Draft Screening Form and Draft Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the San Rafael Ranch; Santa Cruz County, AZ, 69977-69979 [2015-28794]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
Dawkins, Chief, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20529–
2140, Telephone number (202) 272–
8377 (This is not a toll-free number.
Comments are not accepted via
telephone message). Please note contact
information provided here is solely for
questions regarding this notice. It is not
for individual case status inquiries.
Applicants seeking information about
the status of their individual cases can
check Case Status Online, available at
the USCIS Web site at https://
www.uscis.gov, or call the USCIS
National Customer Service Center at
(800) 375–5283; TTY (800) 767–1833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
You may access the information
collection instrument with instructions,
or additional information by visiting the
Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
USCIS–2014 -0002 in the search box.
Written comments and suggestions from
the public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection
Request: New Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
AABB accredited laboratory testing;
Rapid DNA prototype Accelerated
Nuclear DNA Equipment (ANDE) by
NetBio; Rapid DNA prototype
RapidHIT200 by IntegenX.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the DHS
sponsoring the collection: G–1294, G–
1295; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. Overseas applicants for
refugee status filing through the USCIS
Form I–590 (OMB Control Number
1615–0068) that have a spouse and/or
child(ren) must meet all requirements of
Immigration and Nationality Act
§ 207(c)(2) and have the necessary
burden of proof to establish the
relationship(s). In the case of a parentchild relationship, there is often a
degree of difficulty in establishing this
for refugee populations that often lack
reliable documentation. USCIS is
seeking to allow I–590 applicants to
provide DNA testing results through an
AABB accredited laboratory, and in
coordination with the USCIS overseas
office, to provide effective and credible
evidence of this parent-child
relationship. USCIS is also seeking to
conduct simultaneous Rapid DNA
testing as a pilot to make a
determination if the Rapid DNA
machines provide a valid alternative to
traditional DNA testing. USCIS will be
collecting samples for traditional DNA
testing through an AABB accredited
laboratory in conjunction with the
Rapid DNA pilot to test the validity of
the results obtained during the pilot.
The collection of DNA, regardless of
process employed, is strictly voluntary
and refusal to provide a sample does not
adversely impact an applicant’s I–590
application.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: 60 respondents for the
Applicant Initiated AABB accredited lab
DNA Testing with an estimate hour
burden of 6 hours per response. 250
respondents for the standard DNA
process (form G–1294) with an estimate
of .217 hour burden per response. 250
respondents for the Rapid DNA process
(Form G–1295) with an estimate of .217
hour burden per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated hour
burden per response is 470 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in cost) associated with the
collection: The total estimated cost to
the public is $14,700.
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Laura Dawkins,
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division,
Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–28701 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69977
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2015–N194;
FXES11130200000–167–FF02ENEH00]
Draft Screening Form and Draft LowEffect Habitat Conservation Plan for
the San Rafael Ranch; Santa Cruz
County, AZ
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), make
available the draft National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
screening form and draft San Rafael
Ranch low-effect habitat conservation
plan (dHCP). The San Rafael Cattle
Company (applicant) has applied to the
Service for an incidental take permit
(ITP, TE12133A–0) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). If approved, the ITP
would be in force for a period of 30
years, and would authorize incidental
take of three species currently listed
under the Act, and one species that may
become listed under the Act. The
proposed incidental take would occur as
a result of specified actions conducted
under the authority of the San Rafael
Cattle Company.
This is the second notice regarding
the dHCP. An earlier notice of
Availability was published on July 22,
2010 (75 FR 35504). After that notice
was published, processing of the permit
application was suspended by mutual
agreement of the San Rafael Cattle
Company and the Service.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received or
postmarked on or before December 14,
2015. Any comments that we receive
after the closing date may not be
considered.
SUMMARY:
Availability of Documents:
The draft NEPA screening form and
draft San Rafael Ranch low-effect
habitat conservation plan (dHCP) are
available by the following methods:
• Internet: Documents are available
on the Internet at the Service’s Web site,
at https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/
arizona/.
• U.S. Mail: A limited number of CD–
ROM and printed copies of both
documents are available, by request,
from Mr. Steve Spangle, Field
Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services
Field Office, 2321 West Royal Palm
Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021–
4951; telephone: 602–242–0210; fax:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69978
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
602–242–2513. Please note that your
request is in reference to the San Rafael
Ranch dHCP (TE–12133A–0).
• In-Person: Copies of both
documents are also available for public
inspection and review at the following
locations, by written request and
appointment only, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.:
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500
Gold Avenue SW., Room 6034,
Albuquerque, NM 87102.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Arizona Ecological Services Field
Office, 2321 West Royal Palm Road,
Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021–4951;
telephone: 602–242–0210; fax: 602–
242–2513.
The ITP application is available by
mail from the Regional Director, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box
1306, Room 6034, Albuquerque, NM
87103, Attn: Environmental Review
Division.
Comment submission: We request that
you send comments only by one of the
methods described below. Comments
submitted by any other means may not
be considered. Please note that your
request is in reference to the San Rafael
Ranch dHCP (TE–12133A–0).
• Electronically: Send comments to
fw2_hcp_permits@fws.gov.
• By hard copy: Submit comments by
U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office, 2321 West Royal
Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ
85021–4951; telephone: 602–242–0210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Duncan, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office—Tucson SubOffice, 201 N. Bonita Avenue, Suite 141,
Tucson, AZ 85745; telephone (520/670–
6150; extension 236); or by email
(Doug_Duncan@fws.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
announce that:
(1) We have gathered the information
necessary to determine the impacts to
the human environment under NEPA
related to the potential issuance of an
ITP to the applicant; and
(2) The applicant has developed a
dHCP as part of the application for an
ITP, which describes the measures the
applicant has agreed to take to minimize
and mitigate the effects of incidental
take of covered species to the maximum
extent practicable, pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act.
Take of listed plant species is not
defined in the Act, although the Act
does identify several prohibitions.
However, because covered species in
the dHCP include both plants and
animals, in the following discussion we
use the term ‘‘incidental take’’ when
discussing impacts to covered plants, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
well as actual incidental take of covered
animals. Plant species may be included
on an ITP in recognition of the
conservation benefits provided to them
under an HCP.
If approved, the ITP would authorize
incidental take of five listed species,
including Sonoran tiger salamander
(Ambystoma mavortium [=tigrinum]
stebbinsi), Gila chub (Gila intermedia),
northern Mexican gartersnake
(Thamnophis eques megalops), Canelo
Hills ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes
delitescens), and Huachuca water umbel
(Lilaeopsis schaffneriana ssp. recurva),
as well as a species that may become
listed under the Act in the future, and
Huachuca springsnail (Pyrgulopsis
thompsoni).
Also occurring on the Ranch is the
endangered Gila topminnow
(Poeciliopsis o. occidentalis) and
potentially, the threatened Chiricahua
leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis).
Both species are covered under safe
harbor agreements held by the Arizona
Game and Fish Department.
The proposed incidental take would
occur as a result of ranch management
activities on 18,440 acres of the San
Rafael Ranch and 3,560 acres of grazing
preference on the Arizona State Parks,
San Rafael State Natural Area
(consistent with lease terms) in Santa
Cruz County, Arizona. The applicant
has completed a dHCP as part of the
application package, as required by the
Act.
A categorical exclusion for an HCP is
based on the following three criteria: (1)
Implementation of the proposed plan
would result in minor or negligible
effects on federally-listed, proposed,
and candidate species and their
habitats; (2) implementation of the
proposed HCP would result in minor or
negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources; and
(3) impacts of the HCP, considered
together with the impacts of other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable
similarly situated projects, would not
result, over time, in cumulative effects
to environmental values or resources
that would be considered significant.
Based upon the preliminary
determination made in our draft NEPA
screening document, we believe this
action qualifies as a categorical
exclusion. We will consider public
comments when making the final
determination on whether to prepare an
additional NEPA document on the
proposed action.
Background
Since purchasing the San Rafael
Ranch in 2000, the applicant has been
implementing grazing practices that
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
have improved range and habitat
conditions on private lands within the
San Rafael Valley of Santa Cruz County,
Arizona. These improved habitat
conditions provide opportunities for
conservation actions that may enhance
the status and distribution of covered
species on the San Rafael Ranch. The
applicant would like to continue ranch
management activities while working
with agencies to conduct conservation
actions on the San Rafael Ranch, such
as introduction of covered species or
other species not covered, and removal
of aquatic invasive species. The covered
ranch management activities would
consist of watering cattle in stock tanks
and cattle grazing all habitats, including
herding cattle within and between
pastures; maintenance of stock ponds,
wells, waterlines, fences, roads, and
utility lines supporting these facilities;
and brush and invasive plant
management to reduce shrub invasion of
upland grasslands. All of these activities
have short-term impacts on species and
their habitats, and incidental take of
some covered species may occur.
However, a long-term benefit is
anticipated for the watershed and
habitats of the covered species. In
addition, the applicant proposes actions
to minimize the impacts of the activities
and assist in recovery of covered
species. These actions are also proposed
to be covered by the associated section
10(a)(1)(B) permit.
The biological goal of the San Rafael
Ranch HCP is to provide long-term
protection for multiple species of
concern and key natural communities
through maintenance or improvement of
the habitat conditions and ecosystem
functions necessary for their survival,
and to ensure that any incidental take of
listed species will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of those species in the
wild.
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become
part of the public record associated with
this action. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that the entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 218 / Thursday, November 12, 2015 / Notices
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and its implementing regulations (50
CFR 17.22) and NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371
et seq.) and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–28794 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
30. Please register by contacting Lucia
Foulkes at the Federal Geographic Data
Committee (703–648–4142, lfoulkes@
usgs.gov). Comments may also be
submitted to the NGAC in writing.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
December 4, 2015, from 12:30 p.m. to
3:30 p.m. EST.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Mahoney, U.S. Geological Survey (206–
220–4621).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings
of the National Geospatial Advisory
Committee are open to the public.
Additional information about the NGAC
and the meeting are available at
www.fgdc.gov/ngac.
[GX16EE000101100]
Announcement of National Geospatial
Advisory Committee Meeting
Kenneth Shaffer,
Deputy Executive Director, Federal
Geographic Data Committee.
[FR Doc. 2015–28730 Filed 11–10–15; 8:45 am]
U.S. Geological Survey,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
BILLING CODE 4338–11–P
AGENCY:
The National Geospatial
Advisory Committee (NGAC) will meet
on December 4, 2015, from 12:30 p.m.
to 3:30 p.m. EST. The meeting will be
held via web conference and
teleconference.
The NGAC, which is composed of
representatives from governmental,
private sector, non-profit, and academic
organizations, has been established to
advise the Chair of the Federal
Geographic Data Committee on
management of Federal geospatial
programs, the development of the
National Spatial Data Infrastructure, and
the implementation of Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A–16. Topics to be addressed at
the meeting include:
—FGDC Update
—NGAC Subcommittee Reports
—Review of NGAC Papers
—Planning for 2016 NGAC Activities
Members of the public who wish to
attend the meeting must register in
advance. Please register by contacting
Lucia Foulkes at the Federal Geographic
Data Committee (703–648–4142,
lfoulkes@usgs.gov). Meeting
registrations are due by November 30,
2015. Meeting information (Web
conference and teleconference
instructions) will be provided to
registrants prior to the meeting. While
the meeting will be open to the public,
attendance may be limited due to web
conference and teleconference capacity.
The meeting will include an
opportunity for public comment.
Attendees wishing to provide public
comment should register by November
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 10, 2015
Jkt 238001
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 15–21;
Christina B. Paylan, M.D.; Decision and
Order
On July 1, 2015, Administrative Law
Judge Christopher B. McNeil issued the
attached Recommended Decision.
Therein, the ALJ found it undisputed
that Respondent’s medical license has
been suspended by the Florida
Department of Health, and that
therefore, she ‘‘is not authorized to
handle controlled substances in the
State of Florida.’’ R.D. 6. Because
Respondent is no longer a ‘‘practitioner’’
within the meaning of the Controlled
Substances Act, the ALJ granted the
Government’s Motion for Summary
Disposition and recommended that her
registration be revoked 1 and that any
pending application to renew or modify
her registration be denied. Id.
Respondent filed Exceptions to the
Decision and the Government filed a
Response to Respondent’s Exceptions.
Thereafter, the record was forwarded to
me for final agency action.
Having considered the record in its
entirety, I have decided to adopt the
ALJ’s factual finding, his conclusions of
law, and recommended order. A
discussion of Respondent’s Exceptions
follows.
Respondent’s first exception is based
on the ALJ’s finding that she is ‘‘no
1 According to the registration records of this
Agency, of which I take official notice, see 5 U.S.C.
556(e), Respondent’s registration does not expire
until March 31, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69979
longer authorized by state law to handle
controlled substances.’’ Exceptions at 1.
Noting that the language of section
824(a)(3) authorizes the suspension or
revocation of a registration where a
registrant ‘‘is no longer authorized by
State law to engage in the
manufacturing, distribution or
dispensing of controlled substances,’’
Respondent argues that the ALJ lumped
together ‘‘[t]he words ‘manufacturing,
distribution or dispensing’’’ and that
this ‘‘violates the strict requirement for
strict statutory construction.’’ Id.
Apparently, because the ALJ used the
word ‘‘handle’’ rather than ‘‘dispense’’
to describe the authority Respondent no
longer holds by virtue of the suspension
of her medical license, Respondent
believes that the Agency lacks authority
to revoke her registration.
It is true that the Controlled
Substances Act does not use the word
‘‘handle’’ in describing the activities
that various categories of registrants are
authorized to engage in pursuant to
their registrations. Rather, the term is
part of the Agency’s vernacular.
Notwithstanding the language used by
the ALJ, the Agency possesses authority
to revoke Respondent’s registration
because the record establishes that she
lacks authority to dispense controlled
substances in Florida, the State in
which she is registered with DEA.
Specifically, the evidence shows that on
October 28, 2014, the Florida
Department of Health ordered the
emergency suspension of Respondent’s
license ‘‘to practice as a medical doctor’’
after she was convicted in state court of
two felony offenses, including, inter
alia, ‘‘obtaining a controlled substance
by fraud.’’ In re Emergency Suspension
of the License of Christina B. Paylan,
M.D., 1–2 (Fla. Dept. of Health Oct. 28,
2014) (No. 2014–12284). Respondent
therefore lacks authority under Florida
law to dispense controlled substances
within the meaning of the CSA. See Fla.
Stat. § 458.305(3) (defining the ‘‘practice
of medicine’’ as ‘‘the diagnosis,
treatment, operation, or prescription for
any human disease, pain, injury,
deformity, or other physical or mental
condition’’); id. § 458.305(4) (defining
‘‘physician’’ as ‘‘a person who is
licensed to practice medicine in this
state’’); § 456.065(2)(d)(1) (prohibiting
the unlicensed practice of ‘‘a health care
profession without an active, valid . . .
license to practice that professional’’
which ‘‘includes practicing on a
suspended . . . license’’).
Respondent further argues that
because she ‘‘is not a dispensing
practitioner’’ as defined by Florida law,
she is outside of the scope of section
824(a)(3). Exceptions at 5. Respondent
E:\FR\FM\12NON1.SGM
12NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 218 (Thursday, November 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69977-69979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28794]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2015-N194; FXES11130200000-167-FF02ENEH00]
Draft Screening Form and Draft Low-Effect Habitat Conservation
Plan for the San Rafael Ranch; Santa Cruz County, AZ
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), make
available the draft National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) screening
form and draft San Rafael Ranch low-effect habitat conservation plan
(dHCP). The San Rafael Cattle Company (applicant) has applied to the
Service for an incidental take permit (ITP, TE12133A-0) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). If approved, the ITP
would be in force for a period of 30 years, and would authorize
incidental take of three species currently listed under the Act, and
one species that may become listed under the Act. The proposed
incidental take would occur as a result of specified actions conducted
under the authority of the San Rafael Cattle Company.
This is the second notice regarding the dHCP. An earlier notice of
Availability was published on July 22, 2010 (75 FR 35504). After that
notice was published, processing of the permit application was
suspended by mutual agreement of the San Rafael Cattle Company and the
Service.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be received or
postmarked on or before December 14, 2015. Any comments that we receive
after the closing date may not be considered.
ADDRESSES: Availability of Documents: The draft NEPA screening form and
draft San Rafael Ranch low-effect habitat conservation plan (dHCP) are
available by the following methods:
Internet: Documents are available on the Internet at the
Service's Web site, at https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/.
U.S. Mail: A limited number of CD-ROM and printed copies
of both documents are available, by request, from Mr. Steve Spangle,
Field Supervisor, Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, 2321 West
Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021-4951; telephone: 602-242-
0210; fax:
[[Page 69978]]
602-242-2513. Please note that your request is in reference to the San
Rafael Ranch dHCP (TE-12133A-0).
In-Person: Copies of both documents are also available for
public inspection and review at the following locations, by written
request and appointment only, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 500 Gold Avenue SW., Room
6034, Albuquerque, NM 87102.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office, 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix,
AZ 85021-4951; telephone: 602-242-0210; fax: 602-242-2513.
The ITP application is available by mail from the Regional
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Room 6034,
Albuquerque, NM 87103, Attn: Environmental Review Division.
Comment submission: We request that you send comments only by one
of the methods described below. Comments submitted by any other means
may not be considered. Please note that your request is in reference to
the San Rafael Ranch dHCP (TE-12133A-0).
Electronically: Send comments to fw2_hcp_permits@fws.gov.
By hard copy: Submit comments by U.S. mail or hand-
delivery to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office, 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103, Phoenix,
AZ 85021-4951; telephone: 602-242-0210.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Duncan, Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office--Tucson Sub-Office, 201 N. Bonita Avenue, Suite
141, Tucson, AZ 85745; telephone (520/670-6150; extension 236); or by
email (Doug_Duncan@fws.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We announce that:
(1) We have gathered the information necessary to determine the
impacts to the human environment under NEPA related to the potential
issuance of an ITP to the applicant; and
(2) The applicant has developed a dHCP as part of the application
for an ITP, which describes the measures the applicant has agreed to
take to minimize and mitigate the effects of incidental take of covered
species to the maximum extent practicable, pursuant to section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act.
Take of listed plant species is not defined in the Act, although
the Act does identify several prohibitions. However, because covered
species in the dHCP include both plants and animals, in the following
discussion we use the term ``incidental take'' when discussing impacts
to covered plants, as well as actual incidental take of covered
animals. Plant species may be included on an ITP in recognition of the
conservation benefits provided to them under an HCP.
If approved, the ITP would authorize incidental take of five listed
species, including Sonoran tiger salamander (Ambystoma mavortium
[=tigrinum] stebbinsi), Gila chub (Gila intermedia), northern Mexican
gartersnake (Thamnophis eques megalops), Canelo Hills ladies'-tresses
(Spiranthes delitescens), and Huachuca water umbel (Lilaeopsis
schaffneriana ssp. recurva), as well as a species that may become
listed under the Act in the future, and Huachuca springsnail
(Pyrgulopsis thompsoni).
Also occurring on the Ranch is the endangered Gila topminnow
(Poeciliopsis o. occidentalis) and potentially, the threatened
Chiricahua leopard frog (Lithobates chiricahuensis). Both species are
covered under safe harbor agreements held by the Arizona Game and Fish
Department.
The proposed incidental take would occur as a result of ranch
management activities on 18,440 acres of the San Rafael Ranch and 3,560
acres of grazing preference on the Arizona State Parks, San Rafael
State Natural Area (consistent with lease terms) in Santa Cruz County,
Arizona. The applicant has completed a dHCP as part of the application
package, as required by the Act.
A categorical exclusion for an HCP is based on the following three
criteria: (1) Implementation of the proposed plan would result in minor
or negligible effects on federally-listed, proposed, and candidate
species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the proposed HCP
would result in minor or negligible effects on other environmental
values or resources; and (3) impacts of the HCP, considered together
with the impacts of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable
similarly situated projects, would not result, over time, in cumulative
effects to environmental values or resources that would be considered
significant. Based upon the preliminary determination made in our draft
NEPA screening document, we believe this action qualifies as a
categorical exclusion. We will consider public comments when making the
final determination on whether to prepare an additional NEPA document
on the proposed action.
Background
Since purchasing the San Rafael Ranch in 2000, the applicant has
been implementing grazing practices that have improved range and
habitat conditions on private lands within the San Rafael Valley of
Santa Cruz County, Arizona. These improved habitat conditions provide
opportunities for conservation actions that may enhance the status and
distribution of covered species on the San Rafael Ranch. The applicant
would like to continue ranch management activities while working with
agencies to conduct conservation actions on the San Rafael Ranch, such
as introduction of covered species or other species not covered, and
removal of aquatic invasive species. The covered ranch management
activities would consist of watering cattle in stock tanks and cattle
grazing all habitats, including herding cattle within and between
pastures; maintenance of stock ponds, wells, waterlines, fences, roads,
and utility lines supporting these facilities; and brush and invasive
plant management to reduce shrub invasion of upland grasslands. All of
these activities have short-term impacts on species and their habitats,
and incidental take of some covered species may occur. However, a long-
term benefit is anticipated for the watershed and habitats of the
covered species. In addition, the applicant proposes actions to
minimize the impacts of the activities and assist in recovery of
covered species. These actions are also proposed to be covered by the
associated section 10(a)(1)(B) permit.
The biological goal of the San Rafael Ranch HCP is to provide long-
term protection for multiple species of concern and key natural
communities through maintenance or improvement of the habitat
conditions and ecosystem functions necessary for their survival, and to
ensure that any incidental take of listed species will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of those species in
the wild.
Public Availability of Comments
Written comments we receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in
your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment--including
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
[[Page 69979]]
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22) and NEPA
(42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and its implementing regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
Dated: November 5, 2015.
Joy E. Nicholopoulos,
Acting Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-28794 Filed 11-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P