Affiliation for Business Loan Programs and Surety Bond Guarantee Program, 59667-59672 [2015-25204]
Download as PDF
59667
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 191
Friday, October 2, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 115, 120, and 121
RIN 3245–AG73
Affiliation for Business Loan Programs
and Surety Bond Guarantee Program
Small Business Administration.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) has determined
that changing conditions in the
American economy and a constantly
evolving small business community
compel it to seek ways to improve
program efficiency for its Surety Bond
Guarantee (‘‘SBG’’) Program, and the
business loan programs consisting of the
7(a) Loan Program, the Business Disaster
Loan Programs (collectively, the
Economic Injury Disaster Loans,
Reservist Injury Disaster Loans, Physical
Disaster Business Loans, Immediate
Disaster Assistance Program loans), the
Microloan Program, and the
Development Company Program (the
‘‘504 Loan Program’’). As a result, SBA
proposes to simplify guidelines for
determining affiliation for eligibility
based on size as it relates to these
programs. This proposed rule would
redefine affiliation for all five Programs,
thereby simplifying eligibility
determinations.
SUMMARY:
SBA must receive comments to
the proposed rule on or before
December 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN: 3245–AG73 by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: ocareg2015@sba.gov.
Include RIN 3245–AG73 in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Linda Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan
Program, Office of Financial Assistance,
Office of Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Linda
Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan Program, Office
of Financial Assistance, Office of
Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416.
SBA will post all comments on
www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business
information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please
submit the information to Linda Reilly,
Chief, 504 Loan Program, Office of
Financial Assistance, Office of Capital
Access, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416, or send an email
to ocareg2015@sba.gov. Highlight the
information that you consider to be CBI
and explain why you believe SBA
should hold this information as
confidential. SBA will review the
information and make the final
determination whether it will publish
the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan Program,
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of
Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20416; telephone 202–
205–9949.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program authorized by Section 7(b) of
the Act; and (3) the Microloan Program
authorized by Section 7(m) of the Act.
The 504 Loan Program, which is
authorized by Title V of the Small
Business Investment Act of 1958 (the
‘‘SBIA’’), as amended, 15 U.S.C. 695 et
seq., is also affected. These programs
(7(a), BDLP, Microloan, and 504) are
referred to collectively as the Business
Loan Programs in this rule. Finally, this
rule also proposes revisions to the
Surety Bond Guarantee (‘‘SBG’’)
Program, authorized by section 411 of
the SBIA. A description of each program
is set forth below.
I. Background
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’
provides that agencies ‘‘must identify
and use the best, most innovative, and
least burdensome tools for achieving
regulatory ends.’’ (Emphasis added).
Executive Order 13563 further provides
that ‘‘[t]o facilitate the periodic review
of existing significant regulations,
agencies shall consider how best to
promote retrospective analysis of rules
that may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome,
and to modify, streamline, expand, or
repeal them in accordance with what
has been learned.’’ (Emphasis added).
SBA has reviewed its regulations with
regard to the business loan programs
and SBG program and is proposing a
number of amendments and revisions to
accomplish this goal.
The business loan programs
authorized by the Small Business Act
(Act), 15 U.S.C. 631 et seq., that are
affected by this proposed rule are: (1)
The 7(a) Loan Program authorized by
Section 7(a) of the Act; (2) the Business
Disaster Loan Program (‘‘BDLP’’)
B. Business Disaster Loan Programs
Through its Business Disaster Loan
Programs, SBA provides low-interest
disaster loans to businesses of all sizes
and private non-profit organizations.
These loans can be used to restore,
repair or replace disaster damaged
assets and working capital as a result of
a declared disaster. The loans are made
directly by SBA and repayment terms
are determined on a case-by-case basis,
based upon each borrower’s satisfactory
credit and ability to repay.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. 7(a) Loan Program
The 7(a) Loan Program’s main
purpose is to help eligible small
businesses obtain credit when they
cannot obtain credit elsewhere. The
Agency recognizes that the 7(a) Loan
Program is an important engine for job
creation. The 7(a) Loan Program
provides financing for general business
purposes through the guaranty of loans
made by participating private sector
lenders. Currently, there are
approximately 4,500 lenders
participating in the 7(a) Loan Program
with approximately $66 billion in total
SBA guarantees outstanding.
C. Microloan Program
The Microloan Program provides
loans up to $50,000 to help small
businesses and certain nonprofit
childcare centers. The average
microloan is about $13,000. SBA lends
funds to specially-designated
intermediary lenders, which are
primarily nonprofit community-based
organizations with experience in
lending as well as management and
technical assistance. These
intermediaries administer the Microloan
Program for eligible borrowers lending
directly to them. Each intermediary
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
59668
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
lender has its own lending and credit
requirements. Intermediaries generally
require some type of collateral as well
as the personal guarantee of the
business owner. Depending on their
prior experience, applicants to the
Microloan Program may be required to
fulfill training or planning requirements
before a loan application will be
considered.
D. 504 Loan Program
The core mission of the 504 Loan
Program is to provide long-term fixed
asset financing to small businesses for
the purchase or improvement of land,
buildings, and major equipment
purchases, to facilitate the creation of
jobs and to stimulate local economic
development. A Certified Development
Company (‘‘CDC’’) is a nonprofit
corporation, with the exception of
selected for-profit CDCs grandfathered
into the 504 Loan Program that
promotes economic development within
its community through 504 loans. Under
the 504 Loan Program, loans are made
to small business applicants by CDCs,
which are funded through sales of
debentures, which are guaranteed 100%
by the SBA. There are over 260 CDCs
nationwide, each with a defined Area of
Operations covering a specific
geographic area.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
E. SBG Program
Pursuant to the SBG Program, SBA
guarantees bid, payment and
performance bonds for small and
emerging contractors who cannot obtain
surety bonds through regular
commercial channels. SBA’s guarantee
is an agreement between a Surety and
SBA that SBA will cover a certain
percentage of the Surety’s loss should a
contractor default on the underlying
contract. Specifically, SBA guarantees
Sureties participating in the program
against a portion of their losses incurred
and paid as a result of a breach of the
terms of a bid bond, final bond or
ancillary bond, on any eligible contract.
SBA’s guarantee gives Sureties an
incentive to provide bonding for small
businesses and thereby assists small
businesses in obtaining greater access to
contracting opportunities which require
these bonds as a condition for obtaining
the contract.
II. Summary of Proposed Program
Changes
The Agency, in compliance with
Executive Order 13132, previously
requested and received public
comments on the Rules of Affiliation as
part of a Notice of Proposed Rule
Change (February 25,2013) to update the
business loan program . SBA received
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
and reviewed comments and met with
industry participants to identify best
practices based on the feedback. SBA
received 54 comments regarding
Affiliation Rules in general support of
the proposed change. Ten comments
further suggested modification and
clarification of the proposal. The most
consistent concern expressed was the
need in that proposal to require a
borrower to prepare a document that
qualified each potential affiliation under
SBA rules. SBA has determined that the
modifications proposed herein fully
incorporate previous input.
Below is a summary of the proposed
changes regarding determining size and
affiliation of applicants to Business
Loan Programs and SBG Programs. The
Agency requests comments on all of the
proposed regulatory revisions in this
rule and on any related issues affecting
the programs.
A. Business Loan Programs and
Affiliation
The Act defines a small business
concern as ‘‘one which is independently
owned and operated and which is not
dominant in its field of operation . . .’’
15 U.S.C. 632(a)(1). In order to be
eligible for an SBA guaranteed loan, an
applicant must be a small business
pursuant to size standards established
by SBA through regulation. 13 CFR
120.100. In general, to be considered
small, concerns must meet the
particular size standard that
corresponds to a six-digit North
American Industrial Classification
System (NAICS) code. Each size
standard is stated in terms of either
gross revenue receipts or number of
employees, and in limited cases a basis
other than receipts or employees (e.g.,
megawatt hours). SBA considers the
receipts or employees (or other measure)
of an applicant, and all of its domestic
and foreign affiliates, when determining
a business concern’s eligibility as a
small business. 13 CFR 121.103(a)(6).
SBA’s regulations in 13 CFR 121.103
set forth the Agency’s principles of
affiliation and explain when an
individual or an entity is an affiliate of
another individual or entity. SBA’s
affiliation rules generally apply to all
SBA programs for which a business
must qualify as small, including SBA’s
government contracting and business
development programs, small business
loan programs and grant programs.
Generally, affiliation exists when one
business controls or has the power to
control another or when a third party (or
parties) controls or has the power to
control both businesses. Control may
arise through ownership, management,
or other relationships or interactions
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
between parties. SBA may also find
affiliation based on ‘‘negative control,’’
which includes instances where a
minority shareholder has the ability,
under the concern’s charter, by-laws, or
shareholder’s agreement, to prevent a
quorum or otherwise block action by the
board of directors or shareholders.
Upon review of the statutory
provisions for the Business Loan
Programs, the purpose behind these
programs, and the overall goals of
simplification and maximization of
benefits for small businesses, SBA is
proposing amendments to the current
affiliation rules with respect to these
programs. SBA believes that, in general,
a majority of the principles of affiliation
set forth in § 121.103 apply to the
Business Loan Programs. However, SBA
believes that certain affiliation
principles in their current form are more
applicable to determining size with
respect to federal contracting and
subcontracting (where SBA is trying to
ensure only eligible small businesses
win federal contracts expressly intended
for small businesses) and are not
necessarily applicable to business loan
applicants. SBA seeks to create simple,
bright-line tests for Business Loan
Program applicants when determining
eligibility with respect to size and
affiliation, and streamline requirements
for determining whether a business is
small for purposes of receiving SBA
loan assistance. In addition to
clarification, this will reduce costs of an
application for the loan applicant and
its participating lender.
SBA previously amended the
affiliation rules for the Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small
Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
programs. Small Business Size
Regulations, Small Business Innovation
Research (SBIR) Program and Small
Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
Program, Proposed Rule 77 FR 28520
(May 15, 2012) and Final Rule 77 FR
76215 (December 27, 2012). SBA
determined that the general affiliation
rules did not apply to the SBIR and
STTR programs due to the specialized
nature of the program (research and
development) and the type of small
business that applies for the program
(innovative start-ups and research
businesses). The amended affiliation
rules for the SBIR and STTR programs
have helped increase opportunities for
small businesses within these programs,
reduced burdens for SBIR/STTR
eligibility, and streamlined the
programs’ processes.
SBA is proposing similar changes for
the Business Loan Programs. In the SBIR
revision R&D costs were cited, as an
impediment to program participation.
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Many start-ups and undercapitalized
firms face the same, if not greater,
economic challenges. SBA proposes to
add a new § 121.103(a)(8) that would
explain that the bases for affiliation
applicable to SBA’s Business Loan
Programs will be found at a new
§ 121.301(f). SBA proposes to address
size and affiliation for the Business
Loan Programs separately in this new
§ 121.301(f), to avoid any confusion
with SBA’s treatment of affiliation for
government contracting programs,
business development programs, and
other purposes.
In the new § 121.301(f), SBA proposes
to refine the principles of ‘‘affiliation’’
for the purpose of the Business Loan
Programs. Proposed new paragraph
(f)(1) sets forth the affiliation principles
based on percentage of ownership. With
respect to affiliation based on control
through ownership, SBA’s current
affiliation rule (see 13 CFR 121.103(c))
sets forth a minority shareholder
standard stating that when no one
person owns more than 50% of a
company, SBA will find that the
person(s) that own(s) directly or
indirectly an interest in the business no
less than the ownership of the next
largest owner(s) is deemed to have
control of the small business. In
addition, if the ownership of a business
concern is widely held and no
ownership interest is a large single
block of stock as compared to any other,
then the Board of Directors and
President or Chief Executive Officer are
deemed to control the business concern,
unless they can present evidence
showing otherwise.
SBA’s current affiliation rule states
that if two or more persons own, control
or have the power to control less than
50% of the concern’s voting interests,
and the interests are equal, or
approximately equal in size, and the
aggregate of these minority holdings is
large as compared with any other
holding, SBA presumes these owners
have control of the business concern.
For purposes of the Business Loan
Programs, however, SBA considers that
in all of these instances, the holdings
are so diffused that control would
always rest with the small business
concern’s Board of Directors or
management since it is that unit of the
organization that is truly running the
business.
Therefore, in § 121.301(f)(1), SBA
proposes that for the business loan
programs, SBA will determine control
exists based on ownership when:
(1) A person owns or has the power
to control more than 50% of the voting
equity of a concern; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
(2) if no one person owns or has the
power to control more than 50% of the
voting equity of the concern, SBA
would deem the small business to be
controlled by either the President,
Chairman of the Board, or Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of the concern
(or other officers, managing members,
partners, or directors who control the
management of the concern).
SBA refers to ownership or equity
without designating that it is ‘‘stock’’
ownership because not all business loan
applicants are corporations with
ownership determined through stock
issuance.
In paragraph (f)(2) of § 121.301 SBA
proposes no changes to the existing
principles regarding affiliation arising
under stock options, convertible
securities, and agreements to merge
currently found in § 121.103(d).
In § 121.301(f)(3), SBA proposes to
utilize the same principles of affiliation
for common management that are set
forth in § 121.103. However, SBA has
amended the language here to clarify the
different types of managers or
management.
In § 121.301(f)(4), SBA is proposing to
use a different affiliation rule
concerning ‘‘identity of interest,’’ 13
CFR 121.103(f), for the purposes of the
Business Loan Programs and Surety
Bond Program. Currently under identity
of interest, SBA determines affiliation
between individuals or firms when
these individuals or firms have identical
(or substantially identical) business or
economic interests, unless they can
demonstrate to SBA otherwise. Family
members, persons with common
investments, or firms that are
economically dependent through
contractual (or other) relationships, are
among those treated this way. For the
Business Loan Programs and the Surety
Bond Guarantee Program, SBA proposes
to presume that there is an identity of
interest only between close relatives as
defined in § 120.10. SBA proposes to
retain this affiliation principle based on
the customary understanding that close
relatives have an overarching and close
alignment of interests and a strong
financial incentive to participate in and
support family businesses. In the
proposed rule, SBA states that it may
determine affiliation based on an
identity of interest for other reasons.
Upon such a determination, the
applicant may make a case to rebut the
SBA decision.
In § 121.301(f)(5), SBA proposes to
make one change to the existing
language affecting affiliation based on
franchise and license agreements
currently found in § 121.103(i). Under
current § 121.103(i), SBA must review
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59669
franchise agreements as they pertain to
both the applicant and any affiliates of
the applicant. If the applicant has an
affiliate that operates under a franchise
or license agreement, SBA would be
required to review the franchise
agreements as it pertains to the affiliate
to determine the size of the applicant.
Therefore, if the affiliate entity was
operating under a franchise agreement
that gave the franchisor control over the
affiliate franchisee, SBA would
determine that the affiliate entity is
affiliated with the franchisor. Based on
this analysis, when the size of the
affiliate entity and the franchisor are
combined with the size of the applicant,
the applicant may be considered other
than small. The proposed regulation
would limit franchise or license
agreement reviews to the immediate
loan applicant, and not consider other
agreements in place with affiliated
entities.
The proposed change would revise
the first sentence of current § 121.103(i)
to read as follows: ‘‘The restraints
imposed on a franchisee or licensee by
its franchise or license agreement
related to standardized quality,
advertising, accounting format and other
similar provisions, generally will not be
considered in determining whether the
franchisor or licensor is affiliated with
an applicant franchisee or licensee,
provided the applicant franchisee or
licensee has the right to profit from its
efforts and bears the risk of loss
commensurate with ownership.’’ The
revised language would ensure that a
review of the applicant only takes into
consideration the size of the applicant
and its direct affiliate and not the
relationship of the affiliate to any
franchisor or licensor. With this change,
SBA will still have to consider the size
of any affiliate entities, but will not be
required to examine any franchisor/
franchisee relationship of the affiliated
entity. The remaining language will stay
the same and still require a review of a
franchise/license agreement as it
pertains to the applicant.
SBA proposes to retain in
§ 121.301(f)(6) a finding of affiliation
based on the totality of circumstances
currently found in § 121.103(a)(5). This
provides SBA with the ability to
consider all contributing factors that
could potentially impact the
determination that the applicant
business is small. Therefore,
notwithstanding the Agency’s goal to
provide bright line eligibility criteria
regarding affiliation determinations for
loan eligibility, the Agency recognizes
that it must prevent instances where
large entities participate in a small
business loan program, and application
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
59670
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of the totality of circumstances standard
will reinforce that program integrity.
SBA proposes to incorporate the
exceptions to affiliation set forth in
section § 121.103(b) in new
§ 121.301(f)(8). SBA does not propose
any changes to these exceptions to
affiliation.
Finally, SBA proposes to eliminate
from the Business Loan Programs
several current bases of affiliation that
apply in federal contracting.
Specifically, SBA proposes to eliminate
applying affiliation based on a newly
organized concern (see § 121.103(g)) and
joint ventures (see § 121.103(h)). One
purpose of the newly organized concern
rule is to prevent former small
businesses from creating spin-off
companies in order to continue to
perform on small business contracts or
receive other contracting benefits. While
this affiliation principle applies in
federal contracting, it is generally not
applicable to the Business Loan
Programs because the responsible party
or parties for any loan are the immediate
business owners, not any former entity
from which they may have been
employed previously.
With respect to joint ventures, these
partnerships are formed when two or
more businesses combine their efforts in
order to perform on a federal contract or
receive other contract assistance. SBA
does not consider this affiliation based
on joint venture to be of significant
concern to the Business Loan Programs
because a loan to any joint venture will
require all members of the joint venture
to accept full responsibility for loan
guarantee liability. Also, agency records
indicate that applicants for assistance
under SBA Business Loan Programs are
rarely, if ever, joint ventures, and,
therefore, this provision is unnecessary.
For the Surety Bond Guarantee Program,
the guarantee is on the bond, not a
contract. Any joint venture project
where the applicant small business
requests a guarantee would also be
subject to guaranteeing the obligation.
SBA also proposes to omit the
discussion of ‘‘negative control’’ as a
stand-alone factor in determining
affiliation for the purpose of loan
eligibility. As noted above, pursuant to
13 CFR 121.103(a)(3), negative control
may exist where a minority shareholder
can block certain actions by the board
of directors. Under this proposal for
loan eligibility, SBA will consider all
factors when making an affiliation
determination based on the totality of
the circumstances.
SBA considers that this proposed
definition of affiliation used in
determining the applicant’s loan
eligibility, while continuing SBA’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
ability to review totality of
circumstances, adequately ensures that
the loan programs are provided
appropriately to small businesses.
B. Surety Bond Guarantee Program and
Affiliation
Under this program, SBA provides
surety bond guarantees for qualified
small and emerging businesses, in direct
partnership with surety companies. SBA
helps small contractors by guaranteeing
bid, performance, and payment bonds
issued by participating surety
companies for contracts up to $6.5
million so as to allow the qualified
small contractor to obtain a contract.
SBA’s SBG Program is most
commonly used for non-federal
contracts. SBA regularly guarantees
bonds for eligible small business on
state, local and private entity contracts.
State and local jurisdictions may not
have the same size and affiliation rules
as SBA. SBA has proposed to amend the
definition of ‘‘Affiliate’’ in 13 CFR
115.10 to explain that the term is
defined in the proposed 13 CFR 121.301
(the loan programs definition of
affiliation).
C. Request for Comments
SBA requests comments on these
proposed amendments to its current
regulations. Although SBA seeks
comments on all aspects of this
proposed rule, it specifically requests
comments on the following:
1. What impact will this rule have on
Small Business Loan and SBG
applicants?
2. Are there alternatives to the
proposed rule relating to control,
negative control, common ownership,
identity of interest, common
management, and franchise agreements?
3. Would the elimination of the
newly-organized concern and joint
venture affiliation rules from the
Business Loan and SBG Programs affect
those programs, and if so, how?
Compliance With Executive Orders
13563, 12866, 12988, and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch.
35,), and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is a ‘‘significant’’
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the next section contains SBA’s
Regulatory Impact Analysis. However,
this is not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 800.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for this regulatory
action?
The Agency believes it needs to
reduce regulatory burdens and expand
its Business Loan Programs and SBG
Program by streamlining delivery,
lowering costs, and facilitating job
creation. As noted above, responses
received from the Federal Register
proposed rule notice regarding SBA
rules on affiliation were in favor of
simplified rules that enhanced
understanding and aligned with normal
commercial industry practices. Small
business applicants will be assisted by
this proposed streamlining of
requirements because it will be easier
and more cost effective for a lender to
research whether the applicant small
business controls other large companies
which would jeopardize their eligibility.
Higher lender costs potentially results
in greater costs to the applicant small
business.
What are the potential benefits and costs
of this regulatory action?
As stated above, the potential benefits
of this proposed rule are based on its
elimination of unnecessary cost burdens
on loan applicants’ and lenders’
participation in SBA-guaranteed loans.
These proposed changes would
exempt the Business Loan Programs and
SBG Program from certain government
contracting rules that determine
whether an entity is deemed affiliated
with an applicant. These general
affiliation rules apply to federal
contracting to ensure that small
businesses (and not another entity)
receive and perform a federal contract
when a preference for small businesses
is provided. Many of these general
principles of affiliation (e.g., newly
organized concern) are not applicable to
the Business Loan Program or SBG
Program.
What alternatives have been
considered?
As indicated above, on February 25,
2013, the Agency issued a proposed rule
for comment in the Federal Register to
implement several changes intended to
reinvigorate the Business Loan Programs
and SBG Program by eliminating
unnecessary compliance burdens and
loan eligibility restrictions. Proposed
Rule: 504 and 7(a) Loan Programs
Updates, 78 FR 12633 (February 25,
2013). Included in these proposals was
an alternate affiliation definition. After
a full comment period ending April 26,
2013, and careful consideration of all
comments, SBA decided to further
consider issues of redefining affiliation
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for the Business Loan Programs and
SBG Program. Final Rule: 504 and 7(a)
Loan Programs Updates, 78 FR 15641
(March 21, 2014). This proposal
presents a set of requirements to
determine affiliation based on the
precedent separating the Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small
Business Technology Transfer (STTR)
programs from the government
contracting standards. SBA will review
public comment and suggestions to the
proposed rule and consider changes
needed to mitigate identified economic
risk to the taxpayers and reduce waste,
fraud, and abuse.
Executive Order 13563
A description of the need for this
regulatory action and benefits and costs
associated with this action, including
possible distributional impacts that
relate to Executive Order 13563, are
included above in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis under Executive Order 12866.
With the exception of the Economic
Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) which is a
direct loan from SBA to the Borrower,
the Business Loan Programs operate
through the Agency’s lending partners,
which are 7(a) Lenders for the 7(a) Loan
Program, Intermediaries for the
Microloan Program, and CDCs for the
504 Loan Program. The Agency has held
public forums and meetings which
allowed it to reach hundreds of its
lending partners and gain valuable
insight, guidance, and suggestions from
many of them and the trade associations
which represent many of them. The
Agency’s outreach efforts to engage
stakeholders before proposing this rule
was extensive, and will continue
throughout the comment period.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have substantial,
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, for the
purposes of Executive Order 13132,
SBA has determined that this proposed
rule has no federalism implications
warranting preparation of a federalism
assessment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch.
35
The SBA has determined that this
proposed rule would not impose
significant additional reporting and
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Specifically, participants in SBA’s 7(a)
Loan Program will continue to report
any affiliates of their business on SBA
Form 1919 (OMB Control No. 3245–
0348), and participants in SBA’s 504
Loan Program will continue to report
affiliates on SBA Form 1244 (OMB
Control No. 3245–0071). EIDL Program
participants will continue to report
affiliates on SBA Form 5 (OMB Control
No. 3245–0017), and SBG Program
participants will continue to report
affiliates on SBA Form 994 (OMB
Control No. 3245–0007).
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612
When an agency issues a rulemaking
proposal, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) requires the agency to ‘‘prepare
and make available for public comment
an initial regulatory analysis’’ which
will ‘‘describe the impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.’’
Section 605 of the RFA allows an
agency to certify a rule, in lieu of
preparing an analysis, if the proposed
rulemaking is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The rulemaking will positively impact
all of the approximately 5,000 7(a)
Lenders (some of which are small) and
all of the approximately 260 CDCs (all
of which are small). The proposed rule
will reduce the burden on program
participants as they independently
choose on what level to participate,
with cost to deliver being a significant
influence. The proposed modifications
of certain program process requirements
through this proposed modification of
eligibility based on affiliation is not
projected to adversely impact or cost on
the small business borrower, lender or
CDC.
This proposal presents a best practice
rule that removes unnecessary
regulatory burdens and increases access
to capital for small businesses and
facilitates American job preservation
and creation. SBA has determined that
there is no significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
SBA invites comment from members of
the public who believe there will be a
significant impact either on lenders,
CDCs, or their borrowers.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59671
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses, Surety
bonds.
13 CFR Part 120
Individuals with disabilities, Loan
programs—business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
13 CFR Part 121
Grant programs—business,
Individuals with disabilities, Loan
programs—business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SBA proposes to amend 13
CFR parts 115, 120, and 121 as follows:
PART 115—SURETY BOND
GUARANTEE
1. The authority citation for part 115
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 687b,
687c, 694a, 694b note; and Pub. L. 110–246,
Sec. 12079, 122 Stat. 1651.
2. Amend § 115.10 to revise the
definition of ‘‘Affiliate’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 115.10
Definitions.
Affiliate is defined in § 121.301(f) of
this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 120—BUSINESS LOANS
3. The authority citation for part120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), (b)(7),
(b)(14), (h), and note, 636(a), (h), and (m),
650, 687(f), 696(3), and 697(a) and (e); Pub.
L. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115, Pub. L. 111–240, 124
Stat. 2504.
4. Amend § 120.1700 to revise the
definition of ‘‘Affiliate’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 120.1700
Definitions used in subpart J.
*
*
*
*
*
Affiliate. A person or entity SBA
determines to be an affiliate of a
Program Participant pursuant to the
application of the principles and
guidelines set forth in § 121.301 of this
Chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
5. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662,
and 694a(9).
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
59672
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
6. Amend § 121.103 to add paragraph
(a)(8) to read as follows:
■
§ 121.103 How does SBA determine
affiliation?
(a) * * *
(8) For SBA’s Business Loan and
Surety Bond Guarantee programs, the
size standards and bases for affiliation
are set forth in § 121.301.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 121.301 to add paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
§ 121.301 What size standards and
affiliation principles are applicable to
financial assistance programs?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Concerns and entities are affiliates
of each other when one controls or has
the power to control the other, or a third
party or parties controls or has the
power to control both. It does not matter
whether control is exercised, so long as
the power to control exists. For the
purposes of SBA’s Business Loan
Programs, Disaster Loan Program, and
Surety Bond Guarantee Program, the
following principles of affiliation apply:
(1) Affiliation based on ownership.
For determining affiliation based on
equity ownership, a concern is an
affiliate of an individual, concern, or
entity that owns or has the power to
control more than 50 percent of the
concern’s voting equity. If no
individual, concern, or entity is found
to control, SBA will deem the Board of
Directors or President or Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) (or other
officers, managing members, or partners
who control the management of the
concern) to be in control of the concern.
(2) Affiliation arising under stock
options, convertible securities, and
agreements to merge. (i) In determining
size, SBA considers stock options,
convertible securities, and agreements
to merge (including agreements in
principle) to have a present effect on the
power to control a concern. SBA treats
such options, convertible securities, and
agreements as though the rights granted
have been exercised.
(ii) Agreements to open or continue
negotiations towards the possibility of a
merger or a sale of stock at some later
date are not considered ‘‘agreements in
principle’’ and are thus not given
present effect.
(iii) Options, convertible securities,
and agreements that are subject to
conditions precedent which are
incapable of fulfillment, speculative,
conjectural, or unenforceable under
state or Federal law, or where the
probability of the transaction (or
exercise of the rights) occurring is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
shown to be extremely remote, are not
given present effect.
(iv) An individual, concern or other
entity that controls one or more other
concerns cannot use options,
convertible securities, or agreements to
appear to terminate such control before
actually doing so. SBA will not give
present effect to individuals’, concerns’
or other entities’ ability to divest all or
part of their ownership interest in order
to avoid a finding of affiliation.
(3) Affiliation based on common
management. Affiliation arises where
the CEO or President of the applicant
concern (or other officers, managing
members, or partners who control the
management of the concern) also
controls the management of one or more
other concerns. Affiliation also arises
where a single individual, concern or
entity that controls the Board of
Directors or management of one concern
also controls the Board of Directors or
management of one of more other
concerns.
(4) Affiliation based on identity of
interest. (i) Affiliation may arise among
two or more persons (including any
individual, concern, or other entity)
with an identity of interest. An
individual, concern, or entity may rebut
a determination of identity of interest
with evidence showing that the interests
deemed to be one are in fact separate.
(ii) SBA may presume an identity of
interest between close relatives, as
defined in 13 CFR 120.10, with identical
or substantially identical business or
economic interests (such as where the
family members operate concerns in the
same or similar industry in the same
geographic area).
(5) Affiliation based on franchise and
license agreements. The restraints
imposed on a franchisee or licensee by
its franchise or license agreement
relating to standardized quality,
advertising, accounting format and other
similar provisions, generally will not be
considered in determining whether the
franchisor or licensor is affiliated with
an applicant franchisee or licensee
provided the applicant franchisee or
licensee has the right to profit from its
efforts and bears the risk of loss
commensurate with ownership.
Affiliation may arise however, through
other means, such as common
ownership, common management or
excessive restrictions upon the sale of
the franchise interest.
(6) Affiliation based on SBA’s
determination of the totality of the
circumstances. SBA may find affiliation
after considering the totality of the
circumstances, even when no single
factor is sufficient to constitute
affiliation.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(7) Determining the concern’s size. In
determining the concern’s size, SBA
counts the receipts, employees, or the
alternate size standard of the concern
whose size is at issue and all of its
domestic and foreign affiliates,
regardless of whether the affiliates are
organized for profit.
(8) Exceptions to affiliation. For
exceptions to affiliation, see 13 CFR
121.103(b).
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–25204 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2983; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NE–20–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM
International S.A. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
CFM International S.A. (CFM) CFM56–
5B series turbofan engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by a
corrected lifing analysis by the engine
manufacturer that shows the need to
identify an initial and repetitive
inspection threshold for certain part
number (P/N) turbine rear frames
(TRFs). This proposed AD would
require initial and repetitive inspections
of certain P/N TRFs on the low-pressure
turbine (LPT) frame assembly. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of
the TRF on the LPT frame assembly,
which could lead to engine separation,
damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59667-59672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25204]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 59667]]
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Parts 115, 120, and 121
RIN 3245-AG73
Affiliation for Business Loan Programs and Surety Bond Guarantee
Program
AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has determined
that changing conditions in the American economy and a constantly
evolving small business community compel it to seek ways to improve
program efficiency for its Surety Bond Guarantee (``SBG'') Program, and
the business loan programs consisting of the 7(a) Loan Program, the
Business Disaster Loan Programs (collectively, the Economic Injury
Disaster Loans, Reservist Injury Disaster Loans, Physical Disaster
Business Loans, Immediate Disaster Assistance Program loans), the
Microloan Program, and the Development Company Program (the ``504 Loan
Program''). As a result, SBA proposes to simplify guidelines for
determining affiliation for eligibility based on size as it relates to
these programs. This proposed rule would redefine affiliation for all
five Programs, thereby simplifying eligibility determinations.
DATES: SBA must receive comments to the proposed rule on or before
December 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN: 3245-AG73 by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Email: ocareg2015@sba.gov. Include RIN 3245-AG73 in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Linda Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan Program, Office of
Financial Assistance, Office of Capital Access, Small Business
Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Linda Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan
Program, Office of Financial Assistance, Office of Capital Access,
Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC
20416.
SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Linda
Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan Program, Office of Financial Assistance, Office
of Capital Access, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, or send
an email to ocareg2015@sba.gov. Highlight the information that you
consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this
information as confidential. SBA will review the information and make
the final determination whether it will publish the information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Reilly, Chief, 504 Loan Program,
Office of Financial Assistance, Office of Capital Access, Small
Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416;
telephone 202-205-9949.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,'' provides that agencies ``must identify and use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.''
(Emphasis added). Executive Order 13563 further provides that ``[t]o
facilitate the periodic review of existing significant regulations,
agencies shall consider how best to promote retrospective analysis of
rules that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them in
accordance with what has been learned.'' (Emphasis added). SBA has
reviewed its regulations with regard to the business loan programs and
SBG program and is proposing a number of amendments and revisions to
accomplish this goal.
The business loan programs authorized by the Small Business Act
(Act), 15 U.S.C. 631 et seq., that are affected by this proposed rule
are: (1) The 7(a) Loan Program authorized by Section 7(a) of the Act;
(2) the Business Disaster Loan Program (``BDLP'') Program authorized by
Section 7(b) of the Act; and (3) the Microloan Program authorized by
Section 7(m) of the Act. The 504 Loan Program, which is authorized by
Title V of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (the ``SBIA''), as
amended, 15 U.S.C. 695 et seq., is also affected. These programs (7(a),
BDLP, Microloan, and 504) are referred to collectively as the Business
Loan Programs in this rule. Finally, this rule also proposes revisions
to the Surety Bond Guarantee (``SBG'') Program, authorized by section
411 of the SBIA. A description of each program is set forth below.
A. 7(a) Loan Program
The 7(a) Loan Program's main purpose is to help eligible small
businesses obtain credit when they cannot obtain credit elsewhere. The
Agency recognizes that the 7(a) Loan Program is an important engine for
job creation. The 7(a) Loan Program provides financing for general
business purposes through the guaranty of loans made by participating
private sector lenders. Currently, there are approximately 4,500
lenders participating in the 7(a) Loan Program with approximately $66
billion in total SBA guarantees outstanding.
B. Business Disaster Loan Programs
Through its Business Disaster Loan Programs, SBA provides low-
interest disaster loans to businesses of all sizes and private non-
profit organizations. These loans can be used to restore, repair or
replace disaster damaged assets and working capital as a result of a
declared disaster. The loans are made directly by SBA and repayment
terms are determined on a case-by-case basis, based upon each
borrower's satisfactory credit and ability to repay.
C. Microloan Program
The Microloan Program provides loans up to $50,000 to help small
businesses and certain nonprofit childcare centers. The average
microloan is about $13,000. SBA lends funds to specially-designated
intermediary lenders, which are primarily nonprofit community-based
organizations with experience in lending as well as management and
technical assistance. These intermediaries administer the Microloan
Program for eligible borrowers lending directly to them. Each
intermediary
[[Page 59668]]
lender has its own lending and credit requirements. Intermediaries
generally require some type of collateral as well as the personal
guarantee of the business owner. Depending on their prior experience,
applicants to the Microloan Program may be required to fulfill training
or planning requirements before a loan application will be considered.
D. 504 Loan Program
The core mission of the 504 Loan Program is to provide long-term
fixed asset financing to small businesses for the purchase or
improvement of land, buildings, and major equipment purchases, to
facilitate the creation of jobs and to stimulate local economic
development. A Certified Development Company (``CDC'') is a nonprofit
corporation, with the exception of selected for-profit CDCs
grandfathered into the 504 Loan Program that promotes economic
development within its community through 504 loans. Under the 504 Loan
Program, loans are made to small business applicants by CDCs, which are
funded through sales of debentures, which are guaranteed 100% by the
SBA. There are over 260 CDCs nationwide, each with a defined Area of
Operations covering a specific geographic area.
E. SBG Program
Pursuant to the SBG Program, SBA guarantees bid, payment and
performance bonds for small and emerging contractors who cannot obtain
surety bonds through regular commercial channels. SBA's guarantee is an
agreement between a Surety and SBA that SBA will cover a certain
percentage of the Surety's loss should a contractor default on the
underlying contract. Specifically, SBA guarantees Sureties
participating in the program against a portion of their losses incurred
and paid as a result of a breach of the terms of a bid bond, final bond
or ancillary bond, on any eligible contract. SBA's guarantee gives
Sureties an incentive to provide bonding for small businesses and
thereby assists small businesses in obtaining greater access to
contracting opportunities which require these bonds as a condition for
obtaining the contract.
II. Summary of Proposed Program Changes
The Agency, in compliance with Executive Order 13132, previously
requested and received public comments on the Rules of Affiliation as
part of a Notice of Proposed Rule Change (February 25,2013) to update
the business loan program . SBA received and reviewed comments and met
with industry participants to identify best practices based on the
feedback. SBA received 54 comments regarding Affiliation Rules in
general support of the proposed change. Ten comments further suggested
modification and clarification of the proposal. The most consistent
concern expressed was the need in that proposal to require a borrower
to prepare a document that qualified each potential affiliation under
SBA rules. SBA has determined that the modifications proposed herein
fully incorporate previous input.
Below is a summary of the proposed changes regarding determining
size and affiliation of applicants to Business Loan Programs and SBG
Programs. The Agency requests comments on all of the proposed
regulatory revisions in this rule and on any related issues affecting
the programs.
A. Business Loan Programs and Affiliation
The Act defines a small business concern as ``one which is
independently owned and operated and which is not dominant in its field
of operation . . .'' 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(1). In order to be eligible for
an SBA guaranteed loan, an applicant must be a small business pursuant
to size standards established by SBA through regulation. 13 CFR
120.100. In general, to be considered small, concerns must meet the
particular size standard that corresponds to a six-digit North American
Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code. Each size standard is
stated in terms of either gross revenue receipts or number of
employees, and in limited cases a basis other than receipts or
employees (e.g., megawatt hours). SBA considers the receipts or
employees (or other measure) of an applicant, and all of its domestic
and foreign affiliates, when determining a business concern's
eligibility as a small business. 13 CFR 121.103(a)(6).
SBA's regulations in 13 CFR 121.103 set forth the Agency's
principles of affiliation and explain when an individual or an entity
is an affiliate of another individual or entity. SBA's affiliation
rules generally apply to all SBA programs for which a business must
qualify as small, including SBA's government contracting and business
development programs, small business loan programs and grant programs.
Generally, affiliation exists when one business controls or has the
power to control another or when a third party (or parties) controls or
has the power to control both businesses. Control may arise through
ownership, management, or other relationships or interactions between
parties. SBA may also find affiliation based on ``negative control,''
which includes instances where a minority shareholder has the ability,
under the concern's charter, by-laws, or shareholder's agreement, to
prevent a quorum or otherwise block action by the board of directors or
shareholders.
Upon review of the statutory provisions for the Business Loan
Programs, the purpose behind these programs, and the overall goals of
simplification and maximization of benefits for small businesses, SBA
is proposing amendments to the current affiliation rules with respect
to these programs. SBA believes that, in general, a majority of the
principles of affiliation set forth in Sec. 121.103 apply to the
Business Loan Programs. However, SBA believes that certain affiliation
principles in their current form are more applicable to determining
size with respect to federal contracting and subcontracting (where SBA
is trying to ensure only eligible small businesses win federal
contracts expressly intended for small businesses) and are not
necessarily applicable to business loan applicants. SBA seeks to create
simple, bright-line tests for Business Loan Program applicants when
determining eligibility with respect to size and affiliation, and
streamline requirements for determining whether a business is small for
purposes of receiving SBA loan assistance. In addition to
clarification, this will reduce costs of an application for the loan
applicant and its participating lender.
SBA previously amended the affiliation rules for the Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer
(STTR) programs. Small Business Size Regulations, Small Business
Innovation Research (SBIR) Program and Small Business Technology
Transfer (STTR) Program, Proposed Rule 77 FR 28520 (May 15, 2012) and
Final Rule 77 FR 76215 (December 27, 2012). SBA determined that the
general affiliation rules did not apply to the SBIR and STTR programs
due to the specialized nature of the program (research and development)
and the type of small business that applies for the program (innovative
start-ups and research businesses). The amended affiliation rules for
the SBIR and STTR programs have helped increase opportunities for small
businesses within these programs, reduced burdens for SBIR/STTR
eligibility, and streamlined the programs' processes.
SBA is proposing similar changes for the Business Loan Programs. In
the SBIR revision R&D costs were cited, as an impediment to program
participation.
[[Page 59669]]
Many start-ups and undercapitalized firms face the same, if not
greater, economic challenges. SBA proposes to add a new Sec.
121.103(a)(8) that would explain that the bases for affiliation
applicable to SBA's Business Loan Programs will be found at a new Sec.
121.301(f). SBA proposes to address size and affiliation for the
Business Loan Programs separately in this new Sec. 121.301(f), to
avoid any confusion with SBA's treatment of affiliation for government
contracting programs, business development programs, and other
purposes.
In the new Sec. 121.301(f), SBA proposes to refine the principles
of ``affiliation'' for the purpose of the Business Loan Programs.
Proposed new paragraph (f)(1) sets forth the affiliation principles
based on percentage of ownership. With respect to affiliation based on
control through ownership, SBA's current affiliation rule (see 13 CFR
121.103(c)) sets forth a minority shareholder standard stating that
when no one person owns more than 50% of a company, SBA will find that
the person(s) that own(s) directly or indirectly an interest in the
business no less than the ownership of the next largest owner(s) is
deemed to have control of the small business. In addition, if the
ownership of a business concern is widely held and no ownership
interest is a large single block of stock as compared to any other,
then the Board of Directors and President or Chief Executive Officer
are deemed to control the business concern, unless they can present
evidence showing otherwise.
SBA's current affiliation rule states that if two or more persons
own, control or have the power to control less than 50% of the
concern's voting interests, and the interests are equal, or
approximately equal in size, and the aggregate of these minority
holdings is large as compared with any other holding, SBA presumes
these owners have control of the business concern.
For purposes of the Business Loan Programs, however, SBA considers
that in all of these instances, the holdings are so diffused that
control would always rest with the small business concern's Board of
Directors or management since it is that unit of the organization that
is truly running the business.
Therefore, in Sec. 121.301(f)(1), SBA proposes that for the
business loan programs, SBA will determine control exists based on
ownership when:
(1) A person owns or has the power to control more than 50% of the
voting equity of a concern; or
(2) if no one person owns or has the power to control more than 50%
of the voting equity of the concern, SBA would deem the small business
to be controlled by either the President, Chairman of the Board, or
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the concern (or other officers,
managing members, partners, or directors who control the management of
the concern).
SBA refers to ownership or equity without designating that it is
``stock'' ownership because not all business loan applicants are
corporations with ownership determined through stock issuance.
In paragraph (f)(2) of Sec. 121.301 SBA proposes no changes to the
existing principles regarding affiliation arising under stock options,
convertible securities, and agreements to merge currently found in
Sec. 121.103(d).
In Sec. 121.301(f)(3), SBA proposes to utilize the same principles
of affiliation for common management that are set forth in Sec.
121.103. However, SBA has amended the language here to clarify the
different types of managers or management.
In Sec. 121.301(f)(4), SBA is proposing to use a different
affiliation rule concerning ``identity of interest,'' 13 CFR
121.103(f), for the purposes of the Business Loan Programs and Surety
Bond Program. Currently under identity of interest, SBA determines
affiliation between individuals or firms when these individuals or
firms have identical (or substantially identical) business or economic
interests, unless they can demonstrate to SBA otherwise. Family
members, persons with common investments, or firms that are
economically dependent through contractual (or other) relationships,
are among those treated this way. For the Business Loan Programs and
the Surety Bond Guarantee Program, SBA proposes to presume that there
is an identity of interest only between close relatives as defined in
Sec. 120.10. SBA proposes to retain this affiliation principle based
on the customary understanding that close relatives have an overarching
and close alignment of interests and a strong financial incentive to
participate in and support family businesses. In the proposed rule, SBA
states that it may determine affiliation based on an identity of
interest for other reasons. Upon such a determination, the applicant
may make a case to rebut the SBA decision.
In Sec. 121.301(f)(5), SBA proposes to make one change to the
existing language affecting affiliation based on franchise and license
agreements currently found in Sec. 121.103(i). Under current Sec.
121.103(i), SBA must review franchise agreements as they pertain to
both the applicant and any affiliates of the applicant. If the
applicant has an affiliate that operates under a franchise or license
agreement, SBA would be required to review the franchise agreements as
it pertains to the affiliate to determine the size of the applicant.
Therefore, if the affiliate entity was operating under a franchise
agreement that gave the franchisor control over the affiliate
franchisee, SBA would determine that the affiliate entity is affiliated
with the franchisor. Based on this analysis, when the size of the
affiliate entity and the franchisor are combined with the size of the
applicant, the applicant may be considered other than small. The
proposed regulation would limit franchise or license agreement reviews
to the immediate loan applicant, and not consider other agreements in
place with affiliated entities.
The proposed change would revise the first sentence of current
Sec. 121.103(i) to read as follows: ``The restraints imposed on a
franchisee or licensee by its franchise or license agreement related to
standardized quality, advertising, accounting format and other similar
provisions, generally will not be considered in determining whether the
franchisor or licensor is affiliated with an applicant franchisee or
licensee, provided the applicant franchisee or licensee has the right
to profit from its efforts and bears the risk of loss commensurate with
ownership.'' The revised language would ensure that a review of the
applicant only takes into consideration the size of the applicant and
its direct affiliate and not the relationship of the affiliate to any
franchisor or licensor. With this change, SBA will still have to
consider the size of any affiliate entities, but will not be required
to examine any franchisor/franchisee relationship of the affiliated
entity. The remaining language will stay the same and still require a
review of a franchise/license agreement as it pertains to the
applicant.
SBA proposes to retain in Sec. 121.301(f)(6) a finding of
affiliation based on the totality of circumstances currently found in
Sec. 121.103(a)(5). This provides SBA with the ability to consider all
contributing factors that could potentially impact the determination
that the applicant business is small. Therefore, notwithstanding the
Agency's goal to provide bright line eligibility criteria regarding
affiliation determinations for loan eligibility, the Agency recognizes
that it must prevent instances where large entities participate in a
small business loan program, and application
[[Page 59670]]
of the totality of circumstances standard will reinforce that program
integrity.
SBA proposes to incorporate the exceptions to affiliation set forth
in section Sec. 121.103(b) in new Sec. 121.301(f)(8). SBA does not
propose any changes to these exceptions to affiliation.
Finally, SBA proposes to eliminate from the Business Loan Programs
several current bases of affiliation that apply in federal contracting.
Specifically, SBA proposes to eliminate applying affiliation based on a
newly organized concern (see Sec. 121.103(g)) and joint ventures (see
Sec. 121.103(h)). One purpose of the newly organized concern rule is
to prevent former small businesses from creating spin-off companies in
order to continue to perform on small business contracts or receive
other contracting benefits. While this affiliation principle applies in
federal contracting, it is generally not applicable to the Business
Loan Programs because the responsible party or parties for any loan are
the immediate business owners, not any former entity from which they
may have been employed previously.
With respect to joint ventures, these partnerships are formed when
two or more businesses combine their efforts in order to perform on a
federal contract or receive other contract assistance. SBA does not
consider this affiliation based on joint venture to be of significant
concern to the Business Loan Programs because a loan to any joint
venture will require all members of the joint venture to accept full
responsibility for loan guarantee liability. Also, agency records
indicate that applicants for assistance under SBA Business Loan
Programs are rarely, if ever, joint ventures, and, therefore, this
provision is unnecessary. For the Surety Bond Guarantee Program, the
guarantee is on the bond, not a contract. Any joint venture project
where the applicant small business requests a guarantee would also be
subject to guaranteeing the obligation.
SBA also proposes to omit the discussion of ``negative control'' as
a stand-alone factor in determining affiliation for the purpose of loan
eligibility. As noted above, pursuant to 13 CFR 121.103(a)(3), negative
control may exist where a minority shareholder can block certain
actions by the board of directors. Under this proposal for loan
eligibility, SBA will consider all factors when making an affiliation
determination based on the totality of the circumstances.
SBA considers that this proposed definition of affiliation used in
determining the applicant's loan eligibility, while continuing SBA's
ability to review totality of circumstances, adequately ensures that
the loan programs are provided appropriately to small businesses.
B. Surety Bond Guarantee Program and Affiliation
Under this program, SBA provides surety bond guarantees for
qualified small and emerging businesses, in direct partnership with
surety companies. SBA helps small contractors by guaranteeing bid,
performance, and payment bonds issued by participating surety companies
for contracts up to $6.5 million so as to allow the qualified small
contractor to obtain a contract.
SBA's SBG Program is most commonly used for non-federal contracts.
SBA regularly guarantees bonds for eligible small business on state,
local and private entity contracts. State and local jurisdictions may
not have the same size and affiliation rules as SBA. SBA has proposed
to amend the definition of ``Affiliate'' in 13 CFR 115.10 to explain
that the term is defined in the proposed 13 CFR 121.301 (the loan
programs definition of affiliation).
C. Request for Comments
SBA requests comments on these proposed amendments to its current
regulations. Although SBA seeks comments on all aspects of this
proposed rule, it specifically requests comments on the following:
1. What impact will this rule have on Small Business Loan and SBG
applicants?
2. Are there alternatives to the proposed rule relating to control,
negative control, common ownership, identity of interest, common
management, and franchise agreements?
3. Would the elimination of the newly-organized concern and joint
venture affiliation rules from the Business Loan and SBG Programs
affect those programs, and if so, how?
Compliance With Executive Orders 13563, 12866, 12988, and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35,), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
proposed rule is a ``significant'' regulatory action for the purposes
of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the next section contains SBA's
Regulatory Impact Analysis. However, this is not a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 800.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for this regulatory action?
The Agency believes it needs to reduce regulatory burdens and
expand its Business Loan Programs and SBG Program by streamlining
delivery, lowering costs, and facilitating job creation. As noted
above, responses received from the Federal Register proposed rule
notice regarding SBA rules on affiliation were in favor of simplified
rules that enhanced understanding and aligned with normal commercial
industry practices. Small business applicants will be assisted by this
proposed streamlining of requirements because it will be easier and
more cost effective for a lender to research whether the applicant
small business controls other large companies which would jeopardize
their eligibility. Higher lender costs potentially results in greater
costs to the applicant small business.
What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory action?
As stated above, the potential benefits of this proposed rule are
based on its elimination of unnecessary cost burdens on loan
applicants' and lenders' participation in SBA-guaranteed loans.
These proposed changes would exempt the Business Loan Programs and
SBG Program from certain government contracting rules that determine
whether an entity is deemed affiliated with an applicant. These general
affiliation rules apply to federal contracting to ensure that small
businesses (and not another entity) receive and perform a federal
contract when a preference for small businesses is provided. Many of
these general principles of affiliation (e.g., newly organized concern)
are not applicable to the Business Loan Program or SBG Program.
What alternatives have been considered?
As indicated above, on February 25, 2013, the Agency issued a
proposed rule for comment in the Federal Register to implement several
changes intended to reinvigorate the Business Loan Programs and SBG
Program by eliminating unnecessary compliance burdens and loan
eligibility restrictions. Proposed Rule: 504 and 7(a) Loan Programs
Updates, 78 FR 12633 (February 25, 2013). Included in these proposals
was an alternate affiliation definition. After a full comment period
ending April 26, 2013, and careful consideration of all comments, SBA
decided to further consider issues of redefining affiliation
[[Page 59671]]
for the Business Loan Programs and SBG Program. Final Rule: 504 and
7(a) Loan Programs Updates, 78 FR 15641 (March 21, 2014). This proposal
presents a set of requirements to determine affiliation based on the
precedent separating the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and
Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs from the government
contracting standards. SBA will review public comment and suggestions
to the proposed rule and consider changes needed to mitigate identified
economic risk to the taxpayers and reduce waste, fraud, and abuse.
Executive Order 13563
A description of the need for this regulatory action and benefits
and costs associated with this action, including possible
distributional impacts that relate to Executive Order 13563, are
included above in the Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order
12866.
With the exception of the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL)
which is a direct loan from SBA to the Borrower, the Business Loan
Programs operate through the Agency's lending partners, which are 7(a)
Lenders for the 7(a) Loan Program, Intermediaries for the Microloan
Program, and CDCs for the 504 Loan Program. The Agency has held public
forums and meetings which allowed it to reach hundreds of its lending
partners and gain valuable insight, guidance, and suggestions from many
of them and the trade associations which represent many of them. The
Agency's outreach efforts to engage stakeholders before proposing this
rule was extensive, and will continue throughout the comment period.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this proposed rule will not have
substantial, direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore,
for the purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that this
proposed rule has no federalism implications warranting preparation of
a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35
The SBA has determined that this proposed rule would not impose
significant additional reporting and recordkeeping requirements under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Specifically, participants in SBA's
7(a) Loan Program will continue to report any affiliates of their
business on SBA Form 1919 (OMB Control No. 3245-0348), and participants
in SBA's 504 Loan Program will continue to report affiliates on SBA
Form 1244 (OMB Control No. 3245-0071). EIDL Program participants will
continue to report affiliates on SBA Form 5 (OMB Control No. 3245-
0017), and SBG Program participants will continue to report affiliates
on SBA Form 994 (OMB Control No. 3245-0007).
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
When an agency issues a rulemaking proposal, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires the agency to ``prepare and make
available for public comment an initial regulatory analysis'' which
will ``describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.''
Section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to certify a rule, in lieu of
preparing an analysis, if the proposed rulemaking is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The rulemaking will positively impact all of the
approximately 5,000 7(a) Lenders (some of which are small) and all of
the approximately 260 CDCs (all of which are small). The proposed rule
will reduce the burden on program participants as they independently
choose on what level to participate, with cost to deliver being a
significant influence. The proposed modifications of certain program
process requirements through this proposed modification of eligibility
based on affiliation is not projected to adversely impact or cost on
the small business borrower, lender or CDC.
This proposal presents a best practice rule that removes
unnecessary regulatory burdens and increases access to capital for
small businesses and facilitates American job preservation and
creation. SBA has determined that there is no significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. SBA invites comment from members
of the public who believe there will be a significant impact either on
lenders, CDCs, or their borrowers.
List of Subjects
13 CFR Part 115
Claims, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses,
Surety bonds.
13 CFR Part 120
Individuals with disabilities, Loan programs--business, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses.
13 CFR Part 121
Grant programs--business, Individuals with disabilities, Loan
programs--business, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA proposes to amend 13
CFR parts 115, 120, and 121 as follows:
PART 115--SURETY BOND GUARANTEE
0
1. The authority citation for part 115 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. app 3; 15 U.S.C. 687b, 687c, 694a, 694b
note; and Pub. L. 110-246, Sec. 12079, 122 Stat. 1651.
0
2. Amend Sec. 115.10 to revise the definition of ``Affiliate'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 115.10 Definitions.
Affiliate is defined in Sec. 121.301(f) of this chapter.
* * * * *
PART 120--BUSINESS LOANS
0
3. The authority citation for part120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), (b)(7), (b)(14), (h), and note,
636(a), (h), and (m), 650, 687(f), 696(3), and 697(a) and (e); Pub.
L. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, Pub. L. 111-240, 124 Stat. 2504.
0
4. Amend Sec. 120.1700 to revise the definition of ``Affiliate'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 120.1700 Definitions used in subpart J.
* * * * *
Affiliate. A person or entity SBA determines to be an affiliate of
a Program Participant pursuant to the application of the principles and
guidelines set forth in Sec. 121.301 of this Chapter.
* * * * *
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
0
5. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662, and 694a(9).
[[Page 59672]]
0
6. Amend Sec. 121.103 to add paragraph (a)(8) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.103 How does SBA determine affiliation?
(a) * * *
(8) For SBA's Business Loan and Surety Bond Guarantee programs, the
size standards and bases for affiliation are set forth in Sec.
121.301.
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 121.301 to add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 121.301 What size standards and affiliation principles are
applicable to financial assistance programs?
* * * * *
(f) Concerns and entities are affiliates of each other when one
controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or
parties controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter
whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.
For the purposes of SBA's Business Loan Programs, Disaster Loan
Program, and Surety Bond Guarantee Program, the following principles of
affiliation apply:
(1) Affiliation based on ownership. For determining affiliation
based on equity ownership, a concern is an affiliate of an individual,
concern, or entity that owns or has the power to control more than 50
percent of the concern's voting equity. If no individual, concern, or
entity is found to control, SBA will deem the Board of Directors or
President or Chief Executive Officer (CEO) (or other officers, managing
members, or partners who control the management of the concern) to be
in control of the concern.
(2) Affiliation arising under stock options, convertible
securities, and agreements to merge. (i) In determining size, SBA
considers stock options, convertible securities, and agreements to
merge (including agreements in principle) to have a present effect on
the power to control a concern. SBA treats such options, convertible
securities, and agreements as though the rights granted have been
exercised.
(ii) Agreements to open or continue negotiations towards the
possibility of a merger or a sale of stock at some later date are not
considered ``agreements in principle'' and are thus not given present
effect.
(iii) Options, convertible securities, and agreements that are
subject to conditions precedent which are incapable of fulfillment,
speculative, conjectural, or unenforceable under state or Federal law,
or where the probability of the transaction (or exercise of the rights)
occurring is shown to be extremely remote, are not given present
effect.
(iv) An individual, concern or other entity that controls one or
more other concerns cannot use options, convertible securities, or
agreements to appear to terminate such control before actually doing
so. SBA will not give present effect to individuals', concerns' or
other entities' ability to divest all or part of their ownership
interest in order to avoid a finding of affiliation.
(3) Affiliation based on common management. Affiliation arises
where the CEO or President of the applicant concern (or other officers,
managing members, or partners who control the management of the
concern) also controls the management of one or more other concerns.
Affiliation also arises where a single individual, concern or entity
that controls the Board of Directors or management of one concern also
controls the Board of Directors or management of one of more other
concerns.
(4) Affiliation based on identity of interest. (i) Affiliation may
arise among two or more persons (including any individual, concern, or
other entity) with an identity of interest. An individual, concern, or
entity may rebut a determination of identity of interest with evidence
showing that the interests deemed to be one are in fact separate.
(ii) SBA may presume an identity of interest between close
relatives, as defined in 13 CFR 120.10, with identical or substantially
identical business or economic interests (such as where the family
members operate concerns in the same or similar industry in the same
geographic area).
(5) Affiliation based on franchise and license agreements. The
restraints imposed on a franchisee or licensee by its franchise or
license agreement relating to standardized quality, advertising,
accounting format and other similar provisions, generally will not be
considered in determining whether the franchisor or licensor is
affiliated with an applicant franchisee or licensee provided the
applicant franchisee or licensee has the right to profit from its
efforts and bears the risk of loss commensurate with ownership.
Affiliation may arise however, through other means, such as common
ownership, common management or excessive restrictions upon the sale of
the franchise interest.
(6) Affiliation based on SBA's determination of the totality of the
circumstances. SBA may find affiliation after considering the totality
of the circumstances, even when no single factor is sufficient to
constitute affiliation.
(7) Determining the concern's size. In determining the concern's
size, SBA counts the receipts, employees, or the alternate size
standard of the concern whose size is at issue and all of its domestic
and foreign affiliates, regardless of whether the affiliates are
organized for profit.
(8) Exceptions to affiliation. For exceptions to affiliation, see
13 CFR 121.103(b).
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-25204 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P