Airworthiness Directives; CFM International S.A. Turbofan Engines, 59672-59674 [2015-24729]
Download as PDF
59672
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
6. Amend § 121.103 to add paragraph
(a)(8) to read as follows:
■
§ 121.103 How does SBA determine
affiliation?
(a) * * *
(8) For SBA’s Business Loan and
Surety Bond Guarantee programs, the
size standards and bases for affiliation
are set forth in § 121.301.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Amend § 121.301 to add paragraph
(f) to read as follows:
§ 121.301 What size standards and
affiliation principles are applicable to
financial assistance programs?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Concerns and entities are affiliates
of each other when one controls or has
the power to control the other, or a third
party or parties controls or has the
power to control both. It does not matter
whether control is exercised, so long as
the power to control exists. For the
purposes of SBA’s Business Loan
Programs, Disaster Loan Program, and
Surety Bond Guarantee Program, the
following principles of affiliation apply:
(1) Affiliation based on ownership.
For determining affiliation based on
equity ownership, a concern is an
affiliate of an individual, concern, or
entity that owns or has the power to
control more than 50 percent of the
concern’s voting equity. If no
individual, concern, or entity is found
to control, SBA will deem the Board of
Directors or President or Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) (or other
officers, managing members, or partners
who control the management of the
concern) to be in control of the concern.
(2) Affiliation arising under stock
options, convertible securities, and
agreements to merge. (i) In determining
size, SBA considers stock options,
convertible securities, and agreements
to merge (including agreements in
principle) to have a present effect on the
power to control a concern. SBA treats
such options, convertible securities, and
agreements as though the rights granted
have been exercised.
(ii) Agreements to open or continue
negotiations towards the possibility of a
merger or a sale of stock at some later
date are not considered ‘‘agreements in
principle’’ and are thus not given
present effect.
(iii) Options, convertible securities,
and agreements that are subject to
conditions precedent which are
incapable of fulfillment, speculative,
conjectural, or unenforceable under
state or Federal law, or where the
probability of the transaction (or
exercise of the rights) occurring is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
shown to be extremely remote, are not
given present effect.
(iv) An individual, concern or other
entity that controls one or more other
concerns cannot use options,
convertible securities, or agreements to
appear to terminate such control before
actually doing so. SBA will not give
present effect to individuals’, concerns’
or other entities’ ability to divest all or
part of their ownership interest in order
to avoid a finding of affiliation.
(3) Affiliation based on common
management. Affiliation arises where
the CEO or President of the applicant
concern (or other officers, managing
members, or partners who control the
management of the concern) also
controls the management of one or more
other concerns. Affiliation also arises
where a single individual, concern or
entity that controls the Board of
Directors or management of one concern
also controls the Board of Directors or
management of one of more other
concerns.
(4) Affiliation based on identity of
interest. (i) Affiliation may arise among
two or more persons (including any
individual, concern, or other entity)
with an identity of interest. An
individual, concern, or entity may rebut
a determination of identity of interest
with evidence showing that the interests
deemed to be one are in fact separate.
(ii) SBA may presume an identity of
interest between close relatives, as
defined in 13 CFR 120.10, with identical
or substantially identical business or
economic interests (such as where the
family members operate concerns in the
same or similar industry in the same
geographic area).
(5) Affiliation based on franchise and
license agreements. The restraints
imposed on a franchisee or licensee by
its franchise or license agreement
relating to standardized quality,
advertising, accounting format and other
similar provisions, generally will not be
considered in determining whether the
franchisor or licensor is affiliated with
an applicant franchisee or licensee
provided the applicant franchisee or
licensee has the right to profit from its
efforts and bears the risk of loss
commensurate with ownership.
Affiliation may arise however, through
other means, such as common
ownership, common management or
excessive restrictions upon the sale of
the franchise interest.
(6) Affiliation based on SBA’s
determination of the totality of the
circumstances. SBA may find affiliation
after considering the totality of the
circumstances, even when no single
factor is sufficient to constitute
affiliation.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(7) Determining the concern’s size. In
determining the concern’s size, SBA
counts the receipts, employees, or the
alternate size standard of the concern
whose size is at issue and all of its
domestic and foreign affiliates,
regardless of whether the affiliates are
organized for profit.
(8) Exceptions to affiliation. For
exceptions to affiliation, see 13 CFR
121.103(b).
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–25204 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–2983; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NE–20–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM
International S.A. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
CFM International S.A. (CFM) CFM56–
5B series turbofan engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by a
corrected lifing analysis by the engine
manufacturer that shows the need to
identify an initial and repetitive
inspection threshold for certain part
number (P/N) turbine rear frames
(TRFs). This proposed AD would
require initial and repetitive inspections
of certain P/N TRFs on the low-pressure
turbine (LPT) frame assembly. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of
the TRF on the LPT frame assembly,
which could lead to engine separation,
damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 1, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations
Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D Room
285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: 877–
432–3272; fax: 877–432–3329; email:
aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781–238–7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
2983; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
Kyle
Gustafson, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7183; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: kyle.gustafson@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2015–2983; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NE–20–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
59673
Discussion
We were informed by CFM that it has
corrected its lifing analysis for the TRF,
P/N 338–102–907–0 and P/N 338–102–
908–0, on the LPT frame assembly
installed on CFM56–5B turbofan
engines. This corrected lifing analysis
shows the need for initial and repetitive
inspections of certain P/N TRFs to
manage low-cycle fatigue cracks. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in failure of the TRF on the LPT frame
assembly, which could lead to engine
separation, damage to the engine, and
damage to the airplane.
The initial and repetitive inspection
intervals differ depending on whether
CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56–
5B S/B 72–0308, Revision 5, dated
October 12, 2007, has been applied. We
are proposing to allow engines with
TRFs that have exceeded the initial
inspection threshold a continued inservice allowance of 150 cycles to
provide sufficient time to perform the
initial inspection. The proposed
repetitive inspection intervals are based
on the size of the crack, if any, found
during the inspection.
cost of this proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $23,970.
Relevant Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed CFM SB No. CFM56–5B
S/B 72–0850, dated December 19, 2012,
and CFM SB No. CFM56–5B S/B 72–
0308, Revision 5, dated October 12,
2007. CFM SB No. CFM56–5B S/B 72–
0850 describes procedures for
inspecting the TRF. CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0308 identifies the
engines to which this proposed AD
applies. This service information is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
initial and repetitive inspections of the
TRF on the LPT frame assembly.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 94 engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 3
hours per engine to do the inspection.
The average labor rate is $85 per hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
59674
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 191 / Friday, October 2, 2015 / Proposed Rules
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
CFM International S.A.: Docket No. FAA–
2015–2983; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NE–20–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December 1,
2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to CFM International S.A.
(CFM) CFM56–5B engines with turbine rear
frame (TRF), part number (P/N) 338–102–
907–0 or P/N 338–102–908–0, installed.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a corrected
lifing analysis by the engine manufacturer
that shows the need for an initial and
repetitive inspection of certain P/N TRFs on
the low-pressure turbine (LPT) frame
assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the TRF on the LPT frame
assembly, which could lead to engine
separation, damage to the engine, and
damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) For Engines that have Applied CFM
Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56–5B S/B 72–
0308:
(i) Prior to accumulating 25,000 cycles
since new (CSN) on the TRF of the LPT frame
assembly or within 150 cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, perform an initial eddy current
inspection (ECI) or a fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the TRF mount struts on
the LPT assembly.
(ii) For engines with unknown CSN on the
TRF of the LPT frame assembly, perform the
initial inspection required by this AD within
150 cycles-in-service after the effective date
of this AD.
(iii) Use paragraph 3.B. in the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0850, dated December 19,
2012, to do the ECI and paragraph 3.C. in the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0850, to do the FPI. Do
not include TRF mount strut crack lengths
towards the cumulative crack length after the
cracks are repaired.
(iv) If no cracks are found on any of the
three TRF mount struts, or the cumulative
length of all cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is less than 0.20 inches, repeat the
inspection within 1,670 cycles since last
inspection (CSLI).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Oct 01, 2015
Jkt 238001
(v) If the cumulative length of cracks at any
TRF mount strut location is greater than or
equal to 0.20 inches, but less than 0.25
inches, repeat the inspection within 280
CSLI.
(vi) If the cumulative length of cracks at
any TRF mount strut location is 0.25 inches
or greater, replace the TRF with a part
eligible for installation before further flight.
(2) For Engines that have Not Applied CFM
SB No. CFM56–5B S/B 72–0308:
(i) Prior to accumulating 32,000 CSN on
the TRF of the LPT frame assembly or within
150 cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, perform an initial ECI
or FPI of the TRF mount struts on the LPT
frame assembly.
(ii) For engines with unknown CSN on the
TRF of the LPT frame assembly, perform the
initial inspection required by this AD within
150 cycles-in-service after the effective date
of this AD.
(iii) Use paragraph 3.B. in the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0850, dated December 19,
2012, to do the ECI and paragraph 3.C. in the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0850, to do the FPI. Do
not include TRF mount strut crack lengths
towards the cumulative crack length after the
cracks are repaired.
(iv) If no cracks are found on any of the
three TRF mount struts, or the cumulative
length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is less than 0.20 inches, repeat the
inspection within 2,500 CSLI.
(v) If the cumulative length of cracks at any
TRF mount strut location is greater than or
equal to 0.20 inches and less than 0.25
inches, repeat the inspection within 370
CSLI.
(vi) If the cumulative length of cracks at
any TRF mount strut location is 0.25 inches
or greater, replace the TRF with a part
eligible for installation before further flight.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request. You may email your
request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(g) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Kyle Gustafson, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7183; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: kyle.gustafson@faa.gov.
(2) CFM SB No. CFM56–5B S/B 72–0850,
dated December 19, 2012, and CFM SB No.
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0308, Revision 5, dated
October 12, 2007, can be obtained from CFM
using the contact information in paragraph
(g)(3) of this proposed AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact CFM International Inc.,
Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann
Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125;
phone: 877–432–3272; fax: 877–432–3329;
email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
September 24, 2015.
Colleen M. D’Allesandro,
Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–24729 Filed 10–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 147
[Docket No. FAA–2015–3901; Notice No.
15–10]
RIN 2120–AK48
Aviation Maintenance Technician
Schools
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to amend
the regulations governing the
curriculum and operations of FAAcertificated Aviation Maintenance
Technician Schools. These amendments
would modernize and reorganize the
required curriculum subjects in the
appendices of the current regulations.
They would also remove the course
content items currently located in the
appendices and require that they be
placed in each school’s operations
specifications so they could more easily
be amended when necessary. The
amendments are needed because the
existing curriculums are outdated, do
not meet current industry needs, and
can be changed only through notice and
comment rulemaking. These
amendments would ensure that aviation
maintenance technician students
receive up-to-date foundational training
to meet the demanding and consistently
changing needs of the aviation industry.
DATES: Send comments on or before
December 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2015–3901
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCP1.SGM
02OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59672-59674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24729]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-2983; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-20-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM International S.A. Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain CFM International S.A. (CFM) CFM56-5B series turbofan engines.
This proposed AD was prompted by a corrected lifing analysis by the
engine manufacturer that shows the need to identify an initial and
repetitive inspection threshold for certain part number (P/N) turbine
rear frames (TRFs). This proposed AD would require initial and
repetitive inspections of certain P/N TRFs on the low-pressure turbine
(LPT) frame assembly. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of
the TRF on the LPT frame assembly, which could lead to engine
separation, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 1,
2015.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
[[Page 59673]]
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D Room
285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: 877-432-3272; fax: 877-432-3329;
email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2983; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Gustafson, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781-238-7183;
fax: 781-238-7199; email: kyle.gustafson@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-2983;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-20-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We were informed by CFM that it has corrected its lifing analysis
for the TRF, P/N 338-102-907-0 and P/N 338-102-908-0, on the LPT frame
assembly installed on CFM56-5B turbofan engines. This corrected lifing
analysis shows the need for initial and repetitive inspections of
certain P/N TRFs to manage low-cycle fatigue cracks. This condition, if
not corrected, could result in failure of the TRF on the LPT frame
assembly, which could lead to engine separation, damage to the engine,
and damage to the airplane.
The initial and repetitive inspection intervals differ depending on
whether CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0308, Revision 5,
dated October 12, 2007, has been applied. We are proposing to allow
engines with TRFs that have exceeded the initial inspection threshold a
continued in-service allowance of 150 cycles to provide sufficient time
to perform the initial inspection. The proposed repetitive inspection
intervals are based on the size of the crack, if any, found during the
inspection.
Relevant Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, dated December 19,
2012, and CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0308, Revision 5, dated October
12, 2007. CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850 describes procedures for
inspecting the TRF. CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0308 identifies the
engines to which this proposed AD applies. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require initial and repetitive inspections
of the TRF on the LPT frame assembly.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 94 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 3 hours per engine to do the inspection. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $23,970.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 59674]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
CFM International S.A.: Docket No. FAA-2015-2983; Directorate
Identifier 2015-NE-20-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by December 1, 2015.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to CFM International S.A. (CFM) CFM56-5B engines
with turbine rear frame (TRF), part number (P/N) 338-102-907-0 or P/
N 338-102-908-0, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a corrected lifing analysis by the
engine manufacturer that shows the need for an initial and
repetitive inspection of certain P/N TRFs on the low-pressure
turbine (LPT) frame assembly. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the TRF on the LPT frame assembly, which could lead to
engine separation, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(1) For Engines that have Applied CFM Service Bulletin (SB) No.
CFM56-5B S/B 72-0308:
(i) Prior to accumulating 25,000 cycles since new (CSN) on the
TRF of the LPT frame assembly or within 150 cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform an
initial eddy current inspection (ECI) or a fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the TRF mount struts on the LPT assembly.
(ii) For engines with unknown CSN on the TRF of the LPT frame
assembly, perform the initial inspection required by this AD within
150 cycles-in-service after the effective date of this AD.
(iii) Use paragraph 3.B. in the Accomplishment Instructions of
CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, dated December 19, 2012, to do the
ECI and paragraph 3.C. in the Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB
No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, to do the FPI. Do not include TRF mount
strut crack lengths towards the cumulative crack length after the
cracks are repaired.
(iv) If no cracks are found on any of the three TRF mount
struts, or the cumulative length of all cracks at any TRF mount
strut location is less than 0.20 inches, repeat the inspection
within 1,670 cycles since last inspection (CSLI).
(v) If the cumulative length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is greater than or equal to 0.20 inches, but less than 0.25
inches, repeat the inspection within 280 CSLI.
(vi) If the cumulative length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is 0.25 inches or greater, replace the TRF with a part
eligible for installation before further flight.
(2) For Engines that have Not Applied CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B
72-0308:
(i) Prior to accumulating 32,000 CSN on the TRF of the LPT frame
assembly or within 150 cycles after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, perform an initial ECI or FPI of the TRF
mount struts on the LPT frame assembly.
(ii) For engines with unknown CSN on the TRF of the LPT frame
assembly, perform the initial inspection required by this AD within
150 cycles-in-service after the effective date of this AD.
(iii) Use paragraph 3.B. in the Accomplishment Instructions of
CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, dated December 19, 2012, to do the
ECI and paragraph 3.C. in the Accomplishment Instructions of CFM SB
No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, to do the FPI. Do not include TRF mount
strut crack lengths towards the cumulative crack length after the
cracks are repaired.
(iv) If no cracks are found on any of the three TRF mount
struts, or the cumulative length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is less than 0.20 inches, repeat the inspection within
2,500 CSLI.
(v) If the cumulative length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is greater than or equal to 0.20 inches and less than 0.25
inches, repeat the inspection within 370 CSLI.
(vi) If the cumulative length of cracks at any TRF mount strut
location is 0.25 inches or greater, replace the TRF with a part
eligible for installation before further flight.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov.
(g) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Kyle Gustafson,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781-238-7183; fax: 781-238-7199; email:
kyle.gustafson@faa.gov.
(2) CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0850, dated December 19, 2012,
and CFM SB No. CFM56-5B S/B 72-0308, Revision 5, dated October 12,
2007, can be obtained from CFM using the contact information in
paragraph (g)(3) of this proposed AD.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D
Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: 877-432-3272; fax: 877-432-
3329; email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781-238-7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 24, 2015.
Colleen M. D'Allesandro,
Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-24729 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P