Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 61392-61393 [2015-25950]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
61392
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
overall effectiveness, increase
efficiency, and obtain valuable input
from parents and students on new and
existing policies and procedures. Data
collection instruments to include
burden hours and supporting
documentation will be submitted to the
DoD Clearance Officer and OMB for
final approval as they become available.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Annual Burden Hours: 1,041.
Number of Respondents: 2,500.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 2,500.
Average Burden per Response: 25
minutes.
Frequency: On occasion.
The following categories will be
included in this data collection.
School procedures and policies.
These data collections will gather
information from DoDEA students and
parents on issues related to the everyday
operational processes and policies of the
school. These data collections will
include, but will not be limited to,
information on the school calendar,
school uniforms, school transportation,
school lunch, school facilities (i.e.,
gymnasiums, cafeterias, and
playgrounds. These data collections will
allow DoDEA to immediately identify or
determine the extent of student and
parent concerns and to quickly gather
suggestions for improvement from
parents and students.
School curriculum. These data
collections will gather information from
students and parents on the curricular
availability and instructional practices
in DoDEA schools. These data
collections will include, but will not be
limited to, course offerings, availability
and use of curricular materials,
instructional practices, and availability
and use of educational technology.
These data collections will also gather
information on the perceived
effectiveness of the school curriculum.
Program effectiveness and operations.
These data collections will gather
opinions from students and parents on
the provision, needs, and effectiveness
of non-curricular programs and support
services, such as counseling, special
education services, gifted education,
English as a Second Language Services,
Physical and Occupational Therapy,
and in-school medical services. These
data collections will help assess the
extent to which support services are
available and accessible, as well as help
determine the effectiveness and
additional needs of support programs.
Extra-curricular and co-curricular
activities. These data collections will
provide information from students and
parents on the availability,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:23 Oct 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
effectiveness, and perceived needs of
school extra-curricular and co-curricular
activities. These data collections will
help determine the extent to which the
athletic interests of DoDEA students are
being met by the current offerings, and
assess the effectiveness of such
activities. These data collections will
also help determine the extent to which
the dramatic, artistic, musical, and
academic interests of DoDEA students
are being met, and determine the future
needs of such programs.
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–25817 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2013–OS–0100]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Personnel and Readiness),
DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense
(Personnel and Readiness) announces a
proposed public information collection
and seeks public comment on the
provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by December 14,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Any associated form(s) for this
collection may be located within this
same electronic docket and downloaded
for review/testing. Follow the
instructions at https://
www.regulations.gov for submitting
comments. Please submit comments on
any given form identified by docket
number, form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Department of
Defense Education Activity, ATTN: Dr.
Sandra D. Embler, 4040 North Fairfax
Drive, Arlington, VA 22203–1635, or
call at (703) 588–3175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Department of Defense
Education Activity (DoDEA) School
Accreditation Parent and Student
Surveys; OMB Control Number 0704–
0462.
Needs and Uses: The Department of
Defense Education Activity (DoDEA)
regulation 2010.1 (Accreditation
Program) requires accreditation of all
DoDEA schools in order to provide the
activity, the military community served
by the activity, and the public at large
with an external review of the quality of
the educational program provided to
DoDEA students. DoDEA’s accreditation
process is based on the processes and
standards of the North Central
Association Commission on
Accreditation and School Improvement
(NCA CASI)/AdvancED. As part of the
accreditation process, the interview
team uses a worldwide standardized set
of questions to gather data from students
and parents to assess accreditation
standards in the following areas: Vision
and Purpose, Governance and
Leadership, Teaching and Learning,
Documenting and Using Results,
Resources and Support Systems,
Stakeholder Communications and
Relationships, and Commitment to
Continuous Improvement.
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
Affected public: Individuals or
Households.
Annual Burden Hours: 24.
Number of Respondents: 32.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 32.
Average Burden per Response: 45
minutes.
Frequency: Annually.
NCA CASI/AdvancED is the largest
accreditation organization in the United
States, covering 30 states and 65
countries. As part of the accreditation
process, NCA CASI/AdvancED conducts
Quality Assurance Review (QAR) visits
to DoDEA schools in February and April
of each year on a rotating schedule that
ensures that each school is evaluated
within a 5-year cycle. The visits are two
days in length in order to gather data,
information, and evidence to
accomplish the following:
• Evaluate adherence to the
AdvancED standards;
• Provide high quality feedback in the
form of commendations and
recommendations; and
• Determine an accreditation status
recommendation.
The Quality Assurance Review team’s
interview process includes students and
parents/guardians. The purpose of the
interview session is to help the Quality
Assurance Review team gain a deeper
understanding of the school
improvement process. The review team
uses the information to review how well
each school is progressing, provide
commendations on areas in which each
school is excelling, and
recommendations that will help each
school continuously improve. The
review team also uses the information
gathered to make an accreditation status
recommendation at the end of the visit.
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–25950 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2011–OS–0126]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Defense Security Service, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Defense Security Service announces a
proposed public information collection
and seeks public comment on the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:23 Oct 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by December 14,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Any associated form(s) for this
collection may be located within this
same electronic docket and downloaded
for review/testing. Follow the
instructions at https://
www.regulations.gov for submitting
comments. Please submit comments on
any given form identified by docket
number, form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Security
Service, OCIO, Russell-Knox Building,
27130 Telegraph Road, Quantico, VA
22134–2253, or call Defense Security
Service at (571) 305–6445.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: ‘‘Defense Security Service
Industrial Security Review Data’’ and
‘‘Defense Security Service Industrial
Security Facility Clearance Survey
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61393
Data,’’ OMB Control Number 0704–
0427.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is necessary to
assist in determining whether a
contractor is eligible to establish its
facility security clearance and/or retain
its participation in the National
Industrial Security Program (NISP). It is
also the basis for verifying whether
contractors are appropriately
implementing NISP security
requirements. These requirements are
necessary in order to preserve and
maintain the security of the United
States through establishing standards to
prevent the improper disclosure of
classified information.
In accordance with Department of
Defense (DoD), 5220.22–R, ‘‘Industrial
Security Regulation,’’ DSS is required to
maintain a record of the results of
surveys and security reviews.
Documentation for each survey and/or
security review will be compiled
addressing areas applicable to the
contractor’s security program. Portions
of the data collected will be stored in
databases. All data collected will be
handled and marked ‘‘For Official Use
Only.’’
Burden Information for ‘‘Industrial
Security Review Data’’
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit; Not-for-profit institutions.
Annual Burden Hours: 32,606.
Possessors of Classified: 20,818.
Non-Possessors of Classified: 11,788.
Number of Respondents: 9,822.
Possessors of Classified: 3,928.
Non-Possessors of Classified: 5,894.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 9,822.
Possessors of Classified: 3,928.
Non-Possessors of Classified: 5,894.
Average Burden per Response: Varies.
Possessors of Classified: 5.3 hours.
Non-Possessors of Classified: 2 hours.
Frequency: On occasion.
Burden Information for ‘‘Facility
Security Clearance Survey Data’’
Affected Public: Business or other for
profit; Not-for-profit institutions.
Annual Burden Hours: 5,664.
Number of Respondents: 2,832.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 2,832.
Average Burden per Response: 2
hours.
Frequency: On occasion.
Total Burden Information
Annual Burden Hours: 38,270.
Number of Respondents: 12.654.
DSS is the office of record for the
maintenance of information pertaining
to contractor facility clearance records
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61392-61393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD-2013-OS-0100]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and
Readiness), DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness)
announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public
comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December
14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief
Management Officer, Directorate of Oversight and Compliance, Regulatory
and Audit Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
9010.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
Any associated form(s) for this collection may be located within
this same electronic docket and downloaded for review/testing. Follow
the instructions at https://www.regulations.gov for submitting comments.
Please submit comments on any given form identified by docket number,
form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments, please write to the Department of
Defense Education Activity, ATTN: Dr. Sandra D. Embler, 4040 North
Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203-1635, or call at (703) 588-3175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Department of Defense
Education Activity (DoDEA) School Accreditation Parent and Student
Surveys; OMB Control Number 0704-0462.
Needs and Uses: The Department of Defense Education Activity
(DoDEA) regulation 2010.1 (Accreditation Program) requires
accreditation of all DoDEA schools in order to provide the activity,
the military community served by the activity, and the public at large
with an external review of the quality of the educational program
provided to DoDEA students. DoDEA's accreditation process is based on
the processes and standards of the North Central Association Commission
on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA CASI)/AdvancED. As part of
the accreditation process, the interview team uses a worldwide
standardized set of questions to gather data from students and parents
to assess accreditation standards in the following areas: Vision and
Purpose, Governance and Leadership, Teaching and Learning, Documenting
and Using Results, Resources and Support Systems, Stakeholder
Communications and Relationships, and Commitment to Continuous
Improvement.
[[Page 61393]]
Affected public: Individuals or Households.
Annual Burden Hours: 24.
Number of Respondents: 32.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 32.
Average Burden per Response: 45 minutes.
Frequency: Annually.
NCA CASI/AdvancED is the largest accreditation organization in the
United States, covering 30 states and 65 countries. As part of the
accreditation process, NCA CASI/AdvancED conducts Quality Assurance
Review (QAR) visits to DoDEA schools in February and April of each year
on a rotating schedule that ensures that each school is evaluated
within a 5-year cycle. The visits are two days in length in order to
gather data, information, and evidence to accomplish the following:
Evaluate adherence to the AdvancED standards;
Provide high quality feedback in the form of commendations
and recommendations; and
Determine an accreditation status recommendation.
The Quality Assurance Review team's interview process includes
students and parents/guardians. The purpose of the interview session is
to help the Quality Assurance Review team gain a deeper understanding
of the school improvement process. The review team uses the information
to review how well each school is progressing, provide commendations on
areas in which each school is excelling, and recommendations that will
help each school continuously improve. The review team also uses the
information gathered to make an accreditation status recommendation at
the end of the visit.
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015-25950 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P