Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers, including Changes Related to the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Extensions of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural Hospital Program and the Low-Volume Payment Adjustment for Hospitals; Correction, 60055-60069 [2015-25269]
Download as PDF
60055
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—WASTES EXCLUDED FROM NON-SPECIFIC SOURCES
Facility
Address
*
*
John Deere Des Moines
Ankeny, IA.
Works of Deere Company.
Waste description
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 412
[CMS–1632–CN]
RIN 0938–AS41
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient
Prospective Payment Systems for
Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System Policy Changes and
Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of
Quality Reporting Requirements for
Specific Providers, including Changes
Related to the Electronic Health
Record Incentive Program; Extensions
of the Medicare-Dependent, Small
Rural Hospital Program and the LowVolume Payment Adjustment for
Hospitals; Correction
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule and interim final rule
with comment period; correction.
AGENCY:
This document corrects
technical and typographical errors in
the final rule and interim final rule with
comment period that appeared in the
Federal Register on August 17, 2015
titled ‘‘Medicare Program; Hospital
Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems
for Acute Care Hospitals and the LongTerm Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System Policy Changes and
Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of
Quality Reporting Requirements for
Specific Providers, including Changes
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
*
*
*
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2015–19049 which
appeared in the August 17, 2015
Federal Register, titled ‘‘Medicare
Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective
Payment Systems for Acute Care
Hospitals and the Long-Term Care
Hospital Prospective Payment System
Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016
Rates; Revisions of Quality Reporting
Requirements for Specific Providers,
including Changes Related to the
Electronic Health Record Incentive
Program; Extensions of the MedicareDependent, Small Rural Hospital
Program and the Low-Volume Payment
Adjustment for Hospitals’’ (hereinafter
referred to as the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH
PPS final rule), there were a number of
technical and typographical errors that
are identified and corrected in section
IV. of this correcting document. The
provisions in this correction document
are effective as if they had been
included in the document that appeared
in the August 17, 2015 Federal Register.
Accordingly, the corrections are
effective October 1, 2015.
II. Summary of Errors
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
On page 49412, we made a
typographical error with regards to an
MS–DRG code. We made inadvertent
and technical errors related to the
employment cost index (ECI) used in
the wage index, the MS–DRG
PO 00000
*
*
*
*
*
*
1. Delisting Levels: (A) The WWTS Filter Cake shall not exhibit any of the ‘‘Characteristics of
Hazardous Waste’’ in 40 CFR part 261, subpart C. (B) All TCLP leachable concentrations
(40 CFR 261.24(a)) for the following constituents must not exceed the following levels
(mg/L for TCLP): Nickel—32.4. (C) Reserved. (D) All total concentrations for the following
constituents must not exceed the following levels (mg/kg): Cadmium—25.5; Chromium
(total)—51,000; Chromium (hexavalent)—41; Copper—2877; Nickel—3030; Zinc—10,170;
Cyanide—9, Oil and Grease—64,500.
Related to the Electronic Health Record
Incentive Program; Extensions of the
Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural
Hospital Program and the Low-Volume
Payment Adjustment for Hospitals.’’
DATES: This document is effective
October 1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Thompson, (410) 786–4487.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
[FR Doc. 2015–24459 Filed 10–2–15; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
reclassification and recalibration budget
neutrality adjustment factor (as
discussed in section II.B. of this
correcting document), and the MGCRB
reclassification status of certain
providers (as discussed in section II.B.
of this correcting document), each of
which resulted in additional conforming
corrections. Specifically, on page 49492,
we inadvertently miscalculated the
estimated percentage change in the ECI
for compensation for the 30-day
increment after March 14, 2013 and
before April 15, 2013 for private
industry hospital workers from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS’)
‘‘Compensation and Working
Conditions.’’ The ECI is used to adjust
a hospital’s wage data to calculate the
wage index, and is based on the
midpoint of a cost reporting period.
On page 49498, we are making
conforming changes to the number of
hospitals in New Jersey that will be
receiving the imputed rural floor and to
the FY 2016 rural floor value for Nevada
as a result of correcting the ECI error,
the technical error in the calculation of
the MS–DRG reclassification and
recalibration budget neutrality
adjustment factor (discussed in section
II.B. of this correcting document), and
the error in the reclassification status of
50 providers (discussed in section II.B.
of this correcting document).
On page 49619, consistent with the
conforming corrections to the IPPS
outlier fixed-loss cost threshold for FY
2016 discussed in section II.B. of this
correcting document, we are making
further conforming corrections to the FY
2016 outlier fixed-loss amount for site
neutral cases in the context of our
discussion regarding LTCH PPS highcost outliers.
B. Summary of Errors in the Addendum
On page 49776, we are correcting the
MS–DRG reclassification and
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
60056
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
recalibration budget neutrality
adjustment factor as a result of a
technical error made in the calculation
of this factor. We are also making
conforming changes to the affected rates
and factors on pages 49787, 49788 and
49790 as a result of this error.
In addition, as discussed in section
II.A. of this correcting document, we
inadvertently miscalculated the
percentage change in the ECI. The
correction to the ECI necessitated
recalculation of the pre-reclassified
unadjusted and occupational-mix
adjusted wage indexes and Geographic
Adjustment Factors (GAFs) of certain
core-based statistical areas (CBSAs). As
a result of the corrections to the ECI and
the MS–DRG reclassification and
recalibration budget neutrality
adjustment factor, on page 49776, we
recalculated the wage index budget
neutrality adjustment and are making
conforming changes to the tables on
pages 49787 and 49788.
On pages 49776, we recalculated the
reclassification hospital budget
neutrality adjustment because the
reclassification status in the FY 2016
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule did not
properly reflect one of the following for
50 providers:
• Withdrawal or termination of a
Medicare Geographic Classification
Review Board (MGCRB) reclassification
for FY 2016.
• Assignment to the reclassified
CBSA approved by the MGCRB or CMS
Administrator.
As a result of the MS–DRG
reclassification and recalibration budget
neutrality adjustment factor error, the
ECI error, and reclassification error, we
are making conforming technical
changes to tables on pages 49787 and
49788. The technical errors discussed
previously (the percentage change in the
ECI error, MS–DRG reclassification and
recalibration budget neutrality
adjustment factor error, and
reclassification error) directly affected
and required the recalculation of the
wage index, the recalculation of certain
budget neutrality adjustments, and also
indirectly resulted in errors to other
factors and rates. Specifically, on pages
49777, 49778, 49787, and 49788, we are
making conforming corrections to the
following:
• The rural floor budget neutrality
adjustment.
• The wage index transition budget
neutrality adjustment.
• The Rural Community Hospital
Demonstration program budget
neutrality adjustment.
In addition, as discussed in section
II.D. of this correcting document, we are
making corrections to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
uncompensated care payments. As a
result of these errors (the percentage
change in the ECI error, MS–DRG
reclassification and recalibration budget
neutrality adjustment factor error,
reclassification error, and
uncompensated care error) and
conforming corrections, on page 49785,
we are making conforming corrections
to the calculation of the outlier fixedloss cost threshold and the national and
Puerto Rico-specific outlier budget
neutrality factors. We are making further
conforming corrections to the tables on
pages 49787 and 49788 as a result of
these changes, including conforming
corrections in the calculation of the
national and Puerto Rico specific
operating standardized amounts, as a
result of the conforming corrections to
the operating IPPS budget neutrality
factors and outlier threshold described
previously.
On pages 49791, 49793, 49794, and
49795, in our discussion of the
determination of the Federal hospital
inpatient capital related prospective
payment rate update, we are making
conforming corrections to the national
GAF/MS–DRG budget neutrality
adjustment factor (due to the errors in
our calculation of the GAFs, which are
computed from the wage index) and to
the outlier threshold, and outlier budget
neutrality adjustment factors (as
discussed previously).
Also, as a result of these errors, on
page 49794, we are making conforming
corrections in the table showing the
comparison of factors and adjustments
for the FY2015 capital Federal rate and
FY 2016 capital Federal rate and in the
table showing the comparison of factors
and adjustments for the proposed FY
2016 capital Federal rate and final FY
2016 capital Federal rate.
On page 49804, in our discussion
regarding LTCH PPS high-cost outlier
payments for site neutral payment rate
cases, we are making conforming
corrections in the FY 2016 fixed-loss
amount for site neutral cases, due to the
conforming correction to the IPPS
outlier fixed-loss cost threshold for FY
2016 (as discussed previously).
On page 49808, we are correcting the
information on how to access the LTCH
PPS tables for the FY 2016 final rule on
the CMS Web Site.
On page 49809, we are making
conforming corrections to the national
and Puerto Rico specific operating
standardized amounts and capital
standard Federal payment rates in
Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result of
the corrections to certain budget
neutrality factors and the outlier
threshold (as described previously).
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Summary of Errors in the Appendices
On page 49809, we are correcting our
estimate of the increase in FY 2016
operating payments and capital
payments as a result of the technical
errors that led to corrections to certain
budget neutrality factors and the outlier
threshold (as described previously). On
pages 49813 through 49821, 49823,
49828 through 49830, and 49840, in our
regulatory impact analyses, we are
making conforming corrections in the
discussion of the analysis of the changes
in operating and capital IPPS payments
for FY 2016 and the effects of certain
budget neutrality factors as a result of
the technical errors (as discussed
previously) that lead to conforming
corrections to the calculation of the
operating and capital IPPS budget
neutrality factors, outlier threshold,
operating standardized amounts, and
capital Federal rates.
On page 49823, in the table titled
‘‘Modeled Disproportionate Share
Hospital Payments for Estimated FY
2016 DSH Hospitals by Hospital Type:
Model DSH $ (In Millions) From FY
2015 To FY 2016’’ and the
accompanying discussion, we made
technical and formatting errors in the
estimated impacts resulting from
inadvertent errors in the calculation of
Factor 3 for certain hospitals.
On pages 49829 through 49830, we
are making conforming corrections to
Table III—Comparison of Total
Payments Per Case (FY 2015 Payments
Compared to FY 2016 Payments).
On page 49841, we are making
conforming corrections to the
accounting statements and tables for
acute care hospitals that arose from the
corrections of errors as described in
section II.B. of this correcting document.
D. Summary of Errors in and
Corrections to Files and Tables Posted
on the CMS Web site
1. Errors and Corrections to IPPS and
LTCH PPS Tables
We are correcting the errors in the
following IPPS tables that are listed on
page 49808 of the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH
PPS final rule and are available on the
Internet on the CMS Web Site at https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Feefor-Service-Payment/
AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2016-IPPS-FinalRule-Home-Page.html:
Table 2—Final Case-Mix Index and
Wage Index Table by CCN, because of
the ECI error discussed in section II.A.
of this correction document, we are
correcting the values in the columns
titled FY 2016 Wage Index, Average
Hourly Wage FY 2016, and 3-Year
Average Hourly Wage (2014, 2015,
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
2016) for 4 providers located in CBSAs
04, 20, and 12620. Because the average
hourly wage changed for these four
providers which affects the area wage
index, we are also correcting the FY
2016 wage indexes for other providers
geographically located in, or reclassified
into, CBSAs 04, 20, and 12620.
As discussed in section II.B. of this
correcting document, we are also
correcting the reclassification status of
50 providers. Thus, we are correcting
the FY 2016 wage index values for these
providers to reflect assignment to their
geographic CBSAs or reclassified
CBSAs, as applicable.
Furthermore, because we are revising
the national rural floor budget neutrality
adjustment as discussed in section II.B.
of this correcting document, the wage
index values for numerous providers in
Table 2 are corrected as well.
Table 3—Final Wage Index Table by
CBSA, by correcting the ECI error, we
are making corresponding changes to
the wage indexes and GAFs of CBSAs
04, 20, and 12620 listed in Table 3.
Specifically, we are correcting the
values in the columns titled FY 2016
Average Hourly Wage, 3-Year Average
Hourly Wage (2014, 2015, 2016), Wage
Index, Reclassified Wage Index, GAF,
and Reclassified GAF, for CBSAs 04, 20,
and 12620.
Also, by correcting Table 2 to
properly indicate the withdrawal,
termination, or reclassification status of
the 50 providers, we are making
corresponding changes to the wage
indexes and GAFs listed in Table 3.
Specifically, we are correcting the
values in the columns titled Wage
Index, Reclassified Wage Index, GAF,
and Reclassified GAF. Furthermore,
because we are revising the national
rural floor budget neutrality adjustment
as discussed in section II.B. of this
correcting document, we are making
corrections to the wage index values for
numerous CBSAs in Table 3 as well.
Table 5—List of Medicare Severity
Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS–DRGs),
Relative Weighting Factors, and
Geometric and Arithmetic Mean Length
of Stay—FY 2016, in the column labeled
’TYPE’, to be consistent with previous
fiscal years, we are revising the entries
labeled ’P’ to SURG and the entries
labeled ’M’ to MED.
Table 10—New Technology Add-On
Payment Thresholds for Applications
for FY 2017. We are correcting the
thresholds in this table as a result of the
corrections to the operating
standardized amounts discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document.
Table 11—MS–LTC–DRGs, Relative
Weights, Geometric Average Length of
Stay, Short Stay Outlier (SSO)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
Threshold, and ’’IPPS Comparable
Threshold’’ for LTCH PPS Discharges
Occurring from October 1, 2015 through
September 30, 2016. We are correcting
this table by correcting typographical
errors for certain MS–LTC–DRGs in the
columns titled ‘‘Relative Weight,’’
‘‘Geometric Average Length of Stay,’’
‘‘Short-Stay Outlier (SSO) Threshold,’’
and ‘‘IPPS Comparable Threshold.’’
Table 12A—LTCH PPS Wage Index
for Urban Areas for Discharges
Occurring From October 1, 2015
through September 30, 2016. We are
correcting this table by correcting the
values in the column titled ‘‘LTCH PPS
Wage Index’’ as result of the error in the
miscalculation percentage change in the
ECI, which affected the wage data for
CBSA 12620, as discussed in section
II.A. of this correcting document.
Table 12B—LTCH PPS Wage Index for
Rural Areas for Discharges Occurring
From October 1, 2015 through
September 30, 2016. We are correcting
this table by correcting the values in the
column titled ‘‘LTCH PPS Wage Index’’
as result of the technical error in the
percentage change in the ECI, which
affected the wage data for CBSAs 04 and
20, as discussed in section II.A. of this
correcting document.
Table 14—List of Hospitals with
Fewer Than 1,600 Medicare Discharges
Based on the March 2015 Update of the
FY 2014 MedPAR File and Potentially
Eligible Hospitals for the FY 2016 LowVolume Hospital Payment Adjustment
(Eligibility for the low-volume hospital
payment adjustment is also dependent
upon meeting the mileage criteria
specified at § 412.101(b)(2)(ii)). We are
correcting this table by correcting
typographical and technical errors for
certain hospitals in the column titled
‘‘FY 2016 Low-Volume Payment
Adjustment (Percentage Add-on).
Table 18—FY 2016 Medicare DSH
Uncompensated Care Payment Factor 3
and Projected DSH Eligibility. For the
FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule, we
published a list of hospitals that we
identified to be subsection (d) hospitals
and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals
eligible to receive empirically justified
Medicare DSH payment adjustments
and uncompensated care payments for
FY 2016. We also published, in the
Supplemental Medicare DSH File
located in the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS
final rule data files page at https://
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Feefor-Service-Payment/
AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2016-IPPS-FinalRule-Home-Page-Items/FY2016-IPPSFinal-Rule-Data-Files.html, the data
used to calculate each hospital’s Factor
3, total uncompensated care payment,
and uncompensated care payment per
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60057
discharge. Shortly after the publication
of the FY2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule, we discovered that in calculating
Factor 3 of the uncompensated care
payment methodology, we inadvertently
excluded the Medicaid days from the
most recently available 2012 or 2011
cost report for certain providers that
were projected to receive Medicare DSH
in FY 2016. As a result, these providers
had no Medicaid days included in the
calculation of Factor 3. In order to
correct these errors, we have Factor 3 for
all hospitals to incorporate the changes
to the data for these providers whose
Medicare hospital cost report data were
inadvertently excluded. These
corrections to the uncompensated care
payments impacted the calculation of
the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold for
outlier payments.
In addition, we discovered that we
had—
• Inadvertently calculated Factor 3
for several providers using Medicaid
days from a cost report that was less
than a full year when a cost report that
was a full year or closer to being a full
year was available;
• Erroneously provided Factor 3
values for certain new providers; and
• Calculated a Factor 3 for a hospital
that has ceased operations.
We are revising Factor 3 for all
hospitals to correct these errors;
however, unlike the error in which
Medicaid days for certain providers
were excluded, the impacts of these
three errors (specified in the bulleted
list) are too small to change other
aspects of the IPPS ratesetting, such as
the calculation of the fixed-loss
threshold for outlier payments.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and
comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, and incorporates a statement of
the finding and the reasons therefore in
the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily
requires a 30-day delay in effective date
of final rules after the date of their
publication in the Federal Register.
This 30-day delay in effective date can
be waived, however, if an agency finds
for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60058
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
to the public interest, and the agency
incorporates a statement of the findings
and its reasons in the rule issued.
We believe that this correcting
document does not constitute a rule that
would be subject to the APA notice and
comment or delayed effective date
requirements. This correcting document
corrects technical and typographic
errors in the preamble, addendum,
payment rates, tables, and appendices
included or referenced in the FY 2016
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule but does not
make substantive changes to the policies
or payment methodologies that were
adopted in the final rule. As a result,
this correcting document is intended to
ensure that the information in the FY
2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
accurately reflects the policies adopted
in that final rule.
In addition, even if this were a rule to
which the notice and comment
procedures and delayed effective date
requirements applied, we find that there
is good cause to waive such
requirements. Undertaking further
notice and comment procedures to
incorporate the corrections in this
document into the final rule or delaying
the effective date would be contrary to
the public interest because it is in the
public’s interest for providers to receive
appropriate payments in as timely a
manner as possible, and to ensure that
the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
accurately reflects our policies.
Furthermore, such procedures would be
unnecessary, as we are not altering our
payment methodologies or policies, but
rather, we are simply implementing
correctly the policies that we previously
proposed, received comment on, and
subsequently finalized. This correcting
document is intended solely to ensure
that the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule accurately reflects these payment
methodologies and policies. Therefore,
we believe we have good cause to waive
the notice and comment and effective
date requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2015–19049 of August 17,
2015 (80 FR 49325), we are making the
following corrections:
A. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 49412, first column, third
bulleted paragraph, the phrase ‘‘MS–
DRG 007’’ is corrected to read ‘‘MS–
DRG 207’’.
2. On page 49492, first column, after
the first partial paragraph, in the table
titled ‘‘Midpoint of Cost Reporting
Period’’, last entry (After 03/14/2013) is
corrected to read as follows:
MIDPOINT OF COST REPORTING
PERIOD
After
Before
Adjustment
factor
03/14/2013
04/15/2013
0.99851
3. On page 49498, first column,
second full paragraph, line 9, the figure
‘‘21’’ is corrected to read ‘‘19’’.
3. On page 49498, second column,
first partial paragraph, line 13, the figure
‘‘1.0194’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1.0190’’.
4. On page 49619, third column, third
full paragraph, line 4, the figure
‘‘22,544’’ is corrected to read ‘‘22,539’’.
B. Correction of Errors in the Addendum
1. On page 49776:
a. First column:
(1) Fourth full paragraph, line 3, the
figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.998405’’.
(2) Fourth full paragraph, line 8, the
figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.998405’’.
(3) Fifth full paragraph, line 16, the
figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.998405’’.
b. Second column, third full
paragraph:
(1) Line 9, the figure ‘‘0.998749’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.998738’’.
(2) Line 13, the figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.998405’’.
(3) Line 15, the figure ‘‘0.998749’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.998738’’.
(4) Line 21, the figure ‘‘0.997150’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.997145’’.
c. Third column, third full paragraph,
line 12, the figure ‘‘0.987905’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.988168’’.
2. On page 49777, second column, last
paragraph, line 3, the figure ‘‘0.990298’’
is corrected to read ‘‘0.989859’’.
3. On page 49778:
a. First column, second full
paragraph:
(1) Line 3, the figure ‘‘0.999996’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999997’’.
(2) Line 6, the figure ‘‘0.999996’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.999997’’.
b. Third column, last paragraph, line
36, the figure ‘‘0.999861’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.999837’’.
4. On page 49785:
a. Top third of the page, second
column, first full paragraph, last line,
the figure ‘‘22,544’’ is corrected to read
‘‘22,539’’.
b. Middle of the page, the untitled
table, is corrected to read as follows:
Operating
standardized
amounts
National ............................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ......................................................................................................................................................
5. On pages 49787 and 49788, the
table titled ‘‘Comparison of FY 2015
Standardized Amounts to the FY 2016
Capital
Federal rate
0.948999
0.935570
0.936503
0.919204
Standardized Amounts’’, is corrected to
read as follows:
COMPARISON OF FY 2015 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Hospital submitted
quality data and is a
meaningful EHR user
FY 2015 Base Rate after removing:
1. FY 2015 Geographic Reclassification
Budget Neutrality (0.990429)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
Hospital submitted
quality data and is
NOT a meaningful
EHR user
Hospital did NOT
submit quality data
and is a meaningful
EHR user
Hospital did NOT
submit quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is
Greater Than
1.0000: Labor
(69.6%): $4,324.23
Nonlabor (30.4%):
$1,888.74.
If Wage Index is
Greater Than
1.0000: Labor
(69.6%): $4,324.23
Nonlabor (30.4%):
$1,888.74.
If Wage Index is
Greater Than
1.0000: Labor
(69.6%): $4,324.23
Nonlabor (30.4%):
$1,888.74.
If Wage Index is
Greater Than
1.0000: Labor
(69.6%): $4,324.23
Nonlabor (30.4%):
$1,888.74.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
60059
COMPARISON OF FY 2015 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS TO THE FY 2016 STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS—Continued
Hospital submitted
quality data and is a
meaningful EHR user
2. FY 2015 Rural Community Hospital
Demonstration Program Budget Neutrality (0.999313)
3. Cumulative FY 2008, FY 2009, FY
2012, FY 2013 and FY 2014, FY 2015
Documentation and Coding Adjustment as Required under Sections
7(b)(1)(A) and 7(b)(1)(B) of Pub. L.
110–90 and Documentation and Coding Recoupment Adjustment as required under Section 631 of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012
(0.9329)
4. FY 2015 Operating Outlier Offset
(0.948999)
5. FY 2015 New Labor Market Delineation Wage Index Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor (0.998854)
FY 2016 Update Factor .................................
FY 2016 MS–DRG Recalibration and Wage
Index Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Reclassification Budget Neutrality
Factor.
FY 2016 Rural Community Demonstration
Program Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Operating Outlier Factor .................
Cumulative Factor: FY 2008, FY 2009, FY
2012, FY 2013, FY 2014, FY 2015 and FY
2016 Documentation and Coding Adjustment as Required under Sections
7(b)(1)(A) and 7(b)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 110–
90 and Documentation and Coding
Recoupment Adjustment as required under
Section 631 of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.
FY 2016 New Labor Market Delineation
Wage Index 3-Year Hold Harmless Transition Budget Neutrality Factor.
National Standardized Amount for FY 2016 if
Wage Index is Greater Than 1.0000;
Labor/Non-Labor Share Percentage (69.6/
30.4).
National Standardized Amount for FY 2016 if
Wage Index is less Than or Equal to
1.0000; Labor/Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/38).
Hospital submitted
quality data and is
NOT a meaningful
EHR user
Hospital did NOT
submit quality data
and is a meaningful
EHR user
Hospital did NOT
submit quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
If Wage Index is less
Than or Equal to
1.0000: Labor
(62%): $3,852.04
Nonlabor (38%):
$2,360.93.
If Wage Index is less
Than or Equal to
1.0000: Labor
(62%): $3,852.04
Nonlabor (38%):
$2,360.93.
If Wage Index is less
Than or Equal to
1.0000: Labor
(62%): $3,852.04
Nonlabor (38%):
$2,360.93.
If Wage Index is less
Than or Equal to
1.0000: Labor
(62%): $3,852.04
Nonlabor (38%):
$2,360.93.
1.017 ..........................
0.997145 ....................
1.005 ..........................
0.997145 ....................
1.011 ..........................
0.997145 ....................
0.999.
0.997145.
0.988168 ....................
0.988168 ....................
0.988168 ....................
0.988168.
0.999837 ....................
0.999837 ....................
0.999837 ....................
0.999837.
0.948999 ....................
0.9255 ........................
0.948999 ....................
0.9255 ........................
0.948999 ....................
0.9255 ........................
0.948999.
0.9255.
0.999997 ....................
0.999997 ....................
0.999997 ....................
0.999997.
Labor: $3,805.30 ........
Nonlabor: $1,662.09 ..
Labor: $3,760.40 ........
Nonlabor: $1,642.48 ..
Labor: $3,782.85 ........
Nonlabor: $1,652.28 ..
Labor: $3,737.95.
Nonlabor: $1,632.67.
Labor: $3,389.78 ........
Nonlabor: $2,077.61 ..
Labor: $3,349.79 ........
Nonlabor: $2,053.09 ..
Labor: $3,369.78 ........
Nonlabor: $2,065.35 ..
Labor: $3,329.78.
Nonlabor: $2,040.84.
6. On page 49788, in the center of the
page, the table titled ‘‘Comparison of FY
2015 Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate
to the FY 2016 Puerto Rico-Specific
Payment Rate’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
COMPARISON OF FY 2015 PUERTO RICO-SPECIFIC PAYMENT RATE TO THE FY 2016 PUERTO RICO-SPECIFIC PAYMENT
RATE
Update (1.7 percent); Wage index
is greater than 1.0000; Labor/NonLabor Share Percentage (63.2/
36.8)
Labor: $1,758.02 ...........................
Nonlabor: $1,023.66. .....................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FY 2015 Puerto Rico Base Rate, after removing:
1. FY 2015 Geographic Reclassification Budget Neutrality
(0.990429).
2. FY 2015 Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program
Budget Neutrality (0.999313)
3. FY 2015 Puerto Rico Operating Outlier Offset (0.926334)
4. FY 2015 New Labor Market Delineation Wage Index Transition
Budget Neutrality Factor (0.998854)
FY 2016 Update Factor ...........................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Update (1.7 percent); Wage index
is less than or equal to 1.0000;
Labor/Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/38)
Labor: $1,724.64
Nonlabor: $1,057.04.
1.017 ..............................................
1.017.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60060
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
COMPARISON OF FY 2015 PUERTO RICO-SPECIFIC PAYMENT RATE TO THE FY 2016 PUERTO RICO-SPECIFIC PAYMENT
RATE—Continued
Update (1.7 percent); Wage index
is greater than 1.0000; Labor/NonLabor Share Percentage (63.2/
36.8)
FY 2016 MS-DRG Recalibration Budget Neutrality Factor ....................
FY 2016 Reclassification Budget Neutrality Factor ................................
FY 2016 Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 New Labor Market Delineation Wage Index 3-Year Hold
Harmless Transition Budget Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Puerto Rico Operating Outlier Factor ......................................
Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate for FY 2016 ...................................
7. On page 49790, first column, last
paragraph, line 15, the figure
‘‘0.998399’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.998405’’.
8. On page 49791, third column, first
full paragraph, line 6, the figure ‘‘0.85’’
is corrected to read ‘‘0.87’’.
9. On page 49793:
a. Second column:
(1) First full paragraph:
(a) Line 16, the figure ‘‘0.9979’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9982’’.
(b) Line 19, the figure ‘‘0.9864’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9866’’.
Update (1.7 percent); Wage index
is less than or equal to 1.0000;
Labor/Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/38)
0.998405 ........................................
0.988168 ........................................
0.999837 ........................................
0.998405.
0.988168.
0.999837.
0.999997 ........................................
0.999997.
0.935570 ........................................
Labor: $1,650.00 ...........................
Nonlabor: $960.77. ........................
0.935570.
Labor: $1,618.68
Nonlabor: $992.09.
(2) Second full paragraph, line 17, the
figure ‘‘0.9858’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.9860’’.
b. In third column:
(1) Second full paragraph:
(a) Line 2, the figure ‘‘0.9973’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9976’’.
(b) Line 4, the figure ‘‘0.9979’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9982’’.
(2) Third full paragraph:
(a) Line 9, the figure ‘‘438.65’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘438.75’’.
(b) Line 19, the figure ‘‘0.9973’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.9976’’.
10. On page 49794:
a. Third column, first partial
paragraph:
(1) Line 3, the figure ‘‘0.27’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.24’’.
(2) Line 10, the figure ‘‘0.85’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.87’’.
b. The table titled entitled
‘‘Comparison of Factors and
Adjustments: FY 2015 Capital Federal
Rate and FY 2016 Capital Federal Rate’’
is corrected to read as follows:
COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: FY 2015 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FY 2016 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE
FY 2015
Update Factor 1 ................................................................................................
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor 1 ........................................................................
Outlier Adjustment Factor 2 ..............................................................................
Capital Federal Rate ........................................................................................
1.0150
0.9993
0.9382
$434.97
FY 2016
1.0130
0.9976
0.9365
$438.75
Change
1.0130
0.9976
0.9982
1.0087
Percent
change
1.3
¥0.24
¥0.18
0.87
1 The update factor and the GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factors are built permanently into the capital Federal rates. Thus, for example, the incremental change from FY 2015 to FY 2016 resulting from the application of the 0.9976 GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor
for FY 2016 is a net change of 0.9976 (or ¥0.24 percent).
2 The outlier reduction factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is not applied cumulatively in determining
the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting from the application of the FY 2016 outlier adjustment factor is 0.9365/
0.9382, or 0.9982 (or ¥0.18 percent).
c. The table titled entitled
‘‘Comparison of Factors and
Adjustments: Proposed FY 2016 Capital
Federal Rate and Final FY 2016 Capital
Federal Rate’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
COMPARISON OF FACTORS AND ADJUSTMENTS: PROPOSED FY 2016 CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE AND FINAL FY 2016
CAPITAL FEDERAL RATE
Proposed FY
2016
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Update Factor ..................................................................................................
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor ..........................................................................
Outlier Adjustment Factor ................................................................................
Capital Federal Rate ........................................................................................
11. On page 49795, first column:
a. First paragraph, line 7, the figure
‘‘212.56’’ is corrected to read ‘‘212.55’’.
b. Third paragraph, line 21, the figure
‘‘22,544’’ is corrected to read ‘‘22,539’’.
12. On page 49804, second column,
first full paragraph:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
1.0130
0.9976
0.9357
$438.40
a. Line 16, the figure ‘‘22,544’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘22,539’’.
b. Line 27, the figure ‘‘22,544’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘22,539’’.
13. On page 49808, third column, first
full paragraph, lines 6 and 7, the phrase
‘‘index.html under the list item for
Regulation Number’’ is corrected to read
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Final FY 2016
1.0130
0.9976
0.9365
$438.75
Change
1.0000
1.0000
1.0008
1.0008
Percent
change
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
‘‘index.html. Click on the link on the
left side of the screen titled, ‘‘LTCHPPS
Regulations and Notices’’ and select the
list item for Regulation Number CMS–
1632–F. ‘‘.
13. On page 49809:
a. Table 1A titled ‘‘National Adjusted
Operating Standardized Amounts,
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Labor/Nonlabor (69.6 Percent Labor
Share/30.4 Percent Nonlabor Share if
60061
Wage Index is Greater than 1)—FY
2016’’ is corrected to read as follows:
TABLE 1A—NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (69.6 PERCENT LABOR
SHARE/30.4 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 1)—FY 2016
Hospital submitted quality data
and is a meaningful EHR user
(update = 1.7 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 1.1 percent)
Hospital submitted quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 0.5 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is NOT a meaningful
EHR user
(update = ¥0.1 percent)
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
$3,805.30
$1,662.09
$3,782.85
$1,652.28
$3,760.40
$1,642.48
$3,737.95
$1,632.67
b. Table 1B titled ‘‘National Adjusted
Operating Standardized Amounts,
Labor/Nonlabor (62 Percent Labor
Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share if
Wage Index is Less than or Equal TO
1)—FY 2016’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
TABLE 1B—NATIONAL ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS, LABOR/NONLABOR (62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/
38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1)—FY 2016
Hospital submitted quality data
and is a meaningful EHR user
(update = 1.7 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 1.1 percent)
Hospital submitted quality data
and is NOT a meaningful EHR
user
(update = 0.5 percent)
Hospital did NOT submit quality
data and is NOT a meaningful
EHR user
(update = ¥0.1 percent)
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
Labor
Nonlabor
$3,389.78
$2,077.61
$3,369.78
$2,065.35
$3,349.79
$2,053.09
$3,329.78
$2,040.84
c. Table 1C titled ‘‘Adjusted Operating
Standardized Amounts for Puerto Rico,
Labor/Nonlabor (National: 62 Percent
Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share
Because Wage Index is Less than or
Equal to 1; Puerto Rico: 63.2 Percent
Labor Share/36.8 Percent Nonlabor
Share if Wage Index is Greater Than 1
or 62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent
Nonlabor Share if Wage Index is Less
than or Equal to 1—FY 2016’’ is
corrected to read as follows:
TABLE 1C—ADJUSTED OPERATING STANDARDIZED AMOUNTS FOR PUERTO RICO, LABOR/NONLABOR (NATIONAL: 62 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE BECAUSE WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1; PUERTO
RICO: 63.2 PERCENT LABOR SHARE/36.8 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS GREATER THAN 1 OR 62
PERCENT LABOR SHARE/38 PERCENT NONLABOR SHARE IF WAGE INDEX IS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 1—FY 2016
Rates if wage index is greater than 1
Rates if wage index is less
than or equal to 1
Standardized amount
Labor
National 1 ........................................
Puerto Rico .....................................
1 For
Nonlabor
Not Applicable ................................
$1,650.00 .......................................
Not Applicable ................................
$960.77 ..........................................
Labor
$3,389.78
1,618.68
Nonlabor
$2,077.61
992.09
FY 2016, there are no CBSAs in Puerto Rico with a national wage index greater than 1.
d. Table 1D titled ‘‘Capital Standard
Federal Payment Rates—FY 2016’’ is
corrected as follows:
TABLE 1D—CAPITAL STANDARD FEDERAL PAYMENT RATES—FY 2016
Rate
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
National ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
C. Corrections of Errors in the
Appendices
1. On page 49809, third column, first
full paragraph:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
a. Line 10, the figure ‘‘$378’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$391’’.
b. Line 12, the figure ‘‘$187’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$188’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$438.75
212.55
2. On pages 49813 through 49815, the
table titled ‘‘Impact Analysis of Changes
to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY
2016’’ is corrected to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
All Hospitals ................................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals ....................................
Large urban areas ...............................
Other urban areas ...............................
Rural hospitals .....................................
Bed Size (Urban):
0–99 beds ............................................
100–199 beds ......................................
200–299 beds ......................................
300–499 beds ......................................
500 or more beds ................................
Bed Size (Rural):
0–49 beds ............................................
50–99 beds ..........................................
100–149 beds ......................................
150–199 beds ......................................
200 or more beds ................................
Urban by Region:
New England .......................................
Middle Atlantic .....................................
South Atlantic ......................................
East North Central ...............................
East South Central ..............................
West North Central ..............................
West South Central .............................
Mountain ..............................................
Pacific ..................................................
Puerto Rico ..........................................
Rural by Region:
New England .......................................
Middle Atlantic .....................................
South Atlantic ......................................
East North Central ...............................
East South Central ..............................
West North Central ..............................
West South Central .............................
Mountain ..............................................
Pacific ..................................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals ....................................
Large urban areas ...............................
Other urban areas ...............................
Rural areas ..........................................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching .........................................
Fewer than 100 residents ....................
100 or more residents .........................
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH .............................................
100 or more beds ................................
Less than 100 beds .............................
Rural DSH:
SCH .....................................................
RRC .....................................................
100 or more beds ................................
Less than 100 beds .............................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH .......................
Teaching and no DSH .........................
No teaching and DSH .........................
No teaching and no DSH ....................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.9
1
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.4
0.9
1.7
1.2
1.4
1.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
1
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.6
1.3
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
2,533
1,393
1,140
836
668
778
445
428
214
329
297
121
48
41
120
318
407
396
150
166
384
161
380
51
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
22
55
128
116
164
101
165
61
24
2,476
1,386
1,090
893
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2,326
794
249
653
1,593
328
260
347
31
157
855
122
1,066
433
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
0.1
0
0
0
¥0.3
¥0.6
¥0.7
¥0.2
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.2
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.1
0
0.2
0.1
¥0.1
0
¥0.2
0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.6
0.2
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.7
¥0.2
¥0.9
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.2
0
¥0.4
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.4
0
0.1
0
¥0.2
0.7
0.2
0.1
0
¥0.4
¥0.6
¥0.5
¥0.3
0.4
¥0.9
¥0.3
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.1
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
¥0.1
0
0.1
¥0.2
0.1
0
0
0.1
0
¥0.3
¥0.1
0
0
0.1
4
0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
(3)
FY 2016 Wage
data under new
CBSA designations with application of wage budget neutrality
0
0.1
0
¥0.2
0
3
(1)
(2)
2
3,369
Number of
hospitals 1
FY 2016 Weights
and DRG changes
with application of
recalibration budget neutrality
Hospital rate update and documentation and
coding adjustment
(4)
5
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.6
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
¥0.1
¥0.4
¥0.7
0
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.7
¥0.5
¥0.9
¥0.4
¥0.3
0.8
0.3
0.1
0.1
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.3
0.3
¥0.7
¥0.5
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.5
¥0.4
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.1
0.2
¥0.2
¥0.5
0
FY 2016 DRG,
Rel. wts., wage
index changes
with wage and recalibration budget
neutrality
(5)
6
0
0
¥0.2
¥0.6
¥0.6
0.1
0
0
¥0.2
0.4
0.4
¥0.1
0
1.6
2.4
1.7
¥0.1
¥0.1
¥0.7
0.2
0
¥0.2
0
0
0.1
¥0.2
¥0.1
¥0.3
0.1
1.2
0.1
¥0.1
0
¥0.4
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.5
0
¥0.3
¥0.1
¥0.2
2
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.6
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.5
¥0.1
1.7
0.1
¥0.2
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
¥0.2
1.7
0.8
2.4
1
2.5
0.2
1.5
0.2
0.7
0.9
0.8
¥0.5
¥0.3
¥0.6
¥0.8
¥0.6
0
¥0.2
¥1
0.3
0.8
1.7
1.9
2.5
¥0.6
0
0.1
¥0.2
¥0.2
0
0
0.1
¥0.3
7
¥0.1
¥0.3
0.1
1.4
(6)
0
FY 2016 MGCRB Reclassifications
Rural and imputed floor with
application of
national rural
and imputed
floor budget
neutrality
TABLE I—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO THE IPPS FOR OPERATING COSTS FOR FY 2016
¥0.1
0.5
¥0.1
¥0.4
(7)
8
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0
0.1
0.8
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
0.1
0
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
Application of
the frontier
wage index and
out-migration
adjustment
(8)
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.4
1.3
0.2
1.1
0.7
0.4
¥0.9
¥1.2
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
¥0.1
0.2
0.6
0.9
¥1
0.8
¥0.8
0.7
1.5
0
1
0.2
0.5
¥0.4
0.3
¥0.4
0.2
1
¥1.9
¥0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
9
All FY
2016
changes
60062
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.6
1.3
1.6
1.5
0.9
0.9
1
1.1
1
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.4
1.4
1
0.9
1,934
879
529
189
327
150
126
13
533
2,134
571
97
789
2,580
509
1,967
280
503
64
53
14
¥0.6
¥0.3
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.4
0
¥0.1
0
¥0.6
¥0.1
¥0.2
¥0.1
0
¥0.6
¥0.6
¥0.1
0
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.3
¥0.3
0
¥0.5
¥0.9
0
0
0
0
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.1
0.2
¥0.5
¥0.2
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.5
¥0.1
0
0.1
¥0.2
0.1
0
¥0.1
¥0.1
0
0
0
¥0.4
0
¥0.1
¥0.1
0
0
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥1.1
3.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
2.4
¥0.9
2.4
¥0.9
2.3
¥0.3
0
0.6
¥0.3
0.1
¥0.1
¥0.2
2.2
¥0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0
¥0.5
¥0.2
¥0.1
¥0.1
0
¥0.1
0.1
¥0.3
0.2
0
0
0.3
0
0.1
0.1
¥0.4
¥0.1
¥0.2
0
¥0.2
0.9
0
0.3
1.4
0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.6
0
0.2
0
0
0.7
¥0.4
0
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.4
¥0.6
0.5
0.8
0.4
0.5
¥0.1
0
¥0.4
0.8
0.6
0.9
0.6
data necessary to classify some hospitals by category were missing, the total number of hospitals in each category may not equal the national total. Discharge data are from FY 2014, and hospital cost
report data are from reporting periods beginning in FY 2013 and FY 2012.
2 This column displays the payment impact of the hospital rate update and the documentation and coding adjustment including the 1.7 percent adjustment to the national standardized amount and hospital-specific
rate (the estimated 2.4 percent market basket update reduced by the 0.5 percentage point for the multifactor productivity adjustment and the 0.2 percentage point reduction under the Affordable Care Act) and the
¥0.8 percent documentation and coding adjustment to the national standardized amount.
3 This column displays the payment impact of the changes to the Version 33 GROUPER, the changes to the relative weights and the recalibration of the MS–DRG weights based on FY 2014 MedPAR data in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act. This column displays the application of the recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.998405 in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act.
4 This column displays the payment impact of the update to wage index data using FY 2012 cost report data and the OMB labor market area delineations based on 2010 Decennial Census data. This column displays the payment impact of the application of the wage budget neutrality factor, which is calculated separately from the recalibration budget neutrality factor, and is calculated in accordance with section
1886(d)(3)(E)(i) of the Act. The wage budget neutrality factor is 0.998738.
5 This column displays the combined payment impact of the changes in Columns 2 through 3 and the cumulative budget neutrality factor for MS–DRG and wage changes in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii)
of the Act and section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act. The cumulative wage and recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.997145 is the product of the wage budget neutrality factor and the recalibration budget neutrality factor.
6 Shown here are the effects of geographic reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) along with the effects of the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market
area delineations on these reclassifications. The effects demonstrate the FY 2016 payment impact of going from no reclassifications to the reclassifications scheduled to be in effect for FY 2016. Reclassification for
prior years has no bearing on the payment impacts shown here. This column reflects the geographic budget neutrality factor of 0.988168.
7 This column displays the effects of the rural floor and imputed floor based on the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market area delineations. The Affordable Care Act requires the rural floor budget
neutrality adjustment to be 100 percent national level adjustment. The rural floor budget neutrality factor (which includes the imputed floor) applied to the wage index is 0.989859. This column also shows the effect of
the 3-year transition for hospitals that were located in urban counties that became rural under the new OMB delineations or hospitals deemed urban where the urban area became rural under the new OMB delineations, with a budget neutrality factor of 0.999997.
8 This column shows the combined impact of the policy required under section 10324 of the Affordable Care Act that hospitals located in frontier States have a wage index no less than 1.0 and of section
1886(d)(13) of the Act, as added by section 505 of Pub. L. 108–173, which provides for an increase in a hospital’s wage index if a threshold percentage of residents of the county where the hospital is located commute to work at hospitals in counties with higher wage indexes. These are nonbudget neutral policies.
9 This column shows the changes in payments from FY 2015 to FY 2016. It reflects the impact of the FY 2016 hospital update and the adjustment for documentation and coding. It also reflects changes in hospitals’
reclassification status in FY 2016 compared to FY 2015. It incorporates all of the changes displayed in Columns 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, (the changes displayed in Columns 2 and 3 are included in Column 4). The sum of
these impacts may be different from the percentage changes shown here due to rounding and interactive effects.
1 Because
Special Hospital Types:
RRC .....................................................
SCH .....................................................
MDH .....................................................
SCH and RRC .....................................
MDH and RRC ....................................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ..............................................
Proprietary ...........................................
Government .........................................
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0–25 .....................................................
25–50 ...................................................
50–65 ...................................................
Over 65 ................................................
FY 2016 Reclassifications by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals ....................
Non-Reclassified Hospitals ..................
Urban Hospitals Reclassified ..............
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals .........
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full
Year ..................................................
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals:
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section
1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act) ..................
Specialty Hospitals
Cardiac Specialty Hospitals .................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60063
60064
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
3. On page 49816:
a. First column, last paragraph, line 6,
the figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is corrected to
read ‘‘0.998405’’.
b. Third column, first partial
paragraph, line 16, the figure
‘‘0.998749’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.998738’’.
4. On page 49817:
a. First column, first full paragraph:
(1) Line 9, the figure ‘‘0.998749’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.998738’’.
(2) Line 11, the figure ‘‘0.998399’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.998405’’.
(3) Line 18, the figure ‘‘0.997150’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.997145’’.
b. Second column, first full
paragraph, line 6, the figure ‘‘0.987905’’
is corrected to read ‘‘0.988168’’.
c. Third column:
(1) First partial paragraph, line 7, the
figure ‘‘21’’ is corrected to read ‘‘19’’.
(2) First full paragraph, line 8, the
figure ‘‘0.990298’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.989859’’.
(3) Last paragraph:
(a) Line 1, the figure ‘‘371’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘375’’.
(b) Line 3, the figure ‘‘2,998’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘2,994’’.
(c) Line 6, the figure ‘‘0.990298’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.989859’’.
(d) Line 8, the figure ‘‘0.2’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.3’’.
5. On page 49818:
a. First column, first partial
paragraph:
(1) Line 10, the figure ‘‘1.6’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘2.0’’.
(2) Line 16, the figure ‘‘0.990298’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.989859’’.
(3) Line 17, the figure ‘‘$98’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$115’’.
(4) Line 19, the figure ‘‘3.1’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘3.6’’.
b. Second column, first full
paragraph:
(1) Line 1, the figure ‘‘21’’ is corrected
to read ‘‘19’’.
(2) Line 7, the figure ‘‘0.990298’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘0.989859’’.
(3) Line 9, the figure ‘‘$27’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$29’’.
(4) Line 10, the figure ‘‘$9’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$10’’.
(5) Line 18, the figure ‘‘$4.5’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$4.3’’.
(6) Line 19, the figure ‘‘$2.6’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$2.3’’.
c. Third column, first partial
paragraph, line 15, the figure
‘‘0.999996’’ is corrected to read
‘‘0.999997’’.
6. On pages 49818 and 49819, the
table titled ‘‘FY 2016 IPPS Estimated
Payments Due to Rural Floor and
Imputed Floor with National Budget
Neutrality’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
FY 2016 IPPS ESTIMATED PAYMENTS DUE TO RURAL FLOOR AND IMPUTED FLOOR WITH NATIONAL BUDGET NEUTRALITY
Number of
hospitals
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Percent change
in payments
due to
application of
rural floor and
imputed floor
with budget
neutrality
Difference
(in millions)
(1)
State
Number of
hospitals that
will receive the
rural floor or
imputed floor
(2)
(3)
(4)
Alabama .......................................................................................................
Alaska ..........................................................................................................
Arizona .........................................................................................................
Arkansas ......................................................................................................
California ......................................................................................................
Colorado ......................................................................................................
Connecticut ..................................................................................................
Delaware ......................................................................................................
Washington, D.C. .........................................................................................
Florida ..........................................................................................................
Georgia ........................................................................................................
Hawaii ..........................................................................................................
Idaho ............................................................................................................
Illinois ...........................................................................................................
Indiana .........................................................................................................
Iowa .............................................................................................................
Kansas .........................................................................................................
Kentucky ......................................................................................................
Louisiana ......................................................................................................
Maine ...........................................................................................................
Massachusetts .............................................................................................
Michigan .......................................................................................................
Minnesota ....................................................................................................
Mississippi ....................................................................................................
Missouri ........................................................................................................
Montana .......................................................................................................
Nebraska ......................................................................................................
Nevada .........................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...........................................................................................
New Jersey ..................................................................................................
New Mexico .................................................................................................
New York .....................................................................................................
North Carolina ..............................................................................................
North Dakota ................................................................................................
Ohio .............................................................................................................
Oklahoma .....................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
86
6
55
46
303
47
31
6
7
170
105
12
14
127
91
35
53
65
99
20
61
96
50
64
78
12
26
24
13
64
25
156
84
6
132
86
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
3
1
5
0
203
5
7
0
0
14
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
1
3
0
39
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
9
19
0
2
0
0
6
4
05OCR1
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.3
¥0.5
2.2
0.4
¥0.5
¥0.6
¥0.5
¥0.3
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.6
¥0.5
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.4
¥0.5
¥0.5
3.6
¥0.5
¥0.3
¥0.5
¥0.4
0.1
¥0.4
0.2
1.2
0.3
¥0.3
¥0.6
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.5
¥0.4
$¥7.08
¥0.53
¥6
¥4.66
218.44
4.25
¥8.49
¥2.54
¥2.48
¥19.9
¥12.47
¥1.16
¥1.21
¥25.22
¥12.1
¥4.33
¥3.67
¥7.05
¥6.67
¥2.36
114.58
¥22.38
¥6.33
¥4.94
¥9.98
0.15
¥2.53
1.63
5.91
10.01
¥1.41
¥45.17
¥14.6
¥0.83
¥17.56
¥4.47
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
60065
FY 2016 IPPS ESTIMATED PAYMENTS DUE TO RURAL FLOOR AND IMPUTED FLOOR WITH NATIONAL BUDGET
NEUTRALITY—Continued
Number of
hospitals
Percent change
in payments
due to
application of
rural floor and
imputed floor
with budget
neutrality
Difference
(in millions)
(1)
State
Number of
hospitals that
will receive the
rural floor or
imputed floor
(2)
(3)
(4)
Oregon .........................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ..................................................................................................
Rhode Island ................................................................................................
South Carolina .............................................................................................
South Dakota ...............................................................................................
Tennessee ...................................................................................................
Texas ...........................................................................................................
Utah .............................................................................................................
Vermont .......................................................................................................
Virginia .........................................................................................................
Washington ..................................................................................................
West Virginia ................................................................................................
Wisconsin .....................................................................................................
Wyoming ......................................................................................................
7. On page 49819:
a. Second column, last paragraph, line
18, the figure ‘‘336’’ is corrected to read
‘‘367’’.
34
153
51
11
56
19
99
318
34
6
78
49
29
66
11
b. Third column, first partial
paragraph, line 8, the figure ‘‘$45’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$55’’.
8. On pages 49820 and 49821, the
table titled ‘‘Table II—Impact Analysis
¥0.5
¥0.5
0.1
0.6
¥0.2
¥0.3
¥0.5
¥0.5
¥0.4
¥0.3
¥0.4
0
0.1
¥0.5
¥0.2
0
3
10
4
5
0
10
3
2
0
1
6
2
0
0
¥4.85
¥22.99
0.14
2.29
¥3.02
¥1.02
¥10.2
¥30.68
¥2.02
¥0.6
¥11.68
0.93
0.89
¥8.19
¥0.23
of Changes for FY 2016 Acute Care
Hospital Operating Prospective Payment
System (Payments per Discharge)’’ is
corrected as follows:
TABLE II—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2016 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT
SYSTEM
[Payments per discharge]
Estimated average FY 2015
payment per
discharge
Estimated average FY 2016
payment per
discharge
FY 2016
changes
(1)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
hospitals
(2)
(3)
(4)
All Hospitals ...................................................................................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals .......................................................................................
Large urban areas ..................................................................................
Other urban areas ..................................................................................
Rural hospitals ........................................................................................
Bed Size (Urban):
0–99 beds ...............................................................................................
100–199 beds .........................................................................................
200–299 beds .........................................................................................
300–499 beds .........................................................................................
500 or more beds ...................................................................................
Bed Size (Rural):
0–49 beds ...............................................................................................
50–99 beds .............................................................................................
100–149 beds .........................................................................................
150–199 beds .........................................................................................
200 or more beds ...................................................................................
Urban by Region:
New England .................................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ........................................................................................
South Atlantic .........................................................................................
East North Central ..................................................................................
East South Central .................................................................................
West North Central .................................................................................
West South Central ................................................................................
Mountain .................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3,369
11,329
11,372
0.4
2,533
1,393
1,140
836
11,680
12,434
10,766
8,424
11,725
12,484
10,806
8,442
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
668
778
445
428
214
9,254
9,863
10,589
11,927
14,285
9,276
9,902
10,636
11,973
14,340
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
329
297
121
48
41
7,048
7,972
8,290
9,109
9,996
7,043
7,989
8,325
9,132
10,006
¥0.1
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.1
120
318
407
396
150
166
384
161
12,850
13,156
10,387
10,950
9,998
11,438
10,590
12,013
12,853
13,283
10,410
11,009
9,958
11,469
10,548
12,035
0
1
0.2
0.5
¥0.4
0.3
¥0.4
0.2
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60066
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE II—IMPACT ANALYSIS OF CHANGES FOR FY 2016 ACUTE CARE HOSPITAL OPERATING PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT
SYSTEM—Continued
[Payments per discharge]
Estimated average FY 2015
payment per
discharge
Estimated average FY 2016
payment per
discharge
FY 2016
changes
(1)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
hospitals
(2)
(3)
(4)
Pacific .....................................................................................................
Puerto Rico .............................................................................................
Rural by Region:
New England ..........................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ........................................................................................
South Atlantic .........................................................................................
East North Central ..................................................................................
East South Central .................................................................................
West North Central .................................................................................
West South Central ................................................................................
Mountain .................................................................................................
Pacific .....................................................................................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals .......................................................................................
Large urban areas ..................................................................................
Other urban areas ..................................................................................
Rural areas .............................................................................................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching ............................................................................................
Fewer than 100 residents .......................................................................
100 or more residents ............................................................................
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH ................................................................................................
100 or more beds ...................................................................................
Less than 100 beds ................................................................................
Rural DSH:
SCH ........................................................................................................
RRC ........................................................................................................
100 or more beds ...................................................................................
Less than 100 beds ................................................................................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH ..........................................................................
Teaching and no DSH ............................................................................
No teaching and DSH ............................................................................
No teaching and no DSH .......................................................................
Special Hospital Types:
RRC ........................................................................................................
SCH ........................................................................................................
MDH ........................................................................................................
SCH and RRC ........................................................................................
MDH and RRC .......................................................................................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ........................................................................................................
Proprietary ..............................................................................................
Government ............................................................................................
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0–25 ........................................................................................................
25–50 ......................................................................................................
50–65 ......................................................................................................
Over 65 ...................................................................................................
FY 2016 Reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals .......................................................................
Non-Reclassified Hospitals .....................................................................
Urban Hospitals Reclassified ..................................................................
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals ............................................................
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year ...................................................
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year ..............................................
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals: ..................................................
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act) ...........
Specialty Hospitals
Cardiac Specialty Hospitals ....................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
380
51
14,889
7,648
15,039
7,504
1
¥1.9
22
55
128
116
164
101
165
61
24
11,441
8,545
7,868
8,775
7,524
9,280
7,218
9,730
11,500
11,432
8,565
7,918
8,853
7,449
9,351
7,159
9,796
11,671
¥0.1
0.2
0.6
0.9
¥1
0.8
¥0.8
0.7
1.5
2,476
1,386
1,090
893
11,700
12,440
10,771
8,687
11,745
12,490
10,811
8,710
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
2,326
794
249
9,450
10,999
16,424
9,480
11,043
16,494
0.3
0.4
0.4
653
1,593
328
9,946
12,080
8,526
10,057
12,115
8,548
1.1
0.3
0.3
260
347
31
157
8,859
9,023
7,544
6,774
8,918
9,056
7,476
6,695
0.7
0.4
¥0.9
¥1.2
855
122
1,066
433
13,217
11,161
9,878
9,415
13,262
11,305
9,895
9,516
0.4
1.3
0.2
1.1
189
327
150
126
13
9,449
9,951
6,968
10,591
8,621
9,409
10,034
7,011
10,691
8,673
¥0.4
0.8
0.6
0.9
0.6
1,934
879
529
11,498
9,997
12,240
11,560
9,986
12,244
0.5
¥0.1
0
533
2,134
571
97
14,719
11,265
9,180
6,883
14,625
11,322
9,252
6,910
¥0.6
0.5
0.8
0.4
789
2,580
509
1,967
280
503
64
53
11,209
11,374
11,877
11,643
8,829
7,931
10,427
7,855
11,297
11,400
11,982
11,669
8,861
7,933
10,492
7,828
0.8
0.2
0.9
0.2
0.4
0
0.6
¥0.4
14
12,640
12,723
0.7
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
9. On page 49823:
a. Top of the page:
(1) First column, second partial
paragraph, line 1 the figure ‘‘2,418’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘2,408’’.
(2) Second column, first partial
paragraph, lines 1 and 2, the phrase, ‘‘It
did not include hospitals in the Rural
Community Hospital Demonstration,’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘It did not include
new hospitals, hospitals in the Rural
Community Hospital Demonstration,’’.
b. Lower three-fourths of the page, the
table titled ‘‘Modeled Disproportionate
60067
Share Hospital Payments for Estimated
FY 2016 DSH Hospitals by Hospital
Type: Model DSH $ (In Millions) From
FY 2015 to FY 2016’’ is corrected as
follows:
MODELED DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITAL PAYMENTS FOR ESTIMATED FY 2016 DSH HOSPITALS BY HOSPITAL
TYPE: MODEL DSH $ (IN MILLIONS) FROM FY 2015 TO FY 2016
FY 2015
estimated
DSH $ *
FY 2016
estimated
DSH $ *
Percentage
change **
(1)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
estimated
FY 2016 DSH
hospitals
(2)
(3)
(4)
Total .................................................................................................................
By Geographic Location:
Urban Hospitals ........................................................................................
Large Urban Areas ............................................................................
Other Urban Areas ............................................................................
Rural Hospitals .........................................................................................
Bed Size (Urban):
0 to 99 Beds .............................................................................................
100 to 249 Beds .......................................................................................
250 to 499 Beds .......................................................................................
Bed Size (Rural):
0 to 99 Beds .............................................................................................
100 to 249 Beds .......................................................................................
250 to 499 Beds .......................................................................................
Urban by Region:
East North Central ....................................................................................
East South Central ...................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ..........................................................................................
Mountain ...................................................................................................
New England ............................................................................................
Pacific .......................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ...............................................................................................
South Atlantic ...........................................................................................
West North Central ...................................................................................
West South Central ..................................................................................
Rural by Region:
East North Central ....................................................................................
East South Central ...................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ..........................................................................................
Mountain ...................................................................................................
New England ............................................................................................
Pacific .......................................................................................................
South Atlantic ...........................................................................................
West North Central ...................................................................................
West South Central ..................................................................................
By Payment Classification:
Urban Hospitals ........................................................................................
Large Urban Areas ............................................................................
Other Urban Areas ............................................................................
Rural Hospitals .........................................................................................
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching ..............................................................................................
Fewer than 100 residents .........................................................................
100 or more residents ..............................................................................
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ...................................................................................................
Proprietary ................................................................................................
Government ..............................................................................................
Unknown ...................................................................................................
2,408
$10,993
$9,733
¥11.5
1,886
1,019
867
522
10,453
6,629
3,823
540
9,258
5,855
3,403
475
¥11.4
¥11.7
¥11.0
¥12.1
323
825
738
211
2,514
7,728
186
2,195
6,877
¥11.7
¥12.7
¥11.0
388
120
14
235
246
59
208
211
56
¥11.3
¥14.5
¥5.6
307
131
230
115
86
298
39
315
104
261
1,421
649
1,804
504
440
1,649
108
2,012
507
1,357
1,268
572
1,603
447
388
1,455
101
1,770
455
1,198
¥10.8
¥11.8
¥11.2
¥11.3
¥11.9
¥11.8
¥7.3
¥12.0
¥10.2
¥11.7
66
146
27
22
10
10
88
37
116
55
174
40
18
17
6
107
27
97
49
151
34
16
15
8
96
21
84
¥10.9
¥12.9
¥14.5
¥13.1
¥13.7
35.3
¥9.5
¥20.1
¥13.6
1,854
1,016
838
554
10,448
6,640
3,809
545
9,204
5,853
3,351
529
¥11.9
¥11.9
¥12.0
¥2.8
1,539
629
240
3,578
3,585
3,831
3,111
3,190
3,432
¥13.0
¥11.0
¥10.4
1,382
539
485
2
6,770
1,904
2,290
30
6,025
1,660
2,021
27
¥11.0
¥12.8
¥11.7
¥10.4
Source: Dobson DaVanzo analysis of 2011–2012 Hospital Cost Reports, 2015 Provider of Services File, FY 2015 IPPS Final Rule CN Impact
File, and FY 2016 NPRM Impact File.
* Dollar DSH calculated by [0.25 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments] + [0.75 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments * Factor 2 *
Factor 3]. When summed across all hospitals projected to receive DSH payments, the estimated DSH is $10,993 million in FY 2015 and $9,733
million in FY 2016.
** Percentage change is determined as the difference between Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
(column 3) and Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2015 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule (column 2) divided by Medicare DSH payments
modeled for the FY 2015 final rule (column 3) times 100 percent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
60068
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
10. On page 49828, in third column,
last paragraph, line 4, the figure
‘‘0.9973’’ is corrected to read ‘‘0.9976’’.
11. On page 49829:
a. Second column, last paragraph:
(1) Line 4, the figure ‘‘3.1’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘3.2’’
(2) Line 5, the figure ‘‘1.1’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘1.3’’
b. Third column; last paragraph, last
line, the figure ‘‘1.1’’ is corrected to read
‘‘1.2’’.
12. On pages 49829 and 49830, table
titled ‘‘Table III.—Comparison of Total
Payments Per Case [FY 2015 Payments
Compared To FY 2016 Payments]’’ is
corrected to read as follows:
TABLE III—COMPARISON OF TOTAL PAYMENTS PER CASE
[FY 2015 payments compared to FY 2016 payments]
Average
FY 2015
payments/case
Average
FY 2016
payments/case
3,369
1,393
1,140
836
2,533
668
778
445
428
214
836
329
297
121
48
41
871
963
833
591
904
736
788
825
920
1,080
591
490
549
591
645
706
890
987
851
599
925
751
806
844
943
1,106
599
497
558
598
652
715
2.3
2.5
2.1
1.4
2.4
1.9
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.4
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.2
1.0
1.3
2,533
120
318
407
396
150
166
384
161
380
51
836
22
55
128
116
164
101
165
61
24
904
996
1,001
805
868
768
887
817
936
1,150
403
591
822
580
554
616
536
635
524
660
768
925
1,009
1,032
823
889
780
902
835
956
1,187
408
599
828
582
567
626
542
643
524
674
791
2.4
1.3
3.1
2.2
2.3
1.6
1.6
2.1
2.1
3.2
1.4
1.4
0.7
0.3
2.3
1.6
1.1
1.3
0.1
2.1
3.0
3,369
1,386
1,090
893
871
964
837
608
890
988
855
615
2.3
2.5
2.2
1.1
2,326
794
249
739
848
1,227
754
866
1,259
2.1
2.2
2.6
1,593
328
928
662
950
677
2.4
2.2
260
347
576
639
580
647
0.7
1.2
31
157
575
504
572
512
¥0.5
1.7
855
1,003
1,028
2.5
855
1,003
1,028
2.5
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Number of
hospitals
By Geographic Location:
All hospitals ..............................................................................................
Large urban areas (populations over 1 million) .......................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million of fewer) .............................
Rural areas ...............................................................................................
Urban hospitals .........................................................................................
0–99 beds ..........................................................................................
100–199 beds ....................................................................................
200–299 beds ....................................................................................
300–499 beds ....................................................................................
500 or more beds ..............................................................................
Rural hospitals ..........................................................................................
0–49 beds ..........................................................................................
50–99 beds ........................................................................................
100–149 beds ....................................................................................
150–199 beds ....................................................................................
200 or more beds ..............................................................................
By Region:
Urban by Region ......................................................................................
New England .....................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ...................................................................................
South Atlantic ....................................................................................
East North Central .............................................................................
East South Central ............................................................................
West North Central ............................................................................
West South Central ...........................................................................
Mountain ............................................................................................
Pacific ................................................................................................
Puerto Rico ........................................................................................
Rural by Region ........................................................................................
New England .....................................................................................
Middle Atlantic ...................................................................................
South Atlantic ....................................................................................
East North Central .............................................................................
East South Central ............................................................................
West North Central ............................................................................
West South Central ...........................................................................
Mountain ............................................................................................
Pacific ................................................................................................
By Payment Classification:
All hospitals ..............................................................................................
Large urban areas (populations over 1 million) .......................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million of fewer) .............................
Rural areas ...............................................................................................
Teaching Status:
Non-teaching ............................................................................................
Fewer than 100 Residents .......................................................................
100 or more Residents .............................................................................
Urban DSH:
100 or more beds ..............................................................................
Less than 100 beds ...........................................................................
Rural DSH:
Sole Community (SCH/EACH) ..........................................................
Referral Center (RRC/EACH) ............................................................
Other Rural:
100 or more beds .......................................................................
Less than 100 beds ...................................................................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH ....................................................................
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH ....................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Change
60069
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 192 / Monday, October 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE III—COMPARISON OF TOTAL PAYMENTS PER CASE—Continued
[FY 2015 payments compared to FY 2016 payments]
Average
FY 2015
payments/case
Average
FY 2016
payments/case
122
1,066
433
899
780
797
920
797
816
2.3
2.3
2.4
2,562
189
327
126
904
729
665
721
926
737
672
733
2.4
1.1
1.1
1.6
551
1,925
279
504
46
923
902
623
545
600
949
922
634
551
589
2.8
2.2
1.8
1.2
¥1.9
1,934
879
529
884
785
917
904
803
938
2.3
2.3
2.4
533
2,134
571
97
1,046
876
717
523
1,074
896
731
534
2.7
2.3
2.0
2.1
Number of
hospitals
Teaching and no DSH .......................................................................
No teaching and DSH .......................................................................
No teaching and no DSH ..................................................................
Rural Hospital Types:
Non special status hospitals ..............................................................
RRC/EACH ........................................................................................
SCH/EACH ........................................................................................
SCH, RRC and EACH .......................................................................
Hospitals Reclassified by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review
Board:
FY 2016 Reclassifications:
All Urban Reclassified .......................................................................
All Urban Non-Reclassified ...............................................................
All Rural Reclassified ........................................................................
All Rural Non-Reclassified .................................................................
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act) ......
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary ...........................................................................................
Proprietary .........................................................................................
Government .......................................................................................
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient Days:
0–25 ...................................................................................................
25–50 .................................................................................................
50–65 .................................................................................................
Over 65 ..............................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
13. On page 49840, third column,
third paragraph:
a. Line 11, the figure ‘‘$378’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$391’’.
b. Line 23, the figure ‘‘$75’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$88’’.
c. Line 33, the figure ‘‘$75’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$88’’.
d. Line 34, the figure ‘‘$85’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$98’’.
e. Line 39, the figure ‘‘$187’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$188’’.
f. Line 43, the figure ‘‘$272’’ is
corrected to read ‘‘$285’’.
14. On page 49841, first column:
a. Third paragraph, line 3, the figure
‘‘$272’’ is corrected to read ‘‘$285’’.
b. In the table titled ‘‘Table V—
Accounting Statement: Classification of
Estimated Expenditures Under the IPPS
From FY 2015 to FY 2016’’, the first
entry is corrected as follows:
Dated: September 30, 2015.
Madhura Valverde,
Executive Secretary to the Department,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–25269 Filed 9–30–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 418
[CMS–1629–CN]
Transfers
Annualized Monetized Transfers
¥$285 million.
16:55 Oct 02, 2015
Jkt 238001
Sharon Ventura, (410) 786–1985.
HospicePolicy@cms.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2015–19033 of August 6,
2015 (80 FR 47142), there were a
number of technical errors that are
identified and corrected in the
Correction of Errors section below. The
provisions in this correction document
are effective as if they had been
included in the document published
August 6, 2015. Accordingly, the
corrections are effective October 1,
2015.
II. Summary of Errors
Medicare Program; FY 2016 Hospice
Wage Index and Payment Rate Update
and Hospice Quality Reporting
Requirements; Correction
On page 47182, we inadvertently
listed the incorrect hourly rate for
continuous home care. We listed $38.67
instead of $38.59. On page 47203, we
referenced Table H1 instead of Table 29.
In addition, on page 47205, we
referenced Table H2 instead of Table 30.
This notice corrects theses errors.
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
Register on August 6, 2014 entitled
‘‘Medicare Program; FY 2016 Hospice
Wage Index and Payment Rate Update
and Hospice Quality Reporting
Requirements.’’
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RIN 0938–AS39
TABLE V—ACCOUNTING STATEMENT:
CLASSIFICATION OF ESTIMATED EX- SUMMARY: This document corrects
PENDITURES
UNDER THE IPPS technical errors that appeared in the
final rule published in the Federal
FROM FY 2015 TO FY 2016
Category
Change
PO 00000
Effective Date: October 1, 2015.
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
We ordinarily publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register to provide a period for public
comment before the provisions of a rule
take effect in accordance with section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However,
we can waive this notice and comment
E:\FR\FM\05OCR1.SGM
05OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 192 (Monday, October 5, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60055-60069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25269]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Part 412
[CMS-1632-CN]
RIN 0938-AS41
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems
for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of
Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers, including
Changes Related to the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program;
Extensions of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural Hospital Program and
the Low-Volume Payment Adjustment for Hospitals; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule and interim final rule with comment period;
correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors in
the final rule and interim final rule with comment period that appeared
in the Federal Register on August 17, 2015 titled ``Medicare Program;
Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals
and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System Policy
Changes and Fiscal Year 2016 Rates; Revisions of Quality Reporting
Requirements for Specific Providers, including Changes Related to the
Electronic Health Record Incentive Program; Extensions of the Medicare-
Dependent, Small Rural Hospital Program and the Low-Volume Payment
Adjustment for Hospitals.''
DATES: This document is effective October 1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Thompson, (410) 786-4487.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2015-19049 which appeared in the August 17, 2015 Federal
Register, titled ``Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective
Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care
Hospital Prospective Payment System Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2016
Rates; Revisions of Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific
Providers, including Changes Related to the Electronic Health Record
Incentive Program; Extensions of the Medicare-Dependent, Small Rural
Hospital Program and the Low-Volume Payment Adjustment for Hospitals''
(hereinafter referred to as the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule),
there were a number of technical and typographical errors that are
identified and corrected in section IV. of this correcting document.
The provisions in this correction document are effective as if they had
been included in the document that appeared in the August 17, 2015
Federal Register. Accordingly, the corrections are effective October 1,
2015.
II. Summary of Errors
A. Summary of Errors in the Preamble
On page 49412, we made a typographical error with regards to an MS-
DRG code. We made inadvertent and technical errors related to the
employment cost index (ECI) used in the wage index, the MS-DRG
reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality adjustment factor
(as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document), and the
MGCRB reclassification status of certain providers (as discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document), each of which resulted in
additional conforming corrections. Specifically, on page 49492, we
inadvertently miscalculated the estimated percentage change in the ECI
for compensation for the 30-day increment after March 14, 2013 and
before April 15, 2013 for private industry hospital workers from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS') ``Compensation and Working
Conditions.'' The ECI is used to adjust a hospital's wage data to
calculate the wage index, and is based on the midpoint of a cost
reporting period.
On page 49498, we are making conforming changes to the number of
hospitals in New Jersey that will be receiving the imputed rural floor
and to the FY 2016 rural floor value for Nevada as a result of
correcting the ECI error, the technical error in the calculation of the
MS-DRG reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality adjustment
factor (discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document), and
the error in the reclassification status of 50 providers (discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document).
On page 49619, consistent with the conforming corrections to the
IPPS outlier fixed-loss cost threshold for FY 2016 discussed in section
II.B. of this correcting document, we are making further conforming
corrections to the FY 2016 outlier fixed-loss amount for site neutral
cases in the context of our discussion regarding LTCH PPS high-cost
outliers.
B. Summary of Errors in the Addendum
On page 49776, we are correcting the MS-DRG reclassification and
[[Page 60056]]
recalibration budget neutrality adjustment factor as a result of a
technical error made in the calculation of this factor. We are also
making conforming changes to the affected rates and factors on pages
49787, 49788 and 49790 as a result of this error.
In addition, as discussed in section II.A. of this correcting
document, we inadvertently miscalculated the percentage change in the
ECI. The correction to the ECI necessitated recalculation of the pre-
reclassified unadjusted and occupational-mix adjusted wage indexes and
Geographic Adjustment Factors (GAFs) of certain core-based statistical
areas (CBSAs). As a result of the corrections to the ECI and the MS-DRG
reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality adjustment factor,
on page 49776, we recalculated the wage index budget neutrality
adjustment and are making conforming changes to the tables on pages
49787 and 49788.
On pages 49776, we recalculated the reclassification hospital
budget neutrality adjustment because the reclassification status in the
FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule did not properly reflect one of the
following for 50 providers:
Withdrawal or termination of a Medicare Geographic
Classification Review Board (MGCRB) reclassification for FY 2016.
Assignment to the reclassified CBSA approved by the MGCRB
or CMS Administrator.
As a result of the MS-DRG reclassification and recalibration budget
neutrality adjustment factor error, the ECI error, and reclassification
error, we are making conforming technical changes to tables on pages
49787 and 49788. The technical errors discussed previously (the
percentage change in the ECI error, MS-DRG reclassification and
recalibration budget neutrality adjustment factor error, and
reclassification error) directly affected and required the
recalculation of the wage index, the recalculation of certain budget
neutrality adjustments, and also indirectly resulted in errors to other
factors and rates. Specifically, on pages 49777, 49778, 49787, and
49788, we are making conforming corrections to the following:
The rural floor budget neutrality adjustment.
The wage index transition budget neutrality adjustment.
The Rural Community Hospital Demonstration program budget
neutrality adjustment.
In addition, as discussed in section II.D. of this correcting
document, we are making corrections to the uncompensated care payments.
As a result of these errors (the percentage change in the ECI error,
MS-DRG reclassification and recalibration budget neutrality adjustment
factor error, reclassification error, and uncompensated care error) and
conforming corrections, on page 49785, we are making conforming
corrections to the calculation of the outlier fixed-loss cost threshold
and the national and Puerto Rico-specific outlier budget neutrality
factors. We are making further conforming corrections to the tables on
pages 49787 and 49788 as a result of these changes, including
conforming corrections in the calculation of the national and Puerto
Rico specific operating standardized amounts, as a result of the
conforming corrections to the operating IPPS budget neutrality factors
and outlier threshold described previously.
On pages 49791, 49793, 49794, and 49795, in our discussion of the
determination of the Federal hospital inpatient capital related
prospective payment rate update, we are making conforming corrections
to the national GAF/MS-DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor (due to
the errors in our calculation of the GAFs, which are computed from the
wage index) and to the outlier threshold, and outlier budget neutrality
adjustment factors (as discussed previously).
Also, as a result of these errors, on page 49794, we are making
conforming corrections in the table showing the comparison of factors
and adjustments for the FY2015 capital Federal rate and FY 2016 capital
Federal rate and in the table showing the comparison of factors and
adjustments for the proposed FY 2016 capital Federal rate and final FY
2016 capital Federal rate.
On page 49804, in our discussion regarding LTCH PPS high-cost
outlier payments for site neutral payment rate cases, we are making
conforming corrections in the FY 2016 fixed-loss amount for site
neutral cases, due to the conforming correction to the IPPS outlier
fixed-loss cost threshold for FY 2016 (as discussed previously).
On page 49808, we are correcting the information on how to access
the LTCH PPS tables for the FY 2016 final rule on the CMS Web Site.
On page 49809, we are making conforming corrections to the national
and Puerto Rico specific operating standardized amounts and capital
standard Federal payment rates in Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D as a result
of the corrections to certain budget neutrality factors and the outlier
threshold (as described previously).
C. Summary of Errors in the Appendices
On page 49809, we are correcting our estimate of the increase in FY
2016 operating payments and capital payments as a result of the
technical errors that led to corrections to certain budget neutrality
factors and the outlier threshold (as described previously). On pages
49813 through 49821, 49823, 49828 through 49830, and 49840, in our
regulatory impact analyses, we are making conforming corrections in the
discussion of the analysis of the changes in operating and capital IPPS
payments for FY 2016 and the effects of certain budget neutrality
factors as a result of the technical errors (as discussed previously)
that lead to conforming corrections to the calculation of the operating
and capital IPPS budget neutrality factors, outlier threshold,
operating standardized amounts, and capital Federal rates.
On page 49823, in the table titled ``Modeled Disproportionate Share
Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2016 DSH Hospitals by Hospital Type:
Model DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2015 To FY 2016'' and the
accompanying discussion, we made technical and formatting errors in the
estimated impacts resulting from inadvertent errors in the calculation
of Factor 3 for certain hospitals.
On pages 49829 through 49830, we are making conforming corrections
to Table III--Comparison of Total Payments Per Case (FY 2015 Payments
Compared to FY 2016 Payments).
On page 49841, we are making conforming corrections to the
accounting statements and tables for acute care hospitals that arose
from the corrections of errors as described in section II.B. of this
correcting document.
D. Summary of Errors in and Corrections to Files and Tables Posted on
the CMS Web site
1. Errors and Corrections to IPPS and LTCH PPS Tables
We are correcting the errors in the following IPPS tables that are
listed on page 49808 of the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule and are
available on the Internet on the CMS Web Site at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2016-IPPS-Final-Rule-Home-Page.html:
Table 2--Final Case-Mix Index and Wage Index Table by CCN, because
of the ECI error discussed in section II.A. of this correction
document, we are correcting the values in the columns titled FY 2016
Wage Index, Average Hourly Wage FY 2016, and 3-Year Average Hourly Wage
(2014, 2015,
[[Page 60057]]
2016) for 4 providers located in CBSAs 04, 20, and 12620. Because the
average hourly wage changed for these four providers which affects the
area wage index, we are also correcting the FY 2016 wage indexes for
other providers geographically located in, or reclassified into, CBSAs
04, 20, and 12620.
As discussed in section II.B. of this correcting document, we are
also correcting the reclassification status of 50 providers. Thus, we
are correcting the FY 2016 wage index values for these providers to
reflect assignment to their geographic CBSAs or reclassified CBSAs, as
applicable.
Furthermore, because we are revising the national rural floor
budget neutrality adjustment as discussed in section II.B. of this
correcting document, the wage index values for numerous providers in
Table 2 are corrected as well.
Table 3--Final Wage Index Table by CBSA, by correcting the ECI
error, we are making corresponding changes to the wage indexes and GAFs
of CBSAs 04, 20, and 12620 listed in Table 3. Specifically, we are
correcting the values in the columns titled FY 2016 Average Hourly
Wage, 3-Year Average Hourly Wage (2014, 2015, 2016), Wage Index,
Reclassified Wage Index, GAF, and Reclassified GAF, for CBSAs 04, 20,
and 12620.
Also, by correcting Table 2 to properly indicate the withdrawal,
termination, or reclassification status of the 50 providers, we are
making corresponding changes to the wage indexes and GAFs listed in
Table 3. Specifically, we are correcting the values in the columns
titled Wage Index, Reclassified Wage Index, GAF, and Reclassified GAF.
Furthermore, because we are revising the national rural floor budget
neutrality adjustment as discussed in section II.B. of this correcting
document, we are making corrections to the wage index values for
numerous CBSAs in Table 3 as well.
Table 5--List of Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups (MS-
DRGs), Relative Weighting Factors, and Geometric and Arithmetic Mean
Length of Stay--FY 2016, in the column labeled 'TYPE', to be consistent
with previous fiscal years, we are revising the entries labeled 'P' to
SURG and the entries labeled 'M' to MED.
Table 10--New Technology Add-On Payment Thresholds for Applications
for FY 2017. We are correcting the thresholds in this table as a result
of the corrections to the operating standardized amounts discussed in
section II.B. of this correcting document.
Table 11--MS-LTC-DRGs, Relative Weights, Geometric Average Length
of Stay, Short Stay Outlier (SSO) Threshold, and ''IPPS Comparable
Threshold'' for LTCH PPS Discharges Occurring from October 1, 2015
through September 30, 2016. We are correcting this table by correcting
typographical errors for certain MS-LTC-DRGs in the columns titled
``Relative Weight,'' ``Geometric Average Length of Stay,'' ``Short-Stay
Outlier (SSO) Threshold,'' and ``IPPS Comparable Threshold.''
Table 12A--LTCH PPS Wage Index for Urban Areas for Discharges
Occurring From October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016. We are
correcting this table by correcting the values in the column titled
``LTCH PPS Wage Index'' as result of the error in the miscalculation
percentage change in the ECI, which affected the wage data for CBSA
12620, as discussed in section II.A. of this correcting document.
Table 12B--LTCH PPS Wage Index for Rural Areas for Discharges
Occurring From October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016. We are
correcting this table by correcting the values in the column titled
``LTCH PPS Wage Index'' as result of the technical error in the
percentage change in the ECI, which affected the wage data for CBSAs 04
and 20, as discussed in section II.A. of this correcting document.
Table 14--List of Hospitals with Fewer Than 1,600 Medicare
Discharges Based on the March 2015 Update of the FY 2014 MedPAR File
and Potentially Eligible Hospitals for the FY 2016 Low-Volume Hospital
Payment Adjustment (Eligibility for the low-volume hospital payment
adjustment is also dependent upon meeting the mileage criteria
specified at Sec. 412.101(b)(2)(ii)). We are correcting this table by
correcting typographical and technical errors for certain hospitals in
the column titled ``FY 2016 Low-Volume Payment Adjustment (Percentage
Add-on).
Table 18--FY 2016 Medicare DSH Uncompensated Care Payment Factor 3
and Projected DSH Eligibility. For the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule, we published a list of hospitals that we identified to be
subsection (d) hospitals and subsection (d) Puerto Rico hospitals
eligible to receive empirically justified Medicare DSH payment
adjustments and uncompensated care payments for FY 2016. We also
published, in the Supplemental Medicare DSH File located in the FY 2016
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule data files page at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/FY2016-IPPS-Final-Rule-Home-Page-Items/FY2016-IPPS-Final-Rule-Data-Files.html,
the data used to calculate each hospital's Factor 3, total
uncompensated care payment, and uncompensated care payment per
discharge. Shortly after the publication of the FY2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS
final rule, we discovered that in calculating Factor 3 of the
uncompensated care payment methodology, we inadvertently excluded the
Medicaid days from the most recently available 2012 or 2011 cost report
for certain providers that were projected to receive Medicare DSH in FY
2016. As a result, these providers had no Medicaid days included in the
calculation of Factor 3. In order to correct these errors, we have
Factor 3 for all hospitals to incorporate the changes to the data for
these providers whose Medicare hospital cost report data were
inadvertently excluded. These corrections to the uncompensated care
payments impacted the calculation of the outlier fixed-loss cost
threshold for outlier payments.
In addition, we discovered that we had--
Inadvertently calculated Factor 3 for several providers
using Medicaid days from a cost report that was less than a full year
when a cost report that was a full year or closer to being a full year
was available;
Erroneously provided Factor 3 values for certain new
providers; and
Calculated a Factor 3 for a hospital that has ceased
operations.
We are revising Factor 3 for all hospitals to correct these errors;
however, unlike the error in which Medicaid days for certain providers
were excluded, the impacts of these three errors (specified in the
bulleted list) are too small to change other aspects of the IPPS
ratesetting, such as the calculation of the fixed-loss threshold for
outlier payments.
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
We ordinarily publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register to provide a period for public comment before the
provisions of a rule take effect in accordance with section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). However, we
can waive this notice and comment procedure if the Secretary finds, for
good cause, that the notice and comment process is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and incorporates a
statement of the finding and the reasons therefore in the notice.
Section 553(d) of the APA ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in
effective date of final rules after the date of their publication in
the Federal Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be
waived, however, if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
[[Page 60058]]
to the public interest, and the agency incorporates a statement of the
findings and its reasons in the rule issued.
We believe that this correcting document does not constitute a rule
that would be subject to the APA notice and comment or delayed
effective date requirements. This correcting document corrects
technical and typographic errors in the preamble, addendum, payment
rates, tables, and appendices included or referenced in the FY 2016
IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule but does not make substantive changes to the
policies or payment methodologies that were adopted in the final rule.
As a result, this correcting document is intended to ensure that the
information in the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects
the policies adopted in that final rule.
In addition, even if this were a rule to which the notice and
comment procedures and delayed effective date requirements applied, we
find that there is good cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking
further notice and comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in
this document into the final rule or delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest because it is in the public's
interest for providers to receive appropriate payments in as timely a
manner as possible, and to ensure that the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final
rule accurately reflects our policies. Furthermore, such procedures
would be unnecessary, as we are not altering our payment methodologies
or policies, but rather, we are simply implementing correctly the
policies that we previously proposed, received comment on, and
subsequently finalized. This correcting document is intended solely to
ensure that the FY 2016 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule accurately reflects
these payment methodologies and policies. Therefore, we believe we have
good cause to waive the notice and comment and effective date
requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2015-19049 of August 17, 2015 (80 FR 49325), we are
making the following corrections:
A. Corrections of Errors in the Preamble
1. On page 49412, first column, third bulleted paragraph, the
phrase ``MS-DRG 007'' is corrected to read ``MS-DRG 207''.
2. On page 49492, first column, after the first partial paragraph,
in the table titled ``Midpoint of Cost Reporting Period'', last entry
(After 03/14/2013) is corrected to read as follows:
Midpoint of Cost Reporting Period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
After Before Adjustment factor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
03/14/2013 04/15/2013 0.99851
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. On page 49498, first column, second full paragraph, line 9, the
figure ``21'' is corrected to read ``19''.
3. On page 49498, second column, first partial paragraph, line 13,
the figure ``1.0194'' is corrected to read ``1.0190''.
4. On page 49619, third column, third full paragraph, line 4, the
figure ``22,544'' is corrected to read ``22,539''.
B. Correction of Errors in the Addendum
1. On page 49776:
a. First column:
(1) Fourth full paragraph, line 3, the figure ``0.998399'' is
corrected to read ``0.998405''.
(2) Fourth full paragraph, line 8, the figure ``0.998399'' is
corrected to read ``0.998405''.
(3) Fifth full paragraph, line 16, the figure ``0.998399'' is
corrected to read ``0.998405''.
b. Second column, third full paragraph:
(1) Line 9, the figure ``0.998749'' is corrected to read
``0.998738''.
(2) Line 13, the figure ``0.998399'' is corrected to read
``0.998405''.
(3) Line 15, the figure ``0.998749'' is corrected to read
``0.998738''.
(4) Line 21, the figure ``0.997150'' is corrected to read
``0.997145''.
c. Third column, third full paragraph, line 12, the figure
``0.987905'' is corrected to read ``0.988168''.
2. On page 49777, second column, last paragraph, line 3, the figure
``0.990298'' is corrected to read ``0.989859''.
3. On page 49778:
a. First column, second full paragraph:
(1) Line 3, the figure ``0.999996'' is corrected to read
``0.999997''.
(2) Line 6, the figure ``0.999996'' is corrected to read
``0.999997''.
b. Third column, last paragraph, line 36, the figure ``0.999861''
is corrected to read ``0.999837''.
4. On page 49785:
a. Top third of the page, second column, first full paragraph, last
line, the figure ``22,544'' is corrected to read ``22,539''.
b. Middle of the page, the untitled table, is corrected to read as
follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating
standardized Capital Federal
amounts rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
National............................ 0.948999 0.936503
Puerto Rico......................... 0.935570 0.919204
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. On pages 49787 and 49788, the table titled ``Comparison of FY
2015 Standardized Amounts to the FY 2016 Standardized Amounts'', is
corrected to read as follows:
Comparison of FY 2015 Standardized Amounts to the FY 2016 Standardized Amounts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted Hospital did NOT Hospital did NOT
Hospital submitted quality data and submit quality submit quality
quality data and is NOT a data and is a data and is NOT a
is a meaningful meaningful EHR meaningful EHR meaningful EHR
EHR user user user user
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 Base Rate after
removing:
1. FY 2015 Geographic If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is
Reclassification Budget Greater Than Greater Than Greater Than Greater Than
Neutrality (0.990429) 1.0000: Labor 1.0000: Labor 1.0000: Labor 1.0000: Labor
(69.6%): (69.6%): (69.6%): (69.6%):
$4,324.23 $4,324.23 $4,324.23 $4,324.23
Nonlabor (30.4%): Nonlabor (30.4%): Nonlabor (30.4%): Nonlabor (30.4%):
$1,888.74. $1,888.74. $1,888.74. $1,888.74.
[[Page 60059]]
2. FY 2015 Rural Community
Hospital Demonstration
Program Budget Neutrality
(0.999313)
3. Cumulative FY 2008, FY If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is If Wage Index is
2009, FY 2012, FY 2013 and less Than or less Than or less Than or less Than or
FY 2014, FY 2015 Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000: Equal to 1.0000:
Documentation and Coding Labor (62%): Labor (62%): Labor (62%): Labor (62%):
Adjustment as Required $3,852.04 $3,852.04 $3,852.04 $3,852.04
under Sections 7(b)(1)(A) Nonlabor (38%): Nonlabor (38%): Nonlabor (38%): Nonlabor (38%):
and 7(b)(1)(B) of Pub. L. $2,360.93. $2,360.93. $2,360.93. $2,360.93.
110-90 and Documentation
and Coding Recoupment
Adjustment as required
under Section 631 of the
American Taxpayer Relief
Act of 2012 (0.9329)
4. FY 2015 Operating Outlier
Offset (0.948999)
5. FY 2015 New Labor Market
Delineation Wage Index
Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor
(0.998854)
FY 2016 Update Factor........... 1.017............. 1.005............. 1.011............. 0.999.
FY 2016 MS-DRG Recalibration and 0.997145.......... 0.997145.......... 0.997145.......... 0.997145.
Wage Index Budget Neutrality
Factor.
FY 2016 Reclassification Budget 0.988168.......... 0.988168.......... 0.988168.......... 0.988168.
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Rural Community 0.999837.......... 0.999837.......... 0.999837.......... 0.999837.
Demonstration Program Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Operating Outlier Factor 0.948999.......... 0.948999.......... 0.948999.......... 0.948999.
Cumulative Factor: FY 2008, FY 0.9255............ 0.9255............ 0.9255............ 0.9255.
2009, FY 2012, FY 2013, FY
2014, FY 2015 and FY 2016
Documentation and Coding
Adjustment as Required under
Sections 7(b)(1)(A) and
7(b)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 110-90
and Documentation and Coding
Recoupment Adjustment as
required under Section 631 of
the American Taxpayer Relief
Act of 2012.
FY 2016 New Labor Market 0.999997.......... 0.999997.......... 0.999997.......... 0.999997.
Delineation Wage Index 3-Year
Hold Harmless Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor.
National Standardized Amount for Labor: $3,805.30.. Labor: $3,760.40.. Labor: $3,782.85.. Labor: $3,737.95.
FY 2016 if Wage Index is Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor:
Greater Than 1.0000; Labor/Non- $1,662.09. $1,642.48. $1,652.28. $1,632.67.
Labor Share Percentage (69.6/
30.4).
National Standardized Amount for Labor: $3,389.78.. Labor: $3,349.79.. Labor: $3,369.78.. Labor: $3,329.78.
FY 2016 if Wage Index is less Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor: Nonlabor:
Than or Equal to 1.0000; Labor/ $2,077.61. $2,053.09. $2,065.35. $2,040.84.
Non-Labor Share Percentage (62/
38).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. On page 49788, in the center of the page, the table titled
``Comparison of FY 2015 Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate to the FY
2016 Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate'' is corrected to read as
follows:
Comparison of FY 2015 Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate to the FY 2016
Puerto Rico-Specific Payment Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update (1.7 Update (1.7
percent); Wage percent); Wage
index is greater index is less than
than 1.0000; Labor/ or equal to
Non-Labor Share 1.0000; Labor/Non-
Percentage (63.2/ Labor Share
36.8) Percentage (62/38)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2015 Puerto Rico Base Rate, Labor: $1,758.02.. Labor: $1,724.64
after removing: Nonlabor: Nonlabor:
$1,023.66.. $1,057.04.
1. FY 2015 Geographic
Reclassification Budget
Neutrality (0.990429).
2. FY 2015 Rural Community
Hospital Demonstration
Program Budget Neutrality
(0.999313)
3. FY 2015 Puerto Rico
Operating Outlier Offset
(0.926334)
4. FY 2015 New Labor Market
Delineation Wage Index
Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor
(0.998854)
FY 2016 Update Factor........... 1.017............. 1.017.
[[Page 60060]]
FY 2016 MS[dash]DRG 0.998405.......... 0.998405.
Recalibration Budget Neutrality
Factor.
FY 2016 Reclassification Budget 0.988168.......... 0.988168.
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Rural Community Hospital 0.999837.......... 0.999837.
Demonstration Program Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 New Labor Market 0.999997.......... 0.999997.
Delineation Wage Index 3-Year
Hold Harmless Transition Budget
Neutrality Factor.
FY 2016 Puerto Rico Operating 0.935570.......... 0.935570.
Outlier Factor.
Puerto Rico[dash]Specific Labor: $1,650.00.. Labor: $1,618.68
Payment Rate for FY 2016. Nonlabor: $960.77. Nonlabor: $992.09.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. On page 49790, first column, last paragraph, line 15, the figure
``0.998399'' is corrected to read ``0.998405''.
8. On page 49791, third column, first full paragraph, line 6, the
figure ``0.85'' is corrected to read ``0.87''.
9. On page 49793:
a. Second column:
(1) First full paragraph:
(a) Line 16, the figure ``0.9979'' is corrected to read ``0.9982''.
(b) Line 19, the figure ``0.9864'' is corrected to read ``0.9866''.
(2) Second full paragraph, line 17, the figure ``0.9858'' is
corrected to read ``0.9860''.
b. In third column:
(1) Second full paragraph:
(a) Line 2, the figure ``0.9973'' is corrected to read ``0.9976''.
(b) Line 4, the figure ``0.9979'' is corrected to read ``0.9982''.
(2) Third full paragraph:
(a) Line 9, the figure ``438.65'' is corrected to read ``438.75''.
(b) Line 19, the figure ``0.9973'' is corrected to read ``0.9976''.
10. On page 49794:
a. Third column, first partial paragraph:
(1) Line 3, the figure ``0.27'' is corrected to read ``0.24''.
(2) Line 10, the figure ``0.85'' is corrected to read ``0.87''.
b. The table titled entitled ``Comparison of Factors and
Adjustments: FY 2015 Capital Federal Rate and FY 2016 Capital Federal
Rate'' is corrected to read as follows:
Comparison of Factors and Adjustments: FY 2015 Capital Federal Rate and FY 2016 Capital Federal Rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent
FY 2015 FY 2016 Change change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Factor \1\............................... 1.0150 1.0130 1.0130 1.3
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor \1\................... 0.9993 0.9976 0.9976 -0.24
Outlier Adjustment Factor \2\................... 0.9382 0.9365 0.9982 -0.18
Capital Federal Rate............................ $434.97 $438.75 1.0087 0.87
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The update factor and the GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factors are built permanently into the
capital Federal rates. Thus, for example, the incremental change from FY 2015 to FY 2016 resulting from the
application of the 0.9976 GAF/DRG budget neutrality adjustment factor for FY 2016 is a net change of 0.9976
(or -0.24 percent).
\2\ The outlier reduction factor is not built permanently into the capital Federal rate; that is, the factor is
not applied cumulatively in determining the capital Federal rate. Thus, for example, the net change resulting
from the application of the FY 2016 outlier adjustment factor is 0.9365/0.9382, or 0.9982 (or -0.18 percent).
c. The table titled entitled ``Comparison of Factors and
Adjustments: Proposed FY 2016 Capital Federal Rate and Final FY 2016
Capital Federal Rate'' is corrected to read as follows:
Comparison of Factors and Adjustments: Proposed FY 2016 Capital Federal Rate and Final FY 2016 Capital Federal
Rate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed FY
2016 Final FY 2016 Change Percent change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update Factor................................... 1.0130 1.0130 1.0000 0.00
GAF/DRG Adjustment Factor....................... 0.9976 0.9976 1.0000 0.00
Outlier Adjustment Factor....................... 0.9357 0.9365 1.0008 0.08
Capital Federal Rate............................ $438.40 $438.75 1.0008 0.08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. On page 49795, first column:
a. First paragraph, line 7, the figure ``212.56'' is corrected to
read ``212.55''.
b. Third paragraph, line 21, the figure ``22,544'' is corrected to
read ``22,539''.
12. On page 49804, second column, first full paragraph:
a. Line 16, the figure ``22,544'' is corrected to read ``22,539''.
b. Line 27, the figure ``22,544'' is corrected to read ``22,539''.
13. On page 49808, third column, first full paragraph, lines 6 and
7, the phrase ``index.html under the list item for Regulation Number''
is corrected to read ``index.html. Click on the link on the left side
of the screen titled, ``LTCHPPS Regulations and Notices'' and select
the list item for Regulation Number CMS-1632-F. ``.
13. On page 49809:
a. Table 1A titled ``National Adjusted Operating Standardized
Amounts,
[[Page 60061]]
Labor/Nonlabor (69.6 Percent Labor Share/30.4 Percent Nonlabor Share if
Wage Index is Greater than 1)--FY 2016'' is corrected to read as
follows:
Table 1A--National Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts, Labor/Nonlabor (69.6 Percent Labor Share/30.4 Percent Nonlabor Share If Wage Index Is
Greater Than 1)--FY 2016
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted quality data and is Hospital did NOT submit quality data Hospital submitted quality data and Hospital did NOT submit quality data
a meaningful EHR user (update = 1.7 and is a meaningful EHR user (update is NOT a meaningful EHR user (update and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
percent) = 1.1 percent) = 0.5 percent) (update = -0.1 percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3,805.30 $1,662.09 $3,782.85 $1,652.28 $3,760.40 $1,642.48 $3,737.95 $1,632.67
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Table 1B titled ``National Adjusted Operating Standardized
Amounts, Labor/Nonlabor (62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor
Share if Wage Index is Less than or Equal TO 1)--FY 2016'' is corrected
to read as follows:
Table 1B--National Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts, Labor/Nonlabor (62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share If Wage Index Is Less Than
or Equal to 1)--FY 2016
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital submitted quality data and is Hospital did NOT submit quality data Hospital submitted quality data and Hospital did NOT submit quality data
a meaningful EHR user (update = 1.7 and is a meaningful EHR user (update is NOT a meaningful EHR user (update and is NOT a meaningful EHR user
percent) = 1.1 percent) = 0.5 percent) (update = -0.1 percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3,389.78 $2,077.61 $3,369.78 $2,065.35 $3,349.79 $2,053.09 $3,329.78 $2,040.84
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Table 1C titled ``Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts for
Puerto Rico, Labor/Nonlabor (National: 62 Percent Labor Share/38
Percent Nonlabor Share Because Wage Index is Less than or Equal to 1;
Puerto Rico: 63.2 Percent Labor Share/36.8 Percent Nonlabor Share if
Wage Index is Greater Than 1 or 62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent
Nonlabor Share if Wage Index is Less than or Equal to 1--FY 2016'' is
corrected to read as follows:
Table 1C--Adjusted Operating Standardized Amounts for Puerto Rico, Labor/Nonlabor (National: 62 Percent Labor
Share/38 Percent Nonlabor Share Because Wage Index Is Less Than or Equal to 1; Puerto Rico: 63.2 Percent Labor
Share/36.8 Percent Nonlabor Share If Wage Index Is Greater Than 1 or 62 Percent Labor Share/38 Percent Nonlabor
Share If Wage Index Is Less Than or Equal to 1--FY 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rates if wage index is greater than 1 Rates if wage index is less
---------------------------------------------- than or equal to 1
Standardized amount -------------------------------
Labor Nonlabor Labor Nonlabor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National \1\...................... Not Applicable....... Not Applicable....... $3,389.78 $2,077.61
Puerto Rico....................... $1,650.00............ $960.77.............. 1,618.68 992.09
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For FY 2016, there are no CBSAs in Puerto Rico with a national wage index greater than 1.
d. Table 1D titled ``Capital Standard Federal Payment Rates--FY
2016'' is corrected as follows:
Table 1D--Capital Standard Federal Payment Rates--FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
National................................................ $438.75
Puerto Rico............................................. 212.55
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Corrections of Errors in the Appendices
1. On page 49809, third column, first full paragraph:
a. Line 10, the figure ``$378'' is corrected to read ``$391''.
b. Line 12, the figure ``$187'' is corrected to read ``$188''.
2. On pages 49813 through 49815, the table titled ``Impact Analysis
of Changes to the IPPS for Operating Costs for FY 2016'' is corrected
to read as follows:
[[Page 60062]]
Table I--Impact Analysis of Changes to the Ipps for Operating Costs for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rural and
FY 2016 Wage data imputed floor
Hospital rate FY 2016 Weights under new CBSA FY 2016 DRG, Rel. with Application of
Number of update and and DRG changes designations with wts., wage index FY 2016 MGCRB application of the frontier All FY
hospitals documentation and with application application of changes with wage Reclassifications national rural wage index and 2016
\1\ coding adjustment of recalibration wage budget and recalibration and imputed out-migration changes
budget neutrality neutrality budget neutrality floor budget adjustment
neutrality
........... (1) \ 2\ (2) \ 3\ (3) \ 4\ (4) \ 5\ (5) \ 6\ (6) \ 7\ (7) \ 8\ (8) \ 9\
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Hospitals....................... 3,369 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.4
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals................. 2,533 0.9 0 0 0.1 -0.1 0 0.1 0.4
Large urban areas............... 1,393 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.3 0 0.1 0.4
Other urban areas............... 1,140 0.9 0 -0.1 -0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
Rural hospitals................. 836 1.3 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 1.4 -0.3 0.1 0.2
Bed Size (Urban):
0-99 beds....................... 668 0.9 -0.3 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0.1 0.3 0.2
100-199 beds.................... 778 0.9 -0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.3 0.2 0.4
200-299 beds.................... 445 0.9 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4
300-499 beds.................... 428 0.9 0 0 0 -0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4
500 or more beds................ 214 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 0.4
Bed Size (Rural):
0-49 beds....................... 329 1.3 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 0.3 -0.2 0.3 -0.1
50-99 beds...................... 297 1.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.5 0.8 -0.2 0.1 0.2
100-149 beds.................... 121 1.4 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 1.7 -0.3 0.2 0.4
150-199 beds.................... 48 1.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.5 1.9 -0.3 0.1 0.3
200 or more beds................ 41 1.1 -0.1 -0.5 -0.5 2.5 -0.2 0 0.1
Urban by Region:
New England..................... 120 0.9 0 0.7 0.8 0.9 2 0.1 0
Middle Atlantic................. 318 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.8 -0.4 0.2 1
South Atlantic.................. 407 0.9 0 0.1 0.1 -0.5 -0.4 0.1 0.2
East North Central.............. 396 0.9 0 0 0.1 -0.3 -0.6 0 0.5
East South Central.............. 150 0.9 0 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6 -0.4 0.1 -0.4
West North Central.............. 166 0.9 0 -0.6 -0.5 -0.8 -0.5 0.8 0.3
West South Central.............. 384 0.9 0 -0.5 -0.4 -0.6 -0.5 0 -0.4
Mountain........................ 161 1 -0.1 -0.3 -0.3 0 -0.1 0.2 0.2
Pacific......................... 380 0.9 0 0.4 0.3 -0.2 1.7 0.1 1
Puerto Rico..................... 51 1 0.1 -0.9 -0.7 -1 0.1 0.1 -1.9
Rural by Region:
New England..................... 22 1.2 -0.1 -0.6 -0.7 1.7 -0.4 0 -0.1
Middle Atlantic................. 55 1.4 -0.1 0.2 0 0.8 -0.2 0.2 0.2
South Atlantic.................. 128 1.2 -0.2 -0.1 -0.3 2.4 -0.2 0.1 0.6
East North Central.............. 116 1.4 -0.2 -0.1 -0.4 1 -0.2 0.1 0.9
East South Central.............. 164 0.9 0 -0.7 -0.7 2.5 -0.5 0.1 -1
West North Central.............. 101 1.7 -0.4 -0.2 -0.5 0.2 0 0.3 0.8
West South Central.............. 165 1.2 -0.1 -0.9 -0.9 1.5 -0.3 0.1 -0.8
Mountain........................ 61 1.4 -0.3 -0.1 -0.4 0.2 -0.1 0.2 0.7
Pacific......................... 24 1.4 -0.4 0.1 -0.3 0.7 -0.2 0 1.5
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals................. 2,476 0.9 0 0 0.1 -0.1 0 0.1 0.4
Large urban areas............... 1,386 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.3 0 0.1 0.4
Other urban areas............... 1,090 0.9 0 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
Rural areas..................... 893 1.3 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 1.2 -0.2 0.3 0.3
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching..................... 2,326 1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3
Fewer than 100 residents........ 794 0.9 0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0 0.2 0.4
100 or more residents........... 249 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.3 0 -0.2 0.1 0.4
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH......................... 653 0.9 -0.2 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1
100 or more beds................ 1,593 0.9 0.1 0 0.1 -0.1 0 0.1 0.3
Less than 100 beds.............. 328 0.9 -0.1 0 -0.1 -0.7 0 0.3 0.3
Rural DSH:
SCH............................. 260 1.6 -0.3 0 -0.4 0 0 0 0.7
RRC............................. 347 1.3 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 1.6 -0.2 0.4 0.4
100 or more beds................ 31 0.7 0.1 -0.6 -0.5 2.4 -0.6 0.1 -0.9
Less than 100 beds.............. 157 0.8 0 -0.7 -0.6 1.7 -0.6 0.6 -1.2
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH........... 855 0.9 0.1 0 0.1 -0.1 -0.2 0.1 0.4
Teaching and no DSH............. 122 0.9 -0.1 0 -0.1 0.5 0.4 0.1 1.3
No teaching and DSH............. 1,066 0.9 0 0 -0.1 -0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2
No teaching and no DSH.......... 433 0.9 -0.2 0.1 -0.1 -0.4 -0.1 0.2 1.1
[[Page 60063]]
Special Hospital Types:
RRC............................. 189 0.9 -0.1 -0.6 -0.6 2.2 -0.4 0.6 -0.4
SCH............................. 327 1.6 -0.3 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 -0.1 0 0.8
MDH............................. 150 1.3 -0.3 -0.2 -0.4 0.3 -0.2 0.2 0.6
SCH and RRC..................... 126 1.6 -0.3 -0.1 -0.4 0.4 0 0 0.9
MDH and RRC..................... 13 1.5 -0.3 0 -0.4 0.2 -0.2 0 0.6
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary....................... 1,934 0.9 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.2 0.5
Proprietary..................... 879 0.9 0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.1 -0.1
Government...................... 529 0.9 0.1 -0.1 0 -0.2 0.1 0.1 0
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of
Inpatient Days:
0-25............................ 533 0.9 0.1 -0.1 0 -0.3 0.2 0 -0.6
25-50........................... 2,134 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.5
50-65........................... 571 1 -0.1 0.1 0 0.6 0 0.2 0.8
Over 65......................... 97 1.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.4 -0.3 0.3 0.1 0.4
FY 2016 Reclassifications by the
Medicare Geographic Classification
Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals...... 789 1 0 -0.1 -0.1 2.4 -0.1 0 0.8
Non-Reclassified Hospitals...... 2,580 0.9 0 0 0.1 -0.9 0 0.2 0.2
Urban Hospitals Reclassified.... 509 0.9 0 -0.1 -0.1 2.4 -0.1 0.1 0.9
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals. 1,967 0.9 0 0.1 0.1 -0.9 0.1 0.1 0.2
Rural Hospitals Reclassified 280 1.2 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 2.3 -0.3 0 0.4
Full Year......................
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals 503 1.4 -0.3 -0.3 -0.5 -0.3 -0.2 0.3 0
Full Year......................
All Section 401 Reclassified 64 1.4 -0.3 0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.1 1.4 0.6
Hospitals:.....................
Other Reclassified Hospitals 53 1 -0.1 -0.5 -0.6 3.4 -0.5 0 -0.4
(Section 1886(d)(8)(B) of the
Act)...........................
Specialty Hospitals
Cardiac Specialty Hospitals..... 14 0.9 0.2 -0.9 -0.6 -1.1 0 0.9 0.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because data necessary to classify some hospitals by category were missing, the total number of hospitals in each category may not equal the national total. Discharge data are from FY
2014, and hospital cost report data are from reporting periods beginning in FY 2013 and FY 2012.
\2\ This column displays the payment impact of the hospital rate update and the documentation and coding adjustment including the 1.7 percent adjustment to the national standardized amount and
hospital-specific rate (the estimated 2.4 percent market basket update reduced by the 0.5 percentage point for the multifactor productivity adjustment and the 0.2 percentage point reduction
under the Affordable Care Act) and the -0.8 percent documentation and coding adjustment to the national standardized amount.
\3\ This column displays the payment impact of the changes to the Version 33 GROUPER, the changes to the relative weights and the recalibration of the MS-DRG weights based on FY 2014 MedPAR
data in accordance with section 1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act. This column displays the application of the recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.998405 in accordance with section
1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act.
\4\ This column displays the payment impact of the update to wage index data using FY 2012 cost report data and the OMB labor market area delineations based on 2010 Decennial Census data. This
column displays the payment impact of the application of the wage budget neutrality factor, which is calculated separately from the recalibration budget neutrality factor, and is calculated
in accordance with section 1886(d)(3)(E)(i) of the Act. The wage budget neutrality factor is 0.998738.
\5\ This column displays the combined payment impact of the changes in Columns 2 through 3 and the cumulative budget neutrality factor for MS-DRG and wage changes in accordance with section
1886(d)(4)(C)(iii) of the Act and section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Act. The cumulative wage and recalibration budget neutrality factor of 0.997145 is the product of the wage budget neutrality
factor and the recalibration budget neutrality factor.
\6\ Shown here are the effects of geographic reclassifications by the Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB) along with the effects of the continued implementation of the new
OMB labor market area delineations on these reclassifications. The effects demonstrate the FY 2016 payment impact of going from no reclassifications to the reclassifications scheduled to be
in effect for FY 2016. Reclassification for prior years has no bearing on the payment impacts shown here. This column reflects the geographic budget neutrality factor of 0.988168.
\7\ This column displays the effects of the rural floor and imputed floor based on the continued implementation of the new OMB labor market area delineations. The Affordable Care Act requires
the rural floor budget neutrality adjustment to be 100 percent national level adjustment. The rural floor budget neutrality factor (which includes the imputed floor) applied to the wage
index is 0.989859. This column also shows the effect of the 3-year transition for hospitals that were located in urban counties that became rural under the new OMB delineations or hospitals
deemed urban where the urban area became rural under the new OMB delineations, with a budget neutrality factor of 0.999997.
\8\ This column shows the combined impact of the policy required under section 10324 of the Affordable Care Act that hospitals located in frontier States have a wage index no less than 1.0 and
of section 1886(d)(13) of the Act, as added by section 505 of Pub. L. 108-173, which provides for an increase in a hospital's wage index if a threshold percentage of residents of the county
where the hospital is located commute to work at hospitals in counties with higher wage indexes. These are nonbudget neutral policies.
\9\ This column shows the changes in payments from FY 2015 to FY 2016. It reflects the impact of the FY 2016 hospital update and the adjustment for documentation and coding. It also reflects
changes in hospitals' reclassification status in FY 2016 compared to FY 2015. It incorporates all of the changes displayed in Columns 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7, (the changes displayed in Columns 2
and 3 are included in Column 4). The sum of these impacts may be different from the percentage changes shown here due to rounding and interactive effects.
[[Page 60064]]
3. On page 49816:
a. First column, last paragraph, line 6, the figure ``0.998399'' is
corrected to read ``0.998405''.
b. Third column, first partial paragraph, line 16, the figure
``0.998749'' is corrected to read ``0.998738''.
4. On page 49817:
a. First column, first full paragraph:
(1) Line 9, the figure ``0.998749'' is corrected to read
``0.998738''.
(2) Line 11, the figure ``0.998399'' is corrected to read
``0.998405''.
(3) Line 18, the figure ``0.997150'' is corrected to read
``0.997145''.
b. Second column, first full paragraph, line 6, the figure
``0.987905'' is corrected to read ``0.988168''.
c. Third column:
(1) First partial paragraph, line 7, the figure ``21'' is corrected
to read ``19''.
(2) First full paragraph, line 8, the figure ``0.990298'' is
corrected to read ``0.989859''.
(3) Last paragraph:
(a) Line 1, the figure ``371'' is corrected to read ``375''.
(b) Line 3, the figure ``2,998'' is corrected to read ``2,994''.
(c) Line 6, the figure ``0.990298'' is corrected to read
``0.989859''.
(d) Line 8, the figure ``0.2'' is corrected to read ``0.3''.
5. On page 49818:
a. First column, first partial paragraph:
(1) Line 10, the figure ``1.6'' is corrected to read ``2.0''.
(2) Line 16, the figure ``0.990298'' is corrected to read
``0.989859''.
(3) Line 17, the figure ``$98'' is corrected to read ``$115''.
(4) Line 19, the figure ``3.1'' is corrected to read ``3.6''.
b. Second column, first full paragraph:
(1) Line 1, the figure ``21'' is corrected to read ``19''.
(2) Line 7, the figure ``0.990298'' is corrected to read
``0.989859''.
(3) Line 9, the figure ``$27'' is corrected to read ``$29''.
(4) Line 10, the figure ``$9'' is corrected to read ``$10''.
(5) Line 18, the figure ``$4.5'' is corrected to read ``$4.3''.
(6) Line 19, the figure ``$2.6'' is corrected to read ``$2.3''.
c. Third column, first partial paragraph, line 15, the figure
``0.999996'' is corrected to read ``0.999997''.
6. On pages 49818 and 49819, the table titled ``FY 2016 IPPS
Estimated Payments Due to Rural Floor and Imputed Floor with National
Budget Neutrality'' is corrected to read as follows:
FY 2016 IPPS Estimated Payments Due to Rural Floor and Imputed Floor With National Budget Neutrality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percent change
Number of in payments due
hospitals that to application
Number of will receive of rural floor Difference (in
State hospitals the rural and imputed millions)
floor or floor with
imputed floor budget
neutrality
(1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................................ 86 3 -0.4 $-7.08
Alaska......................................... 6 1 -0.3 -0.53
Arizona........................................ 55 5 -0.3 -6
Arkansas....................................... 46 0 -0.5 -4.66
California..................................... 303 203 2.2 218.44
Colorado....................................... 47 5 0.4 4.25
Connecticut.................................... 31 7 -0.5 -8.49
Delaware....................................... 6 0 -0.6 -2.54
Washington, D.C................................ 7 0 -0.5 -2.48
Florida........................................ 170 14 -0.3 -19.9
Georgia........................................ 105 0 -0.5 -12.47
Hawaii......................................... 12 1 -0.4 -1.16
Idaho.......................................... 14 0 -0.4 -1.21
Illinois....................................... 127 2 -0.6 -25.22
Indiana........................................ 91 0 -0.5 -12.1
Iowa........................................... 35 0 -0.5 -4.33
Kansas......................................... 53 0 -0.4 -3.67
Kentucky....................................... 65 1 -0.4 -7.05
Louisiana...................................... 99 3 -0.5 -6.67
Maine.......................................... 20 0 -0.5 -2.36
Massachusetts.................................. 61 39 3.6 114.58
Michigan....................................... 96 0 -0.5 -22.38
Minnesota...................................... 50 0 -0.3 -6.33
Mississippi.................................... 64 0 -0.5 -4.94
Missouri....................................... 78 0 -0.4 -9.98
Montana........................................ 12 2 0.1 0.15
Nebraska....................................... 26 0 -0.4 -2.53
Nevada......................................... 24 3 0.2 1.63
New Hampshire.................................. 13 9 1.2 5.91
New Jersey..................................... 64 19 0.3 10.01
New Mexico..................................... 25 0 -0.3 -1.41
New York....................................... 156 2 -0.6 -45.17
North Carolina................................. 84 0 -0.4 -14.6
North Dakota................................... 6 0 -0.3 -0.83
Ohio........................................... 132 6 -0.5 -17.56
Oklahoma....................................... 86 4 -0.4 -4.47
[[Page 60065]]
Oregon......................................... 34 0 -0.5 -4.85
Pennsylvania................................... 153 3 -0.5 -22.99
Puerto Rico.................................... 51 10 0.1 0.14
Rhode Island................................... 11 4 0.6 2.29
South Carolina................................. 56 5 -0.2 -3.02
South Dakota................................... 19 0 -0.3 -1.02
Tennessee...................................... 99 10 -0.5 -10.2
Texas.......................................... 318 3 -0.5 -30.68
Utah........................................... 34 2 -0.4 -2.02
Vermont........................................ 6 0 -0.3 -0.6
Virginia....................................... 78 1 -0.4 -11.68
Washington..................................... 49 6 0 0.93
West Virginia.................................. 29 2 0.1 0.89
Wisconsin...................................... 66 0 -0.5 -8.19
Wyoming........................................ 11 0 -0.2 -0.23
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. On page 49819:
a. Second column, last paragraph, line 18, the figure ``336'' is
corrected to read ``367''.
b. Third column, first partial paragraph, line 8, the figure
``$45'' is corrected to read ``$55''.
8. On pages 49820 and 49821, the table titled ``Table II--Impact
Analysis of Changes for FY 2016 Acute Care Hospital Operating
Prospective Payment System (Payments per Discharge)'' is corrected as
follows:
Table II--Impact Analysis of Changes for FY 2016 Acute Care Hospital Operating Prospective Payment System
[Payments per discharge]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Number of average FY average FY
hospitals 2015 payment 2016 payment FY 2016 changes
per discharge per discharge
(1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Hospitals.................................. 3,369 11,329 11,372 0.4
By Geographic Location:
Urban hospitals............................ 2,533 11,680 11,725 0.4
Large urban areas.......................... 1,393 12,434 12,484 0.4
Other urban areas.......................... 1,140 10,766 10,806 0.4
Rural hospitals............................ 836 8,424 8,442 0.2
Bed Size (Urban):
0-99 beds.................................. 668 9,254 9,276 0.2
100-199 beds............................... 778 9,863 9,902 0.4
200-299 beds............................... 445 10,589 10,636 0.4
300-499 beds............................... 428 11,927 11,973 0.4
500 or more beds........................... 214 14,285 14,340 0.4
Bed Size (Rural):
0-49 beds.................................. 329 7,048 7,043 -0.1
50-99 beds................................. 297 7,972 7,989 0.2
100-149 beds............................... 121 8,290 8,325 0.4
150-199 beds............................... 48 9,109 9,132 0.3
200 or more beds........................... 41 9,996 10,006 0.1
Urban by Region:
New England.................................... 120 12,850 12,853 0
Middle Atlantic............................ 318 13,156 13,283 1
South Atlantic............................. 407 10,387 10,410 0.2
East North Central......................... 396 10,950 11,009 0.5
East South Central......................... 150 9,998 9,958 -0.4
West North Central......................... 166 11,438 11,469 0.3
West South Central......................... 384 10,590 10,548 -0.4
Mountain................................... 161 12,013 12,035 0.2
[[Page 60066]]
Pacific.................................... 380 14,889 15,039 1
Puerto Rico................................ 51 7,648 7,504 -1.9
Rural by Region:
New England................................ 22 11,441 11,432 -0.1
Middle Atlantic............................ 55 8,545 8,565 0.2
South Atlantic............................. 128 7,868 7,918 0.6
East North Central......................... 116 8,775 8,853 0.9
East South Central......................... 164 7,524 7,449 -1
West North Central......................... 101 9,280 9,351 0.8
West South Central......................... 165 7,218 7,159 -0.8
Mountain................................... 61 9,730 9,796 0.7
Pacific.................................... 24 11,500 11,671 1.5
By Payment Classification:
Urban hospitals............................ 2,476 11,700 11,745 0.4
Large urban areas.......................... 1,386 12,440 12,490 0.4
Other urban areas.......................... 1,090 10,771 10,811 0.4
Rural areas................................ 893 8,687 8,710 0.3
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching................................ 2,326 9,450 9,480 0.3
Fewer than 100 residents................... 794 10,999 11,043 0.4
100 or more residents...................... 249 16,424 16,494 0.4
Urban DSH:
Non-DSH.................................... 653 9,946 10,057 1.1
100 or more beds........................... 1,593 12,080 12,115 0.3
Less than 100 beds......................... 328 8,526 8,548 0.3
Rural DSH:
SCH........................................ 260 8,859 8,918 0.7
RRC........................................ 347 9,023 9,056 0.4
100 or more beds........................... 31 7,544 7,476 -0.9
Less than 100 beds......................... 157 6,774 6,695 -1.2
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH...................... 855 13,217 13,262 0.4
Teaching and no DSH........................ 122 11,161 11,305 1.3
No teaching and DSH........................ 1,066 9,878 9,895 0.2
No teaching and no DSH..................... 433 9,415 9,516 1.1
Special Hospital Types:
RRC........................................ 189 9,449 9,409 -0.4
SCH........................................ 327 9,951 10,034 0.8
MDH........................................ 150 6,968 7,011 0.6
SCH and RRC................................ 126 10,591 10,691 0.9
MDH and RRC................................ 13 8,621 8,673 0.6
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary...................................... 1,934 11,498 11,560 0.5
Proprietary................................ 879 9,997 9,986 -0.1
Government................................. 529 12,240 12,244 0
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of Inpatient
Days:
0-25....................................... 533 14,719 14,625 -0.6
25-50...................................... 2,134 11,265 11,322 0.5
50-65...................................... 571 9,180 9,252 0.8
Over 65.................................... 97 6,883 6,910 0.4
FY 2016 Reclassifications by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board:
All Reclassified Hospitals................. 789 11,209 11,297 0.8
Non-Reclassified Hospitals................. 2,580 11,374 11,400 0.2
Urban Hospitals Reclassified............... 509 11,877 11,982 0.9
Urban Nonreclassified Hospitals............ 1,967 11,643 11,669 0.2
Rural Hospitals Reclassified Full Year..... 280 8,829 8,861 0.4
Rural Nonreclassified Hospitals Full Year.. 503 7,931 7,933 0
All Section 401 Reclassified Hospitals:.... 64 10,427 10,492 0.6
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 53 7,855 7,828 -0.4
1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act).................
Specialty Hospitals
Cardiac Specialty Hospitals................ 14 12,640 12,723 0.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60067]]
9. On page 49823:
a. Top of the page:
(1) First column, second partial paragraph, line 1 the figure
``2,418'' is corrected to read ``2,408''.
(2) Second column, first partial paragraph, lines 1 and 2, the
phrase, ``It did not include hospitals in the Rural Community Hospital
Demonstration,'' is corrected to read ``It did not include new
hospitals, hospitals in the Rural Community Hospital Demonstration,''.
b. Lower three-fourths of the page, the table titled ``Modeled
Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2016 DSH
Hospitals by Hospital Type: Model DSH $ (In Millions) From FY 2015 to
FY 2016'' is corrected as follows:
Modeled Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments for Estimated FY 2016 DSH Hospitals by Hospital Type: Model DSH
$ (In Millions) From FY 2015 to FY 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
estimated FY FY 2015 FY 2016 Percentage
2016 DSH estimated DSH estimated DSH change **
hospitals $ * $ *
(1) (2) (3) (4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................... 2,408 $10,993 $9,733 -11.5
By Geographic Location:
Urban Hospitals............................. 1,886 10,453 9,258 -11.4
Large Urban Areas....................... 1,019 6,629 5,855 -11.7
Other Urban Areas....................... 867 3,823 3,403 -11.0
Rural Hospitals............................. 522 540 475 -12.1
Bed Size (Urban):
0 to 99 Beds................................ 323 211 186 -11.7
100 to 249 Beds............................. 825 2,514 2,195 -12.7
250 to 499 Beds............................. 738 7,728 6,877 -11.0
Bed Size (Rural):
0 to 99 Beds................................ 388 235 208 -11.3
100 to 249 Beds............................. 120 246 211 -14.5
250 to 499 Beds............................. 14 59 56 -5.6
Urban by Region:
East North Central.......................... 307 1,421 1,268 -10.8
East South Central.......................... 131 649 572 -11.8
Middle Atlantic............................. 230 1,804 1,603 -11.2
Mountain.................................... 115 504 447 -11.3
New England................................. 86 440 388 -11.9
Pacific..................................... 298 1,649 1,455 -11.8
Puerto Rico................................. 39 108 101 -7.3
South Atlantic.............................. 315 2,012 1,770 -12.0
West North Central.......................... 104 507 455 -10.2
West South Central.......................... 261 1,357 1,198 -11.7
Rural by Region:
East North Central.......................... 66 55 49 -10.9
East South Central.......................... 146 174 151 -12.9
Middle Atlantic............................. 27 40 34 -14.5
Mountain.................................... 22 18 16 -13.1
New England................................. 10 17 15 -13.7
Pacific..................................... 10 6 8 35.3
South Atlantic.............................. 88 107 96 -9.5
West North Central.......................... 37 27 21 -20.1
West South Central.......................... 116 97 84 -13.6
By Payment Classification:
Urban Hospitals............................. 1,854 10,448 9,204 -11.9
Large Urban Areas....................... 1,016 6,640 5,853 -11.9
Other Urban Areas....................... 838 3,809 3,351 -12.0
Rural Hospitals............................. 554 545 529 -2.8
Teaching Status:
Nonteaching................................. 1,539 3,578 3,111 -13.0
Fewer than 100 residents.................... 629 3,585 3,190 -11.0
100 or more residents....................... 240 3,831 3,432 -10.4
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary................................... 1,382 6,770 6,025 -11.0
Proprietary................................. 539 1,904 1,660 -12.8
Government.................................. 485 2,290 2,021 -11.7
Unknown..................................... 2 30 27 -10.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Dobson DaVanzo analysis of 2011-2012 Hospital Cost Reports, 2015 Provider of Services File, FY 2015 IPPS
Final Rule CN Impact File, and FY 2016 NPRM Impact File.
* Dollar DSH calculated by [0.25 * estimated section 1886(d)(5)(F) payments] + [0.75 * estimated section
1886(d)(5)(F) payments * Factor 2 * Factor 3]. When summed across all hospitals projected to receive DSH
payments, the estimated DSH is $10,993 million in FY 2015 and $9,733 million in FY 2016.
** Percentage change is determined as the difference between Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2016 IPPS/
LTCH PPS final rule (column 3) and Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2015 IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule
(column 2) divided by Medicare DSH payments modeled for the FY 2015 final rule (column 3) times 100 percent.
[[Page 60068]]
10. On page 49828, in third column, last paragraph, line 4, the
figure ``0.9973'' is corrected to read ``0.9976''.
11. On page 49829:
a. Second column, last paragraph:
(1) Line 4, the figure ``3.1'' is corrected to read ``3.2''
(2) Line 5, the figure ``1.1'' is corrected to read ``1.3''
b. Third column; last paragraph, last line, the figure ``1.1'' is
corrected to read ``1.2''.
12. On pages 49829 and 49830, table titled ``Table III.--Comparison
of Total Payments Per Case [FY 2015 Payments Compared To FY 2016
Payments]'' is corrected to read as follows:
Table III--Comparison of Total Payments per Case
[FY 2015 payments compared to FY 2016 payments]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average FY Average FY
Number of 2015 payments/ 2016 payments/ Change
hospitals case case
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Geographic Location:
All hospitals............................... 3,369 871 890 2.3
Large urban areas (populations over 1 1,393 963 987 2.5
million)...................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million 1,140 833 851 2.1
of fewer)..................................
Rural areas................................. 836 591 599 1.4
Urban hospitals............................. 2,533 904 925 2.4
0-99 beds............................... 668 736 751 1.9
100-199 beds............................ 778 788 806 2.2
200-299 beds............................ 445 825 844 2.3
300-499 beds............................ 428 920 943 2.4
500 or more beds........................ 214 1,080 1,106 2.4
Rural hospitals............................. 836 591 599 1.4
0-49 beds............................... 329 490 497 1.5
50-99 beds.............................. 297 549 558 1.7
100-149 beds............................ 121 591 598 1.2
150-199 beds............................ 48 645 652 1.0
200 or more beds........................ 41 706 715 1.3
By Region:
Urban by Region............................. 2,533 904 925 2.4
New England............................. 120 996 1,009 1.3
Middle Atlantic......................... 318 1,001 1,032 3.1
South Atlantic.......................... 407 805 823 2.2
East North Central...................... 396 868 889 2.3
East South Central...................... 150 768 780 1.6
West North Central...................... 166 887 902 1.6
West South Central...................... 384 817 835 2.1
Mountain................................ 161 936 956 2.1
Pacific................................. 380 1,150 1,187 3.2
Puerto Rico............................. 51 403 408 1.4
Rural by Region............................. 836 591 599 1.4
New England............................. 22 822 828 0.7
Middle Atlantic......................... 55 580 582 0.3
South Atlantic.......................... 128 554 567 2.3
East North Central...................... 116 616 626 1.6
East South Central...................... 164 536 542 1.1
West North Central...................... 101 635 643 1.3
West South Central...................... 165 524 524 0.1
Mountain................................ 61 660 674 2.1
Pacific................................. 24 768 791 3.0
By Payment Classification:
All hospitals............................... 3,369 871 890 2.3
Large urban areas (populations over 1 1,386 964 988 2.5
million)...................................
Other urban areas (populations of 1 million 1,090 837 855 2.2
of fewer)..................................
Rural areas................................. 893 608 615 1.1
Teaching Status:
Non-teaching................................ 2,326 739 754 2.1
Fewer than 100 Residents.................... 794 848 866 2.2
100 or more Residents....................... 249 1,227 1,259 2.6
Urban DSH:
100 or more beds........................ 1,593 928 950 2.4
Less than 100 beds...................... 328 662 677 2.2
Rural DSH:
Sole Community (SCH/EACH)............... 260 576 580 0.7
Referral Center (RRC/EACH).............. 347 639 647 1.2
Other Rural:
100 or more beds.................... 31 575 572 -0.5
Less than 100 beds.................. 157 504 512 1.7
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH................... 855 1,003 1,028 2.5
Urban teaching and DSH:
Both teaching and DSH................... 855 1,003 1,028 2.5
[[Page 60069]]
Teaching and no DSH..................... 122 899 920 2.3
No teaching and DSH..................... 1,066 780 797 2.3
No teaching and no DSH.................. 433 797 816 2.4
Rural Hospital Types:
Non special status hospitals............ 2,562 904 926 2.4
RRC/EACH................................ 189 729 737 1.1
SCH/EACH................................ 327 665 672 1.1
SCH, RRC and EACH....................... 126 721 733 1.6
Hospitals Reclassified by the Medicare
Geographic Classification Review Board:
FY 2016 Reclassifications:
All Urban Reclassified.................. 551 923 949 2.8
All Urban Non-Reclassified.............. 1,925 902 922 2.2
All Rural Reclassified.................. 279 623 634 1.8
All Rural Non-Reclassified.............. 504 545 551 1.2
Other Reclassified Hospitals (Section 46 600 589 -1.9
1886(d)(8)(B) of the Act)..............
Type of Ownership:
Voluntary............................... 1,934 884 904 2.3
Proprietary............................. 879 785 803 2.3
Government.............................. 529 917 938 2.4
Medicare Utilization as a Percent of
Inpatient Days:
0-25.................................... 533 1,046 1,074 2.7
25-50................................... 2,134 876 896 2.3
50-65................................... 571 717 731 2.0
Over 65................................. 97 523 534 2.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. On page 49840, third column, third paragraph:
a. Line 11, the figure ``$378'' is corrected to read ``$391''.
b. Line 23, the figure ``$75'' is corrected to read ``$88''.
c. Line 33, the figure ``$75'' is corrected to read ``$88''.
d. Line 34, the figure ``$85'' is corrected to read ``$98''.
e. Line 39, the figure ``$187'' is corrected to read ``$188''.
f. Line 43, the figure ``$272'' is corrected to read ``$285''.
14. On page 49841, first column:
a. Third paragraph, line 3, the figure ``$272'' is corrected to
read ``$285''.
b. In the table titled ``Table V--Accounting Statement:
Classification of Estimated Expenditures Under the IPPS From FY 2015 to
FY 2016'', the first entry is corrected as follows:
Table V--Accounting Statement: Classification of Estimated Expenditures
Under the IPPS From FY 2015 to FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Transfers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized Monetized Transfers............ -$285 million.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: September 30, 2015.
Madhura Valverde,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2015-25269 Filed 9-30-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P