Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of the Synthetic Cannabinoid MAB-CHMINACA Into Schedule I, 55565-55568 [2015-23198]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–421N]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of the Synthetic
Cannabinoid MAB–CHMINACA Into
Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration is issuing
this notice of intent to temporarily
schedule the synthetic cannabinoid N(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3carboxamide (common names, MAB–
CHMINACA and ADB–CHMINACA)
into schedule I pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of the
Controlled Substances Act. This action
is based on a finding by the
Administrator that the placement of this
synthetic cannabinoid into schedule I of
the Controlled Substances Act is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety. Any final order will
impose the administrative, civil, and
criminal sanctions and regulatory
controls applicable to schedule I
controlled substances under the
Controlled Substances Act on the
manufacture, distribution, possession,
importation, exportation, research, and
conduct of instructional activities of this
synthetic cannabinoid.
DATES: September 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
R. Scherbenske, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final
order will be published in the Federal
Register and may not be effective prior
to October 16, 2015.
SUMMARY:
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) implements and
enforces titles II and III of the
Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970, as amended.
Titles II and III are referred to as the
‘‘Controlled Substances Act’’ and the
‘‘Controlled Substances Import and
Export Act,’’ respectively, and are
collectively referred to as the
‘‘Controlled Substances Act’’ or the
‘‘CSA’’ for the purpose of this action.
The DEA publishes the implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
regulations for these statutes in title 21
of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), chapter II. The CSA and its
implementing regulations are designed
to prevent, detect, and eliminate the
diversion of controlled substances and
listed chemicals into the illicit market
while ensuring an adequate supply is
available for the legitimate medical,
scientific, research, and industrial needs
of the United States. Controlled
substances have the potential for abuse
and dependence and are controlled to
protect the public health and safety.
Under the CSA, every controlled
substance is classified into one of five
schedules based upon its potential for
abuse, its currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and the degree of dependence the drug
or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C.
812. The initial schedules of controlled
substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the
current list of all scheduled substances
is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance into schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
temporary scheduling for up to one
year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has
delegated her scheduling authority
under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the
Administrator of the DEA. 28 CFR
0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of the Administrator’s
intention to temporarily place a
substance into schedule I of the CSA.1
1 Because the Secretary of the HHS has delegated
to the Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS the
authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations, for purposes of this notice of
intent, all subsequent references to ‘‘Secretary’’
have been replaced with ‘‘Assistant Secretary.’’ As
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55565
The Administrator transmitted notice of
intent to place N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (hereinafter
referred to as MAB–CHMINACA) into
schedule I on a temporary basis to the
Assistant Secretary by letter dated May
14, 2015. The Assistant Secretary
responded to this notice by letter dated
June 3, 2015, and advised that based on
review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are
currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug
applications for MAB–CHMINACA. The
Assistant Secretary also stated that HHS
has no objection to the temporary
placement of MAB–CHMINACA into
schedule I of the CSA. The DEA has
taken into consideration the Assistant
Secretary’s comments. MAB–
CHMINACA is not currently listed in
any schedule under the CSA, and no
exemptions or approvals are in effect for
MAB–CHMINACA under section 505 of
the FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355. The DEA has
found that the control of MAB–
CHMINACA in schedule I on a
temporary basis is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to public safety.
To find that placing a substance
temporarily into schedule I of the CSA
is necessary to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider
three of the eight factors set forth in
section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(c): the substance’s history and
current pattern of abuse; the scope,
duration and significance of abuse; and
what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate
channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). Substances in schedule
I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(1).
MAB–CHMINACA
Available data and information for
MAB–CHMINACA, summarized below,
set forth in a memorandum of understanding
entered into by the HHS, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency
within the HHS in carrying out the Assistant
Secretary’s scheduling responsibilities under the
CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518,
Mar. 8, 1985.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
55566
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
indicate that this synthetic cannabinoid
(SC) has a high potential for abuse, no
currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States, and a
lack of accepted safety for use under
medical supervision. The DEA analysis
is available in its entirety under the tab
‘‘Supporting and Related Material’’ of
the public docket of this action at
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number DEA–421N.
Synthetic Cannabinoids
Synthetic cannabinoids are
substances synthesized in laboratories
that mimic the biological effects of
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the
main psychoactive ingredient in
marijuana. It is believed SCs were first
introduced on the designer drug market
in several European countries as ‘‘herbal
incense’’ before the initial encounter in
the United States by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) in November
2008. From 2009 to present, misuse of
SCs has increased in the United States
with law enforcement encounters
describing plant material laced with SCs
intended for human consumption. It has
been demonstrated that the substances
and the associated designer products are
abused for their psychoactive
properties. With many generations of
SCs being encountered since 2009,
MAB–CHMINACA is one of the latest,
and based upon reports from public
health and law enforcement, the misuse
and abuse of this substance is negatively
impacting the public health and
communities.
The designer drug products laced
with SCs, including MAB–CHMINACA,
are often sold under the guise of ‘‘herbal
incense’’ or ‘‘potpourri,’’ use various
product names, and are routinely
labeled ‘‘not for human consumption.’’
Additionally, these products are
marketed as a ‘‘legal high’’ or ‘‘legal
alternative to marijuana’’ and are readily
available over the Internet, in head
shops, or sold in convenience stores.
There is an incorrect assumption that
these products are safe, and that
labeling these products as ‘‘not for
human consumption’’ is a legal defense
to criminal prosecution.
MAB–CHMINACA is a SC that has
pharmacological effects similar to the
schedule I hallucinogen THC and other
temporarily and permanently controlled
schedule I substances. MAB–
CHMINACA has been shown to cause
severe toxicity and adverse health
effects following ingestion, including
seizures, excited delirium,
cardiotoxicity and death. With no
approved medical use and limited safety
or toxicological information, MAB–
CHMINACA has emerged on the illicit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
drug market and is being abused for its
psychoactive properties.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of
Abuse
SCs have been developed over the last
30 years as tools for investigating the
cannabinoid system. SCs were first
encountered by CBP within the United
States in November 2008. Since then,
the popularity of SCs and their
associated products has increased
steadily as evidenced by law
enforcement seizures, public health
information, and media reports. Amidst
multiple administrative and legislative
actions to place SCs found on the illicit
market into schedule I of the CSA, new
versions of SCs intended to circumvent
current law continue to be encountered.
MAB–CHMINACA is a SC that was
encountered following the
hospitalization of 125 individuals
around the Baton Rouge, Louisiana area
in October 2014 (see factor 6 of
supporting materials). Since that time,
multiple overdoses and deaths
involving MAB–CHMINACA have been
reported. For example, overdose clusters
attributed to MAB–CHMINACA have
been reported in Shreveport, Louisiana;
Bryan, Texas; Beaumont, Texas;
multiple cities in the State of
Mississippi; Hampton, Virginia; and
Hagerstown, Maryland (see factor 6 of
supporting materials). Specifically, in
April 2015, the largest nationwide
outbreak involving SCs was reported by
multiple news outlets. In addition, State
public health entities have collectively
reported over 2,000 overdoses and at
least 33 deaths across at least 11 States
attributed to the misuse of SCs. Of these
overdoses and deaths, currently
available toxicology results have
determined that a number of overdoses
from this most recent cluster were
connected to ingestion of MAB–
CHMINACA (see factor 6 of supporting
materials).
On April 29, 2015, the European
Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug
Addiction (EMCDDA) reported multiple
outbreaks of intoxications within the
United States resulting from the
ingestion of products believed to
contain SCs. EMCDDA further reported
that MAB–CHMINACA had been
implicated in at least some of those
cases. EMCDDA also reported on two
deaths involving MAB–CHMINACA,
one in Hungary and the other in Japan.
A major concern, as reiterated by
public health officials and medical
professionals, remains the targeting and
direct marketing of SCs and SCcontaining products to adolescents and
youth. This is supported by law
enforcement encounters and reports
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
from emergency departments: however,
all age groups have been reported by the
media as abusing these substances and
related products. Individuals, including
minors, are purchasing SCs from the
Internet, gas stations, convenience
stores, and head shops.
Smoking mixtures of these substances
for the purpose of achieving
intoxication have resulted in numerous
emergency department visits and calls
to poison control centers. As reported
by the American Association of Poison
Control Centers (AAPCC), adverse
effects including severe agitation,
anxiety, racing heartbeat, high blood
pressure, nausea, vomiting, seizures,
tremors, intense hallucinations,
psychotic episodes, suicide, and other
harmful thoughts and/or actions can
occur following ingestion of SCs.
Presentations at emergency departments
directly linked to the abuse of MAB–
CHMINACA have resulted in similar
symptoms, including severe agitation,
seizures and/or death (see factor 6).
As discussed previously, it is believed
most abusers of SCs or SC-related
products smoke the product following
application to plant material. Until
recently, this was the preferred route of
administration. Law enforcement has
also begun to encounter new variations
of SCs in liquid form. It is believed
abusers have been applying the liquid to
hookahs or ‘‘e-cigarettes,’’ which allows
the user to administer a vaporized
liquid that can be inhaled.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and
Significance of Abuse
Following multiple scheduling
actions designed to safeguard the public
from the adverse effects and safety
issues associated with SCs, encounters
by law enforcement and health care
professionals indicate the continued
abuse of these substances and their
associated products. With each action to
control SCs, drug manufacturers and
suppliers are adapting at an alarmingly
quick pace to design new SCs that
circumvent regulatory controls. Even
before DEA temporarily controlled the
latest group of SCs, AB–CHMINACA,
AB–PINACA, and THJ–2201, on January
30, 2015, MAB–CHMINACA was
already available on the illicit market
and responsible for overdoses and
deaths (see factor 6 of supporting
materials). From October 2014 to the
present, multiple overdoses and deaths
have been attributed to the abuse of
MAB–CHMINACA.
On October 29, 2014, the State of
Louisiana issued an emergency rule
adding N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (MAB–
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
CHMINACA) to the list of schedule I
Controlled Dangerous Substances
section of the Louisiana Administrative
Code (La. Admin. Code tit. 46, section
2704 (2014)), upon the determination
that it had a high potential for abuse and
should be scheduled as a controlled
substance to avoid an imminent peril to
the public health, safety, and welfare.
Poison control centers continue to
report the abuse of SCs and their
associated products. These substances
remain a threat to both the short- and
long-term public health and safety.
Exposures to SCs were first reported to
the AAPCC in 2011. The most alarming
report via the AAPCC was published on
April 23, 2015. The AAPCC reported a
dramatic spike in poison center
exposure calls throughout the United
States in 2015. The AAPCC reported
1,512 exposure calls in April 2015,
representing an almost three-fold
increase in exposures to SCs as
compared to the previous largest
monthly tally (657 exposures in January
2012) since reporting began in 2011. It
is likely that many of the calls are
directly attributable to the abuse of
MAB–CHMINACA based on its high
prevalence in drug seizure reports and
specimen test reports (see factor 6 and
table 3 of supporting materials). Further,
exposure calls to the AAPCC from
within the first five months of 2015
(January 1 to June 1) are greater than the
total exposure calls involving SCs from
all of 2014. In addition, a majority of
exposure incidents from 2011 to the
present resulted in individuals seeking
medical attention at health care
facilities.
The following information regarding
MAB–CHMINACA was obtained
through NFLIS 2 (queried on May 27,
2015):
MAB–CHMINACA: NFLIS–451
reports; first encountered in September
2014; locations include Arkansas,
Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, and
Wisconsin.
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to
the Public Health
MAB–CHMINACA was identified in a
cluster of 125 subjects that presented to
emergency facilities within the Baton
Rouge and Shreveport, Louisiana areas
in October 2014. On October 29, 2014,
the Louisiana Secretary of the
Department of Health and Hospitals
announced the addition of MAB–
2 National Forensic Laboratory Information
System (NFLIS) is a national drug forensic
laboratory reporting system that systematically
collects results from drug chemistry analyses
conducted by state and local forensic laboratories
in the United States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
CHMINACA into schedule I of the
Controlled Dangerous Substances
section of the Louisiana Administrative
Code (La. Admin. Code tit. 46, section
2704 (2014)). From October 2014 to the
present, multiple clusters of overdoses
involving MAB–CHMINACA and at
least four deaths attributed to the
misuse and abuse of MAB–CHMINACA
have been reported. (see factor 6 and
table 3 of supporting materials). Adverse
health effects reported from use of
MAB–CHMINACA have included:
seizures, coma, severe agitation, loss of
motor control, loss of consciousness,
difficulty breathing, altered mental
status, and convulsions that in some
cases resulted in death.
Since abusers obtain these drugs
through unknown sources, the identity,
purity, and quantity of these substances
is uncertain and inconsistent, thus
posing significant adverse health risks
to users. The SCs encountered on the
illicit drug market have no accepted
medical use within the United States.
Regardless, SC products continue to be
easily available and abused by diverse
populations. Unknown factors including
detailed product analysis and dosage
variations between various packages
and batches present a significant danger
to an abusing individual. Designer drug
products have been found to vary in the
amount and type of SC that plant
material is laced with, which could be
one explanation for the numerous
emergency department admissions that
have been connected to these
substances. Similar to previous SCs,
MAB–CHMINACA has been found on
plant material.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I
Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
Based on the data and information
summarized above, the continued
uncontrolled manufacture, distribution,
importation, exportation, and abuse of
MAB–CHMINACA poses an imminent
hazard to the public safety. The DEA is
not aware of any currently accepted
medical uses for MAB–CHMINACA in
the United States. A substance meeting
the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may
only be placed in schedule I. Substances
in schedule I are those that have a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States, and a lack of accepted
safety for use under medical
supervision. Available data and
information for MAB–CHMINACA
indicate that this substance has a high
potential for abuse, no currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States, and a lack of accepted
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55567
safety for use under medical
supervision. As required by section
201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(4), the DEA, through a letter
dated May 14, 2015, notified the
Assistant Secretary of the DEA’s
intention to temporarily this substance
in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an
expedited temporary scheduling action
and provides the 30-day notice pursuant
to section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h). In accordance with the
provisions of section 201(h) of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator
considered available data and
information, herein set forth the
grounds for his determination that it is
necessary to temporarily schedule
MAB–CHMINACA in schedule I of the
CSA, and finds that placement of this
SC into schedule I of the CSA is
necessary to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety.
Because the Administrator hereby
finds that it is necessary to temporarily
place this SC into schedule I to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety,
any subsequent final order temporarily
scheduling these substances will be
effective on the date of publication in
the Federal Register, and will be in
effect for a period of two years, with a
possible extension of one additional
year, pending completion of the regular
(permanent) scheduling process. 21
U.S.C. 811(h) (1) and (2). It is the
intention of the Administrator to issue
such a final order as soon as possible
after the expiration of 30 days from the
date of publication of this document.
MAB–CHMINACA will then be subject
to the regulatory controls and
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions applicable to the manufacture,
distribution, possession, importation,
exportation, research, and conduct of
instructional activities of a schedule I
controlled substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for
scheduling a drug or other substance.
Regular scheduling actions in
accordance with 21 U.S.C. 811(a) are
subject to formal rulemaking procedures
done ‘‘on the record after opportunity
for a hearing’’ conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557.
21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling
process of formal rulemaking affords
interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any
additional relevant information needed
to make a determination. Final
decisions that conclude the regular
scheduling process of formal
rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
55568
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 179 / Wednesday, September 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
scheduling orders are not subject to
judicial review. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C.
811(h), provides for an expedited
temporary scheduling action where
such action is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
As provided in this subsection, the
Attorney General may, by order,
schedule a substance in schedule I on a
temporary basis. Such an order may not
be issued before the expiration of 30
days from (1) the publication of a notice
in the Federal Register of the intention
to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued,
and (2) the date that notice of the
proposed temporary scheduling order is
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary.
21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the
CSA directs that temporary scheduling
actions be issued by order and sets forth
the procedures by which such orders are
to be issued, the DEA believes that the
notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) at
5 U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this notice
of intent. In the alternative, even
assuming that this notice of intent might
be subject to section 5 U.S.C. 553, the
Administrator finds that there is good
cause to forgo the notice and comment
requirements of section 553, as any
further delays in the process for
issuance of temporary scheduling orders
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent
hazard to the public safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice
of intent to issue a temporary
scheduling order is not subject to the
notice and comment requirements of the
APA, the DEA notes that in accordance
with 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the
Administrator will take into
consideration any comments submitted
by the Assistant Secretary with regard to
the proposed temporary scheduling
order.
Further, the DEA believes that this
temporary scheduling action is not a
‘‘rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2),
and, accordingly, is not subject to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The requirements for the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are
not applicable where, as here, the DEA
is not required by the APA or any other
law to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), section 3(f), and,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
accordingly, this action has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This action will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), it is determined that this
action does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA
proposes to amend 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
unless otherwise noted.
2. In § 1308.11, add paragraph (h)(25)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.11
Schedule I.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(25) N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)1H-indazole-3-carboxamide, its optical,
positional, and geometric isomers, salts
and salts of isomers—7032 (Other
names: MAB–CHMINACA; ADB–
CHMINACA)
Dated: September 10, 2015.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–23198 Filed 9–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–139483–13]
RIN 1545–BL87
Treatment of Certain Transfers of
Property to Foreign Corporations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
notice of proposed rulemaking by crossreference to temporary regulation.
ACTION:
This document contains
proposed regulations relating to certain
transfers of property by United States
persons to foreign corporations. The
proposed regulations affect United
States persons that transfer certain
property, including foreign goodwill
and going concern value, to foreign
corporations in nonrecognition
transactions described in section 367 of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The
proposed regulations also combine
portions of the existing regulations
under section 367(a) into a single
regulation. In addition, in the Rules and
Regulations section of this issue of the
Federal Register, temporary regulations
are being issued under section 482 to
clarify the coordination of the transfer
pricing rules with other Code
provisions. The text of those temporary
regulations serves as the text of a
portion of these proposed regulations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by December 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–139483–13),
Internal Revenue Service, Room 5203,
P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–139483–
13), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20224; or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–139483–
13).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Ryan A. Bowen, (202) 317–6937;
concerning submissions of comments or
requests for a public hearing, Regina
Johnson, (202) 317–6901 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information
contained in the regulations have been
submitted for review and approved by
the Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507
(d)) under control number 1545–0026.
The collections of information are in
§ 1.6038B–1(c)(4) and (d)(1). The
collections of information are
mandatory. The likely respondents are
domestic corporations. Burdens
associated with these requirements will
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 179 (Wednesday, September 16, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55565-55568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23198]
[[Page 55565]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-421N]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of the
Synthetic Cannabinoid MAB-CHMINACA Into Schedule I
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is
issuing this notice of intent to temporarily schedule the synthetic
cannabinoid N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-
(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (common names, MAB-
CHMINACA and ADB-CHMINACA) into schedule I pursuant to the temporary
scheduling provisions of the Controlled Substances Act. This action is
based on a finding by the Administrator that the placement of this
synthetic cannabinoid into schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act
is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. Any
final order will impose the administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions and regulatory controls applicable to schedule I controlled
substances under the Controlled Substances Act on the manufacture,
distribution, possession, importation, exportation, research, and
conduct of instructional activities of this synthetic cannabinoid.
DATES: September 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John R. Scherbenske, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address:
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (202)
598-6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any final order will be published in the
Federal Register and may not be effective prior to October 16, 2015.
Legal Authority
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) implements and enforces
titles II and III of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and
Control Act of 1970, as amended. Titles II and III are referred to as
the ``Controlled Substances Act'' and the ``Controlled Substances
Import and Export Act,'' respectively, and are collectively referred to
as the ``Controlled Substances Act'' or the ``CSA'' for the purpose of
this action. The DEA publishes the implementing regulations for these
statutes in title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), chapter
II. The CSA and its implementing regulations are designed to prevent,
detect, and eliminate the diversion of controlled substances and listed
chemicals into the illicit market while ensuring an adequate supply is
available for the legitimate medical, scientific, research, and
industrial needs of the United States. Controlled substances have the
potential for abuse and dependence and are controlled to protect the
public health and safety.
Under the CSA, every controlled substance is classified into one of
five schedules based upon its potential for abuse, its currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and the degree
of dependence the drug or other substance may cause. 21 U.S.C. 812. The
initial schedules of controlled substances established by Congress are
found at 21 U.S.C. 812(c), and the current list of all scheduled
substances is published at 21 CFR part 1308.
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811, provides the Attorney
General with the authority to temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements
of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if she finds that such action is necessary to avoid
imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C.
811(a)(1), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling for
up to one year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be
temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under
section 202 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or
approval in effect for the substance under section 505 of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1). The Attorney General has delegated her scheduling authority
under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the DEA. 28 CFR 0.100.
Background
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), requires the
Administrator to notify the Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) of the Administrator's intention to temporarily
place a substance into schedule I of the CSA.\1\ The Administrator
transmitted notice of intent to place N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-
oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide
(hereinafter referred to as MAB-CHMINACA) into schedule I on a
temporary basis to the Assistant Secretary by letter dated May 14,
2015. The Assistant Secretary responded to this notice by letter dated
June 3, 2015, and advised that based on review by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), there are currently no investigational new drug
applications or approved new drug applications for MAB-CHMINACA. The
Assistant Secretary also stated that HHS has no objection to the
temporary placement of MAB-CHMINACA into schedule I of the CSA. The DEA
has taken into consideration the Assistant Secretary's comments. MAB-
CHMINACA is not currently listed in any schedule under the CSA, and no
exemptions or approvals are in effect for MAB-CHMINACA under section
505 of the FDCA, 21 U.S.C. 355. The DEA has found that the control of
MAB-CHMINACA in schedule I on a temporary basis is necessary to avoid
an imminent hazard to public safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because the Secretary of the HHS has delegated to the
Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS the authority to make
domestic drug scheduling recommendations, for purposes of this
notice of intent, all subsequent references to ``Secretary'' have
been replaced with ``Assistant Secretary.'' As set forth in a
memorandum of understanding entered into by the HHS, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse
(NIDA), the FDA acts as the lead agency within the HHS in carrying
out the Assistant Secretary's scheduling responsibilities under the
CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518, Mar. 8, 1985.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find that placing a substance temporarily into schedule I of the
CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety, the
Administrator is required to consider three of the eight factors set
forth in section 201(c) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(c): the substance's
history and current pattern of abuse; the scope, duration and
significance of abuse; and what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3). Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate channels, and clandestine
importation, manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory requirements for temporary
scheduling may only be placed in schedule I. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Substances in schedule I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1).
MAB-CHMINACA
Available data and information for MAB-CHMINACA, summarized below,
[[Page 55566]]
indicate that this synthetic cannabinoid (SC) has a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United
States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical
supervision. The DEA analysis is available in its entirety under the
tab ``Supporting and Related Material'' of the public docket of this
action at www.regulations.gov under Docket Number DEA-421N.
Synthetic Cannabinoids
Synthetic cannabinoids are substances synthesized in laboratories
that mimic the biological effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC), the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. It is believed
SCs were first introduced on the designer drug market in several
European countries as ``herbal incense'' before the initial encounter
in the United States by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in
November 2008. From 2009 to present, misuse of SCs has increased in the
United States with law enforcement encounters describing plant material
laced with SCs intended for human consumption. It has been demonstrated
that the substances and the associated designer products are abused for
their psychoactive properties. With many generations of SCs being
encountered since 2009, MAB-CHMINACA is one of the latest, and based
upon reports from public health and law enforcement, the misuse and
abuse of this substance is negatively impacting the public health and
communities.
The designer drug products laced with SCs, including MAB-CHMINACA,
are often sold under the guise of ``herbal incense'' or ``potpourri,''
use various product names, and are routinely labeled ``not for human
consumption.'' Additionally, these products are marketed as a ``legal
high'' or ``legal alternative to marijuana'' and are readily available
over the Internet, in head shops, or sold in convenience stores. There
is an incorrect assumption that these products are safe, and that
labeling these products as ``not for human consumption'' is a legal
defense to criminal prosecution.
MAB-CHMINACA is a SC that has pharmacological effects similar to
the schedule I hallucinogen THC and other temporarily and permanently
controlled schedule I substances. MAB-CHMINACA has been shown to cause
severe toxicity and adverse health effects following ingestion,
including seizures, excited delirium, cardiotoxicity and death. With no
approved medical use and limited safety or toxicological information,
MAB-CHMINACA has emerged on the illicit drug market and is being abused
for its psychoactive properties.
Factor 4. History and Current Pattern of Abuse
SCs have been developed over the last 30 years as tools for
investigating the cannabinoid system. SCs were first encountered by CBP
within the United States in November 2008. Since then, the popularity
of SCs and their associated products has increased steadily as
evidenced by law enforcement seizures, public health information, and
media reports. Amidst multiple administrative and legislative actions
to place SCs found on the illicit market into schedule I of the CSA,
new versions of SCs intended to circumvent current law continue to be
encountered. MAB-CHMINACA is a SC that was encountered following the
hospitalization of 125 individuals around the Baton Rouge, Louisiana
area in October 2014 (see factor 6 of supporting materials). Since that
time, multiple overdoses and deaths involving MAB-CHMINACA have been
reported. For example, overdose clusters attributed to MAB-CHMINACA
have been reported in Shreveport, Louisiana; Bryan, Texas; Beaumont,
Texas; multiple cities in the State of Mississippi; Hampton, Virginia;
and Hagerstown, Maryland (see factor 6 of supporting materials).
Specifically, in April 2015, the largest nationwide outbreak involving
SCs was reported by multiple news outlets. In addition, State public
health entities have collectively reported over 2,000 overdoses and at
least 33 deaths across at least 11 States attributed to the misuse of
SCs. Of these overdoses and deaths, currently available toxicology
results have determined that a number of overdoses from this most
recent cluster were connected to ingestion of MAB-CHMINACA (see factor
6 of supporting materials).
On April 29, 2015, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and
Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) reported multiple outbreaks of intoxications
within the United States resulting from the ingestion of products
believed to contain SCs. EMCDDA further reported that MAB-CHMINACA had
been implicated in at least some of those cases. EMCDDA also reported
on two deaths involving MAB-CHMINACA, one in Hungary and the other in
Japan.
A major concern, as reiterated by public health officials and
medical professionals, remains the targeting and direct marketing of
SCs and SC-containing products to adolescents and youth. This is
supported by law enforcement encounters and reports from emergency
departments: however, all age groups have been reported by the media as
abusing these substances and related products. Individuals, including
minors, are purchasing SCs from the Internet, gas stations, convenience
stores, and head shops.
Smoking mixtures of these substances for the purpose of achieving
intoxication have resulted in numerous emergency department visits and
calls to poison control centers. As reported by the American
Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC), adverse effects
including severe agitation, anxiety, racing heartbeat, high blood
pressure, nausea, vomiting, seizures, tremors, intense hallucinations,
psychotic episodes, suicide, and other harmful thoughts and/or actions
can occur following ingestion of SCs. Presentations at emergency
departments directly linked to the abuse of MAB-CHMINACA have resulted
in similar symptoms, including severe agitation, seizures and/or death
(see factor 6).
As discussed previously, it is believed most abusers of SCs or SC-
related products smoke the product following application to plant
material. Until recently, this was the preferred route of
administration. Law enforcement has also begun to encounter new
variations of SCs in liquid form. It is believed abusers have been
applying the liquid to hookahs or ``e-cigarettes,'' which allows the
user to administer a vaporized liquid that can be inhaled.
Factor 5. Scope, Duration and Significance of Abuse
Following multiple scheduling actions designed to safeguard the
public from the adverse effects and safety issues associated with SCs,
encounters by law enforcement and health care professionals indicate
the continued abuse of these substances and their associated products.
With each action to control SCs, drug manufacturers and suppliers are
adapting at an alarmingly quick pace to design new SCs that circumvent
regulatory controls. Even before DEA temporarily controlled the latest
group of SCs, AB-CHMINACA, AB-PINACA, and THJ-2201, on January 30,
2015, MAB-CHMINACA was already available on the illicit market and
responsible for overdoses and deaths (see factor 6 of supporting
materials). From October 2014 to the present, multiple overdoses and
deaths have been attributed to the abuse of MAB-CHMINACA.
On October 29, 2014, the State of Louisiana issued an emergency
rule adding N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-
(cyclohexylmethyl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (MAB-
[[Page 55567]]
CHMINACA) to the list of schedule I Controlled Dangerous Substances
section of the Louisiana Administrative Code (La. Admin. Code tit. 46,
section 2704 (2014)), upon the determination that it had a high
potential for abuse and should be scheduled as a controlled substance
to avoid an imminent peril to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Poison control centers continue to report the abuse of SCs and
their associated products. These substances remain a threat to both the
short- and long-term public health and safety. Exposures to SCs were
first reported to the AAPCC in 2011. The most alarming report via the
AAPCC was published on April 23, 2015. The AAPCC reported a dramatic
spike in poison center exposure calls throughout the United States in
2015. The AAPCC reported 1,512 exposure calls in April 2015,
representing an almost three-fold increase in exposures to SCs as
compared to the previous largest monthly tally (657 exposures in
January 2012) since reporting began in 2011. It is likely that many of
the calls are directly attributable to the abuse of MAB-CHMINACA based
on its high prevalence in drug seizure reports and specimen test
reports (see factor 6 and table 3 of supporting materials). Further,
exposure calls to the AAPCC from within the first five months of 2015
(January 1 to June 1) are greater than the total exposure calls
involving SCs from all of 2014. In addition, a majority of exposure
incidents from 2011 to the present resulted in individuals seeking
medical attention at health care facilities.
The following information regarding MAB-CHMINACA was obtained
through NFLIS \2\ (queried on May 27, 2015):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS) is a
national drug forensic laboratory reporting system that
systematically collects results from drug chemistry analyses
conducted by state and local forensic laboratories in the United
States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAB-CHMINACA: NFLIS-451 reports; first encountered in September
2014; locations include Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Factor 6. What, if Any, Risk There Is to the Public Health
MAB-CHMINACA was identified in a cluster of 125 subjects that
presented to emergency facilities within the Baton Rouge and
Shreveport, Louisiana areas in October 2014. On October 29, 2014, the
Louisiana Secretary of the Department of Health and Hospitals announced
the addition of MAB-CHMINACA into schedule I of the Controlled
Dangerous Substances section of the Louisiana Administrative Code (La.
Admin. Code tit. 46, section 2704 (2014)). From October 2014 to the
present, multiple clusters of overdoses involving MAB-CHMINACA and at
least four deaths attributed to the misuse and abuse of MAB-CHMINACA
have been reported. (see factor 6 and table 3 of supporting materials).
Adverse health effects reported from use of MAB-CHMINACA have included:
seizures, coma, severe agitation, loss of motor control, loss of
consciousness, difficulty breathing, altered mental status, and
convulsions that in some cases resulted in death.
Since abusers obtain these drugs through unknown sources, the
identity, purity, and quantity of these substances is uncertain and
inconsistent, thus posing significant adverse health risks to users.
The SCs encountered on the illicit drug market have no accepted medical
use within the United States. Regardless, SC products continue to be
easily available and abused by diverse populations. Unknown factors
including detailed product analysis and dosage variations between
various packages and batches present a significant danger to an abusing
individual. Designer drug products have been found to vary in the
amount and type of SC that plant material is laced with, which could be
one explanation for the numerous emergency department admissions that
have been connected to these substances. Similar to previous SCs, MAB-
CHMINACA has been found on plant material.
Finding of Necessity of Schedule I Placement To Avoid Imminent Hazard
to Public Safety
Based on the data and information summarized above, the continued
uncontrolled manufacture, distribution, importation, exportation, and
abuse of MAB-CHMINACA poses an imminent hazard to the public safety.
The DEA is not aware of any currently accepted medical uses for MAB-
CHMINACA in the United States. A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1), may only be
placed in schedule I. Substances in schedule I are those that have a
high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in
treatment in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. Available data and information for MAB-
CHMINACA indicate that this substance has a high potential for abuse,
no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision. As
required by section 201(h)(4) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the DEA,
through a letter dated May 14, 2015, notified the Assistant Secretary
of the DEA's intention to temporarily this substance in schedule I.
Conclusion
This notice of intent initiates an expedited temporary scheduling
action and provides the 30-day notice pursuant to section 201(h) of the
CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In accordance with the provisions of section
201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), the Administrator considered
available data and information, herein set forth the grounds for his
determination that it is necessary to temporarily schedule MAB-CHMINACA
in schedule I of the CSA, and finds that placement of this SC into
schedule I of the CSA is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the
public safety.
Because the Administrator hereby finds that it is necessary to
temporarily place this SC into schedule I to avoid an imminent hazard
to the public safety, any subsequent final order temporarily scheduling
these substances will be effective on the date of publication in the
Federal Register, and will be in effect for a period of two years, with
a possible extension of one additional year, pending completion of the
regular (permanent) scheduling process. 21 U.S.C. 811(h) (1) and (2).
It is the intention of the Administrator to issue such a final order as
soon as possible after the expiration of 30 days from the date of
publication of this document. MAB-CHMINACA will then be subject to the
regulatory controls and administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions
applicable to the manufacture, distribution, possession, importation,
exportation, research, and conduct of instructional activities of a
schedule I controlled substance.
The CSA sets forth specific criteria for scheduling a drug or other
substance. Regular scheduling actions in accordance with 21 U.S.C.
811(a) are subject to formal rulemaking procedures done ``on the record
after opportunity for a hearing'' conducted pursuant to the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557. 21 U.S.C. 811. The regular scheduling process
of formal rulemaking affords interested parties with appropriate
process and the government with any additional relevant information
needed to make a determination. Final decisions that conclude the
regular scheduling process of formal rulemaking are subject to judicial
review. 21 U.S.C. 877. Temporary
[[Page 55568]]
scheduling orders are not subject to judicial review. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(6).
Regulatory Matters
Section 201(h) of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811(h), provides for an
expedited temporary scheduling action where such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. As provided in this
subsection, the Attorney General may, by order, schedule a substance in
schedule I on a temporary basis. Such an order may not be issued before
the expiration of 30 days from (1) the publication of a notice in the
Federal Register of the intention to issue such order and the grounds
upon which such order is to be issued, and (2) the date that notice of
the proposed temporary scheduling order is transmitted to the Assistant
Secretary. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1).
Inasmuch as section 201(h) of the CSA directs that temporary
scheduling actions be issued by order and sets forth the procedures by
which such orders are to be issued, the DEA believes that the notice
and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) at 5
U.S.C. 553, do not apply to this notice of intent. In the alternative,
even assuming that this notice of intent might be subject to section 5
U.S.C. 553, the Administrator finds that there is good cause to forgo
the notice and comment requirements of section 553, as any further
delays in the process for issuance of temporary scheduling orders would
be impracticable and contrary to the public interest in view of the
manifest urgency to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety.
Although the DEA believes this notice of intent to issue a
temporary scheduling order is not subject to the notice and comment
requirements of the APA, the DEA notes that in accordance with 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4), the Administrator will take into consideration any
comments submitted by the Assistant Secretary with regard to the
proposed temporary scheduling order.
Further, the DEA believes that this temporary scheduling action is
not a ``rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 601(2), and, accordingly, is not
subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
requirements for the preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis in 5 U.S.C. 603(a) are not applicable where, as here, the DEA
is not required by the APA or any other law to publish a general notice
of proposed rulemaking.
Additionally, this action is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review),
section 3(f), and, accordingly, this action has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget.
This action will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order
13132 (Federalism), it is determined that this action does not have
sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set out above, the DEA proposes to amend 21 CFR
part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. In Sec. 1308.11, add paragraph (h)(25) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.11 Schedule I.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(25) N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(cyclohexylmethyl)-
1H-indazole-3-carboxamide, its optical, positional, and geometric
isomers, salts and salts of isomers--7032 (Other names: MAB-CHMINACA;
ADB-CHMINACA)
Dated: September 10, 2015.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-23198 Filed 9-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P