Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate, 65883-65886 [2015-27359]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) After an involuntary enrollment
under paragraph (l)(4)(ii) or (iii) of this
section becomes effective, the annuitant
may change the enrollment to another
option of the plan into which he or she
was enrolled or another health plan of
his or her choice prospectively within
90-days after OPM advises the annuitant
of the new enrollment;
(v) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, an annuitant must change
the enrollment within 60 days of the
disaster, as announced by OPM. If an
annuitant does not change the
enrollment within the time frame
announced by OPM, the annuitant will
be enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan option, as defined in
§ 890.301(n). The effective date of
enrollment changes under this provision
will be set by OPM when it makes the
announcement allowing such changes;
(vi) An annuitant who is unable, for
causes beyond his or her control, to
make an enrollment change within the
60 days following a disaster and is, as
a result, enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan as defined in
§ 890.301(n), may request a belated
enrollment into the plan of his or her
choice subject to the requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 890.806 by revising
paragraphs (j)(4)(ii) through (iv) and
adding paragraph (j)(4)(v) to read as
follows:
§ 890.806 When can former spouses
change enrollment or reenroll and what are
the effective dates?
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) If the whole plan is discontinued,
a former spouse who does not change
the enrollment within the time set will
be enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan option, as defined in
§ 890.301(n);
(iii) If one or more options of a plan
are discontinued, a former spouse who
does not change the enrollment will be
enrolled in the remaining option of the
plan, or in the case of a plan with two
or more options remaining, the lowestcost remaining option that is not a High
Deductible Health Plan (HDHP);
(iv) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, the former spouse must
change the enrollment within 60 days of
the disaster, as announced by OPM. If
a former spouse does not change the
enrollment within the time frame
announced by OPM, the former spouse
will be enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan option, as defined in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
§ 890.301(n) of this section. The
effective date of enrollment changes
under this provision will be set by OPM
when it makes the announcement
allowing such changes;
(v) A former spouse who is unable, for
causes beyond his or her control, to
make an enrollment change within the
60 days following a disaster and is, as
a result, enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan as defined in
§ 890.301(n), may request a belated
enrollment into the plan of his or her
choice subject to the requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend § 890.1108 by revising
paragraphs (h)(4)(ii) through (iv) and
adding paragraph (h)(4)(v) to read as
follows:
■
§ 890.1108 Opportunities to change
enrollment; effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) If the whole plan is discontinued,
an enrollee who does not change the
enrollment within the time set will be
enrolled in the lowest-cost nationwide
plan option, as defined in § 890.301(n);
(iii) If one or more options of a plan
are discontinued, an enrollee who does
not change the enrollment will enrolled
in the remaining option of the plan, or
in the case of a plan with two or more
options remaining, the lowest-cost
remaining option that is not a High
Deductible Health Plan (HDHP);
(iv) If the discontinuance of the plan,
whether permanent or temporary, is due
to a disaster, the enrollee must change
the enrollment within 60 days of the
disaster, as announced by OPM. If the
enrollee does not change the enrollment
within the time frame announced by
OPM, the enrollee will be enrolled in
the lowest-cost nationwide plan option,
as defined in § 890.301(n). The effective
date of enrollment changes under this
provision will be set by OPM when it
makes the announcement allowing such
changes;
(v) An enrollee who is unable, for
causes beyond his or her control, to
make an enrollment change within the
60 days following a disaster and is, as
a result, enrolled in the lowest-cost
nationwide plan as defined in
§ 890.301(n), may request a belated
enrollment into the plan of his or her
choice subject to the requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–27378 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–63–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65883
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–15–0026; FV15–984–1
FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the California
Walnut Board (Board) for an increase of
the assessment rate established for the
2015–16 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0189 to $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of walnuts handled
under the marketing order. The Board
locally administers the marketing order
and is comprised of growers and
handlers of walnuts operating within
the area of production. Assessments
upon walnut handlers are used by the
Board to fund reasonable and necessary
expenses of the program. The marketing
year begins September 1 and ends
August 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective October 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffery.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
984, as amended (7 CFR part 984),
regulating the handling of walnuts
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
65884
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California walnut handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable walnuts
beginning on September 1, 2015, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Board for the
2015–16 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0189 to $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts handled.
The California walnut marketing
order provides authority for the Board,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Board are growers and handlers
of California walnuts. They are familiar
with the Board’s needs and with the
costs for goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to
formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected
persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2013–14 and subsequent
marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an
assessment rate of $0.0189 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts that would continue in effect
from marketing year to marketing year
unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 4, 2015, and
unanimously recommended 2015–16
expenditures of $22,668,980, and an
assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. In comparison, last year’s
budgeted expenditures were $9,861,810.
The assessment rate of $0.0379 is $0.019
per pound higher than the rate currently
in effect. The quantity of assessable
walnuts for the 2015–16 marketing year
is estimated at 518,000 tons inshell or
466,200,000 kernelweight pounds,
which is the five-year average of walnut
production. At the recommended higher
assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound, the Board should
collect approximately $17,668,980 in
assessment income. The Board also
recommended using $5,000,000 from its
monetary reserve to help fund the
increase in the expenditures.
Assessments and funds from the reserve
will be adequate to cover its 2015–16
budgeted expenses of $22,668,980.
The Board noted that sales of
California walnuts in the domestic
market have been declining in recent
years, and believes that more market
development and promotion would
reverse the trend. Thus, they are
committed to increasing expenditures
on domestic marketing promotion
projects and programs.
The following table compares major
budget expenditures recommended by
the Board for the 2014–15 and 2015–16
marketing years:
CHART 1
Budget expense categories
2014–15
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Employee Expenses ....................................................................................................................................
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit ..........................................................................................................
Office Expenses ...........................................................................................................................................
Controlled Purchases ..................................................................................................................................
Crop Acreage Survey ..................................................................................................................................
Crop Estimate ..............................................................................................................................................
Production Research Director .....................................................................................................................
Production Research ...................................................................................................................................
Sustainability Project ...................................................................................................................................
Grades and Standards Research ................................................................................................................
Domestic Market Development ...................................................................................................................
Reserve for Contingency .............................................................................................................................
The assessment rate recommended by
the Board was derived by dividing
anticipated assessment revenue needed
by estimated shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable. The
518,000 ton (inshell) estimate for
merchantable shipments is an average of
shipments during five prior years.
Pursuant to § 984.51(b) of the order, this
figure is converted to a merchantable
kernelweight basis using a factor of 0.45
(518,000 tons x 2,000 pounds per ton x
0.45), which yields 466,200,000
kernelweight pounds. At $0.0379 per
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
pound, the new assessment rate should
generate $17,668,980 in assessment
income. Along with $5,000,000 from the
Board’s monetary reserve, this
assessment rate will allow the Board to
cover its expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes
the Board to carry over excess funds
into subsequent marketing years as a
reserve, provided that funds already in
the reserve do not exceed approximately
two years’ budgeted expenses. Using
$5,000,000 of reserve funds would leave
an estimated $5,895,932 in reserve at
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$ 1,711,000
190,000
241,000
10,000
0
126,000
94,500
1,600,000
75,000
600,000
5,742,000
166,310
2015–16
$1,846,500
191,000
254,000
10,000
100,000
130,000
94,500
1,700,000
75,000
600,000
18,478,440
32,790
the end of the 2015–16 marketing year,
well within the requirements of the
marketing order.
The assessment rate will be in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate
established by this rule will be in effect
for an indefinite period, the Board will
continue to meet prior to or during each
marketing year to recommend a budget
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of
the assessment rate. The dates and times
of Board meetings are available from the
Board or USDA. Board meetings are
open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these
meetings. USDA would evaluate Board
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The Board’s
2015–16 budget and those for
subsequent marketing years would be
reviewed, and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 4,500
growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small
agricultural producers as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000. (13 CFR
121.201)
According to USDA’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service’s
(NASS’s) 2012 Census of Agriculture,
approximately 89 percent of California’s
walnut farms were smaller than 100
acres. Further, NASS reports that the
average yield for 2014 was 1.95 tons per
acre, and the average price received for
2013 was $3,710 per ton. The average
price for 2014 has not been reported yet.
A 100-acre farm with an average yield
of 1.95 tons per acre would therefore
have been expected to produce about
195 tons of walnuts during 2010–11. At
$3,710 per ton, that farm’s production
would have had an approximate value
of $723,450. Since Census of
Agriculture information indicates that
the majority of California’s walnut farms
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
are smaller than 100 acres, it could be
concluded that the majority of the
growers had receipts of less than
$723,450 in 2014–15, below the SBA
threshold of $750,000. Thus, the
majority of California’s walnut growers
would be considered small growers
according to SBA’s definition.
According to information supplied by
the Board, approximately two-thirds of
California’s walnut handlers each
shipped merchantable walnuts valued
under $7,000,000 during the 2014–15
marketing year and would, therefore, be
considered small handlers according to
the SBA definition.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established by the Board and
applicable to handlers for the 2015–16
and subsequent marketing years from
$0.0189 to $0.0379 per kernelweight
pound of assessable walnuts. The Board
unanimously recommended 2015–16
expenditures of $22,668,980 and an
assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The assessment rate of $0.0379
is $0.019 higher than the 2014–15 rate.
The quantity of assessable walnuts for
the 2015–16 marketing year is estimated
at 518,000 tons inshell weight, or
466,200,000 kernelweight pounds.
Thus, the $0.0379 rate should provide
$17,668,980 in assessment income.
The Board also recommended using
$5,000,000 from its monetary reserve to
augment the assessment income. Thus,
assessment income plus the $5,000,000
should be adequate to meet this year’s
expenses. The increased assessment rate
is primarily due to increased domestic
marketing promotion and programs. The
Board has become concerned with the
declining sales of California walnuts in
the domestic market, and believes that
sagging sales can be improved through
increased promotional activities. Thus,
they recommended an increase in
domestic market development from
approximately $5.7 million during the
2014–15 marketing year to
approximately $18.4 million for the
2015–16 marketing year.
The major expenses for the 2015–16
marketing year, as outlined in Chart 1
include: $1,846,500 for employee
expenses; $191,000 for travel, board,
and annual audit expenses; $254,000 for
office expenses; $10,000 for controlled
purchases; $100,000 for the crop acreage
survey; $130,000 for the crop estimate;
$94,500 for the salary of the Production
Research Director; $1,700,000 for
production research; $75,000 for a
sustainability project; $600,000 for
grades and standards research;
$18,478,440 for domestic market
development projects; and $32,790 for
the contingency reserve.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
65885
In comparison, these expenditures for
the 2014–15 marketing year were:
$1,711,000 for employee expenses;
$190,000 for travel, board, and annual
audit expenses; $241,000 for office
expenses; $10,000 for controlled
purchases; $126,000 for the crop
estimate; $94,500 for the salary of the
Production Research Director;
$1,600,000 for production research;
$75,000 for the sustainability project;
$600,000 for grades and standards
research; $5,742,000 for domestic
market development projects; and
$166,310 for the contingency reserve.
There was no acreage survey expense in
the 2014–15 marketing year.
The Board reviewed and unanimously
recommended 2015–16 expenditures of
$22,668,980. Prior to arriving at this
budget, the Board considered alternative
expenditure levels, such as spending an
additional $5,000,000, or $10,000,000
for domestic market development
projects, as well as alternate assessment
rate levels. They ultimately determined
that the recommended expenditure and
assessment levels were reasonable and
necessary to assist in improving
domestic sales, as well as properly
administering the order.
The assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts was derived by dividing
anticipated assessment revenue needed
by expected shipments of California
walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are
estimated at 466,200,000 pounds. It was
determined that $17,668,980 in
assessment income was needed, and
assessment income combined with
funds from the monetary reserve should
allow the Board to cover its expenses of
$22,668,980.
The Board also considered
information from various committees
who deliberate and formulate their own
budgets of expenses and make
recommendations to the Board. The
committees include the Market
Development, Production Research,
Budget and Personnel, and Grades and
Standards Committees.
Unspent funds may be retained in a
financial reserve, provided that funds in
the financial reserve do not exceed
approximately two years’ budgeted
expenses.
According to NASS, the season
average grower prices for the years 2012
and 2013 were $3,030 and $3,710 per
ton, respectively. Prices have not yet
been reported for 2014. The 2012 and
2013 prices provide a range within
which the 2015–16 season average price
could fall. Dividing these average
grower prices by 2,000 pounds per ton
provides an inshell price per pound
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
65886
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
range of $1.52 to $1.86. Dividing these
inshell per pound prices by the 0.45
conversion factor (inshell to
kernelweight) established in the order
yields a 2015–16 price range estimate of
$3.38 to $4.13 per kernelweight pound
of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower
revenue represented by the assessment
rate, the assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound is divided by the
low and high estimates of the price
range. The estimated assessment
revenue for the 2015–16 marketing year
as a percentage of total grower revenue
will thus likely range between 0.92 and
1.11 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. These
costs are offset by the benefits derived
by the operation of the marketing order.
In addition, the Board’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California walnut industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and encouraged to
participate in Board deliberations on all
issues. Like all Board meetings, the June
4, 2015, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were free to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 (Walnuts
Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements are necessary as a
result of this action. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California
walnut handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this action.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on August 18, 2015, (80 FR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:03 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
49930). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all walnut
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 30-day comment period
ending September 17, 2015, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No complete
comments were received. Accordingly,
no changes will be made to the rule as
proposed.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrderSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because handlers are already receiving
2015–16 crop walnuts from growers, the
marketing year began on September 1,
2015, and the assessment rate applies to
all walnuts received during the 2015–16
and subsequent marketing years.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule
which was recommended at a public
meeting. Also, a 30-day comment period
was provided in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is amended as
follows:
PART 984—WALNUTS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 984 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 984.347
Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2015, an
assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound is established for
California merchantable walnuts.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: October 22, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–27359 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Docket No. AMS–FV–15–0034; FV15–987–
1 IR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, California;
Decreased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the California
Date Administrative Committee
(committee) for a decrease in the
assessment rate established for the
2015–16 and subsequent crop years
from $0.20 to $0.10 per hundredweight
of dates handled. The committee locally
administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of dates grown or
packed in Riverside County, California.
Assessments upon date handlers are
used by the committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The crop year begins
October 1 and ends September 30. The
new assessment rate will remain in
effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective October 29, 2015.
Comments received by December 28,
2015, will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the docket number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCR1.SGM
28OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65883-65886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27359]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 984
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-15-0026; FV15-984-1 FR]
Walnuts Grown in California; Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the California
Walnut Board (Board) for an increase of the assessment rate established
for the 2015-16 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0189 to $0.0379
per kernelweight pound of walnuts handled under the marketing order.
The Board locally administers the marketing order and is comprised of
growers and handlers of walnuts operating within the area of
production. Assessments upon walnut handlers are used by the Board to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The marketing
year begins September 1 and ends August 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Effective October 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffery.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 984, as amended (7 CFR part 984), regulating the handling of
walnuts grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
[[Page 65884]]
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
walnut handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
walnuts beginning on September 1, 2015, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the Board
for the 2015-16 and subsequent marketing years from $0.0189 to $0.0379
per kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts handled.
The California walnut marketing order provides authority for the
Board, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Board are growers and handlers of
California walnuts. They are familiar with the Board's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2013-14 and subsequent marketing years, the Board
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $0.0189 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts that would continue in effect
from marketing year to marketing year unless modified, suspended, or
terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information submitted by the
Board or other information available to USDA.
The Board met on June 4, 2015, and unanimously recommended 2015-16
expenditures of $22,668,980, and an assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts. In comparison, last year's
budgeted expenditures were $9,861,810. The assessment rate of $0.0379
is $0.019 per pound higher than the rate currently in effect. The
quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2015-16 marketing year is
estimated at 518,000 tons inshell or 466,200,000 kernelweight pounds,
which is the five-year average of walnut production. At the recommended
higher assessment rate of $0.0379 per kernelweight pound, the Board
should collect approximately $17,668,980 in assessment income. The
Board also recommended using $5,000,000 from its monetary reserve to
help fund the increase in the expenditures. Assessments and funds from
the reserve will be adequate to cover its 2015-16 budgeted expenses of
$22,668,980.
The Board noted that sales of California walnuts in the domestic
market have been declining in recent years, and believes that more
market development and promotion would reverse the trend. Thus, they
are committed to increasing expenditures on domestic marketing
promotion projects and programs.
The following table compares major budget expenditures recommended
by the Board for the 2014-15 and 2015-16 marketing years:
Chart 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget expense categories 2014-15 2015-16
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employee Expenses................. $ 1,711,000 $1,846,500
Travel/Board Expenses/Annual Audit 190,000 191,000
Office Expenses................... 241,000 254,000
Controlled Purchases.............. 10,000 10,000
Crop Acreage Survey............... 0 100,000
Crop Estimate..................... 126,000 130,000
Production Research Director...... 94,500 94,500
Production Research............... 1,600,000 1,700,000
Sustainability Project............ 75,000 75,000
Grades and Standards Research..... 600,000 600,000
Domestic Market Development....... 5,742,000 18,478,440
Reserve for Contingency........... 166,310 32,790
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by
dividing anticipated assessment revenue needed by estimated shipments
of California walnuts certified as merchantable. The 518,000 ton
(inshell) estimate for merchantable shipments is an average of
shipments during five prior years. Pursuant to Sec. 984.51(b) of the
order, this figure is converted to a merchantable kernelweight basis
using a factor of 0.45 (518,000 tons x 2,000 pounds per ton x 0.45),
which yields 466,200,000 kernelweight pounds. At $0.0379 per pound, the
new assessment rate should generate $17,668,980 in assessment income.
Along with $5,000,000 from the Board's monetary reserve, this
assessment rate will allow the Board to cover its expenses.
Section 984.69 of the order authorizes the Board to carry over
excess funds into subsequent marketing years as a reserve, provided
that funds already in the reserve do not exceed approximately two
years' budgeted expenses. Using $5,000,000 of reserve funds would leave
an estimated $5,895,932 in reserve at the end of the 2015-16 marketing
year, well within the requirements of the marketing order.
The assessment rate will be in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Board or other available information.
Although this assessment rate established by this rule will be in
effect for an indefinite period, the Board will continue to meet prior
to or during each marketing year to recommend a budget
[[Page 65885]]
of expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the
assessment rate. The dates and times of Board meetings are available
from the Board or USDA. Board meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA
would evaluate Board recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed.
Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 2015-
16 budget and those for subsequent marketing years would be reviewed,
and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 4,500 growers of California walnuts in the
production area and approximately 90 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. The Small Business Administration (SBA)
defines small agricultural producers as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000. (13 CFR 121.201)
According to USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service's
(NASS's) 2012 Census of Agriculture, approximately 89 percent of
California's walnut farms were smaller than 100 acres. Further, NASS
reports that the average yield for 2014 was 1.95 tons per acre, and the
average price received for 2013 was $3,710 per ton. The average price
for 2014 has not been reported yet.
A 100-acre farm with an average yield of 1.95 tons per acre would
therefore have been expected to produce about 195 tons of walnuts
during 2010-11. At $3,710 per ton, that farm's production would have
had an approximate value of $723,450. Since Census of Agriculture
information indicates that the majority of California's walnut farms
are smaller than 100 acres, it could be concluded that the majority of
the growers had receipts of less than $723,450 in 2014-15, below the
SBA threshold of $750,000. Thus, the majority of California's walnut
growers would be considered small growers according to SBA's
definition.
According to information supplied by the Board, approximately two-
thirds of California's walnut handlers each shipped merchantable
walnuts valued under $7,000,000 during the 2014-15 marketing year and
would, therefore, be considered small handlers according to the SBA
definition.
This rule increases the assessment rate established by the Board
and applicable to handlers for the 2015-16 and subsequent marketing
years from $0.0189 to $0.0379 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts. The Board unanimously recommended 2015-16 expenditures of
$22,668,980 and an assessment rate of $0.0379 per kernelweight pound of
assessable walnuts. The assessment rate of $0.0379 is $0.019 higher
than the 2014-15 rate. The quantity of assessable walnuts for the 2015-
16 marketing year is estimated at 518,000 tons inshell weight, or
466,200,000 kernelweight pounds. Thus, the $0.0379 rate should provide
$17,668,980 in assessment income.
The Board also recommended using $5,000,000 from its monetary
reserve to augment the assessment income. Thus, assessment income plus
the $5,000,000 should be adequate to meet this year's expenses. The
increased assessment rate is primarily due to increased domestic
marketing promotion and programs. The Board has become concerned with
the declining sales of California walnuts in the domestic market, and
believes that sagging sales can be improved through increased
promotional activities. Thus, they recommended an increase in domestic
market development from approximately $5.7 million during the 2014-15
marketing year to approximately $18.4 million for the 2015-16 marketing
year.
The major expenses for the 2015-16 marketing year, as outlined in
Chart 1 include: $1,846,500 for employee expenses; $191,000 for travel,
board, and annual audit expenses; $254,000 for office expenses; $10,000
for controlled purchases; $100,000 for the crop acreage survey;
$130,000 for the crop estimate; $94,500 for the salary of the
Production Research Director; $1,700,000 for production research;
$75,000 for a sustainability project; $600,000 for grades and standards
research; $18,478,440 for domestic market development projects; and
$32,790 for the contingency reserve.
In comparison, these expenditures for the 2014-15 marketing year
were: $1,711,000 for employee expenses; $190,000 for travel, board, and
annual audit expenses; $241,000 for office expenses; $10,000 for
controlled purchases; $126,000 for the crop estimate; $94,500 for the
salary of the Production Research Director; $1,600,000 for production
research; $75,000 for the sustainability project; $600,000 for grades
and standards research; $5,742,000 for domestic market development
projects; and $166,310 for the contingency reserve. There was no
acreage survey expense in the 2014-15 marketing year.
The Board reviewed and unanimously recommended 2015-16 expenditures
of $22,668,980. Prior to arriving at this budget, the Board considered
alternative expenditure levels, such as spending an additional
$5,000,000, or $10,000,000 for domestic market development projects, as
well as alternate assessment rate levels. They ultimately determined
that the recommended expenditure and assessment levels were reasonable
and necessary to assist in improving domestic sales, as well as
properly administering the order.
The assessment rate of $0.0379 per kernelweight pound of assessable
walnuts was derived by dividing anticipated assessment revenue needed
by expected shipments of California walnuts certified as merchantable.
Merchantable shipments for the year are estimated at 466,200,000
pounds. It was determined that $17,668,980 in assessment income was
needed, and assessment income combined with funds from the monetary
reserve should allow the Board to cover its expenses of $22,668,980.
The Board also considered information from various committees who
deliberate and formulate their own budgets of expenses and make
recommendations to the Board. The committees include the Market
Development, Production Research, Budget and Personnel, and Grades and
Standards Committees.
Unspent funds may be retained in a financial reserve, provided that
funds in the financial reserve do not exceed approximately two years'
budgeted expenses.
According to NASS, the season average grower prices for the years
2012 and 2013 were $3,030 and $3,710 per ton, respectively. Prices have
not yet been reported for 2014. The 2012 and 2013 prices provide a
range within which the 2015-16 season average price could fall.
Dividing these average grower prices by 2,000 pounds per ton provides
an inshell price per pound
[[Page 65886]]
range of $1.52 to $1.86. Dividing these inshell per pound prices by the
0.45 conversion factor (inshell to kernelweight) established in the
order yields a 2015-16 price range estimate of $3.38 to $4.13 per
kernelweight pound of assessable walnuts.
To calculate the percentage of grower revenue represented by the
assessment rate, the assessment rate of $0.0379 per kernelweight pound
is divided by the low and high estimates of the price range. The
estimated assessment revenue for the 2015-16 marketing year as a
percentage of total grower revenue will thus likely range between 0.92
and 1.11 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. These costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order.
In addition, the Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
California walnut industry, and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and encouraged to participate in Board deliberations
on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the June 4, 2015, meeting was a
public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were free to
express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178 (Walnuts Grown in California). No changes in
those requirements are necessary as a result of this action. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California walnut handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
action.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on August 18, 2015, (80 FR 49930). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all walnut handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 30-day comment period ending September 17, 2015,
was provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal. No
complete comments were received. Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrderSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because handlers are
already receiving 2015-16 crop walnuts from growers, the marketing year
began on September 1, 2015, and the assessment rate applies to all
walnuts received during the 2015-16 and subsequent marketing years.
Further, handlers are aware of this rule which was recommended at a
public meeting. Also, a 30-day comment period was provided in the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 984
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Walnuts.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 984 is
amended as follows:
PART 984--WALNUTS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 984 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 984.347 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 984.347 Assessment rate.
On and after September 1, 2015, an assessment rate of $0.0379 per
kernelweight pound is established for California merchantable walnuts.
Dated: October 22, 2015.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-27359 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P