Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Acyclovir Tablets, 70243-70245 [2015-28827]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 219 / Friday, November 13, 2015 / Notices
Paperwork Reduction Act
CBP requires aliens subject to this
notice to provide biometric and
biographic data at the Otay Mesa portof-entry in the circumstances described
above. This requirement is considered
an information collection requirement
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, has previously approved
this information collection for use. The
OMB control number for this collection
is 1651–0138.
Dated: November 9, 2015.
R. Gil Kerlikowske,
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2015–28843 Filed 11–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[1651–0108]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Canadian Border Boat
Landing Permit
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments; extension of an existing
collection of information.
AGENCY:
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) of the Department of
Homeland Security will be submitting
the following information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act: Canadian Border Boat
Landing Permit (CBP Form I–68). This
is a proposed extension of an
information collection that was
previously approved. CBP is proposing
that this information collection be
extended with no change to the burden
hours or to the information collected.
This document is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before December 14, 2015
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer for Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Nov 12, 2015
Jkt 238001
Homeland Security, and sent via
electronic mail to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 90 K Street NE.,
10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177, at 202–325–0265.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register (80 FR 25313) on May 4, 2015,
allowing for a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. This process
is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10. CBP invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to comment
on proposed and/or continuing
information collections pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3507). The
comments should address: (a) Whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimates of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or the use of other forms of
information technology; and (e) the
annual costs to respondents or record
keepers from the collection of
information (total capital/startup costs
and operations and maintenance costs).
The comments that are submitted will
be summarized and included in the CBP
request for OMB approval. All
comments will become a matter of
public record. In this document, CBP is
soliciting comments concerning the
following information collection:
Title: Canadian Border Boat Landing
Permit.
OMB Number: 1651–0108.
Form Number: CBP Form I–68.
Abstract: The Canadian Border Boat
Landing Permit (CBP Form I–68) allows
participants entering the United States
along the northern border by small
pleasure boats weighing less than 5 tons
to telephonically report their arrival
without having to appear in person for
an inspection by a CBP officer. United
States citizens, Lawful Permanent
Residents of the United States, Canadian
citizens, and Landed Residents of
Canada who are nationals of the Visa
Waiver Program countries listed in 8
CFR 217.2(a) are eligible to participate.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70243
The information collected on CBP
Form I–68 allows people who enter the
United States from Canada by small
pleasure boats to be inspected only once
during the boating season, rather than
each time they make an entry. This
information collection is provided for
by 8 CFR 235.1(g) and Section 235 of
Immigration and Nationality Act. CBP
Form I–68 is accessible at https://
www.cbp.gov/newsroom/publications/
forms?title=68&=Apply.
Current Actions: This submission is
being made to extend the expiration
date with no change to the burden hours
or to the information collected.
Type of Review: Extension (without
change).
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
68,000.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 10
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 11,288.
Estimated Annual Cost: $1,088,000.
Dated: November 9, 2015.
Tracey Denning,
Agency Clearance Officer, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015–28831 Filed 11–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Acyclovir
Tablets
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain Acyclovir tablets. Based
upon the facts presented, CBP has
concluded that the country of origin of
the Acyclovir Tablets is China and India
for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on November 5, 2015. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination no later than
December 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
70244
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 219 / Friday, November 13, 2015 / Notices
and Rulings, Office of International
Trade (202) 325–0132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on November 5, 2015,
pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart
B), CBP issued a final determination
concerning the country of origin of
certain Acyclovir Tablets, which may be
offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination,
HQ267177, was issued under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the
final determination, CBP concluded that
the processing in the United States does
not result in a substantial
transformation. Therefore, the country
of origin of the Acyclovir tablets is
China and India for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19
CFR 177.29), provides that a notice of
final determination shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Myles B. Harmon,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
HQ H267177
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
November 5, 2015
MAR–2 OT:RR:CTF:VS H267177 RSD
CATEGORY: ORIGIN
Ms. Karen Yu, Regulatory Affairs,
Carlsbad Technology Inc., 5923
Balfour Court, Carlsbad, California
92008
RE: U.S. Government procurement;
Trade Agreements Act; Country of
Origin of Acyclovir Tablets;
Substantial Transformation
Dear Ms. Yu: This is in response to
your ruling request dated July 7, 2015,
requesting a final determination on
behalf of Carlsbad Technology Inc.,
(Carlsbad) pursuant to subpart B of Part
177 of the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 CFR
part 177). Under these regulations,
which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘TAA’’), as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Nov 12, 2015
Jkt 238001
an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of Acyclovir Tablets.
As a U.S. manufacturer of a like
product, Carlsbad Inc. is a party-atinterest within the meaning of 19 CFR
177.22(d)(1), and is entitled to request
this final determination.
FACTS:
Acyclovir is a pharmaceutical product
used as a synthetic nucleoside analogue
active against herpes viruses. The active
pharmaceutical ingredient (‘‘API’’),
Acyclovir is manufactured in China and
India. The API is shipped to the U.S.,
where it undergoes five manufacturing
steps. Inactive ingredient (excipients)
used in the production of the product in
the U.S. are corn starch,
microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium
stearate, and sodium starch glycolate.
The first stage of U.S. manufacturing
is the sizing of the active and inactive
ingredients including the corn starch
glycolate, by passing them through a
sieve to remove any larger granules.
The second stage of U.S.
manufacturing is the preparation of
Acyclovir granules. The Acyclovir API,
corn starch, and sodium starch glycolate
are de-lumped and granulated with a
binding suspension of corn starch. The
wet granules are then sieved through a
comil and discharged into stainless steel
drums. These granules are then moved
to a tray dryer for a drying process for
10 to 18 hours or until it meets its
dryness specification. The dried
granules will then be sieved through a
comil again and discharged into
stainless steel drums. The third stage of
U.S. manufacturing is the preparation of
the tablet blend. The inactive
ingredients, microcrystalline cellulose
and sodium starch glycolated are delumped by passing them through a sieve
and added to the de-lumped acyclovir
granules for preblend. Then the
magnesium stearate is sieved and added
to the final blend. All the blended
product is discharged into stainless steel
drums. The fourth stage of U.S.
manufacturing is tablet compression.
The blended granules are then fed to a
tablet press machine where the tablets
are formed. The bulk tablets are
collected into plastic bags, which are
sealed and packaged in containers. The
fifth stage of U.S. manufacturing is
packaging in high density polyethylene
plastic bottles. These bottles are then
put into cartons for distribution in the
U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the
Acyclovir tablets processed as described
above for purposes U.S. Government
procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19
CFR 177.21 et seq., which implements
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the
purposes of granting waivers if certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
the growth, product, or manufacture of
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in
the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from
another country or instrumentality, it
has been substantially transformed into
a new and different article of commerce
with a name, character, or use distinct
from that of the article or articles from
which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and
final determinations for purposes of
U.S. government procurement, CBP
applies the provisions of subpart B of
part 177 consistent with the Federal
Acquisition Regulations. See 19 CFR
177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes
that the Federal Acquisition Regulations
restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase
of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions
subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end
product’’ as:
. . . an article that is mined, produced,
or manufactured in the United States or
that is substantially transformed in the
United States into a new and different
article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of
the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
48 CFR 25.003
A substantial transformation occurs
when an article emerges from a process
with a new name, character and use
different from that possessed by the
article prior to processing. A substantial
transformation will not result from a
minor manufacturing or combining
process that leaves the identity of the
article intact. See United States v.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 219 / Friday, November 13, 2015 / Notices
Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267
(1940); and, National Juice Products
Association v. United States, 628 F.
Supp. 978 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1986).
In determining whether a substantial
transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such
as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of
the processing and whether the final
article retains the essential identity and
character of the raw material. To that
end, CBP has generally held that the
processing of pharmaceutical products
from bulk form into measured doses
does not result in a substantial
transformation of the product. See e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HQ’’)
561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ
561544, dated May 1, 2000; and, HQ
735146, dated November 15, 1993.
For instance, in HQ 561975, the
anesthetic drug sevoflurane imported
into the U.S. in bulk form and processed
into dosage form by extensive testing
operations, followed by filtering and
packaging into bottles, was found not to
have undergone a substantial
transformation in the U.S. There was no
change in name (the product was
identified as sevoflurane in both its bulk
and processed form). The sevoflurane
retained its chemical and physical
properties after the U.S. processing.
Lastly, because the imported bulk
sevoflurane had a predetermined
medicinal use as an inhalable anesthetic
drug, the processing in the United States
resulted in no change in the product’s
use.
Likewise, in HQ 561544, the testing,
filtering and sterile packaging of
Geneticin Sulfate bulk powder, to create
Geneticin Selective Antibiotic, was not
found to have substantially transformed
the antibiotic substance because the
processing only involved the removal of
impurities from the bulk chemical and
the placement of the chemical into
smaller packaging.
In HQ 735146, 100 percent pure
acetaminophen imported from China
was blended with excipients in the
United States, granulated and sold to
pharmaceutical companies to process
into tablets for retail sale under private
labels. It was found that the process in
the United States did not substantially
transform the imported product because
the product was referred to as
acetaminophen before importation and
after U.S. processing, its use was for
medicinal purposes and continued to be
so used after U.S. processing, and the
granulating process minimally affected
the chemical and physical properties of
the acetaminophen.
In HQ H233356 dated December 26,
2012, mefenamic acid imported from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Nov 12, 2015
Jkt 238001
India was blended with excipients and
packaged into dosage form in the United
States. Based on prior rulings, we found
that the specific processing consisting of
blending the active ingredients with
inactive ingredients in a tumbler and
then encapsulating and packaging the
product did not substantially transform
the mefenamic acid because its
chemical character remained the same.
As such, we found that the country of
origin of the Ponstel (mefenamic acid)
capsules was India, where the
mefanamic acid was manufactured.
In this case, the processing performed
in the U.S. does not result in a change
in the medicinal use of the finished
product and the active ingredient. The
Acyclovir retains its chemical and
physical properties and is merely put
into a dosage form and is packaged for
sale. The active ingredient does not
undergo a change in name, character or
use. Therefore, in accordance with our
prior rulings, we find that no substantial
transformation occurs in U.S., and for
purposes of government procurement,
the Acyclovir tablets would be
considered a product where the active
ingredient was produced, which would
be China and India.
HOLDING:
Based upon the facts in this case, we
find that the imported Acyclovir is not
substantially transformed in U.S.
Accordingly, the country of origin for
government procurement purposes of
the Acyclovir tablets is China and India,
where the active ingredient is produced.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31 that
CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days of
publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Myles B. Harmon Acting Executive Director
Office of Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade
[FR Doc. 2015–28827 Filed 11–12–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70245
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[1651–0124]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Cargo Container and Road
Vehicle Certification for Transport
Under Customs Seal
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments; extension of an existing
collection of information.
AGENCY:
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) of the Department of
Homeland Security will be submitting
the following information collection
request to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act: Cargo Container and
Road Vehicle for Transport under
Customs Seal. This is a proposed
extension of an information collection
that was previously approved. CBP is
proposing that this information
collection be extended with no change
to the burden hours or to the
information collected. This document is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before December 14, 2015
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer for Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, and sent via
electronic mail to oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov or faxed to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Tracey Denning,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade, 90 K Street NE.,
10th Floor, Washington, DC 20229–
1177, at 202–325–0265.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register (80 FR 48117) on August 11,
2015, allowing for a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10. CBP invites the
general public and other Federal
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 219 (Friday, November 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70243-70245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28827]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Acyclovir
Tablets
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain Acyclovir tablets. Based upon the facts
presented, CBP has concluded that the country of origin of the
Acyclovir Tablets is China and India for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on November 5, 2015. A copy
of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as
defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination no later than December 14, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dinerstein, Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Regulations
[[Page 70244]]
and Rulings, Office of International Trade (202) 325-0132.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on November 5,
2015, pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of origin of certain Acyclovir
Tablets, which may be offered to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement contract. This final determination,
HQ267177, was issued under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP
concluded that the processing in the United States does not result in a
substantial transformation. Therefore, the country of origin of the
Acyclovir tablets is China and India for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that a
notice of final determination shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Myles B. Harmon,
Acting Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
HQ H267177
November 5, 2015
MAR-2 OT:RR:CTF:VS H267177 RSD
CATEGORY: ORIGIN
Ms. Karen Yu, Regulatory Affairs, Carlsbad Technology Inc., 5923
Balfour Court, Carlsbad, California 92008
RE: U.S. Government procurement; Trade Agreements Act; Country of
Origin of Acyclovir Tablets; Substantial Transformation
Dear Ms. Yu: This is in response to your ruling request dated July
7, 2015, requesting a final determination on behalf of Carlsbad
Technology Inc., (Carlsbad) pursuant to subpart B of Part 177 of the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Regulations (19 CFR part 177).
Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979 (``TAA''), as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.),
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations
as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of
Acyclovir Tablets. As a U.S. manufacturer of a like product, Carlsbad
Inc. is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1),
and is entitled to request this final determination.
FACTS:
Acyclovir is a pharmaceutical product used as a synthetic
nucleoside analogue active against herpes viruses. The active
pharmaceutical ingredient (``API''), Acyclovir is manufactured in China
and India. The API is shipped to the U.S., where it undergoes five
manufacturing steps. Inactive ingredient (excipients) used in the
production of the product in the U.S. are corn starch, microcrystalline
cellulose, magnesium stearate, and sodium starch glycolate.
The first stage of U.S. manufacturing is the sizing of the active
and inactive ingredients including the corn starch glycolate, by
passing them through a sieve to remove any larger granules.
The second stage of U.S. manufacturing is the preparation of
Acyclovir granules. The Acyclovir API, corn starch, and sodium starch
glycolate are de-lumped and granulated with a binding suspension of
corn starch. The wet granules are then sieved through a comil and
discharged into stainless steel drums. These granules are then moved to
a tray dryer for a drying process for 10 to 18 hours or until it meets
its dryness specification. The dried granules will then be sieved
through a comil again and discharged into stainless steel drums. The
third stage of U.S. manufacturing is the preparation of the tablet
blend. The inactive ingredients, microcrystalline cellulose and sodium
starch glycolated are de-lumped by passing them through a sieve and
added to the de-lumped acyclovir granules for preblend. Then the
magnesium stearate is sieved and added to the final blend. All the
blended product is discharged into stainless steel drums. The fourth
stage of U.S. manufacturing is tablet compression. The blended granules
are then fed to a tablet press machine where the tablets are formed.
The bulk tablets are collected into plastic bags, which are sealed and
packaged in containers. The fifth stage of U.S. manufacturing is
packaging in high density polyethylene plastic bottles. These bottles
are then put into cartons for distribution in the U.S.
ISSUE:
What is the country of origin of the Acyclovir tablets processed as
described above for purposes U.S. Government procurement?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether an article is or would be a
product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers if certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law
or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes
of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B
of part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. See 19
CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's purchase of products to
U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject
to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
. . . an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United
States or that is substantially transformed in the United States into a
new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was
transformed.
48 CFR 25.003
A substantial transformation occurs when an article emerges from a
process with a new name, character and use different from that
possessed by the article prior to processing. A substantial
transformation will not result from a minor manufacturing or combining
process that leaves the identity of the article intact. See United
States v.
[[Page 70245]]
Gibson-Thomsen Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (1940); and, National Juice
Products Association v. United States, 628 F. Supp. 978 (Ct. Int'l
Trade 1986).
In determining whether a substantial transformation occurs in the
manufacture of chemical products such as pharmaceuticals, CBP has
consistently examined the complexity of the processing and whether the
final article retains the essential identity and character of the raw
material. To that end, CBP has generally held that the processing of
pharmaceutical products from bulk form into measured doses does not
result in a substantial transformation of the product. See e.g.,
Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HQ'') 561975, dated April 3, 2002; HQ
561544, dated May 1, 2000; and, HQ 735146, dated November 15, 1993.
For instance, in HQ 561975, the anesthetic drug sevoflurane
imported into the U.S. in bulk form and processed into dosage form by
extensive testing operations, followed by filtering and packaging into
bottles, was found not to have undergone a substantial transformation
in the U.S. There was no change in name (the product was identified as
sevoflurane in both its bulk and processed form). The sevoflurane
retained its chemical and physical properties after the U.S.
processing. Lastly, because the imported bulk sevoflurane had a
predetermined medicinal use as an inhalable anesthetic drug, the
processing in the United States resulted in no change in the product's
use.
Likewise, in HQ 561544, the testing, filtering and sterile
packaging of Geneticin Sulfate bulk powder, to create Geneticin
Selective Antibiotic, was not found to have substantially transformed
the antibiotic substance because the processing only involved the
removal of impurities from the bulk chemical and the placement of the
chemical into smaller packaging.
In HQ 735146, 100 percent pure acetaminophen imported from China
was blended with excipients in the United States, granulated and sold
to pharmaceutical companies to process into tablets for retail sale
under private labels. It was found that the process in the United
States did not substantially transform the imported product because the
product was referred to as acetaminophen before importation and after
U.S. processing, its use was for medicinal purposes and continued to be
so used after U.S. processing, and the granulating process minimally
affected the chemical and physical properties of the acetaminophen.
In HQ H233356 dated December 26, 2012, mefenamic acid imported from
India was blended with excipients and packaged into dosage form in the
United States. Based on prior rulings, we found that the specific
processing consisting of blending the active ingredients with inactive
ingredients in a tumbler and then encapsulating and packaging the
product did not substantially transform the mefenamic acid because its
chemical character remained the same. As such, we found that the
country of origin of the Ponstel (mefenamic acid) capsules was India,
where the mefanamic acid was manufactured.
In this case, the processing performed in the U.S. does not result
in a change in the medicinal use of the finished product and the active
ingredient. The Acyclovir retains its chemical and physical properties
and is merely put into a dosage form and is packaged for sale. The
active ingredient does not undergo a change in name, character or use.
Therefore, in accordance with our prior rulings, we find that no
substantial transformation occurs in U.S., and for purposes of
government procurement, the Acyclovir tablets would be considered a
product where the active ingredient was produced, which would be China
and India.
HOLDING:
Based upon the facts in this case, we find that the imported
Acyclovir is not substantially transformed in U.S. Accordingly, the
country of origin for government procurement purposes of the Acyclovir
tablets is China and India, where the active ingredient is produced.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31 that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue
a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-at-
interest may, within 30 days of publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Myles B. Harmon Acting Executive Director
Office of Regulations and Rulings
Office of International Trade
[FR Doc. 2015-28827 Filed 11-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P