General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights, 65571-65603 [2015-26812]
Download as PDF
Vol. 80
Monday,
No. 206
October 26, 2015
Part IV
Department of Interior
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
National Park Service
36 CFR Parts 1 and 9
General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights; Proposed Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65572
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Parts 1 and 9
[NPS–WASO–NRSS–15890; PX.XVPAD0520.
00.1]
RIN 1024–AD78
General Provisions and Non-Federal
Oil and Gas Rights
National Park Service, Interior.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We are proposing to update
our service-wide regulations governing
the exercise of non-federal oil and gas
rights, to improve our ability to protect
park resources, values, and visitors from
potential impacts associated with nonfederal oil and gas operations located
within National Park Service units. The
proposed rule would also make the
regulations consistent with existing
policies and practices, and update the
format to improve clarity and simplify
application and compliance for oil and
gas operators and our employees.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by December 28, 2015.
Comments on the information collection
requirements must be received by
November 25, 2015
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment on
this proposed rule, you may submit
your comments, identified by
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
1024–AD78, by either of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Edward O. Kassman, Jr.,
Geologic Resources Division, National
Park Service, P.O. Box 25287, Denver,
Colorado 80225.
Instructions: Your comment must
include the agency name and RIN
(1024–AD78) for this rulemaking.
Comments will be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
Public Participation heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
• Send your comments and
suggestions on the information
collection requirements to the Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OMB–OIRA at (202) 395–
5806 (fax) or OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov (email). You may review
all documents submitted to OMB to
support the proposed new information
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
collection requirements online at https://
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the
instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by
OMB. Please provide a copy of your
comments to the Information Collection
Clearance Officer, National Park
Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive,
Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA
20192 (mail); or madonna_baucum@
nps.gov (email). Please reference ‘‘1024–
O&G’’ in the subject line of your
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward O. Kassman, Jr., Geologic
Resources Division, National Park
Service, P.O. Box 25287, Denver,
Colorado 80225; edward_kassman@
nps.gov; 303–969–2146.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
The National Park Service (NPS) is
proposing to update the existing
regulations at 36 CFR part 9, subpart B
(9B regulations), which govern the
exercise of non-federal oil and gas rights
in NPS units, to improve the
effectiveness of the regulations in
protecting park resources and values
and to improve the clarity of the
regulations for both operators and the
NPS.
Key updates to the regulations would
include:
• Elimination of two regulatory
provisions that exempt approximately
60% of the oil and gas operations
located within the national park system;
• Elimination of the cap on financial
assurance (bonding);
• Application of the penalty
provisions of 36 CFR 1.3;
• Incorporation of fees for new access
beyond that held as part of the
operator’s mineral right;
• Addition of a new well-plugging
provision;
• Clarification that access to oil and
gas properties in Alaska is controlled by
43 CFR part 36, which implements
provisions of the Alaska National
Interest Lands Conservation Act;
• Clarification of well stimulation
information requirements and operating
standards;
• Incorporation of a new format that
makes it easier to identify the
information requirements for particular
types of operations;
• Incorporation of a new format for
operating standards so that both the
NPS and the operator can readily
identify what standards apply to
particular operations;
• Elimination of redundant
definitions and provisions;
• Consolidation of existing regulatory
provisions; and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
• Codification of some existing
agency policies and practices.
A detailed discussion of all changes to
the regulations is contained in the
section-by-section analysis.
Background
On December 8, 1978, the NPS
promulgated the current regulations in
36 CFR part 9, subpart B (43 FR 57825),
which govern the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas rights in units of the
National Park System (NPS units).
Current 9B Regulations
The current 9B regulations apply to
all activities associated with non-federal
oil and gas exploration and
development inside NPS unit
boundaries where access is on, across,
or through federally owned or
controlled lands or waters (36 CFR
9.30(a)). Under the existing regulations,
an operator must obtain our approval of
a proposed plan of operations before
commencing non-federal oil and gas
operations in an NPS unit (36 CFR
9.32(b)). This requirement covers
exploration, drilling, production,
transportation, plugging, and
reclamation operations.
The plan of operations is a
prospective operator’s blueprint of all
intended activities and is our primary
means for evaluating the operation’s
potential adverse impacts on park
resources and values. It must show that
the operator is exercising a bona fide
property right to non-federal oil and gas
in an NPS unit (36 CFR 9.36(a)(2)). The
plan of operations must also describe:
• The proposed operation, including
the equipment, methods, and materials
to be used in the operation;
• Access to the site;
• Mitigation measures that will be
implemented to protect NPS resources
and values;
• Environmental conditions in the
vicinity of the site;
• Alternatives to the proposal; and
• The environmental impacts of the
proposed operation (36 CFR 9.36(a)).
In addition to the plan of operations,
the operator must submit a performance
bond to ensure that funds are available
to reclaim a site if the operator defaults
on its obligations under an approved
plan (36 CFR 9.48). In order to make the
regulatory process as efficient and
transparent as possible, we work
collaboratively with operators early in
their planning process to provide
guidance on information requirements,
alternative area of operations locations,
and potential mitigation and avoidance
measures.
As part of our approval process, we
coordinate and consult with a variety of
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
state and other federal regulatory
agencies to ensure that approval
complies with applicable federal
statutes, such as the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the
Endangered Species Act, and the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Operators conducting non-federal oil
and gas operations in NPS units must
also comply with all applicable state
and local laws (36 CFR 9.36(a)(15)).
Although state oil and gas regulations
may contain provisions designed to
protect natural resources (e.g., surface
and groundwater), their primary focus is
on oil and gas production and
protection of associated ownership
interests. The purpose and focus of the
9B regulations is to protect the National
Park System’s natural and cultural
resources and visitor values and safety.
When the NPS Regional Director has
determined that the proposal meets the
requirements contained in the
regulations and the NPS has completed
the required environmental compliance,
the Regional Director will approve the
plan (36 CFR 9.37). The approved plan
is the operator’s authorization to
conduct its operation in an NPS unit (36
CFR 9.32(a)).
During the life of an oil or gas
operation in a park, the park manager
has the authority to monitor and ensure
compliance with the approved plan of
operations (36 CFR 9.37(f)). If there is a
change in circumstances, the NPS or the
operator can make a request to
supplement and modify the plan (36
CFR 9.40). The 9B regulations authorize
us to enforce the terms of the plan, as
may be necessary, by suspending
operations or revoking plan approval
(36 CFR 9.51). The operator may appeal
a Regional Director’s decision (36 CFR
9.49).
Authority To Promulgate the
Regulations
The authority to promulgate these
regulations is the statute commonly
known as the NPS Organic Act (54
U.S.C. 100101 et seq.) as well as other
statutes governing the administration of
the National Park System. In the NPS
Organic Act, Congress directs us to
‘‘promote and regulate the use of the
National Park System by means and
measures that conform to the
fundamental purpose of the System
units, which purpose is to conserve the
scenery, natural and historic objects,
and wild life in the System units and to
provide for the enjoyment of the
scenery, natural and historic objects,
and wild life in such manner and by
such means as will leave them
unimpaired for the enjoyment of future
generations.’’ The Organic Act also gives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
us the authority to promulgate
regulations ‘‘necessary or proper for the
use and management of System units.’’
(54 U.S.C. 100751). This includes the
authority to regulate the exercise of nonfederal oil and gas rights within park
boundaries for the purpose of protecting
the resources and values administered
by the NPS.
In addition, the enabling legislation
for several NPS units contains specific
provisions authorizing us to regulate the
exercise of non-federal oil and gas
rights. In the authority section of the
proposed rule, we list the individual
enabling statutes that address nonfederal oil and gas rights in specific NPS
units.
Our authority to promulgate the 9B
regulations has been recognized as a
valid exercise of NPS’s Organic Act
authority by a U.S. District Court and
the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. See
Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest v.
National Park Service, 964 F. Supp.
1125 (S.D. Tex. 1995), and DunnMcCampbell Royalty Interest v. National
Park Service, 630 F.3d 431 (5th Cir.
2011). Courts have consistently
recognized NPS’s authority to regulate
non-federal interests within units of the
National Park System. See, e.g., United
States v. Vogler, 859 F.2d 638 (9th Cir.
1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1006
(1989); United States v. Garfield County,
122 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Utah 2000).
See also Southern Utah Wilderness
Alliance v. Bureau of Land
Management, 425 F. 3d 735, 746–47
(10th Cir. 2005).
As explained below, the NPS
proposed rule uses most of the language
from BLM’s hydraulic fracturing
information requirements at 43 CFR
3162.3–3(d)(1) through (7), which BLM
recently promulgated under authority of
the Mineral Leasing Act, 30 U.S.C. 189,
the Federal Land Policy and
Management Act, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.,
and other BLM authorities. On
September 30, 2015, the U.S. District
Court for the District of Wyoming
preliminarily enjoined these
regulations. State of Wyoming, et al. v.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Case
No. 2:15–CV–043–SWS. This litigation
is ongoing and the status of the
litigation will be addressed by NPS in
development of its final rule. NPS will
consider any comments addressing NPS’
authority to promulgate the proposed
rules concerning well stimulation
operations within units of the National
Park System, as well as comments on
the proposed requirements (see in
particular, proposed §§ 9.88– 9.90 and
9.118).
For NPS units in Alaska that were
established under the Alaska National
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65573
Interest Lands Conservation Act
(ANILCA), access to non-federal
property is governed by the regulations
at 43 CFR part 36, which implement
section 1110(b) of ANILCA. This
regulation gives operators the option to
file for such access as part of their plans
of operations, but they also may use a
SF 299 as provided in the 43 CFR part
36 regulations. This is similar to the
process applicable to mining claims
under those regulations and the NPS
regulations at 36 CFR part 9, subpart A.
We also note that because these
regulations are generally applicable to
NPS units nationwide and to nonfederal interests in those units, they are
not ‘‘applicable solely to public lands
within [units established under
ANILCA],’’ and thus are not affected by
section 103(c) of ANILCA. See Sturgeon
v. Masica, 768 F.3d 1066, 1077–78 (9th
Cir. 2014).
A unique provision exists under the
Big Cypress National Preserve Addition
Act of 1988, at 16 U.S.C. 698m–4. This
provision states that the Secretary shall
promulgate rules and regulations
governing the exploration for and
development and production of nonFederal interests in oil and gas located
within the boundaries of the Big
Cypress National Preserve and the
Addition, and that such rules and
regulations may be made by appropriate
amendment to or in substitution of the
rules and regulations respecting nonFederal oil and gas rights (currently
codified at 36 CFR 9.30 et seq. (1986)).
16 U.S.C. 698m–4(a).
The Addition Act also authorizes the
Secretary prior to the promulgation of
rules or regulations under this section,
to enter into interim agreements with
owners of non-Federal oil and gas
interests governing the conduct of oil
and gas exploration, development or
production activities within the
boundary of the Addition. 16 U.S.C.
698m–4(e).
Consistent with that authority, the
present oil and gas operations within
the Addition Area are controlled under
the terms of the Agreement Governing
The Exercise Of Reserved Oil And Gas
Rights Of Collier Enterprises And
Barron Collier Company, which is
Appendix 6 to the Agreement Among
the United States of America, Collier
Enterprises, Collier Development
Corporation, and Barron Collier
Company (May 12, 1988). If
promulgated as proposed, the rule
would supersede Appendix 6.
Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights in NPS
Units
Non-federal oil and gas rights exist
within NPS units in situations where
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65574
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the United States does not own the oil
and gas interest, either because:
• The United States acquired the
property from a grantor that did not own
the oil and gas interest; or
• The United States acquired the
property from a grantor that reserved the
oil and gas interest from the
conveyance.
Non-federal oil and gas interests can
be held by individuals; nonprofit
organizations; corporations, including
Alaska Native corporations; or state and
local governments. Interests in nonfederal oil and gas are property rights
that may only be taken for public use
with payment of just compensation in
accordance with the Fifth Amendment
of the U.S. Constitution. Accordingly,
from their initial promulgation, the
existing regulations at 36 CFR 9.30(a)
have stated that they are ‘‘not intended
to result in the taking of a property
interest, but rather to impose reasonable
regulations on activities that involve
and affect federally owned lands.’’ The
proposed rule includes this same
provision.
There are currently 534 non-federal
oil and gas operations in a total of 12
NPS units. These units are: Alibates
Flint Quarries National Monument
(Texas), Aztec Ruins National
Monument (New Mexico), Big Cypress
National Preserve (Florida), Big Thicket
National Preserve (Texas), Big South
Fork National River and Recreation Area
(Tennessee/Kentucky), Cumberland Gap
National Historical Park (Tennessee),
Cuyahoga Valley National Park (Ohio),
Gauley River National Recreation Area
(West Virginia), Lake Meredith National
Recreation Area (Texas), New River
Gorge National River (West Virginia),
Obed Wild and Scenic River
(Tennessee), and Padre Island National
Seashore (Texas).
Based on the presence of split estates,
exploration and production occurring
on adjacent or nearby lands, and likely
future increases in energy prices, we
believe that non-federal oil and gas
operations within park boundaries
could affect up to 30 additional NPS
units.
Summary of Potential Impacts From Oil
and Gas Operations on NPS Resources
and Values
The types of non-federal oil and gas
operations conducted in NPS units
generally include: Geophysical (seismic)
exploration; exploratory well drilling;
field development well drilling; oil and
gas well production operations,
including installation and operation of
well flowlines and gathering lines; well
plugging and abandonment; and site
reclamation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Oil and gas activities may adversely
impact NPS unit resources in some or
all of the following manners:
• Surface water quality degradation
from spills, storm water runoff, erosion,
and sedimentation. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 26
instances of sites with surface
contamination;
• Soil and ground water
contamination from existing drilling
mud pits, poorly constructed wells,
spills, and leaks. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 47
instances of sites with wellhead leaks,
pump jack leaks, tank battery leaks, and
operations and maintenance spills;
• Air quality degradation from dust,
natural gas flaring, hydrogen sulfide gas,
and emissions from production
operations and vehicles. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 14
instances of notable odors emanating
from the wellhead;
• Increased noise from seismic
operations, blasting, construction, oil
and gas drilling and production
operations. Through site inspections the
NPS has documented 6 instances of
noise issues from well pad equipment;
• Noise and human presence effects
on wildlife behavior, breeding, and
habitat utilization;
• Disruption of wildlife migration
routes;
• Adverse effects on sensitive and
endangered species. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 15
sites with sensitive species or habitat;
• Viewshed intrusion by roads,
traffic, drilling equipment, production
equipment, pipelines, etc.;
• Night sky intrusion from artificial
lighting and gas flares;
• Disturbance to archeological and
cultural resources from blasting
associated with seismic exploration and
road/site preparation, maintenance
activities, or by spills. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 6
sites with associated cultural resources.;
and
• Visitor safety hazards from
equipment, pressurized vessels and
lines, presence of hydrogen sulfide gas,
and leaking oil and gas that can create
explosion and fire hazards. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 62
instances of visitor safety hazards.
Examples of documented impacts can
be found in many parks. For example,
at Big South Fork natural gas fired
pump jack engines have caused notable
noise at visitor overlooks that are 2 to
3 miles away. Simple mitigation such as
a corrugated steel fence would abate this
impact, however, due to the well’s
grandfathered status; the NPS is unable
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
to require this mitigation and forced to
accept this unnecessary impact.
Another example of unnecessary
impacts can be found at Aztec Ruins
National Monument where an operation
exempt from the 9B regulations due to
the grandfathered exemption contained
a road that traversed an undeveloped
and buried archeological site. When this
well lost its grandfathered status, the
NPS was able to require the new
operator to conduct a cultural resource
survey to determine the impacts to the
site. As mitigation the operator installed
a layer of dirt between the resource and
the road base to protect the resources.
Unfortunately, in this case the damage
was already done and it did not make
sense to move the road but the resource
is better preserved for future enjoyment.
Summary of Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking Comments
On November 25, 2009, we issued an
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) (74 FR 61597) to
assist us in developing the proposed
rule. The ANPRM and the analysis of
public comments for the ANPRM are
available online at https://
www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_
gas/9b_index.cfm#prev_docs. Although
we are proposing updates to all of
subpart B, the ANPRM focused its
request for public comment on six
topics that we identified as major areas
of concern:
(1) Regulation of previously exempt
operations;
(2) Directional drilling;
(3) Operating standards;
(4) Financial assurance;
(5) Access fees; and
(6) Assessments for non-compliance.
We received comments from oil and
gas owners and operators (2), Alaska
Native Corporations (2), unaffiliated
private citizens (6), and environmental
organizations (10), including 1,477
comments from members of the Sierra
Club in the form of personal comments
added to a form letter.
The majority of commenters were in
favor of strengthening and expanding
the regulations to better protect park
resources and values. Some commenters
requested that we not expand the scope
of the 9B regulations, while others
questioned the legality of regulating
non-federal oil and gas operations in
parks. Additionally, some comments
asked us to consider the impacts of
potential natural gas development of the
Marcellus Shale formation in the eastern
United States.
More information on the ANPRM and
these comments is available at https://
www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
gas/documents/2011-01-11%20ANPR_
Comment_Analysis_Report.pdf.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
We have prepared a draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS),
which will be published shortly after
this proposed rule. The DEIS will be
available for review and public
comment at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/DEIS9B by
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
The DEIS describes three alternatives:
Alternative A—No action; Alternative
B—preferred alternative and proposed
rule; and Alternative C. Alternative C
would include all the proposed changes
in alternative B, except that it would
expand NPS jurisdiction under the
regulations to encompass surface and
subsurface directional drilling
operations outside the boundary of the
park; would provide an operator, under
limited circumstances, with an
exemption to the operations permit
requirement for operations located
wholly on non-federally owned land
within a park boundary; and would
hold mineral owners and operators
jointly and severally liable for
compliance with an operations permit
or other applicable provisions of the 9B
regulations.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Proposed rule
§§ 9.30 through 9.33
Purpose and
Scope.
Existing regulation
§ 9.30(a), (b), (c).
§ 9.32(a), (b).
§ 9.36(a)(2).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§§ 9.30 through 9.33—Purpose and
Scope
Access on, Across, or Through Federally
Owned or Controlled Lands or Waters
The existing 9B regulations apply
only when an operator’s ‘‘access [is] on,
across, or through federally owned or
controlled lands or waters.’’ Seventyeight operations (15% of all oil and gas
operations in NPS units) do not require
access on, across, or through federally
owned or controlled lands or waters and
are thus outside the scope of the 9B
regulations. These operators are not
required to obtain an approved NPS
plan of operations, post financial
assurance, or otherwise comply with
this subpart to protect park resources
and values. However, our experience
over the past three decades has
demonstrated that these operations have
the potential to have adverse effects on
NPS resources, values, and visitor
health and safety. Through site
inspections, the NPS has found at least
10 instances of sites with oil spills or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
leaks resulting in contamination of soils
and water.
For example, a poorly operated oil
tank battery within the boundary of Big
Thicket National Preserve that is
currently exempt because it does not
require access across federally owned
land has contaminated storm water
runoff that runs into adjacent federally
owned land near Village Creek. Another
example is a large compressor that was
located on nonfederal lands within the
boundary of Big South Fork National
River and Recreation Area. The
compressor causes unabated noise for
which the NPS is unable to require
mitigation due to the current scope of
the regulations.
In 1978 the NPS made a policy choice
to limit the application of its nonfederal-oil-and-gas regulatory program
to operators requiring access on, across,
or through federally owned or
controlled lands or waters. That choice
was not required by any statutory
provision. The NPS now believes that it
is appropriate to revisit and modify the
application of its regulations.
Under the proposed rule at §§ 9.30
through 9.33, all operators conducting
operations within NPS boundaries
would be subject to permit
requirements. The permitting process
would include an evaluation to
determine whether, and the extent to
which, such operations would have an
adverse effect on federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety. These operations
would also be subject to measures to
mitigate such adverse effects, as well as
to the financial assurance and
reclamation requirements.
Regulations Not Intended To Result in a
Taking
Proposed § 9.30(c) retains the existing
regulatory language from § 9.30(a) that
the intention of this subpart is to
reasonably regulate such activities, but
not to result in a taking of private
property. Although the NPS has placed
park-protecting mitigation measures on
proposed operations, we have never, in
the more than 35 years of applying this
subpart, denied prospective operators
access to exercise their non-federal oil
and gas rights. We will continue to work
with operators to ensure they have
reasonable access to their operations
and that park resources and values are
protected without resulting in a taking
in violation of the Fifth Amendment of
the United States Constitution.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65575
Interests Regulations Are Designed To
Protect
The existing regulations
inconsistently describe the interests that
the regulations are designed to protect.
The proposed rule would clarify and
consistently state that the 9B regulations
are designed to protect federally owned
or administered lands, waters, or
resources of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, and visitor or employee
health and safety. The proposed rule
would replace the phrase ‘‘federally
owned or controlled’’ with the phrase
‘‘federally owned or administered’’ to be
consistent with the terminology we use
in our general regulations, at 36 CFR
1.2, and 36 CFR 1.4(a) (definition of
‘‘National Park System’’), and in our
NPS Management Policies (2006).
Operations Subject to These Regulations
Proposed § 9.31(a) applies these
regulations to all nonfederal oil and gas
operations within the boundary of an
NPS unit. Proposed § 9.31(b) covers
those operations that become part of an
NPS unit either by boundary expansion
or establishment of a new NPS unit.
Proposed § 9.31(c) covers those
operations that have accessed oil and
gas rights from a surface location
outside the park boundary but due to a
boundary expansion or establishment of
a new unit, the surface location is now
within an NPS unit. Those operations
covered under § 9.31(b) and (c) would
be required to follow the same
requirements and procedures as
previously exempt operations at §§ 9.50
through 9.53.
Type of Authorization Required
Proposed § 9.32(a) would clarify that
an operator must have either a
temporary access permit or an
operations permit before conducting
either reconnaissance surveys or
operations in an NPS unit.
Demonstration of Valid Existing Right
The existing regulation contains a
requirement that operators demonstrate
that they hold valid rights to conduct
activities. The proposed rule would
move this requirement to § 9.32(b)
under ‘‘Scope and Purpose’’ to clarify
that all operators must demonstrate ‘‘up
front’’ that they hold a valid existing
right to conduct operations in an NPS
unit. Unless an operator can
demonstrate a valid existing right to
conduct operations, we would not
undertake formal review of an operator’s
operations permit application.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65576
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Elimination of Unnecessary Regulatory
Language
The proposed rule would delete
existing § 9.30(b) and (c). We view these
sections as advisory and more
appropriate for inclusion in guidance
materials that we will develop following
the promulgation of this subpart.
Operations Authorized Under Previous
9B Regulations
Proposed § 9.33(a) would authorize an
operator that currently holds an
approved plan of operations under the
existing regulations to continue
operations, subject to the applicable
provisions of the regulations.
Proposed § 9.33(b) would authorize an
operator that remains exempt from the
plan of operations requirement because
it is currently accessing oil and gas
rights inside a park boundary from a
surface location outside the park
boundary to continue operations,
subject to the General Terms and
Conditions and the Compliance
Procedure provisions of the regulations.
Proposed rule
Existing regulation
§ 9.40 Definitions ......
§§ 9.31(a) through (o).
§ 9.32(c) and (d).
§ 9.40 Definitions
The proposed rule would organize the
definitions in alphabetical order to
make this section more user-friendly.
The proposed rule would also delete
several redundant definitions because
the same terms are defined at 36 CFR
1.4. The definitions proposed for
deletion are: ‘‘Secretary’’ (existing
§ 9.31(a)), ‘‘Director’’ (existing § 9.31(b)),
‘‘Person’’ (existing § 9.31(e)), and
‘‘Superintendent’’ (existing § 9.31(f)).
The proposed rule also deletes two
definitions that are no longer applicable:
‘‘Commercial Vehicle’’ (existing
§ 9.31(g)) and ‘‘Statement for
Management’’ (existing § 9.31(o)).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
New or Revised Definitions
The proposed rule would add a new
term, ‘‘Area of Operations,’’ to the
Definition section to replace the term
‘‘Site,’’ at existing § 9.31(m). The new
term would identify all areas where an
operator is authorized to conduct its
activities, including access to the
operations site.
The proposed rule would expand the
definition of ‘‘Contaminating
Substances,’’ at existing § 9.31(n), to
include other toxic or hazardous
substances. The NPS is proposing to
remove the term ‘‘waste’’ from this
definition and include a new separate
definition of waste in the proposed rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
The proposed rule would revise the
definition of the term ‘‘Unit’’ to ‘‘NPS
unit’’ and make this term the same as
‘‘National Park System (Park Area)’’
found at 36 CFR 1.4(a).
The proposed rule would change the
definition of ‘‘Operations’’ at existing
§ 9.31(c), to clarify that ‘‘access’’
includes ‘‘any means of ingress to or
egress from an area of operations.’’ The
NPS intends this change to cover any
and all types of access, including access
via aircraft, to and from an area of
operations. For access via aircraft, the
NPS regulates only the time, place, and
manner of aircraft landing on NPS
administered lands or waters within an
NPS unit. The NPS does not regulate
aircraft overflight under the 9B
regulations. Accordingly, the NPS
would remove existing § 9.32(c), which
regulates 9B aircraft access. The
proposed rule would also delete existing
§ 9.32(d). This access is controlled by
NPS commercial vehicle regulations at
36 CFR 5.6(c).
The definition of ‘‘Operations’’ also
clarifies that the operation of a flowline
or a gathering line is included within
this definition, but not the installation,
operation, or maintenance of oil and gas
pipelines that are located within the
park under authority of a deeded
easement or other right-of-way, which
are not covered by the 9B regulations.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Operations Permit’’ as the
permitting vehicle for all operations. An
operations permit will be a special use
permit subject to cost recovery under 54
U.S.C. 103104, which authorizes the
NPS to recover all costs associated with
providing necessary services associated
with special use permits.
The proposed rule would update the
definition of ‘‘Operator’’ at existing
§ 9.31(d) by clarifying that
responsibilities and liability under this
subpart can attach to the operator or the
operator’s agents, assignees, designees,
lessees, or representatives.
The proposed rule defines ‘‘owner’’ as
a ‘‘person’’ which incorporates the
definition of ‘‘person’’ from § 1.4.
The proposed rule adds a new
definition of ‘‘Previously Exempt
Operation’’ to clarify which types of
operations are covered by proposed
§§ 9.50 through 9.53. This definition
does not include those operations where
the operator was granted an exemption
under existing § 9.32(e) to the plan of
operations requirement by the NPS
because it accessed oil and gas rights
inside the park boundary from a surface
location outside the park boundary
(which are covered by proposed
§ 9.33(b)).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Reconnaissance Survey’’ to clarify
that reconnaissance surveys do not
include surface disturbance activities,
except minimal disturbance necessary
to perform surveys.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Right to Operate’’ that
incorporates much of the language in
existing § 9.36(a)(2) (right to operate
description for a Plan of Operations).
The new definition would clarify that
an operator’s right-to-operate
documentation must demonstrate the
proposed activities are within the scope
of that right.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Technologically feasible, least
damaging methods’’ to describe the
general standard that all operators must
satisfy when meeting applicable
operating standards.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Temporary Access Permit’’ to
clarify that under the proposed rule the
NPS would grant temporary access only
for reconnaissance surveys and to
collect basic information necessary to
prepare a permit application.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Third-Party Monitor’’ to identify
a third-party monitor’s necessary
qualifications.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Usable water’’ to describe the
criteria that the NPS uses to identify
protected sources of groundwater.
The proposed rule would add a new
term ‘‘Waste’’ to differentiate between
‘‘waste’’ and ‘‘contaminating
substances.’’
The proposed rule would add a new
set of terms ‘‘We and us’’ to refer to the
National Park Service.
The proposed rule would add a
definition of ‘‘You’’ to be consistent
with the plain language format of this
subpart.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.50 through 9.53
Previously Exempt
Operations.
Existing regulation
§ 9.30(a).
§ 9.33.
§§ 9.50 Through 9.53—Previously
Exempt Operations
The proposed rule would create a new
section ‘‘Previously Exempt Operations’’
to describe the process for bringing all
previously exempt operations into
compliance with the proposed rule.
These include operations that do not
require access on, across, or through
federal lands (15% of total operations
are currently exempt due to existing
§ 9.30, see above discussion) and
grandfathered operations (45% of total
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65577
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
operations are currently exempt due to
existing § 9.33).
Grandfathered Operations
Under existing § 9.33, operators who
were conducting operations at the time
the regulations became effective
(January 8, 1979) and who had already
obtained a valid federal or state permit
were ‘‘grandfathered.’’ These operators
were not required to obtain an approved
plan of operations; comply with NPS
operating standards, including
reclamation of their area of operations to
NPS standards; or post a reclamation
bond. The Superintendent does have
authority under existing § 9.33(c) to
suspend grandfathered operations if
there is an ‘‘immediate threat of
significant injury to federally owned or
controlled lands or waters.’’ The NPS
has used this authority, in limited cases,
to suspend grandfathered operations—
suspensions that would not have been
necessary if the operators were
proactively meeting NPS standards. For
example, at Big Thicket National
Preserve, the NPS suspended two
grandfathered operations that were
causing unnecessary impacts, including
poor spill prevention equipment and
methods resulting in localized
contamination to soils, lack of proper
vegetation control that increased risk of
fire, and poor site security that
presented risks to visitor health and
safety. Under existing § 9.33(a)(1), when
the existing federal or state permit
expires and the operator is issued a new
permit, the operator then becomes
subject to all provision of the 9B
regulations.
In 1978 the NPS expected that over
time the permits associated with these
operators would expire and that the
operators would then be required to
come into compliance with the 9B
regulations. However, the rate of permit
expiration has been much slower than
anticipated. This has left approximately
45% of operations (241 wells servicewide) still exempt from the regulations
over thirty years later, causing
unnecessary and readily avoidable
impacts to NPS-administered resources
and values. For example, through site
inspections, the NPS has found 20
instances of hydrocarbon spills and
leaks, 3 instances of gas venting, 2
instances of notable noise issues, and 3
instances of notable hydrocarbon odors
emanating from the well site. The
grandfather exemption is not required
by statute, and was a discretionary
policy choice by the NPS to provide for
a ‘‘smooth and fair phase in of [the
1978] regulations.’’ (43 FR 57822)
This rulemaking is intended to ensure
that all operations within NPS units are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
conducted in a manner that protects
park resources and values. A majority of
comments to the ANPRM regarding
previously exempt operations suggested
that to achieve this goal, the NPS’s new
rule should require previously exempt
operators to obtain an operations
permit. The NPS agrees, and has
tailored the process for obtaining an
operations permit to the specific
circumstances presented by previously
exempt operations.
Procedure for Bringing Previously
Exempt Operations Into Compliance
Proposed § 9.50(a) would establish
that previously exempt operators must
obtain an Operations Permit.
In proposed § 9.51, the NPS describes
the information that a previously
exempt operator would be required to
submit to the NPS to obtain an
operations permit. For a new oil and gas
operation in an NPS unit, the NPS
requires an operator to submit the
information necessary for the NPS to
select the least damaging locations for
its access route, drilling site, production
facilities, and gathering-line routes.
However, for previously exempt
operations, the operator’s well has
already been drilled and the area of
operations (access route, well site,
production facilities, and routes for
gathering lines) has already been
established. Therefore, under proposed
§ 9.51, within 90 days after the effective
date of this subpart, operators must
provide the NPS with information that
would enable the NPS to evaluate the
previously exempt operation to
determine whether these operations are
being conducted in compliance with
NPS operating standards. This
information is also needed for future
monitoring of the approved operations
to ensure compliance with NPS
operating standards. The information
requirements under this proposed
section also require operators to submit
information if they intend to change
existing operations (e.g., if they intend
to plug their wells).
Once the operator provides the
information required under proposed
§ 9.51, the NPS would review the
operations permit application under
proposed § 9.52, which states that the
NPS will review the application under
the same standards that apply to new
operations, §§ 9.100 through 9.104
(Operations Permit: Application Review
Process).
Under proposed § 9.53, from the
effective date of the final rule and
during the time a previously exempt
operator’s application is under
consideration for approval by the NPS,
the continuation of operations would be
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
limited to those activities and the
specific area of disturbance as of the
effective date. Previously exempt
operations would also become subject to
the General Terms and Conditions at
proposed §§ 9.120 through 9.122 and
the Prohibitions and Penalties at
proposed §§ 9.180 through 9.182.
Finally, proposed § 9.53(a)(2) provides
that except in an emergency, the NPS
would not take any steps to directly
regulate the previously exempt
operator’s activities under proposed
§§ 9.180 through 9.182 within 90 days
after the effective date of the final rule.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.60 through 9.63
Temporary Access
Permits.
Existing regulation
§ 9.38.
§§ 9.60 Through 9.63—Temporary
Access Permits
Existing § 9.38(a)(2) (temporary
approval for the continuance of existing
operations) and existing § 9.38(b)
(temporary approval of new operations)
would not be retained in the proposed
rule. Because the proposed rule would
make all operations subject to the 9B
regulations, including (after a 90-day
grace period) previously exempt
operations, temporary approval of
existing operations is no longer
applicable. Existing § 9.38(b) would also
be deleted because the provision has
rarely been used and the NPS does not
anticipate a need for temporary
approval of new operations.
Proposed § 9.60 would focus solely on
the information requirements and
approval process for obtaining
temporary approval to collect basic
information to develop the information
required to obtain an Operations Permit.
Proposed § 9.61 identifies the
information necessary for the NPS to
evaluate the operator’s proposal to
collect this information. This includes
intended future operations, so the NPS
can determine what information is
available and what additional
information needs to be gathered.
Proposed § 9.61(d) would require that
the operator describe the qualifications
of the specialist who will perform the
reconnaissance survey. The requirement
to hire a qualified specialist codifies
existing NPS guidance and is included
in the definition of ‘‘reconnaissance
survey’’ so that information and
conclusions are accurate and verifiable.
Proposed § 9.62 would clarify that
under a Temporary Access Permit, an
operator may not engage in ground
disturbing activities unless they are
minimal and necessary to conduct the
surveys.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65578
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Under proposed § 9.63, Temporary
Access Permits would be issued for a
period not to exceed 60 days and may
be extended for a reasonable additional
period when justified by an operator.
Proposed rule
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§§ 9.70 through 9.73
Accessing Oil and
Gas Rights from a
Surface Location
Outside the Park
Boundary.
Existing regulation
§ 9.32(e).
Proposed rule
§§ 9.70 Through 9.73—Accessing Oil
and Gas Rights From a Surface
Location Outside the Park Boundary
Existing § 9.32(e) allows operators to
apply for an exemption from the
regulations if they directionally drill
from a surface location outside an NPS
unit to reach a bottom hole located
within NPS boundaries. This exemption
is available if operations pose no
significant threat of damage to NPS
resources, both surface and subsurface,
resulting from surface subsidence,
fracture of geological formations with
resultant fresh water aquifer
contamination, or natural gas escape.
Surface activities located outside the
NPS boundary are not within the scope
of the existing 9B regulation. Under
these regulations, regulatory authority
over these operations continues to begin
at the subsurface point where the
proposed operation (borehole) crosses
the park boundary and enters federally
owned or controlled lands or water, and
applies to all infrastructure and
activities within the NPS unit.
The availability of the exemption
provides an incentive for operators to
locate surface facilities outside an NPS
unit. Location of operations outside an
NPS unit generally avoids direct
impacts to NPS resources and values.
Therefore, proposed § 9.72 retains a
similar exemption.
The NPS proposes to retain the ‘‘no
significant threat of damage’’ review
standard for exemption applications.
Proposed § 9.70 updates and clarifies
the review standards for exemption
applications. If an operator is exempt
from the Operations Permit
requirement, it would still be subject to
the General Terms and Conditions and
the Prohibitions and Penalties
provisions in the regulations. The
proposed rule also addresses
circumstances under which the method
of operation or environmental
conditions of an operation changes.
Proposed § 9.71 identifies the
information an operator would be
required to submit to the NPS to be
considered for an exemption. Proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
§ 9.71 directs operators to those
information requirements, located at
proposed § 9.89, applicable to proposed
hydraulic fracturing operations.
Proposed § 9.72 describes how the
NPS would review and consider
information submitted by the operator
under this section.
Proposed § 9.73 describes
requirements that an operator still must
meet if it does not need an operations
permit.
Jkt 238001
§§ 9.80 through 9.90
Operations Permit:
Application Contents.
Existing regulation
§ 9.36.
§ 9.42.
§§ 9.80 Through 9.90—Operations
Permit: Application Contents
Format
The proposed rule at §§ 9.80 through
9.90 reorganizes information
requirements for each type of operation.
The proposed rule would separate
information requirements into the
following categories: § 9.83, information
that must be included in all
applications; § 9.87, additional
information that must be included for a
proposed geophysical exploration;
§ 9.88, additional information that must
be included for a proposed drilling
operations; § 9.89 additional
information must be included for a
proposed well stimulation operations,
including hydraulic fracturing; and,
§ 9.90 additional information that must
be included for a proposed production
operations.
Additions to and Clarification of
Existing Information Requirements
Some of the information requirements
in the existing 9B regulation are
minimally described. The NPS provided
additional information on some of those
information requirements in the NPS’s
2006 9B Operator’s Handbook. The NPS
intends to clarify all information
requirements in the proposed rule.
Information Requirements That Apply
to All Operations Permit Applications
Some of the existing information
requirements were incorporated into the
proposed rule without substantial
change. However, the NPS is proposing
to clarify the following information
requirements:
Ownership Information
Existing regulation § 9.83 limits
identification of an operation’s key
personnel to the operator, owners, and
lessees. To ensure that the NPS has all
appropriate contact information,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
proposed § 9.83(b) requires that
operators also identify agents, assignees,
designees, contractors, and other
representatives.
• New Surface Disturbance and
Construction
Proposed § 9.84 requires an operator
to specify site security measures and an
operation’s power sources and
transmission systems.
• Use of Water
Proposed § 9.83(e) would clarify and
expand upon the existing § 9.36(a)(5). It
would require information regarding the
source, transportation method and
quantity of water to be used in addition
to how the operator will manage waste
water.
• Environmental Conditions and
Mitigation Actions
Proposed § 9.85 would codify the
existing practice of requiring operators
to include within their permit
application natural resource and
cultural resource survey reports for the
operator’s proposed area of operations.
Proposed § 9.85 would require an
operator to describe steps proposed to
mitigate adverse environmental impacts
and list and discuss the impacts that
cannot be mitigated. Additionally,
operators are required to describe all
alternative technologically feasible, least
damaging methods that were
considered. Technologically feasible,
least damaging alternatives are those
alternatives that are viable (based on
economic, environmental, and
technological considerations) and
conform to federal, state, and local laws
and regulations.
• Cultural Resources
The NPS proposes to eliminate
existing § 9.47(a), ‘‘Cultural Resource
Protection,’’ because the section merely
summarizes the requirements of the
Antiquities Act (54 U.S.C. 320301 et
seq.). Restating these statutory
requirements in the 9B Regulations is
unnecessary, and the section also fails
to acknowledge other statutes that could
also apply to these resources.
• Spill Control and Emergency
Preparedness Plan
Proposed § 9.86 consolidates various
sections of the existing regulation,
clarifies that an operator must submit a
Spill Control and Emergency
Preparedness Plan (SCEPP) plan to the
NPS, and identifies the information
necessary to complete a SCEPP.
Additional Information Requirements
That Apply to Geophysical Operations
Proposed § 9.87 clarifies the
additional information a geophysical
operator would need to submit to the
NPS.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Additional Information Requirements
That Apply to Drilling, Stimulation, and
Production
Proposed §§ 9.88 through 9.90 clarify
the additional information an operator
would need if it is proposing to drill,
stimulate, or produce a well.
Proposed § 9.89 is a new set of
information requirements for well
stimulation, including hydraulic
fracturing operations. Information
requirements include identifying the
geologic barriers between the target zone
and the deepest usable water zone,
verifying mechanical integrity of the
wellbore, and describing water use and
disposal management of flowback
fluids. NPS notes that the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has recently
promulgated regulations addressing
hydraulic fracturing on federal and
Indian lands at 43 CFR part 3160 (80 FR
16128, March 26, 2015). We have
carefully considered the BLM
regulations to ensure that the NPS
regulations are as consistent as possible.
Here, the NPS proposed rule uses most
of the language from BLM’s hydraulic
fracturing information requirements at
43 CFR 3162.3–3(d)(1) through (7).
Where a BLM information requirement
is not specifically included in proposed
§ 9.89, it is because NPS already has
equivalent information requirements
that are applicable to all operations.
Additionally, NPS has specific guidance
on the means to ensure well integrity
standards are met in its NPS’s 2006 9B
Operator’s Handbook.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.100 through
9.105 Operations
Permit: Application
Review Process.
Existing regulation
§ 9.37.
§ 9.48.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§§ 9.100 Through 9.105—Operations
Permit: Application Review Process
Existing § 9.37(a)(1) requires that,
before approving a plan of operations,
the Regional Director determine that the
operator uses technologically feasible,
least damaging methods that provide for
protection of the park’s resources and
public health and safety.
The existing rule has two different
approval standards, depending on
whether the operation is proposed on
non-federally or federally owned
surface. For operations proposed on
non-federally owned surface a Regional
Director cannot approve an operation
that would constitute a nuisance to
federal lands or waters in the vicinity of
the operations, or would significantly
injure federally owned or controlled
lands or waters. For more information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
on what would constitute ‘‘significantly
injury’’ please see NPS Procedures
Governing Nonfederal Oil and Gas
(1992), pages 30–31,which can be found
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/
documentsList.cfm?projectID=28329.
For operations proposed on federally
owned surface a Regional Director
cannot approve an operation that would
substantially interfere with management
of the unit to ensure the preservation of
its natural and ecological integrity in
perpetuity, or would significantly injure
federally owned or controlled lands or
waters. If applying the standard for
operations proposed on federally owned
lands would constitute a taking of a
property interest, the NPS may either
approve the operations if it uses
technologically feasible, least damaging
methods or acquire the mineral interest.
Existing § 9.37(b) and (c) require the
NPS to make a decision on the plan of
operations within 60 days after the date
that the NPS determines that the
materials submitted under the plan are
adequate. Within 60 days, the Regional
Director must make one of six final
decisions in writing. The final decisions
are: Approval or rejection; conditional
approval; modification to the plan or
additional information is required; more
time is necessary to complete review;
environmental statement is required
before approval; or more time is
necessary for public participation and
analysis of public comments.
Existing § 9.37(c) provides that failure
of the NPS to make a final decision
within 60 days constitutes a rejection of
the plan. The operator has a right to
appeal this decision under existing
§ 9.49.
Proposed Application Review Process
The proposed rule establishes a twostage permit application review process,
eliminates the dual approval standards,
provides more realistic timeframes to
provide notice back to an operator, and
consolidates the final decisions the NPS
can make on an operator’s permit
application.
Stage One: Initial Review
Proposed § 9.101 describes the NPS’s
initial review of an operator’s permit
application. During initial review the
NPS would determine whether the
applicant has supplied all information
necessary for the NPS to evaluate the
operation’s potential effects affecting
federally owned or administered lands,
waters, or resources of NPS units, visitor
uses or experiences, or visitor or
employee health and safety. The NPS
would respond to applicants within 30
days and tell them whether the
information contained in their permit
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65579
applications is complete. If the NPS
needs more time to complete the review,
the NPS will provide the applicant with
an estimate of the amount of additional
time reasonably needed and an
explanation for the delay. Once a permit
application is complete the NPS
conducts formal review.
Stage Two: Formal Review
During formal review under proposed
§ 9.102 the NPS evaluates whether the
proposed operation meets the NPS
approval standards (§ 9.103) and
conducts its compliance responsibilities
under applicable federal statutes (e.g.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), Endangered Species Act (ESA),
and National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA)).
Timeframe for Final Action
In light of NPS experience over the
past 35 years in implementing the 9B
regulations, the current 60-day period
for reaching a final decision on a permit
application is not realistic. These
decisions require time to adequately
analyze an operator’s proposal, work
with the operator on a design that
incorporates acceptable avoidance and
mitigation measures, and comply with
the associated federal statutory
responsibilities such as NEPA, ESA, and
NHPA. The regulations should provide
operators with realistic expectations of
the timeframe to process operations
permits in order to adequately plan for
the start of operations. Similarly, the
NPS must take into account realistic
timeframes for its coordination with
other federal and state agencies. Thus,
proposed § 9.104 allows the NPS 180
days to complete its formal review. The
proposed regulation would allow for a
longer period of time, if the parties agree
to it, or if the NPS determines that it
needs more time to comply with
applicable laws, executive orders, and
regulations. In some cases, the NPS may
be able to complete formal review in
less than 180 days. The NPS is seeking
comment on whether 180 days is
reasonable and any incremental impacts
on operators.
The proposed rule would remove
existing section § 9.37(c), which results
in a rejection of the proposal if the NPS
does not respond within 60 days, and
replaces it with § 9.104, which
authorizes the Superintendent to notify
the operator in writing that additional
time is necessary to make a final
decision.
Elimination of Dual Approval Standards
Proposed § 9.103 would replace the
existing dual approval standards with a
single three-part approval standard that
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65580
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
applies to all operations, regardless of
surface ownership. Oil and gas
operations located on non-federally
owned surface have the potential to
impact federally owned or administered
lands, waters, or resources of NPS units,
visitor uses or experiences, or visitor or
employee health and safety to the same
degree as operations sited on federally
owned surface.
Proposed § 9.103(a) lists three basic
determinations that the Regional
Director must make before approving an
application for an operations permit.
Proposed § 9.103(b) adds two other
prerequisites to approval: (1) Submittal
of adequate financial assurance and (2)
proof of adequate liability insurance.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Final Actions
Proposed § 9.104 would establish two
final actions: (1) Approved, with or
without conditions, or (2) denial, and
the justification for the denial. The
Regional Director would notify the
operator in writing of the final action. If
approved, this written notification
constitutes the NPS’s authorization to
conduct activities.
The NPS has eliminated the proviso
in the approval standard in current
section § 9.37(a)(3), which allows for
approval using only the
‘‘technologically feasible, least
damaging methods’’ standard of section
§ 9.37(a)(1) if application of the more
stringent § 9.37(a)(3) standard would
constitute a taking of a property interest.
Over the past 35 years of implementing
the 9B Regulations, the NPS has never
used this exception. In every instance,
the NPS has authorized operators’
access and protected park resources and
values by applying reasonable
avoidance and mitigation measures to
the exercise of operators’ mineral rights.
As noted in the Purpose and Scope
section above, the proposed rule at
§ 9.30(c) maintains the existing
regulatory provision stating that the 9B
regulations are not intended to result in
a taking of mineral rights. The approval
standard in the proposed rule simply
incorporates that provision by reference,
rather than expressly spelling it out as
part of the standard. This change is not
intended or expected to authorize any
taking of property rights, and is
intended solely to simplify the approval
standards and avoid redundancy and
confusion. The NPS will continue to
work with operators to help plan and
design their operations in a way that
meets NPS operating standards and
other applicable provisions of these
regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Compliance With Big Cypress National
Preserve Addition Act
The Big Cypress National Preserve
Addition Act (BCNPAA), (16 U.S.C.
698m–4), requires that the NPS include
language describing the procedures for
reviewing an Operations Permit
application within the Big Cypress
National Preserve and Addition Area.
Accordingly, proposed § 9.105
describes the procedure for initial
review of a proposed operation in Big
Cypress National Preserve. This
procedure would differ slightly from the
service-wide procedure described in
§§ 9.101 and 9.102. The NPS’s servicewide proposed rule incorporates the 30day initial review period from the
BCNPAA. However, the BCNPAA at 16
U.S.C. 698m–4(b)(2)(C) places a
regulatory limit on the amount of
collaboration that can occur between the
NPS and the operator. Under this
provision, there is no regulatory
mechanism for the NPS to request
further information from an operator
after the NPS has made its initial
request for additional information. After
making such a request, the NPS’s only
options are to approve or deny the
application. This procedure could
conceivably result in denial of
applications that would have been
approved if the NPS had the regulatory
authority to again request the additional
information necessary to fully evaluate
a proposed operation. In practice, the
NPS will continue to collaborate with
prospective operators in Big Cypress
National Preserve early in their
planning process and as much as
possible during initial review, in order
to reduce such theoretical problems.
The NPS is not proposing to use the Big
Cypress procedure in its service-wide
regulations, because it does not want to
constrain its ability to have more robust
collaboration with operators.
The BCNPAA also differs slightly
from the proposed service-wide rule in
that under the BCNPAA the 90-day time
period for final action begins upon
submission of the permit application to
the NPS. For the service-wide rule, the
NPS has chosen not to adopt submission
of the permit application as the
triggering event for the 180-day time
period. Rather, the NPS proposed
service-wide rule provides that the 180day time period begins upon the NPS
determination that the operator’s permit
application contains complete
information. This is consistent with the
existing 9B Regulations at 36 CFR
9.36(c). Before the NPS can begin to
conduct an analysis of an operator’s
proposal, it must have all necessary
information from an operator. For
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
proposals within Big Cypress National
Preserve, the NPS will strive to meet the
applicable timeframe for final action
while otherwise complying with
applicable laws including NEPA and the
ESA.
The NPS has decided to include
applicable language from the BCNPAA
in this regulation instead of in a new
park-specific regulation in Part 7,
because the remaining sections of the 9B
regulation still apply to oil and gas
operations in Big Cypress National
Preserve and the NPS believes it will be
easier for operators to have all
applicable regulations in one place.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.110 through
9.118 Operating
Standards.
Existing regulation
§ 9.35.
§ 9.39.
§ 9.41.
§ 9.42.
§ 9.43.
§ 9.44.
§ 9.45.
§ 9.46.
§ 9.47.
§§ 9.110 Through 9.118—Operating
Standards
Purpose and Function
Proposed § 9.110 clarifies the purpose
and function of operating standards.
The NPS would maintain the current
practice of setting non-prescriptive
operating standards to allow operators
the flexibility to design their proposed
operation using the latest technological
innovations that will best protect park
system resources, values, and visitor
health and safety.
Proposed § 9.110(c) is a general
standard that requires all operators to
use technologically feasible, least
damaging methods to protect NPS
resources and values while assuring
human health and safety.
Proposed § 9.110(a) maintains the
practice of incorporating applicable
operating standards into an approved
operations permit so that the operating
standards become enforceable terms and
conditions of an approved permit.
The existing regulation has a specific
operating standards provision at § 9.41.
Additional operating standards are
scattered throughout other sections of
the existing regulations (See, §§ 9.43
through 9.46).
Reorganization
The proposed rule would reorganize
operating standards into one section and
separate operating standards into the
following categories: §§ 9.111 through
9.116, are operating standards that
apply to all operations; § 9.117,
additional operating standards that
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65581
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
apply to geophysical operations; and
§ 9.118, additional operating standards
that apply to drilling, stimulation, and
production operations. The NPS
believes that organizing the standards in
this manner would allow the NPS and
the operator to readily understand
which operating standards are
applicable to the particular type of
proposed operation.
Additions to and Clarification of
Existing Operating Standards
Some of the operating standards in
the existing 9B regulation are minimally
described. The NPS has clarified some
operating standards in its 2006 9B
Operator’s Handbook. The NPS
proposes to include all operating
standards in the proposed rule. The NPS
would incorporate some operating
standards from the existing regulations
into the proposed rule largely without
substantive change; those standards are
not further discussed here. The
standards summarized below either
clarify existing standards or are new
standards that the NPS proposes to add
to the regulations.
Operating Standards That Apply to All
Operations
The NPS is proposing to include new
standards at § 9.111(a) to ensure that
either existing or newly created surface
disturbance is kept to the minimum
necessary for safe conduct of operations.
The NPS is proposing to include new
standards at § 9.114 and § 9.115 that
would reasonably limit the visual and
sound impacts of oil and gas operations
on park visitor use and experience.
The NPS is proposing to add a new
standard at § 9.111(h) that would avoid
or limit the introduction of exotic
species.
The NPS is proposing to add specific
standards at § 9.112 that would address
hydrologic connectivity.
Reclamation Operating Standards
Proposed § 9.116 would specify
reclamation operating standards.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Operating Standards That Apply to
Geophysical Operations
Proposed § 9.117 covers operating
standards for surveying methods; source
points; use of equipment and methods;
and shot holes.
Operating Standards That Apply to
Drilling, Stimulation, and Production
Operations
Proposed § 9.118(a)(1) requires all
operators to use containerized mud
systems during drilling operations.
Proposed § 9.118(a)(2) prohibits the
establishment of new earthen pits for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
any use. Use of existing earthen pits
may continue if the pits are in
compliance with applicable law and
subject to the Superintendent’s periodic
inspection.
Proposed § 9.118(b) is a new section
that establishes standards for well
stimulation, including standards that
address hydraulic fracturing operations,
such as ensuring the mechanical
integrity of the wellbore, water use and
disposal, and management of flowback
fluids. We have carefully considered the
recently promulgated BLM oil and gas
regulations to ensure that the NPS
regulations are as consistent as possible.
The two agencies take different
approaches to operating standards,
though, because of their differing
statutory bases for regulating the
exercise of oil and gas rights. BLM’s
regulatory authority is derived primarily
from the Mineral Leasing Act and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act and controls the use of federal
property. The NPS 9B regulations
address private property rights within
park units and are based largely on the
directive of the NPS Organic Act to
‘‘conserve the scenery, natural and
historic objects, and wild life in the
System units and to provide for the
enjoyment of the scenery, natural and
historic objects, and wild life in such
manner and by such means as will leave
them unimpaired for the enjoyment of
future generations.’’ As a result, BLM
can and has appropriately set more
prescriptive standards in its regulation,
while NPS has generally set required
non-prescriptive operating standards
which allow operators flexibility to
design operations while still protecting
park system resources, values, and
visitor health and safety. For example,
BLM’s regulation at 43 CFR 3162.5–2
(Control of wells) sets a performance
standard with regard to protection of
usable water, and BLM also prescribes
regulatory measures necessary to
achieve and verify the performance
standard (43 CFR 3162.3–3(e)). NPS’s
approach is to review an operator’s
submissions to determine if they meet
the overall operating standard of using
the most ‘‘technologically feasible, least
damaging methods’’ that protect park
resources and values, and all other
applicable operation standards. If not,
the NPS would to add terms and
conditions in the permits to ensure that
they do so. Guidance on the specific
means to meet NPS operating standards
is found in NPS’s 2006 9B Operator’s
Handbook, which is distributed to every
operator and available electronically.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Proposed rule
§§ 9.120 through
9.122 General
Terms and Conditions.
Existing regulation
§ 9.35.
§ 9.36(a)(15).
§ 9.37(f).
§ 9.41(g).
§ 9.42.
§ 9.46.
§ 9.51(b).
§§ 9.120 Through 9.122—General
Terms and Conditions
The NPS proposes a new ‘‘General
Terms and Conditions’’ section to
summarize those terms and conditions
that apply to all operations. This section
consolidates existing: §§ 9.35;
9.36(a)(15); 9.37(f); 9.41(g); 9.42; 9.46;
9.47(b); and, 9.51(a) and (b).
The water use section at existing
§ 9.35 does not address all state water
law systems under which water rights
are established or decided. Proposed
§ 9.120(b) would require that the NPS
approve, in accordance with NPS
policy, the use of surface or
groundwater owned or administered by
the United States.
Because monitoring and reporting
requirements apply, in varying degrees,
to all operations, the NPS is proposing
to include monitoring and reporting
requirements under General Terms and
Conditions. Some of these monitoring
and reporting requirements are taken
from the existing regulation while
others are new requirements. The new
requirements are described below.
Proposed § 9.121(b) would allow the
NPS to require that operators hire third
party monitors when they are necessary
to ensure compliance and protect park
resources and values. The NPS currently
requires the use of third party monitors
to help the NPS ensure that it receives
unbiased, reliable, and timely
monitoring information demonstrating
an operator’s compliance with its plan
of operations. See, 2006 9B Operator’s
Handbook, Chapter 3 (Geophysical
Exploration). Over the past fifteen years,
Big Thicket National Preserve, Padre
Island National Seashore, Jean Lafitte
National Historic Site, and Big Cypress
National Preserve have required
operators to use third party monitors for
geographically extensive and logistically
complex 3D seismic operations. The use
of third party monitors has allowed the
NPS to augment monitoring by park
staff so that the operator can
simultaneously engage in multiple
operations at different locations, while
still ensuring compliance with the
operator’s plan. The proposed rule
would also make the NPS’s
requirements more consistent with the
practice of other federal agencies (BLM,
the U.S. Forest Service, and the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65582
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Fish and Wildlife Service have all
required third party monitoring for oil
and gas operations on lands they
administer), as well as state oil and gas
regulatory agencies. This section
describes the criteria that the NPS will
consider when making the decision to
require a third party monitor. The third
party monitor would report directly to
the NPS to ensure oversight and
accountability.
Proposed § 9.121(e) would broaden
the reporting requirement to require that
the operator submit any information
requested by the Superintendent that is
necessary to verify compliance with
either a provision of the operations
permit or this subpart. To ease this
burden the proposed rule would allow
an operator to submit reports that the
operator has already submitted to a state
or other federal agency to meet this
reporting requirement, similar to
existing § 9.42.
Proposed § 9.122 would require
reporting related to the hydraulic
fracturing process, including the
disclosure of chemicals used in the
hydraulic fracturing process and the
volume of recovered fluids. In § 9.122,
NPS has used BLM’s post-hydraulic
fracturing reporting requirements, but
did not include two provisions
(requirement for affidavit of compliance
and general supporting documentation),
as these requirements are addressed in
other sections of this proposed rule.
Proposed rule
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§§ 9.130 through
9.132 Access to Oil
and Gas Rights.
Existing regulation
§ 9.50.
§§ 9.130 Through 9.132—Access to Oil
and Gas Rights
Existing § 9.50 authorizes the NPS to
charge a fee for commercial vehicles
using NPS administered roads.
Proposed 9.130(b) would clarify that
adequate and feasible access to oil and
gas rights located within the boundaries
of NPS units in Alaska is governed by
the regulations at 43 CFR part 36, which
implements § 1110(b).
Proposed § 9.131(a)(1) would
supplement that authority to allow a fee
based on fair market value for access
(e.g., roads or gatherings lines) across
federal lands outside the scope of an
operator’s oil and gas right. The NPS
would set fees consistent with NPS Part
14 Rights-of-way guidance (NPS
Reference Manual 53, Special Park Uses,
Appendix 5, Exhibit 2).
The NPS is seeking public comment
on whether the NPS should include a
provision that would allow the NPS to
authorize an operator to undertake
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
compensatory mitigation in lieu of
payment. The value of the
compensatory mitigation would be
proportional to the reasonable estimated
cost of the access fee. This would allow
the operator and the NPS to agree on an
option to, for example, reclaim an area
of previously disturbed land elsewhere
within the park to offset the operator’s
new access.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.140 through
9.144 Financial Assurance.
Existing regulation
§ 9.48.
§§ 9.140 Through 9.144—Financial
Assurance
The NPS proposes to rename the
‘‘Performance Bond’’ section as
‘‘Financial Assurance’’ to reflect the
variety of instruments that an operator
can provide to the NPS to meet its
obligation under this section.
Existing § 9.48(a) requires an operator
to file a performance bond, or other
acceptable method of financial
assurance, for all types of non-federal
oil and gas operations and all phases of
the operations. The performance bond
requirement ensures that in the event an
operator becomes insolvent or defaults
on its obligations under an approved
plan of operations, adequate funds will
be available for reclamation.
Existing § 9.48(d)(3) limits the
performance bond amount to $200,000
per operator, per NPS unit. Therefore, if
one operator has multiple wells in an
NPS unit, the NPS can only require up
to $200,000 financial assurance from
that operator. The existing $200,000
limit was established in 1979 and in
most cases no longer represents the
current potential costs of reclamation. In
the event of a default by the operator,
reclamation costs exceeding the limit
could require the NPS to bring a civil
action in federal court to recover the
additional costs.
Proposed § 9.141 would make the
financial assurance amount equal to the
estimated cost of reclamation. This
revision would substantially reduce the
risk of the American taxpayers being left
to assume the operator’s reclamationresponsibility costs if an operator
defaults on its obligations.
Proposed § 9.142 outlines the process
for adjusting the amount of financial
assurance due to changed conditions.
Proposed § 9.143 describes the
conditions under which the NPS would
release the financial assurance.
Proposed § 9.144 describes those
circumstances that would result in
forfeiture.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Proposed § 9.144(b)(3) is a new
provision allowing the NPS to suspend
review of an operator’s pending permit
applications, if that operator has
forfeited its financial assurance.
Suspension would last until the
Superintendent determines that all
violations have been resolved.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.150—Modification to an Operation.
Existing regulation
§ 9.40.
§ 9.150—Modification to an Operation
Proposed § 9.150, would rename the
‘‘Supplementation or Revision of Plan of
Operations’’ section as ‘‘Modification to
an Operation’’ to characterize any
change to an approved operations
permit. This section would clarify that
either the NPS or the operator can
request modification of the operator’s
permit, and describes the modification
procedures. Approval of any
modification to an approved permit
must meet the same criteria that apply
to Temporary Access Permits (proposed
§§ 9.60 through 9.63) or Operations
Permit: Application Review Process
(proposed §§ 9.100 through 9.105).
Proposed § 9.150(c) would prohibit an
operator from implementing a
modification until the NPS has provided
written approval of the modification to
the operator.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.160 and 9.161
Change of Operator.
Existing regulation
§ 9.34.
§§ 9.160 and 9.161—Change of
Operator
This proposed section renames the
existing § 9.34 ‘‘Transfer of Interest’’
section as ‘‘Change of Operator.’’
Existing § 9.34(a) provides that a
previous owner remains liable on its
financial assurance until it informs the
NPS that the rights have been
transferred to another party. A new
owner cannot operate until it posts
financial assurance and ratifies the
existing plan of operations. If the
previous owner provides notice to the
Superintendent, the previous owner
could request release of its financial
assurance before the new owner posts
its own financial assurance with the
NPS. Therefore, if the new owner
abandons operations before posting
financial assurance with the NPS, the
burden of reclaiming the site could fall
on the taxpayers.
Proposed § 9.160 holds the previous
operator responsible to the NPS until
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65583
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the new operator adopts and agrees to
the terms and conditions of the previous
operator’s permit and provides financial
assurance. Proposed § 9.160(a)
addresses a transfer of operation where
the previous operator did not have an
approved NPS permit. Proposed
§ 9.160(b) requires the previous operator
to notify the NPS of its transfer.
Proposed § 9.161 requires that the
new operator adopts and agrees to the
terms and conditions of any previous
operator’s operations permit. Proposed
§ 9.161(b) addresses transfer of an
operation where an exemption was
previously granted under proposed
§ 9.72.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.170 and 9.171
Well Plugging.
Existing regulation
§ 9.39.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§§ 9.170 and 9.171—Well Plugging
This section replaces, in part, existing
§ 9.39(a)(2)(iv) and creates a new section
‘‘Well Plugging.’’
Existing § 9.39(a)(2)(iv) requires
operators to plug and cap all nonproductive wells and to fill dump holes,
ditches, reserve pits, and other
excavations. Proposed § 9.116(d)(1)
(Operating Standards) would retain the
requirement that an operator conduct
reclamation by plugging all wells.
However, the existing regulations do not
give the NPS the authority to require an
operator to plug wells that have been in
extended shut-in status. As a result
inactive wells have remained unplugged
for years and, in some instances,
decades. Unplugged wells could
adversely impact park resources and
could also present risks to park visitors.
Proposed § 9.170(a) would establish
that operators are required to plug a
well within a specified time period after
cessation of drilling or production
operations or upon the expiration of
NPS approved shut-in status. Under
proposed § 9.171, an operator can seek
an extension to the plugging
requirement if the operator describes
why drilling or production operations
have ceased and its reasonable future
use of the well, demonstrates
mechanical integrity, and follows
maintenance requirements.
The proposed procedures are
consistent with the way many states
approach the issue of inactive wells,
and recognize that certain economical or
logistical reasons exist to justify
maintenance of wells in shut-in status
for extended periods of time. Rather
than a ‘‘produce or plug’’ policy, the
proposed regulation provides assurance
that shut-in wells are maintained in an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
environmentally sound and safe
manner.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.180 through
9.182 Prohibitions
and Penalties.
Existing regulation
§ 9.48(e).
§ 9.51.
§§ 9.180 Through 9.182—Prohibitions
and Penalties
Existing § 9.51(c) provides two
different compliance procedures for
suspending an operation, depending on
whether or not the violation poses an
‘‘immediate threat of significant injury
to federally owned lands or waters.’’
Proposed § 9.181 would allow the
Superintendent discretion to suspend
an operation regardless of whether an
operator’s violation poses an
‘‘immediate threat of significant injury.’’
Whether the threat is immediate or not,
any violation that results in a threat of
damage to park resources and values
should be addressed by the
Superintendent.
Prohibited Acts
Proposed § 9.180 lists the prohibited
acts to provide operators with notice of
the acts that would constitute a
violation of the 9B regulations. The
proposed rule expands the prohibited
acts to include not only violation of the
terms and conditions of an Operations
Permit, but also violations of other
provisions of the 9B regulations.
Incorporating Existing 36 CFR 1.3
Penalties Provision in the 9B
Regulations
Existing § 9.51 authorizes the NPS to
suspend an operation for noncompliance and if the violation or
damage is not corrected, revoke an
operator’s plan of operations. The
process to suspend an operation
requires coordination between park staff
and other NPS offices during which
time damage to park system resources
and values may continue. Additionally,
suspension and revocation are not
necessarily the most appropriate means
to correct minor acts of non-compliance
(minor leaks and spills, improper road
maintenance, or not maintaining proper
site security). Therefore, we are
proposing to incorporate our existing
penalties at 36 CFR 1.3 that would allow
NPS law enforcement rangers and
special agents to issue citations, which
would result only in fines for minor acts
of non-compliance, while treating the
more serious acts as ones that may be
subject to a fine or imprisonment, or
both.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
No New Authorization Unless Operator
Is in Compliance
Under proposed § 9.182 NPS would
not review any new operating permit
applications or continue to review any
pending permit applications anywhere
in the National Park System until an
operator comes into compliance with a
violation of this subpart or a violation
of a term or condition of an operations
permit.
Proposed rule
§§ 9.190 through
§ 9.194 Reconsideration and Appeals.
Existing regulation
§ 9.49.
§§ 9.190 Through § 9.194—
Reconsideration and Appeals
Most of the procedures outlined in
existing § 9.49 remain the same. The
operator continues to have the right to
appeal a decision made by either the
Superintendent or the Regional Director.
The operator now must exhaust these
remedies before the NPS decision is
considered a final agency action that is
subject to review under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The proposed rule now describes the
first step of the process as a request for
‘‘reconsideration,’’ rather than an
appeal, since it is directed to the same
official who issued the original
decision. The proposed rule also
includes other clarifications of the
existing language, makes editorial
corrections, and reorganizes the
sequence of some of the paragraphs.
Consistent with the APA, proposed
§ 9.193(a) would provide that during the
reconsideration and appeals process the
NPS’s decision will be suspended and
the decision will not become effective
until the completion of the appeals
process. Proposed § 9.193(b) addresses
suspension of operations due to
emergencies that pose an immediate
threat of injury to injury to federally
owned or controlled lands or waters.
Proposed rule
§ 9.200 Public Participation.
Existing regulation
§ 9.52.
§ 9.200—Public Participation
The proposed rule renames the
‘‘Public Inspection of Documents’’
section to ‘‘Public Participation.’’
Existing § 9.52(a) requires a
Superintendent to publish a notice in a
local newspaper of a request to conduct
non-federal oil and gas operations
whether or not a complete plan of
operations is ever submitted by an
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65584
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
operator. Existing § 9.52(b) further
requires a Superintendent to publish a
notice in the Federal Register of receipt
of a plan of operations. The proposed
rule eliminates the public notice steps
currently required under existing
§ 9.52(a) and (b) and replaces them with
a more efficient public involvement and
review process.
The proposed rule retains the ability
for an operator to protect proprietary or
confidential information from
disclosure to the public. Operators need
to clearly mark those documents that
they wish to protect from public
disclosure as ‘‘proprietary or
confidential information’’ such that
these documents are readily identifiable
by the NPS decision maker. The NPS
has also included proposed provisions
that allow an operator engaged in
hydraulic fracturing operations to
withhold chemical formulations that are
deemed to be a trade secret.
Proposed rule
§ 9.210 Information
Collection.
Existing regulation
New Section.
§ 9.210—Information Collection
See Paperwork Reduction Act
discussion below.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Renumbering and Redesignation of
Subpart D
As a result of the new organization
and section numbering in the proposed
subpart B, it is necessary to renumber
the sections in the existing part 9,
subpart D. In addition, because we see
no reason to continue to reserve subpart
C, the proposed rule redesignates the
existing subpart D as subpart C. The
proposed rule makes no substantive
changes to these provisions.
Compliance With Other Laws,
Executive Orders, and Department
Policies—Regulatory Planning and
Review (Executive Orders 12866 and
13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this proposed rule is significant because
it may raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in the Executive order.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this proposed rule in a
manner consistent with these
requirements. As noted above, we have
carefully considered the BLM
regulations to ensure consistency to the
greatest extent possible between
provisions of these proposed NPS
regulations that relate to hydraulic
fracturing, and the recent BLM
regulations. The NPS is aware of the
current litigation concerning BLM’s
final hydraulic fracturing rule, State of
Wyoming v. U.S. Department of the
Interior, Case No: 2:15–CV–043–SWS,
and will consider public comment as
well as any rulings that may occur in
the litigation in reaching final decisions
on its final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule would not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the RFA (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is
based on the cost-benefit and regulatory
flexibility analysis found in the report
Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses: U.S. Department of the
Interior, National Park Service for
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 9,
Subpart B which can be viewed at
https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_
and_gas/9b_index.cfm.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This proposed rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the SBREFA.
This proposed rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
(b) Would not cause a major increase
in costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, state, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
These conclusions are based upon the
cost-benefit and regulatory flexibility
analysis found in the report entitled
Cost-Benefit and Regulatory Flexibility
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Analyses: U.S. Department of the
Interior, National Park Service for
Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 9,
Subpart B which can be viewed at
https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_
and_gas/9b_index.cfm.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This proposed rule does not impose
an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
proposed rule does not have a
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. It addresses use of
national park lands, and imposes no
requirements on other agencies or
governments. A statement containing
the information required by the UMRA
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
The proposed rule does not take
private property or authorize the taking
of private property. Moreover, NPS
believes that implementation of the
proposed rule is not likely to result in
a taking of private property.
Accordingly, NPS believes that the
proposed rule does not require the
preparation of a takings implications
assessment under Executive Order
12630.
The proposed rule would update
regulations that have been in effect
since 1979. It would update various
provisions of the existing regulations in
a manner that is consistent with current
industry standards and technological
capabilities, prevailing industry and
investor expectations, and the most
recent developments in regulatory and
takings law. It would authorize NPS to
recover its legitimate permit-processing
and monitoring costs and to charge
operators for privileged access across
federal lands (i.e., access that is not a
legal right incident to the mineral
estate). Although it would potentially
increase the amount of financial
assurance that operators must post, it
would do so only to a level
commensurate with the cost of restoring
the federally owned surface estate.
The proposed rule would extend the
applicability of the 9B regulations to
most currently exempt operations
located within park boundaries. During
the 36 years that the existing regulations
have been in place, however, NPS has
never disapproved a submitted plan of
operations and no mineral owner or
operator has ever filed a claim asserting
that implementation of the regulations
has resulted in a taking of private
property. Moreover, as described above,
the proposed rule would update the
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
existing regulations in a manner
consistent with current industry
standards and technological
capabilities. Accordingly, NPS does not
believe that the application of the
proposed rule to currently exempt
operations is likely to result in a taking.
The proposed rule would continue to
allow operators reasonable access across
federally owned surface to develop nonfederal mineral rights. No other private
property is affected. The proposed rule
would bring outdated provisions into
line with modern regulatory practice
and, NPS believes, is a reasonable
exercise of its regulatory authority.
Finally, the regulatory text will
continue to state (as do the existing
regulations) that it is not intended to
result in a taking. The existing
regulations also contain a second
provision that expressly applies the
lower of the two standards of review in
the event of a possible taking. Because
the proposed rule would contain only
one standard of review (in an effort to
simplify the rule), such a provision no
longer appears appropriate. NPS has
never actually needed to invoke that
second provision, nor has it ever failed
to provide final approval for a plan of
operations that has been sought. Under
the proposed rule, NPS would retain
discretion to make individual permit
decisions that will avoid a taking if an
unexpected problem should arise.
For the foregoing reasons, NPS
believes that a takings implications
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, the rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a Federalism summary impact
statement. It addresses use of national
park lands, and imposes no
requirements on other agencies or
governments. A Federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
This proposed rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Consultation With Indian Tribes
(Executive Order 13175 and
Department Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it has
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department’s
tribal consultation policy is not
required. Nonetheless, NPS has
consulted with all federal tribes
traditionally associated with Category 1
parks, which have current oil and gas
operations, and Category 2 parks, which
do not have active operations, but have
potential for future operations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA)
This proposed rule contains
information collection requirements that
we are submitting to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval under the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). We may not
conduct or sponsor and you are not
required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
OMB has reviewed and approved the
current information collection
requirements associated with nonFederal oil and gas rights in national
parks and assigned OMB Control
Number 1024–0064, which expires
March 31, 2016. We are asking OMB to
assign a new OMB Control Number for
the information collection requirements
in this proposed rule. If OMB approves
this request, we plan to keep the new
number for subpart B requirements after
we publish the final rule. We will delete
the burden associated with subpart B
from OMB Control No. 1024–0064.
We are proposing to collect the
following information under 36 CFR
Part 9, Subpart B associated with nonFederal oil and gas operations within
units of the National Park System.
Previously Exempt Operations (§§ 9.50
Through 9.53)
Previously exempt operators must
submit the following information to the
NPS:
• Brief description of the current
operations and any anticipated changes
to the current operations.
• Documentation showing the right to
operate within an NPS unit.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65585
• State well identification permit
number or American Petroleum Institute
(API) well number.
• Maps delineating the area of
operations and the area of surface
disturbance and equipment layout
within the area of operations.
• Spill Control Environmental
Preparedness Plan.
• Documentation of the current
operating methods, surface equipment,
downhole well construction and
completion, materials produced or used,
and monitoring methods.
• Description of how the operation
will meet NPS operating standards.
• Description of procedures to be
used and cost estimates for well
plugging and surface reclamation.
• Results of any necessary
reconnaissance surveys.
Temporary Access Permits (9.60
Through 9.63)
Application for Temporary Access
Permit
To gather necessary background
information for an Operations Permit,
the operator will need to obtain a
Temporary Access permit by submitting
the following information to the NPS:
• Brief description of the intended
future operation.
• Demonstration of the right to
operate.
• Contact information for the person
responsible for the overall management
of the proposed operations.
• Contact information and
qualifications of all specialists
responsible for conducting the
reconnaissance surveys.
• Map delineating the proposed
reconnaissance survey area.
• Description of proposed means of
access and routes to the survey area; and
a description of the survey methods.
Extension of Temporary Access Permit
To extend the term of a Temporary
Access Permit, operators must submit a
written request that explains why the
extension is necessary.
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a
Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary (9.70 Through 9.73)
Application for Exemption
This proposed rule allows operators
to apply for an exemption from the
operations permit requirement of the
regulations if they directionally drill
from a surface location outside an NPS
unit to reach a bottom hole located
within NPS boundaries. To apply for an
exemption, NPS requires the following
information.
• Names and addresses of the
operator; the mineral owner; and any
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65586
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
agents, assignees, designees, lessees,
contractors, employees, or other
representatives of the operator
responsible for the overall management
of the proposed operations.
• Documentation demonstrating the
legal right to operate in an NPS unit.
• Contact information for the
operator’s representative responsible for
field supervision of the proposed
operations and for emergency response
for the proposed operations.
• Maps and plats to scale showing the
boundaries of each of the mineral tracts
that are relevant to the proposed
operations within the NPS unit
boundary.
• Maps and plats to scale showing all
proposed surface uses (well site, access
route, flowlines, production facilities)
that occur outside the NPS unit.
• Description, including depths,
thicknesses, and properties of geologic
horizons between the target zone and
the base of the deepest aquifer.
• Drilling plan, including directionaldrilling program, horizontal distance
along the wellbore’s path from well’s
surface location to the park boundary,
depth at which wellbore crosses NPS
unit boundary, and timeline for
operations.
• Casing, cementing, and mud
programs.
• Stimulation programs.
• Well plugging and abandonment
program.
• If hydraulic fracturing is proposed,
information required in § 9.89.
Notification of Change
Within 30 days, operators must notify
NPS if the method of operation or
environmental conditions of operation
change.
Operations Permit: Application
Contents (§§ 9.80 Through 9.90)
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
All Applications
All applications for an Operations
Permit, must contain the following
information:
• Documentation demonstrating the
right to operate within an NPS unit.
• Contact information for the
operator; the mineral owner; any agents,
assignees, designees, contractors, or
other representatives of the owner; and
the operator’s representative responsible
for overall management, field
supervision, and emergency response
for the proposed operation.
• Existing condition and proposed
area of operations, including all
information required by § 9.84.
• Reclamation Plan, including (1) a
description of the specific equipment
and methods used to meet the operating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
standards for reclamation (§ 9.116); and
(2) a breakdown of the estimated costs
that a third party would charge to
complete reclamation as proposed in the
reclamation plan.
• Use of water, including (1) the
source, quantity, access route, and
transportation/conveyance method for
all water to be used in access road and
pad construction, well drilling,
stimulation, and production; and (2)
estimations of any anticipated waste
water volumes generated and how they
will be managed (i.e., handled,
temporarily stored, disposed, recycled,
reused) throughout stages of the
operation.
• Environmental condition and
mitigation actions, including all
information required in § 9.85.
• Spill control and emergency
preparedness plan, including all
information required by § 9.86.
Additional Information
Geophysical Exploration (§ 9.87). If
you are proposing geophysical
exploration, the application must
include:
• Number of crews and number of
workers in each crew.
• Names and depths of geologic zones
targeted for imaging.
• Description of the acquisition
methods, including the procedures,
specific equipment you will use, and
energy sources (e.g., explosives or
vibroseis trucks).
• Methods of access along each
survey line for personnel, materials, and
equipment.
• List of all explosives, blasting
equipment, chemicals, and fuels you
will use in the proposed operations,
including a description of proposed
disposal methods, transportation
methods, safety measures, and storage
facilities.
• Map showing the positions of each
survey line including all source and
receiver locations as determined by a
locational survey, and including
shotpoint offset distances from wells,
buildings, other infrastructure, and
areas the NPS has indicated to you as
environmentally sensitive areas.
Drilling Operations (§ 9.88). If you are
proposing drilling operations, the
application must include:
• Well-pad construction, including
dimensions and cross sections of: Cut
and fill areas and excavations for
ditches, sumps, and spill control
equipment or structures, including lined
areas.
• Drill-rig and equipment layout,
including rig components, fuel tanks,
testing equipment, support facilities,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
storage areas, and all other well-site
equipment and facilities.
• Drilling program, including hole
size for each section and the directional
program, if applicable.
• Proposed drilling depth and the
estimated depths and names of usable
water, brine, hydrocarbon, geothermal,
or other mineral-bearing zones.
• Type and characteristics of the
proposed mud systems.
• Casing program, including the size,
grade, weight, and setting depth of each
string.
• Cementing program, including
downhole location of any stage
equipment, cement types, volumes, and
additives to be used, and a description
of pressure tests and cement verification
techniques used that will be run to
evaluate cement placement and
integrity.
• Minimum specifications for
pressure control equipment function
and pressure testing frequency and the
blowout preventer stack arrangement.
• Proposed logging, coring, and
testing programs. Proposed completion
program, including completion type
(open-hole, perforated, slotted liner,
etc.).
• Procedures, including
considerations for well control.
• Description of the equipment,
materials, and procedures proposed for
well plugging, including plug depths,
plug types, and minimum mud weight.
Well Simulation Operations (§ 9.89). If
you are proposing well simulation
operations, including hydraulic
fracturing, the application must include:
• Geologic names, a geologic
description, and the estimated depths
(measured and true vertical) to the top
and bottom of the formation into which
hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be
injected. The estimated minimum
vertical distance between the top of the
fracture zone and the nearest usable
water zone, and the measured depth of
the proposed perforated or open-hole
interval.
• Estimated depths (measured and
true vertical) to the top and bottom of
the confining zone(s). Include a map
showing the location, orientation, and
extent of any known or suspected faults
or fractures within one-half mile
(horizontal distance) of the wellbore
trajectory that may transect the
confining zone(s).
• Map showing all existing wellbore
trajectories, regardless of type, within
one-half mile (horizontal distance) of
any portion of the wellbore into which
hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be
injected. The true vertical depth of each
wellbore identified on the map must be
indicated.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Steps to be taken before treatment
to verify mechanical integrity of all
downhole tubulars and tools and
cement quality, including pressure tests
and cement bond logs (or other logs
acceptable to the Superintendent)
demonstrating that the occurrences of
usable water zones have been isolated to
protect them from contamination.
• Detailed description of the
proposed well-stimulation design,
including:
(1) Proposed stimulation fluid,
including, but not limited to, the base
fluid and each additive by trade name,
and purpose of additive.
(2) Proposed proppant system.
(3) Estimated total volume of fluid to
be used.
(4) Anticipated surface treating
pressure range.
(5) Maximum anticipated surface
pressure that will be applied during the
hydraulic fracturing process.
(6) Trajectory of the wellbore into
which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to
be injected and the estimated direction
and length of the fractures that will be
propagated and a notation indicating the
true vertical depth of the top and bottom
of the fractures; and
(7) Any microseismic monitoring
planned or proposed in conjunction
with well stimulation.
• Source and location of water
supply, such as reused or recycled
water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes,
ponds, and water supply wells, and the
source and location of water supply,
such as reused or recycled water, rivers,
creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water
supply wells.
• Storage, mixing, pumping, and
control equipment needed to perform
the stimulation.
• Information on recovered fluids,
including:
(1) Estimated volume of stimulation
fluids to be recovered during flow back.
(2) Proposed methods of handling the
recovered fluids including any onsite
treatment for re-use of fluids in other
stimulation activities.
(3) Proposed disposal method of the
recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, injection, hauling by truck,
or transporting by pipeline.
Production Operations (§ 9.90). If you
are proposing to produce a well, you
must submit all of the following
information:
• Dimensions and the to-scale layout
of the wellpad, clearly identifying well
locations, noting partial reclamation
areas; gathering, separation, metering,
and storage equipment; electrical lines;
fences; spill control equipment or
structures including lined areas,
artificial lift equipment, tank batteries,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
treating and separating vessels,
secondary or enhanced recovery
facilities, water disposal facilities, gas
compression and/or injection facilities;
metering points; sales point (if on lease);
tanker pick-up points; gas compressor,
including size and type (if applicable);
and any other well site equipment.
• Size, grade, weight, and setting
depth of all casing and tubing strings;
cementing history; type and size of
packers and subsurface flow control
devices; top and bottom depths of each
completed interval; and method of
completion.
• Well history, including
completions, stimulations, servicing,
and workovers.
• Minimum specifications for
pressure-control equipment, function,
and pressure-testing frequency.
• Method and means used to
transport produced oil and gas,
including vehicular transport; flowline
and gathering line construction;
operation; pipe size; operating pressure;
cathodic protection methods; surface
equipment use; surface equipment
location; maintenance procedures;
maintenance schedules; pressure
detection methods; and shutdown
procedures.
• Road and wellpad maintenance
plan, including equipment and
materials to maintain the road surface
and control erosion.
• Vegetation management plan on
well sites, roads, pipeline corridors, and
other disturbed surface areas, including
control of exotic species.
• Storm water management plan on
the well site.
• Produced water storage and
disposal plan.
• Procedures proposed for well
plugging, the depths and the types of
plugs, and minimum mud weight.
Operating Standards (§§ 9.110–9.118)
Simulation operations (§ 9.118(a)).
You must:
• Not begin injection activities before
you demonstrate the mechanical
integrity of all surface and downhole
tubulars and equipment to differential
pressures equal to at least those
calculated at the maximum anticipated
treating pressure. Continuously monitor
and record the treating pressures and all
annular pressures before, during, and
after the treatment to ensure that
treatment materials are directed to the
intended zone.
• If mechanical integrity is lost
during the treatment, immediately cease
the operation and notify the
Superintendent as soon as feasible, but
no later than 24 hours after the incident.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65587
• Within 15 days after the occurrence,
submit to the Superintendent a report
containing all details pertaining to the
incident, including corrective actions
taken.
Production (§ 9.118(b)). You must:
• Monitor producing conditions to
document maintenance of mechanical
integrity of both surface and subsurface
equipment.
• Identify wells and related facilities
by a sign, which must remain in place
until the well is plugged and abandoned
and the related facilities are closed. The
sign must be of durable construction,
and the lettering must be legible and
large enough to be read under normal
conditions at a distance of at least 50
feet. Each sign must show the name of
the well, name of the operator, and the
emergency contact phone number.
General Terms and Conditions
(§§ 9.120 Through 9.122)
• Provide the NPS an affidavit, signed
by an official who is authorized to
legally bind the company, stating that
proposed operations are in compliance
with all applicable federal, state, and
local laws and regulations and that all
information submitted to the NPS is true
and correct. (§ 9.120(c)).
• Third party monitor will report to
NPS on compliance with permit.
(§ 9.121(b)(2)).
• Notify the Superintendent of any
accidents involving serious personal
injury or death and of any fires or spills
on the site within 24 hours after the
accident occurs. (§ 9.121(c)).
• Submit a full written report on the
accident to the Superintendent within
90 days after the accident occurs.
(§ 9.121(c)).
• Notify the Superintendent within
24 hours after the discovery of any
cultural or scientific resource you
encounter that might be altered or
destroyed by your operation.
(§ 9.121(d)).
• Submit reports or other information
necessary to verify compliance with
your permit or with any provision of
this subpart. (§ 9.121(d)).
• If your operations include hydraulic
fracturing, you must provide the
Superintendent with a report including
all of the information below within 30
days after the completion of the last
stage of hydraulic fracturing operations
for each well (§ 9.122):
(a) The true vertical depth of the well,
total water volume used, and a
description of the base fluid and each
additive in the hydraulic fracturing
fluid, including the trade name,
supplier, purpose, ingredients,
Chemical Abstract Service Number
(CAS), maximum ingredient
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65588
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
concentration in additive (percent by
mass), and maximum ingredient
concentration in hydraulic fracturing
fluid (percent by mass).
(b) The actual source(s) and
location(s) of the water used in the
hydraulic fracturing fluid;
(c) The maximum surface pressure
and rate at the end of each stage of the
hydraulic fracturing operation and the
actual flush volume.
(d) The actual, estimated, or
calculated fracture length, height, and
direction.
(e) The actual measured depth of
perforations or the open-hole interval.
(f) Actual volume of stimulation
fluids recovered during flow back,
including a description of how the
volumes were measured or calculated.
(g) The following information
concerning the handling of fluids
recovered, covering the period between
the commencement of hydraulic
fracturing and the implementation of
the approved permit for the disposal of
produced water under NPS
requirements:
(1) Methods of handling the recovered
fluids, including, but not limited to,
transfer pipes and tankers, holding pond
use, re-use for other stimulation
activities, or injection; and
(2) Disposal method of the recovered
fluids, including, but not limited to, the
percent injected, the percent stored at
an off-lease disposal facility, and the
percent recycled.
(h) Continuous monitoring records of
annulus pressure at the bradenhead and
other annular pressures that document
pressures before, during, and after
injection operations.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Financial Assurance (§§ 9.140 Through
9.144)
All operators are required to post
adequate financial assurance with the
NPS and are required to submit the
following documentation to the NPS:
• Proof of financial assurance in a
form acceptable to the Regional Director
and payable upon demand.
• If necessary, an adjustment to the
financial assurance amount because of
any circumstance that increases or
decreases the estimated costs.
Modification to an Operation (§ 9.150)
Operators may request or we may
require an operator to modify their
operations. To request a modification to
an approved permit, operators must
provide written notice to the
Superintendent describing the
modification and why it is needed.
Change of Operator (§§ 9.160 and 9.161)
If an operator transfers its operation to
a new operator, both the old and new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
operator must provide information to
the NPS.
Information Current Owner Must
Provide. When current operator
transfers operations, current operator
must:
• Notify the Superintendent in
writing within 30 calendar days after
the date the new owner acquires the
rights to conduct operations providing:
(a) Names and addresses of the person
or entity conveying the right and the
person or entity acquiring the right.
(b) Effective date of transfer.
(c) Description of the rights, assets,
and liabilities being transferred and
which ones, if any, are being reserved
by the previous owner.
(d) Written acknowledgement from
the new owner that the contents of the
notification are true and correct.
Information New Operator Must
Provide
• Adopt and agree in writing to
conduct operations in accordance with
all terms and conditions of the previous
operator’s operations permit;
• File financial assurance with us that
is acceptable to the Regional Director
and made payable to the NPS.
If the previous operator was granted
an exemption for accessing oil and gas
rights from a surface location outside
the park boundary, you must provide to
the Superintendent:
• Documentation demonstrating that
you hold the right to operate within an
NPS unit;
• The names and addresses of the
operator; the mineral owner; any agents,
assignees, designees, lessees, or other
representatives of the operator; the
operator’s representative responsible for
the overall management of the proposed
operations; the operator’s representative
responsible for field supervision of the
proposed operations; and the operator’s
representative responsible for
emergency response for the proposed
operations.
Well Plugging (§§ 9.170 and 9.171)
An operator may apply for either an
operations permit or a modification to
its approved operations permit to
maintain its well in a shut-in status for
up to 5 years. The application must
include the following information:
• Explanation of why the well is shutin or temporarily abandoned and your
future plans for utilization.
• Demonstration of the mechanical
integrity of both surface and downhole
equipment such that there is no
migration of fluid from any formation in
which it originally occurred or from the
surface to the well.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
• Description of the manner in which
the operator well, equipment, and area
of operations will be maintained.
Reconsideration and Appeals (§§ 9.190
Through 9.194)
To appeal an NPS decision, the
operator must submit a written
statement describing the alleged factual
or legal errors in the original decision
and requesting that the Regional
Director reconsider the decision.
Public Participation (§ 9.200)
An operator may request that
information required to be reported
under these regulations concerning
chemical formulations that are deemed
to be trade secrets be withheld from
disclosure. To make this request the
operator must:
• Identify the owner of the withheld
information and provide the name,
address and contact information for a
corporate officer, managing partner, or
sole proprietor of the owner of the
information.
• Identify the Federal statute or
regulation that would prohibit the NPS
from publicly disclosing the information
if it were in the NPS’s possession.
• Affirm that the operator has been
provided the withheld information from
the owner of the information and is
maintaining records of the withheld
information, or that the operator has
access and will maintain access to the
withheld information held by the owner
of the information.
• Affirm that the information is not
publicly available.
• Affirm that the information is not
required to be publicly disclosed under
any applicable laws and policies local,
State, tribal, or Federal law;
• Affirm that the owner of the
information is in actual competition and
identifies competitors or others that
could use the withheld information to
cause the owner of the information
substantial competitive harm;
• Affirm that the release of the
information would likely cause
substantial competitive harm to the
owner of the information and provides
the factual basis for that affirmation; and
• Affirm that the information is not
readily apparent through reverse
engineering with publicly available
information.
Title: Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights,
36 CFR part 9, subpart B.
OMB Control Number: 1024–XXXX.
Service Form Number: None.
Type of Request: Request for a new
OMB control number.
Description of Respondents:
Businesses.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65589
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Estimated
number of
annual
responses
Activity/requirement
Total ......................................................................................................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Previously Exempt Operations (§§ 9.50–9.53) ............................................................................
Application for Temporary Access Permit (§§ 9.60–9.63) ...........................................................
Amendment of Temporary Access Permit ..................................................................................
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the Park Boundary—Application for Exemption (§§ 9.70–9.73) ........................................................................................
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the Park Boundary—Notice
of change (§§ 9.70–9.73) .........................................................................................................
Operations Permit Operations Permit (New Operations):
Application Contents—(§§ 9.80–9.90) ..................................................................................
Operating Standards—Stimulation Operations (§ 9.118(b)):
Demonstrate mechanical integrity ........................................................................................
Record treating pressures and all annular pressures ..........................................................
Notify Superintendent if mechanical integrity is lost ............................................................
Report of accident ................................................................................................................
Operating Standards—Production (§ 9.118(c)):
Document maintenance of mechanical integrity ..................................................................
Signage to identify wells .......................................................................................................
General Terms and Conditions (§§ 9.120–9.122):
Affidavit that proposed operations are in compliance with all laws and that information
submitted to NPS is accurate ...........................................................................................
Third-Party Monitor Report ...................................................................................................
Notification—Accidents involving Serious Personal Injuries/Death and Fires/Spills ...........
Written Report—Accidents Involving Serious Injuries/Deaths and Fires/Spills ...................
Notification—Discovery of any cultural or scientific resources ............................................
Report—Verify Compliance with Permits .............................................................................
Reporting for Hydraulic Fracturing .......................................................................................
Financial Assurance (§§ 9.140–9.144) ........................................................................................
Modification to an Operation (§ 9.150) ........................................................................................
Change of Operator (§§ 9.160–9.161) .........................................................................................
Well Plugging (§§ 9.170–9.171) ...................................................................................................
Reconsideration and Appeals (§§ 9.190–9.194) .........................................................................
Public Participation (§ 9.200) .......................................................................................................
As part of our continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burdens, we invite the public and other
Federal agencies to comment on any
aspect of this information collection,
including:
(1) Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
Send your comments and suggestions
on this information collection by the
date indicated in the DATES section to
the Desk Officer for the Department of
the Interior at OMB–OIRA. See
ADDRESSES section for instructions on
submitting comments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA)
This rule constitutes a major Federal
action with the potential to significantly
affect the quality of the human
environment. We have prepared the
DEIS under the requirements of NEPA.
The DEIS will publish shortly after this
proposed rule and be available online at
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/DEIS9B, by
clicking on the link entitled ‘‘Document
List.’’
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive
Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant
energy action under the definition in
Executive Order 13211. A statement of
Energy Effects is not required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)), 12988 (section
3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and
by the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we
publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Completion
time per
response
(hours)
Estimated total
annual burden
hours
106
5
1
10
15
1
1,060
75
1
3
80
240
1
2
2
5
140
700
5
5
1
2
4
4
1
1
20
20
1
2
534
5
2
4
1,068
20
111
60
2
2
1
534
1
5
1
5
33
1
1
1
17
1
16
1
4
2
1
16
8
14
16
4
111
1,020
2
32
1
2,136
2
5
16
40
462
16
4
1,430
........................
7,056
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you believe we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise this
proposed rule, your comments should
be as specific as possible. For example,
you should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you believe
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
Drafting Information
This proposed rule reflects the
collective efforts of NPS staff in the
Geologic Resources Division, parks, and
field offices, with assistance from the
Division of Jurisdiction, Regulations and
Special Park Uses.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65590
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Public Participation
List of Subjects
PART 9—MINERALS MANAGEMENT
It is the policy of the Department of
the Interior, whenever feasible, to afford
the public an opportunity to participate
in the rulemaking process. Accordingly,
interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. All comments must
be received by midnight of the close of
the comment period. Bulk comments in
any format (hard copy or electronic)
submitted on behalf of others will not be
accepted.
We are particularly interested in
comments concerning:
1. Substantive differences between
NPS’s proposed regulations of oil and
gas activity and those of other Federal
agencies, including differences in the
associated costs and benefits.
2. The costs and benefits of not
applying this rule to inholdings, and to
operators’ surface operations when
accessing oil and gas rights inside an
NPS unit from a surface location outside
the park boundary.
3. Whether relevant guidance
presently, or planned to be, included in
the NPS 9B Operators Handbook should
instead be included in this rule.
4. Whether the performance and
operating standards are clear and certain
in their purpose, including §§ 9.30(a),
9.103(a), 9.110(c), and 9.118.
5. Alternative approaches to removing
public financial exposure including
multi-well blanket bonding, the
establishment of industry provided
plugging fund, or increasing the
financial assurance cap to a fixed
amount higher than $200,000. Please
note that these alternatives were
considered but dismissed from further
analysis in the DEIS because they do not
meet a fundamental purpose of the
rulemaking, which is to ensure that
bonding amounts are sufficient to meet
reclamation needs and do not result in
taxpayer liability.
36 CFR Part 1
■
National parks, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements
Subpart B—Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
36 CFR Part 9
National parks, Oil and gas
exploration, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
National Park Service proposes to
amend 36 CFR parts 1 and 9 as follows:
PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751,
320102.
■
2. Revise § 1.3 to read as follows:
§ 1.3
Penalties.
(a) A person convicted of violating a
provision of the regulations contained
in parts 1 through 7, part 9 subpart B,
and parts 12 and 13 of this chapter,
within a park area not covered in
paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section,
shall be punished by a fine as provided
by law, or by imprisonment not
exceeding 6 months, or both, and shall
be adjudged to pay all costs of the
proceedings.
(b) A person who knowingly and
willfully violates any provision of the
regulations contained in parts 1 through
5, 7, part 9 subpart B, and part 12 of this
chapter, within any national military
park, battlefield site, national
monument, or miscellaneous memorial
transferred to the jurisdiction of the
Secretary of the Interior from that of the
Secretary of War by Executive Order No.
6166, June 10, 1933, and enumerated in
Executive Order No. 6228, July 28, 1933,
shall be punished by a fine as provided
by law, or by imprisonment for not more
than 3 months, or by both.
Note: These park areas are enumerated in
a note under 5 U.S.C. 901.
(c) A person convicted of violating
any provision of the regulations
contained in parts 1 through 7, and part
9 subpart B of this chapter, within a
park area established pursuant to the
Act of August 21, 1935, 49 Stat. 666,
shall be punished by a fine as provided
by law and shall be adjudged to pay all
costs of the proceedings. 54 U.S.C.
320105.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of
paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this
section, a person convicted of violating
§ 2.23 of this chapter shall be punished
by a fine as provided by law. 16 U.S.C.
6811.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3. Revise subpart B to read as follows:
Purpose and Scope
Sec.
9.30 What is the purpose and scope of this
subpart?
9.31 When does this subpart apply to me?
9.32 What authorization do I need to
conduct operations?
9.33 If am already operating under an NPS
authorization, what do I need to do?
Definitions
9.40 What do the terms used in this subpart
mean?
Previously Exempt Operations
9.50 Do I need an operations permit for my
previously exempt operations?
9.51 How do I apply for my operations
permit?
9.52 What will the NPS do with my
application?
9.53 May I continue to operate while the
NPS reviews my application?
Temporary Access Permits
9.60 When do I need a temporary access
permit?
9.61 How do I apply for a temporary access
permit?
9.62 When will the NPS grant a temporary
access permit?
9.63 How long will I have to conduct my
reconnaissance surveys?
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a
Surface Location Outside the Park Boundary
9.70 Do I need an operations permit for
accessing oil and gas rights from outside
the park boundary?
9.71 What information must I submit to the
NPS?
9.72 How will the NPS act on my
submission?
9.73 If I don’t need an operations permit,
are there still requirements that I must I
meet?
Operations Permit: Application Contents
9.80 Who must apply for an operations
permit?
9.81 May I use previously submitted
information?
9.82 What must I include in my
application?
9.83 What information must be included in
all applications?
9.84 Existing conditions.
9.85 Environmental conditions and
mitigation actions.
9.86 Spill control and emergency
preparedness plan.
9.87 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing geophysical
exploration?
9.88 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing drilling
operations?
9.89 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing well
stimulation operations, including
hydraulic fracturing?
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
9.90
What additional information must be
included if I am proposing production
operations?
Operations Permit: Application Review
Process
9.100 How will NPS process my
application?
9.101 How will the NPS conduct initial
review
9.102 How will the NPS conduct formal
review?
9.103 What standards must be met to
approve my application?
9.104 What final actions may the Regional
Director take on my Operations Permit
application?
9.105 What is the approval process for
operations in Big Cypress National
Preserve?
Operating Standards
9.110 What are the purposes and functions
of NPS operating standards?
9.111 What general facility design and
management standards must I meet?
9.112 What hydrologic standards must I
meet?
9.113 What safety standards must I meet?
9.114 What lighting and visual standards
must I meet?
9.115 What noise reduction standards must
I meet?
9.116 What reclamation and protection
standards must I meet?
9.117 What additional operating standards
apply to geophysical operations?
9.118 What additional operating standards
apply to drilling, stimulation, and
production operations?
General Terms and Conditions
9.120 What terms and conditions apply to
all operators?
9.121 What monitoring and reporting is
required for all operators?
9.122 What additional reports must I
submit if my operation includes
hydraulic fracturing?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Access to Oil and Gas Rights
9.130 May I cross Federal property to reach
the boundary of my mineral right?
9.131 Will the NPS charge me a fee for
access?
9.132 Will I be charged a fee for emergency
access to my operations?
Financial Assurance
9.140 Do I have to provide financial
assurance to the NPS?
9.141 How does the NPS establish the
amount of financial assurance?
9.142 Will the NPS adjust my financial
assurance?
9.143 When will the NPS release my
financial assurance?
9.144 Under what circumstances will I
forfeit my financial assurance?
Modification to an Operation
9.150 Can my approved permit be
modified?
Change of Operator
9.160 What are my responsibilities if I
transfer my operations?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
9.161 What must I do if operations are
transferred to me?
Well Plugging
9.170 When must I plug my well?
9.171 Can I get an extension to the well
plugging requirement?
Prohibitions and Penalties
9.180 What acts are prohibited under this
subpart?
9.181 What enforcement actions can the
NPS take?
9.182 How do violations affect my ability to
obtain a permit?
Reconsideration and Appeals
9.190 Can I request reconsideration of NPS
decisions?
9.191 How does the NPS process my
request for reconsideration?
9.192 Can I appeal the Regional Director’s
decision?
9.193 Will filing a request for
reconsideration or appeal stop the NPS
from taking action under this subpart?
9.194 What if the original decision was
made by the Superintendent?
Public Participation
9.200 How can the public participate in the
approval process?
Information Collection
9.210 Has the Office of Management and
Budget approved the information
collection requirements?
65591
affecting federally owned or
administered lands, waters, and
resources of NPS units, visitor uses and
experiences, and visitor and employee
health and safety.
§ 9.31
me?
When does this subpart apply to
(a) This subpart applies to you if you
are an operator who conducts or
proposes to conduct non-federal oil or
gas operations.
(b) If you were operating outside of an
NPS unit and your operation has been
included within an existing NPS unit as
a result of a change to the boundary, or
included within a newly established
NPS unit, you are subject to §§ 9.50
through 9.53.
(c) If you were operating under an
exemption because your operation
accessed oil and gas rights inside the
park boundary from a surface location
outside the park boundary, and your
surface location has been included
within an existing NPS unit as a result
of a change to the boundary, or included
within a newly established NPS unit,
you are subject to §§ 9.50 through 9.53.
§ 9.32 What authorization do I need to
conduct operations?
Purpose and Scope
(a) Except as provided in §§ 9.70
through 9.73, you must obtain a
temporary access permit under §§ 9.60
through 9.63 or an operations permit
under §§ 9.80 through 9.90 before
starting operations.
(b) You must demonstrate that you
have the right to operate in order to
conduct activities within an NPS unit.
§ 9.30 What is the purpose and scope of
this subpart?
§ 9.33 If I am already operating under an
NPS authorization, what do I need to do?
(a) This subpart ensures that operators
exercising non-federal oil and gas rights
within an NPS unit use technologically
feasible, least damaging methods to:
(1) Protect federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of NPS units;
(2) Protect NPS visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety; and
(3) Protect park resources and values
under the statute commonly known as
the NPS Organic Act;
(b) This subpart applies to all
operators conducting non-federal oil or
gas operations on lands or waters within
an NPS unit, regardless of the
ownership or jurisdictional status of
those lands or waters.
(c) We do not intend for this subpart
to result in a taking of a property
interest. The purpose of this subpart is
to reasonably regulate operations
(a) If you already have an NPSapproved plan of operations, you may
continue to operate according to the
terms and conditions of that approval,
subject to the provisions of this subpart.
For purposes of this subpart, we will
consider your approved plan of
operations to be either a temporary
access permit or operations permit.
(b) This section applies to you if we
have granted you an exemption to the
plan of operations requirement because
your operation accesses oil and gas
rights inside a park boundary from a
surface location outside the park’s
boundary. You may continue to operate
under the exemption provided that your
operations comply with the general
terms and conditions of §§ 9.120
through 9.122. You are also subject to
the prohibitions and penalties in
§§ 9.180 through 9.182.
Subpart B—Non-Federal Oil and Gas
Rights
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 230a(a)(4), 459d–3,
460cc–2(i), 460ee(c)(4), 698c(b)(2), 698i(b)(2),
and 698m–4; 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581; 31
U.S.C. 9701; 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, and
103104.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65592
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Definitions
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.40 What do the terms used in this
subpart mean?
In addition to the definitions in 36
CFR 1.4, the following definitions apply
to this subpart:
Area of operations means lands or
waters within an NPS unit on which
operations are approved to be carried
out, including roads or other areas
where you are authorized to exercise the
oil and gas rights.
Contaminating substance means any
toxic or hazardous substance which is
used in or results from the conduct of
operations and is listed under the Clean
Water Act at 40 CFR part 116, the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act at 40 CFR part 261, or the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
at 49 CFR part 172. This includes, but
is not limited to, explosives, radioactive
materials, brine waters, formation
waters, petroleum products, petroleum
by-products, and chemical compounds
used for drilling, production,
processing, well testing, well
completion, and well servicing.
Gas means any fluid, either
combustible or noncombustible, which
is produced in a natural state from the
earth and which maintains a gaseous or
rarefied state at ordinary temperature
and pressure conditions.
NPS unit has the same meaning as
‘‘National Park System (Park Area)’’
defined at 36 CFR 1.4(a).
Oil means any viscous combustible
liquid hydrocarbon or solid
hydrocarbon substance easily
liquefiable on warming that occurs
naturally in the earth, including drip
gasoline or other natural condensates
recovered from gas without resort to
manufacturing process.
Operations means all existing and
proposed functions, work, and activities
in connection with the exercise of oil or
gas rights not owned by the United
States and located or occurring within
an NPS unit.
(1) Operations include, but are not
limited to: Access by any means to or
from an area of operations; construction;
geological and geophysical exploration;
drilling, well servicing, workover, or
recompletion; production; gathering
(including installation and maintenance
of flowlines and gathering lines);
storage, transport, or processing of
petroleum products; earth moving;
excavation; hauling; disposal;
surveillance, inspection, monitoring, or
maintenance of wells, facilities, and
equipment; reclamation; road and pad
building or improvement; shot hole and
well plugging and abandonment, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
reclamation; and all other activities
incident to any of the foregoing.
(2) Operations do not include
reconnaissance surveys as defined in
this subpart or oil and gas pipelines that
are located within the park under
authority of a deeded or other right-ofway.
Operations permit means an NPS
special use permit authorizing an
operator to conduct operations in an
NPS unit. An operations permit is
subject to cost recovery under 54 U.S.C.
103104.
Operator means any person or entity,
agent, assignee, designee, lessee, or
representative thereof who is
conducting operations or proposing to
exercise non-federal oil and gas rights
within the boundaries of an NPS unit.
Owner means the person that holds
title to non-federal oil and gas minerals.
Previously exempt operations means
those operations being conducted in an
NPS unit without an approved permit
from the NPS as of the effective date of
these regulations. This term does not
include operations where, before the
effective date of these regulations, the
NPS granted the operator an exemption
to the plan of operations requirement
because the operation accessed oil and
gas rights inside the park from a surface
location outside the park.
Reconnaissance survey means an
inspection or survey conducted by
qualified specialists for the purpose of
preparing a permit application.
(1) A reconnaissance survey includes
identification of the area of operations
and collection of natural and cultural
resource information within and
adjacent to the proposed area of
operations.
(2) A reconnaissance survey does not
include surface disturbance activities
except for minimal disturbance
necessary to perform cultural resource
surveys, natural resource surveys, and
location surveys required under this
subpart.
Right to operate means a deed, lease,
memorandum of lease, designation of
operator, assignment of right, or other
documentation demonstrating that you
hold a legal right to conduct the
operations you are proposing within an
NPS unit.
Technologically feasible, least
damaging methods are those that we
determine, on a case-by-case basis, to be
most protective of park resources and
values while ensuring human health
and safety, taking into consideration all
relevant factors, including
environmental, economic, and
technological factors and the
requirements of applicable law.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Temporary access permit means an
NPS special use permit authorizing an
operator to access that operator’s
proposed area of operations to conduct
reconnaissance surveys necessary to
collect basic information necessary to
prepare an operations permit
application. A temporary access permit
is subject to cost recovery under 54
U.S.C. 103104.
Third-party monitor means a qualified
specialist who is not an employee,
agent, or representative of the operator
and who has demonstrated to the NPS
the relevant expertise to monitor
operations for compliance with
applicable laws, regulations, and permit
requirements.
Usable water means an aquifer or its
portion which supplies any public
water system; or which contains a
sufficient quantity of ground water to
supply a public water system; and
currently supplies drinking water for
human consumption; or contains fewer
than 10,000 mg/l total dissolved solids;
and which is not an exempted aquifer.
Waste means any material that is
discarded. It includes, but is not limited
to: Drilling fluids and cuttings;
produced fluids not under regulation as
a toxic or hazardous substance; human
waste; garbage; fuel drums; pipes; oil;
contaminated soil; synthetic materials;
man-made structures or equipment; or
native and nonnative materials.
We and us mean the National Park
Service.
You and I mean the operator, unless
otherwise specified or indicated by the
context.
Previously Exempt Operations
§ 9.50 Do I need an operations permit for
my previously exempt operations?
Yes. You must obtain an NPS
operations permit in accordance with
§§ 9.80 through 9.90.
§ 9.51 How do I apply for my operations
permit?
Within 90 days after [effective date of
the final rule] or within 90 days after the
effective date of a boundary change, or
establishment of a new NPS unit, as
applicable, you must submit the
following to the Superintendent of the
NPS unit in which you propose to
continue to conduct operations:
(a) A brief description of the current
operations and any anticipated changes
to the current operations;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that
you hold the right to operate within an
NPS unit;
(c) The State well-identification
permit number or American Petroleum
Institute (API) well number;
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(d) Maps to scale that clearly
delineate your proposed area of
operations as of [effective date of the
final rule] or the effective date of a
boundary change, or establishment of a
new NPS unit, as applicable, and that
identify the area of surface disturbance
and equipment layout within your
proposed area of operations;
(e) A spill control environmental
preparedness plan as required by § 9.86;
(f) Documentation of the current
operating methods, surface equipment,
downhole well construction and
completion, materials produced or used,
and monitoring methods;
(g) A description of how your
proposed operation will meet each
applicable operating standard in this
subpart;
(h) A description of the procedures to
be used and cost estimates for well
plugging and surface reclamation; and
(i) The results of any reconnaissance
surveys you have conducted to be used
by the Superintendent to identify
resource protection measures in your
operations permit.
§ 9.52 What will the NPS do with my
application?
The NPS will review your application
and take action under §§ 9.100 through
9.104.
§ 9.53 May I continue to operate while the
NPS reviews my application?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Before obtaining an approved
operations permit, you may continue to
conduct operations subject to the
following conditions:
(a) Continuation of operations is
limited to those methods and the area of
disturbance that existed on [insert
effective date] or the effective date of a
boundary change, or establishment of a
new NPS unit, as applicable.
(b) Your operation is also subject to
the general terms and conditions in
§§ 9.120 through 9.122 and the
prohibitions and penalties in §§ 9.180
through 9.182.
(c) Except in an emergency, we will
not take any steps to directly regulate
your operation before 90 days after
[effective date of the final rule] or 90
days after the effective date of a
boundary change, or establishment of a
new NPS unit, as applicable.
Temporary Access Permits
§ 9.60 When do I need a temporary access
permit?
You must apply to the Regional
Director for a temporary access permit
to access your proposed area of
operations in order to conduct
reconnaissance surveys. This permit
will describe the means, routes, timing,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
65593
and other terms and conditions of your
access as determined by the Regional
Director.
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a
Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary
§ 9.61 How do I apply for a temporary
access permit?
§ 9.70 Do I need an operations permit for
accessing oil and gas rights from outside
the park boundary?
To apply for a temporary access
permit, you must submit the following
information to the Superintendent of the
NPS unit in which you propose to
conduct operations:
(a) A brief description of the intended
future operation so that we can
determine what information needs to be
gathered;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that
you hold a legal right to operate located
within an NPS unit;
(c) The name, legal address, and
telephone number of the owner,
operator, employee, agent, or contractor
responsible for overall management of
the proposed operations;
(d) The name, legal address,
telephone number, and qualifications of
all specialists responsible for
conducting the reconnaissance surveys;
(e) A map delineating the proposed
reconnaissance survey area in relation
to the park boundary and the proposed
area of operations at a minimum scale
of 1:24,000, or a scale specified by the
Superintendent as acceptable;
(f) A description of proposed means of
access and routes proposed for
conducting the reconnaissance surveys;
and
(g) A description of the survey
methods you intend to use to identify
the natural and cultural resources.
§ 9.62 When will the NPS grant a
temporary access permit?
If the Regional Director determines
that your proposed reconnaissance
survey will not result in surface
disturbance, except for minimal
disturbance necessary to perform
surveys, the Regional Director will issue
you a temporary access permit within
30 days after receipt of a complete
application, unless the Regional
Director notifies you that additional
time is necessary to evaluate or process
your application.
§ 9.63 How long will I have to conduct my
reconnaissance surveys?
Your temporary access permit will be
in effect for a maximum of 60 days from
the date of issuance. The Regional
Director may extend the term of the
temporary access permit for a
reasonable period of time, based upon
your written request that explains why
an extension is necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Your downhole activities inside an
NPS unit are subject to these
regulations. If you wish to access your
oil and gas rights located inside an NPS
unit from a surface location outside the
unit, you must submit the information
required by § 9.71. We will evaluate this
information to determine whether your
operations are exempt or require an
operations permit. We will require an
operations permit only if we determine
that permit requirements are needed to
protect against a significant threat of
damage to:
(a) Federally owned or administered
lands, waters, or resources within NPS
units;
(b) NPS visitor uses or experiences; or
(c) Visitor or employee health or
safety.
§ 9.71 What information must I submit to
the NPS?
You must provide the information
required by this section to the
Superintendent of the relevant NPS
unit. You must provide all of the
following.
(a) The names and addresses of:
(1) The operator;
(2) The mineral owner; and
(3) Any agents, assignees, designees,
lessees, contractors, employees, or other
representatives of the operator
responsible for the overall management
of the proposed operations.
(b) Documentation demonstrating that
you hold a legal right to operate in an
NPS unit.
(c) Contact information for the
operator’s representative responsible for
field supervision of the proposed
operations and for emergency response
for the proposed operations.
(d) Maps and plats to scale showing
the boundaries of each of the mineral
tracts that are relevant to your proposed
operations within the NPS unit
boundary.
(e) Maps and plats to scale showing
all proposed surface uses (well site,
access route, flowlines, production
facilities) that occur outside the NPS
unit.
(f) Information regarding downhole
operations and conditions, including:
(1) Description, including depths,
thicknesses, and properties of geologic
horizons between the target zone and
the base of the deepest aquifer;
(2) Drilling plan, including
directional-drilling program, horizontal
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65594
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
distance along the wellbore’s path from
well’s surface location to the park
boundary, depth at which wellbore
crosses NPS unit boundary, and
timeline for operations;
(3) Casing, cementing, and mud
programs;
(4) Stimulation programs; and
(5) Well plugging and abandonment
program.
(g) If you propose hydraulic
fracturing, then you must also provide
the information required by § 9.89.
§ 9.72 How will the NPS act on my
submission?
(a) Within 30 days after receiving your
submission under § 9.71, the
Superintendent will notify you in
writing that your information is
complete, you need to submit more
information, or we need more time to
review your submission.
(b) Within 30 days after receiving
your complete submission, the
Superintendent will notify you in
writing that either:
(1) No further action is required by
the NPS and you are exempt from the
operations permit requirement; or
(2) You must obtain an operations
permit.
(c) If you need an operations permit,
the information provided under § 9.71 is
your permit application and the NPS
will review your application under
§§ 9.100 through 9.104.
§ 9.73 If I don’t need an operations permit,
are there still requirements that I must I
meet?
If the NPS notifies you under § 9.72
that you do not need an operations
permit, you are still subject to the
general terms and conditions in §§ 9.120
through 9.122, the prohibitions and
penalties in §§ 9.180 through 9.182, and
the requirements in this section.
(a) You must notify the NPS within 30
days if your method of operation or the
environmental conditions of your
operation change.
(b) The Regional Director may notify
you in writing that you are no longer
exempt from the operations permit
requirement after determining that
operational requirements are needed to
protect against a significant threat of
damage to any of the following:
(1) Federally owned or administered
lands, waters, or resources of NPS units;
(2) NPS visitor uses or experiences; or
(3) Visitor or employee health or
safety.
(c) Within 30 days after receiving this
notification, you must file your
operations permit application with the
Superintendent.
Operations Permit: Application
Contents
§ 9.80 Who must apply for an operations
permit?
Except as otherwise provided §§ 9.70
through 9.73, an operator proposing to
conduct operations within the boundary
of an NPS unit must submit an
application for an operations permit to
the Superintendent.
§ 9.81 May I use previously submitted
information?
(a) In satisfying the requirements of
§§ 9.82 through 9.90, you do not need to
resubmit information that is already on
file with the NPS. Instead, you may
reference the previously submitted
information in your permit application.
(b) You may submit documents and
materials containing the information
required by §§ 9.82 through 9.90 that
you have submitted to other Federal and
State agencies. If you do this, you must
clearly identify the information required
by §§ 9.82 through 9.90.
§ 9.82 What must I include in my
application?
(a) Your application for an operations
permit must include all of the
information required by § 9.83. You
must also submit the information
required by §§ 9.87 through 9.90, where
applicable, and any additional
information that the Superintendent
may require.
(b) You may provide information for
only the phase of operations you
propose. Each permit application is only
required to describe those functions for
which you want immediate approval.
However, approval of an Operations
Permit covering one phase of operations
does not guarantee future approval of an
Operations Permit covering a
subsequent phase.
§ 9.83 What information must be included
in all applications?
All applications must include the
information required by this section.
All operations permit applications
must include information on . . .
and must include the following detailed information . . .
(a) Ownership .................................
(b) The owner/operator ...................
documentation demonstrating that you hold the right to operate inside of an NPS unit.
names, addresses, and other contact information for:
(1) The operator;
(2) The mineral owner;
(3) Any agents, assignees, designees, contractors, or other representatives of the operator;
(4) The operator’s representatives responsible for overall management, field supervision, and emergency
response for the proposed operations.
all the information required by § 9.84.
(c) Existing conditions and proposed area of operations.
(d) Reclamation plan .......................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Use of water ..............................
(f) Environmental conditions and
mitigation actions.
(g) The spill control and emergency
preparedness plan.
(1) A description of the specific equipment and methods used to meet the operating standards for reclamation at § 9.116; and
(2) A breakdown of the estimated costs that a third party would charge to complete reclamation as proposed in your reclamation plan.
(1) The source, quantity, access route, and transportation/conveyance method for all water to be used in
access road and pad construction, well drilling, stimulation, and production; and
(2) Estimations of any anticipated waste water volumes generated and how they will be managed (i.e. handled, temporary stored, disposed, recycled, reused) throughout stages of the operation.
all the information required by § 9.85.
all the information required by § 9.86.
§ 9.84
Existing conditions.
(a) You must submit to-scale maps
that clearly identify:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
(1) The boundaries of each of your
mineral tracts in relation to your
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
proposed operations and the relevant
NPS unit boundary;
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(2) The natural features, including,
but not limited, to streams, lakes, ponds,
topographic relief, and areas the NPS
has indicated to you as environmentally
sensitive;
(3) The locations of existing roads,
trails, railroad tracks, pads, and other
disturbed areas; and
(4) The locations of existing structures
that your operations could affect,
including, but not limited to: Buildings,
pipelines, producing oil and gas wells,
freshwater wells, underground and
overhead electrical lines, and other
utility lines.
(b) You must submit the following
information about geologic conditions
under natural conditions and under the
proposed operating conditions:
(1) Estimated depths and names of
zones of usable water, brine,
hydrocarbon, geothermal, or other
mineral-bearing zones based on the best
available information;
(2) Potential hazards to persons and
the environment such as abnormal
pressure zones, lost circulation zones,
hydrogen sulfide gas, or karst
formations; and
(3) Nature and extent (depth if
known) of near-surface bedrock
fracturing/jointing relative to proposed
cemented surface casing-seat depth and
any open annular interval proposed in
the well design.
(c) You must submit the following
information about new surface
disturbances and construction:
(1) Maps showing the proposed area
of operations; boundaries of new surface
disturbances as determined by a
location survey; and proposed access
routes as determined by a location
survey;
(2) Maps showing the proposed
location of all support facilities,
including those for transportation (e.g.,
vehicle parking areas, airstrips,
helicopter pads), sanitation, occupation,
staging areas, fuel dumps, refueling
areas, loading docks, water supplies,
and disposal facilities;
(3) The method and diagrams,
including cross-sections, of any
proposed pad construction, road
construction, cut-and-fill areas, and
surface maintenance, including erosion
control;
(4) The number and types of
equipment and vehicles, including an
estimate of vehicular round trips
associated with each phase of your
operation;
(5) An estimated timetable for each
phase of the proposed operations,
including any operational timing
constraints;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
(6) The type and extent of security
measures proposed at your area of
operations;
(7) The power sources and their
transmission systems for the proposed
operations; and
(8) The types and quantities of all
solid and liquid waste generation and
the proposed methods of storage,
handling, and disposal.
§ 9.85 Environmental conditions and
mitigation actions.
You must submit the following
information about environmental
conditions and mitigation actions:
(a) The natural resource and the
cultural resource survey reports for your
proposed area of operations;
(b) A description of the steps you
propose to take to mitigate any adverse
environmental impacts on park
resources and values, including but not
limited to, the unit’s: Land features,
land uses, fish and wildlife, vegetation,
soils, surface and subsurface water
resources, air quality, noise, lightscapes,
viewsheds, cultural resources, and
economic environment; and
(c) A discussion of:
(1) Any anticipated impacts that you
cannot mitigate; and
(2) All alternative technologically
feasible, least damaging methods of
operations, their costs, and their
environmental effects.
§ 9.86 Spill control and emergency
preparedness plan.
You must submit the following
information about your spill control and
emergency preparedness plan. You may
use a spill prevention control and
countermeasure (SPCC) plan prepared
under 40 CFR part 112 if the plan
includes all of the information required
by this section. You must submit:
(a) A list of names, addresses, and
telephone numbers of persons that the
Superintendent can contact in the event
of a spill, fire, or accident, including the
order in which the persons should be
contacted;
(b) Notification and reporting
procedure in the event of a spill, fire, or
accident;
(c) Identification of contaminating or
toxic substances used within your area
of operations or expected to be
encountered during operations;
(d) Identification of abnormal
pressure, temperature, toxic gases or
substances, or other hazardous
conditions at your area of operations or
expected to be encountered during
operations;
(e) Measures (e.g., procedures, facility
design, equipment) to minimize risks to
human health and safety and the
environment;
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65595
(f) Steps to prevent accumulations of
oil or other materials deemed to be fire
hazards from occurring in the vicinity of
well locations and lease tanks;
(g) The equipment and methods for
containment and cleanup of
contaminating substances, including a
description of the equipment available
at your area of operations and
equipment available from local
contractors;
(h) A storm water drainage plan and
actions intended to mitigate storm water
runoff;
(i) Safety data sheets for each material
you will use or encounter during
operations; including expected
quantities maintained at your area of
operations;
(j) A description of the emergency
actions you will take in the event of
accidents causing human injury; and
(k) Contingency plans for conditions
and emergencies other than spills, such
as if your area of operations is located
in areas prone to hurricanes, flooding,
tornadoes, fires, or earthquakes.
§ 9.87 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing geophysical
exploration?
If you propose to conduct geophysical
exploration, you must submit the
following additional information:
(a) The number of crews and numbers
of workers in each crew;
(b) Names and depths of geologic
zones targeted for imaging;
(c) A description of the acquisition
methods, including the procedures,
specific equipment you will use, and
energy sources (e.g., explosives or
vibroseis trucks);
(d) The methods of access along each
survey line for personnel, materials, and
equipment;
(e) A list of all explosives, blasting
equipment, chemicals, and fuels you
will use in the proposed operations,
including a description of proposed
disposal methods, transportation
methods, safety measures, and storage
facilities; and
(f) A map showing the positions of
each survey line including all source
and receiver locations as determined by
a locational survey, and including
shotpoint offset distances from wells,
buildings, other infrastructure, and
areas the NPS has indicated to you as
environmentally sensitive areas.
§ 9.88 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing drilling
operations?
If you are proposing to drill a well,
you must submit the following
additional information:
(a) Well-pad construction, including
dimensions and cross sections of: Cut
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65596
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
and fill areas and excavations for
ditches, sumps, and spill control
equipment or structures, including lined
areas;
(b) Drill-rig and equipment layout,
including rig components, fuel tanks,
testing equipment, support facilities,
storage areas, and all other well-site
equipment and facilities;
(c) The drilling program, including
hole size for each section and the
directional program, if applicable;
(d) Proposed drilling depth and the
estimated depths and names of usable
water, brine, hydrocarbon, geothermal,
or other mineral-bearing zones;
(e) The type and characteristics of the
proposed mud systems;
(f) The casing program, including the
size, grade, weight, and setting depth of
each string;
(g) The cementing program, including
downhole location of any stage
equipment, cement types, volumes, and
additives to be used, and a description
of pressure tests and cement verification
techniques used that will be run to
evaluate cement placement and
integrity;
(h) The minimum specifications for
pressure control equipment function
and pressure testing frequency and the
blowout preventer stack arrangement;
(i) The proposed logging, coring, and
testing programs;
(j) The proposed completion program,
including completion type (open-hole,
perforated, slotted liner, etc.) and
procedures, including considerations for
well control; and
(k) A description of the equipment,
materials, and procedures proposed for
well plugging, including plug depths,
plug types, and minimum mud weight.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.89 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing well-stimulation
operations, including hydraulic fracturing?
If you are proposing well stimulation
operations, including hydraulic
fracturing, you must submit the
following additional information:
(a) The geologic names, a geologic
description, and the estimated depths
(measured and true vertical) to the top
and bottom of the formation into which
hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be
injected. The estimated minimum
vertical distance between the top of the
fracture zone and the nearest usable
water zone, and the measured depth of
the proposed perforated or open-hole
interval.
(b) The estimated depths (measured
and true vertical) to the top and bottom
of the confining zone(s). Include a map
showing the location, orientation, and
extent of any known or suspected faults
or fractures within one-half mile
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
(horizontal distance) of the wellbore
trajectory that may transect the
confining zone(s).
(c) A map showing all existing
wellbore trajectories, regardless of type,
within one-half mile (horizontal
distance) of any portion of the wellbore
into which hydraulic fracturing fluids
are to be injected. The true vertical
depth of each wellbore identified on the
map must be indicated.
(d) Steps to be taken before treatment
to verify mechanical integrity of all
downhole tubulars and tools and
cement quality, including pressure tests,
monitoring of cement returns to surface,
and cement evaluation logs (or other
logs acceptable to the Superintendent)
demonstrating that the occurrences of
usable water zones have been isolated to
protect them from contamination.
(e) A detailed description of the
proposed well-stimulation design,
including:
(1) The proposed stimulation fluid,
including, but not limited to, the base
fluid and each additive by trade name,
and purpose of additive;
(2) Proposed proppant system;
(3) The estimated total volume of
fluid to be used;
(4) The anticipated surface treating
pressure range;
(5) The maximum anticipated surface
pressure that will be applied during the
hydraulic fracturing process;
(6) The trajectory of the wellbore into
which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to
be injected and the estimated direction
and length of the fractures that will be
propagated and a notation indicating the
true vertical depth of the top and bottom
of the fractures; and
(7) Any microseismic monitoring
planned or proposed in conjunction
with well stimulation.
(f) The source and location of water
supply, such as reused or recycled
water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes,
ponds, and water supply wells, and the
source and location of water supply,
such as reused or recycled water, rivers,
creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water
supply wells.
(g) The storage, mixing, pumping, and
control equipment needed to perform
the stimulation.
(h) The following information
concerning the handling of recovered
fluids:
(1) The estimated volume of
stimulation fluids to be recovered
during flow back;
(2) The proposed methods of handling
the recovered fluids including any
onsite treatment for re-use of fluids in
other stimulation activities; and
(3) The proposed disposal method of
the recovered fluids, including, but not
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
limited to, injection, hauling by truck,
or transporting by pipeline.
§ 9.90 What additional information must be
included if I am proposing production
operations?
If you are proposing to produce a
well, you must submit all of the
following information:
(a) The dimensions and the to-scale
layout of the wellpad, clearly
identifying well locations, noting partial
reclamation areas; gathering, separation,
metering, and storage equipment;
electrical lines; fences; spill control
equipment or structures including lined
areas, artificial lift equipment, tank
batteries, treating and separating
vessels, secondary or enhanced recovery
facilities, water disposal facilities, gas
compression and/or injection facilities;
metering points; sales point (if on lease);
tanker pick-up points; gas compressor,
including size and type (if applicable);
and any other well site equipment;
(b) The size, grade, weight, and setting
depth of all casing and tubing strings;
cementing history; type and size of
packers and subsurface flow control
devices; top and bottom depths of each
completed interval; and method of
completion;
(c) The well history, including
completions, stimulations, servicing,
and workovers;
(d) The minimum specifications for
pressure-control equipment, function,
and pressure-testing frequency;
(e) The method and means used to
transport produced oil and gas,
including vehicular transport; flowline
and gathering line construction;
operation; pipe size; operating pressure;
cathodic protection methods; surface
equipment use; surface equipment
location; maintenance procedures;
maintenance schedules; pressure
detection methods; and shutdown
procedures;
(f) Road and wellpad maintenance
plan, including equipment and
materials to maintain the road surface
and control erosion;
(g) Vegetation management plan on
well sites, roads, pipeline corridors, and
other disturbed surface areas, including
control of exotic species;
(h) Storm water management plan on
the well site;
(i) Produced water storage and
disposal plan; and
(j) The procedures proposed for well
plugging, the depths and the types of
plugs, and minimum mud weight.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Operations Permit: Application Review
Process
§ 9.100 How will NPS process my
application?
We will conduct initial review of your
application to determine if all
information is complete. Once your
information is complete, we can begin
formal review. If you propose operations
in Big Cypress National Preserve, the
requirements in § 9.105 apply instead of
those in § 9.101 and § 9.102.
§ 9.101 How will the NPS conduct initial
review?
(a) Within 30 days after receipt of
your application, the Superintendent
will notify you in writing that either:
(1) Your application is complete and
the NPS will begin formal review;
(2) Your permit application does not
meet the information requirements and
additional information is required
before the NPS will conduct formal
review of your permit application; or
(3) More time is necessary to complete
the review, in which case the NPS will
provide you an estimate of the amount
of additional time reasonably needed
and an explanation for the delay.
(b) If you resubmit information
requested by the NPS under this section
and the Superintendent determines that
you have met all applicable information
requirements, the Superintendent will
notify you within 30 days after receipt
of the additional information that either:
(1) Your application is complete and
the NPS will begin formal review; or
(2) More time is necessary to complete
the review, in which case the NPS will
provide you an estimate of the amount
of additional time reasonably needed
and an explanation for the delay.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.102 How will the NPS conduct formal
review?
(a) The Superintendent will evaluate
the potential impacts of your proposal
on federally owned or administered
lands, waters, or resources within NPS
units, visitor uses and experiences, and
visitor and employee health and safety.
As part of this evaluation process, the
NPS will comply with all applicable
federal laws, including the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The
Superintendent will then make a
recommendation to the Regional
Director regarding final action on your
operations permit.
(b) As part of the evaluation process,
the Superintendent may consult with
other Federal, State, and local agencies.
§ 9.103 What standards must be met to
approve my application?
(a) In order to approve your
operations permit application, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
Regional Director first must determine
that your operations:
(1) Will not impair park resources and
values under the statute commonly
known as the NPS Organic Act;
(2) Will meet all applicable operating
standards; and
(3) Will comply with all applicable
Federal, State, and local laws and
regulations.
(b) Before approval of your permit
application, you must submit to the
Superintendent:
(1) Financial assurance in the amount
specified by the Regional Director and
in accordance with the requirements of
§§ 9.140 through 9.144; and
(2) Proof of liability insurance with
limits sufficient to cover injuries to
persons or property caused by your
operations.
§ 9.104 What final actions may the
Regional Director take on my Operations
Permit application?
(a) The Regional Director will take
final action within 180 days after the
date the NPS deems your application
complete unless:
(1) We and you agree that such final
action will occur within a shorter or
longer period of time; or
(2) We determine that an additional
period of time is required to ensure that
we have, in reviewing the permit
application, complied with other
applicable laws, Executive orders, and
regulations.
(b) The Regional Director will notify
you in writing that your permit
application is:
(1) Approved, and provide you a list
of required operating conditions; or
(2) Denied, and provide you
justification for the denial. Any such
denial must be consistent with § 9.30(c).
§ 9.105 What is the approval process for
operations in Big Cypress National
Preserve?
(a) Within 30 days after the date of
submission of your application, we will
notify you whether the application
contains all information reasonably
necessary to allow us to consider the
application and, if not, will request that
you provide additional information.
After receiving this notification, you
must either supply any reasonably
necessary additional information or
must notify us that you believe that the
application contains all reasonably
necessary information and is therefore
complete; whereupon we may:
(1) Within 30 days after receipt of the
notice from the applicant, determine
that the application does not contain all
reasonably necessary additional
information and, on that basis, deny the
application; or
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65597
(2) Review the application and take
final action within 60 days after the date
that you provided notification to the
NPS that your application is complete.
(b) The Regional Director will take
final action within 90 days after the date
you submitted your application unless:
(1) We and you agree that final action
can occur within a shorter or longer
period of time; or
(2) We determine that an additional
period of time is required to ensure that
we have, in reviewing the permit
application, complied with other
applicable laws, executive orders, and
regulations.
Operating Standards
§ 9.110 What are the purposes and
functions of NPS operating standards?
(a) You must comply with all
operating standards in §§ 9.111 through
9.116, as well as with the standards in
§§ 9.117 and 9.118, if applicable. The
standards apply only to operations that
occur within a park unit, including
downhole activities, and do not apply to
surface activities located outside a park
unit. These operating standards are
incorporated into the terms and
conditions of your operations permit.
Violation of these operating standards
will subject you to the prohibitions and
penalties provisions of §§ 9.180 through
9.182.
(b) NPS operating standards ensure
protection of federally owned
administered lands, waters, and
resources of NPS units, visitor uses and
experiences, and visitor and employee
health and safety. The operating
standards give us and the operator
flexibility to consider using alternative
methods, equipment, materials design,
and conduct of operations.
(c) In applying standards to a
particular operation, you must use
technologically feasible, least damaging
methods to protect federally owned or
administered lands, waters, and
resources of NPS units, visitor uses and
experiences, and visitor and employee
health and safety.
§ 9.111 What general facility design and
management standards must I meet?
(a) You must design, construct,
operate, and maintain access to your
operational site to cause the minimum
amount of surface disturbance needed to
safely conduct operations and to avoid
areas the NPS has indicated to you as
sensitive resources.
(b) You must install and maintain
secondary containment materials and
structures for all equipment and
facilities using or storing contaminating
substances. The containment system
must be sufficiently impervious to
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65598
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
prevent discharge and must have
sufficient storage capacity to contain, at
a minimum, the largest potential spill
incident.
(c) You must keep temporarily stored
waste in the smallest feasible area, and
confine it to prevent escape as a result
of percolation, rain, high water, or other
causes. You must regularly remove
waste from the NPS unit and lawfully
dispose of it in a direct and workable
timeframe. Under 36 CFR part 6, you
may not establish a solid waste disposal
site in an NPS unit.
(d) You must use engines that adhere
to current Federal and State emission
standards.
(e) You must construct, maintain, and
use roads to minimize fugitive dust
emissions;
(f) You must use equipment and
practices that minimize releases or
flaring of gas.
(g) You must provide a safe
environment for fish and wildlife free
from exposure to physical and chemical
hazards.
(h) You must control the invasion of
exotic plant and animal species in your
area of operations from the beginning
through final reclamation.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.112
meet?
What hydrologic standards must I
(a) You must not conduct grounddisturbing operations within 500 feet of
surface water, including an intermittent
or ephemeral watercourse, or wetland;
or within 500 feet of any structure or
facility used by the NPS for
interpretation, public recreation, or
administration. The Superintendent
may increase or decrease this distance
as needed to protect federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety. Measurements for
purposes of this paragraph are by map
distance.
(b) You must construct facilities in a
manner that maintains hydrologic
connectivity between surface water and
groundwater.
(c) You must not cause measureable
degradation of surface water or
groundwater beyond that of existing
conditions.
(d) You must conduct operations in a
manner that maintains natural processes
of erosion and sedimentation.
§ 9.113
meet?
What safety standards must I
(a) You must maintain your area of
operations in a manner that avoids or
minimizes the cause or spread of fires
and does not intensify fires originating
outside your operations area.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
(b) You must maintain structures,
facilities, improvements, and equipment
in a safe and professional manner in
order to provide a safe environment for
park resources, park visitors, and NPS
employees, free from exposure to
physical and chemical hazards.
(c) You must provide site-security
measures to protect visitors from
hazardous conditions resulting from the
conduct of your operations.
§ 9.114 What lighting and visual standards
must I meet?
(a) You must design, shield, and focus
lighting to minimize the effects of spill
light on the night sky or adjacent areas.
(b) You must reduce visual contrast in
the landscape by selecting the area of
operations, avoiding unnecessary
disturbance, choosing appropriate
colors for permanent facilities, and
other means.
(c) You must use road and pad
materials similar in structure to soils in
surrounding profiles whenever feasible.
§ 9.115 What noise reduction standards
must I meet?
You must prevent or minimize all
noise that:
(a) Adversely affects the natural
soundscape or other park resources or
values, taking into account frequency,
magnitude, or duration; or
(b) Exceeds levels that have been
identified through monitoring as being
acceptable to or appropriate for visitor
uses at the sites being monitored.
§ 9.116 What reclamation and protection
standards must I meet?
(a) You must promptly clean up and
remove any released contaminating
substances and provide documentation
to the Superintendent that the
substances were disposed of in
accordance with all applicable Federal,
State, and local laws.
(b) You must perform partial
reclamation of areas no longer necessary
to conduct operations. You must begin
final reclamation as soon as possible but
no later than 6 months after you
complete your permitted operations
unless the Regional Director authorizes
a longer period in writing.
(c) You must protect all survey
monuments, witness corners, reference
monuments, and bearing trees against
destruction, obliteration, or damage
from operations. You are responsible for
reestablishment, restoration, and
referencing of any monuments, corners
and bearing trees that are destroyed,
obliterated, or damaged by your
operations.
(d) You must complete reclamation
by:
(1) Plugging all wells;
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(2) Removing all above-ground
structures, equipment, and roads and all
other man-made material and debris
resulting from operations;
(3) Removing or neutralizing any
contaminating substances;
(4) Reestablishing native vegetative
communities, or providing for
conditions where ecological processes
typical of the ecological zone (e.g., plant
or wildlife succession) will reestablish
themselves;
(5) Grading to reasonably conform the
contours to preexisting elevations that
are most appropriate to maximizing
ecologic functional value;
(6) Restoring conditions to predisturbance hydrologic movement and
functionality;
(7) Restoring natural systems using
native soil material that is similar in
character to the adjacent undisturbed
soil profiles;
(8) Ensuring that reclaimed areas do
not interfere with visitor use or with
administration of the unit;
(9) Meeting conditions compatible
with the management objectives of the
park; and
(10) Ensuring proper and equitable
apportionment of reclamation
responsibilities by coordinating with us
or with other operators who may be
using a portion of your area of
operations.
§ 9.117 What additional operating
standards apply to geophysical operations?
If you conduct geophysical
operations, you must do all of the
following:
(a) Use surveying methods that
minimize the need for vegetative
trimming and removal;
(b) Locate source points using
industry-accepted minimum safe-offset
distances from pipelines, telephone
lines, railroad tracks, roads, power lines,
water wells, oil and gas wells, oil and
gas-production facilities, and buildings;
(c) Use equipment and methods that,
based upon the specific environment,
will minimize impacts to federally
owned or administered lands, waters,
and resources of NPS units, visitor uses
and experiences, and visitor and
employee health and safety; and
(d) If you use shot holes, you must:
(1) Use biodegradable charges;
(2) Plug all shot holes to prevent a
pathway for migration for fluids along
any portion of the bore; and
(3) Leave the site in a clean and safe
condition that will not impede surface
reclamation or pose a hazard to human
health and safety.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.118 What additional operating
standards apply to drilling, stimulation, and
production operations?
If you conduct drilling, stimulation,
and production operations, you must
meet all of the standards in this section.
(a) Drilling. (1) You must use
containerized mud circulation systems
for operations.
(2) You must not create earthen pits
for any use. Earthen pits used solely for
secondary containment on sites existing
before [effective date of the final rule]
may continue in use; however, the
Superintendent may require such
structures to be lined or removed
depending on site-specific operational
and environmental conditions.
(3) You must take all necessary
precautions to keep your wells under
control at all times, use only contractors
or employees trained and competent to
drill and operate the wells, and use only
oil field equipment and practices
generally used in the industry.
(4) You must design, implement, and
maintain integrated casing, cementing,
drilling fluid, completion, stimulation,
and blowout prevention programs.
These programs must be based upon
sound engineering principles to prevent
escape of fluids to the surface and to
isolate and protect usable water zones
throughout the life of the well, taking
into account all relevant geologic and
engineering factors.
(b) Stimulation operations including
hydraulic fracturing. (1) You must not
begin injection activities before you
demonstrate the mechanical integrity of
all surface and downhole tubulars and
equipment to differential pressures
equal to at least those calculated at the
maximum anticipated treating pressure.
(2) You must continuously monitor
and record the treating pressures and all
annular pressures before, during, and
after the treatment to ensure that
treatment materials are directed to the
intended zone.
(3) If mechanical integrity is lost
during the treatment, you must
immediately cease the operation and
notify the Superintendent as soon as
feasible, but no later than 24 hours after
the incident. Within 15 days after the
occurrence, you must submit to the
Superintendent a report containing all
details pertaining to the incident,
including corrective actions taken.
(c) Production. (1) You must monitor
producing conditions to document
maintenance of mechanical integrity of
both surface and subsurface equipment.
(2) You must maintain your well to
prevent escape of fluids to the surface
and to isolate and protect usable water
zones throughout the life of the well,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
taking into account all relevant geologic
and engineering factors.
(3) You must identify wells and
related facilities by a sign, which must
remain in place until the well is plugged
and abandoned and the related facilities
are closed. The sign must be of durable
construction, and the lettering must be
legible and large enough to be read
under normal conditions at a distance of
at least 50 feet. Each sign must show the
name of the well, name of the operator,
and the emergency contact phone
number.
(4) You must remove all equipment
and materials that are no longer needed
for a particular phase of your operation.
(5) You must plug all wells to:
(i) Prevent a pathway of migration for
fluids along any portion of the bore; and
(ii) Leave the surface in a clean and
safe condition that will not impede
surface reclamation or pose a hazard to
human health and safety.
General Terms and Conditions
§ 9.120 What terms and conditions apply
to all operators?
The following terms and conditions
apply to all operators, regardless of
whether these terms and conditions are
expressly included in the operator’s
operations permit:
(a) The operator/permittee is
responsible for ensuring that all of its
contractors and subcontractors comply
fully with all of the requirements of this
subpart;
(b) The operator/permittee may not
use any surface water or groundwater
owned or administered by the United
States that has been diverted or
withdrawn from a source located within
the boundaries of an NPS unit unless
the use has been approved in
accordance with NPS policy;
(c) The operator/permittee must
provide the NPS an affidavit, signed by
an official who is authorized to legally
bind the company, stating that proposed
operations are in compliance with all
applicable federal, state, and local laws
and regulations and that all information
submitted to the NPS is true and correct;
and
(d) The operator/permittee agrees to
indemnify and hold harmless the
United States and its officers and
employees from and against any and all
liability of any kind whatsoever arising
out of or resulting from the acts or
omissions of the operator and its
employees, agents, representatives,
contractors, and subcontractors in the
conduct of activities under the
operations permit.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65599
§ 9.121 What monitoring and reporting is
required for all operators?
(a) The NPS may access your area of
operations at any time to monitor the
potential effects of the operations and to
ensure compliance with this subpart
where applicable.
(b) The Regional Director may
determine that third-party monitors are
necessary to protect federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety.
(1) The Regional Director’s
determination will be based on the
scope and complexity of the proposed
operation and whether the park has the
staff and technical ability to ensure
compliance with the operations permit
and any provision of this subpart.
(2) A third-party monitor will report
directly to the NPS at intervals
determined by the Superintendent, and
you will be responsible for the cost of
the third party monitor. We will make
the information reported available to
you upon your request.
(c) You must notify the
Superintendent of any accidents
involving serious personal injury or
death and of any fires or spills on the
site within 24 hours after the accident
occurs. You must submit a full written
report on the accident to the
Superintendent within 90 days after the
accident occurs.
(d) You must notify the
Superintendent within 24 hours after
the discovery of any cultural or
scientific resource you encounter that
might be altered or destroyed by your
operation. You must cease operations if
necessary and leave the discovered
resource intact until the Superintendent
provides you with instructions. The
Superintendent will determine, within
10 working days after notification what
action will be taken with respect to the
discovery.
(e) Upon the Superintendent’s
request, you must submit reports or
other information necessary to verify
compliance with your permit or with
any provision of this subpart. To fulfill
this request, you may submit to the NPS
reports that you have submitted to the
State under State regulations, or that
you have submitted to any other Federal
agency.
§ 9.122 What additional reports must I
submit if my operation includes hydraulic
fracturing?
If your operations include hydraulic
fracturing, you must provide the
Superintendent with a report including
all of the following details of the
stimulation within 30 days after the
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
65600
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
completion of the last stage of hydraulic
fracturing operations for each well. The
information required in paragraph (a) of
this section must be submitted to the
authorized officer through FracFocus or
another NPS-designated database:
(a) The true vertical depth of the well,
total water volume used, and a
description of the base fluid and each
additive in the hydraulic fracturing
fluid, including the trade name,
supplier, purpose, ingredients,
Chemical Abstract Service Number
(CAS), maximum ingredient
concentration in additive (percent by
mass), and maximum ingredient
concentration in hydraulic fracturing
fluid (percent by mass).
(b) The actual source(s) and
location(s) of the water used in the
hydraulic fracturing fluid;
(c) The maximum surface pressure
and rate at the end of each stage of the
hydraulic fracturing operation and the
actual flush volume.
(d) The actual, estimated, or
calculated fracture length, height and
direction.
(e) The actual measured depth of
perforations or the open-hole interval.
(f) You must submit the actual volume
of stimulation fluids recovered during
flow back, including a description of
how the volumes were measured or
calculated.
(g) The following information
concerning the handling of fluids
recovered, covering the period between
the commencement of hydraulic
fracturing and the implementation of
the approved permit for the disposal of
produced water under NPS
requirements:
(1) The methods of handling the
recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, transfer pipes and tankers,
holding pond use, re-use for other
stimulation activities, or injection; and
(2) The disposal method of the
recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, the percent injected, the
percent stored at an off-lease disposal
facility, and the percent recycled.
(h) You must submit continuous
monitoring records of annulus pressure
at the bradenhead and other annular
pressures that document pressures
before, during, and after injection
operations. You must submit a signed
certification that wellbore integrity was
maintained throughout the operation.
Access to Oil and Gas Rights
§ 9.130 May I cross Federal property to
reach the boundary of my oil and gas right?
(a) The Regional Director may grant
you the privilege of access on, across, or
through federally owned or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
administered lands or waters in any
NPS unit to reach the boundary of your
oil and gas right.
(b) In NPS units in Alaska, regulations
and standards at 43 CFR part 36 govern
access to an operator’s oil and gas right.
§ 9.131 Will the NPS charge me a fee for
access?
(a) The Regional Director may charge
you a fee if you use federally owned or
administered lands or waters outside
the scope of your oil and gas right.
(1) If you require use of federally
owned or administered lands or waters
for your operation, the Regional Director
will charge you a fee based on the fair
market value of the use of the lands for
access.
(2) If access to your mineral right is
across an existing park road, the
Regional Director will charge the fee
according to a posted fee schedule.
(b) Fees under this section will not be
charged for access within the scope of
your oil and gas right or access to your
mineral right that is otherwise provided
for by law.
§ 9.132 Will I be charged a fee for
emergency access to my operations?
The Regional Director will not charge
a fee for access across federally owned
or administered lands beyond the scope
of your oil and gas right as necessary to
respond to an emergency situation at
your area of operations if the Regional
Director determines that the
circumstances require an immediate
response to either:
(a) Prevent or to minimize injury to
park resources; or
(b) Ensure public health and safety.
Financial Assurance
§ 9.140 Do I have to provide financial
assurance to the NPS?
Yes. You must file financial assurance
with us in a form acceptable to the
Regional Director and payable upon
demand. This financial assurance is in
addition to any financial assurance
required by any other regulatory
authority.
§ 9.142 Will the NPS adjust my financial
assurance?
The Regional Director may require, or
you may request, an adjustment to the
financial assurance amount because of
any circumstance that increases or
decreases the estimated costs
established under § 9.141.
§ 9.143 When will the NPS release my
financial assurance?
(a) Your responsibility and that of any
surety under the financial assurance
will continue until either:
(1) The Regional Director determines
that you have met all applicable
reclamation operating standards and
any additional reclamation
requirements that may be included in
your operations permit; or
(2) A new operator assumes your
operations, as provided in §§ 9.160
through 9.161.
(b) You will be notified within 30
days after the Regional Director’s
determination that your financial
assurance has been released.
§ 9.144 Under what circumstances will I
forfeit my financial assurance?
(a) You will forfeit all or part of your
financial assurance if all efforts to
secure your compliance with your
reclamation responsibilities under the
approved permit or any provisions of
this regulation are unsuccessful.
(b) If you forfeit your financial
assurance, we may:
(1) Prohibit you from removing all
structures, equipment, or other
materials from your area of operations;
(2) Require you to secure the
operations site and take any necessary
actions to protect federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety; and
(3) Suspend review of any permit
applications you have submitted until
the Regional Director determines that all
violations of permit provisions or of any
provision of this subpart are resolved.
(4) Seek recovery as provided in
§ 9.141 for all costs of reclamation in
excess of the posted financial assurance.
Modification to an Operation
§ 9.141 How does the NPS establish the
amount of financial assurance?
§ 9.150 Can my approved permit be
modified?
We will base the financial assurance
amount upon the estimated cost for a
third-party contractor to complete
reclamation in accordance with this
subpart. If the cost of reclamation
exceeds the amount of your financial
assurance, you will remain liable for all
costs of reclamation in excess of the
financial assurance.
The Regional Director may modify an
approved temporary access or
operations permit to adjust to changed
conditions or to address unanticipated
conditions, either unilaterally or at your
request.
(a) To request a modification to your
approved permit, you must provide
written notice to the Superintendent
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
describing the modification and why it
is needed. The Regional Director will
review your request for modification,
under the approval standards and
timeframes at § 9.62 or 9.104.
(b) If the Regional Director authorizes
a modification to your permit, you will
receive a written notice that:
(1) Describes the modification
required and justification; and
(2) Specifies the time within which
you must incorporate the modification
into your operations.
(c) You may not implement any
modification until you have received
the Regional Director’s written approval.
Change of Operator
Until you meet the requirements of
this subpart and the Regional Director
accepts the new operator’s financial
assurance, you remain responsible for
compliance with your operations permit
and we will retain your financial
assurance.
(a) If you were operating without an
operations permit, you are subject to
§§ 9.120 through 9.122 and §§ 9.180
through 9.182 until the new operator
meets the requirements of this subpart
and the Regional Director accepts the
new operator’s financial assurance.
(b) You must notify the
Superintendent in writing within 30
calendar days after the date the new
owner acquires the rights to conduct
operations. Your written notification
must include:
(1) The names and addresses of the
person or entity conveying the right and
the person or entity acquiring the right;
(2) The effective date of transfer;
(3) The description of the rights,
assets, and liabilities being transferred
and which ones, if any, are being
reserved by the previous owner, and
(4) A written acknowledgement from
the new owner that the contents of the
notification are true and correct.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.161 What must I do if operations are
transferred to me?
(a) If another operator transfers
operations to you, you must:
(1) Adopt and agree in writing to
conduct operations in accordance with
all terms and conditions of the previous
operator’s operations permit; and
(2) File financial assurance with us
that is acceptable to the Regional
Director and made payable to the NPS.
(b) If the previous operator was
granted an exemption under § 9.72, you
must provide to the Superintendent:
(1) Documentation demonstrating that
you hold the right to operate within an
NPS unit; and
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Well Plugging
§ 9.170
§ 9.160 What are my responsibilities if I
transfer my operations?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(2) The names and addresses of:
(i) The operator;
(ii) The mineral owner;
(iii) Any agents, assignees, designees,
lessees, or other representatives of the
operator;
(iv) The operator’s representative
responsible for the overall management
of the proposed operations;
(v) The operator’s representative
responsible for field supervision of the
proposed operations; and
(vi) The operator’s representative
responsible for emergency response for
the proposed operations.
Jkt 238001
When must I plug my well?
Except as provided in § 9.171, you
must plug your well when any of the
following occurs:
(a) Your drilling operations have
ended and you have taken no further
action on your well within 60 days;
(b) Your well, which has been
completed for production operations, is
continuously inactive for a period of 1
year; or
(c) The period approved in your
operations permit to maintain your well
in shut-in status has expired.
§ 9.171 Can I get an extension to the well
plugging requirement?
(a) You may apply for either an
operations permit or a modification to
your approved operations permit to
maintain your well in a shut-in status
for up to 5 years. The application must
include:
(1) An explanation of why the well is
shut-in or temporarily abandoned and
your future plans for utilization;
(2) A demonstration of the mechanical
integrity of both surface and downhole
equipment such that there is no
migration of fluid from any formation in
which it originally occurred or from the
surface to the well; and
(3) A description of the manner in
which your well, equipment, and area of
operations will be maintained.
(b) Based on the information provided
under this section, the Regional Director
may approve your application to
maintain your well in shut-in status for
a period up to 5 years.
You may apply for additional
extensions by submitting a new
application under paragraph (a) of this
section.
Prohibitions and Penalties
§ 9.180 What acts are prohibited under this
subpart?
The following are prohibited:
(a) Operating in violation of terms or
conditions of a temporary access permit,
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65601
or an approved operations permit, or
any provision of this subpart;
(b) Damaging federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources
of an NPS unit as a result of failure to
comply with the terms or conditions of
a temporary access permit, an
operations permit, or any provision of
this subpart;
(c) Conducting operations without a
temporary access permit or operations
permit;
(d) Failure to comply with any
suspension or revocation order issued
under this subpart; and
(e) Failure to comply with any
applicable Federal, State, or local laws.
§ 9.181 What enforcement actions can the
NPS take?
If you engage in a prohibited act
described in § 9.180:
(a) You may be subject to a fine or
imprisonment, or both, in accordance
with 36 CFR 1.3;
(b) The Superintendent may suspend
your operations; or
(c) The Regional Director may revoke
your approved temporary access permit
or operations permit.
§ 9.182 How do violations affect my ability
to obtain a permit?
Until you comply with this subpart or
the terms and conditions of an existing
temporary access permit or operations
permit, we will not consider any new
requests for access to conduct
operations within any NPS units.
Reconsideration and Appeals
§ 9.190 Can I, as operator, request
reconsideration of NPS decisions?
Yes. If you disagree with a decision of
the Regional Director under this
subpart, you may file with the Regional
Director a written statement describing
the alleged factual or legal errors in the
original decision and requesting that the
Regional Director reconsider the
decision. You must file your request for
reconsideration within 60 calendar days
after your receipt of the Regional
Director’s decision. The NPS will
dismiss as untimely any request for
reconsideration received more than 60
days after your receipt of the original
decision.
§ 9.191 How does the NPS process my
request for reconsideration?
The Regional Director will review his
or her original decision and, within 90
days after receipt of your appeal,
provide you with a written statement
reversing, affirming, or modifying that
decision, unless the Regional Director
notifies you that he or she needs
additional time to review the original
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
65602
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
decision. When issued, that written
statement constitutes the Regional
Director’s final decision on the matter.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 9.192 Can I appeal the Regional
Director’s decision?
(a) If the Regional Director affirms or
modifies his or her original decision
after you file a request for
reconsideration, you may then file an
appeal with the NPS Director within 60
calendar days after your receipt of the
Regional Director’s decision under
§ 9.191.
(b) Your appeal must include a
statement of exceptions specifying your
specific disagreements with the
Regional Director’s final decision. If you
do not file your statement of exceptions
within 60 calendar days, your appeal
will be dismissed, and the Regional
Director’s decision will constitute the
NPS’s final decision on the matter.
(c) If you timely file your statement of
exceptions, the Regional Director will
forward his or her decision and the
record for the appeal to the NPS
Director. The record will consist of
NPS’s official files on the proposed
permit application, as well as any
documents submitted by the parties
upon which the Regional Director based
his or her decision. The Regional
Director will maintain that record under
separate cover and will certify that he or
she based the decision on that record.
The Regional Director will make the
record available to you at your request.
(d) If, upon review, the NPS Director
considers the record inadequate, then
the NPS Director may require additional
appropriate documentation or
information, or may remand the case to
the Regional Director with appropriate
instructions for further action.
(e) Within 45 calendar days from the
date the NPS Director receives your
statement of exceptions, the Director
will make his or her decision in writing.
If the Director requires more than 45
calendar days to reach his or her
decision, then the Director will notify
you and specify the reasons for the
delay. The Director’s written decision
will include:
(1) A statement of facts;
(2) A statement of conclusions; and
(3) An explanation of the reasons
upon which he or she based his or her
conclusions.
(f) No NPS decision under these
regulations that is subject to appeal to
the Regional Director or the Director
shall be considered final agency action
subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C.
704 until the Director has rendered his
or her decision on the matter. The
decision of the NPS Director will
constitute NPS’s final agency action,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
and no further appeal will lie in the
Department from that decision.
§ 9.193 Will filing a request for
reconsideration or appeal stop the NPS
from taking action under this subpart?
(a) Except as provided for in
paragraph (b) of this section, during the
reconsideration and appeal processes,
the decision at issue will be stayed
(suspended). The decision will not
become effective until the appeals
process is completed.
(b) If NPS suspends your operation
due to an emergency within your area
of operation that poses an immediate
threat of injury to federally owned or
controlled lands or waters, you have a
right to request reconsideration and
appeal the decision under §§ 9.190
through 9.194, but the suspension will
not be stayed until the threat is
corrected.
§ 9.194 What if the original decision was
made by the Superintendent?
Where the Superintendent has the
authority to make the original decision,
requests for reconsideration and appeals
may be filed in the manner provided by
the preceding sections, except that:
(a) The request for reconsideration
will be filed with and decided by the
Superintendent;
(b) The appeal will be filed with and
decided by the Regional Director; and
(c) The Regional Director’s decision
will constitute the final agency action
on the matter.
Public Participation
§ 9.200 How can the public participate in
the approval process?
(a) Interested parties may view the
publicly available documents at the
Superintendent’s office during normal
business hours or by other means
prescribed by the Superintendent. The
availability for public inspection of
information about the nature, location,
character, or ownership of park
resources will conform to all applicable
law and implementing regulations,
standards, and guidelines.
(b) The Superintendent will make
available for public inspection any
documents that an operator submits to
the NPS under this subpart except those
that you have identified as proprietary
or confidential.
(c) For the information required in
§ 9.122 of this subpart, the operator and
the owner of the information will be
deemed to have waived any right to
protect from public disclosure
information submitted through
FracFocus or another NPS-designated
database. For information required
under § 9.122 of this subpart that the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
owner of the information claims to be
exempt from public disclosure and is
withheld from the NPS, a corporate
officer, managing partner, or sole
proprietor of the operator must sign and
the operator must submit to the
authorized officer an affidavit that:
(1) Identifies the owner of the
withheld information and provides the
name, address and contact information
for a corporate officer, managing
partner, or sole proprietor of the owner
of the information;
(2) Identifies the Federal statute or
regulation that would prohibit the NPS
from publicly disclosing the information
if it were in the NPS’s possession;
(3) Affirms that the operator has been
provided the withheld information from
the owner of the information and is
maintaining records of the withheld
information, or that the operator has
access and will maintain access to the
withheld information held by the owner
of the information;
(4) Affirms that the information is not
publicly available;
(5) Affirms that the information is not
required to be publicly disclosed under
any applicable local, State, tribal, or
Federal law;
(6) Affirms that the owner of the
information is in actual competition and
identifies competitors or others that
could use the withheld information to
cause the owner of the information
substantial competitive harm;
(7) Affirms that the release of the
information would likely cause
substantial competitive harm to the
owner of the information and provides
the factual basis for that affirmation; and
(8) Affirms that the information is not
readily apparent through reverse
engineering with publicly available
information.
(d) If the operator relies upon
information from third parties, such as
the owner of the withheld information,
to make the affirmations in paragraphs
(c)(6) through (8) of this section, the
operator must provide a written
affidavit from the third party that sets
forth the relied-upon information.
(e) The NPS may require any operator
to submit to the NPS any withheld
information, and any information
relevant to a claim that withheld
information is exempt from public
disclosure.
(f) If the NPS determines that the
information submitted under paragraph
(e) of this section is not exempt from
disclosure, the NPS will make the
information available to the public after
providing the operator and owner of the
information with no fewer than 10
business days’ notice of the NPS’s
determination.
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(g) The operator must maintain
records of the withheld information
until the later of the NPS’s release of the
operator’s financial assurance, or 6 years
after completion of hydraulic fracturing
operations on Indian lands, or 7 years
after completion of hydraulic fracturing
operations on Federal lands. Any
subsequent operator will be responsible
for maintaining access to records
required by this paragraph during its
operation of the well. The operator will
be deemed to be maintaining the records
if it can promptly provide the complete
and accurate information to NPS, even
if the information is in the custody of its
owner.
(h) If any of the chemical identity
information required in § 9.122 of this
subpart is withheld, the operator must
provide the generic chemical name in
the submission required by § 9.122 of
this subpart. The generic chemical name
must be only as nonspecific as is
necessary to protect the confidential
chemical identity, and should be the
same as or no less descriptive than the
generic chemical name provided to the
Environmental Protection Agency.
§ 9.210 Has the Office of Management and
Budget approved the information collection
requirements?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has reviewed and
20:53 Oct 23, 2015
Subpart D—[Redesignated as Subpart
C]
■
4. Redesignate subpart D as subpart C.
Subpart C—[Amended]
Jkt 238001
6. In newly redesignated subpart C,
redesignate §§ 9.80 through 9.89 as
§§ 9.300 through 9.309.
■ 7. In newly redesignated § 9.302, in
paragraph (b)(2), remove the reference
§ 9.86 and add in its place the reference
§ 9.306.
■ 8. In newly redesignated § 9.304, in
paragraph (a), remove the reference
§ 9.84(b) and add in its place the
reference § 9.304(b) and remove the
reference § 9.83(b) and add in its place
the reference § 9.303(b).
■ 9. In newly redesignated § 9.306, in
paragraph (a), remove the reference
§ 9.84 and add in its place the reference
§ 9.304.
■ 10. In newly redesignated § 9.308, in
paragraph (a), remove the reference
§ 9.86 and add in its place the reference
§ 9.306.
■
Dated: October 16, 2015.
Karen Hyun,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2015–26812 Filed 10–23–15; 8:45 am]
5. The authority citation for newly
redesignated subpart C is revised to read
as follows:
■
Information Collection
VerDate Sep<11>2014
approved the information collection
requirements in 36 CFR part 9, subpart
B, and assigned OMB Control Number
1024–XXXX. We may not conduct or
sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. We use the information
collected to:
(1) Evaluate proposed operations;
(2) Ensure that all necessary
mitigation measures are employed to
protect park resources and values; and
(3) Ensure compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations.
(b) You may submit comments on any
aspect of the information collection
requirements to the Information
Collection Clearance Officer, National
Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242,
Reston, VA 20192.
BILLING CODE 4310–EJ–P
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 410hh; 16 U.S.C.
3101, et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 347; 16 U.S.C. 410bb;
16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.; 54 U.S.C. 320301; 54
U.S.C. 100101, et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
65603
E:\FR\FM\26OCP2.SGM
26OCP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 206 (Monday, October 26, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65571-65603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26812]
[[Page 65571]]
Vol. 80
Monday,
No. 206
October 26, 2015
Part IV
Department of Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Park Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
36 CFR Parts 1 and 9
General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 80 , No. 206 / Monday, October 26, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 65572]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Parts 1 and 9
[NPS-WASO-NRSS-15890; PX.XVPAD0520.00.1]
RIN 1024-AD78
General Provisions and Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to update our service-wide regulations
governing the exercise of non-federal oil and gas rights, to improve
our ability to protect park resources, values, and visitors from
potential impacts associated with non-federal oil and gas operations
located within National Park Service units. The proposed rule would
also make the regulations consistent with existing policies and
practices, and update the format to improve clarity and simplify
application and compliance for oil and gas operators and our employees.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by December 28,
2015. Comments on the information collection requirements must be
received by November 25, 2015
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment on this proposed rule, you may submit
your comments, identified by Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) 1024-
AD78, by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Edward O. Kassman, Jr., Geologic Resources Division,
National Park Service, P.O. Box 25287, Denver, Colorado 80225.
Instructions: Your comment must include the agency name and RIN
(1024-AD78) for this rulemaking. Comments will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For
additional instructions on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the Public Participation
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Send your comments and suggestions on the information
collection requirements to the Desk Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395-5806 (fax) or
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov (email). You may review all documents
submitted to OMB to support the proposed new information collection
requirements online at https://www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions
to review Department of the Interior collections under review by OMB.
Please provide a copy of your comments to the Information Collection
Clearance Officer, National Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive,
Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192 (mail); or
madonna_baucum@nps.gov (email). Please reference ``1024-O&G'' in the
subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward O. Kassman, Jr., Geologic
Resources Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 25287, Denver,
Colorado 80225; edward_kassman@nps.gov; 303-969-2146.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
The National Park Service (NPS) is proposing to update the existing
regulations at 36 CFR part 9, subpart B (9B regulations), which govern
the exercise of non-federal oil and gas rights in NPS units, to improve
the effectiveness of the regulations in protecting park resources and
values and to improve the clarity of the regulations for both operators
and the NPS.
Key updates to the regulations would include:
Elimination of two regulatory provisions that exempt
approximately 60% of the oil and gas operations located within the
national park system;
Elimination of the cap on financial assurance (bonding);
Application of the penalty provisions of 36 CFR 1.3;
Incorporation of fees for new access beyond that held as
part of the operator's mineral right;
Addition of a new well-plugging provision;
Clarification that access to oil and gas properties in
Alaska is controlled by 43 CFR part 36, which implements provisions of
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act;
Clarification of well stimulation information requirements
and operating standards;
Incorporation of a new format that makes it easier to
identify the information requirements for particular types of
operations;
Incorporation of a new format for operating standards so
that both the NPS and the operator can readily identify what standards
apply to particular operations;
Elimination of redundant definitions and provisions;
Consolidation of existing regulatory provisions; and
Codification of some existing agency policies and
practices.
A detailed discussion of all changes to the regulations is
contained in the section-by-section analysis.
Background
On December 8, 1978, the NPS promulgated the current regulations in
36 CFR part 9, subpart B (43 FR 57825), which govern the exercise of
non-federal oil and gas rights in units of the National Park System
(NPS units).
Current 9B Regulations
The current 9B regulations apply to all activities associated with
non-federal oil and gas exploration and development inside NPS unit
boundaries where access is on, across, or through federally owned or
controlled lands or waters (36 CFR 9.30(a)). Under the existing
regulations, an operator must obtain our approval of a proposed plan of
operations before commencing non-federal oil and gas operations in an
NPS unit (36 CFR 9.32(b)). This requirement covers exploration,
drilling, production, transportation, plugging, and reclamation
operations.
The plan of operations is a prospective operator's blueprint of all
intended activities and is our primary means for evaluating the
operation's potential adverse impacts on park resources and values. It
must show that the operator is exercising a bona fide property right to
non-federal oil and gas in an NPS unit (36 CFR 9.36(a)(2)). The plan of
operations must also describe:
The proposed operation, including the equipment, methods,
and materials to be used in the operation;
Access to the site;
Mitigation measures that will be implemented to protect
NPS resources and values;
Environmental conditions in the vicinity of the site;
Alternatives to the proposal; and
The environmental impacts of the proposed operation (36
CFR 9.36(a)).
In addition to the plan of operations, the operator must submit a
performance bond to ensure that funds are available to reclaim a site
if the operator defaults on its obligations under an approved plan (36
CFR 9.48). In order to make the regulatory process as efficient and
transparent as possible, we work collaboratively with operators early
in their planning process to provide guidance on information
requirements, alternative area of operations locations, and potential
mitigation and avoidance measures.
As part of our approval process, we coordinate and consult with a
variety of
[[Page 65573]]
state and other federal regulatory agencies to ensure that approval
complies with applicable federal statutes, such as the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Endangered Species Act, and the
National Historic Preservation Act.
Operators conducting non-federal oil and gas operations in NPS
units must also comply with all applicable state and local laws (36 CFR
9.36(a)(15)). Although state oil and gas regulations may contain
provisions designed to protect natural resources (e.g., surface and
groundwater), their primary focus is on oil and gas production and
protection of associated ownership interests. The purpose and focus of
the 9B regulations is to protect the National Park System's natural and
cultural resources and visitor values and safety.
When the NPS Regional Director has determined that the proposal
meets the requirements contained in the regulations and the NPS has
completed the required environmental compliance, the Regional Director
will approve the plan (36 CFR 9.37). The approved plan is the
operator's authorization to conduct its operation in an NPS unit (36
CFR 9.32(a)).
During the life of an oil or gas operation in a park, the park
manager has the authority to monitor and ensure compliance with the
approved plan of operations (36 CFR 9.37(f)). If there is a change in
circumstances, the NPS or the operator can make a request to supplement
and modify the plan (36 CFR 9.40). The 9B regulations authorize us to
enforce the terms of the plan, as may be necessary, by suspending
operations or revoking plan approval (36 CFR 9.51). The operator may
appeal a Regional Director's decision (36 CFR 9.49).
Authority To Promulgate the Regulations
The authority to promulgate these regulations is the statute
commonly known as the NPS Organic Act (54 U.S.C. 100101 et seq.) as
well as other statutes governing the administration of the National
Park System. In the NPS Organic Act, Congress directs us to ``promote
and regulate the use of the National Park System by means and measures
that conform to the fundamental purpose of the System units, which
purpose is to conserve the scenery, natural and historic objects, and
wild life in the System units and to provide for the enjoyment of the
scenery, natural and historic objects, and wild life in such manner and
by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future
generations.'' The Organic Act also gives us the authority to
promulgate regulations ``necessary or proper for the use and management
of System units.'' (54 U.S.C. 100751). This includes the authority to
regulate the exercise of non-federal oil and gas rights within park
boundaries for the purpose of protecting the resources and values
administered by the NPS.
In addition, the enabling legislation for several NPS units
contains specific provisions authorizing us to regulate the exercise of
non-federal oil and gas rights. In the authority section of the
proposed rule, we list the individual enabling statutes that address
non-federal oil and gas rights in specific NPS units.
Our authority to promulgate the 9B regulations has been recognized
as a valid exercise of NPS's Organic Act authority by a U.S. District
Court and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. See Dunn-McCampbell
Royalty Interest v. National Park Service, 964 F. Supp. 1125 (S.D. Tex.
1995), and Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest v. National Park Service,
630 F.3d 431 (5th Cir. 2011). Courts have consistently recognized NPS's
authority to regulate non-federal interests within units of the
National Park System. See, e.g., United States v. Vogler, 859 F.2d 638
(9th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1006 (1989); United States v.
Garfield County, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Utah 2000). See also Southern
Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land Management, 425 F. 3d 735,
746-47 (10th Cir. 2005).
As explained below, the NPS proposed rule uses most of the language
from BLM's hydraulic fracturing information requirements at 43 CFR
3162.3-3(d)(1) through (7), which BLM recently promulgated under
authority of the Mineral Leasing Act, 30 U.S.C. 189, the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act, 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq., and other BLM
authorities. On September 30, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the
District of Wyoming preliminarily enjoined these regulations. State of
Wyoming, et al. v. U.S. Department of the Interior, Case No. 2:15-CV-
043-SWS. This litigation is ongoing and the status of the litigation
will be addressed by NPS in development of its final rule. NPS will
consider any comments addressing NPS' authority to promulgate the
proposed rules concerning well stimulation operations within units of
the National Park System, as well as comments on the proposed
requirements (see in particular, proposed Sec. Sec. 9.88- 9.90 and
9.118).
For NPS units in Alaska that were established under the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), access to non-
federal property is governed by the regulations at 43 CFR part 36,
which implement section 1110(b) of ANILCA. This regulation gives
operators the option to file for such access as part of their plans of
operations, but they also may use a SF 299 as provided in the 43 CFR
part 36 regulations. This is similar to the process applicable to
mining claims under those regulations and the NPS regulations at 36 CFR
part 9, subpart A. We also note that because these regulations are
generally applicable to NPS units nationwide and to non-federal
interests in those units, they are not ``applicable solely to public
lands within [units established under ANILCA],'' and thus are not
affected by section 103(c) of ANILCA. See Sturgeon v. Masica, 768 F.3d
1066, 1077-78 (9th Cir. 2014).
A unique provision exists under the Big Cypress National Preserve
Addition Act of 1988, at 16 U.S.C. 698m-4. This provision states that
the Secretary shall promulgate rules and regulations governing the
exploration for and development and production of non-Federal interests
in oil and gas located within the boundaries of the Big Cypress
National Preserve and the Addition, and that such rules and regulations
may be made by appropriate amendment to or in substitution of the rules
and regulations respecting non-Federal oil and gas rights (currently
codified at 36 CFR 9.30 et seq. (1986)). 16 U.S.C. 698m-4(a).
The Addition Act also authorizes the Secretary prior to the
promulgation of rules or regulations under this section, to enter into
interim agreements with owners of non-Federal oil and gas interests
governing the conduct of oil and gas exploration, development or
production activities within the boundary of the Addition. 16 U.S.C.
698m-4(e).
Consistent with that authority, the present oil and gas operations
within the Addition Area are controlled under the terms of the
Agreement Governing The Exercise Of Reserved Oil And Gas Rights Of
Collier Enterprises And Barron Collier Company, which is Appendix 6 to
the Agreement Among the United States of America, Collier Enterprises,
Collier Development Corporation, and Barron Collier Company (May 12,
1988). If promulgated as proposed, the rule would supersede Appendix 6.
Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights in NPS Units
Non-federal oil and gas rights exist within NPS units in situations
where
[[Page 65574]]
the United States does not own the oil and gas interest, either
because:
The United States acquired the property from a grantor
that did not own the oil and gas interest; or
The United States acquired the property from a grantor
that reserved the oil and gas interest from the conveyance.
Non-federal oil and gas interests can be held by individuals;
nonprofit organizations; corporations, including Alaska Native
corporations; or state and local governments. Interests in non-federal
oil and gas are property rights that may only be taken for public use
with payment of just compensation in accordance with the Fifth
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Accordingly, from their initial
promulgation, the existing regulations at 36 CFR 9.30(a) have stated
that they are ``not intended to result in the taking of a property
interest, but rather to impose reasonable regulations on activities
that involve and affect federally owned lands.'' The proposed rule
includes this same provision.
There are currently 534 non-federal oil and gas operations in a
total of 12 NPS units. These units are: Alibates Flint Quarries
National Monument (Texas), Aztec Ruins National Monument (New Mexico),
Big Cypress National Preserve (Florida), Big Thicket National Preserve
(Texas), Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area (Tennessee/
Kentucky), Cumberland Gap National Historical Park (Tennessee),
Cuyahoga Valley National Park (Ohio), Gauley River National Recreation
Area (West Virginia), Lake Meredith National Recreation Area (Texas),
New River Gorge National River (West Virginia), Obed Wild and Scenic
River (Tennessee), and Padre Island National Seashore (Texas).
Based on the presence of split estates, exploration and production
occurring on adjacent or nearby lands, and likely future increases in
energy prices, we believe that non-federal oil and gas operations
within park boundaries could affect up to 30 additional NPS units.
Summary of Potential Impacts From Oil and Gas Operations on NPS
Resources and Values
The types of non-federal oil and gas operations conducted in NPS
units generally include: Geophysical (seismic) exploration; exploratory
well drilling; field development well drilling; oil and gas well
production operations, including installation and operation of well
flowlines and gathering lines; well plugging and abandonment; and site
reclamation.
Oil and gas activities may adversely impact NPS unit resources in
some or all of the following manners:
Surface water quality degradation from spills, storm water
runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Through site inspections the NPS
has documented 26 instances of sites with surface contamination;
Soil and ground water contamination from existing drilling
mud pits, poorly constructed wells, spills, and leaks. Through site
inspections the NPS has documented 47 instances of sites with wellhead
leaks, pump jack leaks, tank battery leaks, and operations and
maintenance spills;
Air quality degradation from dust, natural gas flaring,
hydrogen sulfide gas, and emissions from production operations and
vehicles. Through site inspections the NPS has documented 14 instances
of notable odors emanating from the wellhead;
Increased noise from seismic operations, blasting,
construction, oil and gas drilling and production operations. Through
site inspections the NPS has documented 6 instances of noise issues
from well pad equipment;
Noise and human presence effects on wildlife behavior,
breeding, and habitat utilization;
Disruption of wildlife migration routes;
Adverse effects on sensitive and endangered species.
Through site inspections the NPS has documented 15 sites with sensitive
species or habitat;
Viewshed intrusion by roads, traffic, drilling equipment,
production equipment, pipelines, etc.;
Night sky intrusion from artificial lighting and gas
flares;
Disturbance to archeological and cultural resources from
blasting associated with seismic exploration and road/site preparation,
maintenance activities, or by spills. Through site inspections the NPS
has documented 6 sites with associated cultural resources.; and
Visitor safety hazards from equipment, pressurized vessels
and lines, presence of hydrogen sulfide gas, and leaking oil and gas
that can create explosion and fire hazards. Through site inspections
the NPS has documented 62 instances of visitor safety hazards.
Examples of documented impacts can be found in many parks. For
example, at Big South Fork natural gas fired pump jack engines have
caused notable noise at visitor overlooks that are 2 to 3 miles away.
Simple mitigation such as a corrugated steel fence would abate this
impact, however, due to the well's grandfathered status; the NPS is
unable to require this mitigation and forced to accept this unnecessary
impact.
Another example of unnecessary impacts can be found at Aztec Ruins
National Monument where an operation exempt from the 9B regulations due
to the grandfathered exemption contained a road that traversed an
undeveloped and buried archeological site. When this well lost its
grandfathered status, the NPS was able to require the new operator to
conduct a cultural resource survey to determine the impacts to the
site. As mitigation the operator installed a layer of dirt between the
resource and the road base to protect the resources. Unfortunately, in
this case the damage was already done and it did not make sense to move
the road but the resource is better preserved for future enjoyment.
Summary of Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments
On November 25, 2009, we issued an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) (74 FR 61597) to assist us in developing the
proposed rule. The ANPRM and the analysis of public comments for the
ANPRM are available online at https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_gas/9b_index.cfm#prev_docs. Although we are proposing updates
to all of subpart B, the ANPRM focused its request for public comment
on six topics that we identified as major areas of concern:
(1) Regulation of previously exempt operations;
(2) Directional drilling;
(3) Operating standards;
(4) Financial assurance;
(5) Access fees; and
(6) Assessments for non-compliance.
We received comments from oil and gas owners and operators (2),
Alaska Native Corporations (2), unaffiliated private citizens (6), and
environmental organizations (10), including 1,477 comments from members
of the Sierra Club in the form of personal comments added to a form
letter.
The majority of commenters were in favor of strengthening and
expanding the regulations to better protect park resources and values.
Some commenters requested that we not expand the scope of the 9B
regulations, while others questioned the legality of regulating non-
federal oil and gas operations in parks. Additionally, some comments
asked us to consider the impacts of potential natural gas development
of the Marcellus Shale formation in the eastern United States.
More information on the ANPRM and these comments is available at
https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_
[[Page 65575]]
gas/documents/2011-01-11%20ANPR_Comment_Analysis_Report.pdf.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
We have prepared a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS),
which will be published shortly after this proposed rule. The DEIS will
be available for review and public comment at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/DEIS9B by clicking on the link entitled ``Document
List.''
The DEIS describes three alternatives: Alternative A--No action;
Alternative B--preferred alternative and proposed rule; and Alternative
C. Alternative C would include all the proposed changes in alternative
B, except that it would expand NPS jurisdiction under the regulations
to encompass surface and subsurface directional drilling operations
outside the boundary of the park; would provide an operator, under
limited circumstances, with an exemption to the operations permit
requirement for operations located wholly on non-federally owned land
within a park boundary; and would hold mineral owners and operators
jointly and severally liable for compliance with an operations permit
or other applicable provisions of the 9B regulations.
Section-by-Section Analysis
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.30 through 9.33 Sec. 9.30(a), (b), (c).
Purpose and Scope. Sec. 9.32(a), (b).
Sec. 9.36(a)(2).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.30 through 9.33--Purpose and Scope
Access on, Across, or Through Federally Owned or Controlled Lands or
Waters
The existing 9B regulations apply only when an operator's ``access
[is] on, across, or through federally owned or controlled lands or
waters.'' Seventy-eight operations (15% of all oil and gas operations
in NPS units) do not require access on, across, or through federally
owned or controlled lands or waters and are thus outside the scope of
the 9B regulations. These operators are not required to obtain an
approved NPS plan of operations, post financial assurance, or otherwise
comply with this subpart to protect park resources and values. However,
our experience over the past three decades has demonstrated that these
operations have the potential to have adverse effects on NPS resources,
values, and visitor health and safety. Through site inspections, the
NPS has found at least 10 instances of sites with oil spills or leaks
resulting in contamination of soils and water.
For example, a poorly operated oil tank battery within the boundary
of Big Thicket National Preserve that is currently exempt because it
does not require access across federally owned land has contaminated
storm water runoff that runs into adjacent federally owned land near
Village Creek. Another example is a large compressor that was located
on nonfederal lands within the boundary of Big South Fork National
River and Recreation Area. The compressor causes unabated noise for
which the NPS is unable to require mitigation due to the current scope
of the regulations.
In 1978 the NPS made a policy choice to limit the application of
its non-federal-oil-and-gas regulatory program to operators requiring
access on, across, or through federally owned or controlled lands or
waters. That choice was not required by any statutory provision. The
NPS now believes that it is appropriate to revisit and modify the
application of its regulations.
Under the proposed rule at Sec. Sec. 9.30 through 9.33, all
operators conducting operations within NPS boundaries would be subject
to permit requirements. The permitting process would include an
evaluation to determine whether, and the extent to which, such
operations would have an adverse effect on federally owned or
administered lands, waters, or resources of NPS units, visitor uses or
experiences, or visitor or employee health and safety. These operations
would also be subject to measures to mitigate such adverse effects, as
well as to the financial assurance and reclamation requirements.
Regulations Not Intended To Result in a Taking
Proposed Sec. 9.30(c) retains the existing regulatory language
from Sec. 9.30(a) that the intention of this subpart is to reasonably
regulate such activities, but not to result in a taking of private
property. Although the NPS has placed park-protecting mitigation
measures on proposed operations, we have never, in the more than 35
years of applying this subpart, denied prospective operators access to
exercise their non-federal oil and gas rights. We will continue to work
with operators to ensure they have reasonable access to their
operations and that park resources and values are protected without
resulting in a taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United
States Constitution.
Interests Regulations Are Designed To Protect
The existing regulations inconsistently describe the interests that
the regulations are designed to protect. The proposed rule would
clarify and consistently state that the 9B regulations are designed to
protect federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources of
NPS units, visitor uses or experiences, and visitor or employee health
and safety. The proposed rule would replace the phrase ``federally
owned or controlled'' with the phrase ``federally owned or
administered'' to be consistent with the terminology we use in our
general regulations, at 36 CFR 1.2, and 36 CFR 1.4(a) (definition of
``National Park System''), and in our NPS Management Policies (2006).
Operations Subject to These Regulations
Proposed Sec. 9.31(a) applies these regulations to all nonfederal
oil and gas operations within the boundary of an NPS unit. Proposed
Sec. 9.31(b) covers those operations that become part of an NPS unit
either by boundary expansion or establishment of a new NPS unit.
Proposed Sec. 9.31(c) covers those operations that have accessed oil
and gas rights from a surface location outside the park boundary but
due to a boundary expansion or establishment of a new unit, the surface
location is now within an NPS unit. Those operations covered under
Sec. 9.31(b) and (c) would be required to follow the same requirements
and procedures as previously exempt operations at Sec. Sec. 9.50
through 9.53.
Type of Authorization Required
Proposed Sec. 9.32(a) would clarify that an operator must have
either a temporary access permit or an operations permit before
conducting either reconnaissance surveys or operations in an NPS unit.
Demonstration of Valid Existing Right
The existing regulation contains a requirement that operators
demonstrate that they hold valid rights to conduct activities. The
proposed rule would move this requirement to Sec. 9.32(b) under
``Scope and Purpose'' to clarify that all operators must demonstrate
``up front'' that they hold a valid existing right to conduct
operations in an NPS unit. Unless an operator can demonstrate a valid
existing right to conduct operations, we would not undertake formal
review of an operator's operations permit application.
[[Page 65576]]
Elimination of Unnecessary Regulatory Language
The proposed rule would delete existing Sec. 9.30(b) and (c). We
view these sections as advisory and more appropriate for inclusion in
guidance materials that we will develop following the promulgation of
this subpart.
Operations Authorized Under Previous 9B Regulations
Proposed Sec. 9.33(a) would authorize an operator that currently
holds an approved plan of operations under the existing regulations to
continue operations, subject to the applicable provisions of the
regulations.
Proposed Sec. 9.33(b) would authorize an operator that remains
exempt from the plan of operations requirement because it is currently
accessing oil and gas rights inside a park boundary from a surface
location outside the park boundary to continue operations, subject to
the General Terms and Conditions and the Compliance Procedure
provisions of the regulations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.40 Definitions............. Sec. Sec. 9.31(a) through (o).
Sec. 9.32(c) and (d).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.40 Definitions
The proposed rule would organize the definitions in alphabetical
order to make this section more user-friendly. The proposed rule would
also delete several redundant definitions because the same terms are
defined at 36 CFR 1.4. The definitions proposed for deletion are:
``Secretary'' (existing Sec. 9.31(a)), ``Director'' (existing Sec.
9.31(b)), ``Person'' (existing Sec. 9.31(e)), and ``Superintendent''
(existing Sec. 9.31(f)). The proposed rule also deletes two
definitions that are no longer applicable: ``Commercial Vehicle''
(existing Sec. 9.31(g)) and ``Statement for Management'' (existing
Sec. 9.31(o)).
New or Revised Definitions
The proposed rule would add a new term, ``Area of Operations,'' to
the Definition section to replace the term ``Site,'' at existing Sec.
9.31(m). The new term would identify all areas where an operator is
authorized to conduct its activities, including access to the
operations site.
The proposed rule would expand the definition of ``Contaminating
Substances,'' at existing Sec. 9.31(n), to include other toxic or
hazardous substances. The NPS is proposing to remove the term ``waste''
from this definition and include a new separate definition of waste in
the proposed rule.
The proposed rule would revise the definition of the term ``Unit''
to ``NPS unit'' and make this term the same as ``National Park System
(Park Area)'' found at 36 CFR 1.4(a).
The proposed rule would change the definition of ``Operations'' at
existing Sec. 9.31(c), to clarify that ``access'' includes ``any means
of ingress to or egress from an area of operations.'' The NPS intends
this change to cover any and all types of access, including access via
aircraft, to and from an area of operations. For access via aircraft,
the NPS regulates only the time, place, and manner of aircraft landing
on NPS administered lands or waters within an NPS unit. The NPS does
not regulate aircraft overflight under the 9B regulations. Accordingly,
the NPS would remove existing Sec. 9.32(c), which regulates 9B
aircraft access. The proposed rule would also delete existing Sec.
9.32(d). This access is controlled by NPS commercial vehicle
regulations at 36 CFR 5.6(c).
The definition of ``Operations'' also clarifies that the operation
of a flowline or a gathering line is included within this definition,
but not the installation, operation, or maintenance of oil and gas
pipelines that are located within the park under authority of a deeded
easement or other right-of-way, which are not covered by the 9B
regulations.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Operations Permit'' as the
permitting vehicle for all operations. An operations permit will be a
special use permit subject to cost recovery under 54 U.S.C. 103104,
which authorizes the NPS to recover all costs associated with providing
necessary services associated with special use permits.
The proposed rule would update the definition of ``Operator'' at
existing Sec. 9.31(d) by clarifying that responsibilities and
liability under this subpart can attach to the operator or the
operator's agents, assignees, designees, lessees, or representatives.
The proposed rule defines ``owner'' as a ``person'' which
incorporates the definition of ``person'' from Sec. 1.4.
The proposed rule adds a new definition of ``Previously Exempt
Operation'' to clarify which types of operations are covered by
proposed Sec. Sec. 9.50 through 9.53. This definition does not include
those operations where the operator was granted an exemption under
existing Sec. 9.32(e) to the plan of operations requirement by the NPS
because it accessed oil and gas rights inside the park boundary from a
surface location outside the park boundary (which are covered by
proposed Sec. 9.33(b)).
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Reconnaissance Survey'' to
clarify that reconnaissance surveys do not include surface disturbance
activities, except minimal disturbance necessary to perform surveys.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Right to Operate'' that
incorporates much of the language in existing Sec. 9.36(a)(2) (right
to operate description for a Plan of Operations). The new definition
would clarify that an operator's right-to-operate documentation must
demonstrate the proposed activities are within the scope of that right.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Technologically feasible,
least damaging methods'' to describe the general standard that all
operators must satisfy when meeting applicable operating standards.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Temporary Access Permit''
to clarify that under the proposed rule the NPS would grant temporary
access only for reconnaissance surveys and to collect basic information
necessary to prepare a permit application.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Third-Party Monitor'' to
identify a third-party monitor's necessary qualifications.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Usable water'' to describe
the criteria that the NPS uses to identify protected sources of
groundwater.
The proposed rule would add a new term ``Waste'' to differentiate
between ``waste'' and ``contaminating substances.''
The proposed rule would add a new set of terms ``We and us'' to
refer to the National Park Service.
The proposed rule would add a definition of ``You'' to be
consistent with the plain language format of this subpart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.50 through 9.53 Sec. 9.30(a).
Previously Exempt Operations. Sec. 9.33.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.50 Through 9.53--Previously Exempt Operations
The proposed rule would create a new section ``Previously Exempt
Operations'' to describe the process for bringing all previously exempt
operations into compliance with the proposed rule. These include
operations that do not require access on, across, or through federal
lands (15% of total operations are currently exempt due to existing
Sec. 9.30, see above discussion) and grandfathered operations (45% of
total
[[Page 65577]]
operations are currently exempt due to existing Sec. 9.33).
Grandfathered Operations
Under existing Sec. 9.33, operators who were conducting operations
at the time the regulations became effective (January 8, 1979) and who
had already obtained a valid federal or state permit were
``grandfathered.'' These operators were not required to obtain an
approved plan of operations; comply with NPS operating standards,
including reclamation of their area of operations to NPS standards; or
post a reclamation bond. The Superintendent does have authority under
existing Sec. 9.33(c) to suspend grandfathered operations if there is
an ``immediate threat of significant injury to federally owned or
controlled lands or waters.'' The NPS has used this authority, in
limited cases, to suspend grandfathered operations--suspensions that
would not have been necessary if the operators were proactively meeting
NPS standards. For example, at Big Thicket National Preserve, the NPS
suspended two grandfathered operations that were causing unnecessary
impacts, including poor spill prevention equipment and methods
resulting in localized contamination to soils, lack of proper
vegetation control that increased risk of fire, and poor site security
that presented risks to visitor health and safety. Under existing Sec.
9.33(a)(1), when the existing federal or state permit expires and the
operator is issued a new permit, the operator then becomes subject to
all provision of the 9B regulations.
In 1978 the NPS expected that over time the permits associated with
these operators would expire and that the operators would then be
required to come into compliance with the 9B regulations. However, the
rate of permit expiration has been much slower than anticipated. This
has left approximately 45% of operations (241 wells service-wide) still
exempt from the regulations over thirty years later, causing
unnecessary and readily avoidable impacts to NPS-administered resources
and values. For example, through site inspections, the NPS has found 20
instances of hydrocarbon spills and leaks, 3 instances of gas venting,
2 instances of notable noise issues, and 3 instances of notable
hydrocarbon odors emanating from the well site. The grandfather
exemption is not required by statute, and was a discretionary policy
choice by the NPS to provide for a ``smooth and fair phase in of [the
1978] regulations.'' (43 FR 57822)
This rulemaking is intended to ensure that all operations within
NPS units are conducted in a manner that protects park resources and
values. A majority of comments to the ANPRM regarding previously exempt
operations suggested that to achieve this goal, the NPS's new rule
should require previously exempt operators to obtain an operations
permit. The NPS agrees, and has tailored the process for obtaining an
operations permit to the specific circumstances presented by previously
exempt operations.
Procedure for Bringing Previously Exempt Operations Into Compliance
Proposed Sec. 9.50(a) would establish that previously exempt
operators must obtain an Operations Permit.
In proposed Sec. 9.51, the NPS describes the information that a
previously exempt operator would be required to submit to the NPS to
obtain an operations permit. For a new oil and gas operation in an NPS
unit, the NPS requires an operator to submit the information necessary
for the NPS to select the least damaging locations for its access
route, drilling site, production facilities, and gathering-line routes.
However, for previously exempt operations, the operator's well has
already been drilled and the area of operations (access route, well
site, production facilities, and routes for gathering lines) has
already been established. Therefore, under proposed Sec. 9.51, within
90 days after the effective date of this subpart, operators must
provide the NPS with information that would enable the NPS to evaluate
the previously exempt operation to determine whether these operations
are being conducted in compliance with NPS operating standards. This
information is also needed for future monitoring of the approved
operations to ensure compliance with NPS operating standards. The
information requirements under this proposed section also require
operators to submit information if they intend to change existing
operations (e.g., if they intend to plug their wells).
Once the operator provides the information required under proposed
Sec. 9.51, the NPS would review the operations permit application
under proposed Sec. 9.52, which states that the NPS will review the
application under the same standards that apply to new operations,
Sec. Sec. 9.100 through 9.104 (Operations Permit: Application Review
Process).
Under proposed Sec. 9.53, from the effective date of the final
rule and during the time a previously exempt operator's application is
under consideration for approval by the NPS, the continuation of
operations would be limited to those activities and the specific area
of disturbance as of the effective date. Previously exempt operations
would also become subject to the General Terms and Conditions at
proposed Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122 and the Prohibitions and
Penalties at proposed Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182. Finally, proposed
Sec. 9.53(a)(2) provides that except in an emergency, the NPS would
not take any steps to directly regulate the previously exempt
operator's activities under proposed Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182
within 90 days after the effective date of the final rule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.60 through 9.63 Sec. 9.38.
Temporary Access Permits.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.60 Through 9.63--Temporary Access Permits
Existing Sec. 9.38(a)(2) (temporary approval for the continuance
of existing operations) and existing Sec. 9.38(b) (temporary approval
of new operations) would not be retained in the proposed rule. Because
the proposed rule would make all operations subject to the 9B
regulations, including (after a 90-day grace period) previously exempt
operations, temporary approval of existing operations is no longer
applicable. Existing Sec. 9.38(b) would also be deleted because the
provision has rarely been used and the NPS does not anticipate a need
for temporary approval of new operations.
Proposed Sec. 9.60 would focus solely on the information
requirements and approval process for obtaining temporary approval to
collect basic information to develop the information required to obtain
an Operations Permit. Proposed Sec. 9.61 identifies the information
necessary for the NPS to evaluate the operator's proposal to collect
this information. This includes intended future operations, so the NPS
can determine what information is available and what additional
information needs to be gathered. Proposed Sec. 9.61(d) would require
that the operator describe the qualifications of the specialist who
will perform the reconnaissance survey. The requirement to hire a
qualified specialist codifies existing NPS guidance and is included in
the definition of ``reconnaissance survey'' so that information and
conclusions are accurate and verifiable.
Proposed Sec. 9.62 would clarify that under a Temporary Access
Permit, an operator may not engage in ground disturbing activities
unless they are minimal and necessary to conduct the surveys.
[[Page 65578]]
Under proposed Sec. 9.63, Temporary Access Permits would be issued
for a period not to exceed 60 days and may be extended for a reasonable
additional period when justified by an operator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.70 through 9.73 Sec. 9.32(e).
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights from a
Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.70 Through 9.73--Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a
Surface Location Outside the Park Boundary
Existing Sec. 9.32(e) allows operators to apply for an exemption
from the regulations if they directionally drill from a surface
location outside an NPS unit to reach a bottom hole located within NPS
boundaries. This exemption is available if operations pose no
significant threat of damage to NPS resources, both surface and
subsurface, resulting from surface subsidence, fracture of geological
formations with resultant fresh water aquifer contamination, or natural
gas escape. Surface activities located outside the NPS boundary are not
within the scope of the existing 9B regulation. Under these
regulations, regulatory authority over these operations continues to
begin at the subsurface point where the proposed operation (borehole)
crosses the park boundary and enters federally owned or controlled
lands or water, and applies to all infrastructure and activities within
the NPS unit.
The availability of the exemption provides an incentive for
operators to locate surface facilities outside an NPS unit. Location of
operations outside an NPS unit generally avoids direct impacts to NPS
resources and values. Therefore, proposed Sec. 9.72 retains a similar
exemption.
The NPS proposes to retain the ``no significant threat of damage''
review standard for exemption applications. Proposed Sec. 9.70 updates
and clarifies the review standards for exemption applications. If an
operator is exempt from the Operations Permit requirement, it would
still be subject to the General Terms and Conditions and the
Prohibitions and Penalties provisions in the regulations. The proposed
rule also addresses circumstances under which the method of operation
or environmental conditions of an operation changes.
Proposed Sec. 9.71 identifies the information an operator would be
required to submit to the NPS to be considered for an exemption.
Proposed Sec. 9.71 directs operators to those information
requirements, located at proposed Sec. 9.89, applicable to proposed
hydraulic fracturing operations.
Proposed Sec. 9.72 describes how the NPS would review and consider
information submitted by the operator under this section.
Proposed Sec. 9.73 describes requirements that an operator still
must meet if it does not need an operations permit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.80 through 9.90 Sec. 9.36.
Operations Permit: Application Sec. 9.42.
Contents.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.80 Through 9.90--Operations Permit: Application Contents
Format
The proposed rule at Sec. Sec. 9.80 through 9.90 reorganizes
information requirements for each type of operation. The proposed rule
would separate information requirements into the following categories:
Sec. 9.83, information that must be included in all applications;
Sec. 9.87, additional information that must be included for a proposed
geophysical exploration; Sec. 9.88, additional information that must
be included for a proposed drilling operations; Sec. 9.89 additional
information must be included for a proposed well stimulation
operations, including hydraulic fracturing; and, Sec. 9.90 additional
information that must be included for a proposed production operations.
Additions to and Clarification of Existing Information Requirements
Some of the information requirements in the existing 9B regulation
are minimally described. The NPS provided additional information on
some of those information requirements in the NPS's 2006 9B Operator's
Handbook. The NPS intends to clarify all information requirements in
the proposed rule.
Information Requirements That Apply to All Operations Permit
Applications
Some of the existing information requirements were incorporated
into the proposed rule without substantial change. However, the NPS is
proposing to clarify the following information requirements:
Ownership Information
Existing regulation Sec. 9.83 limits identification of an
operation's key personnel to the operator, owners, and lessees. To
ensure that the NPS has all appropriate contact information, proposed
Sec. 9.83(b) requires that operators also identify agents, assignees,
designees, contractors, and other representatives.
New Surface Disturbance and Construction
Proposed Sec. 9.84 requires an operator to specify site security
measures and an operation's power sources and transmission systems.
Use of Water
Proposed Sec. 9.83(e) would clarify and expand upon the existing
Sec. 9.36(a)(5). It would require information regarding the source,
transportation method and quantity of water to be used in addition to
how the operator will manage waste water.
Environmental Conditions and Mitigation Actions
Proposed Sec. 9.85 would codify the existing practice of requiring
operators to include within their permit application natural resource
and cultural resource survey reports for the operator's proposed area
of operations.
Proposed Sec. 9.85 would require an operator to describe steps
proposed to mitigate adverse environmental impacts and list and discuss
the impacts that cannot be mitigated. Additionally, operators are
required to describe all alternative technologically feasible, least
damaging methods that were considered. Technologically feasible, least
damaging alternatives are those alternatives that are viable (based on
economic, environmental, and technological considerations) and conform
to federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
Cultural Resources
The NPS proposes to eliminate existing Sec. 9.47(a), ``Cultural
Resource Protection,'' because the section merely summarizes the
requirements of the Antiquities Act (54 U.S.C. 320301 et seq.).
Restating these statutory requirements in the 9B Regulations is
unnecessary, and the section also fails to acknowledge other statutes
that could also apply to these resources.
Spill Control and Emergency Preparedness Plan
Proposed Sec. 9.86 consolidates various sections of the existing
regulation, clarifies that an operator must submit a Spill Control and
Emergency Preparedness Plan (SCEPP) plan to the NPS, and identifies the
information necessary to complete a SCEPP.
Additional Information Requirements That Apply to Geophysical
Operations
Proposed Sec. 9.87 clarifies the additional information a
geophysical operator would need to submit to the NPS.
[[Page 65579]]
Additional Information Requirements That Apply to Drilling,
Stimulation, and Production
Proposed Sec. Sec. 9.88 through 9.90 clarify the additional
information an operator would need if it is proposing to drill,
stimulate, or produce a well.
Proposed Sec. 9.89 is a new set of information requirements for
well stimulation, including hydraulic fracturing operations.
Information requirements include identifying the geologic barriers
between the target zone and the deepest usable water zone, verifying
mechanical integrity of the wellbore, and describing water use and
disposal management of flowback fluids. NPS notes that the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has recently promulgated regulations addressing
hydraulic fracturing on federal and Indian lands at 43 CFR part 3160
(80 FR 16128, March 26, 2015). We have carefully considered the BLM
regulations to ensure that the NPS regulations are as consistent as
possible. Here, the NPS proposed rule uses most of the language from
BLM's hydraulic fracturing information requirements at 43 CFR 3162.3-
3(d)(1) through (7). Where a BLM information requirement is not
specifically included in proposed Sec. 9.89, it is because NPS already
has equivalent information requirements that are applicable to all
operations. Additionally, NPS has specific guidance on the means to
ensure well integrity standards are met in its NPS's 2006 9B Operator's
Handbook.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.100 through 9.105 Sec. 9.37.
Operations Permit: Application Sec. 9.48.
Review Process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.100 Through 9.105--Operations Permit: Application Review
Process
Existing Sec. 9.37(a)(1) requires that, before approving a plan of
operations, the Regional Director determine that the operator uses
technologically feasible, least damaging methods that provide for
protection of the park's resources and public health and safety.
The existing rule has two different approval standards, depending
on whether the operation is proposed on non-federally or federally
owned surface. For operations proposed on non-federally owned surface a
Regional Director cannot approve an operation that would constitute a
nuisance to federal lands or waters in the vicinity of the operations,
or would significantly injure federally owned or controlled lands or
waters. For more information on what would constitute ``significantly
injury'' please see NPS Procedures Governing Nonfederal Oil and Gas
(1992), pages 30-31,which can be found at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/documentsList.cfm?projectID=28329. For operations proposed on federally
owned surface a Regional Director cannot approve an operation that
would substantially interfere with management of the unit to ensure the
preservation of its natural and ecological integrity in perpetuity, or
would significantly injure federally owned or controlled lands or
waters. If applying the standard for operations proposed on federally
owned lands would constitute a taking of a property interest, the NPS
may either approve the operations if it uses technologically feasible,
least damaging methods or acquire the mineral interest.
Existing Sec. 9.37(b) and (c) require the NPS to make a decision
on the plan of operations within 60 days after the date that the NPS
determines that the materials submitted under the plan are adequate.
Within 60 days, the Regional Director must make one of six final
decisions in writing. The final decisions are: Approval or rejection;
conditional approval; modification to the plan or additional
information is required; more time is necessary to complete review;
environmental statement is required before approval; or more time is
necessary for public participation and analysis of public comments.
Existing Sec. 9.37(c) provides that failure of the NPS to make a
final decision within 60 days constitutes a rejection of the plan. The
operator has a right to appeal this decision under existing Sec. 9.49.
Proposed Application Review Process
The proposed rule establishes a two-stage permit application review
process, eliminates the dual approval standards, provides more
realistic timeframes to provide notice back to an operator, and
consolidates the final decisions the NPS can make on an operator's
permit application.
Stage One: Initial Review
Proposed Sec. 9.101 describes the NPS's initial review of an
operator's permit application. During initial review the NPS would
determine whether the applicant has supplied all information necessary
for the NPS to evaluate the operation's potential effects affecting
federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources of NPS
units, visitor uses or experiences, or visitor or employee health and
safety. The NPS would respond to applicants within 30 days and tell
them whether the information contained in their permit applications is
complete. If the NPS needs more time to complete the review, the NPS
will provide the applicant with an estimate of the amount of additional
time reasonably needed and an explanation for the delay. Once a permit
application is complete the NPS conducts formal review.
Stage Two: Formal Review
During formal review under proposed Sec. 9.102 the NPS evaluates
whether the proposed operation meets the NPS approval standards (Sec.
9.103) and conducts its compliance responsibilities under applicable
federal statutes (e.g. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
Endangered Species Act (ESA), and National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA)).
Timeframe for Final Action
In light of NPS experience over the past 35 years in implementing
the 9B regulations, the current 60-day period for reaching a final
decision on a permit application is not realistic. These decisions
require time to adequately analyze an operator's proposal, work with
the operator on a design that incorporates acceptable avoidance and
mitigation measures, and comply with the associated federal statutory
responsibilities such as NEPA, ESA, and NHPA. The regulations should
provide operators with realistic expectations of the timeframe to
process operations permits in order to adequately plan for the start of
operations. Similarly, the NPS must take into account realistic
timeframes for its coordination with other federal and state agencies.
Thus, proposed Sec. 9.104 allows the NPS 180 days to complete its
formal review. The proposed regulation would allow for a longer period
of time, if the parties agree to it, or if the NPS determines that it
needs more time to comply with applicable laws, executive orders, and
regulations. In some cases, the NPS may be able to complete formal
review in less than 180 days. The NPS is seeking comment on whether 180
days is reasonable and any incremental impacts on operators.
The proposed rule would remove existing section Sec. 9.37(c),
which results in a rejection of the proposal if the NPS does not
respond within 60 days, and replaces it with Sec. 9.104, which
authorizes the Superintendent to notify the operator in writing that
additional time is necessary to make a final decision.
Elimination of Dual Approval Standards
Proposed Sec. 9.103 would replace the existing dual approval
standards with a single three-part approval standard that
[[Page 65580]]
applies to all operations, regardless of surface ownership. Oil and gas
operations located on non-federally owned surface have the potential to
impact federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources of
NPS units, visitor uses or experiences, or visitor or employee health
and safety to the same degree as operations sited on federally owned
surface.
Proposed Sec. 9.103(a) lists three basic determinations that the
Regional Director must make before approving an application for an
operations permit.
Proposed Sec. 9.103(b) adds two other prerequisites to approval:
(1) Submittal of adequate financial assurance and (2) proof of adequate
liability insurance.
Final Actions
Proposed Sec. 9.104 would establish two final actions: (1)
Approved, with or without conditions, or (2) denial, and the
justification for the denial. The Regional Director would notify the
operator in writing of the final action. If approved, this written
notification constitutes the NPS's authorization to conduct activities.
The NPS has eliminated the proviso in the approval standard in
current section Sec. 9.37(a)(3), which allows for approval using only
the ``technologically feasible, least damaging methods'' standard of
section Sec. 9.37(a)(1) if application of the more stringent Sec.
9.37(a)(3) standard would constitute a taking of a property interest.
Over the past 35 years of implementing the 9B Regulations, the NPS has
never used this exception. In every instance, the NPS has authorized
operators' access and protected park resources and values by applying
reasonable avoidance and mitigation measures to the exercise of
operators' mineral rights. As noted in the Purpose and Scope section
above, the proposed rule at Sec. 9.30(c) maintains the existing
regulatory provision stating that the 9B regulations are not intended
to result in a taking of mineral rights. The approval standard in the
proposed rule simply incorporates that provision by reference, rather
than expressly spelling it out as part of the standard. This change is
not intended or expected to authorize any taking of property rights,
and is intended solely to simplify the approval standards and avoid
redundancy and confusion. The NPS will continue to work with operators
to help plan and design their operations in a way that meets NPS
operating standards and other applicable provisions of these
regulations.
Compliance With Big Cypress National Preserve Addition Act
The Big Cypress National Preserve Addition Act (BCNPAA), (16 U.S.C.
698m-4), requires that the NPS include language describing the
procedures for reviewing an Operations Permit application within the
Big Cypress National Preserve and Addition Area.
Accordingly, proposed Sec. 9.105 describes the procedure for
initial review of a proposed operation in Big Cypress National
Preserve. This procedure would differ slightly from the service-wide
procedure described in Sec. Sec. 9.101 and 9.102. The NPS's service-
wide proposed rule incorporates the 30-day initial review period from
the BCNPAA. However, the BCNPAA at 16 U.S.C. 698m-4(b)(2)(C) places a
regulatory limit on the amount of collaboration that can occur between
the NPS and the operator. Under this provision, there is no regulatory
mechanism for the NPS to request further information from an operator
after the NPS has made its initial request for additional information.
After making such a request, the NPS's only options are to approve or
deny the application. This procedure could conceivably result in denial
of applications that would have been approved if the NPS had the
regulatory authority to again request the additional information
necessary to fully evaluate a proposed operation. In practice, the NPS
will continue to collaborate with prospective operators in Big Cypress
National Preserve early in their planning process and as much as
possible during initial review, in order to reduce such theoretical
problems. The NPS is not proposing to use the Big Cypress procedure in
its service-wide regulations, because it does not want to constrain its
ability to have more robust collaboration with operators.
The BCNPAA also differs slightly from the proposed service-wide
rule in that under the BCNPAA the 90-day time period for final action
begins upon submission of the permit application to the NPS. For the
service-wide rule, the NPS has chosen not to adopt submission of the
permit application as the triggering event for the 180-day time period.
Rather, the NPS proposed service-wide rule provides that the 180-day
time period begins upon the NPS determination that the operator's
permit application contains complete information. This is consistent
with the existing 9B Regulations at 36 CFR 9.36(c). Before the NPS can
begin to conduct an analysis of an operator's proposal, it must have
all necessary information from an operator. For proposals within Big
Cypress National Preserve, the NPS will strive to meet the applicable
timeframe for final action while otherwise complying with applicable
laws including NEPA and the ESA.
The NPS has decided to include applicable language from the BCNPAA
in this regulation instead of in a new park-specific regulation in Part
7, because the remaining sections of the 9B regulation still apply to
oil and gas operations in Big Cypress National Preserve and the NPS
believes it will be easier for operators to have all applicable
regulations in one place.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.110 through 9.118 Sec. 9.35.
Operating Standards. Sec. 9.39.
Sec. 9.41.
Sec. 9.42.
Sec. 9.43.
Sec. 9.44.
Sec. 9.45.
Sec. 9.46.
Sec. 9.47.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.110 Through 9.118--Operating Standards
Purpose and Function
Proposed Sec. 9.110 clarifies the purpose and function of
operating standards. The NPS would maintain the current practice of
setting non-prescriptive operating standards to allow operators the
flexibility to design their proposed operation using the latest
technological innovations that will best protect park system resources,
values, and visitor health and safety.
Proposed Sec. 9.110(c) is a general standard that requires all
operators to use technologically feasible, least damaging methods to
protect NPS resources and values while assuring human health and
safety.
Proposed Sec. 9.110(a) maintains the practice of incorporating
applicable operating standards into an approved operations permit so
that the operating standards become enforceable terms and conditions of
an approved permit.
The existing regulation has a specific operating standards
provision at Sec. 9.41. Additional operating standards are scattered
throughout other sections of the existing regulations (See, Sec. Sec.
9.43 through 9.46).
Reorganization
The proposed rule would reorganize operating standards into one
section and separate operating standards into the following categories:
Sec. Sec. 9.111 through 9.116, are operating standards that apply to
all operations; Sec. 9.117, additional operating standards that
[[Page 65581]]
apply to geophysical operations; and Sec. 9.118, additional operating
standards that apply to drilling, stimulation, and production
operations. The NPS believes that organizing the standards in this
manner would allow the NPS and the operator to readily understand which
operating standards are applicable to the particular type of proposed
operation.
Additions to and Clarification of Existing Operating Standards
Some of the operating standards in the existing 9B regulation are
minimally described. The NPS has clarified some operating standards in
its 2006 9B Operator's Handbook. The NPS proposes to include all
operating standards in the proposed rule. The NPS would incorporate
some operating standards from the existing regulations into the
proposed rule largely without substantive change; those standards are
not further discussed here. The standards summarized below either
clarify existing standards or are new standards that the NPS proposes
to add to the regulations.
Operating Standards That Apply to All Operations
The NPS is proposing to include new standards at Sec. 9.111(a) to
ensure that either existing or newly created surface disturbance is
kept to the minimum necessary for safe conduct of operations.
The NPS is proposing to include new standards at Sec. 9.114 and
Sec. 9.115 that would reasonably limit the visual and sound impacts of
oil and gas operations on park visitor use and experience.
The NPS is proposing to add a new standard at Sec. 9.111(h) that
would avoid or limit the introduction of exotic species.
The NPS is proposing to add specific standards at Sec. 9.112 that
would address hydrologic connectivity.
Reclamation Operating Standards
Proposed Sec. 9.116 would specify reclamation operating standards.
Operating Standards That Apply to Geophysical Operations
Proposed Sec. 9.117 covers operating standards for surveying
methods; source points; use of equipment and methods; and shot holes.
Operating Standards That Apply to Drilling, Stimulation, and Production
Operations
Proposed Sec. 9.118(a)(1) requires all operators to use
containerized mud systems during drilling operations.
Proposed Sec. 9.118(a)(2) prohibits the establishment of new
earthen pits for any use. Use of existing earthen pits may continue if
the pits are in compliance with applicable law and subject to the
Superintendent's periodic inspection.
Proposed Sec. 9.118(b) is a new section that establishes standards
for well stimulation, including standards that address hydraulic
fracturing operations, such as ensuring the mechanical integrity of the
wellbore, water use and disposal, and management of flowback fluids. We
have carefully considered the recently promulgated BLM oil and gas
regulations to ensure that the NPS regulations are as consistent as
possible. The two agencies take different approaches to operating
standards, though, because of their differing statutory bases for
regulating the exercise of oil and gas rights. BLM's regulatory
authority is derived primarily from the Mineral Leasing Act and the
Federal Land Policy and Management Act and controls the use of federal
property. The NPS 9B regulations address private property rights within
park units and are based largely on the directive of the NPS Organic
Act to ``conserve the scenery, natural and historic objects, and wild
life in the System units and to provide for the enjoyment of the
scenery, natural and historic objects, and wild life in such manner and
by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future
generations.'' As a result, BLM can and has appropriately set more
prescriptive standards in its regulation, while NPS has generally set
required non-prescriptive operating standards which allow operators
flexibility to design operations while still protecting park system
resources, values, and visitor health and safety. For example, BLM's
regulation at 43 CFR 3162.5-2 (Control of wells) sets a performance
standard with regard to protection of usable water, and BLM also
prescribes regulatory measures necessary to achieve and verify the
performance standard (43 CFR 3162.3-3(e)). NPS's approach is to review
an operator's submissions to determine if they meet the overall
operating standard of using the most ``technologically feasible, least
damaging methods'' that protect park resources and values, and all
other applicable operation standards. If not, the NPS would to add
terms and conditions in the permits to ensure that they do so. Guidance
on the specific means to meet NPS operating standards is found in NPS's
2006 9B Operator's Handbook, which is distributed to every operator and
available electronically.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122 Sec. 9.35.
General Terms and Conditions. Sec. 9.36(a)(15).
Sec. 9.37(f).
Sec. 9.41(g).
Sec. 9.42.
Sec. 9.46.
Sec. 9.51(b).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.120 Through 9.122--General Terms and Conditions
The NPS proposes a new ``General Terms and Conditions'' section to
summarize those terms and conditions that apply to all operations. This
section consolidates existing: Sec. Sec. 9.35; 9.36(a)(15); 9.37(f);
9.41(g); 9.42; 9.46; 9.47(b); and, 9.51(a) and (b).
The water use section at existing Sec. 9.35 does not address all
state water law systems under which water rights are established or
decided. Proposed Sec. 9.120(b) would require that the NPS approve, in
accordance with NPS policy, the use of surface or groundwater owned or
administered by the United States.
Because monitoring and reporting requirements apply, in varying
degrees, to all operations, the NPS is proposing to include monitoring
and reporting requirements under General Terms and Conditions. Some of
these monitoring and reporting requirements are taken from the existing
regulation while others are new requirements. The new requirements are
described below.
Proposed Sec. 9.121(b) would allow the NPS to require that
operators hire third party monitors when they are necessary to ensure
compliance and protect park resources and values. The NPS currently
requires the use of third party monitors to help the NPS ensure that it
receives unbiased, reliable, and timely monitoring information
demonstrating an operator's compliance with its plan of operations.
See, 2006 9B Operator's Handbook, Chapter 3 (Geophysical Exploration).
Over the past fifteen years, Big Thicket National Preserve, Padre
Island National Seashore, Jean Lafitte National Historic Site, and Big
Cypress National Preserve have required operators to use third party
monitors for geographically extensive and logistically complex 3D
seismic operations. The use of third party monitors has allowed the NPS
to augment monitoring by park staff so that the operator can
simultaneously engage in multiple operations at different locations,
while still ensuring compliance with the operator's plan. The proposed
rule would also make the NPS's requirements more consistent with the
practice of other federal agencies (BLM, the U.S. Forest Service, and
the U.S.
[[Page 65582]]
Fish and Wildlife Service have all required third party monitoring for
oil and gas operations on lands they administer), as well as state oil
and gas regulatory agencies. This section describes the criteria that
the NPS will consider when making the decision to require a third party
monitor. The third party monitor would report directly to the NPS to
ensure oversight and accountability.
Proposed Sec. 9.121(e) would broaden the reporting requirement to
require that the operator submit any information requested by the
Superintendent that is necessary to verify compliance with either a
provision of the operations permit or this subpart. To ease this burden
the proposed rule would allow an operator to submit reports that the
operator has already submitted to a state or other federal agency to
meet this reporting requirement, similar to existing Sec. 9.42.
Proposed Sec. 9.122 would require reporting related to the
hydraulic fracturing process, including the disclosure of chemicals
used in the hydraulic fracturing process and the volume of recovered
fluids. In Sec. 9.122, NPS has used BLM's post-hydraulic fracturing
reporting requirements, but did not include two provisions (requirement
for affidavit of compliance and general supporting documentation), as
these requirements are addressed in other sections of this proposed
rule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.130 through 9.132 Sec. 9.50.
Access to Oil and Gas Rights.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.130 Through 9.132--Access to Oil and Gas Rights
Existing Sec. 9.50 authorizes the NPS to charge a fee for
commercial vehicles using NPS administered roads.
Proposed 9.130(b) would clarify that adequate and feasible access
to oil and gas rights located within the boundaries of NPS units in
Alaska is governed by the regulations at 43 CFR part 36, which
implements Sec. 1110(b).
Proposed Sec. 9.131(a)(1) would supplement that authority to allow
a fee based on fair market value for access (e.g., roads or gatherings
lines) across federal lands outside the scope of an operator's oil and
gas right. The NPS would set fees consistent with NPS Part 14 Rights-
of-way guidance (NPS Reference Manual 53, Special Park Uses, Appendix
5, Exhibit 2).
The NPS is seeking public comment on whether the NPS should include
a provision that would allow the NPS to authorize an operator to
undertake compensatory mitigation in lieu of payment. The value of the
compensatory mitigation would be proportional to the reasonable
estimated cost of the access fee. This would allow the operator and the
NPS to agree on an option to, for example, reclaim an area of
previously disturbed land elsewhere within the park to offset the
operator's new access.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.140 through 9.144 Sec. 9.48.
Financial Assurance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.140 Through 9.144--Financial Assurance
The NPS proposes to rename the ``Performance Bond'' section as
``Financial Assurance'' to reflect the variety of instruments that an
operator can provide to the NPS to meet its obligation under this
section.
Existing Sec. 9.48(a) requires an operator to file a performance
bond, or other acceptable method of financial assurance, for all types
of non-federal oil and gas operations and all phases of the operations.
The performance bond requirement ensures that in the event an operator
becomes insolvent or defaults on its obligations under an approved plan
of operations, adequate funds will be available for reclamation.
Existing Sec. 9.48(d)(3) limits the performance bond amount to
$200,000 per operator, per NPS unit. Therefore, if one operator has
multiple wells in an NPS unit, the NPS can only require up to $200,000
financial assurance from that operator. The existing $200,000 limit was
established in 1979 and in most cases no longer represents the current
potential costs of reclamation. In the event of a default by the
operator, reclamation costs exceeding the limit could require the NPS
to bring a civil action in federal court to recover the additional
costs.
Proposed Sec. 9.141 would make the financial assurance amount
equal to the estimated cost of reclamation. This revision would
substantially reduce the risk of the American taxpayers being left to
assume the operator's reclamation-responsibility costs if an operator
defaults on its obligations.
Proposed Sec. 9.142 outlines the process for adjusting the amount
of financial assurance due to changed conditions. Proposed Sec. 9.143
describes the conditions under which the NPS would release the
financial assurance. Proposed Sec. 9.144 describes those circumstances
that would result in forfeiture.
Proposed Sec. 9.144(b)(3) is a new provision allowing the NPS to
suspend review of an operator's pending permit applications, if that
operator has forfeited its financial assurance. Suspension would last
until the Superintendent determines that all violations have been
resolved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.150--Modification to Sec. 9.40.
an Operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.150--Modification to an Operation
Proposed Sec. 9.150, would rename the ``Supplementation or
Revision of Plan of Operations'' section as ``Modification to an
Operation'' to characterize any change to an approved operations
permit. This section would clarify that either the NPS or the operator
can request modification of the operator's permit, and describes the
modification procedures. Approval of any modification to an approved
permit must meet the same criteria that apply to Temporary Access
Permits (proposed Sec. Sec. 9.60 through 9.63) or Operations Permit:
Application Review Process (proposed Sec. Sec. 9.100 through 9.105).
Proposed Sec. 9.150(c) would prohibit an operator from
implementing a modification until the NPS has provided written approval
of the modification to the operator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.160 and 9.161 Change Sec. 9.34.
of Operator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.160 and 9.161--Change of Operator
This proposed section renames the existing Sec. 9.34 ``Transfer of
Interest'' section as ``Change of Operator.''
Existing Sec. 9.34(a) provides that a previous owner remains
liable on its financial assurance until it informs the NPS that the
rights have been transferred to another party. A new owner cannot
operate until it posts financial assurance and ratifies the existing
plan of operations. If the previous owner provides notice to the
Superintendent, the previous owner could request release of its
financial assurance before the new owner posts its own financial
assurance with the NPS. Therefore, if the new owner abandons operations
before posting financial assurance with the NPS, the burden of
reclaiming the site could fall on the taxpayers.
Proposed Sec. 9.160 holds the previous operator responsible to the
NPS until
[[Page 65583]]
the new operator adopts and agrees to the terms and conditions of the
previous operator's permit and provides financial assurance. Proposed
Sec. 9.160(a) addresses a transfer of operation where the previous
operator did not have an approved NPS permit. Proposed Sec. 9.160(b)
requires the previous operator to notify the NPS of its transfer.
Proposed Sec. 9.161 requires that the new operator adopts and
agrees to the terms and conditions of any previous operator's
operations permit. Proposed Sec. 9.161(b) addresses transfer of an
operation where an exemption was previously granted under proposed
Sec. 9.72.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.170 and 9.171 Well Sec. 9.39.
Plugging.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.170 and 9.171--Well Plugging
This section replaces, in part, existing Sec. 9.39(a)(2)(iv) and
creates a new section ``Well Plugging.''
Existing Sec. 9.39(a)(2)(iv) requires operators to plug and cap
all non-productive wells and to fill dump holes, ditches, reserve pits,
and other excavations. Proposed Sec. 9.116(d)(1) (Operating Standards)
would retain the requirement that an operator conduct reclamation by
plugging all wells. However, the existing regulations do not give the
NPS the authority to require an operator to plug wells that have been
in extended shut-in status. As a result inactive wells have remained
unplugged for years and, in some instances, decades. Unplugged wells
could adversely impact park resources and could also present risks to
park visitors.
Proposed Sec. 9.170(a) would establish that operators are required
to plug a well within a specified time period after cessation of
drilling or production operations or upon the expiration of NPS
approved shut-in status. Under proposed Sec. 9.171, an operator can
seek an extension to the plugging requirement if the operator describes
why drilling or production operations have ceased and its reasonable
future use of the well, demonstrates mechanical integrity, and follows
maintenance requirements.
The proposed procedures are consistent with the way many states
approach the issue of inactive wells, and recognize that certain
economical or logistical reasons exist to justify maintenance of wells
in shut-in status for extended periods of time. Rather than a ``produce
or plug'' policy, the proposed regulation provides assurance that shut-
in wells are maintained in an environmentally sound and safe manner.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182 Sec. 9.48(e).
Prohibitions and Penalties. Sec. 9.51.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.180 Through 9.182--Prohibitions and Penalties
Existing Sec. 9.51(c) provides two different compliance procedures
for suspending an operation, depending on whether or not the violation
poses an ``immediate threat of significant injury to federally owned
lands or waters.'' Proposed Sec. 9.181 would allow the Superintendent
discretion to suspend an operation regardless of whether an operator's
violation poses an ``immediate threat of significant injury.'' Whether
the threat is immediate or not, any violation that results in a threat
of damage to park resources and values should be addressed by the
Superintendent.
Prohibited Acts
Proposed Sec. 9.180 lists the prohibited acts to provide operators
with notice of the acts that would constitute a violation of the 9B
regulations. The proposed rule expands the prohibited acts to include
not only violation of the terms and conditions of an Operations Permit,
but also violations of other provisions of the 9B regulations.
Incorporating Existing 36 CFR 1.3 Penalties Provision in the 9B
Regulations
Existing Sec. 9.51 authorizes the NPS to suspend an operation for
non-compliance and if the violation or damage is not corrected, revoke
an operator's plan of operations. The process to suspend an operation
requires coordination between park staff and other NPS offices during
which time damage to park system resources and values may continue.
Additionally, suspension and revocation are not necessarily the most
appropriate means to correct minor acts of non-compliance (minor leaks
and spills, improper road maintenance, or not maintaining proper site
security). Therefore, we are proposing to incorporate our existing
penalties at 36 CFR 1.3 that would allow NPS law enforcement rangers
and special agents to issue citations, which would result only in fines
for minor acts of non-compliance, while treating the more serious acts
as ones that may be subject to a fine or imprisonment, or both.
No New Authorization Unless Operator Is in Compliance
Under proposed Sec. 9.182 NPS would not review any new operating
permit applications or continue to review any pending permit
applications anywhere in the National Park System until an operator
comes into compliance with a violation of this subpart or a violation
of a term or condition of an operations permit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.190 through Sec. Sec. 9.49.
9.194 Reconsideration and Appeals.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. Sec. 9.190 Through Sec. 9.194--Reconsideration and Appeals
Most of the procedures outlined in existing Sec. 9.49 remain the
same. The operator continues to have the right to appeal a decision
made by either the Superintendent or the Regional Director. The
operator now must exhaust these remedies before the NPS decision is
considered a final agency action that is subject to review under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
The proposed rule now describes the first step of the process as a
request for ``reconsideration,'' rather than an appeal, since it is
directed to the same official who issued the original decision. The
proposed rule also includes other clarifications of the existing
language, makes editorial corrections, and reorganizes the sequence of
some of the paragraphs.
Consistent with the APA, proposed Sec. 9.193(a) would provide that
during the reconsideration and appeals process the NPS's decision will
be suspended and the decision will not become effective until the
completion of the appeals process. Proposed Sec. 9.193(b) addresses
suspension of operations due to emergencies that pose an immediate
threat of injury to injury to federally owned or controlled lands or
waters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.200 Public Participation... Sec. 9.52.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.200--Public Participation
The proposed rule renames the ``Public Inspection of Documents''
section to ``Public Participation.''
Existing Sec. 9.52(a) requires a Superintendent to publish a
notice in a local newspaper of a request to conduct non-federal oil and
gas operations whether or not a complete plan of operations is ever
submitted by an
[[Page 65584]]
operator. Existing Sec. 9.52(b) further requires a Superintendent to
publish a notice in the Federal Register of receipt of a plan of
operations. The proposed rule eliminates the public notice steps
currently required under existing Sec. 9.52(a) and (b) and replaces
them with a more efficient public involvement and review process.
The proposed rule retains the ability for an operator to protect
proprietary or confidential information from disclosure to the public.
Operators need to clearly mark those documents that they wish to
protect from public disclosure as ``proprietary or confidential
information'' such that these documents are readily identifiable by the
NPS decision maker. The NPS has also included proposed provisions that
allow an operator engaged in hydraulic fracturing operations to
withhold chemical formulations that are deemed to be a trade secret.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed rule Existing regulation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.210 Information Collection. New Section.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.210--Information Collection
See Paperwork Reduction Act discussion below.
Renumbering and Redesignation of Subpart D
As a result of the new organization and section numbering in the
proposed subpart B, it is necessary to renumber the sections in the
existing part 9, subpart D. In addition, because we see no reason to
continue to reserve subpart C, the proposed rule redesignates the
existing subpart D as subpart C. The proposed rule makes no substantive
changes to these provisions.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders, and Department Policies--
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this proposed rule is significant because it may
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
order.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
proposed rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. As noted
above, we have carefully considered the BLM regulations to ensure
consistency to the greatest extent possible between provisions of these
proposed NPS regulations that relate to hydraulic fracturing, and the
recent BLM regulations. The NPS is aware of the current litigation
concerning BLM's final hydraulic fracturing rule, State of Wyoming v.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Case No: 2:15-CV-043-SWS, and will
consider public comment as well as any rulings that may occur in the
litigation in reaching final decisions on its final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This rule would not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). This certification is based on the cost-benefit and regulatory
flexibility analysis found in the report Cost-Benefit and Regulatory
Flexibility Analyses: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park
Service for Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 9, Subpart B which can be
viewed at https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_gas/9b_index.cfm.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the
SBREFA. This proposed rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more;
(b) Would not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
These conclusions are based upon the cost-benefit and regulatory
flexibility analysis found in the report entitled Cost-Benefit and
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses: U.S. Department of the Interior,
National Park Service for Proposed Revisions to 36 CFR Part 9, Subpart
B which can be viewed at https://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/oil_and_gas/9b_index.cfm.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The proposed rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. It addresses use of national park lands, and imposes no
requirements on other agencies or governments. A statement containing
the information required by the UMRA (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
The proposed rule does not take private property or authorize the
taking of private property. Moreover, NPS believes that implementation
of the proposed rule is not likely to result in a taking of private
property. Accordingly, NPS believes that the proposed rule does not
require the preparation of a takings implications assessment under
Executive Order 12630.
The proposed rule would update regulations that have been in effect
since 1979. It would update various provisions of the existing
regulations in a manner that is consistent with current industry
standards and technological capabilities, prevailing industry and
investor expectations, and the most recent developments in regulatory
and takings law. It would authorize NPS to recover its legitimate
permit-processing and monitoring costs and to charge operators for
privileged access across federal lands (i.e., access that is not a
legal right incident to the mineral estate). Although it would
potentially increase the amount of financial assurance that operators
must post, it would do so only to a level commensurate with the cost of
restoring the federally owned surface estate.
The proposed rule would extend the applicability of the 9B
regulations to most currently exempt operations located within park
boundaries. During the 36 years that the existing regulations have been
in place, however, NPS has never disapproved a submitted plan of
operations and no mineral owner or operator has ever filed a claim
asserting that implementation of the regulations has resulted in a
taking of private property. Moreover, as described above, the proposed
rule would update the
[[Page 65585]]
existing regulations in a manner consistent with current industry
standards and technological capabilities. Accordingly, NPS does not
believe that the application of the proposed rule to currently exempt
operations is likely to result in a taking. The proposed rule would
continue to allow operators reasonable access across federally owned
surface to develop non-federal mineral rights. No other private
property is affected. The proposed rule would bring outdated provisions
into line with modern regulatory practice and, NPS believes, is a
reasonable exercise of its regulatory authority.
Finally, the regulatory text will continue to state (as do the
existing regulations) that it is not intended to result in a taking.
The existing regulations also contain a second provision that expressly
applies the lower of the two standards of review in the event of a
possible taking. Because the proposed rule would contain only one
standard of review (in an effort to simplify the rule), such a
provision no longer appears appropriate. NPS has never actually needed
to invoke that second provision, nor has it ever failed to provide
final approval for a plan of operations that has been sought. Under the
proposed rule, NPS would retain discretion to make individual permit
decisions that will avoid a taking if an unexpected problem should
arise.
For the foregoing reasons, NPS believes that a takings implications
assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. It addresses use
of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other agencies
or governments. A Federalism summary impact statement is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This proposed rule complies with the requirements of Executive
Order 12988. Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it has no substantial
direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes and that
consultation under the Department's tribal consultation policy is not
required. Nonetheless, NPS has consulted with all federal tribes
traditionally associated with Category 1 parks, which have current oil
and gas operations, and Category 2 parks, which do not have active
operations, but have potential for future operations.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
This proposed rule contains information collection requirements
that we are submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). We may not
conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
OMB has reviewed and approved the current information collection
requirements associated with non-Federal oil and gas rights in national
parks and assigned OMB Control Number 1024-0064, which expires March
31, 2016. We are asking OMB to assign a new OMB Control Number for the
information collection requirements in this proposed rule. If OMB
approves this request, we plan to keep the new number for subpart B
requirements after we publish the final rule. We will delete the burden
associated with subpart B from OMB Control No. 1024-0064.
We are proposing to collect the following information under 36 CFR
Part 9, Subpart B associated with non-Federal oil and gas operations
within units of the National Park System.
Previously Exempt Operations (Sec. Sec. 9.50 Through 9.53)
Previously exempt operators must submit the following information
to the NPS:
Brief description of the current operations and any
anticipated changes to the current operations.
Documentation showing the right to operate within an NPS
unit.
State well identification permit number or American
Petroleum Institute (API) well number.
Maps delineating the area of operations and the area of
surface disturbance and equipment layout within the area of operations.
Spill Control Environmental Preparedness Plan.
Documentation of the current operating methods, surface
equipment, downhole well construction and completion, materials
produced or used, and monitoring methods.
Description of how the operation will meet NPS operating
standards.
Description of procedures to be used and cost estimates
for well plugging and surface reclamation.
Results of any necessary reconnaissance surveys.
Temporary Access Permits (9.60 Through 9.63)
Application for Temporary Access Permit
To gather necessary background information for an Operations
Permit, the operator will need to obtain a Temporary Access permit by
submitting the following information to the NPS:
Brief description of the intended future operation.
Demonstration of the right to operate.
Contact information for the person responsible for the
overall management of the proposed operations.
Contact information and qualifications of all specialists
responsible for conducting the reconnaissance surveys.
Map delineating the proposed reconnaissance survey area.
Description of proposed means of access and routes to the
survey area; and a description of the survey methods.
Extension of Temporary Access Permit
To extend the term of a Temporary Access Permit, operators must
submit a written request that explains why the extension is necessary.
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary (9.70 Through 9.73)
Application for Exemption
This proposed rule allows operators to apply for an exemption from
the operations permit requirement of the regulations if they
directionally drill from a surface location outside an NPS unit to
reach a bottom hole located within NPS boundaries. To apply for an
exemption, NPS requires the following information.
Names and addresses of the operator; the mineral owner;
and any
[[Page 65586]]
agents, assignees, designees, lessees, contractors, employees, or other
representatives of the operator responsible for the overall management
of the proposed operations.
Documentation demonstrating the legal right to operate in
an NPS unit.
Contact information for the operator's representative
responsible for field supervision of the proposed operations and for
emergency response for the proposed operations.
Maps and plats to scale showing the boundaries of each of
the mineral tracts that are relevant to the proposed operations within
the NPS unit boundary.
Maps and plats to scale showing all proposed surface uses
(well site, access route, flowlines, production facilities) that occur
outside the NPS unit.
Description, including depths, thicknesses, and properties
of geologic horizons between the target zone and the base of the
deepest aquifer.
Drilling plan, including directional-drilling program,
horizontal distance along the wellbore's path from well's surface
location to the park boundary, depth at which wellbore crosses NPS unit
boundary, and timeline for operations.
Casing, cementing, and mud programs.
Stimulation programs.
Well plugging and abandonment program.
If hydraulic fracturing is proposed, information required
in Sec. 9.89.
Notification of Change
Within 30 days, operators must notify NPS if the method of
operation or environmental conditions of operation change.
Operations Permit: Application Contents (Sec. Sec. 9.80 Through 9.90)
All Applications
All applications for an Operations Permit, must contain the
following information:
Documentation demonstrating the right to operate within an
NPS unit.
Contact information for the operator; the mineral owner;
any agents, assignees, designees, contractors, or other representatives
of the owner; and the operator's representative responsible for overall
management, field supervision, and emergency response for the proposed
operation.
Existing condition and proposed area of operations,
including all information required by Sec. 9.84.
Reclamation Plan, including (1) a description of the
specific equipment and methods used to meet the operating standards for
reclamation (Sec. 9.116); and (2) a breakdown of the estimated costs
that a third party would charge to complete reclamation as proposed in
the reclamation plan.
Use of water, including (1) the source, quantity, access
route, and transportation/conveyance method for all water to be used in
access road and pad construction, well drilling, stimulation, and
production; and (2) estimations of any anticipated waste water volumes
generated and how they will be managed (i.e., handled, temporarily
stored, disposed, recycled, reused) throughout stages of the operation.
Environmental condition and mitigation actions, including
all information required in Sec. 9.85.
Spill control and emergency preparedness plan, including
all information required by Sec. 9.86.
Additional Information
Geophysical Exploration (Sec. 9.87). If you are proposing
geophysical exploration, the application must include:
Number of crews and number of workers in each crew.
Names and depths of geologic zones targeted for imaging.
Description of the acquisition methods, including the
procedures, specific equipment you will use, and energy sources (e.g.,
explosives or vibroseis trucks).
Methods of access along each survey line for personnel,
materials, and equipment.
List of all explosives, blasting equipment, chemicals, and
fuels you will use in the proposed operations, including a description
of proposed disposal methods, transportation methods, safety measures,
and storage facilities.
Map showing the positions of each survey line including
all source and receiver locations as determined by a locational survey,
and including shotpoint offset distances from wells, buildings, other
infrastructure, and areas the NPS has indicated to you as
environmentally sensitive areas.
Drilling Operations (Sec. 9.88). If you are proposing drilling
operations, the application must include:
Well-pad construction, including dimensions and cross
sections of: Cut and fill areas and excavations for ditches, sumps, and
spill control equipment or structures, including lined areas.
Drill-rig and equipment layout, including rig components,
fuel tanks, testing equipment, support facilities, storage areas, and
all other well-site equipment and facilities.
Drilling program, including hole size for each section and
the directional program, if applicable.
Proposed drilling depth and the estimated depths and names
of usable water, brine, hydrocarbon, geothermal, or other mineral-
bearing zones.
Type and characteristics of the proposed mud systems.
Casing program, including the size, grade, weight, and
setting depth of each string.
Cementing program, including downhole location of any
stage equipment, cement types, volumes, and additives to be used, and a
description of pressure tests and cement verification techniques used
that will be run to evaluate cement placement and integrity.
Minimum specifications for pressure control equipment
function and pressure testing frequency and the blowout preventer stack
arrangement.
Proposed logging, coring, and testing programs. Proposed
completion program, including completion type (open-hole, perforated,
slotted liner, etc.).
Procedures, including considerations for well control.
Description of the equipment, materials, and procedures
proposed for well plugging, including plug depths, plug types, and
minimum mud weight.
Well Simulation Operations (Sec. 9.89). If you are proposing well
simulation operations, including hydraulic fracturing, the application
must include:
Geologic names, a geologic description, and the estimated
depths (measured and true vertical) to the top and bottom of the
formation into which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be injected.
The estimated minimum vertical distance between the top of the fracture
zone and the nearest usable water zone, and the measured depth of the
proposed perforated or open-hole interval.
Estimated depths (measured and true vertical) to the top
and bottom of the confining zone(s). Include a map showing the
location, orientation, and extent of any known or suspected faults or
fractures within one-half mile (horizontal distance) of the wellbore
trajectory that may transect the confining zone(s).
Map showing all existing wellbore trajectories, regardless
of type, within one-half mile (horizontal distance) of any portion of
the wellbore into which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be injected.
The true vertical depth of each wellbore identified on the map must be
indicated.
[[Page 65587]]
Steps to be taken before treatment to verify mechanical
integrity of all downhole tubulars and tools and cement quality,
including pressure tests and cement bond logs (or other logs acceptable
to the Superintendent) demonstrating that the occurrences of usable
water zones have been isolated to protect them from contamination.
Detailed description of the proposed well-stimulation
design, including:
(1) Proposed stimulation fluid, including, but not limited to, the
base fluid and each additive by trade name, and purpose of additive.
(2) Proposed proppant system.
(3) Estimated total volume of fluid to be used.
(4) Anticipated surface treating pressure range.
(5) Maximum anticipated surface pressure that will be applied
during the hydraulic fracturing process.
(6) Trajectory of the wellbore into which hydraulic fracturing
fluids are to be injected and the estimated direction and length of the
fractures that will be propagated and a notation indicating the true
vertical depth of the top and bottom of the fractures; and
(7) Any microseismic monitoring planned or proposed in conjunction
with well stimulation.
Source and location of water supply, such as reused or
recycled water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water supply
wells, and the source and location of water supply, such as reused or
recycled water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water supply
wells.
Storage, mixing, pumping, and control equipment needed to
perform the stimulation.
Information on recovered fluids, including:
(1) Estimated volume of stimulation fluids to be recovered during
flow back.
(2) Proposed methods of handling the recovered fluids including any
onsite treatment for re-use of fluids in other stimulation activities.
(3) Proposed disposal method of the recovered fluids, including,
but not limited to, injection, hauling by truck, or transporting by
pipeline.
Production Operations (Sec. 9.90). If you are proposing to produce
a well, you must submit all of the following information:
Dimensions and the to-scale layout of the wellpad, clearly
identifying well locations, noting partial reclamation areas;
gathering, separation, metering, and storage equipment; electrical
lines; fences; spill control equipment or structures including lined
areas, artificial lift equipment, tank batteries, treating and
separating vessels, secondary or enhanced recovery facilities, water
disposal facilities, gas compression and/or injection facilities;
metering points; sales point (if on lease); tanker pick-up points; gas
compressor, including size and type (if applicable); and any other well
site equipment.
Size, grade, weight, and setting depth of all casing and
tubing strings; cementing history; type and size of packers and
subsurface flow control devices; top and bottom depths of each
completed interval; and method of completion.
Well history, including completions, stimulations,
servicing, and workovers.
Minimum specifications for pressure-control equipment,
function, and pressure-testing frequency.
Method and means used to transport produced oil and gas,
including vehicular transport; flowline and gathering line
construction; operation; pipe size; operating pressure; cathodic
protection methods; surface equipment use; surface equipment location;
maintenance procedures; maintenance schedules; pressure detection
methods; and shutdown procedures.
Road and wellpad maintenance plan, including equipment and
materials to maintain the road surface and control erosion.
Vegetation management plan on well sites, roads, pipeline
corridors, and other disturbed surface areas, including control of
exotic species.
Storm water management plan on the well site.
Produced water storage and disposal plan.
Procedures proposed for well plugging, the depths and the
types of plugs, and minimum mud weight.
Operating Standards (Sec. Sec. 9.110-9.118)
Simulation operations (Sec. 9.118(a)). You must:
Not begin injection activities before you demonstrate the
mechanical integrity of all surface and downhole tubulars and equipment
to differential pressures equal to at least those calculated at the
maximum anticipated treating pressure. Continuously monitor and record
the treating pressures and all annular pressures before, during, and
after the treatment to ensure that treatment materials are directed to
the intended zone.
If mechanical integrity is lost during the treatment,
immediately cease the operation and notify the Superintendent as soon
as feasible, but no later than 24 hours after the incident.
Within 15 days after the occurrence, submit to the
Superintendent a report containing all details pertaining to the
incident, including corrective actions taken.
Production (Sec. 9.118(b)). You must:
Monitor producing conditions to document maintenance of
mechanical integrity of both surface and subsurface equipment.
Identify wells and related facilities by a sign, which
must remain in place until the well is plugged and abandoned and the
related facilities are closed. The sign must be of durable
construction, and the lettering must be legible and large enough to be
read under normal conditions at a distance of at least 50 feet. Each
sign must show the name of the well, name of the operator, and the
emergency contact phone number.
General Terms and Conditions (Sec. Sec. 9.120 Through 9.122)
Provide the NPS an affidavit, signed by an official who is
authorized to legally bind the company, stating that proposed
operations are in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and
local laws and regulations and that all information submitted to the
NPS is true and correct. (Sec. 9.120(c)).
Third party monitor will report to NPS on compliance with
permit. (Sec. 9.121(b)(2)).
Notify the Superintendent of any accidents involving
serious personal injury or death and of any fires or spills on the site
within 24 hours after the accident occurs. (Sec. 9.121(c)).
Submit a full written report on the accident to the
Superintendent within 90 days after the accident occurs. (Sec.
9.121(c)).
Notify the Superintendent within 24 hours after the
discovery of any cultural or scientific resource you encounter that
might be altered or destroyed by your operation. (Sec. 9.121(d)).
Submit reports or other information necessary to verify
compliance with your permit or with any provision of this subpart.
(Sec. 9.121(d)).
If your operations include hydraulic fracturing, you must
provide the Superintendent with a report including all of the
information below within 30 days after the completion of the last stage
of hydraulic fracturing operations for each well (Sec. 9.122):
(a) The true vertical depth of the well, total water volume used,
and a description of the base fluid and each additive in the hydraulic
fracturing fluid, including the trade name, supplier, purpose,
ingredients, Chemical Abstract Service Number (CAS), maximum ingredient
[[Page 65588]]
concentration in additive (percent by mass), and maximum ingredient
concentration in hydraulic fracturing fluid (percent by mass).
(b) The actual source(s) and location(s) of the water used in the
hydraulic fracturing fluid;
(c) The maximum surface pressure and rate at the end of each stage
of the hydraulic fracturing operation and the actual flush volume.
(d) The actual, estimated, or calculated fracture length, height,
and direction.
(e) The actual measured depth of perforations or the open-hole
interval.
(f) Actual volume of stimulation fluids recovered during flow back,
including a description of how the volumes were measured or calculated.
(g) The following information concerning the handling of fluids
recovered, covering the period between the commencement of hydraulic
fracturing and the implementation of the approved permit for the
disposal of produced water under NPS requirements:
(1) Methods of handling the recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, transfer pipes and tankers, holding pond use, re-use for
other stimulation activities, or injection; and
(2) Disposal method of the recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, the percent injected, the percent stored at an off-lease
disposal facility, and the percent recycled.
(h) Continuous monitoring records of annulus pressure at the
bradenhead and other annular pressures that document pressures before,
during, and after injection operations.
Financial Assurance (Sec. Sec. 9.140 Through 9.144)
All operators are required to post adequate financial assurance
with the NPS and are required to submit the following documentation to
the NPS:
Proof of financial assurance in a form acceptable to the
Regional Director and payable upon demand.
If necessary, an adjustment to the financial assurance
amount because of any circumstance that increases or decreases the
estimated costs.
Modification to an Operation (Sec. 9.150)
Operators may request or we may require an operator to modify their
operations. To request a modification to an approved permit, operators
must provide written notice to the Superintendent describing the
modification and why it is needed.
Change of Operator (Sec. Sec. 9.160 and 9.161)
If an operator transfers its operation to a new operator, both the
old and new operator must provide information to the NPS.
Information Current Owner Must Provide. When current operator
transfers operations, current operator must:
Notify the Superintendent in writing within 30 calendar
days after the date the new owner acquires the rights to conduct
operations providing:
(a) Names and addresses of the person or entity conveying the right
and the person or entity acquiring the right.
(b) Effective date of transfer.
(c) Description of the rights, assets, and liabilities being
transferred and which ones, if any, are being reserved by the previous
owner.
(d) Written acknowledgement from the new owner that the contents of
the notification are true and correct.
Information New Operator Must Provide
Adopt and agree in writing to conduct operations in
accordance with all terms and conditions of the previous operator's
operations permit;
File financial assurance with us that is acceptable to the
Regional Director and made payable to the NPS.
If the previous operator was granted an exemption for accessing oil
and gas rights from a surface location outside the park boundary, you
must provide to the Superintendent:
Documentation demonstrating that you hold the right to
operate within an NPS unit;
The names and addresses of the operator; the mineral
owner; any agents, assignees, designees, lessees, or other
representatives of the operator; the operator's representative
responsible for the overall management of the proposed operations; the
operator's representative responsible for field supervision of the
proposed operations; and the operator's representative responsible for
emergency response for the proposed operations.
Well Plugging (Sec. Sec. 9.170 and 9.171)
An operator may apply for either an operations permit or a
modification to its approved operations permit to maintain its well in
a shut-in status for up to 5 years. The application must include the
following information:
Explanation of why the well is shut-in or temporarily
abandoned and your future plans for utilization.
Demonstration of the mechanical integrity of both surface
and downhole equipment such that there is no migration of fluid from
any formation in which it originally occurred or from the surface to
the well.
Description of the manner in which the operator well,
equipment, and area of operations will be maintained.
Reconsideration and Appeals (Sec. Sec. 9.190 Through 9.194)
To appeal an NPS decision, the operator must submit a written
statement describing the alleged factual or legal errors in the
original decision and requesting that the Regional Director reconsider
the decision.
Public Participation (Sec. 9.200)
An operator may request that information required to be reported
under these regulations concerning chemical formulations that are
deemed to be trade secrets be withheld from disclosure. To make this
request the operator must:
Identify the owner of the withheld information and provide
the name, address and contact information for a corporate officer,
managing partner, or sole proprietor of the owner of the information.
Identify the Federal statute or regulation that would
prohibit the NPS from publicly disclosing the information if it were in
the NPS's possession.
Affirm that the operator has been provided the withheld
information from the owner of the information and is maintaining
records of the withheld information, or that the operator has access
and will maintain access to the withheld information held by the owner
of the information.
Affirm that the information is not publicly available.
Affirm that the information is not required to be publicly
disclosed under any applicable laws and policies local, State, tribal,
or Federal law;
Affirm that the owner of the information is in actual
competition and identifies competitors or others that could use the
withheld information to cause the owner of the information substantial
competitive harm;
Affirm that the release of the information would likely
cause substantial competitive harm to the owner of the information and
provides the factual basis for that affirmation; and
Affirm that the information is not readily apparent
through reverse engineering with publicly available information.
Title: Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights, 36 CFR part 9, subpart B.
OMB Control Number: 1024-XXXX.
Service Form Number: None.
Type of Request: Request for a new OMB control number.
Description of Respondents: Businesses.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
[[Page 65589]]
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Completion
number of time per Estimated
Activity/requirement annual response total annual
responses (hours) burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previously Exempt Operations (Sec. Sec. 9.50-9.53)........... 106 10 1,060
Application for Temporary Access Permit (Sec. Sec. 9.60-9.63) 5 15 75
Amendment of Temporary Access Permit............................ 1 1 1
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the 3 80 240
Park Boundary--Application for Exemption (Sec. Sec. 9.70-
9.73)..........................................................
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the 1 2 2
Park Boundary--Notice of change (Sec. Sec. 9.70-9.73).......
Operations Permit Operations Permit (New Operations):
Application Contents--(Sec. Sec. 9.80-9.90).............. 5 140 700
Operating Standards--Stimulation Operations (Sec. 9.118(b)):
Demonstrate mechanical integrity............................ 5 4 20
Record treating pressures and all annular pressures......... 5 4 20
Notify Superintendent if mechanical integrity is lost....... 1 1 1
Report of accident.......................................... 2 1 2
Operating Standards--Production (Sec. 9.118(c)):
Document maintenance of mechanical integrity................ 534 2 1,068
Signage to identify wells................................... 5 4 20
General Terms and Conditions (Sec. Sec. 9.120-9.122):
Affidavit that proposed operations are in compliance with 111 1 111
all laws and that information submitted to NPS is accurate.
Third-Party Monitor Report.................................. 60 17 1,020
Notification--Accidents involving Serious Personal Injuries/ 2 1 2
Death and Fires/Spills.....................................
Written Report--Accidents Involving Serious Injuries/Deaths 2 16 32
and Fires/Spills...........................................
Notification--Discovery of any cultural or scientific 1 1 1
resources..................................................
Report--Verify Compliance with Permits...................... 534 4 2,136
Reporting for Hydraulic Fracturing.......................... 1 2 2
Financial Assurance (Sec. Sec. 9.140-9.144).................. 5 1 5
Modification to an Operation (Sec. 9.150)..................... 1 16 16
Change of Operator (Sec. Sec. 9.160-9.161)................... 5 8 40
Well Plugging (Sec. Sec. 9.170-9.171)........................ 33 14 462
Reconsideration and Appeals (Sec. Sec. 9.190-9.194).......... 1 16 16
Public Participation (Sec. 9.200)............................. 1 4 4
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 1,430 .............. 7,056
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent
burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on
any aspect of this information collection, including:
(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary,
including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection
of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents.
Send your comments and suggestions on this information collection
by the date indicated in the DATES section to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at OMB-OIRA. See ADDRESSES section for
instructions on submitting comments.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
This rule constitutes a major Federal action with the potential to
significantly affect the quality of the human environment. We have
prepared the DEIS under the requirements of NEPA. The DEIS will publish
shortly after this proposed rule and be available online at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/DEIS9B, by clicking on the link entitled
``Document List.''
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This proposed rule is not a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211. A statement of Energy Effects is
not required.
Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This
means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you believe we have not met these requirements, send us comments
by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help
us revise this proposed rule, your comments should be as specific as
possible. For example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections
or paragraphs that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you believe lists or tables would be
useful, etc.
Drafting Information
This proposed rule reflects the collective efforts of NPS staff in
the Geologic Resources Division, parks, and field offices, with
assistance from the Division of Jurisdiction, Regulations and Special
Park Uses.
[[Page 65590]]
Public Participation
It is the policy of the Department of the Interior, whenever
feasible, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process. Accordingly, interested persons may submit written
comments regarding this proposed rule by one of the methods listed in
the ADDRESSES section. All comments must be received by midnight of the
close of the comment period. Bulk comments in any format (hard copy or
electronic) submitted on behalf of others will not be accepted.
We are particularly interested in comments concerning:
1. Substantive differences between NPS's proposed regulations of
oil and gas activity and those of other Federal agencies, including
differences in the associated costs and benefits.
2. The costs and benefits of not applying this rule to inholdings,
and to operators' surface operations when accessing oil and gas rights
inside an NPS unit from a surface location outside the park boundary.
3. Whether relevant guidance presently, or planned to be, included
in the NPS 9B Operators Handbook should instead be included in this
rule.
4. Whether the performance and operating standards are clear and
certain in their purpose, including Sec. Sec. 9.30(a), 9.103(a),
9.110(c), and 9.118.
5. Alternative approaches to removing public financial exposure
including multi-well blanket bonding, the establishment of industry
provided plugging fund, or increasing the financial assurance cap to a
fixed amount higher than $200,000. Please note that these alternatives
were considered but dismissed from further analysis in the DEIS because
they do not meet a fundamental purpose of the rulemaking, which is to
ensure that bonding amounts are sufficient to meet reclamation needs
and do not result in taxpayer liability.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 1
National parks, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
36 CFR Part 9
National parks, Oil and gas exploration, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service
proposes to amend 36 CFR parts 1 and 9 as follows:
PART 1--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1.3 Penalties.
(a) A person convicted of violating a provision of the regulations
contained in parts 1 through 7, part 9 subpart B, and parts 12 and 13
of this chapter, within a park area not covered in paragraphs (b) or
(c) of this section, shall be punished by a fine as provided by law, or
by imprisonment not exceeding 6 months, or both, and shall be adjudged
to pay all costs of the proceedings.
(b) A person who knowingly and willfully violates any provision of
the regulations contained in parts 1 through 5, 7, part 9 subpart B,
and part 12 of this chapter, within any national military park,
battlefield site, national monument, or miscellaneous memorial
transferred to the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior from
that of the Secretary of War by Executive Order No. 6166, June 10,
1933, and enumerated in Executive Order No. 6228, July 28, 1933, shall
be punished by a fine as provided by law, or by imprisonment for not
more than 3 months, or by both.
Note: These park areas are enumerated in a note under 5 U.S.C.
901.
(c) A person convicted of violating any provision of the
regulations contained in parts 1 through 7, and part 9 subpart B of
this chapter, within a park area established pursuant to the Act of
August 21, 1935, 49 Stat. 666, shall be punished by a fine as provided
by law and shall be adjudged to pay all costs of the proceedings. 54
U.S.C. 320105.
(d) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c)
of this section, a person convicted of violating Sec. 2.23 of this
chapter shall be punished by a fine as provided by law. 16 U.S.C. 6811.
PART 9--MINERALS MANAGEMENT
0
3. Revise subpart B to read as follows:
Subpart B--Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights
Purpose and Scope
Sec.
9.30 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?
9.31 When does this subpart apply to me?
9.32 What authorization do I need to conduct operations?
9.33 If am already operating under an NPS authorization, what do I
need to do?
Definitions
9.40 What do the terms used in this subpart mean?
Previously Exempt Operations
9.50 Do I need an operations permit for my previously exempt
operations?
9.51 How do I apply for my operations permit?
9.52 What will the NPS do with my application?
9.53 May I continue to operate while the NPS reviews my application?
Temporary Access Permits
9.60 When do I need a temporary access permit?
9.61 How do I apply for a temporary access permit?
9.62 When will the NPS grant a temporary access permit?
9.63 How long will I have to conduct my reconnaissance surveys?
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary
9.70 Do I need an operations permit for accessing oil and gas rights
from outside the park boundary?
9.71 What information must I submit to the NPS?
9.72 How will the NPS act on my submission?
9.73 If I don't need an operations permit, are there still
requirements that I must I meet?
Operations Permit: Application Contents
9.80 Who must apply for an operations permit?
9.81 May I use previously submitted information?
9.82 What must I include in my application?
9.83 What information must be included in all applications?
9.84 Existing conditions.
9.85 Environmental conditions and mitigation actions.
9.86 Spill control and emergency preparedness plan.
9.87 What additional information must be included if I am proposing
geophysical exploration?
9.88 What additional information must be included if I am proposing
drilling operations?
9.89 What additional information must be included if I am proposing
well stimulation operations, including hydraulic fracturing?
[[Page 65591]]
9.90 What additional information must be included if I am proposing
production operations?
Operations Permit: Application Review Process
9.100 How will NPS process my application?
9.101 How will the NPS conduct initial review
9.102 How will the NPS conduct formal review?
9.103 What standards must be met to approve my application?
9.104 What final actions may the Regional Director take on my
Operations Permit application?
9.105 What is the approval process for operations in Big Cypress
National Preserve?
Operating Standards
9.110 What are the purposes and functions of NPS operating
standards?
9.111 What general facility design and management standards must I
meet?
9.112 What hydrologic standards must I meet?
9.113 What safety standards must I meet?
9.114 What lighting and visual standards must I meet?
9.115 What noise reduction standards must I meet?
9.116 What reclamation and protection standards must I meet?
9.117 What additional operating standards apply to geophysical
operations?
9.118 What additional operating standards apply to drilling,
stimulation, and production operations?
General Terms and Conditions
9.120 What terms and conditions apply to all operators?
9.121 What monitoring and reporting is required for all operators?
9.122 What additional reports must I submit if my operation includes
hydraulic fracturing?
Access to Oil and Gas Rights
9.130 May I cross Federal property to reach the boundary of my
mineral right?
9.131 Will the NPS charge me a fee for access?
9.132 Will I be charged a fee for emergency access to my operations?
Financial Assurance
9.140 Do I have to provide financial assurance to the NPS?
9.141 How does the NPS establish the amount of financial assurance?
9.142 Will the NPS adjust my financial assurance?
9.143 When will the NPS release my financial assurance?
9.144 Under what circumstances will I forfeit my financial
assurance?
Modification to an Operation
9.150 Can my approved permit be modified?
Change of Operator
9.160 What are my responsibilities if I transfer my operations?
9.161 What must I do if operations are transferred to me?
Well Plugging
9.170 When must I plug my well?
9.171 Can I get an extension to the well plugging requirement?
Prohibitions and Penalties
9.180 What acts are prohibited under this subpart?
9.181 What enforcement actions can the NPS take?
9.182 How do violations affect my ability to obtain a permit?
Reconsideration and Appeals
9.190 Can I request reconsideration of NPS decisions?
9.191 How does the NPS process my request for reconsideration?
9.192 Can I appeal the Regional Director's decision?
9.193 Will filing a request for reconsideration or appeal stop the
NPS from taking action under this subpart?
9.194 What if the original decision was made by the Superintendent?
Public Participation
9.200 How can the public participate in the approval process?
Information Collection
9.210 Has the Office of Management and Budget approved the
information collection requirements?
Subpart B--Non-Federal Oil and Gas Rights
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 230a(a)(4), 459d-3, 460cc-2(i),
460ee(c)(4), 698c(b)(2), 698i(b)(2), and 698m-4; 18 U.S.C. 3571 and
3581; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, and 103104.
Purpose and Scope
Sec. 9.30 What is the purpose and scope of this subpart?
(a) This subpart ensures that operators exercising non-federal oil
and gas rights within an NPS unit use technologically feasible, least
damaging methods to:
(1) Protect federally owned or administered lands, waters, or
resources of NPS units;
(2) Protect NPS visitor uses or experiences, or visitor or employee
health and safety; and
(3) Protect park resources and values under the statute commonly
known as the NPS Organic Act;
(b) This subpart applies to all operators conducting non-federal
oil or gas operations on lands or waters within an NPS unit, regardless
of the ownership or jurisdictional status of those lands or waters.
(c) We do not intend for this subpart to result in a taking of a
property interest. The purpose of this subpart is to reasonably
regulate operations affecting federally owned or administered lands,
waters, and resources of NPS units, visitor uses and experiences, and
visitor and employee health and safety.
Sec. 9.31 When does this subpart apply to me?
(a) This subpart applies to you if you are an operator who conducts
or proposes to conduct non-federal oil or gas operations.
(b) If you were operating outside of an NPS unit and your operation
has been included within an existing NPS unit as a result of a change
to the boundary, or included within a newly established NPS unit, you
are subject to Sec. Sec. 9.50 through 9.53.
(c) If you were operating under an exemption because your operation
accessed oil and gas rights inside the park boundary from a surface
location outside the park boundary, and your surface location has been
included within an existing NPS unit as a result of a change to the
boundary, or included within a newly established NPS unit, you are
subject to Sec. Sec. 9.50 through 9.53.
Sec. 9.32 What authorization do I need to conduct operations?
(a) Except as provided in Sec. Sec. 9.70 through 9.73, you must
obtain a temporary access permit under Sec. Sec. 9.60 through 9.63 or
an operations permit under Sec. Sec. 9.80 through 9.90 before starting
operations.
(b) You must demonstrate that you have the right to operate in
order to conduct activities within an NPS unit.
Sec. 9.33 If I am already operating under an NPS authorization, what
do I need to do?
(a) If you already have an NPS-approved plan of operations, you may
continue to operate according to the terms and conditions of that
approval, subject to the provisions of this subpart. For purposes of
this subpart, we will consider your approved plan of operations to be
either a temporary access permit or operations permit.
(b) This section applies to you if we have granted you an exemption
to the plan of operations requirement because your operation accesses
oil and gas rights inside a park boundary from a surface location
outside the park's boundary. You may continue to operate under the
exemption provided that your operations comply with the general terms
and conditions of Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122. You are also subject
to the prohibitions and penalties in Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182.
[[Page 65592]]
Definitions
Sec. 9.40 What do the terms used in this subpart mean?
In addition to the definitions in 36 CFR 1.4, the following
definitions apply to this subpart:
Area of operations means lands or waters within an NPS unit on
which operations are approved to be carried out, including roads or
other areas where you are authorized to exercise the oil and gas
rights.
Contaminating substance means any toxic or hazardous substance
which is used in or results from the conduct of operations and is
listed under the Clean Water Act at 40 CFR part 116, the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act at 40 CFR part 261, or the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act at 49 CFR part 172. This includes, but is
not limited to, explosives, radioactive materials, brine waters,
formation waters, petroleum products, petroleum by-products, and
chemical compounds used for drilling, production, processing, well
testing, well completion, and well servicing.
Gas means any fluid, either combustible or noncombustible, which is
produced in a natural state from the earth and which maintains a
gaseous or rarefied state at ordinary temperature and pressure
conditions.
NPS unit has the same meaning as ``National Park System (Park
Area)'' defined at 36 CFR 1.4(a).
Oil means any viscous combustible liquid hydrocarbon or solid
hydrocarbon substance easily liquefiable on warming that occurs
naturally in the earth, including drip gasoline or other natural
condensates recovered from gas without resort to manufacturing process.
Operations means all existing and proposed functions, work, and
activities in connection with the exercise of oil or gas rights not
owned by the United States and located or occurring within an NPS unit.
(1) Operations include, but are not limited to: Access by any means
to or from an area of operations; construction; geological and
geophysical exploration; drilling, well servicing, workover, or
recompletion; production; gathering (including installation and
maintenance of flowlines and gathering lines); storage, transport, or
processing of petroleum products; earth moving; excavation; hauling;
disposal; surveillance, inspection, monitoring, or maintenance of
wells, facilities, and equipment; reclamation; road and pad building or
improvement; shot hole and well plugging and abandonment, and
reclamation; and all other activities incident to any of the foregoing.
(2) Operations do not include reconnaissance surveys as defined in
this subpart or oil and gas pipelines that are located within the park
under authority of a deeded or other right-of-way.
Operations permit means an NPS special use permit authorizing an
operator to conduct operations in an NPS unit. An operations permit is
subject to cost recovery under 54 U.S.C. 103104.
Operator means any person or entity, agent, assignee, designee,
lessee, or representative thereof who is conducting operations or
proposing to exercise non-federal oil and gas rights within the
boundaries of an NPS unit.
Owner means the person that holds title to non-federal oil and gas
minerals.
Previously exempt operations means those operations being conducted
in an NPS unit without an approved permit from the NPS as of the
effective date of these regulations. This term does not include
operations where, before the effective date of these regulations, the
NPS granted the operator an exemption to the plan of operations
requirement because the operation accessed oil and gas rights inside
the park from a surface location outside the park.
Reconnaissance survey means an inspection or survey conducted by
qualified specialists for the purpose of preparing a permit
application.
(1) A reconnaissance survey includes identification of the area of
operations and collection of natural and cultural resource information
within and adjacent to the proposed area of operations.
(2) A reconnaissance survey does not include surface disturbance
activities except for minimal disturbance necessary to perform cultural
resource surveys, natural resource surveys, and location surveys
required under this subpart.
Right to operate means a deed, lease, memorandum of lease,
designation of operator, assignment of right, or other documentation
demonstrating that you hold a legal right to conduct the operations you
are proposing within an NPS unit.
Technologically feasible, least damaging methods are those that we
determine, on a case-by-case basis, to be most protective of park
resources and values while ensuring human health and safety, taking
into consideration all relevant factors, including environmental,
economic, and technological factors and the requirements of applicable
law.
Temporary access permit means an NPS special use permit authorizing
an operator to access that operator's proposed area of operations to
conduct reconnaissance surveys necessary to collect basic information
necessary to prepare an operations permit application. A temporary
access permit is subject to cost recovery under 54 U.S.C. 103104.
Third-party monitor means a qualified specialist who is not an
employee, agent, or representative of the operator and who has
demonstrated to the NPS the relevant expertise to monitor operations
for compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and permit
requirements.
Usable water means an aquifer or its portion which supplies any
public water system; or which contains a sufficient quantity of ground
water to supply a public water system; and currently supplies drinking
water for human consumption; or contains fewer than 10,000 mg/l total
dissolved solids; and which is not an exempted aquifer.
Waste means any material that is discarded. It includes, but is not
limited to: Drilling fluids and cuttings; produced fluids not under
regulation as a toxic or hazardous substance; human waste; garbage;
fuel drums; pipes; oil; contaminated soil; synthetic materials; man-
made structures or equipment; or native and nonnative materials.
We and us mean the National Park Service.
You and I mean the operator, unless otherwise specified or
indicated by the context.
Previously Exempt Operations
Sec. 9.50 Do I need an operations permit for my previously exempt
operations?
Yes. You must obtain an NPS operations permit in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 9.80 through 9.90.
Sec. 9.51 How do I apply for my operations permit?
Within 90 days after [effective date of the final rule] or within
90 days after the effective date of a boundary change, or establishment
of a new NPS unit, as applicable, you must submit the following to the
Superintendent of the NPS unit in which you propose to continue to
conduct operations:
(a) A brief description of the current operations and any
anticipated changes to the current operations;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that you hold the right to operate
within an NPS unit;
(c) The State well-identification permit number or American
Petroleum Institute (API) well number;
[[Page 65593]]
(d) Maps to scale that clearly delineate your proposed area of
operations as of [effective date of the final rule] or the effective
date of a boundary change, or establishment of a new NPS unit, as
applicable, and that identify the area of surface disturbance and
equipment layout within your proposed area of operations;
(e) A spill control environmental preparedness plan as required by
Sec. 9.86;
(f) Documentation of the current operating methods, surface
equipment, downhole well construction and completion, materials
produced or used, and monitoring methods;
(g) A description of how your proposed operation will meet each
applicable operating standard in this subpart;
(h) A description of the procedures to be used and cost estimates
for well plugging and surface reclamation; and
(i) The results of any reconnaissance surveys you have conducted to
be used by the Superintendent to identify resource protection measures
in your operations permit.
Sec. 9.52 What will the NPS do with my application?
The NPS will review your application and take action under
Sec. Sec. 9.100 through 9.104.
Sec. 9.53 May I continue to operate while the NPS reviews my
application?
Before obtaining an approved operations permit, you may continue to
conduct operations subject to the following conditions:
(a) Continuation of operations is limited to those methods and the
area of disturbance that existed on [insert effective date] or the
effective date of a boundary change, or establishment of a new NPS
unit, as applicable.
(b) Your operation is also subject to the general terms and
conditions in Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122 and the prohibitions and
penalties in Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182.
(c) Except in an emergency, we will not take any steps to directly
regulate your operation before 90 days after [effective date of the
final rule] or 90 days after the effective date of a boundary change,
or establishment of a new NPS unit, as applicable.
Temporary Access Permits
Sec. 9.60 When do I need a temporary access permit?
You must apply to the Regional Director for a temporary access
permit to access your proposed area of operations in order to conduct
reconnaissance surveys. This permit will describe the means, routes,
timing, and other terms and conditions of your access as determined by
the Regional Director.
Sec. 9.61 How do I apply for a temporary access permit?
To apply for a temporary access permit, you must submit the
following information to the Superintendent of the NPS unit in which
you propose to conduct operations:
(a) A brief description of the intended future operation so that we
can determine what information needs to be gathered;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that you hold a legal right to
operate located within an NPS unit;
(c) The name, legal address, and telephone number of the owner,
operator, employee, agent, or contractor responsible for overall
management of the proposed operations;
(d) The name, legal address, telephone number, and qualifications
of all specialists responsible for conducting the reconnaissance
surveys;
(e) A map delineating the proposed reconnaissance survey area in
relation to the park boundary and the proposed area of operations at a
minimum scale of 1:24,000, or a scale specified by the Superintendent
as acceptable;
(f) A description of proposed means of access and routes proposed
for conducting the reconnaissance surveys; and
(g) A description of the survey methods you intend to use to
identify the natural and cultural resources.
Sec. 9.62 When will the NPS grant a temporary access permit?
If the Regional Director determines that your proposed
reconnaissance survey will not result in surface disturbance, except
for minimal disturbance necessary to perform surveys, the Regional
Director will issue you a temporary access permit within 30 days after
receipt of a complete application, unless the Regional Director
notifies you that additional time is necessary to evaluate or process
your application.
Sec. 9.63 How long will I have to conduct my reconnaissance surveys?
Your temporary access permit will be in effect for a maximum of 60
days from the date of issuance. The Regional Director may extend the
term of the temporary access permit for a reasonable period of time,
based upon your written request that explains why an extension is
necessary.
Accessing Oil and Gas Rights From a Surface Location Outside the Park
Boundary
Sec. 9.70 Do I need an operations permit for accessing oil and gas
rights from outside the park boundary?
Your downhole activities inside an NPS unit are subject to these
regulations. If you wish to access your oil and gas rights located
inside an NPS unit from a surface location outside the unit, you must
submit the information required by Sec. 9.71. We will evaluate this
information to determine whether your operations are exempt or require
an operations permit. We will require an operations permit only if we
determine that permit requirements are needed to protect against a
significant threat of damage to:
(a) Federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources
within NPS units;
(b) NPS visitor uses or experiences; or
(c) Visitor or employee health or safety.
Sec. 9.71 What information must I submit to the NPS?
You must provide the information required by this section to the
Superintendent of the relevant NPS unit. You must provide all of the
following.
(a) The names and addresses of:
(1) The operator;
(2) The mineral owner; and
(3) Any agents, assignees, designees, lessees, contractors,
employees, or other representatives of the operator responsible for the
overall management of the proposed operations.
(b) Documentation demonstrating that you hold a legal right to
operate in an NPS unit.
(c) Contact information for the operator's representative
responsible for field supervision of the proposed operations and for
emergency response for the proposed operations.
(d) Maps and plats to scale showing the boundaries of each of the
mineral tracts that are relevant to your proposed operations within the
NPS unit boundary.
(e) Maps and plats to scale showing all proposed surface uses (well
site, access route, flowlines, production facilities) that occur
outside the NPS unit.
(f) Information regarding downhole operations and conditions,
including:
(1) Description, including depths, thicknesses, and properties of
geologic horizons between the target zone and the base of the deepest
aquifer;
(2) Drilling plan, including directional-drilling program,
horizontal
[[Page 65594]]
distance along the wellbore's path from well's surface location to the
park boundary, depth at which wellbore crosses NPS unit boundary, and
timeline for operations;
(3) Casing, cementing, and mud programs;
(4) Stimulation programs; and
(5) Well plugging and abandonment program.
(g) If you propose hydraulic fracturing, then you must also provide
the information required by Sec. 9.89.
Sec. 9.72 How will the NPS act on my submission?
(a) Within 30 days after receiving your submission under Sec.
9.71, the Superintendent will notify you in writing that your
information is complete, you need to submit more information, or we
need more time to review your submission.
(b) Within 30 days after receiving your complete submission, the
Superintendent will notify you in writing that either:
(1) No further action is required by the NPS and you are exempt
from the operations permit requirement; or
(2) You must obtain an operations permit.
(c) If you need an operations permit, the information provided
under Sec. 9.71 is your permit application and the NPS will review
your application under Sec. Sec. 9.100 through 9.104.
Sec. 9.73 If I don't need an operations permit, are there still
requirements that I must I meet?
If the NPS notifies you under Sec. 9.72 that you do not need an
operations permit, you are still subject to the general terms and
conditions in Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122, the prohibitions and
penalties in Sec. Sec. 9.180 through 9.182, and the requirements in
this section.
(a) You must notify the NPS within 30 days if your method of
operation or the environmental conditions of your operation change.
(b) The Regional Director may notify you in writing that you are no
longer exempt from the operations permit requirement after determining
that operational requirements are needed to protect against a
significant threat of damage to any of the following:
(1) Federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources of
NPS units;
(2) NPS visitor uses or experiences; or
(3) Visitor or employee health or safety.
(c) Within 30 days after receiving this notification, you must file
your operations permit application with the Superintendent.
Operations Permit: Application Contents
Sec. 9.80 Who must apply for an operations permit?
Except as otherwise provided Sec. Sec. 9.70 through 9.73, an
operator proposing to conduct operations within the boundary of an NPS
unit must submit an application for an operations permit to the
Superintendent.
Sec. 9.81 May I use previously submitted information?
(a) In satisfying the requirements of Sec. Sec. 9.82 through 9.90,
you do not need to resubmit information that is already on file with
the NPS. Instead, you may reference the previously submitted
information in your permit application.
(b) You may submit documents and materials containing the
information required by Sec. Sec. 9.82 through 9.90 that you have
submitted to other Federal and State agencies. If you do this, you must
clearly identify the information required by Sec. Sec. 9.82 through
9.90.
Sec. 9.82 What must I include in my application?
(a) Your application for an operations permit must include all of
the information required by Sec. 9.83. You must also submit the
information required by Sec. Sec. 9.87 through 9.90, where applicable,
and any additional information that the Superintendent may require.
(b) You may provide information for only the phase of operations
you propose. Each permit application is only required to describe those
functions for which you want immediate approval. However, approval of
an Operations Permit covering one phase of operations does not
guarantee future approval of an Operations Permit covering a subsequent
phase.
Sec. 9.83 What information must be included in all applications?
All applications must include the information required by this
section.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All operations permit applications
must include information on . . . and must include the following
detailed information . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Ownership..................... documentation demonstrating that you
hold the right to operate inside of
an NPS unit.
(b) The owner/operator............ names, addresses, and other contact
information for:
(1) The operator;
(2) The mineral owner;
(3) Any agents, assignees,
designees, contractors, or other
representatives of the operator;
(4) The operator's representatives
responsible for overall management,
field supervision, and emergency
response for the proposed
operations.
(c) Existing conditions and all the information required by Sec.
proposed area of operations. 9.84.
(d) Reclamation plan.............. (1) A description of the specific
equipment and methods used to meet
the operating standards for
reclamation at Sec. 9.116; and
(2) A breakdown of the estimated
costs that a third party would
charge to complete reclamation as
proposed in your reclamation plan.
(e) Use of water.................. (1) The source, quantity, access
route, and transportation/
conveyance method for all water to
be used in access road and pad
construction, well drilling,
stimulation, and production; and
(2) Estimations of any anticipated
waste water volumes generated and
how they will be managed (i.e.
handled, temporary stored,
disposed, recycled, reused)
throughout stages of the operation.
(f) Environmental conditions and all the information required by Sec.
mitigation actions. 9.85.
(g) The spill control and all the information required by Sec.
emergency preparedness plan. 9.86.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 9.84 Existing conditions.
(a) You must submit to-scale maps that clearly identify:
(1) The boundaries of each of your mineral tracts in relation to
your proposed operations and the relevant NPS unit boundary;
[[Page 65595]]
(2) The natural features, including, but not limited, to streams,
lakes, ponds, topographic relief, and areas the NPS has indicated to
you as environmentally sensitive;
(3) The locations of existing roads, trails, railroad tracks, pads,
and other disturbed areas; and
(4) The locations of existing structures that your operations could
affect, including, but not limited to: Buildings, pipelines, producing
oil and gas wells, freshwater wells, underground and overhead
electrical lines, and other utility lines.
(b) You must submit the following information about geologic
conditions under natural conditions and under the proposed operating
conditions:
(1) Estimated depths and names of zones of usable water, brine,
hydrocarbon, geothermal, or other mineral-bearing zones based on the
best available information;
(2) Potential hazards to persons and the environment such as
abnormal pressure zones, lost circulation zones, hydrogen sulfide gas,
or karst formations; and
(3) Nature and extent (depth if known) of near-surface bedrock
fracturing/jointing relative to proposed cemented surface casing-seat
depth and any open annular interval proposed in the well design.
(c) You must submit the following information about new surface
disturbances and construction:
(1) Maps showing the proposed area of operations; boundaries of new
surface disturbances as determined by a location survey; and proposed
access routes as determined by a location survey;
(2) Maps showing the proposed location of all support facilities,
including those for transportation (e.g., vehicle parking areas,
airstrips, helicopter pads), sanitation, occupation, staging areas,
fuel dumps, refueling areas, loading docks, water supplies, and
disposal facilities;
(3) The method and diagrams, including cross-sections, of any
proposed pad construction, road construction, cut-and-fill areas, and
surface maintenance, including erosion control;
(4) The number and types of equipment and vehicles, including an
estimate of vehicular round trips associated with each phase of your
operation;
(5) An estimated timetable for each phase of the proposed
operations, including any operational timing constraints;
(6) The type and extent of security measures proposed at your area
of operations;
(7) The power sources and their transmission systems for the
proposed operations; and
(8) The types and quantities of all solid and liquid waste
generation and the proposed methods of storage, handling, and disposal.
Sec. 9.85 Environmental conditions and mitigation actions.
You must submit the following information about environmental
conditions and mitigation actions:
(a) The natural resource and the cultural resource survey reports
for your proposed area of operations;
(b) A description of the steps you propose to take to mitigate any
adverse environmental impacts on park resources and values, including
but not limited to, the unit's: Land features, land uses, fish and
wildlife, vegetation, soils, surface and subsurface water resources,
air quality, noise, lightscapes, viewsheds, cultural resources, and
economic environment; and
(c) A discussion of:
(1) Any anticipated impacts that you cannot mitigate; and
(2) All alternative technologically feasible, least damaging
methods of operations, their costs, and their environmental effects.
Sec. 9.86 Spill control and emergency preparedness plan.
You must submit the following information about your spill control
and emergency preparedness plan. You may use a spill prevention control
and countermeasure (SPCC) plan prepared under 40 CFR part 112 if the
plan includes all of the information required by this section. You must
submit:
(a) A list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of persons
that the Superintendent can contact in the event of a spill, fire, or
accident, including the order in which the persons should be contacted;
(b) Notification and reporting procedure in the event of a spill,
fire, or accident;
(c) Identification of contaminating or toxic substances used within
your area of operations or expected to be encountered during
operations;
(d) Identification of abnormal pressure, temperature, toxic gases
or substances, or other hazardous conditions at your area of operations
or expected to be encountered during operations;
(e) Measures (e.g., procedures, facility design, equipment) to
minimize risks to human health and safety and the environment;
(f) Steps to prevent accumulations of oil or other materials deemed
to be fire hazards from occurring in the vicinity of well locations and
lease tanks;
(g) The equipment and methods for containment and cleanup of
contaminating substances, including a description of the equipment
available at your area of operations and equipment available from local
contractors;
(h) A storm water drainage plan and actions intended to mitigate
storm water runoff;
(i) Safety data sheets for each material you will use or encounter
during operations; including expected quantities maintained at your
area of operations;
(j) A description of the emergency actions you will take in the
event of accidents causing human injury; and
(k) Contingency plans for conditions and emergencies other than
spills, such as if your area of operations is located in areas prone to
hurricanes, flooding, tornadoes, fires, or earthquakes.
Sec. 9.87 What additional information must be included if I am
proposing geophysical exploration?
If you propose to conduct geophysical exploration, you must submit
the following additional information:
(a) The number of crews and numbers of workers in each crew;
(b) Names and depths of geologic zones targeted for imaging;
(c) A description of the acquisition methods, including the
procedures, specific equipment you will use, and energy sources (e.g.,
explosives or vibroseis trucks);
(d) The methods of access along each survey line for personnel,
materials, and equipment;
(e) A list of all explosives, blasting equipment, chemicals, and
fuels you will use in the proposed operations, including a description
of proposed disposal methods, transportation methods, safety measures,
and storage facilities; and
(f) A map showing the positions of each survey line including all
source and receiver locations as determined by a locational survey, and
including shotpoint offset distances from wells, buildings, other
infrastructure, and areas the NPS has indicated to you as
environmentally sensitive areas.
Sec. 9.88 What additional information must be included if I am
proposing drilling operations?
If you are proposing to drill a well, you must submit the following
additional information:
(a) Well-pad construction, including dimensions and cross sections
of: Cut
[[Page 65596]]
and fill areas and excavations for ditches, sumps, and spill control
equipment or structures, including lined areas;
(b) Drill-rig and equipment layout, including rig components, fuel
tanks, testing equipment, support facilities, storage areas, and all
other well-site equipment and facilities;
(c) The drilling program, including hole size for each section and
the directional program, if applicable;
(d) Proposed drilling depth and the estimated depths and names of
usable water, brine, hydrocarbon, geothermal, or other mineral-bearing
zones;
(e) The type and characteristics of the proposed mud systems;
(f) The casing program, including the size, grade, weight, and
setting depth of each string;
(g) The cementing program, including downhole location of any stage
equipment, cement types, volumes, and additives to be used, and a
description of pressure tests and cement verification techniques used
that will be run to evaluate cement placement and integrity;
(h) The minimum specifications for pressure control equipment
function and pressure testing frequency and the blowout preventer stack
arrangement;
(i) The proposed logging, coring, and testing programs;
(j) The proposed completion program, including completion type
(open-hole, perforated, slotted liner, etc.) and procedures, including
considerations for well control; and
(k) A description of the equipment, materials, and procedures
proposed for well plugging, including plug depths, plug types, and
minimum mud weight.
Sec. 9.89 What additional information must be included if I am
proposing well-stimulation operations, including hydraulic fracturing?
If you are proposing well stimulation operations, including
hydraulic fracturing, you must submit the following additional
information:
(a) The geologic names, a geologic description, and the estimated
depths (measured and true vertical) to the top and bottom of the
formation into which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be injected.
The estimated minimum vertical distance between the top of the fracture
zone and the nearest usable water zone, and the measured depth of the
proposed perforated or open-hole interval.
(b) The estimated depths (measured and true vertical) to the top
and bottom of the confining zone(s). Include a map showing the
location, orientation, and extent of any known or suspected faults or
fractures within one-half mile (horizontal distance) of the wellbore
trajectory that may transect the confining zone(s).
(c) A map showing all existing wellbore trajectories, regardless of
type, within one-half mile (horizontal distance) of any portion of the
wellbore into which hydraulic fracturing fluids are to be injected. The
true vertical depth of each wellbore identified on the map must be
indicated.
(d) Steps to be taken before treatment to verify mechanical
integrity of all downhole tubulars and tools and cement quality,
including pressure tests, monitoring of cement returns to surface, and
cement evaluation logs (or other logs acceptable to the Superintendent)
demonstrating that the occurrences of usable water zones have been
isolated to protect them from contamination.
(e) A detailed description of the proposed well-stimulation design,
including:
(1) The proposed stimulation fluid, including, but not limited to,
the base fluid and each additive by trade name, and purpose of
additive;
(2) Proposed proppant system;
(3) The estimated total volume of fluid to be used;
(4) The anticipated surface treating pressure range;
(5) The maximum anticipated surface pressure that will be applied
during the hydraulic fracturing process;
(6) The trajectory of the wellbore into which hydraulic fracturing
fluids are to be injected and the estimated direction and length of the
fractures that will be propagated and a notation indicating the true
vertical depth of the top and bottom of the fractures; and
(7) Any microseismic monitoring planned or proposed in conjunction
with well stimulation.
(f) The source and location of water supply, such as reused or
recycled water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water supply
wells, and the source and location of water supply, such as reused or
recycled water, rivers, creeks, springs, lakes, ponds, and water supply
wells.
(g) The storage, mixing, pumping, and control equipment needed to
perform the stimulation.
(h) The following information concerning the handling of recovered
fluids:
(1) The estimated volume of stimulation fluids to be recovered
during flow back;
(2) The proposed methods of handling the recovered fluids including
any onsite treatment for re-use of fluids in other stimulation
activities; and
(3) The proposed disposal method of the recovered fluids,
including, but not limited to, injection, hauling by truck, or
transporting by pipeline.
Sec. 9.90 What additional information must be included if I am
proposing production operations?
If you are proposing to produce a well, you must submit all of the
following information:
(a) The dimensions and the to-scale layout of the wellpad, clearly
identifying well locations, noting partial reclamation areas;
gathering, separation, metering, and storage equipment; electrical
lines; fences; spill control equipment or structures including lined
areas, artificial lift equipment, tank batteries, treating and
separating vessels, secondary or enhanced recovery facilities, water
disposal facilities, gas compression and/or injection facilities;
metering points; sales point (if on lease); tanker pick-up points; gas
compressor, including size and type (if applicable); and any other well
site equipment;
(b) The size, grade, weight, and setting depth of all casing and
tubing strings; cementing history; type and size of packers and
subsurface flow control devices; top and bottom depths of each
completed interval; and method of completion;
(c) The well history, including completions, stimulations,
servicing, and workovers;
(d) The minimum specifications for pressure-control equipment,
function, and pressure-testing frequency;
(e) The method and means used to transport produced oil and gas,
including vehicular transport; flowline and gathering line
construction; operation; pipe size; operating pressure; cathodic
protection methods; surface equipment use; surface equipment location;
maintenance procedures; maintenance schedules; pressure detection
methods; and shutdown procedures;
(f) Road and wellpad maintenance plan, including equipment and
materials to maintain the road surface and control erosion;
(g) Vegetation management plan on well sites, roads, pipeline
corridors, and other disturbed surface areas, including control of
exotic species;
(h) Storm water management plan on the well site;
(i) Produced water storage and disposal plan; and
(j) The procedures proposed for well plugging, the depths and the
types of plugs, and minimum mud weight.
[[Page 65597]]
Operations Permit: Application Review Process
Sec. 9.100 How will NPS process my application?
We will conduct initial review of your application to determine if
all information is complete. Once your information is complete, we can
begin formal review. If you propose operations in Big Cypress National
Preserve, the requirements in Sec. 9.105 apply instead of those in
Sec. 9.101 and Sec. 9.102.
Sec. 9.101 How will the NPS conduct initial review?
(a) Within 30 days after receipt of your application, the
Superintendent will notify you in writing that either:
(1) Your application is complete and the NPS will begin formal
review;
(2) Your permit application does not meet the information
requirements and additional information is required before the NPS will
conduct formal review of your permit application; or
(3) More time is necessary to complete the review, in which case
the NPS will provide you an estimate of the amount of additional time
reasonably needed and an explanation for the delay.
(b) If you resubmit information requested by the NPS under this
section and the Superintendent determines that you have met all
applicable information requirements, the Superintendent will notify you
within 30 days after receipt of the additional information that either:
(1) Your application is complete and the NPS will begin formal
review; or
(2) More time is necessary to complete the review, in which case
the NPS will provide you an estimate of the amount of additional time
reasonably needed and an explanation for the delay.
Sec. 9.102 How will the NPS conduct formal review?
(a) The Superintendent will evaluate the potential impacts of your
proposal on federally owned or administered lands, waters, or resources
within NPS units, visitor uses and experiences, and visitor and
employee health and safety. As part of this evaluation process, the NPS
will comply with all applicable federal laws, including the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The Superintendent will then make a
recommendation to the Regional Director regarding final action on your
operations permit.
(b) As part of the evaluation process, the Superintendent may
consult with other Federal, State, and local agencies.
Sec. 9.103 What standards must be met to approve my application?
(a) In order to approve your operations permit application, the
Regional Director first must determine that your operations:
(1) Will not impair park resources and values under the statute
commonly known as the NPS Organic Act;
(2) Will meet all applicable operating standards; and
(3) Will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws
and regulations.
(b) Before approval of your permit application, you must submit to
the Superintendent:
(1) Financial assurance in the amount specified by the Regional
Director and in accordance with the requirements of Sec. Sec. 9.140
through 9.144; and
(2) Proof of liability insurance with limits sufficient to cover
injuries to persons or property caused by your operations.
Sec. 9.104 What final actions may the Regional Director take on my
Operations Permit application?
(a) The Regional Director will take final action within 180 days
after the date the NPS deems your application complete unless:
(1) We and you agree that such final action will occur within a
shorter or longer period of time; or
(2) We determine that an additional period of time is required to
ensure that we have, in reviewing the permit application, complied with
other applicable laws, Executive orders, and regulations.
(b) The Regional Director will notify you in writing that your
permit application is:
(1) Approved, and provide you a list of required operating
conditions; or
(2) Denied, and provide you justification for the denial. Any such
denial must be consistent with Sec. 9.30(c).
Sec. 9.105 What is the approval process for operations in Big Cypress
National Preserve?
(a) Within 30 days after the date of submission of your
application, we will notify you whether the application contains all
information reasonably necessary to allow us to consider the
application and, if not, will request that you provide additional
information. After receiving this notification, you must either supply
any reasonably necessary additional information or must notify us that
you believe that the application contains all reasonably necessary
information and is therefore complete; whereupon we may:
(1) Within 30 days after receipt of the notice from the applicant,
determine that the application does not contain all reasonably
necessary additional information and, on that basis, deny the
application; or
(2) Review the application and take final action within 60 days
after the date that you provided notification to the NPS that your
application is complete.
(b) The Regional Director will take final action within 90 days
after the date you submitted your application unless:
(1) We and you agree that final action can occur within a shorter
or longer period of time; or
(2) We determine that an additional period of time is required to
ensure that we have, in reviewing the permit application, complied with
other applicable laws, executive orders, and regulations.
Operating Standards
Sec. 9.110 What are the purposes and functions of NPS operating
standards?
(a) You must comply with all operating standards in Sec. Sec.
9.111 through 9.116, as well as with the standards in Sec. Sec. 9.117
and 9.118, if applicable. The standards apply only to operations that
occur within a park unit, including downhole activities, and do not
apply to surface activities located outside a park unit. These
operating standards are incorporated into the terms and conditions of
your operations permit. Violation of these operating standards will
subject you to the prohibitions and penalties provisions of Sec. Sec.
9.180 through 9.182.
(b) NPS operating standards ensure protection of federally owned
administered lands, waters, and resources of NPS units, visitor uses
and experiences, and visitor and employee health and safety. The
operating standards give us and the operator flexibility to consider
using alternative methods, equipment, materials design, and conduct of
operations.
(c) In applying standards to a particular operation, you must use
technologically feasible, least damaging methods to protect federally
owned or administered lands, waters, and resources of NPS units,
visitor uses and experiences, and visitor and employee health and
safety.
Sec. 9.111 What general facility design and management standards must
I meet?
(a) You must design, construct, operate, and maintain access to
your operational site to cause the minimum amount of surface
disturbance needed to safely conduct operations and to avoid areas the
NPS has indicated to you as sensitive resources.
(b) You must install and maintain secondary containment materials
and structures for all equipment and facilities using or storing
contaminating substances. The containment system must be sufficiently
impervious to
[[Page 65598]]
prevent discharge and must have sufficient storage capacity to contain,
at a minimum, the largest potential spill incident.
(c) You must keep temporarily stored waste in the smallest feasible
area, and confine it to prevent escape as a result of percolation,
rain, high water, or other causes. You must regularly remove waste from
the NPS unit and lawfully dispose of it in a direct and workable
timeframe. Under 36 CFR part 6, you may not establish a solid waste
disposal site in an NPS unit.
(d) You must use engines that adhere to current Federal and State
emission standards.
(e) You must construct, maintain, and use roads to minimize
fugitive dust emissions;
(f) You must use equipment and practices that minimize releases or
flaring of gas.
(g) You must provide a safe environment for fish and wildlife free
from exposure to physical and chemical hazards.
(h) You must control the invasion of exotic plant and animal
species in your area of operations from the beginning through final
reclamation.
Sec. 9.112 What hydrologic standards must I meet?
(a) You must not conduct ground-disturbing operations within 500
feet of surface water, including an intermittent or ephemeral
watercourse, or wetland; or within 500 feet of any structure or
facility used by the NPS for interpretation, public recreation, or
administration. The Superintendent may increase or decrease this
distance as needed to protect federally owned or administered lands,
waters, or resources of NPS units, visitor uses or experiences, or
visitor or employee health and safety. Measurements for purposes of
this paragraph are by map distance.
(b) You must construct facilities in a manner that maintains
hydrologic connectivity between surface water and groundwater.
(c) You must not cause measureable degradation of surface water or
groundwater beyond that of existing conditions.
(d) You must conduct operations in a manner that maintains natural
processes of erosion and sedimentation.
Sec. 9.113 What safety standards must I meet?
(a) You must maintain your area of operations in a manner that
avoids or minimizes the cause or spread of fires and does not intensify
fires originating outside your operations area.
(b) You must maintain structures, facilities, improvements, and
equipment in a safe and professional manner in order to provide a safe
environment for park resources, park visitors, and NPS employees, free
from exposure to physical and chemical hazards.
(c) You must provide site-security measures to protect visitors
from hazardous conditions resulting from the conduct of your
operations.
Sec. 9.114 What lighting and visual standards must I meet?
(a) You must design, shield, and focus lighting to minimize the
effects of spill light on the night sky or adjacent areas.
(b) You must reduce visual contrast in the landscape by selecting
the area of operations, avoiding unnecessary disturbance, choosing
appropriate colors for permanent facilities, and other means.
(c) You must use road and pad materials similar in structure to
soils in surrounding profiles whenever feasible.
Sec. 9.115 What noise reduction standards must I meet?
You must prevent or minimize all noise that:
(a) Adversely affects the natural soundscape or other park
resources or values, taking into account frequency, magnitude, or
duration; or
(b) Exceeds levels that have been identified through monitoring as
being acceptable to or appropriate for visitor uses at the sites being
monitored.
Sec. 9.116 What reclamation and protection standards must I meet?
(a) You must promptly clean up and remove any released
contaminating substances and provide documentation to the
Superintendent that the substances were disposed of in accordance with
all applicable Federal, State, and local laws.
(b) You must perform partial reclamation of areas no longer
necessary to conduct operations. You must begin final reclamation as
soon as possible but no later than 6 months after you complete your
permitted operations unless the Regional Director authorizes a longer
period in writing.
(c) You must protect all survey monuments, witness corners,
reference monuments, and bearing trees against destruction,
obliteration, or damage from operations. You are responsible for
reestablishment, restoration, and referencing of any monuments, corners
and bearing trees that are destroyed, obliterated, or damaged by your
operations.
(d) You must complete reclamation by:
(1) Plugging all wells;
(2) Removing all above-ground structures, equipment, and roads and
all other man-made material and debris resulting from operations;
(3) Removing or neutralizing any contaminating substances;
(4) Reestablishing native vegetative communities, or providing for
conditions where ecological processes typical of the ecological zone
(e.g., plant or wildlife succession) will reestablish themselves;
(5) Grading to reasonably conform the contours to preexisting
elevations that are most appropriate to maximizing ecologic functional
value;
(6) Restoring conditions to pre-disturbance hydrologic movement and
functionality;
(7) Restoring natural systems using native soil material that is
similar in character to the adjacent undisturbed soil profiles;
(8) Ensuring that reclaimed areas do not interfere with visitor use
or with administration of the unit;
(9) Meeting conditions compatible with the management objectives of
the park; and
(10) Ensuring proper and equitable apportionment of reclamation
responsibilities by coordinating with us or with other operators who
may be using a portion of your area of operations.
Sec. 9.117 What additional operating standards apply to geophysical
operations?
If you conduct geophysical operations, you must do all of the
following:
(a) Use surveying methods that minimize the need for vegetative
trimming and removal;
(b) Locate source points using industry-accepted minimum safe-
offset distances from pipelines, telephone lines, railroad tracks,
roads, power lines, water wells, oil and gas wells, oil and gas-
production facilities, and buildings;
(c) Use equipment and methods that, based upon the specific
environment, will minimize impacts to federally owned or administered
lands, waters, and resources of NPS units, visitor uses and
experiences, and visitor and employee health and safety; and
(d) If you use shot holes, you must:
(1) Use biodegradable charges;
(2) Plug all shot holes to prevent a pathway for migration for
fluids along any portion of the bore; and
(3) Leave the site in a clean and safe condition that will not
impede surface reclamation or pose a hazard to human health and safety.
[[Page 65599]]
Sec. 9.118 What additional operating standards apply to drilling,
stimulation, and production operations?
If you conduct drilling, stimulation, and production operations,
you must meet all of the standards in this section.
(a) Drilling. (1) You must use containerized mud circulation
systems for operations.
(2) You must not create earthen pits for any use. Earthen pits used
solely for secondary containment on sites existing before [effective
date of the final rule] may continue in use; however, the
Superintendent may require such structures to be lined or removed
depending on site-specific operational and environmental conditions.
(3) You must take all necessary precautions to keep your wells
under control at all times, use only contractors or employees trained
and competent to drill and operate the wells, and use only oil field
equipment and practices generally used in the industry.
(4) You must design, implement, and maintain integrated casing,
cementing, drilling fluid, completion, stimulation, and blowout
prevention programs. These programs must be based upon sound
engineering principles to prevent escape of fluids to the surface and
to isolate and protect usable water zones throughout the life of the
well, taking into account all relevant geologic and engineering
factors.
(b) Stimulation operations including hydraulic fracturing. (1) You
must not begin injection activities before you demonstrate the
mechanical integrity of all surface and downhole tubulars and equipment
to differential pressures equal to at least those calculated at the
maximum anticipated treating pressure.
(2) You must continuously monitor and record the treating pressures
and all annular pressures before, during, and after the treatment to
ensure that treatment materials are directed to the intended zone.
(3) If mechanical integrity is lost during the treatment, you must
immediately cease the operation and notify the Superintendent as soon
as feasible, but no later than 24 hours after the incident. Within 15
days after the occurrence, you must submit to the Superintendent a
report containing all details pertaining to the incident, including
corrective actions taken.
(c) Production. (1) You must monitor producing conditions to
document maintenance of mechanical integrity of both surface and
subsurface equipment.
(2) You must maintain your well to prevent escape of fluids to the
surface and to isolate and protect usable water zones throughout the
life of the well, taking into account all relevant geologic and
engineering factors.
(3) You must identify wells and related facilities by a sign, which
must remain in place until the well is plugged and abandoned and the
related facilities are closed. The sign must be of durable
construction, and the lettering must be legible and large enough to be
read under normal conditions at a distance of at least 50 feet. Each
sign must show the name of the well, name of the operator, and the
emergency contact phone number.
(4) You must remove all equipment and materials that are no longer
needed for a particular phase of your operation.
(5) You must plug all wells to:
(i) Prevent a pathway of migration for fluids along any portion of
the bore; and
(ii) Leave the surface in a clean and safe condition that will not
impede surface reclamation or pose a hazard to human health and safety.
General Terms and Conditions
Sec. 9.120 What terms and conditions apply to all operators?
The following terms and conditions apply to all operators,
regardless of whether these terms and conditions are expressly included
in the operator's operations permit:
(a) The operator/permittee is responsible for ensuring that all of
its contractors and subcontractors comply fully with all of the
requirements of this subpart;
(b) The operator/permittee may not use any surface water or
groundwater owned or administered by the United States that has been
diverted or withdrawn from a source located within the boundaries of an
NPS unit unless the use has been approved in accordance with NPS
policy;
(c) The operator/permittee must provide the NPS an affidavit,
signed by an official who is authorized to legally bind the company,
stating that proposed operations are in compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws and regulations and that all information
submitted to the NPS is true and correct; and
(d) The operator/permittee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
the United States and its officers and employees from and against any
and all liability of any kind whatsoever arising out of or resulting
from the acts or omissions of the operator and its employees, agents,
representatives, contractors, and subcontractors in the conduct of
activities under the operations permit.
Sec. 9.121 What monitoring and reporting is required for all
operators?
(a) The NPS may access your area of operations at any time to
monitor the potential effects of the operations and to ensure
compliance with this subpart where applicable.
(b) The Regional Director may determine that third-party monitors
are necessary to protect federally owned or administered lands, waters,
or resources of NPS units, visitor uses or experiences, or visitor or
employee health and safety.
(1) The Regional Director's determination will be based on the
scope and complexity of the proposed operation and whether the park has
the staff and technical ability to ensure compliance with the
operations permit and any provision of this subpart.
(2) A third-party monitor will report directly to the NPS at
intervals determined by the Superintendent, and you will be responsible
for the cost of the third party monitor. We will make the information
reported available to you upon your request.
(c) You must notify the Superintendent of any accidents involving
serious personal injury or death and of any fires or spills on the site
within 24 hours after the accident occurs. You must submit a full
written report on the accident to the Superintendent within 90 days
after the accident occurs.
(d) You must notify the Superintendent within 24 hours after the
discovery of any cultural or scientific resource you encounter that
might be altered or destroyed by your operation. You must cease
operations if necessary and leave the discovered resource intact until
the Superintendent provides you with instructions. The Superintendent
will determine, within 10 working days after notification what action
will be taken with respect to the discovery.
(e) Upon the Superintendent's request, you must submit reports or
other information necessary to verify compliance with your permit or
with any provision of this subpart. To fulfill this request, you may
submit to the NPS reports that you have submitted to the State under
State regulations, or that you have submitted to any other Federal
agency.
Sec. 9.122 What additional reports must I submit if my operation
includes hydraulic fracturing?
If your operations include hydraulic fracturing, you must provide
the Superintendent with a report including all of the following details
of the stimulation within 30 days after the
[[Page 65600]]
completion of the last stage of hydraulic fracturing operations for
each well. The information required in paragraph (a) of this section
must be submitted to the authorized officer through FracFocus or
another NPS-designated database:
(a) The true vertical depth of the well, total water volume used,
and a description of the base fluid and each additive in the hydraulic
fracturing fluid, including the trade name, supplier, purpose,
ingredients, Chemical Abstract Service Number (CAS), maximum ingredient
concentration in additive (percent by mass), and maximum ingredient
concentration in hydraulic fracturing fluid (percent by mass).
(b) The actual source(s) and location(s) of the water used in the
hydraulic fracturing fluid;
(c) The maximum surface pressure and rate at the end of each stage
of the hydraulic fracturing operation and the actual flush volume.
(d) The actual, estimated, or calculated fracture length, height
and direction.
(e) The actual measured depth of perforations or the open-hole
interval.
(f) You must submit the actual volume of stimulation fluids
recovered during flow back, including a description of how the volumes
were measured or calculated.
(g) The following information concerning the handling of fluids
recovered, covering the period between the commencement of hydraulic
fracturing and the implementation of the approved permit for the
disposal of produced water under NPS requirements:
(1) The methods of handling the recovered fluids, including, but
not limited to, transfer pipes and tankers, holding pond use, re-use
for other stimulation activities, or injection; and
(2) The disposal method of the recovered fluids, including, but not
limited to, the percent injected, the percent stored at an off-lease
disposal facility, and the percent recycled.
(h) You must submit continuous monitoring records of annulus
pressure at the bradenhead and other annular pressures that document
pressures before, during, and after injection operations. You must
submit a signed certification that wellbore integrity was maintained
throughout the operation.
Access to Oil and Gas Rights
Sec. 9.130 May I cross Federal property to reach the boundary of my
oil and gas right?
(a) The Regional Director may grant you the privilege of access on,
across, or through federally owned or administered lands or waters in
any NPS unit to reach the boundary of your oil and gas right.
(b) In NPS units in Alaska, regulations and standards at 43 CFR
part 36 govern access to an operator's oil and gas right.
Sec. 9.131 Will the NPS charge me a fee for access?
(a) The Regional Director may charge you a fee if you use federally
owned or administered lands or waters outside the scope of your oil and
gas right.
(1) If you require use of federally owned or administered lands or
waters for your operation, the Regional Director will charge you a fee
based on the fair market value of the use of the lands for access.
(2) If access to your mineral right is across an existing park
road, the Regional Director will charge the fee according to a posted
fee schedule.
(b) Fees under this section will not be charged for access within
the scope of your oil and gas right or access to your mineral right
that is otherwise provided for by law.
Sec. 9.132 Will I be charged a fee for emergency access to my
operations?
The Regional Director will not charge a fee for access across
federally owned or administered lands beyond the scope of your oil and
gas right as necessary to respond to an emergency situation at your
area of operations if the Regional Director determines that the
circumstances require an immediate response to either:
(a) Prevent or to minimize injury to park resources; or
(b) Ensure public health and safety.
Financial Assurance
Sec. 9.140 Do I have to provide financial assurance to the NPS?
Yes. You must file financial assurance with us in a form acceptable
to the Regional Director and payable upon demand. This financial
assurance is in addition to any financial assurance required by any
other regulatory authority.
Sec. 9.141 How does the NPS establish the amount of financial
assurance?
We will base the financial assurance amount upon the estimated cost
for a third-party contractor to complete reclamation in accordance with
this subpart. If the cost of reclamation exceeds the amount of your
financial assurance, you will remain liable for all costs of
reclamation in excess of the financial assurance.
Sec. 9.142 Will the NPS adjust my financial assurance?
The Regional Director may require, or you may request, an
adjustment to the financial assurance amount because of any
circumstance that increases or decreases the estimated costs
established under Sec. 9.141.
Sec. 9.143 When will the NPS release my financial assurance?
(a) Your responsibility and that of any surety under the financial
assurance will continue until either:
(1) The Regional Director determines that you have met all
applicable reclamation operating standards and any additional
reclamation requirements that may be included in your operations
permit; or
(2) A new operator assumes your operations, as provided in
Sec. Sec. 9.160 through 9.161.
(b) You will be notified within 30 days after the Regional
Director's determination that your financial assurance has been
released.
Sec. 9.144 Under what circumstances will I forfeit my financial
assurance?
(a) You will forfeit all or part of your financial assurance if all
efforts to secure your compliance with your reclamation
responsibilities under the approved permit or any provisions of this
regulation are unsuccessful.
(b) If you forfeit your financial assurance, we may:
(1) Prohibit you from removing all structures, equipment, or other
materials from your area of operations;
(2) Require you to secure the operations site and take any
necessary actions to protect federally owned or administered lands,
waters, or resources of NPS units, visitor uses or experiences, or
visitor or employee health and safety; and
(3) Suspend review of any permit applications you have submitted
until the Regional Director determines that all violations of permit
provisions or of any provision of this subpart are resolved.
(4) Seek recovery as provided in Sec. 9.141 for all costs of
reclamation in excess of the posted financial assurance.
Modification to an Operation
Sec. 9.150 Can my approved permit be modified?
The Regional Director may modify an approved temporary access or
operations permit to adjust to changed conditions or to address
unanticipated conditions, either unilaterally or at your request.
(a) To request a modification to your approved permit, you must
provide written notice to the Superintendent
[[Page 65601]]
describing the modification and why it is needed. The Regional Director
will review your request for modification, under the approval standards
and timeframes at Sec. 9.62 or 9.104.
(b) If the Regional Director authorizes a modification to your
permit, you will receive a written notice that:
(1) Describes the modification required and justification; and
(2) Specifies the time within which you must incorporate the
modification into your operations.
(c) You may not implement any modification until you have received
the Regional Director's written approval.
Change of Operator
Sec. 9.160 What are my responsibilities if I transfer my operations?
Until you meet the requirements of this subpart and the Regional
Director accepts the new operator's financial assurance, you remain
responsible for compliance with your operations permit and we will
retain your financial assurance.
(a) If you were operating without an operations permit, you are
subject to Sec. Sec. 9.120 through 9.122 and Sec. Sec. 9.180 through
9.182 until the new operator meets the requirements of this subpart and
the Regional Director accepts the new operator's financial assurance.
(b) You must notify the Superintendent in writing within 30
calendar days after the date the new owner acquires the rights to
conduct operations. Your written notification must include:
(1) The names and addresses of the person or entity conveying the
right and the person or entity acquiring the right;
(2) The effective date of transfer;
(3) The description of the rights, assets, and liabilities being
transferred and which ones, if any, are being reserved by the previous
owner, and
(4) A written acknowledgement from the new owner that the contents
of the notification are true and correct.
Sec. 9.161 What must I do if operations are transferred to me?
(a) If another operator transfers operations to you, you must:
(1) Adopt and agree in writing to conduct operations in accordance
with all terms and conditions of the previous operator's operations
permit; and
(2) File financial assurance with us that is acceptable to the
Regional Director and made payable to the NPS.
(b) If the previous operator was granted an exemption under Sec.
9.72, you must provide to the Superintendent:
(1) Documentation demonstrating that you hold the right to operate
within an NPS unit; and
(2) The names and addresses of:
(i) The operator;
(ii) The mineral owner;
(iii) Any agents, assignees, designees, lessees, or other
representatives of the operator;
(iv) The operator's representative responsible for the overall
management of the proposed operations;
(v) The operator's representative responsible for field supervision
of the proposed operations; and
(vi) The operator's representative responsible for emergency
response for the proposed operations.
Well Plugging
Sec. 9.170 When must I plug my well?
Except as provided in Sec. 9.171, you must plug your well when any
of the following occurs:
(a) Your drilling operations have ended and you have taken no
further action on your well within 60 days;
(b) Your well, which has been completed for production operations,
is continuously inactive for a period of 1 year; or
(c) The period approved in your operations permit to maintain your
well in shut-in status has expired.
Sec. 9.171 Can I get an extension to the well plugging requirement?
(a) You may apply for either an operations permit or a modification
to your approved operations permit to maintain your well in a shut-in
status for up to 5 years. The application must include:
(1) An explanation of why the well is shut-in or temporarily
abandoned and your future plans for utilization;
(2) A demonstration of the mechanical integrity of both surface and
downhole equipment such that there is no migration of fluid from any
formation in which it originally occurred or from the surface to the
well; and
(3) A description of the manner in which your well, equipment, and
area of operations will be maintained.
(b) Based on the information provided under this section, the
Regional Director may approve your application to maintain your well in
shut-in status for a period up to 5 years.
You may apply for additional extensions by submitting a new
application under paragraph (a) of this section.
Prohibitions and Penalties
Sec. 9.180 What acts are prohibited under this subpart?
The following are prohibited:
(a) Operating in violation of terms or conditions of a temporary
access permit, or an approved operations permit, or any provision of
this subpart;
(b) Damaging federally owned or administered lands, waters, or
resources of an NPS unit as a result of failure to comply with the
terms or conditions of a temporary access permit, an operations permit,
or any provision of this subpart;
(c) Conducting operations without a temporary access permit or
operations permit;
(d) Failure to comply with any suspension or revocation order
issued under this subpart; and
(e) Failure to comply with any applicable Federal, State, or local
laws.
Sec. 9.181 What enforcement actions can the NPS take?
If you engage in a prohibited act described in Sec. 9.180:
(a) You may be subject to a fine or imprisonment, or both, in
accordance with 36 CFR 1.3;
(b) The Superintendent may suspend your operations; or
(c) The Regional Director may revoke your approved temporary access
permit or operations permit.
Sec. 9.182 How do violations affect my ability to obtain a permit?
Until you comply with this subpart or the terms and conditions of
an existing temporary access permit or operations permit, we will not
consider any new requests for access to conduct operations within any
NPS units.
Reconsideration and Appeals
Sec. 9.190 Can I, as operator, request reconsideration of NPS
decisions?
Yes. If you disagree with a decision of the Regional Director under
this subpart, you may file with the Regional Director a written
statement describing the alleged factual or legal errors in the
original decision and requesting that the Regional Director reconsider
the decision. You must file your request for reconsideration within 60
calendar days after your receipt of the Regional Director's decision.
The NPS will dismiss as untimely any request for reconsideration
received more than 60 days after your receipt of the original decision.
Sec. 9.191 How does the NPS process my request for reconsideration?
The Regional Director will review his or her original decision and,
within 90 days after receipt of your appeal, provide you with a written
statement reversing, affirming, or modifying that decision, unless the
Regional Director notifies you that he or she needs additional time to
review the original
[[Page 65602]]
decision. When issued, that written statement constitutes the Regional
Director's final decision on the matter.
Sec. 9.192 Can I appeal the Regional Director's decision?
(a) If the Regional Director affirms or modifies his or her
original decision after you file a request for reconsideration, you may
then file an appeal with the NPS Director within 60 calendar days after
your receipt of the Regional Director's decision under Sec. 9.191.
(b) Your appeal must include a statement of exceptions specifying
your specific disagreements with the Regional Director's final
decision. If you do not file your statement of exceptions within 60
calendar days, your appeal will be dismissed, and the Regional
Director's decision will constitute the NPS's final decision on the
matter.
(c) If you timely file your statement of exceptions, the Regional
Director will forward his or her decision and the record for the appeal
to the NPS Director. The record will consist of NPS's official files on
the proposed permit application, as well as any documents submitted by
the parties upon which the Regional Director based his or her decision.
The Regional Director will maintain that record under separate cover
and will certify that he or she based the decision on that record. The
Regional Director will make the record available to you at your
request.
(d) If, upon review, the NPS Director considers the record
inadequate, then the NPS Director may require additional appropriate
documentation or information, or may remand the case to the Regional
Director with appropriate instructions for further action.
(e) Within 45 calendar days from the date the NPS Director receives
your statement of exceptions, the Director will make his or her
decision in writing. If the Director requires more than 45 calendar
days to reach his or her decision, then the Director will notify you
and specify the reasons for the delay. The Director's written decision
will include:
(1) A statement of facts;
(2) A statement of conclusions; and
(3) An explanation of the reasons upon which he or she based his or
her conclusions.
(f) No NPS decision under these regulations that is subject to
appeal to the Regional Director or the Director shall be considered
final agency action subject to judicial review under 5 U.S.C. 704 until
the Director has rendered his or her decision on the matter. The
decision of the NPS Director will constitute NPS's final agency action,
and no further appeal will lie in the Department from that decision.
Sec. 9.193 Will filing a request for reconsideration or appeal stop
the NPS from taking action under this subpart?
(a) Except as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, during
the reconsideration and appeal processes, the decision at issue will be
stayed (suspended). The decision will not become effective until the
appeals process is completed.
(b) If NPS suspends your operation due to an emergency within your
area of operation that poses an immediate threat of injury to federally
owned or controlled lands or waters, you have a right to request
reconsideration and appeal the decision under Sec. Sec. 9.190 through
9.194, but the suspension will not be stayed until the threat is
corrected.
Sec. 9.194 What if the original decision was made by the
Superintendent?
Where the Superintendent has the authority to make the original
decision, requests for reconsideration and appeals may be filed in the
manner provided by the preceding sections, except that:
(a) The request for reconsideration will be filed with and decided
by the Superintendent;
(b) The appeal will be filed with and decided by the Regional
Director; and
(c) The Regional Director's decision will constitute the final
agency action on the matter.
Public Participation
Sec. 9.200 How can the public participate in the approval process?
(a) Interested parties may view the publicly available documents at
the Superintendent's office during normal business hours or by other
means prescribed by the Superintendent. The availability for public
inspection of information about the nature, location, character, or
ownership of park resources will conform to all applicable law and
implementing regulations, standards, and guidelines.
(b) The Superintendent will make available for public inspection
any documents that an operator submits to the NPS under this subpart
except those that you have identified as proprietary or confidential.
(c) For the information required in Sec. 9.122 of this subpart,
the operator and the owner of the information will be deemed to have
waived any right to protect from public disclosure information
submitted through FracFocus or another NPS-designated database. For
information required under Sec. 9.122 of this subpart that the owner
of the information claims to be exempt from public disclosure and is
withheld from the NPS, a corporate officer, managing partner, or sole
proprietor of the operator must sign and the operator must submit to
the authorized officer an affidavit that:
(1) Identifies the owner of the withheld information and provides
the name, address and contact information for a corporate officer,
managing partner, or sole proprietor of the owner of the information;
(2) Identifies the Federal statute or regulation that would
prohibit the NPS from publicly disclosing the information if it were in
the NPS's possession;
(3) Affirms that the operator has been provided the withheld
information from the owner of the information and is maintaining
records of the withheld information, or that the operator has access
and will maintain access to the withheld information held by the owner
of the information;
(4) Affirms that the information is not publicly available;
(5) Affirms that the information is not required to be publicly
disclosed under any applicable local, State, tribal, or Federal law;
(6) Affirms that the owner of the information is in actual
competition and identifies competitors or others that could use the
withheld information to cause the owner of the information substantial
competitive harm;
(7) Affirms that the release of the information would likely cause
substantial competitive harm to the owner of the information and
provides the factual basis for that affirmation; and
(8) Affirms that the information is not readily apparent through
reverse engineering with publicly available information.
(d) If the operator relies upon information from third parties,
such as the owner of the withheld information, to make the affirmations
in paragraphs (c)(6) through (8) of this section, the operator must
provide a written affidavit from the third party that sets forth the
relied-upon information.
(e) The NPS may require any operator to submit to the NPS any
withheld information, and any information relevant to a claim that
withheld information is exempt from public disclosure.
(f) If the NPS determines that the information submitted under
paragraph (e) of this section is not exempt from disclosure, the NPS
will make the information available to the public after providing the
operator and owner of the information with no fewer than 10 business
days' notice of the NPS's determination.
[[Page 65603]]
(g) The operator must maintain records of the withheld information
until the later of the NPS's release of the operator's financial
assurance, or 6 years after completion of hydraulic fracturing
operations on Indian lands, or 7 years after completion of hydraulic
fracturing operations on Federal lands. Any subsequent operator will be
responsible for maintaining access to records required by this
paragraph during its operation of the well. The operator will be deemed
to be maintaining the records if it can promptly provide the complete
and accurate information to NPS, even if the information is in the
custody of its owner.
(h) If any of the chemical identity information required in Sec.
9.122 of this subpart is withheld, the operator must provide the
generic chemical name in the submission required by Sec. 9.122 of this
subpart. The generic chemical name must be only as nonspecific as is
necessary to protect the confidential chemical identity, and should be
the same as or no less descriptive than the generic chemical name
provided to the Environmental Protection Agency.
Information Collection
Sec. 9.210 Has the Office of Management and Budget approved the
information collection requirements?
(a) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has reviewed and
approved the information collection requirements in 36 CFR part 9,
subpart B, and assigned OMB Control Number 1024-XXXX. We may not
conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection
of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
We use the information collected to:
(1) Evaluate proposed operations;
(2) Ensure that all necessary mitigation measures are employed to
protect park resources and values; and
(3) Ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
(b) You may submit comments on any aspect of the information
collection requirements to the Information Collection Clearance
Officer, National Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Room 2C114,
Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192.
Subpart D--[Redesignated as Subpart C]
0
4. Redesignate subpart D as subpart C.
Subpart C--[Amended]
0
5. The authority citation for newly redesignated subpart C is revised
to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 410hh; 16 U.S.C. 3101, et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
347; 16 U.S.C. 410bb; 16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.; 54 U.S.C. 320301; 54
U.S.C. 100101, et seq.
0
6. In newly redesignated subpart C, redesignate Sec. Sec. 9.80 through
9.89 as Sec. Sec. 9.300 through 9.309.
0
7. In newly redesignated Sec. 9.302, in paragraph (b)(2), remove the
reference Sec. 9.86 and add in its place the reference Sec. 9.306.
0
8. In newly redesignated Sec. 9.304, in paragraph (a), remove the
reference Sec. 9.84(b) and add in its place the reference Sec.
9.304(b) and remove the reference Sec. 9.83(b) and add in its place
the reference Sec. 9.303(b).
0
9. In newly redesignated Sec. 9.306, in paragraph (a), remove the
reference Sec. 9.84 and add in its place the reference Sec. 9.304.
0
10. In newly redesignated Sec. 9.308, in paragraph (a), remove the
reference Sec. 9.86 and add in its place the reference Sec. 9.306.
Dated: October 16, 2015.
Karen Hyun,
Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2015-26812 Filed 10-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EJ-P