Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 61118-61122 [2015-25690]
Download as PDF
61118
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 196 / Friday, October 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2))
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 21, 2015.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Subpart U—Maine
2. In § 52.1020(c), the table is
amended by adding new state citations
for Chapter 149 and Chapter 164 in
numerical order and revising footnote 1
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MAINE REGULATIONS
EPA approval date EPA
approval date
and citation 1
State effective
date
State citation
Title/subject
*
Chapter 149 ............
*
*
General Permit Regulation for
Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants.
04/27/2014
*
*
10/9/2015, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
All of Chapter 149 is approved with the
exception of the ‘‘director discretion’’
provisions in sections 5(A)(8),
5(A)(9)(a), and 5(A)(9)(b), and the
opacity provisions in sections
5(A)(15), 5(C)(7), and 5(E), which
were formally withdrawn from consideration as part of the SIP.
*
Chapter 164 ............
*
*
General Permit Regulation for
Concrete Batch Plants.
04/27/2014
*
*
10/9/2015, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
All of Chapter 164 is approved with the
exception of the ‘‘director discretion’’
provisions in sections 5(C)(2),
5(C)(3)(a), and 5(C)(3)(b), and the
opacity provisions in sections
5(A)(10), 5(B)(3), 5(B)(4), 5(E),
5(F)(5) and 5(G)(4), which were formally withdrawn from consideration
as part of the SIP.
*
*
*
*
Explanations
*
*
*
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
[FR Doc. 2015–25446 Filed 10–8–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0043; FRL–9934–74]
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene;
Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of trans-1,3,3,3-
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Oct 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No.
29118–24–9) when used as an inert
ingredient (propellant) in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops,
raw agricultural commodities after
harvest, and animals, and when used as
an inert ingredient in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations for food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions. The Acta
Group, L.L.C. on behalf of Honeywell
International, Inc. submitted a petition
to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting
establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This regulation is effective
October 9, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before December 8, 2015, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0043, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 196 / Friday, October 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2012–0043 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before December 8, 2015. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Oct 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2012–0043, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of April 4,
2012 (77 FR 20334) (FRL–9340–4), EPA
issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing
the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
1E7938) by The Acta Group, L.L.C.
(2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite
100W, Washington, DC 20037) on behalf
of Honeywell International, Inc., 101
Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ 07962.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.910, 180.930 and 180.940(a) be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9) when
used as an inert ingredient (propellant)
in pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops, raw agricultural
commodities after harvest, and animals,
and when used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations for
food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions, respectively. That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by The Acta Group, L.L.C. on
behalf of Honeywell International, Inc.,
the petitioner, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61119
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
appreciable risks to human health. In
order to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the
toxicity of the inert in conjunction with
possible exposure to residues of the
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
61120
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 196 / Friday, October 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
inert ingredient through food, drinking
water, and through other exposures that
occur as a result of pesticide use in
residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a finite tolerance is not
necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
inert ingredient, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance may be
established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene including
exposure resulting from the exemption
established by this action. EPA’s
assessment of exposures and risks
associated with trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as
well as the no-observed-adverse-effectlevel (NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies are discussed in this
unit.
Acute inhalation toxicity is low for
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene.
Acute inhalation LD50s are >101,850
parts per million (ppm); approximately
713 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) in rats
and mice. Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop1-ene is not a dermal irritant in rabbits
or a sensitizer in humans.
Two subchronic toxicity studies via
the inhalation route of exposure are
available for trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene in rodents.
Toxicity is not observed in rats or mice
at doses as high as 5,000 ppm
(approximately equivalent to 7,800
milligram/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day)
human equivalent dose) following 13
weeks and 90 days of exposure,
respectively. The 90-day inhalation
toxicity study in mice also evaluated the
carcinogenic potential of trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene by conducting a
toxicogenomic assessment. Trans-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Oct 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene is
classified as non-carcinogenic by the
toxicogenomic assessment at 10,000
ppm (approximately equivalent to
15,600 mg/kg/day human equivalent
dose), the highest dose tested (HDT).
Developmental toxicity studies via the
inhalation route are available in rats and
rabbits. Neither maternal nor
developmental toxicity is observed in
either study up to 15,000 ppm
(approximately equivalent to 23,400 mg/
kg/day human equivalent dose), the
HDT.
Two Ames Tests via gas exposure are
available for review with trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene. The mouse
micronucleus assay was performed via
inhalation exposure. These tests are
negative.
A chronic study with trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene is not available for
review. Although a chronic toxicity
study is not available, there is no
concern for the lack of it because
toxicity is not seen following up to 13
weeks of exposure to trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene at excessive doses
(7,800 and 15,600 mg/kg/day). Also,
toxicity is not seen in the
developmental study at an excessive
dose of 23,400 mg/kg/day. Therefore,
the likelihood that chronic exposure to
doses below the limit dose will result in
toxic effects is highly unlikely.
Neurotoxicity studies are not
available for review. However, evidence
of neurotoxicity is not observed in the
submitted inhalation studies.
Immunotoxicity studies are not
available for review. However, very
slight mononuclear cell infiltrates in the
heart are observed in only females (3/5)
at the LOAEL of ≥5,000 ppm
(approximately 7,800 mg/kg/day human
equivalent dose lowest dose tested)
following 10 days of exposure via
inhalation in Sprague Dawley rats. This
effect is not dose dependent with regard
to either incidence or severity. Similar
effects along with increased monocyte
count are observed in the heart at 15,000
ppm (approximately 23,400 mg/kg/day
human equivalent dose; HDT) in a 13week study via inhalation in Sprague
Dawley rats. The NOAEL is 5,000 ppm
(equivalent to 7,800 mg/kg/day human
equivalent dose). This study included
more rats, is conducted in the same
species of rats that underwent the same
route of exposure and was of longer
duration (13 weeks vs 10 days).
Mononuclear cell infiltrates in the heart
are not observed at 5,000 ppm
(equivalent to 7,800 mg/kg/day human
equivalent dose) in either the male or
female rat as was observed in the 10-day
study. Therefore, since the incidence
and severity of these effects are not
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
dose-dependent in the 10-day study, the
13-week study is considered more
reflective of toxicity resulting from
exposure to trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene. However, the
Agency is not concerned about these
effects since they occur well above the
limit dose and exposure above that is
highly unlikely and unrealistic.
Two studies are available for trans1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene on male
rats and mice metabolism and
pharmacokinetics. In rats and mice,
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene via
the inhalation route of exposure is
rapidly absorbed, metabolized and
excreted. The urine is the major route of
excretion. In rats, the major metabolite
is S-(3,3,3-trifluoro-trans-propenyl)mercaptolactic acid. In mice, the major
metabolite is a presumed amino acid
conjugate of 3, 3, 3-trifluoropropionic
acid. Other identified metabolites are S(3, 3, 3-trifluoro-transpropenyl)-Lcysteine, N-acetyl-S-(3,3,3-trifluorotrans-propenyl)-L-cysteine and 3,3,3trifluoropropionic acid.
Specific information on the studies
received on trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as well as the noobserved-adverse-effect level (NOAEL)
and the lowest- observed- adverse-effect
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies
can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in the document,
‘‘Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene;
Human Health Risk Assessment and
Ecological Effects Assessment to
Support Proposed Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance When Used
as Inert Ingredients in Pesticide
Formulations’’ in docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0043.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
The available toxicity studies indicate
that trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene
has very low overall toxicity. The lowest
NOAEL in the database was 5,000 ppm
(approximately 7,800 mg/kg/day human
equivalent dose) observed in a 13 week
toxicity study in rats via the inhalation
route of exposure. Since signs of toxicity
were not observed at well above the
limit dose an endpoint of concern for
risk assessment purposes was not
identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene, EPA considered
exposure under the proposed exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance.
EPA assessed dietary exposures from
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene in
food as follows:
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 196 / Friday, October 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The general population may be
exposed via the diet to trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as a result of
eating foods containing residues of
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene.
However, since a hazard endpoint of
concern was not identified for the acute
and chronic dietary assessment (food
and drinking water), a dietary exposure
risk assessment was not conducted.
2. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables).
The term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is
used in this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables). Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1ene may be used as an inert ingredient
in pesticide products that could result
in short- and intermediate-term
residential exposure. However, based on
the lack of toxicity, a quantitative
exposure assessment from residential
exposures was not performed.
3. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene to share a
common mechanism of toxicity with
any other substances, and trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene does not have a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety
for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Oct 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
Food Quality Protection Act Safety
Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this
provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor.
As part of its qualitative assessment,
the Agency did not use safety factors for
assessing risk, and no additional safety
factor is needed for assessing risk to
infants and children. Based on the lack
of effects in subchronic and
developmental toxicity studies, and an
assessment of trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene, EPA has
concluded that there are no
toxicological endpoints of concern for
the U.S. population, including infants
and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of
concern were identified, EPA concludes
that aggregate exposure to residues of
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene will
not pose a risk to the U.S. population,
including infants and children, and that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.930 and
180.940(a) for trans-1,3,3,3tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No.
29118–24–9) when used as an inert
ingredient (propellant) in pesticide
formulations applied to formulations
applied to growing crops, raw
agricultural commodities after harvest,
and animals, and when used as an inert
ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide
formulations for food-contact surface
sanitizing solutions, respectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61121
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemptions in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
61122
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 196 / Friday, October 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Dated: October 1, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.910, add alphabetically the
inert ingredient to the table to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
post-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
*
*
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9) .......................................................
*
..............................
*
*
*
3. In § 180.930 add alphabetically the
inert ingredient to the table to read as
follows:
■
*
*
Uses
*
Propellant.
*
*
§ 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to
animals; exemptions from the requirement
of a tolerance.
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
*
*
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118–24–9) .......................................................
*
..............................
*
*
*
4. In § 180.940(a), add alphabetically
the inert ingredient to the table to read
as follows:
■
*
*
Uses
*
Propellant.
*
*
§ 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active
and inert ingredients for use in
antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact
surface sanitizing solution).
(a) * * *
Pesticide chemical
CAS Reg. No.
*
*
*
*
*
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene .......................................................................................................
*
29118–24–9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–25690 Filed 10–8–15; 8:45 am]
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 180
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0482; FRL–9934–45]
Cellulose Carboxymethyl Ether,
Potassium Salt; Tolerance Exemption
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:01 Oct 08, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Limits
*
None.
*
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of cellulose
carboxymethyl ether, potassium salt;
when used as an inert ingredient in a
pesticide chemical formulation. Spring
Trading Company on behalf of Lamberti
USA, Incorporated submitted a petition
to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting
an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 196 (Friday, October 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61118-61122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25690]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0043; FRL-9934-74]
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS
Reg. No. 29118-24-9) when used as an inert ingredient (propellant) in
pesticide formulations applied to growing crops, raw agricultural
commodities after harvest, and animals, and when used as an inert
ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide formulations for food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions. The Acta Group, L.L.C. on behalf of
Honeywell International, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting establishment
of an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene.
DATES: This regulation is effective October 9, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before December 8, 2015,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0043, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
[[Page 61119]]
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor
instructions and additional information about the docket available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number: (703) 305-7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0043 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
December 8, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0043, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of April 4, 2012 (77 FR 20334) (FRL-9340-
4), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 1E7938) by The
Acta Group, L.L.C. (2200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 100W,
Washington, DC 20037) on behalf of Honeywell International, Inc., 101
Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ 07962. The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.910, 180.930 and 180.940(a) be amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118-24-9) when used as an inert
ingredient (propellant) in pesticide formulations applied to growing
crops, raw agricultural commodities after harvest, and animals, and
when used as an inert ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide
formulations for food-contact surface sanitizing solutions,
respectively. That document referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by The Acta Group, L.L.C. on behalf of Honeywell
International, Inc., the petitioner, which is available in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response
to the notice of filing.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human
health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the
[[Page 61120]]
inert ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential
settings. If EPA is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not
necessary to ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-
1-ene including exposure resulting from the exemption established by
this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as
well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-
observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are
discussed in this unit.
Acute inhalation toxicity is low for trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-
1-ene. Acute inhalation LD50s are >101,850 parts per million
(ppm); approximately 713 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) in rats and mice.
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene is not a dermal irritant in rabbits
or a sensitizer in humans.
Two subchronic toxicity studies via the inhalation route of
exposure are available for trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene in
rodents. Toxicity is not observed in rats or mice at doses as high as
5,000 ppm (approximately equivalent to 7,800 milligram/kilogram/day
(mg/kg/day) human equivalent dose) following 13 weeks and 90 days of
exposure, respectively. The 90-day inhalation toxicity study in mice
also evaluated the carcinogenic potential of trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene by conducting a toxicogenomic assessment. Trans-
1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene is classified as non-carcinogenic by the
toxicogenomic assessment at 10,000 ppm (approximately equivalent to
15,600 mg/kg/day human equivalent dose), the highest dose tested (HDT).
Developmental toxicity studies via the inhalation route are
available in rats and rabbits. Neither maternal nor developmental
toxicity is observed in either study up to 15,000 ppm (approximately
equivalent to 23,400 mg/kg/day human equivalent dose), the HDT.
Two Ames Tests via gas exposure are available for review with
trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene. The mouse micronucleus assay was
performed via inhalation exposure. These tests are negative.
A chronic study with trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene is not
available for review. Although a chronic toxicity study is not
available, there is no concern for the lack of it because toxicity is
not seen following up to 13 weeks of exposure to trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene at excessive doses (7,800 and 15,600 mg/kg/day).
Also, toxicity is not seen in the developmental study at an excessive
dose of 23,400 mg/kg/day. Therefore, the likelihood that chronic
exposure to doses below the limit dose will result in toxic effects is
highly unlikely.
Neurotoxicity studies are not available for review. However,
evidence of neurotoxicity is not observed in the submitted inhalation
studies.
Immunotoxicity studies are not available for review. However, very
slight mononuclear cell infiltrates in the heart are observed in only
females (3/5) at the LOAEL of =5,000 ppm (approximately
7,800 mg/kg/day human equivalent dose lowest dose tested) following 10
days of exposure via inhalation in Sprague Dawley rats. This effect is
not dose dependent with regard to either incidence or severity. Similar
effects along with increased monocyte count are observed in the heart
at 15,000 ppm (approximately 23,400 mg/kg/day human equivalent dose;
HDT) in a 13-week study via inhalation in Sprague Dawley rats. The
NOAEL is 5,000 ppm (equivalent to 7,800 mg/kg/day human equivalent
dose). This study included more rats, is conducted in the same species
of rats that underwent the same route of exposure and was of longer
duration (13 weeks vs 10 days). Mononuclear cell infiltrates in the
heart are not observed at 5,000 ppm (equivalent to 7,800 mg/kg/day
human equivalent dose) in either the male or female rat as was observed
in the 10-day study. Therefore, since the incidence and severity of
these effects are not dose-dependent in the 10-day study, the 13-week
study is considered more reflective of toxicity resulting from exposure
to trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene. However, the Agency is not
concerned about these effects since they occur well above the limit
dose and exposure above that is highly unlikely and unrealistic.
Two studies are available for trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene
on male rats and mice metabolism and pharmacokinetics. In rats and
mice, trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene via the inhalation route of
exposure is rapidly absorbed, metabolized and excreted. The urine is
the major route of excretion. In rats, the major metabolite is S-
(3,3,3-trifluoro-trans-propenyl)-mercaptolactic acid. In mice, the
major metabolite is a presumed amino acid conjugate of 3, 3, 3-
trifluoropropionic acid. Other identified metabolites are S-(3, 3, 3-
trifluoro-transpropenyl)-L-cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(3,3,3-trifluoro-trans-
propenyl)-L-cysteine and 3,3,3-trifluoropropionic acid.
Specific information on the studies received on trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect level
(NOAEL) and the lowest- observed- adverse-effect level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in the
document, ``Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene; Human Health Risk
Assessment and Ecological Effects Assessment to Support Proposed
Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance When Used as Inert
Ingredients in Pesticide Formulations'' in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2012-0043.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
The available toxicity studies indicate that trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene has very low overall toxicity. The lowest NOAEL
in the database was 5,000 ppm (approximately 7,800 mg/kg/day human
equivalent dose) observed in a 13 week toxicity study in rats via the
inhalation route of exposure. Since signs of toxicity were not observed
at well above the limit dose an endpoint of concern for risk assessment
purposes was not identified.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene, EPA considered
exposure under the proposed exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. EPA assessed dietary exposures from trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene in food as follows:
[[Page 61121]]
The general population may be exposed via the diet to trans-
1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene as a result of eating foods containing
residues of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene. However, since a
hazard endpoint of concern was not identified for the acute and chronic
dietary assessment (food and drinking water), a dietary exposure risk
assessment was not conducted.
2. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
The term ``residential exposure'' is used in this document to refer
to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and
diapers), carpets, swimming pools, and hard surface disinfection on
walls, floors, tables). Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene may be used
as an inert ingredient in pesticide products that could result in
short- and intermediate-term residential exposure. However, based on
the lack of toxicity, a quantitative exposure assessment from
residential exposures was not performed.
3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene to share a
common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and trans-
1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act
Safety Factor (FQPA SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains
the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor
when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
As part of its qualitative assessment, the Agency did not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no additional safety factor is
needed for assessing risk to infants and children. Based on the lack of
effects in subchronic and developmental toxicity studies, and an
assessment of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene, EPA has concluded
that there are no toxicological endpoints of concern for the U.S.
population, including infants and children.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Because no toxicological endpoints of concern were identified, EPA
concludes that aggregate exposure to residues of trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene will not pose a risk to the U.S. population,
including infants and children, and that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.930 and 180.940(a) for trans-
1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No. 29118-24-9) when used as an
inert ingredient (propellant) in pesticide formulations applied to
formulations applied to growing crops, raw agricultural commodities
after harvest, and animals, and when used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations for food-contact surface
sanitizing solutions, respectively.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemptions in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or
[[Page 61122]]
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 1, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.910, add alphabetically the inert ingredient to the
table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and post-harvest; exemptions
from the requirement of a tolerance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. .................. Propellant.
No. 29118-24-9).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. In Sec. 180.930 add alphabetically the inert ingredient to the
table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.930 Inert ingredients applied to animals; exemptions from
the requirement of a tolerance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients Limits Uses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. .................. Propellant.
No. 29118-24-9).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
4. In Sec. 180.940(a), add alphabetically the inert ingredient to the
table to read as follows:
Sec. 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients
for use in antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact surface sanitizing
solution).
(a) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pesticide chemical CAS Reg. No. Limits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene........... 29118-24-9 None.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-25690 Filed 10-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P