Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 61379-61381 [2015-25866]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
encased in plastic cylinders that record
the depth, temperature or other data,
which can be downloaded electronically
from the recovered tags. The groundfish
tagging and tag recovery program is part
of the fishery resource assessment and
data collection that the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) conducts
under the Magnuson-Stevens Act
authority as codified in 16 U.S.C.
1801 (a)(8).
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
II. Method of Collection
RIN 0648–XE231
This is a volunteer program requiring
the actual tag from the fish to be
returned, along with recovery
information. Reporting forms with preaddressed and postage-free envelopes
are distributed to processors and catcher
vessels.
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0276.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a currently approved
collection).
Affected Public: Not-for-profit
institutions; State, local, or tribal
government; business or other for-profit
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
265.
Estimated Time per Response: 5
minutes for returning a regular tag, and
20 minutes for returning an internal
archival tag.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 59.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:23 Oct 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2015–25848 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
We, NMFS, announce that the
Proposed Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho
Salmon (Proposed Plan) is available for
public review and comment. The
Proposed Plan addresses the Oregon
Coast Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus
kisutch) evolutionarily significant unit
(ESU) listed as threatened under the
ESA. The geographic area covered by
the Proposed Plan is the Pacific Ocean
and freshwater habitat (rivers, streams
and lakes) from the Necanicum River
near Seaside, Oregon, on the northern
end to the Sixes River near Port Orford,
Oregon on the south. As required under
the ESA, the Proposed Plan contains
objective, measurable delisting criteria,
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the Proposed
Plan’s goals, and estimates of the time
and costs required to implement
recovery actions. We are soliciting
review and comment from the public
and all interested parties on the
Proposed Plan.
DATES: We will consider and address, as
appropriate, all substantive comments
received during the comment period.
Comments on the Proposed Plan must
be received no later than 5 p.m. Pacific
daylight time on December 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the Public Draft Recovery Plan by the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via:
2015CohoPlan.WCR@noaa.gov. Please
include ‘‘Comments on Oregon Coast
Coho Salmon Recovery Plan’’ in the
subject line of the email.
• Facsimile: (503) 872–2737.
• Mail: Robert Walton, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1201 NE.
Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland,
OR 97232.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61379
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure comments are received,
documented, and considered by NMFS.
Comments sent by any other method, to
any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period, may not be considered.
Attachments to electronic comments
will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Proposed Plan
are available on the NMFS Web site at:
https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/salmon_steelhead/
recovery_planning_and_
implementation/oregon_coast/oregon_
coast_recovery_plan.html. Persons
wishing to obtain an electronic copy on
CD ROM of the Proposed Plan may do
so by calling Nancy Johnson at (503)
230–5442 or by emailing a request to
nancy.johnson@noaa.gov with the
subject line ‘‘CD ROM Request for
Oregon Coast Coho Salmon Recovery
Plan.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Walton, NMFS Oregon Coast
Coho Salmon Recovery Coordinator, at
(503) 231–2285, or rob.walton@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are responsible for developing and
implementing recovery plans for Pacific
salmon and steelhead listed under the
ESA of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). Recovery means that the
listed species and their ecosystems are
sufficiently restored, and their future
secured, to the point that the protections
of the ESA are no longer necessary.
Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that
recovery plans include, to the maximum
extent practicable: (1) Objective,
measurable criteria which, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to
achieve the plan’s goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs
to implement recovery actions. The ESA
requires the development of recovery
plans for each listed species unless such
a plan would not promote its recovery.
We believe it is essential to have local
support of recovery plans by those
whose activities directly affect the listed
species and whose continued
commitment and leadership will be
needed to implement the necessary
recovery actions. We therefore support
and participate in locally led,
collaborative efforts to develop recovery
plans that involve state, tribal, and
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
61380
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal entities, local communities, and
other stakeholders. We have determined
that this Proposed ESA Recovery Plan
for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon meets
the statutory requirements for a recovery
plan and are proposing to adopt it as the
ESA recovery plan for this threatened
species. Section 4(f) of the ESA, as
amended in 1988, requires that public
notice and an opportunity for public
review and comment be provided prior
to final approval of a recovery plan.
This notice solicits comments on this
Proposed Plan.
Development of the Proposed Plan
For the purpose of recovery planning
for the ESA-listed species of Pacific
salmon and steelhead in Idaho, Oregon
and Washington, NMFS designated five
geographically based ‘‘recovery
domains.’’ The Oregon Coast Coho
Salmon ESU spawning range is in the
Oregon Coast domain. For each domain,
NMFS appointed a team of scientists,
nominated for their geographic and
species expertise, to provide a solid
scientific foundation for recovery plans.
The Oregon and Northern California
Coasts Technical Recovery Team (TRT)
included scientists from NMFS, other
Federal agencies, the state of Oregon,
and the private sector.
A primary task for the Oregon and
Northern California Coasts Technical
Recovery Team was to recommend
criteria for determining when the ESU
should be considered viable (i.e., when
they are have a low risk of extinction
over a 100-year period) and when the
ESU would have a risk of extinction
consistent with no longer needing the
protections of the ESA. All Technical
Recovery Teams used the same
biological principles for developing
their recommendations; these principles
are described in the NOAA technical
memorandum Viable Salmonid
Populations and the Recovery of
Evolutionarily Significant Units
(McElhany et al., 2000). Viable
salmonid populations (VSP) are defined
in terms of four parameters: abundance,
productivity or growth rate, spatial
structure, and diversity.
For this Proposed Plan, we
collaborated with state, tribal and
Federal scientists and resource
managers and stakeholders to provide
technical information that NMFS used
to write the Proposed Plan which is
built upon locally-led recovery efforts.
The Proposed Plan, including the
recovery plan modules, is now available
for public review and comment.
Contents of Proposed Plan
The Proposed Plan contains biological
background and contextual information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:23 Oct 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
that includes description of the ESU, the
planning area, and the context of the
plan’s development. It presents relevant
information on ESU structure, biological
status and proposed biological viability
criteria and threats criteria for delisting.
The Proposed Plan also describes
specific information on the following:
Current status of Oregon Coast Coho
Salmon; limiting factors and threats for
the full life cycle that contributed to the
species decline; recovery strategies and
actions addressing these limiting factors
and threats; key information needs, and
a proposed research, monitoring, and
evaluation program for adaptive
management. For recovery strategies
and actions, Chapter 6 in the Proposed
Plan includes proposed actions at the
ESU and strata levels. Population level
information will be posted on the
recovery plan Web site (see below). The
plan also describes how
implementation, prioritization of
actions, and adaptive management will
proceed at the population, strata, and
ESU scales. The Proposed Plan also
summarizes time and costs (Chapter 7)
required to implement recovery actions.
In addition to the information in the
Proposed Plan, readers are referred to
the recovery plan Web site for more
information on all these topics. (https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/salmon_steelhead/
recovery_planning_and_
implementation/oregon_coast/oregon_
coast_salmon_recovery_domain.html)
How NMFS and Others Expect To Use
the Plan
With approval of the final Plan, we
will commit to implement the actions in
the Plan for which we have authority
and funding; encourage other Federal
and state agencies and tribal
governments to implement recovery
actions for which they have
responsibility, authority and funding;
and work cooperatively with the public
and local stakeholders on
implementation of other actions. We
expect the Plan to guide us and other
Federal agencies in evaluating Federal
actions under ESA section 7, as well as
in implementing other provisions of the
ESA and other statutes. For example,
the Plan will provide greater biological
context for evaluating the effects that a
proposed action may have on a species
by providing delisting criteria,
information on priority areas for
addressing specific limiting factors, and
information on how future populations
within the ESU can tolerate varying
levels of risk.
When we are considering a species for
delisting, the agency will examine
whether the section 4(a)(1) listing
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
factors have been addressed. To assist in
this examination, we will use the
delisting criteria described in Chapter 4
of the Plan, which includes both
biological criteria and criteria
addressing each of the ESA section
4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as any
other relevant data and policy
considerations.
We will also work with the Oregon
Coast Coho Conservation Plan
Implementation Team described in the
Proposed Plan to develop
implementation schedules that provide
greater specificity for recovery actions to
be implemented over three-to five-year
periods. This Team will also help
promote implementation of recovery
actions and subsequent implementation
schedules, and will track and report on
implementation progress.
Conclusion
Section 4(f)(1)(B) of the ESA requires
that recovery plans incorporate, to the
maximum extent practicable, (1)
objective, measurable criteria which,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time required
and costs to implement recovery
actions. We conclude that the Proposed
Plan meets the requirements of ESA
section 4(f) and are proposing to adopt
it as the ESA Recovery Plan for Oregon
Coast Coho Salmon.
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting written comments
on the Proposed Plan. All substantive
comments received by the date specified
above will be considered and
incorporated, as appropriate, prior to
our decision whether to approve the
plan. We will issue a news release
announcing the adoption and
availability of the final plan. We will
post on the NMFS West Coast Region
Web site (www.wcr.noaa.gov) a
summary of, and responses to, the
comments received, along with
electronic copies of the final plan and
its appendices.
Literature Cited
McElhany, P., M.H. Ruckelshaus, M.J. Ford,
T.C. Wainwright, and E.P. Bjorkstedt.
2000. Viable salmon populations and the
recovery of evolutionarily significant
units. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA
Tech. Memo., NMFS NWFSC 42, 156 p.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 197 / Tuesday, October 13, 2015 / Notices
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–25866 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF–2013–0032]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION:
Notice.
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Department of the Air Force announces
a proposed public information
collection and seeks public comment on
the provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by December 14,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
Officer, Directorate of Oversight and
Compliance, Regulatory and Audit
Matters Office, 9010 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–9010.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:23 Oct 09, 2015
Jkt 238001
Any associated form(s) for this
collection may be located within this
same electronic docket and downloaded
for review/testing. Follow the
instructions at https://
www.regulations.gov for submitting
comments. Please submit comments on
any given form identified by docket
number, form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to Separation and
Retirement Division (DPSOR), Air Force
Personnel Center, ATTN: Gail Weber,
550 C Street West, Suite 3, Joint Base
San Antonio, TX 78150–4713 or call
210–565–2461.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title;
Associated Form; and OMB Number:
Request for Approval of Foreign
Government Employment of Air Force
Members; OMB Control Number 0701–
0134.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is to obtain the
information needed by the Secretary of
the Air Force and Secretary of State on
which to base a decision to approve/
disapprove a request to work for a
foreign government. This approval is
specified by Title 37, United States
Code, Section 908. This statute
delegates such approval authority of
Congress to the respective service
secretaries and to the Secretary of State.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
Annual Burden Hours: 10.
Number of Respondents: 10.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 10.
Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondents are Air Force retired
members and certain Reserve members
who have gained jobs with a foreign
government and who must obtain
approval of the Secretary of the Air
Force and Secretary of State to do so.
Information, in the form of a letter,
includes a detailed description of duty,
name of employer, Social Security
Number, and statements specifying
whether or not the employee will be
compensated; declaring if the employee
will be required or plans to obtain
foreign citizenship; declaring that the
member will not be required to execute
an oath of allegiance to the foreign
government; verifying that the member
understands that that retired pay
equivalent to the amount received from
the foreign government may be withheld
if he or she accepts employment with a
foreign government before receiving
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61381
approval. Reserve members only must
include a request to be reassigned to
Inactive Status List Reserve Section
(Reserve Section Code RB). After
verifying the status of the individual,
the letter is forwarded to the Air Force
Review Board for processing. If the
signed letter is not included in the file,
individuals reviewing the file cannot
furnish the necessary information to the
Secretary of the Air Force and Secretary
of State on which a decision can be
made. Requested information is
necessary to maintain the integrity of
the Request for Approval of Foreign
Government Employment Program.
Dated: October 5, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–25908 Filed 10–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID USAF–2014–0014]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION:
Notice.
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Department of the Air Force announces
a proposed public information
collection and seeks public comment on
the provisions thereof. Comments are
invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by December 14,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Deputy Chief Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM
13OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 197 (Tuesday, October 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61379-61381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25866]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE231
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce that the Proposed Endangered Species Act
(ESA) Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon (Proposed Plan) is
available for public review and comment. The Proposed Plan addresses
the Oregon Coast Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) evolutionarily
significant unit (ESU) listed as threatened under the ESA. The
geographic area covered by the Proposed Plan is the Pacific Ocean and
freshwater habitat (rivers, streams and lakes) from the Necanicum River
near Seaside, Oregon, on the northern end to the Sixes River near Port
Orford, Oregon on the south. As required under the ESA, the Proposed
Plan contains objective, measurable delisting criteria, site-specific
management actions necessary to achieve the Proposed Plan's goals, and
estimates of the time and costs required to implement recovery actions.
We are soliciting review and comment from the public and all interested
parties on the Proposed Plan.
DATES: We will consider and address, as appropriate, all substantive
comments received during the comment period. Comments on the Proposed
Plan must be received no later than 5 p.m. Pacific daylight time on
December 14, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the Public Draft Recovery Plan by
the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via: 2015CohoPlan.WCR@noaa.gov. Please include ``Comments on
Oregon Coast Coho Salmon Recovery Plan'' in the subject line of the
email.
Facsimile: (503) 872-2737.
Mail: Robert Walton, National Marine Fisheries Service,
1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure comments are received, documented, and considered by
NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be
considered. Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Proposed Plan are available on the NMFS
Web site at: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/salmon_steelhead/recovery_planning_and_implementation/oregon_coast/oregon_coast_recovery_plan.html. Persons wishing to obtain an
electronic copy on CD ROM of the Proposed Plan may do so by calling
Nancy Johnson at (503) 230-5442 or by emailing a request to
nancy.johnson@noaa.gov with the subject line ``CD ROM Request for
Oregon Coast Coho Salmon Recovery Plan.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Walton, NMFS Oregon Coast Coho
Salmon Recovery Coordinator, at (503) 231-2285, or rob.walton@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We are responsible for developing and implementing recovery plans
for Pacific salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Recovery means that the listed
species and their ecosystems are sufficiently restored, and their
future secured, to the point that the protections of the ESA are no
longer necessary. Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that recovery
plans include, to the maximum extent practicable: (1) Objective,
measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a determination
that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-
specific management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and
(3) estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery.
We believe it is essential to have local support of recovery plans
by those whose activities directly affect the listed species and whose
continued commitment and leadership will be needed to implement the
necessary recovery actions. We therefore support and participate in
locally led, collaborative efforts to develop recovery plans that
involve state, tribal, and
[[Page 61380]]
Federal entities, local communities, and other stakeholders. We have
determined that this Proposed ESA Recovery Plan for Oregon Coast Coho
Salmon meets the statutory requirements for a recovery plan and are
proposing to adopt it as the ESA recovery plan for this threatened
species. Section 4(f) of the ESA, as amended in 1988, requires that
public notice and an opportunity for public review and comment be
provided prior to final approval of a recovery plan. This notice
solicits comments on this Proposed Plan.
Development of the Proposed Plan
For the purpose of recovery planning for the ESA-listed species of
Pacific salmon and steelhead in Idaho, Oregon and Washington, NMFS
designated five geographically based ``recovery domains.'' The Oregon
Coast Coho Salmon ESU spawning range is in the Oregon Coast domain. For
each domain, NMFS appointed a team of scientists, nominated for their
geographic and species expertise, to provide a solid scientific
foundation for recovery plans. The Oregon and Northern California
Coasts Technical Recovery Team (TRT) included scientists from NMFS,
other Federal agencies, the state of Oregon, and the private sector.
A primary task for the Oregon and Northern California Coasts
Technical Recovery Team was to recommend criteria for determining when
the ESU should be considered viable (i.e., when they are have a low
risk of extinction over a 100-year period) and when the ESU would have
a risk of extinction consistent with no longer needing the protections
of the ESA. All Technical Recovery Teams used the same biological
principles for developing their recommendations; these principles are
described in the NOAA technical memorandum Viable Salmonid Populations
and the Recovery of Evolutionarily Significant Units (McElhany et al.,
2000). Viable salmonid populations (VSP) are defined in terms of four
parameters: abundance, productivity or growth rate, spatial structure,
and diversity.
For this Proposed Plan, we collaborated with state, tribal and
Federal scientists and resource managers and stakeholders to provide
technical information that NMFS used to write the Proposed Plan which
is built upon locally-led recovery efforts.
The Proposed Plan, including the recovery plan modules, is now
available for public review and comment.
Contents of Proposed Plan
The Proposed Plan contains biological background and contextual
information that includes description of the ESU, the planning area,
and the context of the plan's development. It presents relevant
information on ESU structure, biological status and proposed biological
viability criteria and threats criteria for delisting.
The Proposed Plan also describes specific information on the
following: Current status of Oregon Coast Coho Salmon; limiting factors
and threats for the full life cycle that contributed to the species
decline; recovery strategies and actions addressing these limiting
factors and threats; key information needs, and a proposed research,
monitoring, and evaluation program for adaptive management. For
recovery strategies and actions, Chapter 6 in the Proposed Plan
includes proposed actions at the ESU and strata levels. Population
level information will be posted on the recovery plan Web site (see
below). The plan also describes how implementation, prioritization of
actions, and adaptive management will proceed at the population,
strata, and ESU scales. The Proposed Plan also summarizes time and
costs (Chapter 7) required to implement recovery actions. In addition
to the information in the Proposed Plan, readers are referred to the
recovery plan Web site for more information on all these topics.
(https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/salmon_steelhead/recovery_planning_and_implementation/oregon_coast/oregon_coast_salmon_recovery_domain.html)
How NMFS and Others Expect To Use the Plan
With approval of the final Plan, we will commit to implement the
actions in the Plan for which we have authority and funding; encourage
other Federal and state agencies and tribal governments to implement
recovery actions for which they have responsibility, authority and
funding; and work cooperatively with the public and local stakeholders
on implementation of other actions. We expect the Plan to guide us and
other Federal agencies in evaluating Federal actions under ESA section
7, as well as in implementing other provisions of the ESA and other
statutes. For example, the Plan will provide greater biological context
for evaluating the effects that a proposed action may have on a species
by providing delisting criteria, information on priority areas for
addressing specific limiting factors, and information on how future
populations within the ESU can tolerate varying levels of risk.
When we are considering a species for delisting, the agency will
examine whether the section 4(a)(1) listing factors have been
addressed. To assist in this examination, we will use the delisting
criteria described in Chapter 4 of the Plan, which includes both
biological criteria and criteria addressing each of the ESA section
4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as any other relevant data and policy
considerations.
We will also work with the Oregon Coast Coho Conservation Plan
Implementation Team described in the Proposed Plan to develop
implementation schedules that provide greater specificity for recovery
actions to be implemented over three-to five-year periods. This Team
will also help promote implementation of recovery actions and
subsequent implementation schedules, and will track and report on
implementation progress.
Conclusion
Section 4(f)(1)(B) of the ESA requires that recovery plans
incorporate, to the maximum extent practicable, (1) objective,
measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a determination
that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-
specific management actions necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and
(3) estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery
actions. We conclude that the Proposed Plan meets the requirements of
ESA section 4(f) and are proposing to adopt it as the ESA Recovery Plan
for Oregon Coast Coho Salmon.
Public Comments Solicited
We are soliciting written comments on the Proposed Plan. All
substantive comments received by the date specified above will be
considered and incorporated, as appropriate, prior to our decision
whether to approve the plan. We will issue a news release announcing
the adoption and availability of the final plan. We will post on the
NMFS West Coast Region Web site (www.wcr.noaa.gov) a summary of, and
responses to, the comments received, along with electronic copies of
the final plan and its appendices.
Literature Cited
McElhany, P., M.H. Ruckelshaus, M.J. Ford, T.C. Wainwright, and E.P.
Bjorkstedt. 2000. Viable salmon populations and the recovery of
evolutionarily significant units. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech.
Memo., NMFS NWFSC 42, 156 p.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
[[Page 61381]]
Dated: October 6, 2015.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-25866 Filed 10-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P