Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts-Further Implementation (DFARS Case 2014-D005), 56939-56944 [2015-23516]
Download as PDF
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(7) The requirements of § 806.16
apply to the review of NOIs to any
general permit.
(8) Upon reissuance or amendment of
a general permit, all project sponsors
permitted to divert, withdraw or
consumptively use water in accordance
with the previous general permit shall
be permitted to continue to operate with
the renewed or modified general permit
unless otherwise notified by the
Commission.
(d) Denial of coverage. The Executive
Director will deny or revoke coverage
under a general permit when one or
more of the following conditions exist:
(1) The project or project sponsor does
not or can no longer meet the criteria for
coverage under a general permit.
(2) The diversion, withdrawal or
consumptive use, individually or in
combination with other similar
Commission regulated activities, is
causing or has the potential to cause
adverse impacts to water resources or
competing water users.
(3) The project does not meet the
requirements of § 806.21(a) or (b).
(4) The project includes other
diversions, withdrawals or consumptive
uses that require an individual approval
and the issuance of both an individual
approval and a general permit for the
project would constitute an undue
administrative burden on the
Commission.
(5) The Executive Director determines
that a project cannot be effectively
regulated under a general permit and is
more effectively regulated under an
individual approval.
(e) Requiring an individual approval.
If coverage is denied or revoked under
paragraph (d) of this section, the project
sponsor shall be notified in writing. The
notice will include a brief statement for
the reasons for the decision. If coverage
under a general permit was previously
granted, the notice will also include a
deadline for submission of an
application for an individual approval.
Timely submission of a complete
application will result in continuation
of coverage of the applicable
withdrawal, consumptive use or
diversion under the general permit,
until the Commission takes final action
on the pending individual approval
application.
(f) Action of the commission. Action
by the Executive Director denying or
revoking coverage under a general
permit under paragraph (d) of this
section, or requiring an individual
approval under paragraph (e) of this
section, is not a final action of the
Commission until the project sponsor
submits and the Commission takes final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
56939
action on an individual approval
application.
■ 7. Add § 806.18 to read as follows:
(3) The Commission may approve,
approve with conditions or deny an
application for major modification.
§ 806.18
Dated: September 11, 2015.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
Approval modifications.
(a) General. A project sponsor shall
submit an application for modification
of a current approval prior to making a
change in the design, operational plans,
or use as presented in the application
upon which the approval was originally
issued, and that will affect the terms
and conditions of the current approval.
(b) Applications for modification. (1)
A project sponsor may apply for a
modification of a current approval by
submitting an application for
modification to the Commission.
(c) Minor modifications. The
following are considered minor
modifications:
(1) Correction of typographical errors;
(2) Changes to monitoring or metering
conditions;
(3) Addition of sources of water for
consumptive use;
(4) Changes to the authorized water
uses;
(5) Changes to conditions setting a
schedule for developing, implementing,
and/or reporting on monitoring, data
collection and analyses;
(6) Changes to the design of intakes;
(7) Increases to total system limits that
were established based on the projected
demand of the project; and
(8) Modify approval to allow the
modification of extraction well network
used for groundwater remediation
systems.
(d) Major modifications. Major
modifications are changes not
considered to be minor modifications.
Major modifications may include, but
are not limited to:
(1) Increases in the quantity of water
withdrawals, consumptive uses or
diversions;
(2) Increases to peak day consumptive
water use;
(3) Increases to the instantaneous
withdrawal rate or changes from a single
withdrawal rate to a varied withdrawal
rate;
(4) Changes affecting passby flows
requirements; and
(5) Changes that have the potential for
adverse impacts to water resources or
competing water users.
(e) Notice and approval. (1)
Applications for modifications are
subject to the notice requirements of
§ 806.15.
(2) The Commission or Executive
Director may approve, approve with
conditions or deny an application for
minor modification, or direct that an
application for major modification be
made.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2015–23304 Filed 9–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 202, 212, 246, and 252
[Docket No. 2015–0038]
RIN 0750–AI58
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Detection and
Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic
Parts—Further Implementation
(DFARS Case 2014–D005)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
further implement a requirement of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2012, as modified by a
section of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015,
that addresses required sources of
electronic parts for defense contractors
and subcontractors.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
November 20, 2015, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2014–D005,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–D005’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–
D005.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2014–
D005’’ on your attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2014–D005 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
56940
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Amy G. Williams, telephone 571–372–
6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to further implement section 818 of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (Pub.
L. 112–81), as modified by section 817
of the NDAA for FY 2015 (Pub. L. 113–
291). On May 6, 2014, DoD published a
final rule under DFARS Case 2012–
D055, entitled ‘‘Detection and
Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic
Parts’’ (78 FR 26092). That final rule
constituted the initial partial
implementation of section 818.
After publication of the final rule
under FAR Case 2012–D055, DoD
published on May 9, 2014, a notice of
a public meeting, which was held on
June 16, 2014, to address further
implementation of detections and
avoidance of counterfeit electronic
parts. There were 79 registered
attendees and eight presenters at the
public meeting, as well as robust
discussion. Some of the issues raised at
the public meeting are addressed in this
proposed rule, such as—
• Removal of embedded software or
firmware from the definition of
‘‘electronic part’’;
• Clarification of traceability
expectations; and
• Additional guidance on
determination of risk.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The rule proposes amendments to
DFARS 246.870 and a new clause at
DFARS 252.246–70XX, Sources of
Electronic Parts, to further implement
paragraph (c)(3) of section 818 of the
NDAA for FY 2012, as modified by
section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2015,
which requires DoD to issue regulations
establishing requirements that DoD and
DoD contractors and subcontractors,
except in limited circumstances, shall
acquire electronic parts from trusted
suppliers in order to further address the
avoidance of counterfeit electronic
parts.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Because of the complexities relating
to use of trusted suppliers by DoD and
the requirement of section 818,
paragraph (c)(3)(C), to establish
qualification requirements consistent
with 10 U.S.C. 2319, those aspects of
section 818 will be addressed in a
separate DFARS Case 2015–D020, DoD
Use of Trusted Suppliers for Electronic
Parts.
This proposed rule addresses
requirements for DoD contractors and
subcontractors at all tiers, as set forth in
paragraphs (c)(3)(A), (B), and (D).
Although some paragraphs of section
818 only apply to contractors subject to
the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS),
paragraph (c)(3) applies to all DoD
contractors and subcontractors, when
obtaining electronic parts to be provided
to DoD under a DoD contract.
DoD proposes to include the new
clause at DFARS 252.246–70XX,
Sources of Electronic Parts, as
prescribed at 246.870–3(b), whenever
procuring—
(1) Electronic parts;
(2) End items, components, parts, or
assemblies containing electronic parts;
or
(3) Services, if the contractor will
supply electronic parts or components,
parts, or assemblies containing
electronic parts as part of the service.
Unlike the clause at 252.246–7007,
Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part
Detection and Avoidance System, this
new clause is not limited to contractors
subject to CAS and will apply to small
business set-asides, since paragraph
(c)(3) of section 818 applies to all DoDcontractors and subcontractors at all
tiers that are providing electronic parts
or assemblies containing electronic
parts. Therefore, the clause includes
flowdown to subcontracts, including
subcontracts for commercial items.
DoD does not propose to expand the
requirements of DFARS 252.246–7007,
or the associated clause DFARS
252.244–7001, Contractor Purchasing
System Administration, Alternate I, to
non-CAS covered prime contractors,
because paragraph (e)(1) of section 818
specifically applies the requirements for
a system for avoidance and detection of
counterfeit parts to ‘‘covered
contractors.’’ However, the DFARS
flows down the system requirements to
subcontractors regardless of CAS
coverage.
The clause DFARS 252.246–70XX
includes new proposed definitions of
‘‘authorized dealer’’ and ‘‘trusted
supplier.’’
• DoD notes that ‘‘authorized dealer’’
does not equate to ‘‘authorized reseller.’’
An authorized reseller is not bound to
obtain parts from the original
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
manufacturer. The reseller can obtain
parts from an authorized dealer, an
aftermarket manufacturer, or
independent distributor, for example.
An ‘‘authorized dealer,’’ however, has a
contractual arrangement with the
original manufacturer or current design
activity, including an authorized
aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock,
repackage, sell, and distribute its
product lines.
• The term ‘‘trusted supplier’’
includes not only the original
manufacturer, an authorized dealer for
the part, or a supplier that obtains the
part exclusively from the original
component manufacturer of the part or
an authorized dealer, but also includes
a supplier that a contractor or
subcontractor has identified as a
trustworthy supplier, using DoDadopted counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including
testing, in accordance with section
818(c)(3)(A)(iii) and (D) of the NDAA for
FY 2012, as modified by section 817 of
the NDAA for FY 2015.
In addition to the requirements to
acquire electronic components from
trusted suppliers, contractors and
subcontractors that are not the original
manufacturer are required to have a
risk-based system to trace electronic
parts from the original manufacturer to
product acceptance by the Government.
If such traceability is not feasible for a
particular part, the contractor system
must provide for the consideration of an
alternative part or utilization of tests
and inspections in order to avoid
counterfeit electronic parts. If it is not
possible to obtain an electronic part
from a trusted supplier, the contractor is
required to notify the contracting
officer. The contractor is then
responsible for inspection, testing, and
authentication, in accordance with
existing applicable industry standards,
of electronic parts obtained from
sources other than a trusted supplier.
The rule also proposes a definition in
DFARS 202.101 of ‘‘original
manufacturer’’ to include the ‘‘contract
electronics manufacturer,’’ the ‘‘original
component manufacturer,’’ or the
‘‘original equipment manufacturer,’’
which are also defined. The term
‘‘contract electronics manufacturer’’
includes manufacturers that produce
goods, using electronic parts, for other
companies on a contract basis under the
label or brand of the other organizations,
or fabricate an electronic part under a
contract with, or with the express
written authority of, the original
component manufacturer, based on the
original components manufacturer’s
designs.
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
In addition, the rule proposes to
delete the sentence ‘‘The term
‘electronic part’ includes any embedded
software or firmware’’ from the
definition of ‘‘electronic part.’’ Although
electronic parts may include embedded
software or firmware, the requirements
of this rule are more applicable to
hardware. Further industry standards
are still under development to address
testing of embedded software or
firmware in electronic parts.
There are conforming changes to
DFARS clause 252.246–7007, Contractor
Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection
and Avoidance System, in the
definitions and processes for
traceability.
This rule is part of DoD’s
retrospective plan, completed in August
2011, under Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review.’’ DoD’s full plan and updates
can be accessed at: https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036.
III. Determinations of Applicability
DoD intends to apply the
requirements of section 818(c)(3) to
contracts at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold (SAT) and
contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below
the SAT
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the
applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater
than the SAT. It is intended to limit the
applicability of laws to such contracts or
subcontracts. 41 U.S.C. 1905 provides
that if a provision of law contains
criminal or civil penalties, or if the FAR
Council makes a written determination
that it is not in the best interest of the
Federal Government to exempt contracts
or subcontracts at or below the SAT, the
law will apply to them. The Director,
DPAP, is the appropriate authority to
make comparable determinations for
regulations to be published in the
DFARS, which is part of the FAR system
of regulations.
DoD intends to determine that it is in
the best interest of the Federal
Government to apply the rule to
contracts at or below the SAT, because
a substantial percentage of electronic
parts are valued below the SAT. An
exception for contracts at or below the
SAT would severely decrease the
intended effect of the statute and
increase the risk of receiving counterfeit
parts, which may present a significant
mission, security, or safety hazard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
56941
B. Applicability to Contracts for the
Acquisition of Commercial Items,
Including COTS Items
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
41 U.S.C. 1906 governs the
applicability of laws to contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items, and is
intended to limit the applicability of
laws to contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items. 41 U.S.C. 1906
provides that if a provision of law
contains criminal or civil penalties, or if
the FAR Council makes a written
determination that it is not in the best
interest of the Federal Government to
exempt commercial item contracts, the
provision of law will apply to contracts
for the acquisition of commercial items.
Likewise, 41 U.S.C. governs the
applicability of laws to COTS items,
with the Administrator for Federal
Procurement Policy the decision
authority to determine that it is in the
best interest of the Government to apply
a provision of law to acquisitions of
COTS items in the FAR. The Director,
DPAP, is the appropriate authority to
make comparable determinations for
regulations to be published in the
DFARS, which is part of the FAR system
of regulations.
Since electronic parts are generally
COTS items, and studies have shown
that a large proportion of proven
counterfeit parts were purchased as
commercial items, including COTS
items, DoD intends to determine that it
is in the best interest of the Federal
Government to apply the rule to
contracts for the acquisition of
commercial items, including COTS
items, as defined at FAR 2.101. An
exception for contracts for the
acquisition of commercial items,
including COTS items, would severely
decrease the intended effect of the
statute and increase the risk of receiving
counterfeit parts, which may present a
significant mission, security, or safety
hazard.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule
may have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis has been prepared
and is summarized as follows:
This proposed rule further
implements section 818 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (Pub. L. 112–81),
as modified by section 817 of the NDAA
for FY 2015.
The objective of this rule is to avoid
acquisition of counterfeit electronic
parts by requiring DoD contractors and
subcontractors, except in limited
circumstances, to buy electronic parts
from trusted suppliers, in accordance
with section 818(c)(3) of the NDAA for
FY 2012.
Based on Federal Procurement Data
System data for FY 2013 and 2014, DoD
estimates that this rule will apply to
approximately 33,000 small entities that
have DoD prime contracts or
subcontracts for electronic parts; end
items, components, parts, or assemblies
containing electronic parts; or services,
if the contractor will supply electronic
parts or components, parts, or
assemblies containing electronic parts
as part of the service.
In addition to the requirements to
acquire electronic components from
trusted suppliers, contractors and
subcontractors that are not the original
manufacturer or authorized dealer are
required have a risk-based process to
trace electronic parts from the original
manufacturer to product acceptance by
the Government. If that is not feasible,
the Contractor shall have a process to
complete an evaluation that includes
consideration of alternative parts or
utilization of tests and inspections
commensurate with the risk. If it is not
possible to obtain an electronic part
from a trusted supplier, the contractor is
required to notify the contracting
officer. The contractor is responsible for
inspection, testing, and authentication,
in accordance with existing applicable
industry standards, of electronic parts
obtained from sources other than a
trusted supplier. Notifying the
contracting officer if it is not possible to
obtain an electronic part from a trusted
supplier would probably involve a midlevel of executive involvement.
No relevant Federal rules duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed
rule.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
56942
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
DoD was unable to identify any
significant alternatives that would
reduce the economic impact on small
entities and still fulfill the requirements
of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2014–D005), in
correspondence.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information
collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Accordingly, DoD has submitted a
request for approval of a new
information collection requirement
concerning ‘‘Detection and Avoidance
of Counterfeit Electronic Parts—Further
Implementation’’ to the Office of
Management and Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this
collection of information is estimated to
average one hour per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
The annual reporting burden
estimated as follows:
Respondents: 1,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Annual Responses: 1,000.
Preparation Hours per Response: 1
hour.
Total Response Burden Hours: 1,000.
B. Request for Comments Regarding
Paperwork Burden.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing this burden,
should be sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at
the Office of Management and Budget,
Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@
omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the Defense
Acquisition Regulations System, Attn:
Ms. Amy G. Williams,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room
3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments can be received up to 60
days after the date of this notice, but
comments to OMB will be most useful
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
if received by OMB within 30 days after
the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the DFARS,
and will have practical utility; whether
our estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
To request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G.
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060, or email
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS
Case 2014–D005 in the subject line of
the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 202,
212, 246, and 252
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
Government procurement.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 202, 212, 246,
and 252 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for parts 202,
212, 246, and 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 202—DEFINITIONS OF WORDS
AND TERMS
2. Amend section 202.101 by—
a. Adding, in alphabetical order, the
definitions for ‘‘Contract electronics
manufacturer,’’ ‘‘Original component
manufacturer,’’ ‘‘Original equipment
manufacturer,’’ and ‘‘Original
manufacturer’’; and
■ b. Revising the definition of
‘‘Electronic part’’.
The additions and revision read as
follows:
■
■
202.101
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract electronics manufacturer
means an organization that—
(1) Produces goods, using electronic
parts, for other companies on a contract
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
basis under the label or brand name of
the other organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under
a contract with, or with the express
written authority of, the original
component manufacturer based on the
original component manufacturer’s
designs, formulas, and/or specifications.
*
*
*
*
*
Electronic part means an integrated
circuit, a discrete electronic component
(including, but not limited to, a
transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode),
or a circuit assembly (section 818(f)(2)
of Pub. L. 112–81).
*
*
*
*
*
Original component manufacturer
means an organization that designs and/
or engineers a part and is pursuing, or
has obtained, the intellectual property
rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer
means a company that manufactures
products that it has designed from
purchased components and sells those
products under the company’s brand
name.
Original manufacturer means the
contract electronics manufacturer, the
original component manufacturer, or the
original equipment manufacturer.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend section 212.301 by adding
paragraph (f)(xviii)(C) to read as follows:
■
212.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
(f) * * *
(xviii) * * *
(C) Use the clause at 252.246–70XX,
Sources of Electronic Parts, as
prescribed in 246.870–3(b), to comply
with section 818(c)(3) of Public Law
112–81, as amended by section 817 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015 (Pub. L. 113–291).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 246—QUALITY ASSURANCE
4. Revise section 246.870 heading to
read as follows:
■
246.870 Contractor counterfeit electronic
part detection and avoidance.
246.870–1
[Redesignated as 246.870–0]
5. Redesignate section 246.870–1 as
246.870–0.
■ 6. In newly redesignated section
246.870–0, revise paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
■
246.870–0
Scope.
*
*
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
*
21SEP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(a) Partially implements section
818(c) and (e) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
(Pub. L. 112–81), as amended by section
817 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015
(Pub. L. 113–291); and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Add section 246.870–1 to read as
follows:
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
246.870–1
Definitions.
As used in this section—
Authorized dealer means a supplier
with a contractual arrangement with the
original manufacturer or current design
activity, including an authorized
aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock,
re-package, sell, and distribute its
product lines.
Trusted supplier means—
(1) The original manufacturer of a
part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part
exclusively from the original component
manufacturer of the part or an
authorized dealer; or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or
subcontractor has identified as a
trustworthy supplier, using DoDadopted counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including
testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
■ 8. Amend section 246.870–2 by—
■ a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and
(b) as paragraphs (b)(1) and (2),
respectively;
■ b. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(1), removing the paragraph heading
and adding a comma after the second
use of ‘‘electronic parts’’;
■ c. In the newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(2), further redesignating
paragraphs (1) through (12) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (xii),
respectively;
■ d. Adding paragraph (a);
■ e. Adding a paragraph (b) heading;
■ f. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(2) introductory text, removing ‘‘see
252.246–7007’’ and adding ‘‘see the
clause at 252.246–7007’’ in its place;
and
■ g. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(2)(v), adding the phrase ‘‘, or use of
other trusted suppliers, as identified by
the contractor (see paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
this section)’’ at the end of the sentence,
before the period.
The additions read as follows:
246.870–2
Policy.
(a) Sources of electronic parts. (1)
Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, the Government requires
contractors and subcontractors at all
tiers, to—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
(i) Obtain electronic parts that are in
production or currently available in
stock from—
(A) The original manufacturers of the
parts;
(B) Their authorized dealers; or
(C) Suppliers that obtain such parts
exclusively from the original
manufacturers of the parts or their
authorized dealers;
(ii) Obtain electronic parts that are not
in production, or not currently available
from stock, from suppliers identified by
the contractor or subcontractor as
trusted suppliers, provided that—
(A) The contractor uses established
counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including
testing, for identifying such trusted
suppliers;
(B) The contractor or subcontractor
assumes responsibility for the
authenticity of parts provided by such
suppliers (see 231.205–71); and
(C) The selection of such trusted
suppliers is subject to review and audit
by appropriate Department of Defense
officials.
(iii) If authorized to purchase
electronic parts from the Federal Supply
Schedule, contractors and
subcontractors are still required to
comply with the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section, as
applicable.
(2) If electronic parts are not available
from trusted suppliers, the Government
requires contractors and subcontractors
to comply with the notification,
inspection, testing, and authentication
requirements of paragraph (c) of the
clause at 252.246–70XX, Sources of
Electronic Parts.
(b) Contractor counterfeit electronic
part detection and avoidance
system.* * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend section 246.870–3 by—
■ a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and
(b) as paragraphs (a)(1) and (2),
respectively;
■ b. In the newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(1), further redesignating
paragraphs (1) through (3) as paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) through (iii), respectively;
■ c. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(1), removing ‘‘paragraph (b)’’ and
adding ‘‘paragraph (a)(2)’’ in its place;
■ d. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(1)(iii), removing ‘‘Services where’’
and adding ‘‘Services, if’’ in its place;
■ e. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(2), removing ‘‘set-aside’’ and adding
‘‘set aside’’ in its place; and
■ f. Adding paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
246.870–3
Contract clause.
*
*
PO 00000
*
Frm 00009
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
56943
(b) Use the clause at 252.246–70XX,
Sources of Electronic Parts, in
solicitations and contracts, including
solicitations and contracts using FAR
part 12 procedures for the acquisition of
commercial items, when procuring—
(1) Electronic parts;
(2) End items, components, parts, or
assemblies containing electronic parts;
or
(3) Services, if the contractor will
supply electronic parts or components,
parts, or assemblies containing
electronic parts as part of the service.
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
10. Amend section 252.246–7007 by—
a. In the introductory text, removing
‘‘246.870–3’’ and adding ‘‘246.870–3(a)’’
in its place;
■ b. Removing the clause date ‘‘(MAY
2014)’’ and adding ‘‘(DATE)’’ in its
place;
■ c. In paragraph (a)—
■ i. Adding, in alphabetical order, the
definitions of ‘‘Authorized dealer,’’
‘‘Contract electronics manufacturer,’’
‘‘Original component manufacturer,’’
‘‘Original equipment manufacturer,’’
‘‘Original manufacturer,’’ and ‘‘Trusted
supplier’’; and
■ ii. Revising the definition of
‘‘Electronic part’’; and
■ d. Revising paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
■
■
252.246–7007 Contractor Counterfeit
Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance
System.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
Authorized dealer means a supplier
with a contractual arrangement with the
original manufacturer or current design
activity, including an authorized
aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock,
re-package, sell, and distribute its
product lines.
Contract electronics manufacturer
means an organization that—
(1) Produces goods, using electronic
parts, for other companies on a contract
basis under the label or brand name of
the other organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under
a contract with, or with the express
written authority of, the original
component manufacturer based on the
original component manufacturer’s
designs, formulas, and/or specifications.
*
*
*
*
*
Electronic part means an integrated
circuit, a discrete electronic component
(including, but not limited to, a
transistor, capacitor, resistor, or diode),
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
56944
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 182 / Monday, September 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
or a circuit assembly (section 818(f)(2)
of Pub. L. 112–81).
*
*
*
*
*
Original component manufacturer
means an organization that designs and/
or engineers a part and is pursuing, or
has obtained, the intellectual property
rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer
means a company that manufactures
products that it has designed from
purchased components and sells those
products under the company’s brand
name.
Original manufacturer means the
contract electronics manufacturer, the
original component manufacturer, or the
original equipment manufacturer.
*
*
*
*
*
Trusted supplier means—
(1) The original manufacturer of a
part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part
exclusively from the original component
manufacturer of the part or an
authorized dealer; or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or
subcontractor has identified as a
trustworthy supplier, using DoDadopted counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including
testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Processes to—
(i) Enable tracking of electronic parts
from the original manufacturer to
product acceptance by the Government,
whether the electronic parts are
supplied as discrete electronic parts or
are contained in assemblies; and
(ii) If the Contractor cannot establish
this traceability from the original
manufacturer for a specific part,
complete an evaluation that includes
consideration of alternative parts or
utilization of tests and inspections
commensurate with the risk (see
paragraph (c)(2) of this clause).
(5) Use of trusted suppliers in
accordance with the clause at 252.246–
70XX, Sources of Electronic Parts.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Add section 252.246–70XX to read
as follows:
252.246–70XX
Sources of Electronic Parts.
rmajette on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
As prescribed in 246.870–3(b), use the
following clause:
SOURCES OF ELECTRONIC PARTS (DATE)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—
Authorized dealer means a supplier with
express written authority of a contractual
arrangement with the original manufacturer
or current design activity, including an
authorized aftermarket manufacturer, to buy,
stock, re-package, sell, and distribute its
product lines.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:56 Sep 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Contract electronics manufacturer means
an organization that—
(1) Produces goods, using electronic parts,
for other companies on a contract basis under
the label or brand name of the other
organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under a
contract with, or with the express written
authority of, the original component
manufacturer based on the original
component manufacturer’s designs, formulas,
and/or specifications.
Electronic part means an integrated circuit,
a discrete electronic component (including,
but not limited to, a transistor, capacitor,
resistor, or diode), or a circuit assembly
(section 818(f)(2) of Pub. L. 112–81).
Original component manufacturer means
an organization that designs and/or engineers
a part and is pursuing, or has obtained, the
intellectual property rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer means a
company that manufactures products that it
has designed from purchased components
and sells those products under the
company’s brand name.
Original manufacturer means the contract
electronics manufacturer, the original
component manufacturer, or the original
equipment manufacturer.
Trusted supplier means—
(1) The original manufacturer of a part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part
exclusively from the original component
manufacturer of the part or an authorized
dealer; or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or
subcontractor has identified as a trustworthy
supplier, using DoD-adopted counterfeit
prevention industry standards and processes,
including testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
(b) Trusted suppliers. In accordance with
section 818(c)(3) of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub.
L. 112–81), as amended by section 817 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2015 (Pub. L. 113–291), except as
provided in paragraph (d) of this clause, the
Contractor shall—
(1) Obtain electronic parts that are in
production or currently available in stock
from—
(i) The original manufacturers of the parts;
(ii) Their authorized dealers; or
(iii) Suppliers that obtain such parts
exclusively from the original manufacturers
of the parts or their authorized dealers; and
(2) Obtain electronic parts that are not in
production, or not currently available in
stock, from suppliers identified by the
Contractor as trusted suppliers, provided
that—
(i) The Contractor uses established
counterfeit prevention industry standards
and processes, including testing, for
identifying such trusted suppliers;
(ii) The Contractor assumes responsibility
for the authenticity of parts provided by such
suppliers (see DFARS 231.205–71); and
(iii) The Contractor’s selection of such
trusted suppliers is subject to review and
audit by appropriate Department of Defense
officials.
(c) Traceability. If the Contractor is not the
original manufacturer of, or authorized dealer
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for, an electronic part, the Contractor shall
have risk-based processes (taking into
consideration the consequences of failure of
an electronic part) that—
(1) Enable tracking of electronic parts from
the original manufacturer to product
acceptance by the Government, whether the
electronic part is supplied as a discrete
electronic part or is contained in an
assembly; and
(2) If the Contractor cannot establish this
traceability from the original manufacturer
for a specific part, complete an evaluation
that includes consideration of alternative
parts or utilization of tests and inspections
commensurate with the risk. Determination
of risk shall be based on the assessed
probability of receiving a counterfeit
electronic part; the probability that the
inspection or test selected will detect a
counterfeit electronic part; and the potential
negative consequences of a counterfeit
electronic part being installed (e.g., human
safety, mission success) where such
consequences are made known to the
Contractor.
(d)(1) Non-trusted suppliers. If it is not
possible to obtain an electronic part from a
trusted supplier, as described in paragraph
(b) of this clause, the Contractor shall notify
the Contracting Officer. If an entire lot of
assemblies require an obsolete component,
the Contractor may submit one notification
for the entire lot, providing identification of
the assemblies containing the parts (e.g.,
serial numbers).
(2) The Contractor is responsible for
inspection, testing, and authentication, in
accordance with existing applicable industry
standards, of electronic parts obtained from
sources other than those described in
paragraph (b) of this clause.
(e) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include the substance of this clause,
including this paragraph (e), in subcontracts,
including subcontracts for commercial items
that are for electronic parts or assemblies
containing electronic parts.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2015–23516 Filed 9–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 578
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0090]
RIN 2127–AL38
Civil Penalty Procedures and Factors
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
NHTSA is proposing a rule
prescribing procedures for the
assessment of civil penalties and for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21SEP1.SGM
21SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 182 (Monday, September 21, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56939-56944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23516]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 202, 212, 246, and 252
[Docket No. 2015-0038]
RIN 0750-AI58
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Detection and
Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts--Further Implementation
(DFARS Case 2014-D005)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to further implement a requirement of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, as modified by
a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2015, that addresses required sources of electronic parts for defense
contractors and subcontractors.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before November 20, 2015, to be
considered in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2014-D005, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``DFARS Case 2014-D005''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``DFARS Case
2014-D005.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``DFARS Case 2014-D005'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2014-D005 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy
G.
[[Page 56940]]
Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to further implement section
818 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year
(FY) 2012 (Pub. L. 112-81), as modified by section 817 of the NDAA for
FY 2015 (Pub. L. 113-291). On May 6, 2014, DoD published a final rule
under DFARS Case 2012-D055, entitled ``Detection and Avoidance of
Counterfeit Electronic Parts'' (78 FR 26092). That final rule
constituted the initial partial implementation of section 818.
After publication of the final rule under FAR Case 2012-D055, DoD
published on May 9, 2014, a notice of a public meeting, which was held
on June 16, 2014, to address further implementation of detections and
avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts. There were 79 registered
attendees and eight presenters at the public meeting, as well as robust
discussion. Some of the issues raised at the public meeting are
addressed in this proposed rule, such as--
Removal of embedded software or firmware from the
definition of ``electronic part'';
Clarification of traceability expectations; and
Additional guidance on determination of risk.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The rule proposes amendments to DFARS 246.870 and a new clause at
DFARS 252.246-70XX, Sources of Electronic Parts, to further implement
paragraph (c)(3) of section 818 of the NDAA for FY 2012, as modified by
section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2015, which requires DoD to issue
regulations establishing requirements that DoD and DoD contractors and
subcontractors, except in limited circumstances, shall acquire
electronic parts from trusted suppliers in order to further address the
avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts.
Because of the complexities relating to use of trusted suppliers by
DoD and the requirement of section 818, paragraph (c)(3)(C), to
establish qualification requirements consistent with 10 U.S.C. 2319,
those aspects of section 818 will be addressed in a separate DFARS Case
2015-D020, DoD Use of Trusted Suppliers for Electronic Parts.
This proposed rule addresses requirements for DoD contractors and
subcontractors at all tiers, as set forth in paragraphs (c)(3)(A), (B),
and (D). Although some paragraphs of section 818 only apply to
contractors subject to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), paragraph
(c)(3) applies to all DoD contractors and subcontractors, when
obtaining electronic parts to be provided to DoD under a DoD contract.
DoD proposes to include the new clause at DFARS 252.246-70XX,
Sources of Electronic Parts, as prescribed at 246.870-3(b), whenever
procuring--
(1) Electronic parts;
(2) End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing
electronic parts; or
(3) Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or
components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of
the service.
Unlike the clause at 252.246-7007, Contractor Counterfeit
Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System, this new clause is not
limited to contractors subject to CAS and will apply to small business
set-asides, since paragraph (c)(3) of section 818 applies to all DoD-
contractors and subcontractors at all tiers that are providing
electronic parts or assemblies containing electronic parts. Therefore,
the clause includes flowdown to subcontracts, including subcontracts
for commercial items.
DoD does not propose to expand the requirements of DFARS 252.246-
7007, or the associated clause DFARS 252.244-7001, Contractor
Purchasing System Administration, Alternate I, to non-CAS covered prime
contractors, because paragraph (e)(1) of section 818 specifically
applies the requirements for a system for avoidance and detection of
counterfeit parts to ``covered contractors.'' However, the DFARS flows
down the system requirements to subcontractors regardless of CAS
coverage.
The clause DFARS 252.246-70XX includes new proposed definitions of
``authorized dealer'' and ``trusted supplier.''
DoD notes that ``authorized dealer'' does not equate to
``authorized reseller.'' An authorized reseller is not bound to obtain
parts from the original manufacturer. The reseller can obtain parts
from an authorized dealer, an aftermarket manufacturer, or independent
distributor, for example. An ``authorized dealer,'' however, has a
contractual arrangement with the original manufacturer or current
design activity, including an authorized aftermarket manufacturer, to
buy, stock, repackage, sell, and distribute its product lines.
The term ``trusted supplier'' includes not only the
original manufacturer, an authorized dealer for the part, or a supplier
that obtains the part exclusively from the original component
manufacturer of the part or an authorized dealer, but also includes a
supplier that a contractor or subcontractor has identified as a
trustworthy supplier, using DoD-adopted counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including testing, in accordance with section
818(c)(3)(A)(iii) and (D) of the NDAA for FY 2012, as modified by
section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2015.
In addition to the requirements to acquire electronic components
from trusted suppliers, contractors and subcontractors that are not the
original manufacturer are required to have a risk-based system to trace
electronic parts from the original manufacturer to product acceptance
by the Government. If such traceability is not feasible for a
particular part, the contractor system must provide for the
consideration of an alternative part or utilization of tests and
inspections in order to avoid counterfeit electronic parts. If it is
not possible to obtain an electronic part from a trusted supplier, the
contractor is required to notify the contracting officer. The
contractor is then responsible for inspection, testing, and
authentication, in accordance with existing applicable industry
standards, of electronic parts obtained from sources other than a
trusted supplier.
The rule also proposes a definition in DFARS 202.101 of ``original
manufacturer'' to include the ``contract electronics manufacturer,''
the ``original component manufacturer,'' or the ``original equipment
manufacturer,'' which are also defined. The term ``contract electronics
manufacturer'' includes manufacturers that produce goods, using
electronic parts, for other companies on a contract basis under the
label or brand of the other organizations, or fabricate an electronic
part under a contract with, or with the express written authority of,
the original component manufacturer, based on the original components
manufacturer's designs.
[[Page 56941]]
In addition, the rule proposes to delete the sentence ``The term
`electronic part' includes any embedded software or firmware'' from the
definition of ``electronic part.'' Although electronic parts may
include embedded software or firmware, the requirements of this rule
are more applicable to hardware. Further industry standards are still
under development to address testing of embedded software or firmware
in electronic parts.
There are conforming changes to DFARS clause 252.246-7007,
Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System,
in the definitions and processes for traceability.
This rule is part of DoD's retrospective plan, completed in August
2011, under Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review.'' DoD's full plan and updates can be accessed at:
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=DOD-2011-OS-0036.
III. Determinations of Applicability
DoD intends to apply the requirements of section 818(c)(3) to
contracts at or below the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) and
contracts for the acquisition of commercial items, including
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) items.
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the SAT
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater than the SAT. It is intended to
limit the applicability of laws to such contracts or subcontracts. 41
U.S.C. 1905 provides that if a provision of law contains criminal or
civil penalties, or if the FAR Council makes a written determination
that it is not in the best interest of the Federal Government to exempt
contracts or subcontracts at or below the SAT, the law will apply to
them. The Director, DPAP, is the appropriate authority to make
comparable determinations for regulations to be published in the DFARS,
which is part of the FAR system of regulations.
DoD intends to determine that it is in the best interest of the
Federal Government to apply the rule to contracts at or below the SAT,
because a substantial percentage of electronic parts are valued below
the SAT. An exception for contracts at or below the SAT would severely
decrease the intended effect of the statute and increase the risk of
receiving counterfeit parts, which may present a significant mission,
security, or safety hazard.
B. Applicability to Contracts for the Acquisition of Commercial Items,
Including COTS Items
41 U.S.C. 1906 governs the applicability of laws to contracts for
the acquisition of commercial items, and is intended to limit the
applicability of laws to contracts for the acquisition of commercial
items. 41 U.S.C. 1906 provides that if a provision of law contains
criminal or civil penalties, or if the FAR Council makes a written
determination that it is not in the best interest of the Federal
Government to exempt commercial item contracts, the provision of law
will apply to contracts for the acquisition of commercial items.
Likewise, 41 U.S.C. governs the applicability of laws to COTS items,
with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy the decision
authority to determine that it is in the best interest of the
Government to apply a provision of law to acquisitions of COTS items in
the FAR. The Director, DPAP, is the appropriate authority to make
comparable determinations for regulations to be published in the DFARS,
which is part of the FAR system of regulations.
Since electronic parts are generally COTS items, and studies have
shown that a large proportion of proven counterfeit parts were
purchased as commercial items, including COTS items, DoD intends to
determine that it is in the best interest of the Federal Government to
apply the rule to contracts for the acquisition of commercial items,
including COTS items, as defined at FAR 2.101. An exception for
contracts for the acquisition of commercial items, including COTS
items, would severely decrease the intended effect of the statute and
increase the risk of receiving counterfeit parts, which may present a
significant mission, security, or safety hazard.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD expects that this proposed rule may have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Therefore, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
This proposed rule further implements section 818 of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 (Pub. L.
112-81), as modified by section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2015.
The objective of this rule is to avoid acquisition of counterfeit
electronic parts by requiring DoD contractors and subcontractors,
except in limited circumstances, to buy electronic parts from trusted
suppliers, in accordance with section 818(c)(3) of the NDAA for FY
2012.
Based on Federal Procurement Data System data for FY 2013 and 2014,
DoD estimates that this rule will apply to approximately 33,000 small
entities that have DoD prime contracts or subcontracts for electronic
parts; end items, components, parts, or assemblies containing
electronic parts; or services, if the contractor will supply electronic
parts or components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts
as part of the service.
In addition to the requirements to acquire electronic components
from trusted suppliers, contractors and subcontractors that are not the
original manufacturer or authorized dealer are required have a risk-
based process to trace electronic parts from the original manufacturer
to product acceptance by the Government. If that is not feasible, the
Contractor shall have a process to complete an evaluation that includes
consideration of alternative parts or utilization of tests and
inspections commensurate with the risk. If it is not possible to obtain
an electronic part from a trusted supplier, the contractor is required
to notify the contracting officer. The contractor is responsible for
inspection, testing, and authentication, in accordance with existing
applicable industry standards, of electronic parts obtained from
sources other than a trusted supplier. Notifying the contracting
officer if it is not possible to obtain an electronic part from a
trusted supplier would probably involve a mid-level of executive
involvement.
No relevant Federal rules duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
proposed rule.
[[Page 56942]]
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
DoD was unable to identify any significant alternatives that would
reduce the economic impact on small entities and still fulfill the
requirements of the statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2014-D005), in
correspondence.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule contains information collection requirements that require
the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). Accordingly, DoD has submitted a
request for approval of a new information collection requirement
concerning ``Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts--
Further Implementation'' to the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is
estimated to average one hour per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
The annual reporting burden estimated as follows:
Respondents: 1,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Annual Responses: 1,000.
Preparation Hours per Response: 1 hour.
Total Response Burden Hours: 1,000.
B. Request for Comments Regarding Paperwork Burden.
Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information
collection, including suggestions for reducing this burden, should be
sent to Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk
Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503, or email Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, with a copy to the
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301-3060. Comments can be received up to 60 days after the date of
this notice, but comments to OMB will be most useful if received by OMB
within 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the DFARS, and will have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use
of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
To request more information on this proposed information collection
or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection
instruments, please write to the Defense Acquisition Regulations
System, Attn: Ms. Amy G. Williams, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941,
3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060, or email
osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2014-D005 in the subject line of
the message.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 202, 212, 246, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 202, 212, 246, and 252 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for parts 202, 212, 246, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 202--DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
0
2. Amend section 202.101 by--
0
a. Adding, in alphabetical order, the definitions for ``Contract
electronics manufacturer,'' ``Original component manufacturer,''
``Original equipment manufacturer,'' and ``Original manufacturer''; and
0
b. Revising the definition of ``Electronic part''.
The additions and revision read as follows:
202.101 Definitions.
* * * * *
Contract electronics manufacturer means an organization that--
(1) Produces goods, using electronic parts, for other companies on
a contract basis under the label or brand name of the other
organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under a contract with, or with
the express written authority of, the original component manufacturer
based on the original component manufacturer's designs, formulas, and/
or specifications.
* * * * *
Electronic part means an integrated circuit, a discrete electronic
component (including, but not limited to, a transistor, capacitor,
resistor, or diode), or a circuit assembly (section 818(f)(2) of Pub.
L. 112-81).
* * * * *
Original component manufacturer means an organization that designs
and/or engineers a part and is pursuing, or has obtained, the
intellectual property rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer means a company that manufactures
products that it has designed from purchased components and sells those
products under the company's brand name.
Original manufacturer means the contract electronics manufacturer,
the original component manufacturer, or the original equipment
manufacturer.
* * * * *
PART 212--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
0
3. Amend section 212.301 by adding paragraph (f)(xviii)(C) to read as
follows:
212.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the
acquisition of commercial items.
(f) * * *
(xviii) * * *
(C) Use the clause at 252.246-70XX, Sources of Electronic Parts, as
prescribed in 246.870-3(b), to comply with section 818(c)(3) of Public
Law 112-81, as amended by section 817 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Pub. L. 113-291).
* * * * *
PART 246--QUALITY ASSURANCE
0
4. Revise section 246.870 heading to read as follows:
246.870 Contractor counterfeit electronic part detection and
avoidance.
246.870-1 [Redesignated as 246.870-0]
0
5. Redesignate section 246.870-1 as 246.870-0.
0
6. In newly redesignated section 246.870-0, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
246.870-0 Scope.
* * * * *
[[Page 56943]]
(a) Partially implements section 818(c) and (e) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L. 112-81), as
amended by section 817 of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2015 (Pub. L. 113-291); and
* * * * *
0
7. Add section 246.870-1 to read as follows:
246.870-1 Definitions.
As used in this section--
Authorized dealer means a supplier with a contractual arrangement
with the original manufacturer or current design activity, including an
authorized aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock, re-package, sell,
and distribute its product lines.
Trusted supplier means--
(1) The original manufacturer of a part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part exclusively from the original
component manufacturer of the part or an authorized dealer; or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or subcontractor has identified as
a trustworthy supplier, using DoD-adopted counterfeit prevention
industry standards and processes, including testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
0
8. Amend section 246.870-2 by--
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and (b) as paragraphs (b)(1) and (2),
respectively;
0
b. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(1), removing the paragraph
heading and adding a comma after the second use of ``electronic
parts'';
0
c. In the newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2), further redesignating
paragraphs (1) through (12) as paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (xii),
respectively;
0
d. Adding paragraph (a);
0
e. Adding a paragraph (b) heading;
0
f. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2) introductory text, removing
``see 252.246-7007'' and adding ``see the clause at 252.246-7007'' in
its place; and
0
g. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(2)(v), adding the phrase ``, or
use of other trusted suppliers, as identified by the contractor (see
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section)'' at the end of the sentence,
before the period.
The additions read as follows:
246.870-2 Policy.
(a) Sources of electronic parts. (1) Except as provided in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Government requires contractors
and subcontractors at all tiers, to--
(i) Obtain electronic parts that are in production or currently
available in stock from--
(A) The original manufacturers of the parts;
(B) Their authorized dealers; or
(C) Suppliers that obtain such parts exclusively from the original
manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers;
(ii) Obtain electronic parts that are not in production, or not
currently available from stock, from suppliers identified by the
contractor or subcontractor as trusted suppliers, provided that--
(A) The contractor uses established counterfeit prevention industry
standards and processes, including testing, for identifying such
trusted suppliers;
(B) The contractor or subcontractor assumes responsibility for the
authenticity of parts provided by such suppliers (see 231.205-71); and
(C) The selection of such trusted suppliers is subject to review
and audit by appropriate Department of Defense officials.
(iii) If authorized to purchase electronic parts from the Federal
Supply Schedule, contractors and subcontractors are still required to
comply with the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this
section, as applicable.
(2) If electronic parts are not available from trusted suppliers,
the Government requires contractors and subcontractors to comply with
the notification, inspection, testing, and authentication requirements
of paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.246-70XX, Sources of Electronic
Parts.
(b) Contractor counterfeit electronic part detection and avoidance
system.* * *
* * * * *
0
9. Amend section 246.870-3 by--
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a) and (b) as paragraphs (a)(1) and (2),
respectively;
0
b. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1), further redesignating
paragraphs (1) through (3) as paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii),
respectively;
0
c. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1), removing ``paragraph (b)''
and adding ``paragraph (a)(2)'' in its place;
0
d. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1)(iii), removing ``Services
where'' and adding ``Services, if'' in its place;
0
e. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2), removing ``set-aside'' and
adding ``set aside'' in its place; and
0
f. Adding paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
246.870-3 Contract clause.
* * * * *
(b) Use the clause at 252.246-70XX, Sources of Electronic Parts, in
solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and contracts
using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial items,
when procuring--
(1) Electronic parts;
(2) End items, components, parts, or assemblies containing
electronic parts; or
(3) Services, if the contractor will supply electronic parts or
components, parts, or assemblies containing electronic parts as part of
the service.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
10. Amend section 252.246-7007 by--
0
a. In the introductory text, removing ``246.870-3'' and adding
``246.870-3(a)'' in its place;
0
b. Removing the clause date ``(MAY 2014)'' and adding ``(DATE)'' in its
place;
0
c. In paragraph (a)--
0
i. Adding, in alphabetical order, the definitions of ``Authorized
dealer,'' ``Contract electronics manufacturer,'' ``Original component
manufacturer,'' ``Original equipment manufacturer,'' ``Original
manufacturer,'' and ``Trusted supplier''; and
0
ii. Revising the definition of ``Electronic part''; and
0
d. Revising paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
252.246-7007 Contractor Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and
Avoidance System.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
Authorized dealer means a supplier with a contractual arrangement
with the original manufacturer or current design activity, including an
authorized aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock, re-package, sell,
and distribute its product lines.
Contract electronics manufacturer means an organization that--
(1) Produces goods, using electronic parts, for other companies on
a contract basis under the label or brand name of the other
organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under a contract with, or with
the express written authority of, the original component manufacturer
based on the original component manufacturer's designs, formulas, and/
or specifications.
* * * * *
Electronic part means an integrated circuit, a discrete electronic
component (including, but not limited to, a transistor, capacitor,
resistor, or diode),
[[Page 56944]]
or a circuit assembly (section 818(f)(2) of Pub. L. 112-81).
* * * * *
Original component manufacturer means an organization that designs
and/or engineers a part and is pursuing, or has obtained, the
intellectual property rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer means a company that manufactures
products that it has designed from purchased components and sells those
products under the company's brand name.
Original manufacturer means the contract electronics manufacturer,
the original component manufacturer, or the original equipment
manufacturer.
* * * * *
Trusted supplier means--
(1) The original manufacturer of a part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part exclusively from the original
component manufacturer of the part or an authorized dealer; or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or subcontractor has identified as
a trustworthy supplier, using DoD-adopted counterfeit prevention
industry standards and processes, including testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Processes to--
(i) Enable tracking of electronic parts from the original
manufacturer to product acceptance by the Government, whether the
electronic parts are supplied as discrete electronic parts or are
contained in assemblies; and
(ii) If the Contractor cannot establish this traceability from the
original manufacturer for a specific part, complete an evaluation that
includes consideration of alternative parts or utilization of tests and
inspections commensurate with the risk (see paragraph (c)(2) of this
clause).
(5) Use of trusted suppliers in accordance with the clause at
252.246-70XX, Sources of Electronic Parts.
* * * * *
0
11. Add section 252.246-70XX to read as follows:
252.246-70XX Sources of Electronic Parts.
As prescribed in 246.870-3(b), use the following clause:
SOURCES OF ELECTRONIC PARTS (DATE)
(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--
Authorized dealer means a supplier with express written
authority of a contractual arrangement with the original
manufacturer or current design activity, including an authorized
aftermarket manufacturer, to buy, stock, re-package, sell, and
distribute its product lines.
Contract electronics manufacturer means an organization that--
(1) Produces goods, using electronic parts, for other companies
on a contract basis under the label or brand name of the other
organization; or
(2) Fabricates an electronic part under a contract with, or with
the express written authority of, the original component
manufacturer based on the original component manufacturer's designs,
formulas, and/or specifications.
Electronic part means an integrated circuit, a discrete
electronic component (including, but not limited to, a transistor,
capacitor, resistor, or diode), or a circuit assembly (section
818(f)(2) of Pub. L. 112-81).
Original component manufacturer means an organization that
designs and/or engineers a part and is pursuing, or has obtained,
the intellectual property rights to that part.
Original equipment manufacturer means a company that
manufactures products that it has designed from purchased components
and sells those products under the company's brand name.
Original manufacturer means the contract electronics
manufacturer, the original component manufacturer, or the original
equipment manufacturer.
Trusted supplier means--
(1) The original manufacturer of a part;
(2) An authorized dealer for the part;
(3) A supplier that obtains the part exclusively from the
original component manufacturer of the part or an authorized dealer;
or
(4) A supplier that a contractor or subcontractor has identified
as a trustworthy supplier, using DoD-adopted counterfeit prevention
industry standards and processes, including testing (see https://assist.dla.mil).
(b) Trusted suppliers. In accordance with section 818(c)(3) of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Pub. L.
112-81), as amended by section 817 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Pub. L. 113-291), except as
provided in paragraph (d) of this clause, the Contractor shall--
(1) Obtain electronic parts that are in production or currently
available in stock from--
(i) The original manufacturers of the parts;
(ii) Their authorized dealers; or
(iii) Suppliers that obtain such parts exclusively from the
original manufacturers of the parts or their authorized dealers; and
(2) Obtain electronic parts that are not in production, or not
currently available in stock, from suppliers identified by the
Contractor as trusted suppliers, provided that--
(i) The Contractor uses established counterfeit prevention
industry standards and processes, including testing, for identifying
such trusted suppliers;
(ii) The Contractor assumes responsibility for the authenticity
of parts provided by such suppliers (see DFARS 231.205-71); and
(iii) The Contractor's selection of such trusted suppliers is
subject to review and audit by appropriate Department of Defense
officials.
(c) Traceability. If the Contractor is not the original
manufacturer of, or authorized dealer for, an electronic part, the
Contractor shall have risk-based processes (taking into
consideration the consequences of failure of an electronic part)
that--
(1) Enable tracking of electronic parts from the original
manufacturer to product acceptance by the Government, whether the
electronic part is supplied as a discrete electronic part or is
contained in an assembly; and
(2) If the Contractor cannot establish this traceability from
the original manufacturer for a specific part, complete an
evaluation that includes consideration of alternative parts or
utilization of tests and inspections commensurate with the risk.
Determination of risk shall be based on the assessed probability of
receiving a counterfeit electronic part; the probability that the
inspection or test selected will detect a counterfeit electronic
part; and the potential negative consequences of a counterfeit
electronic part being installed (e.g., human safety, mission
success) where such consequences are made known to the Contractor.
(d)(1) Non-trusted suppliers. If it is not possible to obtain an
electronic part from a trusted supplier, as described in paragraph
(b) of this clause, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting
Officer. If an entire lot of assemblies require an obsolete
component, the Contractor may submit one notification for the entire
lot, providing identification of the assemblies containing the parts
(e.g., serial numbers).
(2) The Contractor is responsible for inspection, testing, and
authentication, in accordance with existing applicable industry
standards, of electronic parts obtained from sources other than
those described in paragraph (b) of this clause.
(e) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of
this clause, including this paragraph (e), in subcontracts,
including subcontracts for commercial items that are for electronic
parts or assemblies containing electronic parts.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2015-23516 Filed 9-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P