Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 61392-61393 [2015-25950]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 61392 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices overall effectiveness, increase efficiency, and obtain valuable input from parents and students on new and existing policies and procedures. Data collection instruments to include burden hours and supporting documentation will be submitted to the DoD Clearance Officer and OMB for final approval as they become available. Affected Public: Individuals or households. Annual Burden Hours: 1,041. Number of Respondents: 2,500. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 2,500. Average Burden per Response: 25 minutes. Frequency: On occasion. The following categories will be included in this data collection. School procedures and policies. These data collections will gather information from DoDEA students and parents on issues related to the everyday operational processes and policies of the school. These data collections will include, but will not be limited to, information on the school calendar, school uniforms, school transportation, school lunch, school facilities (i.e., gymnasiums, cafeterias, and playgrounds. These data collections will allow DoDEA to immediately identify or determine the extent of student and parent concerns and to quickly gather suggestions for improvement from parents and students. School curriculum. These data collections will gather information from students and parents on the curricular availability and instructional practices in DoDEA schools. These data collections will include, but will not be limited to, course offerings, availability and use of curricular materials, instructional practices, and availability and use of educational technology. These data collections will also gather information on the perceived effectiveness of the school curriculum. Program effectiveness and operations. These data collections will gather opinions from students and parents on the provision, needs, and effectiveness of non-curricular programs and support services, such as counseling, special education services, gifted education, English as a Second Language Services, Physical and Occupational Therapy, and in-school medical services. These data collections will help assess the extent to which support services are available and accessible, as well as help determine the effectiveness and additional needs of support programs. Extra-curricular and co-curricular activities. These data collections will provide information from students and parents on the availability, VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 effectiveness, and perceived needs of school extra-curricular and co-curricular activities. These data collections will help determine the extent to which the athletic interests of DoDEA students are being met by the current offerings, and assess the effectiveness of such activities. These data collections will also help determine the extent to which the dramatic, artistic, musical, and academic interests of DoDEA students are being met, and determine the future needs of such programs. Dated: October 6, 2015. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2015–25817 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DoD–2013–OS–0100] Proposed Collection; Comment Request Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), DoD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 14, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Compliance, Regulatory and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–9010. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow the instructions at https:// www.regulations.gov for submitting comments. Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number, form number, and title. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Department of Defense Education Activity, ATTN: Dr. Sandra D. Embler, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203–1635, or call at (703) 588–3175. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) School Accreditation Parent and Student Surveys; OMB Control Number 0704– 0462. Needs and Uses: The Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) regulation 2010.1 (Accreditation Program) requires accreditation of all DoDEA schools in order to provide the activity, the military community served by the activity, and the public at large with an external review of the quality of the educational program provided to DoDEA students. DoDEA’s accreditation process is based on the processes and standards of the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI)/AdvancED. As part of the accreditation process, the interview team uses a worldwide standardized set of questions to gather data from students and parents to assess accreditation standards in the following areas: Vision and Purpose, Governance and Leadership, Teaching and Learning, Documenting and Using Results, Resources and Support Systems, Stakeholder Communications and Relationships, and Commitment to Continuous Improvement. E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices Affected public: Individuals or Households. Annual Burden Hours: 24. Number of Respondents: 32. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 32. Average Burden per Response: 45 minutes. Frequency: Annually. NCA CASI/AdvancED is the largest accreditation organization in the United States, covering 30 states and 65 countries. As part of the accreditation process, NCA CASI/AdvancED conducts Quality Assurance Review (QAR) visits to DoDEA schools in February and April of each year on a rotating schedule that ensures that each school is evaluated within a 5-year cycle. The visits are two days in length in order to gather data, information, and evidence to accomplish the following: • Evaluate adherence to the AdvancED standards; • Provide high quality feedback in the form of commendations and recommendations; and • Determine an accreditation status recommendation. The Quality Assurance Review team’s interview process includes students and parents/guardians. The purpose of the interview session is to help the Quality Assurance Review team gain a deeper understanding of the school improvement process. The review team uses the information to review how well each school is progressing, provide commendations on areas in which each school is excelling, and recommendations that will help each school continuously improve. The review team also uses the information gathered to make an accreditation status recommendation at the end of the visit. Dated: October 6, 2015. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2015–25950 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DoD–2011–OS–0126] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Collection; Comment Request Defense Security Service, DoD. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Defense Security Service announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:23 Oct 09, 2015 Jkt 238001 provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 14, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–9010. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow the instructions at https:// www.regulations.gov for submitting comments. Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number, form number, and title. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Defense Security Service, OCIO, Russell-Knox Building, 27130 Telegraph Road, Quantico, VA 22134–2253, or call Defense Security Service at (571) 305–6445. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: ‘‘Defense Security Service Industrial Security Review Data’’ and ‘‘Defense Security Service Industrial Security Facility Clearance Survey PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 61393 Data,’’ OMB Control Number 0704– 0427. Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary to assist in determining whether a contractor is eligible to establish its facility security clearance and/or retain its participation in the National Industrial Security Program (NISP). It is also the basis for verifying whether contractors are appropriately implementing NISP security requirements. These requirements are necessary in order to preserve and maintain the security of the United States through establishing standards to prevent the improper disclosure of classified information. In accordance with Department of Defense (DoD), 5220.22–R, ‘‘Industrial Security Regulation,’’ DSS is required to maintain a record of the results of surveys and security reviews. Documentation for each survey and/or security review will be compiled addressing areas applicable to the contractor’s security program. Portions of the data collected will be stored in databases. All data collected will be handled and marked ‘‘For Official Use Only.’’ Burden Information for ‘‘Industrial Security Review Data’’ Affected Public: Business or other for profit; Not-for-profit institutions. Annual Burden Hours: 32,606. Possessors of Classified: 20,818. Non-Possessors of Classified: 11,788. Number of Respondents: 9,822. Possessors of Classified: 3,928. Non-Possessors of Classified: 5,894. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 9,822. Possessors of Classified: 3,928. Non-Possessors of Classified: 5,894. Average Burden per Response: Varies. Possessors of Classified: 5.3 hours. Non-Possessors of Classified: 2 hours. Frequency: On occasion. Burden Information for ‘‘Facility Security Clearance Survey Data’’ Affected Public: Business or other for profit; Not-for-profit institutions. Annual Burden Hours: 5,664. Number of Respondents: 2,832. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 2,832. Average Burden per Response: 2 hours. Frequency: On occasion. Total Burden Information Annual Burden Hours: 38,270. Number of Respondents: 12.654. DSS is the office of record for the maintenance of information pertaining to contractor facility clearance records E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61392-61393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0100]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and 
Readiness), DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) 
announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public 
comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; 
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the 
information collection on respondents, including through the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
14, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief 
Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory 
and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
9010.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within 
this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow 
the instructions at https://www.regulations.gov for submitting comments. 
Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number, 
form number, and title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this 
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and 
associated collection instruments, please write to the Department of 
Defense Education Activity, ATTN: Dr. Sandra D. Embler, 4040 North 
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203-1635, or call at (703) 588-3175.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Department of Defense 
Education Activity (DoDEA) School Accreditation Parent and Student 
Surveys; OMB Control Number 0704-0462.
    Needs and Uses: The Department of Defense Education Activity 
(DoDEA) regulation 2010.1 (Accreditation Program) requires 
accreditation of all DoDEA schools in order to provide the activity, 
the military community served by the activity, and the public at large 
with an external review of the quality of the educational program 
provided to DoDEA students. DoDEA's accreditation process is based on 
the processes and standards of the North Central Association Commission 
on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI)/AdvancED. As part of 
the accreditation process, the interview team uses a worldwide 
standardized set of questions to gather data from students and parents 
to assess accreditation standards in the following areas: Vision and 
Purpose, Governance and Leadership, Teaching and Learning, Documenting 
and Using Results, Resources and Support Systems, Stakeholder 
Communications and Relationships, and Commitment to Continuous 
Improvement.

[[Page 61393]]

    Affected public: Individuals or Households.
    Annual Burden Hours: 24.
    Number of Respondents: 32.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 32.
    Average Burden per Response: 45 minutes.
    Frequency: Annually.
    NCA CASI/AdvancED is the largest accreditation organization in the 
United States, covering 30 states and 65 countries. As part of the 
accreditation process, NCA CASI/AdvancED conducts Quality Assurance 
Review (QAR) visits to DoDEA schools in February and April of each year 
on a rotating schedule that ensures that each school is evaluated 
within a 5-year cycle. The visits are two days in length in order to 
gather data, information, and evidence to accomplish the following:
     Evaluate adherence to the AdvancED standards;
     Provide high quality feedback in the form of commendations 
and recommendations; and
     Determine an accreditation status recommendation.
    The Quality Assurance Review team's interview process includes 
students and parents/guardians. The purpose of the interview session is 
to help the Quality Assurance Review team gain a deeper understanding 
of the school improvement process. The review team uses the information 
to review how well each school is progressing, provide commendations on 
areas in which each school is excelling, and recommendations that will 
help each school continuously improve. The review team also uses the 
information gathered to make an accreditation status recommendation at 
the end of the visit.

    Dated: October 6, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015-25950 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.