NRCS Procedures for Granting Equitable Relief, 62439-62441 [2015-26309]
Download as PDF
62439
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 200
Friday, October 16, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
Unfunded Mandates
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments, or the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
This rule contains no Federal
mandates, as defined under Title II of
UMRA, for State, local, and Tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Therefore, a statement under section
202 of UMRA is not required.
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
7 CFR Part 635
RIN 0578–AA57
NRCS Procedures for Granting
Equitable Relief
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) issues its
final rule implementing the equitable
relief authority, and the procedures set
forth in section 1613 of the Farm
Security and Rural Investment Act of
2002 (the 2002 Act), relating to relief for
participants for covered programs
administered by NRCS. The relief
applies to cases where the program
participant took action to his or her
detriment based on action or advice
from an NRCS employee, and situations
where the participant acted in good
faith, but failed to fully comply with
program requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective October 16,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paulette Craig, National Equitable Relief
Specialist, at (301) 504–1650.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) designated this rule as not
significant under Executive Order 12866
as supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, OMB will not review
this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601–612) generally requires an
agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute. However, this
regulation implements section 1613 of
the 2002 Act, which is part of Title I of
the 2002 Act. Section 1601(c) of the
2002 Act requires NRCS to promulgate
regulations or administer Title I without
regard to 5 U.S.C. 553. Therefore, NRCS
did not prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for this final rule.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, (Pub. L. 104–121).
Therefore, NRCS is not required to delay
the effective date for 60 days from the
date of publication to allow for
congressional review. Accordingly, this
rule is effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c)(2) of the 2002 Act
requires that the implementation of this
provision be carried out without regard
to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
Chapter 35 of Title 44, United States
Code. Therefore, NRCS is not reporting
recordkeeping or estimated paperwork
burden associated with this final rule.
Government Paperwork Elimination
Act
NRCS is committed to compliance
with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act as well as continued
pursuit of providing all services
electronically when practicable. This
rule requires that a program participant
make a written request for equitable
relief for a program administered by
NRCS. In part, this rule lends itself to
electronic requests as submitted by State
Conservationists or participants.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Environmental Analysis
NRCS has determined that changes
made by this rule fall within a category
of actions that are excluded from the
requirement to prepare either an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
Administrative changes made in this
rule fall within a categorical exclusion
for policy development relating to
routine activities and similar
administrative functions (7 CFR
1b.3(a)(1)) and NRCS has identified no
extraordinary circumstances that would
otherwise require preparation of either.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
NRCS has determined through a Civil
Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA) that the
final rule discloses no
disproportionately adverse impacts for
minorities, women, or persons with
disabilities. The CRIA provides
responses to the Final rule amendments.
The data presented indicates
producers who are members of the
protected groups have participated in
NRCS conservation programs at parity
with other producers. Extrapolating
from historical participation data, it is
reasonable to conclude that NRCS
programs, including procedures for
granting equitable relief for ineligibility
for these programs, will continue to be
administered in a non-discriminatory
manner. Outreach and communication
strategies are in place to ensure all
producers will be provided the same
information to allow them to make
informed compliance decisions
regarding the use of their lands that will
affect their participation in U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
programs.
The equitable relief procedures apply
to all persons equally regardless of their
race, color, national origin, gender, sex,
or disability status. Therefore, the final
rule portends no adverse civil rights
implications for women, minorities, or
persons with disabilities.
Discussion of the Rule 7 CFR Part 635—
Equitable Relief From Ineligibility
Section 635.1 Definitions and
Abbreviations
This section amends, adds, or
removes a number of defined terms in
the rule. Specifically, it adds definitions
for ‘‘appeal rights,’’ ‘‘equitable relief,’’
‘‘participant,’’ and ‘‘State.’’ ‘‘Appeal
rights’’ is defined to clarify that a
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
62440
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
decision under this rule may be
appealed to the National Appeals
Division (NAD). ‘‘Participant’’ and
‘‘State’’ are defined consistent with their
statutory definitions. The definitions of
‘‘covered program’’ and ‘‘State
Conservationist’’ are simplified. The
definition of ‘‘Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS)’’ is revised
to be consistent with the definition used
in other NRCS regulations, and clarifies
that the term includes programs
administered by the agency using the
funds, facilities, and authorities of the
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC).
Section 635.2
Applicability
The amended rule clarifies the
application of subsection (a), and strikes
subsections (b) and (c) which are no
longer needed.
Section 635.3 Reliance on Incorrect
Actions or Information
The amended rule makes changes to
this section to more closely conform to
the language of the statute by
enumerating the specific requirements
to qualify for relief under this section.
These changes do not substantively
change the scope of this authority.
Section 635.4
Failure To Fully Comply
Section 635.4 of the amended rule
makes changes to this section to more
closely conform to the language of the
statute by enumerating the specific
requirements to qualify for relief under
this section. These changes provide
more flexibility for State
Conservationists and participants to
request equitable relief, and do not
substantively change the scope of this
authority.
Section 635.5
Forms of Relief
The amended rule makes technical
and grammatical changes to this section,
and removes references to ‘‘loans’’ since
NRCS does not have authority to make
loans.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 635.6 Equitable Relief by State
Conservationists
The amended rule restructures and
clarifies the existing language of § 635.6.
In particular, the revised section
explains the limitations on a State
Conservationist’s authority in a separate
subsection, and amends the description
of the State Conservationist’s authority
to more closely reflect the statutory
language.
Section 635.7 Procedures for Granting
Equitable Relief
The amended rule strikes the list of
covered programs in paragraph (a). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
definition of ‘‘covered programs’’
sufficiently identifies these programs.
The amended rule allows the Chief,
State Conservationist, or participant to
initiate a request for equitable relief.
Under the current rule, only the
participant can initiate a request for
equitable relief. The State
Conservationist cannot initiate a request
even if he or she believes the participant
qualifies for such relief. For example, an
NRCS employee’s misaction or
misinformation may impact several
different participants, resulting in a
number of them being determined
ineligible for program benefits. Under
the current rule, the participants must
request equitable relief from NRCS in
order to obtain equitable relief. The
State Conservationist cannot initiate an
equitable relief request, even if he or she
knows that other participants would
likely also qualify for equitable relief.
Given the potential for treating
participants differently, NRCS is
amending this procedure to allow the
Chief or a State Conservationist to
initiate a request for equitable relief for
a participant meeting the requirements
of this part.
Section 635.7 is also amended to add
§ 635.7(e) and (f). Paragraph 635.7(e)
provides that requests for equitable
relief must include any information
necessary to determine eligibility under
this authority and such other
information as required by NRCS to
determine whether granting equitable
relief is appropriate. This revision
reflects that the information needed by
the agency to assess equitable relief
requests will be provided and updated
by applicable policy and procedure at
Title 440 of the Conservation Program
Manual, Part 509.
Paragraph 635.7(f) provides the
participant with appeal rights to the
National Appeals Division, pursuant to
§ 614.9(e) of this chapter, if equitable
relief is denied.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 635
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agriculture, Conservation
programs, Equitable Relief.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 7 CFR part 635 is
revised to read as follows:
PART 635—EQUITABLE RELIEF FROM
INELIGIBILITY
Sec.
635.1 Definitions and abbreviations.
635.2 Applicability.
635.3 Reliance on incorrect actions or
information.
635.4 Failure to fully comply.
635.5 Forms of relief.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
635.6 Equitable relief by State
Conservationists.
635.7 Procedures for granting equitable
relief.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7996.
§ 635.1
Definitions and abbreviations.
The following terms apply to this
part:
Appeal rights means the right of the
participant to appeal a decision to the
National Appeals Division (NAD)
pursuant to part 614 of this chapter.
Chief means the Chief of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service or a
person with delegated authority to act
for the Chief.
Covered program means a
conservation program administered by
NRCS.
Equitable relief means an action
described in § 635.5 of this part.
Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) means an agency of the
U.S. Department of Agriculture which
has responsibility for administering
covered programs, including those using
the funds, facilities, and authorities of
the Commodity Credit Corporation
(CCC).
OGC means the Office of the General
Counsel of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
Participant means a participant in a
covered program.
Secretary means the Secretary of U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
State means each of the several States
of the United States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, and any other territory or
possession of the United States.
State Conservationist means the
NRCS employee authorized to direct
and supervise NRCS activities in a State
or the State Conservationist’s designee.
§ 635.2
Applicability.
This part applies to all covered
programs administered by the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, except
for the Highly Erodible Land and
Wetland Conservation provisions of
Title XII, subtitles B and C of the Food
Security Act of 1985, as amended, (16
U.S.C. 3811 et seq.). Administration of
this part shall be under the supervision
of the Chief, except that such authority
shall not limit the exercise of authority
by State Conservationists of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service
provided in § 635.6 of this part.
§ 635.3 Reliance on incorrect actions or
information.
The Chief may grant equitable relief to
any participant that NRCS determines is
not in compliance with the
requirements, terms and conditions of a
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
covered program, and therefore
ineligible for a payment, or other
benefit, if the participant—
(a) Acting in good faith, relied on
action and advice from an NRCS
employee or representative of USDA to
their detriment;
(b) Did not know or have sufficient
reason to know that the action or advice
upon which they relied would be
detrimental; and
(c) Did not act in reliance on their
own misunderstanding or
misinterpretation of the program
provisions, notices, or information.
§ 635.4
Failure to fully comply.
The Chief may grant equitable relief to
any participant that NRCS determines is
not in full compliance with the
requirements, terms and conditions of a
covered program, and therefore
ineligible for a payment, or other
benefit, if the participant—
(a) Made a good faith effort to comply
fully with the requirements; and
(b) Rendered substantial performance.
§ 635.5
Forms of relief.
(a) The Chief may authorize a
participant in a covered program to:
(1) Retain payments or other benefits
received under the covered program;
(2) Continue to receive payments and
other benefits under the covered
program;
(3) Continue to participate, in whole
or in part, under any contract executed
under the covered program;
(4) Re-enroll all or part of the land
covered by the program; and
(5) Receive such other equitable relief
as determined to be appropriate.
(b) As a condition of receiving relief
under this part, the participant may be
required to remedy their failure to meet
the program requirement or mitigate its
effects.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 635.6 Equitable relief by State
Conservationists.
(a) State Conservationists’ Authority.
State Conservationists have the
authority to grant requests for equitable
relief under this section when—
(1) The program matter with respect
to which the relief is sought is a
program matter in a covered program
operated within the authorized
jurisdiction of the State Conservationist;
(2) The total amount of relief
(including payments and other benefits)
that will be provided to the participant
under this section during the fiscal year
is less than $20,000;
(3) The total amount of such relief
that has been previously provided to the
participant using this section in the
fiscal year, as calculated in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Oct 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
(a)(2) of this section, is not more than
$5,000;
(4) The total amount of payments and
benefits of any kind for which relief is
provided to similarly situated
participants by a State Conservationist
in a fiscal year, is not more than
$1,000,000.
(b) Additional limits on authority. The
authority provided under this section
does not extend to the administration of:
(1) Payment limitations under part
1400 of this title;
(2) Payment limitations under a
conservation program administered by
the Secretary; or
(3) The highly erodible land and
wetland conservation requirements
under subtitles B or C of Title XII of the
Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
3811 et seq.).
(c) Concurrence by the Office of the
General Counsel. Relief shall only be
made under this part after consultation
with, and concurrence by, the Office of
General Counsel.
(d) Secretary’s reversal authority. A
decision made under this part by the
State Conservationist may be reversed
only by the Secretary, who may not
delegate that authority.
(e) Relation to other authorities. The
authority provided under this section is
in addition to any other applicable
authority that may allow relief.
§ 635.7
relief.
Procedures for granting equitable
(a) The Chief or State Conservationist
may initiate a request for equitable relief
for a participant that meets the
requirement of this part.
(b) Participants may request equitable
relief from the Chief or the State
Conservationist as provided in §§ 635.3
and 635.4 of this part.
(c) Only a participant directly affected
by the non-compliance with the covered
program requirements is eligible for
equitable relief under this part.
(d) Requests by a participant for
equitable relief must be made in writing,
no later than 30 calendar days from the
date of receipt of the notification of noncompliance with the requirements of the
covered conservation program.
(e) Requests for equitable relief must
include any information necessary to
determine eligibility under this part and
such other information as required by
NRCS to determine whether granting
equitable relief is appropriate.
Information needed by the agency to
assess equitable relief requests will be
provided and updated by applicable
policy and procedure.
(f) If equitable relief is denied by the
Chief or the State Conservationist, the
participant will be provided with
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62441
written notice of appeal rights to the
National Appeals Division, pursuant to
7 CFR part 614.
Signed this 7th day of October, 2015, in
Washington, DC.
Leonard Jordan,
Associate Chief for Conservation, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–26309 Filed 10–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–TP–0009]
RIN 1904–AC97
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Test Procedures
for Clothes Washers; Correcting
Amendments
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendments.
AGENCY:
On August 5, 2015, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) published
a final rule amending the test
procedures for clothes washers. This
correction addresses several crossreference numbering errors, in which
the cross-references were inadvertently
not updated to reflect the revised
section numbering resulting from the
final rule amendments. In addition, this
correction republishes several
amendments from the final rule that
could not be incorporated into the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) due to
inaccurate amendatory instructions, and
clarifies several of the amendatory
instructions in the final rule to remove
certain sections of the test procedures.
Furthermore, this correction reinstates
three sections of the clothes washer test
procedure that were inadvertently
removed from the CFR starting with the
2013 annual edition. Neither the errors
nor the corrections in this document
affect the substance of the rulemaking or
any of the conclusions reached in
support of either of these final rules.
DATES: Effective Date: October 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–0371. Email:
Bryan.Berringer@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 200 (Friday, October 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62439-62441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26309]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 200 / Friday, October 16, 2015 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 62439]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
7 CFR Part 635
RIN 0578-AA57
NRCS Procedures for Granting Equitable Relief
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) issues its
final rule implementing the equitable relief authority, and the
procedures set forth in section 1613 of the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002 (the 2002 Act), relating to relief for
participants for covered programs administered by NRCS. The relief
applies to cases where the program participant took action to his or
her detriment based on action or advice from an NRCS employee, and
situations where the participant acted in good faith, but failed to
fully comply with program requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective October 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paulette Craig, National Equitable
Relief Specialist, at (301) 504-1650.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) designated this rule as
not significant under Executive Order 12866 as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, OMB will not review this final rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) generally
requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute. However, this
regulation implements section 1613 of the 2002 Act, which is part of
Title I of the 2002 Act. Section 1601(c) of the 2002 Act requires NRCS
to promulgate regulations or administer Title I without regard to 5
U.S.C. 553. Therefore, NRCS did not prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for this final rule.
Unfunded Mandates
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, or
the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year.
This rule contains no Federal mandates, as defined under Title II
of UMRA, for State, local, and Tribal governments, or the private
sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of UMRA is not
required.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (Pub. L. 104-121). Therefore, NRCS is
not required to delay the effective date for 60 days from the date of
publication to allow for congressional review. Accordingly, this rule
is effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 1601(c)(2) of the 2002 Act requires that the implementation
of this provision be carried out without regard to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, Chapter 35 of Title 44, United States Code. Therefore,
NRCS is not reporting recordkeeping or estimated paperwork burden
associated with this final rule.
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
NRCS is committed to compliance with the Government Paperwork
Elimination Act as well as continued pursuit of providing all services
electronically when practicable. This rule requires that a program
participant make a written request for equitable relief for a program
administered by NRCS. In part, this rule lends itself to electronic
requests as submitted by State Conservationists or participants.
Environmental Analysis
NRCS has determined that changes made by this rule fall within a
category of actions that are excluded from the requirement to prepare
either an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement. Administrative changes made in this rule fall within a
categorical exclusion for policy development relating to routine
activities and similar administrative functions (7 CFR 1b.3(a)(1)) and
NRCS has identified no extraordinary circumstances that would otherwise
require preparation of either.
Civil Rights Impact Analysis
NRCS has determined through a Civil Rights Impact Analysis (CRIA)
that the final rule discloses no disproportionately adverse impacts for
minorities, women, or persons with disabilities. The CRIA provides
responses to the Final rule amendments.
The data presented indicates producers who are members of the
protected groups have participated in NRCS conservation programs at
parity with other producers. Extrapolating from historical
participation data, it is reasonable to conclude that NRCS programs,
including procedures for granting equitable relief for ineligibility
for these programs, will continue to be administered in a non-
discriminatory manner. Outreach and communication strategies are in
place to ensure all producers will be provided the same information to
allow them to make informed compliance decisions regarding the use of
their lands that will affect their participation in U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) programs.
The equitable relief procedures apply to all persons equally
regardless of their race, color, national origin, gender, sex, or
disability status. Therefore, the final rule portends no adverse civil
rights implications for women, minorities, or persons with
disabilities.
Discussion of the Rule 7 CFR Part 635--Equitable Relief From
Ineligibility
Section 635.1 Definitions and Abbreviations
This section amends, adds, or removes a number of defined terms in
the rule. Specifically, it adds definitions for ``appeal rights,''
``equitable relief,'' ``participant,'' and ``State.'' ``Appeal rights''
is defined to clarify that a
[[Page 62440]]
decision under this rule may be appealed to the National Appeals
Division (NAD). ``Participant'' and ``State'' are defined consistent
with their statutory definitions. The definitions of ``covered
program'' and ``State Conservationist'' are simplified. The definition
of ``Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)'' is revised to be
consistent with the definition used in other NRCS regulations, and
clarifies that the term includes programs administered by the agency
using the funds, facilities, and authorities of the Commodity Credit
Corporation (CCC).
Section 635.2 Applicability
The amended rule clarifies the application of subsection (a), and
strikes subsections (b) and (c) which are no longer needed.
Section 635.3 Reliance on Incorrect Actions or Information
The amended rule makes changes to this section to more closely
conform to the language of the statute by enumerating the specific
requirements to qualify for relief under this section. These changes do
not substantively change the scope of this authority.
Section 635.4 Failure To Fully Comply
Section 635.4 of the amended rule makes changes to this section to
more closely conform to the language of the statute by enumerating the
specific requirements to qualify for relief under this section. These
changes provide more flexibility for State Conservationists and
participants to request equitable relief, and do not substantively
change the scope of this authority.
Section 635.5 Forms of Relief
The amended rule makes technical and grammatical changes to this
section, and removes references to ``loans'' since NRCS does not have
authority to make loans.
Section 635.6 Equitable Relief by State Conservationists
The amended rule restructures and clarifies the existing language
of Sec. 635.6. In particular, the revised section explains the
limitations on a State Conservationist's authority in a separate
subsection, and amends the description of the State Conservationist's
authority to more closely reflect the statutory language.
Section 635.7 Procedures for Granting Equitable Relief
The amended rule strikes the list of covered programs in paragraph
(a). The definition of ``covered programs'' sufficiently identifies
these programs.
The amended rule allows the Chief, State Conservationist, or
participant to initiate a request for equitable relief. Under the
current rule, only the participant can initiate a request for equitable
relief. The State Conservationist cannot initiate a request even if he
or she believes the participant qualifies for such relief. For example,
an NRCS employee's misaction or misinformation may impact several
different participants, resulting in a number of them being determined
ineligible for program benefits. Under the current rule, the
participants must request equitable relief from NRCS in order to obtain
equitable relief. The State Conservationist cannot initiate an
equitable relief request, even if he or she knows that other
participants would likely also qualify for equitable relief. Given the
potential for treating participants differently, NRCS is amending this
procedure to allow the Chief or a State Conservationist to initiate a
request for equitable relief for a participant meeting the requirements
of this part.
Section 635.7 is also amended to add Sec. 635.7(e) and (f).
Paragraph 635.7(e) provides that requests for equitable relief must
include any information necessary to determine eligibility under this
authority and such other information as required by NRCS to determine
whether granting equitable relief is appropriate. This revision
reflects that the information needed by the agency to assess equitable
relief requests will be provided and updated by applicable policy and
procedure at Title 440 of the Conservation Program Manual, Part 509.
Paragraph 635.7(f) provides the participant with appeal rights to
the National Appeals Division, pursuant to Sec. 614.9(e) of this
chapter, if equitable relief is denied.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 635
Administrative practice and procedure, Agriculture, Conservation
programs, Equitable Relief.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part
635 is revised to read as follows:
PART 635--EQUITABLE RELIEF FROM INELIGIBILITY
Sec.
635.1 Definitions and abbreviations.
635.2 Applicability.
635.3 Reliance on incorrect actions or information.
635.4 Failure to fully comply.
635.5 Forms of relief.
635.6 Equitable relief by State Conservationists.
635.7 Procedures for granting equitable relief.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7996.
Sec. 635.1 Definitions and abbreviations.
The following terms apply to this part:
Appeal rights means the right of the participant to appeal a
decision to the National Appeals Division (NAD) pursuant to part 614 of
this chapter.
Chief means the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation Service
or a person with delegated authority to act for the Chief.
Covered program means a conservation program administered by NRCS.
Equitable relief means an action described in Sec. 635.5 of this
part.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) means an agency of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture which has responsibility for
administering covered programs, including those using the funds,
facilities, and authorities of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC).
OGC means the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
Participant means a participant in a covered program.
Secretary means the Secretary of U.S. Department of Agriculture.
State means each of the several States of the United States, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other
territory or possession of the United States.
State Conservationist means the NRCS employee authorized to direct
and supervise NRCS activities in a State or the State Conservationist's
designee.
Sec. 635.2 Applicability.
This part applies to all covered programs administered by the
Natural Resources Conservation Service, except for the Highly Erodible
Land and Wetland Conservation provisions of Title XII, subtitles B and
C of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 3811 et
seq.). Administration of this part shall be under the supervision of
the Chief, except that such authority shall not limit the exercise of
authority by State Conservationists of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service provided in Sec. 635.6 of this part.
Sec. 635.3 Reliance on incorrect actions or information.
The Chief may grant equitable relief to any participant that NRCS
determines is not in compliance with the requirements, terms and
conditions of a
[[Page 62441]]
covered program, and therefore ineligible for a payment, or other
benefit, if the participant--
(a) Acting in good faith, relied on action and advice from an NRCS
employee or representative of USDA to their detriment;
(b) Did not know or have sufficient reason to know that the action
or advice upon which they relied would be detrimental; and
(c) Did not act in reliance on their own misunderstanding or
misinterpretation of the program provisions, notices, or information.
Sec. 635.4 Failure to fully comply.
The Chief may grant equitable relief to any participant that NRCS
determines is not in full compliance with the requirements, terms and
conditions of a covered program, and therefore ineligible for a
payment, or other benefit, if the participant--
(a) Made a good faith effort to comply fully with the requirements;
and
(b) Rendered substantial performance.
Sec. 635.5 Forms of relief.
(a) The Chief may authorize a participant in a covered program to:
(1) Retain payments or other benefits received under the covered
program;
(2) Continue to receive payments and other benefits under the
covered program;
(3) Continue to participate, in whole or in part, under any
contract executed under the covered program;
(4) Re-enroll all or part of the land covered by the program; and
(5) Receive such other equitable relief as determined to be
appropriate.
(b) As a condition of receiving relief under this part, the
participant may be required to remedy their failure to meet the program
requirement or mitigate its effects.
Sec. 635.6 Equitable relief by State Conservationists.
(a) State Conservationists' Authority. State Conservationists have
the authority to grant requests for equitable relief under this section
when--
(1) The program matter with respect to which the relief is sought
is a program matter in a covered program operated within the authorized
jurisdiction of the State Conservationist;
(2) The total amount of relief (including payments and other
benefits) that will be provided to the participant under this section
during the fiscal year is less than $20,000;
(3) The total amount of such relief that has been previously
provided to the participant using this section in the fiscal year, as
calculated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, is not more than
$5,000;
(4) The total amount of payments and benefits of any kind for which
relief is provided to similarly situated participants by a State
Conservationist in a fiscal year, is not more than $1,000,000.
(b) Additional limits on authority. The authority provided under
this section does not extend to the administration of:
(1) Payment limitations under part 1400 of this title;
(2) Payment limitations under a conservation program administered
by the Secretary; or
(3) The highly erodible land and wetland conservation requirements
under subtitles B or C of Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985
(16 U.S.C. 3811 et seq.).
(c) Concurrence by the Office of the General Counsel. Relief shall
only be made under this part after consultation with, and concurrence
by, the Office of General Counsel.
(d) Secretary's reversal authority. A decision made under this part
by the State Conservationist may be reversed only by the Secretary, who
may not delegate that authority.
(e) Relation to other authorities. The authority provided under
this section is in addition to any other applicable authority that may
allow relief.
Sec. 635.7 Procedures for granting equitable relief.
(a) The Chief or State Conservationist may initiate a request for
equitable relief for a participant that meets the requirement of this
part.
(b) Participants may request equitable relief from the Chief or the
State Conservationist as provided in Sec. Sec. 635.3 and 635.4 of this
part.
(c) Only a participant directly affected by the non-compliance with
the covered program requirements is eligible for equitable relief under
this part.
(d) Requests by a participant for equitable relief must be made in
writing, no later than 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the
notification of non-compliance with the requirements of the covered
conservation program.
(e) Requests for equitable relief must include any information
necessary to determine eligibility under this part and such other
information as required by NRCS to determine whether granting equitable
relief is appropriate. Information needed by the agency to assess
equitable relief requests will be provided and updated by applicable
policy and procedure.
(f) If equitable relief is denied by the Chief or the State
Conservationist, the participant will be provided with written notice
of appeal rights to the National Appeals Division, pursuant to 7 CFR
part 614.
Signed this 7th day of October, 2015, in Washington, DC.
Leonard Jordan,
Associate Chief for Conservation, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-26309 Filed 10-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P