Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Risk Management Program Requirements and Petitions To Modify the List of Regulated Substances (Renewal), 62071-62072 [2015-26231]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
final registration review decision for
soap salts will depend upon the results
of an ESA section 7 consultation with
the services, an EDSP determination,
and an assessment of the non-target
exposure to bees.
Sulfur (Interim Decision). The
registration review docket for sulfur
(EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0176) opened in
March 2008. Sulfur is used as an
insecticide and fungicide on a wide
range of field and greenhouse-grown
food and feed crops, livestock, livestock
quarters, and indoor and outdoor
residential sites. Sulfur is also registered
for use in gas cartridge products, along
with inorganic nitrate/nitrite, carbon,
and carbon dioxide. EPA has conducted
a qualitative assessment for both human
health and ecological risks, including
listed species, for sulfur. Details of the
assessment for the gas cartridge use are
summarized under the gas cartridge
heading in this unit. For uses of sulfur
other than gas cartridges, the Agency is
making a ‘‘no effect’’ determination for
all listed aquatic species, and a ‘‘no
effect’’ determination for direct effects
to listed terrestrial vertebrates that do
not rely on insects as a primary food
source. However, at this time, the
Agency is not able to make a listed
species determination for effects to
terrestrial invertebrates, terrestrial
plants, or indirect effects to terrestrial
vertebrates with insects as a primary
food source. Sulfur has not been
evaluated under the EDSP. Therefore,
the Agency’s final registration review
decision is dependent upon the result of
an ESA Section 7 consultation with the
USFWS and the evaluation of potential
endocrine disruptor risk.
Case Closure for Flufenpyr-ethyl (PC
Code 108853; Case 7262). Flufenpyrethyl is an herbicide which was labeled
for post-emergence control of broadleaf
weeds in field corn, soybeans, and
sugarcane. On March 19, 2015, the
Agency received a request for voluntary
cancellation of flufenpyr-ethyl from the
technical and end-use product
registrant, Valent USA Corporation. EPA
subsequently issued a Federal Register
notice announcing receipt of the request
(FRL–9928–54) on July 8, 2015 (80 FR
39100), and allowed for a 30-day period
for public comment on the request. No
comments were received, and on
September 22, 2015, EPA issued the
cancellation order terminating the last
pesticide products containing flufenpyrethyl registered in the United States (80
FR 57179) (FRL–9933–58). There were
no existing stocks of these products and
no requests for existing stocks
provisions. Therefore no existing stocks
provision was provided for these
product registrations. With the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
cancellation of these remaining
products, the Agency is announcing the
closure of the registration review case
for flufenpyr-ethyl.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a
registration review decision is the
Agency’s determination whether a
pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA
has considered the pesticides listed in
light of the FIFRA standard for
registration. The interim decision
documents in the dockets describe the
Agency’s rationale for issuing
registration review interim decisions for
these pesticides.
In addition to the interim registration
review decision documents, the
registration review docket for these
pesticides also includes other relevant
documents related to the registration
review of these cases. The proposed
interim registration review decisions
were previously posted to each docket
and the public was invited to submit
any comments or new information.
EPA has addressed the substantive
comments or information received
during the 60-day comment period in
the interim decision document for each
pesticide listed in this document.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the
registration review case docket for each
pesticide discussed in this notice will
remain open until all actions required in
the interim decisions have been
completed.
Background on the registration review
program is provided at: https://
www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_
review. Links to earlier documents
related to the registration review of this
pesticide are provided in the Pesticide
Chemical Search data base accessible at:
https://iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/
f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: September 30, 2015.
Bernard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–26299 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62071
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0052; FRL–9935–45–
OEI]
Information Collection Request
Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Risk
Management Program Requirements
and Petitions To Modify the List of
Regulated Substances (Renewal)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency has submitted an information
collection request (ICR), ‘‘Risk
Management Program Requirements and
Petitions to Modify the List of Regulated
Substances under section 112(r) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA)’’ (EPA ICR No.
1656.15, OMB Control No. 2050–0144)
to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through
December 31, 2015. Public comments
were previously requested via the
Federal Register (80 FR 33518) on June
12, 2015 during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may
not conduct or sponsor and a person is
not required to respond to a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before November 16,
2015.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2003–0052, to (1) EPA online
using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail code: 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
62072
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 199 / Thursday, October 15, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Belke, Office of Emergency
Management, Mail Code 5104A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–564–
8023; fax number: 202–564–2625; email
address: belke.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will
be collecting are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Abstract: The 1990 CAA Amendments
added section 112(r) to provide for the
prevention and mitigation of accidental
releases. Section 112(r) mandates that
EPA promulgate a list of ‘‘regulated
substances’’ with threshold quantities
and establish procedures for the
addition and deletion of substances
from the list of regulated substances.
Processes at stationary sources that
contain more than a threshold quantity
of a regulated substance are subject to
accidental release prevention
regulations promulgated under CAA
section 112(r)(7). These two rules are
codified as 40 CFR part 68. Part 68
requires that sources with more than a
threshold quantity of a regulated
substance in a process develop and
implement a risk management program
and submit a risk management plan to
EPA. The compliance schedule for the
Part 68 requirements, established by
rule on June 20, 1996, requires the
implementation of the source risk
management programs and the
submission of initial Risk Management
Plans (RMPs) by June 21, 1999, and at
least every five years after the initial
submission. Sources must resubmit
earlier than their next five-year deadline
if they undergo certain changes to their
covered processes as specified in Part
68. Therefore, after the initial
submission, some sources re-submitted
their RMPs prior to the next 5-year
deadline because they had process
changes that required an earlier update.
These sources were then assigned a new
five-year resubmission deadline based
on the date of their revised plan
submission. Most covered sources had
no significant changes to their covered
processes and therefore resubmitted
their updated RMP on June 21, 2004.
This same pattern continued through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Oct 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
the next two submission cycles—some
sources updated and resubmitted their
RMP prior to their next five-year
deadline and were assigned a new (offcycle) five-year deadline, but a majority
of sources submitted their updated RMP
on or near the next scheduled five-year
resubmission deadlines (June 2009 and
June 2014). Similarly, while most
sources’ next submission is due in June
2019, because of off-cycle resubmission
deadlines assigned to sources who have
resubmitted RMPs prior to their next 5year resubmission date, only a portion
of the RMP-regulated universe has a
submission deadline occurring in June
2019.
Other than the costs for gathering
information and filling out the on-line
RMP form, the regulations require
sources to maintain on-site
documentation, perform a compliance
audit every three years, provide
refresher training to employees, perform
a hazard analysis at least every five
years, etc. Some of these activities are
expected to occur annually or are ongoing. Some are required every three
years or every five years, unless there
are changes at the facility. Therefore, the
burden and costs incurred by sources
vary from ICR to ICR. The five-year
resubmission deadline set by the
regulations or assigned by EPA based on
the latest RMP resubmission also will
cause the burden to vary from ICR to
ICR.
Form Numbers: 8700–25, 8700–27,
8700–28.
Respondents/affected entities:
Chemical manufacturers, petroleum
refineries, water treatment systems,
agricultural chemical distributors,
refrigerated warehouses, chemical
distributors, non-chemical
manufacturers, wholesale fuel
distributors, energy generation facilities,
etc.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR part 68).
Estimated number of respondents:
13,396 (total).
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Total estimated burden: 54,000 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b)
Total estimated cost: $6,680,625 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in the estimates: There is a
decrease of 26,546 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. The reason for this decrease is
because this ICR period does not
include a major filing deadline year and
the previous ICR did include a major
filing deadline. Second, the number of
sources subject to the regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
fluctuates regularly, and is lower in this
ICR period than in the previous ICR.
Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. 2015–26231 Filed 10–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
FDIC Advisory Committee on
Economic Inclusion (ComE–IN); Notice
of Meeting
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice
is hereby given of a meeting of the FDIC
Advisory Committee on Economic
Inclusion, which will be held in
Washington, DC. The Advisory
Committee will provide advice and
recommendations on initiatives to
expand access to banking services by
underserved populations.
DATES: Friday, October 30, 2015, from 9
a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the FDIC Board Room on the sixth floor
of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th
Street NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for further information
concerning the meeting may be directed
to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Committee
Management Officer of the FDIC, at
(202) 898–7043.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agenda: The agenda will be focused
on the Bank On 2.0 initiative, mobile
banking research, expanding economic
inclusion for individuals with
disabilities, and Money Smart for Small
Business. The agenda may be subject to
change. Any changes to the agenda will
be announced at the beginning of the
meeting.
Type of Meeting: The meeting will be
open to the public, limited only by the
space available on a first-come, firstserved basis. For security reasons,
members of the public will be subject to
security screening procedures and must
present a valid photo identification to
enter the building. The FDIC will
provide attendees with auxiliary aids
(e.g., sign language interpretation)
required for this meeting. Those
attendees needing such assistance
should call (703) 562–6067 (Voice or
TTY) at least two days before the
meeting to make necessary
arrangements. Written statements may
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15OCN1.SGM
15OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 199 (Thursday, October 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62071-62072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26231]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0052; FRL-9935-45-OEI]
Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Risk Management Program Requirements and
Petitions To Modify the List of Regulated Substances (Renewal)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``Risk Management Program
Requirements and Petitions to Modify the List of Regulated Substances
under section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)'' (EPA ICR No. 1656.15,
OMB Control No. 2050-0144) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through December 31, 2015. Public comments
were previously requested via the Federal Register (80 FR 33518) on
June 12, 2015 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR
is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before November 16,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2003-0052, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460, and (2) OMB via email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. Address
comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
[[Page 62072]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Belke, Office of Emergency
Management, Mail Code 5104A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-
8023; fax number: 202-564-2625; email address: belke.jim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is 202-566-1744. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Abstract: The 1990 CAA Amendments added section 112(r) to provide
for the prevention and mitigation of accidental releases. Section
112(r) mandates that EPA promulgate a list of ``regulated substances''
with threshold quantities and establish procedures for the addition and
deletion of substances from the list of regulated substances. Processes
at stationary sources that contain more than a threshold quantity of a
regulated substance are subject to accidental release prevention
regulations promulgated under CAA section 112(r)(7). These two rules
are codified as 40 CFR part 68. Part 68 requires that sources with more
than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in a process develop
and implement a risk management program and submit a risk management
plan to EPA. The compliance schedule for the Part 68 requirements,
established by rule on June 20, 1996, requires the implementation of
the source risk management programs and the submission of initial Risk
Management Plans (RMPs) by June 21, 1999, and at least every five years
after the initial submission. Sources must resubmit earlier than their
next five-year deadline if they undergo certain changes to their
covered processes as specified in Part 68. Therefore, after the initial
submission, some sources re-submitted their RMPs prior to the next 5-
year deadline because they had process changes that required an earlier
update. These sources were then assigned a new five-year resubmission
deadline based on the date of their revised plan submission. Most
covered sources had no significant changes to their covered processes
and therefore resubmitted their updated RMP on June 21, 2004. This same
pattern continued through the next two submission cycles--some sources
updated and resubmitted their RMP prior to their next five-year
deadline and were assigned a new (off-cycle) five-year deadline, but a
majority of sources submitted their updated RMP on or near the next
scheduled five-year resubmission deadlines (June 2009 and June 2014).
Similarly, while most sources' next submission is due in June 2019,
because of off-cycle resubmission deadlines assigned to sources who
have resubmitted RMPs prior to their next 5-year resubmission date,
only a portion of the RMP-regulated universe has a submission deadline
occurring in June 2019.
Other than the costs for gathering information and filling out the
on-line RMP form, the regulations require sources to maintain on-site
documentation, perform a compliance audit every three years, provide
refresher training to employees, perform a hazard analysis at least
every five years, etc. Some of these activities are expected to occur
annually or are on-going. Some are required every three years or every
five years, unless there are changes at the facility. Therefore, the
burden and costs incurred by sources vary from ICR to ICR. The five-
year resubmission deadline set by the regulations or assigned by EPA
based on the latest RMP resubmission also will cause the burden to vary
from ICR to ICR.
Form Numbers: 8700-25, 8700-27, 8700-28.
Respondents/affected entities: Chemical manufacturers, petroleum
refineries, water treatment systems, agricultural chemical
distributors, refrigerated warehouses, chemical distributors, non-
chemical manufacturers, wholesale fuel distributors, energy generation
facilities, etc.
Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 68).
Estimated number of respondents: 13,396 (total).
Frequency of response: On occasion.
Total estimated burden: 54,000 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b)
Total estimated cost: $6,680,625 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in the estimates: There is a decrease of 26,546 hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. The reason for this decrease is because this ICR
period does not include a major filing deadline year and the previous
ICR did include a major filing deadline. Second, the number of sources
subject to the regulations fluctuates regularly, and is lower in this
ICR period than in the previous ICR.
Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-26231 Filed 10-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P