Identification of Alternative In Vitro Bioequivalence Pathways Which Can Reliably Ensure In Vivo Bioequivalence of Product Performance and Quality of Non-Systemically Absorbed Drug Products for Animals; Reopening of the Comment Period, 59787-59788 [2015-25121]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Tsai, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 1149, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–6069,
Alice.Tsai@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 9,
2012, the President signed into law
FDASIA. This new law includes the
reauthorization of PDUFA that provides
FDA with the necessary resources to
maintain a predictable and efficient
review process for human drug and
biologic products.
Title I of FDASIA is the fifth
authorization of PDUFA and includes
by reference the performance goals and
procedures for PDUFA V transmitted by
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services to Congress in a commitment
letter. FDA developed recommendations
for PDUFA V in consultation with drug
industry representatives, patient and
consumer advocates, health care
professionals, and other public
stakeholders from July 2010 through
May 2011. These recommendations
included an FDA commitment to
contract with an independent
accounting or consulting firm to review
the adequacy of the PDUFA adjustment
for changes in workload (hereafter
referred to as the workload adjuster).
The workload adjuster was
introduced in PDUFA III to allow for
FDA to augment the total user fee
revenue amount each fiscal year (after
adjusting for inflation) to account for
changes in workload volume in the
human drug application review process.
Workload volume is measured by the
changes in the number of new drug
applications (NDAs) and biologics
license applications (BLAs), active
commercial investigational new drugs
(INDs), efficacy supplements, and
manufacturing supplements submitted
to the human drug review program
during the most recent 5-year period.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
In PDUFA IV, the workload adjuster
was expanded to account for the
workload complexity (known as the
adjustment for changes in review
activities; hereafter referred to as the
Complexity Factor) associated with the
review of NDAs/BLAs and active
commercial INDs. The NDA/BLA
complexity is measured by changes in
the number of labeling supplements,
annual report reviews, and NDA/BLA
meetings per NDA/BLA. IND
complexity is measured by changes in
the number of special protocol
assessments and IND meetings per
active commercial IND.
As part of the PDUFA IV
recommendations, FDA committed to an
evaluation of the adjustment for changes
in review activities by an independent
consulting firm. The study, conducted
by Deloitte & Touche, LLP, in fiscal year
(FY) 2009, found that the adjustment
methodology used by FDA reasonably
captures changes in the workload
complexity for reviewing human drug
applications under PDUFA IV. Although
the FY 2009 evaluation concluded that
the adjustment methodology was
reasonable at that time, the complexity
of new drug applications and FDA’s
regulatory responsibilities are
constantly evolving. Moreover, the
complexity component of the PDUFA IV
workload adjuster was formulated
before the enactment of the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (FDAAA). Thus, the workload
adjuster does not account for new and
significant review activities required by
FDAAA, such as risk evaluation and
mitigation strategies, safety labeling
changes, advisory committee meetings,
and post-market safety requirements,
among others.
Given the dynamic nature of drug
products and FDA’s regulatory
responsibilities, FDA committed to
periodic reassessments of the workload
adjuster in PDUFA V to ensure that it is
achieving its intended role of adjusting
the user fee revenues to reflect actual
changes in FDA s workload volume and
complexity.
The PDUFA V commitment letter
instructs FDA to contract with an
independent accounting or consulting
firm to conduct two assessments of the
workload adjuster. The first assessment
(to examine the performance of the
workload adjuster since FY 2009)
conducted by IBM in FY 2013, found
that the workload adjuster does
reasonably represent changes in
workload volume associated with the
human drug review process. However,
the report concluded that methodology
was flawed with respect to measuring
workload complexity, because it does
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59787
not represent total amount of work per
submission. The report recommended
that FDA consider removing the
Complexity Factor. In addition, the
report found that the workload
adjuster’s use of 5-year rolling averages
to measure changes in workload against
the base years was not as sensitive to
recent trends as 3-year rolling averages
would be. The report is available at
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
ForIndustry/UserFees/
PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM350567.
After reviewing the report and public
comments, FDA discontinued the use of
the Complexity Factor in the adjustment
methodology and adopted 3-year
averages to measure changes in
workload volume.
The second assessment (to address the
recommendations from the first
evaluation and assess the continued
performance of the workload adjuster)
was just completed. The independent
consulting firm is required to submit a
report based on its assessment. The
report will evaluate whether the
workload adjuster reasonably represents
actual changes in workload volume and
will present options to discontinue,
retain, or modify any elements of the
adjustment. After review of the report
and receipt of public comment, FDA, if
warranted, may adopt appropriate
changes to the methodology.
FDA is seeking public comment now
on the second assessment of the PDUFA
Workload Adjuster, available at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/
UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/
UCM464878.pdf.
Dated: September 29, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–25117 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–0684]
Identification of Alternative In Vitro
Bioequivalence Pathways Which Can
Reliably Ensure In Vivo Bioequivalence
of Product Performance and Quality of
Non-Systemically Absorbed Drug
Products for Animals; Reopening of
the Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Request for comments;
reopening of the comment period.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is reopening the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
59788
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Notices
comment period related to the use of in
vitro methods as a mechanism for
assessing the in vivo product
bioequivalence (BE) of nonsystemically
absorbed drug products intended for use
in veterinary species, published in the
Federal Register of March 18, 2015 (80
FR 14146). FDA is reopening the
comment period to receive new
information.
Submit either electronic or
written comments by November 2, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
DATES:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public submit the comment as a written/
paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2015–N–0684 for Identification of
Alternative In Vitro Bioequivalence
Pathways Which Can Reliably Ensure In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:43 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
Vivo Bioequivalence of Product
Performance and Quality of NonSystemically Absorbed Drug Products
for Animals; Reopening of the Comment
Period. Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION’’. The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the guidance to the Policy and
Regulations Staff (HFV–6), Center for
Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Harshman, CVM, Food and Drug
Administration, HFV–170, MPN2, 7500
Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855,
240–402–0845.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of March 18,
2015 (80 FR 14146), FDA announced a
public meeting to discuss the use of in
vitro methods as a mechanism for
assessing the in vivo product
bioequivalence of nonsystemically
absorbed drug products intended for use
in veterinary species. In the same
notice, FDA said that it is seeking
additional public comment to the
docket. Interested persons were
originally given until May 18, 2015, to
comment on this issue. Following
publication of that notice, FDA received
a request to allow interested persons
additional time to comment. In response
to that request, FDA published a
Federal Register notice on June 10,
2015, reopening the comment period for
60 days, until August 10, 2015.
II. Request for Comments
Following publication of the June 10,
2015, notice reopening the comment
period for 60 days, FDA received a
request to allow interested persons an
additional 30 days to comment. FDA
has considered the request and is
reopening the comment period for 30
days, until November 2, 2015.
Dated: September 28, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–25121 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection: Public
Comment Request
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirement for opportunity for public
comment on proposed data collection
projects (section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995), the
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) announces
plans to submit an Information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59787-59788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25121]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0684]
Identification of Alternative In Vitro Bioequivalence Pathways
Which Can Reliably Ensure In Vivo Bioequivalence of Product Performance
and Quality of Non-Systemically Absorbed Drug Products for Animals;
Reopening of the Comment Period
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Request for comments; reopening of the comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reopening the
[[Page 59788]]
comment period related to the use of in vitro methods as a mechanism
for assessing the in vivo product bioequivalence (BE) of
nonsystemically absorbed drug products intended for use in veterinary
species, published in the Federal Register of March 18, 2015 (80 FR
14146). FDA is reopening the comment period to receive new information.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by November 2,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-N-0684 for Identification of Alternative In Vitro
Bioequivalence Pathways Which Can Reliably Ensure In Vivo
Bioequivalence of Product Performance and Quality of Non-Systemically
Absorbed Drug Products for Animals; Reopening of the Comment Period.
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION''. The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV-6), Center for Veterinary Medicine,
Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855.
Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Harshman, CVM, Food and Drug
Administration, HFV-170, MPN2, 7500 Standish Place, Rockville, MD
20855, 240-402-0845.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of March 18, 2015 (80 FR 14146), FDA
announced a public meeting to discuss the use of in vitro methods as a
mechanism for assessing the in vivo product bioequivalence of
nonsystemically absorbed drug products intended for use in veterinary
species. In the same notice, FDA said that it is seeking additional
public comment to the docket. Interested persons were originally given
until May 18, 2015, to comment on this issue. Following publication of
that notice, FDA received a request to allow interested persons
additional time to comment. In response to that request, FDA published
a Federal Register notice on June 10, 2015, reopening the comment
period for 60 days, until August 10, 2015.
II. Request for Comments
Following publication of the June 10, 2015, notice reopening the
comment period for 60 days, FDA received a request to allow interested
persons an additional 30 days to comment. FDA has considered the
request and is reopening the comment period for 30 days, until November
2, 2015.
Dated: September 28, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-25121 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P