Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for Seven Covered Species, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Land, Inyo and Mono Counties, California, 60699-60701 [2015-25521]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: October 1, 2015.
Harriet Tregoning,
Principal Deputy Assistant, Secretary for
Community Planning and Development.
To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by
November 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of
the draft HCP and Environmental
Appendix A
Action Statement/Low Effect Screening
Form online at https://www.fws.gov/
FY 2014 APPALACHIA ECONOMIC
carlsbad/HCPs/HCP_Docs.html. You
DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE GRANTEES
may request copies of the documents by
email, fax, or U.S. mail (see below).
Amount
Grantee
State
These documents are also available for
awarded
public inspection by appointment
Kentucky DepartKY .....
$200,000.00 during normal business hours at the
ment of Local
office below. Please send your requests
Government.
or written comments by any one of the
State of Maryland— MD ....
350,000.00
following methods, and specify
Department of
‘‘LADWP HCP’’ in your request or
Housing and
comment.
Community DeSubmitting Request for Documents/
velopment.
Comments: You may submit comments
Total ................ ...........
550,000.00 or requests for more information by any
of the following methods:
[FR Doc. 2015–25535 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
Email: fw8cfwocomments@fws.gov.
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Include ‘‘LADWP HCP’’ in the subject
line of your message. If you choose to
submit comments via email, please
ensure that the file size does not exceed
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
10 megabytes. Emails that exceed the
maximum file size may not be properly
Fish and Wildlife Service
transmitted to the Service.
Telephone: Kennon A. Corey, Palm
[FWS–R8–ES–2015–N177;
Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, 760–
FXES11120800000–156–FF08ECAR00]
322–2070.
Fax: Kennon A. Corey, Palm Springs
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan
Fish and Wildlife Office, 760–322–4648,
for Seven Covered Species, Los
Attn.: LADWP HCP.
Angeles Department of Water and
U.S. Mail: Kennon A. Corey, Palm
Power Land, Inyo and Mono Counties,
Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, Attn.:
California
LADWP HCP, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way,
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Suite 208, Palm Springs, CA 92262.
Interior.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup of
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
Documents, or Delivery of Comments:
for comment.
Call 760–322–2070 to make an
appointment during regular business
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have received hours at the above address.
an application for a 10-year incidental
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
take permit (ITP) pursuant to the
Kennon A. Corey, Assistant Field
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
Supervisor, Palm Springs Fish and
amended (Act), from the Los Angeles
Wildlife Office; telephone 760–322–
Department of Water and Power
2070. If you use a telecommunications
(applicant). The application includes
device for the deaf (TDD), please call the
the draft habitat conservation plan (draft Federal Information Relay Service
HCP) for the Los Angeles Department of (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
Water and Power’s operations,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
maintenance, and management
Introduction
activities on its land in Mono and Inyo
Counties, California, pursuant to the
The applicant, the Los Angeles
Act. We invite public comment on the
Department of Water and Power,
permit application, draft HCP, and draft requests an ITP under section
Environmental Action Statement/Low
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. If approved, the
Effect Screening Form. The Service is
applicant anticipates the taking of five
considering the issuance of a 10-year
federally listed species and two unlisted
ITP for seven covered species in a
species as a result of activities
314,000-acre permit area. The permit is
undertaken or authorized on lands held
needed because take of species could
by the Los Angeles Department of Water
occur as a result of the proposed
and Power in Inyo and Mono Counties.
covered activities.
These activities are associated with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60699
water conveyance, agriculture,
recreation, road maintenance, habitat
restoration, and other land management
activities. Take of listed species would
be incidental to the applicant’s
performance or authorization of these
activities on lands they manage.
Background
Section 9 of the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), and the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17 prohibit
the ‘‘take’’ of fish and wildlife species
federally listed as endangered or
threatened. Take of federally listed fish
or wildlife is defined under the Act as
to ‘‘harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect
listed species, or attempt to engage in
such conduct’’ (16 U.S.C. 1538). ‘‘Harm’’
includes significant habitat modification
or degradation that actually kills or
injures listed wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, and
sheltering (50 CFR 17.3(c)). Under
limited circumstances, we may issue
permits to authorize incidental take,
which is defined under the Act as take
that is incidental to, and not the
purpose of, otherwise lawful activities.
Regulations governing incidental take
permits for threatened and endangered
species are found in 50 CFR 17.32 and
17.22, respectively. All species included
on the incidental take permit, if issued,
would receive assurances under the
Service’s ‘‘No Surprises’’ regulation (50
CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)).
Applicant’s Proposal
To comply with the requirements of
the Act, the draft HCP defines biological
goals and objectives, evaluates the
effects of covered activities on covered
species, describes a conservation
strategy, describes a monitoring and
adaptive management program,
identifies changed circumstances and
responsive actions, identifies funding
sources, and identifies alternative
actions to the proposed impacts. The
draft HCP is intended to be a document
that will facilitate regional species
conservation and assist the applicant to
better meet its legal obligations to
provide water and power to the citizens
of Los Angeles while managing its nonurban lands. The draft HCP will also
provide a coordinated process for
permitting and mitigating the incidental
take of covered species as an alternative
to activity-by-activity review.
The draft HCP addresses seven
covered species, including three fish
species and four bird species. The
permit would provide take
authorization for all covered species
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
60700
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
identified by the draft HCP. Take
authorized for listed covered species
would be effective upon permit
issuance. Take authorization for
currently unlisted covered species
would become effective concurrent with
listing, should the species be listed
under the Act during the permit term.
The proposed permit would include
the following five federally listed
animal species: Owens tui chub
(Siphateles bicolor snyderi), Owens
pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus), yellowbilled cuckoo (western distinct
population segment) (Coccyzus
americanus), southwestern willow
flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus),
and least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii
pusillus). The unlisted species proposed
for coverage under the draft HCP are the
greater sage-grouse (bi-state distinct
population segment) (Centrocercus
urophasianus) and the Long Valley/
Owens speckled dace (Rhinichthys
osculus ssp.).
The applicant is requesting coverage
for incidental take resulting from
ongoing water and power operations
and maintenance activities and land
management activities (collectively
referred to as covered activities) in the
following categories:
1. Water gathering and distribution,
2. Power production and
transmission,
3. Livestock grazing,
4. Irrigated agriculture,
5. Outdoor recreation,
6. Road maintenance and use,
7. Weed management,
8. Fire management, and
9. Habitat enhancement, habitat
creation, and monitoring.
The proposed 314,000-acre permit
area is the area where incidental take of
covered species resulting from covered
activities could occur. The permit area
is non-urban land held by the City of
Los Angeles in Mono and Inyo Counties;
it includes part of the watershed for
Mono Lake in Mono County and the
Owens River, including several of its
tributaries and much of its watershed in
Mono and Inyo Counties.
The applicant has developed a
conservation strategy that includes
measures to avoid, minimize, and
mitigate take of covered species
associated with the covered activities as
well as enhance and/or create habitat for
covered species. The conservation
strategy includes biological goals and
objectives at the landscape, habitat, and
species levels. The conservation actions
to implement the biological goals and
objectives are habitat based. The
rationale for this habitat-based approach
is that by enhancing/creating habitat,
the HCP implementation would benefit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
a broader range of species in addition to
the covered species.
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan
Alternatives
In the draft HCP, the applicant
considers four alternatives to the
proposed action: ‘‘Status Quo,’’ ‘‘No
Action or Avoid Take,’’ ‘‘Activity by
Activity Permitting,’’ and ‘‘Reduced
Species.’’ Under the ‘‘Status Quo’’
alternative, the Service would not issue
an ITP, but the Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power would continue its
operations and maintenance activities to
provide water and power to the citizens
of Los Angeles and manage City-owned
land in Inyo and Mono Counties. The
Los Angeles Department of Water and
Power would potentially be in violation
of the Act should incidental take of a
listed species occur as a result of their
operations and maintenance and land
management activities. Therefore, the
applicant rejected this alternative.
Under the ‘‘No Action’’ or ‘‘Avoid
Take’’ alternative, no permit would be
issued and the Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power would cease all
activities that may result in the
incidental take of a federally listed
species. Ceasing these activities would
thereby adversely affect its ability to
provide water and power to its
customers and properly manage its
lands. This alternative was rejected
because it does not allow the Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power
to complete its mission.
The Los Angeles Department of Water
and Power evaluated obtaining
incidental take permits for individual
covered activities or an ‘‘Activity by
Activity’’ alternative. This alternative
would require the applicant to prepare
multiple habitat conservation plans. It
would require the Service to prepare
multiple environmental documents to
analyze the issuance of multiple
incidental take permits, complete
multiple public review processes, and
then prepare multiple incidental take
permits. This alternative was rejected
because it is inefficient, less effective in
conserving covered species (i.e., does
not provide a landscape approach to
conservation and management), and
more costly.
Under the ‘‘Reduced Species’’
alternative, the applicant considered
covered species as only the five animal
species listed under the Act whose
ranges substantially overlapped City of
Los Angeles land at the beginning of the
HCP development process, as the
applicant would need a permit to
incidentally take these species. With
this alternative, if additional species
were listed during the term of the
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
permit, the applicant would need to
develop additional habitat conservation
planning documents for these newly
listed species to obtain incidental take
coverage and request new incidental
take permits or major permit
amendments. Based upon input from
the public and its desire to have
incidental take coverage for species that
might become listed during the permit
term, the applicant rejected the
‘‘Reduced Species’’ alternative.
Our Preliminary Determination Under
the National Environmental Policy Act
The Service’s proposed permit
issuance triggers the need for
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act. In our
analysis of the impacts of the proposed
permit issuance, we completed a draft
Environmental Action Statement/Low
Effect Screening Form and made a
preliminary determination that the
applicant’s proposal will have a minor
or negligible effect on the covered
species, and that the plan qualifies as a
low-effect HCP as defined by our
Habitat Conservation Planning
Handbook (November 1996). We invite
comments on our preliminary
determination. Three criteria form the
basis for this determination: (1)
Implementation of the proposed project
as described in the HCP would result in
minor or negligible effects on federally
listed, proposed, and/or candidate
species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the HCP would result
in minor or negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources; and
(3) HCP impacts, considered together
with those of other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future projects,
would not result in cumulatively
significant effects. Our preliminary
determination is that HCP approval and
ITP issuance qualify for categorical
exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), as provided by the
Department of the Interior Manual (516
DM 2.3(A) and 516 DM 8; however, we
may revise our determination based
upon review of public comments
received in response to this notice (see
Public Comments section).
Public Comments
The Service invites the public to
comment on the permit application,
draft HCP, and draft Environmental
Action Statement/Low Effect Screening
Form during the public comment period
(see DATES). Please direct written
comments to the contacts listed in the
ADDRESSES section. Please direct
questions regarding the draft HCP to the
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 194 / Wednesday, October 7, 2015 / Notices
Service contacts listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we
receive, including names and addresses,
will become part of the administrative
record and may be released to the
public. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Next Steps
We provide this notice under section
10(a) of the Act and Service regulations
for implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (40
CFR 1506.6). We will evaluate the
permit application, associated
documents, and comments we receive to
make a final determination regarding
whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act. We will also evaluate whether
issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) ITP
would comply with section 7 of the Act
by conducting an intra-service
consultation. We will use the results of
our intra-Service consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
to issue the ITP. If the requirements and
issuance criteria are met under section
10(a), we will issue the ITP to the
applicant to authorize incidental take of
the covered species. We will make a
permit decision no sooner than 30 days
after the date of this notice.
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
G. Mendel Stewart,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, Carlsbad, California.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2015–25521 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Oct 06, 2015
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–R–2015–N140; 1265–0000–10137–
S3]
Hanford Reach National Monument,
Adams, Benton, Franklin and Grant
Counties, WA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
and public meetings.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), will hold a
30-day comment period, including two
public meetings, to obtain comments on
providing public access to the
Rattlesnake Mountain Unit, including
the summit of Rattlesnake Mountain,
within the Hanford Reach National
Monument (Monument). In Section
3081 of the Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2015, the Service is directed
to ensure public access to the summit of
Rattlesnake Mountain (a.k.a., Laliik) for
educational, recreational, historical,
scientific, cultural, and other purposes,
including motor vehicle access, and
pedestrian and other nonmotorized
access.
SUMMARY:
The public may submit
comments from October 15 through
November 13, 2015. Two public
meetings will be held on October 14,
2015, at 2 p.m. and 7 p.m., see the
location under ADDRESSES.
ADDRESSES: More information on public
access can be found on our Web site:
https://www.fws.gov/refuge/Hanford_
Reach/. The two public meetings will be
held at the Hanford Reach Interpretive
Center, 1943 Columbia Park Trail,
Richland, WA 99352. Submit comments
on public access to the Rattlesnake
Mountain Unit, by any of the following
methods:
Email: mcriver@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Public Access to Rattlesnake
Mountain’’ in the subject line of the
message.
Fax: (509) 546–8303.
U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Rattlesnake Mountain Access,
64 Maple Street, Burbank, WA 99323.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Haas, at (509) 546–8333 (phone), or
mcriver@fws.gov (email).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the public comment period
is to obtain comments and ideas from
the public and other interested parties
on providing public access to the
Monument’s Rattlesnake Mountain Unit
in a manner that protects unique and
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
60701
sensitive natural, scenic, and cultural
resources.
We are furnishing this notice in
compliance with the Service’s National
Wildlife Refuge System planning policy,
and the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 as amended (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and its
implementing regulations. This notice
serves to advise other agencies, Tribal
governments, and the public of our
meetings; initiate the public scoping
comment period; and request public
comments and information on issues,
opportunities, and access alternatives
we should consider.
We will consider the comments we
receive and issue a scoping report that
discusses the issues and opportunities
identified during the public comment
period, the issues we may or may not
further analyze, and the next steps in
our process to examine what public
access opportunities may be compatible
with the purposes of the Monument.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Reasonable Accommodations
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is
committed to providing access to this
meeting for all participants. Please
direct all requests for sign language
interpreting services, closed captioning,
or other accommodation needs to Dan
Haas, (509) 546–8333 (phone); or
mcriver@fws.gov (email); or 800–877–
8339 (TTY); by close of business on
September 30, 2015.
Dated: September 2, 2015.
Richard R. Hannan,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Region,
Portland, OR.
[FR Doc. 2015–24193 Filed 10–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 194 (Wednesday, October 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60699-60701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25521]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2015-N177; FXES11120800000-156-FF08ECAR00]
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for Seven Covered Species,
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Land, Inyo and Mono Counties,
California
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
received an application for a 10-year incidental take permit (ITP)
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), from
the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (applicant). The
application includes the draft habitat conservation plan (draft HCP)
for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power's operations,
maintenance, and management activities on its land in Mono and Inyo
Counties, California, pursuant to the Act. We invite public comment on
the permit application, draft HCP, and draft Environmental Action
Statement/Low Effect Screening Form. The Service is considering the
issuance of a 10-year ITP for seven covered species in a 314,000-acre
permit area. The permit is needed because take of species could occur
as a result of the proposed covered activities.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
November 6, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may obtain copies of the draft HCP and Environmental
Action Statement/Low Effect Screening Form online at https://www.fws.gov/carlsbad/HCPs/HCP_Docs.html. You may request copies of the
documents by email, fax, or U.S. mail (see below). These documents are
also available for public inspection by appointment during normal
business hours at the office below. Please send your requests or
written comments by any one of the following methods, and specify
``LADWP HCP'' in your request or comment.
Submitting Request for Documents/Comments: You may submit comments
or requests for more information by any of the following methods:
Email: fw8cfwocomments@fws.gov. Include ``LADWP HCP'' in the
subject line of your message. If you choose to submit comments via
email, please ensure that the file size does not exceed 10 megabytes.
Emails that exceed the maximum file size may not be properly
transmitted to the Service.
Telephone: Kennon A. Corey, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office,
760-322-2070.
Fax: Kennon A. Corey, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office, 760-
322-4648, Attn.: LADWP HCP.
U.S. Mail: Kennon A. Corey, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office,
Attn.: LADWP HCP, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 777 East Tahquitz
Canyon Way, Suite 208, Palm Springs, CA 92262.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup of Documents, or Delivery of Comments:
Call 760-322-2070 to make an appointment during regular business hours
at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kennon A. Corey, Assistant Field
Supervisor, Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office; telephone 760-322-
2070. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
The applicant, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power,
requests an ITP under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. If approved, the
applicant anticipates the taking of five federally listed species and
two unlisted species as a result of activities undertaken or authorized
on lands held by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in Inyo
and Mono Counties. These activities are associated with water
conveyance, agriculture, recreation, road maintenance, habitat
restoration, and other land management activities. Take of listed
species would be incidental to the applicant's performance or
authorization of these activities on lands they manage.
Background
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50
CFR 17 prohibit the ``take'' of fish and wildlife species federally
listed as endangered or threatened. Take of federally listed fish or
wildlife is defined under the Act as to ``harass, harm, pursue, hunt,
shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect listed species, or
attempt to engage in such conduct'' (16 U.S.C. 1538). ``Harm'' includes
significant habitat modification or degradation that actually kills or
injures listed wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral
patterns, including breeding, feeding, and sheltering (50 CFR 17.3(c)).
Under limited circumstances, we may issue permits to authorize
incidental take, which is defined under the Act as take that is
incidental to, and not the purpose of, otherwise lawful activities.
Regulations governing incidental take permits for threatened and
endangered species are found in 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
All species included on the incidental take permit, if issued, would
receive assurances under the Service's ``No Surprises'' regulation (50
CFR 17.22(b)(5) and 17.32(b)(5)).
Applicant's Proposal
To comply with the requirements of the Act, the draft HCP defines
biological goals and objectives, evaluates the effects of covered
activities on covered species, describes a conservation strategy,
describes a monitoring and adaptive management program, identifies
changed circumstances and responsive actions, identifies funding
sources, and identifies alternative actions to the proposed impacts.
The draft HCP is intended to be a document that will facilitate
regional species conservation and assist the applicant to better meet
its legal obligations to provide water and power to the citizens of Los
Angeles while managing its non-urban lands. The draft HCP will also
provide a coordinated process for permitting and mitigating the
incidental take of covered species as an alternative to activity-by-
activity review.
The draft HCP addresses seven covered species, including three fish
species and four bird species. The permit would provide take
authorization for all covered species
[[Page 60700]]
identified by the draft HCP. Take authorized for listed covered species
would be effective upon permit issuance. Take authorization for
currently unlisted covered species would become effective concurrent
with listing, should the species be listed under the Act during the
permit term.
The proposed permit would include the following five federally
listed animal species: Owens tui chub (Siphateles bicolor snyderi),
Owens pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus), yellow-billed cuckoo (western
distinct population segment) (Coccyzus americanus), southwestern willow
flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), and least Bell's vireo (Vireo
bellii pusillus). The unlisted species proposed for coverage under the
draft HCP are the greater sage-grouse (bi-state distinct population
segment) (Centrocercus urophasianus) and the Long Valley/Owens speckled
dace (Rhinichthys osculus ssp.).
The applicant is requesting coverage for incidental take resulting
from ongoing water and power operations and maintenance activities and
land management activities (collectively referred to as covered
activities) in the following categories:
1. Water gathering and distribution,
2. Power production and transmission,
3. Livestock grazing,
4. Irrigated agriculture,
5. Outdoor recreation,
6. Road maintenance and use,
7. Weed management,
8. Fire management, and
9. Habitat enhancement, habitat creation, and monitoring.
The proposed 314,000-acre permit area is the area where incidental
take of covered species resulting from covered activities could occur.
The permit area is non-urban land held by the City of Los Angeles in
Mono and Inyo Counties; it includes part of the watershed for Mono Lake
in Mono County and the Owens River, including several of its
tributaries and much of its watershed in Mono and Inyo Counties.
The applicant has developed a conservation strategy that includes
measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate take of covered species
associated with the covered activities as well as enhance and/or create
habitat for covered species. The conservation strategy includes
biological goals and objectives at the landscape, habitat, and species
levels. The conservation actions to implement the biological goals and
objectives are habitat based. The rationale for this habitat-based
approach is that by enhancing/creating habitat, the HCP implementation
would benefit a broader range of species in addition to the covered
species.
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan Alternatives
In the draft HCP, the applicant considers four alternatives to the
proposed action: ``Status Quo,'' ``No Action or Avoid Take,''
``Activity by Activity Permitting,'' and ``Reduced Species.'' Under the
``Status Quo'' alternative, the Service would not issue an ITP, but the
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power would continue its operations
and maintenance activities to provide water and power to the citizens
of Los Angeles and manage City-owned land in Inyo and Mono Counties.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power would potentially be in
violation of the Act should incidental take of a listed species occur
as a result of their operations and maintenance and land management
activities. Therefore, the applicant rejected this alternative.
Under the ``No Action'' or ``Avoid Take'' alternative, no permit
would be issued and the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power would
cease all activities that may result in the incidental take of a
federally listed species. Ceasing these activities would thereby
adversely affect its ability to provide water and power to its
customers and properly manage its lands. This alternative was rejected
because it does not allow the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
to complete its mission.
The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power evaluated obtaining
incidental take permits for individual covered activities or an
``Activity by Activity'' alternative. This alternative would require
the applicant to prepare multiple habitat conservation plans. It would
require the Service to prepare multiple environmental documents to
analyze the issuance of multiple incidental take permits, complete
multiple public review processes, and then prepare multiple incidental
take permits. This alternative was rejected because it is inefficient,
less effective in conserving covered species (i.e., does not provide a
landscape approach to conservation and management), and more costly.
Under the ``Reduced Species'' alternative, the applicant considered
covered species as only the five animal species listed under the Act
whose ranges substantially overlapped City of Los Angeles land at the
beginning of the HCP development process, as the applicant would need a
permit to incidentally take these species. With this alternative, if
additional species were listed during the term of the permit, the
applicant would need to develop additional habitat conservation
planning documents for these newly listed species to obtain incidental
take coverage and request new incidental take permits or major permit
amendments. Based upon input from the public and its desire to have
incidental take coverage for species that might become listed during
the permit term, the applicant rejected the ``Reduced Species''
alternative.
Our Preliminary Determination Under the National Environmental Policy
Act
The Service's proposed permit issuance triggers the need for
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. In our analysis
of the impacts of the proposed permit issuance, we completed a draft
Environmental Action Statement/Low Effect Screening Form and made a
preliminary determination that the applicant's proposal will have a
minor or negligible effect on the covered species, and that the plan
qualifies as a low-effect HCP as defined by our Habitat Conservation
Planning Handbook (November 1996). We invite comments on our
preliminary determination. Three criteria form the basis for this
determination: (1) Implementation of the proposed project as described
in the HCP would result in minor or negligible effects on federally
listed, proposed, and/or candidate species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the HCP would result in minor or negligible effects
on other environmental values or resources; and (3) HCP impacts,
considered together with those of other past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future projects, would not result in cumulatively
significant effects. Our preliminary determination is that HCP approval
and ITP issuance qualify for categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as provided by the
Department of the Interior Manual (516 DM 2.3(A) and 516 DM 8; however,
we may revise our determination based upon review of public comments
received in response to this notice (see Public Comments section).
Public Comments
The Service invites the public to comment on the permit
application, draft HCP, and draft Environmental Action Statement/Low
Effect Screening Form during the public comment period (see DATES).
Please direct written comments to the contacts listed in the ADDRESSES
section. Please direct questions regarding the draft HCP to the
[[Page 60701]]
Service contacts listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we receive, including names and
addresses, will become part of the administrative record and may be
released to the public. Before including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any
time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so.
Next Steps
We provide this notice under section 10(a) of the Act and Service
regulations for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (40 CFR 1506.6). We will evaluate the permit application,
associated documents, and comments we receive to make a final
determination regarding whether the application meets the requirements
of section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. We will also evaluate whether
issuance of a section 10(a)(1)(B) ITP would comply with section 7 of
the Act by conducting an intra-service consultation. We will use the
results of our intra-Service consultation, in combination with the
above findings, in our final analysis to determine whether to issue the
ITP. If the requirements and issuance criteria are met under section
10(a), we will issue the ITP to the applicant to authorize incidental
take of the covered species. We will make a permit decision no sooner
than 30 days after the date of this notice.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
G. Mendel Stewart,
Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad,
California.
[FR Doc. 2015-25521 Filed 10-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P