Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2016, 58262-58264 [2015-24508]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
58262
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices
guidance is intended to provide
guidance for new drug substances and
new drug products during their clinical
development and subsequent
applications for marketing.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115 (g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
either electronic or written comments
on the draft guidance by November 27,
2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the draft guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10001 New
Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building,
4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, or the Office of Communication,
Outreach and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71,
Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive
label to assist the office in processing
your requests. The draft guidance may
also be obtained by mail by calling
CBER at 1–800–835–4709 or 240–402–
8010. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Aisar Atrakchi,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, Bldg. 22, Rm. 4118,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–1036; or Anne Pilaro, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm.
4025, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
240–402–8341.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, International Programs, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7208,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important
initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry
associations to promote international
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
harmonization of regulatory
requirements. FDA has participated in
many meetings designed to enhance
harmonization and is committed to
seeking scientifically based harmonized
technical procedures for pharmaceutical
development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then
reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development
among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an
opportunity for tripartite harmonization
initiatives to be developed with input
from both regulatory and industry
representatives. FDA also seeks input
from consumer representatives and
others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical
requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three
regions: Europe, Japan, and North
America. The eight ICH sponsors are the
European Commission; the European
Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries
Associations; the Japanese Ministry of
Health, Labour, and Welfare; the
Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Association; CDER and CBER, FDA; the
Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America; Health
Canada; and Swissmedic. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the
preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International
Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes
representatives from each of the ICH
sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as
observers from the World Health
Organization.
In June 2015, the ICH Steering
Committee agreed that the following
draft guidance should be made available
for public comment: ‘‘M7(R1)
Addendum to ICH M7: Assessment and
Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic)
Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit
Potential Carcinogenic Risk;
Application of the Principles of the ICH
M7 Guidance to Calculation of
Compound-Specific Acceptable
Intakes.’’ The draft guidance is the
product of the Expert Working Group of
the ICH. Comments about this draft will
be considered by FDA and the Expert
Working Group.
The draft guidance provides guidance
on acceptable intake limits derived for
some chemicals that are considered to
be mutagens and carcinogens and that
were selected because they are
commonly used in pharmaceutical
manufacturing or are useful in
illustrating the principles of deriving
compound-specific intakes as described
in ICH M7. The default method from
ICH M7 of linear extrapolation from the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cancer potency estimate, TD50, is used
as the primary method to derive the
acceptable intakes for carcinogens with
likely mutagenic mode of action.
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the current thinking of FDA
on this topic. It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding
on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.regulations.gov, https://
www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/
GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm.
Dated: September 22, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–24510 Filed 9–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0007]
Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease
Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year
2016
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the fee rate for using a rare
pediatric disease priority review
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices
voucher for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food
and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes
FDA to determine and collect rare
pediatric disease priority review user
fees for certain applications for review
of human drug or biological products
when those applications use a rare
pediatric disease priority review
voucher. These vouchers are awarded to
the sponsors of certain rare pediatric
disease product applications, submitted
90 days or more after July 9, 2012, upon
FDA approval of such applications. The
amount of the fee for using a rare
pediatric disease priority review
voucher is determined each FY based on
the difference between the average cost
incurred by FDA in the review of a
human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous FY, and
the average cost incurred in the review
of an application that is not subject to
priority review in the previous FY. This
notice establishes the rare pediatric
disease priority review fee rate for FY
2016 and outlines the payment
procedures for such fees.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of Financial
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd.,
COLE–14202F, Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002, 301–796–7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Section 908 of FDASIA (Pub. L. 112–
144) added section 529 to the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360ff). In section 529 of the
FD&C Act, Congress encouraged
development of new human drugs and
biological products for prevention and
treatment of certain rare pediatric
diseases by offering additional
incentives for obtaining FDA approval
of such products. Under section 529 of
the FD&C Act, the sponsor of an eligible
human drug application submitted 90
days or more after July 9, 2012, for a rare
pediatric disease (as defined in section
529(a)(3)) shall receive a priority review
voucher upon approval of the rare
pediatric disease product application.
The recipient of a rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher may either use
the voucher for a future human drug
application submitted to FDA under
section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351(a) of the
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
262(a)), or transfer (including by sale)
the voucher to another party that may
then use it for a human drug application
submitted to FDA under section
505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act or section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
351(a) of the Public Health Service Act.
A priority review is a review conducted
with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act
(PDUFA) goal date of 6 months after the
receipt or filing date, depending on the
type of application. Information
regarding PDUFA goals is available at
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
forindustry/userfees/
prescriptiondruguserfee/
ucm270412.pdf.
The applicant that uses a rare
pediatric disease priority review
voucher is entitled to a priority review
of its eligible human drug application,
but must pay FDA a rare pediatric
disease priority review user fee in
addition to any fee required by PDUFA
for the application. Information
regarding the rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher program is
available at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
DevelopmentApprovalProcess/
DevelopmentResources/
ucm375479.htm.
This notice establishes the rare
pediatric disease priority review fee rate
for FY 2016 at $2,727,000 and outlines
FDA’s procedures for payment of rare
pediatric disease priority review user
fees. This rate is effective on October 1,
2015, and will remain in effect through
September 30, 2016.
II. Rare Pediatric Priority Review User
Fee for FY 2016
Under section 529(c)(2) of the FD&C
Act, the amount of the rare pediatric
disease priority review user fee is
determined each fiscal year based on the
difference between the average cost
incurred by FDA in the review of a
human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous fiscal
year, and the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug
application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. The
rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher fee is intended to cover the
incremental costs for FDA to do a
priority review on a human drug
application that would otherwise get a
standard review. The formula provides
the Agency with the added resources to
conduct a priority review while still
ensuring a robust rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher program that is
consistent with the Agency’s public
health goal of encouraging the
development of new human drugs and
biological products for rare pediatric
diseases.
A priority review is a review
conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months after the receipt or filing date,
depending on the type of application.
Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has
committed to reviewing and acting on
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58263
90 percent of the applications granted
priority review status within this
expedited timeframe. Normally, an
application for a human drug or
biological product will qualify for
priority review if the product is
intended to treat a serious condition
and, if approved, would provide a
significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. An application that does
not receive a priority designation will
receive a standard review. Under the
PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed
to reviewing and acting on 90 percent of
standard applications within 10 months
of the receipt or filing date depending
on the type of application. A priority
review involves a more intensive level
of effort and a higher level of resources
than a standard review.
Section 529 of the FD&C Act specifies
that the rare pediatric disease priority
review voucher fee amount must be
based on the difference between the
average cost incurred by the Agency in
the review of a human drug application
subject to a priority review in the
previous fiscal year, and the average
cost incurred by the Agency in the
review of a human drug application not
subject to a priority review in the
previous fiscal year. FDA is setting a fee
for FY 2016, which is to be based on
standard cost data from the previous
fiscal year, FY 2015. However, the FY
2015 submission cohort has not been
closed out yet, thus the cost data for FY
2015 are not complete. The latest year
for which FDA has complete cost data
is FY 2014. Furthermore, because FDA
has never tracked the cost of reviewing
applications that get priority review as
a separate cost subset, FDA estimated
this cost based on other data that the
Agency has tracked. FDA uses data that
the Agency estimates and publishes on
its Web site each year—standard costs
for review. FDA does not publish a
standard cost for ‘‘the review of a
human drug application subject to
priority review in the previous fiscal
year.’’ However, we expect all such
applications would contain clinical
data. The standard cost application
categories with clinical data that FDA
publishes each year are: (1) New drug
applications (NDAs) for a new
molecular entity (NME) with clinical
data and (2) biologics license
applications (BLAs) with clinical data.
The standard cost worksheets for FY
2014 show standard costs (rounded to
the nearest thousand dollars) of
$5,646,000 for an NME NDA, and
$5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these
standard costs, the total cost to review
the 48 applications in these two
categories in FY 2014 (30 NME NDAs
and 18 BLAs with clinical data) was
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
58264
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices
$268,974,000. (Note: These numbers
exclude the President’s Emergency Plan
for AIDS Relief NDAs; no
investigational new drug (IND) review
costs are included in this amount.)
Twenty-nine of these applications (20
NDAs and 9 BLAs) received priority
review, which would mean that the
remaining 19 received standard reviews.
Because a priority review compresses a
review schedule that ordinarily takes 10
months into 6 months, FDA estimates
that a multiplier of 1.67 (10 months
divided by 6 months) should be applied
to non-priority review costs in
estimating the effort and cost of a
priority review as compared to a
standard review. This multiplier is
consistent with published research on
this subject which supports a priority
review multiplier in the range of 1.48 to
2.35 (Ref. 1). The multiplier derived by
FDA falls well below the midpoint of
this range. Using FY 2014 figures, the
costs of a priority and standard review
are estimated using the following
formula:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(29 a × 1.67) + (19 a) = $268,974,000
Where ‘‘a’’ is the cost of a standard
review and ‘‘a times 1.67’’ is the cost of
a priority review. Using this formula,
the cost of a standard review for NME
NDAs and BLAs is calculated to be
$3,989,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars) and the cost of a
priority review for NME NDAs and
BLAs is 1.67 times that amount, or
$6,662,000 (rounded to the nearest
thousand dollars). The difference
between these two cost estimates, or
$2,673,000, represents the incremental
cost of conducting a priority review
rather than a standard review.
For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need
to adjust the FY 2014 incremental cost
by the average amount by which FDA’s
average costs increased in the 3 years
prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014
amount for cost increases in FY 2015.
That adjustment, published in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see
80 FR 46028 at 46029), is 2.0266 percent
for the most recent year, not
compounded. Increasing the FY 2014
incremental priority review cost of
$2,673,000 by 2.0266 percent results in
an estimated cost of $2,727,000
(rounded to the nearest thousand
dollars). This is the rare pediatric
disease priority review user fee amount
for FY 2016 that must be submitted with
a priority review voucher for a human
drug application in FY 2016, in addition
to any PDUFA fee that is required for
such an application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Sep 25, 2015
Jkt 235001
III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in
table 1:
FDA’s normal procedures for timely
payment of the PDUFA fee for the
human drug application.
IV. Reference
TABLE 1—RARE PEDIATRIC DISEASE
The following reference has been
PRIORITY REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR placed on display in the Division of
FY 2016
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES),
Fee category
Fee rate for
FY 2016
Application submitted with a
rare pediatric disease priority
review voucher in addition to
the normal PDUFA Fee.
$2,727,000
IV. Implementation of Rare Pediatric
Disease Priority Review User Fee
Under section 529(c)(4)(A) of the
FD&C Act, the priority review user fee
is due (i.e. the obligation to pay the fee
is incurred) when a sponsor notifies
FDA of its intent to use the voucher.
Section 529(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C Act
specifies that the application will be
considered incomplete if the priority
review user fee and all other applicable
user fees are not paid in accordance
with FDA payment procedures. In
addition, section 529(c)(4)(C) specifies
that FDA may not grant a waiver,
exemption, reduction, or refund of any
fees due and payable under this section
of the FD&C Act. Beginning with FDA’s
appropriation for FY 2015, the annual
appropriation language states
specifically that priority review user
fees authorized by 21 U.S.C. 360n and
360ff (section 529 of the FD&C Act)
shall be credited to this account, to
remain available until expended.’’ (Pub.
L. 113–235, Section 5, Division A, Title
VI).
The rare pediatric disease priority
review fee established in the new fee
schedule must be paid for any
application that is received on or after
October 1, 2015. In order to comply
with this requirement, the sponsor must
contact FDA before providing official
notification of its intent to use the
voucher.
FDA will issue an invoice to the
sponsor who has incurred a rare
pediatric disease priority review
voucher fee when it receives the
sponsor’s notification of intent to use
the voucher. The invoice will include
instructions on how to pay the fee via
wire transfer or check.
As noted in section II, if a sponsor
uses a rare pediatric disease priority
review voucher for a human drug
application, the sponsor would incur
the rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher fee in addition to any PDUFA
fee that is required for the application.
The sponsor would need to follow
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and may be seen by interested person
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
1. Ridley, D. B., H. G. Grabowski, and J. L.
Moe, ‘‘Developing Drugs for Developing
Countries,’’ Health Affairs, vol. 25, no. 2,
pp. 313–324, 2006.
Dated: September 22, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–24508 Filed 9–25–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute on Deafness and
Other Communication Disorders;
Notice of Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of a meeting of the Board
of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD.
The meeting will be open to the
public as indicated below, with
attendance limited to space available.
Individuals who plan to attend and
need special assistance, such as sign
language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
notify the Contact Person listed below
in advance of the meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended for
the review, discussion, and evaluation
of individual intramural programs and
projects conducted by the NATIONAL
INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND
OTHER COMMUNICATION
DISORDERS, including consideration of
personnel qualifications and
performance, and the competence of
individual investigators, the disclosure
of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy.
Name of Committee: Board of Scientific
Counselors, NIDCD.
Date: October 26–27, 2015.
Closed: October 26, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to 8:30
a.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate personal
qualifications and performance, and
competence of individual investigators.
E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM
28SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 187 (Monday, September 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58262-58264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0007]
Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher in
Fiscal Year 2016
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the fee rate for using a rare pediatric disease priority
review
[[Page 58263]]
voucher for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to determine and
collect rare pediatric disease priority review user fees for certain
applications for review of human drug or biological products when those
applications use a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher.
These vouchers are awarded to the sponsors of certain rare pediatric
disease product applications, submitted 90 days or more after July 9,
2012, upon FDA approval of such applications. The amount of the fee for
using a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher is determined
each FY based on the difference between the average cost incurred by
FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to priority
review in the previous FY, and the average cost incurred in the review
of an application that is not subject to priority review in the
previous FY. This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease
priority review fee rate for FY 2016 and outlines the payment
procedures for such fees.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of
Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville
Rd., COLE-14202F, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 908 of FDASIA (Pub. L. 112-144) added section 529 to the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff). In section 529 of the FD&C Act, Congress
encouraged development of new human drugs and biological products for
prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases by offering
additional incentives for obtaining FDA approval of such products.
Under section 529 of the FD&C Act, the sponsor of an eligible human
drug application submitted 90 days or more after July 9, 2012, for a
rare pediatric disease (as defined in section 529(a)(3)) shall receive
a priority review voucher upon approval of the rare pediatric disease
product application. The recipient of a rare pediatric disease priority
review voucher may either use the voucher for a future human drug
application submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351(a) of the Public Health Service
Act (42 U.S.C. 262(a)), or transfer (including by sale) the voucher to
another party that may then use it for a human drug application
submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act or section
351(a) of the Public Health Service Act. A priority review is a review
conducted with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of 6
months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of
application. Information regarding PDUFA goals is available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm270412.pdf.
The applicant that uses a rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher is entitled to a priority review of its eligible human drug
application, but must pay FDA a rare pediatric disease priority review
user fee in addition to any fee required by PDUFA for the application.
Information regarding the rare pediatric disease priority review
voucher program is available at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm375479.htm.
This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease priority review
fee rate for FY 2016 at $2,727,000 and outlines FDA's procedures for
payment of rare pediatric disease priority review user fees. This rate
is effective on October 1, 2015, and will remain in effect through
September 30, 2016.
II. Rare Pediatric Priority Review User Fee for FY 2016
Under section 529(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the rare
pediatric disease priority review user fee is determined each fiscal
year based on the difference between the average cost incurred by FDA
in the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in
the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by FDA in the
review of a human drug application that is not subject to priority
review in the previous fiscal year. The rare pediatric disease priority
review voucher fee is intended to cover the incremental costs for FDA
to do a priority review on a human drug application that would
otherwise get a standard review. The formula provides the Agency with
the added resources to conduct a priority review while still ensuring a
robust rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program that is
consistent with the Agency's public health goal of encouraging the
development of new human drugs and biological products for rare
pediatric diseases.
A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6
months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of
application. Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed to
reviewing and acting on 90 percent of the applications granted priority
review status within this expedited timeframe. Normally, an application
for a human drug or biological product will qualify for priority review
if the product is intended to treat a serious condition and, if
approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or
effectiveness. An application that does not receive a priority
designation will receive a standard review. Under the PDUFA goals
letter, FDA has committed to reviewing and acting on 90 percent of
standard applications within 10 months of the receipt or filing date
depending on the type of application. A priority review involves a more
intensive level of effort and a higher level of resources than a
standard review.
Section 529 of the FD&C Act specifies that the rare pediatric
disease priority review voucher fee amount must be based on the
difference between the average cost incurred by the Agency in the
review of a human drug application subject to a priority review in the
previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by the Agency in
the review of a human drug application not subject to a priority review
in the previous fiscal year. FDA is setting a fee for FY 2016, which is
to be based on standard cost data from the previous fiscal year, FY
2015. However, the FY 2015 submission cohort has not been closed out
yet, thus the cost data for FY 2015 are not complete. The latest year
for which FDA has complete cost data is FY 2014. Furthermore, because
FDA has never tracked the cost of reviewing applications that get
priority review as a separate cost subset, FDA estimated this cost
based on other data that the Agency has tracked. FDA uses data that the
Agency estimates and publishes on its Web site each year--standard
costs for review. FDA does not publish a standard cost for ``the review
of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous
fiscal year.'' However, we expect all such applications would contain
clinical data. The standard cost application categories with clinical
data that FDA publishes each year are: (1) New drug applications (NDAs)
for a new molecular entity (NME) with clinical data and (2) biologics
license applications (BLAs) with clinical data.
The standard cost worksheets for FY 2014 show standard costs
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) of $5,646,000 for an NME NDA,
and $5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these standard costs, the total cost
to review the 48 applications in these two categories in FY 2014 (30
NME NDAs and 18 BLAs with clinical data) was
[[Page 58264]]
$268,974,000. (Note: These numbers exclude the President's Emergency
Plan for AIDS Relief NDAs; no investigational new drug (IND) review
costs are included in this amount.) Twenty-nine of these applications
(20 NDAs and 9 BLAs) received priority review, which would mean that
the remaining 19 received standard reviews. Because a priority review
compresses a review schedule that ordinarily takes 10 months into 6
months, FDA estimates that a multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided by 6
months) should be applied to non-priority review costs in estimating
the effort and cost of a priority review as compared to a standard
review. This multiplier is consistent with published research on this
subject which supports a priority review multiplier in the range of
1.48 to 2.35 (Ref. 1). The multiplier derived by FDA falls well below
the midpoint of this range. Using FY 2014 figures, the costs of a
priority and standard review are estimated using the following formula:
(29 [alpha] x 1.67) + (19 [alpha]) = $268,974,000
Where ``[alpha]'' is the cost of a standard review and ``[alpha]
times 1.67'' is the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the
cost of a standard review for NME NDAs and BLAs is calculated to be
$3,989,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a
priority review for NME NDAs and BLAs is 1.67 times that amount, or
$6,662,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). The difference
between these two cost estimates, or $2,673,000, represents the
incremental cost of conducting a priority review rather than a standard
review.
For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need to adjust the FY 2014
incremental cost by the average amount by which FDA's average costs
increased in the 3 years prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014 amount
for cost increases in FY 2015. That adjustment, published in the
Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see 80 FR 46028 at 46029), is
2.0266 percent for the most recent year, not compounded. Increasing the
FY 2014 incremental priority review cost of $2,673,000 by 2.0266
percent results in an estimated cost of $2,727,000 (rounded to the
nearest thousand dollars). This is the rare pediatric disease priority
review user fee amount for FY 2016 that must be submitted with a
priority review voucher for a human drug application in FY 2016, in
addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for such an application.
III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016
The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in table 1:
Table 1--Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Schedule for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee category Fee rate for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application submitted with a rare $2,727,000
pediatric disease priority review voucher
in addition to the normal PDUFA Fee.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Implementation of Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review User Fee
Under section 529(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review
user fee is due (i.e. the obligation to pay the fee is incurred) when a
sponsor notifies FDA of its intent to use the voucher. Section
529(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C Act specifies that the application will be
considered incomplete if the priority review user fee and all other
applicable user fees are not paid in accordance with FDA payment
procedures. In addition, section 529(c)(4)(C) specifies that FDA may
not grant a waiver, exemption, reduction, or refund of any fees due and
payable under this section of the FD&C Act. Beginning with FDA's
appropriation for FY 2015, the annual appropriation language states
specifically that priority review user fees authorized by 21 U.S.C.
360n and 360ff (section 529 of the FD&C Act) shall be credited to this
account, to remain available until expended.'' (Pub. L. 113-235,
Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
The rare pediatric disease priority review fee established in the
new fee schedule must be paid for any application that is received on
or after October 1, 2015. In order to comply with this requirement, the
sponsor must contact FDA before providing official notification of its
intent to use the voucher.
FDA will issue an invoice to the sponsor who has incurred a rare
pediatric disease priority review voucher fee when it receives the
sponsor's notification of intent to use the voucher. The invoice will
include instructions on how to pay the fee via wire transfer or check.
As noted in section II, if a sponsor uses a rare pediatric disease
priority review voucher for a human drug application, the sponsor would
incur the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee in
addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for the application. The
sponsor would need to follow FDA's normal procedures for timely payment
of the PDUFA fee for the human drug application.
IV. Reference
The following reference has been placed on display in the Division
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES), and may be seen by interested
person between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
1. Ridley, D. B., H. G. Grabowski, and J. L. Moe, ``Developing Drugs
for Developing Countries,'' Health Affairs, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 313-
324, 2006.
Dated: September 22, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-24508 Filed 9-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P