Credit for Lower Tier Small Business Subcontracting, 60300-60303 [2015-25234]
Download as PDF
60300
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
calendar days of receiving the appraisal.
Late claims made beyond this period of
time, or submitted with an appraisal not
completed within the timeframes
described in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii)
of this section, will be rejected.
*
*
*
*
*
any redemption period, whichever is
later, will be the responsibility of the
lender and not covered by the
guarantee.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart H—Collecting on the
Guarantee
3. Section 3555.352 is amended by
revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 3555.352
Loss covered by the guarantee.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Liquidation costs. Reasonable and
customary liquidation costs, such as
attorney fees, liquidation value
appraisals, and foreclosure costs.
Annual fees advanced by the lender to
the Agency are ineligible for
reimbursement when calculating the
loss payment, as otherwise provided by
the Agency.
■ 4. Section 3555.353 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 3555.353
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The value of the property as
determined by a liquidation value
appraisal. The value should be
determined as if the property would be
sold without the market exposure it
would ordinarily receive in a normal
transaction, or within 90 days, minus;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 3555.354 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) to read
as follows:
Loss claim procedures.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) The lender must submit a loss
claim request that includes a completed
liquidation value appraisal within 30
calendar days of the period ending:
(i) Nine (9) months after either
foreclosure or the end of any applicable
redemption period, whichever is later, if
the property remains unsold and is not
located on American Indian restricted
land; or
(ii) Twelve (12) months after either
foreclosure or the end of any applicable
redemption period, whichever is later, if
the property remains unsold and is
located on American Indian restricted
land. Late claims made beyond this
period of time, or submitted with a
liquidation value appraisal not
completed within the timeframes
described in parts paragraphs (b)(1)(i)
and (ii) of this section, will be rejected.
(2) The lender must submit a loss
claim that includes the completed
liquidation value appraisal within 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Oct 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2015–25324 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121 and 125
RIN 3245–AG71
Credit for Lower Tier Small Business
Subcontracting
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA or Agency) is
proposing to amend its regulations to
implement Section 1614 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2014. The proposed amendments
authorized by this statute would allow
an other than small prime contractor
that has an individual subcontracting
plan for a contract to receive credit
towards its small business
subcontracting goals for subcontract
awards made to small business concerns
at any tier. The prime contractor shall
incorporate the lower tier
subcontracting performance into its
subcontracting plan goals. Currently,
other than small business prime
contractors establish small business
subcontracting goals at the first tier
level, and receive credit toward their
subcontracting plan goal performance at
the first tier level. The rule also
proposes to implement the statutory
requirements related to the
subcontracting plans of all
subcontractors that are required to
maintain such plans, including the
requirement to monitor subcontractors’
performance and compliance towards
reaching the goals set out in those plans
as well as their compliance with
subcontracting reporting requirements.
SBA is also proposing to clarify that the
size standard for a particular
subcontract must appear in the
solicitation for the subcontract.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 7, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN: 3245–AG71, by any of
the following methods:
SUMMARY:
Net recovery value.
*
§ 3555.354
Dated: September 3, 2015.
Tony Hernandez,
Administrator, Rural Housing Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• For mail, paper, disk, or CD/ROM
submissions: Brenda Fernandez, U.S.
Small Business Administration, Office
of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409
Third Street SW., 8th Floor,
Washington, DC 20416.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Brenda
Fernandez, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Policy,
Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street
SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Brenda
Fernandez, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Policy,
Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street
SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416,
or send an email to brenda.fernandez@
sba.gov. Highlight the information that
you consider to be CBI and explain why
you believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will
review the information and make the
final determination on whether it will
publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Policy,
Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street
SW., Washington, DC 20416; (202) 207–
7337; brenda.fernandez@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed rule implements Section 1614
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2014, Public Law
113–66, December 26, 2013 (hereinafter
NDAA 2014). Section 1614 amended
section 8(d)(6)(D) of the Small Business
Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(6)(d), to provide
that where a prime contractor has a
subcontracting plan for a specific prime
contract with an executive agency, as
required by Section 8(d) of the Small
Business Act, the prime contractor will
receive credit towards its subcontracting
plan goals for awards made to small
business concerns at any tier under the
contract. When a prime contractor
awards a subcontract to a firm it is
generally considered a first tier
subcontract. That subcontractor may
award a subcontract, which would be
considered a second tier subcontract,
and so on. Currently, a prime contractor
generally receives credit towards its
small business subcontracting plan
goals for awards made at the first tier
level.
Other than small business prime
contractors report on their small
business subcontracting activity in
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
various ways. Some firms have
individual subcontracting plans for each
and every Federal prime contract that
meets certain threshold requirements.
Other firms have commercial plans,
which is a plan that covers a firm’s
entire fiscal year and the firm’s entire
commercial production sold by either
the entire company or a portion thereof
(e.g., division, plant, or product line).
See Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) § 19.701. Some firms that do
business with the Department of
Defense have comprehensive
subcontracting plans, where the firms’
negotiate goals and report on a plant,
division or company-wide basis, instead
on each individual Federal contract. See
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
§ 219.702. Section 1614 further provides
that lower tier reporting credit shall not
apply where a subcontracting plan
applies to more than one contract or to
one contract with more than one
executive agency. Section 1614 applies
only when determining whether or not
a prime contractor has met its
individual subcontracting plan goals.
Thus, Section 1614 does not apply
where the prime contractor has a
commercial plan or comprehensive
subcontracting plan. Section 1614 does
not alter the requirement that lower tier
subcontractors have subcontracting
plans when the subcontracting
threshold amounts are met. Section
1614 must be implemented so that
subcontracting dollars are only reported
once for the same award to avoid double
and triple counting the dollars,
notwithstanding the fact that a small
business subcontract may be reported
under more than one subcontracting
plan. Section 1614 further provides that
where a prime contractor or
subcontractor is required to have an
individual subcontracting plan, the
prime contractor or the subcontractor
will review and approve subcontracting
plans submitted by their subcontractors,
monitor their subcontractors’
compliance with the subcontracting
plans, ensure that reports are submitted
by their subcontractors, acknowledge
receipt of subcontractors’ reports,
monitor subcontractor performance, and
discuss subcontractor performance with
subcontractors where necessary.
Section 1614 also requires that a
subcontracting plan must contain a
recitation of the types of records the
prime contractor will maintain to
demonstrate the procedures which have
been adopted to ensure that
subcontractors at all tiers comply with
the requirements and goals in their
respective subcontracting plans,
including the establishment of source
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Oct 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
lists to identify small business concerns,
small business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans, small business
concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans, qualified
HUBZone small business concerns,
small business concerns owned and
controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals, and small
business concerns owned and
controlled by women, and efforts to
identify and award subcontracts to such
concerns.
SBA is also proposing to clarify that
the NAICS code and corresponding size
standard for a particular subcontract
must appear in the solicitation for the
subcontract. The current regulations
only reference the subcontract itself.
However, the solicitation for the
subcontract must contain the size
standard that a firm must represent that
it meets at the time of its offer for the
subcontract in order to be considered a
small business concern for that
subcontract. In addition, SBA is
proposing to allow prime contractors
and subcontractors to accept electronic
size and socioeconomic representations
provided the solicitation and/or
subcontract require the firm making the
electronic representations to verify the
accuracy of the representations.
Compliance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, 12988, and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch.
35), and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612).
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is a significant regulatory
action for the purposes of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the next
section contains SBA’s Regulatory
Impact Analysis. This is not a major
rule, however, under the Congressional
Review Act.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory
action?
The proposed regulations implement
Section 1614 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014.
Section 1614(c)(3) requires the
Administrator to promulgate regulations
necessary to implement the Act.
2. What are the potential benefits and
costs of this regulatory action?
The benefits and costs of the proposed
regulations are minimal. Other than
small business prime contractors and
subcontractors already establish
individual subcontracting plan goals
and report on their achievements if the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60301
subcontracting plan thresholds are met.
Under Section 1614, a prime contractor
with an individual subcontracting plan
will receive credit towards its goals for
small business performance at lower
tiers. Thus, there will be some costs to
the prime contractor to propose
subcontracting plan goals that
incorporate small business performance
at lower tiers, and there will also be
costs to the Government to evaluate
whether the prime contractor’s goals
adequately address maximum
practicable small business
subcontracting opportunity at all tiers.
There may also be costs to the
Government as eSRS may have to be
modified to allow large business prime
contractors to receive small business
credit at any tier towards their
subcontracting plan goals. There should
not be any costs imposed on small
business concerns.
3. What are the alternatives to this final
rule?
Many of the proposed regulations are
required to implement specific statutory
provisions which require promulgation
of implementing regulations. There are
no other alternatives that would meet
the statutory requirements.
Executive Order 13563
As part of its ongoing efforts to engage
stakeholders in the development of its
regulations, SBA has solicited
comments and suggestions from
procuring agencies on how to best
implement Section 1614. SBA has
incorporated those comments and
suggestions to the extent feasible. SBA
intends to incorporate, where feasible,
public input into the final rule.
Executive Order 12988
For purposes of Executive Order
12988, SBA has drafted this proposed
rule, to the extent practicable, in
accordance with the standards set forth
in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of that
Executive Order, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. This rule has no preemptive or
retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For the purpose of Executive Order
13132, SBA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
layers of government. Therefore, SBA
has determined that this proposed rule
has no federalism implications
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
60302
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
warranting preparation of a federalism
assessment.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Ch. 35
For purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), SBA has
determined that this proposed rule, if
adopted in final form, would not impose
new government-wide reporting and
record keeping requirements on other
than small prime contractors and
subcontractors. When this rule is
implemented in the FAR, there may be
a requirement to amend or create an
information collection. Thus, any PRA
implications as part of any proposed
rulemaking implementing an SBA final
rule in the FAR will be addressed in the
FAR rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
601–612
According to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601,
when an agency issues a rulemaking, it
must prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis to address the impact of the
rule on small entities. However, section
605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an
analysis, if the rulemaking is not
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The RFA defines ‘‘small entity’’
to include ‘‘small businesses,’’ ‘‘small
organizations,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdictions.’’ This
proposed rule concerns various aspects
of SBA’s contracting programs. As such,
the rule relates to small business
concerns, but would not affect ‘‘small
organizations’’ or ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions’’ because those programs
generally apply only to ‘‘business
concerns’’ as defined by SBA
regulations, in other words, to small
businesses organized for profit. ‘‘Small
organizations’’ or ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions’’ are non-profits or
governmental entities and do not
generally qualify as ‘‘business concerns’’
within the meaning of SBA’s
regulations.
There are approximately 290,000
concerns registered as small business
concerns in the System for Award
Management (SAM) that could
potentially be impacted by the
implementation of Section 1614.
However, we cannot say with any
certainty how many will be impacted
because we do not know how many of
these concerns participate in
government contracting as
subcontractors. A firm is required to
register in SAM in order to participate
in Federal contracting as a prime
contractor, but not for purposes of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Oct 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
subcontracting. However, as discussed
elsewhere in this proposed rule, there
are no new compliance or other costs
imposed by the proposed rule on small
business concerns. In sum, the proposed
amendments would not have a disparate
impact on small businesses and would
increase their opportunities to
participate in federal government
contracting as subcontractors without
imposing any additional costs. For the
reasons discussed, SBA certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business
concerns.
PART 125—GOVERNMENT
CONTRACTING PROGRAMS
3. The authority citation for 13 CFR
part 125 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632(p), (q); 634(b)(6),
637, 644, 657f, and 657q.
13 CFR Part 121
4. Amend § 125.3 as follows:
a. Revise paragraph (a)(1) introductory
text;
■ b. Add paragraph (a)(1)(i)(C);
■ c. Revise the heading for paragraph
(c);
■ d. Revise the first sentence of
paragraph (c)(1)(i);
■ e. Revise paragraph (c)(1)(v);
■ f. Remove the word ‘‘and’’ at the end
of paragraph (c)(1)(viii);
■ g. Add new paragraphs (c)(1)(x) and
(c)(1)(xi).
Government contracts, Government
procurement, Small businesses, Size
standards.
§ 125.3 What types of subcontracting
assistance are available to small
businesses?
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 125
Government contracts, Government
procurement, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses, Small business
subcontracting.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SBA proposes to amend 13
CFR parts 121 and 125 as follows:
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 13 CFR
part 121 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662,
and 694a(9).
2. Amend § 121.411 by removing the
second sentence in paragraph (b) and
adding two sentences in its place to read
as follows:
■
§ 121.411 What are the size procedures for
SBA’s Section 8(d) Subcontracting
Program?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * Prime contractors may
accept a subcontractor’s electronic selfcertification as to size, if the solicitation
for the subcontract contains a clause
which provides that the subcontractor
verifies by submission of the offer that
the size representations and
certifications are accurate and complete.
Electronic submission may include any
method acceptable to the prime
contractor including, but not limited to,
size representations and certifications
made in SAM (or any successor system).
* * *.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
■
■
(a) * * *
(1) Subcontract—under this section
the term ‘subcontract’ means a legally
binding agreement between a contractor
that is already under contract to another
party to perform work and a third party
(other than one involving an employeremployee relationship), hereinafter
referred to as the subcontractor, for the
subcontractor to perform a part or all of
the work that the contractor has
undertaken.
(i) * * *
(C) Where the subcontracting goals
pertain only to an individual
subcontracting plan, the contractor may
receive credit for small business
concerns performing as first tier
subcontractors or subcontractors at any
tier pursuant to the subcontracting plans
required under paragraph (c) of this
section in an amount equal to the dollar
value of work awarded to such small
business concerns. Prime contractors
must incorporate the subcontracting
plan goals of their lower tier
subcontractors in their individual
subcontracting plans. Lower tier
subcontractors must have their own
individual subcontracting plans if the
subcontract is at or above the
subcontracting plan threshold, and are
required to meet their subcontracting
plan goals. The actual subcontracting
dollars are only reported once for the
same award to avoid double counting
the dollars, notwithstanding the fact
that a small business subcontract may
be reported under more than one
subcontracting plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Additional responsibilities of other
than small contractors. (1) * * *
(i) Submitting and negotiating before
award an acceptable subcontracting
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Proposed Rules
plan that reflects maximum practicable
opportunities for small businesses in the
performance of the contract as
subcontractors or suppliers at all tiers of
performance. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(v) The contractor must assign to the
solicitation and the resulting
subcontract the NAICS code and
corresponding size standard that best
describes the principal purpose of the
subcontract (see § 121.410 of this
chapter). The prime contractor may rely
on a subcontractor’s electronic
representations and certifications, if the
solicitation for the subcontract contains
a clause which provides that the
subcontractor verifies by submission of
the offer that the size or socioeconomic
representations and certifications are
current, accurate and complete as of the
date of the offer for the subcontract.
Electronic submission may include any
method acceptable to the prime
contractor including, but not limited to,
size or socioeconomic representations
and certifications made in SAM (or any
successor system). A prime contractor or
subcontractor may not require the use of
SAM (or any successor system) for
purposes of representing size or
socioeconomic status in connection
with a subcontract;
*
*
*
*
*
(x) The prime contractor must require
all subcontractors (except small
business concerns) who receive
subcontracts in excess of $1,500,000 in
the case of a subcontract for the
construction of any public facility, or in
excess of $650,000 in the case of all
other subcontracts, and which offer
further subcontracting possibilities, to
adopt a subcontracting plan of its own
consistent with this section, and must
ensure at a minimum that all
subcontractors required to maintain
subcontracting plans pursuant to this
paragraph, will review and approve
subcontracting plans submitted by their
subcontractors; monitor subcontractor
compliance with their approved
subcontracting plans; ensure that
subcontracting reports are submitted by
their subcontractors when required;
acknowledge receipt of their
subcontractors’ reports; compare the
performance of their subcontractors to
subcontracting plans and goals; and
discuss performance with
subcontractors when necessary to
ensure their subcontractors make a good
faith effort to comply with their
subcontracting plans; and
(xi) The prime contractor must recite
the types of records the prime will
maintain to demonstrate procedures
which have been adopted to ensure
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:44 Oct 05, 2015
Jkt 238001
subcontractors at all tiers comply with
the requirements and goals set forth in
the plan established in accordance with
paragraph (c)(1)(x) of this section,
including the establishment of source
lists of small business concerns, small
business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans, small business
concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans, qualified
HUBZone small business concerns,
small business concerns owned and
controlled by socially and economically
disadvantaged individuals, and small
business concerns owned and
controlled by women, and the efforts to
identify and award subcontracts to such
small business concerns.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 28, 2015.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–25234 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–3983; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–141–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–100,
747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B,
747–300, 747SR, and 747SP series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by an evaluation by the
design approval holder (DAH)
indicating that the upper chords of the
upper deck floor beams are subject to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for cracks at the floor panel
attachment fastener holes; repetitive
inspections for cracks in the upper and
lower chords of the upper deck floor
beams at permanent fastener locations;
repetitive inspections for cracks in
certain repaired and modified areas; and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This proposed AD
would also require repetitive
replacement of the upper chords of the
upper deck floor beams, including pre-
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60303
replacement inspections and corrective
action if necessary; and postreplacement repetitive inspections and
repair if necessary. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the upper chords of the
upper deck floor beams. Undetected
cracking could result in large deflection
or deformation of the upper deck floor
beams, resulting in damage to wire
bundles and control cables for the flight
control system, and reduced
controllability of the airplane. Multiple
adjacent severed floor beams could
result in rapid decompression of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by November 20,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3983.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
3983; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 193 (Tuesday, October 6, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60300-60303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25234]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 121 and 125
RIN 3245-AG71
Credit for Lower Tier Small Business Subcontracting
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or Agency) is
proposing to amend its regulations to implement Section 1614 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. The proposed
amendments authorized by this statute would allow an other than small
prime contractor that has an individual subcontracting plan for a
contract to receive credit towards its small business subcontracting
goals for subcontract awards made to small business concerns at any
tier. The prime contractor shall incorporate the lower tier
subcontracting performance into its subcontracting plan goals.
Currently, other than small business prime contractors establish small
business subcontracting goals at the first tier level, and receive
credit toward their subcontracting plan goal performance at the first
tier level. The rule also proposes to implement the statutory
requirements related to the subcontracting plans of all subcontractors
that are required to maintain such plans, including the requirement to
monitor subcontractors' performance and compliance towards reaching the
goals set out in those plans as well as their compliance with
subcontracting reporting requirements. SBA is also proposing to clarify
that the size standard for a particular subcontract must appear in the
solicitation for the subcontract.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN: 3245-AG71, by
any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
For mail, paper, disk, or CD/ROM submissions: Brenda
Fernandez, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy,
Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC
20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small
Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409
Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Brenda
Fernandez, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy,
Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW., 8th Floor, Washington, DC
20416, or send an email to brenda.fernandez@sba.gov. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final determination on whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Fernandez, U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third
Street SW., Washington, DC 20416; (202) 207-7337;
brenda.fernandez@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed rule implements Section 1614 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014, Public Law
113-66, December 26, 2013 (hereinafter NDAA 2014). Section 1614 amended
section 8(d)(6)(D) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 637(d)(6)(d),
to provide that where a prime contractor has a subcontracting plan for
a specific prime contract with an executive agency, as required by
Section 8(d) of the Small Business Act, the prime contractor will
receive credit towards its subcontracting plan goals for awards made to
small business concerns at any tier under the contract. When a prime
contractor awards a subcontract to a firm it is generally considered a
first tier subcontract. That subcontractor may award a subcontract,
which would be considered a second tier subcontract, and so on.
Currently, a prime contractor generally receives credit towards its
small business subcontracting plan goals for awards made at the first
tier level.
Other than small business prime contractors report on their small
business subcontracting activity in
[[Page 60301]]
various ways. Some firms have individual subcontracting plans for each
and every Federal prime contract that meets certain threshold
requirements. Other firms have commercial plans, which is a plan that
covers a firm's entire fiscal year and the firm's entire commercial
production sold by either the entire company or a portion thereof
(e.g., division, plant, or product line). See Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) Sec. 19.701. Some firms that do business with the
Department of Defense have comprehensive subcontracting plans, where
the firms' negotiate goals and report on a plant, division or company-
wide basis, instead on each individual Federal contract. See Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation Sec. 219.702. Section 1614 further
provides that lower tier reporting credit shall not apply where a
subcontracting plan applies to more than one contract or to one
contract with more than one executive agency. Section 1614 applies only
when determining whether or not a prime contractor has met its
individual subcontracting plan goals. Thus, Section 1614 does not apply
where the prime contractor has a commercial plan or comprehensive
subcontracting plan. Section 1614 does not alter the requirement that
lower tier subcontractors have subcontracting plans when the
subcontracting threshold amounts are met. Section 1614 must be
implemented so that subcontracting dollars are only reported once for
the same award to avoid double and triple counting the dollars,
notwithstanding the fact that a small business subcontract may be
reported under more than one subcontracting plan. Section 1614 further
provides that where a prime contractor or subcontractor is required to
have an individual subcontracting plan, the prime contractor or the
subcontractor will review and approve subcontracting plans submitted by
their subcontractors, monitor their subcontractors' compliance with the
subcontracting plans, ensure that reports are submitted by their
subcontractors, acknowledge receipt of subcontractors' reports, monitor
subcontractor performance, and discuss subcontractor performance with
subcontractors where necessary.
Section 1614 also requires that a subcontracting plan must contain
a recitation of the types of records the prime contractor will maintain
to demonstrate the procedures which have been adopted to ensure that
subcontractors at all tiers comply with the requirements and goals in
their respective subcontracting plans, including the establishment of
source lists to identify small business concerns, small business
concerns owned and controlled by veterans, small business concerns
owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone
small business concerns, small business concerns owned and controlled
by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, and small
business concerns owned and controlled by women, and efforts to
identify and award subcontracts to such concerns.
SBA is also proposing to clarify that the NAICS code and
corresponding size standard for a particular subcontract must appear in
the solicitation for the subcontract. The current regulations only
reference the subcontract itself. However, the solicitation for the
subcontract must contain the size standard that a firm must represent
that it meets at the time of its offer for the subcontract in order to
be considered a small business concern for that subcontract. In
addition, SBA is proposing to allow prime contractors and
subcontractors to accept electronic size and socioeconomic
representations provided the solicitation and/or subcontract require
the firm making the electronic representations to verify the accuracy
of the representations. Compliance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563,
12988, and 13132, the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35), and
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612).
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is a significant regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the next section contains SBA's
Regulatory Impact Analysis. This is not a major rule, however, under
the Congressional Review Act.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory action?
The proposed regulations implement Section 1614 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014. Section 1614(c)(3)
requires the Administrator to promulgate regulations necessary to
implement the Act.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory action?
The benefits and costs of the proposed regulations are minimal.
Other than small business prime contractors and subcontractors already
establish individual subcontracting plan goals and report on their
achievements if the subcontracting plan thresholds are met. Under
Section 1614, a prime contractor with an individual subcontracting plan
will receive credit towards its goals for small business performance at
lower tiers. Thus, there will be some costs to the prime contractor to
propose subcontracting plan goals that incorporate small business
performance at lower tiers, and there will also be costs to the
Government to evaluate whether the prime contractor's goals adequately
address maximum practicable small business subcontracting opportunity
at all tiers. There may also be costs to the Government as eSRS may
have to be modified to allow large business prime contractors to
receive small business credit at any tier towards their subcontracting
plan goals. There should not be any costs imposed on small business
concerns.
3. What are the alternatives to this final rule?
Many of the proposed regulations are required to implement specific
statutory provisions which require promulgation of implementing
regulations. There are no other alternatives that would meet the
statutory requirements.
Executive Order 13563
As part of its ongoing efforts to engage stakeholders in the
development of its regulations, SBA has solicited comments and
suggestions from procuring agencies on how to best implement Section
1614. SBA has incorporated those comments and suggestions to the extent
feasible. SBA intends to incorporate, where feasible, public input into
the final rule.
Executive Order 12988
For purposes of Executive Order 12988, SBA has drafted this
proposed rule, to the extent practicable, in accordance with the
standards set forth in section 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of that Executive
Order, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
This rule has no preemptive or retroactive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For the purpose of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that
this proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various layers of government. Therefore, SBA has determined that this
proposed rule has no federalism implications
[[Page 60302]]
warranting preparation of a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35
For purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), SBA has
determined that this proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would not
impose new government-wide reporting and record keeping requirements on
other than small prime contractors and subcontractors. When this rule
is implemented in the FAR, there may be a requirement to amend or
create an information collection. Thus, any PRA implications as part of
any proposed rulemaking implementing an SBA final rule in the FAR will
be addressed in the FAR rule.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
According to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601,
when an agency issues a rulemaking, it must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis to address the impact of the rule on small
entities. However, section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to certify a
rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking is not
expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities. The RFA defines ``small entity'' to include ``small
businesses,'' ``small organizations,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdictions.'' This proposed rule concerns various aspects of SBA's
contracting programs. As such, the rule relates to small business
concerns, but would not affect ``small organizations'' or ``small
governmental jurisdictions'' because those programs generally apply
only to ``business concerns'' as defined by SBA regulations, in other
words, to small businesses organized for profit. ``Small
organizations'' or ``small governmental jurisdictions'' are non-profits
or governmental entities and do not generally qualify as ``business
concerns'' within the meaning of SBA's regulations.
There are approximately 290,000 concerns registered as small
business concerns in the System for Award Management (SAM) that could
potentially be impacted by the implementation of Section 1614. However,
we cannot say with any certainty how many will be impacted because we
do not know how many of these concerns participate in government
contracting as subcontractors. A firm is required to register in SAM in
order to participate in Federal contracting as a prime contractor, but
not for purposes of subcontracting. However, as discussed elsewhere in
this proposed rule, there are no new compliance or other costs imposed
by the proposed rule on small business concerns. In sum, the proposed
amendments would not have a disparate impact on small businesses and
would increase their opportunities to participate in federal government
contracting as subcontractors without imposing any additional costs.
For the reasons discussed, SBA certifies that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
business concerns.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 121
Government contracts, Government procurement, Small businesses,
Size standards.
13 CFR Part 125
Government contracts, Government procurement, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses, Small business
subcontracting.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA proposes to amend 13
CFR parts 121 and 125 as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 13 CFR part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662, and 694a(9).
0
2. Amend Sec. 121.411 by removing the second sentence in paragraph (b)
and adding two sentences in its place to read as follows:
Sec. 121.411 What are the size procedures for SBA's Section 8(d)
Subcontracting Program?
* * * * *
(b) * * * Prime contractors may accept a subcontractor's electronic
self-certification as to size, if the solicitation for the subcontract
contains a clause which provides that the subcontractor verifies by
submission of the offer that the size representations and
certifications are accurate and complete. Electronic submission may
include any method acceptable to the prime contractor including, but
not limited to, size representations and certifications made in SAM (or
any successor system). * * *.
* * * * *
PART 125--GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PROGRAMS
0
3. The authority citation for 13 CFR part 125 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632(p), (q); 634(b)(6), 637, 644, 657f, and
657q.
0
4. Amend Sec. 125.3 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a)(1) introductory text;
0
b. Add paragraph (a)(1)(i)(C);
0
c. Revise the heading for paragraph (c);
0
d. Revise the first sentence of paragraph (c)(1)(i);
0
e. Revise paragraph (c)(1)(v);
0
f. Remove the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (c)(1)(viii);
0
g. Add new paragraphs (c)(1)(x) and (c)(1)(xi).
Sec. 125.3 What types of subcontracting assistance are available to
small businesses?
(a) * * *
(1) Subcontract--under this section the term `subcontract' means a
legally binding agreement between a contractor that is already under
contract to another party to perform work and a third party (other than
one involving an employer-employee relationship), hereinafter referred
to as the subcontractor, for the subcontractor to perform a part or all
of the work that the contractor has undertaken.
(i) * * *
(C) Where the subcontracting goals pertain only to an individual
subcontracting plan, the contractor may receive credit for small
business concerns performing as first tier subcontractors or
subcontractors at any tier pursuant to the subcontracting plans
required under paragraph (c) of this section in an amount equal to the
dollar value of work awarded to such small business concerns. Prime
contractors must incorporate the subcontracting plan goals of their
lower tier subcontractors in their individual subcontracting plans.
Lower tier subcontractors must have their own individual subcontracting
plans if the subcontract is at or above the subcontracting plan
threshold, and are required to meet their subcontracting plan goals.
The actual subcontracting dollars are only reported once for the same
award to avoid double counting the dollars, notwithstanding the fact
that a small business subcontract may be reported under more than one
subcontracting plan.
* * * * *
(c) Additional responsibilities of other than small contractors.
(1) * * *
(i) Submitting and negotiating before award an acceptable
subcontracting
[[Page 60303]]
plan that reflects maximum practicable opportunities for small
businesses in the performance of the contract as subcontractors or
suppliers at all tiers of performance. * * *
* * * * *
(v) The contractor must assign to the solicitation and the
resulting subcontract the NAICS code and corresponding size standard
that best describes the principal purpose of the subcontract (see Sec.
121.410 of this chapter). The prime contractor may rely on a
subcontractor's electronic representations and certifications, if the
solicitation for the subcontract contains a clause which provides that
the subcontractor verifies by submission of the offer that the size or
socioeconomic representations and certifications are current, accurate
and complete as of the date of the offer for the subcontract.
Electronic submission may include any method acceptable to the prime
contractor including, but not limited to, size or socioeconomic
representations and certifications made in SAM (or any successor
system). A prime contractor or subcontractor may not require the use of
SAM (or any successor system) for purposes of representing size or
socioeconomic status in connection with a subcontract;
* * * * *
(x) The prime contractor must require all subcontractors (except
small business concerns) who receive subcontracts in excess of
$1,500,000 in the case of a subcontract for the construction of any
public facility, or in excess of $650,000 in the case of all other
subcontracts, and which offer further subcontracting possibilities, to
adopt a subcontracting plan of its own consistent with this section,
and must ensure at a minimum that all subcontractors required to
maintain subcontracting plans pursuant to this paragraph, will review
and approve subcontracting plans submitted by their subcontractors;
monitor subcontractor compliance with their approved subcontracting
plans; ensure that subcontracting reports are submitted by their
subcontractors when required; acknowledge receipt of their
subcontractors' reports; compare the performance of their
subcontractors to subcontracting plans and goals; and discuss
performance with subcontractors when necessary to ensure their
subcontractors make a good faith effort to comply with their
subcontracting plans; and
(xi) The prime contractor must recite the types of records the
prime will maintain to demonstrate procedures which have been adopted
to ensure subcontractors at all tiers comply with the requirements and
goals set forth in the plan established in accordance with paragraph
(c)(1)(x) of this section, including the establishment of source lists
of small business concerns, small business concerns owned and
controlled by veterans, small business concerns owned and controlled by
service-disabled veterans, qualified HUBZone small business concerns,
small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and
economically disadvantaged individuals, and small business concerns
owned and controlled by women, and the efforts to identify and award
subcontracts to such small business concerns.
* * * * *
Dated: September 28, 2015.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-25234 Filed 10-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P