerances on
bulb onion and pear for methomyl residues to remedy inadvertent
drafting errors and cover existing registrations. EPA is deferring a
decision on the malathion tolerances at this time.
DATES: This regulation is effective May 18, 2016, except for the
amendments to 40 CFR 180.253 (the restorations of the bulb onion and
pear tolerances for methomyl), which are effective November 20, 2015.
Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before
January 19, 2016, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0194, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review
[[Page 72594]]
the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket
available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Nevola, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8037; email address:
nevola.joseph@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section
408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect
of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections.
You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2014-0194 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or before January 19, 2016. Addresses
for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are
provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0194, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
A. What action is the agency taking?
In the Federal Register of July 11, 2014 (79 FR 40043) (FRL-9910-
45), EPA issued a proposed rule, in follow-up to canceled uses, to
revoke specific tolerances for amitraz, carfentrazone-ethyl, ethephon,
mepiquat, oxamyl, propetamphos, quizalofop ethyl, spinosad,
spiroxamine, and triflumizole. Also, because rice straw is no longer
considered by the Agency to be a significant feed item, EPA proposed to
revoke the tolerance on rice straw for multiple active ingredients. In
follow-up to reregistration, EPA proposed to modify tolerances for
malathion and mancozeb, and also establish tolerances for mancozeb, and
post-reregistration follow-up to modify specific tolerances for thiram
and triflumizole. In addition, the Agency proposed minor revisions to
the tolerance expressions for malathion, mepiquat, and thiram. The
proposal provided a 60-day comment period.
Since the proposed rule, in the Federal Register of March 27, 2015
(80 FR 16302) (FRL-9924-86), the Agency published a final rule that
removed the expiration/revocation date for the thiram tolerance in 40
CFR 180.132 on banana at 0.80 parts per million (ppm) for thiram
residues. Also, in the Federal Register of June 19, 2015 (80 FR 35249)
(FRL-9928-82), the Agency published a final rule that established a
thiram tolerance in 40 CFR 180.132 on avocado at 15 ppm for thiram
residues.
EPA is finalizing specific mancozeb tolerance actions in order to
implement the tolerance recommendations made during the reregistration
and tolerance reassessment processes (including follow-up on canceled
or additional uses of pesticides). As part of these processes, EPA is
required to determine whether each of the amended tolerances meets the
safety standard of FFDCA. The safety finding determination of
``reasonable certainty of no harm'' is discussed in detail in each
Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) and Report on FQPA Tolerance
Reassessment Progress and Interim Risk Management Decision (TRED) for
the active ingredient. REDs and TREDs recommend the implementation of
certain tolerance actions, including modifications, to reflect current
use patterns, to meet safety findings and change commodity names and
groupings in accordance with new EPA policy. Printed copies of many
REDs and TREDs may be obtained from EPA's National Service Center for
Environmental Publications (EPA/NSCEP), P.O. Box 42419, Cincinnati, OH
45242-2419; telephone number: (800) 490-9198; fax number: (513) 489-
8695; Internet at https://www.epa.gov/ncepihom and from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield,
VA 22161; telephone number: (800) 553-6847 or (703) 605-6000; Internet
at https://www.ntis.gov. Electronic copies of REDs and TREDs are
available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov and https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/status.htm.
In this final rule, EPA is revoking certain tolerances and/or
tolerance exemptions because either they are no longer needed or are
associated with food uses that are no longer registered under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) in the
United States. Those instances where registrations were canceled were
because the registrant failed to pay the required maintenance fee and/
or the registrant voluntarily requested cancellation of one or more
registered uses of the pesticide active ingredient. The tolerances
revoked by this final rule are no longer necessary to cover residues of
the relevant pesticides in or on domestically treated commodities or
commodities treated outside but imported into the United States. It is
EPA's general practice to issue a final rule revoking those tolerances
and tolerance exemptions for residues of
[[Page 72595]]
pesticide active ingredients on crop uses for which there are no active
registrations under FIFRA, unless any person in comments on the
proposal indicates a need for the tolerance or tolerance exemption to
cover residues in or on imported commodities or legally treated
domestic commodities.
EPA has historically been concerned that retention of tolerances
that are not necessary to cover residues in or on legally treated foods
may encourage misuse of pesticides within the United States.
Generally, EPA will proceed with the revocation of these tolerances
on the grounds discussed in Unit II.A. if one of the following
conditions applies:
1. Prior to EPA's issuance of a FFDCA section 408(f) order
requesting additional data or issuance of a FFDCA section 408(d) or (e)
order revoking the tolerances on other grounds, commenters retract the
comment identifying a need for the tolerance to be retained.
2. EPA independently verifies that the tolerance is no longer
needed.
3. The tolerance is not supported by data that demonstrate that the
tolerance meets the requirements under the Food Quality Protection Act
(FQPA).
This final rule does not revoke those tolerances for which EPA
received comments stating a need for the tolerance to be retained.
Among the comments received by EPA, are the following:
1. General--i. Comment by private citizen. An anonymous comment was
received which expressed concerns about the toxicity of pesticides in
general.
Agency response. The commenter did not take issue with the Agency's
specific conclusions to revoke, modify, establish tolerances, or revise
tolerance expressions. Also, the commenter did not refer to any
specific studies which pertain to those conclusions. The Agency has not
changed its previous determination that the tolerances in question are
safe and is therefore not making any changes in response to these
comments.
2. Specific chemical comments--i. Oxamyl-Comment by DuPont Crop
Protection. The commenter requested that the soybean seed tolerance for
oxamyl be retained for possible future actions. DuPont noted that since
the soybean use was deleted from oxamyl labels in 2006 via EPA's
approval of its request for voluntary cancellation, growers have
experienced an increasing need for management of soybean cyst nematode.
Agency response. The use of oxamyl on soybean was officially
canceled under section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1), under
which a registrant of a pesticide product may request that the product
registration be canceled or amended to terminate one or more uses.
Because EPA canceled the soybean use in response to DuPont's request,
and no other oxamyl products include a use on soybeans, there is
currently no legal use of oxamyl on soybeans. EPA will not retain the
tolerance based on the possibility that someone may apply for a new use
on soybean in the future. Tolerances are generally maintained for
current uses. Therefore, EPA is revoking the tolerance for oxamyl in 40
CFR 180.303(a) on soybean, seed.
EPA is considering the public comments received on malathion in
response to the proposed rule of July 11, 2014 and is thus deferring a
decision on the malathion tolerances at this time. The Agency will
respond to the comments in a future notice to be published in the
Federal Register.
With the exception of malathion and oxamyl, the Agency did not
receive any specific comments in the docket, during the 60-day comment
period, concerning proposed tolerance actions associated with pesticide
active ingredients, as described in the Federal Register of July 11,
2014. Therefore, the exceptions of malathion, EPA is finalizing
amendments in the proposed rule of July 11, 2014. Also, EPA is
maintaining both the establishment of the thiram tolerance on avocado
(now in newly codified 40 CFR 180.132(a)(1) for thiram residues), and
the removal of the expiration/revocation date on the thiram tolerance
on banana (now in newly codified 40 CFR.180.132(a)(2) for carbon
disulfide residues). In addition, EPA is finalizing the amendments in
the proposed rule of July 11, 2014 for thiram tolerances on apple,
banana, peach, and strawberry (now in newly codified 40 CFR
180.132(a)(2) for carbon disulfide residues). For a detailed discussion
of the Agency's rationale for the finalized tolerance actions, refer to
the proposed rule of July 11, 2014.
In this final rule EPA is also making corrections to two unrelated
provisions. In the Federal Register of May 9, 2012 (77 FR 27164) (FRL-
9345-2), EPA issued a proposed rule covering multiple pesticide active
ingredients, including methomyl. In that rule, in order to conform to
current Agency practice, EPA proposed to revise the tolerance commodity
terminology, in 40 CFR 180.253 for methomyl, for vegetable, root (an
outdated term) at 0.2(N) ppm to vegetable, root and tuber, group 1 at
0.2 ppm. Also, EPA proposed to make minor revisions to the tolerance
expressions for methomyl in 40 CFR 180.253(a) and (c). In follow-up,
EPA promulgated a final rule in the Federal Register of September 26,
2012 (77 FR 59120) (FRL-9358-8) with an effective date of March 25,
2013. However, the outdated tolerance term ``vegetable, root'' had
covered the use on bulb onions. Therefore, the terminology revision by
EPA inadvertently removed a tolerance which covered methomyl residues
in or on bulb onions. Also, while EPA revised the methomyl tolerance
expressions in 180.253(a) and (c), EPA inadvertently removed the table
under paragraph (c), which contained an entry for a regional tolerance
on pear at 4 ppm. Yet, active registrations for use of methomyl on bulb
onions and pears existed at that time and now. Consequently, in this
final rule, EPA is restoring coverage for methomyl residues on the bulb
onion commodity as an individual tolerance in 40 CFR 180.253(a) for
onion, dry bulb at 0.2 ppm and in 40 CFR 180.253(c) on pear at 4 ppm.
EPA is issuing these tolerance actions for methomyl in this final
rule for this purpose without notice and opportunity to comment.
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act provides that
notice and comment is not necessary ``when the agency for good cause
finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons
therefore in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon
are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.''
EPA finds good cause here because restoring the listings of tolerance
coverages on bulb onion and pear for methomyl residues merely corrects
two inadvertent drafting errors. As such, notice and comment is
unnecessary.
B. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA may issue a regulation establishing, modifying, or revoking a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(e). In this final rule, EPA is
establishing, modifying, and revoking tolerances to implement the
tolerance recommendations made in the RED for mancozeb during the
reregistration and tolerance reassessment processes, and as follow-up
on canceled uses of pesticides.
C. When do these actions become effective?
As stated in the DATES section, this regulation is effective May
18, 2016, except for the restorations of the bulb onion and pear
tolerances for methomyl, which are effective November 20, 2015. With
the exception of methomyl, for which EPA is restoring tolerances
[[Page 72596]]
inadvertently removed, EPA is delaying the effective date of these
finalized actions to allow a reasonable interval for producers in
exporting members of the World Trade Organization's Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures Agreement to adapt to the requirements of a
final rule. EPA believes that existing stocks of the canceled or
amended pesticide products labeled for the uses associated with the
revoked tolerances have been completely exhausted and that treated
commodities have had sufficient time for passage through the channels
of trade.
Any commodities listed in the regulatory text of this document that
are treated with the pesticides subject to this final rule, and that
are in the channels of trade following the tolerance revocations, shall
be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by FQPA. Under
this unit, any residues of these pesticides in or on such food shall
not render the food adulterated so long as it is shown to the
satisfaction of the Food and Drug Administration that:
1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide at a time and in a manner that was lawful under FIFRA.
2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the
time of the application or use to be present on the food under a
tolerance or exemption from tolerance. Evidence to show that food was
lawfully treated may include records that verify the dates that the
pesticide was applied to such food.
III. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for carfentrazone-ethyl,
mepiquat, propetamphos, quizalofop ethyl, spiroxamine, triflumizole,
ethephon in or on cucumber, oxamyl in or on soybean seed, spinosad in
or on coriander leaves, or total dithiocarbamates in or on barley bran,
barley flour, field corn grain, oat flour, oat grain, rye bran, rye
grain, wheat bran, wheat flour, and wheat, shorts.
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates
determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including
barley and wheat, each at 1 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg). These MRLs are
the same as the tolerances finalized for mancozeb in the United States.
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates
determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including
papaya at 5 mg/kg. This MRL will be covered by a finalized U.S.
tolerance at a higher level than the MRL. The MRL is different than the
finalized U.S. tolerance for mancozeb in the United States because of
differences in residue definition, use patterns, and/or good
agricultural practices.
The Codex has established a MRL for amitraz in or on various
commodities, including cotton seed at 0.5 mg/kg. This MRL is covered by
the current U.S. tolerance at a higher level than the MRL, but would no
longer be covered due to the revocation of the U.S. tolerance.
The Codex has established MRLs for total dithiocarbamates
determined as carbon disulfide in or on various commodities, including
banana at 2 mg/kg, peach at 7 mg/kg, and strawberry at 5 mg/kg. The
MRLs for banana and peach are the same as the U.S. tolerances proposed
for thiram in the United States. The MRL for strawberry will be covered
by a finalized U.S. tolerance at a higher level than the MRL. The MRL
for strawberry is different than the tolerance finalized for thiram in
the United States because of differences in use patterns, and/or good
agricultural practices.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In this final rule, EPA establishes tolerances under FFDCA section
408(e), and also modifies and revokes specific tolerances established
under FFDCA section 408. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions (i.e., establishment and modification
of a tolerance and tolerance revocation for which extraordinary
circumstances do not exist) from review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
Nor does it require any special considerations as required by Executive
Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR
7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any other Agency action
under Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997). This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency previously
assessed whether establishment of tolerances, exemptions from
tolerances, raising of tolerance levels, expansion of exemptions, or
revocations might significantly impact a substantial number of small
entities and concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not
impose a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These analyses for tolerance establishments and
modifications, and for tolerance revocations were published in the
Federal Register on May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950) and on December 17, 1997
(62 FR 66020) (FRL-5753-1), respectively, and were provided to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Taking
into account this analysis and available information concerning the
pesticides listed in this rule, the Agency hereby certifies that this
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In a memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA
determined that eight conditions must all be satisfied in order for an
import tolerance or tolerance exemption revocation to adversely affect
a significant number of small entity importers, and that there is a
negligible joint probability of all eight conditions holding
simultaneously with respect to
[[Page 72597]]
any particular revocation. (This Agency document is available in the
docket of the proposed rule). Furthermore, for the pesticides named in
this final rule, the Agency knows of no extraordinary circumstances
that exist as to the present revocations that would change EPA's
previous analysis. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive order
to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not
States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption
provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal
implications'' as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal implications'' is
defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this rule.
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 20, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.132, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. (1) A tolerances for residues of the fungicide thiram
(tetramethyl thiuram disulfide), including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph.
Compliance with the tolerance level specified in this paragraph is to
be determined by measuring only thiram.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avocado \1\............................................. 15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ No U.S. registrations as of September 23, 2009.
(2) Tolerances are established for residues of the fungicide
thiram, tetramethyl thiuram disulfide, including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph.
Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph is to
be determined by measuring only those thiram residues convertible to
and expressed in terms of the degradate carbon disulfide, in or on the
commodity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apple................................................... 5
Banana \1\.............................................. 2.0
Peach................................................... 7.0
Strawberry.............................................. 13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. registrations as of September 23, 2009.
* * * * *
Sec. 180.142 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 180.142, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.169 [Amended]
0
4. In Sec. 180.169, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
0
5. In Sec. 180.176, revise the table in paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almond.................................................. 0.1
Almond, hulls........................................... 4
Apple................................................... 0.6
Asparagus............................................... 0.1
Atemoya................................................. 3.0
Banana.................................................. 2
Barley, bran............................................ 2
Barley, flour........................................... 1.2
Barley, grain........................................... 1
Barley, hay............................................. 30
Barley, pearled barley.................................. 20
Barley, straw........................................... 25
Beet, sugar, dried pulp................................. 3.0
Beet, sugar, roots...................................... 1.2
Beet, sugar, tops....................................... 60
Broccoli................................................ 7
Cabbage................................................. 9
Canistel................................................ 15.0
Cattle, kidney.......................................... 0.5
Cattle, liver........................................... 0.5
Cherimoya............................................... 3.0
Corn, field, forage..................................... 40
Corn, field, grain...................................... 0.06
Corn, field, stover..................................... 15
Corn, pop, grain........................................ 0.1
Corn, pop, stover....................................... 40
Corn, sweet, forage..................................... 70
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed......... 0.1
Corn, sweet, stover..................................... 40
Cotton, undelinted seed................................. 0.5
Crabapple............................................... 0.6
Cranberry............................................... 5
Custard apple........................................... 3.0
Fennel.................................................. 2.5
Flax, seed.............................................. 0.15
Ginseng................................................. 1.2
Goat, kidney............................................ 0.5
Goat, liver............................................. 0.5
Grape................................................... 1.5
Hog, kidney............................................. 0.5
Hog, liver.............................................. 0.5
Horse, kidney........................................... 0.5
[[Page 72598]]
Horse, liver............................................ 0.5
Lettuce, head........................................... 3.5
Lettuce, leaf........................................... 18
Mango................................................... 15.0
Oat, flour.............................................. 1.2
Oat, grain.............................................. 1
Oat, groats/rolled oats................................. 20
Oat, hay................................................ 30
Oat, straw.............................................. 25
Onion, bulb............................................. 1.5
Papaya.................................................. 9
Peanut.................................................. 0.1
Peanut, hay............................................. 65
Pear.................................................... 0.6
Pepper.................................................. 12
Potato.................................................. 0.2
Poultry, kidney......................................... 0.5
Poultry, liver.......................................... 0.5
Quince.................................................. 0.6
Rice, grain............................................. 0.06
Rye, bran............................................... 2
Rye, flour.............................................. 1.2
Rye, grain.............................................. 1
Rye, straw.............................................. 25
Sapodilla............................................... 15.0
Sapote, mamey........................................... 15.0
Sapote, white........................................... 15.0
Sheep, kidney........................................... 0.5
Sheep, liver............................................ 0.5
Sorghum, grain, forage.................................. 0.15
Sorghum, grain, grain................................... 0.25
Sorghum, grain, stover.................................. 0.15
Star apple.............................................. 15.0
Sugar apple............................................. 3.0
Tangerine \1\........................................... 10
Tomato.................................................. 2.5
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9............................ 2.0
Walnut.................................................. 0.70
Wheat, bran............................................. 2
Wheat, flour............................................ 1.2
Wheat, germ............................................. 20
Wheat, grain............................................ 1
Wheat, hay.............................................. 30
Wheat, middlings........................................ 20
Wheat, shorts........................................... 2
Wheat, straw............................................ 25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no U.S. registrations for use of mancozeb on tangerine.
* * * * *
Sec. 180.205 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 180.205, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.253 [Amended]
0
7. In Sec. 180.253, add alphabetically an entry for ``Onion, dry
bulb'' to the table in paragraph (a), and add a table to paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
Sec. 180.253 Methomyl; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per Expiration/
Commodity million Revocation date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Onion, dry bulb....................... 0.2 None.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pear.................................................... 4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 180.274 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 180.274, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.287 [Amended]
0
9. In Sec. 180.287, remove the entry for ``Cotton, undelinted seed
\1\'' and the footnote from the table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.288 [Amended]
0
10. In Sec. 180.288, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.293 [Amended]
0
11. In Sec. 180.293, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.300 [Amended]
0
12. In Sec. 180.300, remove the entry for ``Cucumber'' from the table
in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.301 [Amended]
0
13. In Sec. 180.301, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.303 [Amended]
0
14. In Sec. 180.303, remove the entry for ``Soybean, seed'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.355 [Amended]
0
15. In Sec. 180.355, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.361 [Amended]
0
16. In Sec. 180.361, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.377 [Amended]
0
17. In Sec. 180.377, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.383 [Amended]
0
18. In Sec. 180.383, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
0
19. In Sec. 180.384, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.384 Mepiquat (N,N-dimethylpiperidinium); tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the plant
growth regulator mepiquat, including its metabolites and degradates, in
or on the commodities in the table in this paragraph. Compliance with
the tolerance levels specified in this paragraph is to be determined by
measuring only mepiquat, N,N-dimethylpiperidinium, in or on the
commodity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cattle, meat byproducts................................. 0.1
Cotton, gin byproducts.................................. 6.0
Cotton, undelinted seed................................. 2.0
Goat, meat byproducts................................... 0.1
Grape................................................... 1.0
Grape, raisin........................................... 5.0
Hog, meat byproducts.................................... 0.1
Horse, meat byproducts.................................. 0.1
Sheep, meat byproducts.................................. 0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 180.399 [Amended]
0
20. In Sec. 180.399, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
[[Page 72599]]
Sec. 180.401 [Amended]
0
21. In Sec. 180.401, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.417 [Amended]
0
22. In Sec. 180.417, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.418 [Amended]
0
23. In Sec. 180.418, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.425 [Amended]
0
24. In Sec. 180.425, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.434 [Amended]
0
25. In Sec. 180.434, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.438 [Amended]
0
26. In Sec. 180.438, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1) and from the table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.439 [Amended]
0
27. In Sec. 180.439, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.441 [Amended]
0
28. In Sec. 180.441, remove the entry for ``Soybean, soapstock'' from
the table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.445 [Amended]
0
29. In Sec. 180.445, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.447 [Amended]
0
30. In Sec. 180.447, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.451 [Amended]
0
31. In Sec. 180.451, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.463 [Amended]
0
32. In Sec. 180.463, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.473 [Amended]
0
33. In Sec. 180.473, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
0
34. In Sec. 180.476, revise the table in paragraph (a)(1) and revise
the table in paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.476 Triflumizole; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G, except cranberry... 2.0
Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A.................... 8.0
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B..................... 40
Canistel................................................ 2.5
Cherry, sweet........................................... 1.5
Cherry, tart............................................ 1.5
Cilantro, leaves........................................ 35
Fruit, pome, group 11-10................................ 0.50
Fruit, small, vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, 2.5
subgroup 13-07F........................................
Hazelnut................................................ 0.05
Hop, dried cones........................................ 50
Leafy greens subgroup 4A, except spinach................ 35
Mango................................................... 2.5
Papaya.................................................. 2.5
Pineapple............................................... 4.0
Sapodilla............................................... 2.5
Sapote, black........................................... 2.5
Sapote, mamey........................................... 2.5
Star apple.............................................. 2.5
Swiss chard............................................. 18
Tomato.................................................. 1.5
Turnip, greens.......................................... 40
Vegetable, cucurbit, group 9............................ 0.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cattle, fat............................................. 0.10
Cattle, meat byproducts................................. 0.20
Goat, fat............................................... 0.10
Goat, meat byproducts................................... 0.20
Horse, fat.............................................. 0.10
Horse, meat byproducts.................................. 0.20
Sheep, fat.............................................. 0.10
Sheep, meat byproducts.................................. 0.20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Sec. 180.479 [Amended]
0
35. In Sec. 180.479, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.484 [Amended]
0
36. In Sec. 180.484, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.495 [Amended]
0
37. In Sec. 180.495, remove the entry for ``Coriander, leaves'' from
the table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.507 [Amended]
0
38. In Sec. 180.507, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 180.515 [Amended]
0
39. In Sec. 180.515, remove the entries for ``Caneberry subgroup
13A,'' ``Cotton, hulls,'' ``Cotton, meal,'' ``Cotton, refined oil'' and
``Rice, straw'' from the table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.517 [Amended]
0
40. In Sec. 180.517, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.541 [Removed]
0
41. Remove Sec. 180.541.
Sec. 180.555 [Amended]
0
42. In Sec. 180.555, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.570 [Amended]
0
43. In Sec. 180.570, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a)(2).
Sec. 180.577 [Amended]
0
44. In Sec. 180.577, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.602 [Amended]
0
45. In Sec. 180.602, remove the entry for ``Hop, dried cones'' from
the table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.605 [Amended]
0
46. In Sec. 180.605, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
Sec. 180.625 [Amended]
0
47. In Sec. 180.625, remove the entry for ``Rice, straw'' from the
table in paragraph (a).
[FR Doc. 2015-28491 Filed 11-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P