Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take Permit Application; Draft Environmental Assessment; Alta East Wind Project, Kern County, California, 66032-66033 [2015-27240]
Download as PDF
66032
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
who are highly interested and engaged
in advocating youth preparedness and
making a difference in their
communities. This collection meets the
requirements of 6 U.S.C. Sec. 742,
National Preparedness, and Presidential
Policy Directive—8 (PPD–8) which
emphasize the need for involvement
from all sectors of society in preparing
for and responding to threats and
hazards.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Collection of Information
Title: Individual & Community
Preparedness Division (ICPD) Annual
Youth Preparedness Council (YPC)
Application Form.
Type of Information Collection: New
information collection.
OMB Number: 1660–NEW.
FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 008–0–0–
24, FEMA Youth Preparedness Council
Application Form.
Abstract: FEMA Headquarters and
regional staff review completed
applications to select council members
based on dedication to public service,
efforts in making a difference in their
community, and potential for expanding
their impact as a national advocate for
youth preparedness. Applicants for the
YPC apply by downloading a PDF
application from FEMA’s Web site and
submit the application and related
documents, including reference letters,
to FEMA via the FEMA-YouthPrepareness-Council@fema.dhs.gov
email address. One youth from each of
the ten regions for which FEMA is
divided is selected to serve as a council
member. An additional 5 youths are
selected for an at-large assignment.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Number of Respondents: 100.
Number of Responses: 100.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 142 hours.
Estimated Cost: The estimated annual
cost to respondents for the hour burden
is $0. There are no annual costs to
respondents’ operations and
maintenance costs for technical
services. There are no annual start-up or
capital costs. The cost to the Federal
Government is $65,662.00.
Comments
Comments may be submitted as
indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a)
evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: October 21, 2015.
Richard W. Mattison,
Records Management Program Chief, Mission
Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–27476 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–46–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–MB–2015–N183; FF08M00000–
FXMB12310800000–145]
Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take
Permit Application; Draft
Environmental Assessment; Alta East
Wind Project, Kern County, California
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service announces the availably of a
draft Environmental Assessment (DEA)
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) for the issuance of a
take permit for golden eagles pursuant
to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection
Act (Eagle Act), in association with the
operation of the Alta East Wind Project
in Kern County, California. The DEA
was prepared in response to an
application from Alta Wind X, LLC
(applicant), an affiliate of NRG Yield,
Inc., for a 5-year programmatic take
permit for golden eagles (Aquila
chrysaetos) under the Eagle Act. The
applicant would implement a
conservation program to avoid,
minimize, and compensate for the
project’s impacts to eagles, as described
in the applicant’s Eagle Conservation
Plan (ECP). We invite public comment
on the DEA, which evaluates
alternatives for this permit decision.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
December 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may
download copies of the DEA on the
Internet at: https://www.fws.gov/cno/
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
conservation/MigratoryBirds/Eagle
Permits.html. Alternatively, you may
use one of the methods below to request
a CD–ROM of the document.
Submitting Comments: You may
submit comments or requests for copies
or more information by one of the
following methods.
• Email: fw8_eagle_nepa@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Alta East Eagle Permit draft EA
Comments’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• U.S. Mail: Heather Beeler,
Migratory Bird Program, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest
Regional Office, 2800 Cottage Way,
W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
• Fax: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird
Program, 916–414–6486; Attn: Alta East
Wind Project DEA Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program,
at the address shown above or at (916)
414–6651 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is
considering an application under the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
(16 U.S.C. 668a–d; Eagle Act) for a
programmatic golden eagle (Aquila
chrysaetos) take permit from Alta Wind
X, LLC (applicant), affiliate of NRG
Yield, Inc., for a 5-year programmatic
take permit for golden eagles. The
applicant’s Alta East Wind Project is an
existing, operational wind facility in the
Tehachapi Wind Resource Area (WRA)
within Kern County, California. The
application includes an Eagle
Conservation Plan (ECP) as the
foundation of the applicant’s permit
application. The ECP and the project’s
Bird and Bat Conservation Strategy
describe actions taken and proposed
future actions to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate adverse effects on eagles, birds,
and bats.
We have prepared this DEA to
evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives associated with this permit
application for compliance with our
Eagle Act permitting regulations in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 22.26, as well as impacts of
implementation of the supporting ECP,
which is included as an appendix to the
DEA.
Background
The Eagle Act allows us to authorize
bald eagle and golden eagle
programmatic take (take that is
recurring, is not caused solely by
indirect effects, and that occurs over the
long term in a location or locations that
cannot be specifically identified). Such
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 208 / Wednesday, October 28, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
take must be incidental to actions that
are otherwise lawful. The Eagle Act’s
implementing regulations define ‘‘take’’
as to ‘‘pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison,
wound, kill, capture, trap, collect,
destroy, molest, or disturb’’ individuals,
their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and
‘‘disturb’’ is further defined as ‘‘to
agitate or bother a bald or golden eagle
to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to
an eagle, . . .(2) a decrease in its
productivity, . . . or (3) nest
abandonment’’ (50 CFR 22.3). The Alta
East Wind Project will result in
recurring eagle mortalities over the life
of the project, so the appropriate type of
take permit is the programmatic permit
under 50 CFR 22.26.
We may consider issuance of
programmatic eagle take permits if: (1)
The incidental take is necessary to
protect legitimate interests; (2) the take
is compatible with the preservation
standard of the Eagle Act—providing for
stable or increasing breeding
populations; (3) the take has been
avoided and minimized to the degree
achievable through implementation of
Advanced Compensation Practices, and
the remaining take is unavoidable; and
(4) compensatory mitigation will be
provided for any remaining take. The
Service must determine that the direct
and indirect effects of the take and
required mitigation, together with the
cumulative effects of other permitted
take and additional factors affecting
eagle populations, are compatible with
the preservation of bald eagles and
golden eagles.
Applicant’s Proposal
The permit applicant, Alta Wind X,
LLC, is operating an approximately 150megawatt (MW) commercial windenergy facility in the Tehachapi WRA in
Kern County, California. The recently
constructed (December 2013) Alta East
Wind Project was a new wind energy
project on public (Bureau of Land
Management) and private lands and was
an expansion of Terra-Gen’s Alta Wind
Energy Center. The Bureau of Land
Management and Kern County
permitted Alta Wind X, LLC to
construct, operate, maintain, and
decommission up to 51 wind turbine
generators and related infrastructure on
approximately 2,600 acres of public and
private land in 2013.
The applicant submitted an ECP on
March 4, 2013, that was initially
developed following recommendations
provided by the Service and consistent
with our January 2011 Draft Eagle
Conservation Plan Guidance (https://
www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_
draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_
omb.pdf). The Draft ECP was later
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Oct 27, 2015
Jkt 238001
updated to follow our finalized
guidance, Eagle Conservation Plan
Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind
Energy Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP
Guidance) (https://www.fws.gov/
migratorybirds/PDFs/Eagle%2
0Conservation%20Plan%20GuidanceModule%201.pdf).
As recommended in the Service’s ECP
Guidance, the applicant’s plan outlines
avoidance and minimization measures,
contains a risk assessment, includes
experimental advanced conservation
practices, and adaptive management.
The applicant submitted the ECP as part
of the permit application, and if we
issue the permit following the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
process, then the conservation
commitments would become conditions
of the permit.
The Service independently evaluated
the risk of eagle fatalities from project
operations and compared that risk to the
conservation measures to which the
applicant has committed. This is an
essential step in the Service’s evaluation
of an application for a permit for
programmatic take of eagles because
issuing criteria require permitted take to
comply with the Eagle Act’s
preservation standard. The Service has
interpreted this standard to require
maintenance of stable or increasing
breeding populations of eagles (74 FR
46836; September 11, 2009). In the DEA,
we evaluate the risk and offsetting
conservation measures, and the
implications for direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects under five
alternatives.
Next Steps
The public process for the proposed
Federal permit action will be completed
after the public comment period, at
which time we will evaluate the permit
application and comments submitted
thereupon to determine whether the
application meets the permitting
requirements under the Eagle Act,
applicable regulations, and NEPA
requirements. Upon completion of that
evaluation, we will select our course of
action. We will make the final permit
decision no sooner than 30 days after
the close of the public comment period.
Public Comments
We invite public comment on the
proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
submit comments by any one of the
methods discussed above under
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
We will consider public comments on
the DEA when making the final
determination on NEPA compliance and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66033
permit issuance. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under Section
668a of the Eagle Act (16 U.S.C. 668–
668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest,
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2015–27240 Filed 10–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLIDT02000.L12200000.MA0000.241A.00
4500079363]
Final Supplementary Rules for the
Castle Rocks Land Use Plan
Amendment Area, Idaho
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final supplementary
rules.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is finalizing
supplementary rules for all BLMadministered public lands within an
approximately 400-acre area in Idaho
known as Castle Rocks. The BLM
addressed this area in the November
2013 Cassia Resource Management Plan
(RMP) Amendment and Record of
Decision (ROD). The Cassia RMP
amendment made implementation-level
decisions designed to conserve natural
and cultural resources while providing
for recreational opportunities. These
supplementary rules will allow the BLM
and law enforcement partners to enforce
those decisions.
DATES: These supplementary rules are
effective on November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may direct your
inquiries to the Bureau of Land
Management, Burley Field Office, 15
East 200 South, Burley, Idaho 83318.
email: BLM_ID_BurleyOffice@blm.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Thompson, Outdoor Recreation
Planner, at 208–677–6664 or by email at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 208 (Wednesday, October 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66032-66033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27240]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-MB-2015-N183; FF08M00000-FXMB12310800000-145]
Golden Eagles; Programmatic Take Permit Application; Draft
Environmental Assessment; Alta East Wind Project, Kern County,
California
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announces the availably of
a draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) for the issuance of a take permit for golden eagles
pursuant to the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act), in
association with the operation of the Alta East Wind Project in Kern
County, California. The DEA was prepared in response to an application
from Alta Wind X, LLC (applicant), an affiliate of NRG Yield, Inc., for
a 5-year programmatic take permit for golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos)
under the Eagle Act. The applicant would implement a conservation
program to avoid, minimize, and compensate for the project's impacts to
eagles, as described in the applicant's Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP).
We invite public comment on the DEA, which evaluates alternatives for
this permit decision.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be received on or
before December 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Obtaining Documents: You may download copies of the DEA on the
Internet at: https://www.fws.gov/cno/conservation/MigratoryBirds/EaglePermits.html. Alternatively, you may use one of the methods below
to request a CD-ROM of the document.
Submitting Comments: You may submit comments or requests for copies
or more information by one of the following methods.
Email: fw8_eagle_nepa@fws.gov. Include ``Alta East Eagle
Permit draft EA Comments'' in the subject line of the message.
U.S. Mail: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Regional Office, 2800
Cottage Way, W-2605, Sacramento, CA 95825.
Fax: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird Program, 916-414-6486;
Attn: Alta East Wind Project DEA Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Beeler, Migratory Bird
Program, at the address shown above or at (916) 414-6651 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering an application
under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668a-d; Eagle
Act) for a programmatic golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) take permit
from Alta Wind X, LLC (applicant), affiliate of NRG Yield, Inc., for a
5-year programmatic take permit for golden eagles. The applicant's Alta
East Wind Project is an existing, operational wind facility in the
Tehachapi Wind Resource Area (WRA) within Kern County, California. The
application includes an Eagle Conservation Plan (ECP) as the foundation
of the applicant's permit application. The ECP and the project's Bird
and Bat Conservation Strategy describe actions taken and proposed
future actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate adverse effects on
eagles, birds, and bats.
We have prepared this DEA to evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives associated with this permit application for compliance
with our Eagle Act permitting regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 22.26, as well as impacts of implementation
of the supporting ECP, which is included as an appendix to the DEA.
Background
The Eagle Act allows us to authorize bald eagle and golden eagle
programmatic take (take that is recurring, is not caused solely by
indirect effects, and that occurs over the long term in a location or
locations that cannot be specifically identified). Such
[[Page 66033]]
take must be incidental to actions that are otherwise lawful. The Eagle
Act's implementing regulations define ``take'' as to ``pursue, shoot,
shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, destroy, molest,
or disturb'' individuals, their nests and eggs (50 CFR 22.3); and
``disturb'' is further defined as ``to agitate or bother a bald or
golden eagle to a degree that causes . . . (1) injury to an eagle, . .
.(2) a decrease in its productivity, . . . or (3) nest abandonment''
(50 CFR 22.3). The Alta East Wind Project will result in recurring
eagle mortalities over the life of the project, so the appropriate type
of take permit is the programmatic permit under 50 CFR 22.26.
We may consider issuance of programmatic eagle take permits if: (1)
The incidental take is necessary to protect legitimate interests; (2)
the take is compatible with the preservation standard of the Eagle
Act--providing for stable or increasing breeding populations; (3) the
take has been avoided and minimized to the degree achievable through
implementation of Advanced Compensation Practices, and the remaining
take is unavoidable; and (4) compensatory mitigation will be provided
for any remaining take. The Service must determine that the direct and
indirect effects of the take and required mitigation, together with the
cumulative effects of other permitted take and additional factors
affecting eagle populations, are compatible with the preservation of
bald eagles and golden eagles.
Applicant's Proposal
The permit applicant, Alta Wind X, LLC, is operating an
approximately 150-megawatt (MW) commercial wind-energy facility in the
Tehachapi WRA in Kern County, California. The recently constructed
(December 2013) Alta East Wind Project was a new wind energy project on
public (Bureau of Land Management) and private lands and was an
expansion of Terra-Gen's Alta Wind Energy Center. The Bureau of Land
Management and Kern County permitted Alta Wind X, LLC to construct,
operate, maintain, and decommission up to 51 wind turbine generators
and related infrastructure on approximately 2,600 acres of public and
private land in 2013.
The applicant submitted an ECP on March 4, 2013, that was initially
developed following recommendations provided by the Service and
consistent with our January 2011 Draft Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance
(https://www.fws.gov/windenergy/docs/ECP_draft_guidance_2_10_final_clean_omb.pdf). The Draft ECP was later
updated to follow our finalized guidance, Eagle Conservation Plan
Guidance Module 1: Land-Based Wind Energy Version 2 (Service 2013) (ECP
Guidance) (https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/PDFs/Eagle%20Conservation%20Plan%20Guidance-Module%201.pdf).
As recommended in the Service's ECP Guidance, the applicant's plan
outlines avoidance and minimization measures, contains a risk
assessment, includes experimental advanced conservation practices, and
adaptive management. The applicant submitted the ECP as part of the
permit application, and if we issue the permit following the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, then the conservation
commitments would become conditions of the permit.
The Service independently evaluated the risk of eagle fatalities
from project operations and compared that risk to the conservation
measures to which the applicant has committed. This is an essential
step in the Service's evaluation of an application for a permit for
programmatic take of eagles because issuing criteria require permitted
take to comply with the Eagle Act's preservation standard. The Service
has interpreted this standard to require maintenance of stable or
increasing breeding populations of eagles (74 FR 46836; September 11,
2009). In the DEA, we evaluate the risk and offsetting conservation
measures, and the implications for direct, indirect, and cumulative
effects under five alternatives.
Next Steps
The public process for the proposed Federal permit action will be
completed after the public comment period, at which time we will
evaluate the permit application and comments submitted thereupon to
determine whether the application meets the permitting requirements
under the Eagle Act, applicable regulations, and NEPA requirements.
Upon completion of that evaluation, we will select our course of
action. We will make the final permit decision no sooner than 30 days
after the close of the public comment period.
Public Comments
We invite public comment on the proposed DEA. If you wish, you may
submit comments by any one of the methods discussed above under
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
We will consider public comments on the DEA when making the final
determination on NEPA compliance and permit issuance. Before including
your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under Section 668a of the Eagle Act (16
U.S.C. 668-668c) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Alexandra Pitts,
Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Southwest, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2015-27240 Filed 10-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P