E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice; International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability, 58492-58493 [2015-24623]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58492
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 188 / Tuesday, September 29, 2015 / Notices
discussion here. Specifically, FDA
received numerous comments regarding
two categories of requests that FDA
proposed in the draft guidance to
exclude from the controlled
correspondence process. First, FDA
received comments requesting that the
Agency refrain from excluding requests
for product-specific guidance on
demonstrating bioequivalence. FDA
declines to revise the guidance in this
fashion. As set out in the draft guidance,
the short timeframe contemplated for
the controlled correspondence
responses is inconsistent with the wellestablished process for issuing productspecific recommendations described in
the guidance for industry on
‘‘Bioequivalence Recommendations for
Specific Products (June 2010)’’, as well
as with the principles in the GDUFA
Commitment Letter regarding the
Regulatory Science Initiative. Rather
than incorporating such guidance
development into the controlled
correspondence process, FDA’s Office of
Generic Drugs (OGD) is developing a
separate process for product-specific
guidance development.
This approach is being managed by
the Division of Therapeutic Performance
(DTP) within OGD’s Office of Research
and Standards, involves representatives
from numerous divisions and offices
within OGD, and provides for timely
posting of product-specific
recommendations to facilitate generic
drug development. Requests for
product-specific guidance development
received through the general Generic
Drugs@fda.hhs.gov email account are
forwarded directly to DTP for
consideration and tracking.
Prioritization of guidance development
is based on a variety of factors,
including public health needs, industry
demand for generic development,
anticipated expiration of reference listed
drug exclusivity, formulation features
and predictability of in vivo
performance, OGD experience with
similar formulations or product types,
and the feasibility of different
approaches to demonstrate
bioequivalence (e.g., pharmacokinetic/
pharmacodynamics studies,
comparative clinical endpoint studies,
and in vitro approaches). FDA
anticipates that this targeted
development approach will expedite the
availability of product-specific
guidances while supporting the
important policies of transparency and
maximizing benefit to the public health.
Second, FDA received comments
regarding its proposed method of
responding to requests related to issues
for which the Agency has not yet
determined a policy. Upon review of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Sep 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
comments, FDA is revising its
recommendations related to such
inquiries. As described in the guidance,
if there is a better mechanism for a
requestor to obtain comment from FDA
on the subject of the request than
through a controlled correspondence,
the Agency will direct the requestor to
such a mechanism, e.g., a preabbreviated new drug application
meeting request or the Regulatory
Science Initiative. For requests for
which the controlled correspondence
pathway is the best mechanism, but that
raise issues for which FDA has not
determined appropriate policy, such
requests will remain open until such
policy decision is made.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on controlled
correspondence related to generic drug
development. It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding
on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance refers to collections of
information that are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collection of information has been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0797.
III. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at either
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
V. Reference
The following reference has been
placed on display in the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and may be seen by interested persons
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, and is available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
(FDA has verified the Web site address in
this reference section, but we are not
responsible for any subsequent changes to
the Web site after this document publishes in
the Federal Register.)
1. Generic Drug User Fee Act Program
Performance Goals and Procedures (GDUFA
Commitment Letter) for fiscal years 2013
through 2017, available at https://www.fda.
gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/
GenericDrugUserFees/UCM282505.pdf.
Dated: September 22, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–24621 Filed 9–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–D–3327]
E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice;
International Conference on
Harmonisation; Draft Guidance for
Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance entitled ‘‘E6(R2) Good Clinical
Practice.’’ The draft guidance was
prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on
Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH).
The draft guidance amends the guidance
entitled ‘‘E6 Good Clinical Practice:
Consolidated Guidance’’ (E6(R1)) to
encourage implementation of improved
and more efficient approaches to
clinical trial design, conduct, oversight,
recording, and reporting, and also
updates standards regarding electronic
records and essential documents. The
draft guidance is intended to improve
clinical trial quality and efficiency
while maintaining human subject
protection. FDA is making this draft
guidance available for comment on the
sections that are additions to ICH E6(R1)
and marked as ‘‘ADDENDUM.’’
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on the sections
of this draft guidance marked as
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 188 / Tuesday, September 29, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘ADDENDUM’’ before it begins work on
the final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the ‘‘ADDENDUM’’ sections of the
draft guidance by November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information (HFD–
240), Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER), Food and Drug
Administration, 10001 New Hampshire
Ave., Hillandale Building, 4th Floor,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, or the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist the office in processing your
requests. The draft guidance may also be
obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1–
800–835–4709 or 240–402–7800. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the draft
guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Dianne
Paraoan, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 3326, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2500; or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, International Programs, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, rm. 7208,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important
initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry
associations to promote international
harmonization of regulatory
requirements. FDA has participated in
many meetings designed to enhance
harmonization and is committed to
seeking scientifically based harmonized
technical procedures for pharmaceutical
development. One of the goals of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Sep 28, 2015
Jkt 235001
harmonization is to identify and then
reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development
among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an
opportunity for tripartite harmonization
initiatives to be developed with input
from both regulatory and industry
representatives. FDA also seeks input
from consumer representatives and
others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical
requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three
regions: The European Union, Japan,
and North America. The eight ICH
sponsors are the European Commission;
the European Federation of
Pharmaceutical Industries Associations;
the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour,
and Welfare; the Japanese
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Association; CDER and CBER, FDA; the
Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America; Health
Canada; and Swissmedic. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the
preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International
Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes
representatives from each of the ICH
sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as
observers from the World Health
Organization.
In June 2015, the ICH Steering
Committee agreed that a draft guidance
entitled ‘‘Good Clinical Practice E6(R2)’’
should be made available for public
comment. The draft guidance is the
product of the ICH E6 Expert Working
Group of the ICH. Comments about this
draft will be considered by FDA and the
ICH E6 Expert Working Group.
The draft guidance provides guidance
on approaches to clinical trial design,
conduct, oversight, recording, and
reporting as well as updated standards
regarding electronic records and
essential documents. The additions to
ICH E6(R1) are intended to encourage
implementation of the described
approaches and processes to improve
clinical trial quality and efficiency
while maintaining human subject
protection. Evolutions in technology
and risk management processes offer
new opportunities to increase clinical
trial efficiency, in part by focusing on
trial activities essential to ensuring
human subject protection and the
reliability of trial results. For example,
the draft guidance recommends
sponsors implement a system to manage
quality throughout clinical trials and
recommends sponsors develop a
systematic, prioritized, risk-based
approach to monitoring clinical trials.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58493
The draft guidance provides additional
detail regarding recommendations for
use of electronic trial data handling and
remote electronic trial data systems.
This draft guidance includes
additions to ICH E6(R1) that are
identified as ‘‘ADDENDUM’’ and are
marked with vertical lines on both sides
of the text. FDA is making the draft
guidance available for comment on the
‘‘ADDENDUM’’ text added to ICH
E6(R1).
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the current thinking of FDA
on E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice. It does
not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public.
You can use an alternative approach if
it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.
gov/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
Guidances/default.htm.
Dated: September 23, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–24623 Filed 9–28–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Prospective Intent To Grant Start-Up
Exclusive Patent License: Real-Time
PCR Point Mutation Assays for
Detecting HIV–1 Resistance to Antiviral
Drugs
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
Public Health Service, HHS.
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 188 (Tuesday, September 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58492-58493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24623]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-3327]
E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice; International Conference on
Harmonisation; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``E6(R2) Good Clinical
Practice.'' The draft guidance was prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The draft guidance
amends the guidance entitled ``E6 Good Clinical Practice: Consolidated
Guidance'' (E6(R1)) to encourage implementation of improved and more
efficient approaches to clinical trial design, conduct, oversight,
recording, and reporting, and also updates standards regarding
electronic records and essential documents. The draft guidance is
intended to improve clinical trial quality and efficiency while
maintaining human subject protection. FDA is making this draft guidance
available for comment on the sections that are additions to ICH E6(R1)
and marked as ``ADDENDUM.''
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on the
sections of this draft guidance marked as
[[Page 58493]]
``ADDENDUM'' before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the
``ADDENDUM'' sections of the draft guidance by November 30, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information (HFD-240), Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER), Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD
20993-0002, or the Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist
the office in processing your requests. The draft guidance may also be
obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or 240-402-7800. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the
draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the guidance: Dianne
Paraoan, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 3326, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-2500; or Stephen Ripley, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, International Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, rm. 7208, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
301-796-8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry associations to promote
international harmonization of regulatory requirements. FDA has
participated in many meetings designed to enhance harmonization and is
committed to seeking scientifically based harmonized technical
procedures for pharmaceutical development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for tripartite
harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from both
regulatory and industry representatives. FDA also seeks input from
consumer representatives and others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three regions: The European Union, Japan,
and North America. The eight ICH sponsors are the European Commission;
the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries Associations; the
Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the Japanese
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; CDER and CBER, FDA; the
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; Health Canada;
and Swissmedic. The ICH Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation
of documentation, is provided by the International Federation of
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes representatives from each of
the ICH sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World
Health Organization.
In June 2015, the ICH Steering Committee agreed that a draft
guidance entitled ``Good Clinical Practice E6(R2)'' should be made
available for public comment. The draft guidance is the product of the
ICH E6 Expert Working Group of the ICH. Comments about this draft will
be considered by FDA and the ICH E6 Expert Working Group.
The draft guidance provides guidance on approaches to clinical
trial design, conduct, oversight, recording, and reporting as well as
updated standards regarding electronic records and essential documents.
The additions to ICH E6(R1) are intended to encourage implementation of
the described approaches and processes to improve clinical trial
quality and efficiency while maintaining human subject protection.
Evolutions in technology and risk management processes offer new
opportunities to increase clinical trial efficiency, in part by
focusing on trial activities essential to ensuring human subject
protection and the reliability of trial results. For example, the draft
guidance recommends sponsors implement a system to manage quality
throughout clinical trials and recommends sponsors develop a
systematic, prioritized, risk-based approach to monitoring clinical
trials. The draft guidance provides additional detail regarding
recommendations for use of electronic trial data handling and remote
electronic trial data systems.
This draft guidance includes additions to ICH E6(R1) that are
identified as ``ADDENDUM'' and are marked with vertical lines on both
sides of the text. FDA is making the draft guidance available for
comment on the ``ADDENDUM'' text added to ICH E6(R1).
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on E6(R2) Good
Clinical Practice. It does not establish any rights for any person and
is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm.
Dated: September 23, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-24623 Filed 9-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P