Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project, Sacramento County, California, 72141-72143 [2015-29418]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices
measure a facility condition rating on
the TERM scale.
FTA seeks comment on its proposal to
require recipients to report the above
performance-related information. The
Transit Asset Management Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking was published in
the Federal Register on September 30,
2015. 80 FR 58912. The comment period
closes on November 30, 2015. FTA
encourages readers to submit comments
on the NPRM, including the proposed
performance measures, to docket #
FTA–2014–0020 at
www.regulations.gov.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
Anticipated Burden
A Paperwork Reduction Act
justification of these changes has been
submitted for review. FTA estimates
that the initial year burden nationally
will be 18,636 hours for urban reporters
and 13,097 hours for state and rural
reporters or 31,733 hours in total. This
represents a 10.5% increase to the total
NTD in the first year. The burden in
subsequent years is estimated at 9,318
hours for urban reporters and 6,549 for
state and rural reporters or a total of
15,867 hours representing a 5.2%
increase to the total NTD.
Estimated Annual Burden on
Respondents (new module): 15,867 hrs.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
(Total NTD): 318,267 hrs.
Frequency: Reporting Annually.
Therese W. McMillan,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–29384 Filed 11–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Green Line to the Airport Project,
Sacramento County, California
AGENCY:
Federal Transit Administration,
DOT.
Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
ACTION:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and Sacramento
Regional Transit District (RT) issue this
Notice of Intent (NOI) to advise other
agencies and the public that it will
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the proposed Green
Line to the Airport Project in
Sacramento County, California. The EIS
will be prepared as a joint document
that includes an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Nov 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
(CEQA). The project consists of an
extension of the existing Green Line
light rail service from the existing
terminus of the Green Line at Township
9 (at North 7th Street and Richards
Boulevard near Downtown Sacramento)
to the Sacramento International Airport.
The proposed project would provide
new transit service and related
infrastructure in the City of Sacramento,
serving communities such as the River
District and the South and North
Natomas communities, as well as
linking these areas better to the larger
Sacramento region. The EIS will
evaluate alternatives to the proposed
action, including the No Build
Alternative and possible minimum
operable segments.
The EIS will be prepared in
accordance with regulations
implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508), 23 U.S.C. 139, and FTA’s
regulations and guidance implementing
NEPA under 23 CFR 771. FTA will
serve as the federal lead agency and RT
will serve as a joint lead agency per
NEPA. RT is also the local lead agency
under CEQA. The U.S Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) will be a
cooperating agency pursuant to 40 CFR
1501.6.
The purpose of this notice is to alert
interested parties regarding the intent to
prepare the EIS/EIR, to provide
information on the nature of the
proposed action and possible
alternatives, to invite participation in
the EIS process including providing
comments on the scope of the Draft EIS;
and to announce that public scoping
meetings will be conducted.
DATES: Written comments on the scope
of the Draft EIR/EIS including the
project’s purpose and need, the
alternatives to be considered, the
impacts to be evaluated, and the
methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to RT on or
before Friday, January 15, 2016. See
ADDRESSES below. Public scoping
meetings to accept comments on the
scope of the EIS/EIR will be held on the
following dates:
• Tuesday, December 1, 2015;
beginning at 6 p.m. at the Natomas
Park Elementary School at 4700 Crest
Drive, Sacramento, CA 95835.
• Wednesday, December 2, 2015;
beginning at 6 p.m. at the Library
Galleria, Downtown Sacramento
Public Library at 828 I Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814.
• Thursday, December 3, 2015;
beginning at 6 p.m. at South Natomas
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72141
Community Center at 2921 Truxel
Road, Sacramento, CA 95833.
The locations are accessible to
persons with disabilities. Any
individual who requires a language
interpreter or signing services or other
special accommodations, to participate
in the scoping meetings should contact
Gladys Cornell at (916) 442–1168 or
gcornell@aimconsultingco.com at least
48 hours before the scoping meeting.
Scoping materials will be available at
the meetings and on the RT Web site
(https://www.sacrt.com/dna).
Representatives of Native American
tribal governments and of all federal,
state, regional and local agencies that
may have an interest in any aspect of
the project will be invited to be
participating or cooperating agencies, as
appropriate.
ADDRESSES: Comments will be accepted
at the public scoping meetings or they
may be sent to Jeff Damon, Project
Manager, at RT, 1400 29th Street,
Sacramento, CA 95816.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Damon at the address above or Lucinda
Eagle, Community Planner, Region IX
Office, Federal Transit Administration
at 201 Mission Street, Suite 1650, San
Francisco, CA 94015, phone (415) 744–
2590, or via email at lucinda.eagle@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scoping
Scoping is the process of determining
the scope, focus, and content of an EIS.
The FTA and RT invite all interested
individuals and organizations, agencies,
and Native American groups to provide
comments on the scope of the Draft EIS
including the project’s purpose and
need, the alternatives under
consideration, the environmental
impacts to be evaluated, and the
evaluation approach.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Project
The purpose of the project is to
improve transit linkages and coverage to
communities and activity centers within
the study area, alleviate roadway
congestion by providing a robust transit
network that offers an alternative to
automobile travel, and provide a safe,
convenient, and affordable alternative
for traveling between Downtown
Sacramento, South and North Natomas,
and the Sacramento International
Airport. In addition, the project would
provide a connection directly to the
region’s major intermodal facility at the
Sacramento Valley Station, where bus,
light rail, and Amtrak commuter rail
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
72142
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices
services provide access to a much larger
region.
The need for the project is based on
recent and projected future population
and employment growth in the study
area, including new developments
proposed as a result of the lifting of a
building moratorium by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) in March 2015. The building
moratorium in Natomas went into effect
in 2008 to ensure the advancement of
levee improvement to provide flood
protection in the Natomas area. The
region is showing significant signs of
economic recovery and job growth is
leading housing growth. The proposed
project alignment is entirely within
Center and Corridor Communities, and
is forecast to be among the primary
growth areas in the region. Based on
Sacramento Area Council of
Governments forecasts, the population
in the area is expected to grow by
811,000 people, an increase of about 36
percent, between 2012 and 2036. The
growth projections include
approximately 439,000 new employees
from 2012 to 2036, as compared to the
361,000 new employees forecasted in
the last plan from 2008 to 2035. By
2036, the land use forecast projects that
30 percent of new housing and 35
percent of new employees will be
located in Center and Corridor
Communities. New activity centers in
the study area include North Natomas,
Greenbriar, Metro Air Park, and
redevelopment of the Sleep Train Arena
complex. In addition, the southern
portion of the study area includes the
Railyards development project, the
largest redevelopment of a brownfields
site west of the Mississippi River that
will include new housing, business, and
entertainment destinations, as well as a
regional hospital complex.
The projected development,
population and employment growth,
and new activity centers increase
demand for additional transportation
infrastructure capacity. The only
connection currently serving the study
area, between Downtown Sacramento
and the airport, is Interstate 5 (I–5). The
California Department of Transportation
reports that existing levels of service
along the segment of I–5 in the vicinity
of the proposed project operates at level
of service F, a forced or breakdown flow
of traffic with stop and go traffic.
Increases in traffic congestion are
projected in the study area in the
absence of significant new investments
in alternative transportation. Increases
in traffic volumes will worsen
conditions on the I–5 corridor, which
connects the Natomas area to
Downtown Sacramento via an existing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Nov 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
American River bridge crossing carrying
local, regional, and interstate vehicle
traffic. Congestion on the bridge and its
connecting roadways (Garden Highway
and Richards Boulevard) results in
undesirable travel delays including
delays for buses and emergency
vehicles. Increases in traffic volumes in
the study area are expected to stimulate
increased demand for transit services,
which in the study area are currently
limited to local RT bus routes and one
Yolobus route that serves Sacramento
International Airport.
Study Area Description
The project study area is located in
Sacramento County, California, and
includes portions of North and South
Natomas. The corridor study area
extends approximately 11.3-miles
between Township 9 (at North 7th
Street and Richards Boulevard near
Downtown Sacramento) and
Sacramento International Airport. The
study area surrounding the Township 9
station is within the River District, a
historically industrial area that is being
redeveloped as a mixed-use community.
The American River Parkway is located
north of the River District. The Parkway
includes recreation areas and natural
land cover. South Natomas, between the
American River Parkway and I–80, is
primarily single- and multi-family
residential with supporting
neighborhood commercial and
institutional uses. North Natomas,
between the I–80 and State Route 99
crossings, is a recently developed area
containing new single-family residential
neighborhoods, several multi-family
residential complexes, and larger
commercial, industrial, and institutional
land uses. North Natomas also includes
the large Sleep Train Arena complex,
which is expected to be redeveloped in
the near future. Two proposed
development sites—Greenbriar and
Metro Air Park—are located between
North Natomas and Sacramento
International Airport.
Alternatives Considered
Between 2001 and 2003, RT
conducted the Downtown-NatomasAirport Alternatives Analysis (AA) to
evaluate the costs, benefits, and impacts
of a range of transportation alternatives
to address mobility and transportation
connectivity between Downtown
Sacramento and the Sacramento
International Airport. The AA report
considered a wide range of transit
technology and alignment alternatives
for the corridor. Transit technology
options included bus rapid transit and
light rail, and the alignment options
included Truxel Road to the Airport, I–
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5 between Downtown and I–80 and
Truxel Road between I–80 and the
Airport, and I–5 to Airport. On
December 12, 2001, a Notice of Intent
was issued in the Federal Register of
the Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light
Rail Transit The Board adopted a
Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in
2003. However, no EIS or Record of
Decision was prepared due to lack of
federal funding and participation in the
project. The LPA is included in the RT
Transit Action Plan, the City of
Sacramento General Plan, and the
Sacramento Area Council of
Governments Metropolitan
Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Plan. Following the AA, a
Program EIR was prepared for the
Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail
Transit project in accordance with
CEQA and was certified in 2008.
The Draft EIS/EIR will analyze
reasonable alternatives uncovered
during scoping. The alternatives being
evaluated include:
No-Build Alternative: The No-Build
Alternative represents conditions that
would be reasonably expected to occur
in the foreseeable future if the proposed
build alternative were not implemented.
The No-Build Alternative includes
existing conditions, services, and
facilities plus all possible service
improvements and committed transit
improvements in the proposed project
corridor.
Locally Preferred Alternative: The
LPA is an approximately 11.3-mile light
rail transit project between Township 9
and Sacramento International Airport.
The LPA includes refinements to the
alignment since the LPA was adopted
by the Board in 2003. This alternative
consists of features typical of light rail
transit, including but not limited to
stations, tracks, overhead catenary,
traction power substations, signaling
and safety features, park-and-ride
facilities, and maintenance and storage
facilities. The alignment follows
Richards Boulevard and Sequoia Pacific
Boulevard through the River District. It
crosses the American River to Truxel
Road and includes a section of
dedicated right-of-way adjacent to the
roadway in North Natomas. The
alignment turns westerly, crossing
Highway 99 and traversing planned
transit-oriented developments at
Greenbriar and Metro Air Park before
terminating at the Sacramento
International Airport. Due to the
associated increases in the size of RT’s
light rail vehicle fleet, the project also
includes an expansion of RT’s existing
light rail maintenance facility (on
Academy Way in North Sacramento) in
combination with a new maintenance
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 222 / Wednesday, November 18, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
facility near Sacramento International
Airport.
The LPA includes a new bridge over
the American River which will
accommodate transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians, and include connections to
the American River Parkway on the
north and south sides of the river. A
design option of the bridge includes a
wider bridge cross section to
accommodate automobiles.
In addition to the alternatives
described above, the Draft EIS will
examine alignment design options to
respond to new opportunities and
conditions at the Sleep Train Arena site
and at the Sacramento International
Airport. Also, depending on funding
availability from various federal and
local sources, construction to
Sacramento International Airport may
require one or more phases. Phased
implementation of the Green Line
project or minimum operable segments
will be considered as part of the Draft
EIS.
Probable Effects
The purpose of the EIS is to study, in
a public setting, the potential effects and
benefits on the physical, human, and
natural environment of implementing
the proposed action. The permanent or
long-term effects to be investigated
during this study include effects to
public parks and recreation lands
(Section 4(f) Evaluation), traffic and
transportation, land use and
socioeconomic, visual character and
aesthetics, noise and vibration,
historical and archaeological resources,
community effects, and natural
resources. Temporary effects during
construction may include effects to
transportation and traffic, air quality,
water quality, noise and vibration,
natural resources, and encounters with
hazardous materials and contaminated
soils. Measures to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate adverse impacts will also be
identified and evaluated.
The analysis during the
environmental review process will be
undertaken in conformity with Federal
environmental laws, regulations, and
executive orders applicable to the
proposed project. These requirements
include, but are not limited to, the
regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality implementing
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508), FTA’s NEPA implementing
regulations and procedures (23 CFR part
771 and 23 U.S.C. 139), the air quality
transportation conformity regulation of
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (40 CFR part 93),
guidelines for disposal of dredged or fill
material in section 404(b)(1) guidelines
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Nov 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
of EPA (40 CFR part 230), Executive
Orders 13609and 11988 on floodplains,
11990 on wetlands, and 12898 on
environmental justice, and regulations
implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36
CFR part 800), section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part
402), and section 4(f) of the Department
of Transportation Act (23 CFR 774).
FTA’s Public and Agency Involvement
Procedures
Regulations implementing NEPA and
FTA guidance call for public
involvement in the environmental
review process. In accordance with
these regulations and guidance, FTA
and RT will: (1) Extend an invitation to
other federal and non-federal agencies
and Native American tribes that may
have an interest in the proposed project
to become participating agencies (any
interested agency that does not receive
an invitation can notify any of the
contact persons listed earlier in this
NOI); (2) provide an opportunity for
involvement by participating agencies
and the public to help define the
purpose and need for a proposed
project, as well as the range of
alternatives for consideration in the EIS/
EIR; and (3) establish a plan for
coordinating public and agency
participation in, and comment on, the
environmental review process.
With the publication of this NOI, the
scoping process and the public
comment period for the project begins
allowing the public to offer input on the
scope of the EIS/EIR until Friday,
January 15, 2016. Public comments will
be received through those methods
explained earlier in this NOI and will be
incorporated into a Scoping Summary
Report. The Scoping Summary Report
will detail the scope of the EIS/EIR and
the potential environmental effects that
will be considered during the study
period. After the completion of the Draft
EIS/EIR, a public and agency review
period will allow for input on the Draft
EIS/EIR and these comments will be
incorporated into the Final EIS/EIR for
this project. In accordance with Section
1319 of the Moving Ahead for Progress
in the 21st Century Act (MAP–21) (Pub.
L. 112–114), Accelerated Decisionmaking in Environmental Reviews, FTA
may consider the use of errata sheets
attached to the Draft EIS/EIR in place of
a in place of a traditional Final EIS/EIR
and/or development a single
environmental decision document that
consists of a Final EIS/EIR and a Record
of Decision (ROD), if certain conditions
exist following the conclusion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72143
public and agency review period for the
project’s Draft EIS/EIR.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Regional Administrator, Regional IX, Federal
Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–29418 Filed 11–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0109]
National Emergency Medical Services
Advisory Council (NEMSAC) and
Federal Interagency Committee on
Emergency Medical Services
(FICEMS); Notice of Federal Advisory
Committee Meeting
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)
ACTION: Meeting Notice—National
Emergency Medical Services Advisory
Council and Federal Interagency
Committee on Emergency Medical
Services
AGENCY:
The NHTSA announces
meetings of NEMSAC and FICEMS to be
held consecutively in the Metropolitan
Washington, DC, area. This notice
announces the date, time, and location
of the meetings, which will be open to
the public, as well as opportunities for
public input to the NEMSAC and
FICEMS. The purpose of NEMSAC, a
nationally recognized council of
emergency medical services
representatives and consumers, is to
advise and consult with DOT and the
FICEMS on matters relating to
emergency medical services (EMS). The
purpose of FICEMS is to ensure
coordination among Federal agencies
supporting EMS and 9–1–1 systems.
DATES: The NEMSAC meeting will be
held on December 1, 2015 from 9 a.m.
to 12:30 p.m. EST, and on December 1,
2015 from 9 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. EST. A
public comment period will take place
on December 1, 2015 between 12:15
p.m. and 12:30 p.m. EST and December
2, 2015 between 10:45 a.m. and 11 a.m.
EST. NEMSAC committees will meet in
the same location on Tuesday,
December 1, 2015 from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
EST. Written comments for the
NEMSAC from the public must be
received no later than November 25,
2015.
The FICEMS meeting will be held on
December 2, 2015 from 12:30 p.m. to
3:30 p.m. EST. A public comment
period will take place on December 2,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18NON1.SGM
18NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 222 (Wednesday, November 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72141-72143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29418]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport
Project, Sacramento County, California
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Sacramento
Regional Transit District (RT) issue this Notice of Intent (NOI) to
advise other agencies and the public that it will prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Green Line to the
Airport Project in Sacramento County, California. The EIS will be
prepared as a joint document that includes an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). The project consists of an extension of the existing Green
Line light rail service from the existing terminus of the Green Line at
Township 9 (at North 7th Street and Richards Boulevard near Downtown
Sacramento) to the Sacramento International Airport. The proposed
project would provide new transit service and related infrastructure in
the City of Sacramento, serving communities such as the River District
and the South and North Natomas communities, as well as linking these
areas better to the larger Sacramento region. The EIS will evaluate
alternatives to the proposed action, including the No Build Alternative
and possible minimum operable segments.
The EIS will be prepared in accordance with regulations
implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations
(40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508), 23 U.S.C. 139, and FTA's regulations
and guidance implementing NEPA under 23 CFR 771. FTA will serve as the
federal lead agency and RT will serve as a joint lead agency per NEPA.
RT is also the local lead agency under CEQA. The U.S Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) will be a cooperating agency pursuant to 40 CFR
1501.6.
The purpose of this notice is to alert interested parties regarding
the intent to prepare the EIS/EIR, to provide information on the nature
of the proposed action and possible alternatives, to invite
participation in the EIS process including providing comments on the
scope of the Draft EIS; and to announce that public scoping meetings
will be conducted.
DATES: Written comments on the scope of the Draft EIR/EIS including the
project's purpose and need, the alternatives to be considered, the
impacts to be evaluated, and the methodologies to be used in the
evaluations should be sent to RT on or before Friday, January 15, 2016.
See ADDRESSES below. Public scoping meetings to accept comments on the
scope of the EIS/EIR will be held on the following dates:
Tuesday, December 1, 2015; beginning at 6 p.m. at the Natomas
Park Elementary School at 4700 Crest Drive, Sacramento, CA 95835.
Wednesday, December 2, 2015; beginning at 6 p.m. at the
Library Galleria, Downtown Sacramento Public Library at 828 I Street,
Sacramento, CA 95814.
Thursday, December 3, 2015; beginning at 6 p.m. at South
Natomas Community Center at 2921 Truxel Road, Sacramento, CA 95833.
The locations are accessible to persons with disabilities. Any
individual who requires a language interpreter or signing services or
other special accommodations, to participate in the scoping meetings
should contact Gladys Cornell at (916) 442-1168 or
gcornell@aimconsultingco.com at least 48 hours before the scoping
meeting.
Scoping materials will be available at the meetings and on the RT
Web site (https://www.sacrt.com/dna). Representatives of Native American
tribal governments and of all federal, state, regional and local
agencies that may have an interest in any aspect of the project will be
invited to be participating or cooperating agencies, as appropriate.
ADDRESSES: Comments will be accepted at the public scoping meetings or
they may be sent to Jeff Damon, Project Manager, at RT, 1400 29th
Street, Sacramento, CA 95816.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Damon at the address above or
Lucinda Eagle, Community Planner, Region IX Office, Federal Transit
Administration at 201 Mission Street, Suite 1650, San Francisco, CA
94015, phone (415) 744-2590, or via email at lucinda.eagle@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scoping
Scoping is the process of determining the scope, focus, and content
of an EIS. The FTA and RT invite all interested individuals and
organizations, agencies, and Native American groups to provide comments
on the scope of the Draft EIS including the project's purpose and need,
the alternatives under consideration, the environmental impacts to be
evaluated, and the evaluation approach.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Project
The purpose of the project is to improve transit linkages and
coverage to communities and activity centers within the study area,
alleviate roadway congestion by providing a robust transit network that
offers an alternative to automobile travel, and provide a safe,
convenient, and affordable alternative for traveling between Downtown
Sacramento, South and North Natomas, and the Sacramento International
Airport. In addition, the project would provide a connection directly
to the region's major intermodal facility at the Sacramento Valley
Station, where bus, light rail, and Amtrak commuter rail
[[Page 72142]]
services provide access to a much larger region.
The need for the project is based on recent and projected future
population and employment growth in the study area, including new
developments proposed as a result of the lifting of a building
moratorium by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in March
2015. The building moratorium in Natomas went into effect in 2008 to
ensure the advancement of levee improvement to provide flood protection
in the Natomas area. The region is showing significant signs of
economic recovery and job growth is leading housing growth. The
proposed project alignment is entirely within Center and Corridor
Communities, and is forecast to be among the primary growth areas in
the region. Based on Sacramento Area Council of Governments forecasts,
the population in the area is expected to grow by 811,000 people, an
increase of about 36 percent, between 2012 and 2036. The growth
projections include approximately 439,000 new employees from 2012 to
2036, as compared to the 361,000 new employees forecasted in the last
plan from 2008 to 2035. By 2036, the land use forecast projects that 30
percent of new housing and 35 percent of new employees will be located
in Center and Corridor Communities. New activity centers in the study
area include North Natomas, Greenbriar, Metro Air Park, and
redevelopment of the Sleep Train Arena complex. In addition, the
southern portion of the study area includes the Railyards development
project, the largest redevelopment of a brownfields site west of the
Mississippi River that will include new housing, business, and
entertainment destinations, as well as a regional hospital complex.
The projected development, population and employment growth, and
new activity centers increase demand for additional transportation
infrastructure capacity. The only connection currently serving the
study area, between Downtown Sacramento and the airport, is Interstate
5 (I-5). The California Department of Transportation reports that
existing levels of service along the segment of I-5 in the vicinity of
the proposed project operates at level of service F, a forced or
breakdown flow of traffic with stop and go traffic. Increases in
traffic congestion are projected in the study area in the absence of
significant new investments in alternative transportation. Increases in
traffic volumes will worsen conditions on the I-5 corridor, which
connects the Natomas area to Downtown Sacramento via an existing
American River bridge crossing carrying local, regional, and interstate
vehicle traffic. Congestion on the bridge and its connecting roadways
(Garden Highway and Richards Boulevard) results in undesirable travel
delays including delays for buses and emergency vehicles. Increases in
traffic volumes in the study area are expected to stimulate increased
demand for transit services, which in the study area are currently
limited to local RT bus routes and one Yolobus route that serves
Sacramento International Airport.
Study Area Description
The project study area is located in Sacramento County, California,
and includes portions of North and South Natomas. The corridor study
area extends approximately 11.3-miles between Township 9 (at North 7th
Street and Richards Boulevard near Downtown Sacramento) and Sacramento
International Airport. The study area surrounding the Township 9
station is within the River District, a historically industrial area
that is being redeveloped as a mixed-use community. The American River
Parkway is located north of the River District. The Parkway includes
recreation areas and natural land cover. South Natomas, between the
American River Parkway and I-80, is primarily single- and multi-family
residential with supporting neighborhood commercial and institutional
uses. North Natomas, between the I-80 and State Route 99 crossings, is
a recently developed area containing new single-family residential
neighborhoods, several multi-family residential complexes, and larger
commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses. North Natomas also
includes the large Sleep Train Arena complex, which is expected to be
redeveloped in the near future. Two proposed development sites--
Greenbriar and Metro Air Park--are located between North Natomas and
Sacramento International Airport.
Alternatives Considered
Between 2001 and 2003, RT conducted the Downtown-Natomas-Airport
Alternatives Analysis (AA) to evaluate the costs, benefits, and impacts
of a range of transportation alternatives to address mobility and
transportation connectivity between Downtown Sacramento and the
Sacramento International Airport. The AA report considered a wide range
of transit technology and alignment alternatives for the corridor.
Transit technology options included bus rapid transit and light rail,
and the alignment options included Truxel Road to the Airport, I-5
between Downtown and I-80 and Truxel Road between I-80 and the Airport,
and I-5 to Airport. On December 12, 2001, a Notice of Intent was issued
in the Federal Register of the Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail
Transit The Board adopted a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) in
2003. However, no EIS or Record of Decision was prepared due to lack of
federal funding and participation in the project. The LPA is included
in the RT Transit Action Plan, the City of Sacramento General Plan, and
the Sacramento Area Council of Governments Metropolitan Transportation
Plan/Sustainable Communities Plan. Following the AA, a Program EIR was
prepared for the Downtown-Natomas-Airport Light Rail Transit project in
accordance with CEQA and was certified in 2008.
The Draft EIS/EIR will analyze reasonable alternatives uncovered
during scoping. The alternatives being evaluated include:
No-Build Alternative: The No-Build Alternative represents
conditions that would be reasonably expected to occur in the
foreseeable future if the proposed build alternative were not
implemented. The No-Build Alternative includes existing conditions,
services, and facilities plus all possible service improvements and
committed transit improvements in the proposed project corridor.
Locally Preferred Alternative: The LPA is an approximately 11.3-
mile light rail transit project between Township 9 and Sacramento
International Airport. The LPA includes refinements to the alignment
since the LPA was adopted by the Board in 2003. This alternative
consists of features typical of light rail transit, including but not
limited to stations, tracks, overhead catenary, traction power
substations, signaling and safety features, park-and-ride facilities,
and maintenance and storage facilities. The alignment follows Richards
Boulevard and Sequoia Pacific Boulevard through the River District. It
crosses the American River to Truxel Road and includes a section of
dedicated right-of-way adjacent to the roadway in North Natomas. The
alignment turns westerly, crossing Highway 99 and traversing planned
transit-oriented developments at Greenbriar and Metro Air Park before
terminating at the Sacramento International Airport. Due to the
associated increases in the size of RT's light rail vehicle fleet, the
project also includes an expansion of RT's existing light rail
maintenance facility (on Academy Way in North Sacramento) in
combination with a new maintenance
[[Page 72143]]
facility near Sacramento International Airport.
The LPA includes a new bridge over the American River which will
accommodate transit, bicycles, and pedestrians, and include connections
to the American River Parkway on the north and south sides of the
river. A design option of the bridge includes a wider bridge cross
section to accommodate automobiles.
In addition to the alternatives described above, the Draft EIS will
examine alignment design options to respond to new opportunities and
conditions at the Sleep Train Arena site and at the Sacramento
International Airport. Also, depending on funding availability from
various federal and local sources, construction to Sacramento
International Airport may require one or more phases. Phased
implementation of the Green Line project or minimum operable segments
will be considered as part of the Draft EIS.
Probable Effects
The purpose of the EIS is to study, in a public setting, the
potential effects and benefits on the physical, human, and natural
environment of implementing the proposed action. The permanent or long-
term effects to be investigated during this study include effects to
public parks and recreation lands (Section 4(f) Evaluation), traffic
and transportation, land use and socioeconomic, visual character and
aesthetics, noise and vibration, historical and archaeological
resources, community effects, and natural resources. Temporary effects
during construction may include effects to transportation and traffic,
air quality, water quality, noise and vibration, natural resources, and
encounters with hazardous materials and contaminated soils. Measures to
avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse impacts will also be identified
and evaluated.
The analysis during the environmental review process will be
undertaken in conformity with Federal environmental laws, regulations,
and executive orders applicable to the proposed project. These
requirements include, but are not limited to, the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500
through 1508), FTA's NEPA implementing regulations and procedures (23
CFR part 771 and 23 U.S.C. 139), the air quality transportation
conformity regulation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
(40 CFR part 93), guidelines for disposal of dredged or fill material
in section 404(b)(1) guidelines of EPA (40 CFR part 230), Executive
Orders 13609and 11988 on floodplains, 11990 on wetlands, and 12898 on
environmental justice, and regulations implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR part 800), section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (50 CFR part 402), and section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act (23 CFR 774).
FTA's Public and Agency Involvement Procedures
Regulations implementing NEPA and FTA guidance call for public
involvement in the environmental review process. In accordance with
these regulations and guidance, FTA and RT will: (1) Extend an
invitation to other federal and non-federal agencies and Native
American tribes that may have an interest in the proposed project to
become participating agencies (any interested agency that does not
receive an invitation can notify any of the contact persons listed
earlier in this NOI); (2) provide an opportunity for involvement by
participating agencies and the public to help define the purpose and
need for a proposed project, as well as the range of alternatives for
consideration in the EIS/EIR; and (3) establish a plan for coordinating
public and agency participation in, and comment on, the environmental
review process.
With the publication of this NOI, the scoping process and the
public comment period for the project begins allowing the public to
offer input on the scope of the EIS/EIR until Friday, January 15, 2016.
Public comments will be received through those methods explained
earlier in this NOI and will be incorporated into a Scoping Summary
Report. The Scoping Summary Report will detail the scope of the EIS/EIR
and the potential environmental effects that will be considered during
the study period. After the completion of the Draft EIS/EIR, a public
and agency review period will allow for input on the Draft EIS/EIR and
these comments will be incorporated into the Final EIS/EIR for this
project. In accordance with Section 1319 of the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-114),
Accelerated Decision-making in Environmental Reviews, FTA may consider
the use of errata sheets attached to the Draft EIS/EIR in place of a in
place of a traditional Final EIS/EIR and/or development a single
environmental decision document that consists of a Final EIS/EIR and a
Record of Decision (ROD), if certain conditions exist following the
conclusion of the public and agency review period for the project's
Draft EIS/EIR.
Leslie T. Rogers,
Regional Administrator, Regional IX, Federal Transit Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-29418 Filed 11-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P