Joint Statement of Principles on Student Loan Servicing, 67389-67390 [2015-27775]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
hydropower projects. Portland, OR.
https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
publications/recovery_planning/salmon_
steelhead/domains/interior_columbia/
snake/hydro_supplemental_recovery_
plan_module_063014.pdf.
NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service).
2014b. Snake River Harvest Module.
Portland, OR. https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
publications/recovery_planning/salmon_
steelhead/domains/interior_columbia/
snake/harvest_module_062514.pdf.
Dated: October 27, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
Chapter, and the stock assessments for
BSAI and GOA groundfishes), and
recommend final groundfish harvest
specifications for 2016/17.
PLEASE NOTE: Beginning October
10th, U.S. Driver’s licenses will be
accepted for admittance to the NOAA
facility only if they are Real ID
compliant. Alternative identification,
such as a passport, will be required if a
license is non-compliant. For more
information see https://www.dhs.gov/
real-id-public-faqs.
The Agenda is subject to change, and
the latest version will be posted at
https://www.npfmc.org/fisherymanagement-plan-team/goa-bsaigroundfish-plan-team/.
[FR Doc. 2015–27854 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
Special Accommodations
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Shannon Gleason
at (907) 271–2809 at least 7 working
days prior to the meeting date.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE277
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2015–27832 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
Groundfish Plan Team will meet in
Seattle, WA.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Monday, November 16, to Friday,
November 20, 2015, from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m.
Joint Statement of Principles on
Student Loan Servicing
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Policy Guidance.
AGENCY:
The meeting will be held at
the Alaska Fishery Science Center,
Traynor Room 2076 and NMML Room
2039, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,
Building 4, Seattle, WA 98115.
Council address: North Pacific
Fishery Management Council, 605 W.
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK
99501–2252; telephone: (907) 271–2809.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone:
(907) 271–2809.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: October 28, 2015.
Jeffrey N. Lonergan,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
SUMMARY: On September 29, 2015, the
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (Bureau) joined with the U.S.
Department of the Treasury and the U.S.
Department of Education to release a
Joint Statement of Principles on Student
Loan Servicing as a framework for
policymakers and market participants
looking to improve student loan
servicing practices, promote borrower
success, and mitigate defaults. This
Policy Guidance sets forth those joint
principles.
Agenda
DATES:
Monday, November 16, 2015 to Friday,
November 20, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Plan Teams will compile and
review the annual Groundfish Stock
Assessment and Fishery Evaluation
(SAFE) reports, (including the Economic
Report, the Ecosystems Consideration
Michael Pierce, Program Manager,
Office for Students and Young
Americans, 1700 G Street NW., 20552,
202–435–7938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
This Policy Guidance is
applicable November 2, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67389
1. Policy Guidance
Joint Statement of Principles on Student
Loan Servicing
The U.S. Department of Education,
the U.S. Department of the Treasury,
and the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau have developed a Joint
Statement of Principles on Student Loan
Servicing as a framework to improve
student loan servicing practices,
promote borrower success and minimize
defaults.1
General Principles for Student Loan
Servicing 2
Consistent with their respective
authorities, responsibilities, and
missions, the Departments and the
Bureau are committed to working
together so that all student loan
borrowers have access to (1) the
information they need to repay their
loans responsibly and avoid default; (2)
protections so that they will be treated
fairly even if they are struggling to repay
their loans; and (3) mechanisms so that
errors are resolved expeditiously and
assurances that student loan servicers,
both in the marketplace and through
federally-contracted companies, are
held accountable for their conduct. The
following principles have been
developed to advance these goals.
There are four main types of
postsecondary education loans under
which borrowers have outstanding
balances. Direct Loans are federal loans
made directly to borrowers by the U.S.
Department of Education through the
William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan
program. Federal Family Education
Loan Program (FFELP) loans were
originated by private lenders and
guaranteed by the federal government.
Federal Perkins Loans, which are cofunded by institutions of higher
education and the federal government,
1 On March 10, 2015, the President signed a
Presidential Memorandum on a Student Aid Bill of
Rights to Help Ensure Affordable Loan Repayment.
The President directed the Secretary of Education,
in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury
and the Director of the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, to issue a report by October 1,
2015 on, among other things, recommendations
concerning private and federal student loan
servicing standards, flexible repayment
opportunities for all student loan borrowers, and
changes to bankruptcy laws. This Joint Statement of
Principles on Student Loan Servicing informed this
required report.
2 On September 30, 2015, the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau released Student Loan Servicing:
Analysis of Public Input and Recommendations for
Reform, analyzing comments the Bureau solicited
from stakeholders including student loan
borrowers, federal student loan servicers, private
student loan market participants, policy experts,
and state law enforcement officials and regulators
as part of the Departments’ and the Bureau’s joint
efforts to identify initiatives to strengthen student
loan servicing.
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
67390
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 211 / Monday, November 2, 2015 / Notices
are originated and administered by
participating institutions. Direct Loans,
Perkins Loans and FFELP loans are
made pursuant to Title IV of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA). The SAFRA Act enacted in 2010
ended new loan originations under the
FFELP program in 2010, but a
significant number of loans remain
outstanding. Private student loans are
made by depository and non-depository
financial institutions, states, institutions
of higher education, and other entities.
Private loans are not governed by the
Higher Education Act, but are subject to
other federal and state laws. All Federal
Direct Loans and some FFELP loans are
held by the Department of Education
and serviced pursuant to contracts with
loan servicers and collection
contractors. Servicing for Perkins Loans,
privately-held FFELP loans, and private
student loans is provided at the
direction of the current loan holder, and
servicing activities for Perkins and
FFELP loans are governed by rules and
regulations laid out by law and through
the U.S. Department of Education. The
economic incentives to provide
servicing that best serves borrowers’,
loan holders’, and taxpayers’ needs vary
across the different types of student
loans.
In addition, the respective loan types
come with varying levels of consumer
protections and special benefits. Direct
Loans, in general, offer borrowers more
protections than private or FFELP loans.
Borrowers with FFELP loans continue to
consolidate into the Direct Loan
program to access certain protections
and benefits including the Public
Service Loan Forgiveness Program, the
nonaccrual of interest for
servicemembers serving in areas of
hostilities, and certain income-driven
repayment plans. For federal loans,
pursuant to provisions in the HEA,
institutions of higher education are
required to provide certain disclosures
to borrowers that provide them with
clear and helpful information about
their loans and repayment options as
part of schools’ statutorily required
entrance and exit counseling duties.
The Departments and the Bureau
intend to work closely with one another,
consistent with their respective
authorities, to strengthen servicing
protections for student loan borrowers,
and will seek to ensure that student loan
servicing is, where appropriate:
• Consistent. Student loan borrowers
and servicers alike would benefit from
a clear set of expectations for what
constitutes minimum requirements for
services provided by student loan
servicers and servicer communications
with borrowers, including adequate and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:55 Oct 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
timely customer service. Student loan
borrowers should expect effective
student loan servicing, including, but
not limited to, conduct related to
payment processing, servicing transfers,
customer requests for information, error
resolution, and disclosure of borrower
repayment options and benefits. Such
conduct should account for and
recognize variations in loan features,
terms, and borrower protections.
• Accurate and Actionable. Student
loan borrowers often depend on
servicers to provide basic information
about account features, borrower
protections, and loan terms. It is critical
that information provided to borrowers
by student loan servicers be accurate
and actionable. Information, including
explanation and instructions regarding
borrowers’ loans and repayment
options, should be presented in a
manner that best informs borrowers,
helps them achieve positive outcomes,
and mitigates the risk and costs of
default.
• Accountable. Student loan
servicers, whether for-profit, not-forprofit or government agencies, should
be accountable for serving borrowers
fairly, efficiently and effectively. If
servicers fall short and violate federal or
state consumer financial laws, the HEA,
contractual requirements, or federal
regulations, borrowers, federal and state
agencies and regulators, and law
enforcement officials should have
access to appropriate channels for
recourse, as authorized under law.
• Transparent. The public, including
student loan borrowers, may benefit
from information about the performance
of private and federal student loans and
the practices of individual student loan
lenders and servicers, including
information related to loan origination,
loan terms and conditions, borrower
characteristics, portfolio composition,
delinquency and default, payment plan
enrollment, utilization of forbearance
and deferment, the administration of
borrower benefits and protections, and
the handling of borrower complaints.
The federal government already makes
much of this information available for
federal student loans, and private-sector
lenders and servicers should follow suit.
Portfolio performance data, including
data at the individual servicer level,
should be available for all types of
student loans.
2. Regulatory Requirements
This Policy Guidance is a non-binding
general statement of policy. It does not
establish any binding legal
requirements. It is therefore exempt
from notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Procedure Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b). Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking is required, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act does not require an
initial or final regulatory flexibility
analysis. 5 U.S.C. 603(a), 604(a). The
Bureau has determined that this Policy
Guidance does not impose any new or
revise any existing recordkeeping,
reporting, or disclosure requirements on
covered entities or members of the
public that would be collections of
information requiring OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44
U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
Dated: October 27, 2015.
Christopher D’Angelo,
Chief of Staff, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015–27775 Filed 10–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2015–ICCD–0128]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Perkins
Discretionary Grant Performance
Report
Department of Education (ED),
Office of Career, Technical and Adult
Education (OCTAE).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before January
4, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2015–ICCD–0128. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E115, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
E:\FR\FM\02NON1.SGM
02NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 211 (Monday, November 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67389-67390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27775]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
Joint Statement of Principles on Student Loan Servicing
AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
ACTION: Policy Guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 29, 2015, the Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (Bureau) joined with the U.S. Department of the Treasury and
the U.S. Department of Education to release a Joint Statement of
Principles on Student Loan Servicing as a framework for policymakers
and market participants looking to improve student loan servicing
practices, promote borrower success, and mitigate defaults. This Policy
Guidance sets forth those joint principles.
DATES: This Policy Guidance is applicable November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Pierce, Program Manager,
Office for Students and Young Americans, 1700 G Street NW., 20552, 202-
435-7938.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Policy Guidance
Joint Statement of Principles on Student Loan Servicing
The U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of the
Treasury, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau have developed a
Joint Statement of Principles on Student Loan Servicing as a framework
to improve student loan servicing practices, promote borrower success
and minimize defaults.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On March 10, 2015, the President signed a Presidential
Memorandum on a Student Aid Bill of Rights to Help Ensure Affordable
Loan Repayment. The President directed the Secretary of Education,
in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director
of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to issue a report by
October 1, 2015 on, among other things, recommendations concerning
private and federal student loan servicing standards, flexible
repayment opportunities for all student loan borrowers, and changes
to bankruptcy laws. This Joint Statement of Principles on Student
Loan Servicing informed this required report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Principles for Student Loan Servicing \2\
Consistent with their respective authorities, responsibilities, and
missions, the Departments and the Bureau are committed to working
together so that all student loan borrowers have access to (1) the
information they need to repay their loans responsibly and avoid
default; (2) protections so that they will be treated fairly even if
they are struggling to repay their loans; and (3) mechanisms so that
errors are resolved expeditiously and assurances that student loan
servicers, both in the marketplace and through federally-contracted
companies, are held accountable for their conduct. The following
principles have been developed to advance these goals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On September 30, 2015, the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau released Student Loan Servicing: Analysis of Public Input and
Recommendations for Reform, analyzing comments the Bureau solicited
from stakeholders including student loan borrowers, federal student
loan servicers, private student loan market participants, policy
experts, and state law enforcement officials and regulators as part
of the Departments' and the Bureau's joint efforts to identify
initiatives to strengthen student loan servicing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are four main types of postsecondary education loans under
which borrowers have outstanding balances. Direct Loans are federal
loans made directly to borrowers by the U.S. Department of Education
through the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan program. Federal Family
Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans were originated by private lenders
and guaranteed by the federal government. Federal Perkins Loans, which
are co-funded by institutions of higher education and the federal
government,
[[Page 67390]]
are originated and administered by participating institutions. Direct
Loans, Perkins Loans and FFELP loans are made pursuant to Title IV of
the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). The SAFRA Act
enacted in 2010 ended new loan originations under the FFELP program in
2010, but a significant number of loans remain outstanding. Private
student loans are made by depository and non-depository financial
institutions, states, institutions of higher education, and other
entities. Private loans are not governed by the Higher Education Act,
but are subject to other federal and state laws. All Federal Direct
Loans and some FFELP loans are held by the Department of Education and
serviced pursuant to contracts with loan servicers and collection
contractors. Servicing for Perkins Loans, privately-held FFELP loans,
and private student loans is provided at the direction of the current
loan holder, and servicing activities for Perkins and FFELP loans are
governed by rules and regulations laid out by law and through the U.S.
Department of Education. The economic incentives to provide servicing
that best serves borrowers', loan holders', and taxpayers' needs vary
across the different types of student loans.
In addition, the respective loan types come with varying levels of
consumer protections and special benefits. Direct Loans, in general,
offer borrowers more protections than private or FFELP loans. Borrowers
with FFELP loans continue to consolidate into the Direct Loan program
to access certain protections and benefits including the Public Service
Loan Forgiveness Program, the nonaccrual of interest for servicemembers
serving in areas of hostilities, and certain income-driven repayment
plans. For federal loans, pursuant to provisions in the HEA,
institutions of higher education are required to provide certain
disclosures to borrowers that provide them with clear and helpful
information about their loans and repayment options as part of schools'
statutorily required entrance and exit counseling duties.
The Departments and the Bureau intend to work closely with one
another, consistent with their respective authorities, to strengthen
servicing protections for student loan borrowers, and will seek to
ensure that student loan servicing is, where appropriate:
Consistent. Student loan borrowers and servicers alike
would benefit from a clear set of expectations for what constitutes
minimum requirements for services provided by student loan servicers
and servicer communications with borrowers, including adequate and
timely customer service. Student loan borrowers should expect effective
student loan servicing, including, but not limited to, conduct related
to payment processing, servicing transfers, customer requests for
information, error resolution, and disclosure of borrower repayment
options and benefits. Such conduct should account for and recognize
variations in loan features, terms, and borrower protections.
Accurate and Actionable. Student loan borrowers often
depend on servicers to provide basic information about account
features, borrower protections, and loan terms. It is critical that
information provided to borrowers by student loan servicers be accurate
and actionable. Information, including explanation and instructions
regarding borrowers' loans and repayment options, should be presented
in a manner that best informs borrowers, helps them achieve positive
outcomes, and mitigates the risk and costs of default.
Accountable. Student loan servicers, whether for-profit,
not-for-profit or government agencies, should be accountable for
serving borrowers fairly, efficiently and effectively. If servicers
fall short and violate federal or state consumer financial laws, the
HEA, contractual requirements, or federal regulations, borrowers,
federal and state agencies and regulators, and law enforcement
officials should have access to appropriate channels for recourse, as
authorized under law.
Transparent. The public, including student loan borrowers,
may benefit from information about the performance of private and
federal student loans and the practices of individual student loan
lenders and servicers, including information related to loan
origination, loan terms and conditions, borrower characteristics,
portfolio composition, delinquency and default, payment plan
enrollment, utilization of forbearance and deferment, the
administration of borrower benefits and protections, and the handling
of borrower complaints. The federal government already makes much of
this information available for federal student loans, and private-
sector lenders and servicers should follow suit. Portfolio performance
data, including data at the individual servicer level, should be
available for all types of student loans.
2. Regulatory Requirements
This Policy Guidance is a non-binding general statement of policy.
It does not establish any binding legal requirements. It is therefore
exempt from notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Because no
notice of proposed rulemaking is required, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act does not require an initial or final regulatory flexibility
analysis. 5 U.S.C. 603(a), 604(a). The Bureau has determined that this
Policy Guidance does not impose any new or revise any existing
recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure requirements on covered
entities or members of the public that would be collections of
information requiring OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
Dated: October 27, 2015.
Christopher D'Angelo,
Chief of Staff, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2015-27775 Filed 10-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P