Hours of Service for Drivers: Regulatory Guidance Concerning the Editing of Automatic On-Board Recording Device (AOBRD) Information, 59664-59665 [2015-25135]
Download as PDF
59664
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
geographic features, station transmitter
sites, cable system headend or satellite
carrier local receive facility locations,
terrain features that would affect station
reception, mileage between the
community and the television station
transmitter site, transportation routes
and any other evidence contributing to
the scope of the market.
(2) Noise-limited service contour
maps (for full-power digital stations) or
protected contour maps (for Class A and
low power television stations)
delineating the station’s technical
service area and showing the location of
the cable system headends or satellite
carrier local receive facilities and
communities in relation to the service
areas.
Note to paragraph (b)(2): Service area
maps using Longley-Rice (version 1.2.2)
propagation curves may also be included to
support a technical service exhibit.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Cable system or satellite carrier
channel line-up cards or other exhibits
establishing historic carriage, such as
television guide listings.
(6) Published audience data for the
relevant station showing its average all
day audience (i.e., the reported
audience averaged over Sunday–
Saturday, 7 a.m.–1 a.m., or an
equivalent time period) for both
multichannel video programming
distributor (MVPD) and non-MVPD
households or other specific audience
indicia, such as station advertising and
sales data or viewer contribution
records.
(7) If applicable, a statement that the
station is licensed to a community
within the same state as the relevant
community.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A cable operator or satellite carrier
shall not delete from carriage the signal
of a commercial television station
during the pendency of any proceeding
pursuant to this section.
(e) A market determination under this
section shall not create additional
carriage obligations for a satellite carrier
if it is not technically and economically
feasible for such carrier to accomplish
such carriage by means of its satellites
in operation at the time of the
determination.
(f) No modification of a commercial
television broadcast station’s local
market pursuant to this section shall
have any effect on the eligibility of
households in the community affected
by such modification to receive distant
signals from a satellite carrier pursuant
to 47 U.S.C. 339.
■ 5. Section 76.66 is amended by adding
paragraph (d)(6) and revising paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
(e)(1) introductory text to read as
follows:
§ 76.66
Satellite broadcast signal carriage.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(6) Carriage after a market
modification. Television broadcast
stations that become eligible for
mandatory carriage with respect to a
satellite carrier (pursuant to § 76.66) due
to a change in the market definition (by
operation of a market modification
pursuant to § 76.59) may, within 30
days of the effective date of the new
definition, elect retransmission consent
or mandatory carriage with respect to
such carrier. A satellite carrier shall
commence carriage within 90 days of
receiving the carriage election from the
television broadcast station. The
election must be made in accordance
with the requirements in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section.
(e) Market definitions. (1) A local
market, in the case of both commercial
and noncommercial television broadcast
stations, is the designated market area in
which a station is located, unless such
market is amended pursuant to § 76.59,
and
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–24999 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 395
Hours of Service for Drivers:
Regulatory Guidance Concerning the
Editing of Automatic On-Board
Recording Device (AOBRD)
Information
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of regulatory guidance.
AGENCY:
FMCSA issues regulatory
guidance concerning the editing of
records created by automatic on-board
recording devices (AOBRDs). The
guidance makes clear that, within
certain limits, a driver must be allowed
to review his or her AOBRD records,
annotate and correct inaccurate records,
enter any missing information, and
certify the accuracy of the information.
The AOBRD must retain the original
entries, and reflect the date, time, and
name of the person making edits to the
information. Drivers’ supervisors may
request that a driver make edits to
correct errors, but the driver must
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
accept or reject such requests. Driving
time may not be edited except in the
case of unidentified or team drivers, and
when driving time was assigned to the
wrong driver or no driver. All prior
Agency interpretations and regulatory
guidance on this subject, including
memoranda and letters, may no longer
be relied upon to the extent they are
inconsistent with this guidance.
DATES: This regulatory guidance is
effective October 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and Carrier
Operations Division, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, phone (202) 366–4325, email
MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Basis
The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–554, Title II, 98 Stat. 2832,
October 30, 1984) (1984 Act), as
amended (codified at 49 U.S.C.
31136(a)) authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to regulate commercial
motor vehicles (CMVs) and equipment,
and the drivers and motor carriers that
operate them. Section 211 of the 1984
Act also gives the Secretary broad power
to ‘‘prescribe recordkeeping and
reporting requirements’’ and to
‘‘perform other acts the Secretary
considers appropriate’’ (49 U.S.C.
31133(a)(8) and (10)). The Administrator
of FMCSA has been delegated authority
under 49 CFR 1.87(f) to carry out the
functions vested in the Secretary by 49
U.S.C. chapter 311, subchapters I and
III, relating to CMV programs and safety
regulation.
Background
Motor carriers began to use automated
hours-of-service (HOS) recording
devices in the mid-1980s to replace
paper records. The Federal Highway
Administration, the agency then
responsible for the motor carrier safety
regulations, published a final rule in
1988 that defined Automatic On Board
Recording Devices (AOBRDs) and set
forth performance standards for their
use (53 FR 38670, September 30, 1988,
codified at 49 CFR 395.15).
Question 2 of the regulatory guidance
for § 395.15 prohibits CMV drivers from
‘‘amending’’ AOBRD records of duty
status (RODS) during a trip; the
guidance was published on April 4,
1997 (65 FR 16370, at 16426). The
reason for the prohibition—‘‘If drivers,
who use automatic on-board recording
devices, were allowed to amend their
record of duty status while in transit,
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
legitimate amendments could not be
distinguished from falsifications’’—was
to block a pathway for drivers to falsify
their electronic records. At the time the
guidance was written, most AOBRD
systems required the driver to
physically deliver his or her electronic
HOS information to the motor carrier
using removable media such as a data
disk. The Agency may have been
concerned that some of those early
AOBRD systems might not have
incorporated audit trails into their
software.
Over 25 years have passed since the
AOBRD rule was published. Many
systems now allow electronic transfer of
data from in-cab units to a support
system. Thousands of motor carriers and
hundreds of thousands of drivers are
using HOS recording systems that far
exceed the minimum performance
requirements for AOBRDs. Information
technology systems can place very
precise controls over the data revision;
e.g., specific data elements can be
‘‘locked’’ to prevent any revision once
an entry has been made. They also
routinely incorporate audit trails to
indicate who revised data that was
originally entered, when the revision
was made, and the reason for the
change.
FMCSA acknowledges that drivers
need to be able to make legitimate
corrections to their electronic AOBRD
records. For example, if a driver
erroneously enters ‘‘off duty’’ when he
or she actually is on duty/not driving,
and realizes this error later, under
current guidance the driver would have
to relay this information to a
supervisory motor carrier official, and
that official would need to edit the
driver’s record. In another example, a
driver might need to enter on-duty
activity performed when the driver was
away from the CMV.
With the steady increase in CMV
drivers using AOBRDs, and the ability
of software to note edits without
deleting the original record, the need for
a driver to make this request through
another party is no longer necessary and
is becoming increasing less viable.
Therefore, as long as the AOBRD record
reflects both the original entry and the
revised entry, along with information on
who made the revision, the date and
time, and the reason (in the Remarks
sections, see current Question 2 to
§ 395.15), FMCSA will now allow these
edits.
However, FMCSA continues to
prohibit drivers from editing records
related to driving time, except in limited
circumstances. Driving time may not be
edited except in the case of unidentified
or team drivers, and when driving time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:30 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
was assigned to the wrong driver or no
driver. Such time may be reassigned to
the correct driver. Staff of the motor
carrier or its electronic systems provider
may request that a driver make edits to
correct errors. The driver must accept or
reject such requests and the AOBRD
must record the transaction. If the driver
edits the record based on the request, he
or she must re-submit and re-certify the
corrected record.
In all instances of editing, the AOBRD
must retain the original entries, and
reflect the date, time, and name of the
person making any edit. The motor
carrier must also retain both the original
and edited record of duty status.
The Agency revises Question 2 of the
Regulatory Guidance for § 395.15 to
address all of these issues.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PART 395—HOURS OF SERVICE OF
DRIVERS
SUMMARY:
59665
Replace the text of § 395.15 Question
2 with the following:
‘‘Question 2: May entries made on an
automatic on-board recording device
(AOBRD) be annotated?
Guidance: Yes.
(1) Within certain limits, a driver
must be allowed to review his or her
AOBRD records, annotate and correct
inaccurate records, enter any missing
information, and certify the accuracy of
the information.
(2) The AOBRD must retain the
original entries, and reflect the date and
time of an edit, and name of the person
making the edit. If the driver has already
‘‘certified’’ the entries for the duty
period, he or she must re-certify the
edited version, which must be
transmitted to the carrier.
(3) ‘‘Driving time’’ may not be edited
except in the case of unidentified or
team drivers, and when driving time
was assigned to the wrong driver or no
driver. Such time may be reassigned to
the correct driver.
(4) After reviewing incoming records,
drivers’ supervisors may request that a
driver make edits to correct errors. The
driver must accept or reject such
requests and the AOBRD must record
the transaction. If the driver annotates
the record based on the request, he or
she must re-submit and re-certify the
corrected record.’’
■
Issued on: September 25, 2015.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–25135 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 100217095–2081–04]
RIN 0648–XE217
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; 2015
Recreational Accountability Measure
and Closure for Red Grouper
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; accountability
measures.
AGENCY:
NMFS implements
accountability measures (AMs) for the
red grouper recreational sector in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) for the 2015
fishing year through this temporary rule.
NMFS projects the recreational sector
will reach the recreational annual catch
limit (ACL) by October 7, 2015.
Therefore, the red grouper recreational
sector in the Gulf EEZ will close at
12:01 a.m., local time, October 8, 2015.
This closure is necessary to protect the
Gulf red grouper resource.
DATES: The recreational sector closure
for red grouper in the Gulf EEZ is
effective at 12:01 a.m., local time,
October 8, 2015, until January 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rich
Malinowski, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, email:
rich.malinowski@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The reef
fish fishery of the Gulf, which includes
red grouper, is managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council and is implemented by NMFS
through regulations at 50 CFR part 622
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act). All weights specified in this rule
are in gutted weight.
In accordance with regulations at 50
CFR 622.41(e)(2)(i), if red grouper
recreational landings reach or are
projected to reach the recreational ACL
and without regard to overfished status,
NMFS will close the red grouper
recreational sector in the Gulf EEZ for
the remainder of the fishing year by
filing a notification to that effect with
the Office of the Federal Register. The
E:\FR\FM\02OCR1.SGM
02OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59664-59665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25135]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 395
Hours of Service for Drivers: Regulatory Guidance Concerning the
Editing of Automatic On-Board Recording Device (AOBRD) Information
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of regulatory guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA issues regulatory guidance concerning the editing of
records created by automatic on-board recording devices (AOBRDs). The
guidance makes clear that, within certain limits, a driver must be
allowed to review his or her AOBRD records, annotate and correct
inaccurate records, enter any missing information, and certify the
accuracy of the information. The AOBRD must retain the original
entries, and reflect the date, time, and name of the person making
edits to the information. Drivers' supervisors may request that a
driver make edits to correct errors, but the driver must accept or
reject such requests. Driving time may not be edited except in the case
of unidentified or team drivers, and when driving time was assigned to
the wrong driver or no driver. All prior Agency interpretations and
regulatory guidance on this subject, including memoranda and letters,
may no longer be relied upon to the extent they are inconsistent with
this guidance.
DATES: This regulatory guidance is effective October 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, phone (202) 366-4325, email
MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Legal Basis
The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-554, Title II, 98
Stat. 2832, October 30, 1984) (1984 Act), as amended (codified at 49
U.S.C. 31136(a)) authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to regulate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) and equipment, and the drivers and
motor carriers that operate them. Section 211 of the 1984 Act also
gives the Secretary broad power to ``prescribe recordkeeping and
reporting requirements'' and to ``perform other acts the Secretary
considers appropriate'' (49 U.S.C. 31133(a)(8) and (10)). The
Administrator of FMCSA has been delegated authority under 49 CFR
1.87(f) to carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by 49 U.S.C.
chapter 311, subchapters I and III, relating to CMV programs and safety
regulation.
Background
Motor carriers began to use automated hours-of-service (HOS)
recording devices in the mid-1980s to replace paper records. The
Federal Highway Administration, the agency then responsible for the
motor carrier safety regulations, published a final rule in 1988 that
defined Automatic On Board Recording Devices (AOBRDs) and set forth
performance standards for their use (53 FR 38670, September 30, 1988,
codified at 49 CFR 395.15).
Question 2 of the regulatory guidance for Sec. 395.15 prohibits
CMV drivers from ``amending'' AOBRD records of duty status (RODS)
during a trip; the guidance was published on April 4, 1997 (65 FR
16370, at 16426). The reason for the prohibition--``If drivers, who use
automatic on-board recording devices, were allowed to amend their
record of duty status while in transit,
[[Page 59665]]
legitimate amendments could not be distinguished from
falsifications''--was to block a pathway for drivers to falsify their
electronic records. At the time the guidance was written, most AOBRD
systems required the driver to physically deliver his or her electronic
HOS information to the motor carrier using removable media such as a
data disk. The Agency may have been concerned that some of those early
AOBRD systems might not have incorporated audit trails into their
software.
Over 25 years have passed since the AOBRD rule was published. Many
systems now allow electronic transfer of data from in-cab units to a
support system. Thousands of motor carriers and hundreds of thousands
of drivers are using HOS recording systems that far exceed the minimum
performance requirements for AOBRDs. Information technology systems can
place very precise controls over the data revision; e.g., specific data
elements can be ``locked'' to prevent any revision once an entry has
been made. They also routinely incorporate audit trails to indicate who
revised data that was originally entered, when the revision was made,
and the reason for the change.
FMCSA acknowledges that drivers need to be able to make legitimate
corrections to their electronic AOBRD records. For example, if a driver
erroneously enters ``off duty'' when he or she actually is on duty/not
driving, and realizes this error later, under current guidance the
driver would have to relay this information to a supervisory motor
carrier official, and that official would need to edit the driver's
record. In another example, a driver might need to enter on-duty
activity performed when the driver was away from the CMV.
With the steady increase in CMV drivers using AOBRDs, and the
ability of software to note edits without deleting the original record,
the need for a driver to make this request through another party is no
longer necessary and is becoming increasing less viable. Therefore, as
long as the AOBRD record reflects both the original entry and the
revised entry, along with information on who made the revision, the
date and time, and the reason (in the Remarks sections, see current
Question 2 to Sec. 395.15), FMCSA will now allow these edits.
However, FMCSA continues to prohibit drivers from editing records
related to driving time, except in limited circumstances. Driving time
may not be edited except in the case of unidentified or team drivers,
and when driving time was assigned to the wrong driver or no driver.
Such time may be reassigned to the correct driver. Staff of the motor
carrier or its electronic systems provider may request that a driver
make edits to correct errors. The driver must accept or reject such
requests and the AOBRD must record the transaction. If the driver edits
the record based on the request, he or she must re-submit and re-
certify the corrected record.
In all instances of editing, the AOBRD must retain the original
entries, and reflect the date, time, and name of the person making any
edit. The motor carrier must also retain both the original and edited
record of duty status.
The Agency revises Question 2 of the Regulatory Guidance for Sec.
395.15 to address all of these issues.
PART 395--HOURS OF SERVICE OF DRIVERS
0
Replace the text of Sec. 395.15 Question 2 with the following:
``Question 2: May entries made on an automatic on-board recording
device (AOBRD) be annotated?
Guidance: Yes.
(1) Within certain limits, a driver must be allowed to review his
or her AOBRD records, annotate and correct inaccurate records, enter
any missing information, and certify the accuracy of the information.
(2) The AOBRD must retain the original entries, and reflect the
date and time of an edit, and name of the person making the edit. If
the driver has already ``certified'' the entries for the duty period,
he or she must re-certify the edited version, which must be transmitted
to the carrier.
(3) ``Driving time'' may not be edited except in the case of
unidentified or team drivers, and when driving time was assigned to the
wrong driver or no driver. Such time may be reassigned to the correct
driver.
(4) After reviewing incoming records, drivers' supervisors may
request that a driver make edits to correct errors. The driver must
accept or reject such requests and the AOBRD must record the
transaction. If the driver annotates the record based on the request,
he or she must re-submit and re-certify the corrected record.''
Issued on: September 25, 2015.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-25135 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P