Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed eCollection, eComments Requested; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection; National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), 62570-62572 [2015-26357]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62570
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 / Notices
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on May 22, 2015, based on a complaint
filed by Baxter International Inc. of
Deerfield, Illinois; Baxter Healthcare
Corporation of Deerfield, Illinois; and
Baxter Healthcare SA of Glattpark,
Switzerland (‘‘Baxter’’). 80 FR 29745
(May 22, 2015). The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain recombinant
factor VIII products by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 6,100,061; 6,936,441; and
8,084,252. Id. The notice of
investigation named Novo Nordisk A/S
of Bagsvaerd, Denmark and Novo
Nordisk Inc. of Plainsboro, New Jersey
(‘‘Novo Nordisk’’) as respondents. Id. at
29746. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) also was named
as a party to the investigation. Id.
On September 3, 2015, Baxter filed a
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to add Baxalta,
Inc., Baxalta US Inc., and Baxalta GmbH
(‘‘the Baxalta entities’’) as complainants.
Neither Novo Nordisk nor OUII opposed
the motion.
On September 16, 2015, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
an ID, Order No. 10, granting the motion
to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation. The ALJ found good cause
for the amendment. The ALJ found the
amendment would not prejudice the
parties because (1) they have been aware
of a corporate transition involving
Baxter and the Baxalta entities since the
service of the complaint and the notice
of investigation and (2) Baxter has been
responding to discovery requests as
though they were directed to Baxter and
the Baxalta entities and will continue to
do so. The ALJ found that having the
correct parties in the investigation
would simplify and streamline the
discovery process. No petitions for
review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
Issued: October 8, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–26295 Filed 10–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–958]
Certain Automated Teller Machines
and Point of Sale Devices and
Associated Software Thereof; Notice of
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant’s Motion To
Amend the Complaint and the Notice
of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 9) issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’),
granting the complainant’s unopposed
motion to amend the complaint and
notice of investigation to change the
corporate name of the complainant.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on June 9, 2015, based on a complaint
filed by Global Cash Access, Inc.
(‘‘Complainant’’). 80 FR 32605–06. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section
337’’), in the importation into the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain automated
teller machines, point of sale devices,
and associated software that infringes
claims 1–3, 5–7, and 9 of U.S. Patent
No. 6,081,792. Id. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named as
respondents NRT Technology Corp. of
Toronto, Canada and NRT Technologies,
Inc., of Las Vegas, Nevada. Id. at 32606.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (OUII) is a party to the
investigation. Id.
On August 26, 2015, Complainant
filed an unopposed motion to amend
the complaint and the notice of
investigation to change the name of
Complainant to Everi Payments Inc. to
reflect a corporate name change.
Complainant asserts that good cause
exists for the amendments.
On September 15, 2015, the ALJ
issued the subject ID, granting
Complainant’s motion to amend the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. The ALJ found good cause
for granting the motion because it is
early in the investigation and the
amendments will not affect discovery or
any issue to be litigated. No petitions for
review of the ID were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: October 9, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–26307 Filed 10–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0058]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Revision of a
Currently Approved Collection;
National Incident-Based Reporting
System (NIBRS)
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice,
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division has submitted the following
information collection request to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 / Notices
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with established review
procedures of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection is published to obtain
comments from the public and affected
agencies. This proposed information
collection was previously published in
the Federal Register 80 FR 48567, on
August 13, 2015, allowing for a 60 day
comment period.
The purpose of this notice is to
allow for an additional 30 days for
public comment until November 16,
2015.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Mr. Samuel
Berhanu, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Criminal Justice
Information Services (CJIS) Division,
Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–3566. Written
comments and/or suggestions can also
be directed to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_
submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection:
National Incident-Based Reporting
System
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: 1110–0058 Sponsor:
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
tribal, and federal law enforcement
agencies.
Abstract: Under U.S. Code, Title 28,
Section 534, Acquisition, Preservation,
and Exchange of Identification Records;
Appointment of Officials, June 11, 1930;
Public Law 109–177 (H.R. 3199), March
9, 2006, USA Patriot Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005; Public Law
110–457, Title II, Section 237(a), (b),
December 23, 2008, the William
Wilberforce Trafficking Victims
Reauthorization Act of 2008, and
Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes
Prevention Act, April 28, 2009, this
collection requests Incident data from
city, county, state, tribal and federal law
enforcement agencies in order for the
FBI UCR Program to serve as the
national clearinghouse for the collection
and dissemination of crime data and to
publish these statistics in Crime in the
United States, Hate Crime Statistics, and
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted. NIBRS is an incident-based
reporting system in which law
enforcement collects data on each crime
occurrence. Designed to be generated as
a byproduct of local, state, and federal
automated records systems, currently,
the NIBRS collects data on each
incident and arrest within 23 crime
categories made up of 49 specific crimes
called Group A offenses. For each of the
offenses coming to the attention of law
enforcement, various facts about the
crime are collected. In addition to the
Group A offenses, there are 10 Group B
offense categories for which only arrest
data are reported. The most significant
difference between NIBRS and the
traditional Summary Reporting System
(SRS) is the degree of detail in reporting.
In reporting data via the traditional SRS,
law enforcement agencies tally the
occurrences of eight Part I crimes.
NIBRS is capable of producing more
detailed, accurate, and meaningful data
because data are collected about when
and where crime takes place, what form
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62571
it takes, and the characteristics of its
victims and perpetrators. Although most
of the general concepts for collecting,
scoring, and reporting UCR data in the
SRS apply in the NIBRS, such as
jurisdictional rules, there are some
important differences in the two
systems. The most notable differences
that give the NIBRS an advantage over
the SRS are: No Hierarchy Rule, in a
multiple-offense incident NIBRS reports
every offense occurring during the
incident where SRS would report just
the most serious offense and the lowerlisted offense would not be reported;
NIBRS provides revised, expanded, and
new offense definitions; NIBRS provides
more specificity in reporting offenses,
using NIBRS offense and arrest data for
23 Group A offense categories can be
reported while in the SRS eight Part I
offenses can be reported; NIBRS can
distinguish between attempted and
completed Group A crimes; NIBRS also
provides crimes against society while
the SRS does not; the victim-to-offender
data, circumstance reporting, drug
related offenses, offenders suspected use
of drugs, and computer crime is
expanded in NIBRS; the NIBRS update
reports are directly tied to the original
incident submitted. The Group A
offense categories include arson, assault
offenses, bribery, burglary/breaking and
entering, counterfeiting/forgery,
destruction/damage/vandalism of
property, drug/narcotic offenses,
embezzlement, extortion/blackmail,
fraud offenses, gambling offenses,
homicide offenses, human trafficking,
kidnapping/abduction, larceny/theft
offenses, motor vehicle theft,
pornography/obscene material,
prostitution offenses, robbery, sex
offenses, sex offenses/nonforcible,
stolen property offenses, and weapon
law violations. The Group B offense
categories include bad checks, curfew/
loitering/vagrancy violations, disorderly
conduct, DUI, drunkenness, family
offenses/nonviolent, liquor law
violations, peeping tom, trespass of real
property, and all other offenses.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are approximately 6,420
law enforcement agencies. The amount
of time estimated for an average
respondent to respond is two hours
monthly which totals to an annual hour
burden of 24 hours. The 2 hours to
respond is the time it takes for the
agencies records management system
(RMS) to download the NIBRS and send
to the FBI. By design, law enforcement
agencies generate NIBRS data as a byproduct of their RMS. Therefore, a law
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
62572
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 / Notices
enforcement agency builds its system to
suit its own individual needs, including
all of the information required for
administration and operation; then
forwards only the data required by the
NIBRS to participate in the FBI UCR
Program.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with this
collection: There are approximately
154,080 hours, annual burden,
associated with this information
collection. The total number of
respondents is 6,420 with a total annual
hour burden of 24 hours, (6,420 × 24 =
154,080 total annual hours).
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice,
Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street
NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: October 13, 2015.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer PRA, United
States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015–26357 Filed 10–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0048]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Extension of a
Currently Approved Collection Cargo
Theft Incident Report
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice,
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
(CJIS) Division will be submitting the
following Information Collection
Request to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
clearance in accordance with the
established review procedures of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register at 80 FR 48574, on August 13,
2015, allowing for a 60 day comment
period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for an additional 30
days until November 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden and associated response time,
should be directed to Mr. Samuel
Berhanu, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, CJIS Division, Module E–
3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg,
West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304)
625–3566. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be directed to the
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to OIRA_submissions@
omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection:
Cargo Theft Incident Report.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: 1110–0048. Sponsor:
Criminal Justice Information Services
Division, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
federal, and tribal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: This collection is
needed to collect information on cargo
theft incidents committed throughout
the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are approximately
18,415 law enforcement agency
respondents that submit monthly for a
total of 220,980 responses with an
estimated response time of 5 minutes
per response.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with this
collection: There are approximately
18,415 hours, annual burden, associated
with this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice,
Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street
NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: October 13, 2015.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA,
United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015–26356 Filed 10–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Comment Request for Information
Collection for the Self-Employment
Training (SET) Demonstration
Evaluation (SET Evaluation); Extension
Request Without Change to an
Existing Collection
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA); Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor
(Department), as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) [44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)]. This program helps to
ensure that required data can be
provided in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and financial
resources) is minimized, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
the impact of collection requirements on
respondents can be properly assessed.
The Department notes that a Federal
agency cannot conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it is
approved by the Office of Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16OCN1.SGM
16OCN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 200 (Friday, October 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62570-62572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110-0058]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection;
National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services Division has submitted the
following information collection request to the
[[Page 62571]]
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with established review procedures of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published
to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed
information collection was previously published in the Federal Register
80 FR 48567, on August 13, 2015, allowing for a 60 day comment period.
DATES: The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days
for public comment until November 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated
public burden and associated response time, should be directed to Mr.
Samuel Berhanu, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal
Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, Module E-3, 1000 Custer
Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625-3566.
Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office
of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to OIRA_submissions@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Comments should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently
approved collection.
(2) The Title of the Form/Collection: National Incident-Based
Reporting System
(3) The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of
the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: 1110-0058
Sponsor: Criminal Justice Information Services Division, Federal Bureau
of Investigation, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, tribal, and
federal law enforcement agencies.
Abstract: Under U.S. Code, Title 28, Section 534, Acquisition,
Preservation, and Exchange of Identification Records; Appointment of
Officials, June 11, 1930; Public Law 109-177 (H.R. 3199), March 9,
2006, USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005; Public
Law 110-457, Title II, Section 237(a), (b), December 23, 2008, the
William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act of 2008,
and Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act, April 28, 2009, this
collection requests Incident data from city, county, state, tribal and
federal law enforcement agencies in order for the FBI UCR Program to
serve as the national clearinghouse for the collection and
dissemination of crime data and to publish these statistics in Crime in
the United States, Hate Crime Statistics, and Law Enforcement Officers
Killed and Assaulted. NIBRS is an incident-based reporting system in
which law enforcement collects data on each crime occurrence. Designed
to be generated as a byproduct of local, state, and federal automated
records systems, currently, the NIBRS collects data on each incident
and arrest within 23 crime categories made up of 49 specific crimes
called Group A offenses. For each of the offenses coming to the
attention of law enforcement, various facts about the crime are
collected. In addition to the Group A offenses, there are 10 Group B
offense categories for which only arrest data are reported. The most
significant difference between NIBRS and the traditional Summary
Reporting System (SRS) is the degree of detail in reporting. In
reporting data via the traditional SRS, law enforcement agencies tally
the occurrences of eight Part I crimes. NIBRS is capable of producing
more detailed, accurate, and meaningful data because data are collected
about when and where crime takes place, what form it takes, and the
characteristics of its victims and perpetrators. Although most of the
general concepts for collecting, scoring, and reporting UCR data in the
SRS apply in the NIBRS, such as jurisdictional rules, there are some
important differences in the two systems. The most notable differences
that give the NIBRS an advantage over the SRS are: No Hierarchy Rule,
in a multiple-offense incident NIBRS reports every offense occurring
during the incident where SRS would report just the most serious
offense and the lower-listed offense would not be reported; NIBRS
provides revised, expanded, and new offense definitions; NIBRS provides
more specificity in reporting offenses, using NIBRS offense and arrest
data for 23 Group A offense categories can be reported while in the SRS
eight Part I offenses can be reported; NIBRS can distinguish between
attempted and completed Group A crimes; NIBRS also provides crimes
against society while the SRS does not; the victim-to-offender data,
circumstance reporting, drug related offenses, offenders suspected use
of drugs, and computer crime is expanded in NIBRS; the NIBRS update
reports are directly tied to the original incident submitted. The Group
A offense categories include arson, assault offenses, bribery,
burglary/breaking and entering, counterfeiting/forgery, destruction/
damage/vandalism of property, drug/narcotic offenses, embezzlement,
extortion/blackmail, fraud offenses, gambling offenses, homicide
offenses, human trafficking, kidnapping/abduction, larceny/theft
offenses, motor vehicle theft, pornography/obscene material,
prostitution offenses, robbery, sex offenses, sex offenses/nonforcible,
stolen property offenses, and weapon law violations. The Group B
offense categories include bad checks, curfew/loitering/vagrancy
violations, disorderly conduct, DUI, drunkenness, family offenses/
nonviolent, liquor law violations, peeping tom, trespass of real
property, and all other offenses.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There are
approximately 6,420 law enforcement agencies. The amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to respond is two hours monthly
which totals to an annual hour burden of 24 hours. The 2 hours to
respond is the time it takes for the agencies records management system
(RMS) to download the NIBRS and send to the FBI. By design, law
enforcement agencies generate NIBRS data as a by-product of their RMS.
Therefore, a law
[[Page 62572]]
enforcement agency builds its system to suit its own individual needs,
including all of the information required for administration and
operation; then forwards only the data required by the NIBRS to
participate in the FBI UCR Program.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with this collection: There are approximately 154,080 hours, annual
burden, associated with this information collection. The total number
of respondents is 6,420 with a total annual hour burden of 24 hours,
(6,420 x 24 = 154,080 total annual hours).
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice
Management Division, United States Department of Justice, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC
20530.
Dated: October 13, 2015.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer PRA, United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2015-26357 Filed 10-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-02-P
