Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Gila Chub Draft Recovery Plan, 65793-65795 [2015-27259]
Download as PDF
65793
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 207 / Tuesday, October 27, 2015 / Notices
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Promise Zones.
OMB Approval Number: 2506–0209.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Form Number: None.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: Under
the Promise Zones initiative, the federal
government will invest and partner with
high-poverty urban, rural, and tribal
communities to create jobs, increase
economic activity, improve educational
opportunities, leverage private
investment, and reduce violent crime.
Additional information about the
Promise Zones initiative can be found at
Number of
respondents
Information collection
Frequency
of response
Responses
per annum
Burden
hour per
response
300
300
1
1
1
1
3
3
900
900
$40
40
$36,000
36,000
300
300
300
300
300
300
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
3
6
3
3
1200
300
900
1800
900
900
40
40
40
40
40
40
48,000
12,000
36,000
72,000
36,000
36,000
300
1
1
6
1800
40
72,000
300
1
1
6
1800
40
72,000
300
1
1
6
1800
40
72,000
300
1
1
3
900
40
36,000
300
1
1
3
900
40
36,000
300
300
1
1
1
1
3
9
900
2700
40
40
36,000
96,000
300
1
1
2
18600
40
744,000
Section I—Executive Summary ................................................................
Section II—Abstract ..................................................................................
Section II—Community Eligibility Criteria and Local Leadership Support
Documentation .......................................................................................
Section III—Need ......................................................................................
Section IV—Strategy Part A (Needs and Assets Assessment) ...............
Section IV—Strategy Part B (Plan) ...........................................................
Section IV—Strategy Part C (Sustainability and Financial Feasibility) ....
Section IV—Strategy Part D (Resident Engagement Strategy) ...............
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part A (Partnership Structure and Commitment) ...........................................................................
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part B (Capacity of Lead
Applicant) ...............................................................................................
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part C (Capacity of Implementation Partner Organizations) .........................................................
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part D (Data and Evaluation Capacity) .........................................................................................
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part E (Resident Engagement Capacity) ......................................................................................
Section V—Capacity and Local Commitment Part F (Strength & Extent
of Gov. Commitment) ............................................................................
Goals and Activities Template ..................................................................
Total ...................................................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1701z–1 Research and
Demonstrations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Oct 26, 2015
Jkt 238001
www.hud.gov/promisezones, and
questions can be addressed to
promisezones@hud.gov. This notice
estimates burden for applying for the
designation.
Respondents (i.e. affected public):
Local or Tribal Governments.
Dated: October 21, 2015.
Colette Pollard,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–27341 Filed 10–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2015–N200;
FXES11130200000C2–112–FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Gila Chub Draft Recovery
Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan
for the Gila chub, which is listed as
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
This fish species is currently found in
Arizona and New Mexico in the United
States, and in northern Mexico. The
draft recovery plan includes specific
recovery objectives and criteria to be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Annual
burden
hours
Hourly
cost per
response
Annual
cost
met in order to enable us to remove this
species from the list of endangered and
threatened wildlife and plants. We
request review and comment on this
plan from local, State, and Federal
agencies; Tribes; and the public. We
will also accept any new information on
the status of the Gila chub throughout
its range to assist in finalizing the
recovery plan.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive written comments on or
before December 28, 2015. However, we
will accept information about any
species at any time.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to review the
draft recovery plan, you may obtain a
copy by any one of the following
methods:
Internet: Access the file at
www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/
R2ES/GilaChub_DraftRecoveryPlan_
Final_October2014.pdf;
U.S. mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 2321 West Royal Palm Road,
Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021–4951; or
Telephone: (602) 242–0210.
If you wish to comment on the draft
recovery plan, you may submit your
comments in writing by any one of the
following methods:
• U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, at the
above address;
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
65794
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 207 / Tuesday, October 27, 2015 / Notices
• Hand-delivery: Arizona Ecological
Services Field Office, at the above
address;
• Fax: (602) 242–2513; or
• Email: Steve_Spangle@fws.gov.
For additional information about
submitting comments, see the ‘‘Request
for Public Comments’’ section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor,
Arizona Ecological Services Field
Office, at the above address and phone
number, or by email at Steve_Spangle@
fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants to the point where
they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystems is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program and the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). Recovery means improvement of
the status of listed species to the point
at which listing is no longer appropriate
under the criteria set out in section
4(a)(1) of the Act. The Act requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the conservation of a particular
species.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Species History
Gila chub was listed as endangered
throughout its range with critical habitat
on November 2, 2005 (effective date
December 2, 2005). The species has a
recovery priority number of 2C, which
is based on a high degree of threat, high
potential for recovery, taxonomic
classification as a species, and potential
for conflict over resources (primarily
water) and economic development. Gila
chub is included on the Arizona Game
and Fish Departments’ draft species of
concern (1996), and possession of Gila
chub in Arizona is prohibited except
where such collection is authorized by
special permit. The species was listed
by the New Mexico Department of Game
and Fish as endangered in 1988. Gila
chub is listed as endangered by The
Republic of Mexico; a recovery plan, or
´
´
Program de Accion para la Conservacion
de las Especies (PACE), has not been
developed for this species in Mexico.
Gila chub is a member of the
roundtail chub (Gila robusta) complex
in the Gila River basin, which also
includes headwater chub (G. nigra). Gila
chub is a thick-bodied species, chunky
in aspect, with females reaching 250
millimeters (mm) (10 inches [in]) in
total length, and males rarely exceeding
150 mm (6 in). Body coloration is
typically dark overall, with a lighter
belly speckled with gray; fins are small.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Oct 26, 2015
Jkt 238001
Breeding males, and to a lesser extent
females, develop red or orange on lower
parts of the head and body and on bases
of the pectoral, pelvic, and anal fins.
Gila chub is considered a habitat
generalist (Schultz and Bonar 2006), and
commonly inhabits pools in smaller
(higher order) streams and cienegas
throughout its range in the Gila River
basin, at elevations between 609 and
1,676 meters (m) (2,000–5,500 feet [ft])
(Miller 1946, Minckley 1973, Rinne
1976, Weedman et al. 1996). Gila chub
is a highly secretive species, remaining
near cover, including undercut banks,
terrestrial vegetation, boulders, root
wads, fallen logs, and thick overhanging
or aquatic vegetation in deeper waters,
especially pools (Minckley and Rinne
1991, Nelson 1993, Weedman et al.
1996).
Historically, Gila chub was recorded
from nearly 50 higher order streams
throughout the Gila River basin in
southwestern New Mexico, central and
southeastern Arizona, and northern
Sonora, Mexico (Miller and Lowe 1967,
Rinne and Minckley 1970, Minckley
1973, Rinne 1976, DeMarais 1986,
Sublette et al. 1990, Weedman et al.
1996). Recent literature indicates that
approximately 25 of these localities are
considered occupied, and most are
small and isolated, and face one or more
threats (Weedman et al. 1996, USFWS
2005, Clarkson et al. 2012).
It was also estimated that 90 percent
of the currently occupied habitat is
degraded, due to the presence of
nonnative fishes and land management
actions. The few remaining small,
isolated populations are vulnerable to
environmental conditions such as
drought, flood events, and wildfire.
Primary threats to Gila chub, such as
nonnative fish predation and
competition, and secondary threats
identified as habitat alteration,
destruction, and fragmentation, are all
factors identified in the final rule that
contribute to the consideration that Gila
chub is likely to become extinct
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range (USFWS 2005).
The recovery strategy for Gila chub is
to ensure that existing habitat integrity
and genetic diversity of the species are
adequately protected, represented, and
replicated within each of the major
subbasins in the greater Gila River
watershed, in which the species still
resides. This involves protection of
remnant populations, through
management and regulatory agreements
with agencies and partners; captive
rearing with appropriate genetic,
demographic, and health management
for population establishment and
supplementation; control of threats of
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
nonnative fish predation and
competition, as well as potential
hybridization with other chub species;
establishment of replicated populations
in refuges and selected streams;
monitoring of populations under a
scientifically based, standardized
protocol; and cooperation and education
with agencies, partners, Tribes, and
Mexico to ensure habitat quantity and
quality are maintained and adaptively
managed into the future.
The draft recovery plan proposes the
delineation of five recovery units (RUs)
that represent the major subbasins of the
Gila River basin. These RUs cover much
of the historical and current habitat for
the species in Arizona, New Mexico,
and Mexico, and provide a diversity of
habitats and represent groupings of Gila
chub populations, within which gene
flow may have been common
historically. Designation of RUs is
intended to ensure that the species
remains distributed across its historical
range in representative ecological
settings, and will sustain the remaining
genetic, demographic, morphological,
behavioral, and other life history
elements of the species necessary for the
long-term conservation of the entire
listed taxon. The strategy to recover Gila
chub further relies upon identifying,
preserving, and replicating 17 genetic
Management Units (MUs) that are
distributed among the RUs.
Recovery Plan Goals
The objective of an agency recovery
plan is to provide a framework for the
recovery of a species so that protection
under the Act is no longer necessary. A
recovery plan includes scientific
information about the species and
provides criteria and actions necessary
for us to be able to reclassify the species
to threatened status or remove it from
the List. Recovery plans help guide our
recovery efforts by describing actions
we consider necessary for the species’
conservation, and by estimating time
and costs for implementing needed
recovery measures. To achieve its goals,
this draft recovery plan identifies the
following objectives:
1. Maintain and protect all remnant
populations in the wild.
2. Ensure representation, resiliency,
and redundancy by maintaining genetic
diversity and expanding the size and
number of populations within Gila chub
historical range via replication of
remnant populations within each RU.
3. Manage or eliminate nonnative fish
predation and competition and
associated habitat-related modifications
or loss.
4. Improve or develop new State
regulations or firm agreements that
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 207 / Tuesday, October 27, 2015 / Notices
conserve or improve quality Gila chub
habitat.
5. Work with stakeholders to improve
and conserve existing and newly
established Gila chub populations and
their habitats and ensure that
appropriate management plans and
agreements are in place post-delisting.
6. Promote conservation of Gila chub
in Mexico and on Tribal lands by
forming partnerships and supporting
research, outreach, and conservation
management.
7. Monitor remnant, repatriated, and
refuge populations to inform adaptive
management strategies.
The draft recovery plan contains
recovery criteria based on protecting all
available remnant populations and
replicating each MU in at least two
streams. To achieve recovery criteria,
threats of nonnative fish predation and
competition, habitat alteration and
fragmentation, and decreasing water
availability should be controlled to
manageable levels in streams occupied
by Gila chub such that these threats do
not pose imminent or chronic
downward pressures on population
sizes. When the status of Gila chub
meets these criteria, the species will no
longer meet the conditions of being
endangered throughout a significant
portion of its range and will no longer
warrant listing.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. It is also our policy to
request peer review of recovery plans
(July 1, 1994; 59 FR 34270). We will
summarize and respond to the issues
raised by the public and peer reviewers
and post our responses on our Web site.
Substantive comments may or may not
result in changes to the recovery plan;
comments regarding recovery plan
implementation will be forwarded as
appropriate to Federal or other entities
so that they can be taken into account
during the course of implementing
recovery actions. Responses to
individual commenters will not be
provided, but we will provide a
summary of how we addressed
substantive comments in an appendix to
the approved recovery plan.
We invite written comments on the
draft recovery plan. In particular, we are
interested in additional information
regarding the current threats to the
species and the costs associated with
implementing the recommended
recovery actions. Suggestions of how to
craft recovery criteria addressing threats
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:24 Oct 26, 2015
Jkt 238001
that are objective and measureable are
welcome.
Before we approve our final recovery
plan, we will consider all comments we
receive by the date specified in DATES.
Methods of submitting comments are in
the ADDRESSES section.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Comments and materials we receive
will be available, by appointment, for
public inspection during normal
business hours at our office (see
ADDRESSES).
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available upon request from
the Arizona Ecological Services Field
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section).
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan
under the authority of section 4(f) of the
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f). We publish this
notice under section 4(f) Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: October 15, 2015.
Benjamin N. Tuggle,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–27259 Filed 10–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2015–N189;
FXRS282108E8PD0–167–F2013227943]
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards San
Francisco Bay National Wildlife
Refuge; Draft Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact
Report
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Reopening of the public
comment period.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), in
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65795
coordination with the California State
Coastal Conservancy, announce the
reopening of the public comment period
for the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report
(DEIS/EIR) for Phase 2 of the South Bay
Salt Pond (SBSP) Restoration Project at
the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in
Alameda, Santa Clara, and San Mateo
Counties, California. The DEIS/EIR,
which we prepared in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), describes and analyzes
the alternatives identified for Phase 2 of
the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project.
We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
October 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
may obtain copies of the document in
the following places:
• Internet: https://
www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/
phase2/.
• In-Person:
Æ San Francisco Bay National
Wildlife Refuge Complex Headquarters,
1 Marshlands Road, Fremont, CA 94555.
Æ The following libraries:
D Alviso Branch Library, 5050 N. First
St., San Jose, CA 95002.
D Biblioteca Latino America, 921
South First St., San Jose, CA 95110.
D California State University Library,
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd., Hayward, CA
94542.
D Fremont Main Library, 2400
Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538.
D Menlo Park Library, 800 Alma St.,
Menlo Park, CA 94025.
D Mountain View Library, 585
Franklin St., Mountain View, CA 94041.
D Rinconada Library, 1213 Newell
Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303.
D King Library, 150 E San Fernando
St., San Jose, CA 95112.
D Redwood City Main Library, 1044
Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA
94063.
D San Mateo County East Palo Alto
Library, 2415 University Ave., East Palo
Alto, CA 94303.
D Santa Clara County Milpitas
Library, 160 N Main St., Milpitas, CA
95035.
D Santa Clara Public Library, 2635
Homestead Rd., Santa Clara, CA 95051.
D Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W
Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
D Natural Resources Library, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street
NW., Washington, DC 20240–0001.
For how to view comments on the
draft EIS from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), or for
information on EPA’s role in the EIS
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\27OCN1.SGM
27OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 207 (Tuesday, October 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65793-65795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27259]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2015-N200; FXES11130200000C2-112-FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Gila Chub Draft
Recovery Plan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan for the Gila chub, which is
listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). This fish species is currently found in Arizona and New
Mexico in the United States, and in northern Mexico. The draft recovery
plan includes specific recovery objectives and criteria to be met in
order to enable us to remove this species from the list of endangered
and threatened wildlife and plants. We request review and comment on
this plan from local, State, and Federal agencies; Tribes; and the
public. We will also accept any new information on the status of the
Gila chub throughout its range to assist in finalizing the recovery
plan.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive written comments on or
before December 28, 2015. However, we will accept information about any
species at any time.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to review the draft recovery plan, you may
obtain a copy by any one of the following methods:
Internet: Access the file at www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/R2ES/GilaChub_DraftRecoveryPlan_Final_October2014.pdf;
U.S. mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2321 West Royal Palm
Road, Suite 103, Phoenix, AZ 85021-4951; or
Telephone: (602) 242-0210.
If you wish to comment on the draft recovery plan, you may submit
your comments in writing by any one of the following methods:
U.S. mail: Field Supervisor, at the above address;
[[Page 65794]]
Hand-delivery: Arizona Ecological Services Field Office,
at the above address;
Fax: (602) 242-2513; or
Email: Steve_Spangle@fws.gov.
For additional information about submitting comments, see the
``Request for Public Comments'' section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor,
Arizona Ecological Services Field Office, at the above address and
phone number, or by email at Steve_Spangle@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants to the
point where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of our endangered species program and the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Recovery means improvement of the status
of listed species to the point at which listing is no longer
appropriate under the criteria set out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act.
The Act requires the development of recovery plans for listed species,
unless such a plan would not promote the conservation of a particular
species.
Species History
Gila chub was listed as endangered throughout its range with
critical habitat on November 2, 2005 (effective date December 2, 2005).
The species has a recovery priority number of 2C, which is based on a
high degree of threat, high potential for recovery, taxonomic
classification as a species, and potential for conflict over resources
(primarily water) and economic development. Gila chub is included on
the Arizona Game and Fish Departments' draft species of concern (1996),
and possession of Gila chub in Arizona is prohibited except where such
collection is authorized by special permit. The species was listed by
the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish as endangered in 1988. Gila
chub is listed as endangered by The Republic of Mexico; a recovery
plan, or Program de Acci[oacute]n para la Conservaci[oacute]n de las
Especies (PACE), has not been developed for this species in Mexico.
Gila chub is a member of the roundtail chub (Gila robusta) complex
in the Gila River basin, which also includes headwater chub (G. nigra).
Gila chub is a thick-bodied species, chunky in aspect, with females
reaching 250 millimeters (mm) (10 inches [in]) in total length, and
males rarely exceeding 150 mm (6 in). Body coloration is typically dark
overall, with a lighter belly speckled with gray; fins are small.
Breeding males, and to a lesser extent females, develop red or orange
on lower parts of the head and body and on bases of the pectoral,
pelvic, and anal fins.
Gila chub is considered a habitat generalist (Schultz and Bonar
2006), and commonly inhabits pools in smaller (higher order) streams
and cienegas throughout its range in the Gila River basin, at
elevations between 609 and 1,676 meters (m) (2,000-5,500 feet [ft])
(Miller 1946, Minckley 1973, Rinne 1976, Weedman et al. 1996). Gila
chub is a highly secretive species, remaining near cover, including
undercut banks, terrestrial vegetation, boulders, root wads, fallen
logs, and thick overhanging or aquatic vegetation in deeper waters,
especially pools (Minckley and Rinne 1991, Nelson 1993, Weedman et al.
1996).
Historically, Gila chub was recorded from nearly 50 higher order
streams throughout the Gila River basin in southwestern New Mexico,
central and southeastern Arizona, and northern Sonora, Mexico (Miller
and Lowe 1967, Rinne and Minckley 1970, Minckley 1973, Rinne 1976,
DeMarais 1986, Sublette et al. 1990, Weedman et al. 1996). Recent
literature indicates that approximately 25 of these localities are
considered occupied, and most are small and isolated, and face one or
more threats (Weedman et al. 1996, USFWS 2005, Clarkson et al. 2012).
It was also estimated that 90 percent of the currently occupied
habitat is degraded, due to the presence of nonnative fishes and land
management actions. The few remaining small, isolated populations are
vulnerable to environmental conditions such as drought, flood events,
and wildfire. Primary threats to Gila chub, such as nonnative fish
predation and competition, and secondary threats identified as habitat
alteration, destruction, and fragmentation, are all factors identified
in the final rule that contribute to the consideration that Gila chub
is likely to become extinct throughout all or a significant portion of
its range (USFWS 2005).
The recovery strategy for Gila chub is to ensure that existing
habitat integrity and genetic diversity of the species are adequately
protected, represented, and replicated within each of the major
subbasins in the greater Gila River watershed, in which the species
still resides. This involves protection of remnant populations, through
management and regulatory agreements with agencies and partners;
captive rearing with appropriate genetic, demographic, and health
management for population establishment and supplementation; control of
threats of nonnative fish predation and competition, as well as
potential hybridization with other chub species; establishment of
replicated populations in refuges and selected streams; monitoring of
populations under a scientifically based, standardized protocol; and
cooperation and education with agencies, partners, Tribes, and Mexico
to ensure habitat quantity and quality are maintained and adaptively
managed into the future.
The draft recovery plan proposes the delineation of five recovery
units (RUs) that represent the major subbasins of the Gila River basin.
These RUs cover much of the historical and current habitat for the
species in Arizona, New Mexico, and Mexico, and provide a diversity of
habitats and represent groupings of Gila chub populations, within which
gene flow may have been common historically. Designation of RUs is
intended to ensure that the species remains distributed across its
historical range in representative ecological settings, and will
sustain the remaining genetic, demographic, morphological, behavioral,
and other life history elements of the species necessary for the long-
term conservation of the entire listed taxon. The strategy to recover
Gila chub further relies upon identifying, preserving, and replicating
17 genetic Management Units (MUs) that are distributed among the RUs.
Recovery Plan Goals
The objective of an agency recovery plan is to provide a framework
for the recovery of a species so that protection under the Act is no
longer necessary. A recovery plan includes scientific information about
the species and provides criteria and actions necessary for us to be
able to reclassify the species to threatened status or remove it from
the List. Recovery plans help guide our recovery efforts by describing
actions we consider necessary for the species' conservation, and by
estimating time and costs for implementing needed recovery measures. To
achieve its goals, this draft recovery plan identifies the following
objectives:
1. Maintain and protect all remnant populations in the wild.
2. Ensure representation, resiliency, and redundancy by maintaining
genetic diversity and expanding the size and number of populations
within Gila chub historical range via replication of remnant
populations within each RU.
3. Manage or eliminate nonnative fish predation and competition and
associated habitat-related modifications or loss.
4. Improve or develop new State regulations or firm agreements that
[[Page 65795]]
conserve or improve quality Gila chub habitat.
5. Work with stakeholders to improve and conserve existing and
newly established Gila chub populations and their habitats and ensure
that appropriate management plans and agreements are in place post-
delisting.
6. Promote conservation of Gila chub in Mexico and on Tribal lands
by forming partnerships and supporting research, outreach, and
conservation management.
7. Monitor remnant, repatriated, and refuge populations to inform
adaptive management strategies.
The draft recovery plan contains recovery criteria based on
protecting all available remnant populations and replicating each MU in
at least two streams. To achieve recovery criteria, threats of
nonnative fish predation and competition, habitat alteration and
fragmentation, and decreasing water availability should be controlled
to manageable levels in streams occupied by Gila chub such that these
threats do not pose imminent or chronic downward pressures on
population sizes. When the status of Gila chub meets these criteria,
the species will no longer meet the conditions of being endangered
throughout a significant portion of its range and will no longer
warrant listing.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and comment during recovery plan
development. It is also our policy to request peer review of recovery
plans (July 1, 1994; 59 FR 34270). We will summarize and respond to the
issues raised by the public and peer reviewers and post our responses
on our Web site. Substantive comments may or may not result in changes
to the recovery plan; comments regarding recovery plan implementation
will be forwarded as appropriate to Federal or other entities so that
they can be taken into account during the course of implementing
recovery actions. Responses to individual commenters will not be
provided, but we will provide a summary of how we addressed substantive
comments in an appendix to the approved recovery plan.
We invite written comments on the draft recovery plan. In
particular, we are interested in additional information regarding the
current threats to the species and the costs associated with
implementing the recommended recovery actions. Suggestions of how to
craft recovery criteria addressing threats that are objective and
measureable are welcome.
Before we approve our final recovery plan, we will consider all
comments we receive by the date specified in DATES. Methods of
submitting comments are in the ADDRESSES section.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive will be available, by
appointment, for public inspection during normal business hours at our
office (see ADDRESSES).
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited herein is available upon
request from the Arizona Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan under the authority of section
4(f) of the Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f). We publish this notice under
section 4(f) Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.).
Dated: October 15, 2015.
Benjamin N. Tuggle,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-27259 Filed 10-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P