Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications, 57106-57121 [2015-23669]
Download as PDF
57106
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 183
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 73
[NRC–2011–0015; NRC–2011–0018]
RIN 3150–AI49
Enhanced Weapons, Firearms
Background Checks, and Security
Event Notifications
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Supplemental proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its regulations that would
implement its authority under Section
161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
as amended (AEA), to permit NRC
licensees and certificate holders to
apply for preemption authority and
enhanced weapons authority, and
conduct associated firearms background
checks. The NRC proposed new
regulations on February 3, 2011, that
would implement its authority under
Section 161A. On January 10, 2013, the
NRC proposed to further revise the
regulations to include at-reactor
independent spent fuel storage
installations (ISFSI) as a class of
designated facilities. The NRC is now
proposing to further revise the proposed
rule language that addresses the
voluntary application for enhanced
weapons authority, preemption
authority, and the mandatory firearms
background checks under Section 161A.
DATES: Submit comments on the
supplemental proposed rule and draft
regulatory guide by December 7, 2015.
Also submit comments specific to the
information collection aspects of this
supplemental proposed rule by
December 7, 2015. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
You may submit comments
on the supplemental proposed rule by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0018. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Email comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive an automatic email reply
confirming receipt, then contact us at
301–415–1677.
• Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301–
415–1101.
• Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
• Hand deliver comments to: 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m.
(Eastern Time) Federal workdays;
telephone: 301–415–1677.
See Section XI, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act,’’ of this document for
direction on submitting comments on
the information collection aspects of
this supplemental proposed rule. See
Section XIV, ‘‘Availability of
Guidance,’’ of this document for
direction on submitting comments on
the draft regulatory guide.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Margaret S. Ellenson, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301–
415–0894; email: Margaret.Ellenson@
nrc.gov; Philip G. Brochman, Office of
Nuclear Security and Incident
Response, telephone: 301–287–3691;
email: Phil.Brochman@nrc.gov; U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting
Comments.
A. Obtaining Information.
B. Submitting Comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Background.
III. Discussion.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis.
V. Cumulative Effects of Regulation.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Certification.
VII. Regulatory Analysis.
VIII. Backfitting and Issue Finality.
IX. Plain Writing.
X. Environmental Assessment and Proposed
Finding of No Significant Environmental
Impact.
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act.
XII. Criminal Penalties.
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards.
XIV. Availability of Guidance.
XV. Availability of Documents.
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2011–
0018 or Docket ID NRC–2011–0015
when contacting the NRC about the
availability of information for this
supplemental proposed rule or the draft
regulatory guide, respectively. You may
obtain publicly-available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0018 for the
supplemental proposed rule and Docket
ID NRC–2011–0015 for the revised draft
regulatory guide.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
it is mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. In addition, for the
convenience of the reader, instructions
about obtaining materials related to this
rulemaking are provided in Section XV,
‘‘Availability of Documents,’’ of this
document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
B. Submitting Comments
Please include the appropriate NRC
Docket ID NRC–2011–0018
(supplemental proposed rule) or NRC–
2011–0015 (draft regulatory guide) in
your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS,
and the NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment submissions into
ADAMS.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background
A. Section 161A of the AEA
On August 8, 2005, President Bush
signed into law the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (EPAct), Public Law 109–58, 119
Stat. 594 (2005). Section 653 of the
EPAct amended the AEA by adding
Section 161A, ‘‘Use of Firearms by
Security Personnel’’ (42 U.S.C. 2201a).
Section 161A of the AEA provides the
NRC with authority to permit a
licensee’s or certificate holder’s security
personnel to transfer, receive, possess,
transport, import, and use weapons,
devices, ammunition, or other firearms,
notwithstanding State, local, and certain
Federal firearms laws (and
implementing regulations) that may
prohibit or restrict these actions
(preemption authority). Additionally,
Section 161A authorized the
Commission to permit the security
personnel of licensees and certificate
holders to obtain enhanced weapons,
such as machine guns, short-barreled
shotguns, and short-barreled rifles
(enhanced weapons).
Section 161A requires the
Commission to designate the classes of
facilities, radioactive material, and other
property eligible to apply for
preemption authority or enhanced
weapon authority. Section 161A also
mandates that all security personnel
that receive, possess, transport, import,
or use a weapon, ammunition, or a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
device otherwise prohibited by State,
local, or certain Federal laws, including
regulations, as provided by Section
161A.b. (42 U.S.C. 2201a(b)), shall be
subject to a fingerprint-based
background check by the U.S. Attorney
General and a firearms background
check against the Federal Bureau of
Investigation’s (FBI) National Instant
Criminal Background Check System
(NICS).
B. The Firearms Guidelines—
Implementation of Section 161A of the
AEA
Section 161A.d. of the AEA provides
that the Commission shall, with the
approval of the Attorney General,
develop and promulgate guidelines for
the implementation of this statute. On
September 11, 2009, the NRC, with the
approval of the Attorney General,
published Firearms Guidelines in the
Federal Register (74 FR 46800). These
guidelines allow NRC licensees and
certificate holders to apply for
preemption authority only (hereafter
referred to as stand-alone preemption
authority) or combined preemption and
enhanced weapons authority (hereafter
referred to as enhanced weapons
authority). The statute also includes
provisions for firearms background
checks for those who apply for Section
161A authorities (stand-alone
preemption authority or enhanced
weapons authority).
The Firearms Guidelines permit the
NRC to designate applicable classes of
facilities and to approve application for
Section 161A authority via both orders
and regulations. Following publication
of the Firearms Guidelines, the NRC
received requests from several licensees
to obtain stand-alone preemption
authority via order (i.e., prior to the
NRC’s issuance of the final enhanced
weapons rule). During its review of
these licensee requests, the NRC staff
identified implementation issues related
to the firearms background checks for
these licensees. The NRC staff and the
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) staff
developed a revision to the Firearms
Guidelines to address these issues. The
principal change in the revised Firearms
Guidelines was to limit the scope of the
firearms background check requirement
to only those licensees that apply to the
NRC for Section 161A authority. The
NRC, with the approval of the Attorney
General, published the revised Firearms
Guidelines in the Federal Register (79
FR 36100; June 25, 2014). Both the 2009
Firearms Guidelines and the 2014
Firearms Guidelines are available at
https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID NRC–2008–0465.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57107
C. October 2006 Proposed Rule
In parallel with the development of
the 2009 Firearms Guidelines, the NRC
initiated a rulemaking that would
implement the new authorities and
provisions in Section 161A of the AEA.
On October 26, 2006, the NRC
published proposed regulations in the
Federal Register (71 FR 62664, ‘‘Power
Reactor Security Requirements’’) to
implement the provisions of Section
161A as one component of a larger
proposed amendment to its regulations
under parts 50, 72, and 73 of Title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR). These proposed implementing
regulations were consistent to the extent
possible with discussions between the
NRC and the DOJ on the
implementation of the statute.
The NRC had proposed that the
provisions of Section 161A would apply
only to power reactor facilities
including both operating and
decommissioning power reactors and
Category I Strategic Special Nuclear
Material (Cat. I SSNM) facilities (i.e.,
facilities possessing or using formula
quantities or greater of strategic special
nuclear material). This structure was
proposed to permit these two highestrisk classes of licensed facilities to
apply to the NRC for Section 161A
authority. The NRC had also indicated
that it would consider making Section
161A authority available to additional
classes of facilities, radioactive material,
or other property (including ISFSIs) in
a separate, future rulemaking.
D. February 2011 Proposed Rule
On February 3, 2011, the NRC
published in the Federal Register a new
proposed rule, ‘‘Enhanced Weapons,
Firearms Background Checks and
Security Event Notifications’’ (76 FR
6200), referred to as the Enhanced
Weapons rulemaking, that reflected the
approved 2009 Firearms Guidelines.
The 2011 proposed rule would
implement the provisions of Section
161A and would make several changes
to the security event notification
requirements in 10 CFR part 73 to
address imminent attacks or threats
against power reactors as well as
suspicious events that could be
indicative of potential preoperational
reconnaissance, surveillance, or
challenges to security systems by
adversaries. The public was provided
180 days to review and comment on the
February 2011 proposed rule and
associated guidance.
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
57108
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
E. Preemption Designation Orders and
Confirmatory Orders
Subsequent to the publication of the
2011 proposed rule, the NRC received
requests from 10 licensees (located on 8
separate sites) to obtain stand-alone
preemption authority. In response to the
requests, the NRC issued designation
order EA–13–092 (78 FR 35984) on June
14, 2013. Order EA–13–092 designated
the 10 licensees as part of an interim
class of licensed facilities eligible to
apply for stand-alone preemption
authority under Section 161A of the
AEA, contained direction related to
completing firearms background checks
for security personnel whose official
duties require access to covered
weapons, and contained direction for
the licensees on submitting applications
and supporting information to obtain
preemption authority via a confirmatory
order. Subsequent to the NRC’s issuance
of Order EA–13–092, two licensees
(located at the same site) withdrew their
applications for Section 161A
preemption authority. The NRC staff is
currently reviewing the remaining
applications for preemption authority.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
F. January 2013 Supplemental Proposed
Rule
On January 10, 2013, the NRC
published a supplemental proposed rule
(78 FR 2214) to add at-reactor ISFSIs as
a class of designated facilities under
§ 73.18(c) that would be eligible to
apply for Section 161A authority.
Including at-reactor ISFSIs in the
proposed rulemaking would ensure a
consistent transition from the orders to
the final implementing regulations for
reactor licensees and any ISFSIs colocated at the reactor site. When a
reactor facility and an ISFSI share a
common security guard force, as is the
case for at-reactor ISFSIs, the NRC staff
recognizes that it may be expedient for
both facilities at the site to have standalone preemption authority if the
licensee or certificate holder applies for
it and is approved. In the supplemental
proposed rule, the NRC indicated that
other classes of facilities and activities
(e.g., away-from-reactor ISFSIs and
transportation of spent nuclear fuel)
would be addressed in a separate, future
rulemaking (as originally discussed in
the October 2006 proposed rule). The
public was provided 45 days to review
and comment on the January 2013
supplemental proposed rule.
III. Discussion
Section 161A of the AEA provides the
NRC with the authority to permit a
licensee or certificate holder’s security
personnel to transfer, receive, possess,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
transport, import, and use, weapons,
devices, ammunition or other firearms
notwithstanding State, local, and certain
Federal firearms laws (and any
implementing regulations) that may
prohibit or restrict these actions. The
arsenal of weapons includes, for
example, machine guns, semi-automatic
assault weapons, and large-capacity
ammunition feeding devices (i.e.,
magazines). As indicated in the
February 2011 proposed rule, an NRC
licensee or certificate holder interested
in obtaining Section 161A authority
(either combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority or
stand-alone preemption authority) may
voluntarily apply to the NRC to take
advantage of this new authority. For the
purposes of the proposed Enhanced
Weapons rulemaking, the term
‘‘certificate holder’’ refers only to
entitles holding a 10 CFR part 76
certificate of compliance, not to entities
holding a 10 CFR part 72 certificate of
compliance. However, the NRC notes
that there are currently no existing 10
CFR part 76 certificate holders because
on February 2, 2015, the NRC
terminated the 10 CFR part 76 certificate
of compliance for the United States
Enrichment Corporation’s Paducah
Gaseous Diffusion Plant (ADAMS
Package Accession No. ML14318A331).
While there are no existing 10 CFR part
76 certificate holders, the NRC is
proposing to include such holders in
this supplemental proposed rule so that
the scope of the Firearms Guidelines
and the NRC’s corresponding
implementing regulations continue to be
consistent.
Licensees and certificate holders
falling within the Commissiondesignated classes of facilities,
radioactive material, or other property
would be eligible to apply for Section
161A authority and would be required
to complete the firearms background
check requirements mandated by
Section 161A and the Firearms
Guidelines. The background checks
would be required for security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons.
The 2009 Firearms Guidelines
provided that the security personnel for
all licensees and certificate holders that
fall within the designated eligible
classes of facilities must undergo
firearms background checks, whether or
not a particular licensee or certificate
holder intends to seek preemption
authority. However, under the revised
2014 Firearms Guidelines, the
requirement for background checks
would apply to only those licensees and
certificate holders who apply for
Section 161A authority. Other changes
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to the Firearms Guidelines included the
removal of the definition of ‘‘standard
weapon’’ and the removal of references
to standard weapons in the definitions
of ‘‘covered weapon’’ and ‘‘enhanced
weapon.’’ There were also minor
conforming and clarifying editorial
changes throughout the revised 2014
Firearms Guidelines.
In the February 2011 proposed rule
that would implement the NRC’s
authority under Section 161A of the
AEA, the NRC proposed amendments to
10 CFR part 73 by adding new
definitions, processes for obtaining
enhanced weapons, requirements for
firearms background checks, and
security event notification requirements
for stolen or lost enhanced weapons.
This supplemental proposed rule
continues the proposed changes from
the February 2011 proposed rule and
the January 2013 supplemental
proposed rule and supplements or
modifies the following existing or
proposed regulations in 10 CFR part 73:
• Section 73.2, ‘‘Definitions.’’
• Proposed § 73.18, ‘‘Authorization
for use of enhanced weapons and
preemption of firearms laws.’’
• Proposed § 73.19, ‘‘Firearms
background checks for armed security
personnel.’’
• Section 73.51, ‘‘Requirements for
the physical protection of stored spent
nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive
waste.’’
This supplemental proposed rule
would make the following changes to
the proposed requirements of 10 CFR
part 73:
• Require firearms background checks
only for those licensees and certificate
holders who have applied for Section
161A authority and only for security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons.
• Require periodic firearms
background checks at least once every 5
years. Previously the maximum
periodicity was proposed to be at least
once every 3 years. However, licensees
and certificate holders would continue
to be able to conduct periodic firearms
background checks at a periodicity of
less than every 5 years, at their
discretion.
• Conform the process for conducting
firearms background checks and
applying for preemption authority to the
updated requirements specified in the
revised 2014 Firearms Guidelines (e.g.,
removal of the proposed 30-day and
180-day milestones in conducting
firearms background checks).
• Remove the definition of ‘‘standard
weapon’’ and remove the references to
standard weapon from the definitions of
‘‘covered weapon’’ and ‘‘enhanced
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
weapon,’’ per the revised 2014 Firearms
Guidelines.
• Revise the definitions of ‘‘combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority,’’ ‘‘covered
weapon,’’ and ‘‘stand-alone preemption
authority’’ as conforming changes.
Separately, the NRC would make
several clarifying and corrective changes
to the process for obtaining stand-alone
preemption authority and the
requirements for firearms background
checks, based upon language approved
by the Commission in the designation
orders and confirmatory orders issued
by the NRC subsequent to the
publication of the February 2011
proposed rule.
The NRC would also make several
additional changes to clarify the
agency’s review and acceptance criteria
for evaluating applications for standalone preemption authority, based upon
lessons learned by the NRC staff in
reviewing existing applications for
preemption authority, including
developing confirmatory orders to those
licensees requesting Section 161A
authority, and comments received in
response to prior versions of this
proposed rule. Furthermore, to ensure
consistency between processes, the NRC
would also make corresponding changes
to the proposed process for obtaining
enhanced weapons authority.
Sunsetting of Orders
In the Staff Requirements
Memorandum (SRM) to SECY–12–0125,
‘‘Staff Requirements—Interim Actions to
Execute Commission Preemption
Authority Under Section 161A of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
Amended’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12326A653), the Commission
directed the NRC staff to include in the
final rule a plan ‘‘to sunset the interim
designation order and the confirmatory
orders.’’ Accordingly, the NRC has
developed a plan to sunset these orders
and is taking advantage of this
supplemental proposed rule to include
new language in §§ 73.18 and 73.19 to
accomplish the Commission’s direction.
The NRC is proposing new paragraphs
in §§ 73.18 and 73.19 to indicate that
NRC approvals of Section 161A
authority via confirmatory order would
remain valid after issuance of a final
rule. However, the licensees who
received orders granting preemption
authority prior to issuance of a final rule
would be subject to the implementing
regulations in §§ 73.18 and 73.19, in
lieu of the requirements specified in the
confirmatory orders (i.e., the
requirements of the orders would be
superseded in their entirety by the
requirements in the final rule). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
licensees who receive these
confirmatory orders would be required,
within 60 days of the effective date of
the final rule, to update their applicable
procedures, instructions, and training to
reflect the final rule’s requirements.
These licensees would be required to
notify the NRC, within 70 days of the
effective date of the final rule, when
they have completed these actions.
Once the NRC receives this notification
and inspects the licensee’s transition
actions, the NRC would rescind the
orders.
The Commission would rescind its
designation of licensed facilities as part
of an interim class of facilities eligible
to apply for preemption authority prior
to issuance of a final rule once the
Enhanced Weapons rule is
implemented. The Commission would
designate the permanent classes of
facilities eligible to apply for Section
161A authority in § 73.18(c) of the rule.
All of the facilities issued a designation
order would be included in the final
rule’s list of designated facilities (i.e.,
power reactor facilities, Cat. I SSNM
facilities, and at-reactor ISFSIs).
Accordingly, the firearms background
check requirements contained in these
designation orders would be replaced in
their entirety by the requirements in
§ 73.19.
Public Comments
At this time, the NRC is only seeking
comments on the revisions proposed by
this supplemental proposed rule. The
NRC will address public comments on
the February 2011 proposed rule, the
January 2013 supplemental proposed
rule, and this supplemental proposed
rule in the final rule.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
The following paragraphs describe the
specific changes proposed by this
supplemental proposed rule.
10 CFR 73.2, Definitions
The proposed new definitions for the
terms Combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority,
Covered weapon, and Stand-alone
preemption authority would be revised
to reflect the revised 2014 Firearms
Guidelines. The proposed new
definition for the term Standard weapon
would be removed to reflect the revised
2014 Firearms Guidelines with
conforming, editorial changes made to
the proposed definition for the term
Enhanced weapon.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57109
10 CFR 73.18, Authorization for Use of
Enhanced Weapons and Preemption of
Firearms Laws
In paragraph (d), the NRC would set
forth the requirements and process for
licensees and certificate holders who are
included within the classes of facilities,
radioactive material, and other property
specified in § 73.18(c)(1) and desire to
voluntarily apply for stand-alone
preemption authority under Section
161A of the AEA. The application
would require initial information
describing the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s request for preemption
authority, its purposes and objectives
for requesting this authority, and a
description of its Firearms Background
Check Plan, including training for
security personnel on the background
check disqualifying conditions and
notification requirements. Firearms
background checks would only be
required for security personnel whose
official duties require access to covered
weapons, of licensees or certificate
holders who apply for Section 161A
authority. Licensees and certificate
holders would be required to submit
their applications in writing and under
oath or affirmation.
The licensee or certificate holder
would also be required to submit
supplemental information to the NRC
on the completion of satisfactory
firearms background checks and
required training for security personnel
who require access to covered weapons.
The timing of the submission of the
supplemental information will be at the
discretion of the licensee or certificate
holder, although the licensee or
certificate holder must have completed
a sufficient number of satisfactory
checks to permit the licensee or
certificate holder to meet its securitypersonnel minimum staffing
requirements as specified in its physical
security plan and any applicable fatigue
requirements under 10 CFR part 26.
Subsequent to the completion of the
submission of all required information,
the NRC will review the information
and document the agency’s decision to
approve or disapprove the application.
Licensees or certificate holders cannot
commence firearms background checks
until they have received notification
from the NRC that the agency has
accepted for review their application for
stand-alone preemption authority. Once
the NRC has reviewed and approved a
licensee’s or certificate holder’s
application for stand-alone preemption
authority, the licensee or certificate
holder must assign only security
personnel who have completed a
satisfactory firearms background check
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57110
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
to duties requiring access to covered
weapons.
In paragraph (e), the NRC would set
forth the requirements and process for
eligible licensees and certificate holders
(as specified in § 73.18(c)(2)) who
choose to voluntarily apply for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority under Section
161A of the AEA. Paragraph (e) would
require in the application initial
information describing the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s request for enhanced
weapons authority, its purposes and
objectives for requesting this authority,
and a description of its proposed
Firearms Background Check Plan,
including training of security personnel
on the disqualifying status conditions
and events. The application would be
required to address how security
personnel notify the licensee or
certificate holder security management
of the identification or occurrence of
any Federal or State disqualifying
conditions or events. Also, under the
2011 proposed rule, applicants for
combined enhanced weapons and
preemption authority that already have
preemption authority under § 73.18(d)
would not be required to reapply for
preemption authority in their § 73.18(e)
application. That aspect of the 2011
proposed rule is unchanged by this
supplemental proposed rule.
Firearms background checks would
only be required of applicants for
Section 161A authority. Those regulated
entities required to conduct firearms
background checks would need to
conduct the checks on all security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons, which
includes enhanced weapons. Licensee
and certificate holders would be
required to submit their applications in
writing and under oath or affirmation.
Licensees applying for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority would be required
to submit their application under the
applicable regulations for a license
amendment in 10 CFR parts 50, 52, 70,
or 72. Certificate holders to which the
supplemental proposed rule would
apply (i.e., 10 CFR part 76 certificate of
compliance holders), would be required
to submit their applications under the
applicable regulations for a certificate of
compliance amendment under 10 CFR
part 76.
The application would include the
additional technical information
required by § 73.18(f) addressing the
specific enhanced weapons that the
licensee or certificate holder intends to
use. The licensee or certificate holder
would also submit supplemental
information to the NRC on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
completion of both the firearms
background checks and the required
training (on disqualifying conditions
and events) for security personnel
whose official duties require access to
covered weapons. For this purpose, the
term ‘‘completion’’ means that a
sufficient number of satisfactory checks
are complete to meet a regulated entity’s
minimum staffing and fatigue
requirements.
The timing of the submission of the
supplemental information would be at
the discretion of the licensee or
certificate holder when a sufficient
number of satisfactory checks are
complete. A licensee or certificate
holder who has previously been
approved for stand-alone preemption
authority would not be required to
repeat the initial firearms background
checks on security personnel conducted
to support its original application;
rather the licensee or certificate holder
would only need to state in its
application for enhanced weapons
authority that it was previously granted
preemption authority by the NRC and
provide the effective date of that
authority.
The NRC would review the
application and supplemental
submittals and would document the
agency’s decision to approve or
disapprove the application.
Licensees or certificate holders must
commence firearms background checks
only after they have received
notification from the NRC that the
agency has accepted for review their
application for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption
authority. Furthermore, once the NRC
has approved a licensee’s or certificate
holder’s application for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority, the licensee or
certificate holder must assign only
security personnel who have completed
a satisfactory firearms background check
to duties requiring access to any covered
weapons (including enhanced
weapons).
Licensees and certificate holders who
have been previously approved for
enhanced weapons authority and wish
to use a different type, caliber, or
quantity of enhanced weapons from that
previously approved by the NRC would
be required to submit a new application
under paragraph (e).
In paragraph (f)(2)(iii), a conforming
change would be made to remove the
reference to employment of ‘‘standard
weapons’’ in the safeguards contingency
plan.
In paragraph (j), a corrective change
would be made to add § 73.51 to the list
of regulations specifying training
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
requirements on the use of enhanced
weapons at specific license ISFSIs. This
change would address the potential for
an at-reactor, specific license ISFSI to
possess enhanced weapons at both the
reactor and the co-located ISFSI. This
provision would require the ISFSI
licensee employing enhanced weapons
to train its security personnel on the use
of sufficient force, including deadly
force, consistent with the co-located
power reactor facility. Such training is
already required for the reactor
licensee’s security personnel under the
reactor security requirements in
§ 73.55(k)(3). The NRC anticipates that
such co-located licensees would use a
single integrated guard force for both
facilities such that the security
personnel are considered fungible
between the two facilities.
Consequently, the application of the
same training requirements for the use
of the enhanced weapons is appropriate.
In paragraphs (n)(2), (n)(3), and (n)(4),
conforming changes would replace the
term ‘‘covered weapons’’ with
‘‘enhanced weapons’’ to be consistent
with the revised 2014 Firearms
Guidelines.
In paragraph (s), the NRC would add
new provisions to provide for the
transition from stand-alone preemption
authority and enhanced weapons
authority approved by the NRC via
orders to a licensee or certificate holder,
to approval via the proposed regulations
in § 73.18. While the NRC’s previous
authorizations for Section 161A
authority under those orders would
remain valid, these licensees would be
subject to the implementing
requirements of § 73.18, in lieu of the
requirements contained in these orders.
However these licensees would not be
required to reapply for Section 161A
authority under the provisions of
§ 73.18. Licensees would be required to
update procedures, instructions, and
training to reflect any revised
requirements in the final rule and notify
the NRC of the completion of this
action. The licensee’s actions and
notification would be required to be
completed within 60 days and 70 days,
respectively, of the effective date of the
final rule. Following receipt of the
licensee’s notification and inspection of
the licensee’s actions, the NRC would
rescind these orders.
10 CFR 73.19, Firearms Background
Checks for Armed Security Personnel
Paragraph (b) would be revised in its
entirety to define new general
requirements regarding the completion
of firearm background checks. This
would include a requirement to
establish a Firearms Background Check
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Plan and to specify the elements of this
plan. A Firearms Background Check
Plan would be a component of the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s 10 CFR
part 73, appendix B, required Training
and Qualification plan for security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons. Only those
licensees and certificate holders who
have voluntarily applied for Section
161A authority (i.e., stand-alone
preemption authority or for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority) would be
required to conduct firearms
background checks on their security
personnel. Accordingly, such licensees
and certificate holders would be
required to establish and implement a
Firearms Background Check Plan.
Paragraph (b)(2) would describe the
groups of individuals included within
the term security personnel whose
official duties require access to covered
weapons. In addition to the security
officers themselves (who directly
protect the facility or radioactive
material), this term would include other
groups of individuals who have access
to covered weapons and in some cases
only enhanced weapons. Examples
would include, but are not limited to,
firearms instructors, armorers,
individuals issuing and checking in
weapons, individuals with access to
armories and weapons storage lockers,
and individuals conducting inventories
of enhanced weapons or removing
enhanced weapons from the site for
authorized purposes. Paragraph (b)(3)
would specify the elements of the
Firearms Background Check Plan.
Paragraphs (b)(4) through (b)(9) would
address requirements on conducting
firearms background checks. Licensees
or certificate holders must commence
firearms background checks only after
they have received notification from the
NRC that the agency has accepted for
review their application for either standalone preemption authority or for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority. Furthermore,
once the NRC has approved a licensee’s
or certificate holder’s application for
either stand-alone preemption authority
or for combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority, the
licensee or certificate holder must
assign only security personnel who have
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check to duties requiring
access to covered weapons. Also,
applicants for an NRC license or
certificate of compliance may not
conduct firearms background checks
until after the NRC has both issued their
license or certificate of compliance and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
accepted their application for Section
161A authority for review. These two
steps may occur in any order. Finally,
this section also includes a requirement
to remove individuals from duties
requiring access to covered weapons if
they receive a ‘‘denied NICS response.’’
This also includes removing individuals
from duties requiring access to
enhanced weapons if the individual
receives a ‘‘delayed NICS response.’’
Paragraph (b)(10) would specify the
requirements for a periodic firearms
background check, which would be
required at least once every 5 years from
the most recent check. This periodicity
would be consistent with the
Commission’s designation order issued
to several licensees. Licensees and
certificate holders would be able to
conduct periodic firearms background
checks at a shorter periodicity than
every 5 years, at their discretion.
Security personnel that cease to be
employed by a licensee, certificate
holder, or security contractor, are
considered to have a break in service for
the purposes of the enhanced weapons
rulemaking. The licensee or certificate
holder would need to complete a new
satisfactory firearms background check
for security personnel who experience a
break in service as described in
paragraph (b)(11). Paragraph (b)(11) also
addresses exceptions to the break in
service requirement. Paragraph (b)(12)
would address changes in the licensee,
certificate holder, or their security
contractor that do not require a break in
service firearms background check.
Paragraph (b)(13) would prohibit
licensees and certificate holders from
using a satisfactory firearms background
check in lieu of completing other
required criminal history records checks
or background investigations specified
in the NRC’s access authorization or
personnel security clearance programs
under other provisions of 10 CFR
chapter I.
Paragraph (b)(14) would not require a
new initial firearms background check
for security personnel who have
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check pursuant to a
Commission designation order issued
before the effective date of the final rule.
However, these security personnel
would remain subject to the periodic
firearms background check and the
break in service firearms background
check requirements of § 73.19.
Paragraph (b)(15) would require a
licensee or certificate holder to
discontinue conducting firearms
background checks if it withdraws its
application for Section 161A authority.
Paragraph (b)(16) would require a
licensee or certificate holder to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57111
discontinue conducting firearms
background checks if the NRC rescinds
or revokes its Section 161A authority, in
accordance with § 73.18.
Paragraph (c) would be removed and
reserved. Because § 73.18(c) contains
the list of classes of facilities and
activities eligible to apply for Section
161A authority and only licensees and
certificate holders who have applied to
the NRC under § 73.18 for Section 161A
authority are eligible under § 73.19 to
conduct firearms background checks of
their security personnel, the list of
classes of facilities and activities
previously proposed in § 73.19(c) for
conducting firearms background checks
is now redundant and unnecessary.
Paragraph (f) would be revised to
require periodic firearms background
checks to be completed at least once
every 5 calendar years. This change
would make the proposed rule
consistent with the 2014 Firearms
Guidelines and the Commission’s
designation order EA–13–092, which
required periodic firearms background
checks at least once every 5 years on
security personnel who require access to
covered weapons. Second, a
requirement would be added to specify
an allowance period for completion of a
satisfactory periodic firearms
background check of 5 years from the
date of the most recent firearms
background check. This allowance
period would be consistent with the
Commission’s designation order. Third,
the revised language would clarify that
security personnel may remain assigned
to duties requiring access to covered
weapons while pending completion of a
periodic firearms background check.
However, if a satisfactory firearms
background check is not completed by
the end of the allowance period, then
the security personnel must be removed
from duties requiring access to covered
weapons. Independent of the direction
in paragraph (f), an individual who
receives a ‘‘denied NICS response’’
during a periodic firearms background
check must be removed without delay
from duties requiring access to covered
weapons. Finally, the NRC would
continue to permit licensees and
certificate holders to accomplish
periodic firearms background checks at
a shorter periodicity than the maximum
requirement (i.e., more frequently than
once every 5 years), at the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s discretion.
Paragraph (g) would be revised to
clarify the exception for when a licensee
or certificate holder is required to notify
the NRC that it has removed security
personnel from duties requiring access
to covered weapons. This exception is
intended to encourage security
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57112
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
personnel to notify the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s security management
of the occurrence of any Federal or State
disqualifying status condition or event
within 72 hours. If the security
personnel make the notification, then
the licensee or certificate holder is not
required to notify the NRC within 72
hours of the security personnel’s
removal. However, in all circumstances,
the licensee or certificate holder would
be required to maintain records of such
removals under the Firearms
Background Check Plan, as required
under revised paragraph (b)(3)(vi).
Paragraph (h) would be revised to
change the notification timeliness
requirement for security personnel who
have had a disqualifying status
condition or event from ‘‘3 working
days’’ to ‘‘72 hours’’ to improve
regulatory clarity and consistency with
the licensee’s and certificate holder’s
current proposed notification timeliness
requirement in paragraph (g).
Paragraph (j) would be revised to
clarify the scope of the training modules
required for security personnel who are
subject to firearms background checks
under the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s Firearms Background Check
Plan, as required under paragraph
(b)(3)(iii). Modules would be required
on Federal disqualifying status
conditions or events, applicable State
disqualifying status conditions or
events, the process for appealing
adverse firearms background check
results, and the ongoing obligation of
security personnel who are subject to a
firearms background check to notify
their licensee’s or certificate holder’s
security management of the occurrence
of such a disqualifying status condition
or event. The modules would also
include the requirement on the
timeliness of such notifications (i.e.,
within 72 hours of the occurrence of the
disqualifying condition or event).
Finally, periodic refresher training on
these modules would be required
annually.
Paragraph (p)(1) would be revised to
clarify its applicability to security
personnel subject to a firearms
background check and to remove the
current exception cross-reference to
paragraph (b). Limitations on security
personnel’s access to covered weapons
during the pendency of an appeal to the
FBI would now be found solely in
paragraph (p).
Minor editorial changes would be
made to paragraph (p)(5), including
adding a title and renumbering
subparagraphs. Paragraph (p)(5)(iv)
would be revised to indicate that
individuals who are appealing a
firearms background check should
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
submit a request for extension of time,
with respect to the 45-day timeliness
requirement on submitting an appeal, to
their licensee or certificate holder rather
than to the FBI. The licensee or
certificate holder may grant an
extension request for good cause, as
determined by the licensee or certificate
holder. This change is consistent with
the 2014 Firearms Guidelines.
In paragraph (r), the NRC would add
new provisions to provide for the
transition from preemption authority
and enhanced weapons authority
approved by the NRC via designation
orders and confirmatory orders to
approvals via the proposed regulations
in § 73.19. While the NRC’s
authorizations for Section 161A
authority would remain valid after
issuance of a final rule and licensees
would not need to reapply for Section
161A authority, these licensees would
be subject to the implementing
requirements of § 73.19, in lieu of the
requirements contained in these orders.
However, licensees would not be
required to repeat their initial firearms
background checks. Licensees would be
required to update procedures,
instructions, and training to reflect any
revised requirements in the final rule
and notify the NRC of the completion of
this action. The licensee’s actions and
notification would be required to be
completed within 60 days and 70 days,
respectively, of the effective date of the
final rule. Following receipt of the
licensee’s notification and inspection of
the licensee’s actions, the NRC would
rescind these orders.
10 CFR 73.51, Requirements for the
Physical Protection of Stored Spent
Nuclear Fuel and High-Level
Radioactive Waste
Paragraph (f) would be added as a
conforming change to the proposed
change to § 73.18(j) to reflect the
potential for a specific license, at-reactor
ISFSI to possess covered weapons at
both the reactor and the co-located
ISFSI. This provision would require
ISFSI licensees employing covered
weapons to train their security
personnel on the use of sufficient force,
including deadly force. The NRC
anticipates that the security
organization for a reactor and a colocated specific license ISFSI employing
covered weapons would use an
integrated security organization such
that the security personnel are
considered fungible between these two
facilities. Accordingly, the NRC
considers it appropriate to require both
the reactor and ISFSI security personnel
carrying covered weapons to be trained
on the same standards on the use of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
force, including deadly force. This
proposed language is consistent with
the current regulations on training of
security personnel on the use of force
under § 73.55(k)(3) for reactor licensees
and § 73.46(h)(5) for Cat. I SSNM
licensees and certificate holders.
V. Cumulative Effects of Regulation
Cumulative Effects of Regulation
(CER) consists of the challenges
licensees may face in addressing the
implementation of new regulatory
positions, programs, and requirements
(e.g., rulemaking, guidance, generic
letters, backfits, inspections). The CER
may manifest in several ways, including
the total burden imposed on licensees
by the NRC from simultaneous or
consecutive regulatory actions that can
adversely affect the licensee’s capability
to implement those requirements while
continuing to operate or construct its
facility in a safe and secure manner.
The goals of the NRC’s CER effort
were met throughout the development
of this supplemental proposed rule.
During the development of the 2011
proposed rule, the NRC staff engaged
external stakeholders at a public
meeting and by soliciting public
comments on the proposed rule and
draft guidance documents. The public
meeting was held at NRC Headquarters
on June 1, 2011, to discuss the proposed
implementation plan. A summary of the
public meeting is in ADAMS under
Package Accession No. ML111720007.
Additionally, the NRC staff issued
several draft guidance documents for
comment in conjunction with the
publication of the 2011 proposed rule.
The feedback from this meeting and the
public comments on the 2011 proposed
rule informed the NRC staff’s
recommended schedule for the
implementation of the new enhanced
weapons requirements in this
supplemental proposed rule.
Consistent with SECY–11–0032,
‘‘Consideration of the Cumulative
Effects of Regulation in the Rulemaking
Process,’’ dated March 2, 2011 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML110190027), the NRC
requests specific comment on the
supplemental proposed rule’s
implementation schedule in light of any
existing CER challenges, specifically:
a. Do the supplemental proposed
rule’s compliance date and submittal
dates provide sufficient time to
implement the new supplemental
proposed requirements, including
changes to programs, procedures, and
the facility, in light of any ongoing CER
challenges?
b. If there are ongoing CER challenges,
what do you suggest as a means to
address this situation (e.g., if more time
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
is required to implement the new
requirements, what time period is
sufficient)?
c. Are there unintended consequences
(e.g., does the supplemental proposed
rule create conditions that would be
contrary to the supplemental proposed
rule’s purpose and objectives)? If so,
what are the unintended consequences?
d. Please comment on the NRC’s cost
and benefit estimates in the
supplemental proposed rule regulatory
analysis (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15232A013).
The NRC staff identified one draft
guidance document that is affected by
the revised proposed regulations
described in this document and is
issuing this revised guidance document
for public comment concurrent with
this supplemental proposed rule (see
Section XIV, ‘‘Availability of
Guidance’’).
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC certifies that
this rule will not, if promulgated, have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This supplemental proposed rule affects
only the licensing and operation of
nuclear power plants. The companies
that own these plants do not fall within
the scope of the definition of ‘‘small
entities’’ set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act or the size standards
established by the NRC (§ 2.810).
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VII. Regulatory Analysis
The NRC has prepared a draft
regulatory analysis on this proposed
regulation. The analysis examines the
costs and benefits of the alternatives
considered by the NRC. The draft
regulatory analysis can be found under
ADAMS Accession No. ML15232A013.
The NRC requests public comment on
the draft regulatory analysis. Comments
on the draft regulatory analysis may be
submitted to the NRC as indicated
under the ADDRESSES caption of this
document.
VIII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
This supplemental proposed rule
contains the following: (i) Proposed
provisions which reduce the regulatory
burden associated with the original
2011 proposed rule and the 2013
supplemental proposed rule and (ii)
additional provisions—not contained in
either the original 2011 proposed rule or
the 2013 supplemental proposed rule—
which facilitate licensees’ capability to
obtain burden reduction (i.e., proposed
sunsetting of the interim designation
order and the confirmatory orders). The
provisions of this supplemental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
proposed rule are effectively voluntary
in nature, and would not impose
modifications or additions to existing
structures, components, designs, or
existing procedures or organizations if
adopted in final form. Accordingly, the
provisions of this supplemental
proposed rule, if adopted as a final rule,
would not constitute backfitting or
otherwise be inconsistent with any issue
finality provision in 10 CFR part 52. The
consideration of backfitting for the
original 2011 proposed rule and the
2013 supplemental proposed rule,
considered together, bounds the
backfitting and issue finality
consideration for this supplemental
proposed rule. Therefore, a backfit
analysis is not required and has not
been completed for any of the
provisions of this supplemental
proposed rule.
IX. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274), requires Federal agencies
to write documents in a clear, concise,
and well-organized manner. The NRC
has written this document to be
consistent with the Plain Writing Act as
well as the Presidential Memorandum,
‘‘Plain Language in Government
Writing,’’ published June 10, 1998 (63
FR 31883). The NRC requests comment
on the document with respect to the
clarity and effectiveness of the language
used.
X. Environmental Assessment and
Proposed Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact
In the proposed rule published on
October 26, 2006, the Commission
determined under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended, and the Commission’s
regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part
51, that the proposed rule, if adopted,
would not be a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment and, therefore, an
environmental impact statement was
not required. Instead, the agency
prepared a draft environmental
assessment on the proposed rule for
public comment.
In the proposed rule published on
February 3, 2011, the determination was
that there will be no significant offsite
impact to the public from this action.
Therefore, the Commission concluded
that because of the nature of the
proposed changes to the firearms
background checks and the enhanced
weapons provisions presented in the
2011 proposed rule, the assumptions in
the October 2006 proposed rule were
not changed so the Commission was not
seeking additional comment on the 2006
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57113
environmental assessment. Similarly
here, the nature of the changes to the
firearms background check and the
enhanced provisions in this
supplemental proposed rule do not
change the assumptions in the 2011
proposed rule and the October 2006
environmental assessment. Accordingly,
the Commission is not seeking
additional comment on the
environmental assessment. Availability
of the environmental assessment is
provided in Section XV, ‘‘Availability of
Documents,’’ of this document.
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This supplemental proposed rule
contains new or amended collections of
information subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). This supplemental proposed
rule has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval of the information
collections.
Type of submission, new or revision:
Revision.
The title of the information collection:
10 CFR part 73, ‘‘Enhanced Weapons,
Firearms Background Checks, and
Security Event Notifications,’’
supplemental proposed rule, and NRC
Form 754, ‘‘Armed Security Personnel
Background Check.’’
The form number if applicable: NRC
Form 754.
How often the collection is required or
requested: One time for power reactor
licensees and Cat, I SSNM licensees and
certificate holders applying for
combined enhanced weapons authority.
Initial submissions of NRC Form 754
will be required for all of a licensee’s or
certificate holder’s security personnel
whose duties require access to covered
weapons; thereafter, recurring firearms
background checks and completion of
NRC Form 754 will be required once
every 5 years. One time for licensees
and certificate holders who received
confirmatory orders and must update
their procedures, instructions, and
training materials.
Who will be required or asked to
respond: The supplemental proposed
rule would require only those licensees
and certificate holders who apply for
Section 161A authorities to submit
information about their security
personnel for firearms background
checks. Licensees and certificate holders
that had received confirmatory orders
approving Section 161A authority
would be required to update within 60
days after the final rule effective date
any procedures, instructions, and
training material on a one-time basis.
The regulated entities that would be
eligible to apply for Section 161A
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57114
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
authorities are operating nuclear power
reactors located at 61 sites and their colocated at-reactor ISFSIs, 10
decommissioning power reactor sites, 3
other reactor sites, and 2 fuel cycle
facilities authorized to possess Cat. I
SSNM. In addition to those regulated
entities and consistent with the 2011
proposed rule, modified security event
notifications under different paragraphs
of § 73.71 would also affect 42 research
and test reactor (RTR) sites, 6 Cat. II and
III Special Nuclear Material sites, 7
ISFSI sites not co-located with a reactor,
and 2 hot cell sites.
An estimate of the number of annual
responses: 4,085 (2,992 responses for 10
CFR part 73 requirements and 1,093
responses for NRC Form 754).
The estimated number of annual
respondents: 133.
An estimate of the total number of
hours needed annually to comply with
the information collection requirement
or request: 47,906.4 hours (45,399.8
hours for 10 CFR part 73 requirements
and 2,506.7 hours for NRC Form 754).
Abstract: The NRC is proposing to
amend current security regulations and
add new security requirements
pertaining to nuclear power reactors and
Cat. I SSNM facilities for access to
enhanced weapons and firearms
background checks. The supplemental
proposed rule would modify the
information collections contained in the
Enhanced Weapons, Firearms
Background Checks, and Security Event
Notifications rulemaking. First, firearms
background checks would be required
for security personnel for only those
licensees and certificate holders who
have applied for Section 161A authority
(i.e., either stand-alone preemption
authority or combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption
authority). As a result, the number of
respondents to new §§ 73.18 and 73.19
would be reduced compared to the
proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on February 3, 2011 (76 FR
6199). Second, periodic firearms
background checks would be required at
least once every 5 years rather than
every 3 years. Third, applications for
Section 161A authority would be
required to describe the applicant’s
purposes and objectives in requesting
the authority. Finally, the supplemental
proposed rule would add requirements
for licensees and certificate holders that
had received confirmatory orders
approving Section 161A authority to
update within 60 days after the final
rule effective date any procedures,
instructions, and training material on a
one-time basis. These information
collections are needed to enable the
NRC to implement the mandate of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Section 161A of the AEA to verify that
security personnel who will have access
to enhanced weapons have been subject
to a background check by the Attorney
General to verify that an individual is
not prohibited under Federal or State
law from possessing or receiving
firearms.
The 2011 proposed rule also would
modify the security event notification
requirements under different paragraphs
of § 73.71. This supplemental proposed
rule would not change those proposed
modified requirements, but they are
repeated in the supporting statement for
completeness. The proposed security
event notification requirements would
be used to meet the NRC’s strategic
mission to immediately communicate
threats or attack information to the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) operations center under the
National Response Framework. The
NRC also has a strategic mission to
immediately communicate threat or
attack information to other appropriate
NRC licensees and certificate holders so
that they can increase their security
posture at their facilities or for their
shipments of spent nuclear fuel, highlevel radioactive waste, or Cat. I SSNM.
This prompt notification could be vital
in increasing another licensees’ ability
to defeat poorly-synchronized multiplesite attacks and in protecting the lives
of security and plant personnel (at a
second facility) in such un-coordinated
attacks. This prompt notification could
also be vital in increasing the defensive
posture of other government or critical
infrastructure facilities to defeat poorlysynchronized multiple-sector attacks.
The NRC is seeking public comment
on the potential impact of the
information collections contained in
this proposed rule and on the following
issues:
1. Is the proposed information
collection necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
NRC, including whether the information
will have practical utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection
accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the
proposed information collection on
respondents be minimized, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology?
A copy of the OMB clearance package
and proposed rule is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML15035A635 or may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC’s PDR, One White
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Room
O–1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. You
may obtain information and comment
submissions related to the OMB
clearance package by searching on
https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID NRC–2011–0018.
You may submit comments on any
aspect of these proposed information
collections, including suggestions for
reducing the burden and on the
preceding issues, by the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0018.
• Mail comments to: FOIA, Privacy,
and Information Collections Branch,
Office of Information Services, Mail
Stop: T–5 F53, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; or to Vlad Dorjets, Desk Officer,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (3150–0002 and 3150–0204),
NEOB–10202, Office of Management
and Budget, Washington, DC 20503;
telephone: 202–395–7315, email: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
Submit comments by December 7,
2015. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the NRC staff is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
document requesting or requiring the
collection displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
XII. Criminal Penalties
For the purposes of Section 223 of the
AEA, the NRC is issuing this
supplemental proposed rule that would
amend 10 CFR part 73 under Sections
161b, 161i, or 161o of the AEA. Willful
violations of the rule would be subject
to criminal enforcement. Criminal
penalties as they apply to regulations in
10 CFR part 73 are already discussed in
§ 73.81. Accordingly, §§ 73.18 and 73.19
will not be included in § 73.81(b).
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–113), requires that Federal agencies
use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies, unless
using such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or is otherwise
impractical. In this supplemental
proposed rule, the NRC is using
standards from applicable firearms
standards developed by nationally
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
recognized firearms organizations or
standard setting bodies or from
standards developed by (1) Federal
agencies, such as the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security’s Federal Law
Enforcement Training Center, the U.S.
Department of Energy’s National
Training Center, and the U.S.
Department of Defense; (2) State lawenforcement training centers; or (3)
State Division (or Department) of
Criminal Justice Services (DCJS)
Training Academies. The NRC invites
comment on the applicability and use of
other standards.
XIV. Availability of Guidance
The NRC is issuing draft regulatory
guide (DG), DG–5020, Revision 1,
‘‘Applying for Enhanced Weapons
Authority, Applying for Preemption
Authority, and Accomplishing Firearms
Background Checks under 10 CFR part
73,’’ for the implementation of the
proposed requirements set forth in this
supplemental proposed rule. The draft
guidance is available in ADAMS under
Accession No. ML14322A847. In
conjunction with the supplemental
proposed rule, the NRC seeks public
comment on DG–5020, Revision 1,
which may be accessed by searching on
https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID NRC–2011–0015.
In conjunction with the February
2011 proposed rule, the NRC issued for
comment a new draft guide, DG 5020,
Revision 0, ‘‘Applying for Enhanced
Weapons Authority, Applying for
Preemption Authority, and
Accomplishing Firearms Background
Checks under 10 CFR part 73’’ (76 FR
6086; February 3, 2011). You may also
access DG–5020, Revision 0, supporting
material, and the public comments the
NRC received on DG–5020, Revision 0,
by searching on https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
NRC–2011–0015.
Revision 0 to DG–5020 contained
detailed guidance on the
implementation of the proposed
requirements for applying for enhanced
weapons authority, for applying for
preemption authority, and conducting
firearms background checks. However,
DG–5020, Revision 0, did not include
at-reactor ISFSIs under the applicability
section; rather, the DG reserved a
section for additional facilities to be
added by future rulemakings or
Commission orders. The addition of atreactor ISFSIs to the DG as an eligible
class of licensees to apply for Section
161A authority would not appreciably
change the guidance contained in DG–
5020, Revision 0. Accordingly, the NRC
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Firearms Guidelines .........................................................................................................................
Firearms Guidelines, Revision 1 ......................................................................................................
Environmental Assessment (October 2006 proposed rule) .............................................................
Regulatory Analysis .........................................................................................................................
Regulatory Analysis–appendices .....................................................................................................
(October 2006 proposed rule)
Information Collection Analysis ........................................................................................................
NRC Form 754, ‘‘Armed Security Personnel Firearms Background Check’’ ..................................
Commission: SECY–08–0050, ‘‘Firearms Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 and Associated Policy Issues’’ (April 17, 2008).
Commission: SECY–08–0050A, ‘‘Firearms Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954 and Associated Policy Issues—Supplemental Information’’ (July 8, 2008).
Commission: SRM–SECY–08–0050/0050A, ‘‘Firearms Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Associated Policy Issues’’ (August 15, 2008).
Letter Opinion from Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives’ Office of Enforcement on the Transfer of Enhanced Weapons (January 5, 2009).
Proposed Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications
Rule (February 3, 2011).
DG–5020, Revision 0, ‘‘Applying for Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for Preemption Authority, and Accomplishing Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR Part 73’’ (February 3,
2011).
DG–5020, Revision 1, ‘‘Applying for Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for Preemption Authority, and Accomplishing Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR Part 73’’.
Commission: SECY–12–0027, ‘‘Preemption Authority Pursuant to Section 161A, ‘Use of Firearms by Security Personnel,’ of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended’’ (February 17,
2012).
Commission: SRM–SECY–12–0027, ‘‘Preemption Authority Pursuant to Section 161A, ‘Use of
Firearms by Security Personnel,’ of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended’’ (May 3,
2012).
Commission: SECY–12–0125, ‘‘Interim Actions to Execute Commission Preemption Authority
Under Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended’’ (September 20, 2012).
Commission: SRM–SECY–12–0125, ‘‘Interim Actions to Execute Commission Preemption Authority Under Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended’’ (November 21,
2012).
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
did not issue a revision to DG–5020,
Revision 0, for comment in conjunction
with the January 2013 supplemental
proposed rule.
However, the changes contained in
this supplemental proposed rule are
substantive enough to warrant a revision
to DG–5020, Revision 0. Accordingly,
the NRC staff developed Revision 1 to
DG–5020 to reflect the changes in this
supplemental proposed rule and the
previous supplemental proposed rule
which added at-reactor ISFSIs.
You may submit comments on DG–
5020, Revision 1, by the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2011–0015. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
XV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS Accession No./Federal Register Citation
Document
VerDate Sep<11>2014
57115
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74 FR 46800; September 11, 2009.
79 FR 36100; June 25, 2014.
ML061920093.
ML061380803.
ML061380796.
ML061440013.
ML092640277.
ML092650459.
Package—ML072920478.
ML081910207.
ML082280364.
ML090080191.
ML103410132.
ML100321956.
ML14322A847.
ML113130015.
ML12124A377.
Package—ML12164A839.
ML12326A653.
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
57116
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
ADAMS Accession No./Federal Register Citation
Document
NUREG/BR–0058, ‘‘Regulatory Analysis Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,’’ Revision 4 (September 30, 2004).
Order EA–13–092: ‘‘Order Designating an Interim Class of NRC-Licensed Facilities That are Eligible to Apply to the Commission for Authorization to Use the Authority Granted Under the
Provisions of Section 161a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended’’.
Draft Supporting Statement for the second supplemental proposed rule .......................................
Throughout the development of this
rule, the NRC staff may post documents
related to this rule, including public
comments, on the Federal rulemaking
Web site at https://www.regulations.gov
under Docket ID NRC–2011–0018 and
NRC–2011–0015. The Federal
rulemaking Web site allows you to
receive alerts when changes or additions
occur in a docket folder. To subscribe:
(1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC–
2011–0018 and NRC–2011–0015); (2)
click the ‘‘Sign up for Email Alerts’’
link; and (3) enter your email address
and select how frequently you would
like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or
monthly).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 73
Criminal penalties, Exports,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Imports,
Nuclear energy, Nuclear materials,
Nuclear power plants and reactors,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
AEA, as amended; the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as
amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the
NRC is proposing to adopt the following
amendments to 10 CFR part 73.
PART 73—PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF
PLANTS AND MATERIALS
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
■
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 53, 147, 149, 161, 161A, 170D, 170E,
170H, 170I, 223, 234, 1701 (42 U.S.C. 2073,
2167, 2169, 2201, 2201a, 2210d, 2210e,
2210h, 2210i, 2273, 2282, 2297f); Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, secs. 201, 202
(42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842); Nuclear Waste Policy
Act of 1982, secs. 135, 141 (42 U.S.C. 10155,
10161); 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
Section 73.37(b)(2) also issued under Sec.
301, Pub. L. 96–295, 94 Stat. 789 (42 U.S.C.
5841 note).
2. In § 73.2, paragraph (a), as proposed
to be added February 3, 2011 (76 FR
6232), revise the definitions for
‘‘Combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority,’’
‘‘Covered weapon,’’ ‘‘Enhanced
weapon,’’ and ‘‘Stand-alone preemption
authority,’’; and remove the definition
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
ML042820192.
78 FR 35984; June 14, 2013.
ML15035A633.
for ‘‘Standard weapon’’ to read as
follows:
(n)(3), and (n)(4); and add paragraph (s)
to read as follows:
§ 73.2
§ 73.18 Authorization for use of enhanced
weapons and preemption of firearms laws.
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
Combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority
means the authority granted to the
Commission, at 42 U.S.C. 2201a, to
authorize licensees or certificate
holders, or the designated security
personnel of the licensee or certificate
holder, to transfer, receive, possess,
transport, import, and use one or more
categories of covered weapons,
notwithstanding any State, local, or
certain Federal firearms laws, including
regulations, that prohibit or restrict such
conduct.
*
*
*
*
*
Covered weapon means any handgun,
rifle, shotgun, short-barreled shotgun,
short-barreled rifle, semi-automatic
assault weapon, machine gun,
ammunition for any of such weapons, or
large capacity ammunition feeding
device, as specified under 42 U.S.C.
2201a(b), that are otherwise prohibited
or restricted by State, local, or certain
Federal firearms laws, including
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
Enhanced weapon means any shortbarreled shotgun, short-barreled rifle, or
machine gun. Enhanced weapons do not
include destructive devices as specified
under 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
Stand-alone preemption authority
means the authority granted to the
Commission, at 42 U.S.C. 2201a, to
authorize licensees or certificate
holders, or the designated security
personnel of a licensee or certificate
holder, to transfer, receive, possess,
transport, import, and use one or more
categories of covered weapons other
than enhanced weapons,
notwithstanding any State, local, or
certain Federal firearms laws, including
regulations, that prohibit or restrict such
conduct.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 73.18, as proposed to be added
February 3, 2011 (76 FR 6233), revise
paragraphs (d), (e), (f)(2)(iii), (j), (n)(2),
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Application process for standalone preemption authority. (1) Only
licensees and certificate holders
included within the classes of facilities,
radioactive material, and other property
listed in paragraph (c)(1) of this section
may apply to the NRC for stand-alone
preemption authority.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders
applying for stand-alone preemption
authority must submit an application to
the NRC using the procedures specified
in this section.
(3) The contents of the application
must include the following information:
(i) A statement indicating that the
licensee or certificate holder is applying
for stand-alone preemption authority
under 42 U.S.C. 2201a;
(ii) The Commission-designated
facility, radioactive material, or other
property to be protected by the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s security
personnel using the covered weapons;
(iii) A description of the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s purposes and
objectives in requesting stand-alone
preemption authority. This description
must include whether these covered
weapons are currently employed as part
of the licensee’s or certificate holder’s
existing protective strategy or whether
these covered weapons will be used in
a revised protective strategy; and
(iv) A description of the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s Firearms Background
Check Plan required by § 73.19.
(4) Licensees and certificate holders
must supplement their application for
stand-alone preemption authority with
the following additional information:
(i) A confirmation that a sufficient
number of security personnel have
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check to meet the licensee’s
or certificate holder’s security-personnel
minimum staffing requirements as
specified in its physical security plan
and any applicable fatigue requirements
under part 26 of this chapter;
(ii) A confirmation that the necessary
training modules and notification
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
procedures have been developed under
their Firearms Background Check Plan;
and
(iii) A confirmation that all security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons have been
trained on these modules and
notification procedures.
(5) The licensee or certificate holder
must submit both the application and
the supplementary information to the
NRC in writing, under oath or
affirmation, and in accordance with
§ 73.4.
(6) Upon the effective date of the
NRC’s approval of its application for
stand-alone preemption authority, the
licensee or certificate holder must only
assign security personnel who have
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check to duties requiring
access to any covered weapons.
(e) Application process for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority. (1) Only licensees
and certificate holders included within
the classes of facilities, radioactive
material, and other property listed in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section may
apply to the NRC for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders
applying for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption
authority must submit an application to
the NRC using the procedures specified
in this section.
(3) The contents of the application
must include the following information:
(i) A statement indicating that the
licensee or certificate holder is applying
for combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority
under 42 U.S.C. 2201a.
(ii) The Commission-designated
facility, radioactive material, or other
property to be protected by the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s security
personnel using the enhanced weapons.
(iii) A description of the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s purposes and
objectives in requesting combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority. This must
include whether these covered weapons
are currently employed as part of the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s existing
protective strategy; or whether these
covered weapons will be used in a
revised protective strategy.
(iv) A description of the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s Firearms Background
Check Plan required by § 73.19.
(v) If the NRC has previously
approved the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s application for stand-alone
preemption authority, under either
paragraph (d) of this section or under a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
Commission Order issued before
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE],
then the licensee or certificate holder
must include the effective date of the
NRC’s approval of preemption authority
in their application for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority.
(4) The licensee or certificate holder
must include with their application the
additional technical information
required by paragraph (f) of this section.
(5) Licensees and certificate holders
must supplement their application with
the following additional information:
(i) A confirmation that a sufficient
number of security personnel have
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check to meet the licensee’s
or certificate holder’s security-personnel
minimum staffing requirements as
specified in its physical security plan
and any applicable fatigue requirements
under part 26 of this chapter;
(ii) A confirmation that the necessary
training modules and notification
procedures have been developed under
their Firearms Background Check Plan;
and
(iii) A confirmation that all security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons have been
trained on these modules and
notification procedures.
(iv) Exceptions:
(A) Licensees and certificate holders
who were previously approved by the
NRC for preemption authority under
paragraph (d) of this section are not
required to submit the supplemental
information of this paragraph (as a
component of their application for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority).
(B) Licensees and certificate holders
who were previously approved by the
NRC for preemption authority pursuant
to a Commission Order issued before
[IEFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE],
are not required to submit the
supplemental information of this
paragraph (as a component of their
application for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption
authority).
(6) The licensee or certificate holder
must submit its application in
accordance with the applicable license
amendment or certificate of compliance
amendment provisions specified in
§§ 50.90, 70.34, 72.56, or 76.45 of this
chapter. The licensee or certificate
holder must submit both the application
and the supplementary information to
the NRC in writing and under oath or
affirmation.
(7) If a licensee or certificate holder
wishes to use a different type or caliber
of enhanced weapons or obtain a
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57117
different quantity of enhanced weapons
from that previously approved by the
Commission under this section, then the
licensee or certificate holder must
submit a new application to the NRC in
accordance with paragraph (e) of this
section (to address these different
weapons or different quantities of
weapons).
(8) Upon the effective date of the
NRC’s approval of its application for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority, the licensee
or certificate holder must only assign
security personnel who have completed
a satisfactory firearms background check
to perform duties requiring access to
any covered weapons.
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The licensee or certificate holder
must address in the safeguards
contingency plan how the enhanced
weapons will be employed by the
security personnel in implementing the
protective strategy, including tactical
approaches and maneuvers; and
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Use of enhanced weapons.
Requirements regarding the general use
of enhanced weapons by licensee or
certificate holder security personnel, in
the performance of their official duties,
are contained in §§ 73.46, 73.51, and
73.55 and in appendices B, C, and H of
this part, as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(2) Security personnel transporting
enhanced weapons to or from a
licensee’s or certificate holder’s facility
following the completion of, or in
preparation for, the duty of escorting
shipments of radioactive material or
other property that is being transported
to or from the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s facility must ensure that these
weapons are rendered safe and locked
in a secure container during transport.
Security personnel may transport
unloaded weapons and ammunition in
the same locked secure container.
(3) Security personnel using enhanced
weapons to protect shipments of
radioactive material or other property
that are being transported to or from the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s facility
must ensure that these weapons are
maintained in a state of loaded
readiness and available for immediate
use, except when otherwise prohibited
by 18 U.S.C. 922(q).
(4) Security personnel transporting
enhanced weapons to or from the
licensee’s or certificate holder’s facility
must comply with the requirements of
§ 73.19.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
57118
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(s) Sunsetting of orders. For licensees
who received an NRC order approving
an application for stand-alone
preemption authority or combined
preemption authority and enhanced
weapons authority prior to [EFFECTIVE
DATE OF FINAL RULE], the following
provisions apply.
(1) The NRC’s approval via a
confirmatory order of preemption
authority or enhanced weapons
authority under Section 161A for a
licensee remains valid and licensees or
certificate holders would not need to
reapply for this authority.
(2) Licensees issued such orders must
comply with the requirements of this
section. Accordingly, the requirements
of such orders are superseded in their
entirety by the requirements of this
section.
(3) Licensees issued such orders must
update any procedures, instructions,
and training material, developed in
response to the orders, to reflect the
transition from requirements under the
order to the requirements of this section.
Licensees must complete these
transition actions by [DATE 60 DAYS
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
FINAL RULE].
(4) Licensees issued such orders must
notify the NRC in writing, in accordance
with § 73.4, of the completion of these
transition actions. Licensees must
complete this notification by [DATE 70
DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FINAL RULE].
■ 4. In § 73.19, as proposed to be added
February 3, 2011 (76 FR 6237), revise
paragraph (b); remove and reserve
paragraph (c); revise paragraphs (f), (g),
(h), (j), (p)(1), and (p)(5); and add
paragraph (r) to read as follows:
§ 73.19 Firearms background checks for
armed security personnel.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) General requirements. (1)
Licensees and certificate holders who
have applied to the NRC under § 73.18
for stand-alone preemption authority or
for combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority
must comply with the provisions of this
section. Such licensees and certificate
holders must establish a Firearms
Background Check Plan. Licensees and
certificate holders must establish this
plan as part of their overall NRCapproved Training and Qualification
plan for security personnel whose
official duties require access to covered
weapons.
(2) For the purposes of § 73.18 and
this section only, the term security
personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons includes, but
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
is not limited to, the following groups
of individuals:
(i) Security officers using covered
weapons to protect a Commissiondesignated facility, radioactive material,
or other property;
(ii) Security officers undergoing
firearms training on covered weapons;
(iii) Firearms-training instructors
conducting training on covered
weapons;
(iv) Armorers conducting
maintenance, repair, and testing of
covered weapons;
(v) Individuals with access to
armories and weapons storage lockers
containing covered weapons;
(vi) Individuals issuing covered
weapons from armories to security
personnel and checking in such
weapons;
(vii) Individuals conducting
inventories of enhanced weapons;
(viii) Individuals removing enhanced
weapons from the site for repair,
training, and escort-duty purposes; and
(ix) Individuals whose duties require
access to covered weapons, whether the
individuals are employed directly by
the licensee or certificate holder or they
are employed by a security contractor
who provides security services to the
licensee or certificate holder.
(3) The objectives of a Firearms
Background Check Plan must include:
(i) Completing firearms background
checks for all security personnel whose
official duties require access to covered
weapons;
(ii) Defining the process for
completing initial, periodic, and break
in service firearms background checks;
(iii) Defining the training objectives
and modules for security personnel who
are subject to firearms background
checks;
(iv) Completing the initial and
periodic training for security personnel
whose official duties require access to
covered weapons;
(v) Maintaining records of completed
firearms background checks, required
training, and any supporting
documents;
(vi) Maintaining records of a decision
to remove security personnel from
duties requiring access to covered
weapons, due to the identification or
occurrence of any Federal or State
disqualifying status condition or event;
and
(vii) Developing and implementing
procedures for notifying the NRC of the
removal of security personnel from
access to covered weapons, due to the
identification or occurrence of any
Federal or State disqualifying status
condition or event.
(4) Licensees and certificate holders
who have applied to the NRC for stand-
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
alone preemption authority or for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority under § 73.18
must ensure that a satisfactory firearms
background check has been completed
for all security personnel whose official
duties require access to covered
weapons.
(5) Only licensees and certificate
holders who have applied for Section
161A authority under § 73.18 may
conduct firearms background checks.
(6) The licensee or certificate holder
must commence firearms background
checks only after receiving notification
from the NRC that the agency has
accepted for review their application for
stand-alone preemption authority or for
combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority.
(7) Applicability of firearms
background checks to applicants for a
license or certificate of compliance:
(i) Applicants for a license or a
certificate of compliance who have also
submitted an application for Section
161A authority must only commence
firearms background checks after:
(A) The NRC has issued their license
or certificate of compliance; and
(B) The NRC has accepted their
application for stand-alone preemption
authority or for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption
authority for review.
(ii) Subsequent to [EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FINAL RULE], applicants for a
license or a certificate of compliance
who have also applied for Section 161A
authority and been issued their license
or certificate of compliance must ensure
a satisfactory firearms background check
(as defined in § 73.2) has been
completed for all security personnel
who require access to covered weapons,
before the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s initial receipt of any source
material, special nuclear material, or
radioactive material specified under the
license or certificate of compliance.
(8) Licensee and certificate holder
actions in response to an adverse
firearms background check (as defined
in § 73.2):
(i) The licensee or certificate holder
must remove, without delay, from
duties requiring access to covered
weapons, any security personnel who
receive a ‘‘denied NICS response;’’
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder
must remove, without delay, from
duties requiring access to enhanced
weapons, any security personnel who
receive a ‘‘delayed NICS response;’’ and
(iii) If the security personnel to be
removed is on duty at the time of
removal, then the licensee and
certificate holder must reconstitute the
vacated position within the timeframe
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
specified in their NRC-approved
physical security plan.
(9) Subsequent to the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s receipt of
notification that the NRC has approved
its application for either stand-alone
preemption authority or for combined
enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority:
(i) The licensee or certificate holder
must complete a satisfactory firearms
background check on security
personnel, before assigning that
individual to any duties that require
access to covered weapons;
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder
may return to duties that require access
to covered weapons any security
personnel who has previously received
an adverse firearms background check,
if the individual subsequently
completes a satisfactory firearms
background check or successfully
appeals an adverse firearms background
check; and
(iii) During the pendency of an
individual’s appeal to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of an
adverse firearms background check, the
licensee or certificate holder must not
assign such security personnel to duties
that require access to covered weapons.
(10) Accomplishment of periodic
firearms background checks. (i) The
licensee or certificate holder must
complete a periodic firearms
background check for security personnel
whose duties require access to covered
weapons. A satisfactory periodic
firearms background check must be
completed within 5 calendar years of
the most recent satisfactory firearms
background check.
(ii) Licensees and certificate holders
who had conducted firearms
background checks pursuant to a
confirmatory order issued by the NRC
before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL
RULE], must complete a periodic
firearms background check for security
personnel whose duties continue to
require access to covered weapons. A
satisfactory periodic firearms
background check must be completed
within 5 calendar years of the most
recent satisfactory firearms background
check.
(iii) The licensee or certificate holder
must complete the periodic firearms
background check within the allowance
period specified in paragraph (f) of this
section.
(11) Accomplishment of break in
service firearms background checks. (i)
The licensee or certificate holder must
complete a new satisfactory firearms
background check if the security
personnel has had a break in service
with their employing licensee,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
certificate holder, or their security
contractor which is for a duration of
greater than one week.
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder
must complete a new satisfactory
firearms background check if the
security personnel has transferred from
a different licensee or certificate holder.
(iii) A break in service means the
security personnel’s cessation of
employment with the licensee,
certificate holder, or their security
contractor, notwithstanding that the
previous licensee or certificate holder
completed a satisfactory firearms
background check on the individual
within the last 5 years.
(iv) Exceptions:
(A) For the purposes of this section,
a break in service does not include a
security personnel’s temporary active
duty with the U.S. military reserves or
National Guard.
(B) The licensees or certificate
holders, in lieu of completing a new
satisfactory firearms background check,
may instead verify via an industry-wide
information-sharing database that the
security personnel has completed a
satisfactory firearms background check
within the previous 12 months,
provided that this previous firearms
background check included a duty
station location in the State or Territory
where the licensee or certificate holder
(who would otherwise be accomplishing
the firearms background check) is
located or the activity is solely
occurring.
(12) If subsequent to the NRC’s
approval of an application for Section
161A authority under § 73.18, a change
occurs in the licensee’s or certificate
holder’s ownership of a facility,
radioactive material, or other property
or a security contractor that provides
security services to the licensee or
certificate holder, then the licensee or
certificate holder is not required to
conduct a break in service firearms
background check for the security
personnel whose duties require access
to covered weapons.
(13) With regard to accomplishing the
requirements for other background (e.g.,
criminal history records) checks or
personnel security investigations under
the NRC’s access authorization or
personal security clearance program
requirements of this chapter, the
licensee or certificate holder may not
substitute a satisfactory firearms
background check in lieu of completing
these other required background checks
or security investigations.
(14) If a licensee or certificate holder
has completed initial satisfactory
firearms background checks pursuant to
a Commission order issued before
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57119
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE],
then the licensee or certificate holder is
not required to conduct a new initial
firearms background check for its
current security personnel. However,
the licensee or certificate holder must
conduct initial firearms background
checks on new security personnel and
periodic and break in service firearms
background checks on current security
personnel in accordance with the
provisions of this section.
(15) A licensee or certificate holder
who withdraws their application for
Section 161A authority or whose
application was disapproved by the
NRC must discontinue conducting
firearms background checks.
(16) A licensee or certificate holder
whose authority under Section 161A
has been rescinded or was revoked by
the NRC must discontinue conducting
firearms background checks.
(c) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Periodic firearms background
checks. (1) Licensees and certificate
holders must complete a satisfactory
periodic firearms background check at
least once every 5 calendar years for
security personnel whose continuing
duties require access to covered
weapons.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders
must complete a periodic firearms
background check within the same
calendar month as the initial, or most
recent, firearms background check with
an allowance period to midnight of the
last day of the calendar month of
expiration.
(3) Licensees and certificate holders
may continue the security personnel’s
duties requiring access to covered
weapons pending the satisfactory
completion of a periodic firearms
background check. However, licensees
and certificate holders must remove
security personnel from duties requiring
access to covered weapons if the
satisfactory completion of a periodic
firearms background check does not
occur before the expiration of the
allowance period.
(g) Notification of removal. (1)
Licensees and certificate holders must
notify the NRC Headquarters Operations
Center by telephone within 72 hours
after removing security personnel from
duties requiring access to covered
weapons due to the identification or
occurrence of any Federal or State
disqualifying status condition or event
that would prohibit them from
possessing, receiving, or using firearms
or ammunition. Licensees and
certificate holders must contact the NRC
Headquarters Operations Center at the
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57120
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
phone numbers specified in table 1 of
appendix A of this part.
(2) Exception. The licensee or
certificate holder is not required to
notify the NRC if the licensee’s or
certificate holder’s security management
was notified by the affected security
personnel within 72 hours of the
identification or occurrence of any
Federal or State disqualifying status
condition or event that would prohibit
them from possessing, receiving, or
using firearms or ammunition.
(h) Security personnel responsibilities.
(1) Security personnel assigned to duties
requiring access to covered weapons
must notify their employing licensee’s
or certificate holder’s security
management within 72 hours of the
identification or occurrence of any
Federal or State disqualifying status
condition or event that would prohibit
them from possessing, receiving, or
using firearms or ammunition.
(2) This notification requirement is
applicable to all security personnel
assigned duties requiring access to
covered weapons, irrespective of
whether they are directly employed by
the licensee or certificate holder or
employed by a contractor providing
security services to the licensee or
certificate holder.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Training for security personnel
subject to firearms background checks.
(1) Licensees and certificate holders
must include within their Firearms
Background Check Plan the
development and accomplishment of
training modules for security personnel
assigned official duties requiring access
to covered weapons.
(2) The training modules must
include information on the following
topics:
(i) Federal disqualifying status
conditions or events specified in 18
U.S.C. 922(g) and (n) and the ATF’s
implementing regulations in 27 CFR
part 478 (including any applicable
definitions) identifying categories of
persons who are prohibited from
possessing, receiving, or using any
firearms or ammunition;
(ii) Any applicable State disqualifying
status conditions or events;
(iii) The continuing responsibility of
security personnel subject to a firearms
background check to promptly and
voluntarily notify their employing
licensee or certificate holder of the
identification or occurrence of any
Federal or State disqualifying status
condition or event; and
(iv) The process for appealing to the
FBI a ‘‘denied’’ or ‘‘delayed’’ NICS
response.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
(3) Licensees and certificate holders
must conduct periodic refresher training
on these modules at an annual
frequency for security personnel
assigned official duties requiring access
to covered weapons.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) Appeals and resolution of
erroneous system information. (1) The
licensee or certificate holder may not
assign security personnel who have
receive a ‘‘denied’’ or a ‘‘delayed’’ NICS
response to duties requiring access to
covered weapons:
(i) During the pendency of an appeal
of a ‘‘denied’’ NICS response; or
(ii) During the pendency of providing
to the FBI and evaluating any necessary
additional information to resolve a
‘‘delayed’’ NICS response.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Challenges of the accuracy and
correctness of records. (i) If the
individual wishes to challenge the
accuracy of the record upon which the
‘‘denied’’ or ‘‘delayed’’ response is
based, or if the individual wishes to
assert that his or her rights to possess or
receive a firearm have been restored by
lawful process, he or she must first
contact the FBI at the address stated in
paragraph (p)(4)(i) of this section.
(ii) The individual must file any
appeal of a ‘‘denied’’ response or file a
request to resolve a ‘‘delayed’’ response
within 45 calendar days after the date
the licensee or certificate holder notifies
the individual of the adverse response.
(iii) The individual appealing a
‘‘denied’’ response or resolving a
‘‘delayed’’ response is responsible for
providing the FBI any additional
information the FBI requires to resolve
the adverse response. These individuals
must supply this information to the FBI
within 45 calendar days after the FBI’s
response is issued.
(iv) The individual may request
extensions of the time to supply the
additional information requested by the
FBI in support of a timely appeal or
resolution request. These extension
requests must be made to the licensee or
certificate holder. The licensee or
certificate holder may grant an
extension request for good cause, as
determined by the licensee or certificate
holder.
(v) The individual’s appeal or request
submitted to the FBI must include
appropriate documentation or record(s)
establishing the legal and/or factual
basis for the challenge. Any record or
document of a court or other
government entity or official furnished
in support of an appeal must be certified
by the court or other government entity
or official as a true copy.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(vi) The individual may supplement
their initial appeal or request,
subsequent to the 45-day filing
deadline, with additional information as
it becomes available, for example, where
obtaining a true copy of a court
transcript may take longer than 45 days.
The individual should note in their
appeal or request any information or
records that are being obtained, but are
not yet available.
*
*
*
*
*
(r) Sunsetting of orders. For licensees
who received an NRC order designating
them as part of an interim class of
facilities eligible to apply for Section
161A authority prior to [EFFECTIVE
DATE OF FINAL RULE], the following
provisions apply regarding the
sunsetting of these designation orders.
(1) Licensees issued such orders are
no longer considered part of an interim
class of facilities eligible to apply for
Section 161A authority but instead are
encompassed within the Commissiondesignated classes of facilities,
activities, and other property specified
in § 73.18(c).
(2) Licensees issued such orders must
comply with the requirements of this
section, in lieu of complying with the
firearms background check
requirements of those orders.
Accordingly, the requirements of those
orders are superseded in their entirety
by the requirements of this section.
(3) Licensees issued such orders must
update any procedures, instructions,
and training material they have
developed in response to the orders to
reflect the transition from requirements
under the order to the requirements of
this section. Licensees must complete
these transition actions by [DATE 60
DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FINAL RULE].
(4) Licensees issued such orders must
notify the NRC in writing, in accordance
with § 73.4, of the completion of these
transition actions. Licensees must
complete this notification by [DATE 70
DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FINAL RULE].
■ 5. In § 73.51, add paragraph (f) to read
as follows:
§ 73.51 Requirements for the physical
protection of stored spent nuclear fuel and
high-level radioactive waste.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Response requirements. For
licensees employing covered weapons
as part of their protective strategy, the
licensee must train each armed member
of the security organization using
covered weapons to prevent or impede
attempted acts of radiological sabotage
by using force sufficient to counter the
force directed at that armed member,
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
including the use of deadly force as
authorized by applicable State or
Federal law.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day
of September, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, Texas 76177;
telephone: (817) 222–5439; email:
tyrone.d.millard@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
provide comments, written data, views,
or arguments relating to this notice.
Comments should be submitted to the
address specified above. All comments
received on or before the closing date
will be considered. All comments
received will be available in the docket
for examination by interested persons.
Comments may be inspected at the
office of the FAA, Rotorcraft Standards
Staff, Rotorcraft Directorate, 5th Floor,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth,
Texas, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
This notice announces the
FAA’s intent to designate Silvercraft
S.co.p.a. (Silvercraft) Type Certificate
(TC) H2EU, issued in the normal
category, as abandoned. The FAA has
been unable to locate Silvercraft, the TC
holder, concerning the continued
airworthiness of the aircraft certificated
under its TC. The Federal Aviation
Regulations (regulations) require that TC
holders report certain failures,
malfunctions, and defects to the FAA.
The regulations also require, upon
request, that TC holders submit design
changes to the FAA that are necessary
to correct any unsafe condition in their
products. The FAA is responsible for
surveillance of Silvercraft’s ability to
perform continued operational safety
management and oversight of the
helicopter on its TC. This action is
intended to ensure that Silvercraft
Model SH–4 helicopters are under a TC
that has active continued operational
safety management and oversight by a
TC holder that can be subject to periodic
safety audits by the FAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice
must be submitted to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Rotorcraft
Standards Staff, ASW–110, Rotorcraft
Directorate, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, Texas 76177; fax: (817) 222–
5961.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyrone D. Millard, Aerospace Engineer,
Discussion
This notice is intended to inform the
public that the FAA intends to designate
Silvercraft Type Certificate H2EU,
issued in the normal category, as
abandoned and that no additional
original airworthiness certificates will
be issued against Type Certificate H2EU.
On September 8, 1968, Registro
Aeronautico Italiano (now Ente
Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile) issued
Silvercraft an Italian TC. On September
11, 1968, the FAA issued TC H2EU for
Model SH–4 helicopters to Silvercraft
S.co.p.a., Via Carlo Alberto n. 42, 14049
Nissa Monfferrato (At), Italy. On May 2,
2011, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, revoked Silvercraft’s
TC SO/A–145. The reason for the
revocation is Silvercraft’s failure to
apply for a design organization approval
or an alternative, which is required as
an EASA TC holder. Additionally,
Silvercraft has failed to respond to all
communications from EASA.
As a result of the information
provided by EASA, the FAA sent a
registered letter to Silvercraft dated
February 27, 2015, informing the
company that we intend to classify TC
H2EU as abandoned unless, within 60
days of receipt of the letter, we receive
a written statement from them stating
they are the holder of TC H2EU. The
FAA has also attempted to make contact
with Silvercraft by other means
including telephone communication
and internet searches but without
success. A review of the FAA National
Aircraft Registration Database confirms
that there are no U.S.- registered SH–4
helicopters.
[FR Doc. 2015–23669 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 21
Notice of Intent To Designate as
Abandoned Normal Category Type
Certificate: Silvercraft S.co.p.a., Type
Certificate No. H2EU
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to designate
Silvercraft S.p.A. type certificate issued
in the normal category as abandoned;
request for comments.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:51 Sep 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
57121
The basis for issuance of a TC not
only includes the applicant’s submittal
of various reports and data, but also the
submittal of information about periodic
inspections and maintenance to assure
the continued operational safety of the
helicopter. Among other regulatory
requirements, 14 CFR 21.3 requires TC
holders to report certain failures,
malfunctions, and defects to the FAA;
and 14 CFR 21.99 requires that TC
holders submit design changes that are
necessary to correct any unsafe
condition in its products. Silvercraft is
obligated to meet these requirements for
all aircraft under its TC.
The FAA is responsible for
surveillance of a TC holder’s ability to
perform continued operational safety
management and oversight of each
helicopter on its TC. The FAA continues
to monitor the safety performance of a
helicopter type design after the aircraft
is approved and placed into service.
This is accomplished through postcertification review of TC holder data,
review of service difficulty reports,
communication with aircraft owners
and operators, and other information
provided by a TC holder. Periodic safety
audits cannot be accomplished if the TC
holder cannot be located. To date, the
FAA has been unsuccessful in all
attempts to locate Silvercraft.
Hence, the FAA proposes to flag TC
H2EU and consider it abandoned. This
notice informs the public that the FAA
intends to designate TC H2EU as
abandoned and no additional original
airworthiness certificates will be issued
against that TC. This action is not
intended as a surrender, suspension,
revocation, or termination of the TC as
those terms are used in 14 CFR part 21.
However, this action is intended to
ensure that each Silvercraft Model SH–
4 helicopter is under a TC that has
active continued operational safety
management and oversight by a TC
holder that can be subject to periodic
safety audits by the FAA.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on September
10, 2015.
James A. Grigg,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–24098 Filed 9–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\22SEP1.SGM
22SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57106-57121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23669]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 183 / Tuesday, September 22, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 57106]]
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 73
[NRC-2011-0015; NRC-2011-0018]
RIN 3150-AI49
Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event
Notifications
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Supplemental proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its regulations that would implement its authority under Section
161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), to permit NRC
licensees and certificate holders to apply for preemption authority and
enhanced weapons authority, and conduct associated firearms background
checks. The NRC proposed new regulations on February 3, 2011, that
would implement its authority under Section 161A. On January 10, 2013,
the NRC proposed to further revise the regulations to include at-
reactor independent spent fuel storage installations (ISFSI) as a class
of designated facilities. The NRC is now proposing to further revise
the proposed rule language that addresses the voluntary application for
enhanced weapons authority, preemption authority, and the mandatory
firearms background checks under Section 161A.
DATES: Submit comments on the supplemental proposed rule and draft
regulatory guide by December 7, 2015. Also submit comments specific to
the information collection aspects of this supplemental proposed rule
by December 7, 2015. Comments received after this date will be
considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to
ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the supplemental proposed rule by
any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0018. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this document.
Email comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do
not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact
us at 301-415-1677.
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission at 301-415-1101.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemakings and
Adjudications Staff.
Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (Eastern Time) Federal
workdays; telephone: 301-415-1677.
See Section XI, ``Paperwork Reduction Act,'' of this document for
direction on submitting comments on the information collection aspects
of this supplemental proposed rule. See Section XIV, ``Availability of
Guidance,'' of this document for direction on submitting comments on
the draft regulatory guide.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret S. Ellenson, Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation, telephone: 301-415-0894; email:
Margaret.Ellenson@nrc.gov; Philip G. Brochman, Office of Nuclear
Security and Incident Response, telephone: 301-287-3691; email:
Phil.Brochman@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments.
A. Obtaining Information.
B. Submitting Comments.
II. Background.
III. Discussion.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis.
V. Cumulative Effects of Regulation.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Certification.
VII. Regulatory Analysis.
VIII. Backfitting and Issue Finality.
IX. Plain Writing.
X. Environmental Assessment and Proposed Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact.
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act.
XII. Criminal Penalties.
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards.
XIV. Availability of Guidance.
XV. Availability of Documents.
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2011-0018 or Docket ID NRC-2011-0015
when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this
supplemental proposed rule or the draft regulatory guide, respectively.
You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by
any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0018 for the
supplemental proposed rule and Docket ID NRC-2011-0015 for the revised
draft regulatory guide.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it is available
in ADAMS) is provided the first time that it is mentioned in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. In addition, for the convenience of
the reader, instructions about obtaining materials related to this
rulemaking are provided in Section XV, ``Availability of Documents,''
of this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
[[Page 57107]]
B. Submitting Comments
Please include the appropriate NRC Docket ID NRC-2011-0018
(supplemental proposed rule) or NRC-2011-0015 (draft regulatory guide)
in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into
ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.
II. Background
A. Section 161A of the AEA
On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed into law the Energy Policy
Act of 2005 (EPAct), Public Law 109-58, 119 Stat. 594 (2005). Section
653 of the EPAct amended the AEA by adding Section 161A, ``Use of
Firearms by Security Personnel'' (42 U.S.C. 2201a). Section 161A of the
AEA provides the NRC with authority to permit a licensee's or
certificate holder's security personnel to transfer, receive, possess,
transport, import, and use weapons, devices, ammunition, or other
firearms, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms
laws (and implementing regulations) that may prohibit or restrict these
actions (preemption authority). Additionally, Section 161A authorized
the Commission to permit the security personnel of licensees and
certificate holders to obtain enhanced weapons, such as machine guns,
short-barreled shotguns, and short-barreled rifles (enhanced weapons).
Section 161A requires the Commission to designate the classes of
facilities, radioactive material, and other property eligible to apply
for preemption authority or enhanced weapon authority. Section 161A
also mandates that all security personnel that receive, possess,
transport, import, or use a weapon, ammunition, or a device otherwise
prohibited by State, local, or certain Federal laws, including
regulations, as provided by Section 161A.b. (42 U.S.C. 2201a(b)), shall
be subject to a fingerprint-based background check by the U.S. Attorney
General and a firearms background check against the Federal Bureau of
Investigation's (FBI) National Instant Criminal Background Check System
(NICS).
B. The Firearms Guidelines--Implementation of Section 161A of the AEA
Section 161A.d. of the AEA provides that the Commission shall, with
the approval of the Attorney General, develop and promulgate guidelines
for the implementation of this statute. On September 11, 2009, the NRC,
with the approval of the Attorney General, published Firearms
Guidelines in the Federal Register (74 FR 46800). These guidelines
allow NRC licensees and certificate holders to apply for preemption
authority only (hereafter referred to as stand-alone preemption
authority) or combined preemption and enhanced weapons authority
(hereafter referred to as enhanced weapons authority). The statute also
includes provisions for firearms background checks for those who apply
for Section 161A authorities (stand-alone preemption authority or
enhanced weapons authority).
The Firearms Guidelines permit the NRC to designate applicable
classes of facilities and to approve application for Section 161A
authority via both orders and regulations. Following publication of the
Firearms Guidelines, the NRC received requests from several licensees
to obtain stand-alone preemption authority via order (i.e., prior to
the NRC's issuance of the final enhanced weapons rule). During its
review of these licensee requests, the NRC staff identified
implementation issues related to the firearms background checks for
these licensees. The NRC staff and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)
staff developed a revision to the Firearms Guidelines to address these
issues. The principal change in the revised Firearms Guidelines was to
limit the scope of the firearms background check requirement to only
those licensees that apply to the NRC for Section 161A authority. The
NRC, with the approval of the Attorney General, published the revised
Firearms Guidelines in the Federal Register (79 FR 36100; June 25,
2014). Both the 2009 Firearms Guidelines and the 2014 Firearms
Guidelines are available at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
NRC-2008-0465.
C. October 2006 Proposed Rule
In parallel with the development of the 2009 Firearms Guidelines,
the NRC initiated a rulemaking that would implement the new authorities
and provisions in Section 161A of the AEA. On October 26, 2006, the NRC
published proposed regulations in the Federal Register (71 FR 62664,
``Power Reactor Security Requirements'') to implement the provisions of
Section 161A as one component of a larger proposed amendment to its
regulations under parts 50, 72, and 73 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR). These proposed implementing regulations
were consistent to the extent possible with discussions between the NRC
and the DOJ on the implementation of the statute.
The NRC had proposed that the provisions of Section 161A would
apply only to power reactor facilities including both operating and
decommissioning power reactors and Category I Strategic Special Nuclear
Material (Cat. I SSNM) facilities (i.e., facilities possessing or using
formula quantities or greater of strategic special nuclear material).
This structure was proposed to permit these two highest-risk classes of
licensed facilities to apply to the NRC for Section 161A authority. The
NRC had also indicated that it would consider making Section 161A
authority available to additional classes of facilities, radioactive
material, or other property (including ISFSIs) in a separate, future
rulemaking.
D. February 2011 Proposed Rule
On February 3, 2011, the NRC published in the Federal Register a
new proposed rule, ``Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks and
Security Event Notifications'' (76 FR 6200), referred to as the
Enhanced Weapons rulemaking, that reflected the approved 2009 Firearms
Guidelines. The 2011 proposed rule would implement the provisions of
Section 161A and would make several changes to the security event
notification requirements in 10 CFR part 73 to address imminent attacks
or threats against power reactors as well as suspicious events that
could be indicative of potential preoperational reconnaissance,
surveillance, or challenges to security systems by adversaries. The
public was provided 180 days to review and comment on the February 2011
proposed rule and associated guidance.
[[Page 57108]]
E. Preemption Designation Orders and Confirmatory Orders
Subsequent to the publication of the 2011 proposed rule, the NRC
received requests from 10 licensees (located on 8 separate sites) to
obtain stand-alone preemption authority. In response to the requests,
the NRC issued designation order EA-13-092 (78 FR 35984) on June 14,
2013. Order EA-13-092 designated the 10 licensees as part of an interim
class of licensed facilities eligible to apply for stand-alone
preemption authority under Section 161A of the AEA, contained direction
related to completing firearms background checks for security personnel
whose official duties require access to covered weapons, and contained
direction for the licensees on submitting applications and supporting
information to obtain preemption authority via a confirmatory order.
Subsequent to the NRC's issuance of Order EA-13-092, two licensees
(located at the same site) withdrew their applications for Section 161A
preemption authority. The NRC staff is currently reviewing the
remaining applications for preemption authority.
F. January 2013 Supplemental Proposed Rule
On January 10, 2013, the NRC published a supplemental proposed rule
(78 FR 2214) to add at-reactor ISFSIs as a class of designated
facilities under Sec. 73.18(c) that would be eligible to apply for
Section 161A authority. Including at-reactor ISFSIs in the proposed
rulemaking would ensure a consistent transition from the orders to the
final implementing regulations for reactor licensees and any ISFSIs co-
located at the reactor site. When a reactor facility and an ISFSI share
a common security guard force, as is the case for at-reactor ISFSIs,
the NRC staff recognizes that it may be expedient for both facilities
at the site to have stand-alone preemption authority if the licensee or
certificate holder applies for it and is approved. In the supplemental
proposed rule, the NRC indicated that other classes of facilities and
activities (e.g., away-from-reactor ISFSIs and transportation of spent
nuclear fuel) would be addressed in a separate, future rulemaking (as
originally discussed in the October 2006 proposed rule). The public was
provided 45 days to review and comment on the January 2013 supplemental
proposed rule.
III. Discussion
Section 161A of the AEA provides the NRC with the authority to
permit a licensee or certificate holder's security personnel to
transfer, receive, possess, transport, import, and use, weapons,
devices, ammunition or other firearms notwithstanding State, local, and
certain Federal firearms laws (and any implementing regulations) that
may prohibit or restrict these actions. The arsenal of weapons
includes, for example, machine guns, semi-automatic assault weapons,
and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices (i.e., magazines). As
indicated in the February 2011 proposed rule, an NRC licensee or
certificate holder interested in obtaining Section 161A authority
(either combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority or
stand-alone preemption authority) may voluntarily apply to the NRC to
take advantage of this new authority. For the purposes of the proposed
Enhanced Weapons rulemaking, the term ``certificate holder'' refers
only to entitles holding a 10 CFR part 76 certificate of compliance,
not to entities holding a 10 CFR part 72 certificate of compliance.
However, the NRC notes that there are currently no existing 10 CFR part
76 certificate holders because on February 2, 2015, the NRC terminated
the 10 CFR part 76 certificate of compliance for the United States
Enrichment Corporation's Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (ADAMS Package
Accession No. ML14318A331). While there are no existing 10 CFR part 76
certificate holders, the NRC is proposing to include such holders in
this supplemental proposed rule so that the scope of the Firearms
Guidelines and the NRC's corresponding implementing regulations
continue to be consistent.
Licensees and certificate holders falling within the Commission-
designated classes of facilities, radioactive material, or other
property would be eligible to apply for Section 161A authority and
would be required to complete the firearms background check
requirements mandated by Section 161A and the Firearms Guidelines. The
background checks would be required for security personnel whose
official duties require access to covered weapons.
The 2009 Firearms Guidelines provided that the security personnel
for all licensees and certificate holders that fall within the
designated eligible classes of facilities must undergo firearms
background checks, whether or not a particular licensee or certificate
holder intends to seek preemption authority. However, under the revised
2014 Firearms Guidelines, the requirement for background checks would
apply to only those licensees and certificate holders who apply for
Section 161A authority. Other changes to the Firearms Guidelines
included the removal of the definition of ``standard weapon'' and the
removal of references to standard weapons in the definitions of
``covered weapon'' and ``enhanced weapon.'' There were also minor
conforming and clarifying editorial changes throughout the revised 2014
Firearms Guidelines.
In the February 2011 proposed rule that would implement the NRC's
authority under Section 161A of the AEA, the NRC proposed amendments to
10 CFR part 73 by adding new definitions, processes for obtaining
enhanced weapons, requirements for firearms background checks, and
security event notification requirements for stolen or lost enhanced
weapons. This supplemental proposed rule continues the proposed changes
from the February 2011 proposed rule and the January 2013 supplemental
proposed rule and supplements or modifies the following existing or
proposed regulations in 10 CFR part 73:
Section 73.2, ``Definitions.''
Proposed Sec. 73.18, ``Authorization for use of enhanced
weapons and preemption of firearms laws.''
Proposed Sec. 73.19, ``Firearms background checks for
armed security personnel.''
Section 73.51, ``Requirements for the physical protection
of stored spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste.''
This supplemental proposed rule would make the following changes to
the proposed requirements of 10 CFR part 73:
Require firearms background checks only for those
licensees and certificate holders who have applied for Section 161A
authority and only for security personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons.
Require periodic firearms background checks at least once
every 5 years. Previously the maximum periodicity was proposed to be at
least once every 3 years. However, licensees and certificate holders
would continue to be able to conduct periodic firearms background
checks at a periodicity of less than every 5 years, at their
discretion.
Conform the process for conducting firearms background
checks and applying for preemption authority to the updated
requirements specified in the revised 2014 Firearms Guidelines (e.g.,
removal of the proposed 30-day and 180-day milestones in conducting
firearms background checks).
Remove the definition of ``standard weapon'' and remove
the references to standard weapon from the definitions of ``covered
weapon'' and ``enhanced
[[Page 57109]]
weapon,'' per the revised 2014 Firearms Guidelines.
Revise the definitions of ``combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority,'' ``covered weapon,'' and ``stand-
alone preemption authority'' as conforming changes.
Separately, the NRC would make several clarifying and corrective
changes to the process for obtaining stand-alone preemption authority
and the requirements for firearms background checks, based upon
language approved by the Commission in the designation orders and
confirmatory orders issued by the NRC subsequent to the publication of
the February 2011 proposed rule.
The NRC would also make several additional changes to clarify the
agency's review and acceptance criteria for evaluating applications for
stand-alone preemption authority, based upon lessons learned by the NRC
staff in reviewing existing applications for preemption authority,
including developing confirmatory orders to those licensees requesting
Section 161A authority, and comments received in response to prior
versions of this proposed rule. Furthermore, to ensure consistency
between processes, the NRC would also make corresponding changes to the
proposed process for obtaining enhanced weapons authority.
Sunsetting of Orders
In the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) to SECY-12-0125, ``Staff
Requirements--Interim Actions to Execute Commission Preemption
Authority Under Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
Amended'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML12326A653), the Commission directed
the NRC staff to include in the final rule a plan ``to sunset the
interim designation order and the confirmatory orders.'' Accordingly,
the NRC has developed a plan to sunset these orders and is taking
advantage of this supplemental proposed rule to include new language in
Sec. Sec. 73.18 and 73.19 to accomplish the Commission's direction.
The NRC is proposing new paragraphs in Sec. Sec. 73.18 and 73.19 to
indicate that NRC approvals of Section 161A authority via confirmatory
order would remain valid after issuance of a final rule. However, the
licensees who received orders granting preemption authority prior to
issuance of a final rule would be subject to the implementing
regulations in Sec. Sec. 73.18 and 73.19, in lieu of the requirements
specified in the confirmatory orders (i.e., the requirements of the
orders would be superseded in their entirety by the requirements in the
final rule). The licensees who receive these confirmatory orders would
be required, within 60 days of the effective date of the final rule, to
update their applicable procedures, instructions, and training to
reflect the final rule's requirements. These licensees would be
required to notify the NRC, within 70 days of the effective date of the
final rule, when they have completed these actions. Once the NRC
receives this notification and inspects the licensee's transition
actions, the NRC would rescind the orders.
The Commission would rescind its designation of licensed facilities
as part of an interim class of facilities eligible to apply for
preemption authority prior to issuance of a final rule once the
Enhanced Weapons rule is implemented. The Commission would designate
the permanent classes of facilities eligible to apply for Section 161A
authority in Sec. 73.18(c) of the rule. All of the facilities issued a
designation order would be included in the final rule's list of
designated facilities (i.e., power reactor facilities, Cat. I SSNM
facilities, and at-reactor ISFSIs). Accordingly, the firearms
background check requirements contained in these designation orders
would be replaced in their entirety by the requirements in Sec. 73.19.
Public Comments
At this time, the NRC is only seeking comments on the revisions
proposed by this supplemental proposed rule. The NRC will address
public comments on the February 2011 proposed rule, the January 2013
supplemental proposed rule, and this supplemental proposed rule in the
final rule.
IV. Section-by-Section Analysis
The following paragraphs describe the specific changes proposed by
this supplemental proposed rule.
10 CFR 73.2, Definitions
The proposed new definitions for the terms Combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority, Covered weapon, and Stand-
alone preemption authority would be revised to reflect the revised 2014
Firearms Guidelines. The proposed new definition for the term Standard
weapon would be removed to reflect the revised 2014 Firearms Guidelines
with conforming, editorial changes made to the proposed definition for
the term Enhanced weapon.
10 CFR 73.18, Authorization for Use of Enhanced Weapons and Preemption
of Firearms Laws
In paragraph (d), the NRC would set forth the requirements and
process for licensees and certificate holders who are included within
the classes of facilities, radioactive material, and other property
specified in Sec. 73.18(c)(1) and desire to voluntarily apply for
stand-alone preemption authority under Section 161A of the AEA. The
application would require initial information describing the licensee's
or certificate holder's request for preemption authority, its purposes
and objectives for requesting this authority, and a description of its
Firearms Background Check Plan, including training for security
personnel on the background check disqualifying conditions and
notification requirements. Firearms background checks would only be
required for security personnel whose official duties require access to
covered weapons, of licensees or certificate holders who apply for
Section 161A authority. Licensees and certificate holders would be
required to submit their applications in writing and under oath or
affirmation.
The licensee or certificate holder would also be required to submit
supplemental information to the NRC on the completion of satisfactory
firearms background checks and required training for security personnel
who require access to covered weapons. The timing of the submission of
the supplemental information will be at the discretion of the licensee
or certificate holder, although the licensee or certificate holder must
have completed a sufficient number of satisfactory checks to permit the
licensee or certificate holder to meet its security-personnel minimum
staffing requirements as specified in its physical security plan and
any applicable fatigue requirements under 10 CFR part 26.
Subsequent to the completion of the submission of all required
information, the NRC will review the information and document the
agency's decision to approve or disapprove the application.
Licensees or certificate holders cannot commence firearms
background checks until they have received notification from the NRC
that the agency has accepted for review their application for stand-
alone preemption authority. Once the NRC has reviewed and approved a
licensee's or certificate holder's application for stand-alone
preemption authority, the licensee or certificate holder must assign
only security personnel who have completed a satisfactory firearms
background check
[[Page 57110]]
to duties requiring access to covered weapons.
In paragraph (e), the NRC would set forth the requirements and
process for eligible licensees and certificate holders (as specified in
Sec. 73.18(c)(2)) who choose to voluntarily apply for combined
enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority under Section 161A
of the AEA. Paragraph (e) would require in the application initial
information describing the licensee's or certificate holder's request
for enhanced weapons authority, its purposes and objectives for
requesting this authority, and a description of its proposed Firearms
Background Check Plan, including training of security personnel on the
disqualifying status conditions and events. The application would be
required to address how security personnel notify the licensee or
certificate holder security management of the identification or
occurrence of any Federal or State disqualifying conditions or events.
Also, under the 2011 proposed rule, applicants for combined enhanced
weapons and preemption authority that already have preemption authority
under Sec. 73.18(d) would not be required to reapply for preemption
authority in their Sec. 73.18(e) application. That aspect of the 2011
proposed rule is unchanged by this supplemental proposed rule.
Firearms background checks would only be required of applicants for
Section 161A authority. Those regulated entities required to conduct
firearms background checks would need to conduct the checks on all
security personnel whose official duties require access to covered
weapons, which includes enhanced weapons. Licensee and certificate
holders would be required to submit their applications in writing and
under oath or affirmation. Licensees applying for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority would be required to submit
their application under the applicable regulations for a license
amendment in 10 CFR parts 50, 52, 70, or 72. Certificate holders to
which the supplemental proposed rule would apply (i.e., 10 CFR part 76
certificate of compliance holders), would be required to submit their
applications under the applicable regulations for a certificate of
compliance amendment under 10 CFR part 76.
The application would include the additional technical information
required by Sec. 73.18(f) addressing the specific enhanced weapons
that the licensee or certificate holder intends to use. The licensee or
certificate holder would also submit supplemental information to the
NRC on the completion of both the firearms background checks and the
required training (on disqualifying conditions and events) for security
personnel whose official duties require access to covered weapons. For
this purpose, the term ``completion'' means that a sufficient number of
satisfactory checks are complete to meet a regulated entity's minimum
staffing and fatigue requirements.
The timing of the submission of the supplemental information would
be at the discretion of the licensee or certificate holder when a
sufficient number of satisfactory checks are complete. A licensee or
certificate holder who has previously been approved for stand-alone
preemption authority would not be required to repeat the initial
firearms background checks on security personnel conducted to support
its original application; rather the licensee or certificate holder
would only need to state in its application for enhanced weapons
authority that it was previously granted preemption authority by the
NRC and provide the effective date of that authority.
The NRC would review the application and supplemental submittals
and would document the agency's decision to approve or disapprove the
application.
Licensees or certificate holders must commence firearms background
checks only after they have received notification from the NRC that the
agency has accepted for review their application for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority. Furthermore, once the NRC
has approved a licensee's or certificate holder's application for
combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority, the
licensee or certificate holder must assign only security personnel who
have completed a satisfactory firearms background check to duties
requiring access to any covered weapons (including enhanced weapons).
Licensees and certificate holders who have been previously approved
for enhanced weapons authority and wish to use a different type,
caliber, or quantity of enhanced weapons from that previously approved
by the NRC would be required to submit a new application under
paragraph (e).
In paragraph (f)(2)(iii), a conforming change would be made to
remove the reference to employment of ``standard weapons'' in the
safeguards contingency plan.
In paragraph (j), a corrective change would be made to add Sec.
73.51 to the list of regulations specifying training requirements on
the use of enhanced weapons at specific license ISFSIs. This change
would address the potential for an at-reactor, specific license ISFSI
to possess enhanced weapons at both the reactor and the co-located
ISFSI. This provision would require the ISFSI licensee employing
enhanced weapons to train its security personnel on the use of
sufficient force, including deadly force, consistent with the co-
located power reactor facility. Such training is already required for
the reactor licensee's security personnel under the reactor security
requirements in Sec. 73.55(k)(3). The NRC anticipates that such co-
located licensees would use a single integrated guard force for both
facilities such that the security personnel are considered fungible
between the two facilities. Consequently, the application of the same
training requirements for the use of the enhanced weapons is
appropriate.
In paragraphs (n)(2), (n)(3), and (n)(4), conforming changes would
replace the term ``covered weapons'' with ``enhanced weapons'' to be
consistent with the revised 2014 Firearms Guidelines.
In paragraph (s), the NRC would add new provisions to provide for
the transition from stand-alone preemption authority and enhanced
weapons authority approved by the NRC via orders to a licensee or
certificate holder, to approval via the proposed regulations in Sec.
73.18. While the NRC's previous authorizations for Section 161A
authority under those orders would remain valid, these licensees would
be subject to the implementing requirements of Sec. 73.18, in lieu of
the requirements contained in these orders. However these licensees
would not be required to reapply for Section 161A authority under the
provisions of Sec. 73.18. Licensees would be required to update
procedures, instructions, and training to reflect any revised
requirements in the final rule and notify the NRC of the completion of
this action. The licensee's actions and notification would be required
to be completed within 60 days and 70 days, respectively, of the
effective date of the final rule. Following receipt of the licensee's
notification and inspection of the licensee's actions, the NRC would
rescind these orders.
10 CFR 73.19, Firearms Background Checks for Armed Security Personnel
Paragraph (b) would be revised in its entirety to define new
general requirements regarding the completion of firearm background
checks. This would include a requirement to establish a Firearms
Background Check
[[Page 57111]]
Plan and to specify the elements of this plan. A Firearms Background
Check Plan would be a component of the licensee's or certificate
holder's 10 CFR part 73, appendix B, required Training and
Qualification plan for security personnel whose official duties require
access to covered weapons. Only those licensees and certificate holders
who have voluntarily applied for Section 161A authority (i.e., stand-
alone preemption authority or for combined enhanced weapons authority
and preemption authority) would be required to conduct firearms
background checks on their security personnel. Accordingly, such
licensees and certificate holders would be required to establish and
implement a Firearms Background Check Plan.
Paragraph (b)(2) would describe the groups of individuals included
within the term security personnel whose official duties require access
to covered weapons. In addition to the security officers themselves
(who directly protect the facility or radioactive material), this term
would include other groups of individuals who have access to covered
weapons and in some cases only enhanced weapons. Examples would
include, but are not limited to, firearms instructors, armorers,
individuals issuing and checking in weapons, individuals with access to
armories and weapons storage lockers, and individuals conducting
inventories of enhanced weapons or removing enhanced weapons from the
site for authorized purposes. Paragraph (b)(3) would specify the
elements of the Firearms Background Check Plan. Paragraphs (b)(4)
through (b)(9) would address requirements on conducting firearms
background checks. Licensees or certificate holders must commence
firearms background checks only after they have received notification
from the NRC that the agency has accepted for review their application
for either stand-alone preemption authority or for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority. Furthermore, once the NRC
has approved a licensee's or certificate holder's application for
either stand-alone preemption authority or for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority, the licensee or certificate
holder must assign only security personnel who have completed a
satisfactory firearms background check to duties requiring access to
covered weapons. Also, applicants for an NRC license or certificate of
compliance may not conduct firearms background checks until after the
NRC has both issued their license or certificate of compliance and
accepted their application for Section 161A authority for review. These
two steps may occur in any order. Finally, this section also includes a
requirement to remove individuals from duties requiring access to
covered weapons if they receive a ``denied NICS response.'' This also
includes removing individuals from duties requiring access to enhanced
weapons if the individual receives a ``delayed NICS response.''
Paragraph (b)(10) would specify the requirements for a periodic
firearms background check, which would be required at least once every
5 years from the most recent check. This periodicity would be
consistent with the Commission's designation order issued to several
licensees. Licensees and certificate holders would be able to conduct
periodic firearms background checks at a shorter periodicity than every
5 years, at their discretion.
Security personnel that cease to be employed by a licensee,
certificate holder, or security contractor, are considered to have a
break in service for the purposes of the enhanced weapons rulemaking.
The licensee or certificate holder would need to complete a new
satisfactory firearms background check for security personnel who
experience a break in service as described in paragraph (b)(11).
Paragraph (b)(11) also addresses exceptions to the break in service
requirement. Paragraph (b)(12) would address changes in the licensee,
certificate holder, or their security contractor that do not require a
break in service firearms background check. Paragraph (b)(13) would
prohibit licensees and certificate holders from using a satisfactory
firearms background check in lieu of completing other required criminal
history records checks or background investigations specified in the
NRC's access authorization or personnel security clearance programs
under other provisions of 10 CFR chapter I.
Paragraph (b)(14) would not require a new initial firearms
background check for security personnel who have completed a
satisfactory firearms background check pursuant to a Commission
designation order issued before the effective date of the final rule.
However, these security personnel would remain subject to the periodic
firearms background check and the break in service firearms background
check requirements of Sec. 73.19. Paragraph (b)(15) would require a
licensee or certificate holder to discontinue conducting firearms
background checks if it withdraws its application for Section 161A
authority. Paragraph (b)(16) would require a licensee or certificate
holder to discontinue conducting firearms background checks if the NRC
rescinds or revokes its Section 161A authority, in accordance with
Sec. 73.18.
Paragraph (c) would be removed and reserved. Because Sec. 73.18(c)
contains the list of classes of facilities and activities eligible to
apply for Section 161A authority and only licensees and certificate
holders who have applied to the NRC under Sec. 73.18 for Section 161A
authority are eligible under Sec. 73.19 to conduct firearms background
checks of their security personnel, the list of classes of facilities
and activities previously proposed in Sec. 73.19(c) for conducting
firearms background checks is now redundant and unnecessary.
Paragraph (f) would be revised to require periodic firearms
background checks to be completed at least once every 5 calendar years.
This change would make the proposed rule consistent with the 2014
Firearms Guidelines and the Commission's designation order EA-13-092,
which required periodic firearms background checks at least once every
5 years on security personnel who require access to covered weapons.
Second, a requirement would be added to specify an allowance period for
completion of a satisfactory periodic firearms background check of 5
years from the date of the most recent firearms background check. This
allowance period would be consistent with the Commission's designation
order. Third, the revised language would clarify that security
personnel may remain assigned to duties requiring access to covered
weapons while pending completion of a periodic firearms background
check. However, if a satisfactory firearms background check is not
completed by the end of the allowance period, then the security
personnel must be removed from duties requiring access to covered
weapons. Independent of the direction in paragraph (f), an individual
who receives a ``denied NICS response'' during a periodic firearms
background check must be removed without delay from duties requiring
access to covered weapons. Finally, the NRC would continue to permit
licensees and certificate holders to accomplish periodic firearms
background checks at a shorter periodicity than the maximum requirement
(i.e., more frequently than once every 5 years), at the licensee's or
certificate holder's discretion.
Paragraph (g) would be revised to clarify the exception for when a
licensee or certificate holder is required to notify the NRC that it
has removed security personnel from duties requiring access to covered
weapons. This exception is intended to encourage security
[[Page 57112]]
personnel to notify the licensee's or certificate holder's security
management of the occurrence of any Federal or State disqualifying
status condition or event within 72 hours. If the security personnel
make the notification, then the licensee or certificate holder is not
required to notify the NRC within 72 hours of the security personnel's
removal. However, in all circumstances, the licensee or certificate
holder would be required to maintain records of such removals under the
Firearms Background Check Plan, as required under revised paragraph
(b)(3)(vi).
Paragraph (h) would be revised to change the notification
timeliness requirement for security personnel who have had a
disqualifying status condition or event from ``3 working days'' to ``72
hours'' to improve regulatory clarity and consistency with the
licensee's and certificate holder's current proposed notification
timeliness requirement in paragraph (g).
Paragraph (j) would be revised to clarify the scope of the training
modules required for security personnel who are subject to firearms
background checks under the licensee's or certificate holder's Firearms
Background Check Plan, as required under paragraph (b)(3)(iii). Modules
would be required on Federal disqualifying status conditions or events,
applicable State disqualifying status conditions or events, the process
for appealing adverse firearms background check results, and the
ongoing obligation of security personnel who are subject to a firearms
background check to notify their licensee's or certificate holder's
security management of the occurrence of such a disqualifying status
condition or event. The modules would also include the requirement on
the timeliness of such notifications (i.e., within 72 hours of the
occurrence of the disqualifying condition or event). Finally, periodic
refresher training on these modules would be required annually.
Paragraph (p)(1) would be revised to clarify its applicability to
security personnel subject to a firearms background check and to remove
the current exception cross-reference to paragraph (b). Limitations on
security personnel's access to covered weapons during the pendency of
an appeal to the FBI would now be found solely in paragraph (p).
Minor editorial changes would be made to paragraph (p)(5),
including adding a title and renumbering subparagraphs. Paragraph
(p)(5)(iv) would be revised to indicate that individuals who are
appealing a firearms background check should submit a request for
extension of time, with respect to the 45-day timeliness requirement on
submitting an appeal, to their licensee or certificate holder rather
than to the FBI. The licensee or certificate holder may grant an
extension request for good cause, as determined by the licensee or
certificate holder. This change is consistent with the 2014 Firearms
Guidelines.
In paragraph (r), the NRC would add new provisions to provide for
the transition from preemption authority and enhanced weapons authority
approved by the NRC via designation orders and confirmatory orders to
approvals via the proposed regulations in Sec. 73.19. While the NRC's
authorizations for Section 161A authority would remain valid after
issuance of a final rule and licensees would not need to reapply for
Section 161A authority, these licensees would be subject to the
implementing requirements of Sec. 73.19, in lieu of the requirements
contained in these orders. However, licensees would not be required to
repeat their initial firearms background checks. Licensees would be
required to update procedures, instructions, and training to reflect
any revised requirements in the final rule and notify the NRC of the
completion of this action. The licensee's actions and notification
would be required to be completed within 60 days and 70 days,
respectively, of the effective date of the final rule. Following
receipt of the licensee's notification and inspection of the licensee's
actions, the NRC would rescind these orders.
10 CFR 73.51, Requirements for the Physical Protection of Stored Spent
Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste
Paragraph (f) would be added as a conforming change to the proposed
change to Sec. 73.18(j) to reflect the potential for a specific
license, at-reactor ISFSI to possess covered weapons at both the
reactor and the co-located ISFSI. This provision would require ISFSI
licensees employing covered weapons to train their security personnel
on the use of sufficient force, including deadly force. The NRC
anticipates that the security organization for a reactor and a co-
located specific license ISFSI employing covered weapons would use an
integrated security organization such that the security personnel are
considered fungible between these two facilities. Accordingly, the NRC
considers it appropriate to require both the reactor and ISFSI security
personnel carrying covered weapons to be trained on the same standards
on the use of force, including deadly force. This proposed language is
consistent with the current regulations on training of security
personnel on the use of force under Sec. 73.55(k)(3) for reactor
licensees and Sec. 73.46(h)(5) for Cat. I SSNM licensees and
certificate holders.
V. Cumulative Effects of Regulation
Cumulative Effects of Regulation (CER) consists of the challenges
licensees may face in addressing the implementation of new regulatory
positions, programs, and requirements (e.g., rulemaking, guidance,
generic letters, backfits, inspections). The CER may manifest in
several ways, including the total burden imposed on licensees by the
NRC from simultaneous or consecutive regulatory actions that can
adversely affect the licensee's capability to implement those
requirements while continuing to operate or construct its facility in a
safe and secure manner.
The goals of the NRC's CER effort were met throughout the
development of this supplemental proposed rule. During the development
of the 2011 proposed rule, the NRC staff engaged external stakeholders
at a public meeting and by soliciting public comments on the proposed
rule and draft guidance documents. The public meeting was held at NRC
Headquarters on June 1, 2011, to discuss the proposed implementation
plan. A summary of the public meeting is in ADAMS under Package
Accession No. ML111720007. Additionally, the NRC staff issued several
draft guidance documents for comment in conjunction with the
publication of the 2011 proposed rule. The feedback from this meeting
and the public comments on the 2011 proposed rule informed the NRC
staff's recommended schedule for the implementation of the new enhanced
weapons requirements in this supplemental proposed rule.
Consistent with SECY-11-0032, ``Consideration of the Cumulative
Effects of Regulation in the Rulemaking Process,'' dated March 2, 2011
(ADAMS Accession No. ML110190027), the NRC requests specific comment on
the supplemental proposed rule's implementation schedule in light of
any existing CER challenges, specifically:
a. Do the supplemental proposed rule's compliance date and
submittal dates provide sufficient time to implement the new
supplemental proposed requirements, including changes to programs,
procedures, and the facility, in light of any ongoing CER challenges?
b. If there are ongoing CER challenges, what do you suggest as a
means to address this situation (e.g., if more time
[[Page 57113]]
is required to implement the new requirements, what time period is
sufficient)?
c. Are there unintended consequences (e.g., does the supplemental
proposed rule create conditions that would be contrary to the
supplemental proposed rule's purpose and objectives)? If so, what are
the unintended consequences?
d. Please comment on the NRC's cost and benefit estimates in the
supplemental proposed rule regulatory analysis (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15232A013).
The NRC staff identified one draft guidance document that is
affected by the revised proposed regulations described in this document
and is issuing this revised guidance document for public comment
concurrent with this supplemental proposed rule (see Section XIV,
``Availability of Guidance'').
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC
certifies that this rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
supplemental proposed rule affects only the licensing and operation of
nuclear power plants. The companies that own these plants do not fall
within the scope of the definition of ``small entities'' set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size standards established by the
NRC (Sec. 2.810).
VII. Regulatory Analysis
The NRC has prepared a draft regulatory analysis on this proposed
regulation. The analysis examines the costs and benefits of the
alternatives considered by the NRC. The draft regulatory analysis can
be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML15232A013. The NRC requests public
comment on the draft regulatory analysis. Comments on the draft
regulatory analysis may be submitted to the NRC as indicated under the
ADDRESSES caption of this document.
VIII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
This supplemental proposed rule contains the following: (i)
Proposed provisions which reduce the regulatory burden associated with
the original 2011 proposed rule and the 2013 supplemental proposed rule
and (ii) additional provisions--not contained in either the original
2011 proposed rule or the 2013 supplemental proposed rule--which
facilitate licensees' capability to obtain burden reduction (i.e.,
proposed sunsetting of the interim designation order and the
confirmatory orders). The provisions of this supplemental proposed rule
are effectively voluntary in nature, and would not impose modifications
or additions to existing structures, components, designs, or existing
procedures or organizations if adopted in final form. Accordingly, the
provisions of this supplemental proposed rule, if adopted as a final
rule, would not constitute backfitting or otherwise be inconsistent
with any issue finality provision in 10 CFR part 52. The consideration
of backfitting for the original 2011 proposed rule and the 2013
supplemental proposed rule, considered together, bounds the backfitting
and issue finality consideration for this supplemental proposed rule.
Therefore, a backfit analysis is not required and has not been
completed for any of the provisions of this supplemental proposed rule.
IX. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274), requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, and well-organized
manner. The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the
Plain Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain
Language in Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR
31883). The NRC requests comment on the document with respect to the
clarity and effectiveness of the language used.
X. Environmental Assessment and Proposed Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact
In the proposed rule published on October 26, 2006, the Commission
determined under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended, and the Commission's regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part
51, that the proposed rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment
and, therefore, an environmental impact statement was not required.
Instead, the agency prepared a draft environmental assessment on the
proposed rule for public comment.
In the proposed rule published on February 3, 2011, the
determination was that there will be no significant offsite impact to
the public from this action. Therefore, the Commission concluded that
because of the nature of the proposed changes to the firearms
background checks and the enhanced weapons provisions presented in the
2011 proposed rule, the assumptions in the October 2006 proposed rule
were not changed so the Commission was not seeking additional comment
on the 2006 environmental assessment. Similarly here, the nature of the
changes to the firearms background check and the enhanced provisions in
this supplemental proposed rule do not change the assumptions in the
2011 proposed rule and the October 2006 environmental assessment.
Accordingly, the Commission is not seeking additional comment on the
environmental assessment. Availability of the environmental assessment
is provided in Section XV, ``Availability of Documents,'' of this
document.
XI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This supplemental proposed rule contains new or amended collections
of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This supplemental proposed rule has been
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval of the information collections.
Type of submission, new or revision: Revision.
The title of the information collection: 10 CFR part 73, ``Enhanced
Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event
Notifications,'' supplemental proposed rule, and NRC Form 754, ``Armed
Security Personnel Background Check.''
The form number if applicable: NRC Form 754.
How often the collection is required or requested: One time for
power reactor licensees and Cat, I SSNM licensees and certificate
holders applying for combined enhanced weapons authority. Initial
submissions of NRC Form 754 will be required for all of a licensee's or
certificate holder's security personnel whose duties require access to
covered weapons; thereafter, recurring firearms background checks and
completion of NRC Form 754 will be required once every 5 years. One
time for licensees and certificate holders who received confirmatory
orders and must update their procedures, instructions, and training
materials.
Who will be required or asked to respond: The supplemental proposed
rule would require only those licensees and certificate holders who
apply for Section 161A authorities to submit information about their
security personnel for firearms background checks. Licensees and
certificate holders that had received confirmatory orders approving
Section 161A authority would be required to update within 60 days after
the final rule effective date any procedures, instructions, and
training material on a one-time basis. The regulated entities that
would be eligible to apply for Section 161A
[[Page 57114]]
authorities are operating nuclear power reactors located at 61 sites
and their co-located at-reactor ISFSIs, 10 decommissioning power
reactor sites, 3 other reactor sites, and 2 fuel cycle facilities
authorized to possess Cat. I SSNM. In addition to those regulated
entities and consistent with the 2011 proposed rule, modified security
event notifications under different paragraphs of Sec. 73.71 would
also affect 42 research and test reactor (RTR) sites, 6 Cat. II and III
Special Nuclear Material sites, 7 ISFSI sites not co-located with a
reactor, and 2 hot cell sites.
An estimate of the number of annual responses: 4,085 (2,992
responses for 10 CFR part 73 requirements and 1,093 responses for NRC
Form 754).
The estimated number of annual respondents: 133.
An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to comply
with the information collection requirement or request: 47,906.4 hours
(45,399.8 hours for 10 CFR part 73 requirements and 2,506.7 hours for
NRC Form 754).
Abstract: The NRC is proposing to amend current security
regulations and add new security requirements pertaining to nuclear
power reactors and Cat. I SSNM facilities for access to enhanced
weapons and firearms background checks. The supplemental proposed rule
would modify the information collections contained in the Enhanced
Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications
rulemaking. First, firearms background checks would be required for
security personnel for only those licensees and certificate holders who
have applied for Section 161A authority (i.e., either stand-alone
preemption authority or combined enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority). As a result, the number of respondents to new
Sec. Sec. 73.18 and 73.19 would be reduced compared to the proposed
rule published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2011 (76 FR
6199). Second, periodic firearms background checks would be required at
least once every 5 years rather than every 3 years. Third, applications
for Section 161A authority would be required to describe the
applicant's purposes and objectives in requesting the authority.
Finally, the supplemental proposed rule would add requirements for
licensees and certificate holders that had received confirmatory orders
approving Section 161A authority to update within 60 days after the
final rule effective date any procedures, instructions, and training
material on a one-time basis. These information collections are needed
to enable the NRC to implement the mandate of Section 161A of the AEA
to verify that security personnel who will have access to enhanced
weapons have been subject to a background check by the Attorney General
to verify that an individual is not prohibited under Federal or State
law from possessing or receiving firearms.
The 2011 proposed rule also would modify the security event
notification requirements under different paragraphs of Sec. 73.71.
This supplemental proposed rule would not change those proposed
modified requirements, but they are repeated in the supporting
statement for completeness. The proposed security event notification
requirements would be used to meet the NRC's strategic mission to
immediately communicate threats or attack information to the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) operations center under the National
Response Framework. The NRC also has a strategic mission to immediately
communicate threat or attack information to other appropriate NRC
licensees and certificate holders so that they can increase their
security posture at their facilities or for their shipments of spent
nuclear fuel, high-level radioactive waste, or Cat. I SSNM. This prompt
notification could be vital in increasing another licensees' ability to
defeat poorly-synchronized multiple-site attacks and in protecting the
lives of security and plant personnel (at a second facility) in such
un-coordinated attacks. This prompt notification could also be vital in
increasing the defensive posture of other government or critical
infrastructure facilities to defeat poorly-synchronized multiple-sector
attacks.
The NRC is seeking public comment on the potential impact of the
information collections contained in this proposed rule and on the
following issues:
1. Is the proposed information collection necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the NRC, including whether the
information will have practical utility?
2. Is the estimate of the burden of the proposed information
collection accurate?
3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected?
4. How can the burden of the proposed information collection on
respondents be minimized, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology?
A copy of the OMB clearance package and proposed rule is available
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML15035A635 or may be viewed free of
charge at the NRC's PDR, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Room O-1 F21, Rockville, MD 20852. You may obtain information and
comment submissions related to the OMB clearance package by searching
on https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2011-0018.
You may submit comments on any aspect of these proposed information
collections, including suggestions for reducing the burden and on the
preceding issues, by the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0018.
Mail comments to: FOIA, Privacy, and Information
Collections Branch, Office of Information Services, Mail Stop: T-5 F53,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; or to
Vlad Dorjets, Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (3150-0002 and 3150-0204), NEOB-10202, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503; telephone: 202-395-7315, email:
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Submit comments by December 7, 2015. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC staff
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting
or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
XII. Criminal Penalties
For the purposes of Section 223 of the AEA, the NRC is issuing this
supplemental proposed rule that would amend 10 CFR part 73 under
Sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the AEA. Willful violations of the rule
would be subject to criminal enforcement. Criminal penalties as they
apply to regulations in 10 CFR part 73 are already discussed in Sec.
73.81. Accordingly, Sec. Sec. 73.18 and 73.19 will not be included in
Sec. 73.81(b).
XIII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-113), requires that Federal agencies use technical standards
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies,
unless using such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or is
otherwise impractical. In this supplemental proposed rule, the NRC is
using standards from applicable firearms standards developed by
nationally
[[Page 57115]]
recognized firearms organizations or standard setting bodies or from
standards developed by (1) Federal agencies, such as the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security's Federal Law Enforcement Training
Center, the U.S. Department of Energy's National Training Center, and
the U.S. Department of Defense; (2) State law-enforcement training
centers; or (3) State Division (or Department) of Criminal Justice
Services (DCJS) Training Academies. The NRC invites comment on the
applicability and use of other standards.
XIV. Availability of Guidance
The NRC is issuing draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-5020, Revision
1, ``Applying for Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for Preemption
Authority, and Accomplishing Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR
part 73,'' for the implementation of the proposed requirements set
forth in this supplemental proposed rule. The draft guidance is
available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML14322A847. In conjunction with
the supplemental proposed rule, the NRC seeks public comment on DG-
5020, Revision 1, which may be accessed by searching on https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2011-0015.
In conjunction with the February 2011 proposed rule, the NRC issued
for comment a new draft guide, DG 5020, Revision 0, ``Applying for
Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for Preemption Authority, and
Accomplishing Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR part 73'' (76 FR
6086; February 3, 2011). You may also access DG-5020, Revision 0,
supporting material, and the public comments the NRC received on DG-
5020, Revision 0, by searching on https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID NRC-2011-0015.
Revision 0 to DG-5020 contained detailed guidance on the
implementation of the proposed requirements for applying for enhanced
weapons authority, for applying for preemption authority, and
conducting firearms background checks. However, DG-5020, Revision 0,
did not include at-reactor ISFSIs under the applicability section;
rather, the DG reserved a section for additional facilities to be added
by future rulemakings or Commission orders. The addition of at-reactor
ISFSIs to the DG as an eligible class of licensees to apply for Section
161A authority would not appreciably change the guidance contained in
DG-5020, Revision 0. Accordingly, the NRC did not issue a revision to
DG-5020, Revision 0, for comment in conjunction with the January 2013
supplemental proposed rule.
However, the changes contained in this supplemental proposed rule
are substantive enough to warrant a revision to DG-5020, Revision 0.
Accordingly, the NRC staff developed Revision 1 to DG-5020 to reflect
the changes in this supplemental proposed rule and the previous
supplemental proposed rule which added at-reactor ISFSIs.
You may submit comments on DG-5020, Revision 1, by the following
methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0015. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Office of Administration,
Mail Stop: OWFN-12-H08, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555-0001.
XV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS Accession No./Federal Register Citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firearms Guidelines...................... 74 FR 46800; September 11, 2009.
Firearms Guidelines, Revision 1.......... 79 FR 36100; June 25, 2014.
Environmental Assessment (October 2006 ML061920093.
proposed rule).
Regulatory Analysis...................... ML061380803.
Regulatory Analysis-appendices........... ML061380796.
(October 2006 proposed rule)............. ML061440013.
Information Collection Analysis.......... ML092640277.
NRC Form 754, ``Armed Security Personnel ML092650459.
Firearms Background Check''.
Commission: SECY-08-0050, ``Firearms Package--ML072920478.
Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and
Associated Policy Issues'' (April 17,
2008).
Commission: SECY-08-0050A, ``Firearms ML081910207.
Guidelines Implementing Section 161A of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and
Associated Policy Issues--Supplemental
Information'' (July 8, 2008).
Commission: SRM-SECY-08-0050/0050A, ML082280364.
``Firearms Guidelines Implementing
Section 161A of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954 and Associated Policy Issues''
(August 15, 2008).
Letter Opinion from Bureau of Alcohol, ML090080191.
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives'
Office of Enforcement on the Transfer of
Enhanced Weapons (January 5, 2009).
Proposed Enhanced Weapons, Firearms ML103410132.
Background Checks, and Security Event
Notifications Rule (February 3, 2011).
DG-5020, Revision 0, ``Applying for ML100321956.
Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for
Preemption Authority, and Accomplishing
Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR
Part 73'' (February 3, 2011).
DG-5020, Revision 1, ``Applying for ML14322A847.
Enhanced Weapons Authority, Applying for
Preemption Authority, and Accomplishing
Firearms Background Checks under 10 CFR
Part 73''.
Commission: SECY-12-0027, ``Preemption ML113130015.
Authority Pursuant to Section 161A, `Use
of Firearms by Security Personnel,' of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
Amended'' (February 17, 2012).
Commission: SRM-SECY-12-0027, ML12124A377.
``Preemption Authority Pursuant to
Section 161A, `Use of Firearms by
Security Personnel,' of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as Amended'' (May 3,
2012).
Commission: SECY-12-0125, ``Interim Package--ML12164A839.
Actions to Execute Commission Preemption
Authority Under Section 161A of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended''
(September 20, 2012).
Commission: SRM-SECY-12-0125, ``Interim ML12326A653.
Actions to Execute Commission Preemption
Authority Under Section 161A of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended''
(November 21, 2012).
[[Page 57116]]
NUREG/BR-0058, ``Regulatory Analysis ML042820192.
Guidelines of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission,'' Revision 4
(September 30, 2004).
Order EA-13-092: ``Order Designating an 78 FR 35984; June 14, 2013.
Interim Class of NRC-Licensed Facilities
That are Eligible to Apply to the
Commission for Authorization to Use the
Authority Granted Under the Provisions
of Section 161a of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as Amended''.
Draft Supporting Statement for the second ML15035A633.
supplemental proposed rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughout the development of this rule, the NRC staff may post
documents related to this rule, including public comments, on the
Federal rulemaking Web site at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket
ID NRC-2011-0018 and NRC-2011-0015. The Federal rulemaking Web site
allows you to receive alerts when changes or additions occur in a
docket folder. To subscribe: (1) Navigate to the docket folder (NRC-
2011-0018 and NRC-2011-0015); (2) click the ``Sign up for Email
Alerts'' link; and (3) enter your email address and select how
frequently you would like to receive emails (daily, weekly, or
monthly).
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 73
Criminal penalties, Exports, Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Imports, Nuclear energy, Nuclear materials,
Nuclear power plants and reactors, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the AEA, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended;
and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553; the NRC is proposing to adopt the following
amendments to 10 CFR part 73.
PART 73--PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLANTS AND MATERIALS
0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 53, 147, 149, 161,
161A, 170D, 170E, 170H, 170I, 223, 234, 1701 (42 U.S.C. 2073, 2167,
2169, 2201, 2201a, 2210d, 2210e, 2210h, 2210i, 2273, 2282, 2297f);
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, secs. 201, 202 (42 U.S.C. 5841,
5842); Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, secs. 135, 141 (42 U.S.C.
10155, 10161); 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
Section 73.37(b)(2) also issued under Sec. 301, Pub. L. 96-295,
94 Stat. 789 (42 U.S.C. 5841 note).
0
2. In Sec. 73.2, paragraph (a), as proposed to be added February 3,
2011 (76 FR 6232), revise the definitions for ``Combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority,'' ``Covered weapon,''
``Enhanced weapon,'' and ``Stand-alone preemption authority,''; and
remove the definition for ``Standard weapon'' to read as follows:
Sec. 73.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
Combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority means
the authority granted to the Commission, at 42 U.S.C. 2201a, to
authorize licensees or certificate holders, or the designated security
personnel of the licensee or certificate holder, to transfer, receive,
possess, transport, import, and use one or more categories of covered
weapons, notwithstanding any State, local, or certain Federal firearms
laws, including regulations, that prohibit or restrict such conduct.
* * * * *
Covered weapon means any handgun, rifle, shotgun, short-barreled
shotgun, short-barreled rifle, semi-automatic assault weapon, machine
gun, ammunition for any of such weapons, or large capacity ammunition
feeding device, as specified under 42 U.S.C. 2201a(b), that are
otherwise prohibited or restricted by State, local, or certain Federal
firearms laws, including regulations.
* * * * *
Enhanced weapon means any short-barreled shotgun, short-barreled
rifle, or machine gun. Enhanced weapons do not include destructive
devices as specified under 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(4).
* * * * *
Stand-alone preemption authority means the authority granted to the
Commission, at 42 U.S.C. 2201a, to authorize licensees or certificate
holders, or the designated security personnel of a licensee or
certificate holder, to transfer, receive, possess, transport, import,
and use one or more categories of covered weapons other than enhanced
weapons, notwithstanding any State, local, or certain Federal firearms
laws, including regulations, that prohibit or restrict such conduct.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 73.18, as proposed to be added February 3, 2011 (76 FR
6233), revise paragraphs (d), (e), (f)(2)(iii), (j), (n)(2), (n)(3),
and (n)(4); and add paragraph (s) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.18 Authorization for use of enhanced weapons and preemption
of firearms laws.
* * * * *
(d) Application process for stand-alone preemption authority. (1)
Only licensees and certificate holders included within the classes of
facilities, radioactive material, and other property listed in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section may apply to the NRC for stand-alone
preemption authority.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders applying for stand-alone
preemption authority must submit an application to the NRC using the
procedures specified in this section.
(3) The contents of the application must include the following
information:
(i) A statement indicating that the licensee or certificate holder
is applying for stand-alone preemption authority under 42 U.S.C. 2201a;
(ii) The Commission-designated facility, radioactive material, or
other property to be protected by the licensee's or certificate
holder's security personnel using the covered weapons;
(iii) A description of the licensee's or certificate holder's
purposes and objectives in requesting stand-alone preemption authority.
This description must include whether these covered weapons are
currently employed as part of the licensee's or certificate holder's
existing protective strategy or whether these covered weapons will be
used in a revised protective strategy; and
(iv) A description of the licensee's or certificate holder's
Firearms Background Check Plan required by Sec. 73.19.
(4) Licensees and certificate holders must supplement their
application for stand-alone preemption authority with the following
additional information:
(i) A confirmation that a sufficient number of security personnel
have completed a satisfactory firearms background check to meet the
licensee's or certificate holder's security-personnel minimum staffing
requirements as specified in its physical security plan and any
applicable fatigue requirements under part 26 of this chapter;
(ii) A confirmation that the necessary training modules and
notification
[[Page 57117]]
procedures have been developed under their Firearms Background Check
Plan; and
(iii) A confirmation that all security personnel whose official
duties require access to covered weapons have been trained on these
modules and notification procedures.
(5) The licensee or certificate holder must submit both the
application and the supplementary information to the NRC in writing,
under oath or affirmation, and in accordance with Sec. 73.4.
(6) Upon the effective date of the NRC's approval of its
application for stand-alone preemption authority, the licensee or
certificate holder must only assign security personnel who have
completed a satisfactory firearms background check to duties requiring
access to any covered weapons.
(e) Application process for combined enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority. (1) Only licensees and certificate holders
included within the classes of facilities, radioactive material, and
other property listed in paragraph (c)(2) of this section may apply to
the NRC for combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption
authority.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders applying for combined
enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority must submit an
application to the NRC using the procedures specified in this section.
(3) The contents of the application must include the following
information:
(i) A statement indicating that the licensee or certificate holder
is applying for combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption
authority under 42 U.S.C. 2201a.
(ii) The Commission-designated facility, radioactive material, or
other property to be protected by the licensee's or certificate
holder's security personnel using the enhanced weapons.
(iii) A description of the licensee's or certificate holder's
purposes and objectives in requesting combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority. This must include whether these
covered weapons are currently employed as part of the licensee's or
certificate holder's existing protective strategy; or whether these
covered weapons will be used in a revised protective strategy.
(iv) A description of the licensee's or certificate holder's
Firearms Background Check Plan required by Sec. 73.19.
(v) If the NRC has previously approved the licensee's or
certificate holder's application for stand-alone preemption authority,
under either paragraph (d) of this section or under a Commission Order
issued before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], then the licensee or
certificate holder must include the effective date of the NRC's
approval of preemption authority in their application for combined
enhanced weapons authority and preemption authority.
(4) The licensee or certificate holder must include with their
application the additional technical information required by paragraph
(f) of this section.
(5) Licensees and certificate holders must supplement their
application with the following additional information:
(i) A confirmation that a sufficient number of security personnel
have completed a satisfactory firearms background check to meet the
licensee's or certificate holder's security-personnel minimum staffing
requirements as specified in its physical security plan and any
applicable fatigue requirements under part 26 of this chapter;
(ii) A confirmation that the necessary training modules and
notification procedures have been developed under their Firearms
Background Check Plan; and
(iii) A confirmation that all security personnel whose official
duties require access to covered weapons have been trained on these
modules and notification procedures.
(iv) Exceptions:
(A) Licensees and certificate holders who were previously approved
by the NRC for preemption authority under paragraph (d) of this section
are not required to submit the supplemental information of this
paragraph (as a component of their application for combined enhanced
weapons authority and preemption authority).
(B) Licensees and certificate holders who were previously approved
by the NRC for preemption authority pursuant to a Commission Order
issued before [IEFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], are not required to
submit the supplemental information of this paragraph (as a component
of their application for combined enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority).
(6) The licensee or certificate holder must submit its application
in accordance with the applicable license amendment or certificate of
compliance amendment provisions specified in Sec. Sec. 50.90, 70.34,
72.56, or 76.45 of this chapter. The licensee or certificate holder
must submit both the application and the supplementary information to
the NRC in writing and under oath or affirmation.
(7) If a licensee or certificate holder wishes to use a different
type or caliber of enhanced weapons or obtain a different quantity of
enhanced weapons from that previously approved by the Commission under
this section, then the licensee or certificate holder must submit a new
application to the NRC in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section
(to address these different weapons or different quantities of
weapons).
(8) Upon the effective date of the NRC's approval of its
application for combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption
authority, the licensee or certificate holder must only assign security
personnel who have completed a satisfactory firearms background check
to perform duties requiring access to any covered weapons.
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) The licensee or certificate holder must address in the
safeguards contingency plan how the enhanced weapons will be employed
by the security personnel in implementing the protective strategy,
including tactical approaches and maneuvers; and
* * * * *
(j) Use of enhanced weapons. Requirements regarding the general use
of enhanced weapons by licensee or certificate holder security
personnel, in the performance of their official duties, are contained
in Sec. Sec. 73.46, 73.51, and 73.55 and in appendices B, C, and H of
this part, as applicable.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(2) Security personnel transporting enhanced weapons to or from a
licensee's or certificate holder's facility following the completion
of, or in preparation for, the duty of escorting shipments of
radioactive material or other property that is being transported to or
from the licensee's or certificate holder's facility must ensure that
these weapons are rendered safe and locked in a secure container during
transport. Security personnel may transport unloaded weapons and
ammunition in the same locked secure container.
(3) Security personnel using enhanced weapons to protect shipments
of radioactive material or other property that are being transported to
or from the licensee's or certificate holder's facility must ensure
that these weapons are maintained in a state of loaded readiness and
available for immediate use, except when otherwise prohibited by 18
U.S.C. 922(q).
(4) Security personnel transporting enhanced weapons to or from the
licensee's or certificate holder's facility must comply with the
requirements of Sec. 73.19.
* * * * *
[[Page 57118]]
(s) Sunsetting of orders. For licensees who received an NRC order
approving an application for stand-alone preemption authority or
combined preemption authority and enhanced weapons authority prior to
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], the following provisions apply.
(1) The NRC's approval via a confirmatory order of preemption
authority or enhanced weapons authority under Section 161A for a
licensee remains valid and licensees or certificate holders would not
need to reapply for this authority.
(2) Licensees issued such orders must comply with the requirements
of this section. Accordingly, the requirements of such orders are
superseded in their entirety by the requirements of this section.
(3) Licensees issued such orders must update any procedures,
instructions, and training material, developed in response to the
orders, to reflect the transition from requirements under the order to
the requirements of this section. Licensees must complete these
transition actions by [DATE 60 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL
RULE].
(4) Licensees issued such orders must notify the NRC in writing, in
accordance with Sec. 73.4, of the completion of these transition
actions. Licensees must complete this notification by [DATE 70 DAYS
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
0
4. In Sec. 73.19, as proposed to be added February 3, 2011 (76 FR
6237), revise paragraph (b); remove and reserve paragraph (c); revise
paragraphs (f), (g), (h), (j), (p)(1), and (p)(5); and add paragraph
(r) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.19 Firearms background checks for armed security personnel.
* * * * *
(b) General requirements. (1) Licensees and certificate holders who
have applied to the NRC under Sec. 73.18 for stand-alone preemption
authority or for combined enhanced weapons authority and preemption
authority must comply with the provisions of this section. Such
licensees and certificate holders must establish a Firearms Background
Check Plan. Licensees and certificate holders must establish this plan
as part of their overall NRC-approved Training and Qualification plan
for security personnel whose official duties require access to covered
weapons.
(2) For the purposes of Sec. 73.18 and this section only, the term
security personnel whose official duties require access to covered
weapons includes, but is not limited to, the following groups of
individuals:
(i) Security officers using covered weapons to protect a
Commission-designated facility, radioactive material, or other
property;
(ii) Security officers undergoing firearms training on covered
weapons;
(iii) Firearms-training instructors conducting training on covered
weapons;
(iv) Armorers conducting maintenance, repair, and testing of
covered weapons;
(v) Individuals with access to armories and weapons storage lockers
containing covered weapons;
(vi) Individuals issuing covered weapons from armories to security
personnel and checking in such weapons;
(vii) Individuals conducting inventories of enhanced weapons;
(viii) Individuals removing enhanced weapons from the site for
repair, training, and escort-duty purposes; and
(ix) Individuals whose duties require access to covered weapons,
whether the individuals are employed directly by the licensee or
certificate holder or they are employed by a security contractor who
provides security services to the licensee or certificate holder.
(3) The objectives of a Firearms Background Check Plan must
include:
(i) Completing firearms background checks for all security
personnel whose official duties require access to covered weapons;
(ii) Defining the process for completing initial, periodic, and
break in service firearms background checks;
(iii) Defining the training objectives and modules for security
personnel who are subject to firearms background checks;
(iv) Completing the initial and periodic training for security
personnel whose official duties require access to covered weapons;
(v) Maintaining records of completed firearms background checks,
required training, and any supporting documents;
(vi) Maintaining records of a decision to remove security personnel
from duties requiring access to covered weapons, due to the
identification or occurrence of any Federal or State disqualifying
status condition or event; and
(vii) Developing and implementing procedures for notifying the NRC
of the removal of security personnel from access to covered weapons,
due to the identification or occurrence of any Federal or State
disqualifying status condition or event.
(4) Licensees and certificate holders who have applied to the NRC
for stand-alone preemption authority or for combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority under Sec. 73.18 must ensure that a
satisfactory firearms background check has been completed for all
security personnel whose official duties require access to covered
weapons.
(5) Only licensees and certificate holders who have applied for
Section 161A authority under Sec. 73.18 may conduct firearms
background checks.
(6) The licensee or certificate holder must commence firearms
background checks only after receiving notification from the NRC that
the agency has accepted for review their application for stand-alone
preemption authority or for combined enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority.
(7) Applicability of firearms background checks to applicants for a
license or certificate of compliance:
(i) Applicants for a license or a certificate of compliance who
have also submitted an application for Section 161A authority must only
commence firearms background checks after:
(A) The NRC has issued their license or certificate of compliance;
and
(B) The NRC has accepted their application for stand-alone
preemption authority or for combined enhanced weapons authority and
preemption authority for review.
(ii) Subsequent to [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], applicants for a
license or a certificate of compliance who have also applied for
Section 161A authority and been issued their license or certificate of
compliance must ensure a satisfactory firearms background check (as
defined in Sec. 73.2) has been completed for all security personnel
who require access to covered weapons, before the licensee's or
certificate holder's initial receipt of any source material, special
nuclear material, or radioactive material specified under the license
or certificate of compliance.
(8) Licensee and certificate holder actions in response to an
adverse firearms background check (as defined in Sec. 73.2):
(i) The licensee or certificate holder must remove, without delay,
from duties requiring access to covered weapons, any security personnel
who receive a ``denied NICS response;''
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder must remove, without delay,
from duties requiring access to enhanced weapons, any security
personnel who receive a ``delayed NICS response;'' and
(iii) If the security personnel to be removed is on duty at the
time of removal, then the licensee and certificate holder must
reconstitute the vacated position within the timeframe
[[Page 57119]]
specified in their NRC-approved physical security plan.
(9) Subsequent to the licensee's or certificate holder's receipt of
notification that the NRC has approved its application for either
stand-alone preemption authority or for combined enhanced weapons
authority and preemption authority:
(i) The licensee or certificate holder must complete a satisfactory
firearms background check on security personnel, before assigning that
individual to any duties that require access to covered weapons;
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder may return to duties that
require access to covered weapons any security personnel who has
previously received an adverse firearms background check, if the
individual subsequently completes a satisfactory firearms background
check or successfully appeals an adverse firearms background check; and
(iii) During the pendency of an individual's appeal to the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of an adverse firearms background check,
the licensee or certificate holder must not assign such security
personnel to duties that require access to covered weapons.
(10) Accomplishment of periodic firearms background checks. (i) The
licensee or certificate holder must complete a periodic firearms
background check for security personnel whose duties require access to
covered weapons. A satisfactory periodic firearms background check must
be completed within 5 calendar years of the most recent satisfactory
firearms background check.
(ii) Licensees and certificate holders who had conducted firearms
background checks pursuant to a confirmatory order issued by the NRC
before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], must complete a periodic
firearms background check for security personnel whose duties continue
to require access to covered weapons. A satisfactory periodic firearms
background check must be completed within 5 calendar years of the most
recent satisfactory firearms background check.
(iii) The licensee or certificate holder must complete the periodic
firearms background check within the allowance period specified in
paragraph (f) of this section.
(11) Accomplishment of break in service firearms background checks.
(i) The licensee or certificate holder must complete a new satisfactory
firearms background check if the security personnel has had a break in
service with their employing licensee, certificate holder, or their
security contractor which is for a duration of greater than one week.
(ii) The licensee or certificate holder must complete a new
satisfactory firearms background check if the security personnel has
transferred from a different licensee or certificate holder.
(iii) A break in service means the security personnel's cessation
of employment with the licensee, certificate holder, or their security
contractor, notwithstanding that the previous licensee or certificate
holder completed a satisfactory firearms background check on the
individual within the last 5 years.
(iv) Exceptions:
(A) For the purposes of this section, a break in service does not
include a security personnel's temporary active duty with the U.S.
military reserves or National Guard.
(B) The licensees or certificate holders, in lieu of completing a
new satisfactory firearms background check, may instead verify via an
industry-wide information-sharing database that the security personnel
has completed a satisfactory firearms background check within the
previous 12 months, provided that this previous firearms background
check included a duty station location in the State or Territory where
the licensee or certificate holder (who would otherwise be
accomplishing the firearms background check) is located or the activity
is solely occurring.
(12) If subsequent to the NRC's approval of an application for
Section 161A authority under Sec. 73.18, a change occurs in the
licensee's or certificate holder's ownership of a facility, radioactive
material, or other property or a security contractor that provides
security services to the licensee or certificate holder, then the
licensee or certificate holder is not required to conduct a break in
service firearms background check for the security personnel whose
duties require access to covered weapons.
(13) With regard to accomplishing the requirements for other
background (e.g., criminal history records) checks or personnel
security investigations under the NRC's access authorization or
personal security clearance program requirements of this chapter, the
licensee or certificate holder may not substitute a satisfactory
firearms background check in lieu of completing these other required
background checks or security investigations.
(14) If a licensee or certificate holder has completed initial
satisfactory firearms background checks pursuant to a Commission order
issued before [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], then the licensee or
certificate holder is not required to conduct a new initial firearms
background check for its current security personnel. However, the
licensee or certificate holder must conduct initial firearms background
checks on new security personnel and periodic and break in service
firearms background checks on current security personnel in accordance
with the provisions of this section.
(15) A licensee or certificate holder who withdraws their
application for Section 161A authority or whose application was
disapproved by the NRC must discontinue conducting firearms background
checks.
(16) A licensee or certificate holder whose authority under Section
161A has been rescinded or was revoked by the NRC must discontinue
conducting firearms background checks.
(c) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(f) Periodic firearms background checks. (1) Licensees and
certificate holders must complete a satisfactory periodic firearms
background check at least once every 5 calendar years for security
personnel whose continuing duties require access to covered weapons.
(2) Licensees and certificate holders must complete a periodic
firearms background check within the same calendar month as the
initial, or most recent, firearms background check with an allowance
period to midnight of the last day of the calendar month of expiration.
(3) Licensees and certificate holders may continue the security
personnel's duties requiring access to covered weapons pending the
satisfactory completion of a periodic firearms background check.
However, licensees and certificate holders must remove security
personnel from duties requiring access to covered weapons if the
satisfactory completion of a periodic firearms background check does
not occur before the expiration of the allowance period.
(g) Notification of removal. (1) Licensees and certificate holders
must notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center by telephone within
72 hours after removing security personnel from duties requiring access
to covered weapons due to the identification or occurrence of any
Federal or State disqualifying status condition or event that would
prohibit them from possessing, receiving, or using firearms or
ammunition. Licensees and certificate holders must contact the NRC
Headquarters Operations Center at the
[[Page 57120]]
phone numbers specified in table 1 of appendix A of this part.
(2) Exception. The licensee or certificate holder is not required
to notify the NRC if the licensee's or certificate holder's security
management was notified by the affected security personnel within 72
hours of the identification or occurrence of any Federal or State
disqualifying status condition or event that would prohibit them from
possessing, receiving, or using firearms or ammunition.
(h) Security personnel responsibilities. (1) Security personnel
assigned to duties requiring access to covered weapons must notify
their employing licensee's or certificate holder's security management
within 72 hours of the identification or occurrence of any Federal or
State disqualifying status condition or event that would prohibit them
from possessing, receiving, or using firearms or ammunition.
(2) This notification requirement is applicable to all security
personnel assigned duties requiring access to covered weapons,
irrespective of whether they are directly employed by the licensee or
certificate holder or employed by a contractor providing security
services to the licensee or certificate holder.
* * * * *
(j) Training for security personnel subject to firearms background
checks. (1) Licensees and certificate holders must include within their
Firearms Background Check Plan the development and accomplishment of
training modules for security personnel assigned official duties
requiring access to covered weapons.
(2) The training modules must include information on the following
topics:
(i) Federal disqualifying status conditions or events specified in
18 U.S.C. 922(g) and (n) and the ATF's implementing regulations in 27
CFR part 478 (including any applicable definitions) identifying
categories of persons who are prohibited from possessing, receiving, or
using any firearms or ammunition;
(ii) Any applicable State disqualifying status conditions or
events;
(iii) The continuing responsibility of security personnel subject
to a firearms background check to promptly and voluntarily notify their
employing licensee or certificate holder of the identification or
occurrence of any Federal or State disqualifying status condition or
event; and
(iv) The process for appealing to the FBI a ``denied'' or
``delayed'' NICS response.
(3) Licensees and certificate holders must conduct periodic
refresher training on these modules at an annual frequency for security
personnel assigned official duties requiring access to covered weapons.
* * * * *
(p) Appeals and resolution of erroneous system information. (1) The
licensee or certificate holder may not assign security personnel who
have receive a ``denied'' or a ``delayed'' NICS response to duties
requiring access to covered weapons:
(i) During the pendency of an appeal of a ``denied'' NICS response;
or
(ii) During the pendency of providing to the FBI and evaluating any
necessary additional information to resolve a ``delayed'' NICS
response.
* * * * *
(5) Challenges of the accuracy and correctness of records. (i) If
the individual wishes to challenge the accuracy of the record upon
which the ``denied'' or ``delayed'' response is based, or if the
individual wishes to assert that his or her rights to possess or
receive a firearm have been restored by lawful process, he or she must
first contact the FBI at the address stated in paragraph (p)(4)(i) of
this section.
(ii) The individual must file any appeal of a ``denied'' response
or file a request to resolve a ``delayed'' response within 45 calendar
days after the date the licensee or certificate holder notifies the
individual of the adverse response.
(iii) The individual appealing a ``denied'' response or resolving a
``delayed'' response is responsible for providing the FBI any
additional information the FBI requires to resolve the adverse
response. These individuals must supply this information to the FBI
within 45 calendar days after the FBI's response is issued.
(iv) The individual may request extensions of the time to supply
the additional information requested by the FBI in support of a timely
appeal or resolution request. These extension requests must be made to
the licensee or certificate holder. The licensee or certificate holder
may grant an extension request for good cause, as determined by the
licensee or certificate holder.
(v) The individual's appeal or request submitted to the FBI must
include appropriate documentation or record(s) establishing the legal
and/or factual basis for the challenge. Any record or document of a
court or other government entity or official furnished in support of an
appeal must be certified by the court or other government entity or
official as a true copy.
(vi) The individual may supplement their initial appeal or request,
subsequent to the 45-day filing deadline, with additional information
as it becomes available, for example, where obtaining a true copy of a
court transcript may take longer than 45 days. The individual should
note in their appeal or request any information or records that are
being obtained, but are not yet available.
* * * * *
(r) Sunsetting of orders. For licensees who received an NRC order
designating them as part of an interim class of facilities eligible to
apply for Section 161A authority prior to [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL
RULE], the following provisions apply regarding the sunsetting of these
designation orders.
(1) Licensees issued such orders are no longer considered part of
an interim class of facilities eligible to apply for Section 161A
authority but instead are encompassed within the Commission-designated
classes of facilities, activities, and other property specified in
Sec. 73.18(c).
(2) Licensees issued such orders must comply with the requirements
of this section, in lieu of complying with the firearms background
check requirements of those orders. Accordingly, the requirements of
those orders are superseded in their entirety by the requirements of
this section.
(3) Licensees issued such orders must update any procedures,
instructions, and training material they have developed in response to
the orders to reflect the transition from requirements under the order
to the requirements of this section. Licensees must complete these
transition actions by [DATE 60 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL
RULE].
(4) Licensees issued such orders must notify the NRC in writing, in
accordance with Sec. 73.4, of the completion of these transition
actions. Licensees must complete this notification by [DATE 70 DAYS
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE].
0
5. In Sec. 73.51, add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.51 Requirements for the physical protection of stored spent
nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste.
* * * * *
(f) Response requirements. For licensees employing covered weapons
as part of their protective strategy, the licensee must train each
armed member of the security organization using covered weapons to
prevent or impede attempted acts of radiological sabotage by using
force sufficient to counter the force directed at that armed member,
[[Page 57121]]
including the use of deadly force as authorized by applicable State or
Federal law.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of September, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-23669 Filed 9-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P