Sodium Iodide-131 Patient Release Information Collection, 70843-70846 [2015-29027]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices Dated: November 9, 2015. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts. [FR Doc. 2015–28852 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7537–01–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposal Review Panel for Computing and Communication Foundations; Notice of Meeting In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: Name: Proposal Panel Review for Science and Technology Centers— Integrative Partnerships (#1192) Site Visit. Date/Time: December 7, 2015, 6:30 p.m.–8:30 p.m.; December 8, 2015, 8:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m.; December 9, 2015, 8:30 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Place: Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Type of Meeting: Part-Open. Contact Person: John Cozzens, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1115, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292–8910. Purpose of Meeting: To assess the progress of the STC Award: 0939370 ‘‘Emerging Frontiers of Science of Information: the Science and the Technology of Intelligence’’, and to provide advise and recommendations concerning further NSF support for the Center. Agenda: CSol Purdue Site Visit Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.: Closed; Site Team and NSF Staff meets to discuss Site Visit materials, review process and charge. Tuesday, December 8, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.: Open; Presentations by Awardee Institution, faculty staff and students, to Site Team and NSF Staff; Discussions, question and answer sessions. 1:00 p.m.–8:00 p.m.: Closed; Draft report on education and research activities. Wednesday, December 9, 2015, 8:30 a.m.–noon: Open; Response presentations by Site Team and NSF Staff Awardee Institution faculty staff; Discussions, question and answer sessions. Noon to 3:00 p.m.: Closed; Complete written site visit report with preliminary recommendations. Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. Dated: November 10, 2015. Crystal Robinson, Committee Management Officer. Dated: November 10, 2015. Crystal Robinson, Committee Management Officer. 70843 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [FR Doc. 2015–29165 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2015–29164 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P [NRC–2015–0020] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P Sodium Iodide–131 Patient Release Information Collection NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION AGENCY: Business and Operations Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: Name: Business and Operations Advisory Committee (9556). Date/Time: December 8, 2015; 1:00 p.m. to 5:45 p.m. (EST). December 9, 2015; 8:45 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. (EST). Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230; Stafford I, Room 1235 Type of Meeting: PART–OPEN. Contact Person: Joan Miller, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 (703) 292–8200. Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice concerning issues related to the oversight, integrity, development and enhancement of NSF’s business operations. Agenda: December 8, 2015. 1:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m., OPEN—Welcome/ Introductions; BFA/OIRM Updates; NSF Headquarters Relocation Update; Modernizing the Workforce—IT— Driven Change Management; Records Management/Digitization. 4:30 p.m.–5:45 p.m. CLOSED—Briefing on the National Academy of Public Administration Study of NSF’s Use of Cooperative Agreements to Support Large Scale Investments in Science and Technology. December 9, 2015 8:45 a.m.–12:00 p.m. OPEN— Preparation for discussion with NSF Director and Chief Operating Officer; Discussion with NSF Director and Chief Operating Officer; Presidential Transitions: What Agencies Can Do to Prepare; Meeting Wrap-Up. Reason for Closing: This session of the meeting is closed to the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Request for information. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting information from the general public on a number of issues associated with medical treatment of patients with sodium iodide I–131 (hereafter referred to as I–131). Specifically, the NRC would like input on patient concerns about medical treatment involving the use of I–131, information that physicians use to make decisions on when it is safe to release I–131 patients based on radiation exposure concerns, radiation safety information used by I– 131 patients after their release, and the availability of a radiation safety informational guidance brochure for I– 131 patients that can be distributed nationwide. The information collected will be used to develop a Web site to provide patients with clear and consistent information about radioactive iodine treatments and to revise NRC patient release guidance. DATES: Submit information and comments by February 16, 2016. Information and comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only for information and comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit information and comments by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting information and comments on a specific subject): • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0020. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • Mail information and comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 70844 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices Mail Stop: OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. For additional direction on obtaining and submitting information and comments, see ‘‘Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D., Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–7848; email: DonnaBeth.Howe@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015– 0020 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this action by any of the following methods: • Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0020. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES B. Submitting Information and Comments Please include Docket ID NRC–2015– 0020 in your submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your submission. The NRC will post all submissions at https:// www.regulations.gov as well as enter the submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit submissions to VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating information from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit submissions to remove such information before making the submissions available to the public or entering the submission into ADAMS. II. Background In a March 10, 2014, memorandum to the Commission (COMAMM–14–0001/ COMWDM–14–0001, ‘‘Background and Proposed Direction to NRC Staff to Verify Assumptions Made Concerning Patient Release Guidance’’ (see https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/comm-secy/ 2014/2014-0001comamm-0001comwdm.pdf)), NRC Chairman MacFarlane and Commissioner Magwood brought into question whether patients receiving I–131 treatments are given consistent and useful information from medical facilities and whether patients can correctly follow those instructions. Anecdotal data from patients and patient advocacy groups indicated that while instructions are provided, the quality of the instructions varies significantly, and that some patients are provided with instructions that the patient and the medical facility know will be impractical to follow. In the Staff Requirements Memorandum to COMAMM–14–0001/ COMWDM–14–0001 (see https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/commission/comm-secy/ 2014/2014-0001comamm-0001comwdmsrm.pdf), the Commission, among other things, directed the NRC staff to develop a Web site that provides patients with clear and concise information and links to relevant medical and patient advocacy Web sites about I–131 treatments, to revise NRC guidance to specify guidelines for patient instructions and information including a voluntary model patient/ licensee acknowledgement form documenting the patient/licensee dialog leading to the licensee’s decision of when to safely release the patient from its control based on radiation exposure concerns, and to develop a standard set of guidelines that licensees can use to provide instructions to released I–131 patients. The Commission also directed the NRC staff to consider whether the guidance information provided to the PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 patients can be made into an NRC brochure, or whether a medical organization already has, or would produce, a brochure for nationwide distribution. The NRC is interested in obtaining input from as many stakeholders as possible, including the NRC’s Advisory Committee on the Medical Use of Isotopes, professional organizations, physicians, patients, patient advocacy groups, licensees, Agreement States, and other interested individuals. The focus of this information gathering effort is to obtain: Information that patients believe will help them understand the I–131 treatment (also referred to as Radioactive Iodine (RAI)) procedures, the physician’s or licensee’s best practices when making informed decisions on releasing RAI treatment patients, and information provided to patients on how to reduce radiation doses to others. The NRC is also interested in learning if patient advocacy, medical professional organizations, licensees, or other individuals have brochures that already contain the information requested. III. Requested Information and Comments A. Web Site Information The NRC is considering establishing a Web site that provides potential patients with information on RAI treatment procedures so that patients will understand the reason for the procedures, the process, and how to reduce radiation exposure to others. Some of this is medical information that is outside the NRC’s field of expertise. The NRC would like to be able to provide links to other sites providing this medical information. The NRC may develop the basic radiation safety information itself, but could provide links if established sites already have this information. The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy groups, and other interested individuals to articulate concerns that may not be included in the topics identified in this section. If you have, or know of, a Web site that that can be used to explain the disease and treatment process, and addresses one or more of the following topics, please provide the link to the NRC. • What is radioactivity? • What is radioactive iodine (RAI)? • RAI treatment: • Any explanation of how radiation is used in the treatment should include clear information that the patient will receive radioactive material, emit radiation, retain radioactive material, and release radioactive material. E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices • Preparing for RAI treatment. • What to expect before and after receiving the treatment. • Side effects of RAI treatment. • Basic radiation safety: • Appropriate venues for recovery after release. • Precautions to take after receiving treatment. • Risks to others, to include risks to young children and pregnant women. • Expected general behaviors after release. When identifying a Web site, indicate the topic it addresses and provide a link to that specific information on the topic. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES B. Patient/Licensee Acknowledgement Form and Best Practices in Making Informed Decisions on Releasing Patients Treated With I–131 Based on Radiation Exposure Considerations The NRC is looking for best practices used by individual physicians and licensees that focus on enhancing the ability to make informed radiation safety decisions on the release of individual patients from their radiation safety control under the patient release criteria in the NRC’s medical use regulations. The NRC expects the physician (licensee) to have a dialog with the patient that will ultimately lead to an informed decision on when the patient should be released from its radiation safety control based on radiation exposure considerations (this includes immediate or delayed release, in addition to hospitalization). The NRC is also interested in knowing whether a patient/licensee acknowledgment form documenting this dialog exists and is part of the physicians’ best practices. The NRC believes this dialog would include some or all of the following: • The patient’s ability to understand the language of the physician (licensee) or need for an interpreter that understands the procedure. • The need for a family member or another support person present to facilitate better retention of information. • A discussion with the patient to determine suitability for release. • Description of the patient’s transportation from the medical facility to home. • Discussion of the patient’s normal daily behavior and patterns, including but not limited to: • The patient’s normal/routine social interactions. • The patient’s normal/routine working environment and tasks. • The patient’s normal/routine living arrangements. • The planned changes to the patient’s normal/routine behaviors during the treatment period (have friend VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 or family member accompany the patient or spend time with patient, change in living arrangements, etc.). • Financial considerations that will affect the patient’s preference on early or delayed release. • Discussion to evaluate patient’s ability to understand and follow instructions. • Discussion to evaluate of patient’s willingness to follow instructions. • Discussion to evaluate the level of disruption to patient routine lifestyle, if released, and the ability of the patient to make and follow the changes, if released. If you have a policy or procedure that provides you with the confidence that you are releasing the patient at the appropriate time, please describe your policy or provide your procedure. If the policy or procedure includes a patient/ licensee acknowledgement form, or if you have a stand-alone form, documenting the patient/licensee discussion, please provide it. The policy, procedure, or form could include some of the topics listed but may include others. Indicate when this type of discussion with the patients takes place (e.g., when the patient is referred for the procedure, before administration, after administration, etc.). Does the timing of this discussion allow the patient enough time to make different living, working, or transportation arrangements or for the medical facility to make delayed release (may include hospitalization) arrangements? Please describe how your best practices are used in the decision making process. The NRC would also like input from the patient’s or other interested individual’s perspective of the optimal time for the discussion to take place so that both the patient and the medical facility have confidence the release decision is appropriate. How much time is needed to allow patients to make different living, working, transportation arrangements? The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy groups, and other interested individuals to articulate other topics that should be included in the discussion. C. Guidance for Released Patients The Commission directed the NRC staff to develop standardized guidance for licensees to provide to their patients that would help to reduce the variability of instructions provided to patients and eliminate some of the uncertainty regarding the type of information that is provided to the patient. While the NRC currently prefers to develop performance based guidance (articulating objectives but not telling PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 70845 licensees how to reach those objectives), prescriptive guidance (i.e., very detailed and specific) may be necessary to reduce uncertainty and provide confidence that regulatory requirements are met. If the standardized guidance is performance-based, it would need to provide individual patients with the ‘‘tools’’ needed to follow the objectives in the guidance and protect others. If you have guidance documents that you believe provide clear instructions to released patients, please provide a copy to the NRC. If your guidance includes topics not addressed below, indicate why you think each is an important topic to include. If it does not address one of the topics and you believe that topic is not needed, describe why it is not needed. • What ‘‘tools’’ (or methods/means) can the patient use to protect others once released? • Are both oral and written information presented in the patient’s native language and presented in a manner understandable to both the patient and physician (licensee)? • Does the medical facility/licensee have access to an interpreting service to make sure that oral and written information and instructions are understood? • How are instructions personalized to the individual patient? • Does the medical facility explain how to limit the exposures to others (especially to young children and pregnant women)? • Arrangements for protecting others once arriving at home. • Informed how long special care must be exercised. • Are actions described that the patient can take to minimize the exposure of people both inside and outside the home? • Do transportation instructions from the medical facility to home match the patient’s plans? • Are discussions held on managing biological wastes and trash in accordance with NRC, state, and local requirements? • Are discussions held to identify whom to contact in the event that questions arise during the recovery period? • Are discussions held on where to go for emergency care? The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy groups, and other interested individuals to articulate topics that should be included in the instructions provided to released patients. Further, when do you want to be provided with these instructions? Are the instructions provided in a manner that is easy to understand and E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 70846 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 220 / Monday, November 16, 2015 / Notices follow? What would have made the instructions better? D. Brochure for Nationwide Use The NRC is seeking identification of a brochure that you believe provides clear guidance on the release of patients treated with I–131. If you have or know of such a brochure please send the NRC a copy or a link to it. The intent is to identify a brochure that could be distributed nationwide. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement This information request contains information collection requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collections were approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB control number 3150–0229, expiration date of October 31, 2018. The burden to the public for these information collections is estimated to average 0.25 to 0.50 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering data, performing necessary analyses, and completing and reviewing the information collection. This information collection request only information already possessed by the responder and does not request the responder develop any new data. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control number. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of November, 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Christian E. Einberg, Acting Deputy Director, Division of Material Safety, State, Tribal and Rulemaking Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2015–29027 Filed 11–13–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Docket No. 40–38367, NRC–2015–0255] Rare Element Resources, Inc.; Bear Lodge Project Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: License application; opportunity to request a hearing and petition for leave to intervene; order. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:47 Nov 13, 2015 Jkt 238001 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received an application from Rare Element Resources, Inc., for a license to possess and use source material associated with its Bear Lodge Project. The Bear Lodge Project includes a mine in the Black Hills National Forest in Crook County, Wyoming for the purpose of extracting rare earth element ores, and a rare earth element processing plant in Weston County, Wyoming. In addition, the license application contains sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI). DATES: A request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene must be filed by January 15, 2016. Any potential party as defined in § 2.4 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), who believes access to SUNSI is necessary to respond to this notice must request document access by November 27, 2015. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–0255 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0255. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Kalman, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–6664, email: Kenneth.Kalman@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC has received, by letter dated May 4, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15132A726), an application from Rare Element Resources Inc., to possess and use up to 10 curies of unsealed, non-volatile thorium hydroxide and to possess and use unlimited quantities of unsealed, non-volatile source material in any bound form. The source material will be uranium and thorium in their natural isotopic abundance in concentrations greater than 0.05 percent by weight. The NRC staff will document its review of this license application in a safety evaluation report and an environmental assessment. The license application is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15134A378. The NRC has identified the following documents as containing SUNSI and is withholding these documents from public disclosure pursuant to Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 54 U.S.C. 307103. • ‘‘Stand Alone Report 10, A Class III Cultural Resource Inventory of the Bear Lodge Project—Upton Plant Site.’’ • The two Tribal reports referenced in Section 7.3, ‘‘Historic, Scenic, and Cultural Resources,’’ of the application. II. Opportunity to Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To Intervene Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any person(s) whose interest may be affected by this action may file a request for a hearing and a petition to intervene with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility operating license or combined license. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene shall be filed in accordance with the Commission’s ‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested person(s) should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is available at the NRC’s PDR, located in One White Flint North, Room O1–F21 (first floor), 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The NRC’s regulations are accessible electronically from the NRC Library on the NRC’s Web site at https:// www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. If a request for a hearing or petition for leave to intervene is filed within 60 days, the Commission or a presiding officer designated by the Commission or by the Chief Administrative Judge of the Atomic E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 220 (Monday, November 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70843-70846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29027]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2015-0020]


Sodium Iodide-131 Patient Release Information Collection

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is requesting 
information from the general public on a number of issues associated 
with medical treatment of patients with sodium iodide I-131 (hereafter 
referred to as I-131). Specifically, the NRC would like input on 
patient concerns about medical treatment involving the use of I-131, 
information that physicians use to make decisions on when it is safe to 
release I-131 patients based on radiation exposure concerns, radiation 
safety information used by I-131 patients after their release, and the 
availability of a radiation safety informational guidance brochure for 
I-131 patients that can be distributed nationwide. The information 
collected will be used to develop a Web site to provide patients with 
clear and consistent information about radioactive iodine treatments 
and to revise NRC patient release guidance.

DATES: Submit information and comments by February 16, 2016. 
Information and comments received after this date will be considered if 
it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration 
only for information and comments received on or before this date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit information and comments by any of the 
following methods (unless this document describes a different method 
for submitting information and comments on a specific subject):
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0020. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     Mail information and comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of 
Administration,

[[Page 70844]]

Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
DC 20555-0001.
    For additional direction on obtaining and submitting information 
and comments, see ``Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments'' 
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna-Beth Howe, Ph.D., Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-7848; email: 
Donna-Beth.Howe@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining and Submitting Information and Comments

A. Obtaining Information

    Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0020 when contacting the NRC 
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain 
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the 
following methods:
     Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0020.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available 
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

B. Submitting Information and Comments

    Please include Docket ID NRC-2015-0020 in your submission.
    The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact 
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your 
submission. The NRC will post all submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the submissions into ADAMS. The 
NRC does not routinely edit submissions to remove identifying or 
contact information.
    If you are requesting or aggregating information from other persons 
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to 
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be 
publicly disclosed in their submission. Your request should state that 
the NRC does not routinely edit submissions to remove such information 
before making the submissions available to the public or entering the 
submission into ADAMS.

II. Background

    In a March 10, 2014, memorandum to the Commission (COMAMM-14-0001/
COMWDM-14-0001, ``Background and Proposed Direction to NRC Staff to 
Verify Assumptions Made Concerning Patient Release Guidance'' (see 
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/comm-secy/2014/2014-0001comamm-0001-comwdm.pdf)), NRC Chairman MacFarlane and 
Commissioner Magwood brought into question whether patients receiving 
I-131 treatments are given consistent and useful information from 
medical facilities and whether patients can correctly follow those 
instructions. Anecdotal data from patients and patient advocacy groups 
indicated that while instructions are provided, the quality of the 
instructions varies significantly, and that some patients are provided 
with instructions that the patient and the medical facility know will 
be impractical to follow.
    In the Staff Requirements Memorandum to COMAMM-14-0001/COMWDM-14-
0001 (see https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/comm-secy/2014/2014-0001comamm-0001-comwdmsrm.pdf), the Commission, 
among other things, directed the NRC staff to develop a Web site that 
provides patients with clear and concise information and links to 
relevant medical and patient advocacy Web sites about I-131 treatments, 
to revise NRC guidance to specify guidelines for patient instructions 
and information including a voluntary model patient/licensee 
acknowledgement form documenting the patient/licensee dialog leading to 
the licensee's decision of when to safely release the patient from its 
control based on radiation exposure concerns, and to develop a standard 
set of guidelines that licensees can use to provide instructions to 
released I-131 patients. The Commission also directed the NRC staff to 
consider whether the guidance information provided to the patients can 
be made into an NRC brochure, or whether a medical organization already 
has, or would produce, a brochure for nationwide distribution.
    The NRC is interested in obtaining input from as many stakeholders 
as possible, including the NRC's Advisory Committee on the Medical Use 
of Isotopes, professional organizations, physicians, patients, patient 
advocacy groups, licensees, Agreement States, and other interested 
individuals. The focus of this information gathering effort is to 
obtain: Information that patients believe will help them understand the 
I-131 treatment (also referred to as Radioactive Iodine (RAI)) 
procedures, the physician's or licensee's best practices when making 
informed decisions on releasing RAI treatment patients, and information 
provided to patients on how to reduce radiation doses to others. The 
NRC is also interested in learning if patient advocacy, medical 
professional organizations, licensees, or other individuals have 
brochures that already contain the information requested.

III. Requested Information and Comments

A. Web Site Information

    The NRC is considering establishing a Web site that provides 
potential patients with information on RAI treatment procedures so that 
patients will understand the reason for the procedures, the process, 
and how to reduce radiation exposure to others. Some of this is medical 
information that is outside the NRC's field of expertise. The NRC would 
like to be able to provide links to other sites providing this medical 
information. The NRC may develop the basic radiation safety information 
itself, but could provide links if established sites already have this 
information.
    The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy 
groups, and other interested individuals to articulate concerns that 
may not be included in the topics identified in this section.
    If you have, or know of, a Web site that that can be used to 
explain the disease and treatment process, and addresses one or more of 
the following topics, please provide the link to the NRC.
     What is radioactivity?
     What is radioactive iodine (RAI)?
     RAI treatment:
     Any explanation of how radiation is used in the treatment 
should include clear information that the patient will receive 
radioactive material, emit radiation, retain radioactive material, and 
release radioactive material.


[[Page 70845]]

 Preparing for RAI treatment.
     What to expect before and after receiving the treatment.
     Side effects of RAI treatment.
     Basic radiation safety:
     Appropriate venues for recovery after release.
     Precautions to take after receiving treatment.
     Risks to others, to include risks to young children and 
pregnant women.
     Expected general behaviors after release.
    When identifying a Web site, indicate the topic it addresses and 
provide a link to that specific information on the topic.

B. Patient/Licensee Acknowledgement Form and Best Practices in Making 
Informed Decisions on Releasing Patients Treated With I-131 Based on 
Radiation Exposure Considerations

    The NRC is looking for best practices used by individual physicians 
and licensees that focus on enhancing the ability to make informed 
radiation safety decisions on the release of individual patients from 
their radiation safety control under the patient release criteria in 
the NRC's medical use regulations. The NRC expects the physician 
(licensee) to have a dialog with the patient that will ultimately lead 
to an informed decision on when the patient should be released from its 
radiation safety control based on radiation exposure considerations 
(this includes immediate or delayed release, in addition to 
hospitalization). The NRC is also interested in knowing whether a 
patient/licensee acknowledgment form documenting this dialog exists and 
is part of the physicians' best practices. The NRC believes this dialog 
would include some or all of the following:
     The patient's ability to understand the language of the 
physician (licensee) or need for an interpreter that understands the 
procedure.
     The need for a family member or another support person 
present to facilitate better retention of information.
     A discussion with the patient to determine suitability for 
release.
     Description of the patient's transportation from the 
medical facility to home.
     Discussion of the patient's normal daily behavior and 
patterns, including but not limited to:
     The patient's normal/routine social interactions.
     The patient's normal/routine working environment and 
tasks.
     The patient's normal/routine living arrangements.
     The planned changes to the patient's normal/routine 
behaviors during the treatment period (have friend or family member 
accompany the patient or spend time with patient, change in living 
arrangements, etc.).
     Financial considerations that will affect the patient's 
preference on early or delayed release.
     Discussion to evaluate patient's ability to understand and 
follow instructions.
     Discussion to evaluate of patient's willingness to follow 
instructions.
     Discussion to evaluate the level of disruption to patient 
routine lifestyle, if released, and the ability of the patient to make 
and follow the changes, if released.
    If you have a policy or procedure that provides you with the 
confidence that you are releasing the patient at the appropriate time, 
please describe your policy or provide your procedure. If the policy or 
procedure includes a patient/licensee acknowledgement form, or if you 
have a stand-alone form, documenting the patient/licensee discussion, 
please provide it. The policy, procedure, or form could include some of 
the topics listed but may include others. Indicate when this type of 
discussion with the patients takes place (e.g., when the patient is 
referred for the procedure, before administration, after 
administration, etc.). Does the timing of this discussion allow the 
patient enough time to make different living, working, or 
transportation arrangements or for the medical facility to make delayed 
release (may include hospitalization) arrangements? Please describe how 
your best practices are used in the decision making process.
    The NRC would also like input from the patient's or other 
interested individual's perspective of the optimal time for the 
discussion to take place so that both the patient and the medical 
facility have confidence the release decision is appropriate. How much 
time is needed to allow patients to make different living, working, 
transportation arrangements? The NRC is also seeking input from 
patients, patient advocacy groups, and other interested individuals to 
articulate other topics that should be included in the discussion.

C. Guidance for Released Patients

    The Commission directed the NRC staff to develop standardized 
guidance for licensees to provide to their patients that would help to 
reduce the variability of instructions provided to patients and 
eliminate some of the uncertainty regarding the type of information 
that is provided to the patient. While the NRC currently prefers to 
develop performance based guidance (articulating objectives but not 
telling licensees how to reach those objectives), prescriptive guidance 
(i.e., very detailed and specific) may be necessary to reduce 
uncertainty and provide confidence that regulatory requirements are 
met. If the standardized guidance is performance-based, it would need 
to provide individual patients with the ``tools'' needed to follow the 
objectives in the guidance and protect others.
    If you have guidance documents that you believe provide clear 
instructions to released patients, please provide a copy to the NRC. If 
your guidance includes topics not addressed below, indicate why you 
think each is an important topic to include. If it does not address one 
of the topics and you believe that topic is not needed, describe why it 
is not needed.
     What ``tools'' (or methods/means) can the patient use to 
protect others once released?
     Are both oral and written information presented in the 
patient's native language and presented in a manner understandable to 
both the patient and physician (licensee)?
     Does the medical facility/licensee have access to an 
interpreting service to make sure that oral and written information and 
instructions are understood?
     How are instructions personalized to the individual 
patient?
     Does the medical facility explain how to limit the 
exposures to others (especially to young children and pregnant women)?
     Arrangements for protecting others once arriving at home.
     Informed how long special care must be exercised.
     Are actions described that the patient can take to 
minimize the exposure of people both inside and outside the home?
     Do transportation instructions from the medical facility 
to home match the patient's plans?
     Are discussions held on managing biological wastes and 
trash in accordance with NRC, state, and local requirements?
     Are discussions held to identify whom to contact in the 
event that questions arise during the recovery period?
     Are discussions held on where to go for emergency care?
    The NRC is also seeking input from patients, patient advocacy 
groups, and other interested individuals to articulate topics that 
should be included in the instructions provided to released patients. 
Further, when do you want to be provided with these instructions? Are 
the instructions provided in a manner that is easy to understand and

[[Page 70846]]

follow? What would have made the instructions better?

D. Brochure for Nationwide Use

    The NRC is seeking identification of a brochure that you believe 
provides clear guidance on the release of patients treated with I-131. 
If you have or know of such a brochure please send the NRC a copy or a 
link to it. The intent is to identify a brochure that could be 
distributed nationwide.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act Statement

    This information request contains information collection 
requirements that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). These information collections were approved 
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB control number 3150-
0229, expiration date of October 31, 2018.
    The burden to the public for these information collections is 
estimated to average 0.25 to 0.50 hours per response, including time 
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
data, performing necessary analyses, and completing and reviewing the 
information collection. This information collection request only 
information already possessed by the responder and does not request the 
responder develop any new data.
    The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a request for information or an information collection 
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid 
OMB control number.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day of November, 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Christian E. Einberg,
Acting Deputy Director, Division of Material Safety, State, Tribal and 
Rulemaking Programs, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2015-29027 Filed 11-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.