Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revision to Standard Forms for Bonds, 63485-63497 [2015-26581]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Incentive Program. It also consolidates
aspects of the PQRS, VM, and EHR
Incentive Program into the new MIPS.
Additionally, section 101 of the MACRA
promotes the development of
Alternative Payment Models (APMs) by
providing incentive payments for
certain eligible professionals (EPs) who
participate in APMs, by exempting EPs
from the MIPS if they are qualifying
APM participants, and by encouraging
the creation of physician-focused
payment models (PFPMs). In the request
for information, we seek public and
stakeholder input to inform the
implementation of these provisions.
We have received inquiries from
national organizations regarding the 30day comment period we provided for
the October 1 RFI. The organizations
stated that they need additional time to
respond as a result of the number and
depth of questions posed in the October
1 RFI. Since we requested the public to
comment on various aspects of MIPS
and APMs, we believe that it is
important to allow ample time for the
public to prepare comments regarding
the October 1 RFI. Therefore, we have
decided to extend the comment period
for an additional 15 days. This
document announces the extension of
the public comment period to November
17, 2015.
While we continue to welcome
comments on all questions asked in the
October 1 RFI, we suggest that the
public and stakeholders may choose to
focus their attention on issues that are
a higher priority for CMS. To assist
commenters in considering and
formulating their comments on the
October 1 RFI, we identify the following
sections and questions, which we have
categorized in descending order of
priority for CMS.
• For Section II, Subsection A (The
Merit-Based Incentive Program System
(MIPS)) of the request for information,
each component (sub-subsection) under
Subsection A has been prioritized by the
following categories, in which all
questions listed in the October 1 RFI
that are within each component
correspond to the specified priority
category.
Æ Priority Category One:
—Sub-Subsection 1 (MIPS EP Identifier
and Exclusions)
—Sub-Subsection 3 (Quality
Performance Category)
—Sub-Subsection 4 (Resource Use
Performance Category)
—Sub-Subsection 5 (Clinical Practice
Improvement Activities Performance
Category)
—Sub-Subsection 6 (Meaningful Use of
Certified EHR Technology
Performance Category)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
Æ Priority Category Two:
—Sub-Subsection 2 (Virtual Groups)
—Sub-Subsection 8 (Development of
Performance Standards)
—Sub-Subsection 12 (Feedback Reports)
Æ Priority Category Three:
—Sub-Subsection 7 (Other Measures)
—Sub-Subsection 9 (Flexibility in
Weighting Performance Categories)
—Sub-Subsection 10 (MIPS Composite
Performance Score and Performance
Threshold)
—Sub-Subsection 11 (Public Reporting)
• For Section II, Subsection B
(Alternative Payment Models) of the
October 1 RFI, the following questions
have been prioritized.
Æ Priority Category:
—How should CMS define ‘‘services
furnished under this part through an
EAPM entity’’?
—What types of data and information
can EPs submit to CMS for purposes
of determining whether they meet the
non-Medicare share of the
Combination All-Payer and Medicare
Payment Threshold, and how can
they be securely shared with the
federal government?
—What criteria could the Secretary
consider for determining
comparability of state Medicaid
medical home models to medical
home models expanded under section
1115A(c) of the Act?
—Which states’ Medicaid medical home
models might meet criteria
comparable to medical homes
expanded under section 1115A(c) of
the Act?
—How should CMS define ‘‘use’’ of
certified EHR technology as defined
in section 1848(o)(4) of the Act by
participants in an APM? For example,
should the APM require participants
to report quality measures to all
payers using certified EHR technology
or only payers who require EHR
reported measures? Should all
professionals in the APM in which an
EAPM entity participates be required
to use certified EHR technology or a
particular subset?
—What criteria should be used by the
Physician-focused Payment Model
Technical Advisory Committee for
assessing PFPM proposals submitted
by stakeholders? We are interested in
hearing suggestions related to the
criteria discussed in this RFI as well
as other criteria.
—What are examples of methodologies
for attributing and counting patients
in lieu of using payments to
determine whether an EP is a
qualifying APM participant (QP) or
partial QP?
—What is the appropriate type or types
of ‘‘financial risk’’ under section
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63485
1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be
considered an eligible APM (EAPM)
entity?
—What is the appropriate level of
financial risk ‘‘in excess of a nominal
amount’’ under section
1833(z)(3)(D)(ii)(I) of the Act to be
considered an EAPM entity?
—What criteria could be considered
when determining ‘‘comparability’’ to
MIPS of quality measures used to
identify an EAPM entity? Please
provide specific examples for
measures, measure types (for
example, structure, process, outcome,
and other types), data source for
measures (for example, patients/
caregivers, medical records, billing
claims, etc.), measure domains,
standards, and comparable
methodology.
Dated: October 14, 2015.
Andrew M. Slavitt,
Acting Administrator, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–26568 Filed 10–15–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 53
[FAR Case 2015–025; Docket No. 2015–
0025; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000–AN11
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Revision to Standard Forms for Bonds
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to revise Standard Forms
prescribed by the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) for contracts involving
bonds and other financial protections.
The revisions are aimed at clarifying
liability limitations and expanding the
options for organization types.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addresses
shown below on or before December 21,
2015 to be considered in the formation
of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2015–025 by any
of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
63486
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2015–025’’.
Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2015–
025’’. Follow the instructions provided
on the screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘FAR Case 2015–025’’ on your attached
document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20405–0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2015–025,
Revision to Standard Forms for Bonds
in all correspondence related to this
case. Comments received generally will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kathlyn J. Hopkins, Procurement
Analyst, at 202–969–7226 for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755.
Please cite FAR Case 2015–025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to revise the FAR to clarify liability
limitations and to expand the options
for organization types on Standard
Forms (SFs) 24, 25, 25A, 34, and 35.
This case addresses concerns of surety
bond producers that may be adversely
affected by differing Federal Agency
views on the proper type of organization
to indicate on these Standard Forms
when a business is a limited liability
company (LLC), which is an
increasingly prevalent form of business
in the construction industry. In some
cases, companies are being told to leave
the ‘‘Type of Organization’’ block blank
because there is no good fit; in other
cases, they select the closest fit and are
challenged on that selection. To address
these concerns, this rule proposes to
add a box labelled ‘‘Other: (Specify)’’ to
the ‘‘Type of Organization’’ block on
each of the five forms (SFs 24, 25, 25A,
34, and 35) in order to expand the range
of business types to include LLCs and
others, as they evolve.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
In addition, there have been questions
about the appropriate value to report in
the ‘‘Liability Limit’’ block on these
standard forms (i.e., whether to cite the
Surety Company’s T-limit, as
established by the Treasury Department,
or the penalty limit for a given bond (its
face value)); this has caused processing
delays and even some rejections of bids.
To address this concern, this rule
proposes to add clarifying instructions
to each of the forms (SFs 24, 25, 25A,
34, and 35) that amplify the fact that the
typical value put into the ‘‘Liability
Limit’’ block is the face value of the
bond, unless a co-surety arrangement is
proposed. These instructions are
inserted into item (4) of the SF 24 and
into item (3) of SFs 25, 25A, 34, and 35,
along with some editorial corrections to
the existing instructions.
contractors or subcontractors on U.S.
Government contracts that require bonds and
other financial protections. The Federal
Procurement Data System-Next Generation
(FPDS–NG) indicates that the U.S.
Government awarded 3,495 new construction
contracts that required bonds and other
financial protections from October 1, 2014
through August 4, 2015. Approximately 78
percent (2,711) of the total awards (3,495)
were awarded to small entities (comprised of
1,687 unique small entities). However, the
small entities will not be materially affected
by this rule, as it simply allows all businesses
to choose from a broader array of
organization types.
There are no reporting or recordkeeping
requirements associated with this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
There were no significant alternatives
identified that would meet the objective of
the rule.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
The Regulatory Secretariat has
submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA, and
NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested
parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610
(FAR Case 2015–025), in
correspondence.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect
this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the
rule simply provides additional choices
for offerors in characterizing their
organization types on SFs 24, 25, 25A,
34, and 35, as well as clarifying what
offerors should specify in terms of
liability limits. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) has
been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C.
603. The analysis is summarized as
follows:
The reason for this action is to provide
more choices for organization types on five
Standard Forms and to clarify instructions;
the action’s objective is to make the forms
more reflective of current forms of business
in the construction industry. The proposed
rule would apply to all entities, both small
and other than small, performing as
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule affects the information
collection requirements in the
provisions at FAR 28.1 and 28.2;
52.228–1; 52.228–2; 52.228–13, 52.228–
15; and 52.228–16, currently approved
under OMB Control Number 9000–0045,
titled: Bid Guarantees, Performance, and
Payments Bonds, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). The impact, however, is
negligible, because this rule simply
provides additional choices for offerors
in characterizing their organization
types on SFs 24, 25, 25A, 34, and 35, as
well as clarifying what offerors should
specify in terms of liability limits.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 53
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-Wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA
proposes to amend 48 CFR part 53 as set
forth below:
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 53—FORMS
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 53 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
2. Amend section 53.228 by revising
the introductory text and paragraphs (a)
through (g) to read as follows:
■
53.228
Bonds and insurance.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The following standard forms are
prescribed for use for bond and
insurance requirements, as specified in
part 28 of this chapter:
(a) SF 24 (Rev. (Date)) Bid Bond. (See
28.106–1.) SF 24 is authorized for local
reproduction and can be found in the
GSA Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
(b) SF 25 (Rev. (Date)) Performance
Bond. (See 28.106–1(b).) SF 25 is
authorized for local reproduction and
can be found in the GSA Forms Library
at gsa.gov/forms.
(c) SF 25–A (Rev. (Date)) Payment
Bond. (See 28.106–1(c).) SF 25–A is
authorized for local reproduction and
can be found in the GSA Forms Library
at gsa.gov/forms.
(d) SF 25–B (Rev. 10/83),
Continuation Sheet (For Standard Forms
24, 25, and 25–A). (See 28.106–1(d).)
This form can be found in the GSA
Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(e) SF 28 (Rev. 6/03) Affidavit of
Individual Surety. (See 28.106–1(e) and
28.203(b).) SF 28 is authorized for local
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
63487
reproduction and can be found in the
GSA Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(f) SF 34 (Rev. (Date)), Annual Bid
Bond. (See 28.106–1(f).) SF 34 is
authorized for local reproduction and
can be found in the GSA Forms Library
at gsa.gov/forms.
(g) SF 35 (Rev. (Date)), Annual
Performance Bond. (See 28.106–1.) SF
35 is authorized for local reproduction
and can be found in the GSA Forms
Library at gsa.gov/forms.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise section 53.301–24 to read as
follows:
53.301–24
Bid Bond.
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.000
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
63488
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
63489
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.001
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
INSTRUCTIONS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
4. Revise section 53.301–25 to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
53.301–25
PO 00000
Performance Bond.
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.002
63490
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
63491
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.003
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
INSTRUCTIONS
63492
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
5. Revise section 53.301–25A to read
as follows:
■
53.301–25A
Payment Bond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.004
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PRINCIPAL
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
63493
CORPORATE SURETY(IESJ (Comtnued}
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.005
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
INSTRUCTIONS
63494
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
6. Revise section 53.301–34 to read as
follows:
■
53.301–34
Annual Bid Bond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.006
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
September 30, 20
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
63495
INSTRUCTIONS
1 This form is authorized for use in the "'"''lu'"'"''"
lieu of Standard Form 24
Administrator of General
name and business address of the
Insert the full
the bond.
the face of the form. An authorized person shall
must furnish
venture, or an officer of the
l"nrnnr..tiron
the bond as sureties must appear on the
of
sureties and must act within the limitations listed therein. The value
the face
of the bond,
LIMIT block is the
3.
sureties are involved, their names and addresses shall appear in the
headed "CORPORATE SURETY:' In the
of the form,
sum.
When individual sureties are involved, a
Affidavit of Individual
for each individual
shall accompany the bond.
Government may
furnish additional
information
its financial l"Jllr)~bilitv
the bond shall affix their
seals. Individuals shall execute the bond
Seal", and shall affix an""'"""''"., seal if executed in Maine, New
adhesive
the name and title of each person
this bond in the space
6. In its
"offeror."
and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
BACK
20OCP1
EP20OC15.007
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
STANDARD FORM S4
63496
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
7. Revise section 53.301–35 to read as
follows:
■
53.301–35
Annual Performance Bond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.008
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
OBLIGATION:
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 202 / Tuesday, October 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules
63497
INSTRUCTIONS
In
BACK
[FR Doc. 2015–26581 Filed 10–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–C
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Oct 19, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\20OCP1.SGM
20OCP1
EP20OC15.009
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
STANDARD FORM 35
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 202 (Tuesday, October 20, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63485-63497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26581]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 53
[FAR Case 2015-025; Docket No. 2015-0025; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AN11
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Revision to Standard Forms for
Bonds
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise Standard Forms
prescribed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) for contracts
involving bonds and other financial protections. The revisions are
aimed at clarifying liability limitations and expanding the options for
organization types.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addresses shown below on or before
December 21, 2015 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2015-025 by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 63486]]
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2015-025''. Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with ``FAR
Case 2015-025''. Follow the instructions provided on the screen. Please
include your name, company name (if any), and ``FAR Case 2015-025'' on
your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20405-0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2015-
025, Revision to Standard Forms for Bonds in all correspondence related
to this case. Comments received generally will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business
confidential information provided. To confirm receipt of your
comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, approximately two to
three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for
posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathlyn J. Hopkins, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-969-7226 for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2015-025.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the FAR to clarify
liability limitations and to expand the options for organization types
on Standard Forms (SFs) 24, 25, 25A, 34, and 35. This case addresses
concerns of surety bond producers that may be adversely affected by
differing Federal Agency views on the proper type of organization to
indicate on these Standard Forms when a business is a limited liability
company (LLC), which is an increasingly prevalent form of business in
the construction industry. In some cases, companies are being told to
leave the ``Type of Organization'' block blank because there is no good
fit; in other cases, they select the closest fit and are challenged on
that selection. To address these concerns, this rule proposes to add a
box labelled ``Other: (Specify)'' to the ``Type of Organization'' block
on each of the five forms (SFs 24, 25, 25A, 34, and 35) in order to
expand the range of business types to include LLCs and others, as they
evolve.
In addition, there have been questions about the appropriate value
to report in the ``Liability Limit'' block on these standard forms
(i.e., whether to cite the Surety Company's T-limit, as established by
the Treasury Department, or the penalty limit for a given bond (its
face value)); this has caused processing delays and even some
rejections of bids. To address this concern, this rule proposes to add
clarifying instructions to each of the forms (SFs 24, 25, 25A, 34, and
35) that amplify the fact that the typical value put into the
``Liability Limit'' block is the face value of the bond, unless a co-
surety arrangement is proposed. These instructions are inserted into
item (4) of the SF 24 and into item (3) of SFs 25, 25A, 34, and 35,
along with some editorial corrections to the existing instructions.
II. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect this proposed rule to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because the rule simply provides additional choices for offerors
in characterizing their organization types on SFs 24, 25, 25A, 34, and
35, as well as clarifying what offerors should specify in terms of
liability limits. However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
(IRFA) has been prepared consistent with 5 U.S.C. 603. The analysis is
summarized as follows:
The reason for this action is to provide more choices for
organization types on five Standard Forms and to clarify
instructions; the action's objective is to make the forms more
reflective of current forms of business in the construction
industry. The proposed rule would apply to all entities, both small
and other than small, performing as contractors or subcontractors on
U.S. Government contracts that require bonds and other financial
protections. The Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation
(FPDS-NG) indicates that the U.S. Government awarded 3,495 new
construction contracts that required bonds and other financial
protections from October 1, 2014 through August 4, 2015.
Approximately 78 percent (2,711) of the total awards (3,495) were
awarded to small entities (comprised of 1,687 unique small
entities). However, the small entities will not be materially
affected by this rule, as it simply allows all businesses to choose
from a broader array of organization types.
There are no reporting or recordkeeping requirements associated
with this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
There were no significant alternatives identified that would
meet the objective of the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. A copy
of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory Secretariat. DoD, GSA,
and NASA invite comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by the rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2015-025),
in correspondence.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule affects the information collection requirements in the
provisions at FAR 28.1 and 28.2; 52.228-1; 52.228-2; 52.228-13, 52.228-
15; and 52.228-16, currently approved under OMB Control Number 9000-
0045, titled: Bid Guarantees, Performance, and Payments Bonds, in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). The
impact, however, is negligible, because this rule simply provides
additional choices for offerors in characterizing their organization
types on SFs 24, 25, 25A, 34, and 35, as well as clarifying what
offerors should specify in terms of liability limits.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 53
Government procurement.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-Wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-Wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA proposes to amend 48 CFR part 53 as
set forth below:
[[Page 63487]]
PART 53--FORMS
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 53 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
0
2. Amend section 53.228 by revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (a) through (g) to read as follows:
53.228 Bonds and insurance.
The following standard forms are prescribed for use for bond and
insurance requirements, as specified in part 28 of this chapter:
(a) SF 24 (Rev. (Date)) Bid Bond. (See 28.106-1.) SF 24 is
authorized for local reproduction and can be found in the GSA Forms
Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(b) SF 25 (Rev. (Date)) Performance Bond. (See 28.106-1(b).) SF 25
is authorized for local reproduction and can be found in the GSA Forms
Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(c) SF 25-A (Rev. (Date)) Payment Bond. (See 28.106-1(c).) SF 25-A
is authorized for local reproduction and can be found in the GSA Forms
Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(d) SF 25-B (Rev. 10/83), Continuation Sheet (For Standard Forms
24, 25, and 25-A). (See 28.106-1(d).) This form can be found in the GSA
Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(e) SF 28 (Rev. 6/03) Affidavit of Individual Surety. (See 28.106-
1(e) and 28.203(b).) SF 28 is authorized for local reproduction and can
be found in the GSA Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(f) SF 34 (Rev. (Date)), Annual Bid Bond. (See 28.106-1(f).) SF 34
is authorized for local reproduction and can be found in the GSA Forms
Library at gsa.gov/forms.
(g) SF 35 (Rev. (Date)), Annual Performance Bond. (See 28.106-1.)
SF 35 is authorized for local reproduction and can be found in the GSA
Forms Library at gsa.gov/forms.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise section 53.301-24 to read as follows:
53.301-24 Bid Bond.
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
[[Page 63488]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.000
[[Page 63489]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.001
[[Page 63490]]
0
4. Revise section 53.301-25 to read as follows:
53.301-25 Performance Bond.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.002
[[Page 63491]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.003
[[Page 63492]]
0
5. Revise section 53.301-25A to read as follows:
53.301-25A Payment Bond.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.004
[[Page 63493]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.005
[[Page 63494]]
0
6. Revise section 53.301-34 to read as follows:
53.301-34 Annual Bid Bond.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.006
[[Page 63495]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.007
[[Page 63496]]
0
7. Revise section 53.301-35 to read as follows:
53.301-35 Annual Performance Bond.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.008
[[Page 63497]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP20OC15.009
[FR Doc. 2015-26581 Filed 10-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-C