Energy Conservation Program: Clarification of Test Procedures for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts, 68274-68281 [2015-28077]
Download as PDF
68274
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
generating capacity of 300 MWe or less
per module.
Small modular reactor site (SMR site)
is the geographically bounded location
of one or more SMRs and a basis on
which SMR fees are calculated.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 171—ANNUAL FEES FOR
REACTOR LICENSES AND FUEL
CYCLE LICENSES AND MATERIALS
LICENSES, INCLUDING HOLDERS OF
CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE,
REGISTRATIONS, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROGRAM APPROVALS
AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
LICENSED BY THE NRC
3. The authority citation for part 171
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 11, 161(w), 223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2014,
2201(w), 2273, 2282); Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, sec. 201 (42 U.S.C. 5841); 42
U.S.C. 2214; 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
4. In § 171.5, add, in alphabetical
order, the definitions for bundled unit,
maximum fee, minimum fee, small
modular reactor (SMR), small modular
reactor site (SMR site), variable fee and
variable rate to read as follows:
■
§ 171.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Bundled unit means a measure of the
cumulative licensed thermal power
rating for one or more SMRs located on
a single SMR site. One bundled unit is
less than or equal to 4,500 MWt.
*
*
*
*
*
Maximum fee is defined as the highest
fee paid by a single bundled unit. It is
applied to all bundled units on an SMR
site with a licensed thermal power
rating greater than 2,000 and less than
or equal to 4,500 MWt and is equal to
the annual fee paid by existing fleet
power reactors.
Minimum fee means one annual fee
component paid by the first bundled
unit on a site with a cumulative
licensed thermal power rating of 2,000
MWt or less. For the first bundled unit
on a site with a licensed thermal power
rating of 250 MWt or less, it is the only
annual fee that a licensee pays.
*
*
*
*
*
Small modular reactor (SMR) for the
purposes of calculating fees, means the
class of light-water power reactors
having a licensed thermal power rating
less than or equal to 1,000 MWt per
module. This rating is based on the
thermal power equivalent of a lightwater SMR with an electrical power
generating capacity of 300 MWe or less
per module.
Small modular reactor site (SMR site)
means the geographical bounded
location of one or more SMRs and a
basis on which SMR fees are calculated.
*
*
*
*
*
Variable fee means the annual fee
component paid by the first bundled
unit on a site with a licensed thermal
power rating greater than 250 and less
than or equal to 2,000 MWt. For
additional bundled units on a site, the
variable fee is calculated based on the
licensed thermal power rating equal to
or less 2,000 MWt.
Variable rate means a per-MWt fee
factor applied to the first bundled unit
on a site with a licensed thermal power
rating greater than 250 and or less than
or equal to 2,000 MWt, or to additional
bundled units on a site above the 4,500
MWt threshold based on the licensed
thermal power rating equal to or less
than 2,000 MWt. The factor is based on
the difference between the maximum
fee and the minimum fee, divided by
the difference in the variable fee
licensed thermal rating range (either
1,750 MWt for the 2,000 MWt for first
bundled unit or 2,000 MWt for
additional bundled units).
■ 5. In § 171.15, redesignate paragraph
(e) as paragraph (f), and add new
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 171.15 Annual fees: Reactor licenses
and independent spent fuel storage
licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) Each person holding an
operating license for a small modular
reactor issued under part 50 of this
chapter or that holds a combined license
issued under part 52 of this chapter after
the Commission has made the finding
under 10 CFR 52.103(g) shall pay the
annual fee for each license held during
the fiscal year in which the fee is due.
(2) The annual fees for a small
modular reactor(s) located on a single
site to be collected by September 30 of
each year, are as follows:
Bundled unit
thermal power rating *
Minimum
fee
First Bundled Unit:
0–250 MWt ...................................................................................................................................................
> 250 ≤ 2,000 MWt ......................................................................................................................................
> 2,000 ≤ 4,500 MWt ...................................................................................................................................
Additional Bundled Units:
> 4,500 ≤ 6,500 MWt ...................................................................................................................................
> 6,500 ≤ 9,000 MWt ...................................................................................................................................
Variable
fee
Maximum
fee
TBD ........
TBD ........
N/A .........
N/A .........
TBD ........
N/A .........
N/A.
N/A.
TBD.
N/A .........
N/A .........
TBD ........
N/A .........
N/A.
TBD.
* Note that the total annual fee paid is cumulative for the first bundled unit and each additional bundled unit.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(3) The annual fee is assessed for the
same activities listed for the power
reactor base annual fee and spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning reactor
fee.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day
of October 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Maureen E. Wylie,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–28110 Filed 11–3–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
[Docket No. EERE–2009–BT–TP–0016]
RIN 1904–AD58
Energy Conservation Program:
Clarification of Test Procedures for
Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) proposes to clarify its test
procedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts
established under the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act. DOE is proposing to
replace all instances of ballast efficacy
factor (BEF) with ballast luminous
efficiency (BLE) in our regulations and
to add rounding instructions to the same
section for BLE and power factor. DOE
also proposes to clarify the represented
value instructions for power factor.
Finally, DOE is proposing to revise
Appendix Q to clarify the lamp-ballast
pairings for testing.
SUMMARY:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DOE will accept comments, data,
and information regarding this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR) no later
than January 4, 2016. See section V,
‘‘Public Participation,’’ for details.
ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted
must identify the NOPR for Clarification
of Test Procedures for Fluorescent Lamp
Ballasts, and provide docket number
EE–2009–BT–TP–0016 and/or
regulatory information number (RIN)
number 1904–AD58. Comments may be
submitted using any of the following
methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: [FLB-2009-TP-0016@
ee.doe.gov] Include the docket number
and/or RIN in the subject line of the
message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
CD. It is not necessary to include
printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda
Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600,
Washington, DC 20024. Telephone:
(202) 586–2945. If possible, please
submit all items on a CD. It is not
necessary to include printed copies.
For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see section V of this document (Public
Participation).
Docket: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at
regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed in the regulations.gov
index. However, some documents listed
in the index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
A link to the docket Web page can be
found at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/
buildings/appliance_standards/
product.aspx/productid/62. This Web
page will contain a link to the docket for
this notice on the regulations.gov site.
The regulations.gov Web page will
contain simple instructions on how to
access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket. See section V
for information on how to submit
comments through regulations.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202)
586–2945 or by email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1604. Email:
fluorescent_lamp_ballasts@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–1777. Email:
Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is
incorporating by reference the following
industry standard into 10 CFR part 430.
Copies of this industry standard can be
reviewed in person at U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. For further
information on accessing standards
incorporated by reference, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586–2945 or by
email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
IEC 1 60081 (Amendment 4, Edition
5.0), ‘‘Double-capped fluorescent
lamps—Performance specifications.’’
Copies of IEC 60081 can be obtained
from American National Standards
Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor,
New York, NY 10036 or https://
webstore.iec.ch/.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
III. Discussion
A. Replacing Ballast Efficacy Factor with
Ballast Luminous Efficiency
B. Rounding Requirements for Ballast
Luminous Efficiency
C. Rounding Requirements and
Represented Value for Power Factor
D. Lamp Pairing for Testing
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
1 International
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Electrotechnical Commission.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68275
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal
Energy Administration Act of 1974
M. Description of Standards Incorporated
by Reference
V. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B 2 of the Energy Policy
and Conservation Act of 1975 (‘‘EPCA’’
or, ‘‘the Act’’), Public Law 94–163 (42
U.S.C. 6291–6309, as codified) sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency and
established the ‘‘Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles.’’ 3 These include
fluorescent lamp ballasts, the subject of
this proposed rule. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(13))
Under EPCA, the energy conservation
program consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. The testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as the basis for (1) certifying to the
Department of Energy (DOE) that their
products comply with the applicable
energy conservation standards adopted
under EPCA, and (2) making
representations about the efficiency of
those products. Similarly, DOE must use
these test procedures to determine
whether the products comply with any
relevant standards promulgated under
EPCA.
DOE published test procedure final
rules on April 24, 1991, October 22,
2009, and May 4, 2011 (hereafter the
‘‘May 2011 test procedure final rule’’),
establishing active mode test
procedures, standby and off mode test
procedures, and revised active mode
test procedures respectively. 56 FR
18677, 74 FR 54445, and 76 FR 25211.
The May 2011 test procedure final rule
established Appendix Q1 4 to subpart B
of 10 CFR part 430. DOE also published
final rules establishing and amending
energy conservation standards for
fluorescent lamp ballasts on September
19, 2000, and November 14, 2011
(hereafter the ‘‘November 2011
standards final rule’’), which completed
the two energy conservation standard
rulemakings required under 42 U.S.C.
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated as Part A.
3 All references to EPCA refer to the statute as
amended through the Energy Efficiency
Improvement Act of 2015 (EEIA 2015), Public Law
114–11 (April 30, 2015).
4 Appendix Q1 was redesignated as Appendix Q
in the June 2015 clarification final rule. 80 FR
31971 (June 5, 2015).
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
68276
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
6295(g)(7). 65 FR 56740; 76 FR 70547.
The November 2011 standards final rule
established the regulations located at 10
CFR 430.32(m)(8)–(10). DOE also
published final rules on February 4,
2015 (hereafter the ‘‘February 2015
correction final rule’’) and on June 5,
2015 (hereafter the ‘‘June 2015
clarification final rule’’) to correct and
clarify certain requirements and
specifications in the CFR relating to
energy conservation standards and test
procedures. 80 FR 5896; 80 FR 31971.
This rulemaking proposes additional
requirements in support of the current
test procedure.
from BEF to BLE, DOE is proposing to
replace all instances of BEF with BLE in
10 CFR 429.26.
represented value of power factor prior
to rounding.
B. Rounding Requirements for Ballast
Luminous Efficiency
In the May 2011 test procedure final
rule, DOE specified that ballasts are to
be paired with the most common
wattage lamp and provided a table
(Table A of appendix Q of subpart B of
10 CFR part 430) to indicate which lamp
should be used with each ballast. 76 FR
25211. Table A lists the ballast
description along with the lamp type
intended for testing. Though ballasts
can frequently operate lamps of the
same diameter but different wattages,
DOE requires testing with only one
lamp wattage per ballast. To clarify this
requirement, in the January 2015
clarification NOPR, DOE proposed to
indicate in section 2.3.1.7 of Appendix
Q that each ballast should be tested with
only one lamp type corresponding to the
lamp diameter and base type the ballast
is designed and marketed to operate. 80
FR 404, 415. For example, a ballast
designed and marketed to operate both
32 watt (W) 4-foot medium bipin (MBP)
T8 lamps and 28 W 4-foot MBP T8
lamps should only be tested with the 32
W lamp. DOE also proposed to indicate
in section 2.3.1.5 of Appendix Q that a
ballast designed and marketed to
operate both T8 and T12 lamps must be
tested with T8 lamps. 80 FR at 406. DOE
adopted these proposed clarifications in
the June 2015 clarification final rule. 80
FR 31971.
Regarding the proposal in the January
2015 clarification NOPR, NEMA
recommended that DOE also include the
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) lamp abbreviations from ANSI
C78.81 7 in Table A of Appendix Q of
subpart B of 10 CFR part 430. (NEMA,
No. 30 at p. 2) DOE did not address this
lamp identification issue in the June
2015 clarification final rule because
DOE wanted to provide opportunity for
public comment on the proposed
incorporation by reference of additional
industry standards. DOE agrees that
referencing the ANSI and IEC lamp
specifications would further clarify the
lamp pairings used for testing. Section
2.3.1.3 of Appendix Q states that the
fluorescent lamp used for testing must
meet the specifications of a reference
lamp as defined by ANSI C82.13 (IBR
430.3), and ANSI C82.13 states that the
lamps used must operate at values of
lamp voltage, lamp wattage and lamp
current, each within 2.5 percent of the
values given in the corresponding lamp
III. Discussion
Currently, rounding requirements are
not provided for the represented value
of BLE. When developing standards in
the November 2011 standards final rule,
DOE rounded BLE to the thousandths
place when analyzing the costs and
benefits of the adopted standard. For
consistency with the 2011 standards
final rule, DOE proposed to specify
rounding the represented value of BLE
to the nearest thousandths place in a
NOPR proposing clarifications to the
test procedures for fluorescent lamp
ballasts, published on January 6, 2015
(hereafter the ‘‘January 2015
clarification NOPR’’). 80 FR 404.
Regarding this proposal, NEMA
commented that rounding to the
thousandths place is acceptable as long
as significant figures are handled
correctly. (NEMA, No. 30 at p. 3) 5 DOE
received no further comments on
rounding BLE. However, DOE
determined that rounding requirements
would be more appropriately addressed
in 10 CFR 429.26,6 and thus did not
adopt rounding requirements in the
June 2015 clarification final rule. In this
NOPR, DOE is proposing to amend 10
CFR 429.26 by specifying that the
represented value of BLE must be
rounded to the nearest thousandths
place.
A. Replacing Ballast Efficacy Factor
With Ballast Luminous Efficiency
C. Rounding Requirements and
Represented Value for Power Factor
Manufacturers were previously
required to use the test procedure for
fluorescent lamp ballasts at 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix Q to determine
compliance with DOE’s standards,
which were a measurement of BEF. The
May 2011 test procedure final rule,
which changed the test procedure to a
measurement of BLE, established
appendix Q1 to subpart B of 10 CFR part
430 to determine compliance with
DOE’s fluorescent lamp ballast
standards. 76 FR 25211. On November
14, 2011, DOE issued amended
standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts
based on BLE and compliance with
those standards has been required since
November 14, 2014. 76 FR 70548. 10
CFR 430.32 (m). Because the fluorescent
lamp ballast standards based on BEF are
no longer applicable, the June 2015
clarification final rule removed the test
procedure for BEF at Appendix Q and
redesignated the Appendix Q1 test
procedure for BLE as Appendix Q. 80
FR 31971. To support the transition
Currently, rounding requirements are
not provided for the represented value
of power factor. Manufacturers have
shown the capability to round to the
nearest hundredths place. When
reporting power factor in product
literature and data sheets, it is standard
for manufacturers to round to the
nearest hundredths place. DOE proposes
to amend 10 CFR 429.26 by specifying
that the power factor must be rounded
to the nearest hundredths place. DOE
also proposes to add power factor to 10
CFR 429.26(a)(2)(ii) to clearly indicate
the requirements for calculating the
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
In this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NOPR), DOE proposes several
clarifications to the test procedure
requirements for fluorescent lamp
ballasts. DOE is proposing to replace all
instances of ballast efficacy factor (BEF)
with ballast luminous efficiency (BLE)
in 10 CFR 429.26 and to add rounding
instructions in 10 CFR 429.26 for BLE
and power factor. DOE also proposes to
clarify the represented value
instructions for power factor. Finally,
DOE is proposing revisions to Appendix
Q to clarify the lamp-ballast pairings for
testing.
Manufacturers would be required to
comply with the requirements included
in this rulemaking within 180 days after
the publication of the final rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
5 A notation in this form provides a reference for
information that is in the docket of DOE’s
rulemaking to develop test procedures for
fluorescent lamp ballasts (Docket No. EERE–2009–
BT–TP–0016), which is maintained at
www.regulations.gov. This notation indicates that
the statement preceding the reference is document
number 30 in the docket for the fluorescent lamp
ballasts test procedure rulemaking, and appears at
page 3 of that document.
6 The January 2015 clarification NOPR proposed
to include rounding requirements at 10 CFR 430.23.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
D. Lamp Pairing for Testing
7 ‘‘American National Standard for Electric
Lamps: Double-Capped Fluorescent Lamps—
Dimensional and Electrical Characteristics’’
(approved Jan. 14, 2010).
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
standards found in ANSI C78.81 and
ANSI C78.901.
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to add
the appropriate page number
corresponding to the lamp
specifications in ANSI_ANSLG C78.81–
2010 (hereafter ‘‘ANSI C78.81–2010’’),
ANSI_IEC C78.901–2005 (hereafter
‘‘ANSI C78.901–2005’’),8 and IEC 60081
(Amendment 4, Edition 5.0) 9 in
parentheses alongside the contents of
the Lamp Diameter and Base column of
Table A of Appendix Q. To support
these page number references, DOE
proposes to incorporate by reference IEC
60081 (Amendment 4, Edition 5.0).
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute
‘‘significant regulatory actions’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
action was not subject to review under
the Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) in the Office of Management and
Budget.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et se.) requires preparation of
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IFRA) for any rule that by law must be
proposed for public comment, unless
the agency certifies that the rule, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As required by
Executive Order 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the DOE
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s Web site: https://energy.gov/
gc/office-general-counsel.
This rulemaking clarifies existing
requirements for testing and compliance
8 ‘‘American National Standard for Electric
Lamps—Single-Based Fluorescent Lamps—
Dimensional and Electrical Characteristics’’
(approved Mar. 23, 2005).
9 ANSI C78.81 directs readers to IEC 60081 for
lamp specifications for T5 miniature bipin lamps.
IEC 60081 refers to ‘‘International Electrotechnical
Commission Double-capped fluorescent lamps—
Performance specifications’’ (approved Feb. 18,
2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
with standards and does not change the
burden associated with fluorescent lamp
ballast regulations on any entity, large
or small. Therefore, DOE concludes and
certifies that this rulemaking would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking. DOE’s certification and
supporting statement of factual basis
will be provided to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA 10 for review
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b). DOE certifies that
this rule would have no significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. DOE seeks comment regarding
whether the proposed clarifications in
this proposed rulemaking would have a
significant economic impact on any
small entities.
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of fluorescent lamp
ballasts must certify to DOE that their
products comply with any applicable
energy conservation standards. In
certifying compliance, manufacturers
must test their products according to the
DOE test procedures for fluorescent
lamp ballasts, including any
amendments adopted for those test
procedures. DOE has established
regulations for the certification and
recordkeeping requirements for all
covered consumer products and
commercial equipment, including
fluorescent lamp ballasts. (76 FR 12422
(March 7, 2011). The collection-ofinformation requirement for the
certification and recordkeeping is
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 1910–1400. Public reporting
burden for the certification is estimated
to average 30 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this proposed rule, DOE proposes
revisions to test procedures for
10 Small
PO 00000
Business Administration.
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68277
fluorescent lamp ballasts. DOE has
determined that this rule falls into a
class of actions that are categorically
excluded from review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE’s
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part
1021. Specifically, this proposed rule
would amend the existing test
procedures without affecting the
amount, quality or distribution of
energy usage, and, therefore, would not
result in any environmental impacts.
Thus, this rulemaking is covered by
Categorical Exclusion A5 under 10 CFR
part 1021, subpart D, which applies to
any rulemaking that interprets or
amends an existing rule without
changing the environmental effect of
that rule. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have Federalism implications. The
Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Federalism implications. On
March 14, 2000, DOE published a
statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
it will follow in the development of
such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has
examined this proposed rule and has
determined that it would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. EPCA governs and
prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for
the products that are the subject of this
proposed rule. States can petition DOE
for exemption from such preemption to
the extent, and based on criteria, set
forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No
further action is required by Executive
Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
68278
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, the proposed
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104–4, sec.
201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For a
proposed regulatory action likely to
result in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
in any one year (adjusted annually for
inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires
a Federal agency to publish a written
statement that estimates the resulting
costs, benefits, and other effects on the
national economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b))
The UMRA also requires a Federal
agency to develop an effective process
to permit timely input by elected
officers of State, local, and Tribal
governments on a proposed ‘‘significant
intergovernmental mandate,’’ and
requires an agency plan for giving notice
and opportunity for timely input to
potentially affected small governments
before establishing any requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
that might significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. On March 18,
1997, DOE published a statement of
policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under
UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available at
https://energy.gov/gc/office-generalcounsel. DOE examined today’s
proposed rule according to UMRA and
its statement of policy and determined
that the rule contains neither an
intergovernmental mandate, nor a
mandate that may result in the
expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not
apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
rule would not have any impact on the
autonomy or integrity of the family as
an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive
Order 12630, ‘‘Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights’’ 53 FR 8859
(March 18, 1988), that this regulation
would not result in any takings that
might require compensation under the
Fifth Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides
for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed
this proposed rule under the OMB and
DOE guidelines and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies
in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
prepare and submit to OMB, a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action to clarify test
procedures for measuring the energy
efficiency of fluorescent lamp ballasts is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it
would not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, nor has it been designated as
a significant energy action by the
Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, it is
not a significant energy action, and,
accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department
of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–
91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply
with section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974, as amended
by the Federal Energy Administration
Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C.
788; FEAA) Section 32 essentially
provides in relevant part that, where a
proposed rule authorizes or requires use
of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the
public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section
32(c) requires DOE to consult with the
Attorney General and the Chairman of
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on
competition.
The proposed rule would incorporate
testing methods contained in the
following commercial standards: ANSI
C78.901–2005, ‘‘American National
Standard for Electric Lamps—SingleBased Fluorescent Lamps—Dimensional
and Electrical Characteristics’’ and IEC
60081, ‘‘International Electrotechnical
Commission Double-capped fluorescent
lamps—Performance specifications’’
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(Amendment 4, Edition 5). The
Department has evaluated these
standards and is unable to conclude
whether they fully comply with the
requirements of section 32(b) of the
FEAA, (i.e., that they were developed in
a manner that fully provides for public
participation, comment, and review).
DOE will consult with the Attorney
General and the Chairman of the FTC
concerning the impact of these test
procedures on competition, prior to
prescribing a final rule.
M. Description of Standards
Incorporated by Reference
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to
incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IEC, titled
‘‘International Electrotechnical
Commission Double-capped fluorescent
lamps—Performance specifications,’’
IEC 60081 Amendment 4 Edition 5.0.
IEC 60081 is an industry accepted
standard that specifies dimensional and
electrical characteristics related to
fluorescent lamps (specifically T5
lamps) and is applicable to products
sold in North America. The description
of lamp-ballast pairings for testing
proposed in this NOPR references IEC
60081. IEC 60081 is readily available on
IEC’s Web site at https://
webstore.iec.ch/.
V. Public Participation
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and
information regarding this proposed
rule no later than the date provided in
the DATES section at the beginning of
this proposed rule. Interested parties
may submit comments using any of the
methods described in the ADDRESSES
section at the beginning of this
document.
Submitting comments via
regulations.gov. The regulations.gov
Web page will require you to provide
your name and contact information.
Your contact information will be
viewable to DOE Building Technologies
staff only. Your contact information will
not be publicly viewable except for your
first and last names, organization name
(if any), and submitter representative
name (if any). If your comment is not
processed properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment.
Persons viewing comments will see only
first and last names, organization
names, correspondence containing
comments, and any documents
submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to regulations.gov
information for which disclosure is
restricted by statute, such as trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information
(CBI)). Comments submitted through
regulations.gov cannot be claimed as
CBI. Comments received through the
Web site will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through regulations.gov before posting.
Normally, comments will be posted
within a few days of being submitted.
However, if large volumes of comments
are being processed simultaneously,
your comment may not be viewable for
up to several weeks. Please keep the
comment tracking number that
regulations.gov provides after you have
successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand
delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand
delivery, or mail also will be posted to
regulations.gov. If you do not want your
personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information on a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. If you
submit via mail or hand delivery, please
provide all items on a CD, if feasible. It
is not necessary to submit printed
copies. No facsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, written in English and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68279
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit via email, postal mail, or
hand delivery two well-marked copies:
One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
non-confidential with the information
believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on
a CD, if feasible. DOE will make its own
determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it
according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when
evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include: (1)
A description of the items; (2) whether
and why such items are customarily
treated as confidential within the
industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from
other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made
available to others without obligation
concerning its confidentiality; (5) an
explanation of the competitive injury to
the submitting person which would
result from public disclosure; (6) when
such information might lose its
confidential character due to the
passage of time; and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments
on any aspect of this proposal, DOE is
particularly interested in receiving
comments and views of interested
parties concerning the proposed
clarification regarding rounding and
lamp pairing for testing.
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
68280
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6317.
List of Subjects
2. Section 429.26 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)
and adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
■
10 CFR Part 429
Confidential business information,
Energy conservation, household
appliances, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
§ 429.26
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27,
2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE is proposing to amend
parts 429 and 430 of Chapter II,
Subchapter D, of Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 429—CERTIFICATION,
COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT
FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
EQUIPMENT
Fluorescent lamp ballasts.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Any represented value of the
ballast luminous efficiency, power
factor, or other measure of the energy
consumption of a basic model for which
consumers would favor a higher value
shall be less than or equal to the lower
of:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a
certification report shall include the
following public product-specific
information: the ballast luminous
efficiency, the ballast power factor, the
number of lamps operated by the
ballast, and the type of lamps operated
by the ballast.
(c) Rounding Requirements.
(1) Round ballast luminous efficiency
to the nearest thousandths place.
(2) Round power factor to the nearest
hundredths place.
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
1. The authority citation for Part 429
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
4. Section 430.3 is amended by:
a. Adding in paragraph (e)(7) the text
‘‘, appendix Q’’ after the text ‘‘§ 430.2’’;
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (p)(2)
through (p)(4) as paragraphs (p)(3)
through (p)(5) respectively; and
■ c. Adding paragraph (p)(2) to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 430.3 Materials incorporated by
reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(2) IEC Standard 60081 (‘‘IEC 60081’’),
Double-capped fluorescent lamps—
Performance specifications.
(Amendment 4, Edition 5.0, 2010–02);
IBR approved for appendix Q to subpart
B.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Appendix Q to subpart B of part
430 is amended by revising Table A as
follows:
Appendix Q to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of
Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
*
*
*
*
*
3. The authority citation for Part 430
continues to read as follows:
■
■
TABLE A—LAMP-AND-BALLAST PAIRINGS AND FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
Lamp type
Ballast type
Lamp diameter and base
Ballasts that operate straight-shaped lamps
(commonly referred to as 4-foot medium
bipin lamps) with medium bipin bases and a
nominal overall length of 48 inches.
Nominal lamp
wattage
Low-frequency
High-frequency
Ballasts that operate rapid-start lamps (commonly referred to as 8-foot-high output
lamps) with recessed double contact bases
and a nominal overall length of 96 inches.
Ballasts that operate instant-start lamps (commonly referred to as 8-foot slimline lamps)
with single pin bases and a nominal overall
length of 96 inches.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:42 Nov 03, 2015
Jkt 238001
T8 MBP (Data Sheet 7881–ANSI–
1005–2) *.
32
0.94
1.0
T12 MBP (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1006–1) *.
T8 MBP (Data Sheet 78901–
ANSI–4027–1) *.
34
0.93
1.0
32
0.94
1.0
T12 MBP * * ..................................
T8 HO RDC (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1501–1) *.
34
86
0.93
0.92
1.0
1.0
T12 HO RDC (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1017–1) *.
T8 slimline SP (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1505–1) *.
95
0.94
1.0
59
0.95
1.0
T12 slimline SP (Data Sheet
7881–ANSI–3006–1) *.
Ballasts that operate U-shaped lamps (commonly referred to as 2-foot U-shaped lamps)
with medium bipin bases and a nominal
overall length between 22 and 25 inches.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Frequency adjustment factor (b)
60
0.94
1.0
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
68281
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 213 / Wednesday, November 4, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE A—LAMP-AND-BALLAST PAIRINGS AND FREQUENCY ADJUSTMENT FACTORS—Continued
Lamp type
Ballast type
Lamp diameter and base
Ballasts that operate straight-shaped lamps
(commonly referred to as 4-foot miniature
bipin standard output lamps) with miniature
bipin bases and a nominal length between
45 and 48 inches.
Ballasts that operate straight-shaped lamps
(commonly referred to as 4-foot miniature
bipin high output lamps) with miniature bipin
bases and a nominal length between 45
and 48 inches.
Sign ballasts that operate rapid-start lamps
(commonly referred to as 8-foot high output
lamps) with recessed double contact bases
and a nominal overall length of 96 inches.
Frequency adjustment factor (b)
Nominal lamp
wattage
Low-frequency
High-frequency
T5 SO Mini-BP (Data
60081–IEC–6640–5) *.
Sheet
28
0.95
1.0
T5 HO Mini-BP (Data
60081–IEC–6840–4) *.
Sheet
54
0.95
1.0
T8 HO RDC (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1501–1) *.
86
0.92
1.0
T12 HO RDC (Data Sheet 7881–
ANSI–1019–1) *.
110 †
0.94
1.0
MBP, Mini-BP, RDC, and SP represent medium bipin, miniature bipin, recessed double contact, and single pin, respectively.
A ballast must be tested with only one lamp type based on the ballast type description and lamp diameter it is designed and marketed to operate.
* Data Sheet corresponds to ANSI C78.81, ANSI C78.901, or IEC 60081 page number (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3).
** No ANSI or IEC Data Sheet exists for 34 W T12 MBP U-shaped lamps. For ballasts designed to operate only T12 2-foot U-shaped lamps
with MBP bases and a nominal overall length between 22 and 25 inches, manufacturers should select a T12 U-shaped lamp designed and marketed as having a nominal wattage of 34 W.
† Lamp type is commonly marketed as 110 W, however the ANSI C78.81 Data Sheet (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3) lists nominal
wattage of 113 W. Specifications for operation at 0.800 amperes (A) should be used for testing.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. FAA–2015–5034; Notice No. 23–
15–01–SC]
Special Conditions: Kestrel Aircraft
Company, Model K–350 Turboprop,
Lithium Batteries
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for the Kestrel Aircraft
Company, Model K–350 Turboprop
airplane. This airplane will have a novel
or unusual design feature associated
with the installation of a rechargeable
lithium battery. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. These proposed
special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:23 Nov 03, 2015
Send your comments on or
before December 21, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–5034
using any of the following methods:
b Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
b Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
b Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
b Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: The FAA will post all
comments it receives, without change,
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information the commenter
provides. Using the search function of
the docket Web site, anyone can find
and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA
docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or
signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement can be
found in the Federal Register published
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2015–28077 Filed 11–3–15; 8:45 am]
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–19478),
as well as at https://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth Hirt, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust; Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 329–
4108; facsimile (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested people to take
part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
E:\FR\FM\04NOP1.SGM
04NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 213 (Wednesday, November 4, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68274-68281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28077]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
[Docket No. EERE-2009-BT-TP-0016]
RIN 1904-AD58
Energy Conservation Program: Clarification of Test Procedures for
Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes to clarify its
test procedures for fluorescent lamp ballasts established under the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act. DOE is proposing to replace all
instances of ballast efficacy factor (BEF) with ballast luminous
efficiency (BLE) in our regulations and to add rounding instructions to
the same section for BLE and power factor. DOE also proposes to clarify
the represented value instructions for power factor. Finally, DOE is
proposing to revise Appendix Q to clarify the lamp-ballast pairings for
testing.
[[Page 68275]]
DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) no later than January 4, 2016. See
section V, ``Public Participation,'' for details.
ADDRESSES: Any comments submitted must identify the NOPR for
Clarification of Test Procedures for Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts, and
provide docket number EE-2009-BT-TP-0016 and/or regulatory information
number (RIN) number 1904-AD58. Comments may be submitted using any of
the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: [FLB-2009-TP-0016@ee.doe.gov] Include the docket number
and/or RIN in the subject line of the message.
3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121. If possible, please submit all items on a
CD. It is not necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 586-2945. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD. It is not necessary to include printed
copies.
For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see section V of this document
(Public Participation).
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed in
the regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available.
A link to the docket Web page can be found at: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/product.aspx/productid/62. This Web page will contain a link to the docket for this
notice on the regulations.gov site. The regulations.gov Web page will
contain simple instructions on how to access all documents, including
public comments, in the docket. See section V for information on how to
submit comments through regulations.gov.
For further information on how to submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket, contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at (202)
586-2945 or by email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lucy deButts, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC 20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 287-1604. Email:
fluorescent_lamp_ballasts@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Sarah Butler, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-1777. Email: Sarah.Butler@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is incorporating by reference the
following industry standard into 10 CFR part 430. Copies of this
industry standard can be reviewed in person at U.S. Department of
Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
600, Washington, DC 20024. For further information on accessing
standards incorporated by reference, contact Ms. Brenda Edwards at
(202) 586-2945 or by email: Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
IEC \1\ 60081 (Amendment 4, Edition 5.0), ``Double-capped
fluorescent lamps--Performance specifications.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ International Electrotechnical Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copies of IEC 60081 can be obtained from American National
Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036
or https://webstore.iec.ch/.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
III. Discussion
A. Replacing Ballast Efficacy Factor with Ballast Luminous
Efficiency
B. Rounding Requirements for Ballast Luminous Efficiency
C. Rounding Requirements and Represented Value for Power Factor
D. Lamp Pairing for Testing
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
M. Description of Standards Incorporated by Reference
V. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III, Part B \2\ of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975 (``EPCA'' or, ``the Act''), Public Law 94-163 (42 U.S.C. 6291-
6309, as codified) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency and established the ``Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles.'' \3\ These
include fluorescent lamp ballasts, the subject of this proposed rule.
(42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(13))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated as Part A.
\3\ All references to EPCA refer to the statute as amended
through the Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2015 (EEIA 2015),
Public Law 114-11 (April 30, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under EPCA, the energy conservation program consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The
testing requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of
covered products must use as the basis for (1) certifying to the
Department of Energy (DOE) that their products comply with the
applicable energy conservation standards adopted under EPCA, and (2)
making representations about the efficiency of those products.
Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to determine whether the
products comply with any relevant standards promulgated under EPCA.
DOE published test procedure final rules on April 24, 1991, October
22, 2009, and May 4, 2011 (hereafter the ``May 2011 test procedure
final rule''), establishing active mode test procedures, standby and
off mode test procedures, and revised active mode test procedures
respectively. 56 FR 18677, 74 FR 54445, and 76 FR 25211. The May 2011
test procedure final rule established Appendix Q1 \4\ to subpart B of
10 CFR part 430. DOE also published final rules establishing and
amending energy conservation standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts on
September 19, 2000, and November 14, 2011 (hereafter the ``November
2011 standards final rule''), which completed the two energy
conservation standard rulemakings required under 42 U.S.C.
[[Page 68276]]
6295(g)(7). 65 FR 56740; 76 FR 70547. The November 2011 standards final
rule established the regulations located at 10 CFR 430.32(m)(8)-(10).
DOE also published final rules on February 4, 2015 (hereafter the
``February 2015 correction final rule'') and on June 5, 2015 (hereafter
the ``June 2015 clarification final rule'') to correct and clarify
certain requirements and specifications in the CFR relating to energy
conservation standards and test procedures. 80 FR 5896; 80 FR 31971.
This rulemaking proposes additional requirements in support of the
current test procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Appendix Q1 was redesignated as Appendix Q in the June 2015
clarification final rule. 80 FR 31971 (June 5, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Synopsis of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR), DOE proposes several
clarifications to the test procedure requirements for fluorescent lamp
ballasts. DOE is proposing to replace all instances of ballast efficacy
factor (BEF) with ballast luminous efficiency (BLE) in 10 CFR 429.26
and to add rounding instructions in 10 CFR 429.26 for BLE and power
factor. DOE also proposes to clarify the represented value instructions
for power factor. Finally, DOE is proposing revisions to Appendix Q to
clarify the lamp-ballast pairings for testing.
Manufacturers would be required to comply with the requirements
included in this rulemaking within 180 days after the publication of
the final rule.
III. Discussion
A. Replacing Ballast Efficacy Factor With Ballast Luminous Efficiency
Manufacturers were previously required to use the test procedure
for fluorescent lamp ballasts at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix Q
to determine compliance with DOE's standards, which were a measurement
of BEF. The May 2011 test procedure final rule, which changed the test
procedure to a measurement of BLE, established appendix Q1 to subpart B
of 10 CFR part 430 to determine compliance with DOE's fluorescent lamp
ballast standards. 76 FR 25211. On November 14, 2011, DOE issued
amended standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts based on BLE and
compliance with those standards has been required since November 14,
2014. 76 FR 70548. 10 CFR 430.32 (m). Because the fluorescent lamp
ballast standards based on BEF are no longer applicable, the June 2015
clarification final rule removed the test procedure for BEF at Appendix
Q and redesignated the Appendix Q1 test procedure for BLE as Appendix
Q. 80 FR 31971. To support the transition from BEF to BLE, DOE is
proposing to replace all instances of BEF with BLE in 10 CFR 429.26.
B. Rounding Requirements for Ballast Luminous Efficiency
Currently, rounding requirements are not provided for the
represented value of BLE. When developing standards in the November
2011 standards final rule, DOE rounded BLE to the thousandths place
when analyzing the costs and benefits of the adopted standard. For
consistency with the 2011 standards final rule, DOE proposed to specify
rounding the represented value of BLE to the nearest thousandths place
in a NOPR proposing clarifications to the test procedures for
fluorescent lamp ballasts, published on January 6, 2015 (hereafter the
``January 2015 clarification NOPR''). 80 FR 404.
Regarding this proposal, NEMA commented that rounding to the
thousandths place is acceptable as long as significant figures are
handled correctly. (NEMA, No. 30 at p. 3) \5\ DOE received no further
comments on rounding BLE. However, DOE determined that rounding
requirements would be more appropriately addressed in 10 CFR 429.26,\6\
and thus did not adopt rounding requirements in the June 2015
clarification final rule. In this NOPR, DOE is proposing to amend 10
CFR 429.26 by specifying that the represented value of BLE must be
rounded to the nearest thousandths place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A notation in this form provides a reference for information
that is in the docket of DOE's rulemaking to develop test procedures
for fluorescent lamp ballasts (Docket No. EERE-2009-BT-TP-0016),
which is maintained at www.regulations.gov. This notation indicates
that the statement preceding the reference is document number 30 in
the docket for the fluorescent lamp ballasts test procedure
rulemaking, and appears at page 3 of that document.
\6\ The January 2015 clarification NOPR proposed to include
rounding requirements at 10 CFR 430.23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Rounding Requirements and Represented Value for Power Factor
Currently, rounding requirements are not provided for the
represented value of power factor. Manufacturers have shown the
capability to round to the nearest hundredths place. When reporting
power factor in product literature and data sheets, it is standard for
manufacturers to round to the nearest hundredths place. DOE proposes to
amend 10 CFR 429.26 by specifying that the power factor must be rounded
to the nearest hundredths place. DOE also proposes to add power factor
to 10 CFR 429.26(a)(2)(ii) to clearly indicate the requirements for
calculating the represented value of power factor prior to rounding.
D. Lamp Pairing for Testing
In the May 2011 test procedure final rule, DOE specified that
ballasts are to be paired with the most common wattage lamp and
provided a table (Table A of appendix Q of subpart B of 10 CFR part
430) to indicate which lamp should be used with each ballast. 76 FR
25211. Table A lists the ballast description along with the lamp type
intended for testing. Though ballasts can frequently operate lamps of
the same diameter but different wattages, DOE requires testing with
only one lamp wattage per ballast. To clarify this requirement, in the
January 2015 clarification NOPR, DOE proposed to indicate in section
2.3.1.7 of Appendix Q that each ballast should be tested with only one
lamp type corresponding to the lamp diameter and base type the ballast
is designed and marketed to operate. 80 FR 404, 415. For example, a
ballast designed and marketed to operate both 32 watt (W) 4-foot medium
bipin (MBP) T8 lamps and 28 W 4-foot MBP T8 lamps should only be tested
with the 32 W lamp. DOE also proposed to indicate in section 2.3.1.5 of
Appendix Q that a ballast designed and marketed to operate both T8 and
T12 lamps must be tested with T8 lamps. 80 FR at 406. DOE adopted these
proposed clarifications in the June 2015 clarification final rule. 80
FR 31971.
Regarding the proposal in the January 2015 clarification NOPR, NEMA
recommended that DOE also include the American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) lamp abbreviations from ANSI C78.81 \7\ in Table A of
Appendix Q of subpart B of 10 CFR part 430. (NEMA, No. 30 at p. 2) DOE
did not address this lamp identification issue in the June 2015
clarification final rule because DOE wanted to provide opportunity for
public comment on the proposed incorporation by reference of additional
industry standards. DOE agrees that referencing the ANSI and IEC lamp
specifications would further clarify the lamp pairings used for
testing. Section 2.3.1.3 of Appendix Q states that the fluorescent lamp
used for testing must meet the specifications of a reference lamp as
defined by ANSI C82.13 (IBR 430.3), and ANSI C82.13 states that the
lamps used must operate at values of lamp voltage, lamp wattage and
lamp current, each within 2.5 percent of the values given in the
corresponding lamp
[[Page 68277]]
standards found in ANSI C78.81 and ANSI C78.901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ``American National Standard for Electric Lamps: Double-
Capped Fluorescent Lamps--Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics'' (approved Jan. 14, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to add the appropriate page number
corresponding to the lamp specifications in ANSI_ANSLG C78.81-2010
(hereafter ``ANSI C78.81-2010''), ANSI_IEC C78.901-2005 (hereafter
``ANSI C78.901-2005''),\8\ and IEC 60081 (Amendment 4, Edition 5.0) \9\
in parentheses alongside the contents of the Lamp Diameter and Base
column of Table A of Appendix Q. To support these page number
references, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference IEC 60081
(Amendment 4, Edition 5.0).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``American National Standard for Electric Lamps--Single-
Based Fluorescent Lamps--Dimensional and Electrical
Characteristics'' (approved Mar. 23, 2005).
\9\ ANSI C78.81 directs readers to IEC 60081 for lamp
specifications for T5 miniature bipin lamps. IEC 60081 refers to
``International Electrotechnical Commission Double-capped
fluorescent lamps--Performance specifications'' (approved Feb. 18,
2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
action was not subject to review under the Executive Order by the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et se.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IFRA) for
any rule that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the
agency certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small
Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE
published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that
the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made
its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General
Counsel's Web site: https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
This rulemaking clarifies existing requirements for testing and
compliance with standards and does not change the burden associated
with fluorescent lamp ballast regulations on any entity, large or
small. Therefore, DOE concludes and certifies that this rulemaking
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
for this rulemaking. DOE's certification and supporting statement of
factual basis will be provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
SBA \10\ for review under 5 U.S.C. 605(b). DOE certifies that this rule
would have no significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. DOE seeks comment regarding whether the proposed
clarifications in this proposed rulemaking would have a significant
economic impact on any small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Small Business Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of fluorescent lamp ballasts must certify to DOE that
their products comply with any applicable energy conservation
standards. In certifying compliance, manufacturers must test their
products according to the DOE test procedures for fluorescent lamp
ballasts, including any amendments adopted for those test procedures.
DOE has established regulations for the certification and recordkeeping
requirements for all covered consumer products and commercial
equipment, including fluorescent lamp ballasts. (76 FR 12422 (March 7,
2011). The collection-of-information requirement for the certification
and recordkeeping is subject to review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been approved by
OMB under OMB control number 1910-1400. Public reporting burden for the
certification is estimated to average 30 hours per response, including
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this proposed rule, DOE proposes revisions to test procedures
for fluorescent lamp ballasts. DOE has determined that this rule falls
into a class of actions that are categorically excluded from review
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and DOE's implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021.
Specifically, this proposed rule would amend the existing test
procedures without affecting the amount, quality or distribution of
energy usage, and, therefore, would not result in any environmental
impacts. Thus, this rulemaking is covered by Categorical Exclusion A5
under 10 CFR part 1021, subpart D, which applies to any rulemaking that
interprets or amends an existing rule without changing the
environmental effect of that rule. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have Federalism
implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have Federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed rule and has
determined that it would not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal
preemption of State regulations as to energy conservation for the
products that are the subject of this proposed rule. States can
petition DOE for exemption from such preemption to the extent, and
based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of
[[Page 68278]]
new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice
Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1) Eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to minimize
litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard; and (4) promote simplification and
burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure
that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if
any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or
regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6)
addresses other important issues affecting clarity and general
draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General.
Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable standards in sections 3(a)
and 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to
meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the required review and
determined that, to the extent permitted by law, the proposed rule
meets the relevant standards of Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a proposed regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may
cause the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one
year (adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. On March 18, 1997,
DOE published a statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available
at https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel. DOE examined today's
proposed rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy and
determined that the rule contains neither an intergovernmental mandate,
nor a mandate that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or
more in any year, so these requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This rule would not have any impact on the autonomy or integrity of the
family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it is not
necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this regulation would not
result in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed this proposed rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected
benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action to clarify test procedures for measuring the
energy efficiency of fluorescent lamp ballasts is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it would not
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, nor has it been designated as a significant energy action by
the Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, it is not a significant energy
action, and, accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy
Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply with section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended by the Federal
Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C. 788; FEAA)
Section 32 essentially provides in relevant part that, where a proposed
rule authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE to consult with
the Attorney General and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) concerning the impact of the commercial or industry standards on
competition.
The proposed rule would incorporate testing methods contained in
the following commercial standards: ANSI C78.901-2005, ``American
National Standard for Electric Lamps--Single-Based Fluorescent Lamps--
Dimensional and Electrical Characteristics'' and IEC 60081,
``International Electrotechnical Commission Double-capped fluorescent
lamps--Performance specifications''
[[Page 68279]]
(Amendment 4, Edition 5). The Department has evaluated these standards
and is unable to conclude whether they fully comply with the
requirements of section 32(b) of the FEAA, (i.e., that they were
developed in a manner that fully provides for public participation,
comment, and review). DOE will consult with the Attorney General and
the Chairman of the FTC concerning the impact of these test procedures
on competition, prior to prescribing a final rule.
M. Description of Standards Incorporated by Reference
In this NOPR, DOE proposes to incorporate by reference the test
standard published by IEC, titled ``International Electrotechnical
Commission Double-capped fluorescent lamps--Performance
specifications,'' IEC 60081 Amendment 4 Edition 5.0. IEC 60081 is an
industry accepted standard that specifies dimensional and electrical
characteristics related to fluorescent lamps (specifically T5 lamps)
and is applicable to products sold in North America. The description of
lamp-ballast pairings for testing proposed in this NOPR references IEC
60081. IEC 60081 is readily available on IEC's Web site at https://webstore.iec.ch/.
V. Public Participation
A. Submission of Comments
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this
proposed rule no later than the date provided in the DATES section at
the beginning of this proposed rule. Interested parties may submit
comments using any of the methods described in the ADDRESSES section at
the beginning of this document.
Submitting comments via regulations.gov. The regulations.gov Web
page will require you to provide your name and contact information.
Your contact information will be viewable to DOE Building Technologies
staff only. Your contact information will not be publicly viewable
except for your first and last names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any). If your comment is not
processed properly because of technical difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, DOE
may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. Persons viewing comments will see only first and last names,
organization names, correspondence containing comments, and any
documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to regulations.gov information for which disclosure
is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter referred to as Confidential Business
Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through regulations.gov cannot
be claimed as CBI. Comments received through the Web site will waive
any CBI claims for the information submitted. For information on
submitting CBI, see the Confidential Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
Submitting comments via email, hand delivery, or mail. Comments and
documents submitted via email, hand delivery, or mail also will be
posted to regulations.gov. If you do not want your personal contact
information to be publicly viewable, do not include it in your comment
or any accompanying documents. Instead, provide your contact
information on a cover letter. Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. If you submit via mail or hand
delivery, please provide all items on a CD, if feasible. It is not
necessary to submit printed copies. No facsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English and free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email, postal mail, or hand delivery two well-marked copies: One copy
of the document marked confidential including all the information
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked non-
confidential with the information believed to be confidential deleted.
Submit these documents via email or on a CD, if feasible. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the
items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as
confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is
generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the
information has previously been made available to others without
obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the
competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from
public disclosure; (6) when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why
disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
B. Issues on Which DOE Seeks Comment
Although DOE welcomes comments on any aspect of this proposal, DOE
is particularly interested in receiving comments and views of
interested parties concerning the proposed clarification regarding
rounding and lamp pairing for testing.
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this proposed
rule.
[[Page 68280]]
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Confidential business information, Energy conservation, household
appliances, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27, 2015.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE is proposing to amend
parts 429 and 430 of Chapter II, Subchapter D, of Title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, as set forth below:
PART 429--CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for Part 429 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.
0
2. Section 429.26 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) and
(b)(2) and adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 429.26 Fluorescent lamp ballasts.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Any represented value of the ballast luminous efficiency,
power factor, or other measure of the energy consumption of a basic
model for which consumers would favor a higher value shall be less than
or equal to the lower of:
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Pursuant to Sec. 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall
include the following public product-specific information: the ballast
luminous efficiency, the ballast power factor, the number of lamps
operated by the ballast, and the type of lamps operated by the ballast.
(c) Rounding Requirements.
(1) Round ballast luminous efficiency to the nearest thousandths
place.
(2) Round power factor to the nearest hundredths place.
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
3. The authority citation for Part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
4. Section 430.3 is amended by:
0
a. Adding in paragraph (e)(7) the text ``, appendix Q'' after the text
``Sec. 430.2'';
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (p)(2) through (p)(4) as paragraphs (p)(3)
through (p)(5) respectively; and
0
c. Adding paragraph (p)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 430.3 Materials incorporated by reference.
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(2) IEC Standard 60081 (``IEC 60081''), Double-capped fluorescent
lamps--Performance specifications. (Amendment 4, Edition 5.0, 2010-02);
IBR approved for appendix Q to subpart B.
* * * * *
0
5. Appendix Q to subpart B of part 430 is amended by revising Table A
as follows:
Appendix Q to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts
* * * * *
Table A--Lamp-and-Ballast Pairings and Frequency Adjustment Factors
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lamp type Frequency adjustment factor ([beta])
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ballast type Lamp diameter and Nominal lamp
base wattage Low-frequency High-frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ballasts that operate straight- T8 MBP (Data Sheet 32 0.94 1.0
shaped lamps (commonly referred 7881-ANSI-1005-2) *.
to as 4-foot medium bipin lamps)
with medium bipin bases and a
nominal overall length of 48
inches.
T12 MBP (Data Sheet 34 0.93 1.0
7881-ANSI-1006-1) *.
Ballasts that operate U-shaped T8 MBP (Data Sheet 32 0.94 1.0
lamps (commonly referred to as 2- 78901-ANSI-4027-1)
foot U-shaped lamps) with medium *.
bipin bases and a nominal overall
length between 22 and 25 inches.
T12 MBP * *......... 34 0.93 1.0
Ballasts that operate rapid-start T8 HO RDC (Data 86 0.92 1.0
lamps (commonly referred to as 8- Sheet 7881-ANSI-
foot-high output lamps) with 1501-1) *.
recessed double contact bases and
a nominal overall length of 96
inches.
T12 HO RDC (Data 95 0.94 1.0
Sheet 7881-ANSI-
1017-1) *.
Ballasts that operate instant- T8 slimline SP (Data 59 0.95 1.0
start lamps (commonly referred to Sheet 7881-ANSI-
as 8-foot slimline lamps) with 1505-1) *.
single pin bases and a nominal
overall length of 96 inches.
T12 slimline SP 60 0.94 1.0
(Data Sheet 7881-
ANSI-3006-1) *.
[[Page 68281]]
Ballasts that operate straight- T5 SO Mini-BP (Data 28 0.95 1.0
shaped lamps (commonly referred Sheet 60081-IEC-
to as 4-foot miniature bipin 6640-5) *.
standard output lamps) with
miniature bipin bases and a
nominal length between 45 and 48
inches.
Ballasts that operate straight- T5 HO Mini-BP (Data 54 0.95 1.0
shaped lamps (commonly referred Sheet 60081-IEC-
to as 4-foot miniature bipin high 6840-4) *.
output lamps) with miniature
bipin bases and a nominal length
between 45 and 48 inches.
Sign ballasts that operate rapid- T8 HO RDC (Data 86 0.92 1.0
start lamps (commonly referred to Sheet 7881-ANSI-
as 8-foot high output lamps) with 1501-1) *.
recessed double contact bases and
a nominal overall length of 96
inches.
T12 HO RDC (Data 110 [dagger] 0.94 1.0
Sheet 7881-ANSI-
1019-1) *.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MBP, Mini-BP, RDC, and SP represent medium bipin, miniature bipin, recessed double contact, and single pin,
respectively.
A ballast must be tested with only one lamp type based on the ballast type description and lamp diameter it is
designed and marketed to operate.
* Data Sheet corresponds to ANSI C78.81, ANSI C78.901, or IEC 60081 page number (incorporated by reference; see
Sec. 430.3).
** No ANSI or IEC Data Sheet exists for 34 W T12 MBP U-shaped lamps. For ballasts designed to operate only T12
2-foot U-shaped lamps with MBP bases and a nominal overall length between 22 and 25 inches, manufacturers
should select a T12 U-shaped lamp designed and marketed as having a nominal wattage of 34 W.
[dagger] Lamp type is commonly marketed as 110 W, however the ANSI C78.81 Data Sheet (incorporated by reference;
see Sec. 430.3) lists nominal wattage of 113 W. Specifications for operation at 0.800 amperes (A) should be
used for testing.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-28077 Filed 11-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P