Designation for Planning Purposes; California; PM10; Technical Amendment, 57100-57101 [2015-24049]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
57100
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
J. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Dated: August 25, 2015.
Raymond Negron,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2015–24041 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
K. Indian Tribal Governments
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0608; FRL–9934–51–
Region 9]
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
Designation for Planning Purposes;
California; PM10; Technical
Amendment
L. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
M. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
N. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and is
therefore categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination will be prepared and
submitted after publication, and will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:50 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 165.T09–0835 Safety Zone; Dredging,
Rouge River, Detroit, MI.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All U.S. waters
of the Rouge River, Detroit, MI from the
West Jefferson Avenue Bridge at
42°16.85′ N., 083°07.72′ W., proceeding
East approximately 400-yards to a point
mid-river at 42°16.80′ N., 083°07.47′ W.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective without actual notice from
September 22, 2015 until 11:59 p.m. on
September 24, 2015. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from 10 a.m. on August 25, 2015, until
September 22, 2015.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Detroit (COTP), via Sector Detroit
Command Center or his on-scene
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP, via the
Command Center or his on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the COTP is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
or a Federal, State, or local law
enforcement officer designated by or
assisting the COTP to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators must contact the
COTP via the Command Center to
obtain permission to enter or operate
within the safety zone. The COTP may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16 or at
313—568–9560. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP,
via the Sector Command Center or his
on-scene representative.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making a technical
amendment to the Code of Federal
Regulations to restore the inadvertent
deletion of the entry for ‘‘Rest of State’’
from the table listing California air
quality planning area designations for
particulate matter of ten microns of less
(PM10).
DATES: This technical amendment is
effective on September 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
19, 2013, the EPA published a direct
final rule amending 40 CFR 81.305 to
clarify the description of the Imperial
Valley planning area, an area designated
nonattainment for the National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for
particulate matter of ten microns of less
(PM10) (78 FR 16792). In our March 19,
2013 direct final rule, we amended the
entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning
area’’ but did not intend to amend any
other entry in the table listing PM10 air
quality planning area designations for
the State of California. We believe,
however, that the entry appearing
directly after the entry for ‘‘Imperial
Valley planning area’’ in the
‘‘California-PM–10’’ table and reading
‘‘Rest of State; 11/15/90; Unclassifiable’’
was deleted inadvertently when the
entry for ‘‘Imperial Valley planning
area’’ was amended. For example, see
and compare the ‘‘California-PM–10’’
table within the July 1, 2012 version to
the July 1, 2013 version of 40 CFR
81.305.
Consequently, the EPA is publishing
this technical amendment to restore the
‘‘Rest of State’’ designation entry within
2. Add § 165.T09–0835 to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
57101
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the 40 CFR 81.305 ‘‘California-PM–10’’
table as it appeared prior to our March
19, 2013 direct final action.
Dated: September 9, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Part 81, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 81.305 is amended in the
table for ‘‘California—PM–10’’ by
adding an entry for ‘‘Rest of State’’ at the
end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 81.305
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
*
*
California.
*
*
*
1. The authority citation for Part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
CALIFORNIA—PM–10
Designation
Classification
Designated Area
Date
*
*
*
Rest of State ...........................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–24049 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Part 102–117
[FMR Case 2014–102–2; Docket 2014–0015;
Sequence 1]
RIN 3090–AJ45
Federal Management Regulation
(FMR); Transportation Management;
Transportation Reporting
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
GSA is amending the Federal
Management Regulation (FMR) to
recommend that agencies annually
submit to GSA their prior fiscal year
transaction level transportation data for
freight and cargo, including household
goods (HHG), procured either through
contract or tender, as well as their
transportation management information.
The request for transaction level data
and transportation management
information is a change from the Notice
of the Proposed Rulemaking’s
recommendation that agencies annually
submit to GSA a summary of their
transportation activities.
Specifically, this rule recommends
that agencies report transaction level
transportation data for freight and cargo,
including HHG, such as shipments by
procurement method, spending,
transportation service providers (TSP),
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:50 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Type
*
11/15/90
*
Unclassifiable.
and shipping profiles. This rule also
recommends that agencies report their
transportation management information,
such as environmental justice
information, agency points of contact,
and transportation officer warrant
information and training data.
This rule will provide GSA the data
necessary for analysis, which will assist
GSA in developing enhanced
Governmentwide transportation policies
to make transportation management
programs more efficient, cost-effective,
and sustainable.
DATES: Effective: September 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Ms. Lois
Mandell, Office of Government-wide
Policy, at (202) 501–2735 or by email at
lois.mandell@gsa.gov. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat at 202–501–4755. Please cite
FMR Case 2014–102–2.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In almost every purchase of supplies
and equipment from vendors, something
must be moved and delivered. Since the
early 1860s, the Federal Government
has procured transportation using either
a contract or a tender of service (also
called a rate tender). There are Federal
transportation laws and regulations that
govern each of the five modes of
transportation (air, water, pipeline, rail,
and ground). Each mode has advantages
and disadvantages that should be
evaluated for cost, sustainability, speed
of delivery, etc. The expense of moving
this freight or cargo, including HHG, can
be managed by the agency, consolidated
as a shared service across agencies, or
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Date
Sfmt 4700
*
Type
*
the TSP, depending upon the contract or
tender of service terms.
Over the last several years, GSA has
worked with the Governmentwide
Transportation Policy Council (GTPC) to
identify key transportation performance
measures, data elements, and collection
standards necessary for more informed
decision-making. The GTPC is
composed of representatives from
civilian agencies and the Department of
Defense, and provides guidance in the
planning and development of uniform
transportation policies and procedures.
Best in class organizations exhibit a
consistent set of behaviors to identify
and implement improved processes that
maximize the efficiency, cost
effectiveness, and sustainability of their
transportation operations. Organizations
seeking continuous improvement
monitor, measure, and compare their
performance against other organizations
to improve return on investments,
generate greater savings, enhance
supply chain, and improve
sustainability. The GTPC supports data
collection as a necessary first step to
improve transportation management.
In 2009, GSA contracted for a
Governmentwide transportation
management study. The study
concluded that ‘‘most agencies have no
single point of accountability for
outbound transportation, have limited
transparency into actual expenditures,
and usually do not identify the most
appropriate procurement method.’’ The
study also identified inadequate
research into the acquisition and
selection of a TSP, and a lack of
standard training, expertise, and
operational approaches to transportation
management. A 2012 GSA study
E:\FR\FM\22SER1.SGM
22SER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57100-57101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24049]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0608; FRL-9934-51-Region 9]
Designation for Planning Purposes; California; PM10; Technical
Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making a
technical amendment to the Code of Federal Regulations to restore the
inadvertent deletion of the entry for ``Rest of State'' from the table
listing California air quality planning area designations for
particulate matter of ten microns of less (PM10).
DATES: This technical amendment is effective on September 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Wamsley, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4111, wamsley.jerry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 19, 2013, the EPA published a
direct final rule amending 40 CFR 81.305 to clarify the description of
the Imperial Valley planning area, an area designated nonattainment for
the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for particulate
matter of ten microns of less (PM10) (78 FR 16792). In our
March 19, 2013 direct final rule, we amended the entry for ``Imperial
Valley planning area'' but did not intend to amend any other entry in
the table listing PM10 air quality planning area
designations for the State of California. We believe, however, that the
entry appearing directly after the entry for ``Imperial Valley planning
area'' in the ``California-PM-10'' table and reading ``Rest of State;
11/15/90; Unclassifiable'' was deleted inadvertently when the entry for
``Imperial Valley planning area'' was amended. For example, see and
compare the ``California-PM-10'' table within the July 1, 2012 version
to the July 1, 2013 version of 40 CFR 81.305.
Consequently, the EPA is publishing this technical amendment to
restore the ``Rest of State'' designation entry within
[[Page 57101]]
the 40 CFR 81.305 ``California-PM-10'' table as it appeared prior to
our March 19, 2013 direct final action.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: September 9, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 81, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
1. The authority citation for Part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 81.305 is amended in the table for ``California--PM-10'' by
adding an entry for ``Rest of State'' at the end of the table to read
as follows:
Sec. 81.305 California.
* * * * *
California--PM-10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated Area -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Rest of State......................... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-24049 Filed 9-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
