Information Collection Request Sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Approval; Nomination of Properties for Listing in the National Register of Historic Places, 58774-58776 [2015-24653]
Download as PDF
58774
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 189 / Wednesday, September 30, 2015 / Notices
Gaming Commission. His broad
perspective as a result of this experience
will enrich the Commission’s
deliberations and contribute to informed
decisions that promote economic wellbeing.
Mr. Simermeyer does not have any
financial interests that would make him
ineligible to serve on the Commission
under 25 U.S.C. 2704(b)(5)(B) or (C).
Any person wishing to submit
comments on this proposed
appointment of E. Sequoyah
Simermeyer may submit written
comments to the address listed above.
Comments must be received by October
30, 2015.
Sally Jewell,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2015–24701 Filed 9–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCAN01000 L10200000.XZ0000 16X
LXSIOVHD0000]
Notice of Public Meeting: Northern
California Resource Advisory Council
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972
(FACA), the U.S. Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) Northern California Resource
Advisory Council will meet as indicated
below.
DATES: The meeting will be held
Thursday and Friday, Nov. 5 and 6,
2015, at the Red Lion Hotel, 1929
Fourth Street, Eureka, California. On
Nov. 5, the council will convene at 9
a.m. and depart for a field tour focused
on aspects of the California Coastal
National Monument. Members of the
public are welcome. They must provide
their own transportation, meals and
beverages. On Nov. 6, the council will
convene a business meeting at 8 a.m. in
the Red Lion Hotel Conference Center.
The meeting is open to the public.
Public Comments will be accepted at 11
a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Haug, BLM Northern California
District manager, (530) 224–2160; or
Joseph J. Fontana, public affairs officer,
(530) 252–5332. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:27 Sep 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339,
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15member council advises the Secretary of
the Interior, through the BLM, on a
variety of planning and management
issues associated with public land
management on BLM-administered
lands in northern California and far
northwest Nevada. At this meeting the
RAC will discuss land use planning
issues affecting public lands managed
by the BLM Redding and Arcata Field
Offices and land use plan amendments
for sage grouse conservation affecting
the Eagle Lake and Applegate Field
Offices. All meetings are open to the
public. Members of the public may
present written comments to the
council. Each formal council meeting
will have time allocated for public
comments. Depending on the number of
persons wishing to speak, and the time
available, the time for individual
comments may be limited. Members of
the public are welcome on field tours,
but they must provide their own
transportation and meals. Individuals
who plan to attend and need special
assistance, such as sign language
interpretation and other reasonable
accommodations, should contact the
BLM as provided above.
Martha Maciel,
Deputy State Director Communications.
[FR Doc. 2015–24694 Filed 9–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–CR–19413; PPBSADA0,
PPMPSAS1Y.Y00000 (155)]
Information Collection Request Sent to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; Nomination of
Properties for Listing in the National
Register of Historic Places
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We (National Park Service,
NPS) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the
ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. This information collection is
scheduled to expire on September 30,
2015. We may not conduct or sponsor
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. However, under OMB
regulations, we may continue to
conduct or sponsor this information
collection while it is pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before October 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior at OMB–
OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov (email).
Please provide a copy of your comments
to Madonna L. Baucum, Information
Collection Clearance Officer, National
Park Service, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242,
Reston, VA 20192; or madonna_
baucum@nps.gov (email). Please
include ‘‘1024–0018’’ in the subject line
of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Lisa Deline at Lisa_
Deline@nps.gov (email) or at 202–354–
2239 (telephone). You may review the
ICR online at https://www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to review
Department of the Interior collections
under review by OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Register of Historic
Places (National Register) is the official
Federal list of districts, sites, buildings,
structures, and objects significant in
American history, architecture,
archeology, engineering, and culture.
National Register properties have
significance to the history of
communities, States, or the Nation. The
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 requires the Secretary of the
Interior to maintain and expand the
National Register, and to establish
criteria and guidelines for including
properties on the National Register.
National Register properties must be
considered in the planning for Federal
or federally assisted projects, and listing
on the National Register is required for
eligibility for Federal rehabilitation tax
incentives. Listing on the National
Register provides formal recognition of
a property’s historical, architectural, or
archeological significance based on
national standards used by every State.
The listing places no obligations on
private property owners, and there are
no restrictions on the use, treatment,
transfer, or disposition of private
property.
The National Park Service administers
the National Register. Nominations
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 189 / Wednesday, September 30, 2015 / Notices
listing historic properties come from
State Historic Preservation Officers,
from Federal Preservation Officers for
properties owned or controlled by the
United States Government, and from
Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, for
properties on tribal lands. Regulations at
36 CFR parts 60 and 63 establish the
criteria and guidelines for listing and for
determining the eligibility of properties.
We use three forms for nominating
properties and providing documentation
for the proposed listings:
• NPS Form 10–900 (National
Register of Historic Places Registration
Form).
• NPS Form 10–900–a (National
Register of Historic Places Continuation
Sheet).
• NPS Form 10–900–b (National
Register of Historic Places Multiple
Property Documentation Form).
These forms and supporting
documentation go to the Historic
Preservation Office where the property
is located. The State Historic
Preservation Officer, Federal
Preservation Officer, or Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer can take one of
several options:
• Reject the property.
• Ask for more information.
• In the case of the State Historic
Preservation Officer, list the property
just with the State.
• Send the forms to NPS for listing on
the National Register.
Once we receive the forms, we
conduct a similar review process to
determine eligibility for listing on the
National Register.
Comments Received and Our Responses
On January 28, 2015, we published in
the Federal Register (80 FR 4589) a
notice of our intent to request that OMB
approve the collection of information
associated with nominations of
properties for inclusion in the National
Register of Historic properties. We did
not receive any comments in response
to that notice.
We published an amended notice on
June 26, 2015 (80 FR 36845). The
amended notice extended the comment
date and provided the public with more
detailed information about the five
types of package submissions that we
receive along with additional
information on the respective burden
estimates. We solicited comments for 60
days ending on August 25, 2015. We
received comments from nine States:
Comment: Four States provided
clarifications on the State burden
estimates published in the amended
notice, but did not provide any
additional comments regarding the
collection of information.
Response: We have considered and
included, as appropriate, the
information provided in our burden
estimates.
Comment: One State responded that
the collection of information was
essential to meet the mandates of the
National Historic Preservation Act. The
State acknowledged the burden
estimates for their State were accurate
and added that there is a wide variation
between response times from an
individual compared to an experienced
consultant. It was suggested that the
NPS redesign the NR form so that it
takes up fewer pages and to fix the
‘‘quirks’’ of the existing form. Finally,
the State felt the burden could not be
reduced unless additional funding is
provided to the State Historic
Preservation Offices to hire additional
staff.
Response: The forms are provided as
Word templates, which allow for rolling
text from one page to the next. Some
respondents choose not to fill out NPS
Form 10–900 completely and simply
place most documentation on NPS Form
10–900-a. Blank spaces may be deleted
so there are fewer pages. The current
forms allow for this flexibility. The
current and projected out-year funding
levels do not support the possibility of
hiring additional staff or increasing the
operating budget for the program.
However, hiring additional staff would
not reduce the burden, only spread it
out among a larger staff.
Comment: One State commented that
a category for State Historic Preservation
58775
Offices that prepare NR nominations
should have been included in the
burden estimates.
Response: We agree and have
included the burden in this ICR.
Comment: One State commented that
the information collected is adequate
and useful and would not recommend
any changes to what is requested. The
State believes that providing workshops
and further guidance would help
respondents to more fully understand
the requirements. The State also
commented that it would be difficult to
reduce the burden because most States
are concerned with local administration
of the Federal tax program and
incentives are tied to being listed on the
National Register.
Response: We agree. The NR Program
provides easily accessibly guidance
online via the National Register
Bulletins and webinars that are posted
on the NR Web site, as well as offering
yearly workshops to assist with the
documentation process.
Comment: One State commented that
the collection of information was
neither necessary nor useful and had no
practical utility in the nomination of
properties.
Response: We disagree. The
information we collect is necessary to
properly identify, evaluate, and protect
properties nominated to the National
Register of Historic Places.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024–0018.
Title: Nomination of Properties for
Listing in the National Register of
Historic Places, 36 CFR 60 and 63.
Service Form Number(s): 10–900,
10–900–a, and 10–900–b.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals; businesses; organizations;
and State, local, and tribal local
governments.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Number
of annual
responses
Completion
time per
response
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Activity
Number of
respondents
Preparation and Submission of Nomination Forms .........................................
Historic Preservation Office Review of Nomination Forms .............................
Individual Nominations 1 ...................................................................................
District Nominations 1 .......................................................................................
Nominations Submitted under Existing MPS Covers 1 ....................................
New Proposed MPS Cover Documents 1 ........................................................
New Nominations .............................................................................................
100
100
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
100
1,282
635
435
75
36
1
250
6
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
25,000
7,692
0
0
0
0
0
Totals ........................................................................................................
200
2,564
........................
32,692
1 Prepared
VerDate Sep<11>2014
by consultants.
18:27 Sep 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Total annual
burden hours
58776
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 189 / Wednesday, September 30, 2015 / Notices
paperwork burden of these regulatory
requirements.
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: $19,398,000 for consultant costs
for preparing nominations.
Dated: September 23, 2015.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
National Park Service.
I. Abstract
BILLING CODE 4310–EH–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Natural Resources Revenue
[Docket No. ONRR–2011–0021; DS63610000
DR2PS0000.CH7000 156D0102R2; OMB
Control Number 1012–0002]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Indian Oil and Gas
Valuation; Comment Request
Office of Natural Resources
Revenue, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of extension.
AGENCY:
To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Office of Natural Resources
Revenue (ONRR) is notifying the public
that we have submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) an
information collection request (ICR) to
renew approval of the paperwork
requirements in the regulations under
30 CFR parts 1202, 1206, and 1207. This
notice also provides the public a second
opportunity to comment on the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:27 Sep 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
You may submit your
written comments directly to the Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior (OMB Control Number 1012–
0002), Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or
telefax at (202) 395–5806. Please also
mail a copy of your comments to Mr.
Luis Aguilar, Regulatory Specialist,
ONRR, P.O. Box 25165, MS 61030A,
Denver, Colorado 80225–0165, or email
Luis.Aguilar@onrr.gov. Please reference
OMB Control Number 1012–0002 in
your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
any questions, contact Mr. Luis Aguilar,
telephone (303) 231–3418, or email at
Luis.Aguilar@onrr.gov. You may also
contact Mr. Aguilar to obtain copies
(free of charge) of (1) the ICR, (2) any
associated forms, and (3) the regulations
that require the subject collection of
information. You may also review the
information collection request online at
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2015–24653 Filed 9–29–15; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove this information
collection request but may respond after
30 days; therefore, you should submit
your public comments to OMB by
October 30, 2015, for the assurance of
consideration.
DATES:
III. Comments
We again invite comments concerning
this information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask OMB in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that it will be done.
The Secretary of the United States
Department of the Interior is responsible
for mineral resource development on
Federal and Indian lands and the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS). Under various
laws, the Secretary’s responsibility is to
manage mineral resources production
on Federal and Indian lands and the
OCS, collect royalties due, and
distribute the funds collected under
those laws. The Secretary also has a
trust responsibility to manage Indian
lands and seek advice and information
from Indian beneficiaries. ONRR
performs the minerals revenue
management functions for the Secretary
and assists the Secretary in carrying out
the Department’s trust responsibility for
Indian lands. Public laws pertaining to
mineral leases on Federal and Indian
lands are available at https://
www.onrr.gov/Laws_R_D/PubLaws/
default.htm.
Information collections that we cover
in this ICR are found at 30 CFR part
1202, subparts C and J, which pertain to
royalties; part 1206, subparts B and E,
which govern the valuation of oil and
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
gas produced from leases on Indian
lands; and part 1207, which pertains to
recordkeeping. Indian Tribes and
individual Indian mineral owners
receive all royalties generated from their
lands. Determining product valuation is
essential to ensure that Indian Tribes
and individual Indian mineral owners
receive payment on the full value of the
minerals removed from their lands.
Failure to collect the data that we
describe in this ICR could result in the
undervaluation of leased minerals on
Indian lands. All data reported is
subject to subsequent audit and
adjustment.
Indian Oil
Regulations at 30 CFR part 1206,
subpart B, govern the valuation for
royalty purposes of all oil produced
from Indian oil and gas leases (Tribal
and allotted), except leases on the Osage
Indian Reservation, and are consistent
with mineral leasing laws, other
applicable laws, and lease terms.
Generally, these regulations provide that
lessees determine the value of oil based
upon the higher of (1) the gross
proceeds under an arm’s-length
contract; or (2) major portion analysis.
The value that a lessee determines may
be eligible for a transportation
allowance.
From information collected on Form
ONRR–4110, Oil Transportation
Allowance Report, ONRR and Tribal
audit personnel evaluate (1) whether
lessee-reported transportation
allowances are within regulatory
allowance limitations and calculated
under applicable regulations; and (2)
whether the lessees reported and paid
the proper amount of royalties. Lessees
must use Form ONRR–4110 for both
arm’s-length and non-arm’s-length
contracts.
Indian Gas
Regulations at 30 CFR part 1206,
subpart E, govern the valuation for
royalty purposes of natural gas
produced from Indian oil and gas leases
(Tribal and allotted). These regulations
apply to all gas production from Indian
oil and gas leases, except leases on the
Osage Indian Reservation.
Most Indian leases contain the
requirement to perform accounting for
comparison (dual accounting) for gas
produced from the lease. Lessees must
elect to perform actual dual accounting
as defined in 30 CFR 1206.176, or
alternative dual accounting as defined
in 30 CFR 1206.173. Lessees use Form
ONRR–4410, Accounting for
Comparison [Dual Accounting], to
certify that dual accounting is not
required on an Indian lease or to make
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 189 (Wednesday, September 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58774-58776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24653]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-WASO-CR-19413; PPBSADA0, PPMPSAS1Y.Y00000 (155)]
Information Collection Request Sent to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for Approval; Nomination of Properties for Listing in
the National Register of Historic Places
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We (National Park Service, NPS) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for review and approval. We summarize
the ICR below and describe the nature of the collection and the
estimated burden and cost. This information collection is scheduled to
expire on September 30, 2015. We may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number. However, under OMB
regulations, we may continue to conduct or sponsor this information
collection while it is pending at OMB.
DATES: You must submit comments on or before October 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on this information
collection to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Interior at
OMB-OIRA at (202) 395-5806 (fax) or OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
(email). Please provide a copy of your comments to Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, National Park Service, 12201
Sunrise Valley Drive, Room 2C114, Mail Stop 242, Reston, VA 20192; or
madonna_baucum@nps.gov (email). Please include ``1024-0018'' in the
subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request additional information
about this ICR, contact Lisa Deline at Lisa_Deline@nps.gov (email) or
at 202-354-2239 (telephone). You may review the ICR online at https://www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to review Department of the
Interior collections under review by OMB.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Register of Historic Places (National Register) is the
official Federal list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and
objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology,
engineering, and culture. National Register properties have
significance to the history of communities, States, or the Nation. The
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 requires the Secretary of
the Interior to maintain and expand the National Register, and to
establish criteria and guidelines for including properties on the
National Register.
National Register properties must be considered in the planning for
Federal or federally assisted projects, and listing on the National
Register is required for eligibility for Federal rehabilitation tax
incentives. Listing on the National Register provides formal
recognition of a property's historical, architectural, or archeological
significance based on national standards used by every State. The
listing places no obligations on private property owners, and there are
no restrictions on the use, treatment, transfer, or disposition of
private property.
The National Park Service administers the National Register.
Nominations
[[Page 58775]]
listing historic properties come from State Historic Preservation
Officers, from Federal Preservation Officers for properties owned or
controlled by the United States Government, and from Tribal Historic
Preservation Officers, for properties on tribal lands. Regulations at
36 CFR parts 60 and 63 establish the criteria and guidelines for
listing and for determining the eligibility of properties. We use three
forms for nominating properties and providing documentation for the
proposed listings:
NPS Form 10-900 (National Register of Historic Places
Registration Form).
NPS Form 10-900-a (National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet).
NPS Form 10-900-b (National Register of Historic Places
Multiple Property Documentation Form).
These forms and supporting documentation go to the Historic
Preservation Office where the property is located. The State Historic
Preservation Officer, Federal Preservation Officer, or Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer can take one of several options:
Reject the property.
Ask for more information.
In the case of the State Historic Preservation Officer,
list the property just with the State.
Send the forms to NPS for listing on the National
Register.
Once we receive the forms, we conduct a similar review process to
determine eligibility for listing on the National Register.
Comments Received and Our Responses
On January 28, 2015, we published in the Federal Register (80 FR
4589) a notice of our intent to request that OMB approve the collection
of information associated with nominations of properties for inclusion
in the National Register of Historic properties. We did not receive any
comments in response to that notice.
We published an amended notice on June 26, 2015 (80 FR 36845). The
amended notice extended the comment date and provided the public with
more detailed information about the five types of package submissions
that we receive along with additional information on the respective
burden estimates. We solicited comments for 60 days ending on August
25, 2015. We received comments from nine States:
Comment: Four States provided clarifications on the State burden
estimates published in the amended notice, but did not provide any
additional comments regarding the collection of information.
Response: We have considered and included, as appropriate, the
information provided in our burden estimates.
Comment: One State responded that the collection of information was
essential to meet the mandates of the National Historic Preservation
Act. The State acknowledged the burden estimates for their State were
accurate and added that there is a wide variation between response
times from an individual compared to an experienced consultant. It was
suggested that the NPS redesign the NR form so that it takes up fewer
pages and to fix the ``quirks'' of the existing form. Finally, the
State felt the burden could not be reduced unless additional funding is
provided to the State Historic Preservation Offices to hire additional
staff.
Response: The forms are provided as Word templates, which allow for
rolling text from one page to the next. Some respondents choose not to
fill out NPS Form 10-900 completely and simply place most documentation
on NPS Form 10-900-a. Blank spaces may be deleted so there are fewer
pages. The current forms allow for this flexibility. The current and
projected out-year funding levels do not support the possibility of
hiring additional staff or increasing the operating budget for the
program. However, hiring additional staff would not reduce the burden,
only spread it out among a larger staff.
Comment: One State commented that a category for State Historic
Preservation Offices that prepare NR nominations should have been
included in the burden estimates.
Response: We agree and have included the burden in this ICR.
Comment: One State commented that the information collected is
adequate and useful and would not recommend any changes to what is
requested. The State believes that providing workshops and further
guidance would help respondents to more fully understand the
requirements. The State also commented that it would be difficult to
reduce the burden because most States are concerned with local
administration of the Federal tax program and incentives are tied to
being listed on the National Register.
Response: We agree. The NR Program provides easily accessibly
guidance online via the National Register Bulletins and webinars that
are posted on the NR Web site, as well as offering yearly workshops to
assist with the documentation process.
Comment: One State commented that the collection of information was
neither necessary nor useful and had no practical utility in the
nomination of properties.
Response: We disagree. The information we collect is necessary to
properly identify, evaluate, and protect properties nominated to the
National Register of Historic Places.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1024-0018.
Title: Nomination of Properties for Listing in the National
Register of Historic Places, 36 CFR 60 and 63.
Service Form Number(s): 10-900, 10-900-a, and 10-900-b.
Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Description of Respondents: Individuals; businesses; organizations;
and State, local, and tribal local governments.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Completion
Activity Number of annual time per Total annual
respondents responses response burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preparation and Submission of Nomination Forms.. 100 100 250 25,000
Historic Preservation Office Review of 100 1,282 6 7,692
Nomination Forms...............................
Individual Nominations \1\...................... .............. 635 .............. 0
District Nominations \1\........................ .............. 435 .............. 0
Nominations Submitted under Existing MPS Covers .............. 75 .............. 0
\1\............................................
New Proposed MPS Cover Documents \1\............ .............. 36 .............. 0
New Nominations................................. .............. 1 .............. 0
---------------------------------------------------------------
Totals...................................... 200 2,564 .............. 32,692
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Prepared by consultants.
[[Page 58776]]
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $19,398,000 for consultant
costs for preparing nominations.
III. Comments
We again invite comments concerning this information collection on:
Whether or not the collection of information is necessary,
including whether or not the information will have practical utility;
The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this
collection of information;
Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your address, phone number, email
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire comment, including your personal
identifying information, may be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask OMB in your comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that it
will be done.
Dated: September 23, 2015.
Madonna L. Baucum,
Information Collection Clearance Officer, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-24653 Filed 9-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EH-P