Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa, 63921-63923 [2015-26955]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 5 hours. It is
categorically excluded from further
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Oct 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165— REGULATED
NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED
ACCESS AREAS
63921
(c) Regulations. (1) Non-participant
persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by Captain of the
Port Miami or a designated
representative.
(2) Non-participant persons and
vessels may request authorization to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area by
contacting the Captain of the Port Miami
by telephone at 305–535–4472, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16. If authorization is
granted by the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative,
all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the safety zone by Local Notice
to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced on October 25, 2015 from 6
a.m. until 11:00 a.m.
Dated: October 16, 2015.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2015–26832 Filed 10–21–15; 8:45 am]
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0483 to
read as follows:
■
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
§ 165.T07–0483 Safety Zone; Ironman 70.3
Miami, Biscayne Bay; Miami, FL.
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0906]
(a) Regulated area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone. All
waters of Biscayne Bay located east of
Bayfront Park and encompassed within
the following points: Starting at Point 1
in position 25°46′44″ N., 080°10′59″ W.;
thence southeast to Point 2 in position
25°46′24″ N., 080°10′44″ W.; thence
southwest to Point 3 in position
25°46′18″ N., 080°11′05″ W.; thence
north to Point 4 in position 25°46′33″
N., 080°11′05″ W.; thence northeast back
to origin. All coordinates are North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
RIN 1625–AA00
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor,
American Samoa
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone during the
2015 Fautasi Ocean Challenge in Pago
Pago Harbor, American Samoa. This
action is necessary to safeguard the
participants and spectators, including
all crews, vessels, and persons on the
water in Pago Pago Harbor during the
Fautasi Race. This regulation will
functionally close the port to
commercial vessel traffic during the
start and finish of the race, but will not
require the evacuation of any vessels
from harbor. Entry into, transiting, or
anchoring in the harbor is prohibited to
all vessels not registered with the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
63922
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
sponsor as participants or not part of the
race patrol, unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Honolulu or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00
a.m. (SST) to 4:00 p.m. (SST) on
November 11, 2015 and from 10:00 a.m.
(SST) to 4:00 p.m. (SST) on November
27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2015–
0906 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Commander Nicolas
Jarboe, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Honolulu; telephone (808) 541–4359,
email nicolas.a.jarboe@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
specific details of the event were
received less than 90 days prior to event
and needed to be worked through
between the event coordinator and the
Coast Guard over an extended period of
time. The Coast Guard’s discussions
with the event sponsor to determine the
requirements for this zone were
finalized on 28 September 2015, which
would not allow for a 30 day comment
period. This safety zone is required to
restrict vessel traffic to ensure the safety
of the participants, spectators, the
marine patrol and race officials. It is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Oct 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
impracticable to publish an NPRM
because we must establish this safety
zone by November 11, 2015.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to public interest
because immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the participants,
spectators, the marine patrol and race
officials.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The statutory basis for this
rulemaking is 33 U.S.C. 1231, which
gives the Coast Guard, under a
delegation from the Secretary of
Homeland Security, regulatory authority
to enforce the Ports and Waterways
Safety Act. A safety zone is a water area,
shore area, or water and shore area, for
safety or environmental purposes, of
which access is limited to authorized
persons, vehicles, or vessels.
The purpose of this rule is to
minimize vessel traffic in Pago Pago
Harbor during the start and finish of the
Fautasi canoe race. This is a major
marine event in American Samoa. It is
anticipated that a large number of
spectator pleasure crafts will be drawn
to the event. These vessels will pose a
significant hazard to those operating in
or near the area. The COTP Honolulu is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
Pago Pago Harbor. This rule is needed
to safeguard persons and vessels during
the canoe boat races.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule will create a safety zone in
Pago Pago Harbor. The Coast Guard is
closing the harbor to all vessels not
authorized by the Captain of the Port to
enter, depart, or transit within the port
for the duration of the event. The
Captain of the Port authorizes registered
participants, support vessels, and
enforcement vessels to enter and remain
in the zone. The harbor will remain
closed until the Coast Guard issues an
‘‘All Clear’’ for the harbor after the race
has concluded and the harbor is deemed
safe for normal operations. This rule
does not require any vessel to evacuate
the port if moored.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
it has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone. Due
to the number of participants and the
size of the harbor, vessels cannot safely
transit the harbor during the race.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 204 / Thursday, October 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Oct 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
temporary and limited safety zone in
Pago Pago Harbor. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165— REGULATED
NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED
ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 10:00 a.m. (SST) to
4:00 p.m. (SST) on November 11, 2015
and from 10:00 a.m. (SST) to 4:00 p.m.
(SST) on November 27, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels not registered with the sponsor
as participants or support/enforcement
vessels are considered spectators. The
‘‘support/enforcement vessels’’ consist
of any territory, or local law
enforcement and sponsor provided
vessels assigned or approved by the
Captain of the Port Honolulu to patrol
the safety zone.
(2) No spectator shall anchor, block,
loiter or impede the through transit of
participants or support/enforcement
vessels in the safety zone during the
effective date and times, unless cleared
for entry by or through a support/
enforcement vessel.
(3) Spectator vessels may be moored
to a waterfront facility within the safety
zone in such a way that they shall not
interfere with the progress of the event.
Such mooring must be complete at least
30 minutes prior to the establishment of
the safety zone and remain moored
through the duration of the event.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The
Captain of the Port or a designated
representative will inform the public
through broadcast notices to mariners of
the enforcement period for the safety
zone. The harbor will remain closed
until the Coast Guard issues an ‘‘All
Clear’’ for the harbor after the race has
concluded the harbor is deemed safe for
normal operations.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule would be subject to
the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
Dated: September 29, 2015.
S.N. Gilreath,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2015–26955 Filed 10–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2. Add § 165.T15–0906 to read as
follows:
Coast Guard
§ 165.T15–0906 Safety Zone; Pago Pago
Harbor, America Samoa.
33 CFR Part 165
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: Breakers Point (eastern edge
of Pago Pago Harbor entrance) thence
southeast to 14°18′47″ S, 170°38′54.5″ W
thence southwest to 14°19′03″ S,
170°39′14″ W, thence northwest to
Tulutulu Point and then following the
coastline encompassing Pago Pago
Harbor. This regulated area extends
[Docket Number USCG–2015–0893]
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63923
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Mississippi River
Between Mile 467.0 and 472.0;
Transylvania, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\22OCR1.SGM
22OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63921-63923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2015-0906]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone during the 2015
Fautasi Ocean Challenge in Pago Pago Harbor, American Samoa. This
action is necessary to safeguard the participants and spectators,
including all crews, vessels, and persons on the water in Pago Pago
Harbor during the Fautasi Race. This regulation will functionally close
the port to commercial vessel traffic during the start and finish of
the race, but will not require the evacuation of any vessels from
harbor. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring in the harbor is
prohibited to all vessels not registered with the
[[Page 63922]]
sponsor as participants or not part of the race patrol, unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10:00 a.m. (SST) to 4:00 p.m. (SST)
on November 11, 2015 and from 10:00 a.m. (SST) to 4:00 p.m. (SST) on
November 27, 2015.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0906 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Nicolas Jarboe, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Honolulu; telephone (808) 541-4359,
email nicolas.a.jarboe@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the specific details of the event
were received less than 90 days prior to event and needed to be worked
through between the event coordinator and the Coast Guard over an
extended period of time. The Coast Guard's discussions with the event
sponsor to determine the requirements for this zone were finalized on
28 September 2015, which would not allow for a 30 day comment period.
This safety zone is required to restrict vessel traffic to ensure the
safety of the participants, spectators, the marine patrol and race
officials. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by November 11, 2015.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because
immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the participants,
spectators, the marine patrol and race officials.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The statutory basis for this rulemaking is 33 U.S.C. 1231, which
gives the Coast Guard, under a delegation from the Secretary of
Homeland Security, regulatory authority to enforce the Ports and
Waterways Safety Act. A safety zone is a water area, shore area, or
water and shore area, for safety or environmental purposes, of which
access is limited to authorized persons, vehicles, or vessels.
The purpose of this rule is to minimize vessel traffic in Pago Pago
Harbor during the start and finish of the Fautasi canoe race. This is a
major marine event in American Samoa. It is anticipated that a large
number of spectator pleasure crafts will be drawn to the event. These
vessels will pose a significant hazard to those operating in or near
the area. The COTP Honolulu is establishing a temporary safety zone for
Pago Pago Harbor. This rule is needed to safeguard persons and vessels
during the canoe boat races.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule will create a safety zone in Pago Pago Harbor. The Coast
Guard is closing the harbor to all vessels not authorized by the
Captain of the Port to enter, depart, or transit within the port for
the duration of the event. The Captain of the Port authorizes
registered participants, support vessels, and enforcement vessels to
enter and remain in the zone. The harbor will remain closed until the
Coast Guard issues an ``All Clear'' for the harbor after the race has
concluded and the harbor is deemed safe for normal operations. This
rule does not require any vessel to evacuate the port if moored.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Due to the
number of participants and the size of the harbor, vessels cannot
safely transit the harbor during the race. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman
[[Page 63923]]
and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's
responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves temporary and limited safety zone in Pago Pago Harbor. It
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165-- REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T15-0906 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T15-0906 Safety Zone; Pago Pago Harbor, America Samoa.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: Breakers Point
(eastern edge of Pago Pago Harbor entrance) thence southeast to
14[deg]18'47'' S, 170[deg]38'54.5'' W thence southwest to
14[deg]19'03'' S, 170[deg]39'14'' W, thence northwest to Tulutulu Point
and then following the coastline encompassing Pago Pago Harbor. This
regulated area extends from the surface of the water to the ocean
floor.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 10:00 a.m.
(SST) to 4:00 p.m. (SST) on November 11, 2015 and from 10:00 a.m. (SST)
to 4:00 p.m. (SST) on November 27, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels not registered with
the sponsor as participants or support/enforcement vessels are
considered spectators. The ``support/enforcement vessels'' consist of
any territory, or local law enforcement and sponsor provided vessels
assigned or approved by the Captain of the Port Honolulu to patrol the
safety zone.
(2) No spectator shall anchor, block, loiter or impede the through
transit of participants or support/enforcement vessels in the safety
zone during the effective date and times, unless cleared for entry by
or through a support/enforcement vessel.
(3) Spectator vessels may be moored to a waterfront facility within
the safety zone in such a way that they shall not interfere with the
progress of the event. Such mooring must be complete at least 30
minutes prior to the establishment of the safety zone and remain moored
through the duration of the event.
(d) Informational Broadcasts. The Captain of the Port or a
designated representative will inform the public through broadcast
notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone. The
harbor will remain closed until the Coast Guard issues an ``All Clear''
for the harbor after the race has concluded the harbor is deemed safe
for normal operations.
(e) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule would be
subject to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232.
Dated: September 29, 2015.
S.N. Gilreath,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2015-26955 Filed 10-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P