Multiemployer Plans; Electronic Filing Requirements, 55742-55745 [2015-23361]
Download as PDF
55742
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
September 08, 2015.
Christopher Ramirez,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015–23271 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Chapter I
[Docket No.: FAA–2015–1006]
Discontinuation of Airport Advisory
Service in the Contiguous United
States, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of policy.
AGENCY:
This action discontinues the
availability Airport Advisory services
within the contiguous United States,
Puerto Rico, and Hawaii. The FAA is
taking this action because the frequency
of Remote Airport Advisories service
use at the 19 locations within the
contiguous United States, Puerto Rico,
and Hawaii, no longer justifies the
continuation of the service due to the
lack of productivity.
DATES: Effective date October 1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alan Wilkes, Manager, Flight Service
NAS Initiative Operations/
Implementation, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone 202–267–7771; Fax (202)
267–6310; email Alan.Wilkes@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
History
On June 30, 2015, the FAA published
in the Federal Register (80 FR 37356–
37358) a notice of proposed policy to
inform the public regarding proposed
revisions to the criteria set forth in FAA
Order 7110.10, Flight Services, Chapter
4, Section 4; and FAA Order 7210.3,
Facility Operation and Administration,
paragraph 13–4–5, so that the policy
would apply to the State of Alaska only.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this policy change by
submitting written comments of the
proposal. No comments were received.
Background
The criteria for providing Airport
Advisory (AA) services at Flight Service
Stations (FSS) is provided in FAA Order
7210.3, and specifies the criteria for
providing Airport Advisory (AA)
services; specifically, paragraph 13–4–5,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
addresses Local Airport Advisory
(LAA), Remote Airport Advisory (RAA)
and Remote Airport Information Service
(RAIS). Section (b) of that paragraph
requires, in part, that Flight Service
Stations provide RAA when the
employee productivity factor is high
enough to justify the cost of providing
the service.1
Currently, Lockheed Martin provides
RAA services at 19 locations. At 18 of
the 19 locations, a sample of historical
data reflects that pilots contact the RAA
service an average of less than 1 time
per day. At Millville Municipal Airport
in Millville, NJ, pilots contact the RAA
service an average of 14 times per day.2
The frequency of RAA service use no
longer justifies the continuation of the
service due to the lack of productivity.
The FAA will discontinue the
requirement for FSSs to provide AA
services in the contiguous United States,
Puerto Rico, and Hawaii effective
October 1, 2015, resulting in services no
longer being available at the 19
locations. The AA services in the state
of Alaska will not be affected by this
change, and will remain due to the
unique challenges presented by the
remote mountainous terrain and
weather conditions across the state.
Applicability
The FAA will revise the criteria set
forth in FAA Order 7110.10, Chapter 4,
Section 4; and FAA Order 7210.3,
paragraph 13–4–5 to only be applicable
to the State of Alaska, and AA services
will be discontinued at locations within
the CONUS, Puerto Rico, and Hawaii.
Due to the policy change, RAA service
would no longer be provided at the
following airports:
Altoona-Blair County Airport (AOO),
Altoona, Pennsylvania;
Columbia Regional Airport (COU), Columbia,
Missouri;
Elkins-Randolph Airport (EKN), Elkins, West
Virginia;
Huron Regional Airport (HON), Huron, South
Dakota;
Jackson-McKellar-Sipes Regional Airport
(MKL), Jackson, Tennessee;
Jonesboro Municipal Airport (JBR),
Jonesboro, Arkansas;
Macon-Middle Georgia Regional Airport
(MCN), Macon, Georgia;
Anderson Regional Airport (AND), Anderson,
South Carolina;
1 The facility’s productivity factor is determined
by dividing the annual RAA service count by
16,000. The productivity factor is compared to the
number of employees used to provide the service
and must be equal to or greater than the number of
employees needed to provide the service. Normally
about 2.5 employees are factored annually to
provide 10 hours of service per day.
2 Lockheed Martin contact history daily averages,
July 12–26 and October 1–15, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Anniston Metropolitan Airport (ANB),
Anniston, Alabama;
Casper-Natrona County International Airport
(CPR), Casper, Wyoming;
Gainesville Regional Airport (GNV),
Gainesville, Florida;
Grand Forks International Airport (GFK),
Grand Forks, North Dakota;
Greenwood-Leflore Airport (GWO),
Greenwood, Mississippi;
Louisville-Bowman Field Airport (LOU),
Louisville, Kentucky;
Millville Municipal Airport (MIV), Millville,
New Jersey;
Prescott-Ernest A. Love Field Airport (PRC),
Prescott, Arizona;
St. Louis-Spirit of St. Louis Airport (SUS), St.
Louis, Missouri;
St. Petersburg-Clearwater International
Airport (PIE), St. Petersburg, Florida; and
Miami-Kendall-Tamiami Executive Airport
(TMB), Miami, Florida.
II. Additional Information
A. Availability of Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking
documents may be obtained from the
Internet by—
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
3. Accessing the Government Printing
Office’s Web page at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of
Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or
by calling (202) 267–9680. Commenters
must identify the docket or amendment
number of this notice.
All documents the FAA considered in
developing this notice, including
economic analyses and technical
reports, may be accessed from the
Internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced in item
(1) above.
Issued in Washington, DC, on August 25,
2015.
Jeanne Giering,
Director of Flight Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–21784 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4000, 4041A, and 4281
RIN 1212–AB28
Multiemployer Plans; Electronic Filing
Requirements
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
ACTION:
Final rule.
This final rule amends
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation’s
(PBGC) regulations to require electronic
filing of certain multiemployer notices.
These changes make the provision of
information to PBGC more efficient and
effective.
DATES: Effective October 19, 2015. See
Applicability in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine B. Klion (klion.catherine@
pbgc.gov), Assistant General Counsel for
Regulatory Affairs, or Donald McCabe
(mccabe.donald@pbgc.gov), Attorney,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026; 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD users
may call the Federal relay service tollfree at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to be
connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Executive Summary
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Purpose of the Regulatory Action
This final rule is part of PBGC’s
ongoing implementation of the
Government Paperwork Elimination Act
and is consistent with the Office of
Management and Budget’s directive to
remove regulatory impediments to
electronic transactions. The rule builds
in flexibility to allow PBGC to update
the electronic filing process as
technology advances.
PBGC’s legal authority for this
regulatory action comes from section
4002(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),
which authorizes PBGC to issue
regulations to carry out the purposes of
title IV of ERISA; section 4041A(f)(2),
which gives PBGC authority to prescribe
reporting requirements for terminated
plans; section 4245(e)(4), which
authorizes PBGC to issue regulations on
notices related to insolvency and
resource benefit levels; and section
4281(d), which directs PBGC to
prescribe by regulation the notice
requirements to plan participants and
beneficiaries in the event of a benefit
suspension under an insolvent plan.
Major Provisions of the Regulatory
Action
This final rule requires the following
notices to be filed electronically with
PBGC: Notices of termination under part
4041A, notices of insolvency and of
insolvency benefit level under parts
4245 and 4281, and applications for
financial assistance under part 4281.
This final rule does not involve any
conforming amendments reflecting the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of
2014 (MPRA).1 The rule affects only
notices to PBGC (not notices to
participants or other parties).
Background
The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) is a federal
corporation created under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) to guarantee the payment of
pension benefits earned by more than 41
million American workers and retirees
in nearly 24,000 private-sector defined
benefit pension plans. PBGC
administers two insurance programs—
one for single-employer defined benefit
pension plans and a second for
multiemployer defined benefit pension
plans.
The multiemployer plan program
protects benefits of approximately 10
million workers and retirees in
approximately 1,400 plans. A
multiemployer plan is a collectively
bargained pension arrangement
involving two or more unrelated
employers, usually in a common
industry such as construction or
trucking, where workers move from
employer to employer on a regular basis.
Under PBGC’s multiemployer program,
when a plan becomes insolvent, PBGC
provides financial assistance directly to
the insolvent plan sufficient to pay
guaranteed benefits to participants and
beneficiaries, and the reasonable and
necessary administrative expenses of
the insolvent plan.
ERISA section 4041A provides for two
types of multiemployer plan
terminations: mass withdrawal and plan
amendment. A mass withdrawal
termination occurs when all employers
withdraw or cease to be obligated to
contribute to the plan. A plan
amendment termination occurs when
the plan adopts an amendment that
provides that participants will receive
no credit for service with any employer
after a specified date, or an amendment
that makes it no longer a covered plan.
Unlike terminated single-employer
plans, terminated multiemployer plans
generally continue to pay all vested
benefits out of existing plan assets and
withdrawal liability payments.
Multiemployer Plan Notices
PBGC’s regulation on Termination of
Multiemployer Plans (29 CFR part
1 Division O of the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law
113–235, enacted December 16, 2014. On June 19,
2015, (at 80 FR 35220), PBGC published an interim
final rule on Partitions of Eligible Multiemployer
Plans under MPRA, https://www.pbgc.gov/
documents/2015–14930.pdf. PBGC expects to
publish further guidance under MPRA.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55743
4041A) implements these provisions,
among other things by requiring the
plan sponsor of a terminated
multiemployer plan to file with PBGC a
notice of termination containing basic
information necessary to alert PBGC to
possible demands on the multiemployer
insurance program.
ERISA section 4245(e) requires two
types of notices:
• Notice of insolvency, which states a
plan sponsor’s determination that the
plan is or may become insolvent.
• Notice of insolvency benefit level,
which states the level of benefits that
will be paid during an insolvency year.
Section 4245(e)(4) provides that these
notices are to be given in accordance
with rules promulgated by PBGC.
PBGC’s regulation on Notice of
Insolvency, 29 CFR part 4245,
establishes the procedure for complying
with these notice requirements. The
regulation allows a single notice of
insolvency to cover more than one plan
year, thereby generally permitting plan
sponsors to file only a single notice (a
notice of insolvency benefit level) for
any future year. The regulation also
prescribes, among other things, the
manner in which the notices must be
given. The recipients of these notices
include PBGC, in addition to other
parties.
PBGC’s regulation on Duties of Plan
Sponsor Following Mass Withdrawal
(29 CFR part 4281) implements the
requirements of ERISA section 4281.
The regulation prescribes rules under
which plan sponsors must:
• Provide notices to PBGC and to
participants and beneficiaries that a
plan is, or will be, insolvent (§§ 4281.43
and 4281.44).
• Provide notices of insolvency
benefit level to PBGC and to
participants and beneficiaries who are
in pay status or may reasonably be
expected to enter pay status during the
year (§§ 4281.45 and 4281.46).
• Submit an application to PBGC for
financial assistance if a plan is, or will
be, unable to pay guaranteed benefits
when due (§ 4281.47).
Mandatory Electronic Filing; Current
Requirements
Section 4000.3 of PBGC’s regulation
on Filing, Issuance, Computation of
Time, and Record Retention (29 CFR
part 4000) requires electronic filing of
premium declarations under part 4007
(Payment of Premiums) and information
required under part 4010 (Annual
Financial and Actuarial Information
Reporting).
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
55744
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Review
On January 18, 2011, the President
issued Executive Order 13563
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ to ensure that Federal
regulations seek more affordable, less
intrusive means to achieve policy goals,
and that agencies give careful
consideration to the benefits and costs
of those regulations. PBGC’s Plan for
Regulatory Review,2 identifies several
regulatory areas for review, including
the multiemployer regulations referred
to above. PBGC will continue to review
its regulations with a view to
developing more ideas for improvement.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Proposed Rule
On April 3, 2015 (at 80 FR 18172),
PBGC published a proposed rule to
amend parts 4000, 4041A, and 4281 to
require electronic filing of certain
multiemployer notices.3 PBGC received
no comments on the proposed rule. The
final regulation is unchanged from the
proposed regulation.
Regulatory Changes
The final regulation requires
electronic filing with PBGC of the
following multiemployer plan filings:
• Notices of termination under part
4041A.
• Notices of insolvency and of
insolvency benefit level under part
4245.
• Notices of insolvency and of
insolvency benefit level under part 4281
(following mass withdrawal).
• Applications for financial
assistance under part 4281 (following
mass withdrawal).
PBGC will grant case-by-case
exemptions to the electronic filing
requirement in appropriate
circumstances for filers that
demonstrate good cause for exemption.
PBGC believes that requiring electronic
filing for these notices will result in
benefits for both the public and the
government.
Electronic filing will simplify the
filing process for the public by building
in all required and optional fields and
including readily accessible guidance in
the application. Electronic filing is
expected to reduce the need to contact
PBGC for assistance. PBGC estimates
that the amendments in the rule will
result in a total savings in
administrative burdens for the public of
25 percent (about 22 hours and $99,000
annually).
Electronic filing will also result in
greater efficiencies for the government.
2 https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/plan-forregulatory-review.pdf.
3 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR–2015–04–03/
pdf/2015–07602.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Sep 16, 2015
Jkt 235001
Up to now, documents submitted by
filers needed to be manually uploaded
to electronic depositories. With
electronic filing, those documents will
be automatically uploaded. Electronic
filing will also save the government
time by reducing the need to provide
assistance to filers. It will also improve
the government’s recordkeeping, records
retrieval, and records archiving process
by eliminating the possibility of missing
or lost paper files due to human error.
Moreover, the PBGC expects
electronic filing will improve the
government’s ability to protect potential
personally identifiable information (PII),
or otherwise sensitive information,
since only pre-approved personnel will
have access to PBGC’s electronic records
systems, and limited access will be
approved for officials of pension plans.
PBGC did not propose to require
electronic filing of notices of benefit
reduction and of restoration of benefits
under part 4281. PBGC may in the
future require that other multiemployer
filings also be made electronically.
Applicability
The amendments in this final rule
will be applicable for filings made on or
after January 1, 2016.
Compliance With Rulemaking
Requirements
Executive Order 12866 ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review’’
PBGC has determined that this final
rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
Under Section 3(f)(1) of Executive
Order 12866, a regulatory action is
economically significant if ‘‘it is likely
to result in a rule that may . . . [h]ave
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.’’ PBGC
has determined that this final rule does
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
not cross the $100 million threshold for
economic significance and is not
otherwise economically significant (see
discussion above).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
imposes certain requirements with
respect to rules that are subject to the
notice and comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act and that are likely to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unless an agency determines that a final
rule is not likely to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, section 603 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act requires
that the agency present a regulatory
flexibility analysis at the time of the
publication of the final rule describing
the impact of the rule on small entities
and seeking public comment on such
impact. Small entities include small
businesses, organizations and
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this final rule, PBGC
considers a small entity to be a plan
with fewer than 100 participants. This
is the same criterion PBGC uses in other
aspects of its regulations involving
small plans, and is consistent with
certain requirements in Title I of ERISA
and the Internal Revenue Code, as well
as the definition of a small entity that
the Department of Labor (DOL) has used
for purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Thus, PBGC believes that assessing
the impact of the rule on small plans is
an appropriate substitute for evaluating
the effect on small entities. The
definition of small entity considered
appropriate for this purpose differs,
however, from a definition of small
business based on size standards
promulgated by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201)
pursuant to the Small Business Act.
Therefore, in the proposed rule, PBGC
requested comments on the
appropriateness of the size standard
used in evaluating the impact on small
entities of the amendments to the
benefit payments regulation. No
comments were received on this point.
On the basis of its definition of small
entity, PBGC certifies under section
605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that the
amendments in this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Very few multiemployer plans are
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 180 / Thursday, September 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
small.4 And, as discussed above, the
amendments will not have a significant
economic impact on entities of any size.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), sections 603 and 604
will not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1082(f), 1302(b)(3).
2. In § 4000.3, revise paragraph (b)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 4000.3
What methods of filing may I use?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) When making filings to PBGC
under parts 4041A, 4245, and 4281 of
this chapter (except for notices of
benefit reductions and notices of
restoration of benefits under part 4281),
you must submit the information
required under these parts electronically
in accordance with the instructions on
the PBGC’s Web site, except as
otherwise provided by the PBGC.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 4041A—TERMINATION OF
MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
3. The authority citation for part
4041A continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a,
1441.
4. In § 4041A.11, add paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 4041A.11
Requirement of notice.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) How and where to file. Filings to
PBGC under this subpart must be
submitted in accordance with the rules
in subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter.
See § 4000.4 of this chapter for
information on where to file.
[Amended]
PART 4281—DUTIES OF PLAN
SPONSOR FOLLOWING MASS
WITHDRAWAL
29 CFR Parts 4041A and 4281
Employee benefit plans, Pension
insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons given above, the PBGC
is amending 29 CFR parts 4000, 4041A,
and 4281 as follows.
4 According to data from 2012 5500 filings, only
32 of 1,407 active plans have fewer than 100
participants. Further, PBGC is not aware of a
multiemployer plan that was established and
covered by ERISA that was not initially a large plan.
Generally it is only after a plan terminates and
employers withdraw from the plan that a plan
might reduce in size to fewer than 100 participants.
Jkt 235001
8. In § 4281.43, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 4281.43
Notices of insolvency.
(a) Requirement of notices of
insolvency. A plan sponsor that
determines that the plan is, or is
expected to be, insolvent for a plan year
shall file with the PBGC and issue to
plan participants and beneficiaries
notices of insolvency. Once notices of
insolvency have been filed with the
PBGC and issued to plan participants
and beneficiaries, no notice of
insolvency needs to be issued for
subsequent insolvency years. Notices
shall be delivered in the manner and
within the time prescribed in this
section and shall contain the
information described in § 4281.44.
*
*
*
*
*
9. In § 4281.47, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
■
5. In § 4041A.25, amend paragraph (d)
by removing the words ‘‘of the PBGC’’
and adding in their place ‘‘to the
PBGC’’.
Pension insurance, Pensions,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. The authority citation for part 4000
continues to read as follows:
■
■
29 CFR Part 4000
16:04 Sep 16, 2015
insolvency, and § 4281.45(c) for notices
of insolvency benefit level.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 4041A.25
List of Subjects
VerDate Sep<11>2014
PART 4000—FILING, ISSUANCE,
COMPUTATION OF TIME, AND
RECORD RETENTION
■
PBGC is submitting the information
requirements under this final rule to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
The collection of information in part
4041A is approved under control
number 1212–0020 (expires June 30,
2017). PBGC estimates that there will be
10 respondents each year and that the
total annual burden of the collection of
information will be about 17 hours and
$3,850.00 (about 2 hours and $385 per
respondent).
The collection of information in part
4245 is approved under control number
1212–0033 (expires June 30, 2017).
PBGC estimates that there will be one
respondent each year and that the total
annual burden of the collection of
information will be about $1,550.
The collection of information in part
4281 is approved under control number
1212–0032 (expires July 31, 2017).
PBGC estimates that there will be 324
respondents each year and that the total
annual burden of the collection of
information will be about 61 hours and
$309,000 (about $950 per respondent).
55745
§ 4281.47 Application for financial
assistance.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) When, how, and where to apply.
When the plan sponsor determines a
resource benefit level that is less than
guaranteed benefits, it shall apply for
financial assistance at the same time
that it submits its notice of insolvency
benefit level pursuant to § 4281.45.
When the plan sponsor determines an
inability to pay guaranteed benefits for
any month, it shall apply for financial
assistance within 15 days after making
that determination. Application to the
PBGC for financial assistance shall be
made in accordance with the rules in
subpart A of part 4000 of this chapter.
See § 4000.4 of this chapter for
information on where to apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a,
1399(c)(1)(D), and 1441.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 14 day of
September, 2015.
Alice C. Maroni,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2015–23361 Filed 9–16–15; 8:45 am]
6. The authority citation for part 4281
continues to read as follows:
7. In § 4281.3, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
■
§ 4281.3
Filing and issuance rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Method of issuance. For rules on
method of issuance to interested parties,
see § 4281.32(c) for notices of benefit
reductions, § 4281.43(e) for notices of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\17SER1.SGM
17SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 180 (Thursday, September 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55742-55745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23361]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4000, 4041A, and 4281
RIN 1212-AB28
Multiemployer Plans; Electronic Filing Requirements
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[[Page 55743]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation's
(PBGC) regulations to require electronic filing of certain
multiemployer notices. These changes make the provision of information
to PBGC more efficient and effective.
DATES: Effective October 19, 2015. See Applicability in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine B. Klion
(klion.catherine@pbgc.gov), Assistant General Counsel for Regulatory
Affairs, or Donald McCabe (mccabe.donald@pbgc.gov), Attorney, Office of
the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026; 202-326-4024. (TTY/TDD users may
call the Federal relay service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to
be connected to 202-326-4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Regulatory Action
This final rule is part of PBGC's ongoing implementation of the
Government Paperwork Elimination Act and is consistent with the Office
of Management and Budget's directive to remove regulatory impediments
to electronic transactions. The rule builds in flexibility to allow
PBGC to update the electronic filing process as technology advances.
PBGC's legal authority for this regulatory action comes from
section 4002(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA), which authorizes PBGC to issue regulations to carry out
the purposes of title IV of ERISA; section 4041A(f)(2), which gives
PBGC authority to prescribe reporting requirements for terminated
plans; section 4245(e)(4), which authorizes PBGC to issue regulations
on notices related to insolvency and resource benefit levels; and
section 4281(d), which directs PBGC to prescribe by regulation the
notice requirements to plan participants and beneficiaries in the event
of a benefit suspension under an insolvent plan.
Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action
This final rule requires the following notices to be filed
electronically with PBGC: Notices of termination under part 4041A,
notices of insolvency and of insolvency benefit level under parts 4245
and 4281, and applications for financial assistance under part 4281.
This final rule does not involve any conforming amendments
reflecting the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 (MPRA).\1\ The
rule affects only notices to PBGC (not notices to participants or other
parties).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Division O of the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235, enacted December 16,
2014. On June 19, 2015, (at 80 FR 35220), PBGC published an interim
final rule on Partitions of Eligible Multiemployer Plans under MPRA,
https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/2015-14930.pdf. PBGC expects to
publish further guidance under MPRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is a federal
corporation created under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA) to guarantee the payment of pension benefits earned by
more than 41 million American workers and retirees in nearly 24,000
private-sector defined benefit pension plans. PBGC administers two
insurance programs--one for single-employer defined benefit pension
plans and a second for multiemployer defined benefit pension plans.
The multiemployer plan program protects benefits of approximately
10 million workers and retirees in approximately 1,400 plans. A
multiemployer plan is a collectively bargained pension arrangement
involving two or more unrelated employers, usually in a common industry
such as construction or trucking, where workers move from employer to
employer on a regular basis. Under PBGC's multiemployer program, when a
plan becomes insolvent, PBGC provides financial assistance directly to
the insolvent plan sufficient to pay guaranteed benefits to
participants and beneficiaries, and the reasonable and necessary
administrative expenses of the insolvent plan.
ERISA section 4041A provides for two types of multiemployer plan
terminations: mass withdrawal and plan amendment. A mass withdrawal
termination occurs when all employers withdraw or cease to be obligated
to contribute to the plan. A plan amendment termination occurs when the
plan adopts an amendment that provides that participants will receive
no credit for service with any employer after a specified date, or an
amendment that makes it no longer a covered plan. Unlike terminated
single-employer plans, terminated multiemployer plans generally
continue to pay all vested benefits out of existing plan assets and
withdrawal liability payments.
Multiemployer Plan Notices
PBGC's regulation on Termination of Multiemployer Plans (29 CFR
part 4041A) implements these provisions, among other things by
requiring the plan sponsor of a terminated multiemployer plan to file
with PBGC a notice of termination containing basic information
necessary to alert PBGC to possible demands on the multiemployer
insurance program.
ERISA section 4245(e) requires two types of notices:
Notice of insolvency, which states a plan sponsor's
determination that the plan is or may become insolvent.
Notice of insolvency benefit level, which states the level
of benefits that will be paid during an insolvency year.
Section 4245(e)(4) provides that these notices are to be given in
accordance with rules promulgated by PBGC. PBGC's regulation on Notice
of Insolvency, 29 CFR part 4245, establishes the procedure for
complying with these notice requirements. The regulation allows a
single notice of insolvency to cover more than one plan year, thereby
generally permitting plan sponsors to file only a single notice (a
notice of insolvency benefit level) for any future year. The regulation
also prescribes, among other things, the manner in which the notices
must be given. The recipients of these notices include PBGC, in
addition to other parties.
PBGC's regulation on Duties of Plan Sponsor Following Mass
Withdrawal (29 CFR part 4281) implements the requirements of ERISA
section 4281. The regulation prescribes rules under which plan sponsors
must:
Provide notices to PBGC and to participants and
beneficiaries that a plan is, or will be, insolvent (Sec. Sec. 4281.43
and 4281.44).
Provide notices of insolvency benefit level to PBGC and to
participants and beneficiaries who are in pay status or may reasonably
be expected to enter pay status during the year (Sec. Sec. 4281.45 and
4281.46).
Submit an application to PBGC for financial assistance if
a plan is, or will be, unable to pay guaranteed benefits when due
(Sec. 4281.47).
Mandatory Electronic Filing; Current Requirements
Section 4000.3 of PBGC's regulation on Filing, Issuance,
Computation of Time, and Record Retention (29 CFR part 4000) requires
electronic filing of premium declarations under part 4007 (Payment of
Premiums) and information required under part 4010 (Annual Financial
and Actuarial Information Reporting).
[[Page 55744]]
Regulatory Review
On January 18, 2011, the President issued Executive Order 13563
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' to ensure that Federal
regulations seek more affordable, less intrusive means to achieve
policy goals, and that agencies give careful consideration to the
benefits and costs of those regulations. PBGC's Plan for Regulatory
Review,\2\ identifies several regulatory areas for review, including
the multiemployer regulations referred to above. PBGC will continue to
review its regulations with a view to developing more ideas for
improvement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.pbgc.gov/documents/plan-for-regulatory-review.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule
On April 3, 2015 (at 80 FR 18172), PBGC published a proposed rule
to amend parts 4000, 4041A, and 4281 to require electronic filing of
certain multiemployer notices.\3\ PBGC received no comments on the
proposed rule. The final regulation is unchanged from the proposed
regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-04-03/pdf/2015-07602.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Changes
The final regulation requires electronic filing with PBGC of the
following multiemployer plan filings:
Notices of termination under part 4041A.
Notices of insolvency and of insolvency benefit level
under part 4245.
Notices of insolvency and of insolvency benefit level
under part 4281 (following mass withdrawal).
Applications for financial assistance under part 4281
(following mass withdrawal).
PBGC will grant case-by-case exemptions to the electronic filing
requirement in appropriate circumstances for filers that demonstrate
good cause for exemption. PBGC believes that requiring electronic
filing for these notices will result in benefits for both the public
and the government.
Electronic filing will simplify the filing process for the public
by building in all required and optional fields and including readily
accessible guidance in the application. Electronic filing is expected
to reduce the need to contact PBGC for assistance. PBGC estimates that
the amendments in the rule will result in a total savings in
administrative burdens for the public of 25 percent (about 22 hours and
$99,000 annually).
Electronic filing will also result in greater efficiencies for the
government. Up to now, documents submitted by filers needed to be
manually uploaded to electronic depositories. With electronic filing,
those documents will be automatically uploaded. Electronic filing will
also save the government time by reducing the need to provide
assistance to filers. It will also improve the government's
recordkeeping, records retrieval, and records archiving process by
eliminating the possibility of missing or lost paper files due to human
error.
Moreover, the PBGC expects electronic filing will improve the
government's ability to protect potential personally identifiable
information (PII), or otherwise sensitive information, since only pre-
approved personnel will have access to PBGC's electronic records
systems, and limited access will be approved for officials of pension
plans.
PBGC did not propose to require electronic filing of notices of
benefit reduction and of restoration of benefits under part 4281. PBGC
may in the future require that other multiemployer filings also be made
electronically.
Applicability
The amendments in this final rule will be applicable for filings
made on or after January 1, 2016.
Compliance With Rulemaking Requirements
Executive Order 12866 ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563 ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
PBGC has determined that this final rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866. Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
Under Section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, a regulatory action
is economically significant if ``it is likely to result in a rule that
may . . . [h]ave an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.'' PBGC has determined that this final rule does not cross
the $100 million threshold for economic significance and is not
otherwise economically significant (see discussion above).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act imposes certain requirements with
respect to rules that are subject to the notice and comment
requirements of section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act and
that are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Unless an agency determines that a final rule
is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires that the agency present a regulatory flexibility analysis at
the time of the publication of the final rule describing the impact of
the rule on small entities and seeking public comment on such impact.
Small entities include small businesses, organizations and governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this final rule, PBGC considers a small entity to be a plan
with fewer than 100 participants. This is the same criterion PBGC uses
in other aspects of its regulations involving small plans, and is
consistent with certain requirements in Title I of ERISA and the
Internal Revenue Code, as well as the definition of a small entity that
the Department of Labor (DOL) has used for purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Thus, PBGC believes that assessing the impact of the rule on small
plans is an appropriate substitute for evaluating the effect on small
entities. The definition of small entity considered appropriate for
this purpose differs, however, from a definition of small business
based on size standards promulgated by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201) pursuant to the Small Business Act.
Therefore, in the proposed rule, PBGC requested comments on the
appropriateness of the size standard used in evaluating the impact on
small entities of the amendments to the benefit payments regulation. No
comments were received on this point.
On the basis of its definition of small entity, PBGC certifies
under section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) that the amendments in this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Very few
multiemployer plans are
[[Page 55745]]
small.\4\ And, as discussed above, the amendments will not have a
significant economic impact on entities of any size. Accordingly, as
provided in section 605 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.), sections 603 and 604 will not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ According to data from 2012 5500 filings, only 32 of 1,407
active plans have fewer than 100 participants. Further, PBGC is not
aware of a multiemployer plan that was established and covered by
ERISA that was not initially a large plan. Generally it is only
after a plan terminates and employers withdraw from the plan that a
plan might reduce in size to fewer than 100 participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paperwork Reduction Act
PBGC is submitting the information requirements under this final
rule to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The collection of information in part 4041A is approved under
control number 1212-0020 (expires June 30, 2017). PBGC estimates that
there will be 10 respondents each year and that the total annual burden
of the collection of information will be about 17 hours and $3,850.00
(about 2 hours and $385 per respondent).
The collection of information in part 4245 is approved under
control number 1212-0033 (expires June 30, 2017). PBGC estimates that
there will be one respondent each year and that the total annual burden
of the collection of information will be about $1,550.
The collection of information in part 4281 is approved under
control number 1212-0032 (expires July 31, 2017). PBGC estimates that
there will be 324 respondents each year and that the total annual
burden of the collection of information will be about 61 hours and
$309,000 (about $950 per respondent).
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4000
Pension insurance, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
29 CFR Parts 4041A and 4281
Employee benefit plans, Pension insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons given above, the PBGC is amending 29 CFR parts
4000, 4041A, and 4281 as follows.
PART 4000--FILING, ISSUANCE, COMPUTATION OF TIME, AND RECORD
RETENTION
0
1. The authority citation for part 4000 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1082(f), 1302(b)(3).
0
2. In Sec. 4000.3, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 4000.3 What methods of filing may I use?
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) When making filings to PBGC under parts 4041A, 4245, and 4281
of this chapter (except for notices of benefit reductions and notices
of restoration of benefits under part 4281), you must submit the
information required under these parts electronically in accordance
with the instructions on the PBGC's Web site, except as otherwise
provided by the PBGC.
* * * * *
PART 4041A--TERMINATION OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLANS
0
3. The authority citation for part 4041A continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a, 1441.
0
4. In Sec. 4041A.11, add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 4041A.11 Requirement of notice.
* * * * *
(d) How and where to file. Filings to PBGC under this subpart must
be submitted in accordance with the rules in subpart A of part 4000 of
this chapter. See Sec. 4000.4 of this chapter for information on where
to file.
Sec. 4041A.25 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 4041A.25, amend paragraph (d) by removing the words ``of
the PBGC'' and adding in their place ``to the PBGC''.
PART 4281--DUTIES OF PLAN SPONSOR FOLLOWING MASS WITHDRAWAL
0
6. The authority citation for part 4281 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), 1341a, 1399(c)(1)(D), and 1441.
0
7. In Sec. 4281.3, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 4281.3 Filing and issuance rules.
* * * * *
(b) Method of issuance. For rules on method of issuance to
interested parties, see Sec. 4281.32(c) for notices of benefit
reductions, Sec. 4281.43(e) for notices of insolvency, and Sec.
4281.45(c) for notices of insolvency benefit level.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 4281.43, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 4281.43 Notices of insolvency.
(a) Requirement of notices of insolvency. A plan sponsor that
determines that the plan is, or is expected to be, insolvent for a plan
year shall file with the PBGC and issue to plan participants and
beneficiaries notices of insolvency. Once notices of insolvency have
been filed with the PBGC and issued to plan participants and
beneficiaries, no notice of insolvency needs to be issued for
subsequent insolvency years. Notices shall be delivered in the manner
and within the time prescribed in this section and shall contain the
information described in Sec. 4281.44.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 4281.47, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 4281.47 Application for financial assistance.
* * * * *
(b) When, how, and where to apply. When the plan sponsor determines
a resource benefit level that is less than guaranteed benefits, it
shall apply for financial assistance at the same time that it submits
its notice of insolvency benefit level pursuant to Sec. 4281.45. When
the plan sponsor determines an inability to pay guaranteed benefits for
any month, it shall apply for financial assistance within 15 days after
making that determination. Application to the PBGC for financial
assistance shall be made in accordance with the rules in subpart A of
part 4000 of this chapter. See Sec. 4000.4 of this chapter for
information on where to apply.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, this 14 day of September, 2015.
Alice C. Maroni,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2015-23361 Filed 9-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P