Final Supplementary Rules for the Castle Rocks Land Use Plan Amendment Area, Idaho, 66033-66035 [2015-27373]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
take must be incidental to actions that
are otherwise lawful. The Eagle Act’s
implementing regulations define ‘‘take’’
as to ‘‘pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect,
destroy, molest, or disturb’’ individuals,
their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and
‘‘disturb’’ is further defined as ‘‘to
agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle
to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to
an eagle, . . .(2) a decrease in its
productivity, . . . or (3) nest
abandonment’’ (50 CFR 22.3). The Alta
East Wind Project will result in
recurring eagle mortalities over the life
of the project, so the appropriate type of
take permit is the programmatic permit
under 50 CFR 22.26.
We may consider issuance of
programmatic eagle take permits if: (1)
The incidental take is necessary to
protect legitimate interests; (2) the take
is compatible with the preservation
standard of the Eagle Act—providing for
stable or increasing breeding
populations; (3) the take has been
avoided and minimized to the degree
achievable through implementation of
Advanced Compensation Practices, and
the remaining take is unavoidable; and
(4) compensatory mitigation will be
provided for any remaining take. The
Service must determine that the direct
and indirect effects of the take and
required mitigation, together with the
cumulative effects of other permitted
take and additional factors affecting
eagle populations, are compatible with
the preservation of bald eagles and
golden eagles.
Applicant’s Proposal
The permit applicant, Alta Wind X,
LLC, is operating an approximately 150megawatt (MW) commercial windenergy facility in the Tehachapi WRA in
Kern County, California. The recently
constructed (December 2013) Alta East
Wind Project was a new wind energy
project on public (Bureau of Land
Management) and private lands and was
an expansion of Terra-Gen’s Alta Wind
Energy Center. The Bureau of Land
Management and Kern County
permitted Alta Wind X, LLC to
construct, operate, maintain, and
decommission up to 51 wind turbine
generators and related infrastructure on
approximately 2,600 acres of public and
private land in 2013.
The applicant submitted an ECP on
March 4, 2013, that was initially
developed following recommendations
provided by the Service and consistent
with our January 2011 Draft Eagle
Conservation Plan Guidance (https://
www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_
draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_
omb.pdf). The Draft ECP was later
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
updated to follow our finalized
guidance, Eagle Conservation Plan
Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind
Energy Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP
Guidance) (https://www.fws.gov/
migratorybirds/PDFs/Eagle%2
0Conservation%20Plan%20GuidanceModule%201.pdf).
As recommended in the Service’s ECP
Guidance, the applicant’s plan outlines
avoidance and minimization measures,
contains a risk assessment, includes
experimental advanced conservation
practices, and adaptive management.
The applicant submitted the ECP as part
of the permit application, and if we
issue the permit following the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
process, then the conservation
commitments would become conditions
of the permit.
The Service independently evaluated
the risk of eagle fatalities from project
operations and compared that risk to the
conservation measures to which the
applicant has committed. This is an
essential step in the Service’s evaluation
of an application for a permit for
programmatic take of eagles because
issuing criteria require permitted take to
comply with the Eagle Act’s
preservation standard. The Service has
interpreted this standard to require
maintenance of stable or increasing
breeding populations of eagles (74 FR
46836; September 11, 2009). In the DEA,
we evaluate the risk and offsetting
conservation measures, and the
implications for direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects under five
alternatives.
Next Steps
The public process for the proposed
Federal permit action will be completed
after the public comment period, at
which time we will evaluate the permit
application and comments submitted
thereupon to determine whether the
application meets the permitting
requirements under the Eagle Act,
applicable regulations, and NEPA
requirements. Upon completion of that
evaluation, we will select our course of
action. We will make the final permit
decision no sooner than 30 days after
the close of the public comment period.
Public Comments
We invite public comment on the
proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
submit comments by any one of the
methods discussed above under
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
We will consider public comments on
the DEA when making the final
determination on NEPA compliance and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66033
permit issuance. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under Section
668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668–
668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest,
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2015–27240 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLIDT02000.L12200000.MA0000.241A.00
4500079363]
Final Supplementary Rules for the
Castle Rocks Land Use Plan
Amendment Area, Idaho
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final supplementary
rules.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is finalizing
supplementary rules for all BLMadministered public lands within an
approximately 400-acre area in Idaho
known as Castle Rocks. The BLM
addressed this area in the November
2013 Cassia Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment and Record of
Decision (ROD). The Cassia RMP
amendment made implementation-level
decisions designed to conserve natural
and cultural resources while providing
for recreational opportunities. These
supplementary rules will allow the BLM
and law enforcement partners to enforce
those decisions.
DATES: These supplementary rules are
effective on November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may direct your
inquiries to the Bureau of Land
Management, Burley Field Office, 15
East 200 South, Burley, Idaho 83318.
email: BLM_ID_BurleyOffice@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, at 208–677–6664 or by email at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
66034
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
dthompson@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact Mr. Thompson.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
II. Discussion of Public Comments
I. Background
Castle Rocks is a dramatic geologic
area located in the southern Albion
Mountain Range of Cassia County,
Idaho. Castle Rocks consists primarily of
quartz-monzonite, a type of granite
associated with the Almo Pluton.
Pinnacles and monoliths, towering over
400 feet in local relief, characterize the
area. Castle Rocks currently contains
nearly pristine cultural and natural
resources.
Until 2003, a difficult and lengthy
hike from Stines Pass was the only way
to access Castle Rocks, due to the
unique ownership pattern and
geography of the surrounding lands.
This limited access helped preserve rare
resources that are of great importance to
the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of Fort
Hall and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of
Duck Valley. Castle Rocks became less
isolated after the passage of the Castle
Rock Ranch Acquisition Act of 2000
(Pub. L. 106–421), which authorized the
National Park Service (NPS) to purchase
a private ranch that provided more
convenient public access on the east
side of the geologic area. After the
acquisition, the NPS exchanged the
property with the Idaho Department of
Parks and Recreation (IDPR) for other
lands adjacent to existing NPS
properties.
Since May 25, 2003, the IDPR has
provided park facilities and managed
recreation at Castle Rocks. Since 2003,
the BLM has been protecting resources
on the 400-acre parcel under its
management through a series of
temporary closure orders prohibiting
rock climbing, camping, staging, and
trail building. In 2012, the BLM
determined that amending the Cassia
RMP was necessary to properly manage
the area. The decision in the Plan
Amendment is to close the area
permanently to rock climbing, camping,
staging, and trail building. This decision
will protect significant cultural
resources that were, or had the potential
to be, adversely impacted by these
activities. The Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes of Fort Hall and the ShoshonePaiute Tribes of Duck Valley consider
the area a sacred site and have requested
the assistance of the BLM Burley Field
Office in nominating the area as a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
Traditional Cultural Property under the
National Historic Preservation Act.
These supplementary rules will help
the BLM achieve management objectives
and implement the Cassia RMP
amendment. They will also provide the
BLM with enforcement capability to
help prevent damage to cultural and
natural resources.
The BLM published the proposed
supplementary rules in the Federal
Register on October 15, 2014 (79 FR
61899). Public comments were accepted
for a 60-day period ending on December
15, 2014. The BLM received three
comments. One comment favored
protecting the resources, one comment
was against any restriction on Federal
lands, and the third comment did not
apply to the Castle Rocks area. The
comments received were not specific or
confined to the issues pertinent to the
proposed rules, nor did they
recommend change or clarification;
therefore, no changes were made to the
proposed supplementary rules.
III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules
Supplementary rules are necessary to
protect the cultural and natural
resources within the 400-acre BLM
parcel at Castle Rocks as described in
the environmental assessment (EA) for
the Cassia RMP amendment.
The supplementary rules prohibit
traditional rock climbing, sport rock
climbing, bouldering, staging, trail
building, and camping on BLMadministered public land within the
Castle Rocks area because of potential
adverse effects to significant Traditional
Cultural Properties, and rare historic,
geologic, scenic and cultural resources
resulting from these activities. Use of
the existing Stines Creek trail as shown
on the 2012 Oakley 1:100,000 surface
management Status Map and free solo
climbing—that is, climbing which does
not use ropes, harnesses or other
protective gear during ascent—are still
authorized. The EA for the Cassia RMP
amendment (Appendix II) designates
the trail appropriate for foot, horse, or
bike use and describes the authorized
course of the trail.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The final supplementary rules are not
a significant regulatory action and are
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866. They will not
have an effect of $100 million or more
on the economy. They will not
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
adversely affect, in a material way, the
economy; productivity; competition;
jobs; environment; public health or
safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities. The final
supplementary rules will not create a
serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency. They will
not materially alter the budgetary effects
of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the right or obligations of
their recipients; nor will they raise
novel legal or policy issues. The
supplementary rules merely contain
rules of conduct for public use of a
limited selection of public lands to
prevent adverse effects to significant
traditional cultural properties and rare
historic, geologic, and scenic values at
Castle Rocks.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
The BLM prepared an EA as part of
the development of the Cassia RMP
amendment at Castle Rocks. During that
NEPA process, alternative decisions for
the Cassia RMP amendment were fully
analyzed or discussed and offered for
public comment, including the
substance of these supplementary rules.
The pertinent analysis can be found in
Chapter 4 of the Cassia RMP
Amendment and Proposed Decision
Record, April 2013. The ROD for the
Cassia RMP was signed by the Idaho
BLM State Director on November 20,
2013. These final supplementary rules
will provide for enforcement of the plan
decisions. The rationale for the
decisions made is fully covered in the
ROD, which is available for review in
the BLM administrative record at the
location specified in the ADDRESSES
section and online at https://
eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/
eplanning/planAndProject
Site.do?methodName=dispatchTo
PatternPage¤tPageId=47887.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, to ensure
that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately
burden small entities. The RFA requires
a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule
will have a significant economic impact,
either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities.
These final supplementary rules will
merely establish rules of conduct for use
of a limited area of public lands and
will have no effect on business entities
of any size. Therefore, the BLM has
determined, under the RFA, that the
final supplementary rules will not have
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
66035
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
Supplementary Rules for the Portion of the
Castle Rocks Area Managed by the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The BLM has determined that these
final supplementary rules will not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that they meet the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
Definitions
These final supplementary rules do
not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They will not result
in an effect on the economy of $100
million or more, an increase in costs or
prices, or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
in domestic and export markets. These
final supplementary rules will merely
establish rules of conduct for use of a
limited area of public lands and do not
affect commercial or business activities
of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules will
not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector of more than $100 million
per year nor do they have a significant
or unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector.
Therefore, the BLM is not required to
prepare a statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (Takings)
These final supplementary rules will
not have significant takings implications
nor will they be capable of interfering
with constitutionally protected property
rights. Therefore, the BLM has
determined that these rules will not
cause a ‘‘taking’’ of private property or
require preparation of a takings
assessment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
These final supplementary rules will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. These final
supplementary rules will not conflict
with any law or regulation of the State
of Idaho. Therefore, in accordance with
Executive Order 13132, the BLM has
determined that these final
supplementary rules will not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
Consultation and Coordination with
the Shoshone-Bannock and the
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes has been
ongoing since 2010. The Tribes have
been fully briefed and support these
supplementary rules.
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section
515 of Pub. L. 106–554) requires Federal
agencies to maintain adequate quality,
objectivity, utility, and integrity of the
information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules,
the BLM did not conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey or disseminate
any information to the public.
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules will
not constitute a significant energy
action. These final supplementary rules
will not have an adverse effect on
energy supplies, production, or
consumption, and have no connection
with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do
not contain information collection
requirements that the Office of
Management and Budget must approve
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Author
The principal author of these
supplementary rules is Amanda M.
Dodson, Acting Burley Field Manager,
Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the
Preamble, and under the authority of 43
CFR 8365.1–6, the Burley Field Office,
Bureau of Land Management,
establishes supplementary rules for
BLM-administered lands covered under
the Cassia Resource Management Plan
Amendment at Castle Rocks, to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Traditional rock climbing means a style of
climbing where a climber or group of
climbers places all gear required to protect
against falls and removes it when passage is
complete.
Sport rock climbing means a style of
climbing that relies on fixed protection
against falls, usually bolts and/or top
anchors.
Bouldering means ropeless climbing that
involves short, sequential moves on rock
usually no more than 20 feet off the ground
and uses bouldering crash pads at the base
of the climbing area to prevent injuries from
falls.
Staging means assembling, unpacking or
otherwise preparing gear for climbing;
typically conducted at the base of the cliff,
where gear such a backpacks may also be left
during a climb, but in some cases, is
conducted at the top of a cliff.
Trail building means the act of creating
new travel routes through the use of tools; or
user-created trails developed through
repeated visits to a specific destination. EA
DOI–BLM–ID–T020–2013–0010–EA
Appendix II serves as the baseline for
existing trails on BLM lands.
Camping means setting up, occupying or
making use of a place for shelter or overnight
stay.
On BLM-administered public land within
the Castle Rocks area, the following
supplementary rules apply:
1. Traditional and sport rock climbing and
bouldering are prohibited.
2. Staging is prohibited.
3. Camping is prohibited.
4. Trail building is prohibited.
Exceptions: The following persons are
exempt from these supplementary rules:
A. Any Federal, State, local, and/or
military employee acting within the scope of
their duties;
B. Members of any organized rescue or firefighting force performing an official duty;
and
C. Persons, agencies, municipalities or
companies holding an existing special use
permit and operating within the scope of
their permit.
Penalties: On public lands under Section
303(a) of the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a))
and 43 CFR 8360.0–7, any person who
violates any of these supplementary rules
may be tried before a United States
Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000 or
imprisoned for no more than 12 months or
both. Such violations may also be subject to
enhanced fines provided for by 18 U.S.C.
3571.
Timothy M. Murphy,
BLM Idaho State Director.
[FR Doc. 2015–27373 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66033-66035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27373]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLIDT02000.L12200000.MA0000.241A.00 4500079363]
Final Supplementary Rules for the Castle Rocks Land Use Plan
Amendment Area, Idaho
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final supplementary rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is finalizing
supplementary rules for all BLM-administered public lands within an
approximately 400-acre area in Idaho known as Castle Rocks. The BLM
addressed this area in the November 2013 Cassia Resource Management
Plan (RMP) Amendment and Record of Decision (ROD). The Cassia RMP
amendment made implementation-level decisions designed to conserve
natural and cultural resources while providing for recreational
opportunities. These supplementary rules will allow the BLM and law
enforcement partners to enforce those decisions.
DATES: These supplementary rules are effective on November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may direct your inquiries to the Bureau of Land
Management, Burley Field Office, 15 East 200 South, Burley, Idaho
83318. email: BLM_ID_BurleyOffice@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, at 208-677-6664 or by email at
[[Page 66034]]
dthompson@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 to contact Mr. Thompson.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
II. Discussion of Public Comments
III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules
IV. Procedural Matters
I. Background
Castle Rocks is a dramatic geologic area located in the southern
Albion Mountain Range of Cassia County, Idaho. Castle Rocks consists
primarily of quartz-monzonite, a type of granite associated with the
Almo Pluton. Pinnacles and monoliths, towering over 400 feet in local
relief, characterize the area. Castle Rocks currently contains nearly
pristine cultural and natural resources.
Until 2003, a difficult and lengthy hike from Stines Pass was the
only way to access Castle Rocks, due to the unique ownership pattern
and geography of the surrounding lands. This limited access helped
preserve rare resources that are of great importance to the Shoshone-
Bannock Tribes of Fort Hall and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck
Valley. Castle Rocks became less isolated after the passage of the
Castle Rock Ranch Acquisition Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-421), which
authorized the National Park Service (NPS) to purchase a private ranch
that provided more convenient public access on the east side of the
geologic area. After the acquisition, the NPS exchanged the property
with the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation (IDPR) for other
lands adjacent to existing NPS properties.
Since May 25, 2003, the IDPR has provided park facilities and
managed recreation at Castle Rocks. Since 2003, the BLM has been
protecting resources on the 400-acre parcel under its management
through a series of temporary closure orders prohibiting rock climbing,
camping, staging, and trail building. In 2012, the BLM determined that
amending the Cassia RMP was necessary to properly manage the area. The
decision in the Plan Amendment is to close the area permanently to rock
climbing, camping, staging, and trail building. This decision will
protect significant cultural resources that were, or had the potential
to be, adversely impacted by these activities. The Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes of Fort Hall and the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of Duck Valley
consider the area a sacred site and have requested the assistance of
the BLM Burley Field Office in nominating the area as a Traditional
Cultural Property under the National Historic Preservation Act.
These supplementary rules will help the BLM achieve management
objectives and implement the Cassia RMP amendment. They will also
provide the BLM with enforcement capability to help prevent damage to
cultural and natural resources.
II. Discussion of Public Comments
The BLM published the proposed supplementary rules in the Federal
Register on October 15, 2014 (79 FR 61899). Public comments were
accepted for a 60-day period ending on December 15, 2014. The BLM
received three comments. One comment favored protecting the resources,
one comment was against any restriction on Federal lands, and the third
comment did not apply to the Castle Rocks area. The comments received
were not specific or confined to the issues pertinent to the proposed
rules, nor did they recommend change or clarification; therefore, no
changes were made to the proposed supplementary rules.
III. Discussion of Supplementary Rules
Supplementary rules are necessary to protect the cultural and
natural resources within the 400-acre BLM parcel at Castle Rocks as
described in the environmental assessment (EA) for the Cassia RMP
amendment.
The supplementary rules prohibit traditional rock climbing, sport
rock climbing, bouldering, staging, trail building, and camping on BLM-
administered public land within the Castle Rocks area because of
potential adverse effects to significant Traditional Cultural
Properties, and rare historic, geologic, scenic and cultural resources
resulting from these activities. Use of the existing Stines Creek trail
as shown on the 2012 Oakley 1:100,000 surface management Status Map and
free solo climbing--that is, climbing which does not use ropes,
harnesses or other protective gear during ascent--are still authorized.
The EA for the Cassia RMP amendment (Appendix II) designates the trail
appropriate for foot, horse, or bike use and describes the authorized
course of the trail.
IV. Procedural Matters
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The final supplementary rules are not a significant regulatory
action and are not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Orders 12866. They will not have an effect of
$100 million or more on the economy. They will not adversely affect, in
a material way, the economy; productivity; competition; jobs;
environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities. The final supplementary rules will not
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency. They will not materially alter the
budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs
or the right or obligations of their recipients; nor will they raise
novel legal or policy issues. The supplementary rules merely contain
rules of conduct for public use of a limited selection of public lands
to prevent adverse effects to significant traditional cultural
properties and rare historic, geologic, and scenic values at Castle
Rocks.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
The BLM prepared an EA as part of the development of the Cassia RMP
amendment at Castle Rocks. During that NEPA process, alternative
decisions for the Cassia RMP amendment were fully analyzed or discussed
and offered for public comment, including the substance of these
supplementary rules. The pertinent analysis can be found in Chapter 4
of the Cassia RMP Amendment and Proposed Decision Record, April 2013.
The ROD for the Cassia RMP was signed by the Idaho BLM State Director
on November 20, 2013. These final supplementary rules will provide for
enforcement of the plan decisions. The rationale for the decisions made
is fully covered in the ROD, which is available for review in the BLM
administrative record at the location specified in the ADDRESSES
section and online at https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front-office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=dispatchToPatternPage¤tPageId=47887.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Congress enacted the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, to ensure that Government regulations do not
unnecessarily or disproportionately burden small entities. The RFA
requires a regulatory flexibility analysis if a rule will have a
significant economic impact, either detrimental or beneficial, on a
substantial number of small entities. These final supplementary rules
will merely establish rules of conduct for use of a limited area of
public lands and will have no effect on business entities of any size.
Therefore, the BLM has determined, under the RFA, that the final
supplementary rules will not have
[[Page 66035]]
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
These final supplementary rules do not constitute a ``major rule''
as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). They will not result in an effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, an increase in costs or prices, or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets. These final supplementary rules will merely establish
rules of conduct for use of a limited area of public lands and do not
affect commercial or business activities of any kind.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
These final supplementary rules will not impose an unfunded mandate
on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more
than $100 million per year nor do they have a significant or unique
effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, the BLM is not required to prepare a statement containing
the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.).
Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights (Takings)
These final supplementary rules will not have significant takings
implications nor will they be capable of interfering with
constitutionally protected property rights. Therefore, the BLM has
determined that these rules will not cause a ``taking'' of private
property or require preparation of a takings assessment.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
These final supplementary rules will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. These final
supplementary rules will not conflict with any law or regulation of the
State of Idaho. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132,
the BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules will not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
The BLM has determined that these final supplementary rules will
not unduly burden the judicial system and that they meet the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
Consultation and Coordination with the Shoshone-Bannock and the
Shoshone-Paiute Tribes has been ongoing since 2010. The Tribes have
been fully briefed and support these supplementary rules.
Information Quality Act
The Information Quality Act (Section 515 of Pub. L. 106-554)
requires Federal agencies to maintain adequate quality, objectivity,
utility, and integrity of the information that they disseminate. In
developing these supplementary rules, the BLM did not conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey or disseminate any information to the
public.
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
These final supplementary rules will not constitute a significant
energy action. These final supplementary rules will not have an adverse
effect on energy supplies, production, or consumption, and have no
connection with energy policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
These final supplementary rules do not contain information
collection requirements that the Office of Management and Budget must
approve under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
Author
The principal author of these supplementary rules is Amanda M.
Dodson, Acting Burley Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management.
For the reasons stated in the Preamble, and under the authority of
43 CFR 8365.1-6, the Burley Field Office, Bureau of Land Management,
establishes supplementary rules for BLM-administered lands covered
under the Cassia Resource Management Plan Amendment at Castle Rocks, to
read as follows:
Supplementary Rules for the Portion of the Castle Rocks Area Managed by
the U.S. Bureau of Land Management
Definitions
Traditional rock climbing means a style of climbing where a
climber or group of climbers places all gear required to protect
against falls and removes it when passage is complete.
Sport rock climbing means a style of climbing that relies on
fixed protection against falls, usually bolts and/or top anchors.
Bouldering means ropeless climbing that involves short,
sequential moves on rock usually no more than 20 feet off the ground
and uses bouldering crash pads at the base of the climbing area to
prevent injuries from falls.
Staging means assembling, unpacking or otherwise preparing gear
for climbing; typically conducted at the base of the cliff, where
gear such a backpacks may also be left during a climb, but in some
cases, is conducted at the top of a cliff.
Trail building means the act of creating new travel routes
through the use of tools; or user-created trails developed through
repeated visits to a specific destination. EA DOI-BLM-ID-T020-2013-
0010-EA Appendix II serves as the baseline for existing trails on
BLM lands.
Camping means setting up, occupying or making use of a place for
shelter or overnight stay.
On BLM-administered public land within the Castle Rocks area,
the following supplementary rules apply:
1. Traditional and sport rock climbing and bouldering are
prohibited.
2. Staging is prohibited.
3. Camping is prohibited.
4. Trail building is prohibited.
Exceptions: The following persons are exempt from these
supplementary rules:
A. Any Federal, State, local, and/or military employee acting
within the scope of their duties;
B. Members of any organized rescue or fire-fighting force
performing an official duty; and
C. Persons, agencies, municipalities or companies holding an
existing special use permit and operating within the scope of their
permit.
Penalties: On public lands under Section 303(a) of the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)) and 43
CFR 8360.0-7, any person who violates any of these supplementary
rules may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no
more than $1,000 or imprisoned for no more than 12 months or both.
Such violations may also be subject to enhanced fines provided for
by 18 U.S.C. 3571.
Timothy M. Murphy,
BLM Idaho State Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-27373 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P