Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2016, 58262-58264 [2015-24508]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 58262 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices guidance is intended to provide guidance for new drug substances and new drug products during their clinical development and subsequent applications for marketing. DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115 (g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by November 27, 2015. ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993– 0002, or the Office of Communication, Outreach and Development, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993– 0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in processing your requests. The draft guidance may also be obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1–800–835–4709 or 240–402– 8010. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance document. Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding the guidance: Aisar Atrakchi, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bldg. 22, Rm. 4118, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–1036; or Anne Pilaro, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 4025, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–402–8341. Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, International Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7208, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–8377. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In recent years, many important initiatives have been undertaken by regulatory authorities and industry associations to promote international VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Sep 25, 2015 Jkt 235001 harmonization of regulatory requirements. FDA has participated in many meetings designed to enhance harmonization and is committed to seeking scientifically based harmonized technical procedures for pharmaceutical development. One of the goals of harmonization is to identify and then reduce differences in technical requirements for drug development among regulatory agencies. ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for tripartite harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from both regulatory and industry representatives. FDA also seeks input from consumer representatives and others. ICH is concerned with harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of pharmaceutical products among three regions: Europe, Japan, and North America. The eight ICH sponsors are the European Commission; the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries Associations; the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; CDER and CBER, FDA; the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America; Health Canada; and Swissmedic. The ICH Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation of documentation, is provided by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA). The ICH Steering Committee includes representatives from each of the ICH sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World Health Organization. In June 2015, the ICH Steering Committee agreed that the following draft guidance should be made available for public comment: ‘‘M7(R1) Addendum to ICH M7: Assessment and Control of DNA Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Pharmaceuticals to Limit Potential Carcinogenic Risk; Application of the Principles of the ICH M7 Guidance to Calculation of Compound-Specific Acceptable Intakes.’’ The draft guidance is the product of the Expert Working Group of the ICH. Comments about this draft will be considered by FDA and the Expert Working Group. The draft guidance provides guidance on acceptable intake limits derived for some chemicals that are considered to be mutagens and carcinogens and that were selected because they are commonly used in pharmaceutical manufacturing or are useful in illustrating the principles of deriving compound-specific intakes as described in ICH M7. The default method from ICH M7 of linear extrapolation from the PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 cancer potency estimate, TD50, is used as the primary method to derive the acceptable intakes for carcinogens with likely mutagenic mode of action. This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA’s good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. II. Comments Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https:// www.regulations.gov. III. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at https:// www.regulations.gov, https:// www.fda.gov/Drugs/ GuidanceCompliance RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ default.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/ BiologicsBloodVaccines/ GuidanceCompliance RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ default.htm. Dated: September 22, 2015. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015–24510 Filed 9–25–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0007] Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher in Fiscal Year 2016 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is announcing the fee rate for using a rare pediatric disease priority review SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices voucher for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to determine and collect rare pediatric disease priority review user fees for certain applications for review of human drug or biological products when those applications use a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. These vouchers are awarded to the sponsors of certain rare pediatric disease product applications, submitted 90 days or more after July 9, 2012, upon FDA approval of such applications. The amount of the fee for using a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher is determined each FY based on the difference between the average cost incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous FY, and the average cost incurred in the review of an application that is not subject to priority review in the previous FY. This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease priority review fee rate for FY 2016 and outlines the payment procedures for such fees. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE–14202F, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–796–7223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Background Section 908 of FDASIA (Pub. L. 112– 144) added section 529 to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff). In section 529 of the FD&C Act, Congress encouraged development of new human drugs and biological products for prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases by offering additional incentives for obtaining FDA approval of such products. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act, the sponsor of an eligible human drug application submitted 90 days or more after July 9, 2012, for a rare pediatric disease (as defined in section 529(a)(3)) shall receive a priority review voucher upon approval of the rare pediatric disease product application. The recipient of a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher may either use the voucher for a future human drug application submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262(a)), or transfer (including by sale) the voucher to another party that may then use it for a human drug application submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act or section VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Sep 25, 2015 Jkt 235001 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act. A priority review is a review conducted with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of 6 months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of application. Information regarding PDUFA goals is available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ forindustry/userfees/ prescriptiondruguserfee/ ucm270412.pdf. The applicant that uses a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher is entitled to a priority review of its eligible human drug application, but must pay FDA a rare pediatric disease priority review user fee in addition to any fee required by PDUFA for the application. Information regarding the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program is available at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ DevelopmentApprovalProcess/ DevelopmentResources/ ucm375479.htm. This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease priority review fee rate for FY 2016 at $2,727,000 and outlines FDA’s procedures for payment of rare pediatric disease priority review user fees. This rate is effective on October 1, 2015, and will remain in effect through September 30, 2016. II. Rare Pediatric Priority Review User Fee for FY 2016 Under section 529(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the rare pediatric disease priority review user fee is determined each fiscal year based on the difference between the average cost incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by FDA in the review of a human drug application that is not subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year. The rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee is intended to cover the incremental costs for FDA to do a priority review on a human drug application that would otherwise get a standard review. The formula provides the Agency with the added resources to conduct a priority review while still ensuring a robust rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program that is consistent with the Agency’s public health goal of encouraging the development of new human drugs and biological products for rare pediatric diseases. A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6 months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of application. Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed to reviewing and acting on PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58263 90 percent of the applications granted priority review status within this expedited timeframe. Normally, an application for a human drug or biological product will qualify for priority review if the product is intended to treat a serious condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. An application that does not receive a priority designation will receive a standard review. Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed to reviewing and acting on 90 percent of standard applications within 10 months of the receipt or filing date depending on the type of application. A priority review involves a more intensive level of effort and a higher level of resources than a standard review. Section 529 of the FD&C Act specifies that the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee amount must be based on the difference between the average cost incurred by the Agency in the review of a human drug application subject to a priority review in the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by the Agency in the review of a human drug application not subject to a priority review in the previous fiscal year. FDA is setting a fee for FY 2016, which is to be based on standard cost data from the previous fiscal year, FY 2015. However, the FY 2015 submission cohort has not been closed out yet, thus the cost data for FY 2015 are not complete. The latest year for which FDA has complete cost data is FY 2014. Furthermore, because FDA has never tracked the cost of reviewing applications that get priority review as a separate cost subset, FDA estimated this cost based on other data that the Agency has tracked. FDA uses data that the Agency estimates and publishes on its Web site each year—standard costs for review. FDA does not publish a standard cost for ‘‘the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous fiscal year.’’ However, we expect all such applications would contain clinical data. The standard cost application categories with clinical data that FDA publishes each year are: (1) New drug applications (NDAs) for a new molecular entity (NME) with clinical data and (2) biologics license applications (BLAs) with clinical data. The standard cost worksheets for FY 2014 show standard costs (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) of $5,646,000 for an NME NDA, and $5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these standard costs, the total cost to review the 48 applications in these two categories in FY 2014 (30 NME NDAs and 18 BLAs with clinical data) was E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1 58264 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 187 / Monday, September 28, 2015 / Notices $268,974,000. (Note: These numbers exclude the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief NDAs; no investigational new drug (IND) review costs are included in this amount.) Twenty-nine of these applications (20 NDAs and 9 BLAs) received priority review, which would mean that the remaining 19 received standard reviews. Because a priority review compresses a review schedule that ordinarily takes 10 months into 6 months, FDA estimates that a multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided by 6 months) should be applied to non-priority review costs in estimating the effort and cost of a priority review as compared to a standard review. This multiplier is consistent with published research on this subject which supports a priority review multiplier in the range of 1.48 to 2.35 (Ref. 1). The multiplier derived by FDA falls well below the midpoint of this range. Using FY 2014 figures, the costs of a priority and standard review are estimated using the following formula: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES (29 a × 1.67) + (19 a) = $268,974,000 Where ‘‘a’’ is the cost of a standard review and ‘‘a times 1.67’’ is the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the cost of a standard review for NME NDAs and BLAs is calculated to be $3,989,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a priority review for NME NDAs and BLAs is 1.67 times that amount, or $6,662,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). The difference between these two cost estimates, or $2,673,000, represents the incremental cost of conducting a priority review rather than a standard review. For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need to adjust the FY 2014 incremental cost by the average amount by which FDA’s average costs increased in the 3 years prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014 amount for cost increases in FY 2015. That adjustment, published in the Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see 80 FR 46028 at 46029), is 2.0266 percent for the most recent year, not compounded. Increasing the FY 2014 incremental priority review cost of $2,673,000 by 2.0266 percent results in an estimated cost of $2,727,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). This is the rare pediatric disease priority review user fee amount for FY 2016 that must be submitted with a priority review voucher for a human drug application in FY 2016, in addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for such an application. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:19 Sep 25, 2015 Jkt 235001 III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016 The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in table 1: FDA’s normal procedures for timely payment of the PDUFA fee for the human drug application. IV. Reference TABLE 1—RARE PEDIATRIC DISEASE The following reference has been PRIORITY REVIEW SCHEDULE FOR placed on display in the Division of FY 2016 Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES), Fee category Fee rate for FY 2016 Application submitted with a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher in addition to the normal PDUFA Fee. $2,727,000 IV. Implementation of Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review User Fee Under section 529(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review user fee is due (i.e. the obligation to pay the fee is incurred) when a sponsor notifies FDA of its intent to use the voucher. Section 529(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C Act specifies that the application will be considered incomplete if the priority review user fee and all other applicable user fees are not paid in accordance with FDA payment procedures. In addition, section 529(c)(4)(C) specifies that FDA may not grant a waiver, exemption, reduction, or refund of any fees due and payable under this section of the FD&C Act. Beginning with FDA’s appropriation for FY 2015, the annual appropriation language states specifically that priority review user fees authorized by 21 U.S.C. 360n and 360ff (section 529 of the FD&C Act) shall be credited to this account, to remain available until expended.’’ (Pub. L. 113–235, Section 5, Division A, Title VI). The rare pediatric disease priority review fee established in the new fee schedule must be paid for any application that is received on or after October 1, 2015. In order to comply with this requirement, the sponsor must contact FDA before providing official notification of its intent to use the voucher. FDA will issue an invoice to the sponsor who has incurred a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee when it receives the sponsor’s notification of intent to use the voucher. The invoice will include instructions on how to pay the fee via wire transfer or check. As noted in section II, if a sponsor uses a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher for a human drug application, the sponsor would incur the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee in addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for the application. The sponsor would need to follow PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and may be seen by interested person between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. 1. Ridley, D. B., H. G. Grabowski, and J. L. Moe, ‘‘Developing Drugs for Developing Countries,’’ Health Affairs, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 313–324, 2006. Dated: September 22, 2015. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2015–24508 Filed 9–25–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; Notice of Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD. The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIDCD. Date: October 26–27, 2015. Closed: October 26, 2015, 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators. E:\FR\FM\28SEN1.SGM 28SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 187 (Monday, September 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58262-58264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0007]


Fee for Using a Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Voucher in 
Fiscal Year 2016

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is 
announcing the fee rate for using a rare pediatric disease priority 
review

[[Page 58263]]

voucher for fiscal year (FY) 2016. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (the FD&C Act), as amended by the Food and Drug Administration 
Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA), authorizes FDA to determine and 
collect rare pediatric disease priority review user fees for certain 
applications for review of human drug or biological products when those 
applications use a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. 
These vouchers are awarded to the sponsors of certain rare pediatric 
disease product applications, submitted 90 days or more after July 9, 
2012, upon FDA approval of such applications. The amount of the fee for 
using a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher is determined 
each FY based on the difference between the average cost incurred by 
FDA in the review of a human drug application subject to priority 
review in the previous FY, and the average cost incurred in the review 
of an application that is not subject to priority review in the 
previous FY. This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease 
priority review fee rate for FY 2016 and outlines the payment 
procedures for such fees.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Marcarelli, Office of 
Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville 
Rd., COLE-14202F, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 908 of FDASIA (Pub. L. 112-144) added section 529 to the 
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff). In section 529 of the FD&C Act, Congress 
encouraged development of new human drugs and biological products for 
prevention and treatment of certain rare pediatric diseases by offering 
additional incentives for obtaining FDA approval of such products. 
Under section 529 of the FD&C Act, the sponsor of an eligible human 
drug application submitted 90 days or more after July 9, 2012, for a 
rare pediatric disease (as defined in section 529(a)(3)) shall receive 
a priority review voucher upon approval of the rare pediatric disease 
product application. The recipient of a rare pediatric disease priority 
review voucher may either use the voucher for a future human drug 
application submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act 
(21 U.S.C. 355(b)(1)) or section 351(a) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 262(a)), or transfer (including by sale) the voucher to 
another party that may then use it for a human drug application 
submitted to FDA under section 505(b)(1) of the FD&C Act or section 
351(a) of the Public Health Service Act. A priority review is a review 
conducted with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of 6 
months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of 
application. Information regarding PDUFA goals is available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/forindustry/userfees/prescriptiondruguserfee/ucm270412.pdf.
    The applicant that uses a rare pediatric disease priority review 
voucher is entitled to a priority review of its eligible human drug 
application, but must pay FDA a rare pediatric disease priority review 
user fee in addition to any fee required by PDUFA for the application. 
Information regarding the rare pediatric disease priority review 
voucher program is available at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DevelopmentResources/ucm375479.htm.
    This notice establishes the rare pediatric disease priority review 
fee rate for FY 2016 at $2,727,000 and outlines FDA's procedures for 
payment of rare pediatric disease priority review user fees. This rate 
is effective on October 1, 2015, and will remain in effect through 
September 30, 2016.

II. Rare Pediatric Priority Review User Fee for FY 2016

    Under section 529(c)(2) of the FD&C Act, the amount of the rare 
pediatric disease priority review user fee is determined each fiscal 
year based on the difference between the average cost incurred by FDA 
in the review of a human drug application subject to priority review in 
the previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by FDA in the 
review of a human drug application that is not subject to priority 
review in the previous fiscal year. The rare pediatric disease priority 
review voucher fee is intended to cover the incremental costs for FDA 
to do a priority review on a human drug application that would 
otherwise get a standard review. The formula provides the Agency with 
the added resources to conduct a priority review while still ensuring a 
robust rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program that is 
consistent with the Agency's public health goal of encouraging the 
development of new human drugs and biological products for rare 
pediatric diseases.
    A priority review is a review conducted with a PDUFA goal date of 6 
months after the receipt or filing date, depending on the type of 
application. Under the PDUFA goals letter, FDA has committed to 
reviewing and acting on 90 percent of the applications granted priority 
review status within this expedited timeframe. Normally, an application 
for a human drug or biological product will qualify for priority review 
if the product is intended to treat a serious condition and, if 
approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or 
effectiveness. An application that does not receive a priority 
designation will receive a standard review. Under the PDUFA goals 
letter, FDA has committed to reviewing and acting on 90 percent of 
standard applications within 10 months of the receipt or filing date 
depending on the type of application. A priority review involves a more 
intensive level of effort and a higher level of resources than a 
standard review.
    Section 529 of the FD&C Act specifies that the rare pediatric 
disease priority review voucher fee amount must be based on the 
difference between the average cost incurred by the Agency in the 
review of a human drug application subject to a priority review in the 
previous fiscal year, and the average cost incurred by the Agency in 
the review of a human drug application not subject to a priority review 
in the previous fiscal year. FDA is setting a fee for FY 2016, which is 
to be based on standard cost data from the previous fiscal year, FY 
2015. However, the FY 2015 submission cohort has not been closed out 
yet, thus the cost data for FY 2015 are not complete. The latest year 
for which FDA has complete cost data is FY 2014. Furthermore, because 
FDA has never tracked the cost of reviewing applications that get 
priority review as a separate cost subset, FDA estimated this cost 
based on other data that the Agency has tracked. FDA uses data that the 
Agency estimates and publishes on its Web site each year--standard 
costs for review. FDA does not publish a standard cost for ``the review 
of a human drug application subject to priority review in the previous 
fiscal year.'' However, we expect all such applications would contain 
clinical data. The standard cost application categories with clinical 
data that FDA publishes each year are: (1) New drug applications (NDAs) 
for a new molecular entity (NME) with clinical data and (2) biologics 
license applications (BLAs) with clinical data.
    The standard cost worksheets for FY 2014 show standard costs 
(rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) of $5,646,000 for an NME NDA, 
and $5,533,000 for a BLA. Based on these standard costs, the total cost 
to review the 48 applications in these two categories in FY 2014 (30 
NME NDAs and 18 BLAs with clinical data) was

[[Page 58264]]

$268,974,000. (Note: These numbers exclude the President's Emergency 
Plan for AIDS Relief NDAs; no investigational new drug (IND) review 
costs are included in this amount.) Twenty-nine of these applications 
(20 NDAs and 9 BLAs) received priority review, which would mean that 
the remaining 19 received standard reviews. Because a priority review 
compresses a review schedule that ordinarily takes 10 months into 6 
months, FDA estimates that a multiplier of 1.67 (10 months divided by 6 
months) should be applied to non-priority review costs in estimating 
the effort and cost of a priority review as compared to a standard 
review. This multiplier is consistent with published research on this 
subject which supports a priority review multiplier in the range of 
1.48 to 2.35 (Ref. 1). The multiplier derived by FDA falls well below 
the midpoint of this range. Using FY 2014 figures, the costs of a 
priority and standard review are estimated using the following formula:

(29 [alpha] x 1.67) + (19 [alpha]) = $268,974,000

    Where ``[alpha]'' is the cost of a standard review and ``[alpha] 
times 1.67'' is the cost of a priority review. Using this formula, the 
cost of a standard review for NME NDAs and BLAs is calculated to be 
$3,989,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars) and the cost of a 
priority review for NME NDAs and BLAs is 1.67 times that amount, or 
$6,662,000 (rounded to the nearest thousand dollars). The difference 
between these two cost estimates, or $2,673,000, represents the 
incremental cost of conducting a priority review rather than a standard 
review.
    For the FY 2016 fee, FDA will need to adjust the FY 2014 
incremental cost by the average amount by which FDA's average costs 
increased in the 3 years prior to FY 2015, to adjust the FY 2014 amount 
for cost increases in FY 2015. That adjustment, published in the 
Federal Register on August 3, 2015 (see 80 FR 46028 at 46029), is 
2.0266 percent for the most recent year, not compounded. Increasing the 
FY 2014 incremental priority review cost of $2,673,000 by 2.0266 
percent results in an estimated cost of $2,727,000 (rounded to the 
nearest thousand dollars). This is the rare pediatric disease priority 
review user fee amount for FY 2016 that must be submitted with a 
priority review voucher for a human drug application in FY 2016, in 
addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for such an application.

III. Fee Schedule for FY 2016

    The fee rate for FY 2016 is set out in table 1:

  Table 1--Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review Schedule for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Fee category                     Fee rate for FY 2016
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application submitted with a rare           $2,727,000
 pediatric disease priority review voucher
 in addition to the normal PDUFA Fee.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Implementation of Rare Pediatric Disease Priority Review User Fee

    Under section 529(c)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, the priority review 
user fee is due (i.e. the obligation to pay the fee is incurred) when a 
sponsor notifies FDA of its intent to use the voucher. Section 
529(c)(4)(B) of the FD&C Act specifies that the application will be 
considered incomplete if the priority review user fee and all other 
applicable user fees are not paid in accordance with FDA payment 
procedures. In addition, section 529(c)(4)(C) specifies that FDA may 
not grant a waiver, exemption, reduction, or refund of any fees due and 
payable under this section of the FD&C Act. Beginning with FDA's 
appropriation for FY 2015, the annual appropriation language states 
specifically that priority review user fees authorized by 21 U.S.C. 
360n and 360ff (section 529 of the FD&C Act) shall be credited to this 
account, to remain available until expended.'' (Pub. L. 113-235, 
Section 5, Division A, Title VI).
    The rare pediatric disease priority review fee established in the 
new fee schedule must be paid for any application that is received on 
or after October 1, 2015. In order to comply with this requirement, the 
sponsor must contact FDA before providing official notification of its 
intent to use the voucher.
    FDA will issue an invoice to the sponsor who has incurred a rare 
pediatric disease priority review voucher fee when it receives the 
sponsor's notification of intent to use the voucher. The invoice will 
include instructions on how to pay the fee via wire transfer or check.
    As noted in section II, if a sponsor uses a rare pediatric disease 
priority review voucher for a human drug application, the sponsor would 
incur the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fee in 
addition to any PDUFA fee that is required for the application. The 
sponsor would need to follow FDA's normal procedures for timely payment 
of the PDUFA fee for the human drug application.

IV. Reference

    The following reference has been placed on display in the Division 
of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES), and may be seen by interested 
person between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

1. Ridley, D. B., H. G. Grabowski, and J. L. Moe, ``Developing Drugs 
for Developing Countries,'' Health Affairs, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 313-
324, 2006.

    Dated: September 22, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-24508 Filed 9-25-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.