Sodium Iodide-131 Patient Release Information Collection, 70843-70846 [2015-29027]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
Dated: November 9, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for
the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015–28852 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposal Review Panel for Computing
and Communication Foundations;
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Proposal Panel Review for
Science and Technology Centers—
Integrative Partnerships (#1192) Site
Visit.
Date/Time: December 7, 2015, 6:30
p.m.–8:30 p.m.; December 8, 2015, 8:00
a.m.–8:00 p.m.; December 9, 2015, 8:30
a.m.–3:00 p.m.
Place: Purdue University, West
Lafayette, IN 47907.
Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
Contact Person: John Cozzens,
National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Room 1115,
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703)
292–8910.
Purpose of Meeting: To assess the
progress of the STC Award: 0939370
‘‘Emerging Frontiers of Science of
Information: the Science and the
Technology of Intelligence’’, and to
provide advise and recommendations
concerning further NSF support for the
Center.
Agenda: CSol Purdue Site Visit
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:30 p.m.
to 8:30 p.m.: Closed; Site Team and NSF
Staff meets to discuss Site Visit
materials, review process and charge.
Tuesday, December 8, 2015, 8:00 a.m.
to 1:00 p.m.: Open; Presentations by
Awardee Institution, faculty staff and
students, to Site Team and NSF Staff;
Discussions, question and answer
sessions.
1:00 p.m.–8:00 p.m.: Closed; Draft
report on education and research
activities.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015, 8:30
a.m.–noon: Open; Response
presentations by Site Team and NSF
Staff Awardee Institution faculty staff;
Discussions, question and answer
sessions.
Noon to 3:00 p.m.: Closed; Complete
written site visit report with preliminary
recommendations.
Reason for Closing: The proposals
being reviewed include information of a
proprietary or confidential nature,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:47 Nov 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
including technical information;
financial data, such as salaries; and
personal information concerning
individuals associated with the
proposals. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: November 10, 2015.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
Dated: November 10, 2015.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
70843
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2015–29165 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2015–29164 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
[NRC–2015–0020]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Sodium Iodide–131 Patient Release
Information Collection
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
AGENCY:
Business and Operations Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Business and Operations
Advisory Committee (9556).
Date/Time: December 8, 2015; 1:00
p.m. to 5:45 p.m. (EST).
December 9, 2015; 8:45 a.m. to 12:00
p.m. (EST).
Place: National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington,
Virginia 22230; Stafford I, Room 1235
Type of Meeting: PART–OPEN.
Contact Person: Joan Miller, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703)
292–8200.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice concerning issues related to the
oversight, integrity, development and
enhancement of NSF’s business
operations.
Agenda:
December 8, 2015.
1:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m., OPEN—Welcome/
Introductions; BFA/OIRM Updates;
NSF Headquarters Relocation Update;
Modernizing the Workforce—IT—
Driven Change Management; Records
Management/Digitization.
4:30 p.m.–5:45 p.m. CLOSED—Briefing
on the National Academy of Public
Administration Study of NSF’s Use of
Cooperative Agreements to Support
Large Scale Investments in Science
and Technology.
December 9, 2015
8:45 a.m.–12:00 p.m. OPEN—
Preparation for discussion with NSF
Director and Chief Operating Officer;
Discussion with NSF Director and
Chief Operating Officer; Presidential
Transitions: What Agencies Can Do to
Prepare; Meeting Wrap-Up.
Reason for Closing: This session of the
meeting is closed to the public in
accordance with the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Request for information.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is requesting
information from the general public on
a number of issues associated with
medical treatment of patients with
sodium iodide I–131 (hereafter referred
to as I–131). Specifically, the NRC
would like input on patient concerns
about medical treatment involving the
use of I–131, information that
physicians use to make decisions on
when it is safe to release I–131 patients
based on radiation exposure concerns,
radiation safety information used by I–
131 patients after their release, and the
availability of a radiation safety
informational guidance brochure for I–
131 patients that can be distributed
nationwide. The information collected
will be used to develop a Web site to
provide patients with clear and
consistent information about radioactive
iodine treatments and to revise NRC
patient release guidance.
DATES: Submit information and
comments by February 16, 2016.
Information and comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the NRC is able
to assure consideration only for
information and comments received on
or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit
information and comments by any of the
following methods (unless this
document describes a different method
for submitting information and
comments on a specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0020. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail information and comments to:
Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
70844
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
Mail Stop: OWFN–12–H08, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
and submitting information and
comments, see ‘‘Obtaining and
Submitting Information and Comments’’
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D., Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–7848; email: DonnaBeth.Howe@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining and Submitting
Information and Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–
0020 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0020.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Submitting Information and
Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2015–
0020 in your submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your submission. The NRC
will post all submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
submissions into ADAMS. The NRC
does not routinely edit submissions to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:47 Nov 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
remove identifying or contact
information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
information from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their submission. Your
request should state that the NRC does
not routinely edit submissions to
remove such information before making
the submissions available to the public
or entering the submission into
ADAMS.
II. Background
In a March 10, 2014, memorandum to
the Commission (COMAMM–14–0001/
COMWDM–14–0001, ‘‘Background and
Proposed Direction to NRC Staff to
Verify Assumptions Made Concerning
Patient Release Guidance’’ (see https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/comm-secy/
2014/2014-0001comamm-0001comwdm.pdf)), NRC Chairman
MacFarlane and Commissioner
Magwood brought into question
whether patients receiving I–131
treatments are given consistent and
useful information from medical
facilities and whether patients can
correctly follow those instructions.
Anecdotal data from patients and
patient advocacy groups indicated that
while instructions are provided, the
quality of the instructions varies
significantly, and that some patients are
provided with instructions that the
patient and the medical facility know
will be impractical to follow.
In the Staff Requirements
Memorandum to COMAMM–14–0001/
COMWDM–14–0001 (see https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/comm-secy/
2014/2014-0001comamm-0001comwdmsrm.pdf), the Commission,
among other things, directed the NRC
staff to develop a Web site that provides
patients with clear and concise
information and links to relevant
medical and patient advocacy Web sites
about I–131 treatments, to revise NRC
guidance to specify guidelines for
patient instructions and information
including a voluntary model patient/
licensee acknowledgement form
documenting the patient/licensee dialog
leading to the licensee’s decision of
when to safely release the patient from
its control based on radiation exposure
concerns, and to develop a standard set
of guidelines that licensees can use to
provide instructions to released I–131
patients. The Commission also directed
the NRC staff to consider whether the
guidance information provided to the
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
patients can be made into an NRC
brochure, or whether a medical
organization already has, or would
produce, a brochure for nationwide
distribution.
The NRC is interested in obtaining
input from as many stakeholders as
possible, including the NRC’s Advisory
Committee on the Medical Use of
Isotopes, professional organizations,
physicians, patients, patient advocacy
groups, licensees, Agreement States, and
other interested individuals. The focus
of this information gathering effort is to
obtain: Information that patients believe
will help them understand the I–131
treatment (also referred to as
Radioactive Iodine (RAI)) procedures,
the physician’s or licensee’s best
practices when making informed
decisions on releasing RAI treatment
patients, and information provided to
patients on how to reduce radiation
doses to others. The NRC is also
interested in learning if patient
advocacy, medical professional
organizations, licensees, or other
individuals have brochures that already
contain the information requested.
III. Requested Information and
Comments
A. Web Site Information
The NRC is considering establishing a
Web site that provides potential patients
with information on RAI treatment
procedures so that patients will
understand the reason for the
procedures, the process, and how to
reduce radiation exposure to others.
Some of this is medical information that
is outside the NRC’s field of expertise.
The NRC would like to be able to
provide links to other sites providing
this medical information. The NRC may
develop the basic radiation safety
information itself, but could provide
links if established sites already have
this information.
The NRC is also seeking input from
patients, patient advocacy groups, and
other interested individuals to articulate
concerns that may not be included in
the topics identified in this section.
If you have, or know of, a Web site
that that can be used to explain the
disease and treatment process, and
addresses one or more of the following
topics, please provide the link to the
NRC.
• What is radioactivity?
• What is radioactive iodine (RAI)?
• RAI treatment:
• Any explanation of how radiation is
used in the treatment should include
clear information that the patient will
receive radioactive material, emit
radiation, retain radioactive material,
and release radioactive material.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
• Preparing for RAI treatment.
• What to expect before and after
receiving the treatment.
• Side effects of RAI treatment.
• Basic radiation safety:
• Appropriate venues for recovery
after release.
• Precautions to take after receiving
treatment.
• Risks to others, to include risks to
young children and pregnant women.
• Expected general behaviors after
release.
When identifying a Web site, indicate
the topic it addresses and provide a link
to that specific information on the topic.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Patient/Licensee Acknowledgement
Form and Best Practices in Making
Informed Decisions on Releasing
Patients Treated With I–131 Based on
Radiation Exposure Considerations
The NRC is looking for best practices
used by individual physicians and
licensees that focus on enhancing the
ability to make informed radiation
safety decisions on the release of
individual patients from their radiation
safety control under the patient release
criteria in the NRC’s medical use
regulations. The NRC expects the
physician (licensee) to have a dialog
with the patient that will ultimately
lead to an informed decision on when
the patient should be released from its
radiation safety control based on
radiation exposure considerations (this
includes immediate or delayed release,
in addition to hospitalization). The NRC
is also interested in knowing whether a
patient/licensee acknowledgment form
documenting this dialog exists and is
part of the physicians’ best practices.
The NRC believes this dialog would
include some or all of the following:
• The patient’s ability to understand
the language of the physician (licensee)
or need for an interpreter that
understands the procedure.
• The need for a family member or
another support person present to
facilitate better retention of information.
• A discussion with the patient to
determine suitability for release.
• Description of the patient’s
transportation from the medical facility
to home.
• Discussion of the patient’s normal
daily behavior and patterns, including
but not limited to:
• The patient’s normal/routine social
interactions.
• The patient’s normal/routine
working environment and tasks.
• The patient’s normal/routine living
arrangements.
• The planned changes to the
patient’s normal/routine behaviors
during the treatment period (have friend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:47 Nov 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
or family member accompany the
patient or spend time with patient,
change in living arrangements, etc.).
• Financial considerations that will
affect the patient’s preference on early
or delayed release.
• Discussion to evaluate patient’s
ability to understand and follow
instructions.
• Discussion to evaluate of patient’s
willingness to follow instructions.
• Discussion to evaluate the level of
disruption to patient routine lifestyle, if
released, and the ability of the patient
to make and follow the changes, if
released.
If you have a policy or procedure that
provides you with the confidence that
you are releasing the patient at the
appropriate time, please describe your
policy or provide your procedure. If the
policy or procedure includes a patient/
licensee acknowledgement form, or if
you have a stand-alone form,
documenting the patient/licensee
discussion, please provide it. The
policy, procedure, or form could
include some of the topics listed but
may include others. Indicate when this
type of discussion with the patients
takes place (e.g., when the patient is
referred for the procedure, before
administration, after administration,
etc.). Does the timing of this discussion
allow the patient enough time to make
different living, working, or
transportation arrangements or for the
medical facility to make delayed release
(may include hospitalization)
arrangements? Please describe how your
best practices are used in the decision
making process.
The NRC would also like input from
the patient’s or other interested
individual’s perspective of the optimal
time for the discussion to take place so
that both the patient and the medical
facility have confidence the release
decision is appropriate. How much time
is needed to allow patients to make
different living, working, transportation
arrangements? The NRC is also seeking
input from patients, patient advocacy
groups, and other interested individuals
to articulate other topics that should be
included in the discussion.
C. Guidance for Released Patients
The Commission directed the NRC
staff to develop standardized guidance
for licensees to provide to their patients
that would help to reduce the variability
of instructions provided to patients and
eliminate some of the uncertainty
regarding the type of information that is
provided to the patient. While the NRC
currently prefers to develop
performance based guidance
(articulating objectives but not telling
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70845
licensees how to reach those objectives),
prescriptive guidance (i.e., very detailed
and specific) may be necessary to
reduce uncertainty and provide
confidence that regulatory requirements
are met. If the standardized guidance is
performance-based, it would need to
provide individual patients with the
‘‘tools’’ needed to follow the objectives
in the guidance and protect others.
If you have guidance documents that
you believe provide clear instructions to
released patients, please provide a copy
to the NRC. If your guidance includes
topics not addressed below, indicate
why you think each is an important
topic to include. If it does not address
one of the topics and you believe that
topic is not needed, describe why it is
not needed.
• What ‘‘tools’’ (or methods/means)
can the patient use to protect others
once released?
• Are both oral and written
information presented in the patient’s
native language and presented in a
manner understandable to both the
patient and physician (licensee)?
• Does the medical facility/licensee
have access to an interpreting service to
make sure that oral and written
information and instructions are
understood?
• How are instructions personalized
to the individual patient?
• Does the medical facility explain
how to limit the exposures to others
(especially to young children and
pregnant women)?
• Arrangements for protecting others
once arriving at home.
• Informed how long special care
must be exercised.
• Are actions described that the
patient can take to minimize the
exposure of people both inside and
outside the home?
• Do transportation instructions from
the medical facility to home match the
patient’s plans?
• Are discussions held on managing
biological wastes and trash in
accordance with NRC, state, and local
requirements?
• Are discussions held to identify
whom to contact in the event that
questions arise during the recovery
period?
• Are discussions held on where to go
for emergency care?
The NRC is also seeking input from
patients, patient advocacy groups, and
other interested individuals to articulate
topics that should be included in the
instructions provided to released
patients. Further, when do you want to
be provided with these instructions?
Are the instructions provided in a
manner that is easy to understand and
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
70846
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices
follow? What would have made the
instructions better?
D. Brochure for Nationwide Use
The NRC is seeking identification of
a brochure that you believe provides
clear guidance on the release of patients
treated with I–131. If you have or know
of such a brochure please send the NRC
a copy or a link to it. The intent is to
identify a brochure that could be
distributed nationwide.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
Statement
This information request contains
information collection requirements that
are subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
These information collections were
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), OMB control
number 3150–0229, expiration date of
October 31, 2018.
The burden to the public for these
information collections is estimated to
average 0.25 to 0.50 hours per response,
including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering data, performing
necessary analyses, and completing and
reviewing the information collection.
This information collection request only
information already possessed by the
responder and does not request the
responder develop any new data.
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day
of November, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christian E. Einberg,
Acting Deputy Director, Division of Material
Safety, State, Tribal and Rulemaking
Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015–29027 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. 40–38367, NRC–2015–0255]
Rare Element Resources, Inc.; Bear
Lodge Project
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License application;
opportunity to request a hearing and
petition for leave to intervene; order.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:47 Nov 13, 2015
Jkt 238001
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has received an
application from Rare Element
Resources, Inc., for a license to possess
and use source material associated with
its Bear Lodge Project. The Bear Lodge
Project includes a mine in the Black
Hills National Forest in Crook County,
Wyoming for the purpose of extracting
rare earth element ores, and a rare earth
element processing plant in Weston
County, Wyoming. In addition, the
license application contains sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information
(SUNSI).
DATES: A request for a hearing or
petition for leave to intervene must be
filed by January 15, 2016. Any potential
party as defined in § 2.4 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
who believes access to SUNSI is
necessary to respond to this notice must
request document access by November
27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2015–0255 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0255. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Kalman, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–6664, email:
Kenneth.Kalman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC has received, by letter dated
May 4, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15132A726), an application from
Rare Element Resources Inc., to possess
and use up to 10 curies of unsealed,
non-volatile thorium hydroxide and to
possess and use unlimited quantities of
unsealed, non-volatile source material
in any bound form. The source material
will be uranium and thorium in their
natural isotopic abundance in
concentrations greater than 0.05 percent
by weight. The NRC staff will document
its review of this license application in
a safety evaluation report and an
environmental assessment.
The license application is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML15134A378. The NRC has identified
the following documents as containing
SUNSI and is withholding these
documents from public disclosure
pursuant to Section 304 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54
U.S.C. 307103.
• ‘‘Stand Alone Report 10, A Class III
Cultural Resource Inventory of the Bear
Lodge Project—Upton Plant Site.’’
• The two Tribal reports referenced in
Section 7.3, ‘‘Historic, Scenic, and
Cultural Resources,’’ of the application.
II. Opportunity to Request a Hearing
and Petition for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any person(s)
whose interest may be affected by this
action may file a request for a hearing
and a petition to intervene with respect
to issuance of the amendment to the
subject facility operating license or
combined license. Requests for a
hearing and a petition for leave to
intervene shall be filed in accordance
with the Commission’s ‘‘Agency Rules
of Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR
part 2. Interested person(s) should
consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309,
which is available at the NRC’s PDR,
located in One White Flint North, Room
O1–F21 (first floor), 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
NRC’s regulations are accessible
electronically from the NRC Library on
the NRC’s Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing
or petition for leave to intervene is filed
within 60 days, the Commission or a
presiding officer designated by the
Commission or by the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 220 (Monday, November 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70843-70846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29027]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2015-0020]
Sodium Iodide-131 Patient Release Information Collection
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting
information from the general public on a number of issues associated
with medical treatment of patients with sodium iodide I-131 (hereafter
referred to as I-131). Specifically, the NRC would like input on
patient concerns about medical treatment involving the use of I-131,
information that physicians use to make decisions on when it is safe to
release I-131 patients based on radiation exposure concerns, radiation
safety information used by I-131 patients after their release, and the
availability of a radiation safety informational guidance brochure for
I-131 patients that can be distributed nationwide. The information
collected will be used to develop a Web site to provide patients with
clear and consistent information about radioactive iodine treatments
and to revise NRC patient release guidance.
DATES: Submit information and comments by February 16, 2016.
Information and comments received after this date will be considered if
it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration
only for information and comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information and comments by any of the
following methods (unless this document describes a different method
for submitting information and comments on a specific subject):
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0020. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Mail information and comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of
Administration,
[[Page 70844]]
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
For additional direction on obtaining and submitting information
and comments, see ``Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments''
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D., Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-7848; email:
Donna-Beth.Howe@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0020 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0020.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Information and Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0020 in your submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
submission. The NRC will post all submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the submissions into ADAMS. The
NRC does not routinely edit submissions to remove identifying or
contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating information from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their submission. Your request should state that
the NRC does not routinely edit submissions to remove such information
before making the submissions available to the public or entering the
submission into ADAMS.
II. Background
In a March 10, 2014, memorandum to the Commission (COMAMM-14-0001/
COMWDM-14-0001, ``Background and Proposed Direction to NRC Staff to
Verify Assumptions Made Concerning Patient Release Guidance'' (see
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/comm-secy/2014/2014-0001comamm-0001-comwdm.pdf)), NRC Chairman MacFarlane and
Commissioner Magwood brought into question whether patients receiving
I-131 treatments are given consistent and useful information from
medical facilities and whether patients can correctly follow those
instructions. Anecdotal data from patients and patient advocacy groups
indicated that while instructions are provided, the quality of the
instructions varies significantly, and that some patients are provided
with instructions that the patient and the medical facility know will
be impractical to follow.
In the Staff Requirements Memorandum to COMAMM-14-0001/COMWDM-14-
0001 (see https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/comm-secy/2014/2014-0001comamm-0001-comwdmsrm.pdf), the Commission,
among other things, directed the NRC staff to develop a Web site that
provides patients with clear and concise information and links to
relevant medical and patient advocacy Web sites about I-131 treatments,
to revise NRC guidance to specify guidelines for patient instructions
and information including a voluntary model patient/licensee
acknowledgement form documenting the patient/licensee dialog leading to
the licensee's decision of when to safely release the patient from its
control based on radiation exposure concerns, and to develop a standard
set of guidelines that licensees can use to provide instructions to
released I-131 patients. The Commission also directed the NRC staff to
consider whether the guidance information provided to the patients can
be made into an NRC brochure, or whether a medical organization already
has, or would produce, a brochure for nationwide distribution.
The NRC is interested in obtaining input from as many stakeholders
as possible, including the NRC's Advisory Committee on the Medical Use
of Isotopes, professional organizations, physicians, patients, patient
advocacy groups, licensees, Agreement States, and other interested
individuals. The focus of this information gathering effort is to
obtain: Information that patients believe will help them understand the
I-131 treatment (also referred to as Radioactive Iodine (RAI))
procedures, the physician's or licensee's best practices when making
informed decisions on releasing RAI treatment patients, and information
provided to patients on how to reduce radiation doses to others. The
NRC is also interested in learning if patient advocacy, medical
professional organizations, licensees, or other individuals have
brochures that already contain the information requested.
III. Requested Information and Comments
A. Web Site Information
The NRC is considering establishing a Web site that provides
potential patients with information on RAI treatment procedures so that
patients will understand the reason for the procedures, the process,
and how to reduce radiation exposure to others. Some of this is medical
information that is outside the NRC's field of expertise. The NRC would
like to be able to provide links to other sites providing this medical
information. The NRC may develop the basic radiation safety information
itself, but could provide links if established sites already have this
information.
The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy
groups, and other interested individuals to articulate concerns that
may not be included in the topics identified in this section.
If you have, or know of, a Web site that that can be used to
explain the disease and treatment process, and addresses one or more of
the following topics, please provide the link to the NRC.
What is radioactivity?
What is radioactive iodine (RAI)?
RAI treatment:
Any explanation of how radiation is used in the treatment
should include clear information that the patient will receive
radioactive material, emit radiation, retain radioactive material, and
release radioactive material.
[[Page 70845]]
Preparing for RAI treatment.
What to expect before and after receiving the treatment.
Side effects of RAI treatment.
Basic radiation safety:
Appropriate venues for recovery after release.
Precautions to take after receiving treatment.
Risks to others, to include risks to young children and
pregnant women.
Expected general behaviors after release.
When identifying a Web site, indicate the topic it addresses and
provide a link to that specific information on the topic.
B. Patient/Licensee Acknowledgement Form and Best Practices in Making
Informed Decisions on Releasing Patients Treated With I-131 Based on
Radiation Exposure Considerations
The NRC is looking for best practices used by individual physicians
and licensees that focus on enhancing the ability to make informed
radiation safety decisions on the release of individual patients from
their radiation safety control under the patient release criteria in
the NRC's medical use regulations. The NRC expects the physician
(licensee) to have a dialog with the patient that will ultimately lead
to an informed decision on when the patient should be released from its
radiation safety control based on radiation exposure considerations
(this includes immediate or delayed release, in addition to
hospitalization). The NRC is also interested in knowing whether a
patient/licensee acknowledgment form documenting this dialog exists and
is part of the physicians' best practices. The NRC believes this dialog
would include some or all of the following:
The patient's ability to understand the language of the
physician (licensee) or need for an interpreter that understands the
procedure.
The need for a family member or another support person
present to facilitate better retention of information.
A discussion with the patient to determine suitability for
release.
Description of the patient's transportation from the
medical facility to home.
Discussion of the patient's normal daily behavior and
patterns, including but not limited to:
The patient's normal/routine social interactions.
The patient's normal/routine working environment and
tasks.
The patient's normal/routine living arrangements.
The planned changes to the patient's normal/routine
behaviors during the treatment period (have friend or family member
accompany the patient or spend time with patient, change in living
arrangements, etc.).
Financial considerations that will affect the patient's
preference on early or delayed release.
Discussion to evaluate patient's ability to understand and
follow instructions.
Discussion to evaluate of patient's willingness to follow
instructions.
Discussion to evaluate the level of disruption to patient
routine lifestyle, if released, and the ability of the patient to make
and follow the changes, if released.
If you have a policy or procedure that provides you with the
confidence that you are releasing the patient at the appropriate time,
please describe your policy or provide your procedure. If the policy or
procedure includes a patient/licensee acknowledgement form, or if you
have a stand-alone form, documenting the patient/licensee discussion,
please provide it. The policy, procedure, or form could include some of
the topics listed but may include others. Indicate when this type of
discussion with the patients takes place (e.g., when the patient is
referred for the procedure, before administration, after
administration, etc.). Does the timing of this discussion allow the
patient enough time to make different living, working, or
transportation arrangements or for the medical facility to make delayed
release (may include hospitalization) arrangements? Please describe how
your best practices are used in the decision making process.
The NRC would also like input from the patient's or other
interested individual's perspective of the optimal time for the
discussion to take place so that both the patient and the medical
facility have confidence the release decision is appropriate. How much
time is needed to allow patients to make different living, working,
transportation arrangements? The NRC is also seeking input from
patients, patient advocacy groups, and other interested individuals to
articulate other topics that should be included in the discussion.
C. Guidance for Released Patients
The Commission directed the NRC staff to develop standardized
guidance for licensees to provide to their patients that would help to
reduce the variability of instructions provided to patients and
eliminate some of the uncertainty regarding the type of information
that is provided to the patient. While the NRC currently prefers to
develop performance based guidance (articulating objectives but not
telling licensees how to reach those objectives), prescriptive guidance
(i.e., very detailed and specific) may be necessary to reduce
uncertainty and provide confidence that regulatory requirements are
met. If the standardized guidance is performance-based, it would need
to provide individual patients with the ``tools'' needed to follow the
objectives in the guidance and protect others.
If you have guidance documents that you believe provide clear
instructions to released patients, please provide a copy to the NRC. If
your guidance includes topics not addressed below, indicate why you
think each is an important topic to include. If it does not address one
of the topics and you believe that topic is not needed, describe why it
is not needed.
What ``tools'' (or methods/means) can the patient use to
protect others once released?
Are both oral and written information presented in the
patient's native language and presented in a manner understandable to
both the patient and physician (licensee)?
Does the medical facility/licensee have access to an
interpreting service to make sure that oral and written information and
instructions are understood?
How are instructions personalized to the individual
patient?
Does the medical facility explain how to limit the
exposures to others (especially to young children and pregnant women)?
Arrangements for protecting others once arriving at home.
Informed how long special care must be exercised.
Are actions described that the patient can take to
minimize the exposure of people both inside and outside the home?
Do transportation instructions from the medical facility
to home match the patient's plans?
Are discussions held on managing biological wastes and
trash in accordance with NRC, state, and local requirements?
Are discussions held to identify whom to contact in the
event that questions arise during the recovery period?
Are discussions held on where to go for emergency care?
The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy
groups, and other interested individuals to articulate topics that
should be included in the instructions provided to released patients.
Further, when do you want to be provided with these instructions? Are
the instructions provided in a manner that is easy to understand and
[[Page 70846]]
follow? What would have made the instructions better?
D. Brochure for Nationwide Use
The NRC is seeking identification of a brochure that you believe
provides clear guidance on the release of patients treated with I-131.
If you have or know of such a brochure please send the NRC a copy or a
link to it. The intent is to identify a brochure that could be
distributed nationwide.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This information request contains information collection
requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collections were approved
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB control number 3150-
0229, expiration date of October 31, 2018.
The burden to the public for these information collections is
estimated to average 0.25 to 0.50 hours per response, including time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
data, performing necessary analyses, and completing and reviewing the
information collection. This information collection request only
information already possessed by the responder and does not request the
responder develop any new data.
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of November, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christian E. Einberg,
Acting Deputy Director, Division of Material Safety, State, Tribal and
Rulemaking Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015-29027 Filed 11-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P