Mitigating Impacts on Natural Resources From Development and Encouraging Related Private Investment, 68743-68747 [2015-28466]
Download as PDF
68743
Presidential Documents
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 215
Friday, November 6, 2015
Title 3—
Memorandum of November 3, 2015
The President
Mitigating Impacts on Natural Resources From Development
and Encouraging Related Private Investment
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense[,] the Secretary of the
Interior[,] the Secretary of Agriculture[,] the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency[, and] the Administrator of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
We all have a moral obligation to the next generation to leave America’s
natural resources in better condition than when we inherited them. It is
this same obligation that contributes to the strength of our economy and
quality of life today. American ingenuity has provided the tools that we
need to avoid damage to the most special places in our Nation and to
find new ways to restore areas that have been degraded.
Federal agencies implement statutes and regulations that seek simultaneously
to advance our economic development, infrastructure, and national security
goals along with environmental goals. As efforts across the country have
demonstrated, it is possible to achieve strong environmental outcomes while
encouraging development and providing services to the American people.
This occurs through policies that direct the planning necessary to address
harmful impacts on natural resources by avoiding and minimizing impacts,
then compensating for impacts that do occur. Moreover, when opportunities
to offset foreseeable harmful impacts to natural resources are available in
advance, agencies and project proponents have more options to achieve
positive environmental outcomes and potentially reduce permitting timelines.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Federal agencies can, however, face barriers that hinder their ability to
use Federal resources for restoration in advance of regulatory approval of
development and other activities (e.g., it may not be possible to fund restoration before the exact location and scope of a project have been approved;
or there may be limitations in designing large-scale management plans when
future development is uncertain). This memorandum will encourage private
investment in restoration and public-private partnerships, and help foster
opportunities for businesses or non-profit organizations with relevant expertise to successfully achieve restoration and conservation objectives.
One way to increase private investment in natural resource restoration is
to ensure that Federal policies are clear, work similarly across agencies,
and are implemented consistently within agencies. By encouraging agencies
to share and adopt a common set of their best practices to mitigate for
harmful impacts to natural resources, the Federal Government can create
a regulatory environment that allows us to build the economy while protecting healthy ecosystems that benefit this and future generations. Similarly,
in non-regulatory circumstances, private investment can play an expanded
role in achieving public natural resource restoration goals. For example,
performance contracts and other Pay for Success approaches offer innovative
ways to finance the procurement of measurable environmental benefits that
meet high government standards by paying only for demonstrated outcomes.
Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution
and the laws of the United States of America, and to protect the health
of our economy and environment, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Policy. It shall be the policy of the Departments of Defense,
the Interior, and Agriculture; the Environmental Protection Agency; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Nov 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\06NOO0.SGM
06NOO0
68744
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; and all bureaus or
agencies within them (agencies); to avoid and then minimize harmful effects
to land, water, wildlife, and other ecological resources (natural resources)
caused by land- or water-disturbing activities, and to ensure that any remaining harmful effects are effectively addressed, consistent with existing mission
and legal authorities. Agencies shall each adopt a clear and consistent approach for avoidance and minimization of, and compensatory mitigation
for, the impacts of their activities and the projects they approve. That approach should also recognize that existing legal authorities contain additional
protections for some resources that are of such irreplaceable character that
minimization and compensation measures, while potentially practicable, may
not be adequate or appropriate, and therefore agencies should design policies
to promote avoidance of impacts to these resources.
Large-scale plans and analysis should inform the identification of areas
where development may be most appropriate, where high natural resource
values result in the best locations for protection and restoration, or where
natural resource values are irreplaceable. Furthermore, because doing so
lowers long-term risks to our environment and reduces timelines of development and other projects, agency policies should seek to encourage advance
compensation, including mitigation bank-based approaches, in order to provide resource gains before harmful impacts occur. The design and implementation of those policies should be crafted to result in predictability sufficient
to provide incentives for the private and non-governmental investments
often needed to produce successful advance compensation. Wherever possible, policies should operate similarly across agencies and be implemented
consistently within them.
To the extent allowed by an agency’s authorities, agencies are encouraged
to pay particular attention to opportunities to promote investment by the
non-profit and private sectors in restoration or enhancement of natural resources to deliver measurable environmental outcomes related to an established natural resource goal, including, if appropriate, as part of a restoration
plan for natural resource damages or for authorized investments made on
public lands.
Sec. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this memorandum:
(a) ‘‘Agencies’’ refers to the Department of Defense, Department of the
Interior, Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and any of their respective bureaus or agencies.
(b) ‘‘Advance compensation’’ means a form of compensatory mitigation
for which measurable environmental benefits (defined by performance standards) are achieved before a given project’s harmful impacts to natural resources occur.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
(c) ‘‘Durability’’ refers to a state in which the measurable environmental
benefits of mitigation will be sustained, at minimum, for as long as the
associated harmful impacts of the authorized activity continue. The ‘‘durability’’ of a mitigation measure is influenced by: (1) the level of protection
or type of designation provided; and (2) financial and long-term management
commitments.
(d) ‘‘Irreplaceable natural resources’’ refers to resources recognized through
existing legal authorities as requiring particular protection from impacts
and that because of their high value or function and unique character,
cannot be restored or replaced.
(e) ‘‘Large-scale plan’’ means any landscape- or watershed-scale planning
document that addresses natural resource conditions and trends in an appropriate planning area, conservation objectives for those natural resources,
or multiple stakeholder interests and land uses, or that identifies priority
sites for resource restoration and protection, including irreplaceable natural
resources.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Nov 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\06NOO0.SGM
06NOO0
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents
68745
(f) ‘‘Mitigation’’ means avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing over
time, and compensating for impacts on natural resources. As a practical
matter, all of these actions are captured in the terms avoidance, minimization,
and compensation. These three actions are generally applied sequentially,
and therefore compensatory measures should normally not be considered
until after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization measures have been considered.
Sec. 3. Establishing Federal Principles for Mitigation. To the extent permitted
by each agency’s legal authorities, in addition to any principles that are
specific to the mission or authorities of individual agencies, the following
principles shall be applied consistently across agencies to the extent appropriate and practicable.
(a) Agencies should take advantage of available Federal, State, tribal, local,
or non-governmental large-scale plans and analysis to assist in identifying
how proposed projects potentially impact natural resources and to guide
better decision-making for mitigation, including avoidance of irreplaceable
natural resources.
(b) Agencies’ mitigation policies should establish a net benefit goal or,
at a minimum, a no net loss goal for natural resources the agency manages
that are important, scarce, or sensitive, or wherever doing so is consistent
with agency mission and established natural resource objectives. When a
resource’s value is determined to be irreplaceable, the preferred means of
achieving either of these goals is through avoidance, consistent with applicable legal authorities. Agencies should explicitly consider the extent to which
the beneficial environmental outcomes that will be achieved are demonstrably
new and would not have occurred in the absence of mitigation (i.e.
additionality) when determining whether those measures adequately address
impacts to natural resources.
(c) With respect to projects and decisions other than in natural resource
damage cases, agencies should give preference to advance compensation
mechanisms that are likely to achieve clearly defined environmental performance standards prior to the harmful impacts of a project. Agencies should
look for and use, to the extent appropriate and practicable, available advance
compensation that has achieved its intended environmental outcomes. Where
advance compensation options are not appropriate or not available, agencies
should give preference to other compensatory mitigation practices that are
likely to succeed in achieving environmental outcomes.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
(d) With respect to natural resource damage restoration plans, natural
resource trustee agencies should evaluate criteria for whether, where, and
when consideration of restoration banking or advance restoration projects
would be appropriate in their guidance developed pursuant to section 4(d)
of this memorandum. Consideration under established regulations of restoration banking or advance restoration strategies can contribute to the success
of restoration goals by delivering early, measurable environmental outcomes.
(e) Agencies should take action to increase public transparency in the
implementation of their mitigation policies and guidance. Agencies should
set measurable performance standards at the project and program level to
assess whether mitigation is effective and should clearly identify the party
responsible for all aspects of required mitigation measures. Agencies should
develop and use appropriate tools to measure, monitor, and evaluate effectiveness of avoidance, minimization, and compensation policies to better understand and explain to the public how they can be improved over time.
(f) When evaluating proposed mitigation measures, agencies should consider the extent to which those measures will address anticipated harm
over the long term. To that end, agencies should address the durability
of compensation measures, financial assurances, and the resilience of the
measures’ benefits to potential future environmental change, as well as ecological relevance to adversely affected resources.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Nov 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\06NOO0.SGM
06NOO0
68746
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents
(g) Each agency should ensure consistent implementation of its policies
and standards across the Nation and hold all compensatory mitigation mechanisms to equivalent and effective standards when implementing their policies.
(h) To improve the implementation of effective and durable mitigation
projects on Federal land, agencies should identify, and make public, locations
on Federal land of authorized impacts and their associated mitigation
projects, including their type, extent, efficacy of compliance, and success
in achieving performance measures. When compensatory actions take place
on Federal lands and waters that could be open to future multiple uses,
agencies should describe measures taken to ensure that the compensatory
actions are durable.
Sec. 4. Federal Action to Strengthen Mitigation Policies and Support Private
Investment in Restoration. In support of the policy and principles outlined
above, agencies identified below shall take the following specific actions.
(a) Within 180 days of the date of this memorandum, the Department
of Agriculture, through the U.S. Forest Service, shall develop and implement
additional manual and handbook guidance that addresses the agency’s approach to avoidance, minimization, and compensation for impacts to natural
resources within the National Forest System. The U.S. Forest Service shall
finalize a mitigation regulation within 2 years of the date of this memorandum.
(b) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, the Department of
the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, shall finalize a mitigation policy that will bring consistency to the consideration and application
of avoidance, minimization, and compensatory actions or development activities and projects impacting public lands and resources.
(c) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, the Department of
the Interior, through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, shall finalize a
revised mitigation policy that applies to all of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service’s authorities and trust responsibilities. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service shall also finalize an additional policy that applies to compensatory
mitigation associated with its responsibilities under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973. Further, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall finalize a
policy that provides clarity to and predictability for agencies and State
governments, private landowners, tribes, and others that take action to conserve species in advance of potential future listing under the Endangered
Species Act. This policy will provide a mechanism to recognize and credit
such action as avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
(d) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, each Federal natural
resource trustee agency will develop guidance for its agency’s trustee representatives describing the considerations for evaluating whether, where,
and when restoration banking or advance restoration projects would be
appropriate as components of a restoration plan adopted by trustees. Agencies
developing such guidance will coordinate for consistency.
(e) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum, the Department of
the Interior will develop program guidance regarding the use of mitigation
projects and measures on lands administered by bureaus or offices of the
Department through a land-use authorization, cooperative agreement, or other
appropriate mechanism that would authorize a project proponent to conduct
actions, or otherwise secure conservation benefits, for the purpose of mitigating impacts elsewhere.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) This memorandum complements and is not
intended to supersede existing laws and policies.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable
law, and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This memorandum is intended for the internal guidance of the executive
branch and is inapplicable to the litigation or settlement of natural resource
damage claims. The provisions of section 3 this memorandum encouraging
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Nov 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\06NOO0.SGM
06NOO0
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 / Presidential Documents
68747
restoration banking and advance restoration projects also do not apply to
the selection or implementation of natural resource restoration plans, except
to the extent determined appropriate in Federal trustee guidance developed
pursuant to section 4(d) of this memorandum.
(d) The provisions of this memorandum shall not apply to military testing,
training, and readiness activities.
(e) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise
affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or
the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(f) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right
or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by
any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
(g) The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized and directed to
publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, November 3, 2015
[FR Doc. 2015–28466
Filed 11–5–15; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Nov 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4705
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\06NOO0.SGM
06NOO0
OB#1.EPS
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
Billing code 4310–10–P
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 215 (Friday, November 6, 2015)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 68743-68747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28466]
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 215 / Friday, November 6, 2015 /
Presidential Documents
___________________________________________________________________
Title 3--
The President
[[Page 68743]]
Memorandum of November 3, 2015
Mitigating Impacts on Natural Resources From
Development and Encouraging Related Private Investment
Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense[,] the
Secretary of the Interior[,] the Secretary of
Agriculture[,] the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency[, and] the Administrator of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
We all have a moral obligation to the next generation
to leave America's natural resources in better
condition than when we inherited them. It is this same
obligation that contributes to the strength of our
economy and quality of life today. American ingenuity
has provided the tools that we need to avoid damage to
the most special places in our Nation and to find new
ways to restore areas that have been degraded.
Federal agencies implement statutes and regulations
that seek simultaneously to advance our economic
development, infrastructure, and national security
goals along with environmental goals. As efforts across
the country have demonstrated, it is possible to
achieve strong environmental outcomes while encouraging
development and providing services to the American
people. This occurs through policies that direct the
planning necessary to address harmful impacts on
natural resources by avoiding and minimizing impacts,
then compensating for impacts that do occur. Moreover,
when opportunities to offset foreseeable harmful
impacts to natural resources are available in advance,
agencies and project proponents have more options to
achieve positive environmental outcomes and potentially
reduce permitting timelines.
Federal agencies can, however, face barriers that
hinder their ability to use Federal resources for
restoration in advance of regulatory approval of
development and other activities (e.g., it may not be
possible to fund restoration before the exact location
and scope of a project have been approved; or there may
be limitations in designing large-scale management
plans when future development is uncertain). This
memorandum will encourage private investment in
restoration and public-private partnerships, and help
foster opportunities for businesses or non-profit
organizations with relevant expertise to successfully
achieve restoration and conservation objectives.
One way to increase private investment in natural
resource restoration is to ensure that Federal policies
are clear, work similarly across agencies, and are
implemented consistently within agencies. By
encouraging agencies to share and adopt a common set of
their best practices to mitigate for harmful impacts to
natural resources, the Federal Government can create a
regulatory environment that allows us to build the
economy while protecting healthy ecosystems that
benefit this and future generations. Similarly, in non-
regulatory circumstances, private investment can play
an expanded role in achieving public natural resource
restoration goals. For example, performance contracts
and other Pay for Success approaches offer innovative
ways to finance the procurement of measurable
environmental benefits that meet high government
standards by paying only for demonstrated outcomes.
Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President
by the Constitution and the laws of the United States
of America, and to protect the health of our economy
and environment, I hereby direct the following:
Section 1. Policy. It shall be the policy of the
Departments of Defense, the Interior, and Agriculture;
the Environmental Protection Agency; and
[[Page 68744]]
the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;
and all bureaus or agencies within them (agencies); to
avoid and then minimize harmful effects to land, water,
wildlife, and other ecological resources (natural
resources) caused by land- or water-disturbing
activities, and to ensure that any remaining harmful
effects are effectively addressed, consistent with
existing mission and legal authorities. Agencies shall
each adopt a clear and consistent approach for
avoidance and minimization of, and compensatory
mitigation for, the impacts of their activities and the
projects they approve. That approach should also
recognize that existing legal authorities contain
additional protections for some resources that are of
such irreplaceable character that minimization and
compensation measures, while potentially practicable,
may not be adequate or appropriate, and therefore
agencies should design policies to promote avoidance of
impacts to these resources.
Large-scale plans and analysis should inform the
identification of areas where development may be most
appropriate, where high natural resource values result
in the best locations for protection and restoration,
or where natural resource values are irreplaceable.
Furthermore, because doing so lowers long-term risks to
our environment and reduces timelines of development
and other projects, agency policies should seek to
encourage advance compensation, including mitigation
bank-based approaches, in order to provide resource
gains before harmful impacts occur. The design and
implementation of those policies should be crafted to
result in predictability sufficient to provide
incentives for the private and non-governmental
investments often needed to produce successful advance
compensation. Wherever possible, policies should
operate similarly across agencies and be implemented
consistently within them.
To the extent allowed by an agency's authorities,
agencies are encouraged to pay particular attention to
opportunities to promote investment by the non-profit
and private sectors in restoration or enhancement of
natural resources to deliver measurable environmental
outcomes related to an established natural resource
goal, including, if appropriate, as part of a
restoration plan for natural resource damages or for
authorized investments made on public lands.
Sec. 2. Definitions. For the purposes of this
memorandum:
(a) ``Agencies'' refers to the Department of
Defense, Department of the Interior, Department of
Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and
any of their respective bureaus or agencies.
(b) ``Advance compensation'' means a form of
compensatory mitigation for which measurable
environmental benefits (defined by performance
standards) are achieved before a given project's
harmful impacts to natural resources occur.
(c) ``Durability'' refers to a state in which the
measurable environmental benefits of mitigation will be
sustained, at minimum, for as long as the associated
harmful impacts of the authorized activity continue.
The ``durability'' of a mitigation measure is
influenced by: (1) the level of protection or type of
designation provided; and (2) financial and long-term
management commitments.
(d) ``Irreplaceable natural resources'' refers to
resources recognized through existing legal authorities
as requiring particular protection from impacts and
that because of their high value or function and unique
character, cannot be restored or replaced.
(e) ``Large-scale plan'' means any landscape- or
watershed-scale planning document that addresses
natural resource conditions and trends in an
appropriate planning area, conservation objectives for
those natural resources, or multiple stakeholder
interests and land uses, or that identifies priority
sites for resource restoration and protection,
including irreplaceable natural resources.
[[Page 68745]]
(f) ``Mitigation'' means avoiding, minimizing,
rectifying, reducing over time, and compensating for
impacts on natural resources. As a practical matter,
all of these actions are captured in the terms
avoidance, minimization, and compensation. These three
actions are generally applied sequentially, and
therefore compensatory measures should normally not be
considered until after all appropriate and practicable
avoidance and minimization measures have been
considered.
Sec. 3. Establishing Federal Principles for Mitigation.
To the extent permitted by each agency's legal
authorities, in addition to any principles that are
specific to the mission or authorities of individual
agencies, the following principles shall be applied
consistently across agencies to the extent appropriate
and practicable.
(a) Agencies should take advantage of available
Federal, State, tribal, local, or non-governmental
large-scale plans and analysis to assist in identifying
how proposed projects potentially impact natural
resources and to guide better decision-making for
mitigation, including avoidance of irreplaceable
natural resources.
(b) Agencies' mitigation policies should establish
a net benefit goal or, at a minimum, a no net loss goal
for natural resources the agency manages that are
important, scarce, or sensitive, or wherever doing so
is consistent with agency mission and established
natural resource objectives. When a resource's value is
determined to be irreplaceable, the preferred means of
achieving either of these goals is through avoidance,
consistent with applicable legal authorities. Agencies
should explicitly consider the extent to which the
beneficial environmental outcomes that will be achieved
are demonstrably new and would not have occurred in the
absence of mitigation (i.e. additionality) when
determining whether those measures adequately address
impacts to natural resources.
(c) With respect to projects and decisions other
than in natural resource damage cases, agencies should
give preference to advance compensation mechanisms that
are likely to achieve clearly defined environmental
performance standards prior to the harmful impacts of a
project. Agencies should look for and use, to the
extent appropriate and practicable, available advance
compensation that has achieved its intended
environmental outcomes. Where advance compensation
options are not appropriate or not available, agencies
should give preference to other compensatory mitigation
practices that are likely to succeed in achieving
environmental outcomes.
(d) With respect to natural resource damage
restoration plans, natural resource trustee agencies
should evaluate criteria for whether, where, and when
consideration of restoration banking or advance
restoration projects would be appropriate in their
guidance developed pursuant to section 4(d) of this
memorandum. Consideration under established regulations
of restoration banking or advance restoration
strategies can contribute to the success of restoration
goals by delivering early, measurable environmental
outcomes.
(e) Agencies should take action to increase public
transparency in the implementation of their mitigation
policies and guidance. Agencies should set measurable
performance standards at the project and program level
to assess whether mitigation is effective and should
clearly identify the party responsible for all aspects
of required mitigation measures. Agencies should
develop and use appropriate tools to measure, monitor,
and evaluate effectiveness of avoidance, minimization,
and compensation policies to better understand and
explain to the public how they can be improved over
time.
(f) When evaluating proposed mitigation measures,
agencies should consider the extent to which those
measures will address anticipated harm over the long
term. To that end, agencies should address the
durability of compensation measures, financial
assurances, and the resilience of the measures'
benefits to potential future environmental change, as
well as ecological relevance to adversely affected
resources.
[[Page 68746]]
(g) Each agency should ensure consistent
implementation of its policies and standards across the
Nation and hold all compensatory mitigation mechanisms
to equivalent and effective standards when implementing
their policies.
(h) To improve the implementation of effective and
durable mitigation projects on Federal land, agencies
should identify, and make public, locations on Federal
land of authorized impacts and their associated
mitigation projects, including their type, extent,
efficacy of compliance, and success in achieving
performance measures. When compensatory actions take
place on Federal lands and waters that could be open to
future multiple uses, agencies should describe measures
taken to ensure that the compensatory actions are
durable.
Sec. 4. Federal Action to Strengthen Mitigation
Policies and Support Private Investment in Restoration.
In support of the policy and principles outlined above,
agencies identified below shall take the following
specific actions.
(a) Within 180 days of the date of this memorandum,
the Department of Agriculture, through the U.S. Forest
Service, shall develop and implement additional manual
and handbook guidance that addresses the agency's
approach to avoidance, minimization, and compensation
for impacts to natural resources within the National
Forest System. The U.S. Forest Service shall finalize a
mitigation regulation within 2 years of the date of
this memorandum.
(b) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum,
the Department of the Interior, through the Bureau of
Land Management, shall finalize a mitigation policy
that will bring consistency to the consideration and
application of avoidance, minimization, and
compensatory actions or development activities and
projects impacting public lands and resources.
(c) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum,
the Department of the Interior, through the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, shall finalize a revised
mitigation policy that applies to all of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service's authorities and trust
responsibilities. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
shall also finalize an additional policy that applies
to compensatory mitigation associated with its
responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act of
1973. Further, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall
finalize a policy that provides clarity to and
predictability for agencies and State governments,
private landowners, tribes, and others that take action
to conserve species in advance of potential future
listing under the Endangered Species Act. This policy
will provide a mechanism to recognize and credit such
action as avoidance, minimization, and compensatory
mitigation.
(d) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum,
each Federal natural resource trustee agency will
develop guidance for its agency's trustee
representatives describing the considerations for
evaluating whether, where, and when restoration banking
or advance restoration projects would be appropriate as
components of a restoration plan adopted by trustees.
Agencies developing such guidance will coordinate for
consistency.
(e) Within 1 year of the date of this memorandum,
the Department of the Interior will develop program
guidance regarding the use of mitigation projects and
measures on lands administered by bureaus or offices of
the Department through a land-use authorization,
cooperative agreement, or other appropriate mechanism
that would authorize a project proponent to conduct
actions, or otherwise secure conservation benefits, for
the purpose of mitigating impacts elsewhere.
Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) This memorandum
complements and is not intended to supersede existing
laws and policies.
(b) This memorandum shall be implemented consistent
with applicable law, and subject to the availability of
appropriations.
(c) This memorandum is intended for the internal
guidance of the executive branch and is inapplicable to
the litigation or settlement of natural resource damage
claims. The provisions of section 3 this memorandum
encouraging
[[Page 68747]]
restoration banking and advance restoration projects
also do not apply to the selection or implementation of
natural resource restoration plans, except to the
extent determined appropriate in Federal trustee
guidance developed pursuant to section 4(d) of this
memorandum.
(d) The provisions of this memorandum shall not
apply to military testing, training, and readiness
activities.
(e) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed
to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the
head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget
relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(f) This memorandum is not intended to, and does
not, create any right or benefit, substantive or
procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
party against the United States, its departments,
agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or
agents, or any other person.
(g) The Secretary of the Interior is hereby
authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in
the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, November 3, 2015
[FR Doc. 2015-28466
Filed 11-5-15; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4310-10-P